Search Results

The Defensive All-2023 NFL Draft Team Features Jalen Carter, Will Anderson, and Bryan Bresee The 2022 college football season has concluded, and it is now that time of the year when everyone drops their All-American team lists. Since we are a scouting and NFL Draft-focused entity, I am presenting the first annual Football Scout 365 All-NFL Draft team. Click here to check out the All Offensive 2023 NFL Draft Team The all-NFL Draft team will consist of 2023 NFL Draft-eligible players from both the offensive and defensive sides of the football. Every 2023 All-NFL Draft first-team prospect will be a player we graded as an Instant Impact Player. What is an Instant Impact Player? An Instant Impact Player grade indicates a prospect's projected ceiling once the NFL player has entered the NFL and has become an established commodity. The standard is to give a player a two to three-year window to reach their ceiling; some will achieve it much quicker, and some will show signs of their ceiling in years one and two before taking full flight. Instant Impact Player Examples Some examples are Josh Allen, who took a few years to develop with the Buffalo Bills. We had Allen as a Developmental prospect entering the NFL with an Instant Impact Ceiling. Tua Tagovailoa is another example in 2022 with the Dolphins. Tua finally hit his stride after we graded him equally to Joe Burrow before the 2020 NFL Draft. Tua was on his way to becoming a bust, but after being paired with the right coach and elite WR's, Tua is achieving his expected pre-draft potential. You can learn more about our player grades and the metrics used to measure each prospect we grade. Click here to learn more. 2023 All-NFL Draft Team Defense Edge Rushers (ED1) Will Anderson , Edge Alabama (Top 10 Projection) Anderson is an explosive edge player that combines size, speed, and power to win off the edge. Anderson can play standing up or with his hand in the dirt. He provides three-down versatility as a pass rusher and a run defender. Anderson does not get a lot of pass coverage reps; this is an area he can improve in with more opportunities. Anderson has the athleticism to be a decent pass defender when needed. (ED2) Myles Murphy , Edge Clemson (Top 10 Projection) (ED3) Nolan Smith , Edge Georgia (Top 10 Projection) Interior Defensive Lineman (IDL1) Jalen Carter , IDL Georgia (Top 10 Projection) Carter is a disruptive physical force. Carter combines a quick first step and feet like a running back to shoot into gaps. At 6-3 310lbs, Carter is a densely proportioned twitchy player with quick hips and elite lateral ability. Carter wins with strength from his dense lower half, his elite positional athleticism, and quick hands. Carter will need to improve his ability to handle and move off of double teams at the next level. (IDL2) Bryan Bresee , IDL Clemson (Top 10 Projection) (IDL3) Gervon Dexter, IDL Florida (Late 1st-Early 2nd Projection) Off Ball Linebackers (LB1) Trenton Simpson , LB Clemson (Late 1st-Early to Mid 2nd Projection) (LB2) Noah Sewell , LB Oregon (2nd-3rd Round Projection) (LB3) Drew Sanders, LB Arkansas (2nd-4th Round Projection) Cornerbacks (CB1) Kelee Ringo , CB Georgia (Top 20 Projection) Ringo is another Georgia Bulldog with top-ten NFL Draft potential. Ringo is a lengthy press man corner at 6-2 205lbs; he plays aggressively. Ringo uses his strength and long arms to attack the catch point with good body control muscling the football away from the receiver. The former 10.43sec 100M track star can run with the fastest receivers on the field. In addition, he possesses the twitchiness and fluidity needed to play at a high level in the NFL. (CB2) Cam Smith , CB South Carolina (Top 20 Projection) (CB3) Joey Porter Jr ., CB Penn State (Mid to Late 1st-Early 2nd Projection) Safeties (S1) Antonio Johnson , S Texas A&M (Late 1st-Early to Mid 2nd Projection) (S2) Brian Branch , S Alabama (Early to Mid 2nd-3rd Round Projection) (S3) Jordan Battle, S Alabama (2nd-4th Round Projection)

