College Football Playoff Probabilities & Win Projections Ahead of Week 7 See the latest rankings based on playoff odds, strength of schedule, and our manual win projections for the top 12 teams this season. The rankings for Week 7 are based on the implied playoff odds provided by BetOnline AG and strength of schedule data sourced from ESPN’s Football Power Index (FPI). The win totals are projected using our own algorithm, taking into account each team's strength of schedule, remaining matchups, roster talent, coaching effectiveness, and past performances. These projections highlight the most winnable and challenging games for each team as they navigate their schedules. Below are the top 12 teams, their rankings, and the key metrics influencing their playoff odds. College Football Playoff Rankings and Win Projections: Week 7 Update 1). Ohio State Buckeyes (5-0, Next Matchup: vs Oregon Ducks) Implied Playoff Odds: 95.2% Strength of schedule (SOS): 111 Remaining SOS: 17 Offense Rank: 3 Defense Rank: 5 Win Total Prediction: 12 games 2). Texas Longhorns (5-0, Next Matchup: vs Oklahoma Sooners) Implied Playoff Odds: 92.3% Strength of schedule (SOS): 104 Remaining SOS: 9 Offense Rank: 9 Defense Rank: 2 Win Total Prediction: 12 games 3). Oregon Ducks (5-0, Next Matchup: vs Ohio State Buckeyes) Implied Playoff Odds: 88.9% Strength of schedule (SOS): 95 Remaining SOS: 25 Offense Rank: 20 Defense Rank: 24 Win Total Prediction: 11 games 4). Alabama Crimson Tide (4-1, Next Matchup: vs Tennessee Volunteers) Implied Playoff Odds: 83.3% Strength of schedule (SOS): 25 Remaining SOS: 15 Offense Rank: 12 Defense Rank: 13 Win Total Prediction: 10 games 5). Georgia Bulldogs (4-1, Next Matchup: vs Kentucky Wildcats) Implied Playoff Odds: 83.3% Strength of schedule (SOS): 3 Remaining SOS: 3 Offense Rank: 13 Defense Rank: 21 Win Total Prediction: 10 games 6). Miami Hurricanes (6-0, Next Matchup: vs Clemson Tigers) Implied Playoff Odds: 72.2% Strength of schedule (SOS): 64 Remaining SOS: 51 Offense Rank: 7 Defense Rank: 51 Win Total Prediction: 11 games 7). Penn State Nittany Lions (5-0, Next Matchup: vs USC Trojans) Implied Playoff Odds: 71.4% Strength of schedule (SOS): 96 Remaining SOS: 16 Offense Rank: 18 Defense Rank: 17 Win Total Prediction: 10 games 8). Ole Miss Rebels (5-1, Next Matchup: vs LSU Tigers) Implied Playoff Odds: 58.3% Strength of schedule (SOS): 81 Remaining SOS: 21 Offense Rank: 11 Defense Rank: 6 Win Total Prediction: 10 games 9). Notre Dame Fighting Irish (4-1, Next Matchup: vs USC Trojans) Implied Playoff Odds: 55.6% Strength of schedule (SOS): 42 Remaining SOS: 55 Offense Rank: 46 Defense Rank: 3 Win Total Prediction: 10 games 10). Clemson Tigers (4-1, Next Matchup: vs Miami Hurricanes) Implied Playoff Odds: 54.6% Strength of schedule (SOS): 31 Remaining SOS: 49 Offense Rank: 5 Defense Rank: 14 Win Total Prediction: 10 games 11). Tennessee Volunteers (4-1, Next Matchup: vs Alabama Crimson Tide) Implied Playoff Odds: 47.6% Strength of schedule (SOS): 50 Remaining SOS: 13 Offense Rank: 22 Defense Rank: 1 Win Total Prediction: 9 games 12). Texas A&M Aggies (4-1, Next Matchup: vs Missouri Tigers) Implied Playoff Odds: 41.7% Strength of schedule (SOS): 27 Remaining SOS: 22 Offense Rank: 31 Defense Rank: 10 Win Total Prediction: 10 games

Quinshon Judkins Dynasty Rookie Profile – Fantasy Football 2025 Quinshon Judkins Dynasty Rookie Profile RB – Cleveland Browns | Drafted: Round 2, Pick 36 | College: Ohio State Quinshon Judkins brings early-down hammer traits and underrated three-down potential to a Browns offense looking to rebuild its ground game. With second-round draft capital and a clear rushing path, Judkins enters 2025 dynasty leagues as a high-floor RB2 option with touchdown upside. College Career Recap Judkins began his college career at Ole Miss, exploding onto the scene with over 1,500 scrimmage yards and 17 touchdowns as a true freshman. His north-south running style, compact power, and quick decision-making made him one of the most productive backs in the SEC. After two standout years, he transferred to Ohio State in 2024, where he split work with fellow draft pick TreVeyon Henderson and helped lead the Buckeyes to a national title. Even with the reduced volume, Judkins maintained top-tier efficiency, finishing his collegiate career with a rushing grade consistently above 87.0 and never fumbling more than once in a season. Though rarely used as a receiver, his hands were reliable, and his limited 2024 receiving reps at Ohio State showed promising flashes. His elite vision and physical style translated in both gap and inside-zone concepts. NFL Scouting Report NFL Scouting Report At 6’0” and 221 lbs, Quinshon Judkins enters the NFL as one of the most physically imposing backs in the 2025 class. Built with a dense frame and low center of gravity, Judkins combines bruising power with surprising burst. His athletic profile (4.48 40-yard dash, 1.51 10-yard split, 38.5” vertical, 11’ broad) confirms what the film already shows—he’s explosive through the hole and finishes with authority. Judkins thrives in inside zone and gap schemes where he can press the line, make a controlled one-cut, and accelerate through contact. He’s a violent finisher, generating yards after contact with a natural forward lean and elite contact balance. He consistently falls forward, averaging a touchdown once every 16 carries over his college career. His footwork in tight spaces and ability to control stride length give him the tools to work effectively behind interior-heavy blocking schemes. However, Judkins’ game is built on momentum rather than lateral agility. His hips are tight, limiting sudden re-directs or jukes in confined spaces. He’s not a natural creator when the play breaks down and lacks the top-end speed to consistently beat defenders to the boundary. He’s best when operating on schedule in a well-structured run scheme. As a receiver, Judkins flashed improved hands in 2024 but was rarely asked to run complex routes. He brings functional pass-catching value and has the frame to absorb contact over the middle. Pass protection remains a developmental area—he has the build and physical mindset for blitz pickup, but inconsistent technique and awareness limit his third-down upside early on. Scheme Fit & Projected Role with Browns The Browns selected Judkins early in Round 2 to reboot their backfield after moving on from Nick Chubb and D’Onta Foreman. While Jerome Ford and rookie Dylan Sampson are in the mix, Judkins is expected to take the lead role on early downs. Under head coach Kevin Stefanski, Cleveland has leaned into the run game—often with committee usage—but the investment in Judkins signals a shift toward establishing a primary runner. He’ll likely handle 12–15 carries per game out of the gate, with red zone and short-yardage work giving him weekly scoring upside. If he can prove capable on passing downs, Judkins has a shot to grow into a true bell cow role. Rookie Outlook (2025) Floor: RB3 with consistent rushing volume and TD upside Ceiling: RB2 with three-down potential in a run-centric system Early Projection: 180–210 carries, 15–25 targets, 1,100 total yards, 8–10 TDs Expected PPG (0.5 PPR): 8.8 – 14.8 Long-Term Dynasty Value Judkins offers plug-and-play value in early rookie drafts, particularly in 1QB formats where he projects as a mid-late Round 1 selection. In Superflex leagues, he’s consistently falling into the 1.07-1.08 range in 2QB formats. While the offensive line in Cleveland is aging, Judkins’ workload projection and red zone utility give him a high weekly floor. If he can grow as a pass catcher and earn more snaps in two-minute situations, Judkins could develop into a reliable top-15 fantasy RB. At just 21 years old, he’s a long-term asset with foundational upside in dynasty leagues.

