Search Results

There’s Nothing Here... We can’t find the page you’re looking for. Check the URL, or head back home. Go Home

A Long Time NFL Scout Discussed Misconceptions vs. Reality at the NFL Scouting Combine The NFL Combine is an event made for TV. The drills are generally less important than what you hear from all the social media analysts. Most of the hype is created to generate buzz—a fact I've mentioned for years. Another aspect is that the NFL Combine provides additional data points for evaluators to consider and compare to the film. It's all about matching your initial thoughts prior to the noise, or lack thereof, due to a 40-yard dash time or a remarkable vertical jump. If you actually watch the film of the players participating in the NFL Combine, you will not be surprised by their explosive, or not-so-explosive, 40 times and vertical jumps. What really matters are the player interviews with front-office personnel, coaches, and GMs and the medical evaluations. In a recent article written by Greg Gabriel , much of this was confirmed by Greg Gabriel, a reputable name in NFL scouting circles. Gabriel shared his thoughts on how actual NFL teams view the NFL Combine. Below, I provide a summarized version of Gabriel's thoughts. For more detailed insights, you can read the full article on SB Nation's Windy City Gridiron, linked in the text. Misconceptions vs. Reality at the NFL Scouting Combine In the article, Greg Gabriel reveals the common misunderstandings and truths about the NFL Scouting Combine. He clarifies that the widespread belief of players dramatically improving their draft stock based only on their combine performance is more of a media creation than reality. In fact, NFL teams do not usually alter a player's evaluation significantly based on their combine exercises, which mainly consist of non-football-specific athletic drills. Evaluating Performances May Prompt A Second Look Gabriel explains that while excellent performances are anticipated, subpar performances can lead to concerns, prompting scouts to reassess their initial opinions. However, an outstanding performance typically triggers a second look at the player's game footage rather than an instant elevation in draft prospects. He also observes that despite post-combine hype for some players, dramatic leaps in draft positioning are infrequent. Key Elements of the Combine According to Gabriel, the pivotal components of the combine are the medical assessments and the player interviews. The combine primarily exists to provide thorough medical examinations for the athletes, offering teams valuable health information. Although the interview portion is brief, it offers crucial insights into the players' personalities and can greatly influence a team's interest. Advice on Skipping Workouts Gabriel advises against avoiding combine workouts, arguing that participating offers a chance to rectify any poor performances at subsequent Pro Days. He uses Devin Hester as an example, who improved his draft prospects by bettering his time at his Pro Day following a less impressive combine showing. Significance of Specific Drills He points out that the importance of drills varies by position. For example, speed and agility are vital for skill positions, while vertical jumps and agility drills are critical for receivers to showcase their explosiveness and body control. Quarterback Workouts at the Combine Gabriel mentions that the quarterback drills at the combine are not as significant, given that the format does not allow quarterbacks to fully demonstrate their skills. He suggests that evaluations during Pro Days and private workouts are more reflective of a quarterback's true abilities. The NFL Combine Is Not A Definitive Factor In A Player's NFL Draft Outcome Gabriel's insights highlight NFL teams' internal processes and viewpoints regarding the combine. He emphasizes that while the combine is a crucial element of the scouting process, it is not the definitive factor in a player’s draft outcome. About Greg Gabriel Per The Website Windy City Gridiron Greg Gabriel has over three decades of experience working in the NFL, including stints in the front office with the Buffalo Bills, New York Giants, and Chicago Bears, where he was Director of College Scouting. Greg has done countless media appearances over the years and brought his unique scouting eye to Windy City Gridiron in 2022.

Top Wide Receivers to Watch: Jordyn Tyson, Eric Singleton Jr. Headline an Explosive 2026 NFL Draft WR Class The 2026 NFL Draft wide receiver class is defined more by projection than polish, featuring a mix of dynamic athletes, scheme-specific weapons, and a handful of high-upside perimeter threats. From inside-out separators like Jordyn Tyson and Eric Singleton Jr. to vertical mismatches like Denzel Boston and Malachi Fields, this group offers versatility across a range of offensive systems. Ohio State’s Carnell Tate brings a reliable, pro-ready profile, while Kevin Concepcion and Zachariah Branch stand out as space-creating specialists in modern spread schemes. At the top, several names could rise into Round 1 consideration with strong 2025 campaigns. 2026 NFL Draft Wide Receivers to Watch Below, we evaluate each prospect’s physical tools, draft projection, and long-term ceiling heading into the college football season. Jordyn Tyson, Arizona State Ht/Wt: 6’1”, 195 Class: Senior Grade: High-End Starter Potential (1st–2nd Round) Player Comparison: Chris Olave Analysis: After sitting out 2023 due to transfer rules, Tyson exploded in 2024 with over 1,100 receiving yards and 10 touchdowns despite not playing in the CFB Playoff. A complete route runner with elite separation and advanced ball skills, he fits perfectly in spread systems emphasizing timing and vertical spacing. With better press technique and durability, he has WR1 potential. Eric Singleton Jr., Auburn Ht/Wt: 5’11”, 190 Class: Junior Grade: High-End Starter Potential (2nd Round) Player Comparison: Brandin Cooks Analysis: A verified 4.3-speed burner and deep-ball savant, Singleton leads all returning Power Four receivers in deep yardage. His burst, route pacing, and tracking skills make him a threat at all three levels. He projects as a Z receiver in vertical or motion-heavy schemes with WR2 upside. Carnell Tate, Ohio State Ht/Wt: 6’3”, 191 Class: Junior Grade: High-End Starter Potential (2nd–3rd Round) Player Comparison: Tyler Boyd Analysis: Tate is a polished technician with elite body control and route feel. He may lack top-end explosiveness, but his physicality and precision route running project him as a dependable NFL WR2 with room to develop into more in a rhythm-timing offense. Evan Stewart, Oregon Ht/Wt: 6’0”, 175 Class: Junior Grade: High-End Starter Potential (2nd–3rd Round) Player Comparison: DeVonta Smith-lite Analysis: There is concern that Oregon star wide receiver Evan Stewart could miss the 2025 season after suffering a knee injury reported in early June. If not for the injury, Stewart—who was eligible for the 2025 NFL Draft—was considered a potential early Round 1 candidate in 2026 with a strong season. His ability to beat zone with tempo and separate against man coverage makes him a dangerous WR2-plus type. NFL teams will monitor his recovery closely. Nyck Harbor, South Carolina Ht/Wt: 6’5”, 235 Class: Sophomore Grade: Mid-Level Starter Potential (3rd–4th Round) Player Comparison: D.K. Metcalf (raw version) Analysis: One of the most unique athletic profiles in football, Harbor has Olympic track speed in a tight end’s frame. He’s still raw in his route-running and hands but brings immense red-zone and vertical upside in the right developmental system. Zachariah Branch, Georgia Ht/Wt: 5’11”, 175 Class: Junior Grade: Mid-Level Starter Potential (3rd–4th Round) Player Comparison: Tyreek Hill-lite Analysis: An elite returner and explosive slot threat, Branch can break a game open in one play. His short-area quickness and speed in motion schemes will entice offensive coordinators. Continued strength development will be key for unlocking Round 1 upside. Denzel Boston, Washington Ht/Wt: 6’4”, 210 Class: Junior Grade: Mid-Level Starter Potential (4th Round) Player Comparison: Dorian Green-Beckham Analysis: Boston is a jump-ball artist and red-zone threat who showed out in Washington’s post-Odunze offense. He’ll need to improve suddenness and release work, but his size and contested catch skills give him WR2 upside in vertical schemes. Antonio Williams, Clemson Ht/Wt: 5’11”, 190 Class: Junior Grade: Mid-Level Starter Potential (3rd–4th Round) Player Comparison: Amon-Ra St. Brown Analysis: Williams has elite route-running savvy and separation skills. With a cleaner bill of health and Cade Klubnik's emergence as a more consistent passer, he could rise quickly. Projects as a slot WR2 with big-time third-down utility. Elijah Sarratt, Indiana Ht/Wt: 6’2”, 210 Class: Senior Grade: Mid-Level Starter Potential (3rd–4th Round) Player Comparison: Rashard Higgins Analysis: Sarratt’s production across three programs proves his reliability. While not flashy, he offers high floor value with excellent contested catch skills and subtle route feel. NFL-ready frame with plug-and-play WR3 traits. Malachi Fields, Notre Dame Ht/Wt: 6’4”, 220 Class: Senior Grade: Mid-Level Starter Potential (3rd Round) Player Comparison: Allen Lazard Analysis: Fields brings rare physicality and red-zone prowess. A back-to-back 800+ yard producer, he’s now paired with presumptively better QB play at Notre Dame. He projects as a WR2 in pro-style offenses that need size on the outside. Kevin Concepcion, Texas A&M Ht/Wt: 5’11”, 187 Class: Junior Grade: Mid-Level Starter Potential (4th Round) Player Comparison: Curtis Samuel Analysis: Concepcion thrives on short-area quickness, route IQ, and feel for zone. While not a deep threat or physical YAC machine, his route versatility and reliability in space offer high-floor WR3 value with upside in creative systems.

