Search Results

Who Are the Top Quarterback Prospects in the 2027 NFL Draft? The top quarterback prospects in the 2027 NFL Draft entering the summer scouting window include Dante Moore, Arch Manning, Trinidad Chambliss, C.J. Bailey, LaNorris Sellers, DJ Lagway, CJ Carr, Julian Sayin, Brendan Sorsby, and Drew Mestemaker. This class already carries more early buzz than the 2025 and 2026 quarterback groups, with enough depth, physical upside, and developmental variance to potentially rival the 2024 NFL Draft quarterback class, when six quarterbacks were selected in the first round, all within the first 12 picks. The 2027 group is not there yet, but the early projection is strong. The hype will likely be aggressive, and some of it may get ahead of the tape, but the foundation is legitimate. NFL scouts and executives have already discussed this class as a rare quarterback cycle because of its mix of high-end talent, depth, and potential first-round volume. How Football Scout 365 Uses Grade Tiers to Project 2027 NFL Draft Ceiling These rankings are built around two evaluation points: current Football Scout 365 grade and ceiling pathway. That distinction matters at quarterback because the best current grade does not always mean the highest long-term ceiling. Some passers enter summer scouting with cleaner 2025 tape and more stable starter-level traits, while others carry more volatility but have the physical tools, production profile, or developmental runway to make a larger jump in 2026. The tiers below are designed to separate three different quarterback profiles: Tier 1: Strongest current grades and most stable 2025 tape. Tier 2: Toolsy quarterbacks with NFL-coveted physical traits and major jump potential. Tier 3: Profile-dependent risers who need a specific 2026 validation point, whether that is more starts, Power 4 translation, durability, physical consistency, or elevated production in a new offensive environment. That is the purpose of summer scouting. The current grade shows where the tape stands today. The ceiling pathway shows which quarterbacks have the talent profile, situation, or developmental runway to change the board once live games begin. Tier 1: Strongest Current Grades / Most Stable 2025 Profile Scouting question: Who has the cleanest current evaluation? This tier is built around the quarterbacks with the cleanest 2025 tape and strongest current Football Scout 365 grades. Their evaluations are not based purely on projection. They have already shown enough accuracy, decision-making, production, and week-to-week stability to enter summer scouting near the top of the board. The next step is proving that profile holds up in 2026 against better pressure plans, tighter coverage looks, and the remaining arm-strength or pocket-consistency questions. Dante Moore | QB | Oregon Current Tier: High-End Starter Potential Ceiling Path: Near Elite Dante Moore is the top-graded quarterback entering summer scouting because of his 2025 tape and the growth he showed as a passer. His grade is built on layered accuracy, touch, rhythm, and intermediate timing. He would have been a top-five pick in the 2026 NFL Draft because of quarterback demand and the lack of depth in that class, but he returned to Oregon with a chance to strengthen the overall profile. At 6’3”, 206 pounds, he fits a pro-spread or play-action system that lets him work from structure and attack leverage windows, with his next-tier jump tied to driving deeper outside throws and maintaining mechanics when pressure affects his base. Trinidad Chambliss | QB | Ole Miss Current Tier: High-End Starter Potential Ceiling Path: Near Elite Trinidad Chambliss brings mobility, instincts, accuracy, ball security, and off-script playmaking, with meaningful starting experience across Ferris State and Ole Miss. At 6’0”, 200 pounds, his size and overall measurables will be debated, similar to other quarterbacks in this tier who lack elite physical profiles. The appeal is the Russell Wilson-style creativity, playmaking feel, and ability to stress defenses in spread/RPO or play-action structures when the play moves outside structure. Like Dante Moore, Chambliss returned to school instead of entering a weaker 2026 QB class, where his playmaking profile could have pushed him into the Day 1 discussion. He does not have the strongest arm, but if the decision-making, playmaking efficiency, and week-to-week consistency continue to elevate in 2026, his stock can keep rising. Tier 2: Toolsy Profiles With Major Jump Potential Scouting question: Who has the biggest ceiling if the tape catches up? This tier is built around quarterbacks whose physical traits can move the board quickly. Some already carry stronger current grades, while others still need the tape to catch up, but all of them have tools NFL teams are willing to bet on early. If the accuracy, processing, pocket management, and consistency improve in 2026, this group has the clearest path to a major jump. Arch Manning | QB | Texas Current Tier: High-End Starter Potential Ceiling Path: Near Elite/Elite Arch Manning has the traits to make a two-tier jump in 2026 if the passing profile catches up to the tools. At 6’4”, 220 pounds, he brings the size, arm talent, mobility, creation ability, production, and pedigree NFL teams covet at the top of the draft. Even if the grade stays in the same tier, his ceiling is strong enough that quarterback-needy teams picking in the top 10 will still view him as a legitimate Day 1 option. With 15 career starts already, another full season could push him into the ideal 30-start range, but his climb depends on improved accuracy, footwork, and progression speed across a full season. C.J. Bailey | QB | NC State Current Tier: Mid-Level Starter Potential Ceiling Path: Near Elite / Elite C.J. Bailey is one of the most intriguing quarterbacks in the 2027 NFL Draft class because the physical foundation is difficult to find. At 6’6”, 210 pounds, he has prototype NFL size, a strong arm, pocket toughness, solid touch, and enough mobility to extend plays when the pocket breaks down. He already has meaningful experience with 22 career starts at NC State and returns in 2026 as a soon-to-be three-year starter. The tools are ahead of the grade right now, but if the pressure answers, deep-ball placement, full-field processing, and turnover management continue to improve, Bailey has the profile to push toward the top of the class. LaNorris Sellers | QB | South Carolina Current Tier: Mid-Level Starter Potential Ceiling Path: Near Elite / Elite LaNorris Sellers may be the most talented quarterback in the 2027 NFL Draft class from a pure tools standpoint. At 6’3”, 240 pounds, he brings rare play strength, a live arm, elite break-sack ability, designed-run value, and vertical passing upside, along with 24 career starts and real dual-threat production. His grade sits lower because the pocket timing, ball placement, decision-making, and negative-play avoidance still need to improve, though some of those timing issues are tied to the situation around him at South Carolina. If those areas clean up in 2026, Sellers has the talent profile to make one of the biggest jumps on the board. DJ Lagway | QB | Baylor Current Tier: Mid-Level Starter Potential Ceiling Path: Near Elite / Elite DJ Lagway is a physical-traits bet with one of the biggest arms in the 2027 quarterback class. At 6’3”, 245 pounds, he brings rare arm strength, off-platform creation, functional mobility, and the ability to access throws most quarterbacks cannot. After starting all 12 games at Florida in 2025, he now steps from the SEC into the Big 12 at Baylor, where the offensive environment could help unlock more rhythm and confidence. The ceiling is high, but the 2026 jump depends on improved accuracy, cleaner footwork, better coverage recognition, and cutting down the turnover volatility. Brendan Sorsby | QB | Texas Tech Current Tier: Mid-Level Starter Potential Ceiling Path: Near Elite Brendan Sorsby is a true physical-traits evaluation with the size, arm strength, rushing value, and play strength to keep NFL teams interested. At 6’3”, 235 pounds, he has 31 career starts across Indiana, Cincinnati, and Texas Tech, giving him one of the more experienced résumés in the class. The tools are clearly NFL-caliber in a spread/RPO or play-action structure, but the projection remains volatile because the processing speed, pocket patience, footwork, and accuracy still need to become more consistent. His indefinite leave for gambling addiction treatment also adds a real availability and evaluation variable entering 2026. Tier 3: Profile-Dependent Risers / More Validation Needed Scouting question: Who needs the most specific 2026 proof point? This tier is not a downgrade as much as a checkpoint. These quarterbacks have NFL traits, but their 2026 evaluations need to answer a more specific question than the players above them. Some need a larger starting sample, some need to prove their production travels against stronger competition, and others need health, consistency, or a new offensive environment to lift the profile. The path upward is still there, but this group has more to validate before the projection becomes secure. CJ Carr | QB | Notre Dame Current Tier: High-End Starter Potential Ceiling Path: Near Elite if the starting sample validates the profile CJ Carr has the physical traits and passing foundation to push into the next tier, but the evaluation still needs more starting experience and week-to-week consistency. At 6’3”, 210 pounds, he brings timing, intermediate accuracy, clean mechanics, efficient decision-making, and enough movement skill to slide, climb, and reset from the pocket. He is not a true creation-based passer, so the 2026 tape needs to confirm he can maintain rhythm, ball placement, and progression discipline when pressure forces him off his spot. Drew Mestemaker | QB | Oklahoma State Current Tier: High-End Starter Potential Ceiling Path: Near Elite if the Power 4 transition validates the profile Drew Mestemaker is one of the more