Search Results

Fantasy Football and DFS Player Rankings, Salary Analysis, and Total Volume Reports Go To Advanced Stats Key

2024 NFL Draft Position Rankings: Top 5 Interior Offensive Lineman | Pre NFL Combine We are entering the next stage of the NFL Draft player rankings process. As always, I start with the top 5 quarterbacks (QB) , top 5 running backs (RB) , top 10 wide receivers (WR) , and the top 5 tight ends (TE) before diving into the updated offensive line and top defender grades. Click Here: Check out the Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Big Board top 100 player rankings. We evaluate every player using a proprietary grading process that involves film evaluation combined with advanced data. On the back end, our scouting process mirrors the same process deployed by current NFL front-office personnel so that we can deliver the most in-depth player scouting reports available. All of this is currently free (subject to change). Each player scouting report includes: In-depth player scouting report Play Style and Scheme Fit Analysis Player Strengths & Weaknesses Player Comparisons The Top 5 IOL's The top 5 IOL's according to our updated 2024 NFL Draft Big Board player rankings, ranked ahead of the 2024 NFL Combine. (1) Jackson Powers-Johnson, Oregon (IOL, 6'3", 320 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Powers-Johnson is praised for his athleticism and versatility, shining in zone schemes with his footwork and movement. Despite his shorter reach, his effective anchoring and smart play compensate, making him ideal for dynamic offenses. Expected to be a Day 2 pick, his immediate impact as a starting center is anticipated, supported by his high football IQ and leadership. (2) Christian Mahogany, Boston College (IOL, 6'3", 322 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Mahogany's blend of power and technique positions him as a versatile force on the interior line, capable of excelling in any offensive setup. His ability to engage defenders at the second level and adeptness at handling complex defenses underscore his potential. Projected as a high-end starter, Mahogany's skill set promises significant NFL success. (3) Cooper Beebe, Kansas State (IOL, 6'4", 322 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Beebe's strength and base make him a formidable force in run-heavy schemes, with his versatility allowing play across the interior. While he shines in gap and power run schemes, further development in pass protection could round out his skill set. With high football IQ and adaptability, Beebe is seen as a valuable Day 2 selection. (4) Zak Zinter, Michigan (IOL, 6'6", 334 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Zinter's size and toughness make him a solid fit for vertical run schemes, leveraging his strength for effective engagement. While not the most mobile, his foundational skills suggest a reliable interior presence. Projected with Mid-Level Starter Potential, Zinter's consistency and football IQ forecast a successful NFL career. (5) Zach Frazier, West Virginia (IOL, 6'3", 310 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Frazier's technical proficiency and power excel in gap schemes, with his wrestling background enhancing his blocking leverage. While less suited for zone schemes, his reliable pass protection and football intelligence make him a dependable center option. Anticipated as a Day 2 selection, Frazier's potential as a solid NFL contributor is evident.

The Ravens vs. Chiefs Monday Night Showdown Is a Potential AFC Title Preview The 2019 matchup A year ago, week three, at Arrowhead, the Chiefs beat the Ravens 33-28. The Ravens led 6-0 in the first QTR before the Chiefs would score 23 unanswered 2nd QTR pts. With the Chiefs leading 23-6 at halftime, the pressure would be on the Ravens to score on their first drive of the 3rd QTR. The Ravens would do just that going 75 yards on nine plays using more than 4 minutes of the clock. The Ravens, down 23-13 were back in it and would need their defense to get a stop vs. a red hot Chiefs offense that had scored 3 TD's and a FG on their previous four possessions. The Ravens would get the stop they needed on the next Chiefs possession, but the Ravens offense did nothing with their next opportunity punting the football back to the Chiefs. The Chiefs would go on an eight-play 80-yard drive in 4:14, scoring another TD while taking a commanding 30-13 lead. The Chiefs ability to gain and maintain a lead in 2019 vs the Ravens The 2019 Baltimore Ravens were a run-first team that ate up clock and leaned on their opponents with their dominant offensive line, and with the Chiefs up three scores, they would need to depend on Lamar in the passing game to cut the deficit. Lamar would make some big-time plays down the stretch in the passing game, including two critical 4th down throws that would keep drives alive. But it would prove to be too much for the Ravens offense. Once the Chiefs were up two scores, they maintained that advantage into the 4th QTR, and that is not a situation the Ravens and Lamar Jackson can flourish. The Chiefs would love to get a two-score lead on the Ravens to apply pressure and force them out of their comfort zone tonight. The importance of 3rd/4th down stops The 2020 Baltimore Ravens defense ranks 2nd in the NFL through two weeks in third-down defense. The Ravens were a top ten defense a season ago defending against third-down conversions. Against the Chiefs in 2019, the Ravens struggled to get the Chiefs into third-down situations, and when they were able to, they allowed them to convert 5 of their 9 third-down attempts. The Ravens offense went 5-13 on third downs vs the 2019 Chiefs defense. The Chiefs defense forced 8 third-down stops vs. the Ravens defense, who only forced four third-down stops. The Ravens offense did go 3 for 4 on 4th down attempts in what would prove to be the difference in keeping them in the game. The 3rd/4th down stop differential between the Ravens and the Chiefs would favor the Chiefs, who forced four more 3rd/4th down stops than the Ravens. A handful of plays decides the outcome of most NFL games . The difference in most NFL games will come down to a handful of plays. You can point to these plays as the reason for the outcomes that transpire in any game. In 2019, the difference between the Chiefs and the Ravens came down to a handful of High Impact plays. Getting stops on 3rd/4th down is the most impactful to winning or losing a football game. Both teams will do their best to stay ahead of the chains to prevent third down and long. Stay ahead of the chains (on-schedule) If the Ravens are going to win tonight, they will need to stay ahead of the chains (2nd and four yds or less, 3rd and three yds or less. Staying ahead of schedule on early downs will help them win the 3rd and 4th down stop rate vs. the Chiefs. The run game once again becomes vital to early-down success. Lamar Jackson will need to put pressure on the Chiefs defense with his legs early in the game, setting up RPO and play-action opportunities, and opening the run game for Mark Ingram and company. The Chiefs will do what they can early to get a lead on the Ravens and take them out of their comfort zone. If the Chiefs can get early 3rd down stops, force punts, or get a turnover that leads to a multiple possession lead, they can try to control the game as they were able to do in 2019. Both teams are top five at getting third-down stops through two weeks (Ravens 1st, Chiefs 5th). The importance of the run game for both teams The run game for both teams will need to be a factor. The Ravens secondary will face its toughest battle yet, while the Chiefs defense will be forced to defend all eleven because of Lamar's ability to run the football. The Chiefs can also put pressure on defenses with Mahome's ability to move the chains with his legs. The Ravens will need to scale their man defense on third down and keep a spy on Mahomes in key situations. The Chiefs will spy Lamar the entire night. I expect the Chiefs to be more than happy to force the RB on the inside zone-read plays where Lamar is looking to take the edge. The Ravens could exploit this scenario by running a midline zone-read attacking the one or the three techs. The Midline would allow Lamar to keep it through the middle of the defense while reading inside out. If the Chiefs force the give on a midline zone read, Lamar will give to the RB going outside. Lamar Wants to win from the pocket and will do what it takes to keep plays alive, but should take what is given to him vs. the Chiefs. Lamar wants to throw the football. I recently diagramed a few examples of Lamar Jackson wanting to throw the football by keeping a play alive so his receivers can get open. Even when there is open grass, Lamar keeps his head up, eyes up, looking to make a throw instead of taking off running. How Lamar handles these situations will be a factor. Steve Spagnuolo will use simulated pressure before dropping 7, or even eight into coverage. Lamar should take what they give him if they drop 7, or 8 into coverage. If Lamar can get into space, he should take the quick 5 yards on the ground in situations where the Chiefs are only rushing four. Doing this will force the Chiefs to dedicate another defender or two to contain Lamar and open man to man opportunities in the passing game. The Chiefs will do what they can to get Lamar to force a bad throw, and that can be the difference in a game as evenly matched as this one. One possession lost due to an unforced error could be the difference. The Ravens don't need to blitz Mahomes consistently . The Ravens need not blitz Mahomes as consistently as they have the other QB's they have faced the last few weeks. The Ravens have the third-highest blitz rate in the NFL through two weeks (47%). On the other hand, the Chiefs offense has faced a blitz on 19% of their pass plays through two weeks (5th lowest). Since 2018, Patrick Mahomes has been deadly against the blitz, throwing 25 TD's to only 1 INT according to PFF. If the Ravens are going to try to get after Mahomes with extra defenders, it will have to get home, or he will make them pay. Through two weeks, opposing defenses have utilized two-high shells to help contain the Chiefs explosive pass offense. It may better serve the Ravens to take a less blitz-happy approach against the Chiefs. The red zone might be the difference . The red zone might be an area that decides the outcome of the game. The Chiefs have had some red zone issues the first two weeks of the season, scoring a TD on 57% of their opportunities. If the Ravens attempt to play a bend but don't break style of defense against the Chiefs, they could take advantage of the Chiefs red zone woes as the field becomes more condensed. Expect a chess match that will be highly entertaining. These teams are evenly matched, and the outcome of this game should come down to one or two possessions. There will not be a home filed advantage making this game more of a toss-up. If the Ravens can limit the Chief's explosive plays, keep the 3rd and 4th down stops even on both sides while successfully running the football, they will put themselves in a position to win the game. The Chiefs can win if they can keep the Ravens off schedule on 1st and 2nd down, forcing third and medium to long consistently. The Chiefs defense will have to make themselves susceptible to the big play over the top on occasion if they decide to sell out to stop the Ravens run game. The Chiefs, like the Ravens, are in a rob Peter to pay Paul scenario defensively. If the game comes down to who can score TD's in the red zone, the Ravens might have the advantage.

