Search Results

2026 NFL Draft: Early QB Outlook and Way-Too-Early Top 10 Prospect Rankings The 2026 NFL Draft cycle is already buzzing with anticipation — especially at the quarterback position, where a group of toolsy, unproven passers offers more upside than the 2025 class, but far less certainty. From the intrigue surrounding Arch Manning to the resurgence hopes of Carson Beck, this year’s QB race is wide open and full of volatility. Beyond the quarterbacks, the 2026 class looks particularly strong in the trenches and on defense, with elite prospects emerging along both the offensive and defensive lines. While it’s still early and much will change between now and next April, this article offers a projection-based look at the top QBs and a way-too-early Top 10 prospect list based on ceiling potential. Here are the Top QB Prospects As Of Right Now There’s been early optimism that the 2026 quarterback class could surpass the 2025 group in overall talent and NFL potential, and there’s some truth to that. From a tools and traits perspective, this class flashes more upside. But it’s important to remember: this conversation is almost entirely projection-based. As of now, there is no clear-cut QB1 — no Caleb Williams, no Trevor Lawrence — just a group of talented, unproven, or inconsistent passers with a lot to prove in 2025. Arch Manning, Texas is the wild card with the biggest name. He’s played just nine games with two starts, but in limited reps last season, he posted an 88.0 PFF grade with six big-time throws and flashed dynamic rushing ability. His $6 million NIL valuation and the Manning family’s history of staying in school suggest he may not declare early — but if he takes a leap, he’ll be a top-three pick candidate. Drew Allar, Penn State Allar has the prototype frame (6’5”, 242), elite arm strength, and growing command of Penn State’s offense. He improved from 60% to 66.5% completions in 2024 and threw just 8 interceptions all year. He’ll need more consistency and help on the perimeter, but the tools are undeniable. Garrett Nussmeier, LSU He threw for 4,043 yards in 2024 and ranked top 10 in big-time throws. He’s accurate, aggressive, and fearless in the pocket, but turnovers remain an issue. If he cuts down the mistakes and shows more poise under pressure, he’ll push for Round 1. Cade Klubnik, Clemson Took a big step forward in 2024, throwing for 3,639 yards, 36 touchdowns, and only 6 interceptions. He led all returning FBS QBs in PFF passing grade and big-time throws, but still must prove he can thrive in-structure against top defenses. LaNorris Sellers, South Carolina He may be the most intriguing upside play in the class. At 6’3”, 240 pounds, he ranked fifth nationally with a 95.2 PFF deep passing grade and broke 47 tackles as a runner. He’s a raw, toolsy dual-threat with sky-high potential, but he must refine his accuracy and decision-making. Carson Beck, Miami He is the forgotten man. Coming out of the 2023 season, he was the early favorite to be the first quarterback selected in the 2025 NFL Draft. But after an inconsistent 2024 campaign at Georgia, Beck’s stock slid into Round 3 projection territory. Now at Miami, he gets a fresh start. He brings prototypical size, poise, and one of the quickest releases in the class. Beck operates with a strong base and can drive the ball into tight windows. If he puts together a clean, productive season in 2025, he could re-enter the Day 1 conversation — the traits are still there. Bottom line: The 2026 QB class should be stronger than 2025’s, but it’s still a high-ceiling, high-variance group. The eventual QB1 may not be Arch, Allar, or Klubnik — it could be someone still developing. This race is wide open. Other Quarterbacks to Watch Sam Leavitt , QB | Arizona State Fernando Mendoza , QB | Indiana (Cal transfer) Rocco Becht , QB | Iowa State John Mateer , QB | Oklahoma Mark Gronowski , QB | South Dakota State Top 10 Prospects for the 2026 NFL Draft Below is an early ranking of the top 10 prospects for the 2026 NFL Draft, ordered based on ceiling potential — and it’s important to emphasize this is by no means a definitive list. Just as with the quarterbacks discussed above, the rest of the field should be viewed through the same lens: at this stage, it’s all projection. 1. Arch Manning, QB, Texas Ht: 6'4" | Wt: 215 lbs Let’s address the elephant in the room: Arch Manning is unlikely to declare for the 2026 NFL Draft. The Manning family has a long-standing tradition of staying in school for four years, and Arch has appeared in just nine games with two starts. Still, his upside is undeniable. Across 233 snaps in 2024, he showcased high-level arm talent and underrated mobility. If he takes a significant leap in 2025, NFL teams with a need at QB will be trying to tank or do whatever they can via trade to move up. 2. Caleb Downs, S, Ohio State Ht: 6'0" | Wt: 205 lbs After transferring from Alabama, Caleb Downs helped anchor Ohio State’s national title run. He’s the most complete safety in college football — physical, instinctive, and versatile. Had he been draft-eligible in 2025, he would have graded out as an elite prospect. Over the past two seasons, he owns the second-highest PFF grade among all FBS safeties, and his 7.5 tackles for loss in 2024 ranked top-15 among defensive backs. A true back-end enforcer with top-10 upside. 