Search Results

2026 NFL Mock Draft 1.1: Garrett Nussmeier to the Saints, Arch Manning Slides, and Early First-Round Projections The 2026 NFL Draft is still months away, but the conversation has already shifted after just one week of college football and the start of the NFL season. Back in our summer scouting edition of Mock Draft 1.0 , we highlighted the quarterback demand at the top of the board, with QB-needy teams shaping the early part of Round 1. Now, with updated film and fresh performances to evaluate, it’s time to revisit those projections in Mock Draft 1.1. Week 1 of the college football season delivered plenty of movement, most notably with Arch Manning’s highly anticipated debut against Ohio State . Manning struggled, and that showing forces a re-think on where he belongs in the draft conversation. For now, he slides back (not out) of this version of the mock until he proves otherwise. But even without Manning, this class is still quarterback-heavy — Garrett Nussmeier, Cade Klubnik, Drew Allar, and LaNorris Sellers all bring the kind of ceiling that could push them into the top 10–15 picks if they take the next step in 2025. As we sit in the middle of Week 1 of the NFL season, team needs are still developing, but the early framework is clear: QB-needy franchises will dictate the flow of this draft, while elite defenders like Caleb Downs and Peter Woods remain top-10 locks. With that context in mind, here’s the updated projection of how the first eight picks of the 2026 NFL Draft could shake out in Mock Draft 1.1. 1. New Orleans Saints – Garrett Nussmeier, QB, LSU The Saints bypass the Arch Manning storyline for now and instead land Garrett Nussmeier, who looks every bit the part of a franchise quarterback. After waiting his turn behind Jayden Daniels, Nussmeier broke out in 2024 with over 4,000 passing yards and now enters 2025 as LSU’s unquestioned leader. 2. Cleveland Browns – Spencer Fano, OT, Utah Cleveland continues its search for stability along the offensive line, landing one of the premier tackle prospects in the country. Spencer Fano has started nearly every game since arriving at Utah and enters 2025 as PFF’s highest-graded returning run blocker among FBS tackles. 3. Tennessee Titans – Caleb Downs, S, Ohio State The Titans are in the thick of a rebuild, and Caleb Downs is the type of blue-chip prospect you build a defense around. After starring at Alabama as a freshman and transferring to Ohio State, Downs has emerged as the consensus top defensive player in college football. 4. New York Giants – Francis Mauigoa, OT, Miami With questions still surrounding Jaxson Dart’s development, the Giants choose to solidify their offensive line by drafting Francis Mauigoa. The former five-star has started every game at right tackle since arriving at Miami, improving each year and allowing just two hits/sacks in 2024. 5. New York Jets – Rueben Bain Jr., EDGE, Miami The Jets double down on defense by pairing Quinnen Williams with one of the most disruptive edge defenders in college football. Rueben Bain Jr. burst onto the scene as a freshman at Miami and enters 2025 as one of the most polished pass rushers in the class. 6. Carolina Panthers – T.J. Parker, EDGE, Clemson Carolina’s defense takes center stage here as they add T.J. Parker, who might be the best returning edge defender in the country. The 6’3”, 265-pound pass rusher posted 12 sacks and forced six fumbles in 2024, earning national recognition for his disruptive play. 7. Las Vegas Raiders – Peter Woods, IDL, Clemson The Raiders add a difference-maker in the trenches with Peter Woods, one of the most complete defensive linemen in the draft. At 6’3”, 315 pounds, Woods brings a rare blend of power, explosiveness, and versatility—having thrived at both defensive tackle and defensive end for Clemson. 8. Indianapolis Colts – Drew Allar, QB, Penn State The Colts appear ready to move on from Anthony Richardson, turning to Daniel Jones as their starter in 2025. Jones profiles more as a bridge option, giving Drew Allar time to develop if needed. At 6’5”, 243 pounds, Allar has the prototypical NFL frame and elite arm strength to attack vertically. 9. Cleveland Browns – LaNorris Sellers, QB, South Carolina Cleveland has invested recent draft capital at quarterback, but the long-term answer remains unsettled. Enter LaNorris Sellers, a high-upside prospect with rare physical tools at 6’3”, 242 pounds. 10. Miami Dolphins – Avieon Terrell, CB, Clemson Miami continues to retool its secondary with Avieon Terrell, one of the most polished and competitive corners in the country. The younger brother of Falcons CB A.J. Terrell, he’s quickly established himself as a reliable playmaker at Clemson. 11. New England Patriots – Jordyn Tyson, WR, Arizona State Tyson exploded in 2024 with 1,101 yards and 10 TDs, showing elite separation and fluid route-running. At 6’1”, 195, he’s a versatile inside-outside weapon with WR1 upside. If he cleans up drops and stays healthy, he gives Drake Maye a much-needed top target. 12. Los Angeles Rams – Arch Manning, QB, Texas Manning brings prototypical size, arm talent, and creativity outside of structure, but inconsistency remains. His natural release and touch fit well in Sean McVay’s QB-friendly system. If he bounces back from his shaky opener, his ceiling keeps him in Round 1. 13. Seattle Seahawks – Kadyn Proctor, OT, Alabama Proctor is a 6’7”, 360-pound mauler with rare athleticism for his size. He allowed only two sacks in 2024 and flashes dominance in pass pro and the run game. With conditioning and leverage refinement, he projects as a franchise left tackle. 14. Arizona Cardinals – A.J. Harris, CB, Penn State Harris stepped into a starting role in 2024 and immediately elevated Penn State’s secondary. At 6’2”, he combines length, twitch, and instincts to thrive in man or zone. Still developing ball production, but his traits suggest plug-and-play starter upside. 15. Dallas Cowboys – Dani Dennis-Sutton, EDGE, Penn State Dennis-Sutton is one of the most experienced edge defenders in this class, with 15 career sacks and strong run defense. At 6’5”, 260, he wins with power, leverage, and effort. While he lacks elite bend, his floor as a run-stuffing, power end is high. 16. Pittsburgh Steelers – Cade Klubnik, QB, Clemson Klubnik offers mobility and arm strength to attack all levels but still battles decision-making and post-snap reads. He fits best in a layered play-action system where his movement skills can shine. With refinement, he has mid-tier starter potential. 17. Chicago Bears – Jeremiyah Love, RB, Notre Dame Love is one of the most explosive RBs in the country, with speed, balance, and creativity in open space. At 6’0”, 210, he profiles as a modern three-down weapon. His pass protection needs work, but his home-run ability makes him a first-round fit. 18. Minnesota Vikings – Malik Muhammad, CB, Texas Muhammad is a polished, versatile cover man with 30 games of experience at Texas. He held QBs to a 62.0 rating in 2024, flashing strong instincts and technique. Not an elite size-speed specimen, but his floor and versatility make him a safe CB2/CB1 upside. 19. Houston Texans – Caleb Banks, IDL, Florida At 6’6”, 325, Banks is a rare size-speed defensive tackle with alignment versatility. He led returning Power Four DTs in pressures (53) last year, thriving as a disruptor. Still raw against doubles, but his upside as a penetrating 3-tech is enormous. 20. Denver Broncos – Anthony Hill Jr., LB, Texas Hill is an athletic, sideline-to-sideline linebacker with rare blitz ability. In two years he’s logged 10 sacks, five forced fumbles, and 30+ coverage stops. Still refining block deconstruction, but his hybrid skill set screams three-down starter. 21. Tampa Bay Buccaneers – C.J. Allen, LB, Georgia Allen is one of the fastest-rising linebackers in the class with sideline-to-sideline range and burst. A reliable playmaker since his freshman year, he finished 2024 with 76 tackles and elite efficiency. His instincts and versatility give him three-down starter potential in modern defenses. 22. Los Angeles Chargers – Derrick Moore, EDGE, Michigan Moore enters 2025 as Michigan’s top returning pass rusher, posting a 23.1% win rate last season. At 6’3”, 258, he brings power, explosion, and strong edge-setting ability against the run. Still raw with limited counters, but his upside fits a 4-3 or hybrid front. 23. Green Bay Packers – Jermod McCoy, CB, Tennessee McCoy led the SEC in interceptions and breakups in 2024 before a torn ACL in January. At 6’1”, he’s a ball-hawking zone corner with length, anticipation, and press utility. If healthy, he has CB1 upside and scheme versatility for Green Bay’s secondary. 24. Washington Commanders – Denzel Boston, WR, Washington Boston emerged post-Odunze as a 6’4”, 209-pound red-zone weapon with 9 TDs in 2024. While not sudden, he wins with body control, strong hands, and vertical timing. He projects as a size-mismatch WR2 who thrives in play-action or vertical systems. 25. Cincinnati Bengals – Dillon Thieneman, S, Oregon Thieneman is a proven playmaker with 210 career tackles and six INTs. A transfer from Purdue, he thrives as a rangy single-high safety but also offers box versatility. His instincts, ball skills, and leadership give him a high floor as an NFL starter. 26. San Francisco 49ers – Carnell Tate, WR, Ohio State Tate is a polished route runner with excellent body control and reliability in big spots. He may lack elite burst, but his timing, precision, and toughness stand out. A potential WR2 who thrives in rhythm-based passing offenses, he’s a natural fit in San Francisco. 27. Los Angeles Rams – Eric Singleton Jr., WR, Auburn Singleton is one of the nation’s most dangerous vertical threats, flashing 4.34 speed and sudden route pacing. He led returning Power Four WRs in deep yards since 2023. Though undersized, his burst and tracking ability make him a dynamic WR2 in motion-heavy schemes. 28. Kansas City Chiefs – LT Overton, EDGE, Alabama Overton finally broke out at Alabama in 2024, showing inside-out versatility across the defensive line. At 6’4”, 275, he logged an 18% win rate and stout run defense. His athletic profile fits perfectly in Kansas City’s hybrid fronts as a disruptive chess piece. 29. Detroit Lions – Tyreak Sapp, EDGE, Florida Sapp is a high-floor edge defender with positional flexibility as a 5-tech or power end. He racked up 7 sacks and 13 TFLs in 2024 while earning a 90.4 PFF grade. Not explosive, but his power, technique, and bloodlines make him NFL-ready. 30. Buffalo Bills – Jyaire Hill, CB, Michigan Hill emerged as Michigan’s top corner in 2024 with 46 tackles, 7 PBUs, and 2 INTs. At 6’2”, he thrives in press with length and physicality, while also excelling against the run. His developing ball skills and physical playstyle give him CB1 upside. 31. Baltimore Ravens – Jaishawn Barham, EDGE, Michigan Barham is a hybrid defender shifting from linebacker to full-time EDGE. At 6’3”, 248, he combines explosiveness, power, and versatility to rush or play off-ball. His ceiling is high in pressure-heavy schemes, offering the Ravens a disruptive front-seven weapon. 32. Philadelphia Eagles – Antonio Williams, WR, Clemson Williams rebounded in 2024 with 11 TDs, proving his polish and separation ability at 6’0”, 205. A technician with elite release skills, he thrives in the slot or motion-heavy roles. He projects as a WR2 with third-down reliability and YAC upside.