unusual risers in the 2027 NFL Draft quarterback group. He did not start a varsity game at quarterback in high school, walked on at North Texas, flashed in his 2024 bowl start, then started all 14 games in 2025 before transferring to Oklahoma State. His timing, RPO processing, intermediate accuracy, and high-volume spread production are enough to keep him in the High-End Starter range, but the 2026 tape has to prove the release point, play strength, and passing profile translate against Power 4 competition. Julian Sayin | QB | Ohio State Current Tier: High-End Starter Potential Ceiling Path: Near Elite Julian Sayin has one of the better timing and accuracy profiles in the class, but he still needs more starting experience with only 14 career starts. At 6’1”, 208 pounds, he wins with anticipation, release quickness, rhythm, and controlled ball placement in a West Coast or pro-spread structure. The next step is proving the arm strength, play strength, pressure response, and off-script answers can hold up as the sample grows and defenses get more tape on him. Darian Mensah | QB | Miami Current Tier: Mid-Level Starter Potential Ceiling Path: High-End Starter Potential with a Miami-driven rise Darian Mensah brings one of the more experienced rhythm-passer profiles in the class, with 27 career starts across Tulane and Duke before transferring to Miami. His game is built on intermediate accuracy, ball placement, timing, and poise from structure, giving him a cleaner projection than many lower-graded, toolsy quarterbacks. Like Dante Moore and Trinidad Chambliss, Mensah could have entered the 2026 NFL Draft but returned to school with a chance to raise his stock. The path upward depends on whether Miami’s supporting cast helps him play with more consistency, push the ball more efficiently, and create the type of production jump that can move him into the High-End Starter range. Jayden Maiava | QB | USC Current Tier: Mid-Level Starter Potential Ceiling Path: High-End Starter Potential Jayden Maiava brings a big-framed rhythm-passer profile with 24 career starts across UNLV and USC. At roughly 6’4”, 225-230 pounds, his grade is built on size, functional arm talent, intermediate accuracy, and production inside USC’s pro-spread structure. The 2026 test is whether his processing, pressure response, risk management, and late-down creation improve enough to move him from a developmental QB2 profile into the High-End Starter range. Sam Leavitt | QB | LSU Current Tier: Mid-Level Starter Potential Ceiling Path: High-End Starter Potential Sam Leavitt brings mobility, ball security, competitive toughness, and enough arm talent to create explosives in a spread or pro-spread offense. He has 20 career starts from his time at Arizona State, where he went 16-4 as the starter, including an 11-2 run in 2024 that helped push the Sun Devils into the College Football Playoff. The LSU fit gives him a strong platform if he can operate through RPOs, play-action, quick game, and moving launch points. The 2026 evaluation also carries a durability layer after his October 2025 Lisfranc injury, surgery, and April 2026 follow-up procedure, making summer and fall camp clearance a key checkpoint for his grade. Drake Lindsey | QB | Minnesota Current Tier: Mid-Level Starter Potential Ceiling Path: High-End Starter Potential Drake Lindsey is a legitimate summer scouting riser with a pro frame, strong arm, quick release, and pocket toughness. At 6’5”, 230 pounds, he started all 13 games for Minnesota in 2025, throwing for 2,382 yards, 18 touchdowns, and six interceptions while setting a program freshman QB wins record. The appeal is the vertical pocket-passer profile, but the next step is proving better accuracy, consistency, anticipation, full-field processing, and pressure answers in 2026. Josh Hoover | QB | Indiana Current Tier: Mid-Level Starter Potential / High-End Starter borderline Ceiling Path: High-End Starter Potential, with a Day 2 rise if Indiana validates the profile Josh Hoover brings one of the most experienced and productive résumés in the class, with 31 starts at TCU and back-to-back 3,000-yard seasons before transferring to Indiana. His game is built on processing, anticipation, release quickness, rhythm passing, and full-field distribution, giving him a strong structure-based projection. The concern is that the frame, arm strength, athletic profile, and velocity consistency are not high-end traits, so his 2026 jump depends on proving the efficiency translates outside TCU’s Air Raid structure and into a Big Ten schedule. John Mateer | QB | Oklahoma Current Tier: Mid-Level Starter Potential Ceiling Path: High-End Starter Potential if the passing profile stabilizes John Mateer is a creation-based dual-threat quarterback with 24 career starts across Washington State and Oklahoma. At 6’1”, 218 pounds, he brings mobility, toughness, off-script playmaking, and real rushing production, but he does not have the rare physical tools of the Tier 2 group. His path upward depends on whether the accuracy, deep-ball touch, timing discipline, and decision-making from the pocket become consistent enough in 2026 to support a full NFL passing-game projection.

The 2026 NFL Draft is complete, which means dynasty rookie values can now be evaluated through the full lens of talent, draft capital, landing spot, scheme fit, and path to early opportunity. These rankings are built for Superflex .5 PPR formats, where quarterback value matters, but premium running backs, high-volume receivers, and difference-making tight ends can still swing rookie drafts. This article blends my Football Scout 365 film-based scouting reports with dynasty fantasy football strategy. Each player is evaluated through a scouting-first lens, then adjusted for NFL team fit, surrounding cast, projected role, and long-term fantasy value. The goal is not just to rank talent, but to identify which rookies have the clearest path to becoming dynasty assets. Use these rankings as an early roadmap for your 2026 dynasty rookie drafts. The top of the class has true foundation-level assets, but the board starts to flatten after the first 6-7 picks. From that point forward, roster build, trade leverage, and player archetype become critical when deciding whether to hold your pick, move up, or trade back. 2026 Dynasty Rookie Rankings Round One Targets The first round starts to flatten out around pick 7 in early dynasty rookie drafts. Most managers are trying to move into the top four picks, so focus on your opponents’ roster needs and position yourself to land the player you actually want. The top pick in most drafts should be Jeremiyah Love. If you are not picking first or second and need a running back, you can move back a few spots and target Love’s Notre Dame teammate, Jadarian Price. There should be a wide receiver run from at least picks 3-5, which makes the 6-7 range a safer pocket for players like Kenyon Sadiq or Price. If you are sitting at pick 8, the board gets much thinner. That is a strong trade-out spot if another manager is willing to pay for it. 1). Fernando Mendoza, QB, Indiana Las Vegas Raiders | Pick No. 1 | Round 1 | Age: 22 Player Comparison: Stiff Andrew Luck Quick Scout: Fernando Mendoza is the top Superflex rookie asset because he combines No. 1 overall draft capital with a high-floor pocket passing profile built on accuracy, anticipation, and advanced processing. He wins with timing, placement, red-zone efficiency, and low-risk decision-making, though the lack of elite rushing upside slightly caps his fantasy ceiling. Team Fit: Mendoza fits well in Klint Kubiak’s timing-based, play-action offense, but the transition from a college RPO-heavy structure to more under-center work will require development. Kirk Cousins gives Las Vegas a logical bridge option, so Year 1 patience may be required, but Mendoza’s long-term starter security keeps him firmly in the 1.01 range for Superflex formats. 2). Jeremiyah Love, RB, Notre Dame Arizona Cardinals | Pick No. 3 | Round 1 | Age: 20 Player Comparison: Bigger Jahmyr Gibbs Quick Scout: Jeremiyah Love is a premium dynasty rookie asset because he combines elite draft capital, three-down ability, and explosive-play traits. His 4.36 speed, low college workload, contact balance, and receiving upside create a rare RB profile with immediate impact potential and long-term RB1 value. Team Fit: Arizona is a strong fit under Mike LaFleur, where Love’s one-cut burst, receiving value, and open-field acceleration can be maximized in zone, RPO, and space-based concepts. The only short-term concern is a crowded backfield with James Conner, Trey Benson, and Tyler Allgeier, but Love’s talent and top-three investment make him the clear long-term feature back. 3). Carnell Tate, WR, Ohio State Tennessee Titans | Pick No. 4 | Round 1 | Age: TBD Player Comparison: Chris Olave / Tee Higgins Quick Scout: Carnell Tate is a refined perimeter receiver with advanced route detail, body control, and catch-point consistency. He wins with tempo, leverage, efficient footwork, and strong hands rather than elite vertical speed or overwhelming play strength. His profile is built more around volume, reliability, and quarterback trust than explosive fantasy spike-week upside. Team Fit: Tennessee gives Tate a clean early target path alongside Cam Ward, making him one of the safer rookie WR investments in this class. His ability to separate at all three levels and finish through contact should translate quickly as a high-volume WR2 with room to grow into a primary option. In Superflex .5 PPR, Tate profiles as a mid-first rookie pick with strong floor value and steady long-term production potential. 