Search Results

The 2026 NFL Draft quarterback rankings are the defining storyline of this cycle. Beyond Indiana’s Fernando Mendoza, many evaluators are already turning their attention to 2027. The depth is limited, and there isn’t a surplus of plug-and-play Day 1 starters — but there is legitimate developmental upside embedded within this group. QB1 is clear: Fernando Mendoza. A Heisman winner and precision-based pocket passer, he wins with anticipation, layered accuracy, and advanced processing speed. His timing, command, and subtle pocket movement project cleanly to a pro-style system, and some scouts view him as the safest quarterback in the class. Behind Mendoza, the QB2 conversation will likely center on Alabama’s Ty Simpson and LSU’s Garrett Nussmeier as the NFL Combine unfolds. Simpson brings mechanical consistency and starter-level tools but requires patience and structure. Nussmeier offers gunslinger confidence and arm talent, with week-to-week consistency and durability shaping his ultimate ceiling. This isn’t a generational quarterback group — it’s a projection-heavy class built on development, scheme fit, and long-term upside. Go to other positional grades: QB  | RB | WR  | TE  | OL  | IDL  | Edge  | LB  | CB  | SAF 2026 NFL Draft Quarterback Rankings 1). Fernando Mendoza, 6’5”, 225 lbs, Indiana Grade Tier:  Near Elite NFL Projection:  Top 5 Overall Pick Analysis: Elite anticipation and layered accuracy define Mendoza’s profile. He wins from the pocket with advanced processing speed, calm progression work, and red-zone efficiency. While he lacks rare arm talent or high-end off-script creation, his timing, decision-making, and structure-based command give him one of the highest floors in the class. A rhythm-based offense built on protection and timing maximizes his ceiling. 2). Ty Simpson, 6’2”, 208 lbs, Alabama Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  Late 1st – 2nd Round Analysis: Mechanical consistency and tempo-based processing anchor Simpson’s projection. He operates comfortably in structure with good risk management and functional mobility. However, average arm strength and uneven deep-ball timing create projection variance. His ceiling depends on improved anticipation and stronger pocket command against pressure-heavy NFL looks. 3). Garrett Nussmeier, 6’2”, 200 lbs, LSU Grade Tier:  Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Analysis: Aggressive mentality and timing confidence define Nussmeier’s game. He attacks intermediate and vertical windows with conviction and shows natural layering ability when protected. Under pressure, his mechanics and decision-making can unravel, and durability questions linger. He profiles as a system-dependent starter or high-level backup in a timing-based offense. 4). Carson Beck, 6’4”, 220 lbs, Miami Grade Tier:  Low-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  3rd–4th Round Analysis: Experience and structure-based command drive Beck’s projection. He distributes efficiently in rhythm and manages the offense like a point guard when protected. Limited mobility and average arm velocity cap his ceiling, and pressure consistently exposes mechanical breakdowns. Best suited for a timing-heavy West Coast structure. 5). Drew Allar, 6’5”, 240 lbs, Penn State Grade Tier:  Low-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  3rd–4th Round Analysis: Rare arm strength and prototype size fuel Allar’s upside. At his best, he drives throws to all levels with NFL-caliber velocity. However, inconsistent pocket feel and deteriorating mechanics under pressure create boom-or-bust volatility. His development curve will determine whether he becomes a starter or remains a traits-based backup. 6). Cole Payton, 6’3”, 233 lbs, North Dakota State Grade Tier:  Low-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  4th–5th Round Analysis: Dual-threat ability and structured accuracy highlight Payton’s projection. He brings legitimate RPO and play-action value with plus athleticism and poise for a first-year starter. Processing against rotating coverage and limited deep-drive velocity remain developmental hurdles. High-upside backup with starter traits if refined. 7). Luke Altmyer, 6’2”, 205 lbs, Illinois Grade Tier:  Low-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  5th Round Analysis: Competitive temperament and rhythm passing anchor Altmyer’s outlook. He operates efficiently in structure and shows workable anticipation in the intermediate game. However, limited velocity and pressure-based mechanical breakdowns cap his ceiling. Projects as a developmental QB2 with spot-start potential. 8). Diego Pavia, 5’10”, 207 lbs, Vanderbilt Grade Tier:  Low-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  5th–6th Round Analysis: Improvisational toughness and off-script playmaking define Pavia’s profile. He thrives in chaos and extends plays with mobility and competitive edge. Size, arm strength, and deep-ball trajectory limit long-term projection, making him a scheme-dependent developmental option. 9). Cade Klubnik, 6’2”, 210 lbs, Clemson Grade Tier:  Low-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  6th Round Analysis: Timing, touch, and mobility within structure shape Klubnik’s projection. He delivers a catchable football and executes movement-based concepts efficiently. However, limited drive velocity and inconsistent post-snap processing restrict his ceiling to developmental backup territory. 10). Miller Moss, 6’2”, 205 lbs, USC Grade Tier:  Low-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  6th–7th Round Analysis: Quick release and short-to-intermediate precision define Moss’s game. He operates cleanly in play-action and quick-game concepts but lacks boundary velocity and explosive downfield ability. Projects as a system-dependent QB2 in a timing-heavy offense. 11). Joe Fagnano, 6’4”, 225 lbs, Connecticut Grade Tier:  Not NFL Level NFL Projection:  Priority Free Agent Analysis: Experience and ball security headline Fagnano’s profile, but limited arm talent, elongated mechanics, and poor pressure response restrict his NFL ceiling. Projects as a camp arm rather than a long-term roster piece. How We Grade the Quarterback Position Quarterbacks are evaluated primarily on processing speed, accuracy, and the ability to create sustainable offensive efficiency from the pocket. Grades are driven by how consistently a passer can diagnose coverage pre- and post-snap, operate within structure, and deliver the football on time and in rhythm. In today’s NFL, winning from the pocket remains the foundation — off-script ability is a bonus, not the baseline. Key factors include anticipation, ball placement at all three levels, pressure response, and third-down conversion ability. We heavily weigh pocket movement, internal clock discipline, turnover-worthy play rate, and command at the line of scrimmage. Arm strength and mobility matter, but decision-making consistency, coverage identification, and situational awareness carry the most weight. The highest-graded quarterbacks are those who elevate the structure around them rather than relying solely on athletic traits or scheme manufacturing. Football Scout 365 Grade Scale Elite NFL Projection:  Top 5–10 Picks (1st Round) Franchise-altering talent with elite physical tools, advanced processing, and minimal weaknesses. Immediate high-impact starter with difference-making ability. Near Elite NFL Projection:  Mid-to-Late 1st Round High-level prospect with strong traits and football intelligence. Expected to become a major contributor early in their career with Pro Bowl upside. High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Projects as a quality NFL starter with strong tools and functional traits. May require refinement, but offers consistent impact with development. Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  4th–5th Round Dependable starter or high-end rotational player. Solid athletic profile with some limitations that cap ceiling or require scheme fit. Low-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  6th–7th Round Developmental prospect with starter upside in defined roles. Inconsistencies in technique, processing, or durability limit long-term ceiling. Backup Level NFL Projection:  Undrafted Free Agent (UDFA) Depth player or rotational piece. Functional traits but limited upside for a long-term starting role. Not NFL Level NFL Projection:  Unlikely to Make NFL Roster Significant developmental needs across athleticism, technique, or processing. Long-shot to stick at the NFL level.

Elijah Sarratt has established himself as one of the most dependable and physically dominant wide receivers in college football. At 6’2”, 209 pounds, the Indiana playmaker wins with strong hands, detailed route discipline, and a calm, competitive edge that consistently shows up in critical moments. A former zero-star recruit, Sarratt’s rise through three programs reflects his toughness, consistency, and steady development. He began his career at Saint Francis (PA), earning FCS Freshman All-America and First-Team All-NEC honors in 2022 after tying the program’s single-season touchdown record. That breakout season put him on the national radar and opened the door to the FBS level, where his production and polish only continued to climb. After transferring to James Madison in 2023, Sarratt caught 82 passes for 1,191 yards and eight touchdowns, earning First-Team All-Sun Belt honors while establishing himself as one of the most reliable receivers in the Group of Five. When head coach Curt Cignetti accepted the Indiana job, Sarratt followed him to the Big Ten and proved once again that his game translates anywhere. He became a Third-Team All-Big Ten selection in 2024 and the focal point of the Hoosiers’ offense, closing the 2025 season with 62 receptions, 800 yards, and 15 touchdowns, including two scores in the College Football Playoff semifinal against Oregon. Elijah Sarratt Film Summary Sarratt wins through timing, detail, and control. His route tempo, balance, and leverage manipulation allow him to separate without relying on speed. He thrives in the middle of the field, using body control and strength to finish through contact. His catch-point concentration and situational awareness make him a reliable target in traffic and late-down situations. Ideal Scheme Fit Fits best in timing-based spread or pro-style offenses built on rhythm and precision. Projects as a power slot or boundary X capable of handling contact, converting critical downs, and operating efficiently in congested areas. Key Strengths (Film-Based Traits) Polished Route Detail:  Uses pace, leverage, and smart angles to separate; rarely wastes motion. Reliable at the Catch Point:  Strong, confident hands with excellent concentration through contact. Poise Under Pressure:  Calm, competitive, and clutch. Developmental Areas (Growth Opportunities) Limited Vertical Burst:  Lacks elite deep speed to consistently stretch defenses. Release Craft:  Must refine hand usage and footwork to defeat physical corners early in reps. Average Catch Radius:  Adequate but not elite length for above-the-rim plays. Unique Playstyle Comparison Keenan Allen’s route precision, start-stop efficiency, and separation skill, paired with Mike Evans’ physicality at the catch point and contested-catch dominance. NFL Draft Grade High-End Starter Potential  - A refined, high-floor receiver who brings instant reliability, toughness, and professional polish to an NFL offense. Draft Projection: Day Two (2nd–3rd Round)

2026 NFL Draft Scouting Report: Texas Tech LB Jacob Rodriguez Jacob Rodriguez is a high-IQ, tone-setting linebacker who thrives on instincts, effort, and physicality. At 6’1”, 230 pounds, he’s slightly undersized by prototype standards but compensates with excellent processing speed, closing burst, and a knack for creating turnovers. A converted quarterback, Rodriguez brings advanced football intelligence and leadership to the second level, serving as the vocal centerpiece of Texas Tech’s defense. Film Summary Rodriguez’s tape highlights an instinctive playmaker who diagnoses plays early and triggers downhill with authority. His range and pursuit angles stand out in zone-match concepts, and he consistently arrives at the football with violent intent. He plays bigger than his frame, using leverage and timing to defeat blocks and finish in traffic. In coverage, he’s most comfortable in zone drops where his route anticipation and eyes on the quarterback allow him to undercut passing lanes. He’s a natural playmaker, recording 7 forced fumbles and 4 interceptions in 2025, showcasing his turnover-creating instincts. While his physical traits limit him in man coverage and his size can show up when engaged by interior linemen, Rodriguez compensates with toughness, processing, and effort. Ideal Scheme Fit Best suited as a MIKE or WILL linebacker in a 4-3 or hybrid 4-2-5 system that allows him to read, diagnose, and flow freely to the football. Key Strengths High football IQ:  Elite pre-snap processing and fast key-and-trigger response. Physical run defender:  Delivers forceful strikes, sets tone inside the box. Turnover creation:  Instinctive ball-hawk with advanced strip and pursuit technique. Effort and leadership:  Relentless motor and vocal presence on and off the field. Developmental Areas Size and take-on strength:  Can get washed out when facing power at the point of attack. Tackling angles in space:  Occasional over-pursuit when scraping laterally. Man-coverage matchups:  Struggles to mirror athletic RBs and TEs in isolation. Grade and Projection Summary Football Scout 365 Grade:   High-End Starter Potential Instinctive, assignment-sound linebacker who wins with processing, toughness, and leadership. NFL Draft Projection:   Day 2 (3rd Round Range) Pro Comparison:   Josey Jewell / David Long Jr. hybrid  — instinctive, compact linebacker who thrives in flow-and-fit systems. Final Analysis Jacob Rodriguez embodies the modern cerebral linebacker — quick to diagnose, relentless to finish, and trusted to quarterback a defense. His film shows a consistent playmaker capable of impacting all three downs, even without elite measurables. With his toughness, football IQ, and knack for generating turnovers, Rodriguez profiles as an immediate contributor on special teams and an eventual starter in a multiple 4-3 front.