The 2022 NFL Offseason All in One Place All of the Football Scout 365 NFL offseason content is in one place. Below, you will find all of our offseason NFL analyses covering various topics from the free agency, the NFL Draft, fantasy football, and more. Post-NFL Draft Content 2022 NFL Draft Composite Grades For All 32 NFL Teams Introducing the Football Scout 365 NFL Draft composite grade. We combined five of the industry's top NFL Draft sites, including ESPN/Mel Kiper, PFF, the Ringer/Chad Kelly, CBS/Chad Prisco, and NFL.com, to develop a consensus final grade for this year's NFL Draft. Click Here Offseason Fantasy Football Analysis Fantasy QB Rankings, Will Russ Cook In Denver? Trevor Lawrence Year Two Leap, and More Click Here Can Christian McCaffrey and Saquon Barkley Bounce Back? 2022 NFL RB Projections. Click Here Ranking The Top 2022 NFL WR's, Are The Chiefs and Packers Playing Moneyball At WR? Click Here Offseason NFL Analysis Storylines And Narratives To Watch Ahead Of The Start Of 2022 NFL Training Camp Click Here 2017 NFL Draft RB Class Remains The Best Of The Last Decade Led by Alvin Kamara, Christian McCaffrey Click Here NFL Podcast: Top 10 NFL QB Debate, We Debate ESPN's Current Top Ten QB Rankings Click Here Top 10 2022 NFL WR's Debate, Ja'Marr Chase, Justin Jefferson, Davante Adams, And More Click Here

Michigan vs. Ohio State: How 4th Quarter Dominance Has Flipped the Rivalry Since 2021 The Michigan Wolverines have done it again, beating Ohio State for the fourth consecutive year. The key to their success? Dominating the fourth quarter. This trend has defined the rivalry since 2021, and it’s worth a deep dive to understand how Michigan has managed to consistently outlast the Buckeyes. How Michigan Has Done It Michigan’s dominance in the 4th quarter has been the cornerstone of their recent success against Ohio State. The Wolverines’ strategy is simple but brutally effective: wear down their opponent with physicality, control the clock, and impose their will in the trenches when it matters most. Here’s a breakdown of the 4th-quarter data from the last four games: Time of Possession (TOP): Michigan has averaged 9:45 of 4th-quarter possession time per game, compared to Ohio State’s 5:14. This near 2-to-1 advantage reflects Michigan’s ability to sustain drives and keep the ball out of Ohio State’s hands. Rushing Attempts and Yards: The Wolverines have averaged nearly 15 rushing attempts and 98 yards in the 4th quarter, compared to Ohio State’s meager 4 attempts and 8 yards. Over the four games, Michigan has outgained Ohio State 394 to 32 total rushing yards in the final quarter. Yards After Contact (YAContact): Michigan has also dominated in yards after contact, amassing 176 total yards, an average of 44 per game. This highlights their physical edge and ability to break tackles late in games. 1st Downs and Execution: Michigan’s 4th-quarter rushing attack has produced 17 first downs, keeping drives alive and wearing down Ohio State’s defense. The story of the rivalry is written in these numbers. Michigan’s 4th-quarter performances are where they have taken control, playing a “bend but don’t break” style on defense and suffocating the Buckeyes with their ground game. Why Ohio State Has Struggled The narrative surrounding Ohio State’s recent struggles against Michigan isn’t about talent. In fact, Ohio State has had the more talented roster on paper in each of the last four years. The issue lies in development, strength and conditioning, and the mental approach to this rivalry. Ohio State has struggled to win at the line of scrimmage, particularly late in games. Their inability to establish a consistent ground game has been glaring. Over four years, Ohio State has averaged just 1.9 yards per carry in the 4th quarter, compared to Michigan’s 6.7 yards per carry. This disparity underscores Michigan’s physical dominance and Ohio State’s failure to match it. What About Ryan Day? There’s plenty of speculation about Ryan Day’s future as Ohio State’s head coach, but here’s the reality: a coaching change is unlikely unless the Buckeyes falter early in the College Football Playoff. Reports suggest that Ohio State’s administration is hesitant to pay Day’s buyout, preferring to allocate resources to NIL initiatives. Instead of a head coaching change, Ohio State is more likely to reevaluate their strength and conditioning program and their internal scouting and analytics. These areas will be critical if they hope to close the gap with Michigan and regain control of the rivalry. Where Does Ohio State Go From Here? Despite their recent struggles, Ohio State still boasts one of the most talented rosters in college football. With time to regroup and address injuries along the offensive line, the Buckeyes have the potential to make a deep playoff run and even win the national championship. However, long-term success in this rivalry will require structural changes, particularly in their approach to strength and conditioning and player development. Final Thoughts Michigan’s recent success against Ohio State boils down to their ability to dominate the 4th quarter. They control the clock, execute in the run game, and physically wear down their opponent. This formula has been the difference over the last four years, and if Ohio State hopes to flip the script, they’ll need to match Michigan’s physicality and address their shortcomings in the trenches. Let us know your thoughts. Can Ohio State turn things around? Should they keep Ryan Day if they don’t reach the national title game? Leave your comments below and be sure to like this article, subscribe to our channel, and stay tuned for more great content.

