Matthew Golden Dynasty Rookie Profile – Fantasy Football 2025 Matthew Golden enters the 2025 fantasy football season as a polarizing rookie wide receiver with first-round draft capital and game-breaking speed. Selected 23rd overall by the Green Bay Packers, Golden joins a crowded wide receiver room that includes Jayden Reed, Romeo Doubs, Christian Watson (recovering from a knee injury), and Tucker Kraft. While his college efficiency metrics don’t scream “future WR1,” Golden’s 4.29 speed, playmaking ability in big games, and the Packers’ need for an alpha receiver create an opportunity for immediate contributions in both dynasty and redraft formats. College Career Recap – Golden’s Path to the NFL WR – Green Bay Packers | Drafted: Round 1, Pick 23 | College: Texas Golden began his career at Houston, flashing as a deep threat and kick returner, before transferring to Texas for his final season. In 2024, he led the Longhorns in receiving yards (987) and touchdowns (9) while playing a pivotal role in their College Football Playoff run. His playoff performances were his best work, logging 411 receiving yards and three touchdowns in two games, including 162 yards against Georgia. Despite his postseason surge, Golden’s overall efficiency was modest. He finished his career with an 18.7% target-per-route-run rate and 1.85 yards per route run, per PFF—solid but not elite marks for a first-round wide receiver. Still, his size (5'11”, 191 lbs), speed, and ability to win in contested situations make him an intriguing developmental prospect. NFL Scouting Report – Strengths & Weaknesses Height: 5’11” | Weight: 191 lbs | 40-Yard Dash: 4.29 | Arm Length: 30 5/8” | Hand Size: 9 1/2” Golden is an explosive athlete who can work all three levels of the field. He combines straight-line speed with agility and body control, making him a natural fit for vertical and intermediate routes. Strengths: Elite straight-line speed (4.29) to threaten defenses deep Big-play ability in high-leverage games (notably in the College Football Playoff) Body control and focus at the catch point, strong hands through contact Versatility to play X, Z, and slot roles Special teams value as a returner Areas to Improve: Inconsistent route pacing and breaks; can be nonchalant at times Focus drops and inconsistent hand timing on short throws Needs to develop better strength at the top of routes Average in-game speed compared to timed speed Scheme Fit & Projected Role with the Packers Golden joins a Packers offense searching for a true WR1. Christian Watson’s long-term health remains uncertain, Romeo Doubs profiles as a complementary piece, and Jayden Reed primarily works from the slot. Golden’s 4.29 speed makes him an ideal replacement for Watson’s deep-threat role and gives Jordan Love another explosive weapon. The Packers’ passing attack has lacked a true focal point, with no receiver surpassing 900 yards last season. If Golden’s playoff-level production translates, he could quickly become Love’s go-to option. Still, Green Bay’s wide receiver-by-committee approach and the addition of third-rounder Savion Williams suggest Golden may rotate early on before fully securing a starting role. Rookie Fantasy Outlook (2025) Floor: WR4/bench stash with big-play upside Ceiling: WR2 with spike weeks if he earns consistent snaps Projection: 50–65 receptions, 700–850 yards, 4–6 TDs Expected PPG (0.5 PPR): 7–11 Golden’s speed and role in a high-variance passing offense make him a volatile but intriguing late-round pick in redraft formats. Dynasty managers should view him as a long-term hold with WR2 potential if his route running develops. Long-Term Dynasty Value – Should You Draft Golden? Golden is currently valued as the WR35 in dynasty startups and the WR4 in rookie drafts, making him a solid mid‑round selection with upside. His combination of first‑round draft capital, elite 4.29 speed, and the opportunity to emerge as a primary playmaker in Green Bay makes him a worthwhile investment for dynasty managers. Even if Golden doesn’t develop into a true WR1, his insulated value and potential to refine his route tree make him a strong long‑term stash. If he earns a more defined role, he could realistically develop into a reliable WR2 by Year 2–3.

2023 NFL Draft WR Rankings: LSU's Kayshon Boutte, Ohio State's Jaxon Smith-Njigba Lead The Way The Last Two Drafts Have Produced 7 WR's WIth an Instant Impact Player Grade The 2021 WR Draft produced top-tier WR1's with Ja'Marr Chase, Devonta Smith, and Jaylen Waddle receiving Instant Impact player grades before the 2021 NFL Draft. All three proved their pre-draft value immediately during the 2021 NFL season. In addition, the 2021 NFL Draft proved to be fruitful beyond the top-tier names with Amon-Ra St. Brown (Detroit), Elijah Moore (NY Jets), Rondale Moore (Arizona), and Rashod Bateman (Baltimore). The 2022 WR draft provided us with four players receiving an Instant Impact player grade. Ohio State's Garrett Wilson and Chris Olave led the way, followed by Penn State's Jahan Dotson (Washington) and Alabama's Jameson Williams (Detroit). The importance of the WR position is apparent considering the amount of money NFL teams are shelling out this offseason. Having depth at WR is also crucial as NFL teams can no longer depend on just having one top-tier WR paired with complementary players. Teams are looking to pair their number one guys with an additional number one caliber player. The Bengals are the best example of this with Ja'Marr Chase, Tee Higgins, and Tyler Boyd. Some Notable Draft Data In 2021, WR's listed among our top 100 were drafted in the 2nd round on average. Ja'Marr Chase was the first WR off the board, and the lowest WR drafted from our board was Oklahoma State's Tylan Wallace at pick 93 in round 4 by the Ravens. WR's from the 2021 NFL Draft ranked in our top 100 played an average of 14.1 games. 23% of the WR's drafted in 2021 who ranked in our top 100 became day one starters. So what are we looking for when evaluating the WR position? The Key Positional Factors: Hands Route Running/Separation After Catch Ability The Grade Scale IIP (Instant Impact Potential) (9.0-7.0) High-End Starter HUP (High Upside Potential) (6.9-6.7) Solid Starter Level DP (Developmental Potential) (6.6-6.5) Lower Level Starter (6.4) Starter Level Traits (6.3) Limited Opportunity/Shows Starter Level Traits When Given the Opportunity 1). Kayshon Boutte LSU JR 6-0 190 Current Grade: High-End Starter (Instant Impact Potential) Ceiling Grade: High-End Starter (Instant Impact Potential) Boutte took the reigns as LSU's next big-time WR in 2021 before succumbing to an ankle injury midway through the season. Boutte would miss seven games in 2021 but still led the Tigers in receiving yards and TD's. He is a mismatch for opposing DB's, and his after-the-catch ability is next level. We project Kayshon Boutte as a top ten overall talent in the 2023 NFL Draft. When evaluating the tape, Kayshon Boutte's Athleticism stands out. Listed at 6-0 200lbs, Boutte has the physical traits to play outside or in the slot as needed. Boutte possesses excellent speed and agility, which is why he is such a threat to go the distance with the ball in his hands. His long speed allows him to get natural separation. Boutte has excellent football awareness; he does a good job locating the holes in coverage. Boutte is far from perfect. He has some concentration drops on his resume and can improve his route running. Adding double moves and being a better salesman at the NFL level will allow him to take his game to the next level. Boutte will need to work on his contested catch ability in 2022; if he can improve in critical areas, he will be the top receiver off the board in the 2023 NFL Draft. 2). Jaxon Smith-Njigba Ohio State JR 6-0 198 Current Grade: High-End Starter (Instant Impact Potential) Ceiling Grade: High-End Starter (Instant Impact Potential) Smith-Njigba waited his turn at Ohio State, and when it was his time to shine, he stepped up in a big way a season ago. In the 2022 Rose Bowl game, Smith-Njigba became the Buckeye's number one receiver after Chris Olave, and Garrett Wilson opted out. Without Olave and Wilson, Smith-Njigba lit up the Utah Secondary for 15 catches, 347 yards receiving, hitting pay dirt three times. No wide receiver has more yards in a Rose Bowl game or any single bowl game than Jaxon Smith-Njigba. Surprisingly, Smith-Njigba led all Buckeye receivers in 2021 with 1606 yds receiving. Njigba is not the flashiest receiver; he is a good route runner with excellent hands. He is also fearless and willing to pick up the tough yards over the middle—Smith-Njigba projects as a slot receiver at the next level. At 6-0, 198 lbs, he is a gritty player who can make defenders miss in space like a running back after the catch. He can stop on a dime and displays good lateral movement and loose hips. He attacks the catch point and can muscle the ball away from defenders in traffic. 3). Jordan Addison USC JR 6-0 198 Current Grade: High-End Starter (Instant Impact Potential) Ceiling Grade: High-End Starter (Instant Impact Potential) In 2021, Addison posted a 100-catch season with 1500 yards receiving and 17 TD's. Addison became the unquestioned star of the Pitt Panther's 2021 offense. Addison has since transferred to the USC Trojans to play with new Trojan Head Coach Lincoln Riley who left Norman for L.A. in the offseason. Addison will be a preseason Heisman Trophy candidate and a favorite to bring home the Biletnikoff Trophy as the nation's best receiver in 2022. Jordan Addison is an elite separator who can vary his route speed, lulling a DB to sleep before exploding into the top of his route. He possesses elite agility putting defenders on skates in space with bad angles after the catch. Addison is an elite-level hands catcher; he snags the ball out of the air and handles the fastball on short and intermediate throws with ease, which goes hand in hand with his ability to track the football on deep routes. Addison will likely be limited to the slot at the NFL level due to his lean frame and short stature. He has the three-level route running ability to be an elite-level go-to WR at the next level. 4). Quentin Johnston TCU JR 6-4 212 Current Grade: High-End Starter (High Upside Potential) Ceiling Grade: High-End Starter (Instant Impact Potential) In 2021, Johnston led the Horned Frogs in both yards, receptions, yards per reception, and TD catches. He would go on to earn first-team all-Big 12 honors. Johnston has a knack for the big play. As a true freshman on 2020, Johnston averaged 22.1 yards per catch, the highest ever by a true freshman Big 12 WR. Vs. the Sooners in 2021, Johnston posted a career-best 185 yards on seven receptions and three TD's. Johnston's growth in 2021 was tremendous, leaving many to believe that the sky is the limit for Johnston moving forward. At 6-4 212lbs, Johnston is a unique prospect compared to the other top WR's we have evaluated. Johnston is a lengthy player who has natural outside X WR ability. Johnston combines his length with speed and quick twitch ability that he uses to stack defenders over the top for explosive gains. He is not just a deep field threat; he can attack a defense at all three levels where he defeats coverage with his elite-level short area quickness. He possesses a smooth crossover ability at the line, allowing him to get a free release vs. press coverage, but he does not always win vs. press. He tends to start his routes upright; he will need to learn how to skinny his frame at the snap if he is going to be elite at the NFL level. 5). Zay Flowers Boston College 5-10 172 Current Grade: High-End Starter (High Upside Potential) Ceiling Grade: High-End Starter (Instant Impact Potential) Zay Flowers is another of the many smallish but quick slot or Z (off the ball) WR's we have seen in the last few NFL drafts. In 2020, Flowers was an All-ACC First Team selection. In 2021, Flowers amassed 44 catches and 746 yards, with 5 TD's. Flowers did not shine the same way he did in 2020 as he dealt with injuries at the QB position. With Phil Jurkovec projected to be back under center, Flowers could be in for a big year. Flowers is a versatile player with experience playing inside (slot), outside (X), or off the ball at the Z. At 5-10 175lbs, he projects as a slot at the next level. On tape, Flowers wins his battles with an elite ability to change direction. He is dangerous in space, where he forces defenders into bad angles. He can stop on a dime and get from 0 to 60 in a hurry leaving defenders grasping for air or stuck in quicksand trying to reel him in (Ankles beware). Flowers has quick feet and a quick release off the line. His route running ability is high level, and when you add in his elite agility, he has no issue getting separation. He can sell his routes at a high level, using his entire body to sell the defender one way before snapping his route in the other direction. His size will be a factor at the next level.

