2025 NFL Draft: 15 Offensive Tackles You Should Know Ahead of the 2024 College Football Season The 2024 NFL Draft saw a significant influx of offensive tackle prospects, as a record-breaking eight were selected in the first round. Looking ahead to the 2025 class, early indications suggest a promising pool of talent emerging, making it crucial to closely monitor players during the upcoming 2024 college football season. In the forthcoming analysis, we will spotlight 15 offensive tackles worth noting as we prepare for summer scouting in anticipation of the 2025 NFL Draft, utilizing block percentages and total points earned as key performance evaluation metrics. Understanding Block Percentage and Total Points Earned for Offensive Linemen Block Percentage and Total Points Earned are critical statistical measures in football that assess the impact of each play on a team's scoring potential. These metrics are particularly valuable in evaluating offensive linemen, as they quantify how their actions on the field contribute to the team's ability to score and ultimately succeed. The Significance of Block Percentage and Total Points Earned in Football Analytics Block Percentage measures the effectiveness of an offensive lineman in executing blocks during pass protection and run blocking. A high block percentage indicates a lineman's ability to maintain blocks, providing time for the quarterback and creating running lanes for the ball carriers. Total Points Earned is a comprehensive metric that reflects the overall contribution of an offensive lineman to the team's success. This metric takes into account various factors such as blocking efficiency, penalty avoidance, and performance in critical situations. Offensive linemen with high Total Points Earned are often instrumental in executing successful plays that enhance the team's chances of scoring and winning. By leveraging Block Percentage and Total Points Earned, analysts, coaches, and fans can gain a more nuanced understanding of how strategic play-calling and individual player performances influence the overall game beyond mere statistical outputs. 15 2025 NFL Draft Prospects To Watch Ranked By 2023 Total Points Earned ADAM KARAS, AIR FORCE Total Points Earned: 44.76 (1st) Points Earned Pass Block: 6.97 Points Earned Run Block: 37.79 All Blown Block RK: 27th Pass Blown Block %: 2.30% Run Blown Block %: 1.20% Summary Analysis: Adam Karas excels as a prominent player in the Air Force offensive line, ranking highly nationwide with a total of 44.76 points earned in 2023. His exceptional skill in run blocking is evident, as he earned 37.79 points and effectively boosts the running game. Although he has a 2.30% blown pass block percentage, his reliability in the running game is underscored by a mere 1.20% blown run-block percentage. Standing at 6'4" and weighing 285 pounds, Karas is a valuable asset for Air Force, showcasing proficiency in both run and pass game. RILEY MAHLMAN, WISCONSIN Total Points Earned: 44.33 (2nd) Points Earned Pass Block: 22.87 Points Earned Run Block: 21.45 All Blown Block RK: 18th Pass Blown Block %: 1.70% Run Blown Block %: 1.00% Summary Analysis: After overcoming a major injury in his redshirt freshman season, Riley Mahlman excelled as the nation's second-best offensive tackle by 2023, earning praise from PFF for his pass and run blocking. With consistently low blown block rates, Mahlman's athleticism and reliability make him a valuable asset for Wisconsin. Starting all 13 games at right tackle, he earned a high-level PFF offensive grade, the highest for a Wisconsin lineman and fifth-highest in the Big Ten. Mahlman's PFF pass-blocking grade ranked 13th in the Big Ten. He contributed to Wisconsin's strong offense, helping rush for 314 yards in the season opener and leading the Big Ten in third-down conversions. Additionally, he played a key role in a record-setting UW passing offense with the second-fewest interceptions in program history. XAVIOR GRAY, AKRON Total Points Earned: 41.31 (4th) Points Earned Pass Block: 10.79 Points Earned Run Block: 30.51 All Blown Block RK: 8th Pass Blown Block %: 2.10% Run Blown Block %: 1.80% Summary Analysis: Xavior Gray, who stands 6'8" tall and weighs 335 pounds, began his professional journey at Akron but later moved to Liberty in 2023. During that year at Liberty, Gray accumulated a total of 41.31 points, showcasing strong performance as a run blocker with 30.51 points earned. His low-blown block rates of 2.10% in pass protection and 1.80% in run blocking highlight his reliability and efficiency. Surprisingly, he still has two years left to play after a redshirt in 2019 and open eligibility from the 2020 season due to COVID. He’ll be back in Lynchburg in his junior year for an offensive line unit that paved the way for the ninth-highest-scoring offense (38.3 points per game) in the country last year. -Keff Ciardello, Liberty Flames’ Top 10 Returning Players Include Kaidon Salter, Quinton Cooley JOSH CONERLY JR., OREGON Total Points Earned: 40.38 (6th) Points Earned Pass Block: 17.52 Points Earned Run Block: 22.86 All Blown Block RK: 42nd Pass Blown Block %: 2.40% Run Blown Block %: 0.90% Summary Analysis: Josh Conerly Jr. stepped up as a key player for Oregon, showing impressive skills in both pass protection and run blocking. In 2023, Conerly graded highly according to PFF, with notable points earned in both pass blocking (17.52) and run blocking (22.86). His blown block percentage in pass pro was on the higher side in 2023 at 2.40%; he reflects his reliability, with only 2.40% in pass protection and 0.90% in run blocking. Conerly’s strong performance solidifies his status as a top prospect, capable of handling various defensive challenges. CALEB ROGERS, TEXAS TECH Total Points Earned: 39.46 (8th) Points Earned Pass Block: 16.65 Points Earned Run Block: 22.80 All Blown Block RK: 89th Pass Blown Block %: 3.10% Run Blown Block %: 1.20% Summary Analysis: Caleb Rogers has been a consistent presence on Texas Tech's offensive line, making 41 consecutive starts. In 2023, Rogers earned 39.46 total points, grading highly in both pass blocking (16.65 points) and run blocking (22.80 points), according to PFF. Despite a higher pass-blown block percentage (3.10%), his run-block percentage (1.20%) showcases his dependability. Rogers' flexibility to play multiple positions along the line makes him a valuable player for Texas Tech and a strong NFL prospect. KELVIN BANKS JR., TEXAS Total Points Earned: 39.30 (9th) Points Earned Pass Block: 20.58 Points Earned Run Block: 18.72 All Blown Block RK: 17th Pass Blown Block %: 1.70% Run Blown Block %: 0.90% Summary Analysis: Kelvin Banks Jr. has been a standout left tackle for Texas, excelling as a pass protector. Banks graded highly according to PFF, with impressive points earned in both pass blocking (20.58) and run blocking (18.72). His low blown block percentages in pass protection (1.70%) and run blocking (0.90%) further highlight his consistency and skill. Banks’ athleticism and ability to handle both speed and power rushers make him a top prospect for the upcoming draft. AJANI CORNELIUS, OREGON Total Points Earned: 37.77 (10th) Points Earned Pass Block: 23.53 Points Earned Run Block: 14.24 All Blown Block RK: 1st Pass Blown Block %: 0.80% Run Blown Block %: 0.90% Summary Analysis: Ajani Cornelius transitioned seamlessly to Oregon, becoming one of the most reliable offensive linemen in the country. Cornelius earned high marks according to PFF, with standout points in pass blocking (23.53) and solid performance in run blocking (14.24). His exceptionally low blown block percentages in both pass protection (0.80%) and run blocking (0.90%) underscore his reliability and effectiveness on the field. Cornelius’ athleticism and technique make him a top prospect for the NFL. JONAH MONHEIM, USC TROJANS Total Points Earned: 36.10 (17th) Points Earned Pass Block: 20.32 Points Earned Run Block: 15.78 All Blown Block RK: 39th Pass Blown Block %: 2.20% Run Blown Block %: 1.40% Summary Analysis: Jonah Monheim has shown incredible versatility and skill on USC’s offensive line. In 2023, Monheim earned 36.10 total points, with strong performances in pass blocking (20.32 points) and run blocking (15.78 points), according to PFF. His low blown block percentages, 2.20% in pass protection and 1.40% in run blocking highlight his effectiveness. Monheim's ability to excel in multiple positions along the offensive line makes him an invaluable asset for USC and a top prospect for the NFL. TIGER SHANKS, UNLV REBELS Total Points Earned: 35.90 (19th) Points Earned Pass Block: 16.61 Points Earned Run Block: 19.29 All Blown Block RK: 45th Pass Blown Block %: 2.50% Run Blown Block %: 1.90% Summary Analysis: Tiger Shanks has shown remarkable growth and consistency on UNLV’s offensive line. In 2023, Shanks earned 35.90 total points, with solid performances in both pass blocking (16.61 points) and run blocking (19.29 points), according to PFF. His low blown block percentages, 2.50% in pass protection and 1.90% in run blocking reflect his reliability and effectiveness. Shanks’ strong performance and ability to create holes in the ground game make him a key player for UNLV and a promising NFL prospect. Only one of the Mountain West's last 21 draft picks dating back to 2021 has been an offensive lineman. A 6-foot-5, 325-pound tackle, Shanks could change that. The 2023 All-MW first-teamer is entering his fourth year as a starter. -Chris Murray, Mountain West football's top 10 prospects for the 2025 NFL Draft WILL CAMPBELL, LSU Total Points Earned: 35.08 (20th) Points Earned Pass Block: 15.63 Points Earned Run Block: 19.46 All Blown Block RK: 69th Pass Blown Block %: 3.30% Run Blown Block %: 0.30% Summary Analysis: Campbell has been a standout left tackle for LSU since his freshman year. His 2022 season was highlighted by a near-elite pass-blocking grade on true pass sets, trailing only Peter Skoronski among Power Five tackles. In 2023, he continued his excellence, ranking fifth among FBS offensive tackles in PFF run-blocking grade. Campbell's upper body strength and hand placement are notable, although his narrow base impacts his pass protection anchor. Despite being an average athlete, his overall skill set makes him a strong candidate for the No. 1 overall pick in the 2025 NFL Draft. WYATT MILUM, WEST VIRGINIA Total Points Earned: 31.50 (48th) Points Earned Pass Block: 11.62 Points Earned Run Block: 19.89 All Blown Block RK: 85th Pass Blown Block %: 2.30% Run Blown Block %: 2.20% Summary Analysis: Wyatt Milum is a standout player in West Virginia's offensive line, excelling in both pass protection and run blocking. In 2023, he achieved a total points earned score of 19.89 in run blocking and 11.62 in pass blocking, despite slightly higher blown block rates. Milum's reliability and performance make him a crucial player and a promising prospect for the future. He has started 32 out of 36 games at tackle, with a streak of 31 consecutive games played. In 2023, he participated in 753 offensive snaps, playing 60 or more snaps in nine games. Milum did not concede a sack or quarterback hit and faced only eight pressures throughout the season. He was recognized for his outstanding performance in various games and was part of the offensive line that led the Power 5 in rushing yards per game and ranked third nationally in the fewest sacks allowed. EARNEST GREENE III, GEORGIA Total Points Earned: 29.69 (64th) Points Earned Pass Block: 14.63 Points Earned Run Block: 15.06 All Blown Block RK: 77th Pass Blown Block %: 3.10% Run Blown Block %: 1.10% Summary Analysis: Earnest Greene III has demonstrated significant promise for Georgia in 2023, excelling in both protecting the quarterback and blocking for the running game. PFF has acknowledged Greene's outstanding performance by granting him high ratings in these aspects. In 2023, Greene accumulated a total points earned score of 14.63 and a run-blocking score of 15.06. Despite a slightly higher pass-blown block percentage of 3.10%, Greene's consistent run-blocking rate of 1.10% showcases his reliability. Due to his remarkable athleticism and abilities, Greene is viewed as a potential top prospect for the NFL Draft on day one. JONAH SAVAIINAEA, ARIZONA Total Points Earned: 29.26 (67th) Points Earned Pass Block: 19.22 Points Earned Run Block: 10.03 All Blown Block RK: 59th Pass Blown Block %: 1.70% Run Blown Block %: 2.70% Summary Analysis: Jonah Savaiinaea is a reliable asset for Arizona's offensive line, excelling in pass protection with notable points earned in pass blocking (19.22) and satisfactory scores in run blocking (10.03) in 2023. His low pass-blown block percentage (1.70%) demonstrates his effectiveness, but a slightly higher run-blown block percentage (2.70%) indicates room for improvement. With his balance and strong hands, Savaiinaea is a top NFL prospect. In his second season with the Wildcats in 2023, he started all 13 games, ranking second on the team in overall blocking grade and third in run-blocking grade, according to PFF. He only allowed two sacks in 889 snaps. Savaiinaea played a key role in leading the offensive line that helped the team rank 20th in total offense (448.0 yards per game), 8th in passing offense (308.3 yards per game), and 18th in scoring offense (34.6 points per game) nationwide. BLAKE MILLER, CLEMSON Total Points Earned: 27.50 (81st) Points Earned Pass Block: 13.05 Points Earned Run Block: 14.45 All Blown Block RK: 122nd Pass Blown Block %: 3.70% Run Blown Block %: 1.70% Summary Analysis: In 2023, Miller demonstrated strong performance in terms of total points earned for both pass blocking (13.05) and run blocking (14.45). However, his pass blocking showed a higher blown block percentage of 3.70%, while his run blocking had a solid 1.70% rate, indicating areas for improvement. Blake Miller, who was selected for the All-ACC team in 2023, heads into 2024 with 1,949 offensive snaps across 27 games, all of which he started. Despite being a junior, Miller has significant experience as a starting right tackle for Clemson since joining the team before the 2022 season. Nevertheless, his experience and reliability make him a valuable asset for Clemson and a promising prospect for the NFL. EMERY JONES JR., LSU Total Points Earned: 27.01 (89th) Points Earned Pass Block: 13.64 Points Earned Run Block: 13.38 All Blown Block RK: 51st Pass Blown Block %: 3.20% Run Blown Block %: 0.00% Summary Analysis: Emery Jones Jr. has demonstrated consistent improvement and reliability at LSU. In 2023, Jones achieved equal total points earned in both pass blocking (13.64) and run blocking (13.38). While his pass-blown block percentage (3.20%) needs work, his flawless run-blown block percentage (0.00%) underscores his dependability in the running game. With his strength and athleticism, Jones is a crucial player for LSU and a promising prospect for the future. Regarded as one of the top offensive tackles in the nation, Jones partners with Will Campbell to form the best tackle duo in college football at LSU. Since his debut against Mississippi State in week 3 of the 2022 season, Jones has started 24 games, with LSU boasting an 18-6 record when he and Campbell are in the starting lineup.