3. Kadyn Proctor, OT, Alabama Ht: 6'7" | Wt: 345 lbs Proctor returned to Alabama with something to prove after a brief stint at Iowa. He has rare size and movement skills and allowed just one pressure in 96 snaps against Georgia and South Carolina combined. With refinement, he could be the top tackle off the board. 4. Peter Woods, DL, Clemson Ht: 6'3" | Wt: 300 lbs A power-packed interior disruptor, Woods posted 3 sacks and a forced fumble in 2024 while playing out of position for much of the year. His near elite grade and dominance in the run game place him among the top interior defenders in the nation. 5. TJ Parker, EDGE, Clemson Ht: 6'3" | Wt: 255 lbs Parker exploded for 11 sacks, 16.5 TFLs, and 4 forced fumbles in 2024. His ability to win with power or bend makes him a nightmare off the edge. He’s also one of only three Power Four EDGEs to post near elite grades in both pass rush and run defense. 6. Dani Dennis-Sutton, EDGE, Penn State Ht: 6'5" | Wt: 270 lbs With 8.5 sacks, 15 TFLs, and a monster playoff performance (including a pick-six vs. Notre Dame), DDS has rare explosiveness for his size. He’s the next great Nittany Lion pass rusher and could rise into top-10 lock status with a strong 2025. 7. Drew Allar, QB, Penn State Ht: 6'5" | Wt: 242 lbs Allar threw for 3,327 yards and 24 TDs in 2024 while protecting the football (only 1.5% turnover-worthy play rate). His arm strength is elite, but he needs to improve anticipation, footwork under pressure, and processing speed. Still, his ceiling remains immense. 8. Jeremiyah Love, RB, Notre Dame Ht: 6'0" | Wt: 206 lbs Love averaged 6.9 yards per carry, rushed for 1,125 yards and 17 TDs, and added 237 receiving yards in 2024. He’s explosive, slippery through tight spaces, and one of the top dual-threat backs in the country. If he repeats in 2025, round one is within reach. 9. Francis Mauigoa, OT, Miami (FL) Ht: 6'6" | Wt: 330 lbs Mauigoa started as a true freshman and is trending toward being a cornerstone tackle prospect. He allowed just one sack and one QB hit in 2024, showing improved balance and anchor strength. If he keeps developing, he could be a top-15 pick. 10. Zachariah Branch, WR, Georgia Ht: 5'10" | Wt: 185 lbs After transferring from USC, Branch brings elite speed and return ability to Athens. While Georgia’s offense may limit his raw stats, he’s a home-run threat every time he touches the ball. He had return touchdowns on both punts and kicks in 2023 and is the kind of weapon NFL offenses covet in space.

Tucker is our top interior offensive lineman due to his versatility. He played tackle and guard while at USC; he excelled at both. He plays with good athleticism and shows good bend. He has the power to punch defenders back in the passing game, reset and punch again. He knows how to handle a bull-rushing defender and handles space well. As a run blocker, he gets good push and uses his lower body in combination with his punch to strike defenders and move them. He fits any scheme at the NFL level. < Back Alijah Vera-Tucker USC HT: 6040 WT: 300 YR: RJR POS: IOL OVR RK 18 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 1 High-End Starter Potential OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT Tucker is our top interior offensive lineman due to his versatility. He played tackle and guard while at USC; he excelled at both. He plays with good athleticism and shows good bend. He has the power to punch defenders back in the passing game, reset and punch again. He knows how to handle a bull-rushing defender and handles space well. As a run blocker, he gets good push and uses his lower body in combination with his punch to strike defenders and move them. He fits any scheme at the NFL level. CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS High-End Starter Potential (65-69) A player expected to become a top-tier starter within their first few years. They possess strong physical tools and good technical skills but may have some limitations in their game. With development, they can reach near-elite levels and provide consistent impact at their position. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS KEY WEAKNESSES PLAYER COMPARISONS

There’s Nothing Here... We can’t find the page you’re looking for. Check the URL, or head back home. Go Home

Elite QB Blueprint: How 2021-2024 NFL Draft Quarterbacks Stacked Up Against Today’s Elite QBs Using Pre-Draft Scouting Data Our "Elite QB Blueprint Model" evaluates top quarterback prospects against the core attributes of today’s NFL stars, like Patrick Mahomes and Joe Burrow, using data-driven benchmarks to project who has the talent, adaptability, and skill to thrive at the highest level. What is The Elite QB Blueprint Model? In the ever-evolving landscape of the NFL, finding a franchise quarterback has become both a high-stakes art and a science. Our Elite QB Blueprint Model serves as a roadmap for identifying top quarterback prospects by evaluating them against the attributes of today’s elite quarterbacks, like Patrick Mahomes, Joe Burrow, and Josh Allen. Using six core attributes—arm talent, accuracy, mobility, improvisational skills, football IQ, and experience—each weighted by its importance to NFL success, this model provides a comprehensive benchmark for what it takes to thrive at the highest level. Building the Perfect Quarterback Profile: Core Attributes and Weights The Elite QB Blueprint Model evaluates prospects against six key attributes, each carefully weighted based on its importance to NFL success. The model uses data-driven benchmarks, elite quarterback comparisons, and