2026 NFL Draft Wide Receiver Rankings: Carnell Tate, Jordyn Tyson, Makai Lemon Lead a Deep WR Class
- Brandon Lundberg
- 8 hours ago
- 8 min read
Updated: 5 hours ago
The 2026 NFL Draft wide receiver rankings are far deeper than they’re getting credit for, and it aligns perfectly with where today’s NFL is headed at the position.
While this class does feature a handful of traditional boundary “X” receivers, the true strength of the 2026 group lies in its depth of alignment-flexible slot and Z playmakers — a reflection of where the NFL game is trending. When you study recent NFL success stories, Puka Nacua, Amon-Ra St. Brown, Jaxon Smith-Njigba, the through line isn’t size or testing numbers. It’s separation nuance, spatial IQ, competitive toughness at the catch point, and the ability to generate efficient yards after the catch. That same profile shows up repeatedly throughout this 2026 wide receiver class.
At the top of the 2026 wide receiver rankings is Ohio State’s Carnell Tate, a refined perimeter target who separates at all three levels. Arizona State’s Jordyn Tyson follows closely, bringing true WR1 route nuance and sudden separation ability. USC’s Makai Lemon rounds out the top tier as a high-volume slot who consistently plays bigger than his frame, winning with precision, toughness, and high-level run-after-catch ability.
Overall, this class may not feature a single generational outlier, but it is loaded with versatile, new-age receivers who carry legitimate WR1 upside. More importantly, it offers a deep pool of WR2 and WR3 profiles ready to complement an established NFL alpha and contribute immediately in multiple alignments.
If you need depth or a high-quality TE2, this is the year to find one on Day Two or Day Three.
Go to other positional grades:
2026 NFL Draft Wide Receiver Rankings
1). Carnell Tate, 6’3”, 191 lbs, Ohio State
Grade Tier: Near Elite
NFL Projection: Mid-to-Late 1st Round
Analysis: A refined perimeter receiver who wins with route detail, tempo manipulation, and catch-point consistency rather than overwhelming traits. Tate separates at all three levels with leverage and efficient footwork, and he consistently finishes through contact. While he lacks elite vertical speed and imposing play strength, his route polish and quarterback-friendly profile project him as a high-volume target with legitimate WR1 upside.
2). Jordyn Tyson, 6’1”, 195 lbs, Arizona State
Grade Tier: Near Elite
NFL Projection: Mid-to-Late 1st Round
Analysis: Route manipulation and separation nuance define Tyson’s profile. He consistently creates clean throwing windows with sudden breaks, leverage control, and advanced pacing at the stem. His body control and timing at the catch point allow him to win through contact despite only average long speed. Durability remains the primary concern, but if healthy, Tyson projects as a high-floor WR2 with legitimate WR1 upside built on polish and competitive toughness.
3). Makai Lemon, 5’11”, 195 lbs, USC
Grade Tier: Near Elite
NFL Projection: Late 1st – Early 2nd Round
Analysis: A high-volume slot receiver built for today’s NFL. Lemon separates with tempo, precision, and advanced spatial awareness against man and zone. He consistently wins through contact at the catch point despite modest size. Lacking elite vertical gear and outside dominance caps his overall ceiling slightly, but he projects as a plug-and-play slot with Pro Bowl upside.
4). Denzel Boston, 6’4”, 210 lbs, Washington
Grade Tier: High-End Starter Potential
NFL Projection: 2nd Round
Analysis: A physical boundary receiver who wins with size, body positioning, and red-zone reliability. Boston plays through contact and consistently shields defenders at the catch point. Press coverage refinement and sustained separation remain areas for growth, but his catch strength and possession reliability project him as a high-floor perimeter starter.
5). Omar Cooper Jr., 6’0”, 200 lbs, Indiana
Grade Tier: High-End Starter Potential
NFL Projection: 2nd–3rd Round
Analysis: Explosiveness and contact balance drive Cooper’s impact. He threatens defenses vertically and horizontally with acceleration and run-after-catch creativity, fitting seamlessly into motion-heavy, spacing-based offenses. His physical temperament as a blocker adds to his multi-role value. Route consistency and detail will determine whether he reaches his ceiling, but the upside profiles as a dynamic WR2 with alignment versatility and big-play potential.
6). Malachi Fields, 6’4”, 220 lbs, Notre Dame
Grade Tier: High-End Starter Potential
NFL Projection: 2nd–3rd Round
Analysis: Fields brings classic boundary size and contested-catch reliability to the perimeter. He consistently plays through defenders at the catch point, shielding coverage on back-shoulder throws and intermediate concepts. While he lacks sudden release quickness and clean man-separation ability, his physicality and red-zone value project him as a possession-based WR2 with strong chain-moving utility.