With the NFL Scouting Combine approaching, the evaluation process shifts from finalized film grades and production profiles to verified testing, medical evaluations, and interviews that will ultimately shape draft capital. At the top of the board are two Elite prospects — Caleb Downs and Jeremiyah Love — rare, immediate-impact players with true difference-making ceilings. Just behind them, a strong Near Elite tier shapes the identity of the class. Fernando Mendoza headlines a thin quarterback group, while defenders such as Rueben Bain Jr., David Bailey, Arvell Reese, and Sonny Styles define an athletic, scheme-versatile front seven. Offensively, Spencer Fano and Vega Ioane provide plug-and-play trench stability, while Carnell Tate, Makai Lemon, and Jordyn Tyson headline a deep wide receiver group built on alignment flexibility and strong Day Two value throughout the board. Overall, the 2026 class profiles as a roster-building cycle defined by offensive depth and high-end defensive versatility from the front seven through the secondary. Football Scout 365 Big Board Grade Scale Each prospect on the Top 100 is evaluated through our proprietary film-based grading model and placed into one of the following tiers. Grades reflect long-term NFL projection, positional value, athletic profile, and developmental trajectory. Draft projections are aligned to historical valuation trends entering the 2026 NFL Draft. Top 100 Players Positional Count QB-2, RB-4, WR-18, TE-2, IOL-7, OT-10, IDL-9, Edge-15, LB-11, CB-12, SAF-9 Click and go to the tier Elite  – Top 5–10 Picks (1st Round) Near Elite  – Mid-to-Late (1st Rou nd ) High-End Starter Potential  – 2nd–3rd Round Mid-Level Starter Potential  – 4th–5th Round 2026 NFL Draft Big Board Elite Tier Rare, franchise-altering talent with top-of-draft value and immediate impact projection. 1) Caleb Downs, S, Ohio State (6’0”, 205) Elite processor with rare positional flexibility, capable of rotating post-snap, erasing matchups in split-safety or big nickel structures, and functioning as the defensive quarterback with true All-Pro ceiling. 2) Jeremiyah Love, RB, Notre Dame (6’0”, 214) Explosive three-down playmaker whose acceleration, receiving value, and zone-run instincts project as an immediate RB1 and potential franchise-altering offensive weapon. Near Elite Tier High-end impact prospects with early Round 1 value and Pro Bowl-caliber upside who project as foundational starters within their first two seasons. 3) Fernando Mendoza, QB, Indiana (6’5”, 225) A rhythm-based, precision pocket passer who wins with anticipation and processing, projecting as a high-floor timing-system starter with limited off-script ceiling. 4) Rueben Bain Jr., EDGE, Miami (6’3”, 275) Thick, twitchy, high-motor pass rusher with advanced hand usage and alignment versatility who projects as an early-impact, scheme-diverse EDGE with top-tier upside. 5) Arvell Reese, LB, Ohio State (6’4”, 243) Reese is a powerful hybrid front-seven weapon who can stack, blitz, and rush off the edge, projecting as a disruptive three-down linebacker in pressure-heavy defenses. 6) Sonny Styles, LB, Ohio State (6’4”, 230) Styles is a former safety turned modern hybrid linebacker with rare size-speed versatility, best suited for multiple fronts that value coverage flexibility and matchup tools. 7) David Bailey, EDGE, Texas Tech (6’3”, 250) An explosive, bendy edge rusher with a deep pass-rush arsenal and high-level production, projecting as an immediate third-down difference-maker with Round 1 ceiling. 8) Spencer Fano, OT, Utah (6’5”, 300) Fano is a technically polished, high-floor tackle with dominant run-game leverage and early starter projection at right tackle with long-term left-side upside. 9) Carnell Tate, WR, Ohio State (6’3”, 195) A refined perimeter receiver who separates with route detail and body control, projecting as a high-volume WR2 with reliable three-level production. 10) Olaivavega “Vega” Ioane, IOL, Penn State (6’4”, 330) Ioane is a power-based interior mauler built to anchor gap schemes from Day 1, projecting as a stable starting guard with high-floor impact. 11) Kenyon Sadiq, TE, Oregon (6’3”, 250) An explosive, alignment-versatile tight end with true two-phase value, projecting as a matchup weapon in play-action and spacing-based offenses. 12) Francis Mauigoa, OT, Miami (6’6”, 315) A naturally gifted, movement-skilled tackle with scheme versatility and long-term All-Pro upside, projecting as a Day 1 starter on the right side. 13) Akheem Mesidor, EDGE, Miami (6’3”, 280) Advanced hand technician with a relentless motor and inside-out rush flexibility, built to impact immediately on passing downs with high-end starter trajectory. 14) Mansoor Delane, CB, LSU (6’0”, 190) Scheme-versatile perimeter corner with fluid movement skills and advanced processing, projecting as a Day 1 starter with long-term CB1 upside in press-man and match coverage systems. 15) Makai Lemon, WR, USC (5’11”, 195) Polished, high-volume slot receiver who wins with precision, tempo, and ball skills, projecting as a plug-and-play impact target with Pro Bowl upside inside. 16) Jordyn Tyson, WR, Arizona State (6’1”, 195) Refined route technician with three-level separation ability and WR1 ceiling, projecting as a high-floor starter if durability concerns are cleared. 17) Jermod McCoy, CB, Tennessee (6’0”, 195) McCoy is a press-man technician with elite mirror ability and recovery speed, projecting as a true perimeter CB1 with Pro Bowl upside pending full medical clearance. 18) Peter Woods, IDL, Clemson (6’3”, 315) An explosive, penetration-based interior defender with rare first-step quickness, projecting as a disruptive 3-technique centerpiece in attacking one-gap schemes. High-End Starter Potential Tier Clear NFL starters with strong physical tools and long-term impact value, projecting as multi-year foundational pieces within their first few seasons. 19) Dillon Thieneman, S, Oregon (6’0”, 207) An instinctive, multi-alignment safety with strong range and coverage awareness, projecting as a three-down starter in disguise-heavy, zone-based defenses. 20) Kayden McDonald, IDL, Ohio State (6’3”, 326) A dense, power-based interior run defender with elite anchor ability, projecting as a tone-setting early-down nose in odd or hybrid fronts. 21) Denzel Boston, WR, Washington (6’4”, 210) Boston is a physical boundary receiver who wins at the catch point and in contested situations, projecting as a reliable possession-based perimeter starter. 22) C.J. Allen, LB, Georgia (6’1”, 235) A high-IQ, three-down MIKE linebacker built on processing speed and tackling efficiency, projecting as a Day 1 defensive stabilizer. 23) Omar Cooper Jr., WR, Indiana (6’0”, 200) Cooper is an explosive, RAC-driven playmaker with vertical acceleration and versatility, projecting as a dynamic WR2 in motion-heavy spread offenses. 24) Kadyn Proctor, OT, Alabama (6’7”, 369) A massive, power-oriented tackle with rare physical tools and franchise-left-tackle upside if conditioning and leverage continue to improve. 25) Colton Hood, CB, Tennessee (6’0”, 195) Hood is a competitive, scheme-versatile corner with strong ball skills and perimeter athleticism, projecting as an early-impact outside starter. 26) Caleb Lomu, OT, Utah (6’5”, 295) A smooth, technically refined left tackle with high-end pass-protection balance, projecting as a long-term blindside anchor in zone-based systems. 27) Avieon Terrell, CB, Clemson (5’11”, 180) Twitchy, instinctive press-capable corner who competes above his size, projecting as an aggressive boundary starter in man- and match-heavy schemes. 28) Derrick Moore, EDGE, Michigan (6’3”, 258) Power-based edge defender with strong speed-to-power conversion, projecting as a rotational rusher early with starting upside in multiple fronts. 29) Jalon Kilgore, S, South Carolina (6’1”, 211) Kilgore is a versatile, explosive defensive back with strong zone awareness and click-and-close ability, projecting as an early sub-package contributor with starter upside in match-heavy systems. 30) Kyle Louis, LB, Pittsburgh (6’1”, 220) Louis is an athletic hybrid linebacker with true coverage value, best suited as a WILL or big nickel defender in sub-package-heavy defenses. 31) Caleb Banks, IDL, Florida (6’6”, 325) A rare mover for his size, with penetrating 3-tech upside, projecting as a scheme-diverse defensive chess piece with top-20 ceiling. 32. Ty Simpson, QB, Alabama (6’2”, 208) While on the smaller side, Simpson is a rhythm-based passer with developmental starter traits, projecting as a Day Two quarterback whose ceiling hinges on growth in anticipation. 33) Lee Hunter, IDL, Texas Tech (6’4”, 325) A powerful, gap-controlling interior anchor built to occupy space and collapse pockets, projecting as a starting nose tackle in power-based fronts. 34) Keith Abney II, CB, Arizona State (6’0”, 190) An instinctive, zone-savvy corner with strong processing and ball disruption skills, projecting as a reliable CB2 in off-man and match-heavy schemes. 35) Kevin Concepcion, WR, Texas A&M (5’11”, 187) Concepcion is a sudden, quick-twitch slot playmaker with strong YAC ability, projecting as a high-volume underneath weapon in spacing-based offenses. 36) Keldric Faulk, EDGE, Auburn (6’6”, 290) A long, power-based edge defender with inside-out versatility, projecting as a high-floor strong-side starter in multiple-front defenses. 37) Emmanuel McNeil-Warren, S, Toledo (6’2”, 202) EMW is a downhill, tone-setting safety with robber and box value, projecting as a defined-role starter in split-safety and zone-heavy schemes. 38) T.J. Parker, EDGE, Clemson (6’3”, 265) Parker is a physical, leverage-driven power rusher with strong edge-setting ability, projecting as a dependable three-down starter in even or odd fronts. 39) Christen Miller, IDL, Georgia (6’3”, 305) A disruptive, leverage-based interior defender with scheme flexibility, projecting as a steady 3-tech/4i starter with rising Day Two value. 40) Jacob Rodriguez, LB, Texas Tech (6’1”, 230) Former QB, Rodriguez is a high-IQ, downhill linebacker with strong instincts and reliable tackling, projecting as a versatile MIKE/WILL with early special-teams and blitz value. 41) Keyshaun Elliott, LB, Arizona State (6’2”, 235) Physical, run-first linebacker with excellent play strength and diagnostic ability, projecting as an early-down MIKE/SAM in power-based defensive fronts. 42) Monroe Freeling, OT, Georgia (6’7”, 315) Long, athletic left tackle with high-upside pass-protection traits, projecting as a developmental blindside starter in pro-style systems. 43) Cashius Howell, EDGE, Texas A&M (6’2”, 250) An ascending edge rusher with strong speed-to-power conversion, projecting as a multiple-front starter with double-digit sack upside. 