College Football Playoff Preview: Ohio State vs. Oregon – Rose Bowl Rematch with Championship Stakes The stage is set for one of the most anticipated rematches in College Football Playoff history. No. 1 Oregon (13-0) will face No. 8 Ohio State (11-2) in the historic Rose Bowl on New Year’s Day. For Oregon, this game represents a chance to continue their undefeated season and move closer to a national championship. For Ohio State, it’s an opportunity to avenge their heartbreaking 32-31 loss in October, a game defined by controversial officiating and critical late-game errors. Both teams enter the rematch playing their best football of the season, setting the stage for a high-stakes battle between two of the nation’s most balanced and talented rosters. With championship aspirations and NFL scouts watching closely, this game highlights elite talent on both sides of the ball for each team, including rising NFL Draft prospects at quarterback, dominant defensive linemen, and explosive-skill players. Key Storylines to Watch Key Storylines: Oregon’s Defense vs. Ohio State’s Passing Game Oregon’s defense has been one of the most efficient against the pass this season, allowing just 176 passing yards per game—ranking 8th nationally. Their ability to pressure quarterbacks, led by edge rusher Jordan Burch, has been critical, with a sack rate of 8.5% (18th nationally) . However, in their first matchup, the Ducks struggled at times to contain Ohio State’s explosive passing attack. Will Howard delivered one of his best performances of the season back in October vs. Oregon, completing 28 of 35 passes for 326 yards, two touchdowns, and no interceptions. Ohio State’s offense was aggressive and efficient early, averaging 8.7 yards per play in the first quarter and building a 165-84 advantage in total yards. Emeka Egbuka and Jeremiah Smith combined for 19 receptions, 193 yards, and two touchdowns, frequently exploiting mismatches in Oregon’s secondary. While Oregon allowed explosive plays, their defense adjusted as the game progressed. They limited Ohio State to just 4 of 12 on third downs, stayed disciplined with only three penalties compared to Ohio State’s eight, and avoided turnovers that could have shifted momentum. The key to putting Ohio State into unfavorable passing situations is to keep their run game in check. In the first meeting, the Ducks held Ohio State to 4.3 yards per rush attempt—not dominant, but good enough to keep Ohio State in 3rd-and-obvious passing situations. To replicate their prior success, Oregon will need to contain Ohio State’s big-play threats and leverage their pass rush to disrupt Will Howard’s rhythm. This means forcing longer 3rd-down situations, allowing them to pin their ears back and get after the QB. A consistent pass rush, paired with disciplined coverage, will be critical to neutralizing the Buckeyes’ passing attack and securing another victory. Key Storylines: Oregon’s Offense vs. Ohio State’s Defense On the flip side, Oregon’s high-powered offense, averaging 36.9 points per game, will face an Ohio State defense that has allowed just 11.7 points per game over its last five matchups. Dillon Gabriel, the engine of Oregon’s offense, will be crucial. He has completed 72% of his passes this season, averaging 8.8 yards per attempt, and delivered a stellar performance in their first meeting, throwing for 341 yards and two touchdowns. Gabriel’s efficiency and his ability to extend plays with his legs (8.0 yards per rush in the first matchup) add another layer of complexity for Ohio State’s defense. Ohio State’s defense has undergone a transformation since that October loss, particularly in their pass defense, which hasn’t allowed a touchdown through the air in five games. Anchored by edge rushers J.T. Tuimoloau and Jack Sawyer, along with elite interior lineman Tyliek Williams, the Buckeyes boast one of the most formidable fronts in college football. This unit will be tasked with limiting an Oregon rushing attack that averages 5.0 yards per carry and tallied 155 rushing yards in the first meeting. Jordan James, who rushed for 115 yards and a touchdown in October, remains a key weapon for the Ducks. For Ohio State, the key will be keeping Oregon’s offense off schedule. The Ducks excel in manageable situations, converting 50% of third downs (5th nationally). However, in the first matchup, Oregon struggled in longer third downs, converting just 43% overall and only 2 of 5 in the third quarter. Forcing Oregon into third-and-5 or longer will allow the Buckeyes’ pass rush to focus on Gabriel, limiting the dual-threat quarterback’s ability to exploit mismatches. If Oregon can establish their run game as they did in October, averaging 5.0 yards per carry, it will be difficult for Ohio State to contain their balanced attack. However, if the Buckeyes can clog running lanes and pressure Gabriel consistently, they’ll have a much better chance of disrupting one of the nation’s most efficient offenses. Top NFL Draft Prospects to Watch Ohio State: TreVeyon Henderson, RB : Electrifying back with elite vision and breakaway speed. Quinshon Judkins, RB : Bruising runner who excels in short-yardage and goal-line situations. J.T. Tuimoloau, EDGE : Versatile defender capable of disrupting any offensive game plan. Jack Sawyer, EDGE : Relentless edge rusher who thrives against both the pass and run. Emeka Egbuka, WR : Reliable target with exceptional hands and route-running ability. Will Howard, QB: A poised, strong-armed passer with improving accuracy and decision-making. Oregon: Jordan Burch, EDGE : Dominant presence on the defensive line with elite athleticism. Derrick Harmon, IDL: Powerful interior disruptor with exceptional pocket-collapsing strength. Jordan James, RB : Versatile playmaker with balance and elusiveness. Dillon Gabriel, QB : Seasoned dual-threat quarterback with the ability to deliver in clutch moments. Previous Meeting Highlights Score: Oregon 32, Ohio State 31 (October 12, 2024) Gabriel’s 341 passing yards and three total touchdowns paced Oregon’s offense. Controversial officiating and clock mismanagement in the final moments derailed Ohio State’s comeback. Ohio State vs. Oregon Odds and Projection Ohio State enters the Rose Bowl as a narrow favorite with a -2.5 spread, and the total points line is set at 54.5. The implied final score projects Ohio State narrowly edging Oregon, 28.5-26 , reflecting the balance between Ohio State’s defensive resurgence and Oregon’s offensive firepower. Prediction The prediction for this Rose Bowl rematch leans slightly in Ohio State’s favor, thanks to their recent defensive dominance and offensive resurgence. The Buckeyes’ defense, which hasn’t allowed a passing touchdown in five games, is well-equipped to challenge Oregon’s explosive attack, bolstered by a revitalized pass rush featuring J.T. Tuimoloau and Jack Sawyer. Offensively, Ohio State’s rushing tandem of TreVeyon Henderson and Quinshon Judkins has excelled behind an improved offensive line, as demonstrated in their dominant performance against Tennessee. While Oregon brings a balanced offense and the dynamic playmaking of Dillon Gabriel, the Buckeyes’ ability to control the trenches on both sides of the ball gives them a slight edge in what promises to be a thrilling contest. Projected Implied Score: Ohio State 28.5, Oregon 26

