Search Results

Like Kyle Pitts, Brevin Jordan is a dynamic player; he can lineup inline, slot, or flex out wide. Jordan has also logged snaps out of the backfield. Jordan is a seam-busting TE who is NFL-ready. He can use work expanding his route tree at the next level. Whoever lands Jordan will be drafting a potential star. < Back Brevin Jordan Miami HT: 6030 WT: 245 YR: JR POS: TE OVR RK 52 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 2 High-End Starter Potential OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT Like Kyle Pitts, Brevin Jordan is a dynamic player; he can lineup inline, slot, or flex out wide. Jordan has also logged snaps out of the backfield. Jordan is a seam-busting TE who is NFL-ready. He can use work expanding his route tree at the next level. Whoever lands Jordan will be drafting a potential star. CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS High-End Starter Potential (65-69) A player expected to become a top-tier starter within their first few years. They possess strong physical tools and good technical skills but may have some limitations in their game. With development, they can reach near-elite levels and provide consistent impact at their position. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS KEY WEAKNESSES PLAYER COMPARISONS

< Back Devin Lloyd Utah HT: 6030 WT: 235 YR: JR POS: LB OVR RK 44 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 2 High-End Starter Potential OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS High-End Starter Potential (65-69) A player expected to become a top-tier starter within their first few years. They possess strong physical tools and good technical skills but may have some limitations in their game. With development, they can reach near-elite levels and provide consistent impact at their position. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS KEY WEAKNESSES PLAYER COMPARISONS

2025 NFL Draft: Top 5 Wide Receiver Prospects Ranked by Our Exclusive Player Grades 2025 NFL Draft: Top 5 Wide Receiver Prospects Ranked by Our Exclusive Player Grades Below are my top 5 WR rankings based on our current grades ahead of the 2025 NFL Draft. It is important to remember these grades are subject to change once we get into the college all-star game circuit and post-NFL Combine. The debate about the WR1 will be decided by Travis Hunter's decision on what position he will declare during the NFL Draft process. He might be steadfast about being listed as a two-way athlete, so that's what we have him listed as. If Hunter decides to go the WR route full-time, he would be our WR1 in the class. If he chooses the CB route, he would be a close second to Will Johnson as the top DB in the 2025 NFL Draft class. The 2025 WR class offers an intriguing mix of size, speed, and versatility, with multiple prospects capable of becoming high-impact NFL starters. If Travis Hunter decides to play DB full-time, Tetairoa McMillan would take the lead at the top of the WR class as a prototypical X-receiver with size and body control, followed by Luther Burden III, who adds dynamic playmaking ability from the slot. While this class might lack the top-end talent we had in the 2024 NFL Draft, this group is starting to provide solid depth and varying versatility. Top 5 Wide Receiver Prospects Ranked by Our Exclusive Player Grades 1). Travis Hunter, Colorado Ht: 6'1" Wt: 185 lbs Grade: Near Elite Projected Draft Round: Round 1 Summary: Hunter’s two-way ability is unprecedented, but his WR skill set is elite. With explosive burst, exceptional ball tracking, and run-after-catch ability, Hunter fits perfectly into a vertical passing offense or creative schemes that maximize his after-catch ability and downfield playmaking. 2). Tetairoa McMillan, Arizona Ht: 6'5" Wt: 210 lbs Grade: Near Elite Projected Draft Round: Round 1 Summary: McMillan combines elite size, body control, and a wide catch radius, making him a nightmare matchup for defenders. Best suited for vertically-oriented schemes, he thrives on contested catches and downfield opportunities. 3). Luther Burden III, Missouri Ht: 5'11" Wt: 208 lbs Grade: High-End Starter Potential Projected Draft Round: Late Round 1 / Early Day 2 Summary: Burden is a dynamic slot receiver with elite run-after-catch ability. His agility and burst make him dangerous in motion-heavy offenses that prioritize quick passes and screens to get him into space. 4). Elic Ayomanor, Stanford Ht: 6'2" Wt: 210 lbs Grade: High-End Starter Potential Projected Draft Round: Early Day 2 Summary: Ayomanor excels as an X-receiver, stretching the field with speed and reliability in contested situations. His combination of physicality and route running makes him a valuable asset in both pro-style and spread offenses. 5). Isaiah Bond, Texas Ht: 5'11" Wt: 182 lbs Grade: High-End Starter Potential Projected Draft Round: Mid-to-Late Day 2 Summary: Bond is a vertical threat with elite speed and explosive playmaking ability. Best suited for a West Coast spread offense, his separation skills and after-the-catch explosiveness stand out. Other Top Names to Watch Several additional wide receivers narrowly missed the top five, each bringing unique strengths to the 2025 draft class. Emeka Egbuka (Ohio State): 6'1", 205 lbs – A versatile WR who thrives both inside and outside, excelling at creating separation and making plays at all levels of the field. Evan Stewart (Oregon): 6'0", 175 lbs – A smooth route runner with elite separation skills and the ability to stretch the field vertically. Tory Horton (Colorado State): 6'2", 190 lbs – A polished receiver with reliable hands and a knack for finding soft spots in coverage. Xavier Restrepo (Miami): 5'10", 198 lbs – A tough, shifty slot receiver who excels in short-yardage situations and makes plays after the catch. Kyren Lacy (LSU): 6'2", 215 lbs – A physical presence with excellent contested catch ability and red-zone dominance. Tre Harris (Ole Miss): 6'2", 205 lbs – A versatile WR with great size and burst, capable of thriving in multiple roles within an offense. Savion Williams (TCU): 6'5", 225 lbs – A towering target with a massive catch radius, ideal for contested catches and high-pointing the football. Jalen Royals (Utah State): 6'0", 205 lbs – A balanced receiver with good speed, reliable hands, and a knack for producing big plays. This WR class offers depth and versatility, with prospects available for a variety of offensive schemes, ensuring NFL teams can find high-value players into Day 2 and Day 3.