How We Scout The Offensive Guard And Center Positions | NFL Draft | Football Scouting and Analytics Scouting the offensive guard position in the NFL requires evaluating a player's strength, agility, and blocking ability. Below is a list of critical components we use to grade the OG position during the NFL Draft process. Every OG receives a grade on a scale of 1-10 for each of the below components during the scouting process. Once each player component is graded, we attach a final grade to indicate where the player stands before entering the NFL Draft, and then we attach a ceiling grade based on future potential. Here are some key factors to consider when scouting an offensive guard: Size and Strength: An offensive guard needs to have size and strength to hold their ground against defensive linemen. This includes their ability to generate power at the point of attack, maintain leverage, and finish blocks. Run Blocking: An offensive guard needs to be able to execute a variety of run-blocking techniques, including drive blocking, zone blocking, and pulling. This includes their ability to identify their blocking assignments, maintain proper pad level, and create running lanes for the ball carrier. Pass Protection: An offensive guard needs to be able to pass protect effectively. This includes their ability to anchor against bull rushes, slide their feet to maintain balance, and pass off stunts and twists. Agility and Footwork: An offensive guard must have good agility and footwork to be effective in running and passing. This includes their ability to move laterally, pull and lead in the running game, and set their feet to engage defenders. Football IQ: An offensive guard's football intelligence is important in order to make quick decisions and adjustments on the field. This includes their ability to recognize defensive fronts, communicate with their teammates, and execute their blocking assignments. Durability: An offensive guard's durability is important, as they will be taking a lot of hits on the field. This includes their ability to stay healthy and recover quickly from injuries. When scouting an offensive guard, it's essential to evaluate all of these factors and the player's overall performance on the field. It's also important to consider the team's specific needs and whether the offensive guard's skills and attributes match the team's offensive system and style of play. Additionally, it's important to consider the offensive guard's penalties and mental mistakes, as these can be a liability for the offense. Scouting the center position in the NFL requires evaluating a player's intelligence, technique, and versatility. Below is a list of critical components we use to grade the OC position during the NFL Draft process. Every OC receives a grade on a scale of 1-9 for each of the below components during the scouting process. Once each player component is graded, we attach a final grade to indicate where the player stands before entering the NFL Draft, and then we attach a ceiling grade based on future potential. Here are some key factors to consider when scouting a center: Intelligence: A center needs to read and recognize defensive fronts, communicate blocking assignments to teammates, and make quick decisions under pressure. This includes their ability to process information quickly, adapt to changing situations, and understand their team's offensive scheme. Technique: A center must have good technique to execute their blocking assignments effectively. This includes their ability to snap the ball accurately, maintain a proper stance and pad level, and use their hands and feet effectively to engage defenders. Strength and Power: A center needs good strength and power to anchor against powerful defensive linemen. This includes their ability to generate power with their lower body, maintain leverage, and finish blocks. Versatility: A center needs to be versatile enough to play in different offensive systems and schemes. This includes their ability to execute different blocking techniques, adjust to different quarterback cadences, and work effectively with different offensive linemen. Football IQ: A center's football intelligence is important in order to make quick decisions and adjustments on the field. This includes recognizing defensive fronts, communicating with their teammates, and adjusting their blocking assignments as necessary. Durability: A center's durability is important, as they will be taking a lot of hits on the field. This includes their ability to stay healthy and recover quickly from injuries. When scouting a center, it's important to evaluate all of these factors and the player's overall performance on the field. It's also important to consider the team's specific needs and whether the center's skills and attributes match the team's offensive system and style of play. Additionally, it's essential to consider the center's penalties and mental mistakes, as these can be a liability for the offense.

← Back to NFL Draft Big Board Kyu Blu Kelly Stanford HT: 6000 WT: 191 YR: SR POS: CB OVR RK 97 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 16 KEY STRENGTHS KEY CONCERNS PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT PLAYER COMPARISON: CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS Low-Level Starter Potential (55-59) A player with the upside to be a low-end starter or high-level backup within a couple of seasons. While they have solid physical tools, inconsistencies in technique, processing, or durability limit their ceiling. They are developmental prospects who may carve out a role as specialists or system fits. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Grade Scale Football Scout 365 grades reflect a prospect’s projected long-term NFL value and role. Draft ranges are general value projections, not predictions of an exact selection. Positional value, team needs, scheme fit, medical information and athletic testing can influence where a player is ultimately selected. How Football Scout 365 Grades NFL Draft Prospects Elite (75+): A rare, high-impact prospect with elite physical tools, advanced football intelligence and the ability to make an immediate NFL impact. Elite prospects carry franchise-altering potential and typically project as top 5–10 selections in the first round. Near Elite (70–74): A high-caliber prospect with outstanding physical tools, strong football intelligence and only minor developmental limitations. Near Elite prospects project as significant early-career contributors with Pro Bowl upside and first-round draft value. High-End Starter Potential (65–69): A starting-caliber prospect with strong physical tools, quality technical skills and a defined NFL role. These players may require development before reaching their ceiling but generally carry second- or third-round draft value. Mid-Level Starter Potential (60–64): A solid prospect with NFL-level tools and a pathway to becoming a dependable starter if key limitations are addressed. These players generally carry third- to fifth-round draft value. Low-Level Starter Potential (55–59): A developmental prospect who could become a low-end starter, high-end backup or valuable specialist in the right role. These players generally carry fifth- to seventh-round draft value. Backup Level (50–54): A depth or rotational prospect with enough functional ability to compete for an NFL roster spot but limited long-term starting potential. These players generally project as late Day 3 selections or priority undrafted free agents. Not NFL Level (Below 50): A developmental or camp prospect who does not currently demonstrate enough consistency, technical refinement or functional NFL traits to project as a regular contributor. These players generally project as undrafted free agents, practice-squad candidates or camp invitations. Draft position can vary based on positional value, team needs, scheme fit, medical evaluation and athletic testing.

Syracuse safety Andre Cisco, the first true freshman in program history to earn All-America honors, will forego his college eligibility and enter the 2021 NFL Draft. Cisco, who suffered a season-ending injury earlier this season, announced the news Tuesday evening. Cisco had been pegged as an early draft entry since earning All-America honors as a true freshman in 2018, when he tied for the national lead with seven interceptions. - The Post-Standard ← Back to NFL Draft Big Board Andre Cisco Syracuse HT: 6000 WT: 203 YR: JR POS: S OVR RK 79 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 7 KEY STRENGTHS KEY CONCERNS PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT Syracuse safety Andre Cisco, the first true freshman in program history to earn All-America honors, will forego his college eligibility and enter the 2021 NFL Draft. Cisco, who suffered a season-ending injury earlier this season, announced the news Tuesday evening. Cisco had been pegged as an early draft entry since earning All-America honors as a true freshman in 2018, when he tied for the national lead with seven interceptions. - The Post-Standard PLAYER COMPARISON: CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS Low-Level Starter Potential (55-59) A player with the upside to be a low-end starter or high-level backup within a couple of seasons. While they have solid physical tools, inconsistencies in technique, processing, or durability limit their ceiling. They are developmental prospects who may carve out a role as specialists or system fits. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Grade Scale Football Scout 365 grades reflect a prospect’s projected long-term NFL value and role. Draft ranges are general value projections, not predictions of an exact selection. Positional value, team needs, scheme fit, medical information and athletic testing can influence where a player is ultimately selected. How Football Scout 365 Grades NFL Draft Prospects Elite (75+): A rare, high-impact prospect with elite physical tools, advanced football intelligence and the ability to make an immediate NFL impact. Elite prospects carry franchise-altering potential and typically project as top 5–10 selections in the first round. Near Elite (70–74): A high-caliber prospect with outstanding physical tools, strong football intelligence and only minor developmental limitations. Near Elite prospects project as significant early-career contributors with Pro Bowl upside and first-round draft value. High-End Starter Potential (65–69): A starting-caliber prospect with strong physical tools, quality technical skills and a defined NFL role. These players may require development before reaching their ceiling but generally carry second- or third-round draft value. Mid-Level Starter Potential (60–64): A solid prospect with NFL-level tools and a pathway to becoming a dependable starter if key limitations are addressed. These players generally carry third- to fifth-round draft value. Low-Level Starter Potential (55–59): A developmental prospect who could become a low-end starter, high-end backup or valuable specialist in the right role. These players generally carry fifth- to seventh-round draft value. Backup Level (50–54): A depth or rotational prospect with enough functional ability to compete for an NFL roster spot but limited long-term starting potential. These players generally project as late Day 3 selections or priority undrafted free agents. Not NFL Level (Below 50): A developmental or camp prospect who does not currently demonstrate enough consistency, technical refinement or functional NFL traits to project as a regular contributor. These players generally project as undrafted free agents, practice-squad candidates or camp invitations. Draft position can vary based on positional value, team needs, scheme fit, medical evaluation and athletic testing.