scouting insights to gauge how closely new prospects match up to NFL stars like Patrick Mahomes, Joe Burrow, and Josh Allen. Below, each core trait is defined along with benchmarks and notable NFL comparisons, creating a profile to evaluate new quarterbacks. Arm Talent and Arm Strength (20%) Definition: This measures a quarterback's ability to throw with both power and control, crucial for deep throws and tight-window passes. Benchmark: Consistent, high-velocity throws across field levels, with quarterbacks averaging 250–300 passing yards per game. Elite Comparisons: Patrick Mahomes (diverse arm angles), Josh Allen (deep-throw power), Justin Herbert (blend of accuracy with power). Why it Matters: A quarterback’s arm strength opens up the playbook by challenging defenses at all depths, keeping them honest on every down. Accuracy (20%) Definition: Precision across short, intermediate, and deep routes, especially in pressured scenarios, is essential for sustaining offensive drives. Benchmark: Completion rates above 65%, consistent across game situations and under defensive pressure. Elite Comparisons: Joe Burrow (touch and timing at all levels), Russell Wilson (deep-ball accuracy). Why it Matters: A high completion rate under pressure demonstrates reliability in passing and is critical for maintaining possession in high-stakes moments. Mobility and Athleticism (15%) Definition: The ability to extend plays, maneuver in the pocket, and evade pressure is crucial for versatility in high-stakes situations. Benchmark: 500+ rushing yards per season, or evident escapability and maneuverability within the pocket. Elite Comparisons: Lamar Jackson (top-end speed), Kyler Murray (quickness and agility), Russell Wilson (stability and balance in the pocket). Why it Matters: Mobility gives quarterbacks the ability to adapt when protection breaks down, allowing them to create plays on the ground or buy time for downfield options. Improvisational Skills (15%) Definition: The ability to adapt outside of the offensive structure, managing pressure with composure and creativity, is critical when plays break down. Benchmark: High completion rates on broken plays and effective yardage generation under pressure. Elite Comparisons: Patrick Mahomes (creative, off-script playmaking), Russell Wilson (effectiveness outside of designed plays). Why it Matters: This skill allows quarterbacks to create positive yardage in chaotic situations, ensuring offensive flexibility when defenses disrupt the initial play structure. Mental Processing and Football IQ (20%) Definition: The ability to quickly read defenses, make adaptive decisions, and efficiently process post-snap information is essential for high-level quarterbacking. Benchmark: High-efficiency rating (160+) and low turnover rates; quick, adaptive reads under pressure. Elite Comparisons: Joe Burrow (defensive reads and adaptability), Justin Herbert (rapid decision-making). Why it Matters: A quarterback’s Football IQ enables quick adaptation to complex defenses, making them less predictable and more effective across different play types. Experience and Production (10%) Definition: A quarterback’s collegiate experience, combined with consistent production, indicates their readiness for NFL complexities and adaptability to various scenarios. Benchmark: 30+ games played, a passer rating above 160, and multi-season high production. Elite Comparisons: Joe Burrow (extensive college production), Patrick Mahomes (high-volume passing). Why it Matters: Experience provides quarterbacks with the ability to read defenses effectively and handle varied situations, laying a strong foundation for NFL adaptability. Common Development Areas Analyzed Evaluating potential weaknesses provides an even clearer view of each quarterback’s readiness. Here are common developmental areas, each benchmarked for improvement: Mechanics and Footwork (20%) Definition : This evaluates a quarterback's consistency in footwork and throwing mechanics, which are vital for precise and powerful throws under pressure. Benchmark : Stability in throwing mechanics and footwork under duress, contributing to sustained accuracy and power across different situations. Elite Comparisons : Josh Allen (improved mechanics post-draft), Lamar Jackson (refined release and precision). Why it Matters : Consistent mechanics help quarterbacks maintain accuracy and minimize unnecessary turnovers. Poor mechanics can lead to erratic throws and misreads, particularly under defensive pressure. Pocket Presence and Navigation (20%) Definition : This assesses a quarterback’s ability to sense pressure, evade rushers, and keep the field in view to make quick decisions under stress. Benchmark : Minimal sack rates and effective evasion in high-pressure situations, with quarterbacks showing composure and adaptability. Elite Comparisons : Justin Herbert (calm pocket presence), Kyler Murray (effective pressure navigation while keeping eyes downfield). Why it Matters : Pocket presence separates the great quarterbacks from the good, as it determines how well a QB can avoid negative plays and stay poised to make accurate throws under pressure. Consistency in Accuracy (15%) Definition : This focuses on a quarterback’s ability to maintain precision on throws, especially under pressure or during crucial downs. Benchmark : High completion percentage under pressure, including short and intermediate throws, and minimal drop-off in accuracy when pressured. Elite