NFL Scouting Combine: The Importance Of The NFL Combine | The Data | How Important Are The Workouts? About the NFL Scouting Combine and Why It Is Important The NFL Scouting Combine is an event where college football players eligible for the NFL Draft showcase their physical and mental abilities in a standardized setting. Here are some key things to know about the NFL Combine: Location: The NFL Combine is typically held in late February or early March at Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis, Indiana. However, the event was not held in 2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and the location for future events may be subject to change. Attendees: The Combine is invite-only, and invitations are typically extended to around 300 top college football prospects eligible for the upcoming NFL Draft. Tests and drills: Prospects at the Combine undergo a battery of physical tests and drills to assess their athleticism, strength, and football skills. These include the 40-yard dash, vertical jump, broad jump, three-cone drill, shuttle run, and bench press. Medical evaluations: Besides the physical tests, prospects undergo a thorough medical evaluation to assess any pre-existing injuries or medical conditions. Interviews: Teams also have the opportunity to interview prospects, both individually and in group settings, to assess their character, work ethic, and football IQ. Importance: The Combine can significantly affect a prospect's draft stock. Their performance in the physical tests and interviews can substantially influence how teams view them as potential NFL players. Overall, the NFL Combine is an essential event for both teams and players, as it provides a standardized setting for prospects to showcase their skills and for teams to evaluate them as potential draft picks. The NFL Scouting Combine Data Using Our Free NFL Combine Research Tool Here are some averages of the top player assessments at the NFL Combine since 2012. Average 40 Time Since 2012: 4.7 Average Vertical Jump Since 2012: 33" Average 3-Cone Drill Since 2012: 7.3Sec Average Bench Reps Since 2012: 20 Average Shuttle Run Since 2012: 4.5Sec Defining each NFL Combine measurable and the top performers . 40 Yard Dash The 40 Yard Dash is a test that college football players undergo at the NFL Combine, and it measures a player's speed, acceleration, and explosiveness. Here's how it works: The player starts from a three-point stance at the starting line. At the whistle, the player sprints 40 yards as quickly as possible, with their time being recorded from start to finish. The 40-yard dash is considered one of the most important tests at the NFL Combine. Speed is an essential attribute for many positions in football, including wide receivers, running backs, and defensive backs. A fast 40 40-yard dash time can greatly improve a player's draft stock and overall NFL prospects. Top 5 All-Time 40-Yard Dash Times Xavier Worthy, 2024 NFL Combine – 4.21 seconds (WR, Texas) John Ross, 2017 NFL Combine – 4.22 seconds (WR, Washington) Kalon Barnes, 2022 NFL Combine – 4.23 seconds (CB, Baylor) Chris Johnson, 2008 NFL Combine – 4.24 seconds (RB, East Carolina) DJ Turner II, 2023 NFL Combine – 4.26 seconds (CB, Michigan) 20 Yard Shuttle Run The shuttle run, also known as the 5-10-5 drill, is one of the tests that college football players undergo at the NFL Combine. The shuttle run measures a player's agility and ability to change direction quickly. Here's how it works: The player starts in a three-point stance at the starting line. At the whistle, the player sprints five yards to the right, touches the line, and then sprints 10 yards to the left and touches the line. The player sprints five yards back to the starting line, completing the drill. The player's time is recorded from start to finish, indicating their ability to accelerate, change direction, and decelerate quickly. The shuttle run is considered an important test at the NFL Combine because agility and quickness are crucial for many positions in football, including running backs, wide receivers, and defensive backs. A good time in the shuttle run can help players stand out to NFL teams and improve their draft stock. The Top NFL Combine Shuttle Run Performances Brandin Cooks – wide receiver – 3.81 seconds – 2014 NFL Combine Jason Allen – cornerback – 3.81 seconds – 2006 NFL Combine Bobby McCain – cornerback – 3.82 seconds – 2015 NFL Combine B.W. Webb – cornerback – 3.84 seconds – 2013 NFL Combine Justin Simmons – safety – 3.85 seconds – 2016 NFL Combine Three Cone Drill (Lateral Agility) The Three Cone Drill, or the L-Drill, is a test that college football players undergo at the NFL Combine. The drill measures a player's ability to change direction, agility, and acceleration. Here's how it works: Three cones are placed in an L-shape, with each cone five yards apart from each other. The player starts at the first cone and sprints to the second cone, then quickly changes direction and sprints around the second cone to the third cone. The player then changes direction again and sprints around the third cone, finishing the drill at the starting point. The player's time is recorded from the start to the finish, indicating their ability to change direction quickly while maintaining their speed and balance. The Three Cone Drill is considered to be an important test at the NFL Combine because the ability to change direction quickly and maintain balance is crucial for many positions in football, including running backs, wide receivers, and defensive backs. A good time in the Three Cone Drill can help a player stand out to NFL teams and potentially improve their draft stock. The Top NFL Combine Three-Cone Performances Jordan Thomas – cornerback – 6.28 seconds – 2018 NFL Combine Jeffrey Maehl – wide receiver – 6.42 seconds – 2011 NFL Combine Buster Skrine – cornerback – 6.44 seconds – 2011 NFL Combine Scott Long – wide receiver – 6.45 seconds – 2010 NFL Combine David Long – cornerback – 6.45 seconds – 2019 NFL Combine Vertical Jump (Measures Explosiveness) The Vertical Jump is a test that college football players undergo at the NFL Combine, and it measures a player's explosive lower body power and jumping ability. Here's how it works: The player stands with both feet flat on the ground under a measuring apparatus called a Vertec. The player then jumps as high as they can, hitting the Vertec with their hand at the highest point