Fantasy Football League Winners YouTube Series Top 10 Through Week 6 Of The 2022 NFL Season Over the last few months, the Football Scout 365 NFL podcast team has been hard at work trying to ID potential fantasy football league winners. Today, I wanted to rank the top ten from the 17 potential league winners we have discussed on the podcast since August using a basic grade scale. Grade Scale A= Player has the highest potential league-winning value B= Player is in a timeshare, not the number one at his position, or has been inconsistent, but has shown high-level league winner potential C= Player is a key piece but is not number one at his position. Will need to be more consistent or move up the depth chart. The player is a current flex play or stash D= Was once believed to carry league-winner potential but has yet to move up the depth chart or receive enough snaps. A low-level stash. 1). Deandre Hopkins (A) League Winning Grade: A Hopkins returns Week 7, and if early reports of Hollywood Brown being in a walking boot after wk6 are serious, Hopkins is just in time to retake his WR1 in the Cardinals offense. 2). Kenneth Walker III (A) Walker assumed the lead role in the Seattle backfield after Penny's injury. The last two weeks, Walker has posted 32 fantasy points in the previous two weeks and has shown his explosive playmaking ability if for real. 3). Breece Hall (A) Breece has been a fantasy darling since he was drafted, but his timeshare with Michael Carter early in the season limited his opportunities. Since wk4, Breece has taken the backfield over, posting 20 fantasy pts per game. 4). Rhamondre Stevenson (A) In week 5, Stevenson took over the backfield after Harris injured his hammy. Stevenson racked up 22.5 fantasy points while handling 90% of the backfield snaps. In wk6, Stevenson scored 23 fantasy pts vs. the Browns. 5). Josh Allen (A) Josh Alen, like Lamar, provides league-winning upside because of his big play ability as a passer and runner. He is the QB1. 6). Lamar Jackson (A) We did a combo video on who will be the league MVP in 2022. As of wk6 it is Josh Allen. But Lamar is still QB2, his rushing upside and improved passing allow him to remain one of the best fantasy options. 7). Brian Robinson (B) Robinson is in a favorable spot to receive a heavy workload down the line. In his return from being shot two times in a robbery attempt just over a month ago, it took Robinson two weeks to take over the backfield from Antonio Gibson. In wk6, Robinson broke out with a 47% snap share, 13.5 fantasy pts. 8). J.K. Dobbins (C) Dobbins returned wk3 vs. the Patriots and was on a pitch count. He Assumed 43% snap share in week 3. Wk4 vs. Buffalo, Dobbins scores 22 fantasy pts, returns to earth wk5 vs. Bengals. Wk6, Dobbins started the game before knee "tightness" occurred, rushed 7 times for 15 yds. 9). David Njoku (B) After 6 weeks, Njoku is TE 6. With Brissett at QB, Njoku has been inconsistent yet has posted a 24 pt and 15 pt fantasy performance. Once Watson returns, the bet is Njoku could become a favorite target of a QB who relied on his TE's in the past. 10). Romeo Doubs (C) Since wk3, Doubs has recorded a 90% snap rate with 30 targets in an offense in search of a playmaking WR. Wk3 and 4, Doubs scored 30+ combined fantasy pts against the Bills and Pats, scoring twice. Wk5 and 6, Doubs has fallen back to earth, recording 10 total fantasy pts, but he remains a highly targeted option with 14 targets.

Is Will Howard the Right Choice for Ohio State's Starting QB in 2024? Will Howard Named Ohio State Starting QB in 2024: Ohio State Football's Head Coach Ryan Day made a significant decision by naming Will Howard the starting quarterback for the Buckeyes in 2024. This decision comes amidst considerable changes to the Buckeyes' offense, primarily driven by the arrival of new offensive coordinator Chip Kelly. The big question on everyone's mind: Is Will Howard the right fit for this new-look Ohio State offense? Howard's Leadership and Command Day's decision to start Howard stems from his impressive performance during fall camp. "He's taken command of the huddle (and) at the line of scrimmage. I think he's much more confident out there. Will really has taken some strides here in the last couple of practices, taking control of the offense, making plays on third down," said Day. Leadership and command are critical traits for a starting quarterback, especially in a program like Ohio State, where expectations are sky-high. Howard's ability to lead and make crucial plays will be vital as he steps into the spotlight. Ohio State's Shift in Offensive Philosophy One of the most intriguing aspects of the 2024 season is the evolution of Ohio State's offense. Historically, Ryan Day's offense has leaned heavily on the passing game, often to great success. However, with Chip Kelly now at the helm as offensive coordinator, we can expect a shift towards a more balanced, run-heavy attack. Kelly, known for his innovative run schemes during his time at Oregon, is looking to implement a dual-threat system that takes advantage of both the run game and the quarterback's mobility. The decision to start Howard aligns with this new philosophy. As a transfer quarterback, Howard brings a different skill set to the table. While he may not be the prototypical dual-threat quarterback, his command of the offense and ability to make smart decisions will be crucial in executing Kelly's vision. The run game will be a focal point, and Howard’s role will likely be to manage the game efficiently, make timely throws, and perhaps surprise defenses with his mobility when needed. A Loaded Backfield Ohio State's 2024 offense is expected to be one of the most dynamic in college football, particularly in the run game. With TreVeyon Henderson and Ole Miss transfer Quinshon Judkins forming what could be the best backfield duo in the nation, the Buckeyes have the firepower to dominate on the ground. Howard’s role will be to complement this potent rushing attack, keeping defenses honest and capitalizing on play-action/RPO opportunities. How Does WIll Howard Fit? Urban Meyer, former Ohio State head coach, shared his thoughts on Kelly’s offense and its fit with Howard. “I do believe it’s going to help Ohio State. They’ve got the quarterback that fits this scheme,” Meyer said. Meyer’s endorsement suggests that Howard is indeed the right man for the job. Kelly’s offense, once known for its blistering pace, has evolved into a more measured, methodical approach that prioritizes the perfect play over tempo. This evolution suits Howard’s strengths, as he is expected to be a steady hand guiding this new-look Buckeyes offense. Conclusion In summary, the decision to start Will Howard as the Buckeyes’ quarterback for 2024 seems well-founded. His leadership, combined with a revamped offensive philosophy under Chip Kelly, positions Ohio State for a potentially explosive season. While Howard may not fit the traditional mold of a dual-threat quarterback, his ability to manage the game, make smart decisions, and execute Kelly’s collaborative game plan makes him a solid choice to lead the Buckeyes. With a loaded backfield and an innovative offense, Ohio State is poised for success, and Howard will be at the center of it all.