2024 NFL Draft: Grades For All 32 NFL Teams The 2024 NFL Draft has concluded, culminating months of behind-the-scenes scouting and analysis during a three-day event in Detroit, Michigan, which drew a record attendance of over 700,000 fans, more than any previous NFL Draft. Why Are We Grading The Draft Before The Three-Year Window? Grading the NFL Draft immediately after its conclusion is often criticized because it typically takes two to three years to truly assess which players will succeed. However, the real value in immediate draft grades lies in the extensive time spent analyzing prospects, understanding where they were selected, and determining why they were chosen at their specific draft spots. Additionally, draft grades evaluate each team's ability to fill primary and secondary needs. Did they address their primary needs with prospects who have high-ceiling potential? How effectively did they meet their secondary needs, and what is the initial perception of these efforts? While we can revisit and regrade these drafts in a few years, for now, evaluating the here and now allows us to reflect on our initial perceptions later. 2024 NFL Draft Overview A record six quarterbacks were drafted in the first 12 picks, with no defensive players selected until the 15th overall—the longest gap between an offensive or defensive player in NFL Draft history. There was much speculation that there could be zero defenders taken in the first ten picks, but having none in the first 15 was unprecedented. This trend was less about the talent available and more due to QB-needy teams selecting quarterbacks earlier than expected, coupled with an exceptionally deep wide receiver class featuring talents like Marvin Harrison Jr., Rome Odunze, and Malik Nabers—who each could have been the top wide receiver in any of the past several drafts. The depth of offensive tackles and the need at that position played a significant role this year, leading to more first-round offensive players than any other draft in history, with 23 total offensive players, including eight offensive linemen. How Did Our Big Board Rankings Stack Up? Regarding our big board rankings for this draft class, it was our best recorded year since we started publishing a top 100 Big Board back in 2021. Seventy-eight of our top 100 players were drafted within the first 100 picks, with 95% of our top 150 fully graded players drafted. Additional Draft Notes: Overall, the 2024 NFL Draft proved to be as deep as advertised. We had grades on 26 wide receivers, and all 26 were drafted. Our top three wide receivers, Marvin Harrison Jr., Rome Odunze, and Malik Nabers, were all ranked in the top ten and drafted in the top ten. We graded 11 quarterbacks in the draft, and 10 were drafted, with one signing a guaranteed free agent contract. Our top-graded quarterback, Caleb Williams, went first overall. Our second-highest graded quarterback, J.J. McCarthy, was the fourth quarterback drafted, landing at pick 10 with the Minnesota Vikings, while Jayden Daniels and Drake Maye, 3rd and 4th ranked quarterbacks, went second and third overall, respectively. Michael Penix's going eighth overall to the Falcons was a big surprise in the mainstream media, but not to us, as he was ranked as high as the third quarterback on our board at one time. All 13 running backs we graded were drafted. Our top-ranked running back, Blake Corum, was the second running back off the board after Texas' Jonathan Brooks. We had grades for 21 cornerbacks in this draft class, and 20 were drafted while one signed a UDFA deal, ensuring all 21 are in the NFL. Our top-graded cornerback, Quinyon Mitchell, went to the Eagles and was the first cornerback selected in the 2024 NFL Draft. All 32 Teams 2024 NFL Draft Grades Arizona Cardinals Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A) The Arizona Cardinals adeptly utilized the NFL Draft to reinforce their team, focusing particularly on enhancing their receiving corps, defensive line, and secondary. Marvin Harrison Jr. from Ohio State is recognized as a generational talent, which aligns perfectly with the Cardinals’ ability to maximize their playmakers’ effectiveness. This high-caliber addition significantly raises the expectations for quarterback Kyler Murray. The team’s performance in the middle rounds was notably strong, as they secured several players who could challenge for starting roles much earlier than anticipated, bolstering their roster depth before the projected talent cutoff after Round 3. This strategic approach has positioned them well for the upcoming season. Day One: Average Grade (A-) 4) Marvin Harrison Jr., WR, Ohio State (A+) 27) Darius Robinson, ED, Missouri (A-) Day Two: Average Grade (C+) 43) Max Melton, CB, Rutgers (B) 66) Trey Benson, HB, Florida State (B+) 71) Isaiah Adams, T, Illinois (C) 82) Tip Reiman, TE, Illinois (C) 90) Elijah Jones, CB, Boston College (C) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 104) Dadrion Taylor-Demerson, S, Texas Tech (A-) 138) Xavier Thomas, ED, Clemson (A) 162) Christian Jones, T, Texas (B+) 191) Tejhaun Palmer, WR, UAB (C) 226) Jaden Davis, CB, Miami (FL) (C-) Atlanta Falcons Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B) The Atlanta Falcons focused on a mix of high-reward and developmental picks to address their current roster and future needs. The selection of Michael Penix Jr. from Washington at the 8th overall was a major surprise, considering their current quarterback situation with Kirk Cousins. Penix is viewed as a high-risk, high-reward quarterback with the potential to be the franchise's future leader. The Falcons also aimed to bolster their defensive line and add depth to their backfield and special teams with their mid and late-round picks. Day One: Average Grade (B+) 8) Michael Penix Jr., QB, Washington (B+) Day Two: Average Grade (B) 35) Ruke Orhorhoro, DI, Clemson (C) 74) Bralen Trice, ED, Washington (B) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 109) Brandon Dorlus, DI, Oregon (A+) 143) JD Bertrand, LB, Notre Dame (B) 186) Jase McClellan, HB, Alabama (B) 187) Casey Washington, WR, Illinois (B) 197) Zion Logue, DI, Georgia (C) Baltimore Ravens Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A) The Baltimore Ravens executed a strategic draft, effectively bolstering their secondary and defensive line while also enhancing offensive line depth. Nate Wiggins from Clemson, selected as one of the top corners in the draft, exemplifies Baltimore’s focus on adding elite speed and versatility to their defensive backfield. The team's performance in the later rounds was equally impressive, securing potential impact players like Adisa Isaac from Penn State and Tez Walker from North Carolina, which significantly boosts their defensive and offensive capabilities respectively. This comprehensive approach demonstrates Baltimore's commitment to maintaining a balanced and competitive roster. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 30) Nate Wiggins, CB, Clemson (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 62) Roger Rosengarten, T, Washington (B) 93) Adisa Isaac, ED, Penn State (A+) Day Three: Average Grade (A) 113) Tez Walker, WR, North Carolina (A) 130) T.J. Tampa, CB, Iowa State (A+) 165) Rasheen Ali, HB, Marshall (B) 218) Devin Leary, QB, Kentucky (B) 228) Nick Samac, C, Michigan State (B) 250) Sanoussi Kane, S, Purdue (C) Buffalo Bills Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B+) The Buffalo Bills focused on strengthening their roster across multiple positions, particularly in their secondary, offensive line, and receiving corps. The selection of Keon Coleman from Florida State highlights their attempt to add a prototypical "X" receiver, providing a significant boost to their passing game. Ray Davis from Kentucky and Sedrick Van Pran from Georgia were standout picks, adding versatility and effectiveness to both the rushing and pass protection aspects of their game. This draft illustrates Buffalo’s intent to address gaps while also preparing for future development needs. Day One: No Picks Day Two: Average Grade (B) 33) Keon Coleman, WR, Florida State (B+) 60) Cole Bishop, S, Utah (B+) 95) DeWayne Carter, DI, Duke (B) Day Three: Average Grade (A-) 128) Ray Davis, HB, Kentucky (A) 141) Sedrick Van Pran, C, Georgia (A) 160) Edefuan Ulofoshio, LB, Washington (B) 168) Javon Solomon, ED, Troy (B+) 204) Tylan Grable, T, UCF (B) 219) Daequan Hardy, CB, Penn State (B) 221) Travis Clayton, G, Buffalo (C) Carolina Panthers Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B+) The Carolina Panthers made strategic moves to enhance their receiving options and bolster their defensive and offensive lines. Xavier Legette from South Carolina, compared stylistically to AJ Brown, represents a significant addition to their receiving corps, promising to impact their offensive scheme immediately. Ja'Tavion Sanders from Texas and Michael Barrett from Michigan were also notable selections, aimed at providing immediate contributions to the offense and defense, respectively. This draft approach shows Carolina's commitment to building a robust team framework. Day One: Average Grade (B+) 32) Xavier Legette, WR, South Carolina (B+) Day Two: Average Grade (C) 46) Jonathon Brooks, HB, Texas (A-) 72) Trevin Wallace, LB, Kentucky (C) Day Three: Average Grade (A) 101) Ja'Tavion Sanders, TE, Texas (A+) 157) Chau Smith-Wade, CB, Washington State (B+) 200) Jaden Crumedy, DI, Mississippi State (B) 240) Michael Barrett, LB, Michigan (A-) Chicago Bears Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A+) The Chicago Bears strategically drafted to maximize their offensive potential, significantly enhancing their quarterback and wide receiver positions. Caleb Williams from USC, seen as a generational talent, is compared favorably with elite NFL quarterbacks and sets a high bar for Chicago's future offensive capabilities. Rome Odunze from Washington, picked to complement Williams, is expected to dramatically impact the Bears' passing game. The Bears also focused on strengthening their special teams and defensive line, indicating a comprehensive approach to building a competitive team. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 1) Caleb Williams, QB, USC (A+) 9) Rome Odunze, WR, Washington (A+) Day Two: No Picks Day Three: Average Grade (A) 75) Kiran Amegadjie, T, Yale (A) 122) Tory Taylor, P, Iowa (A) 144) Austin Booker, ED, Kansas (A) Cincinnati Bengals Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B+) The Cincinnati Bengals effectively addressed their offensive line and added depth across the defensive line and receiving corps in this draft. Amarius Mims from Georgia, a highly anticipated tackle, was a significant addition, expected to protect Joe Burrow for the foreseeable future. The Bengals' strategy also included bolstering their defense with multiple picks that could contribute immediately, showcasing their balanced approach to building both sides of the ball. Day One: Average Grade (B+) 18) Amarius Mims, OT, Georgia (B+) Day Two: Average Grade (B+) 49) Kris Jenkins, DI, Michigan (B+) 80) Jermaine Burton, WR, Alabama (B+) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 97) McKinnley Jackson, DI, Texas A&M (C) 115) Erick All, TE, Iowa (B+) 149) Josh Newton, CB, TCU (B) 194) Tanner McLachlan, TE, Arizona (B) 214) Cedric Johnson, ED, Mississippi (B) 224) Daijahn Anthony, S, Mississippi (B) 237) Matt Lee, C, Miami (FL) (B) Cleveland Browns Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B) The Cleveland Browns focused on enhancing their defensive capabilities and adding versatile offensive weapons. Michael Hall Jr. from Ohio State and Zak Zinter from Michigan were key early picks aimed at improving the defensive and offensive lines, respectively. Cleveland's later rounds were marked by selections that emphasized increasing the team's playmaking ability and depth, such as Jamari Thrash from Louisville and Nathaniel Watson from Mississippi State, who are expected to contribute both in regular plays and special teams. Day One: No Picks Day Two: Average Grade (B) 54) Michael Hall Jr., DI, Ohio State (B) 85) Zak Zinter, G, Michigan (B) Day Three: Average Grade (B+) 156) Jamari Thrash, WR, Louisville (B+) 206) Nathaniel Watson, LB, Mississippi State (B+) 227) Myles Harden, CB, South Dakota (B) 243) Jowon Briggs, DI, Cincinnati (A-) Dallas Cowboys Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B) The Dallas Cowboys concentrated on strengthening their offensive and defensive lines through strategic draft selections. Tyler Guyton from Oklahoma, a versatile offensive tackle, and Marshawn Kneeland from Western Michigan, a solid run defender, are expected to contribute significantly to their respective units. The Cowboys also added depth with picks aimed at improving special teams and rotational contributions, indicating a focus on solidifying their overall team structure and readiness for the upcoming challenges. Day One: Average Grade (B) 29) Tyler Guyton, OT, Oklahoma (B) Day Two: Average Grade (B+) 56) Marshawn Kneeland, ED, Western Michigan (B+) 73) Cooper Beebe, G, Kansas State (B+) 87) Marist Liufau, LB, Notre Dame (C) Day Three: Average Grade (A) 174) Caelen Carson, CB, Wake Forest (A+) 216) Ryan Flournoy, WR, Southeast Missouri State (C) 233) Nathan Thomas, T, Louisiana (B) 244) Justin Rogers, DI, Auburn (B) Denver Broncos Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B) The Denver Broncos strategically selected Bo Nix from Oregon as their potential franchise quarterback, indicating a significant commitment to reshaping their offense. The draft choices, including Troy Franklin from Oregon and Kris Abrams-Draine from Missouri, align with Denver’s strategy to enhance their passing game and secondary. The late-round picks continue to support this strategy, aiming to develop depth and versatility across the roster. Day One: Average Grade (C+) 12) Bo Nix, QB, Oregon (C+) Day Two: No Picks Day Three: Average Grade (A) 76) Jonah Elliss, ED, Utah (A) 102) Troy Franklin, WR, Oregon (A+) 145) Kris Abrams-Draine, CB, Missouri (B+) 147) Audric Estime, HB, Notre Dame (B) 235) Devaughn Vele, WR, Utah (B) 256) Nick Gargiulo, C, South Carolina (B) Detroit Lions Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B+) The Detroit Lions focused on bolstering their secondary and offensive line, addressing key areas of need with high-potential picks. Terrion Arnold from Alabama and Ennis Rakestraw