2023 NFL Mock Draft 1.0 (No Trades), Team Needs, Pending Free Agents Our first mock draft ahead of the 2023 NFL Draft will focus on the first round, and there will be no trades. I will add a quick analysis for every team that might suggest a trade could be possible based on available draft capital and team need. 2023 NFL Draft Overview Which QB Will Be Drafted First? The 2023 NFL Draft is one of the more anticipated QB drafts in the last three years after 2022 did not offer an elite-level instant impact player. In 2023, the question is which QB goes number one overall, Alabama's Bryce Young or Ohio State QB C.J. Stroud? As I wrote this at 4:54 am EST on 1/14, Stroud has not declared, so he could throw a wrench into the entire process. Is C.J. Stroud Worthy Of The Top Pick? First off, C.J. Stroud has elite-level accuracy. The question mark to start the 2022 season centered on his mobility. He is not an elite-level athlete, but he does have similar mobility to Joe Burrow in that he can move around and extend plays. We wanted to see Stroud doing more out of the structure of the offense while on the move to keep a play alive and make big-time throws down the field. He did it earlier in the 2022 season vs. Notre Dame, but against Michigan, that creativity disappeared. A month later, in the College Football Playoff vs. Georgia, the creativity we know he is capable of was at its peak. The Georgia game provided enough definitive evidence that Stroud is worthy of a top 5 pick. Is Will Levis For Real? The third player of note that will be an NFL Combine darling is Kentucky QB, WIll Levis. Levis is the third-rated QB on our board as of today, behind Bryce Young and C.J. Stroud. Levis is a guy to keep your eyes on in this draft. His athleticism and big arm give everyone Josh Allen vibes. What About Anthony Richardson? Richardson is a developmental talent who flashes all of the traits you want from the QB position combined with elite athleticism. Richardson could jump into the top 10 of the 2023 NFL Draft and will be an NFL Combine darling. The Twitter machine will buzz when Richardson launches 70-yard bombs vs. air. It will suit Richardson to land on a team with a bridge QB. He needs a year of development in the right offense. Many scouts will say the same about Will Levis, but the difference is that Levis played in back-to-back pro-style offenses at Kentucky. EDGE Rushers and Interior Players Will Be Plentiful The Edge rusher and IDL positions will be plentiful in the 2023 NFL Draft. Five of the top ten ranked players on the Football Scout 365 Big Board are either an Edge or an IDL. The Edge rushers are led by Alabama's Will Anderson Jr, while the IDL is led by our number one overall prospect Georgia's Jalen Carter. The WR Group Is Talented Many scouts are not optimistic about the 2023 WR class compared to the last three classes. But the group has some top-tier talent led by TCU's Quentin Johnston and USC's Jordan Addison. We might see at least 4, potentially 5 WR's drafted in the first round. Keep an eye on BC WR Zay Flowers, and the explosive Jalin Hyatt from Tennessee. Today, we know who the first 18 picks will be ahead of the NFL Playoffs. Chicago is on the clock! The 2023 NFL Draft RB Class could rival the 2017 NFL Draft RB Class. The depth of the 2023 RB class starts with Bijan Robinson and Jahmyr Gibbs at the top. We have 9 RB's listed in our top 100. We had ten until Blake Corun decided to stay at Michigan in 2023. Non-Playoff Teams 1). Chicago Bears Select: Georgia IDL Jalen Carter Pending Free Agents: RB David Montgomery, C Sam Mustipher, WR N'Keal Harry, WR Dante Pettis Team Needs: Edge, DL, OL Draft Capital: 1, 56, 65, 103, 134, 136, 149, 221 Draft Capital RK: 4th Possible Picks: Trade The Pick, IDL Jalen Carter, ED Will Anderson, QB Bryce Young, QB C.J. Stroud Quick Analysis: The Bears landed in a prime position to trade back for more draft capital. The idea is to build around an ascending Justin Fields, or is it? 2). Houston Texans Select: Alabama QB Bryce Young Pending Free Agents: TE O.J. Howard, EDGE Ogbonnia Okoronkwo, DL Rasheem Green, TE Jordan Akins Team Needs: QB, OL, DL Draft Capital: 2, 12, 34, 66, 74, 104, 137, 188, 200, 205, 206, 240 Draft Capital RK: 1st Possible Picks: QB Bryce Young, QB C.J. Stroud, Trade Back, Trade For A Veteran QB? Quick Analysis: It is a no-brainer that the Texans will draft a QB, or is it? The Texans have the highest-rated draft capital in the 2023 NFL Draft. They could gain even more by moving back, and who knows, they could trade for David Carr's little brother. The Texans need help on the offensive line and IDL. WR is also a notable need. 3). Arizona Cardinals Select: Alabama Edge Will Anderson Jr. Pending Free Agents: EDGE J.J. Watt, WR A.J. Green, OT Kelvin Beachum, CB Byron Murphy, C Rodney Hudson Team Needs: OL, Edge, CB Draft Capital: 3, 35, 67, 97, 105, 169, 180, 215 Draft Capital RK: 5th Possible Picks: ED Will Anderson Jr, CB Christian Gonzalez, IDL Jalen Carter Quick Analysis: The Cardinals fill a massive void left by the retiring J.J. Watt and pending free agent Zach Allen who is 2nd on the team in total sacks with 5.5. They have needs on the OL and the defensive secondary. 4). Indianapolis Colts Select: Ohio State QB C.J. Stroud Pending Free Agents: EDGE Yannick Ngakoue, WR Parris Campbell, OG Matt Pryor, LB Bobby Okereke, E.J. Speed Team Needs: QB, OL, WR Draft Capital: 4, 36, 80, 106, 139, 207, 224, 239 Draft Capital RK: 9th Possible Picks: Bryce Young, C.J. Stroud, Will Levis, Trade up Quick Analysis: The Colts are the popular trade-up candidate among the draft community. They could work something out with the Bears to get in a prime position to take their favorite QB in the draft, or they can stay here and hope they get the guy they want. 5). Seattle Seahawks (via DEN) Select: Kentucky QB Will Levis Pending Free Agents: QB Geno Smith, RB Rashaad Penny, DL Poona Ford, OG Phil Haynes, QB Drew Lock Team Needs: Edge, DL, QB Draft Capital: 5, 20, 38, 54, 85, 122, 152, 157, 198 Draft Capital RK: 2nd Possible Picks: QB Bryce Young, QB C.J. Stroud, Trade Back, Trade Up Quick Analysis: The Seahawks are in a prime position to sign Geno Smith as a bridge QB and draft their future QB. This is the perfect spot for Will Levis or Anthony Richardson. They could fill their IDL need with Clemson IDL Bryan Bresee or get the best available edge, Myles Murphy or Tyree Wilson. 6). Detroit Lions (via LAR) Select: Clemson Edge Myles Murphy Pending Free Agents: WR DJ Chark, RB Jamaal Williams, LB Alex Anzalone, OG Evan Brown, CB Mike Hughes Team Needs: DB, DL, LB Draft Capital: 6, 18, 49, 60, 82, 153, 183, 194 Draft Capital RK: 3rd Possible Picks: Edge Myles Murphy, IDL Bryan Bresee, Edge Tyree Wilson, CB Christian Gonzalez, QB Bryce Young, QB C.J. Stroud, Trade Back, Trade Up Quick Analysis: The Lions can go in a lot of different directions. If you asked anyone six months ago who they would draft in the top 10, the majority would say the best available QB. They are in the best position to go with the top CB or best available edge rusher, but if they are bold, they use Goff as a bridge to the future by drafting the best available QB. The logical pick at 6 is the best available CB, and get the best available edge at pick 18. 7). Las Vegas Raiders Select: Clemson IDL Bryan Bresee Pending Free Agents: RB Josh Jacobs, CB Rock Ya-Sin, LB Denzel Perryman, WR Mack Hollins, EDGE Clelin Ferrell Team Needs: QB, OL, Edge Draft Capital: 7, 39, 71, 109, 142, 145, 175, 203, 216, 223, 234 Draft Capital RK: 6th Possible Picks: QB Bryce Young, QB C.J. Stroud, QB Will Levis, QB Anthony Richardson, OT Peter Skoronski Trade Back, Trade Up Quick Analysis: The Raiders need a QB; they might land Tom Brady in free agency. If not, there is always Baker Mayfield. On a serious note, if C.J. Stroud or Bryce Young fall, it is a no-brainer. I do not like Levis or Richardson here without a bridge QB. Could they trade up, or will they stick with Jarett Stidham and tank for Caleb? If they don't go QB here, they should go best available Edge, IDL or OL. 8). Atlanta Falcons Select: Texas Tech Edge Tyree Wilson Pending Free Agents: OT Kaleb McGary, WR Olamide Zaccheaus, EDGE Lorenzo Carter, LB Rashaan Evans Team Needs: Edge, QB, WR Draft Capital: 8, 45, 76, 110, 113, 155, 227, 250 Draft Capital RK: 11th Possible Picks: IDL Bryan Bresee, Edge Tyree Wilson, Edge Myles Murphy, OT Peter Skoronski, OT Paris Johnson Jr, OT Broderick Jones, QB Will Levis, QB C.J. Stroud, QB Bryce Young, QB Anthony Richarson Quick Analysis: The consensus on many mock drafts is that the Falcons should target a pass rusher since they ranked 2nd to last in pass run win rate in 2022. If a QB like Anthony Richardson or Will Levis falls into their lap, they should swing for the fences until they get it right. Desmond Ridder does not look like the future, so unless the Falcons are hoping to get a big win in free agency, why not try to use Ridder as a bridge to the future? If QB is not available, you go best available pass rusher. 