2026 NFL Draft: Early Team Needs for All 32 Teams The 2025 NFL season is entering its final stretch, and as we move into the closing months and toward the playoffs, it’s time to take a full inventory of all 32 franchises. With projected 2026 free agents coming into focus and roster weaknesses becoming clearer each week, this early evaluation outlines every team’s biggest needs heading into the 2026 NFL Draft. This analysis highlights each club’s top positional priorities, a concise breakdown of why those needs exist, and the key pending free agents who will shape the offseason. 2026 NFL Draft: League-Wide Team Needs Summary Across the league, edge rusher and cornerback stand out as the most common early 2026 NFL Draft needs, each appearing on 19 team lists (11.9%). Wide receiver ranks just behind, with 18 teams (11.3%) identifying the need for more explosive perimeter talent or a reliable complement to their established WR1. Quarterback appears on six team lists, a smaller share overall, but one with outsized influence on draft strategy. Even limited QB demand typically dictates early first-round movement, and several franchises are poised to re-enter the market for long-term stability at the position. Jump To NFL Team: ARI, ATL, BAL, BUF, CAR, CHI, CIN, CLE, DAL, DEN, DET, GB, HOU, IND, JAX, KC, LV, LAC, LAR, MIA, MIN, NE, NO, NYG, NYJ, PHI, PIT, SF, SEA, TB, TEN, WSH Arizona Cardinals Top Needs: OT, WR, RB, QB, IOL Summary: Arizona enters the offseason with major uncertainty on the right side of its offensive line. Both Jonah Williams and Will Hernandez are set to hit free agency, and Williams’ season-ending shoulder surgery only adds to the instability at right tackle. Jalen Thompson’s expiring contract creates another key void at safety. With no long-term answer behind Marvin Harrison Jr. and a backfield still lacking durable depth, the Cardinals’ early 2026 priorities revolve around bolstering protection for Kyler Murray and shoring up the defensive back end. Atlanta Falcons Top Needs: TE, DT, QB, WR, CB Summary: Atlanta must strengthen the interior of its defensive line after ranking near the bottom of the league against the run, with major inconsistencies showing up on early downs. Kyle Pitts Sr. is entering the final year of his rookie deal without long-term clarity, elevating tight end to a premium need. Kirk Cousins’ future remains uncertain beyond this season, keeping quarterback firmly in play. With limited perimeter weapons behind Drake London and a secondary that could use another reliable boundary option, Atlanta’s roster still requires multiple upgrades. Baltimore Ravens Top Needs: Edge, TE, IOL, DL, CB Summary: Baltimore faces significant turnover across the secondary and edge positions, with Alohi Gilman, Ar’Darius Washington, Kyle Van Noy, and David Ojabo all headed toward free agency. The interior offensive line has struggled, placing continued pressure on Lamar Jackson and limiting offensive consistency. Tyler Linderbaum is a priority extension, and losing him would create another major need at center. Cornerback depth and a more consistent perimeter receiver remain long-term roster concerns as the Ravens look to reinforce a veteran core. Buffalo Bills Top Needs: LB, Edge, CB, IOL, Safety Summary: Buffalo enters the offseason with both Joey Bosa and AJ Epenesa on expiring deals, creating immediate pressure to replenish the edge room. The ongoing search for a true X receiver continues, as the offense still lacks a reliable, high-end perimeter threat for Josh Allen. Interior OL stability is also at risk with both Connor McGovern and David Edwards approaching free agency. With secondary depth thinning and limited backfield explosiveness behind James Cook, the Bills’ roster demands multiple upgrades across premium positions. Carolina Panthers Top Needs: IOL, WR, TE, DT, Edge Summary: Carolina faces a full evaluation of its interior offensive line with Cade Mays, Austin Corbett, and Brady Christensen all in contract years. Behind Tetairoa McMillan, the receiver room still lacks dependable production, with Xavier Legette falling short of first-round expectations. Rico Dowdle’s breakout season creates a contract challenge for a team already financially committed to Chuba Hubbard. Defensively, the Panthers need more consistency both inside and off the edge to complement their developing young core. Chicago Bears Top Needs: Safety, Edge, OT, DL, CB Summary: Chicago could lose its entire safety group—Jaquan Brisker, Kevin Byard III, and Jonathan Owens—all entering free agency. The defensive interior is aging, with Grady Jarrett nearing 33, while Andrew Billings and Chris Williams are also on expiring contracts. Addressing long-term OT stability remains a priority, and the offense still lacks a proven boundary playmaker opposite Rome Odunze. Re-signing or replacing Byard will be one of the most important decisions of the Bears’ offseason. Cincinnati Bengals Top Needs: IOL, Edge, OT, CB, WR Summary: Cincinnati once again enters the offseason needing major help along the offensive line, ranking 29th in pass-block win rate and struggling to keep the pocket stable. On defense, the pass rush could undergo a complete reset with Trey Hendrickson, Joseph Ossai, and Cam Sample all entering free agency. Hendrickson’s injury and uncertain availability further complicate the decision to retain him. With the defense sitting at the bottom of the league and the offensive line still an issue, the Bengals face foundational decisions at premium positions. Cleveland Browns Top Needs: QB, OL, WR, DT, RB Summary: Cleveland’s early 2026 priorities are centered on stabilizing the quarterback position and rebuilding an offensive line that could lose multiple starters. Dillon Gabriel’s struggles place added urgency on finding a long-term answer under center. Meanwhile, Joel Bitonio, Ethan Pocic, Wyatt Teller, and Jack Conklin, all approaching free agency, leave the Browns at risk of a full-scale offensive line overhaul. With limited continuity and a young quarterback still developing, Cleveland enters the offseason at an inflection point. Dallas Cowboys Top Needs: Edge, Safety, CB, IOL, WR Summary: Dallas faces major turnover on the edge with Dante Fowler Jr., Jadeveon Clowney, and Sam Williams all headed for free agency, leaving the pass rush thin and inconsistent. Safety has been an issue throughout the season, and Donovan Wilson’s expiring contract only increases the urgency to upgrade the back end. Offensively, George Pickens’ breakout performance complicates long-term planning as the Cowboys weigh another high-value contract alongside CeeDee Lamb’s. With questions across multiple defensive positions, the roster needs a recalibration entering 2026. Denver Broncos Top Needs: LB, TE, CB, OT, WR Summary: Denver enters the offseason with linebacker as a clear priority, with both Alex Singleton and Justin Strnad approaching free agency and Singleton nearing age 33. Tight end also becomes a focus, as Evan Engram, Adam Trautman, and Nate Adkins all approach expiring contracts in 2026. With several other starters headed for unrestricted free agency and limited cap flexibility, the Broncos face a challenging balancing act as they attempt to maintain their defensive identity and support the continued development of their offense. Detroit Lions Top Needs: Edge, DT, CB, WR, LB Summary: Detroit urgently needs reinforcements along the defensive front after ranking last in pass-rush win rate. Aidan Hutchinson continues to anchor the unit, but the lack of consistent pressure elsewhere has been a season-long issue. The interior defensive line is also set for turnover with DJ Reader, Roy Lopez, and Levi Onwuzurike all entering free agency. Adding both a disruptive interior presence and a long-term edge partner remains critical to elevating Detroit’s defense. Green Bay Packers Top Needs: LB, CB, WR, OT, IDL Summary: Green Bay’s top priorities land at linebacker and cornerback after declining Quay Walker’s fifth-year option and seeing inconsistent play from Nate Hobbs in his first season with the team. The defense needs more stability at the second level and a reliable boundary corner to match Joe Barry’s system. With the offense growing around Jordan Love, the Packers still lack a complete perimeter threat group and must address depth concerns across multiple position groups. Houston Texans Top Needs: DT, IOL, OT, RB, CB Summary: Houston faces significant interior defensive line turnover with Sheldon Rankins, Tim Settle Jr., and Folorunso Fatukasi approaching free agency. The offensive line remains a major concern after ranking 28th in pass-block win rate and last in run-block win rate, highlighting the need for improved protection and interior strength. Nick Chubb’s unclear long-term future adds another layer of uncertainty to the backfield. Overall, trench play on both sides of the ball will define the Texans’ 2026 draft approach. Indianapolis Colts Top Needs: Edge, RT, CB, WR, DT Summary: Indianapolis enters the offseason needing reinforcements on the edge, ranking 29th in pass-rush win rate with Samson Ebukam, Kwity Paye, and Tyquan Lewis all nearing free agency. Right tackle also becomes a priority with Braden Smith set to hit the market at age 30. The Colts signaled confidence in their current quarterback plan after trading two first-round picks for Sauce Gardner, but the roster still requires upgrades in the trenches to support a playoff-caliber core. Jacksonville Jaguars Top Needs: CB, WR, RB, DT, Edge Summary: Jacksonville faces major roster decisions at both cornerback and wide receiver, with Montaric Brown and Greg Newsome II entering free agency and nearly the entire WR room—outside Brian Thomas Jr.—set to expire. The team must also determine Travis Hunter’s long-term role as a two-way player. Travis Etienne Jr.’s fifth-year option adds further uncertainty to the backfield. With key perimeter roles in flux, the Jaguars’ offseason will revolve around restocking coverage talent and securing weapons for Trevor Lawrence. Kansas City Chiefs Top Needs: TE, RB, OT, WR, CB Summary: Kansas City’s early needs center on tight end and running back as Travis Kelce approaches potential retirement and Noah Gray struggles to claim a larger role. The backfield remains unsettled with Isiah Pacheco battling durability issues and both Kareem Hunt and Elijah Mitchell on expiring deals. The defense could also lose starting corner Jaylen Watson as the team prioritizes a future extension for Trent McDuffie. For the first time in years, the Chiefs must address multiple offensive skill positions to stabilize long-term planning. Las Vegas Raiders Top Needs: QB, WR, CB, OT, DT Summary: The Raiders enter the offseason with clear needs at quarterback and wide receiver as Geno Smith’s play declines at age 35 and the young receiving corps has yet to meet expectations. Rookies Jack Bech and Dont’e Thornton Jr. have shown flashes but not enough to stabilize the position long term. With no clear direction under center and limited proven production at receiver, Las Vegas is positioned to aggressively pursue offensive playmakers as they reshape the roster. Los Angeles Chargers Top Needs: IOL, IDL, CB, WR, LB Summary: The Chargers must rebuild the interior of both lines, even with Rashawn Slater and Joe Alt returning from injury. The offensive line ranks near the bottom of the league in pass-block win rate, and multiple interior defenders — including Teair Tart and Da’Shawn Hand — are set to hit free agency. The long-term future of Khalil Mack also adds uncertainty to the front seven. Shoring up trench play on both sides of the ball will be essential as Los Angeles looks to support a healthy roster in 2026. Los Angeles Rams Top Needs: OT, Safety, CB, Edge, WR Summary: Safety and offensive tackle stand out as the Rams’ early priorities, with Kam Curl and Quentin Lake both approaching free agency and long-time right tackle Rob Havenstein entering the end of his career. Depth concerns persist across the secondary and tackle positions, and Los Angeles may need multiple additions to stabilize both units. With significant cap space available in 2026, this offseason offers a rare opportunity for the Rams to reinforce foundational roster spots. Miami Dolphins Top Needs: CB, G, OT, WR, DT Summary: Miami’s pass defense has struggled all season, ranking 29th in DVOA, and both starting corners — Jack Jones and Rasul Douglas — are entering the final year of their deals. Right guard remains a major issue as Cole Strange continues to grade near the bottom of the league in both run- and pass-block win rate. With multiple expiring contracts in the secondary and ongoing inconsistency up front, the Dolphins may undergo substantial restructuring on the defensive perimeter and interior offensive line. Minnesota Vikings Top Needs: Safety, Slot WR, CB, IOL, RB Summary: Safety and slot receiver headline Minnesota’s early needs as Harrison Smith approaches potential retirement and both Jalen Nailor and Adam Thielen enter free agency. The Vikings lack a clear long-term slot option to complement Justin Jefferson and Jordan Addison. Questions remain across the secondary and interior offensive line as Minnesota prepares for an offseason that may usher in significant transition on both sides of the ball. New England Patriots Top Needs: Edge, Safety, CB, WR, OT Summary: New England needs reinforcements on the edge and at safety after ranking 23rd in pass-rush win rate and leaning heavily on K’Lavon Chaisson, who is playing on a one-year deal. Depth at safety is also in question, especially for the three-safety packages the Patriots frequently deploy. With major contract extensions looming for cornerstone players in the coming seasons, the Patriots must balance short-term defensive needs with long-term cap planning. New Orleans Saints Top Needs: Edge, WR, CB, DT, OT Summary: New Orleans needs immediate help off the edge after ranking 27th in pass-rush win rate and with Cameron Jordan nearing retirement. Offensively, Chris Olave lacks a true running mate for 2026 after the departures of Rashid Shaheed and Brandin Cooks, and the team can’t rely solely on Devaughn Vele’s development. With recent trends showing the Saints’ reluctance to invest heavily in defensive backs, cornerback depth and long-term roster stability remain ongoing concerns as the secondary undergoes another transition. New York Giants Top Needs: LB, G, OT, WR, CB Summary: Linebacker and guard stand out as early needs for the Giants as both Micah McFadden and Demetrius Flannigan-Fowles enter free agency, leaving the middle of the defense thin. Greg Van Roten’s expiring contract at age 36 adds urgency to rebuild the interior offensive line. While Wan’Dale Robinson has emerged as a productive slot option, his long-term valuation becomes more complicated with Malik Nabers’ eventual extension approaching. New York faces another offseason of reshaping foundational pieces on both sides of the ball. New York Jets Top Needs: QB, IOL, RB, WR, LB Summary: Quarterback and interior offensive line headline the Jets’ offseason priorities as Justin Fields’ struggles continue and Tyrod Taylor approaches free agency at age 37. The interior OL remains one of the league’s weakest units, ranking 30th in pass-block win rate with John Simpson and Alijah Vera-Tucker both on expiring deals. Breece Hall’s upcoming contract negotiations will further shape roster flexibility. With instability at QB and inconsistent trench play, the Jets enter 2026 needing major upgrades across the offense. Philadelphia Eagles Top Needs: TE, CB, WR, Edge, LB Summary: Tight end and cornerback headline Philadelphia’s early needs as Dallas Goedert approaches the final year of his contract and the Eagles continue searching for stability at the No. 2 outside corner spot. Depth at tight end will thin quickly with Grant Calcaterra and Kylen Granson entering free agency. With Jaelan Phillips emerging as a key defensive addition and major extensions looming elsewhere, the Eagles must balance long-term cap planning with immediate roster upgrades. Pittsburgh Steelers Top Needs: QB, WR, CB, OT, IOL Summary: Quarterback and wide receiver shape the Steelers’ early priorities as Aaron Rodgers approaches a possible retirement and the team evaluates its long-term successor plans. The lack of consistent production behind DK Metcalf remains a concern, with Calvin Austin III headed for free agency. Injuries and uncertainty under center have slowed Pittsburgh’s offensive growth, making stability at QB and perimeter playmaking central to their 2026 outlook. San Francisco 49ers Top Needs: WR, DT, CB, RB, LB Summary: Wide receiver and defensive tackle are major needs for San Francisco as Brandon Aiyuk’s durability questions persist and both Kendrick Bourne and Jauan Jennings near free agency. The interior defensive front is also set for turnover with multiple rotational linemen on expiring deals and the run defense ranking outside the top 20. With key playmakers in flux, the 49ers must reinforce depth at premium positions to sustain their competitive window. Seattle Seahawks Top Needs: Edge, DB, C, LB, WR Summary: Seattle faces a complete reset across the secondary, with nearly every defensive back outside Devon Witherspoon and Nick Emmanwori entering free agency. The need for a stabilizing presence at cornerback is clear. Center remains another long-standing issue, as Jalen Sundell has struggled in both pass- and run-block win rate. With several young starters potentially not in the long-term plan, the Seahawks enter 2026 needing foundational upgrades in coverage and interior blocking. Tampa Bay Buccaneers Top Needs: Edge, CB, WR, TE, DL Summary: Cornerback and edge rusher stand out as Tampa Bay’s early needs, with Jamel Dean approaching free agency at age 30 and the team relying on a one-year deal from Haason Reddick. Mike Evans’ uncertain future following a major injury adds pressure to maintain offensive continuity. Tampa Bay must prepare for significant roster turnover while continuing to build around a veteran core that remains competitive. Tennessee Titans Top Needs: WR, OT, CB, LB, Edge Summary: Tennessee’s early 2026 priorities center on wide receiver and cornerback as the roster continues its rebuild. While Elic Ayomanor and Chimere Dike offer promise, the Titans still lack a true WR1-caliber playmaker—especially with Calvin Ridley grading near the bottom of ESPN’s receiver metrics. Cornerback is also an urgent need, even before factoring in the expiring contracts of Jalyn Armour-Davis and Darrell Baker Jr. With limited star power on the perimeter and a young quarterback developing, Tennessee must inject high-end talent on both sides of the ball. Washington Commanders Top Needs: Edge, LB, WR, CB, DT Summary: Linebacker and edge rusher headline Washington’s early needs, with Bobby Wagner approaching age 36 and several rotational pass rushers—including Von Miller and Deatrich Wise Jr.—set to hit free agency in 2026. Depth at both positions is thin, and the defense lacks long-term foundational pieces at the second level. Offensively, Deebo Samuel has been the team’s most reliable weapon amid widespread injuries, but his contract situation adds another layer of uncertainty. Washington enters the offseason needing an infusion of defensive speed and edge production to stabilize a roster undergoing transition.