44) Jake Golday, LB, Cincinnati (6’4”, 240) Explosive second-level defender with stack-and-shed power, projecting as a SAM or inside linebacker in aggressive fronts. 45) Chris Johnson, CB, San Diego State (6’0”, 185) Disciplined, zone-savvy corner with strong ball skills and tackling reliability, projecting as a starter in Cover 3 and match-heavy systems. 46) Max Iheanachor, OT, Arizona State (6’6”, 330) Traits-heavy, movement-skilled tackle with developmental polish needed, projecting as a high-upside starter in outside-zone schemes. 47) D’Angelo Ponds, CB, Indiana (5’9”, 170) Instinct-driven nickel corner with quick feet and strong zone awareness, projecting as a high-impact slot defender in match-zone systems. 48) Brandon Cisse, CB, South Carolina (6’0”, 190) Explosive press-man boundary corner with high developmental upside, projecting as a scheme-dependent starter with near-elite traits. 49) Josiah Trotter, LB, Missouri (6’2”, 237) Downhill MIKE with strong run instincts and physical pop, projecting as an interior tone-setter in odd-front defenses. 50) Germie Bernard, WR, Alabama (6’1”, 204) Bernard is a versatile, route-polished receiver with strong intermediate production and alignment flexibility, projecting as a reliable WR2/3 in timing-based offenses. 51) R. Mason Thomas, EDGE, Oklahoma (6’2”, 250) Speed-based edge rusher with bend and vertical burst, projecting as an early third-down specialist with starter upside in odd fronts. 52) Anthony Hill Jr., LB, Texas (6’3”, 235) Downhill linebacker with disruptive blitz ability, projecting as a three-down impact defender if coverage refinement continues. 53) Blake Miller, OT, Clemson (6’6”, 315) Experienced, movement-skilled right tackle with zone-scheme value, projecting as a starting-caliber RT with developmental refinement needed. 54) Zakee Wheatley, S, Penn State (6’2”, 200) Rangy, instinctive post safety with strong ball skills, projecting as a single-high anchor in Cover 1 and Cover 3 structures. 55) Malik Muhammad, CB, Texas (6’0”, 190) Twitchy, competitive man-coverage defender with strong mirror ability, projecting as an early-impact starter in press-heavy systems. 56) Keionte Scott, CB, Miami (6’0”, 194) Explosive playmaking nickel defender with blitz and sub-package value, projecting as a high-energy STAR in pressure-heavy defenses. 57) Malachi Fields, WR, Notre Dame (6’4”, 220) A physical boundary receiver who wins at the catch point, projecting as a possession-based X with red-zone value. 58) Jadarian Price, RB, Notre Dame (5’11”, 210) Price is a patient zone runner with excellent vision, projecting as an early-down starter in outside-zone systems if durability holds. 59) Chris Brazzell II, Tennessee, WR (6’5”, 200) Lengthy perimeter receiver who wins vertically with stride acceleration and catch-radius ball skills, projecting as an explosive outside target with red-zone value and developmental upside tied to strength and route refinement. 60) Zachariah Branch, Georgia, WR (5’11”, 175) Branch is an explosive slot weapon with rare acceleration and open-field creativity, projecting as a dynamic motion-based playmaker with immediate return value and WR3 upside in space-oriented offenses. 61) Logan Jones, Iowa, IOL (6’3”, 293) A highly athletic, zone-scheme center with strong processing and pass-protection consistency, projecting as a Day 1 starter in movement-based offensive systems. 62) C.J. Daniels, Miami, WR (6’2”, 205) Polished possession receiver who wins with route nuance and ball skills, projecting as a high-floor WR3 with WR2 upside in timing-based offenses. 63) Chase Bisontis, Texas A&M, IOL (6’5”, 315) Technically sound, movement-skilled interior blocker with balanced pass protection traits, projecting as an early starter in multiple or zone-heavy schemes. 64) Jonah Coleman, Washington, RB (5’9”, 229) Compact, power-driven runner with strong contact balance and zone vision, projecting as a dependable early-down starter with high-floor value. 65) Elijah Sarratt, Indiana, WR (6’2”, 210) Physical boundary chain-mover who wins at the catch point, projecting as a possession-based outside starter with red-zone reliability. 66) Treydan Stukes, Arizona, S (6’2”, 195) A versatile nickel/safety hybrid with strong zone instincts and downhill trigger ability, projecting as a sub-package starter in aggressive, multiple defenses. 67) Zion Young, Missouri, EDGE (6’5”, 262) Power-based edge defender with strong edge-setting ability and pocket-compression traits, projecting as a dependable strong-side starter in even fronts. 68) Dani Dennis-Sutton, Penn State, EDGE (6’5”, 272) Long, physical defensive end with pro-ready strength and early-down reliability, projecting as a rotational-to-starting power rusher in multiple fronts. 69) Connor Lew, Auburn, IOL (6’3”, 300) Athletic, high-IQ center with strong movement skills and zone-scheme value, projecting as a long-term starter pending full ACL recovery. 70) LT Overton, Alabama, EDGE (6’5”, 283) Power-based, multi-front defensive end with strong edge-setting traits, projecting as a base starter with inside reduction versatility. 71) Chris Bell, Louisville, WR (6’2”, 220) Bell is a physical, YAC-driven wideout with vertical acceleration and catch-point strength, projecting as a scheme-fit WR2 with upside in play-action offenses. 72) Bryce Boettcher, Oregon, LB (6’2”, 230) A coverage-capable, high-motor WILL linebacker with space athleticism, projecting as a sub-package defender with core special teams value. 73) Antonio Williams, Clemson, WR (5’11”, 190) Tempo-driven slot technician with strong spatial awareness and separation skills, projecting as a high-floor volume target in spacing-based systems. 74) Emmanuel Pregnon, Oregon, IOL (6’5”, 318) Powerful, tone-setting interior blocker with plug-and-play strength and anchor, projecting as a long-term starting guard in gap or multiple schemes. 75) A.J. Haulcy, LSU, S (6’0”, 222) A downhill, physical safety with strong zone instincts, projecting as a robber/box defender in run-support-driven schemes. 76) Genesis Smith, Arizona, S (6’2”, 202) Smith is a long, rangy centerfield safety with coverage range and tight-end matchup ability, projecting as a split-field or single-high starter in zone systems. 77) Daylen Everette, Georgia, CB (6’1”, 190) A press-man boundary corner with strong vertical speed and length, projecting as a scheme-dependent starter in man-heavy defenses. 78) Chandler Rivers, Duke, CB (5’11”, 180) An instinctive, zone-savvy defensive back with strong route anticipation, projecting as a nickel or boundary starter in match-heavy systems. 79) Gabe Jacas, Illinois, EDGE (6’3”, 275) Jacas is a power-based edge rusher with speed-to-power traits and interior counter ability, projecting as a rotational early-down defender with starter upside. 80) Skyler Bell, Connecticut, WR (5’11”, 185) Bell is a polished inside/outside receiver with route detail and short-area burst, projecting as a reliable slot/Z target in timing-based offenses. Mid-Level Starter Potential Tier Defined-role starters with developmental traits and long-term rotational value who project as reliable contributors within structured systems. 81) Garrett Nussmeier, LSU, QB (6’2”, 200) Aggressive, rhythm-based pocket passer with functional arm strength, projecting as a high-floor backup with spot-start value in timing-based offenses. 82) Malik Benson, Oregon, WR (5’11”, 185) Benson is an elite track-speed vertical field-stretcher with explosive-play ability, projecting as a rotational X/Z weapon with upside tied to route refinement. 83) Romello Height, Texas Tech, EDGE (6’3”, 240) A bend-driven speed rusher with third-down juice, projecting as a rotational rush linebacker in wide-alignment fronts. 84) Jaishawn Barham, Michigan, EDGE (6’4”, 248) Twitchy hybrid front-seven defender with pass-rush upside, projecting as a SAM/pressure package contributor in odd fronts. 85) Ted Hurst, Georgia State, WR (6’3”, 185) Fluid, vertical perimeter target with developmental upside, projecting as a rotational boundary receiver with growth potential. 86) Jalen Farmer, Kentucky, IOL (6’5”, 320) Farmer is a power-based right guard with strong anchor ability, projecting as a gap-scheme rotational starter with defined-role upside. 87) Taurean York, Texas A&M, LB (6’0”, 235) An instinct-driven, high-processing linebacker with tackling reliability, projecting as a zone-heavy MIKE/WILL in 4-2-5 structures. 88) Domonique Orange, Iowa State, IDL (6’4”, 325) Big Orange is a power-oriented nose tackle built for gap-control systems, projecting as a plug-and-play early-down interior anchor. 89) Kamari Ramsey, USC, S (6’0”, 204) A high-IQ split-field safety with strong zone instincts, projecting as a versatile sub-package defender in disguise-heavy schemes. 90) Jake Slaughter, Florida, IOL (6’5”, 308) Technically refined center with pass-protection reliability, projecting as a plug-and-play starter in zone-based offenses. 91) Eli Stowers, Vanderbilt, TE (6’4”, 225) Movement-based “F” tight end with seam-stretch and YAC ability, projecting as a receiving-focused TE2 with mismatch upside in spread offenses. 92) Austin Barber, Florida, OT (6’8”, 320) Physical, experienced lineman with strong anchor traits, projecting best as a gap-scheme guard with early rotational starter value. 93) Chris McClellan, Missouri, IDL (6’4”, 323) Powerful interior defender with penetration and bull-rush traits, projecting as a rotational Year 1 contributor with starter upside in multiple fronts. 94) Caleb Tiernan, Northwestern, OT (6’7”, 325) Technically polished lineman with strong leverage and hand timing, projecting as a swing tackle/guard with reliable starting potential. 95) Rayshaun Benny, Michigan, IDL (6’4”, 305) Benny is a leverage-driven interior defender with steady rotational value, projecting as a 3-tech or shade nose in even fronts. 96) Darrell Jackson Jr., Florida State, IDL (6’5”, 337) A massive, two-gap anchor with length and power, projecting as a run-plugging nose tackle in odd or heavy fronts. 97) Caden Curry, Ohio State, EDGE (6’3”, 260) High-motor power rusher with strong edge-setting traits, projecting as a rotational defensive end with low-end starter upside. 98) Gennings Dunker, Iowa, OT (6’5”, 316) Rugged, power-based blocker who projects inside, offering guard starter traits in run-heavy, gap schemes. 99) Deion Burks, Oklahoma, WR (5’9”, 188) A quick-twitch slot playmaker with strong underneath separation and YAC value, projecting as a rotational weapon in spacing offenses. 100) Emmett Johnson, Nebraska, RB (5’11”, 200) Johnson is a decisive downhill runner built for gap schemes, projecting as a dependable rotational back.