Ranking 2024 NFL Rookie QBs by scheme Fit and situation: Caleb Williams, J.J. McCarthy, and Michael Penix Lead the Way The 2024 NFL Draft's first round was highlighted by a quarterback showcase, with six quarterbacks selected, setting a record for the highest number taken in the first round since the common draft era began in 1967. While Caleb Williams going No. 1 to the Chicago Bears was no surprise, there was some suspense about who would go second to the Washington Commanders. Washington chose LSU's Jayden Daniels, while North Carolina's Drake Maye went third to the New England Patriots. When the Atlanta Falcons selected Michael Penix Jr. at No. 8, it marked the first time in the common draft era that four quarterbacks were chosen within the first eight picks. Minnesota traded up to 10th overall with the New York Jets to draft J.J. McCarthy, and the Broncos took Bo Nix 12th overall. In this analysis, I am going to rank and grade each of the 2024 NFL Draft quarterbacks based on their scheme fit and surrounding personnel. I will also provide some 2024 yards and touchdown projections for each QB. Each player drafted is in a unique situation. The Bears went out of their way to surround Caleb Williams with outstanding talent, while the Minnesota Vikings were already in a good place when they drafted J.J. McCarthy. However, a team like the Patriots has question marks about their skill players, and Drake Maye still needs time to develop. The reality is that this is not a one-size-fits-all situation for every player. A few of these players will struggle in one way or another, but it is always a good exercise to identify the players who land in the best spots while also recognizing the players who landed in the not-so-great spots. Coaching Scheme Fit Grade This grade evaluates how well a player's skills and attributes align with the offensive or defensive system they are entering in the NFL. It considers how their play style, experience, and strengths match the strategies and preferences of the coaching staff. A: Excellent fit. The player's abilities align perfectly with the team's schemes and coaching strategies. B: Good fit. The player has most of the skills needed to succeed, with minor adjustments or development needed. C: Average fit. The player fits the system in general but may face significant challenges or require substantial development. D: Poor fit. There are notable mismatches between the player's style and the team's schemes that might hinder their success. F: Very poor fit. The player's skills and the team's strategies are fundamentally misaligned, posing serious challenges for effective integration. Surrounding Cast Grade This grade assesses the quality and compatibility of the teammates surrounding the player, including the offensive line for a quarterback or the defensive line for a linebacker, as well as key skill position players. A: Excellent support. The player has a strong, talented group of teammates that enhance their ability to perform and adapt. B: Good support. The supporting cast is competent, providing the player with a solid foundation to succeed. C: Average support. The team provides basic support, but improvements could significantly enhance the player’s performance. D: Poor support. The supporting cast may hinder the player's ability to perform well due to lack of talent or poor fit. F: Very poor support. The player is surrounded by teammates who are significantly below average, likely affecting their development and success. These grades help in understanding the potential for a player to succeed in their new NFL environment by analyzing how well they fit into their team's system and the quality of the support they receive. Bonus Fantasy Football Points Projections The last part is a bonus for fantasy football readers. I added a projected high-low fantasy points projection using 4 points per TD pass and -2 per interception format for each of the quarterbacks in the analysis. Rookie QB Scheme Fit and Situational Rankings 1). Caleb Williams - Chicago Bears Height: 6'1" | Weight: 214 lbs Projections: 3500-4000 passing yards, 25-30 passing TDs, 15-20 interceptions, 300-400 rushing yards, 3-5 rushing TDs Fantasy Projection High Projection: 320 Fantasy Points Low Projection: 248 Fantasy Points Overview: Caleb Williams was the expected No. 1 overall pick, celebrated for his elite arm talent and mobility. His ability to make off-schedule throws and extend plays has made his transition to the NFL highly anticipated. Play Style and Scheme Fit: Grade: A Williams demonstrates exceptional improvisational skills and an ability to dissect defenses from the pocket. His adeptness at evading pass rushers and making accurate throws on the run aligns perfectly with Bears offensive coordinator Shane Waldron's system, which favors quick passes, play-action, and deep balls. Supporting Cast: Grade: A With targets like DJ Moore, Rome Odunze, and Keenan Allen, along with tight end Cole Kmet, Williams is well-equipped to thrive. His rushing ability, highlighted by 27 touchdowns over three seasons in college, adds a dynamic component to the Bears' offense. Year One Starter?: Yes. Williams has been designated the starting quarterback following the trade of Justin Fields to Pittsburgh. 2). J.J. McCarthy - Minnesota Vikings Height: 6'3" | Weight: 214 lbs Projections: 3,000-3500 passing yards, 20-25 passing TDs, 14-19 interceptions, 250-300 rushing yards, 2-4 rushing TDs. Fantasy Projection High Projection: 285.0 Fantasy Points Low Projection: 214.0 Fantasy Points Overview: J.J. McCarthy, chosen tenth by the Minnesota Vikings, brings a record of 27-1 as a college starter. His ability to execute tight-window throws and make plays under pressure makes him a valuable addition to the Vikings. Play Style and Scheme Fit: Grade: A McCarthy's efficiency, his clutch ability in key situations, and his proficiency in executing a similar style of offense at Michigan are well-matched with head coach Kevin O'Connell’s offensive strategies, which emphasize a balanced attack with dynamic playmaking. His ability to extend plays and execute on designed runs fits seamlessly into the Vikings' scheme. Supporting Cast: Grade: A Surrounded by playmakers like Justin Jefferson, Jordan Addison, and tight end T.J. Hockenson, McCarthy is poised to succeed. The offensive line, highly ranked in both pass protection and run blocking in 2023, according to PFF, will support his transition to the NFL. Year One Starter: McCarthy is not expected to start immediately with Sam Darnold on the roster, providing him time to develop under the guidance of new QB coach Josh McCown. 3). Michael Penix Jr. - Atlanta Falcons Height: 6'3" | Weight: 218 lbs Projections: 500-1000 passing yards, 5-10 passing TDs, 2-5 interceptions, 50 rushing yards, 0 rushing TDs Fantasy Projection High Projection: 74.0 Fantasy Points Low Projection: 29.0 Fantasy Points Overview: After revitalizing his career at Washington, Michael Penix Jr. was selected eighth overall by the Atlanta Falcons. Known for his deep accuracy and quick decision-making, Penix is a playmaker and a leader poised to be the Falcons QB of the future. Play Style and Scheme Fit: Grade: A Penix is renowned for his arm strength and ability to navigate the pocket. His deep-ball accuracy and quick reads are ideally suited for a hybrid West Coast spread style of offense. The good news for Penix is that new Falcons OC Zac Robinson is a Sean McVay disciple who will likely deploy a similar style of offense to that of McVay, which focuses on the run and play-action pass games from various formations. The use of presnap motion and scheming guys open could be a staple in Atlanta for years to come. Supporting Cast: Grade: A Penix will benefit from a strong supporting cast, including dynamic receivers like Darnell Mooney and Drake London, and a tight end in Kyle Pitts with elite potential. Add in a three-down RB with elite pass-catching ability in Bijan Robinson with an offensive line that ranked 4th in pass protection last season; Penix is in a solid spot to develop. Year One Starter?: Unlikely right away. Kirk Cousins is expected to remain the starter for the next few years, but Penix provides a solid backup option and potential future starter as he adapts to the NFL. 4). Bo Nix - Denver Broncos Height: 6'2" | Weight: 214 lbs Projections: 3,000-3500 passing yards, 15-20 passing TDs, 15-20 interceptions, 200-400 rushing yards, 1-4 rushing TD Fantasy Projection High Projection: 287.0 Fantasy Points Low Projection: 209.0 Fantasy Points Overview: Bo Nix, drafted twelfth by the Denver Broncos, has evolved into a sound decision-maker with extensive experience from his time at Auburn and Oregon. His quick release and the ability to make plays on the run are what set him apart. He is also a good decision-maker and game manager. Play Style and Scheme Fit: Grade: A Nix's style aligns well with head coach Sean Payton’s system, which focuses on timing, rhythm, and tempo. His wealth of collegiate experience and ability to execute a detailed-oriented playbook make him a good fit for the Broncos’ offensive strategy. Supporting Cast: Grade: B While the Broncos' supporting cast, including receivers like Courtland Sutton, Marvin Mims, and tight end Greg Dulcich, offers reliability and playmaking ability, the offensive line's effectiveness will be critical to Nix’s success. The line is expected to be solid, though the center position may require attention. Year One Starter?: It depends on Payton's strategy and evaluation during training camp. Given Nix's extensive college experience and Payton's coaching style, he may see significant playing time early in his rookie year. 5). Jayden Daniels - Washington Commanders Height: 6'4" | Weight: 210 lbs Projections: 3,500-4000 passing yards, 15-20 passing TDs, 15-20 interceptions, 500-700 rushing yards, 5-8 rushing TDs Fantasy Projection High Projection: 348.0 Fantasy Points Low Projection: 261.0 Fantasy Points Overview: Jayden Daniels selected second overall by the Washington Commanders, brings a dynamic dual-threat capability to the team. His collegiate success suggests a smooth transition to the professional level. Play Style and Scheme Fit: Grade: B Daniels excels at getting the ball out quickly and with precision when he likes the pre-snap look. His play style, combining quick decision-making with mobility, fits well into Offensive Coordinator Kliff Kingsbury's scheme, which leverages a QB's ability to escape pressure and extend plays. The core of his offense is the Air Raid. However, at times, it can be very vanilla, and that is why I am not completely sold on the fit. I know that people like to compare Jayden Daniels to Kyler Murray, and they instantly think this is a great match, but how did that work out in Arizona? I have always viewed Kingsbury's offenses in Arizona as stagnant, without a lot of motion and varying formational use. He did start to diversify these aspects as time went on, and his time at USC with Lincoln Riley could also improve his creativity. I am in a wait-and-see mindset, but I gave it a solid B overall. Supporting Cast: Grade: B While Daniels has elite targets like Terry McLaurin and Jahan Dotson, the Commanders' offensive line, which allowed 65 sacks last season, remains a concern and could limit his effectiveness unless improvements are made. Year One Starter?: Yes. With a new owner, general manager, and coach, the Commanders are poised to start Daniels immediately, looking to rebuild and capitalize on his talents. 6). Drake Maye - New England Patriots Height: 6'4" | Weight: 220 lbs Projections: 2500-3000 passing yards, 16-20 passing TDs, 13-18 interceptions, 300-500 rushing yards, 2-5 rushing TDs Fantasy Projection High Projection: 281.0 Fantasy Points Low Projection: 207.0 Fantasy Points Overview: Drake Maye, chosen third by the New England Patriots, is recognized for his strong arm and mobility. His proficiency in making off-platform throws and extending plays under pressure positions him as a formidable quarterback prospect. Play Style and Scheme Fit: Grade: C Maye has a good pocket presence and the ability to keep plays alive or pick up yards with his legs. Offensive Coordinator Alex Van Pelt will be tasked with building an offense that focuses on Maye's core strengths early on while he develops and improves his mechanics. The Patriots will likely lean on the run game a lot if Drake Maye is in the lineup as a rookie, and that will allow them to set up play-action opportunities. Van Pelt was not the primary playcaller in Cleveland; he was tasked with game planning and play design, so there are a lot of unknowns about Van Pelt and his ability to call plays. What we do know is that he is a true quarterback coach who has worked with Aaron Rodgers, Baker Mayfield, and, most recently, Deshaun Watson. Supporting Cast: Grade: C The supporting cast, including receivers like Kendrick Bourne, Juju Smith-Schuster, and K.J. Osborn, are not considered elite. Still, the offensive line, ranked 29th in pass protection last year, may hinder his ability to perform consistently, but the run blocking ranked at the top of the NFL and could be how they set things up offensively in 2024. The bottom line is that this is the toughest spot for any of the rookie quarterbacks to have landed, and the Patriots have a lot of work to do to get this offense in a place that can support a young quarterback. Year One Starter?: Not initially. The Patriots have brought in Jacoby Brissett to mentor Maye, allowing him time to develop without the immediate pressure of starting.