9). Carolina Panthers Select: Florida QB Anthony Richardson Pending Free Agents: QB Sam Darnold, DL Matthew Ioannidis, C Bradley Bozeman, LB Cory Littleton Team Needs: QB, CB, TE Draft Capital: 9, 40, 61, 93, 114, 131, 146 Draft Capital RK: 8th Possible Picks: QB Will Levis, QB C.J. Stroud, QB Bryce Young, QB Anthony Richarson, CB Christian Gonzalez, CB Kelee Ringo, CB Cam Smith Quick Analysis: Many mock drafts show the Panthers going with Florida QB Anthony Richardson and I cannot help but point to the fact that Carolina had a shot to Draft Justin Fields a few years back and passed on Fields because they had Sam Darnold. They need to consider selling the farm to get into the top 3. If they do not find a way to trade into position to draft C.J. Stroud, Bryce Young, or Will Levis, maybe Richardson falls into their lap. They can go with a CB to complement Jaycee Horn if they miss on QB. 10). Philadelphia Eagles (via NO) Select: Oregon CB Christian Gonzalez Pending Free Agents: DL Javon Hargrave, CB James Bradberry, RB Miles Sanders, C Jason Kelce, DL Fletcher Cox Team Needs: DB, Edge, DL Draft Capital: 10, 32, 64, 96, 222, 252 Draft Capital RK: 15th Possible Picks: CB Kelee Ringo, CB Cam Smith, Christian Gonzalez, S Brian Branch, IDL Brian Bresee, Edge Tyree Wilson Quick Analysis: The Eagles will lose defenders to free agency ahead of the 2023 season. They have big holes on the interior defensive line and at DB. Drafting the best available DB at ten overall is the right move considering Slay and Bradberry are aging quickly, and Bradberry is a pending free agent. They can also draft the best available IDL in this spot. 11). Tennessee Titans Select: Northwestern OT Peter Skoronski Pending Free Agents: TE Austin Hooper, OG Nate Davis, TE Geoff Swaim, LB David Long, DL Teair Tart Team Needs: OL, WR, TE Draft Capital: 11, 42, 73, 148, 186, 231 Draft Capital RK: 21st Possible Picks: OT Paris Johnson Jr., OT Peter Skoronski, OT Broderick Jones, O'Cyrus Torrence, OT Dawand Jones, WR Quentin Johnston, WR Jordan Addison, TE Michael Mayer Quick Analysis: The Titans must continue rebuilding their offensive line ahead of 2023. They appear to have their RT of the future in Nicholas Petit-Frere. With the future of LT Taylor Lewan in question, the Titans can draft the best available OT in this spot. If Skoronski falls this far (big if), you get a guy with positional versatility that you can flip inside if Lewan returns. 12). Houston Texans (via CLE) Select: TCU WR Quentin Johnston Pending Free Agents: TE O.J. Howard, EDGE Ogbonnia Okoronkwo, DL Rasheem Green, TE Jordan Akins Team Needs: QB, OL, DL Draft Capital: 2, 12, 34, 66, 74, 104, 137, 188, 200, 205, 206, 240 Draft Capital RK: 1st Possible Picks: WR Quentin Johnston, WR Jordan Addison, Edge Tyree Wilson, OT Bryan Bresee, OT Paris Johnson Jr., OT Broderick Jones Quick Analysis: After mocking a QB at number two overall, the Texans need to consider a potential elite number one WR with Instant Impact Potential. We have two ranked in our top 15, Quentin Johnston and Jordan Addison. Johnston feels like the perfect fit if he falls to them. Johnston feels like a faster version of Nuk Hopkins. At 6-4 215 lbs, Johnston is what you want in a WR to help a young NFL QB. If they shy away from WR here, they can fill needs on their OL and DL in this spot with high-quality players who can make an immediate impact. 13). New York Jets Select: OT Paris Johnson Jr. Pending Free Agents: RB James Robinson, C Connor McGovern, QB Joe Flacco, DL Sheldon Rankins, OT George Fant Team Needs: OL, S, QB Draft Capital: 13, 44, 75, 112, 144, 179 Draft Capital RK: 19th Possible Picks: T Paris Johnson Jr., OT Peter Skoronski, OT Broderick Jones, O'Cyrus Torrence, OT Dawand Jones, S Brian Branch, S Christopher Smith Quick Analysis: The Jets need to figure out the QB position in the offseason. They should target OL in this spot. Center Connor McGovern will be a free agent, and it seems unlikely that the OT trio of Duane Brown, George Fant, and Mekhi Becton will all return in 2023. 14). New England Patriots Select: Georgia OT Broderick Jones Pending Free Agents: OT Isaiah Wynn, RB Damien Harris, CB Myles Bryant, CB Jonathan Jones, WR Jakobi Meyers Team Needs: OT, WR, DB Draft Capital: 14, 47, 77, 107, 117, 135, 184, 187, 192, 210, 259 Draft Capital RK: 7th Possible Picks: WR Quentin Johnston, WR Jordan Addison, S Brian Branch, OT Paris Johnson Jr., OT O'Cyrus Torrence, OT Broderick Jones Quick Analysis: The Patriots need to draft a WR, and if Jordan Addison is available, Bill will find a way to pass on him for the best available DB or OL, and then he will shock the world and draft Stetson Bennett with pick 47. On a serious note, we choose Georgia OT Broderick Jones as a potential Isaiah Wynn replacement at RT. 15). Green Bay Packers Select: USC WR Jordan Addison Pending Free Agents: WR Allen Lazard, TE Robert Tonyan Jr., OT Elgton Jenkins, S Adrian Amos, DL Dean Lowry Team Needs: S, TE, Edge Draft Capital: 15, 46, 79, 116, 150, 171, 220, 235, 238, 241 Draft Capital RK: 12th Possible Picks: WR Quentin Johnston, WR Jordan Addison, Michael Mayer, S Brian Branch, OT Paris Johnson Jr., OT O'Cyrus Torrence, OT Broderick Jones, S Christopher Smith Quick Analysis: If I am the Packers, with or without Aaron Rodgers, I need to add more talent at WR and potentially replace Elgton Jenkins. If Jordan Addison is available, it is a no-brainer in this spot. Pair Addison with Christan Watson and Romeo Doubs. If Aaron Rodgers moves on, you at least do your best to surround Love with as much firepower as possible. Another option is TE, and if Michael Mayer is available, why not? 16). Washington Commanders Select: Florida IOL O'Cyrus Torrence Pending Free Agents: DL Daron Payne, QB Taylor Heinicke, OG Wes Schweitzer, LB Cole Holcomb, OG Trai Turner Team Needs: QB, CB, OL Draft Capital: 16, 48, 98, 118, 151, 193, 217, 236 Draft Capital RK: 17th Possible Picks: IDL Bryan Bresee, IOL O'Cyrus Torrence, CB Joey Porter Jr. Quick Analysis: The Commanders finished the 2022 season with one top 80 CB, according to PFF. With Daron Payne potentially leaving in free agency, the Commanders appear poised to take the best defensive line value in this position. They can also draft the best available IOL, which is another need. 17). Pittsburgh Steelers Select: Georgia CB Kelee Ringo Pending Free Agents: DL Larry Ogunjobi, LB Devin Bush, DL Chris Wormley, CB Cam Sutton, QB Mason Rudolph Team Needs: OL, CB, DL Draft Capital: 17, 33, 50, 81, 120, 237 Draft Capital RK: 14th Possible Picks: CB Joey Porter Jr., IDL Bryan Bresee, IOL O'Cyrus Torrence, OT Anton Harrison, CB Devon Witherspoon Quick Analysis: The Steelers should try to improve the offensive line here or go with the best available DB. 18). Detroit Lions Select: South Carolina CB Cam Smith Pending Free Agents: WR DJ Chark, RB Jamaal Williams, LB Alex Anzalone, OG Evan Brown, CB Mike Hughes Team Needs: DB, DL, LB Draft Capital: 6, 18, 49, 60, 82, 153, 183, 194 Draft Capital RK: 3rd Possible Picks: Edge Tyree Wilson, Edge Nolan Smith, LB Trenton Simpson, CB Joey Porter Jr., IDL Bryan Bresee, IOL O'Cyrus Torrence, OT Anton Harrison, CB Devon Witherspoon, S/NB Brian Branch Quick Analysis: The big question is, do you go CB or grab an Edge rushing LB like Nolan Smith to place opposite Aidan Hutchinson? Or do you target a high motor versatile edge rusher like Tyree Wilson if he falls? They can go off-ball inside LB in this spot, but I'd skip off-ball LB in round one and snag one in round two or later. Playoff Teams PL). Tampa Bay Buccaneers Select: Georgia Edge/LB Nolan Smith Pending Free Agents: QB Tom Brady, LB Lavonte David, DL Akiem Hicks, WR Julio Jones, CB Sean Bunting, S Mike Edwards Team Needs: QB, DB, OL Draft Capital: 19, 51, 83, 154, 176, 181, 196, 233, 254 Draft Capital RK: 20th Possible Picks: Edge Nolan Smith, CB Kelee Ringo, CB Joey Porter Jr., IOL O'Cyrus Torrence, OT Anton Harrison, IOL Cooper Beebe Quick Analysis: Whoever is under center in 2023 will need to be better protected than Brady was in 2022. Drafting an OL here makes sense, but you must start rebuilding the defense. PL). Seattle Seahawks Select: USC Edge Tuli Tuipulotu Pending Free Agents: QB Geno Smith, RB Rashaad Penny, DL Poona Ford, OG Phil Haynes, QB Drew Lock Team Needs: Edge, DL, QB Draft Capital: 5, 20, 38, 54, 85, 122, 152, 157, 198 Draft Capital RK: 2nd Possible Picks: RB Bijan Robinson, WR Zay Jones, WR Jalin Hyatt, Edge Nolan Smith, Edge Felix Anudike-Uzomah, Edge Isaiah Foskey, Edge Tuli Tuipulotu, TE Michael Mayer Quick Analysis: The Seahawks are in a prime position to sign Geno Smith as a bridge QB and draft their future QB. This is the perfect spot for Will Levis or Anthony Richardson. They could fill their IDL need with Clemson IDL Bryan Bresee or get the best available edge, Myles Murphy or Tyree Wilson. PL). Baltimore Ravens Select: Tennessee WR Jalin Hyatt Pending Free Agents: LB Roquan Smith, CB Marcus Peters, QB Lamar Jackson, OT Ja'Wuan James, CB Kyle Fuller Team Needs: CB, WR, Edge Draft Capital: 24, 88, 126, 159, 201 Draft Capital RK: 30th Possible Picks: RB Bijan Robinson, OT Anton Harrison, OT Dawand Jones, WR Zay Jones, WR Jalin Hyatt Edge Nolan Smith, Edge Felix Anudike-Uzomah, Edge Isaiah Foskey, Edge Tuli Tuipulotu, TE Michael Mayer, Darnell Washington Quick Analysis: If the Ravens can retain Lamar Jackson, they need to add deep speed to the WR position to lineup opposite Rashod Bateman. With or without Lamar, the Ravens need to add legit weapons at WR, or this offense will remain stale. PL). Miami Dolphins Select: Forfeited Pending Free Agents: TE Mike Gesicki, QB Teddy Bridgewater, RB Raheem Mostert, RB Jeff Wilson, EDGE Trey Flowers Team Needs: OL, CB, TE Draft Capital: 53, 78, 84, 178, 242 Draft Capital RK: 32nd PL). New York Giants Select: Ohio State WR Jaxon Smith-Njigba Pending Free Agents: QB Daniel Jones, RB Saquon Barkley, DL Dalvin Tomlinson, WR Sterling Shepard, WR Darius Slayton Team Needs: WR, IOL, DB Draft Capital: 23, 55, 87, 125, 158, 173, 208, 243, 244, 256 Draft Capital RK: 16th Possible Picks: RB Bijan Robinson, IOL Andrew Vorhees, IOL John Michael Schmitz IOL Cooper Beebe, WR Zay Jones, WR Jalin Hyatt, TE Michael Mayer, WR Jaxon Smith-Njigba, WR Kayshon Boutte Quick Analysis: The Giant's offense needs a go-to WR ahead of the 2023 season to help Daniel Jones. If they do not sign Barkley to a second contract, they could land Bijan Robinson or Jahmyr Gibbs. PL). Jacksonville Jaguars Select: LSU WR Kayshon Boutte Pending Free Agents: TE Evan Engram, OT Jawaan Taylor, EDGE Arden Key, EDGE Dawuane Smoot, CB Tre Herndon Team Needs: DL, OT, CB Draft Capital: 21, 52, 86, 121, 123, 185, 199, 209, 229 Draft Capital RK: 13th Possible Picks: RB Bijan