2025 NFL Combine Day One: Shemar Stewart & James Pearce Jr. Steal the Show Day 1 of the 2025 NFL Scouting Combine is in the books, and with several top prospects opting out of testing, new names had a chance to seize the spotlight in Indianapolis. Mason Graham (Michigan) and Abdul Carter (Penn State)—the top two players on our Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Big Board —chose not to participate in workouts, along with other highly regarded defenders like Kenneth Grant (Michigan) and Jalon Walker (Georgia). With these big names sitting out, James Pearce Jr., Shemar Stewart, Landon Jackson, and CJ West capitalized on the opportunity to make their case as early-round picks. Below, we break down how these standouts performed, how their Combine results align with their scouting profiles, and how their draft stock has shifted based on today’s testing. Day One 2025 NFL Combine: Defensive Linemen & Linebackers James Pearce Jr. (EDGE, Tennessee) 40-Yard Dash: 4.47 seconds (Fastest among DL) 10-Yard Split: 1.56 seconds Vertical Jump: 31” Broad Jump: 10’3” Size: 6’5”, 245 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance: Pearce entered the Combine with questions about his bend and ability to consistently convert speed to power, but his elite 4.47-second 40-yard dash at 6’5”, 245 lbs reaffirmed his explosive get-off. His 1.56-second 10-yard split was among the best for edge rushers, emphasizing his ability to accelerate quickly off the line. His 31-inch vertical jump, however, was lower than expected, raising minor concerns about his lower-body explosiveness. 📈 Draft Stock Impact: Pearce’s stock had been slipping in recent weeks, with some teams viewing him as an early Round 2 prospect due to concerns about his flexibility and power at the point of attack. After today’s showing, he likely moved himself back into the top 20 conversation, where he had been projected earlier in the process. Shemar Stewart (EDGE, Texas A&M) 40-Yard Dash: 4.59 seconds 10-Yard Split: 1.58 seconds (2nd-best 265+ lb EDGE since 2010) Vertical Jump: 40” (Top 10 All-Time for EDGE) Broad Jump: 10’11” (Best among EDGE) Size: 6’5”, 267 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance: Stewart was already considered one of the most physically imposing prospects in this draft, but his testing numbers exceeded even the highest expectations. His 40-inch vertical and 10’11” broad jump place him among the best testers at his position in Combine history, comparable to Myles Garrett’s legendary workout. His 1.58-second 10-yard split ranks among the fastest ever recorded for an EDGE over 265 lbs, trailing only Nick Bosa (1.55s) in the last 15 years. 📈 Draft Stock Impact: Already viewed as a top-20 lock on our draft board, and we have mocked him as a top-10 pick two separate times, Stewart solidified his standing today. His testing reinforced that he is one of the best athletic prospects in this class, and teams looking for a high-upside pass rusher will strongly consider him in the mid-first round range. Landon Jackson (EDGE, Arkansas) 40-Yard Dash: 4.68 seconds 10-Yard Split: 1.65 seconds Vertical Jump: 40.5” (Best among all DL) Broad Jump: 10’9” Size: 6’6”, 264 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance: Jackson's athletic ability had always been evident on film, but today’s performance put him firmly back on the radar as a first-round prospect. His 40.5-inch vertical jump is among the best ever for a defensive lineman, and his 10’9” broad jump confirms his elite lower-body power. While his 4.68-second 40-yard dash is solid for his size, his 1.65-second 10-yard split was slightly slower than other top edge rushers. 📈 Draft Stock Impact: Once viewed as a fringe first-rounder, Jackson may have worked his way back into late Round 1 discussions. His combination of length, motor, and elite explosion numbers could make him a fit for teams looking for a developmental but high-upside pass rusher at the back end of the first round. CJ West (DT, Indiana) 40-Yard Dash: 4.95 seconds 10-Yard Split: 1.73 seconds Vertical Jump: 33” Size: 6’1”, 316 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance: West turned heads with his rare speed for a 316-pound defensive tackle, becoming just the ninth DT since 2003 to run a sub-5.0-second 40-yard dash at 315+ lbs. His 33-inch vertical jump further demonstrated his athleticism, though his shorter arms (31.5”) and lack of length remain concerns for his ability to take on blockers at the next level. 📈 Draft Stock Impact: West was already viewed as a mid-Day 2 pick, and his testing today likely solidified that range. Teams needing a one-gap penetrating DT will see him as an early third-round option, with a chance to sneak into late Round 2 depending on team fit.

Jayden Daniels’ Commanders Debut: 5 Key Observations From His First Preseason NFL Game Jayden Daniels, who was selected with the number two overall pick by the Washington Commanders in the 2024 NFL Draft, made his NFL debut against the New York Jets on Saturday. the former LSU Tiger and reigning Heisman Trophy winner provided fans with a glimpse of the future by showing off his deep accuracy as a passer and versatility as a runner. Jayden Daniels’ Commanders Debut: 5 Key Observations From His First Preseason NFL Game 1. Dynamic Opening Drive Daniels wasted no time making an impact, leading the Commanders on an impressive 11-play, 70-yard drive to open the game. The drive was capped off with Daniels showcasing his dual-threat ability by faking a handoff to Austin Ekeler and keeping the ball for a three-yard touchdown run. This early score set the tone for his debut and highlighted the athleticism that made him a top pick. 2. Showcasing His Arm Talent Before his rushing touchdown, Daniels flashed his arm strength and accuracy with a 42-yard strike to wide receiver Dyami Brown on a crucial third down. This throw not only kept the drive alive but also demonstrated his ability to make big plays downfield, even in a high-pressure situation. He later connected with Terry McLaurin for a three-yard gain, further showcasing his potential as a passer. 3. Limited but Efficient In his brief appearance, Daniels completed 2-of-3 passes for 48 yards. His only incompletion came on a missed screen pass to Austin Ekeler, but he quickly bounced back with completions on the next two throws. Despite the limited action, Daniels was efficient and showed poise, managing the offense effectively on his only drive of the game. 4. Immediate Optimism Among Fans Even though it’s just preseason, Daniels’ debut generated significant excitement among Commanders fans. His ability to lead a scoring drive with both his arm and legs has created optimism for what he can bring to the team this season. The performance, albeit against the Jets' backups, showcased why Washington invested such a high draft pick in the former Heisman winner. 5. Setting Expectations High While it’s important to temper expectations based on one preseason drive, Daniels’ debut was a promising glimpse of his potential. He displayed the composure, athleticism, and playmaking ability that Washington hopes will translate into regular-season success. As the preseason progresses, all eyes will be on Daniels to see if he can build on this strong start and continue to impress as the Commanders' quarterback of the future.