2024 NFL Rookie QB Updates: Williams, Daniels, Maye, Penix Jr., McCarthy, and Nix Currently, we are in the midst of NFL training camp and the beginning of the NFL preseason. I would like to spotlight the latest updates circulating within the NFL regarding the top rookie quarterbacks from the 2024 NFL Draft. Caleb Williams has demonstrated his potential during the Chicago Bears' training camp, though his progress has been hindered by an injury-plagued offensive line. Jayden Daniels has made significant strides, showing readiness and poise in his first training camp with the Commanders, while sharing reps with veteran Marcus Mariota. Drake Maye has experienced ups and downs in camp, struggling initially with NFL speed but showing resilience and improvement over time under a patient coaching staff. Michael Penix Jr. has impressed in training camp, though he is expected to develop behind veteran Kirk Cousins, with a realistic starting timeline set for 2026. J.J. McCarthy has displayed potential and strong arm talent in Vikings' training camp, earning first-team reps and competing for the starting role, though he still needs to improve his decision-making and timing. Bo Nix has quickly become a key focus in Broncos' camp, showing impressive growth and potential, with head coach Sean Payton emphasizing a patient approach to his development. Caleb Williams, Chicago Bears Draft Round: 1, Pick: 1 Summary Camp Analysis: Caleb Williams has shown flashes of his potential in his first NFL training camp with the Chicago Bears, despite facing significant challenges due to a makeshift offensive line. The Bears have invested heavily in surrounding Williams with a strong supporting cast, including Pro Bowl wide receiver Keenan Allen, rookie receiver Rome Odunze, and running back D’Andre Swift. However, injuries to key offensive linemen have raised concerns about Williams' protection and development. Head coach Matt Eberflus has been cautious, indicating that Williams' playtime in the preseason will depend on the health of his offensive line. Williams' progress is critical for the Bears, who are looking to him to be their franchise quarterback from Day 1. Positives: Strong Start: Williams has acclimated quickly to the NFL, showing promise in practice sessions, especially during 7-on-7 drills where he connected well with top receivers like Keenan Allen and DJ Moore (Albert Breer, Sports Illustrated). Chemistry with Receivers: Williams has developed good chemistry with his receivers, notably DJ Moore, highlighted by a 35-yard touchdown connection during practice (Alyssa Barbieri, Bears Wire). Tailored Development: The Bears have tailored their training and development plan to Williams' learning style, helping him absorb NFL terminology and concepts effectively (Albert Breer, Sports Illustrated). Negatives: Offensive Line Issues: Williams has struggled under pressure due to a makeshift offensive line that has been missing several starters, impacting his performance during 11-on-11 drills (Mark Potash, Chicago Sun-Times). Turnovers and Mistakes: In team drills, Williams has experienced turnovers and mistakes, such as fumbled snaps and interceptions, particularly when the offensive line fails to provide adequate protection (Alyssa Barbieri, Bears Wire). Inconsistent Protection: The health and depth of the offensive line remain a concern, which could jeopardize Williams' playtime in the preseason and potentially his readiness for Week 1 (Josh Schrock, NBC Sports). Jayden Daniels, Washington Commanders Draft Round: 1, Pick: 2 Summary Camp Analysis: Jayden Daniels has been making significant strides in his first NFL training camp with the Washington Commanders. Observers have noted his readiness and poise, both key attributes that have earned him opportunities to share starting reps with veteran Marcus Mariota. Daniels' dual-threat capability and experience from college have translated well, although he is still adjusting to the faster pace and complexity of the NFL. Head coach Dan Quinn has been supportive, emphasizing a gradual process for getting Daniels game-ready. The Commanders are keen to see how Daniels performs in live-action during the preseason, which will be crucial for determining his readiness to start in the regular season. Positives: First Preseason Game: Daniels is set to play in the Commanders' preseason opener against the New York Jets, marking his first NFL action and a chance to showcase his abilities (Michael Baca, NFL.com). Poise and Readiness: Daniels has shown considerable poise in camp, impressing coaches and teammates with his maturity and preparation (Ivan Lambert, Commanders Wire). Coach's Confidence: Head coach Dan Quinn has praised Daniels' progress, highlighting his strong start and the potential to compete for the starting role (Scott Jennings, Hogs Haven). Negatives: Adapting to NFL Speed: Daniels is still adjusting to the faster pace of the NFL, which has been a challenge in terms of executing plays quickly and effectively (Michael Baca, NFL.com). Decision-Making: His decision-making under pressure is an area that needs improvement, as he continues to learn when to take risks and when to protect himself (Scott Jennings, Hogs Haven). Inexperience: Despite his readiness, Daniels is still inexperienced at the NFL level, and there are concerns about how he will handle the complexities of professional defenses in live-game situations (Ivan Lambert, Commanders Wire). Drake Maye, New England Patriots Draft Round: 1, Pick: 3 Summary Camp Analysis: Drake Maye's experience at the New England Patriots' training camp has been a mix of highs and lows. Initially, he struggled to adjust to NFL speed, and his footwork issues were evident. Despite these early challenges, Maye has shown resilience and improvement, particularly in building confidence to make aggressive downfield throws. The coaching staff, led by head coach Jerod Mayo, remains patient, understanding that Maye's development will take time. For this reason, the Patriots brought in veteran Jacoby Brissett in the offseason to give them time to develop their young future franchise QB. Positives: Improvement Over Time: After a shaky start, Maye has shown steady improvement (Evan Lazar, Patriots.com). Downfield Aggressiveness: Maye has started to build confidence in making downfield throws, an area where he excelled in college (Evan Lazar, Patriots.com). Coach's Patience: The Patriots' coaching staff, led by head coach Jerod Mayo, is patient with Maye's development, understanding the learning curve for a rookie quarterback (Chad Finn, Boston Globe). Negatives: Adjusting to NFL Speed: Maye has struggled with the speed of the NFL game, looking overwhelmed during the first two days in pads (Evan Lazar, Patriots.com). Footwork Issues: His footwork needs improvement, as noted by both coaches and observers, impacting his overall play execution (Chad Finn, Boston Globe). Inconsistent Aggressiveness: Despite progress, Maye still hesitates to show the same downfield aggressiveness seen in his college film, affecting his overall performance (Evan Lazar, Patriots.com). Michael Penix Jr., Atlanta Falcons Draft Round: 1, Pick: 8 Summary Camp Analysis: Michael Penix Jr. has made a strong impression in his first NFL training camp with the Atlanta Falcons. Despite being drafted as the potential future of the franchise, Penix is currently learning behind veteran quarterback Kirk Cousins. The Falcons have invested heavily in Cousins with a four-year, $180 million deal, making it clear that Penix's time as the starter will likely not come immediately. Observers have noted Penix's solid camp performance and potential, but the realistic timeline for him to take over as the starter appears to be around 2026, coinciding with a potential out in Cousins' contract without a significant cap hit. Positives: Strong Camp Performance: Penix has been solid during training camp, making impressive throws and demonstrating his potential as a future starter (Tim Weaver, Falcons Wire). High Ceiling: Analysts highlight Penix's higher ceiling compared to Cousins, with his ability to make dynamic plays and his strong arm standing out (Nick Halden, FanSided). Development Plan: The Falcons are committed to developing Penix, with head coach Raheem Morris ensuring he gets ample reps in practice, splitting second-team duties with Taylor Heinicke (Tim Weaver, Falcons Wire). Negatives: Timeline for Starting: Realistically, Penix is not expected to take over the starting role until at least 2026, as the Falcons aim to avoid a massive dead cap hit and allow him to develop fully (Nick Halden, FanSided). NFL Speed: While Penix has shown promise, he is still adjusting to the NFL level and is not guaranteed the second-team quarterback spot yet, competing with Heinicke for that role (Tim Weaver, Falcons Wire). Current Backup Role: Penix remains in a backup role, which could limit his immediate impact and game-time experience, crucial for his development and readiness to take over as a starter (Nick Halden, FanSided). J.J. McCarthy, Minnesota Vikings Draft Round: 1, Pick: 10 Summary Camp Analysis: J.J. McCarthy has been navigating his first NFL training camp with the Minnesota Vikings, showcasing a mix of potential and areas for growth. Camp observers have noted his strong arm and flashes of brilliance in his ability to navigate the pocket and make plays on the move. However, McCarthy is still adapting to the speed and complexity of the NFL, with his decision-making and timing needing improvement. Head coach Kevin O'Connell's emphasis on competition means McCarthy has a genuine shot at earning the starting role as early as week one of the 2024 NFL season. He is currently locked into a competition with Journeyman QB Sam Darnold, and the Vikings are in no rush to throw McCarthy to the wolves too soon. They remain content with allowing him time to develop, which was always the plan. Positives: First-Team Reps: McCarthy has started getting reps with the first-team offense, showing his potential and earning opportunities to play with top receivers like Justin Jefferson (Tyler Forness, SI.com). Arm Talent: He has displayed impressive arm talent and mobility throughout camp so far (Will Ragatz, Inside the Vikings). Coach's Support: Head coach Kevin O'Connell emphasizes competition and has not ruled out McCarthy as a potential Week 1 starter, indicating confidence in his abilities (Nick Kosko, Vikings Wire). Negatives: Getting Through Progressions: McCarthy has had some struggles in this department, but he has shown flashes in his ability to work through progressions (Tyler Forness, SI.com). Inconsistency: His performance in camp has been uneven when the defense applies pressure (Will Ragatz, Inside the Vikings). Timing Issues: He needs to improve his timing and decision-making under pressure (Will Ragatz, Inside the Vikings). Bo Nix, Denver Broncos Draft Round: 1, Pick: 12 Summary Camp Analysis: Bo Nix has quickly become a focal point in his first NFL training camp with the Denver Broncos. Under the guidance of head coach Sean Payton, who is working with a first-round rookie QB for the first time in his career, Nix has shown impressive growth and potential. Payton's approach emphasizes patience and ensuring Nix is fully prepared before making any definitive decisions about the starting role. The competition between Nix and veteran Jarrett Stidham is ongoing, but Nix's performance in practice has been promising, with notable arm talent and decision-making under pressure. Positives: Strong Arm Talent: Nix has consistently demonstrated his ability to throw downfield with precision, impressing both coaches and teammates with his arm strength and accuracy (Albert Breer, Sports Illustrated). Quick Adaptation: Despite being new to the NFL, Nix has shown a good grasp of the playbook and the ability to make smart adjustments at the line of scrimmage (Nick Kosmider, The Athletic). Coach's Confidence: Sean Payton has expressed high expectations for Nix, likening some of his traits to those of Drew Brees, particularly his pocket awareness and ability to avoid sacks (Henry Chisholm, DNVR). Negatives: Competition Pressure: Nix is still in a heated competition with Jarrett Stidham, and while he is gaining ground, the battle for the starting job remains intense (Nick Kosmider, The Athletic). Inconsistency Under Pressure: While Nix has shown flashes of brilliance, there have been instances where he struggled under defensive pressure, indicating a need for continued improvement (Scotty Payne, SB Nation). Adjustment to NFL Speed: Like many rookies, Nix is still adjusting to the speed and complexity of NFL defenses, which can lead to occasional mistakes and learning opportunities (Henry Chisholm, DNVR).