Robinson, OT Anton Harrison, OT Dawand Jones, WR Zay Jones, WR Jalin Hyatt, TE Michael Mayer, LB Trenton Simpson, LB Noah Sewell, LB Drew Sanders, WR Jaxon Smith-Njigba, WR Kayshon Boutte, IDL Quick Analysis: The Jaguars need to build around their franchise QB. Going with the best available WR is a great start. PL). Los Angeles Chargers Select: Clemson LB Trenton Simpson Pending Free Agents: DL Jerry Tillery, S Nasir Adderley, RB Sony Michel, LB Drue Tranquill, TE Donald Parham Team Needs: DB, OL, WR Draft Capital: 25, 57, 89, 127, 160, 202, 245 Draft Capital RK: 23rd Possible Picks: RB Bijan Robinson, OT Anton Harrison, OT Dawand Jones, WR Zay Jones, WR Jalin Hyatt, TE Michael Mayer, LB Trenton Simpson, LB Noah Sewell, LB Drew Sanders, WR Jaxon Smith-Njigba, WR Kayshon Boutte, S Antonio Johnson, S Christopher Smith, S Brian Branch Quick Analysis: The Chargers can go with a WR here, but it might be better to continue building the OL. They also need help at LB, and with the potential that Drue Tranquill could move on, they can go with a top LB in the draft. PL). Dallas Cowboys Select: Oklahoma OT Anton Harrison Pending Free Agents: TE Dalton Schultz, RB Tony Pollard, OT Terence Steele, WR Noah Brown, LB Leighton Vander Esch Team Needs: DB, WR, OL Draft Capital: 26, 58, 90, 128, 161, 170, 177, 213, 246 Draft Capital RK: 18th Possible Picks: RB Bijan Robinson, OT Anton Harrison, OT Dawand Jones, WR Zay Jones, WR Jalin Hyatt, TE Michael Mayer, LB Trenton Simpson, LB Noah Sewell, LB Drew Sanders, WR Jaxon Smith-Njigba, WR Kayshon Boutte Quick Analysis: The Cowboys might have to replace Dalton Schultz and Tony Pollard. The OL could use some youth, and an upgrade at LB might be in the cards. PL). Cincinnati Bengals Select: Alabama S/NB Brian Branch Pending Free Agents: S Jessie Bates III, TE Hayden Hurst, CB Eli Apple, S Vonn Bell, RB Samaje Perine Team Needs: DB, OT, TE Draft Capital: 27, 59, 91, 129, 162, 204, 247 Draft Capital RK: 24th Possible Picks: RB Bijan Robinson, OT Anton Harrison, OT Dawand Jones, TE Michael Mayer, TE Darnell Washington, TE Dalton Kincaid, LB Trenton Simpson, LB Noah Sewell, LB Drew Sanders, S Antonio Johnson, S Christopher Smith, S Brian Branch Quick Analysis: The Jesse Bates pending free agency might leave a huge hole in the Bengal's defense. They will be in a good spot to find his replacement in the late first round if necessary. PL). Minnesota Vikings Select: Penn State CB Joey Porter Jr. Pending Free Agents: TE Irv Smith Jr., RB Alexander Mattison, CB Patrick Peterson, C Garrett Bradbury, WR Olabisi Johnson Team Needs: DB, DL, WR Draft Capital: 28, 92, 119, 163, 211, 214 Draft Capital RK: 29th Possible Picks: CB Joey Porter Jr., RB Bijan Robinson, TE Michael Mayer, TE Darnell Washington, TE Dalton Kincaid, CB Emmanuel Forbes, CB Tre'Vius Hodges-Tomlinson Quick Analysis: With needs on the OL, the secondary, and at WR, you must go with the best available at a position of need. PL). Denver Broncos (from SF, via MIA) Select: Texas RB Bijan Robinson Pending Free Agents: RB Melvin Gordon, OG Dalton Risner, OT Cameron Fleming, S Kareem Jackson, DL Dre'Mont Jones Team Needs: OL, WR, DL Draft Capital: 29, 68, 69, 108, 140, 195, 248 Draft Capital RK: 22nd Possible Picks: RB Bijan Robinson, IOL Andrew Vorhees, IOL John Michael Schmitz IOL Cooper Beebe, WR Zay Jones, WR Jalin Hyatt, TE Michael Mayer, LB Trenton Simpson, LB Noah Sewell, LB Drew Sanders, WR Jaxon Smith-Njigba, WR Kayshon Boutte, S Antonio Johnson, S Christopher Smith, S Brian Branch Quick Analysis: The Broncos have a lot of needs, but finding a replacement for Melvin Gordon and the possibility for an elite one-two punch at RB might be too good to pass up. PL). Buffalo Bills Select: USC IOL Andrew Voorhees Pending Free Agents: S Jordan Poyer, LB Tremaine Edmunds, QB Case Keenum, C Mitch Morse, OG Rodger Saffold Team Needs: OL, WR, LB Draft Capital: 30, 62, 94, 132, 138, 165 Draft Capital RK: 25th Possible Picks: RB Bijan Robinson, IOL Andrew Vorhees, IOL John Michael Schmitz, IOL Cooper Beebe, WR Zay Jones, WR Jalin Hyatt, TE Michael Mayer, LB Trenton Simpson, LB Noah Sewell, LB Drew Sanders, WR Jaxon Smith-Njigba, WR Kayshon Boutte Quick Analysis: The Bills can go best available or rebuild their IOL. They have needs at WR and LB that need to be addressed. PL). Kansas City Chiefs Select: Notre Dame TE Michael Mayer Pending Free Agents: OT Orlando Brown Jr., WR Mecole Hardman, WR Juju Smith-Schuster, S Juan Thornhill Team Needs: OT, Edge, DB Draft Capital: 31, 63, 95, 101, 124, 133, 166, 197, 218, 228, 251, 253, 258 Draft Capital RK: 10th Possible Picks: RB Bijan Robinson, OT Anton Harrison, OT Dawand Jones , WR Zay Jones, WR Jalin Hyatt, TE Michael Mayer, LB Trenton Simpson, LB Noah Sewell, LB Drew Sanders, WR Jaxon Smith-Njigba, WR Kayshon Boutte, S Antonio Johnson, S Christopher Smith, S Brian Branch Quick Analysis: The Chiefs could be in the market to find a replacement for an aging Travis Kelce. They also have needs at safety pending the Juan Thornhill free agency. They could also go after the best available OT. PL). Philadelphia Eagles Select: Baylor IDL Siaki Ika Pending Free Agents: DL Javon Hargrave, CB James Bradberry, RB Miles Sanders, C Jason Kelce, DL Fletcher Cox Team Needs: DB, Edge, DL Draft Capital: 10, 32, 64, 96, 222, 252 Draft Capital RK: 15th Possible Picks: RB Bijan Robinson, Edge Nolan Smith, Edge Felix Anudike-Uzomah, Edge Isaiah Foskey, Edge Tuli Tuipulotu, TE Michael Mayer, CB Jaylon Jones, CB Clark Phillips, RB Jahmyr Gibbs, IDL Mazi Smith, IDL Gervon Dexter Quick Analysis: The Eagles will lose defenders to free agency ahead of the 2023 season. They have big holes on the interior defensive line and at DB. Drafting the best available DB at ten overall is the right move considering Slay and Bradberry are aging quickly, and Bradberry is a pending free agent. They can also draft the best available IDL in this spot. Teams Without A 2023 First-Round Pick 37). Los Angeles Rams Pending Free Agents: S Taylor Rapp, DL A'Shawn Robinson, CB Troy Hill, RB Darrell Henderson, DL Greg Gaines Team Needs: Edge, OL, DB Draft Capital: 37, 70, 168, 172, 182, 189, 191, 212, 226, 255 Draft Capital RK: 27th 41). New Orleans Saints Pending Free Agents: DL David Onyemata, EDGE Marcus Davenport, WR Jarvis Landry, RB Mark Ingram, QB Andy Dalton Team Needs: QB, DL, IOL Draft Capital: 41, 72, 115, 147, 167, 230, 260 Draft Capital RK: 28th 43). Cleveland Browns Pending Free Agents: OT Jack Conklin, RB Kareem Hunt, EDGE Jadeveon Clowney, LB Deion Jones, QB Jacoby Brissett Team Needs: DT, WR, TE Draft Capital: 43, 99, 111, 130, 141, 143, 190, 232 Draft Capital RK: 26th 53). Miami Dolphins Pending Free Agents: TE Mike Gesicki, QB Teddy Bridgewater, RB Raheem Mostert, RB Jeff Wilson, EDGE Trey Flowers Team Needs: OL, CB, TE Draft Capital: 53, 78, 84, 178, 242 Draft Capital RK: 32nd 100). San Francisco 49ers Pending Free Agents: QB Jimmy Garoppolo, OT Mike McGlinchey, CB Emmanuel Moseley, EDGE Charles Omenihu Team Needs: OL, DL, DB Draft Capital: 100, 102, 156, 164, 174, 219, 225, 249, 257 Draft Capital RK: 31st

How We Scout The Edge Rusher Position | NFL Draft | Football Scouting and Analytics Scouting edge rushers in the NFL requires evaluating a player's size, athleticism, technique, and versatility. Below is a list of critical components we use to grade the EDGE position during the NFL Draft process. Every EDGE defender receives a grade on a scale of 1-10 for each of the below components during the scouting process. Once each player component is graded, we attach a final grade to indicate where the player stands before entering the NFL Draft, and then we attach a ceiling grade based on future potential. Here are some key factors to consider when scouting an edge rusher: Size and Length: An edge rusher needs size and length to create separation from offensive linemen and disrupt the quarterback's throwing motion. This includes their ability to generate power at the point of attack, maintain leverage, and finish sacks. Speed and Agility: An edge rusher must be fast and agile enough to beat offensive linemen and get to the quarterback quickly. This includes their ability to change direction quickly, accelerate off the snap, and bend around the edge. Pass Rushing Ability: An edge rusher needs to be able to get to the quarterback and disrupt the passing game. This includes their ability to generate pressure, penetrate the offensive line, and use various pass-rushing techniques such as the bull rush, swim move, and spin move. Run Stopping Ability: An edge rusher must stop the run and limit the yardage gained by ball carriers. This includes their ability to maintain gap control, set the edge, and pursue ball carriers. Versatility: An edge rusher needs to be versatile enough to play on both sides of the defensive line, drop back into coverage, and execute different pass-rushing techniques. This includes their ability to adjust to different offensive schemes, work effectively with different defensive linemen, and contribute to special teams. Football IQ: An edge rusher's football intelligence is essential to make quick decisions and adjustments on the field. This includes their ability to recognize offensive formations, diagnose plays, and communicate with their teammates. Durability: An edge rusher's durability is important, as they will be taking a lot of hits on the field. This includes their ability to stay healthy and recover quickly from injuries. When scouting an edge rusher, it's important to evaluate all of these factors and the player's overall performance on the field. It's also important to consider the team's specific needs and whether the edge rusher's skills and attributes match the team's defensive system and style of play. Additionally, it's important to consider the edge rusher's penalties and mental mistakes, as these can be a liability for the defense.