4). Jordyn Tyson, WR, Arizona State New Orleans Saints | Pick No. 8 | Round 1 | Age: TBD Player Comparison: Jerry Jeudy Quick Scout: Jordyn Tyson is a polished, high-IQ route technician with legitimate WR1 upside if the durability holds. He wins with stem manipulation, sudden breaks, pacing, ball skills, and competitive toughness at the catch point. The concern is medical, not talent, because his injury history adds more dynasty risk than most receivers in this range. Team Fit: New Orleans is an ideal landing spot because Tyson joins a Kellen Moore offense with Tyler Shough and Chris Olave, giving him a path to early volume without needing to carry the entire passing game immediately. His inside-outside versatility allows him to win as an X, Z, or slot target, which should keep him on the field in multiple personnel packages. In Superflex .5 PPR, Tyson belongs in the mid-first range as a high-ceiling WR bet with more volatility than Carnell Tate. 5). Makai Lemon, WR, USC Philadelphia Eagles | Pick No. 20 | Round 1 | Age: TBD Player Comparison: Amon-Ra St. Brown / Julian Edelman Quick Scout: Makai Lemon is a high-volume slot receiver with elite ball skills, route precision, and quarterback-friendly separation ability. He wins with tempo, spatial awareness, sudden breaks, and strong hands rather than size or vertical speed. His profile is built for .5 PPR efficiency, but his size and outside projection slightly cap the true alpha WR ceiling. Team Fit: Philadelphia gives Lemon a strong fantasy setup if A.J. Brown is moved and he steps into a featured slot role alongside DeVonta Smith. His ability to uncover quickly fits Jalen Hurts well, especially on option routes, crossers, choice concepts, and middle-of-field targets. In Superflex .5 PPR, Lemon profiles as a late-first rookie pick with one of the cleaner volume-based floors among the receivers in this class. 6). Jadarian Price, RB, Notre Dame Seattle Seahawks | Pick No. 32 | Round 1 | Age: 22 Player Comparison: Kyren Williams / Javonte Williams Quick Scout: Jadarian Price is a high-floor dynasty RB target with advanced vision, tempo, and zone-run instincts. His best traits are patience, spatial awareness, smooth footwork, and the ability to press blocks before cutting into daylight, giving him a clean early-down projection. Team Fit: Seattle is a strong landing spot because the offense is built around zone concepts and a physical run game. With Kenneth Walker III gone and Zach Charbonnet working back from injury, Price has a realistic path to meaningful early touches, though his limited receiving profile caps the .5 PPR ceiling compared to the elite backs in this class. 7). Kenyon Sadiq, TE, Oregon New York Jets | Pick No. 16 | Round 1 | Age: 21 Player Comparison: Trey McBride Quick Scout: Kenyon Sadiq is a rare two-phase tight end with explosive athletic ability, play strength, and true alignment versatility. He can win vertically up the seam, create after the catch, and function as a competitive in-line blocker, giving him one of the highest ceilings in this rookie class. The route detail still needs refinement, but the physical profile and three-down utility give him legitimate long-term TE1 upside. Team Fit: The Jets are a strong landing spot because Frank Reich’s offense can use Sadiq as a move tight end, flex option, and play-action matchup weapon. With Garrett Wilson, Breece Hall, Omar Cooper Jr., and Mason Taylor also in the offense, Sadiq may not command elite target volume immediately, but his role should grow quickly. In Superflex .5 PPR, he profiles as a late-first rookie pick, with top-five value in TE-premium formats. 8). Omar Cooper Jr., WR, Indiana New York Jets | Pick No. 30 | Round 1 | Age: 22 Player Comparison: Deebo Samuel Quick Scout: Omar Cooper Jr. is a compact, explosive receiver with YAC ability, contact balance, and inside-outside versatility. He wins as a physical space player who can threaten horizontally on crossers, RPOs, screens, and motion concepts while also creating chunk plays after the catch. His route detail still needs development, but the play strength, acceleration, and competitive profile give him WR2 upside. Team Fit: Cooper fits well in Frank Reich’s timing-based offense as a physical WR2/slot weapon opposite Garrett Wilson. The target tree is crowded with Wilson, Kenyon Sadiq, Mason Taylor, and Breece Hall, so the Year 1 fantasy ceiling may be more volatile than the talent suggests. In Superflex .5 PPR, Cooper profiles as a late-first to early-second rookie pick with a stronger long-term payoff if the Jets stabilize the quarterback position beyond Geno Smith. 9). Ty Simpson, QB, Alabama Los Angeles Rams | Pick No. 13 | Round 1 | Age: 23 Player Comparison: Quick Scout: Ty Simpson is a developmental pocket passer with size, arm talent, and enough functional mobility to operate within structure, but his late-season pressure management at Alabama created real projection risk. He has starter traits when the picture is clean, showing the ability to work timing concepts, attack intermediate windows, and protect the football. The issue is consistency under duress, where his mechanics and decision-making can speed up. Team Fit: The Rams are one of the better developmental landing spots because Sean McVay can let Simpson sit behind Matthew Stafford rather than forcing him into early action. That lowers his Year 1 dynasty value, but it creates a cleaner long-term runway if he develops inside a quarterback-friendly system. In Superflex .5 PPR, Simpson profiles as a late-first to early-second rookie pick with higher real-life upside than immediate fantasy value. 10). KC Concepcion, WR, Texas A&M Cleveland Browns | Pick No. 24 | Round 1 | Age: 21 Player Comparison: Zay Flowers / Tank Dell** Quick Scout: KC Concepcion is an explosive space receiver with separation quickness, run-after-catch ability, and added return value. He wins with speed, suddenness, zone feel, and the ability to create chunk plays on manufactured touches, screens, crossers, and slot targets. The route tree still needs refinement, but his acceleration and open-field instincts give him immediate fantasy splash-play appeal. Team Fit: Cleveland gives Concepcion a clear path to early touches as the Browns reshape the passing game around younger playmakers. His ability to separate quickly and create after the catch should translate well if used as a motion, slot, and manufactured-touch weapon. In Superflex .5 PPR, Concepcion profiles as a late-first rookie pick with upside if the Browns stabilize quarterback play and expand his route usage. 11). Denzel Boston, WR, Washington Cleveland Browns | Pick No. 39 | Round 2 | Age: 22 Player Comparison: Michael Pittman Jr. / Courtland Sutton** Quick Scout: Denzel Boston is a physically imposing boundary receiver who wins with ball skills, body positioning, and competitive toughness. He plays through contact, creates throwing windows with leverage, and gives quarterbacks a reliable target in contested and red-zone situations. He lacks a true vertical second gear, so his fantasy ceiling depends on volume, touchdown usage, and improved separation versus press coverage. Team Fit: Cleveland doubled up at wide receiver, giving Boston a defined role as the bigger perimeter complement to KC Concepcion’s explosive space-player profile. That pairing makes sense structurally, but it could also split early rookie target volume. In Superflex .5 PPR, Boston profiles as an early-to-mid Round 2 rookie pick with possession WR2 upside if he earns red-zone and chain-moving volume. 12). Eli Stowers, TE, Vanderbilt Philadelphia Eagles | Pick No. 54 | Round 2 | Age: 23 Player Comparison: Evan Engram Quick Scout: Eli Stowers is a high-upside quarterback-convert tight end with athletic movement skills, receiving production, and developmental projection. He brings mismatch potential as a detached or move tight end, with enough explosiveness to threaten seams and create after the catch. The frame, blocking consistency, and route detail still need refinement, but the receiving ceiling is legitimate. Team Fit: Philadelphia gives Stowers a strong developmental environment with Jalen Hurts and an offense that can use him as a flex weapon rather than forcing him into a traditional in-line role immediately. His Year 1 role may be package-based, but the long-term receiving upside makes him relevant in dynasty. In Superflex .5 PPR, he is more of a Round 2 rookie target, with a stronger value bump in TE-premium formats. Round Two Targets I have a few players in this range who could push into the back end of Round 1 depending on roster needs and how your league values position scarcity. If you have a late Round 1 pick, this is the area where I would explore trading down for two early Round 2 picks. This class starts to lose clarity after the top 4-6 players, so the goal becomes stacking upside shots rather than forcing a single pick in a flat tier. Round 2 is where you can find productive profiles, strong landing spots, and discounted players with specific paths to value, but the hit rates are naturally less secure. 13). De’Zhaun Stribling, WR, Ole Miss San Francisco 49ers | Pick No. 33 | Round 2 | Age: 23 Player Comparison: Brandon Aiyuk-style vertical separator Quick Scout: De’Zhaun Stribling is a height-speed receiver with a 6-foot-2 frame, 4.36 speed, strong hands, and natural ball-tracking ability. He brings vertical juice and route-running upside, but the one-year starter profile adds some projection risk. His dynasty ceiling is tied to whether he becomes more than a field-stretching piece and develops into a full-route-tree starter. Team Fit: San Francisco is an ideal schematic landing spot because Kyle Shanahan can manufacture space, create explosive looks off play-action, and maximize receivers who separate horizontally and vertically. The 49ers have a strong history developing Day 2 receivers, but early target competition could make Stribling more of a Year 2 dynasty payoff. In Superflex .5 PPR, he profiles as a Round 2 rookie pick with upside if his role expands quickly. 