The 2026 NFL Draft wide receiver rankings are far deeper than they’re getting credit for, and it aligns perfectly with where today’s NFL is headed at the position. While this class does feature a handful of traditional boundary “X” receivers, the true strength of the 2026 group lies in its depth of alignment-flexible slot and Z playmakers — a reflection of where the NFL game is trending. When you study recent NFL success stories, Puka Nacua, Amon-Ra St. Brown, Jaxon Smith-Njigba, the through line isn’t size or testing numbers. It’s separation nuance, spatial IQ, competitive toughness at the catch point, and the ability to generate efficient yards after the catch. That same profile shows up repeatedly throughout this 2026 wide receiver class. At the top of the 2026 wide receiver rankings is Ohio State’s Carnell Tate, a refined perimeter target who separates at all three levels. Arizona State’s Jordyn Tyson follows closely, bringing true WR1 route nuance and sudden separation ability. USC’s Makai Lemon rounds out the top tier as a high-volume slot who consistently plays bigger than his frame, winning with precision, toughness, and high-level run-after-catch ability. Overall, this class may not feature a single generational outlier, but it is loaded with versatile, new-age receivers who carry legitimate WR1 upside. More importantly, it offers a deep pool of WR2 and WR3 profiles ready to complement an established NFL alpha and contribute immediately in multiple alignments. If you need depth or a high-quality TE2, this is the year to find one on Day Two or Day Three. Go to other positional grades: QB  | RB | WR  | TE  | OL  | IDL  | Edge  | LB  | CB  | SAF 2026 NFL Draft Wide Receiver Rankings 1). Carnell Tate, 6’3”, 191 lbs, Ohio State Grade Tier:  Near Elite NFL Projection:  Mid-to-Late 1st Round Analysis: A refined perimeter receiver who wins with route detail, tempo manipulation, and catch-point consistency rather than overwhelming traits. Tate separates at all three levels with leverage and efficient footwork, and he consistently finishes through contact. While he lacks elite vertical speed and imposing play strength, his route polish and quarterback-friendly profile project him as a high-volume target with legitimate WR1 upside. 2). Jordyn Tyson, 6’1”, 195 lbs, Arizona State Grade Tier:  Near Elite NFL Projection:  Mid-to-Late 1st Round Analysis: Route manipulation and separation nuance define Tyson’s profile. He consistently creates clean throwing windows with sudden breaks, leverage control, and advanced pacing at the stem. His body control and timing at the catch point allow him to win through contact despite only average long speed. Durability remains the primary concern, but if healthy, Tyson projects as a high-floor WR2 with legitimate WR1 upside built on polish and competitive toughness. 3). Makai Lemon, 5’11”, 195 lbs, USC Grade Tier:  Near Elite NFL Projection:  Late 1st – Early 2nd Round Analysis: A high-volume slot receiver built for today’s NFL. Lemon separates with tempo, precision, and advanced spatial awareness against man and zone. He consistently wins through contact at the catch point despite modest size. Lacking elite vertical gear and outside dominance caps his overall ceiling slightly, but he projects as a plug-and-play slot with Pro Bowl upside. 4). Denzel Boston, 6’4”, 210 lbs, Washington Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd Round Analysis: A physical boundary receiver who wins with size, body positioning, and red-zone reliability. Boston plays through contact and consistently shields defenders at the catch point. Press coverage refinement and sustained separation remain areas for growth, but his catch strength and possession reliability project him as a high-floor perimeter starter. 5). Omar Cooper Jr., 6’0”, 200 lbs, Indiana Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Analysis: Explosiveness and contact balance drive Cooper’s impact. He threatens defenses vertically and horizontally with acceleration and run-after-catch creativity, fitting seamlessly into motion-heavy, spacing-based offenses. His physical temperament as a blocker adds to his multi-role value. Route consistency and detail will determine whether he reaches his ceiling, but the upside profiles as a dynamic WR2 with alignment versatility and big-play potential. 6). Malachi Fields, 6’4”, 220 lbs, Notre Dame Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Analysis: Fields brings classic boundary size and contested-catch reliability to the perimeter. He consistently plays through defenders at the catch point, shielding coverage on back-shoulder throws and intermediate concepts. While he lacks sudden release quickness and clean man-separation ability, his physicality and red-zone value project him as a possession-based WR2 with strong chain-moving utility. 7). Germie Bernard, 6’1”, 204 lbs, Alabama Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Analysis: Tempo and route polish define Bernard’s game. He uncovers at all three levels from both slot and outside alignments, winning with pacing and competitive toughness rather than pure speed. Without a true vertical second gear, his upside is tied to consistency and refinement against press, but his alignment flexibility gives him strong WR2/3 value. 8). C.J. Daniels, 6’2”, 205 lbs, Miami Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  3rd–4th Round Analysis: Route nuance and short-area efficiency anchor Daniels’ evaluation. He separates with sharp stems, fluid hip transitions, and a strong understanding of leverage, consistently presenting clean throwing windows at all three levels. Daniels tracks the football naturally and finishes outside his frame with body control and toughness in traffic. While he lacks elite vertical gear and does not consistently overpower defenders at the catch point, his football IQ, competitiveness, and willingness as a blocker make him a quarterback-friendly, scheme-versatile target. He projects as a high-floor WR3 with legitimate WR2 upside in timing-based or West Coast systems. 9). Kevin Concepcion, 5’11”, 187 lbs, Texas A&M Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Analysis: A quick-twitch slot weapon built on burst, short-area separation, and run-after-catch creativity. Concepcion thrives on option routes and quick-game concepts, creating immediate throwing windows. His game relies heavily on speed and acceleration rather than tempo manipulation, and contested-catch consistency remains developmental. Projects as a high-volume slot playmaker in spacing-based systems. 10). Chris Brazzell II, 6’5”, 200 lbs, Tennessee Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  3rd Round Analysis: A long, vertical perimeter target who wins with stride acceleration and catch radius. Brazzell stretches coverage downfield and finishes above the rim in contested situations. Limited suddenness underneath and strength versus tight man coverage cap his immediate ceiling, but refinement could unlock explosive outside playmaker value. 11). Zachariah Branch, 5’11”, 175 lbs, Georgia Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  3rd Round Analysis: Rare acceleration and open-field creativity make Branch one of the most explosive space players in the class. Much of his production has come on manufactured touches, and his route nuance must expand for full-time volume projection, but his immediate special teams value and motion-based offensive role create clear early impact potential. 12). Elijah Sarratt, 6’2”, 210 lbs, Indiana Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Analysis: Physicality and catch-point discipline define Sarratt’s profile. He consistently shields defenders, wins on back-shoulder concepts, and finishes through contact with strong timing and body control. While he lacks top-end vertical speed and elite suddenness, his understanding of leverage and route pacing allows him to create functional separation underneath. Press-coverage refinement will be key, but he projects as a dependable boundary chain-mover with red-zone value and WR2 upside. 13). Chris Bell, 6’2”, 220 lbs, Louisville Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Analysis: Power and run-after-catch ability drive Bell’s evaluation. He blends vertical acceleration with contact balance, creating explosive YAC opportunities on crossers and in-breakers. His physicality at the catch point adds red-zone and contested-catch value. Technical refinement versus press and improved hand consistency will determine how quickly he reaches his ceiling, but the upside projects as a physical WR2 with offensive centerpiece potential in a play-action-heavy system. 14). Antonio Williams, 5’11”, 190 lbs, Clemson Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  3rd Round Analysis: Tempo and spatial intelligence are the foundation of Williams’ game. He separates with leverage control, route pacing, and sharp footwork, consistently uncovering against man and zone. While he lacks true vertical gear and elite size, his run-after-catch vision and competitive toughness create reliable slot production. Projects as a high-floor volume slot starter in spacing-based offenses. 15). Skyler Bell, 5’11”, 185 lbs, Connecticut Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  3rd–4th Round Analysis: Route detail and short-area burst allow Bell to win at multiple levels. He accelerates quickly, manipulates stems, and consistently separates with sharp breaks. Though not a true burner, his technical consistency and improved hands profile him as a reliable slot/Z contributor early. Minor drop history and limited catch radius slightly cap his ceiling, but he projects as a high-floor timing-based receiver. 16). Malik Benson, 5’11”, 185 lbs, Oregon Grade Tier:  Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  3rd–4th Round Analysis: Track-caliber speed and vertical acceleration define Benson’s projection. He forces early hip turns from corners and creates natural separation on go routes, posts, and deep overs, consistently threatening explosive plays. His ball tracking and body control downfield are legitimate strengths, and his speed opens access throws underneath. However, a limited route tree, slender frame, and inconsistent release package create volatility against press-heavy coverage. Benson profiles as an immediate vertical X/Z field-stretcher with upside tied to refinement in tempo, leverage manipulation, and short-area route detail. 17). Ted Hurst, 6’3”, 185 lbs, Georgia State Grade Tier:  Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  4th–5th Round Analysis: Length and vertical speed highlight Hurst’s upside. He stresses coverage early in routes and tracks the ball naturally downfield. However, he must play with more physicality at the catch point and improve consistency against stronger competition. Development in route refinement and play strength will determine his long-term projection as a boundary starter. 18). Brenen Thompson, 5’9”, 170 lbs, Mississippi State Grade Tier:  Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  4th–5th Round Analysis: Rare acceleration and long-speed immediately define Thompson’s impact. A true vertical field-stretcher, he forces safeties to widen their landmarks and can flip coverage structure with pure speed. He complements that burst with sudden stop-start ability that makes double moves and underneath counters effective once defenders respect the deep threat. His undersized frame limits contested-catch wins and durability raises concerns, but he projects as a rotational deep-threat weapon capable of manufacturing explosive plays. 19). Bryce Lance, 6’3”, 209 lbs, North Dakota State Grade Tier:  Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  4th–5th Round Analysis: Stride length and ball tracking anchor Lance’s projection. He presses vertically and consistently finishes deep throws with concentration and frame control. However, limited short-area quickness and high-cut movement mechanics restrict sudden separation ability. The transition to NFL competition will test his consistency, but he fits best in a vertical offense that maximizes catch-point wins downfield. 