2023 NFL Draft: Scouting The Top Running Back Prospects The 2023 NFL Draft will provide NFL teams with a lot of depth at the running back position. Can the 2023 RB class rival the great 2017 NFL Draft RB class? Click here to check out the full 2023 NFL Draft Big Board rankings. We have added many new features to our NFL Draft big board, including full player analysis, player comparisons, scheme fit, and player strengths and weaknesses. Early to Mid 1st Round Draft Grades 1. Texas RB Bijan Robinson: Bijan Robinson is an elusive player who can also play with power. His 6-0 220lb frame is built for the rigors of the NFL. His style translates best in a zone-based offense. Robinson displays great patience and vision, allowing his blocks to set up before showing off his explosive burst. One in the 2nd and 3rd level of a defense, Robinson shows elite contact balance and the ability to make defenders miss in small areas. Robinson can deploy a mean stiff arm to ward off defenders and be counted on in short-yardage and goal-to-go situations. Robinson is as versatile as it gets. He possesses true three-down versatility that translates to the next level. He can run routes in and out of the backfield Late 1st-2nd Round Draft Grades 2. Alabama RB Jahmyr Gibbs: At 5-11 200lbs, Jahmyr Gibbs is an elusive three-down back who can play in both a zone or gap scheme. As a runner, Gibbs shows an elite burst. He can easily exploit an opening and enter a defense's second and third levels, where defenders have difficulty reeling him in. Gibbs possesses elite balance and good speed, which is why you rarely see him taken down on first contact. Gibbs is an excellent receiver in and out of the backfield. He will need to improve his pass protection at the next level. 2nd-3rd Round Draft Grades 3. UCLA RB Zach Charbonnet: Charbonnet is a 6-1 220lb RB with three-down versatility and a frame made for the NFL. He can excel in a zone or gap-based scheme. In the run game, Charbonnet possesses the power that NFL teams like to see. He can get dirty between the tackles, where he can bounce off of contact and become a nightmare for second and third-level defenders. He plays with good patience and vision and often sees a hole close in advance before bouncing to daylight. For a bigger back, Charbonnet has excellent footwork and lateral movement. Charbonnet can be an upright runner, but that will not deter NFL scouts and GM's looking for a player with size and every down ability. 3rd-4th Round Draft Grades 4. Georgia RB Kenny McIntosh: McIntosh provides three-down versatility with perfect RB size. At 6-1 210lbs, Mcintosh delivers speed and power as a runner. He combines excellent contact balance with the ability to make a defender miss in space. As a receiver, McIntosh has lined up all over the formation while at Georgia to run routes and is a matchup nightmare for opposing LB's. He is a versatile scheme RB entering the NFL. 4th-6th Round Draft Grades 5. Illinois RB Chase Brown: Chase Brown is a 5-11 205 lb RB with good instincts and track speed suitable for a zone-based rushing offense in the NFL. He plays with good vision and patience as a runner, where he will press the line of scrimmage, forcing LB's out of position before bursting off the edge for a long run. He possesses the three-down versatility needed in the NFL. In 2022, he improved his pass-catching ability and provided quite a few highlight moments on catches out of the backfield. There will be questions about his size once he enters the NFL. 6. Syracuse RB Sean Tucker: Sean Tucker is a compact 5-10 210 RB. His fast accelerator drives his big play ability. A track star at Syracuse, Tucker shows his speed and ability to make defenders miss once he enters the 2nd and 3rd levels of a defense. He plays with good balance and can run through contact. There are questions about his three-down versatility. He has to improve his pass protection and as a pass catcher. He did improve as a pass catcher in 2022 and will need to keep improving once he enters the NFL.

← Back to NFL Draft Big Board George Pickens Georgia HT: 6030 WT: 200 YR: JR POS: WR OVR RK 33 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 6 KEY STRENGTHS KEY CONCERNS PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT PLAYER COMPARISON: CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS Near Elite (70-74) A high-caliber prospect who is expected to become a significant contributor by Year 2. These players have outstanding physical tools and strong football IQ, with only minor flaws in their game. They demonstrate consistency at a high level and project as future Pro Bowl-caliber players if properly developed. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Grade Scale Football Scout 365 grades reflect a prospect’s projected long-term NFL value and role. Draft ranges are general value projections, not predictions of an exact selection. Positional value, team needs, scheme fit, medical information and athletic testing can influence where a player is ultimately selected. How Football Scout 365 Grades NFL Draft Prospects Elite (75+): A rare, high-impact prospect with elite physical tools, advanced football intelligence and the ability to make an immediate NFL impact. Elite prospects carry franchise-altering potential and typically project as top 5–10 selections in the first round. Near Elite (70–74): A high-caliber prospect with outstanding physical tools, strong football intelligence and only minor developmental limitations. Near Elite prospects project as significant early-career contributors with Pro Bowl upside and first-round draft value. High-End Starter Potential (65–69): A starting-caliber prospect with strong physical tools, quality technical skills and a defined NFL role. These players may require development before reaching their ceiling but generally carry second- or third-round draft value. Mid-Level Starter Potential (60–64): A solid prospect with NFL-level tools and a pathway to becoming a dependable starter if key limitations are addressed. These players generally carry third- to fifth-round draft value. Low-Level Starter Potential (55–59): A developmental prospect who could become a low-end starter, high-end backup or valuable specialist in the right role. These players generally carry fifth- to seventh-round draft value. Backup Level (50–54): A depth or rotational prospect with enough functional ability to compete for an NFL roster spot but limited long-term starting potential. These players generally project as late Day 3 selections or priority undrafted free agents. Not NFL Level (Below 50): A developmental or camp prospect who does not currently demonstrate enough consistency, technical refinement or functional NFL traits to project as a regular contributor. These players generally project as undrafted free agents, practice-squad candidates or camp invitations. Draft position can vary based on positional value, team needs, scheme fit, medical evaluation and athletic testing.

Carson Beck NFL Draft Scouting Report Carson Beck’s college career has been a story of promise and volatility. At 6’4”, 225 pounds, the Miami quarterback brings prototypical size, arm talent, and extensive experience in multiple pro-style systems. Yet the defining trait of his evaluation remains inconsistency, stretches of high-level execution followed by head-scratching decisions that stall momentum. After four years at Georgia, Beck transferred to Miami for his final season, helping the Hurricanes reach the College Football Playoff behind a 73.3% completion rate, 3,581 yards, and 29 touchdowns. Under Shannon Dawson’s pro-spread offense, he has displayed leadership and command of the offense. When his processing is clean, Beck’s anticipation and ball placement resemble an NFL-caliber starter. But when forced off-script or asked to extend plays beyond structure, his decision-making varies. Carson Beck Scouting Report & Film Summary Beck is a rhythm passer who operates best on schedule. When he identifies coverage early and gets the ball out in under 2.5 seconds, he’s accurate, efficient, and confident. His quick-game timing and anticipatory throws mirror the traits of a veteran field general. However, when plays break down or post-snap rotations muddy his reads, Beck’s processing slows. His turnover-worthy plays nearly triple when he holds the ball beyond 2.5 seconds, and his play under pressure remains a major variable. Despite the inconsistency, Beck’s positives are undeniable. He can make any throw, he possesses pro-ready footwork, and a calm demeanor when protected. The question is whether he can translate those traits into sustained success against NFL pressure looks. Ideal Scheme Fit West Coast / Play-Action Hybrid. Beck fits systems emphasizing timing, layered route concepts, and defined reads. He projects best as a distributor in rhythm-based passing games that blend structure with movement throws, maximizing his anticipation and touch while minimizing prolonged pocket reads. Key Strengths (Film-Based Traits) Prototypical Size & Mechanics: 6’4” frame with clean base and over-the-top delivery; ideal stature for pocket operation. Anticipation & Timing: NFL-caliber rhythm thrower; releases early with confidence in structure. Experience & Command: 40+ career starts in high-pressure SEC and ACC environments; comfortable executing complex pro-style concepts. Developmental Areas (Growth Opportunities) Processing Under Pressure: Must improve post-snap reaction time and avoid forcing throws into rotation-heavy coverages. Decision-Making Consistency: Turnover-prone when extending plays; needs to embrace checkdowns and avoid “hero ball.” Velocity & Arm Strength: Functional but not elite; late throws lose zip and risk placement errors outside the numbers. Unique Playstyle Comparison Jared Goff’s rhythm and timing traits with flashes of Eli Manning’s volatility — precise and poised when in rhythm, but streaky when structure breaks down. NFL Draft Grade Range: Mid-Level to High-End Starter. Toolsy, experienced passer with pro-ready mechanics and leadership qualities. His volatility limits his floor, but his processing growth at Miami shows starter-level upside. Draft Projection – Early Day Two to Day Three (Rounds 2-5)

Netflix Untold: Sign Stealer Documentary Confirms What We Already Knew About Connor Stalions and Michigan Football Last year, I broke down the controversy surrounding Michigan’s alleged sign-stealing and in-person scouting. Now, with the release of Netflix’s documentary “Sign Stealer,” featuring ex-Michigan staffer Connor Stalions, it’s time to connect the dots between what I said then and what’s being revealed now. Netflix Untold: Sign Stealer Documentary Confirms What We Already Knew In the documentary, Stalions insists he didn’t break NCAA rules, which aligns with my analysis from last year. I had already pointed out how Michigan’s advanced analytics and scouting could potentially function within the rules without resorting to sign-stealing. I also explored NCAA bylaw 11.6.1, which explicitly prohibits off-campus, in-person scouting. However, I noted a possible gray area where Stalions might have operated, potentially by using third-party vendors to record signals rather than personally attending opponents' games to do so. This approach could technically keep him within the boundaries of the rules, even as it pushes ethical limits. Spoiler Alert: Here are Five Key Takeaways From The Sign Stealer Documentary Stalions Denies Breaking NCAA Rules: Connor Stalions claims in the documentary that he did not break NCAA rules, specifically denying that he obtained signals through in-person scouting, which is prohibited by NCAA bylaw 11.6.1. Gray Area in NCAA Rules: The documentary highlights the potential gray area in the NCAA's rules, where Stalions may have operated. He mentions that some tickets he bought ended up with people who sent him unsolicited video clips, suggesting a loophole in the regulations regarding third-party involvement. Stalions’ Role in Sign Deciphering: Stalions detailed his method of deciphering signs by creating a comprehensive database with thousands of images and signals. This system was developed over years, starting from his time at the Naval Academy, where he also performed sign-stealing tasks. Stalions' Connection to Michigan’s Success: The documentary shows that Stalions was rewarded by the Michigan football program for his work in deciphering signals, including being given a game ball after a win over Iowa in 2022. This connection is crucial in understanding his role within the team. Stalions' Response to Allegations: Throughout the documentary, Stalions remains defiant, insisting that he did not direct anyone to attend games or record signals on his behalf. He portrays himself as a scapegoat, emphasizing that he went into hiding after the scandal broke and that his name was unfairly dragged through the mud. Navigating the Gray Areas of NCAA Rules and the Competitive Edge in College Football The Netflix documentary “Sign Stealer” sheds new light on Connor Stalions’ role in the Michigan sign-stealing scandal, but it also reinforces much of what I previously analyzed. The blurred lines in NCAA rules, combined with Stalions’ methods and claims, create a complex picture of what really happened. While Stalions insists he operated within the rules, the documentary highlights just how fine the line between legal and illegal scouting can be. Whether he’s a scapegoat or a rule-bender, Stalions’ story serves as a fascinating case study that underscores the hyper-competitive nature of college football, where no stone is left unturned in the pursuit of victory.