2025 NFL Mock Draft 1.0: First-Round Projections Featuring Mason Graham, Travis Hunter, and Will Johnson in a Defensive-Heavy Class A Defensive-Heavy Draft with Elite Talent The 2025 NFL Draft is shaping up to be one of the most impactful in recent memory for teams in need of elite talent on the defensive side of the football. With elite prospects like Michigan’s Mason Graham and Will Johnson, as well as Colorado's two-way star Travis Hunter, this class offers transformative talent across the board. Quarterback Class Lacks a Surefire Superstar This year’s quarterback class doesn’t carry the same high-end punch as recent years. While players like Shedeur Sanders and Cam Ward have intriguing traits, their ceilings don’t measure up to the generational talents we’ve seen in prior drafts. J.J. McCarthy, who declared early for the 2024 cycle, would have easily been QB1 in this class. Nevertheless, with several NFL teams desperate for a quarterback, we’re likely to see one or two prospects drafted higher than their grades suggest. This positional value dynamic could cause elite talents like Mason Graham, Travis Hunter, or Will Johnson to miss out on being the No. 1 overall pick—that’s simply the nature of the draft. Mock Draft 1.0 leans heavily on defense, featuring 20 defensive players, including 6 selected in the top 10. Offensively, 12 players are projected to go in the first round, making this a draft dominated by defensive talent. First Round 2025 NFL Mock Draft - Non-Playoff Teams Picks 1-18 1). Tennessee Titans – Travis Hunter | CB | Colorado Primary Team Needs: (Quarterback, Offensive Line, Defensive Playmakers) Titans Draft Capital: 1, 35, 102, 119, 140, 166, 177, 240 Pick Analysis: The Titans hold the highly coveted first overall pick, presenting a chance to draft a quarterback like Shedeur Sanders or Cam Ward. However, their roster deficiencies stretch far beyond the quarterback position. Trading down to amass additional draft capital for a full-scale rebuild could be the most strategic move. Alternatively, they could select one of the top three defensive prospects—Mason Graham, Travis Hunter, or Will Johnson—while targeting a developmental quarterback like Jalen Milroe, Carson Beck, or the NFL-ready and underrated Kyle McCord on Day 2. Adding a bridge QB such as Kirk Cousins or Sam Darnold would provide immediate stability, with Will Levis remaining a contingency plan as they look to the 2026 QB class. 2). Cleveland Browns – Mason Graham | IDL | Michigan Primary Team Needs: (Quarterback, Defensive Line, Depth) Browns Draft Capital: 2, 33, 67, 93, 103, 167, 178, 191, 203, 214, 215 Pick Analysis: Imagine the Browns' defense with a dominant force like Mason Graham anchoring the interior alongside 2023 Defensive Player of the Year Myles Garrett. Graham’s presence would alleviate double-teams on Garrett, allowing the rookie to thrive while bolstering Cleveland’s defensive front. With excellent draft capital, the Browns can still address quarterback or add depth on Day 2, making Graham the ideal choice to elevate their defense to elite status. 3). New York Giants – Will Johnson | CB | Michigan Primary Team Needs: (Quarterback, Offensive Line, Future Assets) Giants Draft Capital: 3, 34, 65, 104, 134, 153, 219, 245, 256 Pick Analysis: With the Daniel Jones era officially over, the Giants face a critical decision at quarterback. However, instead of reaching for a QB in a class with no clear elite talent, they opt for Michigan cornerback Will Johnson to address their defensive needs. Johnson’s lockdown coverage ability and elite athleticism give the Giants a cornerstone defender while they explore other options for QB—whether on Day 2 of the draft, free agency with Kirk Cousins or Sam Darnold, or even a trade for Joe Milton. 4). New England Patriots – Kelvin Banks Jr. | OT | Texas Primary Team Needs: (Offensive Line, Skill Positions, Defensive Depth) Patriots Draft Capital: 4, 38, 69, 77, 105, 143, 217, 220, 241 Pick Analysis: The Patriots prioritize protecting their investment in second-year QB Drake Maye by selecting Kelvin Banks Jr., the top offensive tackle in the 2025 class. Banks offers elite pass-blocking skills and the athleticism to thrive in New England’s scheme, solidifying a unit plagued by injuries and inconsistency. While elite prospects like edge rusher Abdul Carter and WR Tetairoa McMillan were on the board, building a stable offensive line around Maye is the foundation of the Patriots’ rebuild. This move ensures long-term success for their young quarterback. 5). Jacksonville Jaguars – Malaki Starks | S | Georgia Primary Team Needs: (Defensive Secondary, Interior Defensive Line) Jaguars Draft Capital: 5, 39, 72, 108, 142, 169, 193, 224, 246 Pick Analysis: With multiple impending free agents in the secondary, the Jaguars select Georgia’s Malaki Starks, a versatile safety capable of filling several defensive roles. Starks’ positional flexibility—logging snaps as a deep safety, nickel defender, off-ball linebacker, and even cornerback—makes him an ideal fit for Jacksonville’s evolving defensive needs. His high football IQ and ability to impact the game from anywhere on the field will elevate a unit that needs stability and playmaking in the secondary. Starks is a best-available option with the versatility to anchor the Jaguars’ defense for years to come. 6). Las Vegas Raiders – Shedeur Sanders | QB | Colorado Primary Team Needs: (Quarterback, Defensive Line, Offensive Line) Raiders Draft Capital: 6, 37, 68, 73, 107, 142, 179, 212, 216, 222 Pick Analysis: With the Antonio Pierce era officially over, the Raiders pivot to a new direction by selecting Shedeur Sanders as their quarterback of the future. While this is a speculative overdraft, Tom Brady’s role as a minority owner and vocal supporter of Sanders makes this pick logical for a franchise in need of a fresh face at QB. Sanders brings poise, accuracy, and athleticism to the table, giving the Raiders a cornerstone to build around as they address other critical needs at receiver, running back, and the trenches in later rounds. 7). New York Jets – Cam Ward | QB | Miami Primary Team Needs: (Quarterback, Trade Assets) Jets Draft Capital: 7, 42, 96, 109, 144, 158, 185, 206 Pick Analysis: With Aaron Rodgers likely out of the picture, the Jets address their quarterback uncertainty by selecting Cam Ward from Miami. Ward’s extensive experience and NFL-ready style make him a strong candidate to stabilize New York’s offense. While other options like pursuing Kirk Cousins, Sam Darnold, or trading for J.J. McCarthy or Joe Milton are in play, the Jets opt to secure their QB of the future in the first round. This pick gives them a foundation at the most critical position, while their remaining draft capital can be used to bolster other areas. 8). Carolina Panthers – Abdul Carter | EDGE | Penn State Primary Team Needs: (Edge Rusher, Defensive Line, Secondary) Panthers Draft Capital: 8, 54, 74, 110, 113, 139, 145, 162, 227 Pick Analysis: Despite the temptation to give Bryce Young a premier target like Tetairoa McMillan, the Panthers prioritize fixing one of the NFL’s worst defenses by selecting Abdul Carter. The explosive edge rusher fills a critical need, bolstering a pass rush that has struggled to complement star Derrick Brown. Carter’s dynamic ability to disrupt the backfield brings immediate impact to a defense that needs big bodies and difference-makers to contend. While adding McMillan would have helped the offense, this pick ensures the Panthers are more balanced and competitive heading into 2025. 9). New Orleans Saints – Mykel Williams | EDGE | Georgia Primary Team Needs: (Defensive Line, Offensive Line, Wide Receiver) Saints Draft Capital: 9, 40, 71, 90, 111, 128, 183, 253 Pick Analysis: With Cameron Jordan nearing the end of his illustrious career and the uncertain futures of Chase Young and Payton Turner, the Saints address their pass rush by selecting Mykel Williams from Georgia. A versatile and well-rounded defender, Williams excels against the run and as a pass rusher, bringing length and athleticism reminiscent of former Bulldog Travon Walker. While his rotational usage at Georgia limited his snap counts, his production and impact have surpassed expectations. Williams’ addition strengthens a defensive line in need of a new cornerstone to sustain success. 10). Chicago Bears – Will Campbell | OT | LSU Primary Team Needs: (Offensive Line, Defensive Line, Wide Receiver) Bears Draft Capital: 10, 39, 41, 72, 147, 197, 233, 244 Pick Analysis: After a season where Caleb Williams was sacked a team-record 68 times, the Bears take LSU’s Will Campbell to fortify their offensive line. Campbell’s athleticism, power, and positional versatility make him an ideal solution for Chicago’s depleted unit. A three-year starter at left tackle for LSU, Campbell projects effectively to guard or center if needed, offering flexibility to address multiple holes. His ability to anchor against power rushers and execute in both zone and power schemes provides immediate value. This pick ensures Chicago protects their franchise quarterback while adding a foundational piece for long-term success. 11). San Francisco 49ers – Nic Scourton | EDGE | Texas A&M Primary Team Needs: (Defensive Tackle, Pass Rushers, Offensive Line) 49ers Draft Capital: 11, 43, 75, 100, 112, 137, 186, 226, 230, 249, 254 Pick Analysis: After being outmatched in the trenches throughout the season, the 49ers bolster their defensive line by selecting Nic Scourton, a versatile and powerful edge rusher from Texas A&M. Scourton’s size (6’4/285), length, and strength make him an ideal complement to Nick Bosa, with the flexibility to rotate inside on passing downs. His relentless motor, quick hands, and ability to collapse pockets add a dynamic presence to San Francisco’s defensive front. This pick helps restore the 49ers’ physical identity while addressing a critical need for a reliable pass-rushing partner for Bosa. 12). Dallas Cowboys – Ashton Jeanty | RB | Boise State Primary Team Needs: (Defensive Line, Offensive Line, Running Back) Cowboys Draft Capital: 12, 44, 76, 148, 168, 170, 171, 187, 209, 247 Pick Analysis: The Cowboys hit a home run by selecting Ashton Jeanty, the dynamic running back from Boise State. Jeanty’s combination of agility, vision, and contact balance makes him a perfect fit for Dallas’ zone-blocking schemes, particularly outside zone and pin/pull concepts. His record-setting 2,601 rushing yards in 2024, coupled with his exceptional receiving ability, provide Dallas with a dual-threat offensive weapon. With Jeanty in the backfield, the Cowboys add a game-changing playmaker who elevates their offensive ceiling and ensures balance for years to come. 13). Miami Dolphins – Tetairoa McMillan | WR | Arizona Primary Team Needs: (Offensive Line, Defensive Line, Linebacker) Dolphins Draft Capital: 13, 48, 98, 99, 115, 149, 156, 224, 231, 251 Pick Analysis: With Tyreek Hill likely on the move, the Dolphins draft his long-term replacement in Tetairoa McMillan, a true X receiver from Arizona. At 6’5” and 210 pounds, McMillan offers an elite catch radius, exceptional body control, and the versatility to align across formations. While his straight-line speed isn’t elite, his fluidity and smooth acceleration make him a matchup nightmare. Pairing McMillan with Jalen Waddle and Jonnu Smith provides franchise QB Tua Tagovailoa a dynamic, complementary receiving corps, ensuring Miami's offense remains among the league’s most explosive. 14). Indianapolis Colts – Shavon Revel Jr. | CB | East Carolina Primary Team Needs: (Defensive Line, Linebacker, Offensive Line) Colts Draft Capital: 14, 45, 80, 116, 150, 188, 232 Pick Analysis: The Colts address their struggling secondary by selecting East Carolina’s Shavon Revel Jr., a lengthy and physical cornerback who excels in press coverage. Despite an ACL tear in September 2024, Revel’s elite movement skills, competitiveness, and disruptive abilities in both coverage and run support make him a high-upside prospect. His physicality and length are perfect for divisional matchups against talented receivers like the Jaguars' Brian Thomas Jr. Adding Revel provides the Colts with a transformative talent to pair with their youthful defensive core while addressing a glaring weakness in pass defense. 