Search Results

The 2026 NFL Draft wide receiver rankings are far deeper than they’re getting credit for, and it aligns perfectly with where today’s NFL is headed at the position. While this class does feature a handful of traditional boundary “X” receivers, the true strength of the 2026 group lies in its depth of alignment-flexible slot and Z playmakers — a reflection of where the NFL game is trending. When you study recent NFL success stories, Puka Nacua, Amon-Ra St. Brown, Jaxon Smith-Njigba, the through line isn’t size or testing numbers. It’s separation nuance, spatial IQ, competitive toughness at the catch point, and the ability to generate efficient yards after the catch. That same profile shows up repeatedly throughout this 2026 wide receiver class. At the top of the 2026 wide receiver rankings is Ohio State’s Carnell Tate, a refined perimeter target who separates at all three levels. Arizona State’s Jordyn Tyson follows closely, bringing true WR1 route nuance and sudden separation ability. USC’s Makai Lemon rounds out the top tier as a high-volume slot who consistently plays bigger than his frame, winning with precision, toughness, and high-level run-after-catch ability. Overall, this class may not feature a single generational outlier, but it is loaded with versatile, new-age receivers who carry legitimate WR1 upside. More importantly, it offers a deep pool of WR2 and WR3 profiles ready to complement an established NFL alpha and contribute immediately in multiple alignments. If you need depth or a high-quality TE2, this is the year to find one on Day Two or Day Three. Go to other positional grades: QB  | RB | WR  | TE  | OL  | IDL  | Edge  | LB  | CB  | SAF 2026 NFL Draft Wide Receiver Rankings 1). Carnell Tate, 6’3”, 191 lbs, Ohio State Grade Tier:  Near Elite NFL Projection:  Mid-to-Late 1st Round Analysis: A refined perimeter receiver who wins with route detail, tempo manipulation, and catch-point consistency rather than overwhelming traits. Tate separates at all three levels with leverage and efficient footwork, and he consistently finishes through contact. While he lacks elite vertical speed and imposing play strength, his route polish and quarterback-friendly profile project him as a high-volume target with legitimate WR1 upside. 2). Jordyn Tyson, 6’1”, 195 lbs, Arizona State Grade Tier:  Near Elite NFL Projection:  Mid-to-Late 1st Round Analysis: Route manipulation and separation nuance define Tyson’s profile. He consistently creates clean throwing windows with sudden breaks, leverage control, and advanced pacing at the stem. His body control and timing at the catch point allow him to win through contact despite only average long speed. Durability remains the primary concern, but if healthy, Tyson projects as a high-floor WR2 with legitimate WR1 upside built on polish and competitive toughness. 3). Makai Lemon, 5’11”, 195 lbs, USC Grade Tier:  Near Elite NFL Projection:  Late 1st – Early 2nd Round Analysis: A high-volume slot receiver built for today’s NFL. Lemon separates with tempo, precision, and advanced spatial awareness against man and zone. He consistently wins through contact at the catch point despite modest size. Lacking elite vertical gear and outside dominance caps his overall ceiling slightly, but he projects as a plug-and-play slot with Pro Bowl upside. 4). Denzel Boston, 6’4”, 210 lbs, Washington Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd Round Analysis: A physical boundary receiver who wins with size, body positioning, and red-zone reliability. Boston plays through contact and consistently shields defenders at the catch point. Press coverage refinement and sustained separation remain areas for growth, but his catch strength and possession reliability project him as a high-floor perimeter starter. 5). Omar Cooper Jr., 6’0”, 200 lbs, Indiana Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Analysis: Explosiveness and contact balance drive Cooper’s impact. He threatens defenses vertically and horizontally with acceleration and run-after-catch creativity, fitting seamlessly into motion-heavy, spacing-based offenses. His physical temperament as a blocker adds to his multi-role value. Route consistency and detail will determine whether he reaches his ceiling, but the upside profiles as a dynamic WR2 with alignment versatility and big-play potential. 6). Malachi Fields, 6’4”, 220 lbs, Notre Dame Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Analysis: Fields brings classic boundary size and contested-catch reliability to the perimeter. He consistently plays through defenders at the catch point, shielding coverage on back-shoulder throws and intermediate concepts. While he lacks sudden release quickness and clean man-separation ability, his physicality and red-zone value project him as a possession-based WR2 with strong chain-moving utility. 