2025 NFL Draft: 10 AAC Draft Prospects to Watch This Season The American Athletic Conference (AAC) had a strong showing in the 2024 NFL Draft, with five players selected, including Tulane quarterback Michael Pratt, wide receiver Jha’Quan Jackson, Rice wide receiver Luke McCaffrey, and Temple linebacker Jordan Magee. As the AAC undergoes changes, including SMU’s departure for the ACC, a new crop of talent is ready to step into the spotlight for the 2024 college football season. Today’s analysis features the top 10 2025 NFL Draft prospects to watch in the AAC during the upcoming season. Each player has the potential not only to lead their respective teams to success but also to enhance their draft profiles in 2024. 2025 NFL Draft: Top 10 AAC Draft Prospects to Watch This Season 1. Seth Henigan, QB, Memphis Memphis quarterback Seth Henigan has been at the helm of the conference’s most explosive offense, which averaged a conference-leading 39.4 points per game last season. Henigan threw for an impressive 3,883 yards in 2023, ranking fourth in FBS. Returning for his fourth season as the Tigers' starter, Henigan’s experience and leadership make him a prime candidate to lead Memphis to an AAC Championship while drawing the attention of NFL scouts. 2. Patrick Jenkins, DT, Tulane Tulane’s Patrick Jenkins is a dominant force on the defensive line and arguably the top defensive player in the AAC. Standing at 6-2 and 305 pounds, Jenkins recorded 11.5 tackles for loss and 5.5 sacks last season. His combination of quickness and power makes him a disruptive presence in the trenches, making him a key player to watch in 2024. 3. Roc Taylor, WR, Memphis Roc Taylor has become Seth Henigan’s go-to target at Memphis, posting 1,083 receiving yards on 69 receptions last season. The 6-foot-3, 215-pound receiver is a physical mismatch for defenders and should be in line for another 1,000-yard campaign in 2024. Taylor’s ability to make contested catches and his size make him an appealing NFL prospect. 4. Xavier Hill, OG, Memphis Xavier Hill, a former LSU transfer, made significant strides in his first season at Memphis, showcasing his versatility and athleticism along the offensive line. His performance in 2023 has him on the radar as one of the AAC’s top offensive linemen, with the potential to be a valuable asset at the next level. 5. E.J. Warner, QB, Rice E.J. Warner, the son of Hall of Famer Kurt Warner, takes over as Rice’s starting quarterback after transferring from Temple. Warner threw for 23 touchdowns and 3,076 yards last season. With the experience gained at Temple, Warner is poised for a breakout season at Rice, carrying high expectations and NFL pedigree. 6. Andreas Keaton, SAF, Temple Temple’s defense received a boost with the addition of Andreas Keaton, a transfer from Western Carolina. Keaton brings a wealth of experience, having recorded 184 tackles, five interceptions, and 19 pass breakups over three seasons. His size and playmaking ability make him a standout in the AAC and a prospect with NFL potential. 7. Jacob Zeno, QB, UAB Jacob Zeno emerged as a promising quarterback for UAB in 2023, showcasing a strong arm and significant growth in his game. Entering his senior season, Zeno has the tools to continue his upward trajectory and solidify his place as one of the AAC’s top quarterbacks. 8. Chad Lindberg, OT, Rice Chad Lindberg, a transfer from Georgia, brings SEC experience and a sturdy presence to Rice’s offensive line. At 6-6 and 320 pounds, Lindberg’s size and skill set make him an important piece for Rice’s offense and a potential early-round pick in the 2025 NFL Draft. 9. Donyai Taylor, LB, UTSA UTSA’s Donyai Taylor is a versatile linebacker with the ability to cover the field from sideline to sideline. His 46 tackles, two sacks, and an interception last season earned him second-team All-AAC honors. Taylor’s athleticism and football IQ position him as a breakout candidate in 2024. 10. Ty Thompson, QB, Tulane Ty Thompson, a transfer from Oregon, steps into a significant role at Tulane, replacing Michael Pratt at quarterback. Thompson possesses the physical tools and upside to seize this opportunity and lead the Green Wave offense. If he can capitalize on his potential, Thompson could quickly become one of the conference’s top signal-callers.

2026 NFL Draft Big Board Rankings: Updated Top 50 and Position Rankings As we head into December, the 2026 NFL Draft Big Board is starting to come into focus. A defensive back, a hybrid edge, and a pure pass rusher are all making legitimate cases to be the top player in the class. This is before factoring in a quarterback race that could completely reshape the top 10 of round one. The Quarterback Race Right now, we have three signal-callers — Fernando Mendoza (Indiana), Dante Moore (Oregon), and Ty Simpson (Alabama) — who each could go No. 1 overall depending on draft order. However, all three still hold college eligibility, which adds another layer of chaos to an already unpredictable class. Defensive Talent at the Top At the top, the defensive talent remains elite. Caleb Downs (Ohio State), Arvell Reese (Ohio State), and Rueben Bain Jr. (Miami) headline the board. Truthfully, any of the three could make a case for the top overall spot. Downs’ versatility and polish give him the edge for now, but Reese’s hybrid impact and Bain’s traditional edge dominance make the top tier as close as any in recent memory. This class is defined by its defensive depth at linebacker, edge rusher, and interior defensive lineman (IDL). The trenches are loaded with elite talent and solid depth pieces. The linebacker group is versatile, and the wide receiver class is showing early signs of star power. This is led by Jordyn Tyson (Arizona State), Carnell Tate (Ohio State), and Makai Lemon (USC). With the final weeks of the college football season ahead, including rivalry week, conference championships, and the College Football Playoff, the 2026 NFL Draft landscape is beginning to take shape. Click here to jump to the individual player rankings 2026 NFL Draft Big Board: Top 50 Overall Prospect Rankings 1. Caleb Downs, S, Ohio State (6’0”, 205) Downs is the prototype modern safety. He is a high-IQ, interchangeable defender who can align deep, in the slot, or in the box. His instincts, tackling consistency, and field command make him a defensive coordinator’s extension on the field. He is an ideal fit for split-safety or match-zone systems (49ers, Eagles, Ravens) that rely on communication and disguise. He can also thrive as a cover-2 or big nickel safety in 4-2-5 structures. 2. Arvell Reese, LB, Ohio State (6’4”, 243) Reese is a modern front-seven weapon. He is best deployed as a hybrid MIKE/SAM/EDGE in multiple fronts. His true three-down impact comes from his ability to stack blocks in base, rush with power on passing downs, and plug gaps in blitz-heavy looks. His style mirrors a “Micah Parsons-lite” profile — dominant power, inside-out utility, and rare scheme versatility. 3. Rueben Bain Jr., EDGE, Miami (6’3”, 275) Bain is a disruptive, technically refined pass rusher. He wins with leverage, hand power, and elite motor. He fits best in attacking 4-3 fronts as a hand-in-the-dirt edge or reduced 5-tech, but he can also slide inside on passing downs. With polish, he projects as an early NFL contributor with Pro Bowl-level potential. 4. Jeremiyah Love, RB, Notre Dame (6’0”, 210) Love is an explosive, two-phase offensive weapon. He thrives in space and is built for wide-zone and outside-zone systems. His one-cut burst and natural receiving skills create mismatch potential in motion and slot alignments. He projects as a modern feature back with RB1 upside in tempo-driven offenses. 5. Jordyn Tyson, WR, Arizona State (6’1”, 195) Tyson is a dynamic vertical threat. He possesses route precision and field-stretching speed. His alignment flexibility — boundary, slot, or motion — makes him ideal for timing-based or vertical-spread offenses. He profiles as a WR1-caliber prospect with pro-ready separation and playmaking traits. 6. Keldric Faulk, EDGE, Auburn (6’6”, 290) Faulk is a power-based, multi-alignment defender. He has inside-out utility and is best suited for 3-4 fronts as a 5-tech DE or base end in a 4-3. He wins with strength, leverage, and heavy hands. His versatility and edge-setting ability make him a valuable piece for hybrid defenses. 7. Carnell Tate, WR, Ohio State (6’3”, 191) Tate is a polished route runner with advanced spatial awareness. He thrives in West Coast and rhythm offenses. His smooth movement and reliable hands make him a high-volume target who consistently finds soft spots in coverage. 