14). Jonah Coleman, RB, Washington Denver Broncos | Pick No. 108 | Round 4 | Age: 22 Player Comparison: JK Dobbins Quick Scout: Jonah Coleman is a compact, physical runner with a low center of gravity, contact balance, pass-protection value, and strong ball security. He is not a true explosive-play back, but he can keep an offense on schedule and handle dirty-yardage work. The fantasy ceiling is capped unless he earns goal-line volume or injuries open a larger role. Team Fit: Denver gives Coleman a viable depth path, but the early role is crowded behind J.K. Dobbins and RJ Harvey in Sean Payton’s backfield. His pass protection could help him get on the field faster than most Day 3 backs, but he is likely a complementary piece to start. In Superflex .5 PPR, Coleman profiles as a late Round 3 to Round 4 rookie dart with roster-stash appeal. 15). Mike Washington Jr., RB, Arkansas Las Vegas Raiders | Pick No. 122 | Round 4 | Age: 22 Player Comparison: Chris Carson Quick Scout: Mike Washington Jr. is a size-speed RB with rare straight-line burst for a 223-pound back. He can press the perimeter, glide through lane development, and create chunk gains when he gets into space, but he still needs to run with more consistent aggression between the tackles. Ball security, pass-protection, and quicker downhill decision-making are the key transition points. Team Fit: Las Vegas is a solid developmental landing spot because Washington gives the Raiders a bigger explosive back who can complement their run-game structure. He is likely a rotational back or taxi-squad stash early, but the athletic profile gives him upside if he earns trust and cleans up the fumble issues. In Superflex .5 PPR, he profiles as a late Round 3 to Round 4 rookie pick with best-ball appeal and long-term stash value. 16). Germie Bernard, WR, Alabama Pittsburgh Steelers | Pick No. 47 | Round 2 | Age: 22 Player Comparison: Screams Tyler Boyd Quick Scout: Germie Bernard is a strong, shifty slot receiver with enough size and toughness to work the middle of the field. He wins with physicality, short-area quickness, contact balance, and reliable hands rather than high-end vertical speed. His ceiling may not be elite, but the skill set gives him a useful PPR-friendly role if he earns steady slot volume. Team Fit: Pittsburgh traded up for Bernard, which signals clear organizational conviction. He fits as the slot option between DK Metcalf and Michael Pittman Jr., giving the Steelers a chain-moving target who can work underneath while the bigger perimeter receivers stress defenses outside. In Superflex .5 PPR, Bernard profiles as a Round 2 rookie pick with a cleaner floor than ceiling. 17). Chris Bell, WR, Louisville Miami Dolphins | Pick No. 94 | Round 3 | Age: 21 Player Comparison: AJ Brown(ish) Quick Scout: Chris Bell is a big-bodied boundary receiver with an NFL-ready frame at nearly 6-foot-2 and 222 pounds, built to win on in-breaking routes, crossers, and vertical possession concepts. He steadily improved each season at Louisville, finishing with a First-Team All-ACC campaign in 2025 before suffering a late-season ACL tear. The injury is the primary concern, and his route disguise and press-release efficiency still need refinement before he earns consistent NFL targets. Team Fit: Miami is a strong schematic fit because Bell can operate as a big slot or boundary target in a spread-heavy, tempo-driven offense that creates space for crossers and movement routes. The Dolphins have room for a developmental WR2/3 to emerge, but Bell’s rookie-year value depends heavily on his ACL recovery timeline. In Superflex .5 PPR dynasty, he profiles as a late-round rookie stash with Year 2 payoff potential and realistic WR3 upside if the recovery and route development track positively. 18). Antonio Williams, WR, Clemson Washington Commanders | Pick No. 71 | Round 3 | Age: 21 Player Comparison: If Ladd McConkey & Jayden Reed had a baby? Quick Scout: Antonio Williams is a quick-twitch slot and movement receiver who wins with separation quickness, creativity, and run-after-catch ability rather than size or contested-catch strength. He profiles best as a designed-touch weapon who can work underneath, attack space, and create yards in rhythm. The concern is whether he has enough high-end traits to command volume without being specifically schemed into touches. Team Fit: Washington is a good fit because Jayden Daniels’ mobility and the Commanders’ spread/RPO structure can create natural windows for Williams on quick-game concepts, screens, crossers, and slot targets. The early target tree may be crowded, but Williams has a path to a defined role if Washington uses him as a Z/slot chess piece rather than a traditional boundary receiver. In Superflex .5 PPR dynasty, he profiles as a mid-to-late rookie pick with WR3/flex upside if the role becomes stable. 19). Skyler Bell, WR, Connecticut Buffalo Bills | Pick No. 125 | Round 4 | Age: 23 Player Comparison: Zay Flowers, but taller Quick Scout: Skyler Bell is a developmental speed receiver with 4.40 acceleration, inside-outside flexibility, and legitimate vertical/YAC ability. He improved as a hands catcher and can threaten all three levels, but the jump from Connecticut to NFL coverage is a real transition point. His route detail, release package, and ability to separate against NFL-caliber corners will determine whether he becomes more than a rotational field-stretcher. Team Fit: Buffalo is a quality landing spot for a Day 3 receiver because Josh Allen’s arm talent can maximize Bell’s vertical speed and off-schedule ability. The Bills can bring him along as a special teams contributor and package receiver while he develops behind established targets. In Superflex .5 PPR dynasty, Bell is a late-round rookie dart throw or taxi-squad stash with best-ball appeal and WR3/flex upside only if he earns a defined role. 20). Zachariah Branch, WR, Georgia Atlanta Falcons | Pick No. 79 | Round 3 | Age: 22 Player Comparison: Rondale Moore / Tank Dell Quick Scout: Zachariah Branch is a compact, electric slot weapon with legitimate 4.35 speed and instant acceleration. He can threaten vertically, win on manufactured touches, and create explosive plays after the catch, but his size limits his contested-catch profile and physical margin for error. His dynasty value depends on Atlanta using him as a motion, slot, return, and space player rather than asking him to win like a traditional perimeter receiver. Team Fit: Atlanta gives Branch a clear speed element in an offense that can use jet motion, screens, option routes, and vertical shots to stress coverage. The Falcons have enough offensive infrastructure to create touches for him, but consistent target volume may be volatile early. In Superflex .5 PPR dynasty, Branch profiles as a mid-to-late rookie draft target with boom-or-bust flex upside. 21). Carson Beck, QB, Miami Arizona Cardinals | Pick No. 65 | Round 2 | Age: 24 Player Comparison: Derek Carr / Mac Jones Quick Scout: Carson Beck is a big-bodied pocket passer with extensive starting experience, strong production, and the processing profile to operate within structure. He is not a high-end creator, but he can win with timing, rhythm, and pre-snap command when protected. The medical history and limited rushing value cap the fantasy ceiling, but the arm talent and experience give him a viable developmental starter profile. Team Fit: Arizona is a strong long-term landing spot after moving on from Kyler Murray, giving Beck a real path to becoming the Cardinals’ future starter. Mike LaFleur’s offense should help him with play-action, defined reads, and timing-based concepts, but he may need time before becoming fantasy-relevant. In Superflex .5 PPR dynasty, Beck profiles as a Round 2 rookie pick with starter-upside stash value because quarterbacks with Day 2 draft capital and a plausible runway carry inflated Superflex value. 22). Chris Brazzell II, WR, Tennessee Carolina Panthers | Pick No. 83 | Round 3 | Age: 22 Player Comparison: Jameson Williams Quick Scout: Chris Brazzell II is a traits-based vertical receiver with rare height-speed ability at 6-foot-4 and 4.37 speed. He can stretch coverage, win downfield, and create red-zone stress, but he is still developing as a route runner and needs more functional strength to consistently win through contact. The fantasy profile is volatile, but the big-play ceiling is legitimate. Team Fit: Carolina gives Brazzell a defined role as a vertical field-stretcher opposite Tetairoa McMillan, which should create favorable single-coverage looks if defenses tilt coverage toward McMillan. Bryce Young benefits from having a bigger speed target who can win outside the numbers and threaten the deep third. In Superflex .5 PPR dynasty, Brazzell profiles as a Round 3 rookie pick with best-ball appeal and developmental WR3 upside if the route detail catches up to the tools. 23). Ted Hurst, WR, Georgia State Tampa Bay Buccaneers | Pick No. 84 | Round 3 | Age: 21 Player Comparison: George Pickens (I hope) Quick Scout: Ted Hurst is a long, athletic Z receiver with vertical speed, acceleration, and the ability to stack corners on deep routes. He has enough release quickness to beat press and enough stride speed to threaten downfield, but he still needs to become more physical and consistent at the catch point. The jump in competition adds some projection risk, but the athletic profile gives him a workable NFL role. Team Fit: Tampa Bay is a solid developmental landing spot because Hurst can be brought along as a vertical Z receiver while expanding his route tree. His early fantasy value may be inconsistent unless he earns a steady snap share, but his size-speed profile gives the Buccaneers a field-stretching option with red-zone upside. In Superflex .5 PPR dynasty, Hurst profiles as a late Round 3 rookie pick with taxi-squad value and best-ball appeal. 