Fantasy Football Waiver Wire Week 4: Trey Benson Leads RB Adds, Daniel Jones, Hunter Henry, and More Must-Pickups Week 4 fantasy football waivers: Trey Benson, Hunter Henry, and Daniel Jones headline the top injury replacements and breakout adds. This week’s waiver wire isn’t flashy — no shocking breakouts, no hidden league-winners just yet. But with injuries piling up (James Conner, Mike Evans, Najee Harris, CeeDee Lamb, and more), several veterans and rookies step into bigger roles. That means there’s value to be found if you play smart with your FAAB heading into Week 4. Top Waiver Priorities (Overall) Trey Benson (RB – ARI) Hunter Henry (TE – NE) Daniel Jones (QB – IND) Elic Ayomanor (WR – TEN) Tre Tucker (WR – LV) Blake Corum (RB – LAR) Ollie Gordon II (RB – MIA) Calvin Austin III (WR – PIT) Sterling Shepard (WR – TB) Isaiah Likely (TE – BAL) Quarterbacks Daniel Jones (Colts) – 30% rostered, FAAB: 5–7% Jones has cooled off statistically but remains the QB10 overall and the leader of a Colts offense averaging 30+ points per game. Week 3’s 15.8 fantasy points were his lowest yet, but Indy scored 41 and he was pulled early with the game in hand. His rushing floor (3 TDs already) and efficiency keep him in the low-end QB1 mix. Geno Smith (Raiders) – 28% rostered, FAAB: 3–5% Smith shredded Washington for 289 yards and 3 TDs. In Week 4, he gets Chicago’s secondary, which has allowed the 3rd-most fantasy points to QBs. A strong streamer in all formats. Carson Wentz (Vikings) – 5% rostered, FAAB: 1–3% It wasn’t pretty, but Wentz managed 15 fantasy points in Week 3. With the Steelers on deck and Minnesota leaning pass-heavy, he’s a desperation streamer with volume appeal. Running Backs Trey Benson (Cardinals) – 51% rostered, FAAB: 15–20% With James Conner likely sidelined long-term after a leg injury, Benson steps in as Arizona’s lead back. He posted 51 total yards on 13 touches after Conner left. Benson has RB2 upside rest-of-season and should be the top add if available. Ollie Gordon II (Dolphins) – 32% rostered, FAAB: 5–7% The rookie saw his biggest role yet with 9 carries for 38 yards and a TD on just 25% of snaps. He’s locked in as De’Von Achane’s handcuff but has standalone value in Miami’s explosive run game. Blake Corum (Rams) – 17% rostered, FAAB: 4–6% Corum logged 8 carries for 53 yards in Week 3 after scoring in Week 2. He’s eating into Kyren Williams’ workload and is one injury away from RB2 value. Rico Dowdle (Panthers) – 16% rostered, FAAB: 3–5% Dowdle saw 11 touches (10 carries, 1 target) and found the end zone in Week 3. He remains behind Chuba Hubbard, but his red-zone work makes him a stash in deeper leagues. Chris Rodriguez Jr. (Commanders) – 5% rostered, FAAB: 1–3% Rodriguez started in Week 3, logging 11 carries. This backfield is unsettled post-Ekeler, and while the upside is capped, Rodriguez has deep-league Flex appeal. Wide Receivers Elic Ayomanor (Titans) – 25% rostered, FAAB: 6–8% The rookie has back-to-back games with a TD and is quickly building chemistry with Cam Ward. With Calvin Ridley struggling, Ayomanor looks like Tennessee’s WR1 in waiting. A priority stash with breakout potential. Tre Tucker (Raiders) – 3% rostered, FAAB: 5–7% Tucker exploded for 8/145/3 (36.9 fantasy points) in Week 3. His role is volatile behind Jakobi Meyers and Brock Bowers, but his speed and target spike make him worth grabbing as a boom-bust Flex. Calvin Austin III (Steelers) – 17% rostered, FAAB: 3–5% Austin caught his 2nd TD of the season in Week 3 and is emerging as Aaron Rodgers’ red-zone WR2 behind DK Metcalf. He’s not a volume play, but the role is sticky. Sterling Shepard (Buccaneers) – 1% rostered, FAAB: 1–3% With Mike Evans battling a hamstring injury, Shepard’s Week 3 line (4/80 on 5 targets) puts him in the next-man-up conversation. He’s a speculative add with upside if Evans misses time. Luther Burden III (Bears) – 10% rostered, FAAB: 1–3% The rookie broke out with a 3/101/1 line, showing his big-play chops. Still raw, but worth stashing in deeper leagues as Justin Fields looks his way more often. Tight Ends Hunter Henry (Patriots) – 49% rostered, FAAB: 8–10% Henry erupted for 8/90/2 in Week 3 and is averaging nearly 7 targets per game. In an offense desperate for playmakers, Henry is Drake Maye’s safety blanket and a weekly TE1. Isaiah Likely (Ravens) – 15% rostered, FAAB: 3–5% Likely is close to returning from a foot injury. With Mark Andrews off to a slow start (just 2 catches so far), Likely could earn an immediate role. Stash now before the breakout. Harold Fannin Jr. (Browns) – 20% rostered, FAAB: 3–5% Quiet in Week 3, but Fannin has flashed as part of Cleveland’s pass-heavy scheme. He’s a TE2 stash with upside if his snaps climb. Oronde Gadsden (Chargers) – 0% rostered, FAAB: 1–2% The rookie tight end stepped into the mix with Will Dissly sidelined and made the most of it, catching 5 of 7 targets for 46 yards. While in Greg Roman’s scheme, pass-catching TEs can carve out sneaky fantasy value, making Gadsden a deep-league stash with long-term upside.

Fantasy Football Draft Guide Free Fantasy football league winning advice, player rankings by format, sleepers, and more. 2024 Fantasy Football Redraft Rankings: 2QB Superflex Format Check out our latest 2024 2QB super flex fantasy football redraft rankings! These rankings are based on our updated projections using a .5 PPR format, helping you make the best decisions for your draft. Click Here 2024 Fantasy Football Redraft Rankings: 1QB, Half-PPR Format Check out our latest 2024 fantasy football redraft rankings! These rankings are based on our updated projections using a .5 PPR format, helping you make the best decisions for your draft. Click Here Fantasy Football: 10 Players Who Can Outperform Their ADP in 2024 Identifying players who are undervalued compared to their ADP is crucial for building a championship fantasy football roster. Click Here 15 Fantasy Football League Winners You Cannot Ignore in 2024 Discussing the role, opportunity, key data points, and current ADP in best ball and dynasty startup drafts for all 15 players will help us evaluate their value more effectively before the fantasy redraft season. Click Here Fantasy Football Projections For 2nd Year NFL QBs: C.J. Stroud, Anthony Richardson, Will Levis, and Bryce Young Today's analysis will provide each of the top year-two QBs' 2024 stat projections and their 2024 fantasy football projections. Additionally, I will summarize each player's rookie season and discuss their 2024 expectations. Click Here 2024 Fantasy Football Rankings: Quarterback Tiers When analyzing fantasy football, a tier-based analysis provides fantasy managers with a clearer understanding of the differences between each group of players and how to value them for the upcoming season. Click Here 2024 Fantasy Football Rankings: Running Back Tiers When analyzing fantasy football, a tier-based analysis provides fantasy managers with a clearer understanding of the differences between each group of players and how to value them for the upcoming season. Let's dive into the running back rankings and tiers for the 2024 fantasy football season. Click Here 2024 Fantasy Football Rankings: Wide Receiver Tiers When analyzing fantasy football, a tier-based analysis provides fantasy managers with a clearer understanding of the differences between each group of players and how to value them for the upcoming season. Let's dive into the wide receiver rankings and tiers for the 2024 fantasy football season. Click Here 2024 Fantasy Football Rankings: Tight End Tiers When analyzing fantasy football, a tier-based analysis provides fantasy managers with a clearer understanding of the differences between each group of players and how to value them for the upcoming season. Let's dive into the tight end rankings and tiers for the 2024 fantasy football season. Click Here Check Out Football Scout 365 on YouTube For more in-depth NFL Draft, fantasy football, and college football content, make sure to check out the Football Scout 365 YouTube channel. YouTube Content and Analysis 📅 Weekly Mock Drafts 📝 Player Scouting Reports 📊 Fantasy Football Analysis 🏃♂️ NFL Combine & Pro Day Coverage About Football Scout 365 Football Scout 365: Provider of in-depth NFL Draft analysis, player evaluations, and fantasy football content, combining advanced analytics and film-based scouting methods.