20). Deion Burks, 5’9”, 188 lbs, Oklahoma Grade Tier:  Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  4th–5th Round Analysis: Acceleration and open-field creativity define Burks’ game. He separates underneath with sharp breaks and spatial awareness, then becomes dangerous after the catch with vision and lateral agility. Vertical consistency and contested-catch limitations cap his full-time upside, but he projects as a rotational slot weapon with return and manufactured-touch value in motion-heavy offenses. 21). Ja’Kobi Lane, 6’4”, 200 lbs, USC Grade Tier:  Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  4th–5th Round Analysis:n Catch-point dominance and red-zone utility highlight Lane’s profile. He consistently boxes out defenders with timing and body control, converting contested throws outside the numbers. While he flashes leverage awareness, his route tree lacks urgency and refinement, and he does not possess true vertical separation speed. Added strength and route detail will determine his ceiling, but he projects as a developmental boundary X with immediate scoring-area value. How We Grade the Wide Receiver Position Wide receivers are evaluated primarily on separation ability, alignment versatility, and functional playmaking impact. Grades are driven by how consistently a player can win against man and zone coverage, create throwing windows for the quarterback, and generate production independent of scheme manufacturing. In today’s NFL, receivers must function as movable chess pieces capable of aligning outside, in the slot, or in motion without sacrificing timing, spacing, or route integrity. Key factors include route tempo and detail, leverage manipulation, release package efficiency, catch-point consistency, and run-after-catch creation. We heavily weigh spatial awareness versus zone, toughness through contact, and the ability to finish in traffic. While size and timed speed matter, separation craft, football IQ, competitive temperament, and down-to-down reliability carry the most weight in a league increasingly built on spacing, rhythm, and yards after the catch. Football Scout 365 Grade Scale Elite NFL Projection:  Top 5–10 Picks (1st Round) Franchise-altering talent with elite physical tools, advanced processing, and minimal weaknesses. Immediate high-impact starter with difference-making ability. Near Elite NFL Projection:  Mid-to-Late 1st Round High-level prospect with strong traits and football intelligence. Expected to become a major contributor early in their career with Pro Bowl upside. High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Projects as a quality NFL starter with strong tools and functional traits. May require refinement, but offers consistent impact with development. Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  4th–5th Round Dependable starter or high-end rotational player. Solid athletic profile with some limitations that cap ceiling or require scheme fit. Low-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  6th–7th Round Developmental prospect with starter upside in defined roles. Inconsistencies in technique, processing, or durability limit long-term ceiling. Backup Level NFL Projection:  Undrafted Free Agent (UDFA) Depth player or rotational piece. Functional traits but limited upside for a long-term starting role. Not NFL Level NFL Projection:  Unlikely to Make NFL Roster Significant developmental needs across athleticism, technique, or processing. Long-shot to stick at the NFL level.

The quarterback conversation entering the 2026 NFL Scouting Combine is straightforward at the top and complicated immediately after. Fernando Mendoza remains the clear QB1 in this class, and his draft positioning is unlikely to change in Indianapolis. The real question begins with Ty Simpson. If Simpson is the projected QB2 entering the week, can he do enough to firmly plant himself in the Day One conversation? And after Mendoza and Simpson, who separates as QB3? Indianapolis provides a neutral environment — identical throws, identical interview structure, identical scrutiny. In a class defined by thin margins, the Combine could shape the order behind the top two. Ty Simpson, Alabama (Projected QB2) Analysis: Assuming Simpson enters Indianapolis as QB2, this is his opportunity to solidify first-round momentum rather than simply protect his current standing. His tape flashes timing, anticipation, and middle-of-the-field confidence, particularly when operating from structure. The concern lies in his limited starting experience, late-season inconsistency, and durability questions tied to his frame. The Combine is critical for Simpson. Clean mechanics during scripted throws, verified size, and strong interviews could push him toward the top of Round Two — with an outside shot at sneaking into late Round One conversations. A flat showing, however, tightens the margin between him and the rest of this tier. Garrett Nussmeier, LSU (Projected QB3) Analysis: Nussmeier’s draft arc has been volatile. A year ago, he was discussed as a potential QB1 candidate. Now, he enters Indianapolis fighting to stabilize his evaluation. Over a two-year sample, the tape shows NFL-caliber arm strength and flashes of high-level processing, but it also reveals turnover volatility and risk-heavy decision-making. The Combine represents a perception reset. If he throws with rhythm, demonstrates improved command, and handles interviews with composure, he could climb back into the Day Two conversation. Without that clarity, teams may view him as a developmental mid-round investment. Carson Beck, Miami NFL Draft Projection:  4th–5th Round Analysis: Beck remains one of the more complex evaluations in this group. When protected and operating within rhythm, he flashes strong accuracy and the ability to diagnose coverage structures. Under pressure, however, his performance can become streaky and negative plays snowball. The Combine should highlight his strengths — clean platform mechanics and natural arm talent in controlled throwing sessions. While his current projection sits in the late-round range, a sharp and confident performance in Indianapolis could help him reenter the broader Day Two discussion internally for some quarterback-needy teams. Cole Payton, North Dakota State NFL Draft Projection:  4th–6th Round Analysis: Payton is the traits-based wild card. The former FCS standout brings dual-threat ability, high-end arm elasticity, and impressive off-platform ball placement. His throwing motion is unconventional, but the ball jumps off his hand with velocity and life. The primary concern remains experience — only one season as a starter and limited exposure against Power Five competition. Indianapolis provides a critical apples-to-apples comparison against top-tier quarterbacks. If he looks natural, decisive, and consistent in drills, his stock could rise quickly. If inconsistencies show, teams may view him as a developmental late-round swing. Drew Allar, Penn State NFL Draft Projection:  4th–6th Round Analysis: Allar’s trajectory mirrors elements of both Nussmeier and Beck. Once viewed as a potential first-round quarterback, a disappointing 2025 campaign cooled that momentum. He possesses NFL-level arm strength and prototypical size, but his tendency to predetermine throws and lock onto primary reads has raised concerns about processing and adaptability. The Combine setting should showcase his pure arm talent. Whether it does enough to shift the broader evaluation remains the question. Cade Klubnik, Clemson NFL Draft Projection:  5th–7th Round Analysis: Klubnik enters Indianapolis as a classic tools-based projection. His arm strength and rushing ability are intriguing, and those traits should translate well during throwing sessions at Lucas Oil Stadium. However, inconsistent footwork and pocket presence remain areas that require development. The Combine will not erase structural concerns, but it can reinforce why his physical profile remains appealing to teams seeking a developmental quarterback with upside. Luke Altmyer, Illinois NFL Draft Projection:  5th–7th Round Analysis: Altmyer profiles as a developmental option with functional arm strength and a quick release. While it is difficult to project him into the top-75 mix, Indianapolis offers an opportunity to showcase velocity and mechanical efficiency in a structured setting. A clean and controlled week could solidify his status as an early Day Three selection for teams seeking quarterback depth with developmental upside.

The NFL Scouting Combine—formally known as the National Invitational Camp (NIC)—is the league’s premier pre-draft evaluation event and one of the most important checkpoints in the player development and scouting process. Held annually in Indianapolis, the Combine is a four-day, invitation-only event that brings together approximately 300 of the top draft-eligible college football players for standardized medical, mental, and physical evaluations. From an NFL scouting perspective, the Combine is not designed to discover  players—it exists to verify and contextualize what teams have already seen on film. Every drill, measurement, interview, and medical exam is used to reduce uncertainty and risk as clubs finalize draft boards. What the NFL Scouting Combine Evaluates The NFL Scouting Combine evaluates prospects across four primary pillars: Medical Evaluation Medical information is the single most important component of the Combine. Each invited prospect undergoes a comprehensive medical examination, including orthopedic evaluations, imaging (X-rays and MRIs), injury history reviews, and specialist consultations when necessary. All results are compiled into electronic medical records and shared with all 32 NFL teams, ensuring equal access to verified medical data. Interviews & Psychological Testing Teams are permitted to conduct up to 60 formal interviews with prospects, each lasting 15 minutes. These sessions allow clubs to assess football intelligence, personality, leadership traits, recall, and overall fit within their organizational culture. Psychological testing is also administered as part of the broader evaluation process. Physical Measurements & Athletic Testing Height, weight, arm length, hand size, and body composition are officially recorded, followed by position-specific athletic testing. While results are widely discussed publicly, teams use these metrics primarily to confirm thresholds, movement efficiency, and functional athleticism relative to position norms—not to override film evaluation. On-Field Workouts Prospects participate in drills designed to showcase position-specific skills, movement patterns, and body control. These sessions help evaluators assess traits such as explosiveness, change of direction, flexibility, balance, and coordination in a controlled environment. How the Combine Fits Into the Draft Process The Combine serves as a centralized, standardized evaluation hub. Rather than prospects traveling from team to team for physicals and interviews, all testing is conducted in one location under league oversight. This structure allows NFL clubs to compare prospects using consistent data points while minimizing logistical inefficiencies and medical redundancy. Importantly, participation is invitation-based. A committee of NFL evaluators determines which prospects attend, and the league reserves the right to deny participation based on medical, legal, or conduct-related findings. Teams, however, are free to independently evaluate any draft-eligible player outside the Combine framework. Why the Combine Matters For NFL teams, the Combine is about risk management and decision-making. Medical clarity, character evaluation, and athletic verification play a significant role in determining draft value, contract guarantees, and long-term investment. For prospects, it represents the most comprehensive job interview of their football careers—an opportunity to confirm their draft standing or, in some cases, elevate it. While the public focus often centers on 40-yard dash times and highlight clips, the true value of the NFL Scouting Combine lies behind closed doors, where film, data, medicals, and interviews are brought together to shape draft boards across the league.