24). Nick Singleton, RB, Penn State Tennessee Titans | Pick No. 165 | Round 5 | Age: 22 Player Comparison: Tevin Coleman / Kendre Miller Quick Scout: Nick Singleton is a well-built, explosive runner with a legitimate NFL size-speed profile at 6-foot, 219 pounds. He is dangerous in space, on linear tracks, and on angle/wheel routes out of the backfield, but his vision and lane feel remain inconsistent. The broken foot at the Senior Bowl adds to the risk profile and helps explain the Day 3 slide despite tools that once looked like Day 2 value. Team Fit: Tennessee gives Singleton a developmental landing spot as a complementary back with early special teams and sub-package potential. His receiving flashes and kick-return value can help him earn snaps, but the crowded backfield, injury flag, and instinct concerns make him more projection than immediate role. In Superflex .5 PPR dynasty, Singleton profiles as a late-round rookie dart or taxi-squad stash with RB3/flex upside if the athletic traits translate and the vision improves. Round Three Targets By Round 3, you are clearly playing the lottery, but there are still a few profiles worth targeting early in the round. This is where I am looking for athletic traits, strong offensive environments, handcuff value, or a plausible development path into future snaps. Bryce Lance is one of my favorite upside shots in this range because the size-speed profile is worth betting on. Drew Allar is also worth a swing in Superflex formats because any quarterback with a potential path to future starts carries stash value. Emmett Johnson makes sense as a deeper backfield bet in Kansas City, especially as a possible Kenneth Walker III handcuff. Zachariah Branch may not stay in this range as rookie draft season moves forward, but if he is still available in Round 3, that is an easy upside pick. 25). Bryce Lance, WR, North Dakota State New Orleans Saints | Pick No. 136 | Round 4 | Age: 23 Player Comparison: Christian Watson-lite / MVS Quick Scout: Bryce Lance is a high-end size-speed athlete with vertical juice, a 6-foot-3 frame, and big-play production at the FCS level. He has the traits to win downfield and stress coverage vertically, but the jump from North Dakota State to NFL corners is a major transition point. His route detail, press plan, and week-to-week consistency will determine whether he becomes more than a field-stretching role player. Team Fit: New Orleans is a favorable landing spot because the Saints are rebuilding their receiver room and can afford to develop Lance while giving him early vertical-package snaps. His athletic profile gives him a path to targets if he earns trust, but the Year 1 projection should remain measured. In Superflex .5 PPR dynasty, Lance is a late-round rookie pick with legitimate taxi-squad upside, especially in best-ball formats. 26). Brenen Thompson, WR, Mississippi State Los Angeles Chargers | Pick No. 105 | Round 4 | Age: 22 Player Comparison: Tutu Atwell / Marvin Mims-lite Quick Scout: Brenen Thompson is a pure speed receiver with rare vertical juice, highlighted by 4.26 speed and true field-stretching ability. At 5-foot-9 and 164 pounds, he is undersized and will need to win with releases, spacing, and manufactured touches rather than physicality. His dynasty profile is explosive but volatile, with the ceiling tied to whether he becomes a real route-running weapon instead of a package-speed player. Team Fit: The Chargers give Thompson a strong quarterback environment with Justin Herbert and a passing game that can use vertical speed to stretch coverage. His early role likely comes on deep shots, motion, gadget touches, and special teams, which makes weekly fantasy consistency a challenge. In Superflex .5 PPR dynasty, Thompson is a late-round rookie dart or best-ball stash with splash-play upside but a thin floor. 27). Ja’Kobi Lane, WR, USC Baltimore Ravens | Pick No. 80 | Round 3 | Age: 21 Player Comparison: Mike Williams / Alec Pierce Quick Scout: Ja’Kobi Lane is a long-limbed boundary receiver with a rare size-speed profile at over 6-foot-4 with vertical and red-zone upside. He wins best through frame, body positioning, back-shoulder timing, and contested-catch opportunities, but his route polish, release package, and play strength still need development. The production never fully matched the tools at USC, making him a traits-based dynasty bet more than a polished early-volume receiver. Team Fit: Baltimore is a strong landing spot for a developmental big receiver because the Ravens can use play-action, vertical shots, and red-zone packages to maximize Lane’s frame while he refines the rest of his game. With Zay Flowers and Rashod Bateman ahead of him, Year 1 volume is unlikely, but the long-term role is clear if he adds strength and becomes more consistent versus press. In Superflex .5 PPR dynasty, Lane profiles as a late-round rookie stash with WR3/flex upside by Year 2. 28). Malachi Fields, WR, Notre Dame New York Giants | Pick No. 74 | Round 3 | Age: 22 Player Comparison: Michael Pittman Jr. Quick Scout: Malachi Fields is a big-bodied boundary receiver who wins with size, length, catch radius, and contested-catch ability rather than separation quickness. At over 6-foot-4 with a 79-inch wingspan, he has the frame to develop into a possession X and red-zone target. The concern is vertical separation, as his long speed and route suddenness limit the explosive fantasy ceiling. Team Fit: The Giants give Fields a real opportunity to carve out a role as a big perimeter complement in a receiver room that can use size and red-zone utility. His best path to fantasy relevance is becoming a back-shoulder, third-down, and touchdown-area target rather than a high-volume separator. In Superflex .5 PPR dynasty, Fields profiles as a late-round rookie stash with WR4/TD-dependent upside. 29). Elijah Sarratt, WR, Indiana Baltimore Ravens | Pick No. 115 | Round 4 | Age: 22 Player Comparison: Allen Lazard Quick Scout: Elijah Sarratt is a physical possession receiver with strong hands, size, contested-catch ability, and intermediate reliability. He wins more with body control, toughness, and catch-point timing than athletic separation or YAC explosiveness. The profile is useful for real football, but the fantasy ceiling is capped unless he earns red-zone volume. Team Fit: Baltimore’s run-heavy structure fits Sarratt’s physical profile, but it also limits the target ceiling. The Ravens already added Ja’Kobi Lane earlier in the draft, so Sarratt may need to win through special teams, blocking value, and situational passing-game work before earning consistent snaps. In Superflex .5 PPR dynasty, he profiles as a late-round flier or taxi-squad stash with role-player upside. 30). Kaytron Allen, RB, Penn State Washington Commanders | Pick No. 187 | Round 6 | Age: 23 Player Comparison: Gus Edwards Quick Scout: Kaytron Allen is a physical downhill runner with patience, contact balance, and short-yardage utility. He runs with a low center of gravity, fits multiple run schemes, and can grind out efficient interior carries, but he lacks explosive traits and does not project as a major space or receiving weapon. The fantasy ceiling is limited unless he earns goal-line work. Team Fit: Washington gives Allen a clear depth role as a power complement in a Jayden Daniels-led offense that can create light boxes with RPO and option elements. His path to touches likely starts on early downs and short-yardage packages, but the lack of third-down value makes him more roster-dependent than role-secure. In Superflex .5 PPR dynasty, Allen profiles as a late Round 4 rookie dart or waiver-watch back rather than a priority draft target. 31). Emmett Johnson, RB, Nebraska Kansas City Chiefs | Pick No. 161 | Round 5 | Age: 22 Player Comparison: Kyren Williams-lite Quick Scout: Emmett Johnson is a hard-charging, production-driven back with pass-catching value and a decisive downhill style. He led the FBS with 151.8 all-purpose yards per game in 2025, but his 4.56 40-yard dash and segmented lateral cuts raise questions about his ability to create when blocking is muddy. The profile is more efficient committee back than explosive feature runner, but his receiving ability gives him a better .5 PPR path than most Day 3 backs. Team Fit: Kansas City is a strong schematic landing spot because Andy Reid can manufacture touches for backs who catch the ball and process space well. Johnson enters behind Kenneth Walker III, so Year 1 fantasy value is limited, but his pass-game utility gives him a possible sub-package role if he earns trust in protection. In Superflex .5 PPR dynasty, Johnson profiles as a late-round rookie stash or taxi-squad back with deeper-league appeal. 32). Drew Allar, QB, Penn State Pittsburgh Steelers | Pick No. 76 | Round 3 | Age: 22 Player Comparison: Joe Flacco/Christian Hackenberg Quick Scout: Drew Allar is a big-framed developmental pocket passer with pro-style experience, pre-snap exposure, and enough arm talent to work the intermediate field from structure. He can layer throws and operate route combinations when protected, but his production never fully matched the physical profile, and the tape lacks the high-end creativity or dynamic second-reaction traits of a premium fantasy quarterback. The ceiling is a developmental starter or long-term QB2, while the floor is a career backup. Team Fit: Pittsburgh is a reasonable landing spot because the Steelers’ quarterback room gives Allar a more realistic path to future snaps than most Round 3 passers. Arthur Smith’s system can lean on play-action, protection structure, and defined reads, which helps Allar’s profile, but he is unlikely to provide early fantasy value. In Superflex .5 PPR dynasty, Allar is a late-round quarterback stash with more value in deeper 2QB formats than shallow rookie drafts. 33). Justin Joly, TE, NC State Denver Broncos | Pick No. 152 | Round 5 | Age: 21 Player Comparison: IDK Quick Scout: Justin Joly is a production-based tight end with reliable hands, functional route feel, and the ability to find space against zone coverage. He lacks the explosive athletic profile to project as a featured fantasy tight end, but he can win as a short-area target and complementary piece in 12 personnel. The fantasy ceiling is limited unless he earns consistent route volume near the goal line. Team Fit: Denver’s Sean Payton offense values tight ends who can work the intermediate area and contribute in structure, which gives Joly a viable roster path. He is unlikely to threaten for a major rookie role, but his hands and blocking utility could help him become a rotational TE2. In Superflex .5 PPR dynasty, Joly is a deep-league or TE-premium stash only, not a priority target in standard rookie drafts. 