Jermod McCoy NFL Draft Scouting Report 2026 NFL Draft Scouting Report: Tennessee CB Jermod McCoy Jermod McCoy is a fluid, explosive man-coverage corner with elite ball skills and advanced route anticipation. At 6’0”, 193 pounds, McCoy’s 2024 tape at Tennessee showed the kind of polished technique, reactive quickness, and playmaking range that NFL defensive coordinators covet in a modern boundary corner. A 2024 All-SEC performer and former Oregon State transfer, McCoy established himself as one of the nation’s premier cover defenders before an ACL injury cut short his junior campaign. When healthy, McCoy’s combination of hip fluidity, processing speed, and competitive toughness gives him the profile of a future CB1. He thrives in press-man and match-quarters structures, where he can challenge releases early, pattern-match vertical stems, and drive aggressively on intermediate routes. Film Summary McCoy’s film highlights a corner with rare mirroring ability and short-area burst. His transitions are crisp, and his closing speed stands out on in-breaking routes or comebacks. He’s disruptive at the catch point with natural receiver-like hands, tallying six interceptions and 16 pass breakups in 2024. Against the run, he’s a willing tackler who maintains leverage and rarely misses in space. Though not the most imposing in size, McCoy compensates with superb timing, anticipation, and route IQ. His footwork and controlled aggression make him a tough matchup for any receiver type. The lone question mark remains durability following his ACL injury, but his medical recovery will dictate whether he enters 2026 as a first-round lock or a high-Day-2 value. Ideal Scheme Fit Press-Man / Match-Quarters System — perfect for defenses that allow corners to challenge receivers early, read stems, and transition quickly downhill. Best fits include Philadelphia, Miami, and Kansas City, where hybrid coverage packages demand technically refined man corners with elite short-area burst and discipline. Key Strengths (Film-Based Traits) Elite man-coverage technician: Exceptional mirroring ability and foot discipline through route stems. Explosiveness and burst: Quick click-and-close acceleration with top-tier change-of-direction agility. Ball skills: Tracks the football like a receiver; high-point timing and finishing ability stand out. Press-man discipline: Controls early contact, wins leverage, and stays patient through release. Route intelligence: Reads route concepts and QB eyes; anticipates breaks to disrupt timing. Developmental Areas (Growth Opportunities) Health/durability: ACL recovery (2025) is key to restoring full top-end burst. Grabby tendencies: Must refine downfield hand usage to reduce penalty risk. Limited single-high reps: Thrived in match-quarters; needs more experience in deep-zone rotations. Grade and Projection Summary Football Scout 365 Grade: High-End Starter Potential An instinctive, ball-productive corner with advanced man-coverage skill and natural playmaking instincts. Projects as an immediate starter in press-man or match-quarters systems. Ceiling Grade: Near Elite If he returns to pre-injury form, McCoy’s combination of quickness, coverage IQ, and ball skills could elevate him into a perennial Pro Bowl-caliber CB1. NFL Draft Projection: Late Round 1 Pro Comparison: Devon Witherspoon / Greg Newsome II / Rock Ya-Sin (early-career) — mirrors Witherspoon’s physicality, Newsome’s route smoothness, and Ya-Sin’s short-area burst in press. Final Analysis Jermod McCoy projects as one of the premier coverage defenders in the 2026 NFL Draft. His refined man-coverage technique, reactive athleticism, and elite ball skills make him a natural fit for press-heavy and match-quarters defenses. If he clears medical evaluations and regains full explosiveness, McCoy offers CB1 upside and a clear path to early NFL success. His floor remains that of a dependable, high-IQ perimeter starter, and his ceiling is an All-Pro-level shutdown corner.

2024 Fantasy Football Redraft Rankings: 2QB Superflex Format Fantasy Football: Check out our latest 2024 2QB super flex fantasy football redraft rankings! These rankings are based on our updated projections using a .5 PPR format, helping you make the best decisions for your draft. 2024 2QB Superflex Redraft Rankings Josh Allen (BUF) - QB Josh Allen is coming off a dominant 2023 season, finishing as the overall QB1 in fantasy football. However, after Joe Brady took over play-calling duties, Allen’s passing metrics dipped slightly, with reductions in passing attempts, yards, and touchdowns per game. Despite these concerns, his rushing upside keeps him as a top-three quarterback option for 2024. Lamar Jackson (BAL) - QB Lamar Jackson returned to form in 2023, finishing as a top-three fantasy quarterback for the first time since his MVP season in 2019. Jackson’s elite rushing ability remains a cornerstone of his fantasy value, and his passing efficiency continues to be underrated. With his dual-threat capabilities, Jackson has top-three upside once again in 2024. Patrick Mahomes (KC) - QB Patrick Mahomes experienced a “down” year in 2023, finishing as QB10 in fantasy points per game, largely due to defensive schemes and a weaker supporting cast. Despite this, his accuracy remained elite. With the addition of new playmakers in the Chiefs’ offense, Mahomes is poised for a strong bounce-back season and should be considered a top-three fantasy quarterback in 2024. Jalen Hurts (PHI) - QB Jalen Hurts finished as the QB2 in fantasy points per game in 2023, thanks to his 15 rushing touchdowns and consistent goal-line usage. Despite a dip in production, Hurts’ rushing ability and improved passing metrics keep him among the elite quarterbacks. With the addition of Kellen Moore as offensive coordinator, Hurts could lead a high-flying Eagles offense in 2024. Christian McCaffrey (SF) - RB Christian McCaffrey continued to dominate in 2023, finishing as the top running back in fantasy football. He was an RB1 in 81% of his games and showed no signs of slowing down. With his combination of rushing and receiving production, McCaffrey remains a lock for the RB1 spot heading into 2024. CeeDee Lamb (DAL) - WR CeeDee Lamb emerged as one of the top wide receivers in fantasy football in 2023, leading all WRs in half-PPR formats with 335 fantasy points. Lamb’s red-zone usage was a key factor in his success, though some regression is possible in 2024 due to the Cowboys’ red-zone trends. His ongoing contract negotiations add an element of uncertainty. Tyreek Hill (MIA) - WR Tyreek Hill finished as the WR2 in 2023, amassing over 1,700 receiving yards and 12 touchdowns. His deep-threat ability remains unmatched, and despite turning 30, Hill is still among the elite wide receivers in the NFL. With a restructured contract, Hill is set for another explosive season in 2024. C.J. Stroud (HOU) - QB C.J. Stroud quickly silenced critics in his rookie season, finishing as a top-10 fantasy quarterback in 2023. His passing efficiency was impressive, ranking highly in key metrics despite the narrative surrounding his S2 score. With added weapons like Joe Mixon and Stefon Diggs, Stroud is set for a strong sophomore campaign and could break into the top-five quarterbacks in 2024. Joe Burrow (CIN) - QB Joe Burrow’s 2023 season was hampered by injuries, including a calf strain and a season-ending wrist injury. However, when healthy, Burrow was among the top quarterbacks, ranking as QB4 in fantasy points per game from Weeks 5-10. With a clean bill of health for 2024, Burrow is a mid-round pick with top-five upside. Ja'Marr Chase (CIN) - WR Ja'Marr Chase solidified his role as the Bengals’ offensive cornerstone, finishing 2023 with 100 receptions and over 1,200 yards. Although he was WR13 overall, he ranked as WR6 during Weeks 1-10 with Joe Burrow under center. Chase’s consistent red zone presence makes him a prime candidate for WR1 status in 2024, though his contract situation is worth monitoring. Anthony Richardson (IND) - QB Bijan Robinson (ATL) - RB Amon-Ra St. Brown (DET) - WR Dak Prescott (DAL) - QB Tua Tagovailoa (MIA) - QB Breece Hall (NYJ) - RB Justin Jefferson (MIN) - WR A.J. Brown (PHI) - WR Kyler Murray (ARI) - QB Jahmyr Gibbs (DET) - RB Jordan Love (GB) - QB Brock Purdy (SF) - QB Jonathan Taylor (IND) - RB Jayden Daniels (WAS) - QB Garrett Wilson (NYJ) - WR Puka Nacua (LAR) - WR Kyren Williams (LAR) - RB Saquon Barkley (PHI) - RB Caleb Williams (CHI) - QB Derrick Henry (BAL) - RB Isiah Pacheco (KC) - RB Chris Olave (NO) - WR Marvin Harrison Jr. (ARI) - WR De'Von Achane (MIA) - RB Jared Goff (DET) - QB Kirk Cousins (ATL) - QB Drake London (ATL) - WR Trevor Lawrence (JAX) - QB Sam LaPorta (DET) - TE Travis Etienne Jr. (JAX) - RB Davante Adams (LV) - WR Travis Kelce (KC) - TE Brandon Aiyuk (SF) - WR Jaylen Waddle (MIA) - WR James Cook (BUF) - RB Joe Mixon (HOU) - RB Josh Jacobs (GB) - RB Mike Evans (TB) - WR Nico Collins (HOU) - WR Justin Herbert (LAC) - QB Michael Pittman Jr. (IND) - WR Aaron Rodgers (NYJ) - QB Mark Andrews (BAL) - TE Matthew Stafford (LAR) - QB Deebo Samuel (SF) - WR DeVonta Smith (PHI) - WR Rachaad White (TB) - RB Kenneth Walker III (SEA) - RB Deshaun Watson (CLE) - QB D.K. Metcalf (SEA) - WR Malik Nabers (NYG) - WR Trey McBride (ARI) - TE DJ Moore (CHI) - WR Rashee Rice (KC) - WR Cooper Kupp (LAR) - WR Alvin Kamara (NO) - RB Aaron Jones (MIN) - RB Baker Mayfield (TB) - QB Amari Cooper (CLE) - WR Geno Smith (SEA) - QB Will Levis (TEN) - QB David Montgomery (DET) - RB Stefon Diggs (HOU) - WR Dalton Kincaid (BUF) - TE Tee Higgins (CIN) - WR James Conner (ARI) - RB D'Andre Swift (CHI) - RB Zay Flowers (BAL) - WR Rhamondre Stevenson (NE) - RB Bryce Young (CAR) - QB Tank Dell (HOU) - WR Derek Carr (NO) - QB Terry McLaurin (WAS) - WR Sam Darnold (MIN) - QB Daniel Jones (NYG) - QB George Kittle (SF) - TE Kyle Pitts (ATL) - TE Najee Harris (PIT) - RB George Pickens (PIT) - WR Jaylen Warren (PIT) - RB Drake Maye (NE) - QB Keenan Allen (CHI) - WR Raheem Mostert (MIA) - RB Evan Engram (JAX) - TE Zamir White (LV) - RB Chris Godwin (TB) - WR Zack Moss (CIN) - RB Tony Pollard (TEN) - RB Brian Robinson (WAS) - RB Diontae Johnson (CAR) - WR Calvin Ridley (TEN) - WR Russell Wilson (PIT) - QB Javonte Williams (DEN) - RB Christian Kirk (JAX) - WR Tyjae Spears (TEN) - RB Xavier Worthy (KC) - WR Justin Fields (PIT) - QB Devin Singletary (NYG) - RB Jake Ferguson (DAL) - TE Jonathon Brooks (CAR) - RB David Njoku (CLE) - TE Jayden Reed (GB) - WR Ladd McConkey (LAC) - WR Chase Brown (CIN) - RB Ezekiel Elliott (DAL) - RB Romeo Doubs (GB) - WR Brock Bowers (LV) - TE Nick Chubb (CLE) - RB Marquise Brown (KC) - WR Brian Thomas Jr. (JAX) - WR Courtland Sutton (DEN) - WR Gus Edwards (LAC) - RB Bo Nix (DEN) - QB Christian Watson (GB) - WR Jaxon Smith-Njigba (SEA) - WR DeAndre Hopkins (TEN) - WR Austin Ekeler (WAS) - RB Jerome Ford (CLE) - RB Keon Coleman (BUF) - WR Dallas Goedert (PHI) - TE Zach Charbonnet (SEA) - RB Curtis Samuel (BUF) - WR Chuba Hubbard (CAR) - RB Gardner Minshew (LV) - QB Jakobi Meyers (LV) - WR Tyler Lockett (SEA) - WR Blake Corum (LAR) - RB Romeo Doubs (GB) - WR Jameson Williams (DET) - WR Rico Dowdle (DAL) - RB Jordan Addison (MIN) - WR Joshua Palmer (LAC) - WR Khalil Shakir (BUF) - WR Brandin Cooks (DAL) - WR T.J. Hockenson (MIN) - TE Trey Benson (ARI) - RB Tyler Allgeier (ATL) - RB Ty Chandler (MIN) - RB Mike Williams (NYJ) - WR Rashid Shaheed (NO) - WR