15). Atlanta Falcons – James Pearce | EDGE | Tennessee Primary Team Needs: (Pass Rushers, Defensive Line, Secondary) Falcons Draft Capital: 15, 46, 117, 238 Pick Analysis: The Falcons address their longstanding pass-rush deficiencies by selecting James Pearce, a dynamic edge rusher from Tennessee. Pearce’s quick first step, fluid athleticism, and versatility to align in multiple positions make him an ideal fit for Atlanta’s defense. With impending free agency for key edge rushers like Matthew Judon and Lorenzo Carter, Pearce offers immediate impact and the potential to end Atlanta’s drought of double-digit sack seasons. His speed and inside counter moves provide the Falcons with a much-needed disruptive presence on the edge, revitalizing their pass rush. 16). Arizona Cardinals – Kenneth Grant | IDL | Michigan Primary Team Needs: (Outside Linebacker, Cornerback, Interior Offensive Line) Cardinals Draft Capital: 16, 47, 78, 114, 151 Pick Analysis: The Cardinals reinforce their defensive front with Kenneth Grant, a massive 6’6”, 340-pound interior lineman from Michigan. Grant’s ability to dominate the B gap, disrupt the pocket, and anchor against the run makes him a perfect addition to a defensive line facing significant turnover. His versatility to excel as a 3-technique in a 4-3 or as a defensive end in a 3-4 scheme ensures immediate impact in any alignment. With key contributors like Roy Lopez and L.J. Collier entering free agency, Grant provides Arizona with a cornerstone player to rebuild their defensive identity. 17). Cincinnati Bengals – Colston Loveland | TE | Michigan Primary Team Needs: (Wide Receiver, Offensive Line, Defensive Back) Bengals Draft Capital: 17, 49, 81, 118, 152, 192 Pick Analysis: The Bengals address a pressing need on offense by selecting Colston Loveland, a versatile and athletic tight end from Michigan. Loveland’s combination of size, speed, and physicality creates mismatch opportunities, making him an ideal fit within this Bengals offense. With uncertainty surrounding Tee Higgins and Mike Gesicki’s futures, Loveland gives Cincinnati a reliable red-zone target and a field-stretching option in both traditional and spread formations. Paired with Ja’Marr Chase, Loveland has the potential to transform the Bengals’ offense into an unstoppable force, evoking comparisons to the Kelce-Hill connection in Kansas City. 18). Seattle Seahawks – Shemar Stewart | EDGE | Texas A&M Primary Team Needs: (Offensive Line, Defensive Line, Secondary) Seahawks Draft Capital: 18, 50, 82, 136, 173, 184, 210, 234 Pick Analysis: Despite significant offensive line needs, the Seahawks opt for Texas A&M’s Shemar Stewart, a blue-chip edge defender with rare size (6’6", 290 lbs), athleticism, and power. Stewart’s ability to reset the line of scrimmage and disrupt plays in the backfield makes him an ideal fit for Seattle’s aggressive defensive identity. While his college production doesn’t jump off the page, his impact as a run-stuffer and his potential as a pass-rusher are undeniable. With Boye Mafe stepping forward this season, Stewart provides another cornerstone for a defensive front looking to dominate in the trenches. First Round 2025 NFL Mock Draft - Playoff Teams Picks 19-32 19). Houston Texans – Tyleik Williams | IDL | Ohio State Primary Team Needs: (Wide Receiver, Offensive Line, Secondary) Texans Draft Capital: 19, 55, 86, 122, 164, 239 Pick Analysis: The Texans strengthen their defensive front with Tyleik Williams, a powerful interior lineman from Ohio State. Williams’ ability to anchor in a two-gap system and disrupt run plays makes him an ideal fit for a Houston defense in need of stability. While his pass-rush skill set is limited, his explosiveness and heavy hands ensure he can collapse pockets and control the line of scrimmage. Pairing Williams with Houston’s young core helps address a critical need as the Texans aim to retool their defense while supporting CJ Stroud’s progression in year three. 20). Denver Broncos – Tyler Warren | TE | Penn State Primary Team Needs: (Tight End, Wide Receiver, Defensive Line, Secondary) Broncos Draft Capital: 20, 51, 87, 123, 190, 195, 205 Pick Analysis: The Broncos address a key offensive need with Tyler Warren, a versatile and dynamic tight end from Penn State. At 6’6” and 260 pounds, Warren offers a rare blend of size, athleticism, and blocking ability, making him a perfect fit for Denver’s offense. With 98 catches and just three drops in 2024, he’s a reliable receiving target, particularly in red-zone situations, and his ability to line up in multiple positions adds to his value. 21). Pittsburgh Steelers – Luther Burden III | WR | Missouri Primary Team Needs: (Cornerback, Running Back, Wide Receiver, Offensive Line) Steelers Draft Capital: 21, 53, 84, 120, 154, 223, 229, 242 Pick Analysis: The Steelers select Luther Burden III, a dynamic slot receiver who complements George Pickens perfectly. Burden specializes in turning short passes into big gains with his exceptional yards-after-catch ability. His physicality and thick lower body allow him to break tackles in space, adding much-needed versatility to Pittsburgh’s receiver room. Paired with Pickens’ deep-threat prowess, Burden provides balance to the Steelers’ offense by excelling in short and intermediate routes. 22). Tampa Bay Buccaneers – Jalon Walker | LB | Georgia Primary Team Needs: (Wide Receiver, Offensive Line, Defensive Line) Buccaneers Draft Capital: 22, 52, 83, 124, 157, 236 Pick Analysis: The Buccaneers address their need for youth and versatility at linebacker by selecting Jalon Walker, the reigning Butkus Award winner from Georgia. Walker is a downhill disruptor who excels as a run defender, blitzer, and edge rusher, making him an ideal fit for Todd Bowles’ hybrid defensive scheme. With Lavonte David, K.J. Britt, and Joe Tryon-Shoyinka potentially departing in free agency, Walker brings much-needed explosiveness and flexibility to Tampa Bay’s front seven. His ability to exploit mismatches and contribute in multiple roles makes him a slam-dunk pick for a defense in transition. 23). Los Angeles Rams – Benjamin Morrison | CB | Notre Dame Primary Team Needs: (Offensive Line, Cornerback, Wide Receiver, Linebacker) Rams Draft Capital: 23, 85, 101, 121, 189, 194, 198 Pick Analysis: The Rams bolster their secondary by selecting Benjamin Morrison, a polished and physical cornerback from Notre Dame. Despite a season-ending injury, Morrison’s ability to lock down receivers in man and press coverage makes him an excellent fit for Los Angeles’ defensive scheme. Over his college career, Morrison demonstrated elite ball skills with nine interceptions and allowed a catch rate of just 44% in 2024. His versatility to excel in both man and zone alignments provides the Rams with a reliable presence in the secondary as they continue to rebuild their roster post-Aaron Donald. 24). Los Angeles Chargers – Xavier Watts | S | Notre Dame Primary Team Needs: (Edge, Wide Receiver, Offensive Line, Safety) Chargers Draft Capital: 24, 57, 89, 126, 160, 180, 200, 208, 213, 218, 252 Pick Analysis: The Chargers address their need for secondary help by selecting Xavier Watts, an intelligent and versatile safety from Notre Dame. Watts has extensive experience playing both free safety and in the box, showcasing strong instincts and play recognition. At 6’0” and 205 pounds, Watts is a reliable defender against both the pass and run, making him a valuable addition to a defense looking to solidify itself against elite passing attacks. His maturity and positional flexibility align perfectly with the Chargers’ defensive goals heading into 2025. 25). Green Bay Packers – Jahdae Barron | DB | Texas Primary Team Needs: (Defensive Line, Interior Offensive Line, Secondary, Wide Receiver) Packers Draft Capital: 25, 56, 88, 125, 159, 199, 237, 250 Pick Analysis: The Packers address their secondary by selecting Jahdae Barron, the versatile and dynamic Jim Thorpe Award-winning defensive back from Texas. Barron’s ability to play outside, in the nickel, or at safety makes him an invaluable chess piece for Green Bay’s defense. His agility, instincts, and playmaking ability in zone coverage complement his physicality in run support. With Eric Stokes and Keisean Nixon’s futures uncertain, Barron provides Green Bay with a reliable, multi-positional defender who can seamlessly adapt to their defensive needs. 26). Washington Commanders – Emeka Egbuka | WR | Ohio State Primary Team Needs: (Edge, Linebacker, Wide Receiver, Secondary) Commanders Draft Capital: 26, 59, 79, 146, 202, 235, 246 Pick Analysis: To maximize Jayden Daniels’ rookie contract, the Commanders add Ohio State’s Emeka Egbuka, a versatile receiver with elite speed, precise route running, and dynamic playmaking ability. Egbuka can thrive in both the slot and outside roles, making him a perfect complement to Terry McLaurin. His ability to stretch defenses and create separation gives Daniels a potent weapon to elevate Washington’s passing game. 27). Baltimore Ravens – Aireontae Ersery | OT | Minnesota Primary Team Needs: (Offensive Line, Wide Receiver, Edge, Secondary) Ravens Draft Capital: 27, 58, 91, 127, 135, 174, 175, 182, 201, 211, 243 Pick Analysis: The Ravens secure their offensive future with Aireontae Ersery, a physically dominant and athletic tackle from Minnesota. At 6’6” and 330 pounds, Ersery combines size and agility, making him a natural fit for Baltimore’s power run game. With multiple offensive tackles nearing the end of their contracts, Ersery provides a long-term solution at left tackle and pairs seamlessly with rookie standout Roger Rosengarten on the right side. 28). Buffalo Bills – Mike Green | EDGE | Marshall Primary Team Needs: (Defensive Line, Wide Receiver, Secondary) Bills Draft Capital: 28, 60, 61, 108, 130, 169, 172, 176, 204, 207 Pick Analysis: The Bills address their pass-rushing woes by selecting Mike Green, a breakout edge rusher from Marshall who led FBS in sacks this season. Green’s quick-twitch athleticism and acceleration make him a dynamic threat off the edge, addressing Buffalo’s pressure rate and run defense issues. His rapid ascent from under-the-radar prospect to one of the draft’s premier pass-rushers gives the Bills a disruptive playmaker who can anchor their defensive line. 29). Philadelphia Eagles – Princely Umanmielen | EDGE | Ole Miss Primary Team Needs: (Wide Receiver, Edge, Interior Offensive Line) Eagles Draft Capital: 28, 62, 94, 133, 155, 161, 165 Pick Analysis: The Eagles address their defensive front by selecting Princely Umanmielen, a versatile edge rusher from Ole Miss. Umanmielen’s ability to play both as a traditional defensive end in a 4-3 alignment and as an outside linebacker in a 3-4 front makes him a perfect fit for Philadelphia’s hybrid defensive scheme. With Brandon Graham retiring and Josh Sweat entering the final year of his contract, Umanmielen provides the Eagles with a dynamic pass-rusher capable of stepping into a starting role and adding flexibility to their defensive line. 30). Minnesota Vikings – Derrick Harmon | IDL | Oregon Primary Team Needs: (Secondary, Interior Defensive Line, Interior Offensive Line, Running Back) Vikings Draft Capital: 28, 97, 138, 163 Pick Analysis: The Vikings bolster their defensive line with Derrick Harmon, a dominant interior defender from Oregon. At 6’5” and 310 pounds, Harmon excels at taking on double teams with his powerful base and pad level, making him a force against the run. With impending free agents along the defensive line and the need for more interior pass-rush production, Harmon brings both stability and upside to a position group in transition. His breakout season at Oregon has cemented him as one of the top defensive tackle prospects in this draft class. 31). Kansas City Chiefs – Josh Simmons | OT | Ohio State Primary Team Needs: (Cornerback, Wide Receiver, Interior Defensive Line, Offensive Line) Chiefs Draft Capital: 31, 63, 66, 95, 132, 255 Pick Analysis: The Chiefs address their left tackle concerns by selecting Josh Simmons, a versatile and athletic lineman from Ohio State. At 6’5” and 310 pounds, Simmons brings a muscular, well-rounded build with good length and play strength. With 18 starts at both tackle spots in Columbus, Simmons fits Kansas City’s need for an athletic and dependable lineman in their zone-heavy and pin-pull scheme. After struggles at the position in 2024, Simmons provides an immediate upgrade and a long-term solution to protect Patrick Mahomes’ blind side. 32). Detroit Lions – Landon Jackson | EDGE | Arkansas Primary Team Needs: (Edge, Cornerback, Wide Receiver, Interior Offensive Line, Interior Defensive Line) Lions Draft Capital: 32, 64, 131, 196, 225, 228, 248 Pick Analysis: The Lions bolster their defensive front by selecting Landon Jackson, a towering 6’7”, 280-pound edge rusher from Arkansas. Jackson excels at setting the edge in the run game with his length and strength, while his technically sound pass-rush moves add value on passing downs. Pairing Jackson with Aidan Hutchinson creates a formidable duo on the defensive line, addressing a critical need with Marcus Davenport leaving in free agency and Za’Darius Smith’s uncertain future. His relentless motor and potential for growth make him a perfect fit for Detroit’s physical defensive identity.