Jr. from Missouri were notable for their immediate potential to improve Detroit's coverage capabilities. The Lions' strategy reflects a commitment to building a robust defensive lineup, complemented by strategic additions to the offensive line and special teams. Day One: Average Grade (B+) 24) Terrion Arnold, CB, Alabama (B+) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 61) Ennis Rakestraw Jr., CB, Missouri (A) 126) Giovanni Manu, T, Detroit (B) 132) Sione Vaki, S, Utah (B+) Day Three: Average Grade (A-) 189) Mekhi Wingo, DI, LSU (A-) 210) Christian Mahogany, G, Boston College (A) Green Bay Packers Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B) The Green Bay Packers focused on reinforcing their offensive line and adding dynamic playmakers in the 2024 NFL Draft. Jordan Morgan from Arizona, a versatile offensive lineman, was a key acquisition, expected to compete for a critical role protecting the quarterback. The Packers also secured high-quality additions to their backfield and defense, aiming to increase their overall team speed and versatility. Day One: Average Grade (B+) 25) Jordan Morgan, OT, Arizona (B+) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 45) Edgerrin Cooper, LB, Texas A&M (B+) 58) Javon Bullard, S, Georgia (B+) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 88) MarShawn Lloyd, HB, USC (B+) 91) Ty'Ron Hopper, LB, Missouri (C) 111) Evan Williams, S, Oregon (C) 163) Jacob Monk, G, Duke (C) 169) Kitan Oladapo, S, Oregon State (B) 202) Travis Glover, T, Georgia State (C) 245) Michael Pratt, QB, Tulane (A-) 255) Kalen King, CB, Penn State (A-) Houston Texans Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B) The Houston Texans strategically bolstered their secondary, offensive line, and special teams with this year's draft picks. Key selections like Kamari Lassiter from Georgia and Calen Bullock from USC reflect Houston's commitment to enhancing their defensive backfield, while Blake Fisher from Notre Dame provides much-needed stability on the offensive line. The selection of Cade Stover from Ohio State is a highlight, potentially offering a new offensive weapon at tight end. Day One: No Picks Day Two: Average Grade (B) 42) Kamari Lassiter, CB, Georgia (B) 59) Blake Fisher, T, Notre Dame (B) 78) Calen Bullock, S, USC (B) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 123) Cade Stover, TE, Ohio State (A-) 188) Jamal Hill, LB, Oregon (C) 205) Jawhar Jordan, HB, Louisville (B) 238) Solomon Byrd, ED, USC (B) 249) LaDarius Henderson, T, Michigan (B) Indianapolis Colts Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A) The Indianapolis Colts focused on adding high-impact players across the board, with a notable emphasis on bolstering their defensive and offensive lines. Laiatu Latu from UCLA and Adonai Mitchell from Texas are key examples of their strategy to inject talent into critical areas, potentially providing immediate contributions. The Colts also enhanced their offensive flexibility with selections like Tanor Bortolini from Wisconsin and Cade Stover from Ohio State, addressing both short-term needs and long-term depth. Day One: Average Grade (A) 15) Laiatu Latu, ED, UCLA (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A+) 52) Adonai Mitchell, WR, Texas (A+) 79) Matt Goncalves, T, Pittsburgh (B) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 117) Tanor Bortolini, C, Wisconsin (A) 142) Anthony Gould, WR, Oregon State (B) 151) Jaylon Carlies, S, Missouri (C) 164) Jaylin Simpson, S, Auburn (B) 201) Micah Abraham, CB, Marshall (C) 234) Jonah Laulu, DI, Oklahoma (B) Jacksonville Jaguars Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B-) Jacksonville Jaguars' draft approach was aimed at upgrading their receiver corps and defensive line, with a significant investment in physical and versatile players like Brian Thomas Jr. from LSU and Maason Smith from LSU. The Jaguars also focused on adding depth to their secondary with picks like Jarrian Jones from Florida State and improving their special teams with the addition of Cam Little from Arkansas, reflecting a holistic approach to team building. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 23) Brian Thomas Jr., WR, LSU (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (C) 48) Maason Smith, DI, LSU (C) 96) Jarrian Jones, CB, Florida State (B+) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 114) Javon Foster, T, Missouri (B) 116) Jordan Jefferson, DI, LSU (C) 153) Deantre Prince, CB, Mississippi (C) 167) Keilan Robinson, HB, Texas (B) 212) Cam Little, K, Arkansas (B) 236) Myles Cole, ED, Texas Tech (B) Kansas City Chiefs Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A-) The Kansas City Chiefs executed a focused strategy to enhance their offensive firepower and defensive flexibility. Xavier Worthy from Texas, a dynamic receiver, stands out as a significant addition. The Chiefs also invested in protecting Patrick Mahomes with the selection of Kingsley Suamataia from BYU and added depth to their tight end room and secondary. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 28) Xavier Worthy, WR, Texas (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (B+) 63) Kingsley Suamataia, T, BYU (B+) Day Three: Average Grade (A) 131) Jared Wiley, TE, TCU (B+) 133) Jaden Hicks, S, Washington State (A+) 159) Hunter Nourzad, C, Penn State (B+) 211) Kamal Hadden, CB, Tennessee (B+) 248) C.J. Hanson, G, Holy Cross (B) Las Vegas Raiders Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A-) The Las Vegas Raiders focused on adding potential star power and depth across their roster. Brock Bowers from Georgia and Jackson Powers-Johnson from Oregon were notable picks, expected to immediately boost the Raiders' offensive capabilities. The selection of Delmar Glaze from Maryland and the emphasis on enhancing the defensive and offensive lines reflect Las Vegas's strategy to build a robust and competitive team for the future. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 13) Brock Bowers, TE, Georgia (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A+) 44) Jackson Powers-Johnson, C, Oregon (A+) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 77) Delmar Glaze, T, Maryland (C) 112) Decamerion Richardson, CB, Mississippi State (B) 148) Tommy Eichenberg, LB, Ohio State (B) 208) Dylan Laube, HB, New Hampshire (B) 223) Trey Taylor, S, Air Force (B) 229) M.J. Devonshire, CB, Pittsburgh (B) Los Angeles Chargers Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A) The Los Angeles Chargers focused on strengthening their offensive and defensive lines and added significant depth to their secondary. Joe Alt from Notre Dame, a standout offensive tackle, and Ladd McConkey from Georgia, a versatile receiver, were key additions aimed at boosting the Chargers' offensive capabilities. The Chargers also focused on adding depth to their linebacker and defensive line positions, ensuring that they remain competitive in all phases of the game. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 5) Joe Alt, OT, Notre Dame (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 34) Ladd McConkey, WR, Georgia (A) 69) Junior Colson, LB, Michigan (B+) Day Three: Average Grade (B+) 105) Justin Eboigbe, ED, Alabama (C) 137) Tarheeb Still, CB, Maryland (B) 140) Cam Hart, CB, Notre Dame (A) 181) Kimani Vidal, HB, Troy (A-) 225) Brenden Rice, WR, USC (A) 253) Cornelius Johnson, WR, Michigan (B) Los Angeles Rams Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A-) The Los Angeles Rams focused on enhancing their defensive prowess and adding dynamic playmakers to their offense. Jared Verse from Florida State, a versatile defensive end, and Blake Corum from Michigan, a highly agile running back, highlight the Rams' strategy to build a robust and flexible team. The Rams' draft picks reflect a clear intent to enhance their defensive line and secondary while adding explosive potential to their offensive lineup. Day One: Average Grade (A) 19) Jared Verse, ED, Florida State (A) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 39) Braden Fiske, DI, Florida State (B) 83) Blake Corum, HB, Michigan (A) Day Three: Average Grade (B+) 99) Kamren Kinchens, S, Miami (FL) (A-) 154) Brennan Jackson, ED, Washington State (B) 196) Tyler Davis, DI, Clemson (B+) 209) Joshua Karty, K, Stanford (B) 213) Jordan Whittington, WR, Texas (A-) 217) Beaux Limmer, C, Arkansas (A-) 254) KT Leveston, T, Kansas State (A-) Miami Dolphins Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B+) The Miami Dolphins targeted a mix of high-impact and developmental players to strengthen their roster. Chop Robinson from Penn State is a standout pick, a potential star at the edge rusher position with the right development. The Dolphins also bolstered their offensive line with Patrick Paul from Houston, adding much-needed protection for Tua Tagovailoa. The addition of dynamic playmakers like Jaylen Wright from Tennessee and Mohamed Kamara from Colorado State in the later rounds indicates a clear strategy to enhance their offensive explosiveness and defensive depth. Day One: Average Grade (A) 21) Chop Robinson, ED, Penn State (A) Day Two: Average Grade (B) 55) Patrick Paul, T, Houston (B) Day Three: Average Grade (B+) 120) Jaylen Wright, HB, Tennessee (B+) 158) Mohamed Kamara, ED, Colorado State (B+) 184) Malik Washington, WR, Virginia (B+) 198) Patrick McMorris, S, California (C) 241) Tahj Washington, WR, USC (A-) Minnesota Vikings Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A+) The Minnesota Vikings made strategic moves to improve both their offense and defense, selecting highly capable players. J.J. McCarthy from Michigan stands out as a potentially transformative quarterback, fitting perfectly into Minnesota’s system. Dallas Turner from Alabama offers significant value as a versatile linebacker, enhancing their defensive strength. The Vikings' focus on adding depth and talent, such as Khyree Jackson from Oregon in the secondary and Walter Rouse from Oklahoma on the offensive line, showcases a commitment to building a solid and versatile roster. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 10) J.J. McCarthy, QB, Michigan (A+) 17) Dallas Turner, ED, Alabama (A+) Day Two: No Picks Day Three: Average Grade (B) 108) Khyree Jackson, CB, Oregon (A-) 177) Walter Rouse, T, Oklahoma (B) 203) Will Reichard, K, Alabama (B) 230) Michael Jurgens, G, Wake Forest (B) 232) Levi Drake Rodriguez, DI, Texas A&M-Commerce (B) New England Patriots Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B-) The New England Patriots focused on revitalizing their offense with the addition of Drake Maye from North Carolina, a quarterback with the tools to potentially lead the franchise. The Patriots also targeted enhancing their receiving corps and offensive line depth with picks like Ja'Lynn Polk from Washington and Layden Robinson from Texas A&M. The selection of dynamic receivers and solid offensive linemen demonstrates New England's strategy to build around their new quarterback and solidify the offense. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 3) Drake Maye, QB, North Carolina (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (B+) 37) Ja'Lynn Polk, WR, Washington (B+) 68) Caedan Wallace, T, Penn State (C) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 103) Layden Robinson, G, Texas A&M (B) 110) Javon Baker, WR, UCF (B+) 180) Marcellas Dial, CB, South Carolina (C) 193) Joe Milton, QB, Tennessee (B) 231) Jaheim Bell, TE, Florida State (A-) New Orleans Saints Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A-) The New Orleans Saints capitalized on key opportunities in the draft to significantly upgrade their roster, particularly on the offensive line and in the secondary. Taliese Fuaga from Oregon State, an elite offensive tackle with the versatility to play multiple positions, highlights their approach to strengthening the line. Kool-Aid McKinstry from Alabama adds immediate talent and depth to their secondary, addressing a critical need. The Saints also sought depth and potential impact players in the later rounds, enhancing both their defensive and offensive units. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 14) Taliese Fuaga, OT, Oregon State (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 41) Kool-Aid McKinstry, CB, Alabama (A) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 150) Spencer Rattler, QB, South Carolina (A-) 170) Bub Means, WR, Pittsburgh (B) 175) Jaylan Ford, LB, Texas (B) 199) Khristian Boyd, DI, Northern Iowa (B+) 239) Josiah Ezirim, T, Eastern Kentucky (B) New York Giants Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A) The New York Giants focused heavily on bringing in high-impact talent, particularly at wide receiver and in the secondary. Malik Nabers from LSU, as a highly-touted receiver, is expected to elevate the Giants' offensive playmaking ability immediately. The Giants also added depth and versatility to their defensive backfield, with Ty Nubin from Minnesota and Andru Phillips from Kentucky enhancing their coverage capabilities. The selection of impactful players across the board underscores the Giants' intent to effectively bolster both sides of the ball. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 6) Malik Nabers, WR, LSU (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 47) Ty Nubin, S, Minnesota (A+) 70) Andru Phillips, CB, Kentucky (B+) Day Three: Average Grade (A) 107) Theo Johnson, TE, Penn State (A) 166) Tyrone Tracy, HB, Purdue (A) 183) Darius Muasau, LB, UCLA (B) New York Jets Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A-) The New York Jets executed a focused draft strategy to fortify their offensive line and add dynamic weapons to their offense. Olumuyiwa Fashanu from Penn State, a top tackle prospect, is expected to become a cornerstone on the offensive line. The Jets also selected playmakers like Malachi Corley from Western Kentucky and Braelon Allen from Wisconsin, aiming to inject versatility and explosiveness into their offensive schemes. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 11) Olumuyiwa Fashanu, OT, Penn State (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (B+) 65) Malachi Corley, WR, Western Kentucky (B+) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 134) Braelon Allen, HB, Wisconsin (B+) 171) Jordan Travis, QB, Florida State (B) 173) Isaiah Davis, HB, South Dakota State (A-) 176) Qwan'tez Stiggers, CB, New York (B) 257) Jaylen Key, S, Alabama (B) Philadelphia Eagles Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A) The Philadelphia Eagles targeted versatility and athleticism in their draft picks, focusing on strengthening their secondary and adding depth to their offensive and defensive lines. Quinyon Mitchell from Toledo, an elite cornerback prospect, and Cooper DeJean from Iowa, another versatile secondary player, highlight their commitment to improving their defensive backfield. The Eagles also added dynamic offensive playmakers like Ainias Smith from Texas A&M and strategic depth pieces like Trevor Keegan from Michigan, showing a balanced approach to building their roster. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 22) Quinyon Mitchell, CB, Toledo (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 40) Cooper DeJean, CB, Iowa (A+) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 94) Jalyx Hunt, ED, Houston Christian (B+) 127) Will Shipley, HB, Clemson (A-) 152) Ainias Smith, WR, Texas A&M (A-) 155) Jeremiah Trotter Jr., LB, Clemson (B+) 172) Trevor Keegan, G, Michigan (B+) 185) Johnny Wilson, WR, Florida State (B+) 190) Dylan McMahon, C, North Carolina State (C) Pittsburgh Steelers Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A+) The Pittsburgh Steelers focused on adding strength and versatility to their offensive line and injecting new talent into their receiving and defensive units. Troy Fautanu from Washington and Zach Frazier from West Virginia are expected to significantly enhance the Steelers' offensive line capabilities, while Roman Wilson from Michigan provides an exciting new weapon for their passing game. The Steelers' strategic selection of high-impact players across the board demonstrates their commitment to building a balanced and competitive team. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 20) Troy Fautanu, OT, Washington (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 51) Zach Frazier, C, West Virginia (A+) 84) Roman Wilson, WR, Michigan (A+) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 98) Payton Wilson, LB, North Carolina State (A) 119) Mason McCormick, G, South Dakota State (B+) 178) Logan Lee, DI, Iowa (B) 195) Ryan Watts, CB, Texas (B) San Francisco 49ers Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B) The San Francisco 49ers focused on adding dynamic and versatile players to their roster this draft season. Ricky Pearsall from Florida, a standout wide receiver known for his excellent route running and ability to track the ball, was a significant acquisition. The 49ers also fortified their offensive line and secondary with Dominick Puni from Kansas and Renardo Green from Florida State, aiming to bolster both pass protection and coverage depth. Additional picks in the secondary and offensive skill positions underline their strategy to increase depth and enhance playmaking abilities across the board. Day One: Average Grade (B+) 31) Ricky Pearsall, WR, Florida (B+) Day Two: Average Grade (B) 64) Renardo Green, CB, Florida State (B) 86) Dominick Puni, T, Kansas (B) Day Three: Average Grade (B+) 124) Malik Mustapha, S, Wake Forest (B) 129) Isaac Guerendo, HB, Louisville (B+) 135) Jacob Cowing, WR, Arizona (A) 215) Jarrett Kingston, G, USC (C) 251) Tatum Bethune, LB, Florida State (B) Seattle Seahawks Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B+) The Seattle Seahawks strategically targeted areas of need, focusing particularly on their defensive line and secondary while also strengthening the offensive line. Byron Murphy II from Texas, the top interior defender in the draft, is expected to make an immediate impact. The Seahawks also added key offensive linemen like Christian Haynes from Connecticut and Sataoa Laumea from Utah, aiming to solidify their protection schemes and run game. The secondary received new talent with picks like Nehemiah Pritchett from Auburn and D.J. James from Auburn, enhancing their coverage abilities. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 16) Byron Murphy II, IDL, Texas (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 81) Christian Haynes, G, Connecticut (A+) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 118) Tyrice Knight, LB, UTEP (C) 121) AJ Barner, TE, Michigan (B) 136) Nehemiah Pritchett, CB, Auburn (B) 179) Sataoa Laumea, T, Utah (B) 192) D.J. James, CB, Auburn (B+) 207) Mike Jerrell, T, Findlay (C) Tampa Bay Buccaneers Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B+) Tampa Bay Buccaneers targeted both offensive and defensive enhancements through their draft picks. Graham Barton from Duke, a versatile offensive lineman, was a key addition to solidifying the interior and possibly playing multiple positions on the line. Chris Braswell from Alabama and Tykee Smith from Georgia were significant defensive additions, with Braswell expected to provide immediate edge rushing capabilities and Smith enhancing the run defense. Jalen McMillan from Washington and Bucky Irving from Oregon are expected to bring dynamism to the offense, particularly in the passing and running games. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 26) Graham Barton, IOL, Duke (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (B+) 57) Chris Braswell, ED, Alabama (B+) 89) Tykee Smith, S, Georgia (B) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 92) Jalen McMillan, WR, Washington (A) 125) Bucky Irving, HB, Oregon (B+) 220) Elijah Klein, G, UTEP (C) 246) Devin Culp, TE, Washington (C) Tennessee Titans Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B) The Tennessee Titans focused on solidifying their offensive and defensive lines with high-ceiling picks like J.C. Latham from Alabama and T'Vondre Sweat from Texas. Both are expected to bring physicality and durability to the line units. The Titans also added depth to their linebacker group and secondary with picks like Cedric Gray from North Carolina and Jarvis Brownlee Jr. from Louisville, enhancing their defensive versatility. The selection of Jha'Quan Jackson from Tulane as a return specialist underscores their focus on improving special teams. Day One: Average Grade (A) 7) J.C. Latham, OT, Alabama (A) Day Two: Average Grade (B) 38) T'Vondre Sweat, DI, Texas (B) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 106) Cedric Gray, LB, North Carolina (B) 146) Jarvis Brownlee Jr., CB, Louisville (B+) 182) Jha'Quan Jackson, WR, Tulane (B) 242) James Williams, S, Miami (FL) (B) 247) Marcus Harris, DI, Auburn (B) 252) Jaylen Harrell, ED, Michigan (A-) Washington Commanders Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A) The Washington Commanders prioritized acquiring game-changing talent at key positions, particularly at quarterback, with Jayden Daniels from LSU as their highest quarterback draft pick since Robert Griffin III. Jayden Daniels offers dynamic playmaking ability that could revitalize the Commanders' offense. The draft strategy also focused on shoring up the defensive line and secondary with high-impact picks like Jer'Zhan Newton from Illinois and Mike Sainristil from Michigan. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 2) Jayden Daniels, QB, LSU (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A+) 36) Jer'Zhan Newton, DI, Illinois (A+) 50) Mike Sainristil, CB, Michigan (A+) 53) Ben Sinnott, TE, Kansas State (C) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 50) Mike Sainristil, CB, Michigan (A+) 53) Ben Sinnott, TE, Kansas State (C) 67) Brandon Coleman, T, TCU (B+) 100) Luke McCaffrey, WR, Rice (B) 139) Jordan Magee, LB, Temple (B+) 161) Dominique Hampton, S, Washington (B) 222) Javontae Jean-Baptiste, ED, Notre Dame (C)

2023 NFL Draft Running Back Rankings: Texas's Bijan Robinson, UCLA's Zach Charbonnet Lead the Way The 2023 NFL Draft RB class is loaded with versatile players. The reoccurring theme in the 2023 class is three-down versatility and that's exactly what NFL teams covet the most at the RB position as evidenced in the last few years and at least ever since the 2017 RB draft class that was loaded with several backs who provided high-level three-down versatility. You can read more about the 2017 draft class here. So what are we looking for when evaluating the RB position? The Key Positional Factors: Vision Contact Balance Three Down Versatility As everyone already knows (or should know), we do a show (After Further Review) on our Youtube channel that features in-depth individual NFL Draft player analysis. We cover a lot in these episodes, from player grades, team fits, and player comps, and we even do a quick film analysis. Still, the core of the final player analysis is the final grade and the ceiling grade, which are largely determined by the key positional factor grades. The Final Grades for any player in the top 50 rankings will be within the range of Instant Impact, High Upside, and Developmental. Each of the grades referenced in the above text possesses subcategories to help us gauge where a player stands from day one entering the NFL. You can find these below. The Grade Scale IIP (Instant Impact Potential) (9.0-7.0) High-End Starter HUP (High Upside Potential) (6.9-6.7) Solid Starter Level DP (Developmental Potential) (6.6-6.5) Lower Level Starter (6.4) Starter Level Traits (6.3) Limited Opportunity/Shows Starter Level Traits When Given the Opportunity The Top 5 2023 NFL Draft RB's 1). Bijan Robinson Texas, JR, 6-0, 220 Current Grade: High-End Starter (Instant Impact Potential) Ceiling Grade: High-End Starter (Instant Impact Potential) Bijan Robinson has a chance to become a generational talent at the running back position in 2022. Already considered a first-round talent, Robinson can cement his top status by continuing to build off of a strong 2021 season. If our bar at the college level is Saquon Barkley, Bijan checks many of the same boxes as Barkley. Bijan is not as fluid an athlete as Barkley, but he can make a defender miss in a small area or run behind his pads to turn a small gain into an explosive play (arm tacklers need not apply). Robinson is also a proven receiver out of the backfield and can split wide or in the slot when needed. He possesses high-level Three down ability and positional versatility built for the NFL level. 2). Zach Charbonnet UCLA, 6-1, 220 Current Grade: Solid Starter Level (High Upside Potential) Ceiling Grade: High-End Starter (Instant Impact Potential) Committed initially to Michigan, where he played as a true freshman, Charbonnet drew comparisons to David Johnson, according to his former RB coach at Michigan (Jay Harbaugh). Charbonnet transferred to UCLA before the 2021 college football season seeking a less competitive backfield situation. Charbonnet exploded onto the scene in his first game as a Bruin, rushing only six times for 106 yards, and three of those carries went for scores. In week two, Charbonett proved his week one performance was not a fluke by rushing 11 times for 111 yards and another score against the LSU Tigers. Charbonnet finished the 2021 season with seven games of 100 rush yards or more and 13 TD's on the ground. Charbonnet has legit three-down versatility; he is also a dangerous receiver out of the backfield. For a bigger back, Charbonnet plays with great footwork and possesses the ability to make a defender miss in space or run through arm tackles. 3). Jahmyr Gibbs Alabama, JR, 5-11, 200 Current Grade: Solid Starter Level (High Upside Potential) Ceiling Grade: High-End Starter (Instant Impact Potential) The Georgia Tech Transfer took his talents to Tuscaloosa via the transfer portal this offseason. Gibbs is a talented player with three-down versatility. At Georgia Tech, he proved he could be a threat as both a runner and a receiver out of the backfield. In 2021, Gibbs rushed 143 times for 743 yards and added 36 catches for an additional 460 yards as a receiver. Gibbs provides the Crimson Tide with a different type of back than they have trotted out in recent history. At 5-11 200lbs, Gibbs is not a player the Tide should depend on to bang out tough yards between the tackles. If Gibbs is deployed correctly, he is a versatile chess piece with big-play ability. He can make defenders miss with very little daylight and is explosive off the block. Once he enters the second level of the defense, good luck. If Gibbs is, in fact, the lead back for the Crimson Tide in 2022, he will be in the conversation to become a top-three back in the 2023 NFL draft. 4). Zach Evans Ole Miss, JR, 5-11, 215 Current Grade: Starter Level Traits (Developmental) Ceiling Grade: High-End Starter (Instant Impact Potential) Evans has been on my radar the last few years. The former five-star recruit from the 2020 class ranked as the 2nd best RB in his class, with Bijan Robinson ahead of him. Evans had a laundry list of SEC offers but chose TCU. Evans amassed 1046 rush yards in two years at TCU and averaged 7.3 yards per rush attempt. Where he was wildly underutilized was as a receiver. When given the opportunity, Evans has proven chops as a receiver. Evans transferred to Ole Miss during the offseason, and one of the areas I expect Lane Kiffen will unlock is his ability as a receiver in and out of the backfield. Evans is a natural at pressing the hole and using his vision to locate the open area and either explode through an opening or bounce it to the open space. Evans can run behind his pads, picking up the tough yards or in goal-to-go situations when needed. If Evans does grow as a receiver with more usage at Ole Miss in 2022, he has the skill set to be a top-three back in this class. 5). Blake Corum Michigan, JR, 5-8, 200 Current Grade: Starter Level Traits (Developmental) Ceiling Grade: High-End Starter (Instant Impact Potential) Blake Corum is a unique talent both as a runner and a receiver. As a runner, Corum proved he can be utilized both as an inside and outside runner. He can pick up tough yards after contact or make a defender miss in a phonebooth. For a player that is 5-8 200lbs, Corum possesses deceptive lower body strength. In addition to being a tough runner, he is an explosive home run hitter if given any space once entering the second and third level of a defense. Corum is also a dynamic receiver. He can lineup all over the formation and displayed a solid route tree for a running back in 2021. You name it, the angle route, the wheel, a flat route, a bubble, a screen; Corum's tool belt is not lacking. The three-down versatility is where Corum has the best opportunity to rise on 2023 NFL Draft Boards.