7). Germie Bernard, 6’1”, 204 lbs, Alabama Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Analysis: Tempo and route polish define Bernard’s game. He uncovers at all three levels from both slot and outside alignments, winning with pacing and competitive toughness rather than pure speed. Without a true vertical second gear, his upside is tied to consistency and refinement against press, but his alignment flexibility gives him strong WR2/3 value. 8). C.J. Daniels, 6’2”, 205 lbs, Miami Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  3rd–4th Round Analysis: Route nuance and short-area efficiency anchor Daniels’ evaluation. He separates with sharp stems, fluid hip transitions, and a strong understanding of leverage, consistently presenting clean throwing windows at all three levels. Daniels tracks the football naturally and finishes outside his frame with body control and toughness in traffic. While he lacks elite vertical gear and does not consistently overpower defenders at the catch point, his football IQ, competitiveness, and willingness as a blocker make him a quarterback-friendly, scheme-versatile target. He projects as a high-floor WR3 with legitimate WR2 upside in timing-based or West Coast systems. 9). Kevin Concepcion, 5’11”, 187 lbs, Texas A&M Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Analysis: A quick-twitch slot weapon built on burst, short-area separation, and run-after-catch creativity. Concepcion thrives on option routes and quick-game concepts, creating immediate throwing windows. His game relies heavily on speed and acceleration rather than tempo manipulation, and contested-catch consistency remains developmental. Projects as a high-volume slot playmaker in spacing-based systems. 10). Chris Brazzell II, 6’5”, 200 lbs, Tennessee Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  3rd Round Analysis: A long, vertical perimeter target who wins with stride acceleration and catch radius. Brazzell stretches coverage downfield and finishes above the rim in contested situations. Limited suddenness underneath and strength versus tight man coverage cap his immediate ceiling, but refinement could unlock explosive outside playmaker value. 11). Zachariah Branch, 5’11”, 175 lbs, Georgia Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  3rd Round Analysis: Rare acceleration and open-field creativity make Branch one of the most explosive space players in the class. Much of his production has come on manufactured touches, and his route nuance must expand for full-time volume projection, but his immediate special teams value and motion-based offensive role create clear early impact potential. 12). Elijah Sarratt, 6’2”, 210 lbs, Indiana Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Analysis: Physicality and catch-point discipline define Sarratt’s profile. He consistently shields defenders, wins on back-shoulder concepts, and finishes through contact with strong timing and body control. While he lacks top-end vertical speed and elite suddenness, his understanding of leverage and route pacing allows him to create functional separation underneath. Press-coverage refinement will be key, but he projects as a dependable boundary chain-mover with red-zone value and WR2 upside. 13). Chris Bell, 6’2”, 220 lbs, Louisville Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Analysis: Power and run-after-catch ability drive Bell’s evaluation. He blends vertical acceleration with contact balance, creating explosive YAC opportunities on crossers and in-breakers. His physicality at the catch point adds red-zone and contested-catch value. Technical refinement versus press and improved hand consistency will determine how quickly he reaches his ceiling, but the upside projects as a physical WR2 with offensive centerpiece potential in a play-action-heavy system. 14). Antonio Williams, 5’11”, 190 lbs, Clemson Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  3rd Round Analysis: Tempo and spatial intelligence are the foundation of Williams’ game. He separates with leverage control, route pacing, and sharp footwork, consistently uncovering against man and zone. While he lacks true vertical gear and elite size, his run-after-catch vision and competitive toughness create reliable slot production. Projects as a high-floor volume slot starter in spacing-based offenses. 15). Skyler Bell, 5’11”, 185 lbs, Connecticut Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  3rd–4th Round Analysis: Route detail and short-area burst allow Bell to win at multiple levels. He accelerates quickly, manipulates stems, and consistently separates with sharp breaks. Though not a true burner, his technical consistency and improved hands profile him as a reliable slot/Z contributor early. Minor drop history and limited catch radius slightly cap his ceiling, but he projects as a high-floor timing-based receiver. 