2023 NFL Draft: Mock Draft 2.0 | Post Senior Bowl and Super Bowl Edition | Four QB's In The Top 5? The Bears Trade Justin Fields To The Atlanta Falcons Mock Draft 2.0 is here, and I get a little wild with the trades, including the Bears trading Justin Fields to the Atlanta Falcons for their 8th overall pick. In the 2021 NFL Draft, The Falcons had their shot at grabbing Fields, and they decided to draft TE Kyle Pitts. The Broncos and the Panthers also passed on drafting Justin Fields and are definitely in full regret mode. In this mock draft, the Bears draft Ohio State QB C.J. Stroud with the top pick, then turn around at pick eight and grab Jaxon Smith-Njigba . Houston Gets Bryce Young At #2 Overall Bryce Young goes number two overall to the Houston Texans. Seahawks Trade Up To Grab Kentucky QB Will Levis I get more out of control with another trade. The Seattle Seahawks trade ahead of the Colts and steal Kentucky QB Will Levis away. The Seahawks can sign Geno Smith to a one-year or two-year deal and allow Will Levis to develop his elite tools. The Colts Draft Anthony Richarson The final shoe to drop is the Colts settling quickly on developmental QB Anthony Richardson. Richardson possesses the highest ceiling in the 2023 NFL Draft, aside from maybe Will Levis. Like Will Levis, Richardson needs a year or two to develop, but there is no doubt new Colts Head Coach Shane Steichen can find creative ways to utilize Richardson's toolsy skillset. (1). Chicago Bears Select: QB C.J. Stroud | Ohio State Team Needs: WR, TE, OL, DL, LB, DB Pending Free Agents: RB David Montgomery, C Sam Mustipher, WR N'Keal Harry, WR Dante Pettis Analysis: The Bears offer a draft day surprise by trading Justin Fields to the Atlanta Falcons. The Bears receive the 8th overall pick and grab another former Ohio State QB with a new rookie deal. (2). Houston Texans Select: QB Bryce Young | Alabama Team Needs: QB, C, DL Pending Free Agents: TE O.J. Howard, EDGE Ogbonnia Okoronkwo, DL Rasheem Green, TE Jordan Akins Analysis: The Texans get their QB of the future. (3). Seattle Seahawks (via AZ) Select: QB Will Levis | Kentucky Team Needs: G, C, DL Pending Free Agents: QB Geno Smith, RB Rashaad Penny, DL Poona Ford, OG Phil Haynes, QB Drew Lock Analysis: In another draft day surprise, the Cardinals trade back with the Seattle Seahawks, who are also in the market to grab their QB of the future. Because we believe Will Levis will need a year of development, the Seahawks would retain Geno Smith in this scenario. The Seahawks would trade their 5th and the 20th overall pick for the Cardinal's 3rd and 34th overall picks. (4). Indianapolis Colts Select: QB Anthony Richardson | Florida Team Needs: QB, OL Pending Free Agents: EDGE Yannick Ngakoue, WR Parris Campbell, OG Matt Pryor, LB Bobby Okereke, E.J. Speed Analysis: New Indianapolis Colts Head Coach Shane Steichen lands the QB with the highest ceiling in the 2023 NFL Draft. Richardson could use a year of development on the sidelines, but the Colts might have no other options. In this scenario, the Colts might grab a free-agent bridge QB. (5). Arizona Cardinals (via SEA) Select: EDGE Will Anderson Jr. | Alabama Team Needs: G, C, ED, CB Pending Free Agents: EDGE J.J. Watt, WR A.J. Green, OT Kelvin Beachum, CB Byron Murphy, C Rodney Hudson Analysis: The Cardinals get a slam dunk even after trading back. Now that they have their edge rusher of the future, they acquired pick 20 from the Seahawks, where they could add a top CB to go along with Will Anderson. (6). Detroit Lions Select: IDL Jalen Carter | Georgia Team Needs: DI, LB, CB Pending Free Agents: WR DJ Chark, RB Jamaal Williams, LB Alex Anzalone, OG Evan Brown, CB Mike Hughes Analysis: In this mock draft scenario, the Lions win the lottery, with IDL Jalen Carter falling to them at pick 6. ( 7). Las Vegas Raiders Select: CB Devon Witherspoon | Illinois Team Needs: QB, OL, DB Pending Free Agents: RB Josh Jacobs, CB Rock Ya-Sin, LB Denzel Perryman, WR Mack Hollins, EDGE Clelin Ferrell Analysis: The Raiders are in a bit of no man's land and need a QB. The way the board has fallen, the Raiders could be in the market for a free-agent QB, or they might have to roll with Jarrett Stidham. In this scenario, the Raiders could trade back if someone is interested, or they can fill their need at defensive back. (8). Chicago Bears (via ATL) Select: WR Jaxon Smith-Njigba | Ohio State Team Needs: WR, TE, OL, DL, LB, DB Pending Free Agents: RB David Montgomery, C Sam Mustipher, WR N'Keal Harry, WR Dante Pettis Analysis: The Bears have a lot of needs, and with this being their only pick between now and pick 54, they still have a lot of draft capital available in the mid to late rounds. The Bears receivers in recent years have been awful, and the 2023 NFL Draft is top-heavy at the position. They could go with the best available DB here or the best available EDGE. The gut says go WR here, and it would be ideal pairing Stroud with his former teammate Jaxon Smith-Njigba. (9). Carolina Panthers Select: RB Bijan Robinson | Texas Team Needs: QB, RB, TE, ED Pending Free Agents: QB Sam Darnold, DL Matthew Ioannidis, C Bradley Bozeman, LB Cory Littleton Analysis: In no man's land without a QB, the Panthers will need to figure out the direction of their franchise. Like the Raiders, if the Panthers fail to move into position to get one of the top QB's they will have to figure it out in free agency, or could Sam Darnold be the answer? They can also trade back to gain more draft capital. We go with the cardinal sin in this scenario and draft RB Bijan Robinson in the top 10. This also means Mel Kiper will retire. (10). Philadelphia Eagles Select: CB Christian Gonzalez | Oregon Team Needs: WR, G, C Pending Free Agents: DL Javon Hargrave, CB James Bradberry, RB Miles Sanders, C Jason Kelce, DL Fletcher Cox Analysis: To keep the defense in place while also paying Jalen Hurts, the Eagles draft a top DB. (11). Tennessee Titans Select: OT Paris Johnson Jr. | Ohio State Team Needs: WR, T, ED Pending Free Agents: TE Austin Hooper, OG Nate Davis, TE Geoff Swaim, LB David Long, DL Teair Tart Analysis: The Titans need an OT to replace Taylor Lewan. They could go with an edge rusher in this spot. (12). Houston Texans Select: EDGE Tyree Wilson | Texas Tech Team Needs: QB, C, DL Pending Free Agents: TE O.J. Howard, EDGE Ogbonnia Okoronkwo, DL Rasheem Green, TE Jordan Akins Analysis: The Texans drafted their QB of the future. Now they need a difference-maker on the defensive side of the football. (13). New York Jets Select: OT Peter Skoronski | Northwestern Team Needs: QB, T, ED Pending Free Agents: RB James Robinson, C Connor McGovern, QB Joe Flacco, DL Sheldon Rankins, OT George Fant Analysis: The Jets must figure out the QB position in the offseason. They should target OL in this spot. Center Connor McGovern will be a free agent, and it seems unlikely that the OT trio of Duane Brown, George Fant, and Mekhi Becton will all return in 2023. (14). New England Patriots Select: WR Quentin Johnston | TCU Team Needs: QB, T, ED Pending Free Agents: OT Isaiah Wynn, RB Damien Harris, CB Myles Bryant, CB Jonathan Jones, WR Jakobi Meyers Analysis: The Patriots need to draft a WR, Bill will find a way to pass on a WR for the best available DB or OL, and then he will shock the world and draft Stetson Bennett in