7). Germie Bernard, 6’1”, 204 lbs, Alabama
Grade Tier: High-End Starter Potential
NFL Projection: 2nd–3rd Round
Analysis: Tempo and route polish define Bernard’s game. He uncovers at all three levels from both slot and outside alignments, winning with pacing and competitive toughness rather than pure speed. Without a true vertical second gear, his upside is tied to consistency and refinement against press, but his alignment flexibility gives him strong WR2/3 value.
8). C.J. Daniels, 6’2”, 205 lbs, Miami
Grade Tier: High-End Starter Potential
NFL Projection: 3rd–4th Round
Analysis: Route nuance and short-area efficiency anchor Daniels’ evaluation. He separates with sharp stems, fluid hip transitions, and a strong understanding of leverage, consistently presenting clean throwing windows at all three levels. Daniels tracks the football naturally and finishes outside his frame with body control and toughness in traffic. While he lacks elite vertical gear and does not consistently overpower defenders at the catch point, his football IQ, competitiveness, and willingness as a blocker make him a quarterback-friendly, scheme-versatile target. He projects as a high-floor WR3 with legitimate WR2 upside in timing-based or West Coast systems.
9). Kevin Concepcion, 5’11”, 187 lbs, Texas A&M
Grade Tier: High-End Starter Potential
NFL Projection: 2nd–3rd Round
Analysis: A quick-twitch slot weapon built on burst, short-area separation, and run-after-catch creativity. Concepcion thrives on option routes and quick-game concepts, creating immediate throwing windows. His game relies heavily on speed and acceleration rather than tempo manipulation, and contested-catch consistency remains developmental. Projects as a high-volume slot playmaker in spacing-based systems.
10). Chris Brazzell II, 6’5”, 200 lbs, Tennessee
Grade Tier: High-End Starter Potential
NFL Projection: 3rd Round
Analysis: A long, vertical perimeter target who wins with stride acceleration and catch radius. Brazzell stretches coverage downfield and finishes above the rim in contested situations. Limited suddenness underneath and strength versus tight man coverage cap his immediate ceiling, but refinement could unlock explosive outside playmaker value.
11). Zachariah Branch, 5’11”, 175 lbs, Georgia
Grade Tier: High-End Starter Potential
NFL Projection: 3rd Round
Analysis: Rare acceleration and open-field creativity make Branch one of the most explosive space players in the class. Much of his production has come on manufactured touches, and his route nuance must expand for full-time volume projection, but his immediate special teams value and motion-based offensive role create clear early impact potential.
12). Elijah Sarratt, 6’2”, 210 lbs, Indiana
Grade Tier: High-End Starter Potential
NFL Projection: 2nd–3rd Round
Analysis: Physicality and catch-point discipline define Sarratt’s profile. He consistently shields defenders, wins on back-shoulder concepts, and finishes through contact with strong timing and body control. While he lacks top-end vertical speed and elite suddenness, his understanding of leverage and route pacing allows him to create functional separation underneath. Press-coverage refinement will be key, but he projects as a dependable boundary chain-mover with red-zone value and WR2 upside.
13). Chris Bell, 6’2”, 220 lbs, Louisville
Grade Tier: High-End Starter Potential
NFL Projection: 2nd–3rd Round
Analysis: Power and run-after-catch ability drive Bell’s evaluation. He blends vertical acceleration with contact balance, creating explosive YAC opportunities on crossers and in-breakers. His physicality at the catch point adds red-zone and contested-catch value. Technical refinement versus press and improved hand consistency will determine how quickly he reaches his ceiling, but the upside projects as a physical WR2 with offensive centerpiece potential in a play-action-heavy system.
14). Antonio Williams, 5’11”, 190 lbs, Clemson
Grade Tier: High-End Starter Potential
NFL Projection: 3rd Round
Analysis: Tempo and spatial intelligence are the foundation of Williams’ game. He separates with leverage control, route pacing, and sharp footwork, consistently uncovering against man and zone. While he lacks true vertical gear and elite size, his run-after-catch vision and competitive toughness create reliable slot production. Projects as a high-floor volume slot starter in spacing-based offenses.
15). Skyler Bell, 5’11”, 185 lbs, Connecticut
Grade Tier: High-End Starter Potential
NFL Projection: 3rd–4th Round
Analysis: Route detail and short-area burst allow Bell to win at multiple levels. He accelerates quickly, manipulates stems, and consistently separates with sharp breaks. Though not a true burner, his technical consistency and improved hands profile him as a reliable slot/Z contributor early. Minor drop history and limited catch radius slightly cap his ceiling, but he projects as a high-floor timing-based receiver.