NFL Draft: NFL Mock Draft 4.1 | No Trades | Texans Draft C.J. Stroud, Will Levis To The Colts It has been a wild draft week, and we are now less than 24 hours away from the start of the 2023 NFL Draft. Last week it was all about the leaked S2 Cognition scores that started to tank C.J. Stroud's draft stock. We had another rumor this week that originated on Reddit, mentioning that Will Levis has informed friends and family he will be the top pick in the 2023 NFL Draft. Aaron Rodgers has been traded to the Packers. I hoped that mock 4.0 would be it, but I wanted to take one more crack at it. First-Round NFL Mock Draft 1). Panthers: QB Bryce Young, Alabama Previous Mock Picks: C.J. Stroud, Bryce Young Industry Consensus: Bryce Young The Final Analysis: The Panthers should have taken Justin Fields in the 2021 NFL Draft. In 2023, they aim to make up for that by trading the farm to draft QB1. The names that make the most sense outside of Bryce Young are C.J. Stroud and Anthony Richardson. But why not Will Levis? Levis is a developmental player with a high ceiling and is reportedly a brilliant person earning two degrees as a finance major while achieving a 4.0 the entire way. The only concern is that the Panthers need a bridge QB to allow Richardson to develop without needing to start as a rookie. Bryce Young is the only QB in this class expected to provide an immediate impact. 2). Texans: QB C.J. Stroud, Ohio State Previous Mock Picks: C.J. Stroud, Will Anderson Jr., Bryce Young, Anthony Richardson, Tyree Wilson, Trade Back Industry Consensus: C.J. Stroud The Final Analysis: At the top of the order, there are some elite defenders, and there are many in the draft community that believe the Texans will pass on a QB, pairing first-year head coach Demeco Ryans with an elite defensive lineman. If the Texans choose a QB, Will it be C.J. Stroud, Bryce Young, Will Levis, or Anthony Richardson? Some insiders believe the Texans and the Colts really like Will Levis more than C.J. Stroud, so assuming this is the case, I won't argue the fit because the Texans are in a complete rebuild. It will take a lot for them to be competitive, and whoever they draft this year will not have a massive impact as a rookie, even if it was Trevor Lawrence or Andrew Luck's generational talent. 3). Cardinals: Edge Will Anderson Jr., Alabama Previous Mock Picks: Will Anderson Jr., Tyree Wilson, Trade Back Industry Consensus: Will Anderson Jr. The Final Analysis: Compared to Mock 4.0, the significant change is that the Texans take the freakish ceiling of Tyree Wilson, allowing Will Anderson to fall one more spot. The Cardinals appear to be losing the perceived value they once held at pick #3. For months the industry has debated who might try to trade up to pick 3 to get a QB. Now we hear that teams are less interested in trading up and will wait to see where the chips fall. A trade is still likely if a team like the Tennessee Titans loves one of the top 4 QB's. If the Cardinals remain in this spot, they should have their choice of Will Anderson, Jalen Carter, or Tyree Wilson. 4). Colts: QB Will Levis, Kentucky Previous Mock Picks: Will Levis, Anthony Richardson, C.J. Stroud Industry Consensus: Anthony Richardson The Final Analysis: Could C.J. Stroud fall to them instead of Will Levis—so many smoke screens? In this particular addition, we follow the trends to see how it shakes out. Colts owner Jim Irsay recently tweeted that they do not have to take a QB if they do not like the options available. Still, it appears the options will be there if the Cardinals and the Texans opt not to trade back and the Texans choose a defender instead of a QB at pick #2. The difficult decision will come down to which of the three remaining QB's fit their new head coach the best. All of our mocks had teams trading in front of the Colts, leaving them with Will Levis, and if it comes down to it, Will Levis or Anthony Richardson can both be great options in a physical Shane Steichen offense. 5). Seahawks: IDL Jalen Carter, Georgia Previous Mock Picks: Anthony Richardson, Will Levis, Will Anderson Jr., Jalen Carter Industry Consensus: Christian Gonzalez The Final Analysis: The Seahawks are a team that could take a QB, and we have mocked QB to the Seahawks in different scenarios. We like Anthony Richardson, who can sit behind Geno Smith or Will Levis. If C.J. Stroud falls, how do you pass on the rookie value? Regardless, the Seahawks will be in a good spot. They could trade back to a QB-needy team or take arguably the best defender in the draft. 6). Lions: CB Devon Witherspoon, Illinois Previous Mock Picks: Jalen Carter, Myles Murphy, Tyree Wilson, Devon Witherspoon Industry Consensus: Devon Witherspoon The Final Analysis: The Lions are also in a fascinating spot. If a QB falls, they have a bridge QB in Jared Goff. Do you draft Anthony Richardson, or Will Levis, trade back, or stay and get the top DB in the class? 7). Raiders: CB Christian Gonzalez, Oregon Previous Mock Picks: Devon Witherspoon, Christian Gonzalez, Anthony Richardson, Bryan Bresee, Will Levis, Trade Up Industry Consensus: Christian Gonzalez The Final Analysis: We had Witherspoon in this spot in Mock 4.0. The Raiders might be quick to the podium if a QB falls to them. But they have so many other needs they could trade back and get solid value. 8). Falcons: QB Anthony Richardson, Florida Previous Mock Picks: Tyree Wilson, Nolan Smith, Bijan Robinson Industry Consensus: Bijan Robinson The Final Analysis: Another team in the top 10 with a need at QB, and if one falls, we expect they will not hesitate to grab him, but if not, they can get a top defender. 9). Bears: RB Bijan Robinson, Texas Previous Mock Picks: Jaxon Smith-Njigba, Will Anderson Jr., Myles Murphy, Paris Johnson Jr., Bijan Robinson Industry Consensus: Paris Johnson Jr. The Final Analysis: The Bears traded back to pick #9 because they have what appears to be their franchise QB in place. They have several needs on both sides of the football, but how could you pass on the opportunity to have Bijan Robinson in the same backfield as Justin Fields? One of my basic arguments is that Justin Fields is great off of play-action, and having a legit elite RB next to him in the backfield will only open up the offense more. They can also go after one of the top available defenders or offensive line. 10). Eagles: OT Paris Johnson Jr., Ohio State Previous Mock Picks: Christian Gonzalez, Jalen Carter, Devon Witherspoon, Bijan Robinson, Jaxon Smith-Njigba, Lukas Van Ness Industry Consensus: Lukas Van Ness The Final Analysis: The Eagles have few needs but are aging at certain positions. Pairing the WR1 with Jalen Hurts would be phenomenal. The industry is low on the WR position in 2023, but only 3 or 4 round-one projections can provide an immediate impact, and Smith-Njigba would be perfect playing out of the slot in Philly. 11). Titans: QB Hendon Hooker, Tennessee Previous Mock Picks: Paris Johnson Jr., Will Levis, Darnell Wright Industry Consensus: Will Levis The Final Analysis: The Titans are losing OT Taylor Lewan to retirement, so replacing him is necessary. However, the Titans are among the teams rumored to be interested in moving up for a QB. If a QB falls, they might be tempted, or they can still try to move into the top 5 if they are motivated by a particular player. 12). Texans: Edge Tyree Wilson, Texas Tech Previous Mock Picks: Quentin Johnston, Tyree Wilson, Jaxon Smith-Njigba, Anthony Richardson Industry Consensus: Jaxon Smith-Njigba The Final Analysis: One of the least likely scenarios will be Anthony Richardson dropping out of the top 10. I cannot see this scenario being realistic, but some insiders are speculating that this could be the case, and if it is, you might see several teams trying to move up to get him. The same can be said about Will Levis. As for Richardson, the ceiling is too high not to risk it, and if he falls this far and the Texans pass on QB at pick #2 as some believe, they have to make this move. But what about Hendon Hooker? His stock is rising, and some are speculating he is the 3rd QB on a lot of draft boards. 13). Packers (via Jets) : OT Peter Skoronski, Northwestern Previous Mock Picks: Peter Skoronski, Broderick Jones Industry Consensus: Broderick Jones The Final Analysis: People are still waiting to see what will happen with the Aaron Rodgers situation. Will the Jets trade this pick to the Packers or not is less likely, but they might have no choice if they want to procure Aaron Rodgers. The Jets must add help on their OL if they retain this pick. 14). Patriots: CB Joey Porter Jr., Penn State Previous Mock Picks: Broderick Jones, Quentin Johnston, Jordan Addison, Jaxon Smith-Njigba, Devon Witherspoon, Zay Flowers, Joey Porter Jr. Industry Consensus: Zay Flowers The Final Analysis: The Patriots are a pre-draft speculative trade candidate, but the Patriots need to draft a WR, and we all know that Bill will find a way to pass on a WR for the best available DB or OL, and then he will shock the world and draft Stetson Bennett in the 2nd or 3rd round. 15). Jets (via Packers): OT Darnell Wright, Tennessee Previous Mock Picks: Jordan Addison, Myles Murphy, Quentin Johnston, Nolan Smith, Broderick Jones Industry Consensus: Nolan Smith The Final Analysis: The Aaron Rodgers trade might determine the direction the Packers go with this pick. So it's difficult to determine the direction they are thinking about going. Drafting a WR in this spot to support Jordan Love in the post-Aaron Rodgers era could make sense; they could go with OL or an edge defender. 