the 2nd or 3rd round. (15). Green Bay Packers Select: WR Jordan Addison | USC Team Needs: WR, TE, ED, LB Pending Free Agents: WR Allen Lazard, TE Robert Tonyan Jr., OT Elgton Jenkins, S Adrian Amos, DL Dean Lowry Analysis: If I am the Packers, with or without Aaron Rodgers, I need to add more talent at WR and potentially replace Elgton Jenkins. If Jordan Addison is available, it is a no-brainer in this spot. Pair Addison with Christan Watson and Romeo Doubs. If Aaron Rodgers moves on, you at least do your best to surround Love with as much firepower as possible. Another option is TE, and if Michael Mayer is available, why not? (16). Washington Commanders Select: Broderick Jones | Georgia Team Needs: QB, G, C, LB Pending Free Agents: DL Daron Payne, QB Taylor Heinicke, OG Wes Schweitzer, LB Cole Holcomb, OG Trai Turner Analysis: The Commanders finished the 2022 season with one top 80 CB, according to PFF. With Daron Payne potentially leaving in free agency, the Commanders appear poised to take the best defensive line value in this position. They also need to improve the IOL. (17). Pittsburgh Steelers Select: OT Dawand Jones | Ohio State Team Needs: T, LB, CB Pending Free Agents: DL Larry Ogunjobi, LB Devin Bush, DL Chris Wormley, CB Cam Sutton, QB Mason Rudolph Analysis: With essentially two first-round picks after the Dolphins forfeited pick, the Steelers have an excellent opportunity to capitalize. With apparent needs on the offensive line, they can also grab a top cornerback. (18). Detroit Lions Select: EDGE Myles Murphy | Clemson Team Needs: DI, LB, CB Pending Free Agents: WR DJ Chark, RB Jamaal Williams, LB Alex Anzalone, OG Evan Brown, CB Mike Hughes Analysis: After lucking into the top interior defender, the Lions add an athletic developmental EDGE with big-time upside to align opposite Aidan Hutchinson. (19). Tampa Bay Bucs Select: IDL Bryan Bresee | Clemson Team Needs: QB, TE, G, C, DI Pending Free Agents: QB Tom Brady, LB Lavonte David, DL Akiem Hicks, WR Julio Jones, CB Sean Bunting, S Mike Edwards Analysis: Whoever is under center in 2023 will need to be better protected than Brady was in 2022. Drafting an OL here makes sense, but you must start rebuilding the defense. (20). Arizona Cardinals (via SEA) Select: CB Joey Porter Jr. | Penn State Team Needs: G, C, ED, CB Pending Free Agents: EDGE J.J. Watt, WR A.J. Green, OT Kelvin Beachum, CB Byron Murphy, C Rodney Hudson Analysis: After moving up via the trade with the Seahawks, the Cardinals could use an elite DB to go with Will Anderson. *Dolphins Forefeit Pick (21). Los Angeles Chargers Select: WR Zay Flowers | Boston College Team Needs: WR, T, LB, CB Pending Free Agents: DL Jerry Tillery, S Nasir Adderley, RB Sony Michel, LB Drue Tranquill, TE Donald Parham Analysis: The Chargers need help at CB and could use a WR. There is an argument that they could draft an edge rusher with Khalil Mack in his 30s and Joey Bosa's injury-plagued 2022; the Chargers need some youthful depth. (22). Baltimore Ravens Select: WR Jalin Hyatt | Tennessee Team Needs: WR, ED, CB Pending Free Agents: CB Marcus Peters, QB Lamar Jackson, OT Ja'Wuan James, CB Kyle Fuller Analysis: The Ravens will have a new OC in 2023, but they still need to sign Lamar Jackson to a new deal. In recent years, I have mocked several receivers to the Ravens, but they have passed on all but Rashod Bateman. If they are going to entice Lamar, they will need to draft a legit field-stretching WR to go along with their elite TE group and WR Rashod Bateman. (23). Minnesota Vikings Select: CB Kelee Ringo | Georgia Team Needs: DI, LB, CB Pending Free Agents: TE Irv Smith Jr., RB Alexander Mattison, CB Patrick Peterson, C Garrett Bradbury, WR Olabisi Johnson Analysis: The Vikings need help in their secondary. Ringo is a physical DB who can be an impact player in year one. (24). Jacksonville Jaguars Select: O'Cyrus Torrence | Florida Team Needs: G, C, DB Pending Free Agents: TE Evan Engram, OT Jawaan Taylor, EDGE Arden Key, EDGE Dawuane Smoot, CB Tre Herndon Analysis: The Jags land a big-time interior offensive lineman who is a mauler in the run game. In addition, you continue to build the offensive line to protect Trevor Lawrence. (25). New York Giants Select: DB Brian Branch | Alabama Team Needs: WR, TE, C, LB Pending Free Agents: QB Daniel Jones, RB Saquon Barkley, DL Dalvin Tomlinson, WR Sterling Shepard, WR Darius Slayton Analysis: The Giants possess decent draft capital. They have needs at WR and TE and with Michael Mayer available in this spot, it will be difficult to pass on the highest-rated TE. But the Giants take the best available in Alabama, DB Brian Branch. Branch is a slot safety who can cover and provide support in the run game. (26). Dallas Cowboys Select: TE Michael Mayer | Notre Dame Team Needs: WR, DI, LB Pending Free Agents: TE Dalton Schultz, RB Tony Pollard, OT Terence Steele, WR Noah Brown, LB Leighton Vander Esch Analysis: The Cowboys could use upgrades on the OL, but they could also add an elite TE in Michael Mayer to pair with CeeDee Lamb. (27). Buffalo Bills Select: EDGE Nolan Smith | Georgia Team Needs: G, C, DB Pending Free Agents: S Jordan Poyer, LB Tremaine Edmunds, QB Case Keenum, C Mitch Morse, OG Rodger Saffold Analysis: The Bills need to improve their offensive line, but they could also use a Von Miller-style edge rusher, and with Nolan Smith still available, you cannot pass on the talent. Von Miller is 34 years old, and Nolan Smith makes a ton of sense. (28). Cincinnati Bengals Select: OT Anton Harrison | Oklahoma Team Needs: T, DI, CB Pending Free Agents: S Jessie Bates III, TE Hayden Hurst, CB Eli Apple, S Vonn Bell, RB Samaje Perine Analysis: The Bengals need to continue to build the offensive line to keep Burrow upright and on the field. Harrison might need some time to acclimate to the NFL game, but he has the tools to be a high-level starter. (29). New Orleans Saints Select: Edge Keion White | Georgia Tech Team Needs: QB, DI, CB Pending Free Agents: DL David Onyemata, EDGE Marcus Davenport, WR Jarvis Landry, RB Mark Ingram, QB Andy Dalton Analysis: The Saints have options to replace the often-injured Marcus Davenport. The Saints ultimately choose the 6-5 280lb Keion White who will enter the NFL with elite potential, is already an excellent run-stopper, and can play all along the line of scrimmage. (30). Philadelphia Eagles Select: CB Cam Smith | South Carolina Team Needs: WR, G, C Pending Free Agents: DL Javon Hargrave, CB James Bradberry, RB Miles Sanders, C Jason Kelce, DL Fletcher Cox Analysis: The Super Bowl runner-up and a team with many potential pending free agents and Center Jason Kelce, who is mulling the idea of retiring. The Eagles need to find their Kelce replacement in the middle of their offensive line. With other needs at CB and the potential that James Bradberry could move on, the Eagles will have some solid options. (31). Kansas City Chiefs Select: TE Luke Musgrave | Oregon State Team Needs: WR, DL Pending Free Agents: OT Orlando Brown Jr., WR Mecole Hardman, WR Juju Smith-Schuster, S Juan Thornhill Analysis: The Super Bowl champs have a young defense with great potential and could use a WR. With tight end Travis Kelce is in his 30's, and options like Dalton Kincaid and Luke Musgrave, the Chiefs could grab Kelce's replacement a year or two in advance.