2026 NFL Combine: Reese, Bailey & Styles Headline Historic DL & LB Testing The 2026 NFL Scouting Combine opened with defensive linemen and linebackers — and by multiple accounts, including NFL Network, this may be the fastest front-seven group in Combine history. Historically, wide receivers remain the fastest position group overall (4.52 average since 2003), with defensive backs close behind (4.53). This year, however, the front seven blurred traditional positional lines. Unlike the 2019 linebacker class — which featured sub-4.5 speed from Devin White and Devin Bush — the 2026 group stands out for its size-adjusted explosiveness. Interior defensive linemen near 290 pounds and linebackers weighing 240+ pounds posted numbers typically reserved for edge rushers and defensive backs. Sonny Styles became the first linebacker since 2003 to run sub-4.5 while also recording a 40+ inch vertical and 11+ foot broad jump at over 230 pounds — a rare size-speed-explosion combination. For front-seven defenders, the first 10 yards matter more than the final 30. Explosive short-area acceleration translates directly into disruption — and in 2026, those traits tested at a historic level. Below, we break down the metrics that matter most — and how performances from Zane Durant, David Bailey, Sonny Styles, and Arvell Reese confirm what shows up on tape heading into the 2026 NFL Draft. Defensive Line & Linebacker Combine Metrics That Translate Core Translation Metrics 10-Yard Split — First-step burst and acceleration; the clearest indicator of get-off and penetration. Vertical Jump — Lower-body explosion and power conversion. Short Shuttle (LB) / Broad Jump (DL/EDGE) — Lateral agility and horizontal force. Linebacker Historical Baseline Linebackers have averaged 4.71 seconds in the 40-yard dash since 2003, but short-area movement has proven more predictive than straight-line speed. Since 2003, elite linebackers have averaged roughly a 1.51-second 10-yard split, a 40.9-inch vertical, and a 4.04-second shuttle — benchmarks that better reflect range and coverage fluidity than the full sprint. Fastest 40 ever: 4.38 — Shaquem Griffin Sub-4.4 occurrences since 2003: 3 total 40-yard sweet spot: 4.5–4.6 range Elite explosion profile: ~1.51 split | 40.9” vertical | 4.04 shuttle Defensive Line Historical Baseline Defensive linemen average 4.94 seconds in the 40-yard dash, but evaluation must be separated by role. Since 2003, top interior defenders have averaged a 1.65-second 10-yard split, a 34.9-inch vertical, and roughly a 9’10” broad jump, while elite edge rushers cluster closer to the 1.60 split range with verticals near 39–40 inches. EDGE 40 average: 4.83 | Sweet spot: 4.5–4.6 EDGE explosion profile: ~1.60 split | ~39–40” vertical DT 40 average: 5.11 DT explosion profile: ~1.65 split | ~35” vertical | ~9’10” broad When 240+ pound linebackers run in the 4.4s, and 290-pound interior linemen post elite 10-yard splits, they are operating outside traditional positional norms — and that’s where testing begins to validate draft projection. 2026 NFL Combine Defensive Line & Linebacker Standouts Zane Durant | IDL | Penn State | 6’1” | 290 lbs Durant’s 1.66-second 10-yard split places him in an elite historical tier among interior defensive linemen. Within a 25-player sample of top Combine DT testers, that mark ties him with names like Fletcher Cox, Devonte Wyatt, and Khalil Davis, with only 10 faster times recorded. That same group carries a median 40-yard dash of 4.81 seconds, and Durant’s 4.75 ranks tied for 4th out of 25 — reinforcing that his speed profile is historically strong for the position. The numbers confirm what the film shows: Durant wins with first-step burst, lateral quickness, and penetration ability. He is not built to anchor and absorb double teams — his value lies in disruption. His acceleration allows him to cross faces, win early in gaps, and stress protection before blocks can fully develop. In attacking one-gap systems, those traits translate directly. David Bailey | EDGE | Texas Tech | 6’4” | 251 lbs David Bailey’s 4.51-second 40-yard dash places him tied for 16th among premier edge testers, alongside Travon Walker, Yaya Diaby, and Cliff Avril. He sits one-hundredth behind Bruce Irvin and Lorenzo Carter (4.50) and just ahead of Haason Reddick (4.52). The median time within that elite sample is 4.50 seconds, positioning Bailey firmly in high-end EDGE athletic territory. More importantly, his 1.62-second 10-yard split and 35-inch vertical validate the tape. Bailey wins with rare short-area explosion, bend, and acceleration through contact. His get-off consistently stresses tackles out of their stance, and his ability to widen the rush track while building momentum mirrors the fluid, slashing profile noted in his evaluation. While anchor strength caps his run-defense ceiling, the testing confirms legitimate Pro Bowl upside as an odd-front rush linebacker with translatable sack production. Sonny Styles | LB | Ohio State | 6’5” | 244 lbs Sonny Styles delivered one of the most impressive performances of the Combine, running a 4.46 in the 40 at 6’5”, 244 pounds while posting a 43.5-inch vertical — the best ever recorded by a linebacker — and an elite 1.56-second 10-yard split. His NFL.com production score (91) and athleticism score (92) both ranked first among linebackers, driving a position-leading total score of 95. The size-speed-explosion combination places him in rare territory for the position. The testing mirrors the tape. Styles plays with exceptional range, length, and closing speed, gaining depth effortlessly in zone coverage and carrying vertical routes like a defensive back — a natural extension of his safety background. He triggers downhill with force, separates from blocks with violent hand usage, and finishes tackles cleanly in space. In a league that prioritizes size and coverage versatility at linebacker, Styles profiles as a day-one impact defender firmly in the Top 10 conversation. Arvell Reese | LB/EDGE | Ohio State | 6’4” | 241 lbs Arvell Reese backed up his Pro Bowl-caliber grade with elite movement numbers, running a 4.46 in the 40 with a 1.58-second 10-yard split at 241 pounds. That combination of size and acceleration placed him among the top EDGE testers in this class, reinforcing a rare speed profile for a hybrid defender. His production score (84) and total score (84) both rank inside the top four at his position, underscoring that this isn’t just projection — the traits and impact are already aligning. The testing mirrors his versatile deployment on film. Reese can align off-ball or as a stand-up rusher, flowing quickly once he triggers and using length and active hands to disrupt blocking surfaces. His rush is kinetic, blending speed-to-power with developing counters, while his pursuit speed and lateral twitch allow him to finish in space. Still just 20 years old, Reese remains a traits-forward prospect whose explosiveness and alignment flexibility give defensive coordinators a movable chess piece with true impact upside.

There’s Nothing Here... We can’t find the page you’re looking for. Check the URL, or head back home. Go Home

Ty Simpson NFL Draft Scouting Report 2026 NFL Draft Scouting Report: Alabama QB Ty Simpson Ty Simpson’s rise from unproven depth piece to one of the most productive quarterbacks in the country has been one of the defining storylines of the 2025 college football season. In his first year as Alabama’s starter, Simpson has quickly elevated himself into first-round range. At 6’2”, 208 pounds, Simpson lacks prototype size but compensates with elite poise, quick processing, and advanced playmaking instincts. He’s a rhythm passer with an elastic arm, twitchy athleticism, and the ability to create second-reaction plays without sacrificing structure. A coach’s son with strong football DNA, Simpson blends discipline and improvisation as seamlessly as any passer in the 2026 NFL Draft class. Film Summary Simpson’s film reveals a confident, adaptable quarterback who thrives in chaos. He demonstrates high-level pocket awareness, keeps his eyes downfield while maneuvering away from pressure, and displays consistent accuracy on the move. His release is quick and compact, generating effortless velocity and pinpoint short-to-intermediate placement. What separates Simpson is his composure and situational precision. He’s been at his best on “got to have it” downs (3rd & 4+). When the moment demands it, Simpson maintains his base, resets his platform, and fires strikes into tight windows. While his arm strength is more “very good” than elite, his mechanical consistency and sequencing allow him to generate high-end velocity from a variety of angles. Ideal Scheme Fit West Coast / Spread Hybrid Offense — systems that emphasize timing. Simpson fits modern pro schemes, such as those used by the Lions, Rams, or Chargers, which rely on quick triggers, layered route concepts, and controlled movement within the pocket. Key Strengths (Film-Based Traits) Poise and composure: Remains calm under duress, manipulates space in collapsing pockets, and delivers with balance and precision. Processing and anticipation: Reads coverage rotations quickly and triggers throws on time, particularly in the short and intermediate levels. Accuracy and mechanics: Smooth, compact release with excellent hip torque; places the ball where only his receivers can make a play. Extension ability: Mobile enough to escape pressure and reset his base; creates off-script without panic or chaos. Clutch execution: Statistically dominant in late-game and high-pressure scenarios; displays high football character and leadership. Developmental Areas (Growth Opportunities) Experience: Just a one-year starter; still developing reps and defensive recognition consistency. Arm strength ceiling: More functional than elite; must prove he can consistently drive the football into tight NFL windows outside the hashes. Pocket patience: Occasionally holds the ball too long (3.0+ seconds average time-to-throw); must speed up internal clock against faster pro rushers. Ball security: Three recorded fumbles in 2025; needs to improve grip awareness and pocket ball protection. Grade and Projection Football Scout 365 Grade: Under Review Ceiling Grade: Under Review NFL Draft Projection: Under Review Pro Comparison: Brock Purdy with more twitch — an efficient rhythm passer with elite pocket instincts, mobility, and late-down poise. Final Analysis Ty Simpson has turned limited experience into elite production through poise, processing, and precision. He’s a natural leader who thrives under pressure, balancing timing-based efficiency with improvisational creativity. His size and arm talent won’t blow evaluators away, but his mechanical polish, field vision, and competitive edge evoke starting-caliber stability from Day 1. Simpson projects as a scheme-versatile, long-term NFL starter in offenses that value quick processing, accuracy, and controlled mobility. If he continues to mature in full-field reads and maintains ball security, he could challenge for QB1 status in the 2026 class and cement himself as one of the most dependable quarterbacks in the draft.