Mock Draft 2.0: Washington, New England, Atlanta, Denver, New York and Seattle Draft A QB Another week, another mock draft. In Mock Draft 1.0 , I proposed a trade between the Bears and the Falcons that involved sending the number one overall pick to the Falcons in exchange for the number 8 pick. The Falcons would win the Caleb Williams sweepstakes, while the Bears would continue with Justin Fields but still select a quarterback with the 8th pick. In Mock Draft 1.0, we saw five quarterbacks drafted; however, this number has increased with the addition of one more QB in version 2.0. In this version, there are no trades; I am simply drafting based on team needs and the best available fit. Check out the Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Big Board top 100 player rankings. We evaluate every player using a proprietary grading process that involves film evaluation combined with advanced data. On the back end, our scouting process mirrors the same process deployed by current NFL front-office personnel so that we can deliver the most in-depth player scouting reports available. All of this is currently free (subject to change). Each player scouting report includes: In-depth player scouting report Play Style and Scheme Fit Analysis Player Strengths & Weaknesses Player Comparisons Here is a breakdown of my mock draft by position group. Quarterback (QB): 6 (Although only five quarterbacks possess a first-round grade on our board, six are taken). Wide Receiver (WR): 6 (The wide receiver class is deep. We might not see six in the actual NFL Draft due to the depth and available talent on days two and three). Offensive Tackle (OT): 7 (There is always a high demand for the tackle position in the NFL, and this class is deep, so selecting seven might be a bit excessive). Edge Rusher (EDGE): 4 (This class has some really good edge rushers. There is a noticeable drop-off after the top four, so I believe four will be chosen quickly, and as many as six could be selected in the first round). Interior Defensive Lineman (IDL): 2 (The interior defensive lineman group is not deep, so the top players will likely be selected quickly). Cornerback (CB): 5 (I am quite fond of this cornerback class, and there is a lot of high-ceiling talent that will be chosen quickly. There is also good depth that will extend into days two and three). Tight End (TE): 1 Interior Offensive Lineman (IOL): 1 Additional Variables To Consider: Smaller Group of Underclassmen: The NFL has announced a notably smaller group of underclassmen for the 2024 Draft, with only 54 prospects compared to the traditional number of over 100 in previous years. Influence of NIL Benefits: The reduction in numbers is thought to be influenced by the growth of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) benefits at the college level, offering financial incentives to student-athletes that may encourage them to stay in college longer. Top Talents in the Group: Despite the smaller size, the group includes top talents such as quarterbacks Caleb Williams (USC) and Drake Maye (North Carolina), as well as elite wide receivers Marvin Harrison Jr. (Ohio State) and Malik Nabers (LSU). Quality of Talent: The presence of high-profile players highlights the quality of talent entering the draft, indicating that the standard of players remains high despite the overall decrease in numbers. Changing College Football Landscape: This shift could signify a changing landscape in college football, where NIL benefits are altering traditional decisions and pathways of college athletes regarding their professional careers. Mock Draft 2.0 (The draft order for picks 1-28 has been set). (1). Chicago Bears (Needs: OG, C, Edge, DT, WR) Pick: Marvin Harrison Jr., WR, Ohio State Rationale: Harrison Jr. is highly regarded for his remarkable size and route running ability, which could benefit the Bears' receiving corps greatly. Paired with D.J. Moore, the Bears' offense would be extremely dynamic if they chose this route and retained Justin Fields. Notable Free Agents: EDGE Yannick Ngakoue, TE Robert Tonyan, CB Jaylon Johnson, WR Darnell Mooney (2). Washington Commanders (Needs: OG, C, TE, LB, Edge, QB) Pick: Caleb Williams, QB, USC Rationale: Caleb Williams is considered a generational talent at the quarterback position, with a unique blend of arm strength, accuracy, and mobility. Notable Free Agents: DB Kamren Curl, RB Antonio Gibson, WR Curtis Samuel, QB Jacoby Brissett, CB Kendall Fuller ( 3). New England Patriots (Needs: OT, DT, TE, WR, LB) Pick: Drake Maye, QB, North Carolina Rationale: Drake Maye's potential as a high-ceiling quarterback makes him a compelling choice for the Patriots. His ability to extend plays and make accurate throws on the move could rejuvenate the Patriots' offense, providing a dynamic element at the quarterback position that has been missing. Notable Free Agents: TE Hunter Henry, OT Trent Brown, TE Mike Gesicki, EDGE Josh Uche, S Kyle Dugger, RB Ezekiel Elliott (4). Arizona Cardinals (Needs: CB, DT, Edge, LB, OG, WR) Pick: Malik Nabers, WR, LSU Rationale: Malik Nabers' explosive playmaking ability is exactly what the Cardinals need to enhance their wide receiver unit. His agility and speed make him a significant threat, especially in creating separation and yards after the catch. Nabers' potential to become a reliable and dynamic target for Kyler Murray could open up the Cardinals' passing game, providing much-needed versatility and depth to their offense. Notable Free Agents: WR Hollywood Brown, DT Leki Fotu, CB Antonio Hamilton, EDGE L.J. Collier (5). Los Angeles Chargers (Needs: CB, DT, TE, RB, LB) Pick: Brock Bowers, TE, Georgia Rationale: Brock Bowers is chosen for his versatility and unmatched ability as a pass-catching tight end. His athleticism and playmaking skills are reminiscent of some of the top tight ends in the league, potentially transforming the Chargers' offense into a more dynamic and versatile unit. His presence on the field could open up new dimensions in the Chargers' offensive schemes, particularly in the red zone and third-down situations. Notable Free Agents: RB Austin Ekeler, LB Kenneth Murray, TE Gerald Everett, RB Josh Kelley, CB Michael Davis (6). New York Giants (Needs: QB, OG, C, CB, DT, Edge, WR, RB) Pick: Jayden Daniels, QB, LSU Rationale: Daniels brings a significant improvement in terms of versatility and dual-threat capabilities, which could perfectly match Coach Brian Daboll's offensive vision. Notable Free Agents: CB Adoree' Jackson, RB Saquon Barkley, WR Parris Campbell, LB Isaiah Simmons (7). Tennessee Titans (Needs: OT, WR, DT, CB, Edge, RB) Pick: Olu Fashanu, OT, Penn State Rationale: Fashanu's selection addresses a critical need at the offensive tackle position for the Titans. His exceptional athleticism and technical prowess make him a prime candidate to provide immediate improvement and stability to the offensive line, particularly in protecting the quarterback's blind side. His ability to excel in both run blocking and pass protection would be a significant asset for the Titans' offense. Notable Free Agents: QB Ryan Tannehill, RB Derrick Henry, DT Denico Autry, OT Chris Hubbard (8). Atlanta Falcons (Needs: QB, LB, WR, Edge, CB, S) Pick: Michael Penix Jr., QB, Washington Rationale: Penix Jr. is selected for his impressive accuracy and decision-making abilities, making him an ideal candidate to lead the Falcons' offense. His leadership and ability to perform under pressure could be instrumental in revitalizing the Falcons' quarterback position. Notable Free Agents: CB Jeff Okudah, EDGE Calais Campbell, EDGE Bud Dupree, RB Cordarrelle Patterson, C Matt Hennessy, WR Van Jefferson (9). Chicago Bears (Second Pick) (Needs: OG, C, Edge, DT, WR) Pick: Jared Verse, EDGE, Florida State Rationale: After taking Marvin Harrison Jr. with the number one overall pick, the Bears add a versatile pass rusher to solidify the edge of their defense. Notable Free Agents: EDGE Yannick Ngakoue, TE Robert Tonyan, CB Jaylon Johnson, WR Darnell Mooney (10). New York Jets (Needs: OT, OG, S, LB, Edge, WR) Pick: Joe Alt, OT, Notre Dame Rationale: Alt's selection is a strategic move to fortify the Jets' offensive line. His size and athleticism make him a valuable asset in both pass protection and run blocking. His ability to provide essential protection for the quarterback and improve the effectiveness of the run game could be pivotal in enhancing the overall performance of the Jets' offense. Notable Free Agents: EDGE Carl Lawson, RB Dalvin Cook, OT Duane Brown, EDGE Bryce Huff, WR Mecole Hardman (11). Minnesota Vikings (Needs: QB, Edge, CB, DT, RB) Pick: Byron Murphy, IDL, Texas Rationale: The Vikings need an elite interior rusher, and Murphy is starting to climb draft boards. He can provide an elite hole filler that the Vikings desperately need in the middle of their defense. Notable Free Agents: QB Kirk Cousins, EDGE Danielle Hunter, EDGE Marcus Davenport, WR K.J. Osborn, QB Josh Dobbs (12). Denver Broncos (Needs: DT, S, Edge, LB, CB, RB) Pick: Bo Nix, QB, Oregon Rationale: Denver will move on from Russell Wilson, and they need a quick stopgap with some long-term potential. Bo Nix offers experience and versatility at the QB position and could provide an immediate impact. Notable Free Agents: LB Josey Jewell, S Kareem Jackson, C Lloyd Cushenberry, TE Adam Trautman (13). Las Vegas Raiders (Needs: DT, OT, OG, CB, LB, QB, RB) Pick: Jer'Zhan Newton, IDL, Illinois Rationale: Newton's quickness and ability to disrupt plays from the interior line position are key reasons for his selection. His presence in the middle of the defense can help the Raiders in both run defense and interior pass rush, providing a much-needed boost to their defensive line. Notable Free Agents: RB Josh Jacobs, C Andre James, TE Austin Hooper, OL Jermaine Eluemunor ( 14). New Orleans Saints (Needs: OG, TE, Edge, DT, S) Pick: Dallas Turner, EDGE, Alabama Rationale: Turner's high upside as a young edge