16). Malik Benson, 5’11”, 185 lbs, Oregon Grade Tier:  Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  3rd–4th Round Analysis: Track-caliber speed and vertical acceleration define Benson’s projection. He forces early hip turns from corners and creates natural separation on go routes, posts, and deep overs, consistently threatening explosive plays. His ball tracking and body control downfield are legitimate strengths, and his speed opens access throws underneath. However, a limited route tree, slender frame, and inconsistent release package create volatility against press-heavy coverage. Benson profiles as an immediate vertical X/Z field-stretcher with upside tied to refinement in tempo, leverage manipulation, and short-area route detail. 17). Ted Hurst, 6’3”, 185 lbs, Georgia State Grade Tier:  Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  4th–5th Round Analysis: Length and vertical speed highlight Hurst’s upside. He stresses coverage early in routes and tracks the ball naturally downfield. However, he must play with more physicality at the catch point and improve consistency against stronger competition. Development in route refinement and play strength will determine his long-term projection as a boundary starter. 18). Brenen Thompson, 5’9”, 170 lbs, Mississippi State Grade Tier:  Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  4th–5th Round Analysis: Rare acceleration and long-speed immediately define Thompson’s impact. A true vertical field-stretcher, he forces safeties to widen their landmarks and can flip coverage structure with pure speed. He complements that burst with sudden stop-start ability that makes double moves and underneath counters effective once defenders respect the deep threat. His undersized frame limits contested-catch wins and durability raises concerns, but he projects as a rotational deep-threat weapon capable of manufacturing explosive plays. 19). Bryce Lance, 6’3”, 209 lbs, North Dakota State Grade Tier:  Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  4th–5th Round Analysis: Stride length and ball tracking anchor Lance’s projection. He presses vertically and consistently finishes deep throws with concentration and frame control. However, limited short-area quickness and high-cut movement mechanics restrict sudden separation ability. The transition to NFL competition will test his consistency, but he fits best in a vertical offense that maximizes catch-point wins downfield. 20). Deion Burks, 5’9”, 188 lbs, Oklahoma Grade Tier:  Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  4th–5th Round Analysis: Acceleration and open-field creativity define Burks’ game. He separates underneath with sharp breaks and spatial awareness, then becomes dangerous after the catch with vision and lateral agility. Vertical consistency and contested-catch limitations cap his full-time upside, but he projects as a rotational slot weapon with return and manufactured-touch value in motion-heavy offenses. 21). Ja’Kobi Lane, 6’4”, 200 lbs, USC Grade Tier:  Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  4th–5th Round Analysis:n Catch-point dominance and red-zone utility highlight Lane’s profile. He consistently boxes out defenders with timing and body control, converting contested throws outside the numbers. While he flashes leverage awareness, his route tree lacks urgency and refinement, and he does not possess true vertical separation speed. Added strength and route detail will determine his ceiling, but he projects as a developmental boundary X with immediate scoring-area value. How We Grade the Wide Receiver Position Wide receivers are evaluated primarily on separation ability, alignment versatility, and functional playmaking impact. Grades are driven by how consistently a player can win against man and zone coverage, create throwing windows for the quarterback, and generate production independent of scheme manufacturing. In today’s NFL, receivers must function as movable chess pieces capable of aligning outside, in the slot, or in motion without sacrificing timing, spacing, or route integrity. Key factors include route tempo and detail, leverage manipulation, release package efficiency, catch-point consistency, and run-after-catch creation. We heavily weigh spatial awareness versus zone, toughness through contact, and the ability to finish in traffic. While size and timed speed matter, separation craft, football IQ, competitive temperament, and down-to-down reliability carry the most weight in a league increasingly built on spacing, rhythm, and yards after the catch. Football Scout 365 Grade Scale Elite NFL Projection:  Top 5–10 Picks (1st Round) Franchise-altering talent with elite physical tools, advanced processing, and minimal weaknesses. Immediate high-impact starter with difference-making ability. Near Elite NFL Projection:  Mid-to-Late 1st Round High-level prospect with strong traits and football intelligence. Expected to become a major contributor early in their career with Pro Bowl upside. High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Projects as a quality NFL starter with strong tools and functional traits. May require refinement, but offers consistent impact with development. Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  4th–5th Round Dependable starter or high-end rotational player. Solid athletic profile with some limitations that cap ceiling or require scheme fit. Low-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  6th–7th Round Developmental prospect with starter upside in defined roles. Inconsistencies in technique, processing, or durability limit long-term ceiling. Backup Level NFL Projection:  Undrafted Free Agent (UDFA) Depth player or rotational piece. Functional traits but limited upside for a long-term starting role. Not NFL Level NFL Projection:  Unlikely to Make NFL Roster Significant developmental needs across athleticism, technique, or processing. Long-shot to stick at the NFL level.

The quarterback conversation entering the 2026 NFL Scouting Combine is straightforward at the top and complicated immediately after. Fernando Mendoza remains the clear QB1 in this class, and his draft positioning is unlikely to change in Indianapolis. The real question begins with Ty Simpson. If Simpson is the projected QB2 entering the week, can he do enough to firmly plant himself in the Day One conversation? And after Mendoza and Simpson, who separates as QB3? Indianapolis provides a neutral environment — identical throws, identical interview structure, identical scrutiny. In a class defined by thin margins, the Combine could shape the order behind the top two. Ty Simpson, Alabama (Projected QB2) Analysis: Assuming Simpson enters Indianapolis as QB2, this is his opportunity to solidify first-round momentum rather than simply protect his current standing. His tape flashes timing, anticipation, and middle-of-the-field confidence, particularly when operating from structure. The concern lies in his limited starting experience, late-season inconsistency, and durability questions tied to his frame. The Combine is critical for Simpson. Clean mechanics during scripted throws, verified size, and strong interviews could push him toward the top of Round Two — with an outside shot at sneaking into late Round One conversations. A flat showing, however, tightens the margin between him and the rest of this tier. Garrett Nussmeier, LSU (Projected QB3) Analysis: Nussmeier’s draft arc has been volatile. A year ago, he was discussed as a potential QB1 candidate. Now, he enters Indianapolis fighting to stabilize his evaluation. Over a two-year sample, the tape shows NFL-caliber arm strength and flashes of high-level processing, but it also reveals turnover volatility and risk-heavy decision-making. The Combine represents a perception reset. If he throws with rhythm, demonstrates improved command, and handles interviews with composure, he could climb back into the Day Two conversation. Without that clarity, teams may view him as a developmental mid-round investment. Carson Beck, Miami NFL Draft Projection:  4th–5th Round Analysis: Beck remains one of the more complex evaluations in this group. When protected and operating within rhythm, he flashes strong accuracy and the ability to diagnose coverage structures. Under pressure, however, his performance can become streaky and negative plays snowball. The Combine should highlight his strengths — clean platform mechanics and natural arm talent in controlled throwing sessions. While his current projection sits in the late-round range, a sharp and confident performance in Indianapolis could help him reenter the broader Day Two discussion internally for some quarterback-needy teams. Cole Payton, North Dakota State NFL Draft Projection:  4th–6th Round Analysis: Payton is the traits-based wild card. The former FCS standout brings dual-threat ability, high-end arm elasticity, and impressive off-platform ball placement. His throwing motion is unconventional, but the ball jumps off his hand with velocity and life. The primary concern remains experience — only one season as a starter and limited exposure against Power Five competition. Indianapolis provides a critical apples-to-apples comparison against top-tier quarterbacks. If he looks natural, decisive, and consistent in drills, his stock could rise quickly. If inconsistencies show, teams may view him as a developmental late-round swing. Drew Allar, Penn State NFL Draft Projection:  4th–6th Round Analysis: Allar’s trajectory mirrors elements of both Nussmeier and Beck. Once viewed as a potential first-round quarterback, a disappointing 2025 campaign cooled that momentum. He possesses NFL-level arm strength and prototypical size, but his tendency to predetermine throws and lock onto primary reads has raised concerns about processing and