There’s Nothing Here... We can’t find the page you’re looking for. Check the URL, or head back home. Go Home

2025 NFL Draft Big Board Update: Rankings Ahead of Senior Bowl and Shrine Bowl As we approach the 2025 Reese’s Senior Bowl, East-West Shrine Bowl, and other pre-draft events, the updated NFL Draft Big Board reflects some of the recent changes I have made. One part that remains consistent is that this year’s draft is shaping up to be one of the deepest defensive classes in recent memory, with depth across multiple positions and star power at the top. Below, I break down my thoughts on the key position groups based on the sample of my top 50 players. As Always, the Debate About the Top QBs Will Take Center Stage As always, the quarterback discussion generates all the buzz, but opinions on this group vary widely. While Cam Ward has edged out Shedeur Sanders as my QB1, neither has solidified themselves as top-five prospects in my eyes. Ultimately, I believe teams picking in the top five must focus on the best-available talent, where players like Mason Graham, Abdul Carter, Will Johnson, and Travis Hunter stand out as surefire impact players. This Could Be the Best RB Class Since 2017 This could be the best running back class since the 2017 group, which featured stars like Christian McCaffrey, Alvin Kamara, Joe Mixon, and Austin Ekeler. The 2025 class is led by Boise State’s Ashton Jeanty, who I have in my top 10 and could be one of a select few running backs drafted in the top 15 picks in recent years. As the NFL adjusts defensively with more two-high safety variations to counter explosive passing offenses, the value of running backs is rising. I expect at least three or four names from this class to come off the board in the first two rounds. The WR Class Is Starting to Take Shape The wide receiver class is gaining momentum as we move closer to the draft. Arizona’s Tetairoa McMillan headlines this group with his size, body control, and ability to win contested catches. Luther Burden and Emeka Egbuka are strong first-round candidates, while Texas’ Matthew Golden is rising into Day 1 consideration. If you include a part-time Travis Hunter as a wide receiver, this group could feature two top-10 players. Stanford’s Elic Ayomanor is another name to monitor through the NFL Combine circuit, and I expect this class to produce four to five first-rounders. The TE Class is Deep and Talented This tight end class might be the deepest in NFL Draft history. Michigan’s Colston Loveland sits at the top of my board, with Penn State’s Tyler Warren not far behind. Both players project as top-20 picks, with the potential to crack the top 15. Loveland’s versatility and ability to stretch the field vertically make him a dangerous weapon, while Warren’s combination of size, athleticism, and blocking ability gives him a complete skill set. In a weaker wide receiver class, these tight ends could be pivotal offensive playmakers for NFL teams. The OL Class Is One Of The More most versatile I Have Ever Evaluated The offensive tackle group is led by LSU’s Will Campbell and Texas’ Kelvin Banks Jr., both of whom have elite potential. Campbell’s versatility and power make him a candidate to play multiple positions along the offensive line, while Banks’ refined technique and athleticism project him as a high-impact starter at left tackle. Beyond these two, Ohio State’s Josh Simmons and Missouri’s Armond Membou are rising prospects with Day 1 potential. The Defensive Line Class Has Unreal Depth, and It Is Led By Michigan's Mason Graham The defensive line group is headlined by Michigan’s Mason Graham, who I believe could be the next Aaron Donald. Graham’s dominance on the interior, combined with his versatility to disrupt both the run and pass, sets him apart as one of the most impactful players in this class. Alongside Graham, the class boasts a wealth of talent on the interior and edge, with Abdul Carter from Penn State emerging as an elite edge rusher. Carter’s transition to a full-time defensive end role has elevated his stock, and he could be the first overall pick in the draft. The Cornerback Class Is Very Talented, with Elite Options at The Top This year’s cornerback class is led by Michigan’s Will Johnson and Colorado’s Travis Hunter. Johnson profiles as a prototypical No. 1 cornerback, blending size, speed, and coverage instincts. Hunter, listed as an athlete on my board, is a rare two-way talent. If he were a full-time wide receiver, he could be the WR1 in this class; as a cornerback, he’d rank as CB2 behind Johnson. Regardless of where Hunter ultimately lines up in the NFL, he is a dynamic playmaker who will be a top-five consideration for many teams. 2025 NFL Draft - Here are the updated top 50 rankings. This is subject to change at any time, so be sure to check out our full NFL Draft Big Board. 1). Mason Graham, IDL, Michigan Height: 6-3 | Weight: 318 Mason Graham is a physical force on the interior defensive line, showcasing an exceptional blend of size, strength, and explosiveness. His dominance as a run-stopper, combined with natural leverage and refined hand technique, makes him a disruptive presence. Graham’s ability to pressure the pocket and handle double-teams projects him as an instant starter with All-Pro upside. Best suited for a 1-tech or 3-tech role in a four-man front, Graham could anchor a defense for years to come. 2). Will Johnson, CB, Michigan Height: 6-2 | Weight: 205 Will Johnson possesses prototypical size, speed, and physicality for a lockdown NFL cornerback. His elite instincts and ability to excel in both man and zone coverage make him a scheme-versatile player. Johnson’s route recognition and anticipation skills stand out, and he consistently limits big plays. With his long frame and fluid athleticism, Johnson projects as a shutdown corner capable of making an immediate impact as a team’s No. 1 option. 3). Travis Hunter, ATH, Colorado Height: 6-1 | Weight: 185 Travis Hunter is the most versatile prospect in this draft. As a cornerback, he displays elite anticipation, recovery speed, and ball skills, while as a wide receiver, his burst and ability to make contested catches make him a dynamic playmaker. Hunter’s thin frame limits his physicality at times, but his overall athleticism and two-way potential make him a rare talent. Whether used as a corner, receiver, or hybrid player, Hunter is a top-five talent with immense upside. 4). Abdul Carter, EDGE, Penn State Height: 6-3 | Weight: 259 Abdul Carter’s transition to a full-time edge rusher has elevated his stock significantly. The junior logged 61 pressures and 12 sacks, with an 18.5% pressure rate that ranks among the best in the nation. His speed off the edge, coupled with powerful hands and improving technique, makes him a dynamic pass rusher. With his ability to disrupt the pocket and play the run effectively, Carter profiles as an instant-impact starter with Pro Bowl potential. 5). Ashton Jeanty, RB, Boise State Height: 5-9 | Weight: 210 Jeanty is a compact and powerful runner with elite vision, agility, and contact balance. The nation’s leading rusher with 2,601 yards and 29 touchdowns, Jeanty thrives in zone-blocking schemes where his ability to cut back and find lanes is showcased. His breakaway speed and elusiveness in space add to his value, while his role in the passing game remains underdeveloped. Jeanty has the skill set to be a rare first-round running back and a Day 1 starter. 6). Tetairoa McMillan, WR, Arizona Height: 6-5 | Weight: 212 McMillan is a towering receiver with exceptional body control and hands, making him a dangerous red-zone target. His ability to win contested catches and leverage his frame against defenders creates mismatches. While he lacks elite speed, his smooth acceleration and hip fluidity help him separate from defenders. McMillan is an ideal fit for vertically oriented offenses that can maximize his size and playmaking ability. 7). Will Campbell, OT, LSU Height: 6-6 | Weight: 323 Will Campbell’s athleticism and power make him a standout offensive line prospect. A versatile player, Campbell projects as a guard or tackle in the NFL, with his balance, quick feet, and strong anchor standing out in both run and pass protection. Some scouts see his best fit at guard due to arm length concerns, but his skill set ensures he’ll thrive regardless of position. Campbell projects as a Pro Bowl-caliber starter early in his career. 8). Jahdae Barron, CB, Texas Height: 5-11 | Weight: 192 Barron is an instinctive and versatile cornerback who excelled in Texas’ secondary, allowing only 20 receptions on 51 targets with five interceptions. His ability to diagnose plays and react quickly makes him a perfect fit for zone-heavy schemes, though his physicality supports man coverage as well. Barron’s performance in 2024 has solidified him as a Round 1 talent with the ability to make an immediate impact at the next level. 9). Kelvin Banks Jr., OT, Texas Height: 6-4 | Weight: 320 Banks is one of the most polished offensive linemen in this class, combining smooth footwork with refined hand placement and power. Despite battling an ankle injury, he allowed just one sack all season and remains a top tackle prospect. His lateral agility and technical skill make him an excellent pass protector, while his run-blocking ability suits zone and gap schemes. Banks projects as a Day 1 starter with All-Pro potential. 10). Colston Loveland, TE, Michigan Height: 6-5 | Weight: 245 Loveland is a versatile tight end with a rare blend of size, speed, and athleticism. He thrives in multiple roles, aligning in the slot, backfield, or traditional in-line positions. Loveland’s ability to separate from defenders and attack contested catches makes him a reliable receiving threat. While he needs to refine his blocking consistency, Loveland projects as a high-upside player who can be a focal point in both traditional and spread offenses. 11). Tyler Warren, TE, Penn State Warren is a versatile tight end suitable for various offensive schemes. He excels as a blocker and a reliable red-zone receiving target, with the ability to align in multiple positions, making him a valuable asset. 12). Mike Green, EDGE, Marshall Green is a dynamic edge rusher with explosive first-step quickness and the versatility to disrupt both in run defense and as a pass rusher. His relentless motor and ability to bend the edge make him a rising prospect. 13). Malaki Starks, S, Georgia Starks is a versatile safety with a balanced skill set for man and zone coverage. His instincts and play-recognition skills allow him to excel in both coverage and run support, making him a reliable all-around defender. 14). Kenneth Grant, IDL, Michigan Grant is a powerful interior defensive lineman who excels in stopping the run and disrupting the pocket. His ability to play multiple alignments makes him a great fit for both 4-3 and 3-4 schemes. 15). Benjamin Morrison, CB, Notre Dame Morrison thrives as an outside corner in man and press coverage, with the agility and instincts to transition seamlessly into zone schemes. His technique and physicality make him a lockdown option on the perimeter. 16). James Pearce Jr., EDGE, Tennessee Pearce is a versatile edge rusher with elite first-step quickness and the ability to play multiple roles. His speed and agility allow him to win on the outside, while his counter moves make him disruptive in pass rush. 17). Mykel Williams, EDGE, Georgia Williams is an alignment-versatile edge rusher who can thrive in various defensive schemes. His combination of athleticism and physical tools makes him a potential star as a 4-3 end or 3-4 outside linebacker. 