2026 NFL Draft Wide Receiver Rankings: Carnell Tate, Jordyn Tyson, Makai Lemon Lead a Deep WR Class The 2026 NFL Draft wide receiver rankings are far deeper than they’re getting credit for, and it aligns perfectly with where today’s NFL is headed at the position. While this class does feature a handful of traditional boundary “X” receivers, the true strength of the 2026 group lies in its depth of alignment-flexible slot and Z playmakers — a reflection of where the NFL game is trending. When you study recent NFL success stories, Puka Nacua, Amon-Ra St. Brown, Jaxon Smith-Njigba, the through line isn’t size or testing numbers. It’s separation nuance, spatial IQ, competitive toughness at the catch point, and the ability to generate efficient yards after the catch. That same profile shows up repeatedly throughout this 2026 wide receiver class. At the top of the 2026 wide receiver rankings is Ohio State’s Carnell Tate, a refined perimeter target who separates at all three levels. Arizona State’s Jordyn Tyson follows closely, bringing true WR1 route nuance and sudden separation ability. USC’s Makai Lemon rounds out the top tier as a high-volume slot who consistently plays bigger than his frame, winning with precision, toughness, and high-level run-after-catch ability. Overall, this class may not feature a single generational outlier, but it is loaded with versatile, new-age receivers who carry legitimate WR1 upside. More importantly, it offers a deep pool of WR2 and WR3 profiles ready to complement an established NFL alpha and contribute immediately in multiple alignments. If you need depth or a high-quality TE2, this is the year to find one on Day Two or Day Three. Go to other positional grades: QB | RB | WR | TE | OL | IDL | Edge | LB | CB | SAF 2026 NFL Draft Wide Receiver Rankings 1). Carnell Tate, 6’3”, 191 lbs, Ohio State Grade Tier: Near Elite NFL Projection: Mid-to-Late 1st Round Analysis: A refined perimeter receiver who wins with route detail, tempo manipulation, and catch-point consistency rather than overwhelming traits. Tate separates at all three levels with leverage and efficient footwork, and he consistently finishes through contact. While he lacks elite vertical speed and imposing play strength, his route polish and quarterback-friendly profile project him as a high-volume target with legitimate WR1 upside. 2). Jordyn Tyson, 6’1”, 195 lbs, Arizona State Grade Tier: Near Elite NFL Projection: Mid-to-Late 1st Round Analysis: Route manipulation and separation nuance define Tyson’s profile. He consistently creates clean throwing windows with sudden breaks, leverage control, and advanced pacing at the stem. His body control and timing at the catch point allow him to win through contact despite only average long speed. Durability remains the primary concern, but if healthy, Tyson projects as a high-floor WR2 with legitimate WR1 upside built on polish and competitive toughness. 3). Makai Lemon, 5’11”, 195 lbs, USC Grade Tier: Near Elite NFL Projection: Late 1st – Early 2nd Round Analysis: A high-volume slot receiver built for today’s NFL. Lemon separates with tempo, precision, and advanced spatial awareness against man and zone. He consistently wins through contact at the catch point despite modest size. Lacking elite vertical gear and outside dominance caps his overall ceiling slightly, but he projects as a plug-and-play slot with Pro Bowl upside. 4). Denzel Boston, 6’4”, 210 lbs, Washington Grade Tier: High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection: 2nd Round Analysis: A physical boundary receiver who wins with size, body positioning, and red-zone reliability. Boston plays through contact and consistently shields defenders at the catch point. Press coverage refinement and sustained separation remain areas for growth, but his catch strength and possession reliability project him as a high-floor perimeter starter. 5). Omar Cooper Jr., 6’0”, 200 lbs, Indiana Grade Tier: High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection: 2nd–3rd Round Analysis: Explosiveness and contact balance drive Cooper’s impact. He threatens defenses vertically and horizontally with acceleration and run-after-catch creativity, fitting seamlessly into motion-heavy, spacing-based offenses. His physical temperament as a blocker adds to his multi-role value. Route consistency and detail will determine whether he reaches his ceiling, but the upside profiles as a dynamic WR2 with alignment versatility and big-play potential. 6). Malachi Fields, 6’4”, 220 lbs, Notre Dame Grade Tier: High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection: 2nd–3rd Round Analysis: Fields brings classic boundary size and contested-catch reliability to the perimeter. He consistently plays through defenders at the catch point, shielding coverage on back-shoulder throws and intermediate concepts. While he lacks sudden release quickness and clean man-separation ability, his physicality and red-zone value project him as a possession-based WR2 with strong chain-moving utility. 7). Germie Bernard, 6’1”, 204 lbs, Alabama Grade Tier: High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection: 2nd–3rd Round Analysis: Tempo and route polish define Bernard’s game. He uncovers at all three levels from both slot and outside alignments, winning with pacing and competitive toughness rather than pure speed. Without a true vertical second gear, his upside is tied to consistency and refinement against press, but his alignment flexibility gives him strong WR2/3 value. 8). C.J. Daniels, 6’2”, 205 lbs, Miami Grade Tier: High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection: 3rd–4th Round Analysis: Route nuance and short-area efficiency anchor Daniels’ evaluation. He separates with sharp stems, fluid hip transitions, and a strong understanding of leverage, consistently presenting clean throwing windows at all three levels. Daniels tracks the football naturally and finishes outside his frame with body control and toughness in traffic. While he lacks elite vertical gear and does not consistently overpower defenders at the catch point, his football IQ, competitiveness, and willingness as a blocker make him a quarterback-friendly, scheme-versatile target. He projects as a high-floor WR3 with legitimate WR2 upside in timing-based or West Coast systems. 9). Kevin Concepcion, 5’11”, 187 lbs, Texas A&M Grade Tier: High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection: 2nd–3rd Round Analysis: A quick-twitch slot weapon built on burst, short-area separation, and run-after-catch creativity. Concepcion thrives on option routes and quick-game concepts, creating immediate throwing windows. His game relies heavily on speed and acceleration rather than tempo manipulation, and contested-catch consistency remains developmental. Projects as a high-volume slot playmaker in spacing-based systems. 10). Chris Brazzell II, 6’5”, 200 lbs, Tennessee Grade Tier: High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection: 3rd Round Analysis: A long, vertical perimeter target who wins with stride acceleration and catch radius. Brazzell stretches coverage downfield and finishes above the rim in contested situations. Limited suddenness underneath and strength versus tight man coverage cap his immediate ceiling, but refinement could unlock explosive outside playmaker value. 11). Zachariah Branch, 5’11”, 175 lbs, Georgia Grade Tier: High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection: 3rd Round Analysis: Rare acceleration and open-field creativity make Branch one of the most explosive space players in the class. Much of his production has come on manufactured touches, and his route nuance must expand for full-time volume projection, but his immediate special teams value and motion-based offensive role create clear early impact potential. 12). Elijah Sarratt, 6’2”, 210 lbs, Indiana Grade Tier: High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection: 2nd–3rd Round Analysis: Physicality and catch-point discipline define Sarratt’s profile. He consistently shields defenders, wins on back-shoulder concepts, and finishes through contact with strong timing and body control. While he lacks top-end vertical speed and elite suddenness, his understanding of leverage and route pacing allows him to create functional separation underneath. Press-coverage refinement will be key, but he projects as a dependable boundary chain-mover with red-zone value and WR2 upside. 13). Chris Bell, 6’2”, 220 lbs, Louisville Grade Tier: High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection: 2nd–3rd Round Analysis: Power and run-after-catch ability drive Bell’s evaluation. He blends vertical acceleration with contact balance, creating explosive YAC opportunities on crossers and in-breakers. His physicality at the catch point adds red-zone and contested-catch value. Technical refinement versus press and improved hand consistency will determine how quickly he reaches his ceiling, but the upside projects as a physical WR2 with offensive centerpiece potential in a play-action-heavy system. 14). Antonio Williams, 5’11”, 190 lbs, Clemson Grade Tier: High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection: 3rd Round Analysis: Tempo and spatial intelligence are the foundation of Williams’ game. He separates with leverage control, route pacing, and sharp footwork, consistently uncovering against man and zone. While he lacks true vertical gear and elite size, his run-after-catch vision and competitive toughness create reliable slot production. Projects as a high-floor volume slot starter in spacing-based offenses. 15). Skyler Bell, 5’11”, 185 lbs, Connecticut Grade Tier: High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection: 3rd–4th Round Analysis: Route detail and short-area burst allow Bell to win at multiple levels. He accelerates quickly, manipulates stems, and consistently separates with sharp breaks. Though not a true burner, his technical consistency and improved hands profile him as a reliable slot/Z contributor early. Minor drop history and limited catch radius slightly cap his ceiling, but he projects as a high-floor timing-based receiver. 16). Malik Benson, 5’11”, 185 lbs, Oregon Grade Tier: Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection: 3rd–4th Round Analysis: Track-caliber speed and vertical acceleration define Benson’s projection. He forces early hip turns from corners and creates natural separation on go routes, posts, and deep overs, consistently threatening explosive plays. His ball tracking and body control downfield are legitimate strengths, and his speed opens access throws underneath. However, a limited route tree, slender frame, and inconsistent release package create volatility against press-heavy coverage. Benson profiles as an immediate vertical X/Z field-stretcher with upside tied to refinement in tempo, leverage manipulation, and short-area route detail. 17). Ted Hurst, 6’3”, 185 lbs, Georgia State Grade Tier: Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection: 4th–5th Round Analysis: Length and vertical speed highlight Hurst’s upside. He stresses coverage early in routes and tracks the ball naturally downfield. However, he must play with more physicality at the catch point and improve consistency against stronger competition. Development in route refinement and play strength will determine his long-term projection as a boundary starter. 18). Brenen Thompson, 5’9”, 170 lbs, Mississippi State Grade Tier: Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection: 4th–5th Round Analysis: Rare acceleration and long-speed immediately define Thompson’s impact. A true vertical field-stretcher, he forces safeties to widen their landmarks and can flip coverage structure with pure speed. He complements that burst with sudden stop-start ability that makes double moves and underneath counters effective once defenders respect the deep threat. His undersized frame limits contested-catch wins and durability raises concerns, but he projects as a rotational deep-threat weapon capable of manufacturing explosive plays. 19). Bryce Lance, 6’3”, 209 lbs, North Dakota State Grade Tier: Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection: 4th–5th Round Analysis: Stride length and ball tracking anchor Lance’s projection. He presses vertically and consistently finishes deep throws with concentration and frame control. However, limited short-area quickness and high-cut movement mechanics restrict sudden separation ability. The transition to NFL competition will test his consistency, but he fits best in a vertical offense that maximizes catch-point wins downfield. 20). Deion Burks, 5’9”, 188 lbs, Oklahoma Grade Tier: Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection: 4th–5th Round Analysis: Acceleration and open-field creativity define Burks’ game. He separates underneath with sharp breaks and spatial awareness, then becomes dangerous after the catch with vision and lateral agility. Vertical consistency and contested-catch limitations cap his full-time upside, but he projects as a rotational slot weapon with return and manufactured-touch value in motion-heavy offenses. 21). Ja’Kobi Lane, 6’4”, 200 lbs, USC Grade Tier: Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection: 4th–5th Round Analysis:nCatch-point dominance and red-zone utility highlight Lane’s profile. He consistently boxes out defenders with timing and body control, converting contested throws outside the numbers. While he flashes leverage awareness, his route tree lacks urgency and refinement, and he does not possess true vertical separation speed. Added strength and route detail will determine his ceiling, but he projects as a developmental boundary X with immediate scoring-area value. How We Grade the Wide Receiver Position Wide receivers are evaluated primarily on separation ability, alignment versatility, and functional playmaking impact. Grades are driven by how consistently a player can win against man and zone coverage, create throwing windows for the quarterback, and generate production independent of scheme manufacturing. In today’s NFL, receivers must function as movable chess pieces capable of aligning outside, in the slot, or in motion without sacrificing timing, spacing, or route integrity. Key factors include route tempo and detail, leverage manipulation, release package efficiency, catch-point consistency, and run-after-catch creation. We heavily weigh spatial awareness versus zone, toughness through contact, and the ability to finish in traffic. While size and timed speed matter, separation craft, football IQ, competitive temperament, and down-to-down reliability carry the most weight in a league increasingly built on spacing, rhythm, and yards after the catch. Football Scout 365 Grade Scale Elite NFL Projection: Top 5–10 Picks (1st Round) Franchise-altering talent with elite physical tools, advanced processing, and minimal weaknesses. Immediate high-impact starter with difference-making ability. Near Elite NFL Projection: Mid-to-Late 1st Round High-level prospect with strong traits and football intelligence. Expected to become a major contributor early in their career with Pro Bowl upside. High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection: 2nd–3rd Round Projects as a quality NFL starter with strong tools and functional traits. May require refinement, but offers consistent impact with development. Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection: 4th–5th Round Dependable starter or high-end rotational player. Solid athletic profile with some limitations that cap ceiling or require scheme fit. Low-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection: 6th–7th Round Developmental prospect with starter upside in defined roles. Inconsistencies in technique, processing, or durability limit long-term ceiling. Backup Level NFL Projection: Undrafted Free Agent (UDFA) Depth player or rotational piece. Functional traits but limited upside for a long-term starting role. Not NFL Level NFL Projection: Unlikely to Make NFL Roster Significant developmental needs across athleticism, technique, or processing. Long-shot to stick at the NFL level.