8. Jermod McCoy, CB, Tennessee (6’0”, 195) McCoy is a fluid, explosive cover corner built for man-match systems. His mirror technique, anticipation, and ball skills give him CB1 upside in press and match-quarters schemes. If healthy post-ACL recovery, he projects as an immediate impact starter. 9. Spencer Fano, OT, Utah (6’5”, 304) Fano offers plug-and-play reliability. He has elite run-blocking leverage and technical consistency. He’s scheme-diverse, capable of excelling in both zone and power concepts, and projects as a long-term starter with All-Pro ceiling. 10. Fernando Mendoza, QB, Indiana (6’5”, 225) Mendoza brings prototypical size and poise. He excels in RPO and play-action concepts. He’s efficient from the pocket, shows timing and touch at all levels, and has the tools to develop into a high-end starter in pro-style or spread hybrid systems. 11. Francis Mauigoa, OT, Miami (6’6”, 315) Mauigoa is one of the most naturally gifted linemen in the class. His blend of size, movement skills, and competitive toughness sets him apart. He’s a Day 1 right tackle with the athleticism and power to thrive in either wide-zone or gap/power systems. With refined hand usage and continued growth, he has legitimate All-Pro potential. 12. Makai Lemon, WR, USC (5’11”, 195) Lemon is a twitchy, high-IQ slot receiver. He thrives in quick-strike offenses built on timing and leverage. His short-area quickness and route pacing allow him to separate at will. His toughness over the middle makes him a natural fit in West Coast or RPO-heavy schemes. 13. Peter Woods, IDL, Clemson (6’3”, 315) Woods is a rare interior defender. He combines elite power, quickness, and leverage. Capable of thriving at 3-tech or 5-tech, he fits best in one-gap systems that emphasize disruption. His explosiveness and hand strength give him game-wrecking potential reminiscent of Quinnen Williams or Chris Jones. 14. Kadyn Proctor, OT, Alabama (6’7”, 369) Proctor brings prototype size and raw strength to the blindside. He is a mauler in the run game with improving pass protection. He fits best in power/gap schemes but flashes enough agility to hold his own in zone concepts. With better leverage and conditioning, he projects as a franchise-caliber left tackle. 15. David Bailey, EDGE, Texas Tech (6’3”, 250) A former Stanford standout, Bailey is an explosive edge defender. He has bend, burst, and a relentless motor. His athleticism and fluidity in space make him an ideal 3-4 OLB or hybrid rusher in multiple fronts. If his strength profile continues to improve, he’ll push for Round 1 consideration. 16. Mansoor Delane, CB, LSU (6’0”, 190) Delane is a physical, man-cover corner. He has NFL-ready technique and confidence. He’s sticky in press, aggressive at the catch point, and shows the football IQ to thrive in both man-match and Cover 3 systems. His transition to LSU has elevated his stock into early-round territory. 17. Ty Simpson, QB, Alabama (6’2”, 208) Simpson is a rhythm-based passer. He excels in timing systems that reward anticipation and accuracy. His compact release, processing speed, and poise under pressure give him early starter potential. Continued deep-ball refinement could elevate him into the top-15 mix. 18. Avieon Terrell, CB, Clemson (5’11”, 180) Terrell is a twitchy, physical corner. He has sharp instincts and top-tier tackling for his size. His man-match and press technique are clean. His aggressiveness at the catch point gives him CB1 upside. Best fit: zone-match or press-quarters schemes emphasizing physicality. 19. Dante Moore, QB, Oregon (6’3”, 206) Moore brings natural touch, anticipation, and field vision to a modern pro-style offense. His 2025 breakout year highlighted improved mechanics and composure under pressure. While he must add consistency on deep throws, his rhythm and processing are already first-round quality. 20. Kenyon Sadiq, TE, Oregon (6’3”, 250) Sadiq is a versatile tight end. He has elite explosiveness, functional strength, and YAC ability. He can line up in-line, in the slot, or as a boundary mismatch. His athletic profile fits perfectly in play-action-heavy or motion-based offenses built around hybrid tight ends. 21. Denzel Boston, WR, Washington (6’4”, 210) Boston is a prototypical boundary receiver. He has size, body control, and red-zone production. His strong hands and ability to adjust to off-target throws make him a reliable vertical and intermediate target. While not overly sudden, his high-point timing and physical play style give him WR2 upside in vertical or play-action offenses. 22. Colton Hood, CB, Tennessee (6’0”, 195) Hood is a confident, aggressive corner. He has fluid hips and top-tier awareness in both man and zone coverage. He plays bigger than his frame, using excellent route anticipation and physicality to disrupt receivers early. His recovery speed and timing at the catch point give him CB2 potential with CB1 traits if consistency improves. 23. Chris Bell, WR, Louisville (6’2”, 220) Bell is a power-built wideout. He blends vertical acceleration with physical toughness after the catch. His play style mirrors Deebo Samuel’s — a mix of strength, balance, and explosive YAC ability. He fits perfectly in play-action and West Coast systems built on crossers and schemed touches. 24. Cashius Howell, EDGE, Texas A&M (6’2”, 250) Howell is an explosive, undersized pass rusher. He has dynamic bend and burst off the edge. His speed-to-power conversion and relentless motor give him rotational value early. With added strength, he can develop into a disruptive 3-4 OLB or nickel pass-rush specialist. 25. Caleb Lomu, OT, Utah (6’5”, 295) Lomu is a technically refined tackle prospect. He has outstanding recovery balance and natural foot quickness. He thrives in zone-based run schemes where his mobility and leverage can be maximized. While his anchor strength needs improvement, his agility and feel in pass protection project long-term starting potential. 26. Christen Miller, IDL, Georgia (6’3”, 305) Miller is a powerful, ascending interior defender. He has the blend of length, motor, and quickness NFL teams covet. His ability to stack, shed, and reset the line of scrimmage makes him a scheme-versatile fit in 3- or 4-man fronts. He’s a breakout candidate with steady Day 2 value. 27. Matayo Uiagalelei, EDGE, Oregon (6’5”, 272) Uiagalelei is a fluid, long-limbed edge defender. He has excellent play recognition and closing speed. He wins with leverage, hand placement, and a controlled pass-rush plan. His hybrid build fits best as a 5-tech or 4i in multiple-front defenses that prioritize gap integrity and pressure flexibility. 28. Jacob Rodriguez, LB, Texas Tech (6’1”, 230) Rodriguez is a high-IQ, instinctive linebacker. He plays with urgency and physicality. He thrives in zone-match systems that let him read and trigger downhill. His tackling consistency and blitz timing make him an immediate depth and special teams contributor with starter potential in 4-2-5 defenses. 29. Olaivavega Ioane, IOL, Penn State (6’4”, 330) Ioane is a physically dominant interior lineman. He has powerful hands and a thick lower base. He excels in downhill run schemes, consistently generating movement at the point of attack. With improved pad level and foot consistency, he can develop into a long-term starting guard or center. 30. T.J. Parker, EDGE, Clemson (6’3”, 265) Parker enters 2025 as one of the most productive returning edge defenders in college football. His heavy hands, leverage control, and finishing power make him a reliable three-down defensive end. He projects best in even fronts as a 4-3 end but offers enough versatility to kick inside on passing downs. 31. Chris Brazzell II, WR, Tennessee (6’5”, 200) Brazzell is a long, smooth wideout. He has vertical burst and elite catch radius. His stride length and natural tracking ability make him a downfield weapon. His body control allows him to win in contested catch situations. Still developing as a route-runner, he projects as a high-upside X receiver with WR2 potential in vertical or RPO-based passing games. 32. C.J. Allen, LB, Georgia (6’1”, 235) Allen is an explosive, high-IQ linebacker. He has sideline-to-sideline range and strong diagnostic skills. A physical tackler with 4.5 speed, he thrives in zone-heavy systems that let him key, trigger, and attack downhill. His instincts and leadership give him three-down starter potential in modern 4-2-5 or 3-3-5 defenses. 33. Kayden McDonald, IDL, Ohio State (6’3”, 326) McDonald is a stout, two-gap nose tackle. He plays with heavy hands and excellent leverage. He excels at resetting the line of scrimmage and occupying space in the run game. He shows flashes of power-based pass rush from 0- to 3-tech alignments. He is an ideal fit in odd-front systems built around gap control and pocket disruption. 