defender is a strategic addition to the Saints' defensive lineup. His ability to generate pressure and disrupt the backfield could significantly enhance the Saints' pass rush, preparing them for a strong defensive future post-Cam Jordan era. Notable Free Agents: OG Andrus Peat, QB Jameis Winston, OT James Hurst, LB Zack Baun, TE Jimmy Graham (15). Indianapolis Colts (Needs: CB, S, WR, DT, Edge, LB) Pick: Rome Odunze, WR, Washington Rationale: Odunze might not make it out of the top ten, but if he is available, the Colts can add an elite contested catch threat at WR to pair with Michael Pittman (If they can sign him) to build around Anthony Richardson. Notable Free Agents: DT Grover Stewart, CB Kenny Moore, QB Gardner Minshew, WR Michael Pittman Jr., RB Zack Moss (16). Seattle Seahawks (Needs: OG, S, Edge, LB, DT) Pick: J.J. McCarthy, QB, Michigan Rationale: McCarthy's selection as a potential successor to Geno Smith signifies a long-term investment in the quarterback position. His NFL-ready skill set, elite-level arm talent, and mobility offer the Seahawks a chance to develop a dynamic and versatile quarterback who can adapt to the evolving needs of the offense. Notable Free Agents: OG Damien Lewis, LB Devin Bush, LB Jordyn Brooks, QB Drew Lock, LB Bobby Wagner, DT Leonard Williams, EDGE Frank Clark (17). Jacksonville Jaguars (Needs: OG, DT, Edge, WR, S, CB) Pick: Keon Coleman, WR, Florida State Rationale: Coleman's physical presence and exceptional ball skills make him a prime candidate to become a key feature in the Colts' offense. His ability to make big plays and his prowess in the red zone can add a new dynamic to the team's passing attack, potentially elevating the overall offensive output. Notable Free Agents: EDGE Josh Allen, EDGE K'Lavon Chaisson, WR Calvin Ridley, OG Ezra Cleveland (18). Cincinnati Bengals (Needs: OT, OG, C, DT, WR) Pick: JC Latham, OT, Alabama Rationale: Latham's addition aims to solidify the Bengals' offensive line, providing quarterback Joe Burrow with better protection and stability. His technical skills and strength are crucial in enhancing both the passing and running games, which are central to the Bengals' offensive strategy. Notable Free Agents: DT D.J. Reader, WR Tyler Boyd, WR Tee Higgins, OT Jonah Williams, TE Irv Smith (19). Los Angeles Rams (Needs: OT, RB, CB, S, Edge) Pick: Laiatu Latu, Edge, UCLA Rationale: The Rams add a kid from down the road to help them improve their pass rush. Latu provides versatility off the edge of the defense that the Rams aging defense needs. Notable Free Agents: S Jordan Fuller, OG Kevin Dotson, S John Johnson, LB Troy Reeder (20). Pittsburgh Steelers (Needs: OT, CB, LB, OG, QB) Pick: Terrion Arnold, CB, Alabama Rationale: Arnold's completeness as a cornerback is vital for the Steelers, aiming to elevate their secondary's performance. His ability in coverage and playmaking skills can lead to an improved defensive backfield, essential for contending in a pass-heavy league. Notable Free Agents: CB Levi Wallace, DT Montravius Adams, QB Mason Rudolph, EDGE Markus Golden (21). Miami Dolphins (Needs: TE, OG, CB, DT, LB) Pick: Graham Barton, OT, Duke Rationale: Barton provides versatility to the Dolphins OL. He will be drafted as a tackle but can flip inside early in his career to provide an immediate impact. Notable Free Agents: C Connor Williams, DT Christian Wilkins, OG Isaiah Wynn, OG Robert Hunt, DT Raekwon Davis, LB Jerome Baker (22). Philadelphia Eagles (Needs: RB, Edge, CB, TE, DT) Pick: Cooper DeJean, CB, Iowa Rationale: DeJean's explosive athleticism and outstanding instincts make him an ideal fit for the Eagles' secondary. His ability to play multiple positions in the backfield adds much-needed versatility and depth, enhancing the team's defensive strategy. Notable Free Agents: C Jason Kelce, DT Fletcher Cox, EDGE Brandon Graham, RB D'Andre Swift, RB Rashaad Penny (23). Houston Texans (via CLE) (Needs: OT, DT, CB, Edge, WR) Pick: Kool-Aid McKinstry, CB, Alabama Rationale: McKinstry's selection addresses the Texans' need for a versatile and athletic cornerback. His ability to pair effectively with Derek Stingley Jr. in the secondary is expected to strengthen the team's pass defense significantly. Notable Free Agents: TE Dalton Schultz, DT Sheldon Rankins, CB Steven Nelson, EDGE Jonathan Greenard, CB Tavierre Thomas, EDGE Derek Barnett (24). Dallas Cowboys (Needs: C, RB, CB, DT, OG) Pick: Chop Robinson, EDGE, Penn State Rationale: Robinson's explosive pass-rushing ability is a key addition to the Cowboys' defense. His outstanding first step and energy are expected to complement Micah Parsons, enhancing the team's overall pass rush and defensive pressure. Notable Free Agents: OT Tyron Smith, RB Tony Pollard, CB Stephon Gilmore, C Tyler Biadasz, EDGE Dorance Armstrong (25). Green Bay Packers (Needs: S, OG, C, Edge, RB, QB) Pick: Taliese Fuaga, OT, Oregon State Rationale: Fuaga's selection emphasizes the Packers' commitment to enhancing their offensive line, particularly in pass protection. His capabilities are seen as crucial in supporting quarterback Jordan Love and ensuring the team's offensive longevity. Notable Free Agents: S Darnell Savage, RB A.J. Dillon, OT Yosh Nijman, OG Jon Runyan (26). Tampa Bay Buccaneers (Needs: OG, C, LB, S, DT, QB) Pick: Quinyon Mitchell, CB, Toledo Rationale: Mitchell's high upside, quick footwork, and fluidity make him a valuable asset for the Buccaneers' secondary. His abilities are expected to align well with Head Coach Todd Bowles' defensive strategy and enhance the team's overall defensive capabilities. Notable Free Agents: WR Mike Evans, LB Devin White, LB Lavonte David, QB Baker Mayfield, S Antoine Winfield Jr. (27). Arizona Cardinals (via HOU) (Needs: CB, DT, Edge, LB, OG, WR) Pick: Jordan Morgan, OT, Arizona Rationale: Morgan's versatility in playing across the offensive line is vital for the Cardinals. His ability to adapt and provide strength at various positions is expected to significantly support Kyler Murray's offensive play, offering flexibility and reliability upfront. Notable Free Agents: WR Hollywood Brown, DT Leki Fotu, CB Antonio Hamilton, EDGE L.J. Collier, TE Geoff Swaim (28). Buffalo Bills (Needs: CB, S, DT, Edge, WR, LB) Pick: Brian Thomas Jr., WR, LSU Rationale: Thomas Jr.'s impressive height, weight, and speed combination offers the Bills another dynamic and explosive threat in their offense. His ability to stretch the field vertically and make big plays is expected to complement the team's already potent offensive attack. Notable Free Agents: S Micah Hyde, EDGE Leonard Floyd, RB Damien Harris, WR Gabe Davis, EDGE Shaq Lawson, EDGE A.J. Epenesa (29). Kansas City Chiefs (Needs: OT, WR, CB, DT, Edge) Pick: Troy Franklin, WR, Oregon Rationale: Franklin's deep-threat ability and well-rounded game are projected to thrive with quarterback Patrick Mahomes. His speed and route-running skills are expected to add a new dimension to the Chiefs' already powerful offensive unit. Notable Free Agents: DT Chris Jones, LB Drue Tranquill, S Mike Edwards, LB Willie Gay Jr., CB L'Jarius Sneed, OT Donovan Smith (30). Detroit Lions (Needs: CB, OG, DT, Edge, WR) Pick: Nate Wiggins, CB, Clemson Rationale: Selected for his height-weight-speed profile, bringing range and playmaking ability to a defense needing a lockdown defender. Notable Free Agents: EDGE Romeo Okwara, S Chauncey Gardner-Johnson, OG Halapoulivaati Vaitai, OG Jonah Jackson, CB Emmanuel Moseley, WR Donovan Peoples-Jones (31). San Francisco 49ers (Needs: OT, OG, C, CB, TE, S) Pick: Amarius Mims, OT, Georgia Rationale: Mims' selection reflects the 49ers' focus on bolstering their offensive line. His raw talent and potential are seen as key to providing long-term stability, particularly in protecting the blind side of the quarterback. Notable Free Agents: DT Javon Kinlaw, QB Sam Darnold, EDGE Clelin Ferrell, S Tashaun Gipson, EDGE Chase Young (32). Baltimore Ravens (Needs: OG, OT, CB, DT, RB, Edge) Pick: Powers-Johnson, IOL, Oregon Rationale: Powers-Johnson's selection as the best interior lineman in the class signals the Ravens' commitment to strengthening their offensive line. Notable Free Agents: WR Odell Beckham Jr., OG Kevin Zeitler, DT Michael Pierce, LB Patrick Queen, EDGE Jadeveon Clowney, RB J.K. Dobbins Teams without a First-Round Pick Cleveland Browns (Needs: OT, Edge, DT, S, RB, OG) Notable Free Agents: EDGE Za'Darius Smith, DT Shelby Harris, S Grant Delpit, DT Maurice Hurst, DT Jordan Elliott Carolina Panthers (Needs: WR, RB, OG, OT, CB, DT, Edge) Notable Free Agents: EDGE Justin Houston, EDGE Brian Burns, LB Frankie Luvu, S Jeremy Chinn, WR DJ Chark

