Search Results

< Back Keldric Faulk Auburn HT: 6060 WT: 290 YR: JR POS: ED OVR RK 6 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL High-End Starter Potential OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT Keldric Faulk profiles as a multi-alignment edge defender best suited for odd fronts (3–4 base) as a 5-tech DE or 4i, with passing down value as an inside-out rusher in nickel packages. In even fronts, he’s a natural fit as a base DE (strongside) in a 4–3, with rotational versatility to rush inside. He’s not a true speed-rusher, but his speed-to-power, motor, and violent temperament offer mismatch potential, especially when moved inside on third downs. Teams like Pittsburgh, Baltimore, New England, or San Francisco would maximize his traits. CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS High-End Starter Potential (65-69) A player expected to become a top-tier starter within their first few years. They possess strong physical tools and good technical skills but may have some limitations in their game. With development, they can reach near-elite levels and provide consistent impact at their position. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS NFL-ready frame with elite length Elite run-defending skill set Scheme-diverse front defender KEY WEAKNESSES Not a twitchy or bendy edge Raw hand counters Displacement vs. double teams PLAYER COMPARISONS Carlos Dunlap

< Back Kadyn Proctor Alabama HT: 6070 WT: 369 YR: JR POS: OT OVR RK 14 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL High-End Starter Potential OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT Kadyn Proctor is one of the most physically imposing offensive linemen in the 2026 NFL Draft cycle. A rare athlete for his 6’7”, 360-pound frame, he brings overwhelming size and raw strength to the blindside, earning All-SEC honors and starting 25 of 27 games across his first two seasons. After a bumpy true freshman campaign, he allowed just two sacks and 13 pressures in 2024 and showed dominance late in the year, posting elite pass-blocking grades against Georgia and South Carolina. Proctor fits best in a power/gap-based run scheme but has flashed enough lateral agility and recovery quickness to succeed in zone-heavy systems as well—especially if he continues refining his footwork, hand placement, and body control. Conditioning and leverage remain areas for growth, but the upside here is franchise-left-tackle caliber. CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS High-End Starter Potential (65-69) A player expected to become a top-tier starter within their first few years. They possess strong physical tools and good technical skills but may have some limitations in their game. With development, they can reach near-elite levels and provide consistent impact at their position. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS Elite Size & Length Anchor & Power Finishing Mentality KEY WEAKNESSES Hand Placement Leverage Issues Lateral Redirects PLAYER COMPARISONS Orlando Brown Jr.

< Back Olaivavega Ioane Penn State HT: 6040 WT: 330 YR: JR POS: IOL OVR RK 29 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS Under Review Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS KEY WEAKNESSES PLAYER COMPARISONS

< Back David Bailey Texas Tech HT: 6030 WT: 250 YR: SR POS: ED OVR RK 15 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL High-End Starter Potential OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT David Bailey enters the 2025 season as one of the most explosive and versatile edge defenders in college football. A former Freshman All-American at Stanford, Bailey transferred to Texas Tech after three highly productive seasons that included 14.5 sacks, 22.5 TFLs, and 7 forced fumbles. He led Stanford in sacks and forced fumbles in 2024, earning a 93.2 PFF pass-rush grade—the highest in the FBS. At 6’3”, 250 pounds, Bailey possesses the burst, bend, and relentless motor to win off the edge but also shows impressive fluidity in space, giving him legitimate three-down versatility. His ideal NFL fit is as a 3-4 outside linebacker who can drop in coverage or play on the line in even fronts. With another strong season in Lubbock, Bailey could lock in Day 2 draft status and rise into Round 1 with improved strength and rush diversity. CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS High-End Starter Potential (65-69) A player expected to become a top-tier starter within their first few years. They possess strong physical tools and good technical skills but may have some limitations in their game. With development, they can reach near-elite levels and provide consistent impact at their position. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS Explosive First Step Flexible and Twitchy Scheme Versatility KEY WEAKNESSES Play Strength at POA Pass-Rush Repertoire Discipline vs. Zone Reads PLAYER COMPARISONS

< Back Jacob Rodriguez Texas Tech HT: 6010 WT: 230 YR: SR POS: LB OVR RK 28 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL High-End Starter Potential OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT Rodriguez is a high-IQ, downhill linebacker with excellent instincts and a physical play style. While undersized by NFL standards, he’s a proven tackler with sideline-to-sideline range and a knack for creating turnovers. Best suited as a MIKE/WILL in a 4-3 zone-match defense or hybrid 4-2-5 system that allows him to key and trigger. Adds value as a blitzer and special teamer early on. Will appeal to teams like Pittsburgh, Buffalo, or San Francisco that prioritize processing and toughness. CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS High-End Starter Potential (65-69) A player expected to become a top-tier starter within their first few years. They possess strong physical tools and good technical skills but may have some limitations in their game. With development, they can reach near-elite levels and provide consistent impact at their position. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS Tough, tone-setting run defender High IQ Turnover creator with high motor KEY WEAKNESSES Undersized and can be washed Inconsistent tackling angles in space Struggles in man coverage vs. RBs/TEs PLAYER COMPARISONS

< Back Mansoor Delane LSU HT: 6000 WT: 190 YR: SR POS: CB OVR RK 16 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL No Grade OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS Under Review Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS KEY WEAKNESSES PLAYER COMPARISONS

< Back A'Mauri Washington Oregon HT: 6030 WT: 330 YR: JR POS: IDL OVR RK 39 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS Under Review Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS KEY WEAKNESSES PLAYER COMPARISONS