16). Commanders: OT Broderick Jones, Georgia Previous Mock Picks: O'Cyrus Torrence, Broderick Jones, Joey Porter Jr. Industry Consensus: Joey Porter Jr. The Final Analysis: I have mocked OL to the Commanders. QB could be an option if one falls drastically, or they love Hendon Hooker. Don't rule out a potential trade into the top 10. 17). Steelers: CB Deonte Banks, Maryland Previous Mock Picks: Kelee Ringo, Dawand Jones, Joey Porter Jr., Christian Gonzalez, Darnell Wright, Broderick Jones Industry Consensus: Darnell Wright The Final Analysis: They need OL; they could add a DB, and they have many options with essentially two first-round picks due to the Dolphin's pick forfeiture. 18). Lions: Edge Myles Murphy, Clemson Previous Mock Picks: Cam Smith, Myles Murphy, Calijah Kancey Industry Consensus: Calijah Kancey The Final Analysis: The Lion's #6 overall pick will determine their direction at pick 18. In addition, the Lions lost Jameson Williams for an extended period ahead of the 2023 season because he allegedly used a sports betting app within Lion's facilities. Could the Lions be motivated to draft a WR? 19). Bucs: OT Anton Harrison, Oklahoma Previous Mock Picks: Nolan Smith, Broderick Jones, Anton Harrison, Bryan Bresee, Hendon Hooker Industry Consensus: Anton Harrison The Final Analysis: The Bucs are one of several teams allegedly grading Hendon Hooker higher than the industry consensus. If he is available, why not take a shot? Hooker is already 25, so the perceived risk is that he might have already peaked to his ceiling. 20). Seahawks: WR Jaxon Smith-Njigba, Ohio State Previous Mock Picks: Tuli Tuipulotu, Calijah Kancey, Joey Porter Jr., Myles Murphy Industry Consensus: Myles Murphy The Final Analysis: The Seahawks, like the Lions, have a top 10 pick to go along with a mid 1st round bonus pick that could be used to fill a need, or they could go with a luxury pick like a WR or maybe a QB like Will Levis or Anthony Richardson does fall significantly. Regardless, the Seahawks will have a lot of options. 21). Chargers: WR Zay Flowers, Boston College Previous Mock Picks: Trenton Simpson, Zay Flowers, Jordan Addison, Kelee Ringo Industry Consensus: Jordan Addison The Final Analysis: The Chargers must replace an aging, often injury-plagued WR core. They could add a DB or an edge defender to build depth. 22). Ravens: CB Kelee Ringo, Georgia Previous Mock Picks: Jalin Hyatt, Joey Porter Jr., Kelee Ringo, Zay Flowers, Deonte Banks Industry Consensus: Deonte Banks The Final Analysis: The Ravens added OBJ, so why not add more firepower to the offense in hopes that Lamar Jackson accepts whatever alleged deal the Ravens offered? Other options are DB and an edge rusher. 23). Vikings: CB Emmanuel Forbes, Mississippi State Previous Mock Picks: Joey Porter Jr., Emannuel Forbes, Hendon Hooker, Quentin Johnston, Kelee Ringo Industry Consensus: Quentin Johnston The Final Analysis: There has been speculation that the Vikings could be a team looking to move up to draft a QB. They have a lot of other needs, but they are in a suitable position to move up and draft a QB, or if one falls to them, they could pull the trigger with Kirk Cousins on the roster as a bridge to the future. 24). Jaguars: S/NB Brian Branch, Alabama Previous Mock Picks: Kayshon Boutte, O'Cyrus Torrence, Anton Harrison, Steve Avilla Industry Consensus: Brian Branch The Final Analysis: Jags need interior OL help and help in their defensive secondary. 25). Giants: Edge Nolan Smith, Georgia Previous Mock Picks: Jaxon Smith-Njigba, Brian Branch, Jalin Hyatt, Zay Flowers, John Michael Schmitz, Industry Consensus: John Michael Schmitz The Final Analysis: The Giants possess decent draft capital. They have needs at WR and safety, but with Saquon Barkley mentioning he might not sign the franchise tag, could the Giants be in the market to draft Jahmyr Gibbs? They could go WR or OL. We have also mocked DB. 26). Cowboys: IDL Bryan Bresee, Clemson Previous Mock Picks: Anton Harrison, Michael Mayer, Trenton Simpson, Mazi Smith, Dalton Kincaid, Dawand Jones Industry Consensus: John Michael Schmitz The Final Analysis: The Cowboys will probably throw a 1st round curveball. They are consistently the most challenging team to mock even when they have obvious needs, but in this mock, we fill their need on the OL. 27). Bills: LB Jack Campbell, Iowa Previous Mock Picks: Andrew Vorhees, Nolan Smith, Brian Branch, O'Cyrus Torrence, Quentin Johnston Industry Consensus: O'Cyrus Torrence The Final Analysis: With a need at LB, the Bills can fill that in the 2nd round and draft the best available WR left on the board to solidify its receiver core. There is some first-round buzz for LB Jack Campbell or Drew Sanders, but that's too early to draft a LB, or is it? Jack Campbell has elite physical traits and athleticism. 28). Bengals: RB Jahmyr Gibbs, Alabama Previous Mock Picks: Brian Branch, Anton Harrison, Jahmyr Gibbs, Michael Mayer Industry Consensus: Michael Mayer The Final Analysis: I have been obsessed with the idea of Jahmyr Gibbs in Cincinnati. With the Bengals' front office not likely committing to Joe Mixon, why not grab the speed of Jahmyr Gibbs to pair with Burrow and Chase? Or, they can go with the versatile TE from Utah. 29). Saints: IDL Calijah Kancey, Pitt Previous Mock Picks: Keion White, Lukas Van Ness, Mazi Smith, Deonte Banks Industry Consensus: Mazi Smith The Final Analysis: The Saints could go many different ways here depending on the availability at certain positions. We go with DB this time around. 30). Eagles: IDL Mazi Smith, Michigan Previous Mock Picks: Siaki Ika, Cam Smith, Steve Avilla, John Michael Schmitz, Bryan Bresee Industry Consensus: Bryan Bresee The Final Analysis: The Eagles apparently dislike RB's. Or do they? Why not add another dynamic playmaker with Jalen Hurts in the same backfield? Gibbs is one of a handful of instant-impact players in this year's class. 31). Chiefs: WR Jordan Addison, USC Previous Mock Picks: Luke Musgrave, Keion White, Lukas Van Ness, Dawand Jones, Quentin Johnston Industry Consensus: Dawand Jones The Final Analysis: The Chiefs could get one of the top WR's in the draft. Quentin Johnston has the upside to be the top WR in this class if he is drafted into the right scenario. In this scenario, he falls far enough to land in the hands of Andy Reid and Patrick Mahomes.

2027 NFL Draft Rankings: Big Board, Draft Hub, Top 50 Prospects, and Position Rankings The 2027 NFL Draft rankings are starting to form through early summer scouting, with the Big Board, NFL Draft prospects, mock draft analysis, and position rankings providing the first full look at the class before the 2026 college football season. Football Scout 365’s 2027 NFL Draft coverage brings those pieces together through a ranked Big Board, Draft Hub, Top 50 prospect analysis, and position-by-position scouting reports built around film grades, scheme fit, positional value, and NFL projection. 2027 NFL Draft Big Board The 2027 NFL Draft Top 50 prospect rankings highlight the top players on the Big Board. The list connects film grades, positional value, scheme fit, and NFL projection, while giving readers direct access to the full Big Board, position rankings, and scouting reports from Football Scout 365. 2027 NFL Draft Top 50 Prospect Rankings The 2027 NFL Draft Top 50 prospect rankings highlight the highest-graded players on the Big Board. The list connects film grades, positional value, scheme fit, and NFL projection, while giving readers direct access to the full Big Board, position rankings, and scouting reports from Football Scout 365. 2027 NFL Draft Hub The 2027 NFL Draft Hub is an all-in-one tool built around the Big Board, team needs analysis, and an early predictive mock draft. The Big Board adds the deeper scouting layer, with player grades, in-depth player comparisons, film-room style video analysis, video profiles, and scheme-fit projection for top 2027 NFL Draft prospects. More Early 2027 NFL Draft Positional Rankings The 2027 NFL Draft position rankings organize the class by position, grade tier, scheme fit, and NFL projection. 2027 NFL Draft QB Rankings 2027 NFL Draft RB Rankings 2027 NFL Draft WR Rankings 2027 NFL Draft TE Rankings 2027 NFL Draft OL Rankings 2027 NFL Draft DL Rankings 2027 NFL Draft LB Rankings 2027 NFL Draft DB Rankings How Football Scout 365 Grades 2027 NFL Draft Prospects Football Scout 365 grades 2027 NFL Draft prospects through a film-first model supported by production, athletic profile, positional value, scheme fit, and role projection. Summer grades establish the baseline, while the 2026 college football season determines which prospects confirm first-round traits, rise into higher tiers, or expose developmental concerns. Learn more about the Football Scout 365 NFL Draft grading process. 2027 NFL Draft Rankings Questions Who are the top prospects in the 2027 NFL Draft rankings? The top prospects in the 2027 NFL Draft rankings are listed on the Football Scout 365 Big Board and Top 50 prospect rankings, with players evaluated by film grade, positional value, scheme fit, and NFL projection. What is the 2027 NFL Draft Big Board? The 2027 NFL Draft Big Board is an overall ranking of the top prospects in the class, built around scouting grades, positional value, scheme fit, and early NFL Draft outlook. Does Football Scout 365 have a 2027 NFL mock draft? Yes. The 2027 NFL Draft Hub includes summer mock draft analysis tied to prospect grades, team needs, positional value, and class movement during the 2026 college football season. Where can I find 2027 NFL Draft position rankings? The 2027 NFL Draft position rankings break down the class by quarterback, running back, wide receiver, tight end, offensive line, defensive line, EDGE, linebacker, cornerback, and safety. How are 2027 NFL Draft prospects graded? Prospects are graded through a film-first evaluation model that factors in traits, production, athletic profile, positional value, scheme fit, role projection, and long-term NFL upside. When will the 2027 NFL Draft rankings be updated? The 2027 NFL Draft rankings will update throughout the 2026 college football season as new film, production, injuries, role changes, and team context reshape the class.