Top 10 CFB Coaches, Plus Coaches On the Rise And The Hot Seat In 2021 The analysis covers only power five programs. The data we are going to use will come from our Returning Starter and Total Talent Dashboard . The dashboard includes: 247 Sports Total Talent ratings for the last three years. The total number of players sent to the NFL the last three years. The last three years' win percentages. The data will provide a solid baseline for the analysis as all three are vital elements to the success of a major college football coach. The Value Of Recruiting Recruiting, as everyone who is an avid follower of college football knows, is the lifeblood of the sport. If you are not recruiting at a high level in today's college football, you are not competing for national titles. The days of recruiting several developmental three-star players and coaching them up for several years are gone. However, there are a few exceptions at schools with lower expectations, for example, Tom Allen at Indiana. Aside from the two or three exceptions, the coaches who recruit at a high level and win at a high level will be rated higher, while coaches who recruit at a high level yet fail to succeed at a high level will be listed lower. Sending Players to The NFL One trend you will likely see in the rankings will be that teams who recruit at the highest level are sending the most players to the NFL. Some teams send many players to the league yet fail to win at a high level, which presents a red flag. Michigan Football is an excellent example of a team in recent years that has had success sending players to the NFL, yet they are not performing at the highest level. Alabama and Ohio State are on the other end of that spectrum; they both recruit well, send players to the NFL at a high rate and win at a high level. The obvious rule of thumb, teams who can develop their players at a high level, especially teams who recruit at a high level, have the highest success rate. Winning The bottom line in college football is that you have to win. Winning matters, and we decided to add a three-year trend percentage to the dashboard so we can quickly evaluate the teams who are on the rise, stagnant, or consistently winning at a high level. The other day, I had a conversation with one of the 5 Tool Sports Podcast analysts about the difference in expectations between Ohio State and Michigan. My short answer; it is acceptable to consistently go 9-3 or 10-2 at Michigan, while 9-3 or 10-2 can get you fired at Ohio State. That is the difference. The expectations of the top-flight programs are higher, and for a good reason. If teams are consistently winning, the alumni and big-time donors are happy, which keeps the AD, school President, or the Regents comfortable. Once the higher brass starts to feel the heat, it rolls downhill fast in major college football. Coach Salaries Another critical data point to consider is coaching salary. According to USA Today Sports, the average Power Five head coach makes $2.7M per year. The top coaches in the country make $5M or more per year, and the elite coaches (we will use Nick Saban as an example) bring home $8-10M per year. LSU's Ed Orgeron, whose LSU Tigers completed an undefeated 15-0 season in 2019, followed up their incredible 2019 season in 2020 by going 5-5. Ed Orgeron earned $9M in 2020. That is an excellent $1.8M per win, or if you are a glass half empty kind of human, $1.8M per loss. The reality for a coach like Ed Oregon heading into the 2021 season is that the heat will turn up if they have another bad year, even after the historic 2019 season. Winning matters, LSU is in the toughest conference in college football, and for every coach, the leash is short. How many .500 seasons has Nick Saban had? The Football Scout 365 Top Ten Power Five Head Coaches #1 Nick Saban, Alabama Crimson Tide Strength: Recruiting, Development, Defense Three-Year Win %: 92.7% (1st) Three-Year 247 Sports Total Talent Composite Rank: 1st 2021 Class Rankings Updated (7/15) 247 Sports : 1st Three-Year Total Players Drafted: 29 (1st) Nick Saban wins games at the highest level winning six national titles with Alabama, including this past year and one with the LSU Tigers. Alabama's recruiting under Saban has been superb; they rank first in average total team talent, a measure we compiled using the previous three years' data from 247 sports total team talent composite rankings. As far as sending players to the NFL, no coach does it better. Under Saban, the Crimson Tide has been an NFL feeder school. Saban has sent 39 players to the NFL through the first round alone since he arrived in Tuscaloosa, and in the last three years, the Tide continues to roll, sending 29 total players to the NFL according to the data pulled from Pro Football Reference. Nick Saban is also 91-8 since the College Football Playoff era began. #2 Dabo Swinney, Clemson Tigers Strength: Recruiting & Development Three-Year Win %: 92.2% (2nd) Three-Year 247 Sports Total Talent Composite Rank: 6th 2021 Class Rankings Updated (7/15) 247 Sports : 5th Three-Year Total Players Drafted: 18 (8th) The numbers scream more with less when compared to Nick Saban above, and some of that is true, but the reality is that Dabo is still building Clemson into the level that Alabama has been at for years. There were several seasons where Clemson was outside of the top ten in recruiting and still winning at a high level, but they are now bringing in consistent top ten classes. The key component for Dabo has been getting it right when recruiting QB's. Under Swinney, the Tigers had three back-to-back-to-back program-changing signal callers, Tajh Boyd, Deshaun Watson, and Trevor Lawrence. Swinney has two national titles under his belt, and arguably another program-changing QB (DJ Uiagalelei) heads into the 2021 season. #3 Lincoln Riley, Oklahoma Sooners Strength: Scheme, Development, Offense Three-Year Win %: 84.4% Three-Year 247 Sports Total Talent Composite Rank: 11th 2021 Class Rankings Updated (7/15) 247 Sports : 10th Three-Year Total Players Drafted: 17 *(9th) Lincoln Riley is an offensive genius and a consistent go-to for offensive coaches around the country who are looking for new ideas. Since his days as an OC under Bob Stoops, he has been the constant force behind the Sooners Offensive resurgence since 2015. Since taking the reigns as the Sooner head coach, Riley has won 4 Big 12 titles and made appearances in three College Football Playoffs. The Sooners have the 4th highest win percentage in FBS since Riley arrived as the OC in Norman back in 2015. Riley has produced two Heisman Trophy-winning QB's (Kyler Murray and Baker Mayfield) and one Heisman runner-up in Jalen Hurts. In 2020, Riley started his first QB (Spencer Rattler) as head coach recruited and developed by his staff rather than a transfer from another program. Rattler is now a projected top-five NFL Draft prospect ahead of the 2021 college football season. There is a reason NFL teams covet Riley as a potential candidate for open NFL jobs. That trend will continue moving forward due to his ability as an offensive guru. Riley needs to procure a national title to further cement his status as one of the top three coaches. #4 Mack Brown, North Carolina Tarheels Strength: CEO, Recruiting Three-Year Win %: 46.23% (44th) (Brown Has Been on Campus Two Years). Three-Year 247 Sports Total Talent Composite Rank: 25th 2021 Class Rankings Updated (7/15) 247 Sports : 14th Three-Year Total Players Drafted: 8 *(27th) (5 drafted in 2021 NFL draft) Number will continue to increase under Brown. Mack Brown has turned the Tarheels football program around in two short seasons, similar to his first stint in Chapel Hill, where he coached from 1988 to 1997. Brown bookended his first stint in Chapel hill by going 1-10 in 1988 to 10-1 and a top-five finish in 1997. Brown boasts a career 65% win percentage; from 1998 to 2013, Brown won 76% of his games at Texas, won a national title, produced a few Heisman winners (Ricky Williams and Vince Young). He has coached for 32 years and won 253 games. So why is Mack Brown rated 4th on our list? Brown is known for his recruiting prowess and has been dynamite the last two years. The total talent rating using the 247 Sports combined three-year total from 2017-2020; the Tarheels have risen to 25th with an 86.62 average rating. Their 2021 recruiting class rating of 90.88 ranks 15th, which shows they will continue their talent ascension. Again, recruiting matters, and Brown has been dynamite as a recruiter and a team CEO in his first few years in Chapel Hill. The Tarheels are a legitimate ACC title contender and a darkhorse CFB playoff contender in 2021. #5 Ryan Day, Ohio State Strength: Recruiting, Offense, QB Guru Three-Year Win %: 91.0% (3rd) Three-Year 247 Sports Total Talent Composite Rank: 2nd 2021 Class Rankings Updated (7/15) 247 Sports : 2nd Three-Year Total Players Drafted: 28 (2nd) The last few years before 2020, we have watched Alabama take on Clemson for the king of college football. Ohio State is now in the driver seat at number two in key categories such as 247 Sports total talent ranking and sending players to the NFL. Ohio State is and always has been a football factory. They have gone from Jim Tressel to Urban Meyer, and now they have Ryan Day. Tressel set the tone in the early 2000s for a program that should have won several titles in the '90s had John Cooper found the secret recipe to beating arch-rival Michigan. Jim Tressel discovered that recipe (closing the Ohio Border to recruiting), Urban Meyer took that approach and expanded it nationally. Now Ryan Day is expanding the horizons of Ohio State with a coach dedicated to offense and high-level QB play. Ryan Day has one feat he must conquer to continue his ascension, win a national title. The two coaches prior did it in a few short years on campus. At Ohio State winning 11, or 12 games a year is the norm; making the college football playoff and winning a national title is expected. Ryan Day is positioning himself to reach that goal of a national title. #6 Tom Allen, Indiana Hoosiers Strength: CEO, Development, Defense Three-Year Win %: 59.4% (24th) Three-Year 247 Sports Total Talent Composite Rank: 53rd 2021 Class Rankings Updated (7/15) 247 Sports : 53rd Three-Year Total Players Drafted: 3 Tom Allen is the outlier on our list for many reasons, but the key reason is that he is at Indiana, where football is secondary to basketball. Allen inherited a cusp under current Ohio State OC Kevin Wilson, an offensive-focused coach fired for player mistreatment claims. Allen, unlike Wilson, is a defensive-minded coach. And the Hoosiers have never been better in the modern era on the defensive side of the ball. The Hoosiers ranked 43rd in yards allowed a season ago, but do not be fooled; they ranked 1st in the country in the red-zone scoring rate (64%). In addition, the Hoosier's offense was equally good in unique ways. They took care of the football ranking 9th in turnover margin nationally, and they ranked 31st in time of possession offense, two stats that benefit a team who wants to protect their defense. Compared to the previous five coaches, Allen does not have the resources, facilities, prestige that the others possess at name-brand universities known for football. Indiana is