adaptability. The Combine setting should showcase his pure arm talent. Whether it does enough to shift the broader evaluation remains the question. Cade Klubnik, Clemson NFL Draft Projection:  5th–7th Round Analysis: Klubnik enters Indianapolis as a classic tools-based projection. His arm strength and rushing ability are intriguing, and those traits should translate well during throwing sessions at Lucas Oil Stadium. However, inconsistent footwork and pocket presence remain areas that require development. The Combine will not erase structural concerns, but it can reinforce why his physical profile remains appealing to teams seeking a developmental quarterback with upside. Luke Altmyer, Illinois NFL Draft Projection:  5th–7th Round Analysis: Altmyer profiles as a developmental option with functional arm strength and a quick release. While it is difficult to project him into the top-75 mix, Indianapolis offers an opportunity to showcase velocity and mechanical efficiency in a structured setting. A clean and controlled week could solidify his status as an early Day Three selection for teams seeking quarterback depth with developmental upside.

The NFL Scouting Combine—formally known as the National Invitational Camp (NIC)—is the league’s premier pre-draft evaluation event and one of the most important checkpoints in the player development and scouting process. Held annually in Indianapolis, the Combine is a four-day, invitation-only event that brings together approximately 300 of the top draft-eligible college football players for standardized medical, mental, and physical evaluations. From an NFL scouting perspective, the Combine is not designed to discover  players—it exists to verify and contextualize what teams have already seen on film. Every drill, measurement, interview, and medical exam is used to reduce uncertainty and risk as clubs finalize draft boards. What the NFL Scouting Combine Evaluates The NFL Scouting Combine evaluates prospects across four primary pillars: Medical Evaluation Medical information is the single most important component of the Combine. Each invited prospect undergoes a comprehensive medical examination, including orthopedic evaluations, imaging (X-rays and MRIs), injury history reviews, and specialist consultations when necessary. All results are compiled into electronic medical records and shared with all 32 NFL teams, ensuring equal access to verified medical data. Interviews & Psychological Testing Teams are permitted to conduct up to 60 formal interviews with prospects, each lasting 15 minutes. These sessions allow clubs to assess football intelligence, personality, leadership traits, recall, and overall fit within their organizational culture. Psychological testing is also administered as part of the broader evaluation process. Physical Measurements & Athletic Testing Height, weight, arm length, hand size, and body composition are officially recorded, followed by position-specific athletic testing. While results are widely discussed publicly, teams use these metrics primarily to confirm thresholds, movement efficiency, and functional athleticism relative to position norms—not to override film evaluation. On-Field Workouts Prospects participate in drills designed to showcase position-specific skills, movement patterns, and body control. These sessions help evaluators assess traits such as explosiveness, change of direction, flexibility, balance, and coordination in a controlled environment. How the Combine Fits Into the Draft Process The Combine serves as a centralized, standardized evaluation hub. Rather than prospects traveling from team to team for physicals and interviews, all testing is conducted in one location under league oversight. This structure allows NFL clubs to compare prospects using consistent data points while minimizing logistical inefficiencies and medical redundancy. Importantly, participation is invitation-based. A committee of NFL evaluators determines which prospects attend, and the league reserves the right to deny participation based on medical, legal, or conduct-related findings. Teams, however, are free to independently evaluate any draft-eligible player outside the Combine framework. Why the Combine Matters For NFL teams, the Combine is about risk management and decision-making. Medical clarity, character evaluation, and athletic verification play a significant role in determining draft value, contract guarantees, and long-term investment. For prospects, it represents the most comprehensive job interview of their football careers—an opportunity to confirm their draft standing or, in some cases, elevate it. While the public focus often centers on 40-yard dash times and highlight clips, the true value of the NFL Scouting Combine lies behind closed doors, where film, data, medicals, and interviews are brought together to shape draft boards across the league.

The Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Big Board elevates player rankings with an innovative approach. We offer individual film-based player grades, tailored assessments of scheme fit, comprehensive player comparisons, and more to provide you with a thorough understanding of each prospect's potential. Top of Page NFL DRAFT BIG BOARD YEAR OFF/DEF POS 2026 1 S Caleb Downs Ohio State PROFILE 2 QB Fernando Mendoza Indiana PROFILE 3 ED Rueben Bain Miami PROFILE 4 ED David Bailey Texas Tech PROFILE 5 LB Arvell Reese Ohio State PROFILE 6 RB Jeremiyah Love Notre Dame PROFILE 7 WR Carnell Tate Ohio State PROFILE 8 WR Jordyn Tyson Arizona State PROFILE 9 LB Sonny Styles Ohio State PROFILE 10 OT Spencer Fano Utah PROFILE 11 CB Mansoor Delane LSU PROFILE 12 WR Makai Lemon USC PROFILE 13 OT Francis Mauigoa Miami PROFILE 14 IDL Peter Woods Clemson PROFILE 15 IDL Kayden McDonald Ohio State PROFILE 16 CB Jermod McCoy Tennessee PROFILE 17 ED Akheem Mesidor Miami PROFILE 18 CB Colton Hood Tennessee PROFILE 19 IDL Caleb Banks Florida PROFILE 20 TE Kenyon Sadiq Oregon PROFILE 21 ED Derrick Moore Michigan PROFILE 22 QB Ty Simpson Alabama PROFILE 23 ED Keldric Faulk Auburn PROFILE 24 CB Avieon Terrell Clemson PROFILE 25 IOL Olaivavega Ioane Penn State PROFILE First Prev Page 1 Next Last

Football Scout 365 provides NFL Draft analysis, player rankings, player grades, advanced stats, fantasy football analysis, and more. 2026 NFL Draft Big Board: Top 50 Prospects and Positional Rankings (Pre–Senior Bowl) With the all-star circuit underway and the Senior Bowl approaching, the 2026 NFL Draft landscape is beginning to sharpen. This updated Top 50 Big Board reflects a full season of film study, early postseason evaluations, and a reshuffling at the very top — highlighted by Fernando Mendoza’s rise into the No. 2 overall slot and a loaded defensive class led by Caleb Downs, Rueben Bain Jr., and Arvell Reese. 2026 NFL Mock Draft: Senior Bowl Edition An updated 2026 NFL Mock Draft during Senior Bowl week, breaking down top prospects, team fits, and rising talent. Featuring Fernando Mendoza, Ty Simpson, Caleb Downs, Carnell Tate, and more as the pre-draft process accelerates toward April. 1 S Caleb Downs Ohio State VIEW PROFILE 3 ED Rueben Bain Miami VIEW PROFILE 5 LB Arvell Reese Ohio State VIEW PROFILE 7 WR Carnell Tate Ohio State VIEW PROFILE 9 LB Sonny Styles Ohio State VIEW PROFILE 2 QB Fernando Mendoza Indiana VIEW PROFILE 4 ED David Bailey Texas Tech VIEW PROFILE 6 RB Jeremiyah Love Notre Dame VIEW PROFILE 8 WR Jordyn Tyson Arizona State VIEW PROFILE 10 OT Spencer Fano Utah VIEW PROFILE TOP 10 NFL DRAFT PROSPECTS VIEW ALL RANKINGS Rueben Bain Jr. & David Bailey Lead 2026 NFL Draft EDGE Rankings #shorts #foryou Play Video Peter Woods & Kayden McDonald Lead 2026 NFL Draft IDL Rankings #shorts #foryou Play Video Arvell Reese & Sonny Styles Headline 2026 NFL Draft LB Class #shorts #foryou Play Video Jermod McCoy & Mansoor Delane Lead 2026 NFL Draft CB Rankings #shorts #foryou Play Video Play Video Play Video Facebook Twitter Pinterest