Fantasy Football: 10 Players Who Can Outperform Their ADP in 2024 Fantasy Football: Identifying players who are undervalued compared to their ADP is crucial for building a championship fantasy football roster. These 10 players are ranked ahead of their ADP by 10 or more spots according to the Football Scout 365 fantasy rankings, making them potential steals or league-winning values either immediately or as the season progresses. Whether you’re targeting a high-upside rookie like Jayden Daniels or a proven veteran like Raheem Mostert, these players offer the opportunity to outperform their draft price and provide significant returns on investment. 10 Players Who Can Outperform Their ADP in 2024 Tua Tagovailoa, QB, Miami Dolphins ADP: 105 2QB ADP: 22 Summary: Tua Tagovailoa has the potential to be a QB1 in 2024 if he can even out his production. Despite finishing as the QB16 in fantasy points per game last season, Tagovailoa led the NFL in passing yards and was elite in key metrics like yards per attempt and completion percentage over expected (CPOE). His ADP as a QB2 does not fully reflect his upside, making him a potential steal in 2QB formats. Jayden Daniels, QB, Washington Commanders ADP: 114 2QB ADP: 27 Summary: Jayden Daniels is a rookie quarterback with elite rushing upside, reminiscent of past dual-threat quarterbacks like Cam Newton and Lamar Jackson. Daniels enters the NFL with a solid college background and is stepping into an offense that suits his strengths. Given his potential for both passing and rushing production, Daniels is a prime candidate to outproduce his current ADP, making him a potential low-end QB1 and a league-winning value in 2QB formats. David Montgomery, RB, Detroit Lions ADP: 63 Summary: David Montgomery finished as the RB15 in 2023, proving to be a reliable option in the Lions’ backfield. He is set to continue sharing touches with Jahmyr Gibbs but remains the primary early-down and red zone back. Montgomery’s current ADP undervalues his role in one of the NFL’s most potent offenses, making him a solid RB2 with potential upside, especially in .5 PPR formats. George Pickens, WR, Pittsburgh Steelers ADP: 75 Summary: George Pickens is on the verge of a breakout in his third year, particularly with Diontae Johnson no longer in the picture. While the Steelers’ run-heavy offense could limit his ceiling, Pickens has shown the ability to produce in tough matchups. His ADP does not fully account for his potential growth and increased target share, making him an intriguing upside play in 2024. Raheem Mostert, RB, Miami Dolphins ADP: 103 Summary: Raheem Mostert was a standout performer last season, finishing as the RB4 in fantasy with 21 touchdowns. Despite being in a timeshare with De'Von Achane, Mostert's efficiency and explosive playmaking ability make him a solid RB2 with RB1 upside in Miami’s high-octane offense. His current ADP undervalues his role, making him a strong value pick in 2024. Zack Moss, RB, Cincinnati Bengals ADP: 111 Summary: Zack Moss is set to inherit a significant workload in the Bengals' offense following Joe Mixon’s departure. Moss is expected to handle early-down work, providing a solid floor and potential for RB2 production. His ADP is much lower than his projected role, making him a valuable pick for fantasy managers looking for stable running back options later in drafts. Brian Robinson, RB, Washington Commanders ADP: 126 Summary: Brian Robinson was quietly effective last season, showcasing a three-down skillset. With Austin Ekeler expected to challenge him for passing down and red zone work, Robinson may settle into an RB2/3 role. However, his ADP significantly undervalues his potential workload, making him a sneaky value pick, especially in deeper leagues. Justin Fields, QB, Pittsburgh Steelers ADP: 149 2QB ADP: 42 Summary: Justin Fields is a high-risk, high-reward fantasy option in 2024. Despite competition with Russell Wilson for the starting job, Fields’ dual-threat ability provides him with significant upside. His current ADP reflects uncertainty, but if he secures the starting role, Fields could deliver QB1 value, particularly in 2QB formats. Chase Brown, RB, Cincinnati Bengals ADP: 135 Summary: Chase Brown is one of the Bengals' most exciting prospects heading into 2024. With the potential to take over the backfield, Brown is generating buzz in training camp. His ability to force missed tackles and gain yards after contact makes him a high-upside handcuff who could become a lead back. His ADP makes him an excellent late-round pick with significant upside. Demario Douglas, WR, New England Patriots ADP: 183.6 Summary: DeMario Douglas was a surprising contributor for the Patriots last season, leading the team in receiving yards despite not scoring any touchdowns. With competition from newly drafted receivers, his role in the offense is uncertain, but his ADP leaves room for upside. Douglas could be a valuable depth piece or bye-week filler in deeper leagues.

What Is the NFL Scouting Combine? How It Works and Why It Matters The NFL Scouting Combine—formally known as the National Invitational Camp (NIC)—is the league’s premier pre-draft evaluation event and one of the most important checkpoints in the player development and scouting process. Held annually in Indianapolis, the Combine is a four-day, invitation-only event that brings together approximately 300 of the top draft-eligible college football players for standardized medical, mental, and physical evaluations. From an NFL scouting perspective, the Combine is not designed to discover players—it exists to verify and contextualize what teams have already seen on film. Every drill, measurement, interview, and medical exam is used to reduce uncertainty and risk as clubs finalize draft boards. What the NFL Scouting Combine Evaluates The NFL Scouting Combine evaluates prospects across four primary pillars: Medical Evaluation Medical information is the single most important component of the Combine. Each invited prospect undergoes a comprehensive medical examination, including orthopedic evaluations, imaging (X-rays and MRIs), injury history reviews, and specialist consultations when necessary. All results are compiled into electronic medical records and shared with all 32 NFL teams, ensuring equal access to verified medical data. Interviews & Psychological Testing Teams are permitted to conduct up to 60 formal interviews with prospects, each lasting 15 minutes. These sessions allow clubs to assess football intelligence, personality, leadership traits, recall, and overall fit within their organizational culture. Psychological testing is also administered as part of the broader evaluation process. Physical Measurements & Athletic Testing Height, weight, arm length, hand size, and body composition are officially recorded, followed by position-specific athletic testing. While results are widely discussed publicly, teams use these metrics primarily to confirm thresholds, movement efficiency, and functional athleticism relative to position norms—not to override film evaluation. On-Field Workouts Prospects participate in drills designed to showcase position-specific skills, movement patterns, and body control. These sessions help evaluators assess traits such as explosiveness, change of direction, flexibility, balance, and coordination in a controlled environment. How the Combine Fits Into the Draft Process The Combine serves as a centralized, standardized evaluation hub. Rather than prospects traveling from team to team for physicals and interviews, all testing is conducted in one location under league oversight. This structure allows NFL clubs to compare prospects using consistent data points while minimizing logistical inefficiencies and medical redundancy. Importantly, participation is invitation-based. A committee of NFL evaluators determines which prospects attend, and the league reserves the right to deny participation based on medical, legal, or conduct-related findings. Teams, however, are free to independently evaluate any draft-eligible player outside the Combine framework. Why the Combine Matters For NFL teams, the Combine is about risk management and decision-making. Medical clarity, character evaluation, and athletic verification play a significant role in determining draft value, contract guarantees, and long-term investment. For prospects, it represents the most comprehensive job interview of their football careers—an opportunity to confirm their draft standing or, in some cases, elevate it. While the public focus often centers on 40-yard dash times and highlight clips, the true value of the NFL Scouting Combine lies behind closed doors, where film, data, medicals, and interviews are brought together to shape draft boards across the league.

2024 NFL Draft: Grades For All 32 NFL Teams The 2024 NFL Draft has concluded, culminating months of behind-the-scenes scouting and analysis during a three-day event in Detroit, Michigan, which drew a record attendance of over 700,000 fans, more than any previous NFL Draft. Why Are We Grading The Draft Before The Three-Year Window? Grading the NFL Draft immediately after its conclusion is often criticized because it typically takes two to three years to truly assess which players will succeed. However, the real value in immediate draft grades lies in the extensive time spent analyzing prospects, understanding where they were selected, and determining why they were chosen at their specific draft spots. Additionally, draft grades evaluate each team's ability to fill primary and secondary needs. Did they address their primary needs with prospects who have high-ceiling potential? How effectively did they meet their secondary needs, and what is the initial perception of these efforts? While we can revisit and regrade these drafts in a few years, for now, evaluating the here and now allows us to reflect on our initial perceptions later. 2024 NFL Draft Overview A record six quarterbacks were drafted in the first 12 picks, with no defensive players selected until the 15th overall—the longest gap between an offensive or defensive player in NFL Draft history. There was much speculation that there could be zero defenders taken in the first ten picks, but having none in the first 15 was unprecedented. This trend was less about the talent available and more due to QB-needy teams selecting quarterbacks earlier than expected, coupled with an exceptionally deep wide receiver class featuring talents like Marvin Harrison Jr., Rome Odunze, and Malik Nabers—who each could have been the top wide receiver in any of the past several drafts. The depth of offensive tackles and the need at that position played a significant role this year, leading to more first-round offensive players than any other draft in history, with 23 total offensive players, including eight offensive linemen. How Did Our Big Board Rankings Stack Up? Regarding our big board rankings for this draft class, it was our best recorded year since we started publishing a top 100 Big Board back in 2021. Seventy-eight of our top 100 players were drafted within the first 100 picks, with 95% of our top 150 fully graded players drafted. Additional Draft Notes: Overall, the 2024 NFL Draft proved to be as deep as advertised. We had grades on 26 wide receivers, and all 26 were drafted. Our top three wide receivers, Marvin Harrison Jr., Rome Odunze, and Malik Nabers, were all ranked in the top ten and drafted in the top ten. We graded 11 quarterbacks in the draft, and 10 were drafted, with one signing a guaranteed free agent contract. Our top-graded quarterback, Caleb Williams, went first overall. Our second-highest graded quarterback, J.J. McCarthy, was the fourth quarterback drafted, landing at pick 10 with the Minnesota Vikings, while Jayden Daniels and Drake Maye, 3rd and 4th ranked quarterbacks, went second and third overall, respectively. Michael Penix's going eighth overall to the Falcons was a big surprise in the mainstream media, but not to us, as he was ranked as high as the third quarterback on our board at one time. All 13 running backs we graded were drafted. Our top-ranked running back, Blake Corum, was the second running back off the board after Texas' Jonathan Brooks. We had grades for 21 cornerbacks in this draft class, and 20 were drafted while one signed a UDFA deal, ensuring all 21 are in the NFL. Our top-graded cornerback, Quinyon Mitchell, went to the Eagles and was the first cornerback selected in the 2024 NFL Draft. All 32 Teams 2024 NFL Draft Grades Arizona Cardinals Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A) The Arizona Cardinals adeptly utilized the NFL Draft to reinforce their team, focusing particularly on enhancing their receiving corps, defensive line, and secondary. Marvin Harrison Jr. from Ohio State is recognized as a generational talent, which aligns perfectly with the Cardinals’ ability to maximize their playmakers’ effectiveness. This high-caliber addition significantly raises the expectations for quarterback Kyler Murray. The team’s performance in the middle rounds was notably