of their jump. The difference between the player's standing reach and their highest point of contact with the Vertec is recorded as their vertical jump height. The Vertical Jump is considered an important test at the NFL Combine because a player's ability to jump high can indicate their lower body strength, power, and explosiveness. This is particularly important for positions such as wide receivers, defensive backs, and defensive linemen, where jumping high can help a player make plays on the ball, disrupt passes, or jump over blockers. The Top NFL Combine Vertical Jump Performances Chris Conley – wide receiver – 45 inches – 2015 NFL Combine Donald Washington – cornerback 45 inches – 2009 NFL Combine Byron Jones – cornerback – 44.5 inches – 2015 NFL Combine A.J. Jefferson – cornerback – 44 inches – 2010 NFL Combine Obi Melifonwu – safety – 44 inches – 2017 NFL Combine Broad Jump (Measures Explosiveness) The Broad Jump is a test that college football players undergo at the NFL Combine, and it measures a player's lower body explosive power, lower body strength, and overall athleticism. Here's how it works: The player stands with both feet shoulder-width apart behind a starting line. The player then jumps forward as far as they can, landing on both feet and keeping their balance. The distance between the starting line and the point where the player's heels make contact with the ground is recorded as their broad jump distance. The Broad Jump is considered an important test at the NFL Combine because a player's ability to jump far can indicate their lower body strength, power, and explosiveness. This is particularly important for positions such as wide receivers, defensive backs, and defensive linemen, where the ability to jump far can help a player make plays on the ball, disrupt passes, or jump over blockers. The Top NFL Combine Broad Jump Performances Byron Jones – cornerback – 12’3″ – 2015 NFL Combine Obi Melifonwu – safety – 11’9″ – 2017 NFL Combine Emanuel Hal – wide receiver – 11’9″ – 2019 NFL Combine Juan Thornhill – safety – 11’9″ – 2019 NFL Combine Miles Boykin – wide receiver – 11’8″ – 2019 NFL Combine Bench Press (Measures Strength) The Bench Press is a test that college football players undergo at the NFL Combine, and it measures a player's upper body strength and endurance. Here's how it works: The player lies flat on a bench with their feet on the ground and their hands on the bar, using a grip that is shoulder-width apart. The player then lifts the bar off the rack, lowers it to their chest, and then lifts it back up until their arms are fully extended. The player repeats this motion as many times as they can in a set period of time (usually 225 pounds for as many reps as possible). The number of reps that the player can complete is recorded as their bench press score. The Bench Press is considered an important test at the NFL Combine because upper body strength is important for many positions in football, including offensive linemen, defensive linemen, and tight ends. The Top NFL Combine Bench Press Performances Stephen Paea, 2011 NFL Combine – 49 reps (DT, Oregon State) Mitch Petrus, 2010 NFL Combine – 45 reps (OL, Arkansas) Mike Kudla, 2006 NFL Combine – 45 reps (DL, Ohio State) Netane Muti, 2020 NFL Combine – 44 reps (G, Fresno State) Dontari Poe, 2012 NFL Combine – 44 reps (DT, Memphis)

2022 NFL Draft Profile: Cincinnati QB Desmond Ridder Click Here to view our NFL Draft Big Board with player rankings and analysis. Click here to learn more about our updated player grade scale and critical position factors. Player Profile Name: Desmond Ridder School: Cincinnati Bearcats Recruiting Profile: Click Here Position: QB Height: 6-4 Weight: 215 Year: SR Jersey Number: 9 Offensive Scheme: Spread/RPO, hybrid offense, that blends play-action and a moving pocket. Offensive Coordinator: Gino Guidugli Games Reviewed: 2021 Georgia (Peach Bowl), 2021 Alabama (CFP) 2021 Notre Dame, 2019 Ohio State, 2021 Indiana Position Specific Critical Factors Arm Talent : (7) Very Good The QB position requires good accuracy at all levels of the field. The QB prospect must have control of the football to place the ball in tight windows and with the appropriate leverage on his throws. Ball placement is paramount when the targeted receiver is not open in the NFL. The ability to throw a receiver open (anticipatory throwing) can separate a good prospect from an elite prospect. The ability throws that are catchable and with good placement is paramount. A prospect's overall arm strength combined with the ability to change speeds based on throwing distance and situation is critical . The prospect's arm angles and ability to make difficult throws while off-platform or on the move are vital indicators of a QB's overall arm talent. Decision Making/Awareness: (6) Very Good The ability to make smart decisions on the field, with good judgment, and poise in the pocket , is fundamental at the highest level of football. Possessing the ability to process quickly on the fly can separate a prospect from being good or elite. The prospect's intelligence, field vision, understanding of coverage , and reading defenses are all critical. The prospect's ability to not break down as pressure builds is a key factor. Possessing the ability to recognize pre-snap and post-snap coverage is another trait that is paramount . Big Moments/Clutch: (6) Very Good Late game, tight game, playing from behind while under pressure ; does the prospect rise to the occasion in the close games against better competition? Can the prospect deliver big-time plays under pressure in critical situations? Is the QB composed and focused in key moments ? Key Strengths Arm Talent Mobility Protects The Football Key Weaknesses Accuracy Decision Making Progressions Pass Game Summary Desmond Ridder displays inconsistent accuracy as a passer, but there are moments you can see his arm talent shine through. Teams will pressure Ridder to get him off his spot to force inaccurate throws. When teams are not applying pressure, Ridder does a good job of staying in the pocket and using his height and solid field vision to identify open targets and make an accurate throw. His most significant area for improvement as he moves into the NFL is his ball placement and anticipatory throws. Placing the football in front of his intended receiver or before they make their break, allowing them to maximize yards after the catch. Ridder