Michael Carter has been a steady force in Chapel Hill since 2017. Carter is a dynamic RB who excels as a receiver for the Tarheels. He is elusive and possesses great instincts as a runner allowing him to find lanes inside or out. Carter is on the smaller side, but you would not be able to tell by his willingness to run between the tackles. He is hard to tackle, and when you do have him reeled in, you better wrap up and hold on because he has a knack for slipping through tackles. Some scouts believe Carter will fit a complementary role in the NFL. We think he is a sneaky good player with three-down ability who could potentially be the number one in the right situation. < Back Michael Carter North Carolina HT: 5080 WT: 202 YR: SR POS: RB OVR RK 55 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 4 High-End Starter Potential OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT Michael Carter has been a steady force in Chapel Hill since 2017. Carter is a dynamic RB who excels as a receiver for the Tarheels. He is elusive and possesses great instincts as a runner allowing him to find lanes inside or out. Carter is on the smaller side, but you would not be able to tell by his willingness to run between the tackles. He is hard to tackle, and when you do have him reeled in, you better wrap up and hold on because he has a knack for slipping through tackles. Some scouts believe Carter will fit a complementary role in the NFL. We think he is a sneaky good player with three-down ability who could potentially be the number one in the right situation. CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS High-End Starter Potential (65-69) A player expected to become a top-tier starter within their first few years. They possess strong physical tools and good technical skills but may have some limitations in their game. With development, they can reach near-elite levels and provide consistent impact at their position. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS KEY WEAKNESSES PLAYER COMPARISONS

