Search Results

The 2024 NFL Draft has concluded, culminating months of behind-the-scenes scouting and analysis during a three-day event in Detroit, Michigan, which drew a record attendance of over 700,000 fans, more than any previous NFL Draft. Why Are We Grading The Draft Before The Three-Year Window? Grading the NFL Draft immediately after its conclusion is often criticized because it typically takes two to three years to truly assess which players will succeed. However, the real value in immediate draft grades lies in the extensive time spent analyzing prospects, understanding where they were selected, and determining why they were chosen at their specific draft spots. Additionally, draft grades evaluate each team's ability to fill primary and secondary needs. Did they address their primary needs with prospects who have high-ceiling potential? How effectively did they meet their secondary needs, and what is the initial perception of these efforts? While we can revisit and regrade these drafts in a few years, for now, evaluating the here and now allows us to reflect on our initial perceptions later. 2024 NFL Draft Overview A record six quarterbacks were drafted in the first 12 picks, with no defensive players selected until the 15th overall—the longest gap between an offensive or defensive player in NFL Draft history. There was much speculation that there could be zero defenders taken in the first ten picks, but having none in the first 15 was unprecedented. This trend was less about the talent available and more due to QB-needy teams selecting quarterbacks earlier than expected, coupled with an exceptionally deep wide receiver class featuring talents like Marvin Harrison Jr., Rome Odunze, and Malik Nabers—who each could have been the top wide receiver in any of the past several drafts. The depth of offensive tackles and the need at that position played a significant role this year, leading to more first-round offensive players than any other draft in history, with 23 total offensive players, including eight offensive linemen. How Did Our Big Board Rankings Stack Up? Regarding our big board rankings for this draft class, it was our best recorded year since we started publishing a top 100 Big Board back in 2021. Seventy-eight of our top 100 players were drafted within the first 100 picks, with 95% of our top 150 fully graded players drafted. Additional Draft Notes: Overall, the 2024 NFL Draft proved to be as deep as advertised. We had grades on 26 wide receivers, and all 26 were drafted. Our top three wide receivers, Marvin Harrison Jr., Rome Odunze, and Malik Nabers, were all ranked in the top ten and drafted in the top ten. We graded 11 quarterbacks in the draft, and 10 were drafted, with one signing a guaranteed free agent contract. Our top-graded quarterback, Caleb Williams, went first overall. Our second-highest graded quarterback, J.J. McCarthy, was the fourth quarterback drafted, landing at pick 10 with the Minnesota Vikings, while Jayden Daniels and Drake Maye, 3rd and 4th ranked quarterbacks, went second and third overall, respectively. Michael Penix's going eighth overall to the Falcons was a big surprise in the mainstream media, but not to us, as he was ranked as high as the third quarterback on our board at one time. All 13 running backs we graded were drafted. Our top-ranked running back, Blake Corum, was the second running back off the board after Texas' Jonathan Brooks. We had grades for 21 cornerbacks in this draft class, and 20 were drafted while one signed a UDFA deal, ensuring all 21 are in the NFL. Our top-graded cornerback, Quinyon Mitchell, went to the Eagles and was the first cornerback selected in the 2024 NFL Draft. All 32 Teams 2024 NFL Draft Grades Arizona Cardinals Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A) The Arizona Cardinals adeptly utilized the NFL Draft to reinforce their team, focusing particularly on enhancing their receiving corps, defensive line, and secondary. Marvin Harrison Jr. from Ohio State is recognized as a generational talent, which aligns perfectly with the Cardinals’ ability to maximize their playmakers’ effectiveness. This high-caliber addition significantly raises the expectations for quarterback Kyler Murray. The team’s performance in the middle rounds was notably strong, as they secured several players who could challenge for starting roles much earlier than anticipated, bolstering their roster depth before the projected talent cutoff after Round 3. This strategic approach has positioned them well for the upcoming season. Day One: Average Grade (A-) 4) Marvin Harrison Jr., WR, Ohio State (A+) 27) Darius Robinson, ED, Missouri (A-) Day Two: Average Grade (C+) 43) Max Melton, CB, Rutgers (B) 66) Trey Benson, HB, Florida State (B+) 71) Isaiah Adams, T, Illinois (C) 82) Tip Reiman, TE, Illinois (C) 90) Elijah Jones, CB, Boston College (C) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 104) Dadrion Taylor-Demerson, S, Texas Tech (A-) 138) Xavier Thomas, ED, Clemson (A) 162) Christian Jones, T, Texas (B+) 191) Tejhaun Palmer, WR, UAB (C) 226) Jaden Davis, CB, Miami (FL) (C-) Atlanta Falcons Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B) The Atlanta Falcons focused on a mix of high-reward and developmental picks to address their current roster and future needs. The selection of Michael Penix Jr. from Washington at the 8th overall was a major surprise, considering their current quarterback situation with Kirk Cousins. Penix is viewed as a high-risk, high-reward quarterback with the potential to be the franchise's future leader. The Falcons also aimed to bolster their defensive line and add depth to their backfield and special teams with their mid and late-round picks. Day One: Average Grade (B+) 8) Michael Penix Jr., QB, Washington (B+) Day Two: Average Grade (B) 35) Ruke Orhorhoro, DI, Clemson (C) 74) Bralen Trice, ED, Washington (B) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 109) Brandon Dorlus, DI, Oregon (A+) 143) JD Bertrand, LB, Notre Dame (B) 186) Jase McClellan, HB, Alabama (B) 187) Casey Washington, WR, Illinois (B) 197) Zion Logue, DI, Georgia (C) Baltimore Ravens Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A) The Baltimore Ravens executed a strategic draft, effectively bolstering their secondary and defensive line while also enhancing offensive line depth. Nate Wiggins from Clemson, selected as one of the top corners in the draft, exemplifies Baltimore’s focus on adding elite speed and versatility to their defensive backfield. The team's performance in the later rounds was equally impressive, securing potential impact players like Adisa Isaac from Penn State and Tez Walker from North Carolina, which significantly boosts their defensive and offensive capabilities respectively. This comprehensive approach demonstrates Baltimore's commitment to maintaining a balanced and competitive roster. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 30) Nate Wiggins, CB, Clemson (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 62) Roger Rosengarten, T, Washington (B) 93) Adisa Isaac, ED, Penn State (A+) Day Three: Average Grade (A) 113) Tez Walker, WR, North Carolina (A) 130) T.J. Tampa, CB, Iowa State (A+) 165) Rasheen Ali, HB, Marshall (B) 218) Devin Leary, QB, Kentucky (B) 228) Nick Samac, C, Michigan State (B) 250) Sanoussi Kane, S, Purdue (C) Buffalo Bills Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B+) The Buffalo Bills focused on strengthening their roster across multiple positions, particularly in their secondary, offensive line, and receiving corps. The selection of Keon Coleman from Florida State highlights their attempt to add a prototypical "X" receiver, providing a significant boost to their passing game. Ray Davis from Kentucky and Sedrick Van Pran from Georgia were standout picks, adding versatility and effectiveness to both the rushing and pass protection aspects of their game. This draft illustrates Buffalo’s intent to address gaps while also preparing for future development needs. Day One: No Picks Day Two: Average Grade (B) 33) Keon Coleman, WR, Florida State (B+) 60) Cole Bishop, S, Utah (B+) 95) DeWayne Carter, DI, Duke (B) Day Three: Average Grade (A-) 128) Ray Davis, HB, Kentucky (A) 141) Sedrick Van Pran, C, Georgia (A) 160) Edefuan Ulofoshio, LB, Washington (B) 168) Javon Solomon, ED, Troy (B+) 204) Tylan Grable, T, UCF (B) 219) Daequan Hardy, CB, Penn State (B) 221) Travis Clayton, G, Buffalo (C) Carolina Panthers Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B+) The Carolina Panthers made strategic moves to enhance their receiving options and bolster their defensive and offensive lines. Xavier Legette from South Carolina, compared stylistically to AJ Brown, represents a significant addition to their receiving corps, promising to impact their offensive scheme immediately. Ja'Tavion Sanders from Texas and Michael Barrett from Michigan were also notable selections, aimed at providing immediate contributions to the offense and defense, respectively. This draft approach shows Carolina's commitment to building a robust team framework. Day One: Average Grade (B+) 32) Xavier Legette, WR, South Carolina (B+) Day Two: Average Grade (C) 46) Jonathon Brooks, HB, Texas (A-) 72) Trevin Wallace, LB, Kentucky (C) Day Three: Average Grade (A) 101) Ja'Tavion Sanders, TE, Texas (A+) 157) Chau Smith-Wade, CB, Washington State (B+) 200) Jaden Crumedy, DI, Mississippi State (B) 240) Michael Barrett, LB, Michigan (A-) Chicago Bears Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A+) The Chicago Bears strategically drafted to maximize their offensive potential, significantly enhancing their quarterback and wide receiver positions. Caleb Williams from USC, seen as a generational talent, is compared favorably with elite NFL quarterbacks and sets a high bar for Chicago's future offensive capabilities. Rome Odunze from Washington, picked to complement Williams, is expected to dramatically impact the Bears' passing game. The Bears also focused on strengthening their special teams and defensive line, indicating a comprehensive approach to building a competitive team. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 1) Caleb Williams, QB, USC (A+) 9) Rome Odunze, WR, Washington (A+) Day Two: No Picks Day Three: Average Grade (A) 75) Kiran Amegadjie, T, Yale (A) 122) Tory Taylor, P, Iowa (A) 144) Austin Booker, ED, Kansas (A) Cincinnati Bengals Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B+) The Cincinnati Bengals effectively addressed their offensive line and added depth across the defensive line and receiving corps in this draft. Amarius Mims from Georgia, a highly anticipated tackle, was a significant addition, expected to protect Joe Burrow for the foreseeable future. The Bengals' strategy also included bolstering their defense with multiple picks that could contribute immediately, showcasing their balanced approach to building both sides of the ball. Day One: Average Grade (B+) 18) Amarius Mims, OT, Georgia (B+) Day Two: Average Grade (B+) 49) Kris Jenkins, DI, Michigan (B+) 80) Jermaine Burton, WR, Alabama (B+) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 97) McKinnley Jackson, DI, Texas A&M (C) 115) Erick All, TE, Iowa (B+) 149) Josh Newton, CB, TCU (B) 194) Tanner McLachlan, TE, Arizona (B) 214) Cedric Johnson, ED, Mississippi (B) 224) Daijahn Anthony, S, Mississippi (B) 237) Matt Lee, C, Miami (FL) (B) Cleveland Browns Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B) The Cleveland Browns focused on enhancing their defensive capabilities and adding versatile offensive weapons. Michael Hall Jr. from Ohio State and Zak Zinter from Michigan were key early picks aimed at improving the defensive and offensive lines, respectively. Cleveland's later rounds were marked by selections that emphasized increasing the team's playmaking ability and depth, such as Jamari Thrash from Louisville and Nathaniel Watson from Mississippi State, who are expected to contribute both in regular plays and special teams. Day One: No Picks Day Two: Average Grade (B) 54) Michael Hall Jr., DI, Ohio State (B) 85) Zak Zinter, G, Michigan (B) Day Three: Average Grade (B+) 156) Jamari Thrash, WR, Louisville (B+) 206) Nathaniel Watson, LB, Mississippi State (B+) 227) Myles Harden, CB, South Dakota (B) 243) Jowon Briggs, DI, Cincinnati (A-) Dallas Cowboys Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B) The Dallas Cowboys concentrated on strengthening their offensive and defensive lines through strategic draft selections. Tyler Guyton from Oklahoma, a versatile offensive tackle, and Marshawn Kneeland from Western Michigan, a solid run defender, are expected to contribute significantly to their respective units. The Cowboys also added depth with picks aimed at improving special teams and rotational contributions, indicating a focus on solidifying their overall team structure and readiness for the upcoming challenges. Day One: Average Grade (B) 29) Tyler Guyton, OT, Oklahoma (B) Day Two: Average Grade (B+) 56) Marshawn Kneeland, ED, Western Michigan (B+) 73) Cooper Beebe, G, Kansas State (B+) 87) Marist Liufau, LB, Notre Dame (C) Day Three: Average Grade (A) 174) Caelen Carson, CB, Wake Forest (A+) 216) Ryan Flournoy, WR, Southeast Missouri State (C) 233) Nathan Thomas, T, Louisiana (B) 244) Justin Rogers, DI, Auburn (B) Denver Broncos Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B) The Denver Broncos strategically selected Bo Nix from Oregon as their potential franchise quarterback, indicating a significant commitment to reshaping their offense. The draft choices, including Troy Franklin from Oregon and Kris Abrams-Draine from Missouri, align with Denver’s strategy to enhance their passing game and secondary. The late-round picks continue to support this strategy, aiming to develop depth and versatility across the roster. Day One: Average Grade (C+) 12) Bo Nix, QB, Oregon (C+) Day Two: No Picks Day Three: Average Grade (A) 76) Jonah Elliss, ED, Utah (A) 102) Troy Franklin, WR, Oregon (A+) 145) Kris Abrams-Draine, CB, Missouri (B+) 147) Audric Estime, HB, Notre Dame (B) 235) Devaughn Vele, WR, Utah (B) 256) Nick Gargiulo, C, South Carolina (B) Detroit Lions Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B+) The Detroit Lions focused on