Tumblr Copy Link Link Copied Close FEATURED CONTENT 2026 NFL Draft Offensive Line Rankings: Spencer Fano, Francis Mauigoa Headline Deep Class Brandon Lundberg 21 hours ago 2026 NFL Draft Edge Rusher Rankings: Rueben Bain Jr. & David Bailey Headline a Loaded Pass-Rush Class Brandon Lundberg 22 hours ago 2026 NFL Draft Interior Defensive Line Rankings: Peter Woods, Kayden McDonald Lead a Strong Class Brandon Lundberg 1 day ago 2026 NFL Draft Linebacker Rankings: Arvell Reese, Sonny Styles Lead A Scheme Versatile Group Brandon Lundberg 2 days ago 2026 NFL Draft Cornerback Rankings: Jermod McCoy, Mansoor Delane Lead a Scheme-Versatile Class Brandon Lundberg 3 days ago 2026 NFL Draft Safety Rankings: Caleb Downs, Dillon Thieneman Lead a Versatile Class Brandon Lundberg 4 days ago 2026 Senior Bowl Practice Report: Standouts & NFL Draft Risers Brandon Lundberg Jan 29 2026 NFL Mock Draft: Senior Bowl Edition Brandon Lundberg Jan 27 VIEW ALL ANALYSIS

< Back Jordyn Tyson Arizona State HT: 6010 WT: 195 YR: JR POS: WR OVR RK 8 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL Near Elite OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT Jordyn Tyson has true WR1-caliber skills, combining vertical speed, polished route tempo, and high-level contested-catch ability with the alignment versatility that today’s NFL offenses value. In 2025 at Arizona State, he recorded 61 receptions for 711 yards and 8 touchdowns, and is listed at 6’2”, 200 pounds, giving him the size of a viable boundary target who can also move inside to create mismatches. Tyson excels with quickness off the line, reliable separation in the intermediate area, and the ability to finish through contact when the passing window narrows. The next step is developing more functional strength and refining his press-man release plan, but Tyson possesses the traits and production needed, and the main question is durability. If he passes the medical checks, he has clear top 10–15 potential in the 2026 NFL Draft. CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS Near Elite (70-74) A high-caliber prospect who is expected to become a significant contributor by Year 2. These players have outstanding physical tools and strong football IQ, with only minor flaws in their game. They demonstrate consistency at a high level and project as future Pro Bowl-caliber players if properly developed. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS Separation skill + route nuance Contested Catch Ability Alignment versatility KEY WEAKNESSES Durability Frame/Play Strength Not a true “size bully” PLAYER COMPARISONS CeeDee Lamb Stefon Diggs Rueben Bain Jr. & David Bailey Lead 2026 NFL Draft EDGE Rankings #shorts #foryou Play Video Peter Woods & Kayden McDonald Lead 2026 NFL Draft IDL Rankings #shorts #foryou Play Video Arvell Reese & Sonny Styles Headline 2026 NFL Draft LB Class #shorts #foryou Play Video Jermod McCoy & Mansoor Delane Lead 2026 NFL Draft CB Rankings #shorts #foryou Play Video Play Video Play Video Facebook Twitter Pinterest Tumblr Copy Link Link Copied Close