In the passing game, Hall exhibits solid pass protection ability. He is also a solid receiver out of the backfield, where he has compiled. 82 catches for 734 yards. Most of Hall's work as a receiver occurs at or near the line of scrimmage; though he has lined up in the slot and out wide on occasion, he will do most of his receiving work from the backfield at the NFL level. In the run game, Hall possesses exceptional speed. There are a few different 40 times available, and one dates back to his time in high school, where he clocked a 4.43. I would not be surprised to see him run in the electronic timed 4.5's during the NFL combine, which is more than adequate for the RB position. Hall will be ideal for a zone-heavy run game as a one-cut runner. His best trait as a runner is his vision, and he has good patience in allowing his blockers to get in position. < Back Breece Hall Iowa State HT: 6010 WT: 220 YR: JR POS: RB OVR RK 40 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 2 Near Elite OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT In the passing game, Hall exhibits solid pass protection ability. He is also a solid receiver out of the backfield, where he has compiled. 82 catches for 734 yards. Most of Hall's work as a receiver occurs at or near the line of scrimmage; though he has lined up in the slot and out wide on occasion, he will do most of his receiving work from the backfield at the NFL level. In the run game, Hall possesses exceptional speed. There are a few different 40 times available, and one dates back to his time in high school, where he clocked a 4.43. I would not be surprised to see him run in the electronic timed 4.5's during the NFL combine, which is more than adequate for the RB position. Hall will be ideal for a zone-heavy run game as a one-cut runner. His best trait as a runner is his vision, and he has good patience in allowing his blockers to get in position. CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS Near Elite (70-74) A high-caliber prospect who is expected to become a significant contributor by Year 2. These players have outstanding physical tools and strong football IQ, with only minor flaws in their game. They demonstrate consistency at a high level and project as future Pro Bowl-caliber players if properly developed. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS KEY WEAKNESSES PLAYER COMPARISONS

Standing 6 feet 5 inches tall and weighing around 260 pounds, Foskey possesses impressive size and athleticism. He is a quick and explosive pass rusher, utilizing his speed and power to get around opposing offensive linemen and pressure the quarterback. Foskey is also a strong run defender, holding his ground and using his length and strength to set the edge and make tackles. He has good instincts and awareness, reading the play and reacting quickly to make plays. With continued development and refinement of his technique, Foskey has the potential to be a highly productive pass rusher at the NFL level. < Back Isaiah Foskey Notre Dame HT: 6047 WT: 264 YR: SR POS: ED OVR RK 59 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 12 Mid-Level Starter Potential OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT As for his playstyle, Foskey is a dynamic and explosive pass rusher with a quick first step and good speed around the edge. He also possesses excellent length and uses his hands well to create separation from offensive linemen. Foskey is equally adept at rushing from the edge or kicking inside to take advantage of mismatches against slower guards or centers. In terms of scheme fit at the NFL level, Foskey projects well as a 4-3 defensive end or a 3-4 outside linebacker. His size and athleticism make him an ideal fit as an edge rusher in a multiple-front defense. However, he must continue developing his technique and refining his pass-rushing moves to become a consistent threat at the next level. CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS Mid-Level Starter Potential (60-64) A solid, dependable starter with the potential to exceed expectations. They have good athleticism and tools but may lack elite traits. While they show flashes of high-level play, they also have some notable weaknesses that must be developed. These players often need 2-3 years to establish themselves. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS Plus Athlete Speed Rush Versatile KEY WEAKNESSES Every Down Stiff Ankles Consistency PLAYER COMPARISONS Danielle Hunter Barkevious Mingo Randy Gregory

A late discovery by Football Scout 365, Mills shows you a little bit of everything on his tape, both good and bad. The good that he does show is very good. His short and intermediate accuracy rank highly; he can operate beautifully in the pocket, he displays nice touch and a quick release. His throwing motion is consistent, compact, and damn near perfect. Where he struggled on film is his deep accuracy and, at times, his decision-making. < Back Davis Mills Stanford HT: 6040 WT: 222 YR: SR POS: QB OVR RK 49 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 7 Low-Level Starter Potential OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT A late discovery by Football Scout 365, Mills shows you a little bit of everything on his tape, both good and bad. The good that he does show is very good. His short and intermediate accuracy rank highly; he can operate beautifully in the pocket, he displays nice touch and a quick release. His throwing motion is consistent, compact, and damn near perfect. Where he struggled on film is his deep accuracy and, at times, his decision-making. CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS Low-Level Starter Potential (55-59) A player with the upside to be a low-end starter or high-level backup within a couple of seasons. While they have solid physical tools, inconsistencies in technique, processing, or durability limit their ceiling. They are developmental prospects who may carve out a role as specialists or system fits. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS KEY WEAKNESSES PLAYER COMPARISONS