does not put the football in harm's way very often. Still, he has moments where his coverage recognition and decision-making can lapse, which is another critical area he must improve in as a passer in the NFL. Ridder does display good poise under pressure, but there are moments where he might be better off relying on his athleticism to extend a play instead of hanging in the pocket. Regardless, he is consistently keeping his eyes up and down the field, looking to make a throw rather than relying on his legs to bail him out. Desmond Ridder has improved as a passer in his four years at UC. His mechanics, release, and overall arm talent is the area I am keeping an eye on with Ridder. He has a strong arm, and the ball jumps out of his hand. At the 2021 Senior Bowl, Ridder recorded an initial ball speed of 74 MPH, which was second to Liberty QB Malik Willis, who registered a 75 MPH initial ball speed. He can make some fantastic throws at all levels and deploy different arm angles and make off-platform throws which are vital traits that NFL scouts and GM's are looking at when evaluating the QB position. Run Game Summary As a runner, Ridder is what I call a conflict player that pressures all 11 defenders. His dual-threat running ability allows a coach to open up his playbook and get creative. He can operate using the zone read and RPO concepts. He can extend a drive with his legs in critical 3rd down moments. Final Analysis Desmond Ridder is a player that certainly possesses some key characteristics that you are looking for in an NFL-level QB. He has improved in multiple areas as a passer while at Cincinnati, and he is a proven winner. His leadership is also a valuable trait that can help him move forward into the NFL. He possesses good NFL size at 6-4, 215 lbs. I liken him to a poor man, Trevor Lawrence, in terms of size and athleticism. He has arm talent; he just needs to clean up his accuracy and decision-making. Overall, I think if he lands in a spot where he can sit for a season or two behind an established NFL starter, he can develop into an NFL-level starter. Ridder's best fit will be in a run-first offense that uses a lot of play-action and roll-out style plays that can get him out on the edge of the defense. Final Grade Analysis Final Grade: (6.1) (Role Player Potential) (6.1) High-Level Backup/Developmental Starter Traits Ceiling Grade: (6.8) High Upside Potential (9.0-7.0) Solid Starter Level Floor Grade: (5.9) (Role Player Potential) (5.9) Career Backup Level

2021 NFL Offensive Team Stats: The Five NFL Offenses That Lead The NFL In Turnovers Through 8 Weeks We have updated the weekly NFL advanced stats. You can learn more about Football Scout 365's NFL, NFL Draft, CFB, NFL Best Bets, and Fantasy Football Tools by clicking the link below. Click Here To Learn More Here are the five NFL offenses that lead the NFL in turnovers so far this season. The Kansas City Chiefs lead the NFL with 19 Turnovers. New York Jets- 15 Washington Football Team- 13 Miami Dolphins- 12 New England Patriots- 12

Jaxson Dart Dynasty Rookie Profile – Fantasy Football 2025 Jaxson Dart Dynasty Rookie Profile QB – New York Giants | Drafted: Round 1 | College: Ole Miss Jaxson Dart was a surprise first-round selection by the New York Giants in the 2025 NFL Draft, joining an offense that currently features Russell Wilson as the short-term starter. Dart isn’t expected to start in Year 1, but his long-term upside as a dual-threat quarterback in Superflex dynasty leagues makes him an intriguing investment with a clear pathway to a starting role by 2026. College Career Recap Jaxson Dart began his career at USC before transferring to Ole Miss, where he evolved into a productive, efficient SEC quarterback over three seasons. His final year in 2024 was his most complete campaign: 4,279 passing yards, 38 total touchdowns, and just 5 interceptions while leading the Rebels to a Gator Bowl victory. He showcased leadership, toughness, and poise, earning first-team All-SEC honors and setting school records for total offense and passing yards. Dart was especially effective from a clean pocket, earning a 94.3 PFF grade in such situations—second-best among all draft-eligible quarterbacks. He also showed touch, accuracy, and strong decision-making when working in rhythm, completing over 65% of his passes each of the last two seasons. However, questions remain about his processing speed and ability to work beyond his first read. NFL Scouting Report Measured at 6'2", 223 lbs, Dart combines above-average mobility with a quick release and a natural feel for play-action and RPO-based systems. He’s a rhythm passer who thrives when throwing in structure. While not an elite athlete or arm talent, he wins with anticipation and timing. His ability to alter throw types and stay composed in muddy pockets gives him a solid floor, but his post-snap processing and off-platform mechanics need refinement. Scheme Fit & Projected Role with Giants Dart lands in New York with Russell Wilson entrenched as the short-term starter. This allows Dart time to develop behind a veteran in Brian Daboll’s offense—a favorable situation for a rhythm passer with developmental traits. The Giants have built a young core around 2024 first-round pick Malik Nabers, creating the potential for Dart to eventually grow into a starter surrounded by ascending talent. Given Wilson’s one-year contract and age, Dart has a realistic chance to compete for the starting job by Year 2. His fit in a West Coast-style system that leans on RPOs, play-action, and timing routes should help maximize his strengths while minimizing early weaknesses. Rookie Outlook (2025) Floor: Redshirt rookie season; minimal fantasy impact barring injury Ceiling: Potential midseason starter with low-end QB2 value in Superflex leagues Early Projection: 5–7 games played, 1,500–1,800 passing yards, 10–12 total TDs Expected PPG (0.5 PPR/Superflex): 8.8-15.0 Long-Term Dynasty Value Dart profiles as a long-term stash in Superflex formats. While he lacks an elite trait, his production, polish, and leadership offer a high floor. If he earns the starting role in 2026 and forms chemistry with Nabers, Dart could emerge as a mid-tier QB2 with matchup-dependent QB1 upside in the right system. He’s a strong value pick in the late first or early second round of Superflex rookie drafts, particularly for teams already set at quarterback but seeking upside for 2026 and beyond.