strong, as they secured several players who could challenge for starting roles much earlier than anticipated, bolstering their roster depth before the projected talent cutoff after Round 3. This strategic approach has positioned them well for the upcoming season. Day One: Average Grade (A-) 4) Marvin Harrison Jr., WR, Ohio State (A+) 27) Darius Robinson, ED, Missouri (A-) Day Two: Average Grade (C+) 43) Max Melton, CB, Rutgers (B) 66) Trey Benson, HB, Florida State (B+) 71) Isaiah Adams, T, Illinois (C) 82) Tip Reiman, TE, Illinois (C) 90) Elijah Jones, CB, Boston College (C) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 104) Dadrion Taylor-Demerson, S, Texas Tech (A-) 138) Xavier Thomas, ED, Clemson (A) 162) Christian Jones, T, Texas (B+) 191) Tejhaun Palmer, WR, UAB (C) 226) Jaden Davis, CB, Miami (FL) (C-) Atlanta Falcons Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B) The Atlanta Falcons focused on a mix of high-reward and developmental picks to address their current roster and future needs. The selection of Michael Penix Jr. from Washington at the 8th overall was a major surprise, considering their current quarterback situation with Kirk Cousins. Penix is viewed as a high-risk, high-reward quarterback with the potential to be the franchise's future leader. The Falcons also aimed to bolster their defensive line and add depth to their backfield and special teams with their mid and late-round picks. Day One: Average Grade (B+) 8) Michael Penix Jr., QB, Washington (B+) Day Two: Average Grade (B) 35) Ruke Orhorhoro, DI, Clemson (C) 74) Bralen Trice, ED, Washington (B) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 109) Brandon Dorlus, DI, Oregon (A+) 143) JD Bertrand, LB, Notre Dame (B) 186) Jase McClellan, HB, Alabama (B) 187) Casey Washington, WR, Illinois (B) 197) Zion Logue, DI, Georgia (C) Baltimore Ravens Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A) The Baltimore Ravens executed a strategic draft, effectively bolstering their secondary and defensive line while also enhancing offensive line depth. Nate Wiggins from Clemson, selected as one of the top corners in the draft, exemplifies Baltimore’s focus on adding elite speed and versatility to their defensive backfield. The team's performance in the later rounds was equally impressive, securing potential impact players like Adisa Isaac from Penn State and Tez Walker from North Carolina, which significantly boosts their defensive and offensive capabilities respectively. This comprehensive approach demonstrates Baltimore's commitment to maintaining a balanced and competitive roster. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 30) Nate Wiggins, CB, Clemson (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 62) Roger Rosengarten, T, Washington (B) 93) Adisa Isaac, ED, Penn State (A+) Day Three: Average Grade (A) 113) Tez Walker, WR, North Carolina (A) 130) T.J. Tampa, CB, Iowa State (A+) 165) Rasheen Ali, HB, Marshall (B) 218) Devin Leary, QB, Kentucky (B) 228) Nick Samac, C, Michigan State (B) 250) Sanoussi Kane, S, Purdue (C) Buffalo Bills Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B+) The Buffalo Bills focused on strengthening their roster across multiple positions, particularly in their secondary, offensive line, and receiving corps. The selection of Keon Coleman from Florida State highlights their attempt to add a prototypical "X" receiver, providing a significant boost to their passing game. Ray Davis from Kentucky and Sedrick Van Pran from Georgia were standout picks, adding versatility and effectiveness to both the rushing and pass protection aspects of their game. This draft illustrates Buffalo’s intent to address gaps while also preparing for future development needs. Day One: No Picks Day Two: Average Grade (B) 33) Keon Coleman, WR, Florida State (B+) 60) Cole Bishop, S, Utah (B+) 95) DeWayne Carter, DI, Duke (B) Day Three: Average Grade (A-) 128) Ray Davis, HB, Kentucky (A) 141) Sedrick Van Pran, C, Georgia (A) 160) Edefuan Ulofoshio, LB, Washington (B) 168) Javon Solomon, ED, Troy (B+) 204) Tylan Grable, T, UCF (B) 219) Daequan Hardy, CB, Penn State (B) 221) Travis Clayton, G, Buffalo (C) Carolina Panthers Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B+) The Carolina Panthers made strategic moves to enhance their receiving options and bolster their defensive and offensive lines. Xavier Legette from South Carolina, compared stylistically to AJ Brown, represents a significant addition to their receiving corps, promising to impact their offensive scheme immediately. Ja'Tavion Sanders from Texas and Michael Barrett from Michigan were also notable selections, aimed at providing immediate contributions to the offense and defense, respectively. This draft approach shows Carolina's commitment to building a robust team framework. Day One: Average Grade (B+) 32) Xavier Legette, WR, South Carolina (B+) Day Two: Average Grade (C) 46) Jonathon Brooks, HB, Texas (A-) 72) Trevin Wallace, LB, Kentucky (C) Day Three: Average Grade (A) 101) Ja'Tavion Sanders, TE, Texas (A+) 157) Chau Smith-Wade, CB, Washington State (B+) 200) Jaden Crumedy, DI, Mississippi State (B) 240) Michael Barrett, LB, Michigan (A-) Chicago Bears Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A+) The Chicago Bears strategically drafted to maximize their offensive potential, significantly enhancing their quarterback and wide receiver positions. Caleb Williams from USC, seen as a generational talent, is compared favorably with elite NFL quarterbacks and sets a high bar for Chicago's future offensive capabilities. Rome Odunze from Washington, picked to complement Williams, is expected to dramatically impact the Bears' passing game. The Bears also focused on strengthening their special teams and defensive line, indicating a comprehensive approach to building a competitive team. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 1) Caleb Williams, QB, USC (A+) 9) Rome Odunze, WR, Washington (A+) Day Two: No Picks Day Three: Average Grade (A) 75) Kiran Amegadjie, T, Yale (A) 122) Tory Taylor, P, Iowa (A) 144) Austin Booker, ED, Kansas (A) Cincinnati Bengals Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B+) The Cincinnati Bengals effectively addressed their offensive line and added depth across the defensive line and receiving corps in this draft. Amarius Mims from Georgia, a highly anticipated tackle, was a significant addition, expected to protect Joe Burrow for the foreseeable future. The Bengals' strategy also included bolstering their defense with multiple picks that could contribute immediately, showcasing their balanced approach to building both sides of the ball. Day One: Average Grade (B+) 18) Amarius Mims, OT, Georgia (B+) Day Two: Average Grade (B+) 49) Kris Jenkins, DI, Michigan (B+) 80) Jermaine Burton, WR, Alabama (B+) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 97) McKinnley Jackson, DI, Texas A&M (C) 115) Erick All, TE, Iowa (B+) 149) Josh Newton, CB, TCU (B) 194) Tanner McLachlan, TE, Arizona (B) 214) Cedric Johnson, ED, Mississippi (B) 224) Daijahn Anthony, S, Mississippi (B) 237) Matt Lee, C, Miami (FL) (B) Cleveland Browns Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B) The Cleveland Browns focused on enhancing their defensive capabilities and adding versatile offensive weapons. Michael Hall Jr. from Ohio State and Zak Zinter from Michigan were key early picks aimed at improving the defensive and offensive lines, respectively. Cleveland's later rounds were marked by selections that emphasized increasing the team's playmaking ability and depth, such as Jamari Thrash from Louisville and Nathaniel Watson from Mississippi State, who are expected to contribute both in regular plays and special teams. Day One: No Picks Day Two: Average Grade (B) 54) Michael Hall Jr., DI, Ohio State (B) 85) Zak Zinter, G, Michigan (B) Day Three: Average Grade (B+) 156) Jamari Thrash, WR, Louisville (B+) 206) Nathaniel Watson, LB, Mississippi State (B+) 227) Myles Harden, CB, South Dakota (B) 243) Jowon Briggs, DI, Cincinnati (A-) Dallas Cowboys Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B) The Dallas Cowboys concentrated on strengthening their offensive and defensive lines through strategic draft selections. Tyler Guyton from Oklahoma, a versatile offensive tackle, and Marshawn Kneeland from Western Michigan, a solid run defender, are expected to contribute significantly to their respective units. The Cowboys also added depth with picks aimed at improving special teams and rotational contributions, indicating a focus on solidifying their overall team structure and readiness for the upcoming challenges. Day One: Average Grade (B) 29) Tyler Guyton, OT, Oklahoma (B) Day Two: Average Grade (B+) 56) Marshawn Kneeland, ED, Western Michigan (B+) 73) Cooper Beebe, G, Kansas State (B+) 87) Marist Liufau, LB, Notre Dame (C) Day Three: Average Grade (A) 174) Caelen Carson, CB, Wake Forest (A+) 216) Ryan Flournoy, WR, Southeast Missouri State (C) 233) Nathan Thomas, T, Louisiana (B) 244) Justin Rogers, DI, Auburn (B) Denver Broncos Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B) The Denver Broncos strategically selected Bo Nix from Oregon as their potential franchise quarterback, indicating a significant commitment to reshaping their offense. The draft choices, including Troy Franklin from Oregon and Kris Abrams-Draine from Missouri, align with Denver’s strategy to enhance their passing game and secondary. The late-round picks continue to support this strategy, aiming to develop depth and versatility across the roster. Day One: Average Grade (C+) 12) Bo Nix, QB, Oregon (C+) Day Two: No Picks Day Three: Average Grade (A) 76) Jonah Elliss, ED, Utah (A) 102) Troy Franklin, WR, Oregon (A+) 145) Kris Abrams-Draine, CB, Missouri (B+) 147) Audric Estime, HB, Notre Dame (B) 235) Devaughn Vele, WR, Utah (B) 256) Nick Gargiulo, C, South Carolina (B) Detroit Lions Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B+) The Detroit Lions focused on bolstering their secondary and offensive line, addressing key areas of need with high-potential picks. Terrion Arnold from Alabama and Ennis Rakestraw Jr. from Missouri were notable for their immediate potential to improve Detroit's coverage capabilities. The Lions' strategy reflects a commitment to building a robust defensive lineup, complemented by strategic additions to the offensive line and special teams. Day One: Average Grade (B+) 24) Terrion Arnold, CB, Alabama (B+) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 61) Ennis Rakestraw Jr., CB, Missouri (A) 126) Giovanni Manu, T, Detroit (B) 132) Sione Vaki, S, Utah (B+) Day Three: Average Grade (A-) 189) Mekhi Wingo, DI, LSU (A-) 210) Christian Mahogany, G, Boston College (A) Green Bay Packers Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B) The Green Bay Packers focused on reinforcing their offensive line and adding dynamic playmakers in the 2024 NFL Draft. Jordan Morgan from Arizona, a versatile offensive lineman, was a key acquisition, expected to compete for a critical role protecting the quarterback. The Packers also secured high-quality additions to their backfield and defense, aiming to increase their overall team speed and versatility. Day One: Average Grade (B+) 25) Jordan Morgan, OT, Arizona (B+) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 45) Edgerrin Cooper, LB, Texas A&M (B+) 58) Javon Bullard, S, Georgia (B+) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 88) MarShawn Lloyd, HB, USC (B+) 91) Ty'Ron Hopper, LB, Missouri (C) 111) Evan Williams, S, Oregon (C) 163) Jacob Monk, G, Duke (C) 169) Kitan Oladapo, S, Oregon State (B) 202) Travis Glover, T, Georgia State (C) 245) Michael Pratt, QB, Tulane (A-) 255) Kalen King, CB, Penn State (A-) Houston Texans Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B) The Houston Texans strategically bolstered their secondary, offensive line, and special teams with this year's draft picks. Key selections like Kamari Lassiter from Georgia and Calen Bullock from USC reflect Houston's commitment to enhancing their defensive backfield, while Blake Fisher from Notre Dame provides much-needed stability on the offensive line. The selection of Cade Stover from Ohio State is a highlight, potentially offering a new offensive weapon at tight end. Day One: No Picks Day Two: Average Grade (B) 42) Kamari Lassiter, CB, Georgia (B) 59) Blake Fisher, T, Notre Dame (B) 78) Calen Bullock, S, USC (B) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 123) Cade Stover, TE, Ohio State (A-) 188) Jamal Hill, LB, Oregon (C) 205) Jawhar Jordan, HB, Louisville (B) 238) Solomon Byrd, ED, USC (B) 249) LaDarius Henderson, T, Michigan (B) Indianapolis Colts Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A) The Indianapolis Colts focused on adding high-impact players across the board, with a notable emphasis on bolstering their defensive and offensive lines. Laiatu Latu from UCLA and Adonai Mitchell from Texas are key examples of their strategy to inject talent into critical areas, potentially providing immediate contributions. The Colts also enhanced their offensive flexibility with selections like Tanor Bortolini from Wisconsin and Cade Stover from Ohio State, addressing both short-term needs and long-term depth. Day One: Average Grade (A) 15) Laiatu Latu, ED, UCLA (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A+) 52) Adonai Mitchell, WR, Texas (A+) 79) Matt Goncalves, T, Pittsburgh (B) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 117) Tanor Bortolini, C, Wisconsin (A) 142) Anthony Gould, WR, Oregon State (B) 151) Jaylon Carlies, S, Missouri (C) 164) Jaylin Simpson, S, Auburn (B) 201) Micah Abraham, CB, Marshall (C) 234) Jonah Laulu, DI, Oklahoma (B) Jacksonville Jaguars Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B-) Jacksonville Jaguars' draft approach was aimed at upgrading their receiver corps and defensive line, with a significant investment in physical and versatile players like Brian Thomas Jr. from LSU and Maason Smith from LSU. The Jaguars also focused on adding depth to their secondary with picks like Jarrian Jones from Florida State and improving their special teams with the addition of Cam Little from Arkansas, reflecting a holistic approach to team building. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 23) Brian Thomas Jr., WR, LSU (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (C) 48) Maason Smith, DI, LSU (C) 96) Jarrian Jones, CB, Florida State (B+) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 114) Javon Foster, T, Missouri (B) 116) Jordan Jefferson, DI, LSU (C) 153) Deantre Prince, CB, Mississippi (C) 167) Keilan Robinson, HB, Texas (B) 212) Cam Little, K, Arkansas (B) 236) Myles Cole, ED, Texas Tech (B) Kansas City Chiefs Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A-) The Kansas City Chiefs executed a focused strategy to enhance their offensive firepower and defensive flexibility. Xavier Worthy from Texas, a dynamic receiver, stands out as a significant addition. The Chiefs also invested in protecting Patrick Mahomes with the selection of Kingsley Suamataia from BYU and added depth to their tight end room and secondary. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 28) Xavier Worthy, WR, Texas (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (B+) 63) Kingsley Suamataia, T, BYU (B+) Day Three: Average Grade (A) 131) Jared Wiley, TE, TCU (B+) 133) Jaden Hicks, S, Washington State (A+) 159) Hunter Nourzad, C, Penn State (B+) 211) Kamal Hadden, CB, Tennessee (B+) 248) C.J. Hanson, G, Holy Cross (B) Las Vegas Raiders Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A-) The Las Vegas Raiders focused on adding potential star power and depth across their roster. Brock Bowers from Georgia and Jackson Powers-Johnson from Oregon were notable picks, expected to immediately boost the Raiders' offensive capabilities. The selection of Delmar Glaze from Maryland and the emphasis on enhancing the defensive and offensive lines reflect Las Vegas's strategy to build a robust and competitive team for the future. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 13) Brock Bowers, TE, Georgia (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A+) 44) Jackson Powers-Johnson, C, Oregon (A+) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 77) Delmar Glaze, T, Maryland (C) 112) Decamerion Richardson, CB, Mississippi State (B) 148) Tommy Eichenberg, LB, Ohio State (B) 208) Dylan Laube, HB, New Hampshire (B) 223) Trey Taylor, S, Air Force (B) 229) M.J. Devonshire, CB, Pittsburgh (B) Los Angeles Chargers Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A) The Los Angeles Chargers focused on strengthening their offensive and defensive lines and added significant depth to their secondary. Joe Alt from Notre Dame, a standout offensive tackle, and Ladd McConkey from Georgia, a versatile receiver, were key additions aimed at boosting the Chargers' offensive capabilities. The Chargers also focused on adding depth to their linebacker and defensive line positions, ensuring that they remain competitive in all phases of the game. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 5) Joe Alt, OT, Notre Dame (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 34) Ladd McConkey, WR, Georgia (A) 69) Junior Colson, LB, Michigan (B+) Day Three: Average Grade (B+) 105) Justin Eboigbe, ED, Alabama (C) 137) Tarheeb Still, CB, Maryland (B) 140) Cam Hart, CB, Notre Dame (A) 181) Kimani Vidal, HB, Troy (A-) 225) Brenden Rice, WR, USC (A) 253) Cornelius Johnson, WR, Michigan (B) Los Angeles Rams Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A-) The Los Angeles Rams focused on enhancing their defensive prowess and adding dynamic playmakers to their offense. Jared Verse from Florida State, a versatile defensive end, and Blake Corum from Michigan, a highly agile running back, highlight the Rams' strategy to build a robust and flexible team. The Rams' draft picks reflect a clear intent to enhance their defensive line and secondary while adding explosive potential to their offensive lineup. Day One: Average Grade (A) 19) Jared Verse, ED, Florida State (A) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 39) Braden Fiske, DI, Florida State (B) 83) Blake Corum, HB, Michigan (A) Day Three: Average Grade (B+) 99) Kamren Kinchens, S, Miami (FL) (A-) 154) Brennan Jackson, ED, Washington State (B) 196) Tyler Davis, DI, Clemson (B+) 209) Joshua Karty, K, Stanford (B) 213) Jordan Whittington, WR, Texas (A-) 217) Beaux Limmer, C, Arkansas (A-) 254) KT Leveston, T, Kansas State (A-) Miami Dolphins Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B+) The Miami Dolphins targeted a mix of high-impact and developmental players to strengthen their roster. Chop Robinson from Penn State is a standout pick, a potential star at the edge rusher position with the right development. The Dolphins also bolstered their offensive line with Patrick Paul from Houston, adding much-needed protection for Tua Tagovailoa. The addition of dynamic playmakers like Jaylen Wright from Tennessee and Mohamed Kamara from Colorado State in the later rounds indicates a clear strategy to enhance their offensive explosiveness and defensive depth. Day One: Average Grade (A) 21) Chop Robinson, ED, Penn State (A) Day Two: Average Grade (B) 55) Patrick Paul, T, Houston (B) Day Three: Average Grade (B+) 120) Jaylen Wright, HB, Tennessee (B+) 158) Mohamed Kamara, ED, Colorado State (B+) 184) Malik Washington, WR, Virginia (B+) 198) Patrick McMorris, S, California (C) 241) Tahj Washington, WR, USC (A-) Minnesota Vikings Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A+) The Minnesota Vikings made strategic moves to improve both their offense and defense, selecting highly capable players. J.J. McCarthy from Michigan stands out as a potentially transformative quarterback, fitting perfectly into Minnesota’s system. Dallas Turner from Alabama offers significant value as a versatile linebacker, enhancing their defensive strength. The Vikings' focus on adding depth and talent, such as Khyree Jackson from Oregon in the secondary and Walter Rouse from Oklahoma on the offensive line, showcases a commitment to building a solid and versatile roster. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 10) J.J. McCarthy, QB, Michigan (A+) 17) Dallas Turner, ED, Alabama (A+) Day Two: No Picks Day Three: Average Grade (B) 108) Khyree Jackson, CB, Oregon (A-) 177) Walter Rouse, T, Oklahoma (B) 203) Will Reichard, K, Alabama (B) 230) Michael Jurgens, G, Wake Forest (B) 232) Levi Drake Rodriguez, DI, Texas A&M-Commerce (B) New England Patriots Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B-) The New England Patriots focused on revitalizing their offense with the addition of Drake Maye from North Carolina, a quarterback with the tools to potentially lead the franchise. The Patriots also targeted enhancing their receiving corps and offensive line depth with picks like Ja'Lynn Polk from Washington and Layden Robinson from Texas A&M. The selection of dynamic receivers and solid offensive linemen demonstrates New England's strategy to build around their new quarterback and solidify the offense. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 3) Drake Maye, QB, North Carolina (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (B+) 37) Ja'Lynn Polk, WR, Washington (B+) 68) Caedan Wallace, T, Penn State (C) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 103) Layden Robinson, G, Texas A&M (B) 110) Javon Baker, WR, UCF (B+) 180) Marcellas Dial, CB, South Carolina (C) 193) Joe Milton, QB, Tennessee (B) 231) Jaheim Bell, TE, Florida State (A-) New Orleans Saints Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A-) The New Orleans Saints capitalized on key opportunities in the draft to significantly upgrade their roster, particularly on the offensive line and in the secondary. Taliese Fuaga from Oregon State, an elite offensive tackle with the versatility to play multiple positions, highlights their approach to strengthening the line. Kool-Aid McKinstry from Alabama adds immediate talent and depth to their secondary, addressing a critical need. The Saints also sought depth and potential impact players in the later rounds, enhancing both their defensive and offensive units. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 14) Taliese Fuaga, OT, Oregon State (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 41) Kool-Aid McKinstry, CB, Alabama (A) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 150) Spencer Rattler, QB, South Carolina (A-) 170) Bub Means, WR, Pittsburgh (B) 175) Jaylan Ford, LB, Texas (B) 199) Khristian Boyd, DI, Northern Iowa (B+) 239) Josiah Ezirim, T, Eastern Kentucky (B) New York Giants Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A) The New York Giants focused heavily on bringing in high-impact talent, particularly at wide receiver and in the secondary. Malik Nabers from LSU, as a highly-touted receiver, is expected to elevate the Giants' offensive playmaking ability immediately. The Giants also added depth and versatility to their defensive backfield, with Ty Nubin from Minnesota and Andru Phillips from Kentucky enhancing their coverage capabilities. The selection of impactful players across the board underscores the Giants' intent to effectively bolster both sides of the ball. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 6) Malik Nabers, WR, LSU (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 47) Ty Nubin, S, Minnesota (A+) 70) Andru Phillips, CB, Kentucky (B+) Day Three: Average Grade (A) 107) Theo Johnson, TE, Penn State (A) 166) Tyrone Tracy, HB, Purdue (A) 183) Darius Muasau, LB, UCLA (B) New York Jets Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A-) The New York Jets executed a focused draft strategy to fortify their offensive line and add dynamic weapons to their offense. Olumuyiwa Fashanu from Penn State, a top tackle prospect, is expected to become a cornerstone on the offensive line. The Jets also selected playmakers like Malachi Corley from Western Kentucky and Braelon Allen from Wisconsin, aiming to inject versatility and explosiveness into their offensive schemes. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 11) Olumuyiwa Fashanu, OT, Penn State (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (B+) 65) Malachi Corley, WR, Western Kentucky (B+) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 134) Braelon Allen, HB, Wisconsin (B+) 171) Jordan Travis, QB, Florida State (B) 173) Isaiah Davis, HB, South Dakota State (A-) 176) Qwan'tez Stiggers, CB, New York (B) 257) Jaylen Key, S, Alabama (B) Philadelphia Eagles Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A) The Philadelphia Eagles targeted versatility and athleticism in their draft picks, focusing on strengthening their secondary and adding depth to their offensive and defensive lines. Quinyon Mitchell from Toledo, an elite cornerback prospect, and Cooper DeJean from Iowa, another versatile secondary player, highlight their commitment to improving their defensive backfield. The Eagles also added dynamic offensive playmakers like Ainias Smith from Texas A&M and strategic depth pieces like Trevor Keegan from Michigan, showing a balanced approach to building their roster. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 22) Quinyon Mitchell, CB, Toledo (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 40) Cooper DeJean, CB, Iowa (A+) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 94) Jalyx Hunt, ED, Houston Christian (B+) 127) Will Shipley, HB, Clemson (A-) 152) Ainias Smith, WR, Texas A&M (A-) 155) Jeremiah Trotter Jr., LB, Clemson (B+) 172) Trevor Keegan, G, Michigan (B+) 185) Johnny Wilson, WR, Florida State (B+) 190) Dylan McMahon, C, North Carolina State (C) Pittsburgh Steelers Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A+) The Pittsburgh Steelers focused on adding strength and versatility to their offensive line and injecting new talent into their receiving and defensive units. Troy Fautanu from Washington and Zach Frazier from West Virginia are expected to significantly enhance the Steelers' offensive line capabilities, while Roman Wilson from Michigan provides an exciting new weapon for their passing game. The Steelers' strategic selection of high-impact players across the board demonstrates their commitment to building a balanced and competitive team. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 20) Troy Fautanu, OT, Washington (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 51) Zach Frazier, C, West Virginia (A+) 84) Roman Wilson, WR, Michigan (A+) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 98) Payton Wilson, LB, North Carolina State (A) 119) Mason McCormick, G, South Dakota State (B+) 178) Logan Lee, DI, Iowa (B) 195) Ryan Watts, CB, Texas (B) San Francisco 49ers Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B) The San Francisco 49ers focused on adding dynamic and versatile players to their roster this draft season. Ricky Pearsall from Florida, a standout wide receiver known for his excellent route running and ability to track the ball, was a significant acquisition. The 49ers also fortified their offensive line and secondary with Dominick Puni from Kansas and Renardo Green from Florida State, aiming to bolster both pass protection and coverage depth. Additional picks in the secondary and offensive skill positions underline their strategy to increase depth and enhance playmaking abilities across the board. Day One: Average Grade (B+) 31) Ricky Pearsall, WR, Florida (B+) Day Two: Average Grade (B) 64) Renardo Green, CB, Florida State (B) 86) Dominick Puni, T, Kansas (B) Day Three: Average Grade (B+) 124) Malik Mustapha, S, Wake Forest (B) 129) Isaac Guerendo, HB, Louisville (B+) 135) Jacob Cowing, WR, Arizona (A) 215) Jarrett Kingston, G, USC (C) 251) Tatum Bethune, LB, Florida State (B) Seattle Seahawks Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B+) The Seattle Seahawks strategically targeted areas of need, focusing particularly on their defensive line and secondary while also strengthening the offensive line. Byron Murphy II from Texas, the top interior defender in the draft, is expected to make an immediate impact. The Seahawks also added key offensive linemen like Christian Haynes from Connecticut and Sataoa Laumea from Utah, aiming to solidify their protection schemes and run game. The secondary received new talent with picks like Nehemiah Pritchett from Auburn and D.J. James from Auburn, enhancing their coverage abilities. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 16) Byron Murphy II, IDL, Texas (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 81) Christian Haynes, G, Connecticut (A+) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 118) Tyrice Knight, LB, UTEP (C) 121) AJ Barner, TE, Michigan (B) 136) Nehemiah Pritchett, CB, Auburn (B) 179) Sataoa Laumea, T, Utah (B) 192) D.J. James, CB, Auburn (B+) 207) Mike Jerrell, T, Findlay (C) Tampa Bay Buccaneers Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B+) Tampa Bay Buccaneers targeted both offensive and defensive enhancements through their draft picks. Graham Barton from Duke, a versatile offensive lineman, was a key addition to solidifying the interior and possibly playing multiple positions on the line. Chris Braswell from Alabama and Tykee Smith from Georgia were significant defensive additions, with Braswell expected to provide immediate edge rushing capabilities and Smith enhancing the run defense. Jalen McMillan from Washington and Bucky Irving from Oregon are expected to bring dynamism to the offense, particularly in the passing and running games. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 26) Graham Barton, IOL, Duke (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (B+) 57) Chris Braswell, ED, Alabama (B+) 89) Tykee Smith, S, Georgia (B) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 92) Jalen McMillan, WR, Washington (A) 125) Bucky Irving, HB, Oregon (B+) 220) Elijah Klein, G, UTEP (C) 246) Devin Culp, TE, Washington (C) Tennessee Titans Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B) The Tennessee Titans focused on solidifying their offensive and defensive lines with high-ceiling picks like J.C. Latham from Alabama and T'Vondre Sweat from Texas. Both are expected to bring physicality and durability to the line units. The Titans also added depth to their linebacker group and secondary with picks like Cedric Gray from North Carolina and Jarvis Brownlee Jr. from Louisville, enhancing their defensive versatility. The selection of Jha'Quan Jackson from Tulane as a return specialist underscores their focus on improving special teams. Day One: Average Grade (A) 7) J.C. Latham, OT, Alabama (A) Day Two: Average Grade (B) 38) T'Vondre Sweat, DI, Texas (B) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 106) Cedric Gray, LB, North Carolina (B) 146) Jarvis Brownlee Jr., CB, Louisville (B+) 182) Jha'Quan Jackson, WR, Tulane (B) 242) James Williams, S, Miami (FL) (B) 247) Marcus Harris, DI, Auburn (B) 252) Jaylen Harrell, ED, Michigan (A-) Washington Commanders Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A) The Washington Commanders prioritized acquiring game-changing talent at key positions, particularly at quarterback, with Jayden Daniels from LSU as their highest quarterback draft pick since Robert Griffin III. Jayden Daniels offers dynamic playmaking ability that could revitalize the Commanders' offense. The draft strategy also focused on shoring up the defensive line and secondary with high-impact picks like Jer'Zhan Newton from Illinois and Mike Sainristil from Michigan. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 2) Jayden Daniels, QB, LSU (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A+) 36) Jer'Zhan Newton, DI, Illinois (A+) 50) Mike Sainristil, CB, Michigan (A+) 53) Ben Sinnott, TE, Kansas State (C) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 50) Mike Sainristil, CB, Michigan (A+) 53) Ben Sinnott, TE, Kansas State (C) 67) Brandon Coleman, T, TCU (B+) 100) Luke McCaffrey, WR, Rice (B) 139) Jordan Magee, LB, Temple (B+) 161) Dominique Hampton, S, Washington (B) 222) Javontae Jean-Baptiste, ED, Notre Dame (C)

Jayden Daniels’ Commanders Debut: 5 Key Observations From His First Preseason NFL Game Jayden Daniels, who was selected with the number two overall pick by the Washington Commanders in the 2024 NFL Draft, made his NFL debut against the New York Jets on Saturday. the former LSU Tiger and reigning Heisman Trophy winner provided fans with a glimpse of the future by showing off his deep accuracy as a passer and versatility as a runner. Jayden Daniels’ Commanders Debut: 5 Key Observations From His First Preseason NFL Game 1. Dynamic Opening Drive Daniels wasted no time making an impact, leading the Commanders on an impressive 11-play, 70-yard drive to open the game. The drive was capped off with Daniels showcasing his dual-threat ability by faking a handoff to Austin Ekeler and keeping the ball for a three-yard touchdown run. This early score set the tone for his debut and highlighted the athleticism that made him a top pick. 2. Showcasing His Arm Talent Before his rushing touchdown, Daniels flashed his arm strength and accuracy with a 42-yard strike to wide receiver Dyami Brown on a crucial third down. This throw not only kept the drive alive but also demonstrated his ability to make big plays downfield, even in a high-pressure situation. He later connected with Terry McLaurin for a three-yard gain, further showcasing his potential as a passer. 3. Limited but Efficient In his brief appearance, Daniels completed 2-of-3 passes for 48 yards. His only incompletion came on a missed screen pass to Austin Ekeler, but he quickly bounced back with completions on the next two throws. Despite the limited action, Daniels was efficient and showed poise, managing the offense effectively on his only drive of the game. 4. Immediate Optimism Among Fans Even though it’s just preseason, Daniels’ debut generated significant excitement among Commanders fans. His ability to lead a scoring drive with both his arm and legs has created optimism for what he can bring to the team this season. The performance, albeit against the Jets' backups, showcased why Washington invested such a high draft pick in the former Heisman winner. 5. Setting Expectations High While it’s important to temper expectations based on one preseason drive, Daniels’ debut was a promising glimpse of his potential. He displayed the composure, athleticism, and playmaking ability that Washington hopes will translate into regular-season success. As the preseason progresses, all eyes will be on Daniels to see if he can build on this strong start and continue to impress as the Commanders' quarterback of the future.

2024 NFL Draft Position Rankings: Top 5 Tight Ends | Pre NFL Combine We are entering the next stage of the NFL Draft player rankings process. As always, I start with the top 5 quarterbacks (QB), top 5 running backs (RB), top 10 wide receivers (WR), and the top 5 tight ends (TE) before diving into the updated offensive line and top ten defender grades. Click Here: Check out the Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Big Board top 100 player rankings. We evaluate every player using a proprietary grading process that involves film evaluation combined with advanced data. On the back end, our scouting process mirrors the same process deployed by current NFL front-office personnel so that we can deliver the most in-depth player scouting reports available. All of this is currently free (subject to change). Each player scouting report includes: In-depth player scouting report Play Style and Scheme Fit Analysis Player Strengths & Weaknesses Player Comparisons The Top 5 TE's The top 5 TE's, according to our updated 2024 NFL Draft Big Board player rankings, ranked ahead of the 2024 NFL Combine. (1) Brock Bowers, Georgia Ranking Analysis: Brock Bowers is a versatile, athletic, tight end who can make plays in both the passing and the running game. He has been compared to some of the best tight ends in the NFL, including George Kittle, Travis Kelce, and Darren Waller. Bowers would fit well in a scheme that values athletic, pass-catching tight ends and takes advantage of his abilities in the middle of the field and down the seam. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 1st Consensus Overall Pick #: Top 10 Overall NFL Teams Mocked: Chargers, Broncos, Colts Ceiling: Elite, capable of becoming a cornerstone player for an NFL franchise. (2) Ja'Tavion Sanders, Texas Ranking Analysis: Sanders is a dynamic tight end who excels in a versatile offensive scheme. His ability to line up in multiple positions, including in-line, slot, and even outside, makes him a valuable asset for any team looking for a modern, pass-catching tight end. He's particularly effective in schemes that utilize the tight end as a key weapon in the passing game, leveraging his route-running ability and athleticism to create mismatches. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 2nd-4th Round Consensus Overall Pick #: 40th Overall NFL Teams Mocked: Bengals, Dolphins, Commanders Ceiling: High-End Starter Potential, with the ability to significantly impact the game. (3) Jaheim Bell, Florida State Ranking Analysis: Jaheim Bell's role as a versatile H-back or move tight end is underscored by his athleticism and receiving skills. While he shows promise as a receiver, enhancements in contested catches and deep speed are necessary for NFL success. Bell's multifunctional play style, comparable to Hunter Henry and Gerald Everett, presents him as a valuable draft pick with the versatility to fit into numerous offensive formations. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 4th-5th Round Consensus Overall Pick #: NA NFL Teams Mocked: Bengals, Pats, Commanders Ceiling: Mid-Level Starter Potential, with the ability to exceed expectations within a few years. (4) AJ Barner, Michigan Ranking Analysis: AJ Barner embodies the traditional tight end archetype with a strong emphasis on blocking and reliable receiving. His fit in pro-style offenses that value a dual-threat tight end suggests a role as a dependable contributor. While Barner may not redefine the tight end position, his solid fundamentals and work ethic could make him a steady presence in the NFL. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 5th-6th Round Consensus Overall Pick #: NA NFL Teams Mocked: Bears, Bengals, Chargers Ceiling: Low-Level Starter Potential, indicating the potential for reliable, if not spectacular, NFL contributions. (5) Theo Johnson, Penn State Ranking Analysis: Theo Johnson's versatility as a tight end is highlighted by his receiving prowess and adequate blocking. Drawing comparisons to athletic tight ends like Mark Andrews, Johnson's ability in various offensive roles suggests a promising NFL future. While his blocking requires refinement, Johnson's athleticism and receiving skills make him a notable prospect in the draft. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 4th-6th Round Consensus Overall Pick #: NA NFL Teams Mocked: Bengals, Vikings, Texans Ceiling: Low-Level Starter Potential, with room for development into a more comprehensive role within an NFL offense.