Michigan vs. Ohio State: How 4th Quarter Dominance Has Flipped the Rivalry Since 2021 The Michigan Wolverines have done it again, beating Ohio State for the fourth consecutive year. The key to their success? Dominating the fourth quarter. This trend has defined the rivalry since 2021, and it’s worth a deep dive to understand how Michigan has managed to consistently outlast the Buckeyes. How Michigan Has Done It Michigan’s dominance in the 4th quarter has been the cornerstone of their recent success against Ohio State. The Wolverines’ strategy is simple but brutally effective: wear down their opponent with physicality, control the clock, and impose their will in the trenches when it matters most. Here’s a breakdown of the 4th-quarter data from the last four games: Time of Possession (TOP): Michigan has averaged 9:45 of 4th-quarter possession time per game, compared to Ohio State’s 5:14. This near 2-to-1 advantage reflects Michigan’s ability to sustain drives and keep the ball out of Ohio State’s hands. Rushing Attempts and Yards: The Wolverines have averaged nearly 15 rushing attempts and 98 yards in the 4th quarter, compared to Ohio State’s meager 4 attempts and 8 yards. Over the four games, Michigan has outgained Ohio State 394 to 32 total rushing yards in the final quarter. Yards After Contact (YAContact): Michigan has also dominated in yards after contact, amassing 176 total yards, an average of 44 per game. This highlights their physical edge and ability to break tackles late in games. 1st Downs and Execution: Michigan’s 4th-quarter rushing attack has produced 17 first downs, keeping drives alive and wearing down Ohio State’s defense. The story of the rivalry is written in these numbers. Michigan’s 4th-quarter performances are where they have taken control, playing a “bend but don’t break” style on defense and suffocating the Buckeyes with their ground game. Why Ohio State Has Struggled The narrative surrounding Ohio State’s recent struggles against Michigan isn’t about talent. In fact, Ohio State has had the more talented roster on paper in each of the last four years. The issue lies in development, strength and conditioning, and the mental approach to this rivalry. Ohio State has struggled to win at the line of scrimmage, particularly late in games. Their inability to establish a consistent ground game has been glaring. Over four years, Ohio State has averaged just 1.9 yards per carry in the 4th quarter, compared to Michigan’s 6.7 yards per carry. This disparity underscores Michigan’s physical dominance and Ohio State’s failure to match it. What About Ryan Day? There’s plenty of speculation about Ryan Day’s future as Ohio State’s head coach, but here’s the reality: a coaching change is unlikely unless the Buckeyes falter early in the College Football Playoff. Reports suggest that Ohio State’s administration is hesitant to pay Day’s buyout, preferring to allocate resources to NIL initiatives. Instead of a head coaching change, Ohio State is more likely to reevaluate their strength and conditioning program and their internal scouting and analytics. These areas will be critical if they hope to close the gap with Michigan and regain control of the rivalry. Where Does Ohio State Go From Here? Despite their recent struggles, Ohio State still boasts one of the most talented rosters in college football. With time to regroup and address injuries along the offensive line, the Buckeyes have the potential to make a deep playoff run and even win the national championship. However, long-term success in this rivalry will require structural changes, particularly in their approach to strength and conditioning and player development. Final Thoughts Michigan’s recent success against Ohio State boils down to their ability to dominate the 4th quarter. They control the clock, execute in the run game, and physically wear down their opponent. This formula has been the difference over the last four years, and if Ohio State hopes to flip the script, they’ll need to match Michigan’s physicality and address their shortcomings in the trenches. Let us know your thoughts. Can Ohio State turn things around? Should they keep Ryan Day if they don’t reach the national title game? Leave your comments below and be sure to like this article, subscribe to our channel, and stay tuned for more great content.

How We Scout The Wide Receiver Position | NFL Draft | Football Scouting and Analytics In today's NFL, the wide receiver position is among the most critical. NFL teams invested $30M in cap space in 2022 towards their WR room, and as the salary cap continues to rise annually, the WR price tags will follow suit. Below is a list of critical components we use to grade the WR position during the NFL Draft process. Every WR receives a grade on a scale of 1-10 for each of the below components during the scouting process. Once each player component is graded, we attach a final grade to indicate where the player stands before entering the NFL Draft, and then we attach a ceiling grade based on future potential. Speed: One of the most essential attributes for a wide receiver is speed. The ability to get open quickly and create separation from defenders is crucial. Coaches and scouts look for players who can run fast in a straight line and change direction quickly. Route running: A wide receiver's ability to run precise and effective routes is another critical attribute. They should be able to run various routes, such as slants, curls, posts, and fly routes. A good route runner can create separation from defenders and get open for the quarterback. Hands: A receiver's ability to catch the ball consistently is essential. Scouts look for players who can catch the ball with their hands and not rely on body catches. They should also be able to catch the ball in traffic and make contested catches. Size and physicality: Wide receivers come in all shapes and sizes, but size can be an advantage. A taller receiver with a large catch radius can be a valuable asset for a quarterback. Physicality is also essential, as receivers must fight off defenders and make tough catches in traffic. Athleticism: Wide receivers need to be agile and athletic, with good body control and the ability to make quick cuts and change direction with fluidity. Explosiveness and jumping ability are also important, as receivers sometimes must go up and high-point the ball in contested situations. Football IQ: A receiver's ability to read coverages and make adjustments on the fly can make a big difference in their success. A player who can recognize zone vs. man coverage and adjust their route accordingly can be a valuable asset to a team. Attitude and work ethic: Scouts look for players with a positive attitude and a strong work ethic. Wide receivers must be dedicated to their craft and willing to work to improve their skills. Overall, scouting for wide receivers is a complex process requiring physical attributes and mental skills. A successful receiver must have speed, route running ability, good hands, size and physicality, athleticism, football IQ, and a strong work ethic.

2025 NFL Draft Strategy Tiers: Ravens Nail Value, Falcons Draft Traits, Raiders Swing Big 2025 NFL Draft: Full Team Class Breakdowns and Strategic Buckets The 2025 NFL Draft is officially complete, and we're taking a deeper look beyond simple letter grades. Instead of just handing out As and Bs, we've organized all 32 NFL teams into strategic "buckets" — based on how they attacked value, traits, risk, and long-term upside. In this breakdown, we identify which teams maximized draft capital, bet big on elite athleticism, or swung for risk-reward upside. See why the Ravens crushed value selections, the Falcons prioritized high-end traits, and the Raiders took bold, calculated swings. This full team-by-team analysis highlights draft winners by category, future NFL stars, and which franchises built the strongest foundations for success. A must-read for serious draft fans, analysts, and anyone looking to understand the real story behind every 2025 NFL Draft pick. 🔹 2025 NFL Draft Class Bucketing Methodology Maximized Value Definition: Teams that consistently found first-round talents later than expected, capitalized on player falls, and extracted premium value relative to draft slot. Indicators: BPA (Best Player Available) picks, minimal reaches, smart trade-backs. Traits-Heavy Classes Definition: Teams that prioritized athletic upside, size, or pure raw tools over production or polish. Indicators: Combine stars, prototype measurements, heavy coaching projection. Risk vs Reward Swings Definition: Teams that made boom-bust bets by drafting injury risks, raw athletes, or making aggressive trades. Indicators: Medical flags, positional transitions, trading significant capital. Highest Ceiling Builds Definition: Teams that targeted elite talents at premium positions (QB, WR, EDGE, CB) with an eye on future stars. Indicators: Early premium-position picks, star profile selections. Safe and Impactful Drafts Definition: Teams that prioritized high-floor prospects who fill needs and stabilize the roster immediately. Indicators: Multi-year college starters, Senior Bowl standouts, immediate fits. 🔹 Full Team Bucket Placement and Analysis 🏆 Maximized Value Teams Baltimore Ravens Picked Malaki Starks at a discount, scooped Mike Green and Emery Jones Jr. late. Let the board come to them perfectly. Arizona Cardinals Walter Nolen and Will Johnson were major value falls. Simon and Burke are potential starting-caliber defenders by 2026. Cleveland Browns Mason Graham was a BPA gem at No. 5. Shedeur Sanders in Round 5 could define this class if he develops. 🏅 Traits-Heavy Classes Atlanta Falcons Drafted two elite athletes in Walker and Pearce Jr. Took swings on defensive playmaking traits all draft long. Seattle Seahawks Prioritized versatility and raw ability with Emmanwori, Arroyo, and Jalen Milroe. Major athletic upside across the board. San Francisco 49ers Picked Mykel Williams and Alfred Collins based on frame, movement, and flashes more than pure production. 🚀 Risk vs Reward Swings Carolina Panthers Drafted Tetairoa McMillan over consensus talents early. Doubled up risky EDGE profiles. Heavy boom-bust swings. Las Vegas Raiders Ashton Jeanty at 6 overall was aggressive. Later loaded up on WR/QB swings with high variance outcomes. Miami Dolphins Took risky prospects like Quinn Ewers, Jason Marshall Jr., and Ollie Gordon II looking for major upside despite risk. 📈 Highest Ceiling Builds Tennessee Titans Cam Ward, WR/TE heavy Day 3. They are betting on explosive future pillars on offense. Jacksonville Jaguars Travis Hunter could be a generational WR/CB. Ransaw, Milum, and depth picks reinforced a high-upside reload. New York Giants Abdul Carter brings elite EDGE juice. Jaxson Dart could stabilize QB long-term if developed properly. 🏏 Safe and Impactful Drafts Chicago Bears Loveland, Burden III, Trapilo. Balanced, need-based picks without sacrificing upside. Buffalo Bills Hairston, Sanders, Jackson. Clean roster additions at CB, DT, and EDGE with strong Day 3 depth. Dallas Cowboys Booker, Ezeiruaku, Revel. Strong positional fits, minimized risk at every pick. 🏁 Final Thoughts Teams like the Ravens, Browns, and Cardinals played the board beautifully, maximizing value with every selection. Others, like the Titans, Jaguars, and Giants, swung for true superstars and potential franchise changers. Meanwhile, teams like the Falcons, Seahawks, and 49ers trusted their scouting and bet heavily on raw traits, while franchises like the Bears and Bills stuck to safe, impactful building strategies. Each approach has merit — but history shows that blending value with upside tends to yield the best results. Team Day 1 Pick(s) Day 2 Pick(s) Day 3 Pick(s) Draft Strategy Bucket Arizona Cardinals R1-16: DT Walter Nolen R2-47: CB Will Johnson, R3-78: Edge Jordan Burch R4-115: LB Cody Simon, R5-174: CB Denzel Burke, R6-211: OG Hayden Conner, R7-225: S Kitan Crawford Maximized Value Atlanta Falcons R1-15: Edge Jalon Walker, R1-26: Edge James Pearce Jr. R3-96: S Xavier Watts R4-118: S Billy Bowman Jr., R7-218: OT Jack Nelson Traits-Heavy + Moderate Risk Baltimore Ravens R1-27: S Malaki Starks R2-59: Edge Mike Green, R3-91: OT Emery Jones Jr. R4-129: LB Teddye Buchanan, R5-141: OT Carson Vinson, multiple R6/R7 depth picks Maximized Value Buffalo Bills R1-30: CB Maxwell Hairston R2-41: DT T.J. Sanders, R3-72: Edge Landon Jackson Multiple Day 3 Picks (DT Deone Walker, CB Hancock, TE Hawes) Safe but Impactful Carolina Panthers R1-8: WR Tetairoa McMillan R2-51: Edge Nic Scourton, R3-77: Edge Princely Umanmielen RB Trevor Etienne, S Lathan Ransom, WR Jimmy Horn Jr. Risk vs Reward Chicago Bears R1-10: TE Colston Loveland R2-39: WR Luther Burden III, R2-56: OT Ozzy Trapilo, R2-62: DT Shemar Turner LB Ruben Hyppolite II, RB Kyle Monangai, others Safe but Impactful Cincinnati Bengals R1-17: Edge Shemar Stewart R2-49: LB Demetrius Knight Jr., R3-81: OG Dylan Fairchild LB Barrett Carter, OT Jalen Rivers, RB Tahj Brooks Safe but Slight Reach Cleveland Browns R1-5: DT Mason Graham R2-33: LB Carson Schwesinger, R2-36: RB Quinshon Judkins, R3-67: TE Harold Fannin Jr., R3-94: QB Dillon Gabriel R5: QB Shedeur Sanders (Steal) Maximized Value + High Reward Dallas Cowboys R1-12: OG Tyler Booker R2-44: Edge Donovan Ezeiruaku, R3-76: CB Shavon Revel Jr. Found RB, LB, OL depth late Safe + Traits Boost Denver Broncos R1-20: CB Jahdae Barron R2-60: RB RJ Harvey, R3-74: WR Pat Bryant, R3-101: Edge Sai'vion Jones Swing depth picks (Edge Robinson, P Crawshaw) Mixed Risk/Reward Detroit Lions R1-28: DT Tyleik Williams R2-57: OG Tate Ratledge, R3-70: WR Isaac TeSlaa DL, WR, and Safety depth late Safe and Smart Build Green Bay Packers R1-23: WR Matthew Golden R2-54: OT Anthony Belton, R3-87: WR Savion Williams Edge-heavy Day 3: Barryn Sorrell, Collin Oliver Aggressive Offensive Rebuild + DL Depth Houston Texans (No Day 1 Pick) R2-34: WR Jayden Higgins, R2-48: OT Aireontae Ersery, R3-79: WR Jaylin Noel, R3-97: CB Jaylin Smith WR/RB depth; QB Graham Mertz flyer Depth Focus (High Floor) Indianapolis Colts R1-14: TE Tyler Warren R2-45: Edge J.T. Tuimoloau, R3-80: CB Justin Walley QB Riley Leonard, RB DJ Giddens, OL, DL Highest Ceiling Draft Jacksonville Jaguars R1-2: WR/CB