34. LT Overton, EDGE, Alabama (6’5”, 283) Overton is a rare size-speed edge defender. He can line up anywhere from 4i to 9-tech. His 2024 breakout at Alabama highlighted elite power and functional athleticism. He fits perfectly in multiple-front schemes that value hybrid alignment and inside-out versatility. 35. Jaishawn Barham, LB/EDGE, Michigan (6’4”, 248) Barham is a physically dominant hybrid defender. He can play off-ball or rush the edge. His explosiveness, striking power, and pursuit range give him three-down flexibility. If his full-time move to EDGE at Michigan sticks, he could emerge as one of the top pass rushers in the class. 36. Kevin Concepcion, WR, Texas A&M (5’11”, 187) Concepcion is a precise route-runner. He has sharp short-area quickness and elite feel for space. A technician who thrives in timing offenses, he projects best as a Z/slot hybrid in modern spread or West Coast schemes. His YAC ability and football intelligence make him a high-floor contributor with WR2 potential. 37. Trevor Goosby, OT, Texas (6’7”, 312) Goosby is a developmental tackle prospect. He has excellent length and strong lower-body control. His foot quickness and pass-set balance stand out, though his hand placement and anchor need refinement. He is a scheme-versatile lineman with starting upside once his technique stabilizes. 38. Sonny Styles, LB, Ohio State (6’4”, 243) Styles is a prototype hybrid defender. He has rare athletic traits and versatility. The former safety brings coverage fluidity to the linebacker position. This allows him to match tight ends and track running backs in space. He is a perfect fit for multiple-front defenses that rely on disguise and flexibility. 39. A’Mauri Washington, IDL, Oregon (6’3”, 330) Washington is a powerful, space-eating interior defender. He can anchor a defensive front. His combination of strength, length, and short-area explosiveness makes him ideal for early-down work in gap-control systems. With improved pad level and pass-rush variety, he could become a dependable NFL starter. 40. Austin Barber, OT, Florida (6’8”, 320) Barber is an experienced, long-armed tackle. He has excellent foot quickness and poise in pass protection. His movement skills make him a natural fit in zone schemes. His improved anchor strength has elevated his all-around game. He projects as a plug-and-play swing tackle with starter-level ceiling. 41. Zion Young, EDGE, Missouri (6’5”, 262) Young is a long, explosive edge defender. He has excellent hand timing and linear burst. He wins with length, leverage, and discipline in the run game. He flashes closing speed and power on stunts and twists. He projects as a high-upside rotational rusher who fits best in 4-3 fronts with attacking principles. 42. R. Mason Thomas, EDGE, Oklahoma (6’2”, 250) Thomas is a twitchy, compact edge rusher. He has elite first-step quickness and natural bend. His ability to dip, flatten, and finish through contact gives him early pass-rush value. While undersized, his explosiveness and motor make him a strong fit as a 3-4 OLB or situational speed rusher in hybrid defenses. 43. Gennings Dunker, OT, Iowa (6’5”, 316) Dunker is a powerful, tone-setting lineman. He has a nasty finish and strong run-blocking fundamentals. His lack of lateral quickness limits his NFL projection to guard. However, his leverage, anchor strength, and competitive edge make him a plug-and-play interior starter. 44. Caleb Banks, IDL, Florida (6’6”, 325) Banks is one of the most physically unique interior defenders in the class. He boasts elite length, agility, and disruptive upside. His ability to rush from multiple alignments and generate pressure with power and quickness makes him a natural 3-tech fit in 4-3 fronts. With refinement in pad level and counters, he carries top-20 upside. 45. Quincy Rhodes Jr., EDGE, Arkansas (6’6”, 276) Rhodes is a raw but toolsy defender. He has ideal NFL measurables and power traits. He flashes dominance when converting speed to power and setting hard edges versus the run. With improved hand placement and leverage consistency, he could develop into a starting-caliber 4-3 end or hybrid 5-tech. 46. A.J. Harris, CB, Penn State (6’1”, 191) Harris is a long, confident corner. He has scheme versatility and elite recovery traits. He thrives in man-match and Cover 3 systems. He shows physicality at the line and excellent awareness in zone. With improved ball production, he projects as a plug-and-play boundary starter at the next level. 47. Caleb Tiernan, OT, Northwestern (6’7”, 325) Tiernan is a towering, smooth-footed tackle. He has impressive reach and balance for his size. He is patient in pass protection and effective on the move in zone run schemes. His pad level and displacement strength remain developmental areas, but he has the frame and agility of a long-term starter. 48. Emmanuel McNeil-Warren, S, Toledo (6’2”, 202) McNeil-Warren is a rangy, instinctive safety. He has excellent closing speed and tackling discipline. He thrives as a single-high or deep-half defender. He reads the quarterback and triggers downhill with precision. His length and range make him a fit for zone-match or split-field schemes. 49. LaNorris Sellers, QB, South Carolina (6’3”, 240) Sellers offers rare dual-threat ability. He has a big arm and physical rushing style. His off-platform throws and improvisational creativity make him a dangerous playmaker in vertical or play-action offenses. Refinement in decision-making and timing will determine whether he reaches his top-tier ceiling. 50. Chris Johnson, CB, San Diego State (6’0”, 185) Johnson is a fluid, competitive corner. He has smooth hips and natural mirror ability. He excels in off-man and quarters coverage. He shows consistent ball tracking and click-and-close quickness. His athletic profile and football instincts make him an intriguing developmental starter at the next level. 2026 NFL Draft Positional Rankings Top 5 Quarterbacks — 2026 NFL Draft 1) Fernando Mendoza, Indiana (6’5”, 225) Prototypical pocket passer with size, anticipation, and poise in pro-spread systems. 2) Ty Simpson, Alabama (6’2”, 208) Accurate rhythm thrower who thrives in timing and progression-based offenses. 3) Dante Moore, Oregon (6’3”, 206) Quick processor with natural touch and franchise-level upside in hybrid pro schemes. 4) LaNorris Sellers, South Carolina (6’3”, 240) Big-armed dual-threat who can create off-script and attack vertically. 5) Jayden Maiava, USC (6’4”, 230) Toolsy, strong-arm passer built for vertical attacks with developmental starter traits. Top 5 Running Backs — 2026 NFL Draft 1) Jeremiyah Love, Notre Dame (6’0”, 210) Explosive two-phase weapon built for wide-zone and tempo offenses with home-run speed. 2) Justice Haynes, Michigan (5’11”, 210) Powerful one-cut runner with balance, burst, and three-down starter potential. 3) Jadarian Price, Notre Dame (5’11”, 210) Smooth, efficient runner with plus vision and underrated receiving value. 4) Jonah Coleman, Washington (5’9”, 229) Compact, physical tone-setter who thrives in gap and power run concepts. 5) Kaytron Allen, Penn State (5’11”, 220) Steady, downhill runner with strong contact balance and workhorse traits. Top 5 Wide Receivers — 2026 NFL Draft 1) Jordyn Tyson, Arizona State (6’1”, 195) Explosive field-stretcher with refined route running and top-tier WR1 traits in vertical and play-action systems. 2) Carnell Tate, Ohio State (6’3”, 191) Polished route technician with elite spatial awareness and reliable hands in timing-based offenses. 3) Makai Lemon, USC (5’11”, 195) Dynamic slot weapon with elite short-area quickness and route tempo; thrives in West Coast and RPO systems. 4) Denzel Boston, Washington (6’4”, 210) Prototypical X receiver with strong hands, body control, and red-zone dominance. 5) Chris Bell, Louisville (6’2”, 220) Physical, explosive YAC threat built for hybrid West Coast and play-action schemes. Top 5 Tight Ends — 2026 NFL Draft 1) Kenyon Sadiq, Oregon (6’3”, 250) Explosive, physical two-phase tight end with elite burst and true three-down versatility. 2) Michael Trigg, Baylor (6’4”, 240) Athletic flex target with soft hands and mismatch potential in spread or play-action systems. 3) Max Klare, Ohio State (6’4”, 240) Fluid mover with natural hands and seam-stretching ability; thrives in motion and spacing concepts. 4) Eli Stowers, Vanderbilt (6’4”, 225) Converted QB with top-tier athleticism and open-field explosiveness as a hybrid passing-game weapon. 