2024 NFL Draft Position Rankings: Top 5 Interior Offensive Lineman | Pre NFL Combine We are entering the next stage of the NFL Draft player rankings process. As always, I start with the top 5 quarterbacks (QB) , top 5 running backs (RB) , top 10 wide receivers (WR) , and the top 5 tight ends (TE) before diving into the updated offensive line and top defender grades. Click Here: Check out the Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Big Board top 100 player rankings. We evaluate every player using a proprietary grading process that involves film evaluation combined with advanced data. On the back end, our scouting process mirrors the same process deployed by current NFL front-office personnel so that we can deliver the most in-depth player scouting reports available. All of this is currently free (subject to change). Each player scouting report includes: In-depth player scouting report Play Style and Scheme Fit Analysis Player Strengths & Weaknesses Player Comparisons The Top 5 IOL's The top 5 IOL's according to our updated 2024 NFL Draft Big Board player rankings, ranked ahead of the 2024 NFL Combine. (1) Jackson Powers-Johnson, Oregon (IOL, 6'3", 320 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Powers-Johnson is praised for his athleticism and versatility, shining in zone schemes with his footwork and movement. Despite his shorter reach, his effective anchoring and smart play compensate, making him ideal for dynamic offenses. Expected to be a Day 2 pick, his immediate impact as a starting center is anticipated, supported by his high football IQ and leadership. (2) Christian Mahogany, Boston College (IOL, 6'3", 322 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Mahogany's blend of power and technique positions him as a versatile force on the interior line, capable of excelling in any offensive setup. His ability to engage defenders at the second level and adeptness at handling complex defenses underscore his potential. Projected as a high-end starter, Mahogany's skill set promises significant NFL success. (3) Cooper Beebe, Kansas State (IOL, 6'4", 322 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Beebe's strength and base make him a formidable force in run-heavy schemes, with his versatility allowing play across the interior. While he shines in gap and power run schemes, further development in pass protection could round out his skill set. With high football IQ and adaptability, Beebe is seen as a valuable Day 2 selection. (4) Zak Zinter, Michigan (IOL, 6'6", 334 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Zinter's size and toughness make him a solid fit for vertical run schemes, leveraging his strength for effective engagement. While not the most mobile, his foundational skills suggest a reliable interior presence. Projected with Mid-Level Starter Potential, Zinter's consistency and football IQ forecast a successful NFL career. (5) Zach Frazier, West Virginia (IOL, 6'3", 310 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Frazier's technical proficiency and power excel in gap schemes, with his wrestling background enhancing his blocking leverage. While less suited for zone schemes, his reliable pass protection and football intelligence make him a dependable center option. Anticipated as a Day 2 selection, Frazier's potential as a solid NFL contributor is evident.

The Ravens vs. Chiefs Monday Night Showdown Is a Potential AFC Title Preview The 2019 matchup A year ago, week three, at Arrowhead, the Chiefs beat the Ravens 33-28. The Ravens led 6-0 in the first QTR before the Chiefs would score 23 unanswered 2nd QTR pts. With the Chiefs leading 23-6 at halftime, the pressure would be on the Ravens to score on their first drive of the 3rd QTR. The Ravens would do just that going 75 yards on nine plays using more than 4 minutes of the clock. The Ravens, down 23-13 were back in it and would need their defense to get a stop vs. a red hot Chiefs offense that had scored 3 TD's and a FG on their previous four possessions. The Ravens would get the stop they needed on the next Chiefs possession, but the Ravens offense did nothing with their next opportunity punting the football back to the Chiefs. The Chiefs would go on an eight-play 80-yard drive in 4:14, scoring another TD while taking a commanding 30-13 lead. The Chiefs ability to gain and maintain a lead in 2019 vs the Ravens The 2019 Baltimore Ravens were a run-first team that ate up clock and leaned on their opponents with their dominant offensive line, and with the Chiefs up three scores, they would need to depend on Lamar in the passing game to cut the deficit. Lamar would make some big-time plays down the stretch in the passing game, including two critical 4th down throws that would keep drives alive. But it would prove to be too much for the Ravens offense. Once the Chiefs were up two scores, they maintained that advantage into the 4th QTR, and that is not a situation the Ravens and Lamar Jackson can flourish. The Chiefs would love to get a two-score lead on the Ravens to apply pressure and force them out of their comfort zone tonight. The importance of 3rd/4th down stops The 2020 Baltimore Ravens defense ranks 2nd in the NFL through two weeks in third-down defense. The Ravens were a top ten defense a season ago defending against third-down conversions. Against the Chiefs in 2019, the Ravens struggled to get the Chiefs into third-down situations, and when they were able to, they allowed them to convert 5 of their 9 third-down attempts. The Ravens offense went 5-13 on third downs vs the 2019 Chiefs defense. The Chiefs defense forced 8 third-down stops vs. the Ravens defense, who only forced four third-down stops. The Ravens offense did go 3 for 4 on 4th down attempts in what would prove to be the difference in keeping them in the game. The 3rd/4th down stop differential between the Ravens and the Chiefs would favor the Chiefs, who forced four more 3rd/4th down stops than the Ravens. A handful of plays decides the outcome of most NFL games . The difference in most NFL games will come down to a handful of plays. You can point to these plays as the reason for the outcomes that transpire in any game. In 2019, the difference between the Chiefs and the Ravens came down to a handful of High Impact plays. Getting stops on 3rd/4th down is the most impactful to winning or losing a football game. Both teams will do their best to stay ahead of the chains to prevent third down and long. Stay ahead of the chains (on-schedule) If the Ravens are going to win tonight, they will need to stay ahead of the chains (2nd and four yds or less, 3rd and three yds or less. Staying ahead of schedule on early downs will help them win the 3rd and 4th down stop rate vs. the Chiefs. The run game once again becomes vital to early-down success. Lamar Jackson will need to put pressure on the Chiefs defense with his legs early in the game, setting up RPO and play-action opportunities, and opening the run game for Mark Ingram and company. The Chiefs will do what they can early to get a lead on the Ravens and take them out of their comfort zone. If the Chiefs can get early 3rd down stops, force punts, or get a turnover that leads to a multiple possession lead, they can try to control the game as they were able to do in 2019. Both teams are top five at getting third-down stops through two weeks (Ravens 1st, Chiefs 5th). The importance of the run game for both teams The run game for both teams will need to be a factor. The Ravens secondary will face its toughest battle yet, while the Chiefs defense will be forced to defend all eleven because of Lamar's ability to run the football. The Chiefs can also put pressure on defenses with Mahome's ability to move the chains with his legs. The Ravens will need to scale their man defense on third down and keep a spy on Mahomes in key situations. The Chiefs will spy Lamar the entire night. I expect the Chiefs to be more than happy to force the RB on the inside zone-read plays where Lamar is looking to take the edge. The Ravens could exploit this scenario by running a midline zone-read attacking the one or the three techs. The Midline would allow Lamar to keep it through the middle of the defense while reading inside out. If the Chiefs force the give on a midline zone read, Lamar will give to the RB going outside. Lamar Wants to win from the pocket and will do what it takes to keep plays alive, but should take what is given to him vs. the Chiefs. Lamar wants to throw the football. I recently diagramed a few examples of Lamar Jackson wanting to throw the football by keeping a play alive so his receivers can get open. Even when there is open grass, Lamar keeps his head up, eyes up, looking to make a throw instead of taking off running. How Lamar handles these situations will be a factor. Steve Spagnuolo will use simulated pressure before dropping 7, or even eight into coverage. Lamar should take what they give him if they drop 7, or 8 into coverage. If Lamar can get into space, he should take the quick 5 yards on the ground in situations where the Chiefs are only rushing four. Doing this will force the Chiefs to dedicate another defender or two to contain Lamar and open man to man opportunities in the passing game. The Chiefs will do what they can to get Lamar to force a bad throw, and that can be the difference in a game as evenly matched as this one. One possession lost due to an unforced error could be the difference. The Ravens don't need to blitz Mahomes consistently . The Ravens need not blitz Mahomes as consistently as they have the other QB's they have faced the last few weeks. The Ravens have the third-highest blitz rate in the NFL through two weeks (47%). On the other hand, the Chiefs offense has faced a blitz on 19% of their pass plays through two weeks (5th lowest). Since 2018, Patrick Mahomes has been deadly against the blitz, throwing 25 TD's to only 1 INT according to PFF. If the Ravens are going to try to get after Mahomes with extra defenders, it will have to get home, or he will make them pay. Through two weeks, opposing defenses have utilized two-high shells to help contain the Chiefs explosive pass offense. It may better serve the Ravens to take a less blitz-happy approach against the Chiefs. The red zone might be the difference . The red zone might be an area that decides the outcome of the game. The Chiefs have had some red zone issues the first two weeks of the season, scoring a TD on 57% of their opportunities. If the Ravens attempt to play a bend but don't break style of defense against the Chiefs, they could take advantage of the Chiefs red zone woes as the field becomes more condensed. Expect a chess match that will be highly entertaining. These teams are evenly matched, and the outcome of this game should come down to one or two possessions. There will not be a home filed advantage making this game more of a toss-up. If the Ravens can limit the Chief's explosive plays, keep the 3rd and 4th down stops even on both sides while successfully running the football, they will put themselves in a position to win the game. The Chiefs can win if they can keep the Ravens off schedule on 1st and 2nd down, forcing third and medium to long consistently. The Chiefs defense will have to make themselves susceptible to the big play over the top on occasion if they decide to sell out to stop the Ravens run game. The Chiefs, like the Ravens, are in a rob Peter to pay Paul scenario defensively. If the game comes down to who can score TD's in the red zone, the Ravens might have the advantage.