< Back Sonny Styles Ohio State HT: 6040 WT: 243 YR: SR POS: LB OVR RK 38 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL High-End Starter Potential OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT Sonny Styles brings a rare blend of size, speed, and versatility that fits the modern NFL defense exceptionally well in hybrid or multiple‑front schemes. After starting his career at safety, he transitioned into a hybrid linebacker slot and looks the part of a “joker” or off‑ball defender who can cover, blitz, and support the run. His physical tools allow him to play near the line or in space, giving defensive coordinators multiple alignment options. While he still needs to refine some technique—especially in tighter coverage situations and shedding blocks—his ceiling is very high when paired with his instincts and versatility. In a scheme that values interchangeable front‑seven defenders and change‑up looks, Styles projects as an early‑impact starter with potential for high upside. CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS High-End Starter Potential (65-69) A player expected to become a top-tier starter within their first few years. They possess strong physical tools and good technical skills but may have some limitations in their game. With development, they can reach near-elite levels and provide consistent impact at their position. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS Elite physical traits Versatility & alignment flexibility Run‑fit physicality & range in pursuit KEY WEAKNESSES Coverage technique Shedding blocks Gap/assignment discipline PLAYER COMPARISONS

< Back Kayden McDonald Ohio State HT: 6030 WT: 326 YR: JR POS: IDL OVR RK 33 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS Under Review Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS KEY WEAKNESSES PLAYER COMPARISONS

< Back T.J. Parker Clemson HT: 6030 WT: 265 YR: JR POS: ED OVR RK 30 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL High-End Starter Potential OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT T.J. Parker enters the 2025 college football season as the top returning edge defender in the country after a dominant sophomore campaign that saw him post 12 sacks and lead all returning Power Four edge rushers in that category. He also forced six fumbles and graded out above 80.0 as both a pass rusher and a run defender—putting him in rare company. At 6'3", 265 pounds, Parker is a violent, heavy-handed bull rusher with the ability to collapse pockets, shed blocks with authority, and finish with bad intentions. While his get-off and bend aren’t elite, his play strength, length, and finishing ability make him a force on every down. He projects best in an even front as a 4-3 defensive end but has shown enough versatility to kick inside on passing downs or play as a 3-4 base end in heavier looks. With another year of refinement, particularly in his hand counters and pass-rush plan, Parker has top-10 potential and could push for EDGE1 status in the 2026 NFL Draft. CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS High-End Starter Potential (65-69) A player expected to become a top-tier starter within their first few years. They possess strong physical tools and good technical skills but may have some limitations in their game. With development, they can reach near-elite levels and provide consistent impact at their position. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS Prototypical NFL frame Elite play strength High motor and violent finisher KEY WEAKNESSES Inconsistent first-step Still developing his pass-rush arsenal Disappears at times in games PLAYER COMPARISONS Rashan Gary

< Back Spencer Fano Utah HT: 6050 WT: 304 YR: JR POS: OT OVR RK 9 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL Near Elite OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT Fano presents one of the cleanest—and arguably highest‑floor—tackle prospects in the 2026 class. His run‑game dominance, motor, technique and movement skills project him as a Day 1 starter in either tackle slot or even as a guard in a pinch. His polish, ability to fire off the ball, climb to the second level and sustain blocks mark him immediate‑impact material. That said, concerns over his slightly lean frame and hand‑strike timing mean some teams may view him as better suited inside until he adds functional strength. In a wide‑zone or power scheme, he can shine; in heavy bull‑rush, anchor‑heavy systems, he may need incremental growth. His alignment flexibility from left to right tackle enhances his value. On balance, he projects as a first‑rounder with Pro Bowl upside if he adds lower‑body strength and further refines his pass‑pro hand game. CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS Near Elite (70-74) A high-caliber prospect who is expected to become a significant contributor by Year 2. These players have outstanding physical tools and strong football IQ, with only minor flaws in their game. They demonstrate consistency at a high level and project as future Pro Bowl-caliber players if properly developed. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS Elite Run Blocking Athleticism in Space Versatility KEY WEAKNESSES Functional Strength Punch Timing Positional Fit Debate PLAYER COMPARISONS Rashawn Slater

< Back LT Overton Alabama HT: 6050 WT: 283 YR: JR POS: ED OVR RK 34 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL Mid-Level Starter Potential OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT LT Overton is a rare size-speed athlete who finally put it all together after transferring to Alabama in 2024. A former 5-star recruit, Overton produced a breakout season while showcasing elite versatility—lining up across the front from 0-tech to wide 9. His 18% pass-rush win rate and 81.7 PFF run-defense grade placed him among the nation’s most efficient defenders. Overton’s power profile, combined with functional athleticism, makes him an ideal 4i/5T fit in an even or odd front, particularly in hybrid schemes that value inside-out versatility. If he can sharpen his technique and finish more plays, Overton could rise into top-40 territory and be a game-changing chess piece on an NFL defensive line. CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS Mid-Level Starter Potential (60-64) A solid, dependable starter with the potential to exceed expectations. They have good athleticism and tools but may lack elite traits. While they show flashes of high-level play, they also have some notable weaknesses that must be developed. These players often need 2-3 years to establish themselves. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS Elite length and frame Alignment versatility Converts speed to power effectively KEY WEAKNESSES Inconsistent pad level Develop a more refined pass-rush plan Change-of-direction limitations PLAYER COMPARISONS