rated 53rd in total talent, according to 247 Sports Total Talent Rating in 2021. With 77% of their starters returning, the Hoosiers can make a play to compete in the Big Ten East and a potential shot at a trip to Indy for the Big Ten Title. It is a long shot, but certainly not out of the question. #7 Matt Campbell, Iowa State Strength: Motivator, Development, Offense Three-Year Win %: 63.5 (16th) Three-Year 247 Sports Total Talent Composite Rank: 54th 2021 Class Rankings Updated (7/15) 247 Sports : 59th Three-Year Total Players Drafted: 3 *(56th) Matt Campbell is a highly coveted (does more with less) coach whose name popped up in NFL coaching discussion(s) this offseason. He reportedly turned down the Texas Longhorns to stay in Aimes, Iowa. Campbel is a player(s) coach, similar to Tom Allen; according to sources, his players love and respect him so much they would go into a literal war, not just on the football field with him if needed. In football, this is a highly valuable trait that some coaches try to develop but fail. Some of the best coaches in the game do not possess this leadership trait. Campbell, who owns the best winning percentage in Iowa State history, initiated his rebuilding plan and laid the foundation by instilling in his team to “Trust The Process.” His team(s) responded, delivering Iowa State into the most prosperous period in its history. Campbel is a three-time Big 12 Coach of The Year (2017, 2018, 2020) and could be in a position to win it again and even more in 2021. #8 Brian Kelly, Notre Dame Strength: CEO, Recruiting, Offense Three-Year Win %: 86.8% (4th) Three-Year 247 Sports Total Talent Composite Rank: 8th 2021 Class Rankings Updated (7/15) 247 Sports : (9th) Three-Year Total Players Drafted: 21 (6th) Think about Notre Dame before Brian Kelly. Charlie Weis won 56% of his games, and before Weis, Bob Davie and Tyrone Willingham combined to win 58% of their games. Brian Kelly has returned Notre Dame to a notch below Lou Holtz Era success, winning 72% of his games; Holtz won 76% of his games in the 80s and early 90s. In 2016, Brian Kelly's Notre Dame squad went 4-8, an unacceptable mark. With Kelly at a crossroads, he let go of several coaches on his staff and retooled to keep Notre Brass from letting him go. The changes were a huge success. Since that 4-8 season, the Irish have went 43-7, appeared in the College Football Playoff two times, and played for an ACC title in 2020. Kelly has 252 victories in his career with stints at Grand Valley State, where he won two FCS championships, Central Michigan, where he won the MAC Title, and the Cincinnati Bearcats, where he won two Big East Titles before he moved on to Notre Dame in 2010. Brian Kelly has reached great heights, but Irish fans, alumni, and big-money donors are hungry for more. There were rumors a year ago that if Urban Meyer wanted the Notre Dame job, it was his to have. What this says to me is 10-11 wins, and a CFP beatdown is not enough. Kelly must deliver more soon to ascend higher, but as of right now, he is our 8th highest-rated CFB coach. #9 Pat Fitzgerald, Northwestern Strength: CEO, Development, Defense Three-Year Win %: 55.7% Three-Year 247 Sports Total Talent Composite Rank: 41st 2021 Class Rankings Updated (7/15) 247 Sports : 50th Three-Year Total Players Drafted: 4 (54th) Like Tom Allen Indiana, Pat Fitzgerald is a coach who achieves more with less. The Wildcats are consistent, and from time to time, they have a down year, but each time they have a bad season, they follow it with a strong year. Northwestern is not a five-star NFL factory; they are known more for academics than sports. Pat Fitzgerald is the perfect coach because he played at Northwestern in the '90s and understands what it takes to be a student-athlete at a prestigious academic institution. His program consistently embodies toughness and resilience. Winning 55% of his games the last three seasons, the Wildcats finished 7-2 in 2020, won the Big Ten West, and represented the West Division in the Big Ten title game. The Wildcats lost talent to the NFL draft from its 2020 team, and they return only 31% of their starters from a season ago. Fitzgerald can solidify his top-ten status as a top ten head coach by putting together another Big Ten West contending season in 2021. #10 Jimbo Fisher, Texas A&M Strength: CEO , Recruiting, Offense Three-Year Win %: 73.6% (10th) Three-Year 247 Sports Total Talent Composite Rank: 13th 2021 Class Rankings Updated (7/15) 247 Sports : 8th Three-Year Total Players Drafted: 13 (13th) There is Jim Harbaugh, and there is Jimbo Fisher. The two are not the same, considering Jim has not won a conference title or a national title, but the conversation of coaching salary and failed expectations is very comparable. According to USA Today , Jimbo received the 5th highest pay of $7.5M last season, while Jim Harbaugh made the 4th highest pay at $8M. Why is this relevant? Fisher has yet to defeat Alabama. Now, Fisher is still an excellent football coach; he is one of the nation's best recruiters; though his offense has become stagnant, his teams are efficient. The Aggies know that the road to a title travels through Alabama. If there will be a better year to take down Alabama, it's 2021 while they are "reloading." For Jimbo to live up to this top ten ranking or move up higher, he has to beat Saban, win the SEC and make the College Football Playoff. Coaches on The Hotseat Ed Orgeron, LSU Tigers Strength: Recruiting Improvement Area: Development and Staff Three-Year Win %: 75.6% (8th) Three-Year 247 Sports Total Talent Composite Rank: 4th 2021 Class Rankings Updated (7/15) 247 Sports : 3rd Three-Year Total Players Drafted: 24 (3rd) It feels like an eternity since the Tigers went 15-0 in a historic year where they had arguably the greatest offense of all time. That was in 2019, and in college football years, that's like ten years ago. After a 5-5 season in 2020 and a 4th place SEC west division finish, Orgeron is looking at a year where he has to prove he is not a one-hit-wonder. Being the head coach at LSU like Alabama, Ohio State, and Clemson, the expectation is to make the playoff and compete for national championships. According to our three-year total talent average, the Tigers boasted the 4th most talented roster, yet in 2020 the on-field product appeared to be far from what the expectations require in Baton Rouge. There is one guy they could go after if things go south, and that is Carolina Panthers OC and the OC when they won the National Title in 2019, Joe Brady. Jim Harbaugh, Michigan Strength: Recruiting Three-Year Win %: 59.8% Three-Year 247 Sports Total Talent Composite Rank: 14th 2021 Class Rankings Updated (7/15) 247 Sports : 13th Three-Year Total Players Drafted: 23 *(4th) After a 2-4 season in 2020, Jim Harbaugh is taking the 2017 Brian Kelly route. He has retooled the majority of his staff, including his recruiting coordinator, to turn things around. Recruiting and talent have not been the issue; developing talent when it arrives in Ann Arbor is the issue. Will the changes be enough to get Michigan to 9 or 10 wins in 2021 and at least a competitive game vs. Ohio State? Harbaugh is betting on himself to do so, even taking a pay cut in a new contract to prove he can get Michigan back on track. If not, Harbaugh could be out by the end of the 2021 season. Clay Helton, USC Trojans Strength: Recruiting Improvement Area: Development Three-Year Win %: 62.2% Three-Year 247 Sports Total Talent Composite Rank: 5th 2021 Class Rankings Updated (7/15) 247 Sports : 7th Three-Year Total Players Drafted: 11 *(21st) Like Jim Harbaugh, talent is not the issue. Helton avoided the calls for Urban Meyer to replace him in 2021, but that still does not mean he is out of the woods. Helton won the Pac 12 and the Rose Bowl in 2017. Since then, he has posted a 5-7 record in 2017, 8-5 in 2018 but bounced back with a 5-1 record in 2020. He has an opportunity to bounce back even stronger in 2021. He has a promising QB Kedon Slovis who is getting 1st round NFL draft buzz, and the Trojans return 59% of their 2020 starters. The talent is there; they rank 5th in total talent average the last three seasons. Coaches On The Rise Mario Cristobal, Oregon Ducks Strength: Recruiting, Offensive Line Three-Year Win %: 70.7% Three-Year 247 Sports Total Talent Composite Rank: 17th 2021 Class Rankings Updated (7/15) 247 Sports : 6th Three-Year Total Players Drafted: 13 (13th) Cristobal is building Oregon into a potential OL U. Cristobal, a former Miami Hurricanes OL Under Jimmy Johnson in the '80s is building Oregon from inside out by focusing on the trenches. Ducks fans should be happy to see a coach who believes in the trenches in a conference not known for physicality. For Oregon to ascend into a realistic national title contender, they will have to be more physical when facing the Ohio State's and Alabama's of the world, and Cristobal appears to get that. Cristobal is a CFB playoff appearance away from ascending into the top ten. Lane Kiffen, Ole Miss Rebels Strength: Offense, QB's Three-Year Win %: 41.7% Three-Year 247 Sports Total Talent Composite Rank: 23rd 2021 Updated (7/15) 247 Sports Total Talent Ranking : 17th Three-Year Total Players Drafted: Lane Kiffen is on the rise once again, and this time we think it's for real. He is a brilliant offensive mind who can be a high-level head coach at a prestigious program if given the opportunity. Mark Stoops, Kentucky Wildcats Strength: Defense, Development Three-Year Win %: 61.3% (21st) Three-Year 247 Sports Total Talent Composite Rank: 39th 2021 Class Rankings Updated (7/15) 247 Sports : 34th Three-Year Total Players Drafted: 13 *(13th) How many Stoops are there? Stoops has built the Wildcats into a middle-tier SEC team after winning just 12 games in his first three seasons. Since that stretch, Stoops has won 37 games, and the Wildcats have made five straight bowl appearances. They are also developing and putting guys in the league.