The 2026 NFL Draft class may be light at the most important position in football — quarterback — but what it lacks there, it makes up for in trench depth and defensive firepower. The offensive and defensive line groups are strong, and the linebacker class might be one of the deepest and most talented we’ve evaluated in years. Offensively, the quarterback story starts and ends with Indiana’s Fernando Mendoza, who is widely projected to go No. 1 overall to the Las Vegas Raiders. After him, things get interesting. Alabama’s Ty Simpson sits as QB2, but there’s real buzz that Mendoza could be the only quarterback selected on Day 1. That could push Simpson — along with Garrett Nussmeier and Carson Beck — into the Day 2 conversation. At wide receiver, there may not be a generational prospect, but the depth is real. Ohio State’s Carnell Tate, USC’s Makai Lemon, and Arizona State’s Jordyn Tyson each have legitimate WR1 cases depending on preference and scheme. The class is rich in WR2 and WR3 types built to complement established NFL No. 1 targets. Up front, the offensive line lacks a clear blue-chip left tackle, but versatility defines this group. Spencer Fano leads the way, followed by Francis Mauigoa, with interior standout Vega Ioane carrying potential top-10 upside at his position. Across Days 1–3, flexibility and multi-position value will drive this board. At running back, the class is top-heavy with Notre Dame’s Jeremiyah Love carrying legitimate generational buzz. Behind him is solid depth, but the true high-end value sits at the top. Defensively, this is where the class separates itself. Caleb Downs, Arvell Reese, and Rueben Bain Jr. headline a group loaded with impact players. The real theme of this draft? Non-premium defensive positions could dominate early selections — and teams focused on front-seven playmakers will find value quickly. 2026 NFL Draft Positional Rankings and Player Grades Below, you’ll find direct links to our full 2026 NFL Draft position rankings. Each position group includes detailed player rankings, Football Scout 365 grades, in-depth scouting analysis, and projected draft ranges to provide a complete evaluation of the class. Quarterback The 2026 NFL Draft quarterback rankings are the defining storyline of this cycle. Beyond Indiana’s Fernando Mendoza, many evaluators are already turning their attention to 2027. The depth is limited, and there isn’t a surplus of plug-and-play Day 1 starters — but there is legitimate developmental upside embedded within this group. Running Back Jeremiyah Love headlines a top-heavy running back group with true three-down, game-changing ability, while Jadarian Price brings vision and tempo that translate cleanly to today’s lighter defensive fronts. The depth isn’t overwhelming, but the top-end talent is legitimate. Wide Receiver Carnell Tate, Jordyn Tyson, and Makai Lemon pace a receiver class built on separation craft and alignment flexibility. This group reflects the modern NFL — polished route runners who win with tempo, leverage, and run-after-catch production rather than pure measurables. Tight End Kenyon Sadiq sets the ceiling with explosive mismatch potential, and Eli Stowers adds move-piece versatility in space. Behind them is a balanced mix of in-line stability and flex value that should produce multiple Day 2 contributors. Offensive Line Spencer Fano and Francis Mauigoa anchor a trench-driven class featuring starting-caliber tackles and powerful interior options. It’s a sturdy, scheme-versatile group with early impact potential. EDGE Rankings Rueben Bain Jr. and David Bailey headline one of the strongest position groups in the class. Production, pass-rush depth, and alignment flexibility define a wave of defenders capable of impacting quarterbacks early. Interior Defensive Line Peter Woods and Kayden McDonald bring anchor strength and disruptive interior traits to a powerful IDL group. It’s a run-stopping core with enough pocket push to translate on passing downs. Linebacker Arvell Reese’s hybrid upside sets the tone, with Sonny Styles close behind as a range-and-versatility defender built for sub-package football. This is a modern, three-down linebacker group. Cornerback Jermod McCoy and Mansoor Delane lead a competitive coverage class built on instincts, press traits, and schematic flexibility. Multiple starters should emerge from this group. Safety Caleb Downs headlines the safety class as a true defensive chess piece. Around him is a versatile collection of safeties capable of playing deep, rotating late, or matching in space.

The 2026 NFL Draft interior defensive line rankings arrive at a time when the value of disruptive interior defenders is rising across the league. Modern NFL defenses are increasingly relying on a four-man rush to generate pressure while defending the run with lighter boxes. As seen on the biggest stages — including recent Super Bowl runs — the ability to rush four and still collapse the pocket allows defenses to maximize coverage on the back end and unlock pressure packages from multiple launch points. This class reflects that evolution. While it may not feature a consensus top-10, game-wrecking interior pass rusher, it offers a deep collection of powerful, gap-disciplined defenders who can anchor against double teams and compress the pocket with force. Prospects like Peter Woods headline a group built on leverage, motor, and interior toughness, with strong Day 2 depth for teams seeking early-down stability and sub-package disruption from the inside. Go to other positional grades: QB  | RB | WR  | TE  | OL  | IDL  | Edge  | LB  | CB  | SAF 2026 NFL Draft Interior Defensive Line Rankings 1). Peter Woods, 6’3”, 315 lbs, Clemson Grade Tier:  Near Elite NFL Projection:  Mid-to-Late 1st Round Analysis:  A twitch-heavy interior disruptor with rare first-step explosion and natural leverage. Woods consistently wins across the guard’s face with speed-to-power and violent hands, stressing protection rules before blocks can fully develop. His 2025 production dip appears more contextual than trait-based. Best deployed as an attacking 3-technique in one-gap systems where penetration is prioritized over static two-gapping. 2). Kayden McDonald, 6’3”, 326 lbs, Ohio State Grade Tier:  Near Elite NFL Projection:  Mid-to-Late 1st Round Analysis:  A dense, leverage-driven nose tackle whose anchor strength and leg drive consistently reset the line of scrimmage. McDonald controls A-gaps, absorbs double teams, and frees second-level defenders to flow cleanly. Pass-rush counters and pad-level consistency remain developmental, but his play strength and early-down reliability project immediate value in odd or hybrid fronts. 3). Caleb Banks, 6’6”, 325 lbs, Florida Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd Round Analysis:  A physically rare interior defender with elite length and movement skills for his size. Banks flashes disruptive burst and alignment versatility, generating pressure from multiple launch points. Pad level and double-team anchor consistency must improve, but his blend of size and interior pass-rush upside gives him legitimate top-20 ceiling in attacking schemes. 4). Lee Hunter, 6’4”, 325 lbs, Texas Tech Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Analysis:  A powerful interior anchor built to control A-gaps in both odd and even fronts. Hunter wins with leverage, heavy hands, and functional explosiveness, consistently collapsing space versus single blocks and surviving doubles. While not a high-volume interior penetrator, he compresses pockets and projects as an early-down tone-setter with starting nose tackle upside. 5). Christen Miller, 6’3”, 305 lbs, Georgia Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Analysis:  A leverage-based interior defender with strong run integrity and developing pass-rush efficiency. Miller wins with length, power, and consistent motor, stacking and shedding effectively while flashing interior quickness. His ability to align as a 3-tech or 4i gives him scheme flexibility in hybrid fronts. If pressure-to-sack conversion improves, he profiles as a steady Day 2 starter with three-down potential. 6). Domonique Orange, 6’4”, 325 lbs, Iowa State Grade Tier:  Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  3rd–4th Round Analysis:  A power-centric nose tackle built for gap-control systems. Orange wins with natural leverage, mass, and play strength, consistently anchoring versus double teams and compressing interior run lanes. He projects cleanly as a zero- or one-tech in odd fronts, with early-down value in even schemes. Pass-rush upside remains limited, but his plug-and-play run defense gives him immediate rotational floor with starting nose tackle potential. 7). Chris McClellan, 6’4”, 323 lbs, Missouri Grade Tier:  Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  3rd–4th Round Analysis:  A disruptive interior defender with size, length (34” arms), and explosive get-off to impact both as a penetrator and gap-control player. When leverage is consistent, McClellan controls blocks and collapses the pocket with heavy power. His snap anticipation and competitive motor elevate his flashes. Pad-level inconsistency limits down-to-down reliability, but the tools suggest rotational Year 1 impact with starter-level upside in multiple fronts. 8). Rayshaun Benny, 6’4”, 305 lbs, Michigan Grade Tier:  Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  3rd–4th Round Analysis:  A strong-anchored interior defender with steady three-down rotational value. Benny combines natural leverage, heavy hands, and good lateral quickness to control interior gaps and survive double teams. He currently relies too heavily on bull rush mechanics and lacks a refined counter package. If pass-rush development takes a step forward, he projects as a dependable early-down starter in even or hybrid schemes. 9). Darrell Jackson Jr., 6’5”, 337 lbs, Florida State Grade Tier:  Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  3rd–4th Round Analysis:  A massive two-gap anchor with rare length (35” arms) and overwhelming play strength. Jackson consistently commands double teams and resets the line of scrimmage with heavy hands and long-arm power. Conditioning consistency and limited pass-rush sequencing cap three-down projection, but he offers immediate value as a starting nose in odd fronts or a heavy 1-tech in even systems built on interior run control. 10). Dontay Corleone, 6’1”, 320 lbs, Cincinnati Grade Tier:  Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  3rd–4th Round Analysis:  A compact, power-dense nose tackle who wins with leverage and violent hands. Corleone absorbs double teams, controls A-gaps, and generates interior push with natural lower-body strength. Shorter length and limited counter development restrict pass-rush ceiling, but his ability to reset the pocket and control the run game makes him an ideal early-down 1-tech or rotational nose in odd fronts. How We Grade the Interior Defensive Line Position Interior defensive linemen are evaluated primarily on anchor strength, gap discipline, and disruption at the point of attack. Grades are driven by how consistently a defender controls leverage, holds ground against double teams, and executes assignments within even and odd front structures. Key factors include first-step explosiveness, hand usage, block deconstruction, pad level, interior pass-rush plan, and pursuit motor. While raw size and mass matter, functional strength, leverage consistency, and the ability to collapse the pocket without compromising run integrity carry the most weight in today’s NFL, where interior defenders must impact both early downs and sub-package situations. Football Scout 365 Grade Scale Elite NFL Projection:  Top 5–10 Picks (1st Round) Franchise-altering talent with elite physical tools, advanced processing, and minimal weaknesses. Immediate high-impact starter with difference-making ability. Near Elite NFL Projection:  Mid-to-Late 1st Round High-level prospect with strong traits and football intelligence. Expected to become a major contributor early in their career with Pro Bowl upside. High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Projects as a quality NFL starter with strong tools and functional traits. May require refinement but offers consistent impact with development. Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  4th–5th Round Dependable starter or high-end rotational player. Solid athletic profile with some limitations that cap ceiling or require scheme fit. Low-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  6th–7th Round Developmental prospect with starter upside in defined roles. Inconsistencies in technique, processing, or durability limit long-term ceiling. Backup Level NFL Projection:  Undrafted Free Agent (UDFA) Depth player or rotational piece. Functional traits but limited upside for a long-term starting role. Not NFL Level NFL Projection:  Unlikely to Make NFL Roster Significant developmental needs across athleticism, technique, or processing. Long-shot to stick at the NFL level.