Travis Hunter R3-88: CB Caleb Ransaw, R3-89: OG Wyatt Milum RB Bhayshul Tuten, LB Jack Kiser, OL/DB depth Highest Ceiling Swing Kansas City Chiefs R1-32: OT Josh Simmons R2-63: DT Omarr Norman-Lott, R3-66: Edge Ashton Gillotte, R3-85: CB Nohl Williams WR Jalen Royals, others Offense/Defense Balance Las Vegas Raiders R1-6: RB Ashton Jeanty R2-58: WR Jack Bech, R3-68: CB Darien Porter, R3-98: OG Caleb Rogers Deep Day 3 including WR Tommy Mellott, QB Cam Miller Traits + High Risk/Reward Los Angeles Chargers R1-22: RB Omarion Hampton R2-55: WR Tre Harris, R3-86: DT Jamaree Caldwell Strong WR/TE/DB haul Safe, Clean Build Los Angeles Rams (No Day 1 Pick) R2-46: TE Terrance Ferguson, R3-90: Edge Josaiah Stewart Lower ceiling Day 3 picks Solid But Limited Upside Miami Dolphins R1-13: DT Kenneth Grant R2-37: OG Jonah Savaiinaea Massive Day 3: RB Ollie Gordon, QB Quinn Ewers (steal) Sneaky High Ceiling Minnesota Vikings R1-24: OG Donovan Jackson R3-102: WR Tai Felton Focused Day 3 OL/DL/LB depth Balanced Value New England Patriots R1-4: OT Will Campbell R2-38: RB TreVeyon Henderson, R3-69: WR Kyle Williams Heavy OL/DL/Special Teams on Day 3 Rebuild the Roster (Solid Picks) New Orleans Saints R1-9: OT Kelvin Banks Jr. R2-40: QB Tyler Shough, R3-71: DL Vernon Broughton WR/RB/DB depth late Traits-Based + Risk New York Giants R1-3: Edge Abdul Carter, R1-25: QB Jaxson Dart R3-65: DT Darius Alexander Loaded Day 3 (RB Skattebo, TE Fidone) Highest Ceiling Draft New York Jets R1-7: OT Armand Membou R2-42: TE Mason Taylor, R3-73: CB Azareye'h Thomas Balanced WR/DB picks Safe and Smart Draft Philadelphia Eagles R1-31: LB Jihaad Campbell R2-64: S Andrew Mukuba OL/DL and backup QB Kyle McCord Traits Heavy, Deep Draft Pittsburgh Steelers R1-21: DT Derrick Harmon R3-83: RB Kaleb Johnson Steal DL/LB Depth, QB Will Howard late Rock Solid Class San Francisco 49ers R1-11: Edge Mykel Williams R2-43: DT Alfred Collins, R3-75: LB Nick Martin Weaponized Day 3 WR/RB adds Traits and Risk vs Reward Seattle Seahawks R1-18: OG Grey Zabel R2-35: S Nick Emmanwori, R2-50: TE Elijah Arroyo, R3-92: QB Jalen Milroe WR, RB, OL swings Day 3 Highest Ceiling Potential Tampa Bay Buccaneers R1-19: WR Emeka Egbuka R2-53: CB Benjamin Morrison, R3-84: CB Jacob Parrish EDGE Walker and Roberts, WR Tez Johnson Immediate Starter Focus Tennessee Titans R1-1: QB Cam Ward R2-52: Edge Oluwafemi Oladejo, R3-82: S Kevin Winston Jr. Loaded Day 3 WR/TE/RB class Highest Ceiling Bet Washington Commanders R1-29: OT Josh Conerly Jr. R2-61: CB Trey Amos Great WR/LB late value Improved with Depth

2027 NFL Draft QB Class: Elite or Completely Overhyped? The 2027 NFL Draft QB class already has the names, projections, and early first-round intrigue to become one of the most-discussed quarterback groups in recent years. Texas quarterback Arch Manning and Oregon quarterback Dante Moore headline the early QB1 debate, while Ohio State’s Julian Sayin, South Carolina’s LaNorris Sellers, NC State’s C.J. Bailey, Notre Dame’s CJ Carr, and Oklahoma State’s Drew Mestemaker give the class multiple pathways into the Day One conversation. But the bigger question is whether this quarterback class is actually trending toward historic status, or whether the early hype is outpacing the evaluation. Watch: 2027 NFL Draft QB Class — Elite or Completely Overhyped? Why the 2027 NFL Draft QB Class Is Getting Historic Buzz The 2027 NFL Draft QB class is getting historic buzz because it has the right mix of name value, early scouting intrigue, and potential NFL demand. At the top, Dante Moore and Arch Manning give the class two different QB1 cases. Moore currently has the cleaner early profile because of his accuracy, rhythm, timing, pocket poise, and intermediate ball placement. Manning brings the higher-profile ceiling case because of his size, arm talent, mobility, and projected top-five tools. That contrast alone creates a strong early debate. But the buzz around this class is not just about Moore and Manning. Julian Sayin gives the group another timing-and-accuracy-based passer. LaNorris Sellers brings the size, arm strength, and dual-threat ability NFL teams are willing to bet on if the passing consistency improves. C.J. Bailey has the frame and tools to rise with a strong 2026 season. CJ Carr already has the type of pocket-passing profile that can keep climbing, while Drew Mestemaker adds a production-based profile with him from North Texas to Oklahoma State. How the NFL QB Market Could Drive Draft Value The 2027 NFL Draft QB class will not be shaped by scouting grades alone. The NFL quarterback market could play a major role in how high this group rises. If teams like the Cardinals, Browns, Jets, Steelers, Falcons, Buccaneers, and Vikings remain connected to quarterback need, the class does not need every prospect to carry a top-10 grade to create first-round movement. In the right draft cycle, team need can push quarterback value higher than the tape grade alone. That is why the 2027 quarterback class is already being discussed in historic terms. The talent is real, the names are recognizable, and the market could be aggressive. But the 2026 season will determine whether the early buzz turns into a truly strong NFL Draft quarterback class. Historic QB Class Comparisons: 1983, 2004, 2020, 2021, and 2024 The 2024 NFL Draft QB class remains an important comparison point because its long-term value is still being evaluated. Every hyped quarterback class eventually gets measured against the groups that actually changed the NFL. The 1983 NFL Draft produced John Elway, Jim Kelly, and Dan Marino. The 2004 class gave the league Eli Manning, Philip Rivers, and Ben Roethlisberger. The 2020 class has already delivered Joe Burrow, Tua Tagovailoa, Justin Herbert, Jordan Love, and Jalen Hurts. Those are the quarterback classes that set the standard because the draft capital eventually turned into long-term NFL value. But the 2021 class is the warning label. Trevor Lawrence, Zach Wilson, Trey Lance, Justin Fields, and Mac Jones all went in the first round, but that group has not produced the same type of franchise stability. The 2024 class is still being evaluated. Caleb Williams, Jayden Daniels, Drake Maye, Michael Penix Jr., J.J. McCarthy, and Bo Nix all carried major draft investment, but the final value of that group will take more time to define. That is the standard the 2027 NFL Draft QB class is being compared against. The names are strong, the early grades are interesting, and the NFL market could be aggressive, but the 2026 college football season will determine whether this class belongs in the historic conversation. Final Verdict: Best Ever or Overhyped? The 2027 NFL Draft QB class is not ready to be called one of the best ever, but the early buzz is not empty either. Arch Manning and Dante Moore provide this class with top-tier potential. Julian Sayin, LaNorris Sellers, C.J. Bailey, CJ Carr, and Drew Mestemaker add depth, variety, and first-round upside. So for now, the answer is somewhere in the middle. If the top names take the next step, this class can move toward historic territory. If they do not, NFL team need could still push quarterbacks higher than the grades say they should go. That is why the 2027 NFL Draft QB class should not be crowned yet. Football Scout 365 will continue tracking this quarterback class throughout the 2026 college football season as the QB1 race, NFL Draft rankings, and team needs begin to take shape. Be sure to track it all using our free NFL Draft Hub tool.

2025 NFL Draft: Running Back Rankings – Ashton Jeanty, Omarion Hampton & TreVeyon Henderson Headline Deepest Class in Years The 2025 NFL Draft running back class is arguably the deepest position group in this draft cycle. With a loaded top tier and high-upside prospects scattered throughout Day 2 and Day 3, this group draws early comparisons to the legendary 2017 RB class that featured Christian McCaffrey, Alvin Kamara, and Aaron Jones. At the top, Boise State’s Ashton Jeanty leads the way as a true three-down back with elite contact balance, receiving skills, and vision. North Carolina’s Omarion Hampton brings power and volume-runner ability, while TreVeyon Henderson is the class’s premier home-run hitter. Beyond the top names, backs like Quinshon Judkins, Kaleb Johnson, and Dylan Sampson offer starting-caliber traits and scheme versatility. Beyond the top three, the depth of this class is what truly stands out. There are NFL-ready backs projected to go in the mid-to-late rounds who could take over starting roles as rookies. Whether teams are searching for a featured workhorse or a dynamic committee back, the 2025 RB class is poised to deliver star power throughout all three days of the draft. 2025 NFL Draft: Running Back Rankings Elite Tier - 1st Round Top 15 Projection A rare, high-impact prospect with elite tools, athleticism, and football IQ. Polished with minimal weaknesses, they can dominate from day one and be franchise-altering talents. 1) Ashton Jeanty | Boise State | Ht: 5'9" | Wt: 210 lbs Player Comparison: LaDainian Tomlinson Analysis: Jeanty is a compact, dynamic do-it-all back with rare contact balance, vision, and elusiveness. His ability to explode through gaps and manipulate second-level defenders makes him a perfect fit in zone-based or pin-pull schemes. Also a natural pass-catcher with three-down value. A true franchise-caliber runner. Near Elite Tier – 1st/2nd Round Projection High-ceiling players with pro-ready traits who may need minor refinement to reach Pro Bowl potential. 2). Omarion Hampton | North Carolina | Ht: 6'0" | Wt: 220 lbs Player Comparison: James Conner Analysis: Hampton is a bruising power runner with excellent contact balance and finishing ability. He thrives in gap and power schemes, where he can build momentum and wear down defenses. Lacks elite speed but can hit the home run, so thats not a big issue. His physicality and volume-carry potential make him a strong three-down option. High-End Starter Potential - 2nd/3rd Round Projection A projected top-tier starter with strong physical tools and solid technique. While they have some limitations, development can elevate them to near-elite status with consistent impact. 3) TreVeyon Henderson | Ohio State | Ht: 5'11" | Wt: 215 lbs Player Comparison: Aaron Jones Analysis: Henderson is a home-run hitter with elite burst and lateral agility. He manipulates defenders at the second level with ease and thrives in outside-zone and spread-based rushing attacks. His pass protection and durability concerns limit his workhorse upside, but he’s a game-changer when healthy. 4) Quinshon Judkins | Ohio State | Ht: 5'11" | Wt: 210 lbs Player Comparison: Joe Mixon Analysis: Judkins is a tough, decisive runner with strong burst and physicality. His ability to press the line and finish through contact makes him an ideal fit for inside-zone and power-run schemes. Not a breakaway threat, but his three-down skill set gives him NFL-ready value. 5) Kaleb Johnson | Iowa | Ht: 6'0" | Wt: 225 lbs Player Comparison: Larry Johnson (via Thor Nystrom) Analysis: Johnson is a disciplined, north-south runner with great balance and patience. He fits best in zone-heavy schemes that allow him to press the line before cutting decisively. His power and vision make him a valuable early-down and short-yardage back with high-end potential. Mid-Level Starter Potential - 3rd/5th Round Projection A solid starter with good tools and athleticism but lacking elite traits. Flashes high-level play but needs development, often taking 2-3 years to establish themselves. 6) Dylan Sampson | Tennessee | Ht: 5'11" | Wt: 201 lbs Player Comparison: Devon Achane Analysis: Sampson is an explosive, instinctive back with elite burst and contact balance. His quick acceleration and lateral agility make him a big-play threat in zone-heavy and spread offenses. Needs to improve as a receiver and pass protector to maximize his three-down value. 7) RJ Harvey | UCF | Ht: 5'9" | Wt: 210 lbs Player Comparison: Not Available Analysis: Harvey is a shifty, elusive back with excellent vision and footwork. His ability to create in space and make defenders miss makes him an ideal fit for inside-zone and gap-heavy rushing schemes. Ball security concerns and a smaller frame limit his workhorse upside, but he has third-down value. 8) DJ Giddens | Kansas State | Ht: 6'1" | Wt: 212 lbs Player Comparison: Latavius Murray Analysis: Giddens is a well-rounded back with good vision and contact balance but lacks breakaway speed. His best fit is in a gap-heavy scheme where his patience and burst can be maximized. Pass protection and decisiveness at the line need refinement. 9) Jaydon Blue | Texas | Ht: 6'0" | Wt: 200 lbs Player Comparison: N/A Analysis: Blue is a vertical-speed threat with the tools to become a top-tier receiving back. He excels in space and flashes elite acceleration, but must improve vision, contact balance, and overall consistency to reach his potential. A third-down weapon with upside. 10) Damien Martinez | Miami | Ht: 6'0" | Wt: 232 lbs Player Comparison: Josh Jacobs Analysis: Martinez is a bruising, tackle-breaking runner with surprising lateral agility for his size. His vision and patience make him a fit for power/gap schemes, but he also thrives in inside-zone. Must improve pass protection to reach lead-back status. Mid-Level Starter Potential - 4th/7th Round Projection A solid starter with good tools and athleticism but lacking elite traits. Flashes high-level play but needs development, often taking 2-3 years to establish themselves. 11) Cam Skattebo | Arizona State Ht: 5'11" | Wt: 215 lbs Player Comparison: Alfred Morris Analysis: Skattebo is a rugged, no-nonsense power back with excellent contact balance and short-yardage toughness. He shines in gap/power run concepts, especially on early downs and in goal-line packages. Lacks top-end speed and receiving versatility but offers fullback flexibility and core special teams upside. 12) Bhayshul Tuten | Virginia Tech | Ht: 5'11" | Wt: 209 lbs Player Comparison: Raheem Mostert Analysis: Tuten is an explosive, compact runner with elite straight-line speed and excellent balance. His tackle-breaking ability makes him dangerous in space, but he needs to improve vision, ball security, and pass protection. Best fit in a zone-heavy scheme. 