2025 NFL Draft: 10 C-USA Draft Prospects to Watch This Season The Conference USA (C-USA) is expanding to include 10 programs this season, including Kennesaw State, which is transitioning from NCAA Division I FCS to FBS. The conference’s growth promises an exciting 2024 season. In the 2024 NFL Draft, C-USA produced the 65th overall selection in Western Kentucky wide receiver Malachi Corley, with two more players, UTEP linebacker Tyrice Knight and guard Elijah Klein, also being drafted. As the 2024 college football season arrives, the C-USA is home to several prospects who could hear their names called in the 2025 NFL Draft. Here’s a look at the top 10 prospects to watch in the conference. Top 10 C-USA Draft Prospects to Watch This Season 1. Maurice Westmoreland, DE, UTEP Maurice Westmoreland is UTEP’s top defender following Tyrice Knight’s departure to the NFL. Westmoreland had a breakout 2023 season, recording 10.5 tackles for loss and 7.5 sacks. With a relentless motor and a knack for getting to the quarterback, Westmoreland is a strong candidate for a double-digit sack season in 2024. 2. T.J. Finley, QB, Western Kentucky After stints at LSU, Auburn, and Texas State, T.J. Finley has found a new home at Western Kentucky. The 6’7” quarterback threw for 3,439 yards and 24 touchdowns last season. Finley’s arm strength and experience make him one of the most intriguing passers in the C-USA. 3. Quinton Cooley, RB, Liberty Quinton Cooley is a powerful, downhill runner with excellent vision. After transferring from Wake Forest, Cooley rushed for 1,401 yards and 16 touchdowns in 2023, helping Liberty secure the C-USA Championship. His physicality and determination make him a prospect to watch. 4. Hosea Wheeler, DT, Western Kentucky Hosea Wheeler made a name for himself with a standout performance against Ohio State in 2023. With 42 tackles and two sacks last season, Wheeler’s ability to disrupt the line of scrimmage will be key for Western Kentucky’s defense in 2024. 5. Noah Smith, WR, Sam Houston State Noah Smith was a focal point for the Bearkats’ offense in 2023, with 79 receptions for 783 yards and six touchdowns. Smith’s playmaking ability and reliable hands make him a top receiving threat in the C-USA this season. 6. Shiyazh Pete, OT, New Mexico State At 6’8” and 320 pounds, Shiyazh Pete is a massive presence on New Mexico State’s offensive line. A First-Team All-CUSA selection in 2023, Pete’s size and power make him a dominant force in the run game and a potential early-round pick in the 2025 draft. 7. Derek Carter, CB, Jacksonville State Derek Carter is one of the most competitive and productive cornerbacks in the conference. With 44 tackles and eight pass breakups in 2023, Carter’s ball skills and coverage ability will be crucial for Jacksonville State’s defense in 2024. 8. Reggie Peterson, LB, FIU Despite FIU’s struggles last season, Reggie Peterson emerged as a bright spot on defense. With 104 tackles, 7.5 tackles for loss, and 3.5 sacks, Peterson’s versatility and playmaking ability make him a key player to watch this year. 9. Holden Willis, TE, Middle Tennessee State Holden Willis is a versatile tight end who blurs the line between receiver and tight end. Standing at 6’4”, Willis caught 46 passes for 697 yards and five touchdowns in 2023. His athleticism and size make him a matchup nightmare for defenders. 10. Jase Bauer, QB, Sam Houston State Sam Houston State struggled in the passing game last season, but the addition of Jase Bauer from Central Michigan could change that. Bauer threw for 1,881 yards and 12 touchdowns in 2023, and his untapped potential could lead to a breakout season in 2024.

The Top Transfers Who Could Provide The Biggest Impact In 2021 How a Transfer Used To Work I remember the days where if you transferred, you had to sit out a year unless the NCAA granted you a waiver. I can attest as someone who follows the sport of college football closely; it would be easier to fit a camel through the eye of a needle than to get the NCAA to approve a transfer. Your circumstances would have to be extreme and generally involved a sick parent, and even then, the NCAA had a rule that you had to transfer within a certain distance of that parent to get the waiver. The New Transfer Rules And The Transfer Portal (AKA, CFB Free Agency) In the fall of 2018, the NCAA introduced the transfer portal. The Student-athlete can now enter their name into the portal indicating their desire to transfer from their current school. The significant difference is that student-athletes can bypass seeking approval from their school and hop into the portal without question. The kicker, you get one free transfer year where you do not lose year eligibility or have to sit out a year. After you use that free year, you can still transfer as often as you want with the consideration of your remaining eligibility. Still, once you burn that free transfer year, you might need an NCAA waiver to avoid losing a year of eligibility while also sitting out a year. When is The Deadline To Transfer? You can transfer anytime during a calendar year, but if you want to use your free year, you have until May 1st (subject to change) to take advantage of not losing your free year and having to sit out for an entire year. What About Those Pesky Transfer Destination Limitations The Old Ball Coach Used To Prevent A Student-Athlete From Leaving? The rule that allowed your coach to place transfer restrictions on where you can go is no more. You are free to transfer anywhere you want, to any division, conference, etc., unless it is the University of Michigan where your credit hours cannot transfer because of the supreme academic overlords who believe Michigan is Harvard (sarcasm). The Recent History of The Transfer Portal and Some Success Stories When I think of the transfer portal, I think of Oklahoma who has had tremendous success landing QB's from other schools and turning them into Heisman contending players who also ascend to championship level QBs. It began with Baker Mayfield as walkon at Texas Tech, who left for Oklahoma back in 2013, followed by Kyler Murray, who left Texas A&M after Kyle Allen was named the starter. Then Jalen Hurts, the ultimate team player, a great leader who stayed the course at Alabama before transferring to Oklahoma in 2019. All three are going to be NFL starters in 2021. You also had Shea Patterson, who transferred from Ole Miss to Michigan back in 2018; he had to get waiver approval. Patterson had a successful two seasons in Ann Arbor. The other high-profile transfer player that comes to mind is Justin Fields, who transferred from Georgia to Ohio State and ascended into a Big Ten MVP, Heisman Trophy Finalist, and a National Championship contending QB. Not all transfer players have success, but we will try to pinpoint who we think will provide the most significant impact in 2021. LB Henry To'o To'o, Alabama Crimson Tide HS Star Rating (247 Sports Comp): 4 Star Measurables: 6-2, 225lbs Yr: SO Old School: Tennessee Volunteers Best Season: 2020, 76 tac, 10 TFL's, 1 Sack, 1 INT Analysis: The 2019 freshman All-American racked up 76 tackles, ten tackles for loss, a sack, and an INT. The former 4-star recruit is considered one of the most talented LB recruits ever to don a Tennessee uniform and left the Alabama program. The Crimson Tide, who is never hard up for talent, added depth at LB, and they were able to procure a very good one via the transfer portal. To'o To'o should not need to learn much as he played in a similar system defensively under Jeremy Pruitt, a former Saban DC. His sideline to side speed, ability to cover backs, and his stout run stop ability will be a major asset in Tuscaloosa. QB McKenzie Milton, Florida State HS Star Rating (247 Sports Comp): 3 Star Measurables: 5-11, 190lbs Yr: RSSR Old School: UCF Golden Knights Best Season: 2017, 4037 passing yards, 37/9 TD/INT Ratio Analysis: Milton won 26 games as a starter at UCF, including two conference championships; he led the Golden Knights to an undefeated season in 2017. Milton has not played football in two years after dislocating his right knee and suffering ligament, nerve, and artery damage during a game in November 2018. RB Eric Gray, Oklahoma Sooners HS Star Rating (247 Sports Comp): 4 Star Measurables: 5-10, 205lbs Yr: JR Old School: Tennessee New School: Oklahoma Best Season: 2019, 772 rush yds, 4 Rush TD's, 30 rec, 254 yds receiving, 2 TD's Analysis: The Sooners are getting a very good player via the portal. Gray entered the college football scene as the nation's 3rd rated all-purpose back according to 247 sports. His playstyle will fit well in the Big 12 conference, and in the Lincoln Riley offense, a player like Gray can flourish as a receiver out of the backfield. He possesses good speed and athleticism. Kennedy Brooks and Eric Gray's one-two combo will give Big 12 defenses a lot to think about in 2021. As if they wouldn't already have a lot to deal with when facing the Sooners. OT Wanya Morris, Oklahoma Sooners HS Star Rating (247 Sports Comp): 5 Star Measurables: 6-5, 320lbs Yr: JR Old School: Tennessee Best Season: 2020, played in 9 of 10 games for the Volunteers, allowed two sacks, and surrendered three penalties. Analysis: A long-limbed athlete from the 2019 recruiting cycle, Morris was a 5-star recruit. If morris reaches his potential at Oklahoma as a left tackle, he could place himself in 1st round 2022 NFL Draft discussions. QB Charlie Brewer, Utah Utes HS Star Rating (247 Sports Comp): 3 Star Measurables: 6-1, 210lbs Yr: SR Old School: Baylor Bears Best Season : 2019, 3161 yards passing, 21/7 