The 2026 NFL Draft safety rankings are defined by versatility at the top, aligning with the NFL’s growing demand for defenders who function as true chess pieces, process quickly, and stay on the field in all situations. The top tier features three-level defenders capable of playing high, rotating late, handling slot responsibilities, and triggering downhill without compromising coverage integrity. That flexibility allows defensive coordinators to disguise coverages and lean into post-snap movement without substituting personnel. Beyond the top-end talent, the class also includes physical, downhill profiles who thrive near the line of scrimmage and fit cleanly into zone-heavy structures. The strength of this group isn’t just playmaking—it’s how seamlessly these players translate to modern NFL defensive frameworks. Go to other positional grades: QB  | RB | WR  | TE  | OL  | IDL  | Edge  | LB  | CB  | SAF 2026 NFL Draft Safety Rankings 1). Caleb Downs , 6’0”, 205 lbs, Ohio State Grade Tier:  Elite NFL Projection:  Top 5–10 Picks (1st Round) The clear standard-bearer of the 2026 safety class. A prototype modern safety with elite processing, positional versatility, and three-level impact. Capable of anchoring the backend while also functioning as a matchup eraser, run defender, and on-field communicator in disguise-heavy structures. 2). Dillon Thieneman, 6’0”, 207 lbs, Oregon Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Instinctive, high-IQ, multi-alignment safety who consistently impacts games with range, effort, and coverage awareness. Best suited for modern, multiple defenses that emphasize zone coverage and post-snap rotation. 3). Zakee Wheatley, 6’2”, 200 lbs, Penn State Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Rangy, instinctive post safety with strong ball skills and disciplined zone awareness. Best deployed as a single-high or split-field defender tasked with erasing vertical threats. 4). Jalon Kilgore, 6’1”, 211 lbs, South Carolina Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Explosive, physical safety with sub-package value and starter upside. Thrives in zone and match-zone systems where his short-area burst and click-and-close can be maximized. 5). Emmanuel McNeil-Warren, 6’2”, 202 lbs, Toledo Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Downhill, tone-setting safety with defined role value near the line of scrimmage. Most effective as a box or robber defender in zone-heavy structures that allow him to trigger aggressively. 6). Genesis Smith, 6’2”, 202 lbs, Arizona Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  3rd Round Long, athletic coverage safety with centerfield range and movement skills. Offers upside as a coverage-first defender, with run support consistency still developing. 7). A.J. Haulcy, 6’0”, 222 lbs, LSU Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  3rd–4th Round Linebacker-bodied safety with physicality and anticipation. Brings value as a box defender or robber in run-support-driven, zone-heavy defenses. 8). Kamari Ramsey, 6’0”, 204 lbs, USC Grade Tier:  Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  4th–5th Round High-IQ defensive chess piece with strong zone instincts and positional flexibility. Best utilized in split-field, nickel, or robber roles rather than as a full-time post safety. 9). Jakobe Thomas, 6’2”, 200 lbs, Miami Grade Tier:  Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  4th–5th Round Aggressive, downhill safety who thrives as a pressure piece and box defender. Playmaking ability stands out, though control and structure discipline remain key areas. 10). Bud Clark, 6’2”, 185 lbs, TCU Grade Tier:  Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  5th Round Instinctive ball-hawk with strong route recognition and feel for zone coverage. Lacks ideal mass and true eraser range but offers value in disguise-based schemes. How We Grade the Safety Position Safeties are evaluated primarily on versatility, processing speed, and coverage impact. Grades are driven by how consistently a player functions across multiple alignments—post, split-field, slot, robber, and box—while maintaining assignment discipline. Key factors include range and pursuit angles, route recognition and trigger speed, tackling efficiency in space, and the ability to rotate late and disguise coverage. While physicality and run support matter, coverage reliability and football intelligence carry the most weight in today’s pass-heavy NFL. Football Scout 365 Grade Scale Elite NFL Projection:  Top 5–10 Picks (1st Round) Franchise-altering talent with elite physical tools, advanced processing, and minimal weaknesses. Immediate high-impact starter with difference-making ability. Near Elite NFL Projection:  Mid-to-Late 1st Round High-level prospect with strong traits and football intelligence. Expected to become a major contributor early in their career with Pro Bowl upside. High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Projects as a quality NFL starter with strong tools and functional traits. May require refinement but offers consistent impact with development. Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  4th–5th Round Dependable starter or high-end rotational player. Solid athletic profile with some limitations that cap ceiling or require scheme fit. Low-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  6th–7th Round Developmental prospect with starter upside in defined roles. Inconsistencies in technique, processing, or durability limit long-term ceiling. Backup Level NFL Projection:  Undrafted Free Agent (UDFA) Depth player or rotational piece. Functional traits but limited upside for a long-term starting role. Not NFL Level NFL Projection:  Unlikely to Make NFL Roster Significant developmental needs across athleticism, technique, or processing. Long-shot to stick at the NFL level.

The 2026 NFL Draft cornerback rankings are loaded with perimeter talent, aligning with what today’s multiple NFL defenses demand from boundary defenders. This class is led by Tennessee’s Jermod McCoy and LSU’s Mansoor Delane, with Tennessee’s Colton Hood rounding out a strong top tier. McCoy entered the 2025 season as the presumptive CB1 in the class, but an ACL injury that sidelined his entire year opened the door for movement at the top. Delane has since emerged as a legitimate top-10 candidate and a real threat to be the first corner off the board, followed closely by Hood. Once you move beyond the top four or five names, this cornerback class transitions into a strong Day 2 run of defensive backs with starter-level upside. Go to other positional grades: QB  | RB | WR  | TE  | OL  | IDL  | Edge  | LB  | CB  | SAF 2026 NFL Draft Cornerback Rankings 1). Jermod McCoy, 6’0”, 195 lbs, Tennessee Grade Tier:  Near Elite NFL Projection:  Mid-to-Late 1st Round Analysis: A rare press-man corner who combines physical control at the line with advanced technical discipline. McCoy uses mirror-match footwork and loose hips to erase releases, and his recovery burst shows up immediately when stressed vertically. His route recognition and quarterback manipulation separate him, turning tight coverage into takeaways. If medicals check out, he projects as a Day 1 starter with Pro Bowl-level ceiling. 2). Mansoor Delane, 6’0”, 190 lbs, LSU Grade Tier:  Near Elite NFL Projection:  Mid-to-Late 1st Round Analysis: A well-rounded perimeter starter with the movement skills and processing speed teams prioritize at the position. Delane thrives in press-man and match quarters, where his patient hands and fluid hips disrupt timing early. His awareness in off coverage allows him to read route distribution quickly and close windows with urgency. With continued refinement locating the ball downfield, he carries legitimate long-term CB1 upside. 3). Colton Hood, 6’0”, 195 lbs, Tennessee Grade Tier:  Near Elite NFL Projection:  Late 1st – Early 2nd Round Analysis: An ascending coverage defender with SEC-tested consistency. Hood blends length, speed, and competitive toughness, showing comfort both outside and inside. His ball skills and anticipation stand out in press and zone-match structures, and he plays with controlled aggression through the route stem. Continued refinement in tackling and grab discipline will determine how quickly he reaches his ceiling as a long-term perimeter starter. 4). Avieon Terrell, 5’11”, 180 lbs, Clemson Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Analysis: A twitchy, competitive corner who plays bigger than his frame. Terrell excels in press-man and match coverage with quick feet, fluid hips, and strong route-mirroring ability. His open-field tackling and physicality elevate his value on early downs. While not an elite size-speed outlier, his instincts and finishing ability at the catch point project him as an early contributor with upside in aggressive coverage systems. 5). Chris Johnson, 6’0”, 185 lbs, San Diego State Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Analysis: A refined, instinctive outside corner whose ball skills consistently show up in off and zone coverage. Johnson plays with disciplined eyes and strong leverage awareness, timing his click-and-close to disrupt throws and generate takeaways. Average top-end speed and occasional vertical stress limitations show up against explosive receivers, but his processing and technical control project cleanly to zone-heavy and match-based systems. 6). D'Angelo Ponds, 5’9”, 170 lbs, Indiana Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Analysis: An ultra-competitive, instinct-driven corner with advanced route recognition and quick feet. Ponds consistently plays with timing at the catch point and shows very good mirroring ability despite size limitations. His processing speed and eye discipline fit cleanly into match-zone concepts, where he can anticipate and disrupt. Limited length and mass create matchup concerns, projecting him best as a high-impact nickel or versatile CB2. 7). Brandon Cisse, 6’0”, 190 lbs, South Carolina Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Analysis: An explosive boundary corner with rare movement tools and developmental upside. Cisse’s burst, length, and recovery speed show up in press-man, allowing him to stay attached vertically and contest at the catch point. Downhill trigger ability in run support adds edge to his profile. Route recognition and eye discipline remain inconsistent, but the athletic ceiling is near-elite with refinement. 8). Keith Abney II, 6’0”, 190 lbs, Arizona State Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  3rd Round Analysis: A competitive, instinctive defender with strong processing and click-and-close urgency. Abney communicates well in match-zone structures and consistently contests at the catch point. While not a top-tier athlete, his awareness and leverage discipline allow him to function across boundary and nickel roles. Grab tendencies and run-game block deconstruction are areas to clean up. 9). Daylen Everette, 6’1”, 190 lbs, Georgia Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd-3rd Round Analysis: A prototypical boundary corner with very good length and straight-line speed. Everette thrives in tight press alignments, where his patient jam and hip fluidity keep him in phase vertically. His closing speed flashes at the catch point, but zone processing and tackling consistency fluctuate. Best fit in press-heavy, man-match systems. 10). Malik Muhammad, 6’0”, 190 lbs, Texas Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Analysis: A twitch-driven, competitive man defender with outstanding short-area agility and mirror ability. Muhammad’s smooth hips and foot quickness allow him to stay connected at all three levels. Positional flexibility adds value inside or outside, though occasional over-aggression and play-strength development remain refinement areas. Projects as an early-impact starter in press-man or match coverage. 11). Chandler Rivers, 5’11”, 180 lbs, Duke Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  3rd–4th Round Analysis: A zone-savvy corner with strong spatial awareness and anticipation. Rivers plays with vision on the quarterback, undercutting throws and generating turnovers. Smooth hip and ankle flexibility aid transitions, though length and vertical recovery speed cap his ceiling in pure isolation. Projects best in Cover 3 and match-zone structures. 12). Keionte Scott, 6’0”, 194 lbs, Miami Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  3rd–4th Round Analysis: An explosive nickel defender whose value comes from blitz timing, downhill trigger, and sub-package disruption. Scott processes quickly in zone and brings physicality in pressure-heavy structures. Man coverage fluidity and ball location downfield limit full-time outside projection. Best deployed as a STAR/nickel defender. How We Grade the Cornerback Position Cornerbacks are evaluated primarily on coverage ability, technique, and processing speed. Grades are driven by how consistently a player can execute assignments on the outside or in the slot while maintaining leverage, spacing, and route discipline across different coverage calls. Key factors include press-man control, footwork and hip transitions, recovery speed, route recognition, and finish at the catch point. While size and tackling ability factor into the evaluation, coverage consistency, mental discipline, and the ability to stay in phase against NFL route concepts carry the most weight in today’s pass-heavy league. Football Scout 365 Grade Scale Elite NFL Projection:  Top 5–10 Picks (1st Round) Franchise-altering talent with elite physical tools, advanced processing, and minimal weaknesses. Immediate high-impact starter with difference-making ability. Near Elite NFL Projection:  Mid-to-Late 1st Round High-level prospect with strong traits and football intelligence. Expected to become a major contributor early in their career with Pro Bowl upside. High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Projects as a quality NFL starter with strong tools and functional traits. May require refinement but offers consistent impact with development. Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  4th–5th Round Dependable starter or high-end rotational player. Solid athletic profile with some limitations that cap ceiling or require scheme fit. Low-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  6th–7th Round Developmental prospect with starter upside in defined roles. Inconsistencies in technique, processing, or durability limit long-term ceiling. Backup Level NFL Projection:  Undrafted Free Agent (UDFA) Depth player or rotational piece. Functional traits but limited upside for a long-term starting role. Not NFL Level NFL Projection:  Unlikely to Make NFL Roster Significant developmental needs across athleticism, technique, or processing. Long-shot to stick at the NFL level.