34). Demond Claiborne, RB, Wake Forest Minnesota Vikings | Pick No. 198 | Round 6 | Age: 22 Player Comparison: Nyheim Hines / Justice Hill Quick Scout: Demond Claiborne is a compact speed back with 4.37 burst, perimeter juice, and receiving-space utility. He is at his best on screens, swing passes, outside-zone tracks, and designed touches where his acceleration can stress angles. The limitation is size and workload projection, as his frame does not point to a true three-down or high-volume interior role. Team Fit: Minnesota gives Claiborne a reasonable schematic fit under Kevin O’Connell, where zone concepts, space touches, and spread looks can hide some of his size limitations. His early path likely runs through special teams and sub-package work behind the established backs on the depth chart. In Superflex .5 PPR dynasty, Claiborne is a late-round dart throw or taxi-squad stash with minimal standalone value unless injuries open a role. 35). Max Klare, TE, Ohio State Los Angeles Rams | Pick No. 61 | Round 2 | Age: 22 Player Comparison: Hunter Henry / Dalton Schultz Quick Scout: Max Klare is a reliable receiving tight end with size, length, hands, and enough route polish to work the seam and intermediate zones. He is not a rare mismatch athlete, but he has the frame and receiving profile to become a quality NFL starter. The fantasy ceiling is more volume-driven TE1/TE2 than explosive weekly difference-maker. Team Fit: The Rams are a strong schematic fit because Sean McVay’s offense can use Klare on play-action, leak concepts, crossers, and middle-of-field targets. The concern is short-term target competition in a crowded tight end room, which could delay his fantasy usefulness. In Superflex .5 PPR dynasty, Klare profiles as a late Round 2 to early Round 3 rookie pick with stronger long-term value than Year 1 appeal. 36). Cade Klubnik, QB, Clemson New York Jets | Pick No. 110 | Round 4 | Age: 22 Player Comparison: Gardner Minshew / Baker Mayfield-lite Quick Scout: Cade Klubnik is a three-year starter with functional dual-threat ability, a quick release, and enough timing and touch to operate in a modern RPO-based passing game. He flashes the ability to drive intermediate throws and play in rhythm, but his 2025 tape raised concerns about pressure processing, pocket movement, and consistency when the picture changes post-snap. He is a developmental quarterback whose fantasy value is tied more to future opportunity than immediate traits. Team Fit: New York traded up for Klubnik, which gives him more dynasty relevance than most Day 3 quarterbacks. Frank Reich’s offense values timing, rhythm, and quick decisions, which fits Klubnik’s best traits, but a crowded room with Geno Smith, Bailey Zappe, and Brady Cook makes him a long-term stash rather than an early contributor. In Superflex .5 PPR dynasty, Klubnik profiles as a late-round rookie pick with deeper-league appeal because any quarterback with draft-capital investment and a possible future runway is worth monitoring. Rankings Table RK Player Name Pos School NFL Team Drafted 1 Fernando Mendoza QB Indiana Las Vegas Raiders 2 Jeremiyah Love RB Notre Dame Arizona Cardinals 3 Carnell Tate WR Ohio State Tennessee Titans 4 Jordyn Tyson WR Arizona State New Orleans Saints 5 Makai Lemon WR USC Philadelphia Eagles 6 Jadarian Price RB Notre Dame Seattle Seahawks 7 Kenyon Sadiq TE Oregon New York Jets 8 Omar Cooper Jr. WR Indiana New York Jets 9 Ty Simpson QB Alabama Los Angeles Rams 10 KC Concepcion WR Texas A&M Cleveland Browns 11 Denzel Boston WR Washington Cleveland Browns 12 Eli Stowers TE Vanderbilt Philadelphia Eagles 13 De’Zhaun Stribling WR Ole Miss San Francisco 49ers 14 Jonah Coleman RB Washington Denver Broncos 15 Mike Washington Jr. RB Arkansas Las Vegas Raiders 16 Germie Bernard WR Alabama Pittsburgh Steelers 17 Chris Bell WR Louisville Miami Dolphins 18 Antonio Williams WR Clemson Washington Commanders 19 Skyler Bell WR Connecticut Buffalo Bills 20 Zachariah Branch WR Georgia Atlanta Falcons 21 Carson Beck QB Miami Arizona Cardinals 22 Chris Brazzell II WR Tennessee Carolina Panthers 23 Ted Hurst WR Georgia State Tampa Bay Buccaneers 24 Nick Singleton RB Penn State Tennessee Titans 25 Bryce Lance WR North Dakota State New Orleans Saints 26 Brenen Thompson WR Mississippi State Los Angeles Chargers 27 Ja’Kobi Lane WR USC Baltimore Ravens 28 Malachi Fields WR Notre Dame New York Giants 29 Elijah Sarratt WR Indiana Baltimore Ravens 30 Kaytron Allen RB Penn State Washington Commanders 31 Emmett Johnson RB Nebraska Kansas City Chiefs 32 Drew Allar QB Penn State Pittsburgh Steelers 33 Justin Joly TE NC State Denver Broncos 34 Demond Claiborne RB Wake Forest Minnesota Vikings 35 Max Klare TE Ohio State Los Angeles Rams 36 Cade Klubnik QB Clemson New York Jets

The 2026 NFL Draft is complete, and the real evaluation starts now. Every team leaves draft weekend with a class that reflects its roster priorities, scouting philosophy, and willingness to balance need with value. At Football Scout 365, our team grades are not based on hype or a simple average of individual pick grades. Each class is evaluated through a roster-building lens, weighing premium-pick execution, value versus draft slot, positional need, scheme fit, Day 3 utility, and whether the team solved its most important pre-draft problems. A high grade does not require every pick to fill a need, but it does require a clear plan. The best classes matched talent with roster urgency, found starter-level value in the right ranges, and avoided major opportunity-cost mistakes. The lower-graded classes either left critical needs unresolved, reached too often relative to the board, or used premium capital on luxury positions while more urgent roster holes remained open. Here is our full 2026 NFL Draft team-by-team grade breakdown. How We Graded Every 2026 NFL Draft Class How We Graded Every 2026 NFL Draft Class Each team grade is based on a full-class evaluation, not a simple average of individual pick grades. Premium picks carry more weight because early-round selections shape the direction of a draft class. The final grade considers team need, value vs. draft slot, positional value, scheme fit, roster-building logic, and Day 3 utility. We also compare each pick against the team’s pre-draft needs to determine whether the selection was a Direct Need, Secondary Need, BPA / Luxury, or Depth / Development pick. Grade Key A Range: Excellent draft class. Strong premium-pick execution, clear roster-building logic, high-value selections, and multiple players with starter-level or impact potential. B Range: Solid draft class. The team found useful players, addressed several needs, and generally matched value with fit, but left at least one notable roster gap or had some allocation concerns. C Range: Mixed draft class. Some useful pieces, but the class includes clear reaches, unresolved priority needs, or questionable use of premium draft capital. D Range: Poor draft class. Major value concerns, weak need fulfillment, limited starter upside, or a flawed roster-building process. F Range: Failed draft process. The team missed value, ignored major needs, and failed to add meaningful impact talent. Need Match Key Direct Need: The pick directly addressed one of the team’s primary pre-draft needs. Secondary Need: The pick addressed a lesser need or a position that made roster sense, but was not the team’s top priority. BPA / Luxury: The pick was based more on talent or value than need. These picks can still grade well, but must justify the opportunity cost. Depth / Development: The pick added competition, special teams value, or long-term developmental upside, usually on Day 3. Search By NFL Team ARI | ATL | BAL | BUF | CAR | CHI CIN | CLE | DAL | DEN | DET | GB HOU | IND | JAX | KC | LAC | LAR LV | MIA | MIN | NE | NO | NYG NYJ | PHI | PIT | SEA | SF | TB TEN | WAS 2026 NFL Draft Team Grades Sorted Team Grade New York Jets A Cleveland Browns A- Dallas Cowboys A- Kansas City Chiefs A- Las Vegas Raiders A- Miami Dolphins A- New York Giants A- Tampa Bay Buccaneers A- Washington Commanders A- Baltimore Ravens B+ Buffalo Bills B+ Chicago Bears B+ Detroit Lions B+ Houston Texans B+ Los Angeles Chargers B+ Minnesota Vikings B+ New England Patriots B+ New Orleans Saints B+ Philadelphia Eagles B+ Carolina Panthers B Indianapolis Colts B Pittsburgh Steelers B San Francisco 49ers B Tennessee Titans B Arizona Cardinals B- Cincinnati Bengals B- Green Bay Packers B- Jacksonville Jaguars B- Seattle Seahawks B- Atlanta Falcons C+ Denver Broncos C+ Los Angeles Rams C+ Arizona Cardinals 2026 NFL Draft Grade: B- Class Summary & Final Grade: Arizona added useful talent, but the class is capped by the use of the No. 3 overall pick on Jeremiyah Love, a dynamic running back, while quarterback, edge rusher, and offensive line remained premium roster needs. Chase Bisontis was the cleanest pick in the class, giving the Cardinals a high-floor interior blocker who fits the run-game structure, while Carson Beck gives them an experienced bridge quarterback option rather than a true franchise answer. Kaleb Proctor adds developmental defensive line depth, and Jayden Williams provides practical tackle competition late. The biggest miss is edge rusher, which Arizona never addressed across seven selections. This class has talent, but the top-end allocation and unresolved pass-rush need keep it in the B- range. Pick-by-Pick Review: 1.3 Jeremiyah Love, RB, Notre Dame — B | BPA / Luxury 2.34 Chase Bisontis, IOL, Texas A&M — B+ | Direct Need 3.65 Carson Beck, QB, Miami — C+ | Direct Need 4.104 Kaleb Proctor, DT, Southeastern Louisiana — B- | Secondary Need 5.143 Reggie Virgil, WR, Texas Tech — C+ | Depth / Development 6.183 Karson Sharar, LB, Iowa — C+ | Depth / Development 7.217 Jayden Williams, OT, Ole Miss — B | Direct Need Atlanta Falcons 2026 NFL Draft Grade: C+ Class Summary & Final Grade: Atlanta entered the