2025 NFL Draft: 15 Linebackers You Should Know Ahead of the 2024 College Football Season As we approach the 2024 college football season, the preliminary summer scouting evaluations for the linebacker position are in full swing. The 2025 NFL Draft linebacker class appears to be rich in talent, boasting depth from top to bottom. Today’s analysis will highlight some of the top prospects to watch ahead of the 2024 college football season The 2024 NFL Draft LB class was led by Edgerrin Cooper, Payton Wilson, and Junior Colson. Cooper was the first LB off the board at 45th overall in what was considered a weak LB class. The 2025 class, featuring standout prospects such as Harold Perkins Jr. and Barrett Carter, promises to be different, offering a higher caliber of players poised to make an immediate impact at the next level. 2025 NFL Draft: 15 Linebackers You Should Know Ahead of the 2024 College Football Season HAROLD PERKINS JR., LSU Ht: 6'1" Wt: 220 lbs Coverage Grade: Very Good Run Stop Grade: Good Tackling Grade: Good Summary Analysis: Harold Perkins Jr. is a dynamic linebacker known for his elite pass-rushing ability and versatility on the field. In 2023, he tallied 48 tackles, 7 tackles for loss, and 6 sacks. Perkins' agility and speed make him a disruptive force, capable of excelling in various roles, including coverage and edge defense. His athleticism has made him a standout prospect, with a bright future ahead in the NFL. BARRETT CARTER, CLEMSON Ht: 6'0" Wt: 233 lbs Coverage Grade: Very Good Run Stop Grade: Good Tackling Grade: Good Summary Analysis: Barrett Carter has shown considerable potential, particularly in coverage, where he excels. In 2023, he recorded 43 tackles, 5 tackles for loss, and 4 sacks. Carter's versatility and athleticism have kept him on the radar as a top linebacker prospect, and he has the opportunity to elevate his stock with a strong senior season at Clemson. DANNY STUTSMAN, OKLAHOMA Ht: 6'4" Wt: 241 lbs Coverage Grade: Good Run Stop Grade: Good Tackling Grade: Good Summary Analysis: Danny Stutsman is a physical and aggressive linebacker who has been a key figure in Oklahoma's defense. In 2023, he notched 68 tackles, 14 tackles for loss, and 3 sacks. Stutsman's ability to disrupt plays in the backfield and his solid tackling make him a standout player. His leadership and consistent performance have made him a cornerstone of the Sooners' defense. JAMON DUMAS-JOHNSON, KENTUCKY Ht: 6'1" Wt: 240 lbs Coverage Grade: Above Average Run Stop Grade: Good Tackling Grade: Average Summary Analysis: Jamon Dumas-Johnson, aka "JDJ," transferred to Kentucky after completing three seasons and participating in 38 games at Georgia. He is recognized for his outstanding run-stopping ability. During the 2023 season, he recorded 30 tackles, two tackles for loss, and 3 sacks. His knack for applying pressure and his reliable run-stopping abilities render him a valuable contributor and a name to keep an eye on in 2024. SMAEL MONDON JR., GEORGIA Ht: 6'3" Wt: 225 lbs Coverage Grade: Above Average Run Stop Grade: Above Average Tackling Grade: Very Good Summary Analysis: Smael Mondon Jr. is known for his exceptional athleticism and ability to cover ground quickly. In 2023, he recorded 51 tackles, 2 tackles for loss, and 4 sacks. Mondon's speed and agility make him a versatile linebacker, capable of playing in coverage and stopping the run. His raw athletic traits make him a high-upside prospect for Georgia. JAY HIGGINS, IOWA Ht: 6'1" Wt: 230 lbs Coverage Grade: Outstanding Run Stop Grade: Very Good Tackling Grade: Outstanding Summary Analysis: Jay Higgins has been a standout for Iowa, leading the team with 114 tackles in 2023, along with 4 tackles for loss and 2 sacks. His exceptional coverage skills and reliable tackling make him one of the top linebackers in the nation. Higgins' consistent presence around the ball and his ability to make critical plays have made him a key player in Iowa's defense. JAISHAWN BARHAM, MICHIGAN Ht: 6'3" Wt: 248 lbs Coverage Grade: Good Run Stop Grade: Very Good Tackling Grade: Good Summary Analysis: Jaishawn Barham has shown promise with his physical play and ability to disrupt plays. In 2023, he recorded 32 tackles, 3 tackles for loss, and 3 sacks. Barham's transfer to Michigan provides an opportunity for him to showcase his skills on a bigger stage. His size and strength make him effective in both run defense and pass rushing. JASON HENDERSON, OLD DOMINION Ht: 6'1" Wt: 227 lbs Coverage Grade: Good Run Stop Grade: Good Tackling Grade: Very Good Summary Analysis: Jason Henderson has been a tackling machine for Old Dominion, with 93 tackles, 12 tackles for loss, and 6 sacks in 2023. His ability to find the ball and make stops has been a key part of his game. Henderson's performance at Old Dominion has showcased his potential to succeed at the next level, despite questions about his level of competition. COLLIN OLIVER, OKLAHOMA STATE Ht: 6'2" Wt: 235 lbs Coverage Grade: Very Good Run Stop Grade: Above Average Tackling Grade: Average Summary Analysis: Collin Oliver has transitioned from an edge rusher to an off-ball linebacker, where he has continued to excel in pass rushing. In 2023, he recorded 59 tackles, 10 tackles for loss, and 7 sacks. Oliver's pass-rushing skills and ability to disrupt the backfield make him a versatile player. His performance in coverage and run defense will be key to his future success. JACK KISER, NOTRE DAME Ht: 6'2" Wt: 225 lbs Coverage Grade: Outstanding Run Stop Grade: Very Good Tackling Grade: Very Good Summary Analysis: Jack Kiser has been a versatile and reliable linebacker for Notre Dame, known for his coverage skills and run defense. In 2023, he recorded 41 tackles and 1 sack. Kiser's intelligence and instincts on the field allow him to excel in multiple roles, making him a valuable asset to Notre Dame's defense. His ability to read plays and make quick decisions has been critical to his success. POWER ECHOLS, NORTH CAROLINA Ht: 6'0" Wt: 225 lbs Coverage Grade: Very Good Run Stop Grade: Very Good Tackling Grade: Good Summary Analysis: Power Echols has been a standout for North Carolina, showcasing his physical play and tackling ability. In 2023, he recorded 81 tackles, 3 tackles for loss, and 13 pressures. Echols' aggressive play style and solid coverage skills make him a versatile linebacker. His consistent performance and ability to impact games make him a player to watch in the upcoming draft. TYREEM POWELL, RUTGERS Ht: 6'5" Wt: 240 lbs Coverage Grade: Good Run Stop Grade: Good Tackling Grade: Very Good Summary Analysis: Tyreem Powell has shown promise with his size and athleticism, recording 29 tackles, 1 tackle for loss, and 3 sacks in 2023 before a season-ending injury. Powell's mix of size and explosiveness makes him a versatile player in coverage and run defense. His return to form and continued development will be key to his draft prospects. FRANCISCO MAUIGOA, MIAMI (FL) Ht: 6'3" Wt: 230 lbs Coverage Grade: Average Run Stop Grade: Very Good Tackling Grade: Good Summary Analysis: Francisco Mauigoa has been a productive linebacker, recording 58 tackles, 18 tackles for loss, and 7.5 sacks in 2023. His ability to disrupt plays in the backfield and explosive downhill play make him a valuable asset in the run game. Mauigoa's performance at Miami has increased his visibility as a top prospect. JESTIN JACOBS, OREGON Ht: 6'4" Wt: 236 lbs Coverage Grade: Average Run Stop Grade: Good Tackling Grade: Outstanding Summary Analysis: Jestin Jacobs has shown flashes of potential, recording 25 tackles and 1 sack in 2023. His size and athleticism give him the potential to be a disruptive force, particularly in blitz situations. Jacobs' ability to cover ground and tackle effectively makes him a prospect with high upside, especially if he can stay healthy and showcase his skills consistently. DEONTAE LAWSON, ALABAMA Ht: 6'2" Wt: 230 lbs Coverage Grade: Below Average Run Stop Grade: Very Good Tackling Grade: Good Summary Analysis: Deontae Lawson has been a key player in Alabama's defense, showcasing his strength and tackling abilities. In 2023, he recorded 54 tackles, 4 tackles for loss, and 3 sacks. Lawson's proficiency in stopping the run and making solid tackles makes him a reliable linebacker. While his coverage skills need improvement, his physical play and consistency in the box make him a valuable asset for the Crimson Tide.