Overall, Jamari Thrash’s capabilities suggest he could be a valuable addition to NFL rosters, particularly for teams seeking versatile and reliable receiving options. Based on the available metrics and the typical attributes of a player in his projected draft range, his overall potential might align with a Mid-Level Starter Potential grade, pending further evaluation of specific game film and combine results​. < Back Jamari Thrash Louisville HT: 6010 WT: 185 YR: JR POS: WR OVR RK 92 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 22 Mid-Level Starter Potential OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT Thrash seems best suited for a versatile receiving role that can leverage his ability to gain yards after the catch. His moderate speed and agility make him a potential fit for slot receiver roles or as a secondary outside option in spread offenses. CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS Mid-Level Starter Potential (60-64) A solid, dependable starter with the potential to exceed expectations. They have good athleticism and tools but may lack elite traits. While they show flashes of high-level play, they also have some notable weaknesses that must be developed. These players often need 2-3 years to establish themselves. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS Productive In College Good Agility Reliable Hands KEY WEAKNESSES Lacks Deep Speed Improve Physicality Contested Catch Ability PLAYER COMPARISONS

Tyler Guyton represents a high-upside prospect whose athletic background and transition from defense to offense underscore a capacity for growth and adaptation. His blend of size, agility, and strength positions him as a compelling target for NFL teams seeking to bolster their offensive line with a player possessing both immediate impact potential and room for further development. < Back Tyler Guyton Oklahoma HT: 6070 WT: 327 YR: RJR POS: OT OVR RK 44 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 7 High-End Starter Potential OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT Guyton's towering presence and athleticism make him an intriguing prospect for NFL teams looking for versatile offensive linemen capable of both pass protection and run blocking. His best fit would be in a scheme that values athleticism and agility in their tackles, allowing him to utilize his mobility and recovery skills. Zone-blocking schemes could benefit from his skill set, offering him opportunities to leverage his first-step explosiveness and range as a puller. CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS High-End Starter Potential (65-69) A player expected to become a top-tier starter within their first few years. They possess strong physical tools and good technical skills but may have some limitations in their game. With development, they can reach near-elite levels and provide consistent impact at their position. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS Good Athleticism Explosive Great Anchor KEY WEAKNESSES Consistency Hand Placement Reactionary Speed PLAYER COMPARISONS

2022 NFL Draft: QB Positional Rankings, Final Grades, Ceiling Grades, Advanced Stats and Analysis As we move closer to the 2022 NFL Draft, we have to finalize our positional rankings. We have watched the film, monitored the Senior Bowl and the combine, and now it's time to complete the analysis. Below, you can find our player positional grades, including our final grades, ceiling grades, and where each player ranks on the current NFL Draft Big Board . Check out our NFL Draft Big Board, our grading process, and our NFL Draft YouTube series After Further Review. NFL Draft Big Board and Player Profiles Click Here Updated NFL Player Grade Scale Click Here After Further Review NFL Draft Edition (YouTube) Click Here Positional Ranking By Final Grade The final grade represents the level of the immediate impact we project a player can make in their first year. Kenny Pickett Pitt (Solid Starter Level) Year One Starter Level Malik Willis Liberty (Developmental) 1-2 yrs development Desmond Ridder UC (Developmental) 1-3 Years development Matt Corral Ole Miss (Developmental) 1-3 Years Development Sam Howell UNC (Developmental) 1-3 Years Development Carson Strong NEV (High-Level Backup) Bailey Zappe WKU (High-Level Backup) Positional Ranking by Ceiling Grade The ceiling grade projects the highest level of potential we believe a prospect can reach once they have developed their skills at the NFL level. If a player enters the NFL with a developmental grade (1-3 years development) with a ceiling of projected high-end starter, we believe that the prospect has the potential to reach their projected ceiling if in the right situation within 1-3 years. The projected time frame might vary based on a player's final grade and film review. Malik Willis Liberty (High-End Starter Potential) Carson Strong Nevada (High-End Starter Potential) Desmond Ridder UC (High-End Starter Potential) Sam Howell UNC (Solid Starter Potential) Kenny Pickett Pitt (Solid Starter Potential) Matt Corral Ole Miss (Solid Starter Potential) Bailey Zappe WKU (Lower Level Starter Potential) Player Ranking By On Target Throw Rate Measuring QB accuracy regardless of completion Player Ranking by Deep On Target Passing Rate On target throws of 20+ yds or more Player Ranking by Medium On Target Passing Rate On target throws of 10-19 yds or more Player Ranking by On Target Throws Under Pressure On target throw rate while under pressure Player Ranking By Mobility Ranking By Mobility, and the ability to extend a play Player Ranking By Overall Arm Talent Ranking by Arm Talent Football Scout 365 Big Board Ranking 27th Kenny Pickett Pitt (Proj Rnd 1) 38th Malik Willis Liberty (Proj Rnd 1) 57th Desmond Ridder UC (Proj Rnd 2) 58th Carson Strong Nevada (Proj Rnd 2-3) 61st Matt Corral (Proj Rnd 2-4) 79th Sam Howell UNC (Proj Rnd 2-5) 100th Bailey Zappe WKU (Proj 3-6)