bolstering their secondary and offensive line, addressing key areas of need with high-potential picks. Terrion Arnold from Alabama and Ennis Rakestraw Jr. from Missouri were notable for their immediate potential to improve Detroit's coverage capabilities. The Lions' strategy reflects a commitment to building a robust defensive lineup, complemented by strategic additions to the offensive line and special teams. Day One: Average Grade (B+) 24) Terrion Arnold, CB, Alabama (B+) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 61) Ennis Rakestraw Jr., CB, Missouri (A) 126) Giovanni Manu, T, Detroit (B) 132) Sione Vaki, S, Utah (B+) Day Three: Average Grade (A-) 189) Mekhi Wingo, DI, LSU (A-) 210) Christian Mahogany, G, Boston College (A) Green Bay Packers Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B) The Green Bay Packers focused on reinforcing their offensive line and adding dynamic playmakers in the 2024 NFL Draft. Jordan Morgan from Arizona, a versatile offensive lineman, was a key acquisition, expected to compete for a critical role protecting the quarterback. The Packers also secured high-quality additions to their backfield and defense, aiming to increase their overall team speed and versatility. Day One: Average Grade (B+) 25) Jordan Morgan, OT, Arizona (B+) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 45) Edgerrin Cooper, LB, Texas A&M (B+) 58) Javon Bullard, S, Georgia (B+) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 88) MarShawn Lloyd, HB, USC (B+) 91) Ty'Ron Hopper, LB, Missouri (C) 111) Evan Williams, S, Oregon (C) 163) Jacob Monk, G, Duke (C) 169) Kitan Oladapo, S, Oregon State (B) 202) Travis Glover, T, Georgia State (C) 245) Michael Pratt, QB, Tulane (A-) 255) Kalen King, CB, Penn State (A-) Houston Texans Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B) The Houston Texans strategically bolstered their secondary, offensive line, and special teams with this year's draft picks. Key selections like Kamari Lassiter from Georgia and Calen Bullock from USC reflect Houston's commitment to enhancing their defensive backfield, while Blake Fisher from Notre Dame provides much-needed stability on the offensive line. The selection of Cade Stover from Ohio State is a highlight, potentially offering a new offensive weapon at tight end. Day One: No Picks Day Two: Average Grade (B) 42) Kamari Lassiter, CB, Georgia (B) 59) Blake Fisher, T, Notre Dame (B) 78) Calen Bullock, S, USC (B) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 123) Cade Stover, TE, Ohio State (A-) 188) Jamal Hill, LB, Oregon (C) 205) Jawhar Jordan, HB, Louisville (B) 238) Solomon Byrd, ED, USC (B) 249) LaDarius Henderson, T, Michigan (B) Indianapolis Colts Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A) The Indianapolis Colts focused on adding high-impact players across the board, with a notable emphasis on bolstering their defensive and offensive lines. Laiatu Latu from UCLA and Adonai Mitchell from Texas are key examples of their strategy to inject talent into critical areas, potentially providing immediate contributions. The Colts also enhanced their offensive flexibility with selections like Tanor Bortolini from Wisconsin and Cade Stover from Ohio State, addressing both short-term needs and long-term depth. Day One: Average Grade (A) 15) Laiatu Latu, ED, UCLA (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A+) 52) Adonai Mitchell, WR, Texas (A+) 79) Matt Goncalves, T, Pittsburgh (B) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 117) Tanor Bortolini, C, Wisconsin (A) 142) Anthony Gould, WR, Oregon State (B) 151) Jaylon Carlies, S, Missouri (C) 164) Jaylin Simpson, S, Auburn (B) 201) Micah Abraham, CB, Marshall (C) 234) Jonah Laulu, DI, Oklahoma (B) Jacksonville Jaguars Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B-) Jacksonville Jaguars' draft approach was aimed at upgrading their receiver corps and defensive line, with a significant investment in physical and versatile players like Brian Thomas Jr. from LSU and Maason Smith from LSU. The Jaguars also focused on adding depth to their secondary with picks like Jarrian Jones from Florida State and improving their special teams with the addition of Cam Little from Arkansas, reflecting a holistic approach to team building. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 23) Brian Thomas Jr., WR, LSU (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (C) 48) Maason Smith, DI, LSU (C) 96) Jarrian Jones, CB, Florida State (B+) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 114) Javon Foster, T, Missouri (B) 116) Jordan Jefferson, DI, LSU (C) 153) Deantre Prince, CB, Mississippi (C) 167) Keilan Robinson, HB, Texas (B) 212) Cam Little, K, Arkansas (B) 236) Myles Cole, ED, Texas Tech (B) Kansas City Chiefs Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A-) The Kansas City Chiefs executed a focused strategy to enhance their offensive firepower and defensive flexibility. Xavier Worthy from Texas, a dynamic receiver, stands out as a significant addition. The Chiefs also invested in protecting Patrick Mahomes with the selection of Kingsley Suamataia from BYU and added depth to their tight end room and secondary. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 28) Xavier Worthy, WR, Texas (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (B+) 63) Kingsley Suamataia, T, BYU (B+) Day Three: Average Grade (A) 131) Jared Wiley, TE, TCU (B+) 133) Jaden Hicks, S, Washington State (A+) 159) Hunter Nourzad, C, Penn State (B+) 211) Kamal Hadden, CB, Tennessee (B+) 248) C.J. Hanson, G, Holy Cross (B) Las Vegas Raiders Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A-) The Las Vegas Raiders focused on adding potential star power and depth across their roster. Brock Bowers from Georgia and Jackson Powers-Johnson from Oregon were notable picks, expected to immediately boost the Raiders' offensive capabilities. The selection of Delmar Glaze from Maryland and the emphasis on enhancing the defensive and offensive lines reflect Las Vegas's strategy to build a robust and competitive team for the future. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 13) Brock Bowers, TE, Georgia (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A+) 44) Jackson Powers-Johnson, C, Oregon (A+) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 77) Delmar Glaze, T, Maryland (C) 112) Decamerion Richardson, CB, Mississippi State (B) 148) Tommy Eichenberg, LB, Ohio State (B) 208) Dylan Laube, HB, New Hampshire (B) 223) Trey Taylor, S, Air Force (B) 229) M.J. Devonshire, CB, Pittsburgh (B) Los Angeles Chargers Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A) The Los Angeles Chargers focused on strengthening their offensive and defensive lines and added significant depth to their secondary. Joe Alt from Notre Dame, a standout offensive tackle, and Ladd McConkey from Georgia, a versatile receiver, were key additions aimed at boosting the Chargers' offensive capabilities. The Chargers also focused on adding depth to their linebacker and defensive line positions, ensuring that they remain competitive in all phases of the game. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 5) Joe Alt, OT, Notre Dame (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 34) Ladd McConkey, WR, Georgia (A) 69) Junior Colson, LB, Michigan (B+) Day Three: Average Grade (B+) 105) Justin Eboigbe, ED, Alabama (C) 137) Tarheeb Still, CB, Maryland (B) 140) Cam Hart, CB, Notre Dame (A) 181) Kimani Vidal, HB, Troy (A-) 225) Brenden Rice, WR, USC (A) 253) Cornelius Johnson, WR, Michigan (B) Los Angeles Rams Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A-) The Los Angeles Rams focused on enhancing their defensive prowess and adding dynamic playmakers to their offense. Jared Verse from Florida State, a versatile defensive end, and Blake Corum from Michigan, a highly agile running back, highlight the Rams' strategy to build a robust and flexible team. The Rams' draft picks reflect a clear intent to enhance their defensive line and secondary while adding explosive potential to their offensive lineup. Day One: Average Grade (A) 19) Jared Verse, ED, Florida State (A) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 39) Braden Fiske, DI, Florida State (B) 83) Blake Corum, HB, Michigan (A) Day Three: Average Grade (B+) 99) Kamren Kinchens, S, Miami (FL) (A-) 154) Brennan Jackson, ED, Washington State (B) 196) Tyler Davis, DI, Clemson (B+) 209) Joshua Karty, K, Stanford (B) 213) Jordan Whittington, WR, Texas (A-) 217) Beaux Limmer, C, Arkansas (A-) 254) KT Leveston, T, Kansas State (A-) Miami Dolphins Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B+) The Miami Dolphins targeted a mix of high-impact and developmental players to strengthen their roster. Chop Robinson from Penn State is a standout pick, a potential star at the edge rusher position with the right development. The Dolphins also bolstered their offensive line with Patrick Paul from Houston, adding much-needed protection for Tua Tagovailoa. The addition of dynamic playmakers like Jaylen Wright from Tennessee and Mohamed Kamara from Colorado State in the later rounds indicates a clear strategy to enhance their offensive explosiveness and defensive depth. Day One: Average Grade (A) 21) Chop Robinson, ED, Penn State (A) Day Two: Average Grade (B) 55) Patrick Paul, T, Houston (B) Day Three: Average Grade (B+) 120) Jaylen Wright, HB, Tennessee (B+) 158) Mohamed Kamara, ED, Colorado State (B+) 184) Malik Washington, WR, Virginia (B+) 198) Patrick McMorris, S, California (C) 241) Tahj Washington, WR, USC (A-) Minnesota Vikings Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A+) The Minnesota Vikings made strategic moves to improve both their offense and defense, selecting highly capable players. J.J. McCarthy from Michigan stands out as a potentially transformative quarterback, fitting perfectly into Minnesota’s system. Dallas Turner from Alabama offers significant value as a versatile linebacker, enhancing their defensive strength. The Vikings' focus on adding depth and talent, such as Khyree Jackson from Oregon in the secondary and Walter Rouse from Oklahoma on the offensive line, showcases a commitment to building a solid and versatile roster. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 10) J.J. McCarthy, QB, Michigan (A+) 17) Dallas Turner, ED, Alabama (A+) Day Two: No Picks Day Three: Average Grade (B) 108) Khyree Jackson, CB, Oregon (A-) 177) Walter Rouse, T, Oklahoma (B) 203) Will Reichard, K, Alabama (B) 230) Michael Jurgens, G, Wake Forest (B) 232) Levi Drake Rodriguez, DI, Texas A&M-Commerce (B) New England Patriots Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B-) The New England Patriots focused on revitalizing their offense with the addition of Drake Maye from North Carolina, a quarterback with the tools to potentially lead the franchise. The Patriots also targeted enhancing their receiving corps and offensive line depth with picks like Ja'Lynn Polk from Washington and Layden Robinson from Texas A&M. The selection of dynamic receivers and solid offensive linemen demonstrates New England's strategy to build around their new quarterback and solidify the offense. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 3) Drake Maye, QB, North Carolina (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (B+) 37) Ja'Lynn Polk, WR, Washington (B+) 68) Caedan Wallace, T, Penn State (C) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 103) Layden Robinson, G, Texas A&M (B) 110) Javon Baker, WR, UCF (B+) 180) Marcellas Dial, CB, South Carolina (C) 193) Joe Milton, QB, Tennessee (B) 231) Jaheim Bell, TE, Florida State (A-) New Orleans Saints Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A-) The New Orleans Saints capitalized on key opportunities in the draft to significantly upgrade their roster, particularly on the offensive line and in the secondary. Taliese Fuaga from Oregon State, an elite offensive tackle with the versatility to play multiple positions, highlights their approach to strengthening the line. Kool-Aid McKinstry from Alabama adds immediate talent and depth to their secondary, addressing a critical need. The Saints also sought depth and potential impact players in the later rounds, enhancing both their defensive and offensive units. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 14) Taliese Fuaga, OT, Oregon State (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 41) Kool-Aid McKinstry, CB, Alabama (A) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 150) Spencer Rattler, QB, South Carolina (A-) 170) Bub Means, WR, Pittsburgh (B) 175) Jaylan Ford, LB, Texas (B) 199) Khristian Boyd, DI, Northern Iowa (B+) 239) Josiah Ezirim, T, Eastern Kentucky (B) New York Giants Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A) The New York Giants focused heavily on bringing in high-impact talent, particularly at wide receiver and in the secondary. Malik Nabers from LSU, as a highly-touted receiver, is expected to elevate the Giants' offensive playmaking ability immediately. The Giants also added depth and versatility to their defensive backfield, with Ty Nubin from Minnesota and Andru Phillips from Kentucky enhancing their coverage capabilities. The selection of impactful players across the board underscores the Giants' intent to effectively bolster both sides of the ball. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 6) Malik Nabers, WR, LSU (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 47) Ty Nubin, S, Minnesota (A+) 70) Andru Phillips, CB, Kentucky (B+) Day Three: Average Grade (A) 107) Theo Johnson, TE, Penn State (A) 166) Tyrone Tracy, HB, Purdue (A) 183) Darius Muasau, LB, UCLA (B) New York Jets Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A-) The New York Jets executed a focused draft strategy to fortify their offensive line and add dynamic weapons to their offense. Olumuyiwa Fashanu from Penn State, a top tackle prospect, is expected to become a cornerstone on the offensive line. The Jets also selected playmakers like Malachi Corley from Western Kentucky and Braelon Allen from Wisconsin, aiming to inject versatility and explosiveness into their offensive schemes. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 11) Olumuyiwa Fashanu, OT, Penn State (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (B+) 65) Malachi Corley, WR, Western Kentucky (B+) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 134) Braelon Allen, HB, Wisconsin (B+) 171) Jordan Travis, QB, Florida State (B) 173) Isaiah Davis, HB, South Dakota State (A-) 176) Qwan'tez Stiggers, CB, New York (B) 257) Jaylen Key, S, Alabama (B) Philadelphia Eagles Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A) The Philadelphia Eagles targeted versatility and athleticism in their draft picks, focusing on strengthening their secondary and adding depth to their offensive and defensive lines. Quinyon Mitchell from Toledo, an elite cornerback prospect, and Cooper DeJean from Iowa, another versatile secondary player, highlight their commitment to improving their defensive backfield. The Eagles also added dynamic offensive playmakers like Ainias Smith from Texas A&M and strategic depth pieces like Trevor Keegan from Michigan, showing a balanced approach to building their roster. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 22) Quinyon Mitchell, CB, Toledo (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 40) Cooper DeJean, CB, Iowa (A+) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 94) Jalyx Hunt, ED, Houston Christian (B+) 127) Will Shipley, HB, Clemson (A-) 152) Ainias Smith, WR, Texas A&M (A-) 155) Jeremiah Trotter Jr., LB, Clemson (B+) 172) Trevor Keegan, G, Michigan (B+) 185) Johnny Wilson, WR, Florida State (B+) 190) Dylan McMahon, C, North Carolina State (C) Pittsburgh Steelers Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A+) The Pittsburgh Steelers focused on adding strength and versatility to their offensive line and injecting new talent into their receiving and defensive units. Troy Fautanu from Washington and Zach Frazier from West Virginia are expected to significantly enhance the Steelers' offensive line capabilities, while Roman Wilson from Michigan provides an exciting new weapon for their passing game. The Steelers' strategic selection of high-impact players across the board demonstrates their commitment to building a balanced and competitive team. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 20) Troy Fautanu, OT, Washington (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 51) Zach Frazier, C, West Virginia (A+) 84) Roman Wilson, WR, Michigan (A+) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 98) Payton Wilson, LB, North Carolina State (A) 119) Mason McCormick, G, South Dakota State (B+) 178) Logan Lee, DI, Iowa (B) 195) Ryan Watts, CB, Texas (B) San Francisco 49ers Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B) The San Francisco 49ers focused on adding dynamic and versatile players to their roster this draft season. Ricky Pearsall from Florida, a standout wide receiver known for his excellent route running and ability to track the ball, was a significant acquisition. The 49ers also fortified their offensive line and secondary with Dominick Puni from Kansas and Renardo Green from Florida State, aiming to bolster both pass protection and coverage depth. Additional picks in the secondary and offensive skill positions underline their strategy to increase depth and enhance playmaking abilities across the board. Day One: Average Grade (B+) 31) Ricky Pearsall, WR, Florida (B+) Day Two: Average Grade (B) 64) Renardo Green, CB, Florida State (B) 86) Dominick Puni, T, Kansas (B) Day Three: Average Grade (B+) 124) Malik Mustapha, S, Wake Forest (B) 129) Isaac Guerendo, HB, Louisville (B+) 135) Jacob Cowing, WR, Arizona (A) 215) Jarrett Kingston, G, USC (C) 251) Tatum Bethune, LB, Florida State (B) Seattle Seahawks Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B+) The Seattle Seahawks strategically targeted areas of need, focusing particularly on their defensive line and secondary while also strengthening the offensive line. Byron Murphy II from Texas, the top interior defender in the draft, is expected to make an immediate impact. The Seahawks also added key offensive linemen like Christian Haynes from Connecticut and Sataoa Laumea from Utah, aiming to solidify their protection schemes and run game. The secondary received new talent with picks like Nehemiah Pritchett from Auburn and D.J. James from Auburn, enhancing their coverage abilities. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 16) Byron Murphy II, IDL, Texas (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 81) Christian Haynes, G, Connecticut (A+) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 118) Tyrice Knight, LB, UTEP (C) 121) AJ Barner, TE, Michigan (B) 136) Nehemiah Pritchett, CB, Auburn (B) 179) Sataoa Laumea, T, Utah (B) 192) D.J. James, CB, Auburn (B+) 207) Mike Jerrell, T, Findlay (C) Tampa Bay Buccaneers Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B+) Tampa Bay Buccaneers targeted both offensive and defensive enhancements through their draft picks. Graham Barton from Duke, a versatile offensive lineman, was a key addition to solidifying the interior and possibly playing multiple positions on the line. Chris Braswell from Alabama and Tykee Smith from Georgia were significant defensive additions, with Braswell expected to provide immediate edge rushing capabilities and Smith enhancing the run defense. Jalen McMillan from Washington and Bucky Irving from Oregon are expected to bring dynamism to the offense, particularly in the passing and running games. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 26) Graham Barton, IOL, Duke (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (B+) 57) Chris Braswell, ED, Alabama (B+) 89) Tykee Smith, S, Georgia (B) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 92) Jalen McMillan, WR, Washington (A) 125) Bucky Irving, HB, Oregon (B+) 220) Elijah Klein, G, UTEP (C) 246) Devin Culp, TE, Washington (C) Tennessee Titans Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B) The Tennessee Titans focused on solidifying their offensive and defensive lines with high-ceiling picks like J.C. Latham from Alabama and T'Vondre Sweat from Texas. Both are expected to bring physicality and durability to the line units. The Titans also added depth to their linebacker group and secondary with picks like Cedric Gray from North Carolina and Jarvis Brownlee Jr. from Louisville, enhancing their defensive versatility. The selection of Jha'Quan Jackson from Tulane as a return specialist underscores their focus on improving special teams. Day One: Average Grade (A) 7) J.C. Latham, OT, Alabama (A) Day Two: Average Grade (B) 38) T'Vondre Sweat, DI, Texas (B) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 106) Cedric Gray, LB, North Carolina (B) 146) Jarvis Brownlee Jr., CB, Louisville (B+) 182) Jha'Quan Jackson, WR, Tulane (B) 242) James Williams, S, Miami (FL) (B) 247) Marcus Harris, DI, Auburn (B) 252) Jaylen Harrell, ED, Michigan (A-) Washington Commanders Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A) The Washington Commanders prioritized acquiring game-changing talent at key positions, particularly at quarterback, with Jayden Daniels from LSU as their highest quarterback draft pick since Robert Griffin III. Jayden Daniels offers dynamic playmaking ability that could revitalize the Commanders' offense. The draft strategy also focused on shoring up the defensive line and secondary with high-impact picks like Jer'Zhan Newton from Illinois and Mike Sainristil from Michigan. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 2) Jayden Daniels, QB, LSU (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A+) 36) Jer'Zhan Newton, DI, Illinois (A+) 50) Mike Sainristil, CB, Michigan (A+) 53) Ben Sinnott, TE, Kansas State (C) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 50) Mike Sainristil, CB, Michigan (A+) 53) Ben Sinnott, TE, Kansas State (C) 67) Brandon Coleman, T, TCU (B+) 100) Luke McCaffrey, WR, Rice (B) 139) Jordan Magee, LB, Temple (B+) 161) Dominique Hampton, S, Washington (B) 222) Javontae Jean-Baptiste, ED, Notre Dame (C)