18). Shemar Stewart, EDGE, Texas A&M Stewart is a powerful edge defender with great size and length. His ability to set the edge against the run and generate pressure in pass-rushing situations makes him a valuable piece for any defensive front. 19). Jalon Walker, LB, Georgia Walker is an explosive linebacker with natural pass-rush ability and the versatility to impact both as a run defender and in coverage. His athletic profile and hybrid skill set give him Pro Bowl potential. 20). Shavon Revel, CB, ECU Revel is a long, physical cornerback who excels in press coverage. Despite an ACL injury in 2024, his movement skills and ability to disrupt at the line make him an ideal fit for press-man schemes. 21). Josh Simmons, OT, Ohio State Simmons is an athletic offensive tackle with quick feet and strong hands, making him an ideal fit for zone-blocking schemes. His ability to protect the edge against speed rushers enhances his value in pass-heavy offenses. 22). Tyleik Williams, IDL, Ohio State Williams is a powerful nose tackle who thrives in two-gap systems. With strong anchor ability, heavy hands, and disciplined run fits, he is an effective run defender. While his pass-rushing repertoire is limited, he offers consistent pocket disruption with a reliable bull rush. 23). Matthew Golden, WR, Texas Golden is a smooth route-runner with excellent hands and ball-tracking ability. His ability to separate at all levels of the field makes him a valuable asset for teams seeking a reliable and dynamic outside receiver. 24). Nic Scourton, EDGE, Texas A&M Scourton is a versatile edge rusher with the strength to set the edge and collapse the pocket. His quick hands and ability to rotate inside on passing downs make him a perfect fit for hybrid defensive schemes that value power-based rushers. 25). Cam Ward, QB, Miami Ward is a talented quarterback who excels in pro-style and West Coast offenses that emphasize quick decisions and downfield accuracy. Known for his improvisational skills, he thrives in vertical passing schemes and excels at pre-snap adjustments. 26). Emeka Egbuka, WR, Ohio State Egbuka is a versatile receiver with elite speed, precise route running, and playmaking ability after the catch. His effectiveness in both the slot and outside makes him a valuable weapon in spread offenses that emphasize his dynamic skill set. 27). Jack Sawyer, EDGE, Ohio State Sawyer is a high-motor edge rusher with strong run-stopping ability and a quick first step. His strength as a bull rusher and ability to chase mobile quarterbacks make him a solid fit for versatile defensive schemes. 28). Luther Burden, WR, Missouri Burden is a dynamic slot receiver with explosive after-the-catch ability. His agility and burst make him a weapon in motion-based systems that prioritize quick passes, screens, and opportunities to maximize his YAC potential. 29). Shedeur Sanders, QB, Colorado Sanders excels in systems that focus on short-to-intermediate throws and leverage his ability to process defenses. His accuracy, decision-making, and mobility make him a fit for West Coast and spread offenses, though he could benefit from mechanical refinement. 30). Armand Membou, OT, Missouri Membou is a strong, technically sound offensive tackle with great balance and agility. His ability to hold his ground in pass protection and create lanes in the run game makes him an asset for power or zone-blocking schemes. 31). Trey Amos, CB, Mississippi Amos is a long, athletic cornerback with fluid movement skills and the ability to play effectively in both man and zone coverage. His instincts and length make him a valuable perimeter defender. 32). Tyler Booker, IOL, Alabama Booker is a powerful and athletic interior lineman who excels in both run blocking and pass protection. His quick feet and strong hands make him a great fit for power-blocking schemes. 33). Xavier Watts, S, Notre Dame Watts is a versatile safety with excellent range and ball skills. His ability to read and react quickly in coverage, combined with his physicality in run support, makes him a complete defensive back. 34). Elic Ayomanor, WR, Stanford Ayomanor fits well as an outside X-receiver in both spread and pro-style offenses. His ability to stretch the field with speed and make contested catches makes him a reliable deep threat and a key target in critical situations. 35). Donovan Jackson, IOL, Ohio State Jackson is a versatile interior lineman with strong footwork and mobility, excelling in both zone- and power-blocking schemes. His ability to sustain blocks and reach the second level makes him a valuable asset for any offense. 36). Omarion Hampton, RB, North Carolina Hampton is a powerful and versatile running back with three-down ability. His speed, vision, and power make him effective in both power and zone-blocking schemes, with room to grow as a receiver. 37). Derrick Harmon, IDL, Oregon Harmon is a disruptive interior defensive lineman with great size and power. His ability to collapse the pocket and anchor against the run makes him an intriguing prospect for teams needing a versatile defensive tackle. 38). Donovan Ezeiruaku, EDGE, Boston College Ezeiruaku is a high-energy edge rusher with quickness and relentless pursuit. His ability to disrupt passing plays and set the edge against the run makes him an ideal fit for hybrid defensive schemes. 39). Josh Conerly Jr., OT, Oregon Conerly is an athletic and technically sound offensive tackle who excels in pass protection. His ability to handle speed rushers and his fluid footwork make him an excellent fit for zone-blocking schemes. 40). Aireontae Ersery, OT, Minnesota Ersery is a towering tackle with great power and balance. His ability to generate movement in the run game and hold his ground in pass protection makes him a strong fit for power-running offenses. 41). Harold Fannin Jr., TE, Bowling Green Fannin is a versatile tight end who thrives both as a blocker and a receiver. His strength and reliable hands make him a valuable target in short-to-intermediate routes, while his ability to create mismatches enhances his utility in modern offensive schemes. 42). Wyatt Milum, OT, West Virginia Milum is a technically sound offensive tackle with excellent size and strength. His ability to protect the quarterback and drive defenders in the run game makes him a consistent performer, especially in power-blocking schemes. 43). Princely Umanmielen, EDGE, Ole Miss Umanmielen’s versatility allows him to thrive in both 3-4 and 4-3 defensive schemes. His ability to play as a stand-up rusher or with his hand in the dirt makes him an asset for hybrid defenses looking to maximize alignment flexibility. 44). Landon Jackson, EDGE, Arkansas Jackson is a towering edge rusher with great length and strength. His ability to set the edge in run defense and generate pressure as a pass rusher makes him a valuable addition to any defensive front. 45). T.J. Sanders, IDL, South Carolina Sanders is a disruptive interior defensive lineman with the quickness and strength to excel in both pass rushing and run stopping. His versatility across multiple alignments makes him an excellent fit for modern NFL defenses. 46). TreVeyon Henderson, RB, Ohio State Henderson is a dynamic dual-threat running back who excels as a runner and a receiver. His twitch, vision, and ability to create momentum make him a perfect fit for modern offenses that emphasize versatility in their running backs. 47). Omarr Norman-Lott, IDL, Tennessee Norman-Lott is a strong and versatile interior defender who can anchor against the run and provide pocket disruption as a pass rusher. His strength and quickness make him an effective player in both 4-3 and 3-4 schemes. 48). Jonah Savaiinaea, OT, Arizona Savaiinaea is a massive offensive lineman with the versatility to play tackle or guard. His strength and ability to move defenders off the ball make him an asset in power-running schemes, though he must refine his agility to handle speed rushers consistently. 49). Xavier Restrepo, WR, Miami Restrepo is a shifty and reliable slot receiver who excels in short and intermediate routes. His quickness, hands, and ability to find soft spots in coverage make him an ideal fit for spread offenses that prioritize slot production. 50). Walter Nolen, IDL, Ole Miss Nolen is a powerful and disruptive interior defensive lineman with excellent run-stopping ability and the potential to develop as a pass rusher. His versatility and physical tools make him a high-upside prospect for teams needing an anchor in the trenches.

2025 Dynasty SuperFlex Rankings: Full Tiered Breakdown 2025 Dynasty SuperFlex Rankings In dynasty fantasy football, balancing youth, long-term upside, and immediate production is the key to building a powerhouse roster. For SuperFlex leagues—where QBs are king—this becomes even more crucial. That’s why we created a complete Dynasty SuperFlex Tiered Ranking System, blending 2024 points per game (PPG) with age-adjusted thresholds across positions (QB, RB, WR, TE) to create future-proof tiers for startup drafts. Below is a summary of the definitions for these tiers and an overview of the methodology. Tier Tier Defined Tier 1 – Generational Dynasty Assets Elite ceiling, young age, foundational pieces for years to come Tier 2 – Elite Dynasty Starters with Long-Term Value Strong production, slightly older, long runway remaining Tier 3 – High-Upside Starters Positional top-15 ceiling, younger age, still ascending Tier 4 – Solid Starters or Aging Elites Strong PPG or experience, but near career peak or decline Tier 5 – Depth with Upside or Fading Veterans Bench value or rookies with uncertain roles 🧠 Methodology Overview Our rankings are built on a blend of long-term upside, 2024 production, and positional value specific to SuperFlex dynasty leagues. Here's how we structured the process: Age Thresholds (Position-Specific): Career longevity varies by position, so we tailored Tier 1 and Tier 2 cutoffs accordingly: Quarterback (QB): Tier 1 ≤ 26 | Tier 2 ≤ 29 Running Back (RB): Tier 1 ≤ 24 | Tier 2 ≤ 26 Wide Receiver (WR): Tier 1 ≤ 25 | Tier 2 ≤ 27 Tight End (TE): Tier 1 ≤ 25 | Tier 2 ≤ 27 2024 PPG Baseline: Points per game (PPG) from the 2024 season was used to measure recent production, but long-term upside and age weighed more heavily in tier placement. SuperFlex Format Prioritization: Due to the 2QB format, quarterbacks were prioritized in overall rankings. Young starting QBs carry elevated value across all tiers. Rookie Pedigree Adjustments: High-upside rookies with no prior PPG (e.g., Ashton Jeanty, Tetairoa McMillan) were elevated based on draft capital, athletic traits, and projected usage. 🧮 How to Apply This Tiered Analysis to Your Draft Startup Drafts : Build around Tier 1 and Tier 2 players. Tier 3 offers depth and flex value. Trade Strategy : Use this system to pivot aging producers for youth upside. Roster Management : Fade Tier 4 players unless contending for a championship right now . 