The Art of Pocket Presence: Watch QB Pocket Presence Drills Taught by Former NFL QB Jeff Garcia We posted on Instagram this week about tom Brady's pocket presence and his ability to wade through the pressure so that his receivers can complete their routes. In the video below, former NFL QB Jeff Garcia goes through a series of pocket presence drills with some young players. You can check out our Instagram post below where we discuss The Art of Pocket Presence. For daily analysis, please follow us on Instagram. We are also on Twitter, Linkedin, and YouTube. Football Scout 365 on Instagram Football Scout 365 on Twitter Football Scout 365 on LinkedIn Football Scout 365 on YouTube

Most schools recruited Willis as an athlete and not as a quarterback as a high school recruit. In 2016, Willis committed to Virginia Tech as an athlete, and the program planned to transition him to play defensive back. After some thought about his future, Willis decided to de-commit, believing in his ability to play QB. He searched for a school that would afford him a chance to play QB. The school he chose would be Auburn under then-head coach Gus Malzahn. While at Auburn, Willis would start his career as the backup behind Jarrett Stidham in 2017-18, only seeing the field for spot duty. In 2019, after Stidham departed for the NFL, Willis was poised to take over as the starter for the Tigers but would inevitably lose out to Bo Nix. That is when Willis decided to transfer to Liberty, where he would sit out the 2019 season under the transfer rules before taking over as the Flames starter in 2020 and 2021. Malik Willis has all the tools and is a confident leader. He has a cannon for an arm but lacks touch at the short and intermediate areas of the football field. Upon entering the NFL, his greatest asset will be his mobility, a trait he can rely on while developing other critical skills as a passer. Willis can provide a Lamar Jackson style of play as both a runner and a passer, forcing defenses to defend all eleven. He will benefit early in his career by playing in an offense that uses RPO and zone-read concepts. < Back Malik Willis Liberty HT: 6010 WT: 215 YR: JR POS: QB OVR RK 37 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 2 Low-Level Starter Potential OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT Most schools recruited Willis as an athlete and not as a quarterback as a high school recruit. In 2016, Willis committed to Virginia Tech as an athlete, and the program planned to transition him to play defensive back. After some thought about his future, Willis decided to de-commit, believing in his ability to play QB. He searched for a school that would afford him a chance to play QB. The school he chose would be Auburn under then-head coach Gus Malzahn. While at Auburn, Willis would start his career as the backup behind Jarrett Stidham in 2017-18, only seeing the field for spot duty. In 2019, after Stidham departed for the NFL, Willis was poised to take over as the starter for the Tigers but would inevitably lose out to Bo Nix. That is when Willis decided to transfer to Liberty, where he would sit out the 2019 season under the transfer rules before taking over as the Flames starter in 2020 and 2021. Malik Willis has all the tools and is a confident leader. He has a cannon for an arm but lacks touch at the short and intermediate areas of the football field. Upon entering the NFL, his greatest asset will be his mobility, a trait he can rely on while developing other critical skills as a passer. Willis can provide a Lamar Jackson style of play as both a runner and a passer, forcing defenses to defend all eleven. He will benefit early in his career by playing in an offense that uses RPO and zone-read concepts. CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS Low-Level Starter Potential (55-59) A player with the upside to be a low-end starter or high-level backup within a couple of seasons. While they have solid physical tools, inconsistencies in technique, processing, or durability limit their ceiling. They are developmental prospects who may carve out a role as specialists or system fits. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS KEY WEAKNESSES PLAYER COMPARISONS

Elite QB Blueprint: How 2021-2024 NFL Draft Quarterbacks Stacked Up Against Today’s Elite QBs Using Pre-Draft Scouting Data Our "Elite QB Blueprint Model" evaluates top quarterback prospects against the core attributes of today’s NFL stars, like Patrick Mahomes and Joe Burrow, using data-driven benchmarks to project who has the talent, adaptability, and skill to thrive at the highest level. What is The Elite QB Blueprint Model? In the ever-evolving landscape of the NFL, finding a franchise quarterback has become both a high-stakes art and a science. Our Elite QB Blueprint Model serves as a roadmap for identifying top quarterback prospects by evaluating them against the attributes of today’s elite quarterbacks, like Patrick Mahomes, Joe Burrow, and Josh Allen. Using six core attributes—arm talent, accuracy, mobility, improvisational skills, football IQ, and experience—each weighted by its importance to NFL success, this model provides a comprehensive benchmark for what it takes to thrive at the highest level. Building the Perfect Quarterback Profile: Core Attributes and Weights The Elite QB Blueprint Model evaluates prospects against six key attributes, each carefully weighted based on its importance to NFL success. The model uses data-driven benchmarks, elite quarterback comparisons, and scouting insights to gauge how closely new prospects match up to NFL stars like Patrick Mahomes, Joe Burrow, and Josh Allen. Below, each core trait is defined along with benchmarks and notable NFL comparisons, creating a profile to evaluate new quarterbacks. Arm Talent and Arm Strength (20%) Definition: This measures a quarterback's ability to throw with both power and control, crucial for deep throws and tight-window passes. Benchmark: Consistent, high-velocity