Entering Day 3 of the 2024 NFL Draft, here are the best available players, according to our NFL Draft Big Board player rankings. A lot of talent is still available ahead of day three of the 2024 NFL Draft. In fact, several names still available possess day-one and day-two talent. That is how deep this draft class is. 29). Troy Franklin, WR, Oregon Troy Franklin is a highly effective player who can excel in a West Coast offense, utilizing his speed and route-running in a timing and precision-based offense. 55). Christian Mahogany, IOL, Boston College Christian Mahogany is a versatile lineman, effective in both run and pass blocking. 57). Tez Walker, WR, North Carolina Tez Walker dominates as a vertical threat due to his speed and size, making him ideal for offenses that prioritize deep passing. He needs to develop his route running and blocking. 58). Khyree Jackson, CB, Oregon Khyree Jackson excels in press coverage, using his length to disrupt receivers effectively. He's best suited for man-to-man defense but needs to improve his agility to handle quicker receivers. 64). Jaden Hicks, S, Washington State Jaden Hicks is well-suited for a Zone Box/Strong Safety role. 68). Spencer Rattler, QB, South Carolina Spencer Rattler, known for his arm strength and mobility, fits best in offensive schemes that leverage his ability to make off-platform throws and extend plays. 72). Cam Hart, CB, Notre Dame Cam Hart is versatile, excelling in both zone and press coverage, making him well-suited for complex defensive schemes that utilize varied coverage strategies. 74). Leonard Taylor III, IDL, Miami Leonard Taylor III is effective as a 3-technique in even fronts, bringing strong pass-rushing capabilities but needing to improve his consistency against double teams. 75). Johnny Wilson, WR, Florida State Johnny Wilson uses his size and athleticism to excel at contested catches. He's effective in stretching the defense vertically and using his body to box out. 76). Ja'Tavion Sanders, TE, Texas Ja'Tavion Sanders excels as a modern receiving tight end, capable of significant contributions in the passing game, particularly in schemes that utilize his after-catch abilities in space. 79). T.J. Tampa, CB, Iowa State T.J. Tampa is effective as an Outside Zone CB, using his length and agility to disrupt passing lanes. His style fits well with zone-heavy defensive schemes. 80). Brandon Dorlus, IDL, Oregon Brandon Dorlus displays versatility on the defensive line, effective both on the edge and inside, with strong technique against the run. 83). Javon Baker, WR, UCFJavon Baker is a precise route runner with strong hands, effective at the catch point and suitable for schemes that value precise route running and contested catch ability. 84). Jeremiah Trotter Jr., LB, Clemson Jeremiah Trotter Jr. is dynamic in run defense and can contribute in pass rush scenarios, fitting well in both 4-3 and 3-4 defensive schemes as a versatile linebacker. 86). Jacob Cowing, WR, Arizona Jacob Cowing is a potent vertical threat, utilizing his speed and route-running to stretch defenses, making him a significant threat on deep routes. 88). Brenden Rice, WR, USC Brenden Rice is effective in deep-route scenarios, using his speed and physicality to make plays downfield and in the red zone, suited for vertical and West Coast offenses. 89). Austin Booker, ED, Kansas Austin Booker is a dynamic edge rusher with a strong first step and variety of moves, best in schemes that utilize his pass-rushing abilities on the edge. 91). Kris Abrams-Draine, CB, Missouri Kris Abrams-Draine is adaptable to various defensive schemes, with strong coverage skills both in the slot and on the boundary. 92). Jamari Thrash, WR, Louisville Jamari Thrash fits well in a versatile receiving role, utilizing his skills to gain yards after the catch, suitable for slot roles or secondary outside options in spread offenses. 95). Kalen King, CB, Penn State Kalen King excels as an Outside Man/Press Cornerback, using his quickness and coverage skills to effectively challenge receivers, fitting aggressive defensive schemes. 99). Josh Newton, CB, TCU Josh Newton's skill set makes him ideal for zone defenses, leveraging his recognition skills and physicality to excel in press coverage. 100). Jaylen Wright, RB, Tennessee Jaylen Wright is notable for his speed and playmaking ability, best utilized in schemes that allow him to use his receiving skills and operate in space. 103). Malik Washington, WR, Virginia Malik Washington is an explosive slot receiver, utilizing his agility and route-running to create separation and make plays after the catch. 104). Bucky Irving, RB, Oregon Bucky Irving is versatile and dynamic, excelling in outside zone and gap schemes due to his speed and agility, also contributing in the passing game. 105). Audric Estime, RB, Notre Dame Audric Estime is a powerful back, ideal for ground-and-pound offenses and effective in zone-blocking schemes due to his ability to identify and exploit lanes. 106). Ray Davis, RB, Kentucky Ray Davis is a power back, ideal for short-yardage situations and zone-blocking schemes, demonstrating good hands and versatility in the passing game. 107). Will Shipley, RB, Clemson Will Shipley is dynamic and versatile, effective in both zone and power-run schemes due to his vision, agility, and tackle-breaking ability. 108). Sedrick Van Pran, IOL, Georgia Sedrick Van Pran is highly athletic and intelligent, effective in both power and zone blocking schemes, valued for his mobility and versatility on the line. 109). Isaac Guerendo, RB, Louisville Isaac Guerendo shows excellent patience and vision, fitting well in zone and gap running schemes due to his speed and power blend. 110). Cedric Gray, LB, North Carolina Cedric Gray is explosive and versatile, capable of impacting both the run and pass game, fitting well in zone-heavy systems as an inside linebacker. 112). Mason McCormick, IOL, South Dakota State Mason McCormick is a strong run blocker, best suited for power run strategies, though he needs to improve pass protection and mobility to enhance his versatility. 114). Michael Barrett, LB, Michigan Michael Barrett is versatile, effective as a hybrid linebacker in both the box and coverage, fitting well in 4-3 or 4-2-5 defensive schemes due to his coverage skills and edge impact.