Change Is Coming as College Sports Leadership Is Working To Separate FBS Football From The NCAA As the college football season nears the finish line while running on fumes, and college basketball kicks off its 2020-21 season, a commission of former AD's, school presidents, and influential figures in college sports are recommending sweeping changes across the college sports landscape. The group, which refers to themselves as the Knight Commission on intercollegiate athletics, began a deep dive into the structure of today's intercollegiate athletics landscape. Their mission is to transform the current NCAA D1 model and at the top of that list is D1 or "FBS" college football. Knight Commission recommends a new governing structure for the sport of FBS Football In a December 3rd press release, The Knights Commission released a document detailing their recommendation to form a new governing body for FBS (D1) level college football. The commission discusses the need to separate D1 football from the NCAA model leaving The NCAA as the governing body for all other intercollegiate athletics, including the men's and woman NCAA tournaments. March Madness is the top revenue generator for the NCAA, generating a near $1B annually, with most of the revenue coming from TV contracts. The NCAA currently handles all regulatory functions for FBS college football yet does not receive any football revenues. FBS football’s national championship, the College Football Playoff (CFP), is managed instead by the independent CFP Administration, LLC, outside of the NCAA structure. The revenues from that championship, which generated more than $460 million in 2019, are retained by the FBS conferences and institutions to use however they choose. We’re at a moment of both crisis and opportunity in college sports,” said Knight Commission co-chair Arne Duncan, former U.S. Secretary of Education. “Now is not the time to think only of narrow institutional interests. Now is the time for college leaders to step up, and act on their desire to advance big solutions to benefit college athletes. - Knights Commission Co-Chair Arne Duncan The Survey Says, Change is Needed The commission’s novel survey found that nearly 80 percent of Division I campus and sports leaders favor “big solutions” over incremental change for reforming D-I governance. Those leaders also believe the crisis created by the COVID-19 pandemic presents the “perfect time” to address serious governance shortcomings. The commission believes that the NCAA is falling behind the fast-moving evolutionary commercial changes sweeping across the college sports landscape. Separating the sport of FBS football from the NCAA would end the current financially defunct system of governance, in which the NCAA absorbs all expenses for FBS college football, without receiving financial benefits from the sport or the College Football Playoff. Those expenses include enforcement, catastrophic insurance, legal services, health and safety administration, and research. No single entity today is responsible for FBS football – the most powerful sport in Division I athletics,” said incoming Knight Commission co-chair Nancy Zimpher, Chancellor Emeritus of the State University of New York. “It is time to end this leadership void and bring more accountability to the sport, both for the benefit of athletes and for the future of FBS football. - Knight Commission Co-Chair Nancy Zimpher The Separation of the Haves and Have Nots Is A Numbers Game The landscape of college football is changing. Student-athletes will soon be able to profit from their name image and likeness, and the schools with the largest following and richest donors will begin to separate from the have nots. In addition, with the new transfer portal rules that allow a student-athlete to essentially become a free agent, the landscape is ablaze. These changes might be an indicator that FBS football might consider a significant consolidation where they separate the haves from the have nots. Below are the top 5 revenue generators from each Power Five Football conference. The athletic departments who are not operating at a loss have the best opportunity to come out on the other side of Covid with little to no harm vs. the schools which are operating in the red, including those who have operated in the red before Covid that might not be able to sustain their current FBS status moving forward. The future of D1 (FBS) college football could see a transformation where the conferences consolidate to divide more revenue among fewer football programs—driven by TV contracts and the need for more top matchups to generate buzz and get eyes on TV and the growing online viewing platforms. Changes are inevitable, and it will only strengthen the game of college football moving forward. American 1. UCF — $30 million 2. SMU — $21 million 3. Houston — $19 million 4. Memphis — $18 million 5. South Florida — $17 million ACC 1. Florida State — $69 million 2. Clemson — $61 million 3. Miami — $56 million 4. NC State — $46 million 5. Syracuse — $44 million Big Ten 1. Michigan — $122 million 2. Ohio State — $115 million 3. Penn State — $100 million 4. Nebraska — $94 million 5. Wisconsin — $90 million Big 12 1. Texas — $156 million 2. Oklahoma — $95 million 3. TCU — $65 million 4. Oklahoma State — $52.2 million 5. Iowa State — $51.9 million Conference USA 1. UTEP — $14.22 million 2. FIU — $14.2 million 3. Rice — $13 million 4. UAB — $12 million 5. Florida Atlantic — $11.9 million MAC 1. Toledo — $11.7 million 2. Miami (Ohio) — $9.3 million 3. Western Michigan — $9.26 million 4. Ohio — $9.1 million 5. Eastern Michigan — $8.8 million Mountain West 1. Colorado State – $25 million 2. Boise State — $20 million 3. Fresno State — $16 million 4. Wyoming — $14 million 5. San Diego State — $13.4 million Pac-12 1. Washington — $84 million 2. Oregon — $72 million 3. Utah — $63 million 4. USC — $50 million 5. Washington State — $45 million SEC 1. Georgia — $123 million 2. Auburn — $95 million 3. Alabama — $94.6 million 4. LSU — $92 million 5. Tennessee — $91 million Sun Belt 1. Louisiana-Lafayette — $11 million 2. South Alabama — $10 million 3. Appalachian State — $9.4 million 4. Coastal Carolina — $9.2 million 5. Troy — $8.6 million Power 5 — Top 15 (Revenue Generators) 1. Texas — $156 million 2. Georgia — $123 million 3. Michigan — $122 million 4. Notre Dame — $116 million 5. Ohio State — $115 million 6. Penn State — $100 million 7. Auburn — $95 million 8. Oklahoma — $94.8 million 9. Alabama — $94.6 million 10. Nebraska — $94.3 million 11. LSU — $92 million 12. Tennessee — $91 million 13. Wisconsin — $90 million 14. Florida — $85 million 15. Washington — $84 million Follow Football Scout 365 or visit FootballScout365.com For daily analysis, please follow us on Instagram. We are also on Twitter, Linkedin, and YouTube. Football Scout 365 on Instagram Football Scout 365 on Twitter Football Scout 365 on LinkedIn Football Scout 365 on YouTube