Comparisons : Joe Burrow (consistently accurate despite defensive pressure), Russell Wilson (reliable accuracy across levels, including deep throws). Why it Matters : Accurate quarterbacks sustain offensive drives, converting on key downs and keeping their teams in scoring positions. Inconsistent accuracy, particularly under duress, can lead to missed opportunities and stalled drives. Decision-Making Under Pressure (25%) Definition : This measures a quarterback’s ability to make sound, efficient decisions when facing defensive pressure, avoiding forced throws and turnovers. Benchmark : Low turnover rates, high adjusted completion rates when pressured, and success on critical downs. Elite Comparisons : Russell Wilson (calm, efficient decisions in high-pressure scenarios), Lamar Jackson (avoids forced plays, keeps drives alive). Why it Matters : Decision-making under pressure is crucial for maintaining drive efficiency and avoiding costly mistakes. A QB who can make safe, productive decisions under duress will limit turnovers and maximize scoring opportunities. Trusting Offensive Structure (20%) Definition : This assesses a quarterback’s balance between improvisation and reliance on the designed play structure. Over-reliance on broken plays can disrupt offensive rhythm. Benchmark : High efficiency within structured offensive plays and low reliance on improvisation as the primary source of production. Elite Comparisons : Patrick Mahomes (developed trust in structured plays, enhancing overall efficiency). Why it Matters : While improvisation is essential, a quarterback who can trust and execute within an offense’s structure can elevate the entire team’s performance, staying efficient while minimizing chaos. Ranking Quarterbacks from 2021-2024 Based on Elite QB Profile Matches The following rankings reveal how recent first-round quarterback prospects align with the elite quarterback model: 1). Caleb Williams (2024) – 85% Match Strengths : Elite arm talent, creativity, high football IQ; excels with multi-angle throws and power in off-schedule plays. Weaknesses : Footwork inconsistencies; reliance on improvisation sometimes affects rhythm. Comparison : Patrick Mahomes Key Match Drivers : Arm talent (20%), improvisational skills (15%). Lowering Factor : Footwork inconsistencies impacting accuracy (20% weight). 2). Trevor Lawrence (2021) – 84% Match Strengths : Arm strength, composure under pressure, field vision. Weaknesses : Occasional accuracy drops under heavy pressure. Comparison : Justin Herbert Key Match Drivers : Arm strength (20%), mental processing (20%). Lowering Factor : Accuracy under pressure (20% weight). 3). Drake Maye (2024) – 82% Match Strengths : Accurate, quick decision-making, pocket awareness. Weaknesses : Inconsistent deep-ball accuracy. Comparison : Josh Allen Key Match Drivers : Accuracy (20%), mental processing (20%). Lowering Factor : Deep-ball accuracy (20% weight). 4). C.J. Stroud (2023) – 81% Match Strengths : Accuracy, pocket stability, intermediate route precision. Weaknesses : Limited off-script playmaking. Comparison : Joe Burrow Key Match Drivers : Pocket presence (20%), accuracy (20%). Lowering Factor : Off-script limitations (15% weight). 5). Jayden Daniels (2024) – 79% Match Strengths : Dual-threat, athletic, creative out of structure. Weaknesses : Needs improvement in pocket mechanics. Comparison : Lamar Jackson Key Match Drivers : Mobility (15%), improvisational skills (15%). Lowering Factor : Pocket mechanics inconsistency (15% weight). 6). Justin Fields (2021) – 78% Match Strengths : Athleticism, deep ball power, playmaking out of structure. Weaknesses : Intermediate accuracy, pressure navigation. Comparison : Lamar Jackson Key Match Drivers : Arm strength (20%), improvisational skills (15%). Lowering Factor : Intermediate accuracy (20% weight). 7). Bryce Young (2023) – 78% Match Strengths : Decision-making, accuracy under pressure, field awareness. Weaknesses : Durability concerns due to smaller stature. Comparison : Russell Wilson Key Match Drivers : Mental processing (20%), accuracy (20%). Lowering Factor : Durability (10% weight). 8). Michael Penix Jr. (2024) – 77% Match Strengths : Deep-ball accuracy, poised pocket presence. Weaknesses : Durability issues, footwork inconsistencies. Comparison : Justin Herbert Key Match Drivers : Deep-ball accuracy (20%), pocket management (20%). Lowering Factor : Durability (10% weight). 9). J.J. McCarthy (2024) – 76% Match Strengths : Play extension, accuracy in short-to-intermediate range, mobility. Weaknesses : Needs rhythm development in timing routes. Comparison : Joe Burrow Key Match Drivers : Play extension (15%), short-range accuracy (20%). Lowering Factor : Timing consistency (20% weight). 10). Bo Nix (2024) – 74% Match Strengths: Efficient decision-making, experience, and pocket awareness. Weaknesses: Limited deep-ball consistency and arm strength for high-velocity throws Comparison: Joe Burrow Key Match Drivers: Mental processing (20%), accuracy (20%). Lowering Factor: Arm strength limitations impacting deep-ball consistency (15% weight). 11). Kenny Pickett (2022) – 74% Match Strengths : Leadership, intermediate accuracy, sound processing. Weaknesses : Limited arm strength for deep throws. Comparison : Joe Burrow Key Match Drivers : Leadership (10%), intermediate accuracy (20%). Lowering Factor : Arm strength (20% weight). 