throws across field levels, with quarterbacks averaging 250–300 passing yards per game. Elite Comparisons: Patrick Mahomes (diverse arm angles), Josh Allen (deep-throw power), Justin Herbert (blend of accuracy with power). Why it Matters: A quarterback’s arm strength opens up the playbook by challenging defenses at all depths, keeping them honest on every down. Accuracy (20%) Definition: Precision across short, intermediate, and deep routes, especially in pressured scenarios, is essential for sustaining offensive drives. Benchmark: Completion rates above 65%, consistent across game situations and under defensive pressure. Elite Comparisons: Joe Burrow (touch and timing at all levels), Russell Wilson (deep-ball accuracy). Why it Matters: A high completion rate under pressure demonstrates reliability in passing and is critical for maintaining possession in high-stakes moments. Mobility and Athleticism (15%) Definition: The ability to extend plays, maneuver in the pocket, and evade pressure is crucial for versatility in high-stakes situations. Benchmark: 500+ rushing yards per season, or evident escapability and maneuverability within the pocket. Elite Comparisons: Lamar Jackson (top-end speed), Kyler Murray (quickness and agility), Russell Wilson (stability and balance in the pocket). Why it Matters: Mobility gives quarterbacks the ability to adapt when protection breaks down, allowing them to create plays on the ground or buy time for downfield options. Improvisational Skills (15%) Definition: The ability to adapt outside of the offensive structure, managing pressure with composure and creativity, is critical when plays break down. Benchmark: High completion rates on broken plays and effective yardage generation under pressure. Elite Comparisons: Patrick Mahomes (creative, off-script playmaking), Russell Wilson (effectiveness outside of designed plays). Why it Matters: This skill allows quarterbacks to create positive yardage in chaotic situations, ensuring offensive flexibility when defenses disrupt the initial play structure. Mental Processing and Football IQ (20%) Definition: The ability to quickly read defenses, make adaptive decisions, and efficiently process post-snap information is essential for high-level quarterbacking. Benchmark: High-efficiency rating (160+) and low turnover rates; quick, adaptive reads under pressure. Elite Comparisons: Joe Burrow (defensive reads and adaptability), Justin Herbert (rapid decision-making). Why it Matters: A quarterback’s Football IQ enables quick adaptation to complex defenses, making them less predictable and more effective across different play types. Experience and Production (10%) Definition: A quarterback’s collegiate experience, combined with consistent production, indicates their readiness for NFL complexities and adaptability to various scenarios. Benchmark: 30+ games played, a passer rating above 160, and multi-season high production. Elite Comparisons: Joe Burrow (extensive college production), Patrick Mahomes (high-volume passing). Why it Matters: Experience provides quarterbacks with the ability to read defenses effectively and handle varied situations, laying a strong foundation for NFL adaptability. Common Development Areas Analyzed Evaluating potential weaknesses provides an even clearer view of each quarterback’s readiness. Here are common developmental areas, each benchmarked for improvement: Mechanics and Footwork (20%) Definition : This evaluates a quarterback's consistency in footwork and throwing mechanics, which are vital for precise and powerful throws under pressure. Benchmark : Stability in throwing mechanics and footwork under duress, contributing to sustained accuracy and power across different situations. Elite Comparisons : Josh Allen (improved mechanics post-draft), Lamar Jackson (refined release and precision). Why it Matters : Consistent mechanics help quarterbacks maintain accuracy and minimize unnecessary turnovers. Poor mechanics can lead to erratic throws and misreads, particularly under defensive pressure. Pocket Presence and Navigation (20%) Definition : This assesses a quarterback’s ability to sense pressure, evade rushers, and keep the field in view to make quick decisions under stress. Benchmark : Minimal sack rates and effective evasion in high-pressure situations, with quarterbacks showing composure and adaptability. Elite Comparisons : Justin Herbert (calm pocket presence), Kyler Murray (effective pressure navigation while keeping eyes downfield). Why it Matters : Pocket presence separates the great quarterbacks from the good, as it determines how well a QB can avoid negative plays and stay poised to make accurate throws under pressure. Consistency in Accuracy (15%) Definition : This focuses on a quarterback’s ability to maintain precision on throws, especially under pressure or during crucial downs. Benchmark : High completion percentage under pressure, including short and intermediate throws, and minimal drop-off in accuracy when pressured. Elite Comparisons : Joe Burrow (consistently accurate despite defensive pressure), Russell Wilson (reliable accuracy across levels, including deep throws). Why it Matters : Accurate quarterbacks sustain offensive drives, converting on key downs and keeping their teams in scoring positions. Inconsistent accuracy, particularly under duress, can lead to missed opportunities and stalled drives. Decision-Making Under Pressure (25%) Definition : This measures a quarterback’s ability to make sound, efficient decisions when facing defensive pressure, avoiding forced throws and turnovers. Benchmark : Low turnover rates, high adjusted completion rates when pressured, and success on critical downs. Elite Comparisons : Russell Wilson (calm, efficient decisions in high-pressure scenarios), Lamar Jackson (avoids forced plays, keeps drives alive). Why it Matters : Decision-making under pressure is crucial for maintaining drive efficiency and avoiding costly mistakes. A QB who can