NFL Week 1 Fantasy Football Start 'Em, Sit 'Em Fantasy lineups hinge on tough decisions in Week 1, especially around fringe players. This guide is built to highlight key starts and sits based on advanced analysis, matchups, and expected usage, helping you maximize your lineup for the 2024 NFL season opener. Quarterbacks: Start: Jared Goff (Detroit Lions) vs. Los Angeles Rams Goff excels at home, averaging over 20 fantasy points per game in Detroit. The Rams' defense allowed the fourth-most fantasy points to QBs in 2023. With Detroit’s offense intact and the Rams' weakened secondary, Goff is a top-12 QB this week. Jayden Daniels (Washington Commanders) vs. Tampa Bay Buccaneers Daniels’ dual-threat ability is key, as he faces a Tampa defense that allowed the seventh-most fantasy points to QBs last year. His rushing upside makes him a top-10 option in a high-volume game with plenty of fantasy points on the line. Caleb Williams (Chicago Bears) vs. Tennessee Titans Williams is set for a big debut against a Titans defense that struggled with QB pressures. His mobility and ability to extend plays make him dangerous. Tennessee allowed a league-high seven rushing TDs to QBs in 2023, making Williams a must-start. Sit: Dak Prescott (Dallas Cowboys) vs. Cleveland Browns Prescott consistently struggled against top-10 defenses in 2023, and Cleveland ranked third in limiting QB fantasy points. With heavy pressure expected from the Browns’ front, Prescott’s ceiling is too limited for Week 1. Brock Purdy (San Francisco 49ers) vs. New York Jets Purdy faces one of the league’s best defenses in the Jets, who allowed the fewest passing yards per game in 2023. Coming off injury, Purdy is a risky option against this elite secondary and pass rush. Aaron Rodgers (New York Jets) vs. San Francisco 49ers Rodgers will be playing his first game back from injury against a 49ers defense that allowed the sixth-fewest fantasy points to QBs last year. With questions surrounding his post-injury performance, Rodgers is best left on the bench for Week 1. Running Backs: Start: Raheem Mostert (Miami Dolphins) vs. Jacksonville Jaguars Mostert enters Week 1 as Miami’s lead back and gets a great matchup against a Jaguars defense that ranked in the bottom half against the run last season. Mostert’s explosiveness and red-zone role give him RB1 upside in this high-scoring game. Javonte Williams (Denver Broncos) vs. Seattle Seahawks Williams is the clear lead back for Denver and faces a Seahawks defense that allowed the second-most rushing yards to RBs last year. With a strong volume of touches expected, Williams is a solid RB2 with upside in this favorable matchup. Chuba Hubbard (Carolina Panthers) vs. New Orleans Saints Hubbard will handle the bulk of the carries with Jonathon Brooks out. The Saints’ run defense was middle-of-the-pack in 2023, and Hubbard’s expected volume makes him a strong flex option in PPR formats for Week 1. Sit: D’Andre Swift (Chicago Bears) vs. Tennessee Titans Swift’s role in Chicago’s committee backfield is uncertain, and the Titans allowed the seventh-fewest fantasy points to RBs in 2023. The uncertainty around his usage makes him too risky to start in Week 1. Zamir White (Las Vegas Raiders) vs. Los Angeles Chargers White will likely be part of a committee, limiting his value. Despite the Chargers' struggles against RBs last year, White’s minimal role in the passing game caps his upside. Best to wait and see how he's used before starting him. Jaylen Warren (Pittsburgh Steelers) vs. Atlanta Falcons Warren is coming off a hamstring injury and hasn’t practiced much. Atlanta’s defense has improved, and Warren’s unclear workload makes him a risky Week 1 start. Monitor his health before considering him as a flex option. Wide Receivers: Start: Malik Nabers (New York Giants) vs. Minnesota Vikings Nabers faces a Vikings defense that allowed the fifth-most fantasy points to WRs in 2023. As Daniel Jones’ top target, he’ll see significant volume. Nabers has WR2 upside in a high-scoring game, making him a must-start in all formats. Stefon Diggs (Houston Texans) vs. Indianapolis Colts Diggs should dominate in his Texans debut against a Colts defense that gave up the 24th-most points to WRs last year. With C.J. Stroud at QB, Diggs will be heavily targeted, making him a WR1 with big-play potential in Week 1. Chris Godwin (Tampa Bay Buccaneers) vs. Washington Commanders Godwin lines up in the slot against a Washington defense that allowed 29 touchdowns to WRs last season. His high target volume in a pass-heavy offense gives him WR2 upside. Expect Godwin to start the season strong in this matchup. Sit: Calvin Ridley (Tennessee Titans) vs. Chicago Bears Ridley’s role is still evolving in Tennessee, and he faces a tough Chicago secondary led by Jaylon Johnson. Until Ridley’s role is clearer, he’s too risky to trust in Week 1, especially with this challenging matchup. Brandon Aiyuk (San Francisco 49ers) vs. New York Jets Aiyuk is set to face Sauce Gardner, and the Jets’ defense ranked among the best against WRs in 2023. Aiyuk’s ceiling is limited, and he may struggle to find space against this elite secondary. He’s better suited for deeper leagues this week. Tank Dell (Houston Texans) vs. Indianapolis Colts With Stefon Diggs now in Houston, Dell’s target share is likely to decrease. The Colts allowed the sixth-fewest fantasy points to WRs last year, and Dell’s role in the Texans’ offense is unclear. Best to avoid him in Week 1. Tight Ends: Start: Taysom Hill (New Orleans Saints) vs. Carolina Panthers Hill’s versatility as a passer, rusher, and receiver makes him a unique fantasy asset. The Panthers struggled against dynamic playmakers last year, giving Hill top-five TE upside. He’ll be heavily involved in various roles this week. Jake Ferguson (Dallas Cowboys) vs. Cleveland Browns Ferguson’s strong efficiency against man coverage makes him a sneaky Week 1 play, especially with Cleveland’s defense playing one of the highest rates of man coverage. Ferguson will be a key target for Prescott, making him a solid TE1 option. Evan Engram (Jacksonville Jaguars) vs. Miami Dolphins Engram faces a Dolphins defense that allowed the ninth-most fantasy points to TEs in 2023. Jacksonville’s high-volume passing attack ensures plenty of targets for Engram, making him a strong TE1 in this favorable matchup. Sit: Brock Bowers (Las Vegas Raiders) vs. Los Angeles Chargers Bowers’ foot injury and limited preseason action make him a risky Week 1 play. The Raiders will likely ease him into the offense, and the Chargers’ defense was solid against TEs last season. Wait until Bowers is fully healthy and has a more defined role. Dalton Schultz (Houston Texans) vs. Indianapolis Colts Schultz will compete for targets with Stefon Diggs and others, making his role unclear. The Colts allowed the fifth-fewest fantasy points to TEs in 2023, further limiting Schultz’s upside. He’s a risky option for Week 1, best left on the bench. David Njoku (Cleveland Browns) vs. Dallas Cowboys Njoku struggled with Deshaun Watson, averaging fewer fantasy points than with other QBs. Dallas’ defense allowed the fifth-fewest points to TEs last season, making Njoku a risky play this week in a tough matchup.

There’s Nothing Here... We can’t find the page you’re looking for. Check the URL, or head back home. Go Home