12). Trey Lance (2021) – 73% Match Strengths : Raw arm talent, physicality, and dual-threat potential. Weaknesses : Limited experience, needs development in decision-making. Comparison : Josh Allen Key Match Drivers : Arm strength (20%), mobility (15%). Lowering Factor : Experience and decision-making (10% weight). 13.) Anthony Richardson (2023) – 72% Match Strengths : Explosive arm, elite athleticism. Weaknesses : Inconsistent footwork and structured decision-making. Comparison : Josh Allen Key Match Drivers : Arm strength (20%), athleticism (15%). Lowering Factor : Footwork and decision-making (20% weight). 14). Zach Wilson (2021) – 70% Match Strengths : Dynamic arm, short-area accuracy, off-platform versatility. Weaknesses : Decision-making under pressure, reading defenses. Comparison : Patrick Mahomes Key Match Drivers : Improvisational skills (15%), arm versatility (20%). Lowering Factor : Decision-making under pressure (20% weight). 15). Mac Jones (2021) – 69% Match Strengths : Processing speed, accuracy in short-to-intermediate range. Weaknesses : Limited arm strength and mobility. Comparison : Joe Burrow Key Match Drivers : Processing speed (20%), accuracy (20%). Lowering Factor : Arm strength (20% weight). These comparisons use the benchmark traits and weightings to quantify each quarterback's match to an elite profile, focusing on how their skills align with NFL-level success factors. This systematic analysis provides insights into each player’s strengths, developmental needs, and overall fit in comparison to top-tier quarterbacks in the league.

2025 NFL Combine Day 4: Armand Membou & Aireontae Ersery Headline Versatile Athletic OL Performances Day 4 of the 2025 NFL Scouting Combine belonged to the offensive linemen, and this year’s group put on an impressive display of speed, agility, and power. With the final day of on-field workouts wrapping up in Indianapolis, several linemen cemented themselves as first-round prospects, while others saw their stock rise dramatically. Among the standouts, LSU’s Will Campbell, Missouri’s Armand Membou, Minnesota’s Aireontae Ersery, Georgia’s Jared Wilson, and several others flashed high-level athleticism, showcasing rare movement skills at their size. 2025 NFL Combine Day 4: Offensive Linemen Showcase Elite Athleticism Below, we break down the top performers, their results, and how today’s testing impacted their NFL Draft stock. Aireontae Ersery (OT, Minnesota) 40-Yard Dash: 5.01 seconds 10-Yard Split: 1.75 seconds Vertical Jump: 29.5” Broad Jump: 9’3” Size: 6’6”, 331 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance: Ersery’s 5.01-second 40-yard dash made history, as he became the fastest offensive lineman over 6’6” and 330 lbs since 2003. His short-area quickness, powerful hands, and ability to move laterally were on full display in drills. 📈 Draft Stock Impact: Ersery was viewed as an early to mid-second-round prospect, but his athletic testing could push him up into the first round. His experience as a left tackle and ability to thrive in zone-heavy blocking schemes make him an intriguing developmental starter at tackle or guard. Will Campbell (OT, LSU) 40-Yard Dash: 4.98 seconds 10-Yard Split: 1.76 seconds Vertical Jump: 32” Broad Jump: 9’5” Size: 6’6”, 319 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance: Campbell showed why he’s a first-round prospect, testing in elite company. His 4.98-second 40-yard dash at 319 pounds makes him one of only four offensive linemen since 2003 to run a sub-5.0 40 while jumping over 30 inches in the vertical. His movement skills on drills like the Deep Short Pull Drill (17.38 mph) and Pass Pro Mirror Drill (13.45 mph) further prove his high-end athleticism for the tackle position. 📈 Draft Stock Impact: Campbell was already viewed as a top-20 pick, and today’s performance solidified his first-round projection. His positional flexibility at tackle or guard could make him a target for teams needing offensive line help early in the draft. Armand Membou (OT, Missouri) 40-Yard Dash: 4.91 seconds 10-Yard Split: 1.74 seconds Vertical Jump: 34” Broad Jump: 9’7” Size: 6’4”, 332 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance: Membou's 4.91-second 40-yard dash at 332 pounds was one of the best performances of the day, reaching a top speed of 20.28 mph, the fastest by any offensive lineman today. His 34-inch vertical jump was the best among all linemen, showing elite explosiveness and lower-body power. 📈 Draft Stock Impact: Membou had been projected as a late first-rounder or early Day 2 pick, but his elite testing numbers could push him firmly into the middle of the first round. His power, movement skills and versatility make him an intriguing option for teams looking for a high-upside tackle or guard. Jared Wilson (C, Georgia) 40-Yard Dash: 4.84 seconds 10-Yard Split: 1.72 seconds Vertical Jump: 32” Broad Jump: 9’4” Size: 6’3”, 310 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance: Wilson ran a 4.84-second 40-yard dash, reaching a top speed of 21.04 mph, making him the fastest interior offensive lineman in this year's Combine and the only interior OL to surpass 21 mph. His 32-inch vertical and 9’4” broad jump further reinforce his explosiveness, proving he can excel at the center position at the next level. 📈 Draft Stock Impact: Wilson entered the Combine as a Day 2 prospect, but his testing numbers solidified his status as a high-end second-round pick. His athleticism and ability to work in space make him a perfect fit for teams running outside-zone blocking schemes.