make safe, productive decisions under duress will limit turnovers and maximize scoring opportunities. Trusting Offensive Structure (20%) Definition : This assesses a quarterback’s balance between improvisation and reliance on the designed play structure. Over-reliance on broken plays can disrupt offensive rhythm. Benchmark : High efficiency within structured offensive plays and low reliance on improvisation as the primary source of production. Elite Comparisons : Patrick Mahomes (developed trust in structured plays, enhancing overall efficiency). Why it Matters : While improvisation is essential, a quarterback who can trust and execute within an offense’s structure can elevate the entire team’s performance, staying efficient while minimizing chaos. Ranking Quarterbacks from 2021-2024 Based on Elite QB Profile Matches The following rankings reveal how recent first-round quarterback prospects align with the elite quarterback model: 1). Caleb Williams (2024) – 85% Match Strengths : Elite arm talent, creativity, high football IQ; excels with multi-angle throws and power in off-schedule plays. Weaknesses : Footwork inconsistencies; reliance on improvisation sometimes affects rhythm. Comparison : Patrick Mahomes Key Match Drivers : Arm talent (20%), improvisational skills (15%). Lowering Factor : Footwork inconsistencies impacting accuracy (20% weight). 2). Trevor Lawrence (2021) – 84% Match Strengths : Arm strength, composure under pressure, field vision. Weaknesses : Occasional accuracy drops under heavy pressure. Comparison : Justin Herbert Key Match Drivers : Arm strength (20%), mental processing (20%). Lowering Factor : Accuracy under pressure (20% weight). 3). Drake Maye (2024) – 82% Match Strengths : Accurate, quick decision-making, pocket awareness. Weaknesses : Inconsistent deep-ball accuracy. Comparison : Josh Allen Key Match Drivers : Accuracy (20%), mental processing (20%). Lowering Factor : Deep-ball accuracy (20% weight). 4). C.J. Stroud (2023) – 81% Match Strengths : Accuracy, pocket stability, intermediate route precision. Weaknesses : Limited off-script playmaking. Comparison : Joe Burrow Key Match Drivers : Pocket presence (20%), accuracy (20%). Lowering Factor : Off-script limitations (15% weight). 5). Jayden Daniels (2024) – 79% Match Strengths : Dual-threat, athletic, creative out of structure. Weaknesses : Needs improvement in pocket mechanics. Comparison : Lamar Jackson Key Match Drivers : Mobility (15%), improvisational skills (15%). Lowering Factor : Pocket mechanics inconsistency (15% weight). 6). Justin Fields (2021) – 78% Match Strengths : Athleticism, deep ball power, playmaking out of structure. Weaknesses : Intermediate accuracy, pressure navigation. Comparison : Lamar Jackson Key Match Drivers : Arm strength (20%), improvisational skills (15%). Lowering Factor : Intermediate accuracy (20% weight). 7). Bryce Young (2023) – 78% Match Strengths : Decision-making, accuracy under pressure, field awareness. Weaknesses : Durability concerns due to smaller stature. Comparison : Russell Wilson Key Match Drivers : Mental processing (20%), accuracy (20%). Lowering Factor : Durability (10% weight). 8). Michael Penix Jr. (2024) – 77% Match Strengths : Deep-ball accuracy, poised pocket presence. Weaknesses : Durability issues, footwork inconsistencies. Comparison : Justin Herbert Key Match Drivers : Deep-ball accuracy (20%), pocket management (20%). Lowering Factor : Durability (10% weight). 9). J.J. McCarthy (2024) – 76% Match Strengths : Play extension, accuracy in short-to-intermediate range, mobility. Weaknesses : Needs rhythm development in timing routes. Comparison : Joe Burrow Key Match Drivers : Play extension (15%), short-range accuracy (20%). Lowering Factor : Timing consistency (20% weight). 10). Bo Nix (2024) – 74% Match Strengths: Efficient decision-making, experience, and pocket awareness. Weaknesses: Limited deep-ball consistency and arm strength for high-velocity throws Comparison: Joe Burrow Key Match Drivers: Mental processing (20%), accuracy (20%). Lowering Factor: Arm strength limitations impacting deep-ball consistency (15% weight). 11). Kenny Pickett (2022) – 74% Match Strengths : Leadership, intermediate accuracy, sound processing. Weaknesses : Limited arm strength for deep throws. Comparison : Joe Burrow Key Match Drivers : Leadership (10%), intermediate accuracy (20%). Lowering Factor : Arm strength (20% weight). 12). Trey Lance (2021) – 73% Match Strengths : Raw arm talent, physicality, and dual-threat potential. Weaknesses : Limited experience, needs development in decision-making. Comparison : Josh Allen Key Match Drivers : Arm strength (20%), mobility (15%). Lowering Factor : Experience and decision-making (10% weight). 13.) Anthony Richardson (2023) – 72% Match Strengths : Explosive arm, elite athleticism. Weaknesses : Inconsistent footwork and structured decision-making. Comparison : Josh Allen Key Match Drivers : Arm strength (20%), athleticism (15%). Lowering Factor : Footwork and decision-making (20% weight). 14). Zach Wilson (2021) – 70% Match Strengths : Dynamic arm, short-area accuracy, off-platform versatility. Weaknesses : Decision-making under pressure, reading defenses. Comparison : Patrick Mahomes Key Match Drivers : Improvisational skills (15%), arm versatility (20%). Lowering Factor : Decision-making under pressure (20% weight). 15). Mac Jones (2021) – 69% Match Strengths : Processing speed, accuracy in short-to-intermediate range. Weaknesses : Limited arm strength and mobility. Comparison : Joe Burrow Key Match Drivers : Processing speed (20%), accuracy (20%). Lowering Factor : Arm strength (20% weight). These comparisons use the benchmark traits and weightings to quantify each quarterback's match to an elite profile, focusing on how their skills align with NFL-level success factors. This systematic analysis provides insights into each player’s strengths, developmental needs, and overall fit in comparison to top-tier quarterbacks in the league.