The 2026 NFL Draft linebacker rankings are one of the deepest second-level groups in recent cycles, built on versatility and modern defensive value. This group will provide NFL teams with high-level run defenders, coverage-capable second-level athletes, and legitimate pass-rush threats from the linebacker position. It’s a true chess-piece class, headlined by Arvell Reese — a hybrid defender capable of playing off-ball or rushing off the edge — and his Ohio State teammate Sonny Styles, a former safety with elite sideline-to-sideline range, physical run presence, and blitz upside. There should be at least two linebackers drafted on Day 1, with as many as four pushing into that range depending on how the board falls. Expect a strong run on Day 2, where multiple Round 2–4 prospects project as starter-level defenders in match-heavy, sub-package-driven systems. For teams seeking speed, processing, and coverage competency at the second level, this class offers quality options throughout the top 60 picks. Go to other positional grades: QB  | RB | WR  | TE  | OL  | IDL  | Edge  | LB  | CB  | SAF 2026 NFL Draft Linebacker Rankings 1). Arvell Reese, 6’4”, 243 lbs, Ohio State Grade Tier:  Near Elite NFL Projection:  Mid-to-Late 1st Round Analysis:  A true modern front-seven chess piece with inside-out versatility. Reese brings stack-and-shed power, edge-rush utility, and legitimate three-down value in pressure-heavy fronts. At 6’4”, 243 pounds, he overwhelms with length and closing burst, finishing 2025 with 69 tackles, 10 TFL, and 6.5 sacks. Best deployed as a hybrid MIKE/SAM/EDGE in multiple structures, where his ability to stress protection rules and create disruption elevates his impact. 2). Sonny Styles, 6’4”, 243 lbs, Ohio State Grade Tier:  Near Elite NFL Projection:  Mid-to-Late 1st Round Analysis:  A rare size-speed hybrid who transitioned from safety into a true second-level weapon. Styles offers sideline-to-sideline range, blitz upside, and alignment flexibility in multiple fronts. His ability to cover, trigger downhill, and rush off the edge fits today’s interchangeable linebacker mold. Continued refinement shedding blocks and tightening coverage technique will determine how quickly he reaches his ceiling, but the physical profile is first-round caliber. 3). C.J. Allen, 6’1”, 235 lbs, Georgia Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Analysis:  A high-floor, instinct-driven off-ball linebacker built on processing speed and tackling reliability. Allen consistently sorts run fits, plays with leverage discipline, and finishes efficiently. While not an elite splash-play generator, his football IQ and communication project cleanly to a MIKE role in 4-2-5 or 3-3-5 structures. Three-down viability comes from steadiness and zone competence rather than raw explosiveness. 4). Jake Golday, 6’4”, 240 lbs, Cincinnati Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Analysis:  A big-bodied, explosive linebacker with edge background and physical presence near the line of scrimmage. Golday wins with heavy hands, length, and downhill pop, constricting run lanes and flashing value as a blitzer. Processing speed and zone awareness remain developmental areas, but his size and athletic ceiling project him as a starting SAM or inside linebacker with upside in aggressive fronts. 5). Josiah Trotter, 6’2”, 237 lbs, Missouri Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Analysis:  A downhill tone-setter with outstanding trigger speed and physical pop. Trotter diagnoses quickly and beats blockers to landmarks, finishing with authority in the box. Coverage limitations and hip stiffness restrict full three-down projection at this stage, but in an attack-style front where he can play forward and downhill, he offers immediate run-game value. 6). Anthony Hill Jr., 6’3”, 235 lbs, Texas Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Analysis:  A prototype modern linebacker with length, range, and disruptive upside. Hill excels attacking interior gaps, scraping laterally, and closing violently at contact. His improved tackling efficiency in 2025 reflects growth in consistency, though coverage refinement will determine whether he reaches full three-down centerpiece status. In pressure-heavy structures, his burst and length create consistent second-level disruption. 7). Kyle Louis, 6’1”, 220 lbs, Pittsburgh Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Analysis:  A modern space defender with outstanding short-area burst and real coverage value. Louis matches tight ends and slot receivers comfortably, giving him true sub-package utility. His decisiveness downhill and range show up in nickel-heavy structures. Undersized frame and average block deconstruction limit full-time MIKE projection, but as a WILL, rover, or big nickel, he brings three-down versatility in the right front. 8). Jacob Rodriguez, 6’1”, 230 lbs, Texas Tech Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  3rd Round Analysis:  An instinct-driven linebacker with strong downhill trigger and physical temperament. Rodriguez wins with processing speed, tackling consistency, and turnover production rather than elite traits. While undersized by some standards, his sideline-to-sideline range and blitz timing fit cleanly into zone-match systems. Projects as a MIKE/WILL in read-and-react structures that prioritize IQ and toughness. 9). Keyshaun Elliott, 6’2”, 235 lbs, Arizona State Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  3rd–4th Round Analysis:  A physical, box-oriented linebacker with excellent play strength and run instincts. Elliott stacks and sheds effectively, plays with patience in tight quarters, and delivers pop at contact. Limited range and coverage ceiling cap full three-down projection, but as an early-down MIKE or SAM in physical fronts, he offers tone-setting value. 10). Bryce Boettcher, 6’2”, 230 lbs, Oregon Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  3rd–4th Round Analysis:  A high-motor, coverage-capable defender with natural movement skills in space. Boettcher transitions smoothly, mirrors backs and tight ends, and tracks the football with ease. Anchor strength and block deconstruction remain developmental areas, projecting him best as a WILL with sub-package upside and early special teams impact. 11). Deontae Lawson, 6’2”, 230 lbs, Alabama Grade Tier:  Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  4th–5th Round Analysis:  A productive, downhill linebacker with strong run-stopping presence and closing burst. Lawson brings physicality inside and flashes value as a blitzer, though coverage refinement and lateral consistency limit his ceiling. Best suited for a 3-4 structure where he can attack interior gaps and play forward rather than carry extended space responsibilities. 12). Taurean York, 6’0”, 235 lbs, Texas A&M Grade Tier:  Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  4th–5th Round Analysis:  An instinctive, technically sound linebacker whose game is built on processing speed and tackling reliability. York consistently diagnoses quickly and plays with functional strength despite length limitations. Ideal fit in zone-heavy or read-and-react systems where his football IQ and communication can elevate the structure. 13). Harold Perkins Jr., 6’1”, 225 lbs, LSU Grade Tier:  Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  4th–5th Round Analysis:  An explosive hybrid defender with edge-rush burst and alignment flexibility. Perkins wins with speed, bend, and mismatch ability, though undersized dimensions and coverage consistency create projection questions at the next level. Best deployed in movement-based, hybrid fronts that maximize his sub-package disruption rather than traditional stack linebacker duties. How We Grade the Linebacker Position Linebackers are evaluated primarily on processing speed, range, and coverage viability within modern NFL defensive structures. Grades are driven by how consistently a defender reads run-pass keys, fits gaps with discipline, and functions in space against today’s spread offenses. Key factors include play diagnosis, downhill trigger, pursuit angles, block deconstruction, man and zone coverage ability, and tackling efficiency in space. While physicality and run-stopping production matter, three-down value, coverage reliability, and communication within sub-package structures carry the most weight in today’s pass-first league. Football Scout 365 Grade Scale Elite NFL Projection:  Top 5–10 Picks (1st Round) Franchise-altering talent with elite physical tools, advanced processing, and minimal weaknesses. Immediate high-impact starter with difference-making ability. Near Elite NFL Projection:  Mid-to-Late 1st Round High-level prospect with strong traits and football intelligence. Expected to become a major contributor early in their career with Pro Bowl upside. High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Projects as a quality NFL starter with strong tools and functional traits. May require refinement but offers consistent impact with development. Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  4th–5th Round Dependable starter or high-end rotational player. Solid athletic profile with some limitations that cap ceiling or require scheme fit. Low-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  6th–7th Round Developmental prospect with starter upside in defined roles. Inconsistencies in technique, processing, or durability limit long-term ceiling. Backup Level NFL Projection:  Undrafted Free Agent (UDFA) Depth player or rotational piece. Functional traits but limited upside for a long-term starting role. Not NFL Level NFL Projection:  Unlikely to Make NFL Roster Significant developmental needs across athleticism, technique, or processing. Long-shot to stick at the NFL level.