🏆 Tier 1 – Generational Dynasty Assets These players are elite building blocks in dynasty SuperFlex leagues. They are young, possess top-tier production or projected upside, and carry long-term positional security. Whether it’s a 22-year-old rookie QB or a 25-year-old WR1, these are cornerstone pieces you can build a franchise around for the next 3–5 years. Jayden Daniels (QB, WAS, 24) Caleb Williams (QB, CHI, 23) Drake Maye (QB, NE, 22) C.J. Stroud (QB, HOU, 23) Jalen Hurts (QB, PHI, 26) Ja’Marr Chase (WR, CIN, 25) Justin Jefferson (WR, MIN, 25) Patrick Mahomes (QB, KC, 29) CeeDee Lamb (WR, DAL, 26) Bijan Robinson (RB, ATL, 23) Malik Nabers (WR, NYG, 21) Justin Herbert (QB, LAC, 27) Jahmyr Gibbs (RB, DET, 23) Amon-Ra St. Brown (WR, DET, 25) Josh Allen (QB, BUF, 29) Puka Nacua (WR, LAR, 23) Lamar Jackson (QB, BAL, 28) Brian Thomas Jr. (WR, JAX, 22) Ashton Jeanty (RB, LV, 21) Joe Burrow (QB, CIN, 28) Brock Bowers (TE, LV, 22) 🔥 Tier 2 – Elite Dynasty Starters with Long-Term Value These players are either in their prime or rising fast. They may be slightly older than Tier 1 players or have a slightly lower ceiling, but they are high-end starters who can deliver strong production over multiple seasons. In dynasty startups, these names help fill out your core. 22. Bo Nix (QB, DEN, 25) 23. Nico Collins (WR, HOU, 26) 24. Saquon Barkley (RB, PHI, 28) 25. Jordan Love (QB, GB, 26) 26. Kyler Murray (QB, ARI, 27) 27. De'Von Achane (RB, MIA, 23) 28. Drake London (WR, ATL, 23) 29. A.J. Brown (WR, PHI, 27) 30. Ladd McConkey (WR, LAC, 23) 31. Jaxon Smith-Njigba (WR, SEA, 23) 32. Brock Purdy (QB, SF, 25) 33. Garrett Wilson (WR, NYJ, 24) 34. Baker Mayfield (QB, TB, 30) 35. Jonathan Taylor (RB, IND, 26) 36. Marvin Harrison Jr. (WR, ARI, 22) 37. Trey McBride (TE, ARI, 25) 38. Omarion Hampton (RB, LAC, 22) 39. Breece Hall (RB, NYJ, 23) 40. Bucky Irving (RB, TB, 22) 📈 Tier 3 – High-Upside Starters This group includes breakout candidates, bounce-back bets, and future top-15 scorers. They’re either still ascending or have the talent to re-emerge as fantasy staples. Many are 23–27 years old with real potential to make the leap to Tier 2. 41. Tee Higgins (WR, CIN, 26) 42. Trevor Lawrence (QB, JAX, 25) 43. Jared Goff (QB, DET, 30) 44. Travis Hunter (WR, JAX, 22) 45. Tetairoa McMillan (WR, CAR, 22) 46. Rashee Rice (WR, KC, 25) 47. James Cook (RB, BUF, 25) 48. Kyren Williams (RB, LAR, 24) 49. DeVonta Smith (WR, PHI, 26) 50. JJ McCarthy (QB, MIN, 22) 51. Zay Flowers (WR, BAL, 24) 52. Sam LaPorta (TE, DET, 24) 53. Chase Brown (RB, CIN, 25) 54. Josh Jacobs (RB, GB, 27) 55. Dak Prescott (QB, DAL, 31) 56. Rome Odunze (WR, CHI, 22) 57. Cam Ward (QB, TEN, 22) 58. Terry McLaurin (WR, WAS, 29) 59. DJ Moore (WR, CHI, 28) 60. Dalton Kincaid (TE, BUF, 25) 61. DK Metcalf (WR, PIT, 27) 62. Kenneth Walker III (RB, SEA, 24) 63. Jordan Addison (WR, MIN, 23) 64. TreVeyon Henderson (RB, NE, 22) 🧱 Tier 4 – Solid Starters with Upside or Aging Elites Veterans who still have production left or younger players who haven’t hit a consistent tier yet. They’re great value picks in win-now builds or strong contributors with capped ceilings. Expect a mix of WR2s, low-end QB1s, and plug-and-play RBs. 65. Jaylen Waddle (WR, MIA, 26) 66. George Kittle (TE, SF, 31) 67. Michael Penix Jr. (QB, ATL, 25) 68. Chris Olave (WR, NO, 24) 69. Xavier Worthy (WR, KC, 22) 70. Christian McCaffrey (RB, SF, 28) 71. Derrick Henry (RB, BAL, 31) 72. T.J. Hockenson (TE, MIN, 27) 73. Quinshon Judkins (RB, CLE, 21) 74. Jameson Williams (WR, DET, 24) 75. Tua Tagovailoa (QB, MIA, 27) 76. Tyreek Hill (WR, MIA, 31) 77. Bryce Young (QB, CAR, 23) 78. Emeka Egbuka (WR, TB, 22) 79. Brandon Aiyuk (WR, SF, 27) 80. Justin Fields (QB, NYJ, 26) 81. George Pickens (WR, DAL, 24) 82. Chuba Hubbard (RB, CAR, 25) 83. Joe Mixon (RB, HOU, 28) 84. Jerry Jeudy (WR, CLE, 26) 85. David Njoku (TE, CLE, 28) 86. Mark Andrews (TE, BAL, 29) 87. Sam Darnold (QB, SEA, 27) 88. Mike Evans (WR, TB, 31) 89. Anthony Richardson (QB, IND, 23) 90. David Montgomery (RB, DET, 27) 91. Jaxson Dart (QB, NYG, 22) 92. Kaleb Johnson (RB, PIT, 21) 93. RJ Harvey (RB, DEN, 24) 94. Tucker Kraft (TE, GB, 24) 95. Alvin Kamara (RB, NO, 29) 96. Luther Burden III (WR, CHI, 21) 97. Jayden Reed (WR, GB, 25) 🧊 Tier 5 – Depth with Upside or Fading Veterans A mix of younger players with unknown roles and veterans nearing the end of their fantasy prime. These players can round out rosters as emergency starters, trade chips, or taxi squad stashes. Some may emerge due to injuries or depth chart shifts. 98. Chris Godwin (WR, TB, 29) 99. Khalil Shakir (WR, BUF, 25) 100. Ricky Pearsall (WR, SF, 24) 101. Josh Downs (WR, IND, 23) 102. Courtland Sutton (WR, DEN, 29) 103. Jayden Higgins (WR, HOU, 22) 104. Brian Robinson Jr. (RB, WAS, 26) 105. Tyrone Tracy Jr. (RB, NYG, 25) 106. Michael Pittman Jr. (WR, IND, 27) 107. Isiah Pacheco (RB, KC, 26) 108. Geno Smith (QB, LV, 34) 109. Tony Pollard (RB, TEN, 28) 110. Evan Engram (TE, DEN, 30) 111. Tre Harris (WR, LAC, 23) 112. D’Andre Swift (RB, CHI, 26) 113. Calvin Ridley (WR, TEN, 30) 114. Kyle Pitts (TE, ATL, 24) 115. James Conner (RB, ARI, 30) 116. Travis Kelce (TE, KC, 35) 117. Deebo Samuel Sr. (WR, WAS, 29) 118. Jonnu Smith (TE, MIA, 29) 119. Matthew Stafford (QB, LAR, 37) 120. Jalen Milroe (QB, SEA, 22) 121. Jauan Jennings (WR, SF, 27) 122. Jalen McMillan (WR, TB, 23) 123. Bhayshul Tuten (RB, JAX, 23) 124. Najee Harris (RB, LAC, 27) 125. Aaron Jones Sr. (RB, MIN, 30) 126. Travis Etienne Jr. (RB, JAX, 26) 127. Cooper Kupp (WR, SEA, 31) 128. Darnell Mooney (WR, ATL, 27) 129. Stefon Diggs (WR, NE, 31) 130. Jakobi Meyers (WR, LV, 28) 131. Jack Bech (WR, LV, 22) 132. Keon Coleman (WR, BUF, 22) 133. Cam Skattebo (RB, NYG, 23) 134. Dallas Goedert (TE, PHI, 30) 135. Rhamondre Stevenson (RB, NE, 27) 136. Rashid Shaheed (WR, NO, 26) 137. Jake Ferguson (TE, DAL, 26) 138. Zach Charbonnet (RB, SEA, 24) 139. Pat Freiermuth (TE, PIT, 26) 140. Shedeur Sanders (QB, CLE, 23) 141. Isaiah Likely (TE, BAL, 25) 142. Mason Taylor (TE, NYJ, 21) 143. Trey Benson (RB, ARI, 22) 144. Jaylen Warren (RB, PIT, 26) 145. Jaylin Noel (WR, HOU, 22) 146. Kyle Williams (WR, NE, 22) 147. Rashod Bateman (WR, BAL, 25) 148. Rachaad White (RB, TB, 26) 149. Christian Kirk (WR, HOU, 28) 150. Tank Bigsby (RB, JAX, 22)

Fantasy Football Waiver Wire Week 9: Tyrone Tracy Jr. and Troy Franklin Headline the Must-Add Pickups We’ve made it through the bye-week gauntlet, but roster holes remain. Injuries to Cam Skattebo, Quinshon Judkins, and Saquon Barkley have opened doors across the league — and smart managers will pounce. Whether you’re playing for a playoff push or looking for long-term depth, Week 9’s waiver wire features legitimate impact players with season-long and dynasty relevance. Top Waiver Priorities (Overall) RB Tyrone Tracy Jr. (Giants) QB Joe Flacco (Bengals) WR Troy Franklin (Broncos) TE Oronde Gadsden (Chargers) RB Dylan Sampson (Browns) Quarterbacks Joe Flacco — Cincinnati Bengals (51% rostered, FAAB 8-10%) Flacco has been shockingly steady since joining Cincinnati, posting 18.8, 26.0, and 24.3 fantasy points in his first three starts. He’s thrown 7 touchdowns across 126 attempts — the most in the league during that span — while leaning on Ja’Marr Chase and Tee Higgins. The Bengals face Chicago next, and Flacco’s upcoming schedule ranks top-3 in QB matchups. His volume alone gives him weekly QB1 potential, especially for Hurts or Mayfield managers seeking stability. J.J. McCarthy — Minnesota Vikings (25% rostered, FAAB 3-5%) Set to return from injury, McCarthy gets Detroit’s secondary — a defense that’s given up top-10 fantasy numbers to quarterbacks. His mobility and aggressive downfield accuracy make him a strong stash with favorable playoff matchups (DAL, NYG, DET). Running Backs Tyrone Tracy Jr. — New York Giants (42% rostered, FAAB 15-20%) Cam Skattebo’s season-ending injury vaults Tracy into an every-down role. He played 28 of the team’s final 36 snaps in Week 8, commanding 10 carries and 2 receptions. Don’t let the modest 53 yards fool you — Tracy’s pass-catching skillset gives him immediate RB2 value. He’s averaged 2.9 yards after contact and owns a 12% target share when on the field. Add him everywhere; this is a potential rest-of-season starter. Dylan Sampson — Cleveland Browns (10% rostered, FAAB 6-8%) With Quinshon Judkins sidelined, Sampson handled 19 of 27 snaps down the stretch, showing burst as both a runner and receiver. He caught 5 of 6 targets for 29 yards, out-snapping Jerome Ford 2:1 in passing situations. If Judkins misses additional time after the bye, Sampson projects as a high-end Flex. Tank Bigsby — Philadelphia Eagles (33% rostered, FAAB 4-6%) Bigsby capitalized when Saquon Barkley left with a groin issue, ripping 104 yards on 9 carries. Even if Barkley returns after the bye, Bigsby’s performance cemented him as the primary handcuff — and an elite stash in one of the NFL’s most efficient rushing offenses. Ollie Gordon II — RB, Miami Dolphins (10% rostered, FAAB 3–5%) Ollie Gordon quietly continues to carve out a role in Miami’s high-octane offense — and in deeper leagues, that makes him an intriguing Week 9 pickup. The rookie logged 10 carries for 46 yards and added a 20-yard receiving touchdown in Week 8, flashing the same downhill burst and contact balance that made him a collegiate star. His 2.9 yards after contact per attempt ranks second among Miami backs over the past three games, showing he’s making the most of limited touches. Kyle Monangai — Chicago Bears (38% rostered, FAAB 3-5%) Monangai is quietly earning more touches — 20 carries for 105 yards and a TD over the last two weeks — and now draws the Bengals’ defense, which just gave up 200+ yards to the Jets’ RBs. A strong streaming play for managers in need. Wide Receivers Troy Franklin — Denver Broncos (42% rostered, FAAB 10-12%) Franklin broke out in Week 8 with 6 catches for 89 yards and 2 TDs, finally overtaking Marvin Mims in snaps and targets. His 25% target share over the past two games signals a role expansion that could stick. Franklin’s speed and route nuance make him a legitimate WR3 with upside in both redraft and dynasty. Alec Pierce — WR, Indianapolis Colts (10% rostered, FAAB 3–5%) Alec Pierce has quietly emerged as a steady Flex option and one of the best under-the-radar deep threats still available in fantasy. He’s averaged 9.4 PPR points per game this season — ranking inside the top 50 among wide receivers and first among players available in most leagues. In Week 8, Pierce hauled in 2 catches for 69 yards, continuing to show his vertical efficiency as the Colts’ primary X receiver. His 14.7-yard average depth of target (aDOT) keeps him in big-play territory every week. Chimere Dike — Tennessee Titans (4% rostered, FAAB 3-5%) The rookie followed up his 70-yard TD outing with 7 catches for 93 yards. With Calvin Ridley still battling injury and Tyler Lockett released, Dike has carved out a steady 70%+ snap share. He’s worth adding before the breakout becomes mainstream. Jayden Higgins — Houston Texans (21% rostered, FAAB 3-4%) With Nico Collins sidelined, Higgins led the Texans in targets (8) and routes (34). His 11.4 half-PPR points highlight a growing chemistry with C.J. Stroud, and his role could stick even once Collins returns. Tight Ends Oronde Gadsden II — Los Angeles Chargers (69% rostered, FAAB 8-10%) Gadsden has exploded with 12 catches for 241 yards and 2 TDs in the last two weeks, ranking as the TE1 in half-PPR scoring. The Chargers are featuring him as a hybrid slot weapon, and his 21% target share over that stretch rivals elite TEs. If he’s somehow available, he’s a must-add in every format. Isaiah Likely — Baltimore Ravens (4% rostered, FAAB 3-5%) Likely continues to split time with Andrews but could see a major bump if Baltimore deals Andrews at the deadline. Over the past three games, Likely has earned a 17% target share when lined up as the primary tight end. A speculative stash with top-10 upside if the depth chart shifts. Colston Loveland — Chicago Bears (24% rostered, FAAB 2-4%) With Cole Kmet nursing a back injury, Loveland’s 81% snap share and 78% route rate put him squarely on the streaming radar. The Bears face the Bengals, who’ve allowed the most fantasy points to tight ends this year. Deep League Adds Isaiah Davis (Jets) – Stash if Breece Hall trade rumors persist. Bam Knight (Cardinals) – Short-term volume until Trey Benson returns. Parker Washington (Jaguars) – Sneaky slot role in Jacksonville’s offense.