Overall, McKinstry shows the potential to be a high-end starter in the NFL, with room for further growth and refinement of his skills. His performances at Alabama, especially his significant improvement from his freshman to sophomore years, indicate a strong foundation and a high ceiling for his future in professional football. < Back Kool-Aid McKinstry Alabama HT: 6010 WT: 195 YR: JR POS: CB OVR RK 19 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 4 Near Elite OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT McKinstry is known for his excellent zone coverage awareness, utilizing his length effectively to disrupt passes. He's skilled in bump and run, mirroring receivers with quick footwork and fluid hips. His ball skills are particularly notable when facing the quarterback, and he's physical at the top of routes. McKinstry's lack of panic when out of position and his solid tackling ability in the open field make him a reliable defensive back. Additionally, his communication skills within Saban’s defense are a significant asset, and he brings added value as a punt returner. His versatility allows him to fit well in various NFL schemes, particularly those that utilize complex zone coverage systems. CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS Near Elite (70-74) A high-caliber prospect who is expected to become a significant contributor by Year 2. These players have outstanding physical tools and strong football IQ, with only minor flaws in their game. They demonstrate consistency at a high level and project as future Pro Bowl-caliber players if properly developed. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS Fluid Hips Attacks Catch Point Physical KEY WEAKNESSES Trail Technique Reactiveness Technique PLAYER COMPARISONS Sauce Gardner Trevon Diggs J.C. Jackson

Chris Braswell's skills and potential suggest a 'High-End Starter Potential' (65-69) rating. With further development in run defense and strength, he could rise to a 'Near Elite' level in the NFL, particularly in schemes that leverage his pass-rushing strengths. < Back Chris Braswell Alabama HT: 6030 WT: 255 YR: SR POS: ED OVR RK 36 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 5 High-End Starter Potential OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT Chris Braswell demonstrates a dynamic and powerful edge rushing ability, excelling in explosiveness and agility. His speed off the line and ability to maneuver around blockers makes him a consistent threat to opposing quarterbacks. Braswell's strength is in pass rush situations, where his explosiveness and agility shine. While effective in run stop, there's room for improvement. His versatility allows for adaptability in various defensive schemes, making him a valuable asset in both 3-4 and 4-3 alignments. However, his optimal fit would be in a scheme that frequently utilizes edge rushers in aggressive pass-rush scenarios. CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS High-End Starter Potential (65-69) A player expected to become a top-tier starter within their first few years. They possess strong physical tools and good technical skills but may have some limitations in their game. With development, they can reach near-elite levels and provide consistent impact at their position. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS Explosiveness Agility Versatility KEY WEAKNESSES Run Stop Strength Pass Coverage PLAYER COMPARISONS

< Back Derick Hall Auburn HT: 6026 WT: 254 YR: SR POS: ED OVR RK 79 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 13 Mid-Level Starter Potential OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT 3-4 OLB/Edge Rusher CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS Mid-Level Starter Potential (60-64) A solid, dependable starter with the potential to exceed expectations. They have good athleticism and tools but may lack elite traits. While they show flashes of high-level play, they also have some notable weaknesses that must be developed. These players often need 2-3 years to establish themselves. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS Athleticism Run Defense 1st Step KEY WEAKNESSES Counter Moves Rush Plan Flexibility PLAYER COMPARISONS