Entering Day 2 of the draft, here are the best available players, according to our NFL Draft Big Board player rankings. There is a lot of talent available ahead of day two of the 2024 NFL Draft. After a QB- and OL-heavy day one, several high-level prospects are still available, including some that could have been drafted on day one. 10). Cooper DeJean, CB, Iowa Ideal for zone and off-man schemes. Versatile enough for various alignments including boundary, slot, and possibly field safety. Known for explosive athleticism and rapid closing speed. 19). Kool-Aid McKinstry, CB, Alabama Excellent in zone coverage; utilizes length to disrupt passes. Skilled in bump and run. Known for physicality and solid tackling. Fits well in complex zone systems. 20). Adonai Mitchell, WR, Texas Excels in deep routes with strong hands and route-running. Ideal for vertical threat schemes needing receivers to create separation and make big plays downfield. 28). Ladd McConkey, WR, Georgia Known for route-running precision and creating separation. Excels in the slot with quickness and understanding of defenses. Fits well in a spread offense, leveraging open-field abilities. 29). Troy Franklin, WR, Oregon Speed, athleticism, and ball skills make him ideal for a West Coast offense or schemes using short passes and screens. Compared to receivers like Devonta Smith and Chris Olave. 31). Mike Sainristil, CB, Michigan Adept in nickel and press coverage. Quickness and athleticism enable effective coverage of slot receivers and contribute in various secondary roles. 33). Payton Wilson, LB, NC State Versatile, high-energy linebacker suited for aggressive, swarming defensive schemes. Excels in run stopping and pass coverage with sideline-to-sideline speed. 34). Jer'Zhan Newton, IDL, Illinois Best fit as a 3-tech in hybrid fronts. Known for explosive athleticism and refined hand technique. Suited for modern, versatile defensive schemes. 35). Jackson Powers-Johnson, IOL, Oregon Excels in a zone-based running scheme with advanced footwork and lateral movement. High football IQ makes him ideal for schemes that value versatility and the center's role as an on-field coordinator. 36). Chris Braswell, ED, Alabama Dynamic edge rusher with explosiveness and agility. Strength in pass rush scenarios. Fits well in schemes that utilize edge rushers in aggressive pass-rush scenarios. 39). Roman Wilson, WR, Michigan Characterized by vertical threat capability, ideal for offensive schemes that leverage speed and deep passing plays. Room for expansion in the short and intermediate game. 40). Braden Fiske, IDL, Florida State Excels as a three-technique in a 4-3 defense, primarily as an interior pass rusher. Needs improvement in run defense but is agile and active with hands in pass rush scenarios. 41). Cole Bishop, S, Utah Fluid in movement with quick directional changes, well-suited for a free safety role in versatile defensive schemes. Needs to improve tackling and positioning. 42). Ruke Orhorhoro, IDL, Clemson Versatile defender, fits well as a defensive end in a 3-4 defense or various other defensive schemes. Known for run stopping and pressure on the quarterback through power and explosiveness. 43). Zach Frazier, IOL, West Virginia Powerful and technically proficient, thrives in a gap scheme focusing on run blocking. Ideal for offenses emphasizing power running, though less suited for extensive movement required in zone schemes. 46). Ennis Rakestraw Jr., CB, Missouri Instinctive in man coverage with effective press-man technique. Excels in changing direction and flipping hips seamlessly, fitting well in schemes that leverage man coverage and instinctive play. 47). Keon Coleman, WR, Florida State Physical and aggressive at the catch point with strong hands. Effective in contested catch scenarios and as an X receiver in schemes that value physicality. 49). Kris Jenkins, IDL, Michigan Robust and effective in run-stopping scenarios, suited for a 3-4 scheme as a nose tackle or 4-3 defensive tackle. Needs refinement in pass-rushing skills and versatility. 50). Tyler Nubin, S, Minnesota Physical with strong run defense instincts. Ideal for roles that leverage run-stopping abilities, potentially as a zone slot/nickel safety or in two-high safety alignments. 51). Michael Hall Jr., IDL, Ohio StateIdeal as a three-technique on an even line with one-gap principles. Known for explosiveness and leveraging length into power. Needs improvement in pass-rushing technique and hand placement. 53). Blake Corum, RB, Michigan Dynamic, compact running back suited for a zone-blocking scheme. Excels with vision and agility, effective in between-the-tackles runs. Solid pass protection skills make him a viable three-down back. 54). Ben Sinnott, TE, Kansas State Versatile F-tight-end able to play in-line, in the backfield, or split out as a receiver. Effective pass catcher and blocker, suitable for various roles in the NFL. 55). Christian Mahogany, IOL, Boston College Capable of thriving in any offensive scheme with power, technique, and athleticism. Effective at moving to the second level and handling stunts and twists. Ideal for teams that prioritize physicality in the trenches. 56). T'Vondre Sweat, IDL, Texas Strong run-stopper, best suited for schemes prioritizing run defense. Potential as a rotational, two-down player with room for development in pass-rushing techniques. 57). Tez Walker, WR, North Carolina Thrives as a vertical threat with speed and size to dominate on deep routes. Ideal for a vertical passing offense looking for dynamic playmakers to stretch the field. 58). Khyree Jackson, CB, Oregon Long, athletic cornerback ideal for man-to-man defensive schemes. Excels in press coverage, leveraging exceptional length to disrupt routes. Notable for aggressive physicality against the run. 59). Christian Haynes, IOL, Connecticut Excels in wide zone blocking schemes with exceptional technique and athleticism. Best suited for offenses prioritizing mobility and space creation in offensive linemen. 60). Kingsley Suamataia, OT, BYU A formidable blocker with significant reach and a strong base, excels in both run blocking and pass protection. Versatile, fitting well in both zone and power run schemes. 61). Max Melton, CB, Rutgers Physical, agile cornerback excellent in man-to-man coverage and versatile enough for zone schemes. Solid in run support, making him a well-rounded prospect for various defensive roles. 62). Adisa Isaac, ED, Penn State Best utilized in schemes that emphasize agility and pass rush technique, particularly as a designated pass rusher. Fits well in hybrid defenses with potential in creative defensive fronts. 63). Junior Colson, LB, MichiganVersatile linebacker effective in run defense and pass coverage. Ideal for a 4-3 defensive scheme, using speed and agility to cover a wide range of the field and make plays.