2024 NFL Combine: Day Three Recap, Quarterbacks | Who Impressed? | Do The Numbers Match The Scouting Report? Day three of the 2024 NFL Combine is underway, and we are recapping the top performances by position group on the day. Check back at the end of each day as we continue to recap every position group from the drill work at the 2024 NFL Combine. Overview of Today's Analysis Below, we provide a breakdown of the top players ranked within their respective position groups. This analysis is based on the drill work and how it correlates with each prospect's initial scouting report from the Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Big Board, available on our website. Grading If the Film Matches the NFL Combine Data The aim of today's analysis is to assess each prospect's NFL Combine drill performance. We consider all aspects of the workouts, from the 40-yard dash to the on-field exercises, to determine if a prospect's previous film analysis and scouting report align with their performance during the NFL Combine's on-field drills. Learn more about the player grade scale here. The Top Quarterback's Grades At The 2024 NFL Combine J.J. McCarthy, QB, Michigan (6’ 2 1/2’’, 219 lbs) Combine Data & Ranking Within His Position Group: 40-Yard Dash: 10-Yard Split: Vertical Jump: Broad Jump: Scouting Report Connection: J.J. McCarthy is characterized as a quarterback with a unique set of skills that deviate from traditional early-round QB expectations. While lacking in certain physical measurables and arm strength, his poise in the pocket and ability to make plays outside the conventional structure highlight a player with significant potential. McCarthy's mental toughness, focus in critical game moments, and ability to use adversity as motivation indicate a strong psychological foundation for a quarterback. Grade Assignment: Reflecting on McCarthy’s perceived college performance and intangible qualities, despite the lack of specific combine data, his grade aligns with a Above Average to Good (6-7) based on the scouting insights provided. McCarthy exhibits a combination of qualities that, with further development and refinement, could see him evolve beyond an average starter to become a significant player at the NFL level. His progression will be contingent on his ability to improve in areas such as ball placement, timing, and physical conditioning. Michael Penix Jr., QB, Washington (6’ 2’’, 216 lbs) Combine Data & Ranking Within His Position Group: 40-Yard Dash: 10-Yard Split: Vertical Jump: Broad Jump: Scouting Report Connection: Michael Penix Jr. presents a complex blend of experience and vulnerability, with a collegiate tenure marked by both significant production and recurrent injuries. His time at Washington showcased his capability to operate effectively in a tailored offensive scheme, highlighting his strengths in making intermediate and deep passes. Penix’s adeptness in the pocket, combined with his strategic mobility, underscores his potential. Nonetheless, his unconventional throwing mechanics and history of injuries pose challenges for his transition to the NFL. Grade Assignment: Considering Penix’s substantial collegiate output and his physical attributes, despite the absence of detailed combine metrics, his grade would align with Above Average to Good (6-7) based on available insights. Penix embodies the traits of a quarterback who could excel in a supportive system, particularly one that leverages his arm talent and decision-making skills. His development at the professional level will depend significantly on his ability to adapt to diverse offensive strategies and his resilience in overcoming past injury concerns. Bo Nix, QB, Oregon (6’ 2’’, 214 lbs) Combine Data & Ranking Within His Position Group: 40-Yard Dash: Data not provided 10-Yard Split: Data not provided Vertical Jump: Data not provided Broad Jump: Data not provided Scouting Report Connection: Bo Nix is recognized for his significant evolution as a quarterback over five seasons, showing marked improvements in accuracy, arm talent, and athleticism. His ability to execute both structured plays and improvisational second-reaction plays demonstrates a versatility fitting the modern pro quarterback mold. While some of his success is attributed to the offensive system at Oregon, Nix has evidently grown beyond his earlier years at Auburn, showcasing an NFL-ready skill set characterized by enhanced pocket poise and effective mobility. Grade Assignment: Given Nix’s high production score and the developmental arc reflected in his scouting report, his grade is Above Average to Good (6-7) . His experience and upward trajectory, combined with the physical and mental attributes necessary for success at the next level, suggest he is poised to become a solid starter in the NFL. Continued refinement and adaptation to the pro game will be key to fulfilling his potential and transitioning his college success to professional achievement. Joe Milton III, QB, Tennessee (6’ 5’’, 235 lbs) Combine Data & Ranking Within His Position Group: 40-Yard Dash: 10-Yard Split: Vertical Jump: 35'' Broad Jump: 10’ 1’’ Scouting Report Connection: Joe Milton III is described as a quarterback with exceptional physical attributes and arm strength, capable of making the challenging throws required in the NFL. However, his challenges lie in the finer aspects of quarterbacking, such as timing, accuracy, and touch. Despite his ability to create impressive plays with his strength and mobility, inconsistency and a lack of development in reading defenses and making multidimensional decisions have hindered his progression. His athleticism, as evidenced by his vertical and broad jump performances, showcases his potential beyond traditional pocket passing. Grade Assignment: Considering Milton’s remarkable physical talents contrasted with his developmental needs in decision-making and accuracy, his grade would be Average (5) . While his athletic scores and arm strength are intriguing, translating those into consistent, effective quarterback play at the NFL level will require significant improvement in his mental approach to the game and technical skills. If Milton can harness his physical attributes and enhance his understanding of the game, there is potential for him to develop into a more reliable quarterback option. Sam Hartman, QB, Notre Dame (6’ 1’’, 211 lbs) Combine Data & Ranking Within His Position Group: 40-Yard Dash: 4.8 seconds 10-Yard Split: 1.63 seconds Vertical Jump: 28.5'' Broad Jump: 8’ 10’’ Scouting Report Connection: Sam Hartman is identified as a QB with a solid build and competitive edge, capable of improvisational play beyond the structured offense. His performance at Notre Dame, coupled with his time at Wake Forest, exhibits a quarterback comfortable making plays outside the pocket. However, concerns regarding his consistency, arm strength, and propensity for turnovers are highlighted against his ability to process quickly and navigate through reads efficiently. Grade Assignment: Reflecting on Hartman's combine performance and his collegiate track record, his grade is Average (5) . While he shows the mental acuity and competitive spirit desirable in a quarterback, his average physical attributes and performance metrics suggest limitations in his transition to the NFL level. Hartman's potential growth into a more reliable player will depend significantly on his ability to refine his decision-making and enhance his physical capabilities to match the demands of a professional quarterback role. Spencer Rattler, QB, South Carolina (6’ 0’’, 211 lbs) Combine Data & Ranking Within His Position Group: 40-Yard Dash: 4.95 seconds 10-Yard Split: 1.63 seconds Vertical Jump: 32'' Broad Jump: 9’ 0’’ Scouting Report Connection: Spencer Rattler's tenure as a college quarterback displayed moments of high capability, particularly in his earlier seasons. However, his performance has been inconsistent, failing to sustain the level of play expected by NFL standards. While he has shown the ability to scramble and create plays, his physical limitations, such as height and arm strength, restrict his ability to be a dominant force against robust NFL defenses. Rattler's challenges were compounded by external factors such as poor pass protection and unreliable receiving options during his final college season. Grade Assignment: Considering Rattler’s collegiate production and the attributes demonstrated at the combine, his grade would align with Average (5) . While he possesses the basic skills required for a quarterback and has shown flashes of potential, his overall profile suggests that he fits better as a backup or a developmental QB2/3 in the NFL. Rattler’s success at the next level will largely depend on finding a system that accommodates his style of play and addresses his weaknesses, along with improvements in his decision-making and consistency.

Fantasy Football: 10 Players Who Can Outperform Their ADP in 2024 Fantasy Football: Identifying players who are undervalued compared to their ADP is crucial for building a championship fantasy football roster. These 10 players are ranked ahead of their ADP by 10 or more spots according to the Football Scout 365 fantasy rankings, making them potential steals or league-winning values either immediately or as the season progresses. Whether you’re targeting a high-upside rookie like Jayden Daniels or a proven veteran like Raheem Mostert, these players offer the opportunity to outperform their draft price and provide significant returns on investment. 10 Players Who Can Outperform Their ADP in 2024 Tua Tagovailoa, QB, Miami Dolphins ADP: 105 2QB ADP: 22 Summary: Tua Tagovailoa has the potential to be a QB1 in 2024 if he can even out his production. Despite finishing as the QB16 in fantasy points per game last season, Tagovailoa led the NFL in passing yards and was elite in key metrics like yards per attempt and completion percentage over expected (CPOE). His ADP as a QB2 does not fully reflect his upside, making him a potential steal in 2QB formats. Jayden Daniels, QB, Washington Commanders ADP: 114 2QB ADP: 27 Summary: Jayden Daniels is a rookie quarterback with elite rushing upside, reminiscent of past dual-threat quarterbacks like Cam Newton and Lamar Jackson. Daniels enters the NFL with a solid college background and is stepping into an offense that suits his strengths. Given his potential for both passing and rushing production, Daniels is a prime candidate to outproduce his current ADP, making him a potential low-end QB1 and a league-winning value in 2QB formats. David Montgomery, RB, Detroit Lions ADP: 63 Summary: David Montgomery finished as the RB15 in 2023, proving to be a reliable option in the Lions’ backfield. He is set to continue sharing touches with Jahmyr Gibbs but remains the primary early-down and red zone back. Montgomery’s current ADP undervalues his role in one of the NFL’s most potent offenses, making him a solid RB2 with potential upside, especially in .5 PPR formats. George Pickens, WR, Pittsburgh Steelers ADP: 75 Summary: George Pickens is on the verge of a breakout in his third year, particularly with Diontae Johnson no longer in the picture. While the Steelers’ run-heavy offense could limit his ceiling, Pickens has shown the ability to produce in tough matchups. His ADP does not fully account for his potential growth and increased target share, making him an intriguing upside play in 2024. Raheem Mostert, RB, Miami Dolphins ADP: 103 Summary: Raheem Mostert was a standout performer last season, finishing as the RB4 in fantasy with 21 touchdowns. Despite being in a timeshare with De'Von Achane, Mostert's efficiency and explosive playmaking ability make him a solid RB2 with RB1 upside in Miami’s high-octane offense. His current ADP undervalues his role, making him a strong value pick in 2024. Zack Moss, RB, Cincinnati Bengals ADP: 111 Summary: Zack Moss is set to inherit a significant workload in the Bengals' offense following Joe Mixon’s departure. Moss is expected to handle early-down work, providing a solid floor and potential for RB2 production. His ADP is much lower than his projected role, making him a valuable pick for fantasy managers looking for stable running back options later in drafts. Brian Robinson, RB, Washington Commanders ADP: 126 Summary: Brian Robinson was quietly effective last season, showcasing a three-down skillset. With Austin Ekeler expected to challenge him for passing down and red zone work, Robinson may settle into an RB2/3 role. However, his ADP significantly undervalues his potential workload, making him a sneaky value pick, especially in deeper leagues. Justin Fields, QB, Pittsburgh Steelers ADP: 149 2QB ADP: 42 Summary: Justin Fields is a high-risk, high-reward fantasy option in 2024. Despite competition with Russell Wilson for the starting job, Fields’ dual-threat ability provides him with significant upside. His current ADP reflects uncertainty, but if he secures the starting role, Fields could deliver QB1 value, particularly in 2QB formats. Chase Brown, RB, Cincinnati Bengals ADP: 135 Summary: Chase Brown is one of the Bengals' most exciting prospects heading into 2024. With the potential to take over the backfield, Brown is generating buzz in training camp. His ability to force missed tackles and gain yards after contact makes him a high-upside handcuff who could become a lead back. His ADP makes him an excellent late-round pick with significant upside. Demario Douglas, WR, New England Patriots ADP: 183.6 Summary: DeMario Douglas was a surprising contributor for the Patriots last season, leading the team in receiving yards despite not scoring any touchdowns. With competition from newly drafted receivers, his role in the offense is uncertain, but his ADP leaves room for upside. Douglas could be a valuable depth piece or bye-week filler in deeper leagues.

How DeAndre Hopkins Can Improve the Chiefs' Red Zone Efficiency in 2024 DeAndre Hopkins' contested-catch ability can boost Mahomes' red zone efficiency in 2024, turning more of his 92.3% on-target throws into TDs. While DeAndre Hopkins is expected to improve the Kansas City Chiefs' offense overall, one key area that deserves a closer look is red zone passing in 2024 . Given the Chiefs’ struggles in converting red zone opportunities into touchdowns, Hopkins could be a reason for optimism, particularly when it comes to improving Patrick Mahomes' efficiency when targeting outside wide receivers. Evaluating Deandre Hopkins' Endzone Target Efficiency in the Redzone (2021-23) From 2021-2023, in the red zone, Hopkins was targeted 22 times on throws to the endzone , catching 8 TDs with an 88% catchable throw rate . These numbers aren’t necessarily elite—players like Mike Evans had 34 end zone targets , 17 TDs , and a 49% catch rate during the same period. Similarly, Davante Adams had 31 end zone targets , 16 TDs , and a 53% catch rate . While Hopkins’ end zone catch rate (39%) might not stand out, his contested-catch ability in tight spaces makes him an invaluable asset in the red zone. DeAndre Hopkins : 39% catch rate, 8 TDs Mike Evans : 49% catch rate, 17 TDs Davante Adams : 53% catch rate, 16 TDs Patrick Mahomes' performance in the red zone passing game in 2024 has been subpar, but the blame cannot solely be placed on him. Looking at Patrick Mahomes' 2024 red zone passing numbers , there’s a clear gap between his accuracy and his scoring output. Mahomes has an elite 92.3% on-target throw rate in the red zone, but his completion rate is at 69.2% , and his TD rate sits at just 15.4% . Compare that to other quarterbacks in 2024: Josh Allen : 15 attempts, 26.7% TD rate, 53.3% completion rate, 80% on-target throw rate Joe Burrow : 22 attempts, 27.3% TD rate, 50% completion rate, 85% on-target throw rate Justin Herbert : 12 attempts, 25% TD rate, 66.7% completion rate, 75% on-target throw rate Despite Mahomes' accuracy, his red zone efficiency when it comes to touchdowns is notably lower than other top QBs. This is where Hopkins can make a huge difference. Hopkins' contested-catch ability and success in tight spaces, especially in the end zone, can help Mahomes convert more of those on-target throws into touchdowns. Not only will Hopkins likely become the primary target , but his presence will demand additional defensive attention, freeing up more opportunities for Travis Kelce , Xavier Worthy , and even the run game in critical red zone situations.