McMillan's combination of speed, route running, and reliable hands position him as a High-End Starter Potential (65-69) prospect. His ability to immediately contribute in the passing game, combined with potential growth in blocking, makes him a valuable asset for teams looking for a versatile and dynamic wide receiver. < Back Jalen McMillan Washington HT: 6010 WT: 192 YR: JR POS: WR OVR RK 81 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 17 High-End Starter Potential OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT Jalen McMillan is a dynamic wide receiver who excels in vertical and intermediate routes. His speed and agility make him a deep threat in any offense, particularly in systems that prioritize downfield passing. McMillan's ability to track the ball and make contested catches fits well in an offense that utilizes play-action and vertical stretching plays. While his run blocking needs improvement, his route-running ability and versatility make him a fit for multiple offensive schemes, especially those that utilize spread concepts. CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS High-End Starter Potential (65-69) A player expected to become a top-tier starter within their first few years. They possess strong physical tools and good technical skills but may have some limitations in their game. With development, they can reach near-elite levels and provide consistent impact at their position. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS Deep Ball Tracking Strong Hands Versatile Routes KEY WEAKNESSES Run Blocking Physicality Health PLAYER COMPARISONS

Caleb Williams’ Bears Debut: 5 Key Observations From His First Preseason Game Caleb Williams, selected as the No. 1 overall pick in the 2024 NFL Draft and widely regarded as one of the top quarterback prospects in recent memory, made his NFL preseason debut on Saturday afternoon against the Buffalo Bills. Caleb Williams’ Bears Debut: 5 Key Observations From His First Preseason Game 1. Williams Made A Strong First Impression Caleb Williams didn’t play much in his preseason debut, but the No. 1 overall pick wasted no time making an impact. In just one-quarter of play, Williams completed 4-of-7 passes for 95 yards and added 13 rushing yards, showcasing a glimpse of the talent that led the Bears to make him their franchise quarterback. His ability to step into his throws and hit tight windows, even in windy conditions, was on full display, leaving fans excited for what’s to come. 2. Highlight-Reel Plays Show Off Unique Skill Set Williams demonstrated why he’s considered a special talent with a series of highlight-worthy plays. On a third-and-12, he delivered a laser to D.J. Moore for a first down, threading the needle against tight coverage. He then followed up with a creative no-look pass to D’Andre Swift, turning what could have been a busted play into a 42-yard gain. Later, Williams rolled out to his right and launched a fastball to Cole Kmet, a throw that showcased both his arm strength and ability to make plays on the move. 3. Mobility Adds Another Dimension In addition to his impressive arm talent, Williams showed off his athleticism by scrambling for a first down on a third-and-9. His ability to extend plays and pick up yards with his legs adds a valuable dimension to the Bears' offense. Williams smartly slid before taking a hit, demonstrating his awareness. 4. Room for Growth and Learning Although Williams' first game showed promise, there were still some valuable lessons to be learned. Despite almost throwing an interception while under pressure, he was saved by a penalty against the Bills. Additionally, he missed the mark on a few passes, like the one to Rome Odunze in the end zone that went too long. These are the areas where Williams will need to improve as he progresses in his NFL career. 5. Living Up to the Hype Williams' performance during his brief preseason appearances validated the hype surrounding him as the top overall draft pick. His impressive blend of arm strength, agility, and improvisational skills were on display, offering Bears supporters a lot to anticipate as the regular season nears. Despite the early stage of his career, Williams convincingly demonstrated why he was chosen first in the draft and why Chicago's prospects appear promising under his leadership.