5) Marlin Klein, Michigan (6’6”, 250) Tall, developmental inline prospect with strong blocking foundation and red-zone upside. Top 5 Offensive Tackles — 2026 NFL Draft 1) Spencer Fano, Utah (6’5”, 304) Technically refined tackle with elite run-blocking grades and day-one starter polish on either side. 2) Francis Mauigoa, Miami (6’6”, 315) Powerful, athletic right tackle with rare movement skills and All-Pro potential in any blocking scheme. 3) Kadyn Proctor, Alabama (6’7”, 369) Massive blindside protector with dominant strength and improving footwork in power/gap concepts. 4) Caleb Lomu, Utah (6’5”, 295) Smooth, flexible mover with quick feet and natural recovery ability in zone-based systems. 5) Trevor Goosby, Texas (6’7”, 312) Long, athletic pass protector who projects as a developmental left tackle with starter upside. Top 5 Interior Offensive Linemen — 2026 NFL Draft 1) Olaivavega Ioane, Penn State (6’4”, 330) Powerful, scheme-versatile guard with heavy hands and anchor strength for gap or inside zone systems. 2) Connor Lew, Auburn (6’3”, 300) Technically sound center-guard hybrid with high football IQ and consistent leverage control. 3) Logan Jones, Iowa (6’3”, 293) Athletic, experienced center who excels in wide-zone concepts and second-level blocking. 4) Cayden Green, Missouri (6’5”, 320) Strong, agile interior blocker with starter-level traits in gap-heavy and duo run schemes. 5) Emmanuel Pregnon, Oregon (6’5”, 315) Explosive, physical guard with strong hands and functional athleticism for multiple blocking systems. Top 5 Interior Defensive Linemen — 2026 NFL Draft 1) Peter Woods, Clemson (6’3”, 315) Dominant interior disruptor with elite first-step quickness and scheme versatility as a 3-tech or 5-tech. 2) Caleb Banks, Florida (6’6”, 325) Massive, explosive defensive tackle with rare length and athleticism — a prototype penetrating 3-tech. 3) Christen Miller, Georgia (6’3”, 305) Powerful, technically refined interior lineman who wins with leverage, effort, and consistent gap integrity. 4) Kayden McDonald, Ohio State (6’3”, 326) Dense, physical run stuffer with violent hands and disruptive power at the point of attack. 5) A’Mauri Washington, Oregon (6’3”, 330) Heavy-handed interior anchor who excels as a two-gapping nose or early-down run defender. Top 5 Edge Defenders — 2026 NFL Draft 1) Rueben Bain Jr., Miami (6’3”, 275) Polished, high-motor pass rusher with elite hand usage and scheme versatility — a true every-down disruptor. 2) Keldric Faulk, Auburn (6’6”, 290) Powerful, inside-out edge with multi-front versatility who wins with leverage, length, and violent temperament. 3) David Bailey, Texas Tech (6’3”, 250) Explosive, bendy speed rusher with three-down upside — thrives as a 3-4 OLB or hybrid edge in attacking schemes. 4) Cashius Howell, Texas A&M (6’2”, 250) Twitchy, high-energy rusher who excels with speed-to-power and bend off the corner in 4-3 alignments. 5) Matayo Uiagalelei, Oregon (6’5”, 272) Long, athletic edge defender with strong anchor traits and inside-out flexibility for multiple front structures. Top 5 Cornerbacks — 2026 NFL Draft 1) Jermod McCoy, Tennessee (6’0”, 195) Elite man-cover specialist with explosive hips, top-tier ball skills, and CB1 upside pending full recovery from ACL injury. 2) Mansoor Delane, LSU (6’0”, 190) Physical, instinctive corner who thrives in off-man and zone-match coverage, with the range and toughness to fit multiple schemes. 3) Avieon Terrell, Clemson (5’11”, 180) Highly competitive, twitchy corner with sticky coverage ability and strong tackling traits — projects as a Day 1 starter in press or quarters systems. 4) A.J. Harris, Penn State (6’1”, 191) Long, intelligent defender with balanced man-zone skills and strong run support — a plug-and-play boundary corner at the next level. 5) Colton Hood, Tennessee (6’0”, 195) Athletic, physical outside corner with fluid transitions and high football IQ — excels in man-match coverage with disruptive instincts. Top 5 Safeties — 2026 NFL Draft 1) Caleb Downs, Ohio State (6’0”, 205) Elite, interchangeable safety with rare instincts and positional versatility — the prototype for split-safety or match-zone defenses. 2) Dillon Thieneman, Oregon (6’0”, 207) Smart, rangy single-high safety with elite instincts and leadership traits — thrives in aggressive, disguise-heavy systems. 3) Kamari Ramsey, USC (6’0”, 204) Versatile, instinctive defender who can rotate between deep, slot, and box roles — excels in match-zone or hybrid coverage schemes. 4) Emmanuel McNeil-Warren, Toledo (6’2”, 202) Long, fluid safety with downhill burst and range to impact both the run and pass game in multi-front defenses. 5) A.J. Haulcy, LSU (6’0”, 222) Physical, tone-setting enforcer with strong tackling and communication skills — ideal for hybrid box and Cover-3 alignments.

There’s Nothing Here... We can’t find the page you’re looking for. Check the URL, or head back home. Go Home

Ja'Tavion Sanders presents as a potentially valuable asset for teams looking for a versatile and dynamic tight end. His receiving skills are standout, making him a threat in various offensive schemes. While there are areas for growth, particularly in blocking, Sanders' playmaking ability, especially after the catch, is notable. He is projected as a late first to early second-round pick, signaling high expectations for his transition to the professional game​. ← Back to NFL Draft Big Board Ja'Tavion Sanders Texas HT: 6040 WT: 249 YR: JR POS: TE OVR RK 76 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 3 KEY STRENGTHS Strong Hands Athleticism Versatility KEY CONCERNS Refine Routes Improve Run Blocking Add Size to Frame PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT Sanders is a modern tight end capable of contributing significantly in the passing game. His route-running precision, catches in traffic, and run-after-catch ability position him well as a dynamic receiving threat. However, improvements in run blocking could enhance his all-around game. Sanders fits best in an offense that leverages his receiving talents and uses him in space, rather than traditional inline blocking roles. PLAYER COMPARISON: CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS High-End Starter Potential (65-69) A player expected to become a top-tier starter within their first few years. They possess strong physical tools and good technical skills but may have some limitations in their game. With development, they can reach near-elite levels and provide consistent impact at their position. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Grade Scale Football Scout 365 grades reflect a prospect’s projected long-term NFL value and role. Draft ranges are general value projections, not predictions of an exact selection. Positional value, team needs, scheme fit, medical information and athletic testing can influence where a player is ultimately selected. How Football Scout 365 Grades NFL Draft Prospects Elite (75+): A rare, high-impact prospect with elite physical tools, advanced football intelligence and the ability to make an immediate NFL impact. Elite prospects carry franchise-altering potential and typically project as top 5–10 selections in the first round. Near Elite (70–74): A high-caliber prospect with outstanding physical tools, strong football intelligence and only minor developmental limitations. Near Elite prospects project as significant early-career contributors with Pro Bowl upside and first-round draft value. High-End Starter Potential (65–69): A starting-caliber prospect with strong physical tools, quality technical skills and a defined NFL role. These players may require development before reaching their ceiling but generally carry second- or third-round draft value. Mid-Level Starter Potential (60–64): A solid prospect with NFL-level tools and a pathway to becoming a dependable starter if key limitations are addressed. These players generally carry third- to fifth-round draft value. Low-Level Starter Potential (55–59): A developmental prospect who could become a low-end starter, high-end backup or valuable specialist in the right role. These players generally carry fifth- to seventh-round draft value. Backup Level (50–54): A depth or rotational prospect with enough functional ability to compete for an NFL roster spot but limited long-term starting potential. These players generally project as late Day 3 selections or priority undrafted free agents. Not NFL Level (Below 50): A developmental or camp prospect who does not currently demonstrate enough consistency, technical refinement or functional NFL traits to project as a regular contributor. These players generally project as undrafted free agents, practice-squad candidates or camp invitations. Draft position can vary based on positional value, team needs, scheme fit, medical evaluation and athletic testing.