Not the biggest WR out there, Moore shows impressive strength and physicality for someone his size. Moore also offers some good (albeit not elite). His top asset is his top-end speed, and he can snap off explosive plays if defenses give him some space. He projects as a slot receiver in the NFL. He can line up in the backfield, slot, or outside, which adds to his value. ← Back to NFL Draft Big Board Elijah Moore Ole Miss HT: 5090 WT: 184 YR: JR POS: WR OVR RK 77 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 10 KEY STRENGTHS KEY CONCERNS PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT Not the biggest WR out there, Moore shows impressive strength and physicality for someone his size. Moore also offers some good (albeit not elite). His top asset is his top-end speed, and he can snap off explosive plays if defenses give him some space. He projects as a slot receiver in the NFL. He can line up in the backfield, slot, or outside, which adds to his value. PLAYER COMPARISON: CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS High-End Starter Potential (65-69) A player expected to become a top-tier starter within their first few years. They possess strong physical tools and good technical skills but may have some limitations in their game. With development, they can reach near-elite levels and provide consistent impact at their position. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Grade Scale Football Scout 365 grades reflect a prospect’s projected long-term NFL value and role. Draft ranges are general value projections, not predictions of an exact selection. Positional value, team needs, scheme fit, medical information and athletic testing can influence where a player is ultimately selected. How Football Scout 365 Grades NFL Draft Prospects Elite (75+): A rare, high-impact prospect with elite physical tools, advanced football intelligence and the ability to make an immediate NFL impact. Elite prospects carry franchise-altering potential and typically project as top 5–10 selections in the first round. Near Elite (70–74): A high-caliber prospect with outstanding physical tools, strong football intelligence and only minor developmental limitations. Near Elite prospects project as significant early-career contributors with Pro Bowl upside and first-round draft value. High-End Starter Potential (65–69): A starting-caliber prospect with strong physical tools, quality technical skills and a defined NFL role. These players may require development before reaching their ceiling but generally carry second- or third-round draft value. Mid-Level Starter Potential (60–64): A solid prospect with NFL-level tools and a pathway to becoming a dependable starter if key limitations are addressed. These players generally carry third- to fifth-round draft value. Low-Level Starter Potential (55–59): A developmental prospect who could become a low-end starter, high-end backup or valuable specialist in the right role. These players generally carry fifth- to seventh-round draft value. Backup Level (50–54): A depth or rotational prospect with enough functional ability to compete for an NFL roster spot but limited long-term starting potential. These players generally project as late Day 3 selections or priority undrafted free agents. Not NFL Level (Below 50): A developmental or camp prospect who does not currently demonstrate enough consistency, technical refinement or functional NFL traits to project as a regular contributor. These players generally project as undrafted free agents, practice-squad candidates or camp invitations. Draft position can vary based on positional value, team needs, scheme fit, medical evaluation and athletic testing.

2024 NFL Draft: Measuring Quarterback Clutch Ability Using Points Earned Per Play on 3rd and 4th Down: J.J. McCarthy, Caleb Williams, Jayden Daniels, Drake Maye Which of the top 2024 NFL Draft prospects is the most clutch in key moments? Among the many data points we measure to evaluate the quarterback position is their ability to operate in high-leverage situations. The top quarterbacks at any level of football, but most importantly in college football and the NFL, are those who can minimize mistakes, manage the game as needed, and activate their game-changing ability in key moments. The definition of a key moment can vary, and we can get extremely granular in the analysis if needed. However, for this circumstance, I chose 3rd down and obvious passing situations as one of the better ways to measure a quarterback's clutch ability. The rankings below use a measure referred to as the expected points model or the points earned model. What is the Points Earned Model? The Points Earned model is an analytical framework used to quantify a player's contribution to their team's scoring output, taking into account the context and impact of each play. It's derived from the Expected Points Added (EPA) concept, which measures how each play affects the team's scoring chances. The Points Earned model goes beyond traditional statistics by considering the value of each play within its game context, offering a nuanced view of a player's performance and impact. It's particularly insightful for quarterbacks, as it captures their contribution to the team's scoring potential, factoring in the plays that lead directly to points and those that significantly improve the team's scoring chances. How Does This Apply To The Analysis Below? Today, we compare the top 2024 NFL Draft Quarterback prospects from this past 2023 college football season on third down and obvious passing situations of 5 yards or more. These throws by the QBs must be thrown past the sticks, eliminating some of the after-the-catch ability of their wide receivers from the equation. The Key metrics we are going to use in this analysis include the following *(Combined 3rd/4th down throws past the sticks of 5 yards or more to go) Points Added Per Play Ranking (PAA Per Play Rank) *SIS Definition: Points Above Average per pass play. This metric measures a quarterback's effectiveness by comparing the points earned on each pass play to the league average. A higher value indicates a quarterback contributes more points than the average per play, highlighting their efficiency and effectiveness in critical situations. Positive Play% EPA Boom% Definition: The percentage of pass attempts that resulted in an exceptionally successful play, defined by an EPA of at least +1. This indicates the quarterback's capability to create big, game-changing plays. A higher percentage represents a higher capability for making impactful plays. EPA Bust% Definition: The percentage of pass attempts that resulted in a significant negative Expected Points Added (EPA), specifically less than -1. This metric identifies plays significantly decreasing a team's scoring opportunity or overall field position. A lower ranking (indicating fewer bust plays) is desirable, showing the quarterback's ability to avoid costly mistakes. The top QBs in the 2024 NFL Draft Ranked BY 2023 PAA Per Play *(Combined 3rd/4th down throws past the sticks of 5 yards or more to go) 1.) J.J. McCarthy (Michigan) PAA Per Play Rank: 1st nationally (1.06 PAA Per Play) Performance & Style Correlation: McCarthy's efficiency is unparalleled with a 1.06 Points Above Average (PAA) per play, complemented by a leading Boom% rank (71.4%, 1st) and a remarkably low Bust% rank (20.0%, 4th), highlighting his precision and capacity for high-impact plays. This balance between high success in Boom% and minimizing failures in Bust% underscores his precision under pressure. Player Comparison Correlation: The comparison to Joe Burrow spotlights McCarthy’s ability to elevate his game under pressure, suggesting potential growth areas in play processing and decision-making to reach Burrow's level of NFL success. 2). Bo Nix (Oregon) PAA Per Play Rank: 3rd nationally (0.96 PAA Per Play) Performance & Style Correlation: Nix's play is characterized by a solid 0.96 Points Above Average (PAA) per play, a high Boom% rank (71.40%, 2nd), and a lower Bust% rank (19.0%, 3rd), demonstrating his capability to generate significant plays while efficiently avoiding negative outcomes. This proficiency in maximizing positive plays and mitigating risks highlights his suitability for dynamic offenses that leverage quarterback mobility and improvisational skills. Player Comparison Correlation: The parallel with Jalen Hurts accentuates Nix's potential. His precision and decision-making could elevate his performance, fostering a trajectory of development akin to Hurts. 3). Caleb Williams (USC) PAA Per Play Rank: 5th nationally (0.87 PAA Per Play) Performance & Style Correlation: Williams showcases a notable 0.87 Points Above Average (PAA) per play, with a Boom% rank (59.0%, 13th) that contrasts with a higher Bust% rank (25.6%, 10th). This highlights his dynamic dual-threat abilities and indicates room for improvement in areas such as trusting his pocket and taking what the defense gives him rather than always chasing explosive plays. Player Comparison Correlation: Williams' comparison to Patrick Mahomes and Aaron Rodgers suggests his fit in schemes that prize mobility and playmaking, emphasizing that refining structured play could unlock his elite potential. 4). Jayden Daniels (LSU) PAA Per Play Rank: 23rd nationally (0.60 PAA Per Play) Performance & Style Correlation: Daniels' balance is evident with a 0.59 Points Above Average (PAA) per play. His moderate Boom% rank (52.9%, 27th) and Bust% rank (35.3%, 43rd) in key 3rd down and obvious passing situations are areas for improvement. This suggests that refining his decision-making could lead to more consistent high-impact plays. Player Comparison Correlation: Comparing Daniels to Lamar Jackson and Kyler Murray underscores his potential in an offense that allows for his creative playmaking ability to flourish. He will need to improve as a passer in key 3rd down and obvious passing moments; he is a dynamic runner who can beat you in two ways, but leveraging his running ability to create more opportunities as a passer will elevate his game at the NFL level. 5). Spencer Rattler (South Carolina) PAA Per Play Rank: 24th nationally (0.59 PAA Per Play) Performance & Style Correlation: Rattler’s capability is marked by a 0.59 PAA per play, alongside a Boom% rank (46.3%, 66th) that is notably higher than his Bust% rank (41.5%, 85th), indicating a strong arm and creativity but also a need for better decision-making and consistency. This balance between creating impactful plays and the relatively higher occurrence of negative plays points to areas for growth in playmaking consistency. Player Comparison Correlation: Rattler's parallels with Jameis Winston and Jay Cutler suggest a trajectory towards becoming a resilient quarterback, focusing on improving decision-making to mitigate bust plays and enhance overall performance. 6). Michael Penix Jr. (Washington) PAA Per Play Rank: 68th nationally (0.345 PAA Per Play) Performance & Style Correlation: Penix demonstrates a classic pocket passer's profile with a blend of arm strength and accuracy, reflected in his Points Above Average (PAA) per play (0.345). Despite a moderate Boom% (48.0%, ranked 56th) and Bust% (34.0%, ranked 35th), Penix's tape shows a quarterback who can execute precise throws from the short to deep areas of the field. Ideal for a pro-style or West Coast offense, Penix's skill set aligns with a quarterback capable of managing the game effectively and making strong, accurate passes. Player Comparison Correlation: Penix's comparisons to Tua Tagovailoa and Mac Jones resonate with the idea that he could thrive in the right system by leveraging his quick decision-making and accuracy. These comparisons suggest Penix possesses the foundational skills to develop into a reliable starting quarterback, emphasizing the importance of a supportive team structure and an offensive scheme that aligns with his strengths. 7). Drake Maye (North Carolina) PAA Per Play Rank: 69th nationally (0.34 PAA Per Play) Performance & Style Correlation: Despite a lower Points Above Average (PAA) per play (0.34), Drake Maye's role in the Tar Heel offense was evident from his tape. However, in key 3rd down and obvious pass situations, his high Boom% (34.9%, ranked 124th) and high Bust% (41.9%, ranked 90th) indicate raw talent in improvisation but also highlight a necessity for improvement as a passer in high-leverage situations. His capability for making plays outside the structure is notable, but he needs to develop a greater trust in his pocket. His skill set is desirable in today's NFL, but he will need time to develop. Player Comparison Correlation: Maye's potential comparisons to Justin Herbert and Josh Allen highlight his ability to thrive in a system that values quarterbacks who can extend plays and make decisive throws. His comparisons make sense, as Josh Allen and Justin Herbert needed to improve consistency and decision-making when they entered the NFL. Advanced-Data Glossary PAA Per Play Definition: Points Above Average per pass play. This metric measures a quarterback's effectiveness by comparing the points earned on each pass play to the league average. A higher value indicates a quarterback contributes more points than the average per play, highlighting their efficiency and effectiveness in critical situations. Positive Play% Definition: The percentage of pass attempts that resulted in a positive Expected Points Added (EPA). It reflects the quarterback's ability to consistently make plays that advance the team's position or score, with a higher percentage indicating more successful plays than total attempts. EPA Bust% Definition: The percentage of pass attempts that resulted in a significant negative Expected Points Added (EPA), specifically less than -1. This metric identifies plays significantly decreasing a team's scoring opportunity or overall field position. A lower ranking (indicating fewer bust plays) is desirable, showing the quarterback's ability to avoid costly mistakes. Boom% Definition: The percentage of pass attempts that resulted in an exceptionally successful play, defined by an EPA of at least +1. This indicates the quarterback's capability to create big, game-changing plays. A higher percentage represents a higher capability for making impactful plays. Total Points Earned in 2023 Definition: The total points a quarterback is responsible for through passing in high-leverage situations during the season. It aggregates the value of all positive plays made by the quarterback. A higher total indicates a greater contribution to the team's scoring efforts in critical situations. Total Pass Attempts in this situation Definition: The number of pass attempts made by the quarterback in high-leverage situations (3rd down and 5+ yards). This provides context for the sample size of the data, with more attempts offering a broader basis for evaluating the quarterback's performance.