13) Devin Neal | Kansas | Ht: 5'11" | Wt: 210 lbs Player Comparison: Michael Carter Analysis: Neal is a compact, agile runner who excels in space and on perimeter runs. His one-cut ability and suddenness make him dangerous in zone-heavy schemes. Needs more consistency in pass protection and power runs, but offers strong change-of-pace value with third-down upside. 14) Ollie Gordon II | Oklahoma State | Ht: 6'2" | Wt: 220 lbs Player Comparison: Braelon Allen Analysis: Gordon is a powerful, patient downhill runner with excellent contact balance and finishing ability. He thrives in gap/power-based rushing attacks but lacks elite breakaway speed. Best suited for a two-back system where he can be a volume runner and short-yardage specialist. 15) Jordan James | Oregon | Ht: 5'10" | Wt: 210 lbs Player Comparison: Dameon Pierce Analysis: James is a tough, physical runner with strong burst and vision. He thrives in gap/power schemes and short-yardage situations but lacks elite breakaway speed. Projects as a reliable rotational back in a run-heavy offense. 16) Kalel Mullings | Michigan | Ht: 6'0" | Wt: 235 lbs Player Comparison: Gus Edwards Analysis: Mullings is a bruising power back with impressive agility for his size. His ability to break tackles and pass protect adds value, but his limited receiving profile and late breakout raise concerns. Best suited for a short-yardage or rotational role. 17) Trevor Etienne | Georgia | Ht: 5'9" | Wt: 205 lbs Player Comparison: Michael Carter Analysis: Etienne is a quick, elusive back with solid vision and acceleration. His lateral agility and receiving ability give him rotational value, but he lacks top-end speed and power to be a full-time workhorse. Ideal for zone-based rushing attacks. 18) Kyle Monangai | Rutgers | Ht: 5'9" | Wt: 209 lbs Player Comparison: Mark Ingram Analysis: Monangai is a compact, powerful back with excellent balance and vision. His ability to press gaps and break tackles makes him a strong fit in zone and duo-heavy rushing schemes. Lacks elite speed but offers RB2 potential in a run-heavy offense. 19) LeQuint Allen | Syracuse | Ht: 6'0" | Wt: 200 lbs Player Comparison: Not Available Analysis: Allen is a well-rounded back with three-down potential. His vision, lateral agility, and receiving ability make him a valuable rotational back with RB1 upside. Needs to improve top-end speed and acceleration to maximize his effectiveness. 20) Tahj Brooks | Texas Tech | Ht: 5'10" | Wt: 230 lbs Player Comparison: Mike Davis Analysis: Brooks is a powerful, low-center-of-gravity runner with excellent contact balance. He excels in inside-zone and power schemes but lacks top-end speed. His short-yardage and pass protection skills make him a valuable rotational RB2 with starter upside. 21) Donovan Edwards | Michigan | Ht: 6'1" | Wt: 210 lbs Player Comparison: Alvin Kamara (Believe me) Analysis: Edwards is an explosive, dynamic weapon with elite receiving ability. Best utilized in space, whether as an outside runner, receiving back, or gadget player. Inconsistent vision and contact balance limit his every-down value.

← Back to NFL Draft Big Board Denzel Boston Washington HT: 6040 WT: 210 YR: JR POS: WR OVR RK 25 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL KEY STRENGTHS Big-bodied target Contested Catch Specialist Natural Ball Skills KEY CONCERNS Limited Burst Lateral Agility Route Sharpness PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT Denzel Boston is a physically imposing boundary receiver who wins with ball skills, body positioning, and competitive toughness rather than pure speed. He consistently plays to his size, shielding defenders at the catch point and finishing through contact, particularly in high-leverage and red-zone situations. Boston shows fluidity and control in his routes for a bigger target and understands how to create throwing windows with leverage and timing. While he flashes early acceleration, he lacks a true vertical second gear and can struggle to sustain separation as routes develop. Press coverage and release efficiency will be key transition areas, but his reliability, catch strength, and red-zone productivity give him a high floor as a possession-based perimeter starter. PLAYER COMPARISON: CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS High-End Starter Potential (65-69) A player expected to become a top-tier starter within their first few years. They possess strong physical tools and good technical skills but may have some limitations in their game. With development, they can reach near-elite levels and provide consistent impact at their position. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Grade Scale Football Scout 365 grades reflect a prospect’s projected long-term NFL value and role. Draft ranges are general value projections, not predictions of an exact selection. Positional value, team needs, scheme fit, medical information and athletic testing can influence where a player is ultimately selected. How Football Scout 365 Grades NFL Draft Prospects Elite (75+): A rare, high-impact prospect with elite physical tools, advanced football intelligence and the ability to make an immediate NFL impact. Elite prospects carry franchise-altering potential and typically project as top 5–10 selections in the first round. Near Elite (70–74): A high-caliber prospect with outstanding physical tools, strong football intelligence and only minor developmental limitations. Near Elite prospects project as significant early-career contributors with Pro Bowl upside and first-round draft value. High-End Starter Potential (65–69): A starting-caliber prospect with strong physical tools, quality technical skills and a defined NFL role. These players may require development before reaching their ceiling but generally carry second- or third-round draft value. Mid-Level Starter Potential (60–64): A solid prospect with NFL-level tools and a pathway to becoming a dependable starter if key limitations are addressed. These players generally carry third- to fifth-round draft value. Low-Level Starter Potential (55–59): A developmental prospect who could become a low-end starter, high-end backup or valuable specialist in the right role. These players generally carry fifth- to seventh-round draft value. Backup Level (50–54): A depth or rotational prospect with enough functional ability to compete for an NFL roster spot but limited long-term starting potential. These players generally project as late Day 3 selections or priority undrafted free agents. Not NFL Level (Below 50): A developmental or camp prospect who does not currently demonstrate enough consistency, technical refinement or functional NFL traits to project as a regular contributor. These players generally project as undrafted free agents, practice-squad candidates or camp invitations. Draft position can vary based on positional value, team needs, scheme fit, medical evaluation and athletic testing.

Week One 3 For 3 Draft Eligible: We Evaluate C.J. Stroud, Anthony Richardson, And Jalen Carter I wanted to start a new written series covering the top three performances that stood out in big moments among top NFL Draft prospects across the college football landscape. Week one of the 2022 college football season provided plus matchups for us to feast our football-deprived brains upon. To open the season, we chose to dive into the big matchups, Ohio State vs. Notre Dame at the top, followed by Florida vs. Utah and Oregon vs. Georgia. The prospects we chose to focus on in these three games were Florida QB Anthony Richardson, Ohio State QB C.J. Stroud, and Georgia IDL Jalen Carter. Florida QB Anthony Richardson (6-4, 240lbs) The Measurables As an NFL Draft prospect, Richardson possesses all the attributes you want in a QB. At 6-4, 240lbs, Richardson has the size to go with the big arm. He also possesses the athleticism we are consistently looking for in today's NFL QB. He can move to keep a play alive and take off and pick up explosive plays with his legs. He exhibited all these attributes last night vs. the #7 Utah Utes at home in the Swamp. The Performance Anthony Richardson shined last night against #7 Utah in the Swamp in front of the largest home-opening crowd in Florida football history. In only his second career start at QB for the Gators, Richardson posted 274 total yards and three TD's (all three on the ground). He scored on a two-point conversion throw that will be a surefire ESPN top 10 play late in the game to extend the Gator's lead by 3. Utah would not go away, and they would answer on their next drive, regaining the lead and placing the pressure squarely on the shoulders of Anthony Richardson. As the game progressed, the one thing I wanted to see from Richardson was his ability to put his team on his back, and he did just that by avoiding mistakes in a pressured situation. On the Gator's final offensive drive, Richardson rose to the occasion leading his team down the field on a 75-yard, 14-play drive that lasted 5 minutes. Richardson capped off the drive with a zone-read keeper for a one-yard TD. On the final drive, Richardson helped his team convert 3 of their total 3rd and 4th down plays. Two with his legs, one through the air. The Final Word I went into this game remembering how Ohio State shredded the Utah secondary in the Rose Bowl, and I kept that perspective at the front of my mind for a good reason. I knew that if the Gators could exploit the Utah defense, it would be through the air, but that was not the case. Richardson only attempted 21 throws, completing 17 (70%) for 174 yards. He did not throw a TD pass, but he did throw for a 2pt score on the move, escaping a defender's grasp in the backfield. From an advanced data perspective, Richardson committed one turnover-worthy throw, and his ADOT per pass attempt of 7.6 ranked 77th among all passers with at least 20 attempts. He finished the night with an average PFF passer grade, ranking 76th. He had (0) big-time throws on the night. I am impressed with Richardson, not just by the physical tools but by his patience and moxie. He did not make a critical mistake late; instead, he stepped up, stayed calm, and did exactly what you expect from a big-time player, finishing a tight game with a win. Richardson's first SEC challenge happens in one week when the Gators face off against the WIll Levis-led Kentucky Wildcats at home. Ohio State QB C.J. Stroud The Measurables C.J. Stroud entered the night as the 2nd rated QB on our NFL Draft Board behind Alabama's Bryce Young. The 6-3, 220lbs QB is considered by many to be a top 5 NFL Draft pick in the 2023 NFL Draft. Stroud throws with great anticipation and does a great job putting his receivers in a position to be lucky after the catch. He is not the athlete Justin Fields presented while at Ohio State, but Stroud proved he could be every bit as good as a passer, and when needed, he can pick up a first down with his legs. Continued improvement with his footwork and timing will further elevate his top ten NFL draft status. The Performance Against Notre Dame at home in week one, C.J. Stroud stepped up and made the plays needed to help his team move past a tough and inspired Irish defense. Ohio State entered the game as a three-score favorite (16.5) but trailed by a score at halftime. Stroud spent most of the game taking what the Irish defense gave him, he did not force anything, and the Irish played a lot of two-high coverage. The word of the night for Stroud was patience. He exhibited tremendous patience throughout, just waiting for the right opportunity, and the Irish would present him with that opportunity late in the third Qtr down 10-7. The Irish decided to bring both safeties from a two-high look on a blitz, and Stroud made them pay with a TD pass to give the Buckeyes the 14-10 lead heading into the 4th Qtr. From an advanced data perspective, C.J. Stroud did not commit a single turnover-worthy play, and he completed (4) big-time throws, including the TD to put the Buckeyes ahead at the end of the 3rd QTR. Stroud finished with a 90.2 (Elite) PFF passing grade. The Final Word Stroud had to deal with a banged-up Smith-Njigba in this game; he made the most of it without his star WR and found a way without him on the field. Stroud also did a great job getting away from pressure several times, extending plays, and making a few big-time throws into small windows on the sideline in this game. We discussed C.J. Stroud's mobility on After Further Review a few weeks ago and that if he is going to leapfrog Bryce Young into the QB1 spot, he would need to show more as an athlete, keeping plays alive and making throws on the run, and he did that vs. Notre Dame to start the 2022 season. Georgia IDL Jalen Carter The Measurables Jalen Carter is the early #2 prospect on the Football Scout 365 NFL Draft board to start the 2022 CFB season behind Alabama Edge Will Anderson. Carter is a disruptive physical force. He combines a quick first step and feet like a running back to shoot into gaps. At 6-3, 310lbs, Carter is a densely proportioned twitchy player with quick hips and elite lateral ability for his position. Carter wins with strength generated from his dense lower half; combined with his elite positional athleticism and quick hands, Carter is a problematic defender to block. He will need to improve his ability to handle and move off of double teams at the next level. The Performance Carter dominated from his interior position in week one vs. the Oregon Ducks in ways not shown in a stat book. The Ducks could not block him at times, and you can see precisely why Carter is considered an elite prospect that NFL scouts and GM's are drooling over. His overwhelming presence in the middle of the defense makes life easier for the 2nd and 3rd level defenders behind him and creates problems as both a run stopper and a pass rusher. The Final Word Carter did not fill up a stat book. But that does not mean his presence was not felt in different ways. In the videos below, you will see exactly what I am talking about regarding his ability to affect a game. A clear holding penalty on this play. Carter is tackled in the backfield. If the holding is called, it's as good as a sack. Carter uses his strength to displace the blocker in his way so that he can get the TFL.