draft with critical needs at edge, interior defensive line, and linebacker, but the class is defined by what it failed to address. Avieon Terrell is a quality player and a defensible secondary-need pick, but using the top selection on cornerback while edge remained untouched created an immediate process concern. Zachariah Branch is a dynamic talent, but he profiles more as a luxury swing than a direct roster solution. The back half is more defensible, with Kendal Daniels and Harold Perkins Jr. addressing linebacker and Perkins standing out as the best value in the class. Anterio Thompson adds interior defensive line depth, but the failure to draft an edge rusher across six selections is the major miss. That omission, combined with the top-two pick allocation, keeps Atlanta firmly in C+ territory. Pick-by-Pick Review: 2.48 Avieon Terrell, CB, Clemson — B+ | Secondary Need 3.79 Zachariah Branch, WR, Georgia — B- | BPA / Luxury 4.134 Kendal Daniels, LB, Oklahoma — B- | Direct Need 6.208 Anterio Thompson, DT, Washington — C+ | Direct Need 6.215 Harold Perkins Jr., LB, LSU — B+ | Direct Need 7.231 Ethan Onianwa, IOL, Ohio State — C+ | Depth / Development Baltimore Ravens 2026 NFL Draft Grade: B+ Class Summary & Final Grade: Baltimore built a well-structured class with a clear identity: protect Lamar Jackson, add pass-catching depth, and reinforce the defensive perimeter. Olaivavega Ioane is the anchor as an immediate starter at guard with the power and movement skills to fit Baltimore’s run-heavy structure. Zion Young gives the edge room another pro-ready rotational piece, while Ja’Kobi Lane and Elijah Sarratt add two different receiver profiles around Zay Flowers and Rashod Bateman. Chandler Rivers is the best value pick in the class, giving Baltimore 4.40 speed and zone-coverage traits at a fifth-round price. The main issue is defensive line, which was not addressed until Rayshaun Benny in Round 7, leaving a starting-caliber interior need largely unresolved. The two-tight end investment also creates some roster-balance questions, but the premium pick execution, scheme clarity, and Day 3 value push this class into the B+ range. Pick-by-Pick Review: 1.14 Olaivavega Ioane, IOL, Penn State — A- | Direct Need 2.45 Zion Young, EDGE, Missouri — B | Direct Need 3.80 Ja’Kobi Lane, WR, USC — B- | Direct Need 4.115 Elijah Sarratt, WR, Indiana — B | Direct Need 4.133 Matthew Hibner, TE, SMU — B | Secondary Need 5.162 Chandler Rivers, CB, Duke — B+ | Direct Need 5.173 Josh Cuevas, TE, Alabama — B- | Secondary Need 5.174 Adam Randall, RB, Clemson — B | Secondary Need 6.211 Ryan Eckley, P, Michigan State — B- | Depth / Development 7.250 Rayshaun Benny, DT, Michigan — B | Direct Need 7.253 Evan Beerntsen, IOL, Northwestern — B | Depth / Development Buffalo Bills 2026 NFL Draft Grade: B+ Class Summary & Final Grade: Buffalo traded out of Round 1 and turned the capital into a 10-pick class built around depth, value, and positional need. T.J. Parker at No. 35 directly addresses the edge need and carries late first-round traits, while Davison Igbinosun gives the Bills a long, physical corner with big-game experience. Skyler Bell and Jalon Kilgore are the best value swings in the class, with Bell adding vertical juice and Kilgore giving Buffalo starter-level safety upside at a fifth-round price. Kaleb Elarms-Orr, Zane Durant, and Ar’maj Reed-Adams all fit the roster-building plan, while Tommy Doman Jr. is the lone clear value drag. The lack of a true starter-level interior defensive line answer keeps this out of the A range, but the volume, need alignment, and Day 3 value push Buffalo to B+. Pick-by-Pick Review: 2.35 T.J. Parker, EDGE, Clemson — B+ | Direct Need 2.62 Davison Igbinosun, CB, Ohio State — B+ | Secondary Need 4.102 Jude Bowry, OT, Boston College — C+ | Secondary Need 4.125 Skyler Bell, WR, Connecticut — A- | BPA / Luxury 4.126 Kaleb Elarms-Orr, LB, TCU — B+ | Direct Need 5.167 Jalon Kilgore, S, South Carolina — A- | Direct Need 5.181 Zane Durant, DT, Penn State — B+ | Direct Need 7.220 Toriano Pride Jr., CB, Missouri — B- | Secondary Need 7.239 Tommy Doman Jr., P, Florida — D+ | Depth / Development 7.241 Ar’maj Reed-Adams, G, Texas A&M — B | Direct Need Carolina Panthers 2026 NFL Draft Grade: B Class Summary & Final Grade: Carolina entered the draft needing to protect and support Bryce Young, and the class largely follows that plan. Monroe Freeling at No. 19 is the anchor pick, giving the Panthers a direct offensive tackle answer with long-term starter upside. Lee Hunter adds interior defensive line mass and power, while Chris Brazzell II gives the offense another pass-catching option. The Day 3 stretch is logical, with Sam Hecht providing center depth and Zakee Wheatley standing out as the best value in the class at safety. The class checks several needs and has a coherent roster-building plan, but it lacks a true breakout value beyond Freeling and Wheatley. Solid, functional, and need-aware, but not quite dynamic enough to climb above B. Pick-by-Pick Review: 1.19 Monroe Freeling, OT, Georgia — B+ | Direct Need 2.49 Lee Hunter, DT, Texas Tech — Ungraded | Direct Need 3.83 Chris Brazzell II, WR, Tennessee — B | Secondary Need 4.129 Will Lee III, CB, Texas A&M — B | Secondary Need 5.144 Sam Hecht, C, Kansas State — B+ | Direct Need 5.151 Zakee Wheatley, S, Penn State — A- | Direct Need 7.227 Jackson Kuwatch, LB, Miami (OH) — B- | Depth / Development Chicago Bears 2026 NFL Draft Grade: B+ Class Summary & Final Grade: Chicago’s class is carried by excellent premium-pick execution. Dillon Thieneman at No. 25 is one of the better value picks in this group, giving the Bears a top-tier safety prospect who fills a major pre-draft void. Logan Jones at No. 57 is another clean fit, adding a center with the movement skills and processing profile to fit Ben Johnson’s RPO structure. The middle of the class is more uneven, with Sam Roush and Zavion Thomas carrying projection risk, but Malik Muhammad provides strong fourth-round value at corner. The issue is what Chicago did not solve: edge and offensive line depth were not meaningfully addressed. The top two selections are strong enough to keep this firmly in B+ territory, but the unresolved premium needs prevent an A-range grade. Pick-by-Pick Review: 1.25 Dillon Thieneman, S, Oregon — A | Direct Need 2.57 Logan Jones, C, Iowa — A- | Direct Need 3.69 Sam Roush, TE, Stanford — B- | BPA / Luxury 3.89 Zavion Thomas, WR, LSU — C+ | Direct Need 4.124 Malik Muhammad, CB, Texas — B+ | Secondary Need 5.166 Keyshaun Elliott, LB, Arizona State — C+ | Depth / Development 6.213 Jordan van den Berg, DT, Georgia Tech — C+ | Direct Need Cincinnati Bengals 2026 NFL Draft Grade: B- Class Summary & Final Grade: Cincinnati entered the draft without a first-round pick and still built a useful class, but the overall process is uneven. Cashius Howell at No. 41 is the best alignment of value and need, giving the Bengals an explosive edge presence, while Tacario Davis adds long corner depth in Round 3. Connor Lew and Brian Parker II both provide offensive line value, but the double investment at center creates some positional redundancy. Colbie Young is a luxury wide receiver swing, and Jack Endries is a good late-round tight end value. The defining issue is linebacker, which remained one of the biggest roster holes and was never addressed. The top of the class is solid, but the soft middle and unresolved LB need pull Cincinnati into B- territory. Pick-by-Pick Review: 2.41 Cashius Howell, EDGE, Texas A&M — B+ | Direct Need 3.72 Tacario Davis, CB, Washington — B+ | Direct Need 4.128 Connor Lew, C, Auburn — B+ | Secondary Need 4.140 Colbie Young, WR, Georgia — C+ | BPA / Luxury 6.189 Brian Parker II, C, Duke — A- | Secondary Need 7.221 Jack Endries, TE, Texas — B+ | Depth / Development 7.226 Landon Robinson, DT, Navy — B- | Direct Need Cleveland Browns 2026 NFL Draft Grade: A- Class Summary & Final Grade: Cleveland entered the draft with live needs at quarterback, cornerback, and edge, but turned a 10-pick class into one of the stronger offensive rebuilds in the league. Spencer Fano at No. 9 is a foundational offensive tackle and the cleanest premium pick in the class, while KC Concepcion and Denzel Boston give Cleveland two different receiver types who immediately raise the ceiling of the passing game. Emmanuel McNeil-Warren addresses the secondary, Austin Barber adds another offensive tackle swing, and Parker Brailsford gives the Browns strong interior line depth. Taylen Green is a reasonable developmental quarterback investment in Round 6, but edge was never addressed, which is the major unresolved need. The top-end value and clear offensive plan carry this into A- territory, even with a modest Day 3 and no pass-rush addition. Pick-by-Pick Review: 1.9 Spencer Fano, OT, Utah — A | Direct Need 1.24 KC Concepcion, WR, Texas A&M — A- | Direct Need 2.39 Denzel Boston, WR, Washington — A- | Direct Need 2.58 Emmanuel McNeil-Warren, S, Toledo — Ungraded | Direct Need 3.86 Austin Barber, OT, Florida — B | Secondary Need 5.146 Parker Brailsford, C, Alabama — B+ | Secondary Need 5.149 Justin Jefferson, LB, Alabama — B | Depth / Development 5.170 Joe Royer, TE, Cincinnati — C+ | Depth / Development 6.182 Taylen Green, QB, Arkansas — B- | Direct Need 7.248 Carsen Ryan, TE, BYU — B | Depth / Development Dallas Cowboys 2026 NFL Draft Grade: A- Class Summary & Final Grade: Dallas entered the draft with live needs at edge, cornerback, linebacker, and interior defensive line, and used two first-round picks to add immediate defensive impact. Caleb Downs is the best pick in the class, giving Dallas an elite interchangeable safety with high-end range, instincts, and scheme versatility. Malachi Lawrence directly addresses the edge need with burst and pass-rush upside, while Jaishawn Barham and LT Overton give the Cowboys a deeper, more flexible pressure package. Devin Moore addresses cornerback on Day 3, but the team waited longer than ideal to attack the position, and linebacker plus interior defensive line were never addressed. The