16). Ted Hurst, 6’3”, 185 lbs, Georgia State
Grade Tier: Mid-Level Starter Potential
NFL Projection: 4th–5th Round
Analysis: Length and vertical speed highlight Hurst’s upside. He stresses coverage early in routes and tracks the ball naturally downfield. However, he must play with more physicality at the catch point and improve consistency against stronger competition. Development in route refinement and play strength will determine his long-term projection as a boundary starter.
17). Brenen Thompson, 5’9”, 170 lbs, Mississippi State
Grade Tier: Mid-Level Starter Potential
NFL Projection: 4th–5th Round
Analysis: Rare acceleration and long-speed immediately define Thompson’s impact. A true vertical field-stretcher, he forces safeties to widen their landmarks and can flip coverage structure with pure speed. He complements that burst with sudden stop-start ability that makes double moves and underneath counters effective once defenders respect the deep threat. His undersized frame limits contested-catch wins and durability raises concerns, but he projects as a rotational deep-threat weapon capable of manufacturing explosive plays.
18). Bryce Lance, 6’3”, 209 lbs, North Dakota State
Grade Tier: Mid-Level Starter Potential
NFL Projection: 4th–5th Round
Analysis: Stride length and ball tracking anchor Lance’s projection. He presses vertically and consistently finishes deep throws with concentration and frame control. However, limited short-area quickness and high-cut movement mechanics restrict sudden separation ability. The transition to NFL competition will test his consistency, but he fits best in a vertical offense that maximizes catch-point wins downfield.
19). Deion Burks, 5’9”, 188 lbs, Oklahoma
Grade Tier: Mid-Level Starter Potential
NFL Projection: 4th–5th Round
Analysis: Acceleration and open-field creativity define Burks’ game. He separates underneath with sharp breaks and spatial awareness, then becomes dangerous after the catch with vision and lateral agility. Vertical consistency and contested-catch limitations cap his full-time upside, but he projects as a rotational slot weapon with return and manufactured-touch value in motion-heavy offenses.
20). Ja’Kobi Lane, 6’4”, 200 lbs, USC
Grade Tier: Mid-Level Starter Potential
NFL Projection: 4th–5th Round
Analysis:nCatch-point dominance and red-zone utility highlight Lane’s profile. He consistently boxes out defenders with timing and body control, converting contested throws outside the numbers. While he flashes leverage awareness, his route tree lacks urgency and refinement, and he does not possess true vertical separation speed. Added strength and route detail will determine his ceiling, but he projects as a developmental boundary X with immediate scoring-area value.
How We Grade the Wide Receiver Position
Wide receivers are evaluated primarily on separation ability, alignment versatility, and functional playmaking impact. Grades are driven by how consistently a player can win against man and zone coverage, create throwing windows for the quarterback, and generate production independent of scheme manufacturing. In today’s NFL, receivers must function as movable chess pieces capable of aligning outside, in the slot, or in motion without sacrificing timing, spacing, or route integrity.
Key factors include route tempo and detail, leverage manipulation, release package efficiency, catch-point consistency, and run-after-catch creation. We heavily weigh spatial awareness versus zone, toughness through contact, and the ability to finish in traffic. While size and timed speed matter, separation craft, football IQ, competitive temperament, and down-to-down reliability carry the most weight in a league increasingly built on spacing, rhythm, and yards after the catch.
Football Scout 365 Grade Scale
Elite
NFL Projection: Top 5–10 Picks (1st Round)
Franchise-altering talent with elite physical tools, advanced processing, and minimal weaknesses. Immediate high-impact starter with difference-making ability.
Near Elite
NFL Projection: Mid-to-Late 1st Round
High-level prospect with strong traits and football intelligence. Expected to become a major contributor early in their career with Pro Bowl upside.
High-End Starter Potential
NFL Projection: 2nd–3rd Round
Projects as a quality NFL starter with strong tools and functional traits. May require refinement, but offers consistent impact with development.
Mid-Level Starter Potential
NFL Projection: 4th–5th Round
Dependable starter or high-end rotational player. Solid athletic profile with some limitations that cap ceiling or require scheme fit.
Low-Level Starter Potential
NFL Projection: 6th–7th Round
Developmental prospect with starter upside in defined roles. Inconsistencies in technique, processing, or durability limit long-term ceiling.
Backup Level
NFL Projection: Undrafted Free Agent (UDFA)
Depth player or rotational piece. Functional traits but limited upside for a long-term starting role.
Not NFL Level
NFL Projection: Unlikely to Make NFL Roster
Significant developmental needs across athleticism, technique, or processing. Long-shot to stick at the NFL level.