Travis Hunter Shines at Wide Receiver: Colorado’s Two-Way Star Impresses Against NDSU When Colorado needed him the most, Travis Hunter stepped up and made one spectacular play after another on the offensive side of the ball. Hunter played a total of 129 snaps, showcasing his durability and versatility in the season opener. Our Initial Summer Scouting Report Travis Hunter entered the 2024 season as one of the most highly anticipated NFL Draft prospects in college football. His rare combination of explosive athleticism, football instincts, and versatility on both sides of the ball made him a standout in scouting circles. Hunter's skill set is well-suited for a role that leverages his agility and quickness, whether as a wide receiver in a West Coast or spread offense or as a defensive back in zone-based coverage schemes. Hunter Shined On The Offensive Side Of The Football Against the Bison, Hunter was targeted nine times, catching seven passes for an average of 18.9 yards per reception. His longest reception of the day was a 41-yard touchdown, which exemplified his ability to stretch the field and make plays in critical situations. Hunter’s receiving performance was a highlight reel showcasing his elite ball skills and body control. His ability to make contested catches when completely covered is one of his top traits on the offensive side of the football and a major reason why NFL scouts may start to consider him more as a receiver than a DB at the NFL level. Receiving Breakdown: 1st Quarter: Hunter caught a 41-yard touchdown pass, demonstrating his deep-threat ability and connection with QB Shedeur Sanders. 2nd Quarter: He had key receptions, including a 16-yard catch on 3rd and 4, showing his reliability on crucial downs. 3rd Quarter: Another deep reception of 40 yards set up a touchdown, and he capped the drive with a 13-yard touchdown catch. 4th Quarter: Hunter secured a 13-yard reception on 3rd and 10, followed by a 3-yard touchdown on 3rd and goal. Hunter's route running was effective across all levels of the field: These statistics underscore his ability to impact the game across different route depths, with a particularly strong performance on short routes, where he excelled at gaining yards after the catch (12.2 YAC/REC). Deep Routes (20+ yards): 66.7% catch rate, 53 yards, 26.6 YPR, 1 TD Medium Routes (10-19 yards): 66.7% catch rate, 29 yards, 14.5 YPR Short Routes (0-9 yards): 100% catch rate, 50 yards, 16.8 YPR On the Defensive Side of the Football Defensively, Hunter was equally impactful, showing the same versatility and athleticism that makes him an elite prospect. Lining up primarily at cornerback, he recorded three tackles and allowed just three receptions on three targets, holding the opposition to 18 yards. Hunter's coverage was particularly effective in off-man and zone schemes, where he used his quick reaction time to limit yards after the catch. His recovery speed was on display, allowing him to close gaps quickly and prevent big plays. Final Analysis: Travis Hunter Could Be The Top WR In College Football in 2024 Travis Hunter's performance in Week One reinforced his status as one of the most dynamic players in college football. His performance on the offensive side of the football reminded me of what Daniel Jeremiah said during the summer scouting period when he compared Hunter to former Ohio State and now Jets WR Garrett Wilson, highlighting his WR1 potential in the 2025 NFL Draft. We still have a long way to go, but his ability to dominate on both sides of the ball will continue to keep a lot of scouts conflicted. I believe he is a really great cornerback who can translate to the NFL and be elite, but he might be an even better wide receiver.

Bralen Trice shows promise as a solid mid-level starter in the NFL, with potential for further development. His ability to contribute in the pass rush and run defense makes him a valuable asset, but his limitations in coverage and agility need addressing. He is likely to be a mid-round pick with a final grade scale of 'Mid-Level Starter Potential' (60-64). With the right coaching and scheme fit, Trice has the potential to grow into a more complete and impactful player at the professional level. < Back Bralen Trice Washington HT: 6040 WT: 274 YR: JR POS: ED OVR RK 85 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 9 Mid-Level Starter Potential OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT Bralen Trice is a physically imposing edge rusher with a good combination of size and athleticism. His explosiveness off the line and ability to apply pressure on the quarterback are his standout attributes. Trice shows proficiency in run stopping, using his size and strength effectively. He is best suited for a 4-3 defensive scheme, where he can primarily focus on rushing the passer and stopping the run. His agility and pass coverage skills, while average, could be improved to make him more versatile in various defensive schemes. CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS Mid-Level Starter Potential (60-64) A solid, dependable starter with the potential to exceed expectations. They have good athleticism and tools but may lack elite traits. While they show flashes of high-level play, they also have some notable weaknesses that must be developed. These players often need 2-3 years to establish themselves. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS Physical Pass Rusher Good Size Consistent vs. Run KEY WEAKNESSES Pass Coverage Improve Agility Pass Rush Plan PLAYER COMPARISONS Ryan Kerrigan Frank Clark