TD/INT ratio, 344 yds rushing, 11 TD's Analysis: Charlie Brewer was a four-year starter at Baylor who amassed over 10K total yards and 65 passing TD's. He brings experience, leadership, and good athletic ability to the QB position for the Utes. CB Derion Kendrick, Georgia Bulldogs HS Star Rating (247 Sports Comp): 5 Star Measurables: 6-0, 190lbs Yr: SR Old School: Clemson Best Season: 2019, 43 Tac, 2 INT's Analysis: Derion Kendrick arrived at Clemson as a WR; he transitioned over to the defensive side and took off in his first season as a DB. He progressed more in 2020, improving all facets, man, press, and zone coverage. With room to grow, he will be on NFL team radars in 2021. TE/WR Arik Gilbert, Georgia Bulldogs HS Star Rating (247 Sports Comp): 5 Star Measurables: 6-5, 248lbs Yr: SO Old School: LSU Best Season: 2020, 35 rec, 368, 2TD's Analysis: Gilbert is a physical player who will play WR in Athens but could transition to an off-ball H-Back style TE at the NFL level. Gilbert should provide instant versatility to the Georgia offense in 2021. WR Wan'Dale Robinson, Kentucky Wildcats HS Star Rating (247 Sports Comp): 4 Star Measurables: 5-10, 185lbs Yr: JR Old School: Nebraska Best Season: 2019, 793 Yds From Scrimmage, 5 Total TD's Analysis: The versatile Robinson was hard to defend while at Nebraska. He can play WR and return punts and kicks if needed. He brings a unique versatility to the Wildcats offense and will have a great opportunity to show NFL scouts that he can play at a high level in the SEC. DL Antonio Shelton Florida Gators HS Star Rating (247 Sports Comp): 3 Star Measurables: 6-2, 325lbs Yr: SR Old School: Penn State Best Season: 2020, 13 tac, 4 sacks, 1 FF Analysis: Florida needed a solid interior defender, and they landed one with Penn State transfer Antonio Shelton. He provides a big body in the middle for the Gators and is a capable pass rusher who can get after opposing QB's. LB Mike Jones JR., LSU Tigers HS Star Rating (247 Sports Comp): 4 Star Measurables: 6-0, 220lbs Yr: SO Old School: Clemson Best Season: 2020, 26 tac, 1 sack, 1 FF Analysis: Jones played in 29 games with the Clemson Tigers and started 7. The former 4-star recruit from the 2018 class brings experience to the LSU LB core. He reportedly transferred to LSU for a shot to play inside linebacker, reportedly what LSU brought him in to do. He possesses good athletic ability, which LSU fans have grown accustomed to seeing in recent years at the LB position.

Top 10 2022 NFL WR's Debate, Ja'Marr Chase, Justin Jefferson, Davante Adams, And More Today the Football Scout 365 NFL Podcast team debates who the top 10 WR’s are ahead of the 2022 NFL season. We dive into the ESPN top ten rankings, PFF top ten grades and rankings, and more. Advanced Data Used For Show Discussion 2021 PFF Top Ten Player Grades Cooper Kupp 93.0 Davante Adams 92.7 Deebo Samuel 90.2 Justin Jefferson 90.1 A.J. Brown 86.3 Tyreek Hill 86.0 Ja’Marr Chase 85.3 CeeDee Lamb 84.1 Tee Higgins 83.4 Gabe Davis 81.5 TGT Per Route Run Top Ten Since 2019 Davante Adams 33% Michael Thomas 32% Cooper Kupp 29% Julio Jones 28% Keenan Allen 27% Jarvis Landry 27% A.J. Brown 27% Julian Edelman 27% DeAndre Hopkins 27% Diontae Johnson 27% Top Ten TGT Per Route Run in 2021 (Any Total Routes Run) Antonio Brown 34% Cooper Kupp 33% A.J. Brown 32% Davante Adams 32% Kadarius Toney 29% Diontae Johnson 29% Deonte Harty 28% Tyreek Hill 28% Justin Jefferson 28% Top Ten TGT Per Route Run in 2021 (Min 300 Routes Run) Cooper Kupp 33% A.J. Brown 32% Davante Adams 32% Diontae Johnson 29% Tyreek Hill 28% Justin Jefferson 28% DJ Moore 28% DK Metcalf 27% Jarvis Landry 27% Stefon Diggs 27% Efficiency Measure, What They Do With Their Route Opportunities Top Ten Yds Per Route Run in 2021 (Min 300 Routes Run) Cooper Kupp 3.38 Deebo Samuel 3.12 Davante Adams 2.94 A.J. Brown 2.67 Justin Jefferson 2.67 Ja'Marr Chase 2.63 Tyler Lockett 2.49 Tee Higgins 2.35 Tyreek Hill 2.19 CeeDee Lamb 2.17

< Back Jackson Carman Clemson HT: 6050 WT: 345 YR: JR POS: OT OVR RK 66 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 9 High-End Starter Potential OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS High-End Starter Potential (65-69) A player expected to become a top-tier starter within their first few years. They possess strong physical tools and good technical skills but may have some limitations in their game. With development, they can reach near-elite levels and provide consistent impact at their position. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS KEY WEAKNESSES PLAYER COMPARISONS

A versatile defender who can excel in a cover three or press-man defense. He plays with a long frame at 6-1 and has the speed to stay in the receivers' hip pocket. He uses his body well to defend, not allowing receivers to box him out, and shows a knack for tracking the football down the field. He is an NFL-style outside corner. His primary issue is that he gets grabby at times in man to man. He won't be able to get away with that at the NFL level. < Back Greg Newsome Northwestern HT: 6010 WT: 190 YR: JR POS: CB OVR RK 32 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 4 High-End Starter Potential OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT A versatile defender who can excel in a cover three or press-man defense. He plays with a long frame at 6-1 and has the speed to stay in the receivers' hip pocket. He uses his body well to defend, not allowing receivers to box him out, and shows a knack for tracking the football down the field. He is an NFL-style outside corner. His primary issue is that he gets grabby at times in man to man. He won't be able to get away with that at the NFL level. CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS High-End Starter Potential (65-69) A player expected to become a top-tier starter within their first few years. They possess strong physical tools and good technical skills but may have some limitations in their game. With development, they can reach near-elite levels and provide consistent impact at their position. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS KEY WEAKNESSES PLAYER COMPARISONS

Rice projects as a 'Mid-Level Starter Potential' in the NFL, with a final grade scale of 60-64. His ability to make plays downfield and his physical tools suggest a promising future, though continued development in consistency and physicality will be key to realizing his full potential. < Back Brenden Rice USC HT: 6030 WT: 210 YR: SR POS: WR OVR RK 88 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 21 Mid-Level Starter Potential OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT Brenden Rice is a dynamic receiver with a good blend of size, speed, and catching ability. He excels in deep-route scenarios, utilizing his speed and ball-tracking skills. Rice's physicality and ability to make contested catches make him a red-zone threat. He fits well in a vertical passing offense that leverages his downfield capabilities. His agility and quickness also make him a good fit for West Coast offense systems, where short and intermediate routes are prevalent. CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS Mid-Level Starter Potential (60-64) A solid, dependable starter with the potential to exceed expectations. They have good athleticism and tools but may lack elite traits. While they show flashes of high-level play, they also have some notable weaknesses that must be developed. These players often need 2-3 years to establish themselves. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS Deep Routes Ball Tracking Solid Speed KEY WEAKNESSES Concentration Physicality Run Block PLAYER COMPARISONS

At 6-2 205lbs, Ringo is another Georgia Bulldog with top-ten NFL Draft potential. Ringo is a lengthy press man corner at 6-2 205lbs; he plays aggressively. Ringo uses his strength and long arms to attack the catch point with good body control muscling the football away from the receiver. The former 10.43sec 100M track star can run with the fastest receivers on the field. In addition, he possesses the twitchiness and fluidity needed to play at a high level in the NFL. Ringo does not allow receivers to gain a step often; when they do, he has the explosiveness to close fast. Ringo must learn to use his aggression as needed at the NFL level. His physicality in the NFL might be deemed too aggressive and lead to penalties in coverage. He will need to improve eye discipline; he can get caught off guard by play action, pump fakes, and double moves by receivers. < Back Kelee Ringo Georgia HT: 6016 WT: 207 YR: RSO POS: CB OVR RK 19 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 4 High-End Starter Potential OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT Ringo's size and athleticism make him a good fit for a press-man coverage scheme, where he can use his length and physicality to disrupt routes at the line of scrimmage. He could also excel in a zone coverage scheme, where he can use his speed and agility to cover a lot of ground and make plays on the ball. CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS High-End Starter Potential (65-69) A player expected to become a top-tier starter within their first few years. They possess strong physical tools and good technical skills but may have some limitations in their game. With development, they can reach near-elite levels and provide consistent impact at their position. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS Explosive Lengthy Man Cov. KEY WEAKNESSES Aggressive Eye Discipline Experience PLAYER COMPARISONS Stephon Gilmore Jaire Alexander Eli Apple