2025 NFL Combine Day 4: Armand Membou & Aireontae Ersery Headline Versatile Athletic OL Performances Day 4 of the 2025 NFL Scouting Combine belonged to the offensive linemen, and this year’s group put on an impressive display of speed, agility, and power. With the final day of on-field workouts wrapping up in Indianapolis, several linemen cemented themselves as first-round prospects, while others saw their stock rise dramatically. Among the standouts, LSU’s Will Campbell, Missouri’s Armand Membou, Minnesota’s Aireontae Ersery, Georgia’s Jared Wilson, and several others flashed high-level athleticism, showcasing rare movement skills at their size. 2025 NFL Combine Day 4: Offensive Linemen Showcase Elite Athleticism Below, we break down the top performers, their results, and how today’s testing impacted their NFL Draft stock. Aireontae Ersery (OT, Minnesota) 40-Yard Dash: 5.01 seconds 10-Yard Split: 1.75 seconds Vertical Jump: 29.5” Broad Jump: 9’3” Size: 6’6”, 331 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance: Ersery’s 5.01-second 40-yard dash made history, as he became the fastest offensive lineman over 6’6” and 330 lbs since 2003. His short-area quickness, powerful hands, and ability to move laterally were on full display in drills. 📈 Draft Stock Impact: Ersery was viewed as an early to mid-second-round prospect, but his athletic testing could push him up into the first round. His experience as a left tackle and ability to thrive in zone-heavy blocking schemes make him an intriguing developmental starter at tackle or guard. Will Campbell (OT, LSU) 40-Yard Dash: 4.98 seconds 10-Yard Split: 1.76 seconds Vertical Jump: 32” Broad Jump: 9’5” Size: 6’6”, 319 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance: Campbell showed why he’s a first-round prospect, testing in elite company. His 4.98-second 40-yard dash at 319 pounds makes him one of only four offensive linemen since 2003 to run a sub-5.0 40 while jumping over 30 inches in the vertical. His movement skills on drills like the Deep Short Pull Drill (17.38 mph) and Pass Pro Mirror Drill (13.45 mph) further prove his high-end athleticism for the tackle position. 📈 Draft Stock Impact: Campbell was already viewed as a top-20 pick, and today’s performance solidified his first-round projection. His positional flexibility at tackle or guard could make him a target for teams needing offensive line help early in the draft. Armand Membou (OT, Missouri) 40-Yard Dash: 4.91 seconds 10-Yard Split: 1.74 seconds Vertical Jump: 34” Broad Jump: 9’7” Size: 6’4”, 332 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance: Membou's 4.91-second 40-yard dash at 332 pounds was one of the best performances of the day, reaching a top speed of 20.28 mph, the fastest by any offensive lineman today. His 34-inch vertical jump was the best among all linemen, showing elite explosiveness and lower-body power. 📈 Draft Stock Impact: Membou had been projected as a late first-rounder or early Day 2 pick, but his elite testing numbers could push him firmly into the middle of the first round. His power, movement skills and versatility make him an intriguing option for teams looking for a high-upside tackle or guard. Jared Wilson (C, Georgia) 40-Yard Dash: 4.84 seconds 10-Yard Split: 1.72 seconds Vertical Jump: 32” Broad Jump: 9’4” Size: 6’3”, 310 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance: Wilson ran a 4.84-second 40-yard dash, reaching a top speed of 21.04 mph, making him the fastest interior offensive lineman in this year's Combine and the only interior OL to surpass 21 mph. His 32-inch vertical and 9’4” broad jump further reinforce his explosiveness, proving he can excel at the center position at the next level. 📈 Draft Stock Impact: Wilson entered the Combine as a Day 2 prospect, but his testing numbers solidified his status as a high-end second-round pick. His athleticism and ability to work in space make him a perfect fit for teams running outside-zone blocking schemes.

McMillan's combination of speed, route running, and reliable hands position him as a High-End Starter Potential (65-69) prospect. His ability to immediately contribute in the passing game, combined with potential growth in blocking, makes him a valuable asset for teams looking for a versatile and dynamic wide receiver. < Back Jalen McMillan Washington HT: 6010 WT: 192 YR: JR POS: WR OVR RK 81 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 17 High-End Starter Potential OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT Jalen McMillan is a dynamic wide receiver who excels in vertical and intermediate routes. His speed and agility make him a deep threat in any offense, particularly in systems that prioritize downfield passing. McMillan's ability to track the ball and make contested catches fits well in an offense that utilizes play-action and vertical stretching plays. While his run blocking needs improvement, his route-running ability and versatility make him a fit for multiple offensive schemes, especially those that utilize spread concepts. CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS High-End Starter Potential (65-69) A player expected to become a top-tier starter within their first few years. They possess strong physical tools and good technical skills but may have some limitations in their game. With development, they can reach near-elite levels and provide consistent impact at their position. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS Deep Ball Tracking Strong Hands Versatile Routes KEY WEAKNESSES Run Blocking Physicality Health PLAYER COMPARISONS