< Back Ennis Rakestraw Jr. CB Missouri HT: 6000 WT: 187 YR: JR NO: 2 OVR RK 46 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 7 High-End Starter Potential OVR RK SCOUTING REPORT High-End Starter Potential (65-69) - Rakestraw is projected to be among the top starters on his team within the second or third year in the NFL, with a clear path to Pro Bowl appearances as he develops. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT Ennis Rakestraw Jr. is an instinctive cornerback with a natural affinity for man coverage. His technique in press-man allows him to effectively disrupt receivers' timing at the line, showcasing his twitch, length, and football IQ. Rakestraw's ability to change direction quickly and flip his hips seamlessly makes him a formidable opponent in coverage. He exhibits a high level of football intelligence, making him an asset in both man and zone schemes. His long arms and instinctive play are beneficial in pass breakups and run defense, although his tackling in open-field situations and against larger wideouts needs improvement. Rakestraw fits best in a defensive scheme that leverages his man coverage skills and allows him to utilize his instinctive play in various coverage situations. KEY STRENGTHS Man to Man Football IQ Change Of Direction KEY WEAKNESSES Lean Tackling In Space Create Turnovers PLAYER COMPARISONS ​ ​ ​

BACK TO TOP BACK TO TOP Your Guide To The 2024 NFL Draft All In One Place We compiled an NFL Draft guide containing all Football Scout 365 premium NFL Draft content. Below, you will find a list of current and... 2024 NFL Mock Draft 5.1: Draft Day Edition - 4 Major Trades, 6 QBs in Round One, Vikings Trade Up, Chargers Trade Back It's Draft Day! Tonight marks the start of the 2024 NFL Draft, and today, I’m presenting my final NFL Mock Draft for this cycle. The... DRAFT YEAR 2024 POSITION QB Elite USC OFF/DEF O DYNASTY RANKINGS Dynasty 1 QB Caleb Williams USC PROFILE 2 WR Marvin Harrison Jr. Ohio State PROFILE 3 TE Brock Bowers Georgia PROFILE 4 WR Rome Odunze Washington PROFILE 5 WR Malik Nabers LSU PROFILE 6 QB J.J. McCarthy Michigan PROFILE 7 OT Joe Alt Notre Dame PROFILE 8 ED Dallas Turner Alabama PROFILE 9 CB Quinyon Mitchell Toledo PROFILE 10 CB Cooper DeJean Iowa PROFILE 11 IDL Byron Murphy II Texas PROFILE 12 CB Nate Wiggins Clemson PROFILE 13 OT Olumuyiwa Fashanu Penn State PROFILE 14 OT Taliese Fuaga Oregon State PROFILE 15 WR Brian Thomas Jr. LSU PROFILE 16 ED Chop Robinson Penn State PROFILE 17 ED Laiatu Latu UCLA PROFILE 18 ED Jared Verse Florida State PROFILE 19 CB Kool-Aid McKinstry Alabama PROFILE 20 WR Adonai Mitchell Texas PROFILE 21 OT J.C. Latham Alabama PROFILE 22 QB Drake Maye North Carolina PROFILE 23 QB Jayden Daniels LSU PROFILE 24 WR Xavier Worthy Texas PROFILE 25 CB Terrion Arnold Alabama PROFILE First Prev Next Last

Your Guide To The 2024 NFL Draft All In One Place We compiled an NFL Draft guide containing all Football Scout 365 premium NFL Draft content. Below, you will find a list of current and... 2024 NFL Mock Draft 5.1: Draft Day Edition - 4 Major Trades, 6 QBs in Round One, Vikings Trade Up, Chargers Trade Back It's Draft Day! Tonight marks the start of the 2024 NFL Draft, and today, I’m presenting my final NFL Mock Draft for this cycle. The... 1 QB Caleb Williams USC VIEW PROFILE 3 TE Brock Bowers Georgia VIEW PROFILE 5 WR Malik Nabers LSU VIEW PROFILE 7 OT Joe Alt Notre Dame VIEW PROFILE 9 CB Quinyon Mitchell Toledo VIEW PROFILE 2 WR Marvin Harrison Jr. Ohio State VIEW PROFILE 4 WR Rome Odunze Washington VIEW PROFILE 6 QB J.J. McCarthy Michigan VIEW PROFILE 8 ED Dallas Turner Alabama VIEW PROFILE 10 CB Cooper DeJean Iowa VIEW PROFILE TOP 10 NFL DRAFT PROSPECTS VIEW ALL RANKINGS 2024 NFL Draft: Who Will Be the First Defensive Player Drafted? Play Video Share Whole Channel This Video Facebook Twitter Pinterest Tumblr Copy Link Link Copied Now Playing 22:00 Play Video Now Playing 05:21 Play Video Now Playing 00:38 Play Video FEATURED VIDEO ANALYSIS Brandon Lundberg 5 hours ago 2024 NFL Draft: Best Prospects Still Available Ahead Of Day Two Brandon Lundberg 6 hours ago 2024 NFL Draft Analysis: Record 6 QBs Picked in Top 12 - First Round Grades & Insights Brandon Lundberg 1 day ago 2024 NFL Mock Draft 5.1: Draft Day Edition - 4 Major Trades, 6 QBs in Round One, Vikings Trade Up, Chargers Trade Back Brandon Lundberg 3 days ago 2024 NFL Draft: Final Big Board Rankings Update Brandon Lundberg 4 days ago 2024 NFL Draft: My Top Ten "Pound the Table" Prospects—From J.J. McCarthy, Cooper DeJean to Luke McCaffrey and More Brandon Lundberg Apr 17 2024 NFL Mock Draft: 7 QBs Are Selected in First 3 Rounds | NFL Draft Brandon Lundberg Apr 15 2024 NFL Draft: Ranking Our Top Graded Safeties Led by Cole Bishop and Tyler Nubin - Evaluating Playstyle and Scheme Fit Brandon Lundberg Apr 14 2024 NFL Draft: Ranking Our Top Graded Cornerbacks Led by Quinyon Mitchell - Evaluating Playstyle and Scheme Fit FEATURED WRITTEN ANALYSIS VIEW ALL ANALYSIS