A wide, and strong interior player at 338 lbs, Brown is a very good run blocker. He is a good pass blocker but has shown a tendency to get beat against twitchier, more athletic interior defenders. He has only played guard in college, so his versatility might come into question. < Back Deonte Brown Alabama HT: 6030 WT: 364 YR: RSR POS: IOL OVR RK 89 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 6 High-End Starter Potential OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT A wide, and strong interior player at 338 lbs, Brown is a very good run blocker. He is a good pass blocker but has shown a tendency to get beat against twitchier, more athletic interior defenders. He has only played guard in college, so his versatility might come into question. CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS High-End Starter Potential (65-69) A player expected to become a top-tier starter within their first few years. They possess strong physical tools and good technical skills but may have some limitations in their game. With development, they can reach near-elite levels and provide consistent impact at their position. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS KEY WEAKNESSES PLAYER COMPARISONS

2025 NFL Draft: Top 5 Running Back Prospects Ranked by Our Exclusive Player Grades 2025 NFL Draft: Top 5 Running Back Prospects Ranked by Our Exclusive Player Grades Below are my top 5 RB rankings based on our current grades ahead of the 2025 NFL Draft. It is important to remember these grades are subject to change once we get into the college all-star game circuit and post-NFL Combine. The 2025 NFL Draft is set to showcase one of the most talented running back classes in recent memory, rivaling the historic 2017 RB draft in talent and depth. With Ashton Jeanty leading as an early favorite for RB1, it’s almost certain we’ll see at least one first-round RB selection. This class is packed with potential, and we could see as many as six running backs drafted in the first two rounds. Top 5 Running Back Prospects Ranked by Our Exclusive Player Grades Ashton Jeanty, Boise State Ht: 5'9" Wt: 210 lbs Grade: Elite Projected Draft Round: Round 1 Summary: A versatile RB with outstanding agility and vision, Jeanty shines in zone-blocking schemes and brings dynamic pass-catching ability. He projects as a top-15 pick with breakaway potential and elite playmaking. Omarion Hampton, North Carolina Ht: 6'0" Wt: 220 lbs Grade: High-End Starter Potential Projected Draft Round: Early Day 2 Summary: Hampton combines power, speed, and vision, fitting well in both power and zone-blocking schemes. His reliable three-down versatility and Nick Chubb-like style make him a strong early Day 2 option. Quinshon Judkins, Ohio State Ht: 5'11" Wt: 210 lbs Grade: High Starter Potential Projected Draft Round: Mid-to-Late Day 2 Summary: Judkins is an elusive, powerful back with sharp cutting ability and a knack for gaining yards after contact, making him an excellent choice for teams needing a balanced offensive weapon. Kaleb Johnson, Iowa Ht: 6'0" Wt: 225 lbs Grade: High Starter Potential Projected Draft Round: Day 2 Summary: Known for his one-cut style and durability, Johnson excels in creating yards after contact. He’s an ideal fit for teams prioritizing physical, power-based rushing. TreVeyon Henderson, Ohio State Ht: 5'11" Wt: 215 lbs Grade: Mid-Level Starter Potential Projected Draft Round: Day 2 Summary: Henderson brings a two-phase skill set, with twitchy, explosive playmaking both on the ground and in the air. He’s versatile and fits seamlessly into modern, multifaceted NFL offenses. Other Top Names to Watch Several additional running backs narrowly missed the top five, each bringing unique strengths to the 2025 draft class: Nick Singleton (Penn State): Strong Day 2 or 3 potential with a well-rounded skill set. DJ Giddens (Kansas State): Known for his powerful yet agile running style. Ollie Gordon II (Oklahoma State): A dynamic playmaker with big-play potential. RJ Harvey (UCF): Brings versatility and reliability in both rushing and receiving. Tahj Brooks (Texas Tech): A consistent, powerful runner who excels in tough situations. Kyle Monangai (Rutgers): Combines toughness with excellent vision. This RB class runs deep, offering NFL teams quality talent that will likely extend into Day 3 of the draft.

Malik Nabers is a highly promising prospect with the potential to make an immediate impact at the NFL level. His athletic profile, combined with his on-field production, positions him as a potential high draft pick. Continued development in precision route running and enhancing his blocking could elevate his game, making him an even more valuable asset for any NFL team. Given his current skill set and potential for growth, Nabers is projected to have High-End Starter Potential (65-69) on the NFL level, suggesting he could become among the top starters on his team within his first few years in the league. < Back Malik Nabers LSU HT: 6000 WT: 195 YR: JR POS: WR OVR RK 5 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 3 Near Elite OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT Nabers excels with his dynamic playmaking ability, combining speed, explosiveness, and agility to create separation and make plays in open space. His physicality and strong hands make him a reliable target in contested situations. While he continues to refine his route-running, his skill set is a match for offensive schemes that prioritize vertical threats and versatile receivers capable of making an impact across the field. CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS Near Elite (70-74) A high-caliber prospect who is expected to become a significant contributor by Year 2. These players have outstanding physical tools and strong football IQ, with only minor flaws in their game. They demonstrate consistency at a high level and project as future Pro Bowl-caliber players if properly developed. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS Physical Agile Short Area Quickness KEY WEAKNESSES Route Diversity Run Blocking Catch Radius PLAYER COMPARISONS Justin Jefferson DJ Moore Brandon Aiyuk