premium picks are strong enough to push this to A-, but the back half is thin and leaves important roster gaps unresolved. Pick-by-Pick Review: 1.11 Caleb Downs, S, Ohio State — A+ | BPA / Luxury 1.23 Malachi Lawrence, ED, UCF — A- | Direct Need 3.92 Jaishawn Barham, EDGE, Michigan — B+ | Direct Need 4.112 Drew Shelton, OT, Penn State — C | Secondary Need 4.114 Devin Moore, CB, Florida — C+ | Direct Need 4.137 LT Overton, EDGE, Alabama — B | Direct Need 7.218 Anthony Smith, WR, East Carolina — C+ | Depth / Development Denver Broncos 2026 NFL Draft Grade: C+ Class Summary & Final Grade: Denver entered the draft without a first- or second-round pick and needed help at linebacker and edge, which made every selection matter. Tyler Onyedim was the first pick at No. 66, but using the only Day 2 selection on a developmental defensive tackle at a position already addressed in free agency limited the early impact of the class. Jonah Coleman was a strong value addition at running back, and Justin Joly was the best pick in the class as a receiving tight end with real offensive utility. Kage Casey adds developmental tackle traits, while the Round 7 group brings depth and special teams value. The issue is that neither linebacker nor edge received meaningful investment until Red Murdock at pick 257, leaving Denver’s biggest needs largely unresolved. Limited capital matters, but the process still lands in C+ territory. Pick-by-Pick Review: 3.66 Tyler Onyedim, DT, Texas A&M — C+ | Secondary Need 4.108 Jonah Coleman, RB, Washington — B+ | BPA / Luxury 4.111 Kage Casey, OT, Boise State — C+ | Depth / Development 5.152 Justin Joly, TE, N.C. State — A | Secondary Need 7.246 Miles Scott, S, Illinois — C | Depth / Development 7.256 Dallen Bentley, TE, Utah — B- | Depth / Development 7.257 Red Murdock, LB, Buffalo — B | Direct Need Detroit Lions 2026 NFL Draft Grade: B+ Class Summary & Final Grade: Detroit entered the draft with live needs at offensive line, defensive line, and safety, and built a class with strong trench logic. Blake Miller at No. 17 is a plug-and-play right tackle who stabilizes the offensive front, while Derrick Moore gives the Lions a direct edge answer after offseason losses. Jimmy Rolder provides linebacker depth and special teams value, Keith Abney II is one of the better Day 3 value picks in this group, and the late defensive line additions of Skyler Gill-Howard and Tyre West help address the interior need. Kendrick Law is a tools-based receiver swing, but safety was never directly addressed. The premium picks and quality Day 3 defensive values push this to B+, with the unresolved safety need serving as the main drag. Note: D’Angelo Ponds was flagged in the submitted data and excluded pending verification. Pick-by-Pick Review: 1.17 Blake Miller, OT, Clemson — A- | Direct Need 2.44 Derrick Moore, ED, Michigan — Ungraded | Direct Need 4.118 Jimmy Rolder, LB, Michigan — B+ | Secondary Need 5.157 Keith Abney II, CB, Arizona State — A- | BPA / Luxury 5.168 Kendrick Law, WR, Kentucky — C+ | BPA / Luxury 6.205 Skyler Gill-Howard, DL, Texas Tech — B+ | Direct Need 7.222 Tyre West, DT, Tennessee — B+ | Direct Need Green Bay Packers 2026 NFL Draft Grade: B- Class Summary & Final Grade: Green Bay entered the draft without a first-round pick and with live needs at OL, Edge, DL, and RB. The class has a clear defensive identity, but the roster-building execution is incomplete. Brandon Cisse gives the Packers another long, athletic corner, but CB was more of a secondary need after free agency. Chris McClellan was the best value in the class and directly addresses the defensive line need, while Dani Dennis-Sutton adds a legitimate developmental edge swing with starter traits. Jager Burton provides interior offensive line depth, but he does not solve the bigger tackle concern, and running back was never addressed. Domani Jackson is excellent late-round value, but the Trey Smack specialist pick adds limited roster impact. The defensive focus is coherent, but the unresolved RB and OT needs keep this class in the B- range. Pick-by-Pick Review: 2.52 Brandon Cisse, CB, South Carolina — B | Secondary Need 3.77 Chris McClellan, DT, Missouri — B | Direct Need 4.120 Dani Dennis-Sutton, EDGE, Penn State — B+ | Direct Need 5.153 Jager Burton, C, Kentucky — B | Secondary Need 6.201 Domani Jackson, CB, Alabama — A | BPA / Luxury 6.216 Trey Smack, K, Florida — C+ | Depth / Development Houston Texans 2026 NFL Draft Grade: B+ Class Summary & Final Grade: Houston built a strong trench-focused class around C.J. Stroud, even if it did not fully match the stated need board. Keylan Rutledge gives the Texans a plug-and-play guard after the Tytus Howard trade, while Kayden McDonald adds a reliable interior run defender. Febechi Nwaiwu was the best value in the class, giving Houston another starter-caliber guard option in Round 4, and Aiden Fisher is a strong late-round linebacker find. The concern is structural: Houston never drafted a cornerback or edge rusher despite both being primary needs entering the draft. Marlin Klein is the most questionable allocation as a second-round developmental tight end at a non-critical position. Still, the volume of useful picks, the interior offensive line investment, and the defensive depth added make this a strong B+ class. Pick-by-Pick Review: 1.26 Keylan Rutledge, IOL, Georgia Tech — B | Direct Need 2.38 Kayden McDonald, DT, Ohio State — B | Secondary Need 2.59 Marlin Klein, TE, Michigan — C+ | Depth / Development 4.106 Febechi Nwaiwu, OG, Oklahoma — A- | Direct Need 4.123 Wade Woodaz, LB, Clemson — B | Secondary Need 5.141 Kamari Ramsey, S, USC — B | Secondary Need 6.204 Lewis Bond, WR, Boston College — B | Depth / Development 7.243 Aiden Fisher, LB, Indiana — B+ | Secondary Need Indianapolis Colts 2026 NFL Draft Grade: B Class Summary & Final Grade: Indianapolis entered the draft without a first-round pick and with live needs at Edge, right tackle, and wide receiver, with linebacker and safety also in the mix. The Colts built a defensively coherent class, led by CJ Allen and A.J. Haulcy, two high-floor defenders with starter traits and strong value for their draft slots. Bryce Boettcher adds more linebacker depth, while George Gumbs Jr. and Caden Curry give the edge room two rotational swings. Deion Burks was the best value pick in the class, giving Indianapolis explosive slot ability in Round 7, but he does not solve the larger WR need. The issue is that no right tackle was drafted, and the wide receiver answer came too late to fully offset the Michael Pittman Jr. departure. Strong defensive value keeps this in the B range, but the unresolved offensive needs prevent a higher grade. Pick-by-Pick Review: 2.53 CJ Allen, LB, Georgia — A- | Secondary Need 3.78 A.J. Haulcy, S, LSU — A- | Direct Need 4.113 Jalen Farmer, OG, Kentucky — B- | Secondary Need 4.135 Bryce Boettcher, LB, Oregon — B | Secondary Need 5.156 George Gumbs Jr., EDGE, Florida — B | Direct Need 6.214 Caden Curry, EDGE, Ohio State — B | Direct Need 7.237 Seth McGowan, RB, Kentucky — B- | Depth / Development 7.254 Deion Burks, WR, Oklahoma — A+ | Direct Need Jacksonville Jaguars 2026 NFL Draft Grade: B- Class Summary & Final Grade: Jacksonville had volume, but the class lacked clean positional prioritization at the top. The Jaguars entered with live needs at linebacker and safety, yet their highest pick went to Nate Boerkircher, a developmental tight end at a non-critical position. Albert Regis adds interior defensive line depth, but Emmanuel Pregnon was the best pick in the class, giving Jacksonville a powerful guard with starter traits and a clean fit in Liam Coen’s run structure. Jalen Huskey addresses safety in Round 3, though his profile projects more as sub-package and special teams help than a clear starter. The double-dip at tight end and wide receiver created roster-balance questions, while linebacker was not addressed until Parker Hughes at pick 240. Pregnon, Wesley Williams, and Josh Cameron give the class useful pieces, but the lack of starter-level investment at LB and S keeps this in the B- range. Pick-by-Pick Review: 2.56 Nate Boerkircher, TE, Texas A&M — B | Depth / Development 3.81 Albert Regis, DT, Texas A&M — C+ | Secondary Need 3.88 Emmanuel Pregnon, OG, Oregon — B+ | Secondary Need 3.100 Jalen Huskey, S, Maryland — C+ | Direct Need 4.119 Wesley Williams, ED, Duke — B | Secondary Need 5.164 Tanner Koziol, TE, Houston — C+ | Depth / Development 6.191 Josh Cameron, WR, Baylor — B | Depth / Development 6.203 CJ Williams, WR, Stanford — C | Depth / Development 7.233 Zach Durfee, ED, Washington — B- | Secondary Need 7.240 Parker Hughes, LB, Middle Tennessee — C | Direct Need Kansas City Chiefs 2026 NFL Draft Grade: A- Class Summary & Final Grade: Kansas City’s class is defined by elite premium execution and a clear defensive identity. Mansoor Delane at No. 6 gives the Chiefs the top corner in the class and directly answers the secondary turnover created by the Trent McDuffie trade, while Peter Woods adds a productive interior defender who can help preserve Chris Jones. R Mason Thomas fills the edge need with a high-motor Day 2 value pick, and Jadon Canady adds more secondary depth on Day 3. The offensive additions are modest, with Emmett Johnson providing a useful three-down RB profile and Cyrus Allen partially addressing wide receiver in Round 5. The only major structural miss is linebacker, which was never addressed, and the WR answer does not fully solve the need for a true outside target. Garrett Nussmeier is excellent late value, and the top three picks carry this class into A- territory. Pick-by-Pick Review: 1.6 Mansoor Delane, CB, LSU — A | Direct Need 1.29 Peter Woods, IDL, Clemson — B | Direct Need 2.40 R Mason Thomas, EDGE, Oklahoma — B | Direct Need 4.109 Jadon Canady, CB, Oregon — B+ | Secondary Need 5.161 Emmett Johnson, RB, Nebraska — B+ | Depth / Development 5.176 Cyrus Allen, WR, Cincinnati — C+ | Direct Need 7.249 Garrett Nussmeier, QB, LSU — A | Depth / Development Las Vegas Raiders 2026 NFL Draft Grade: A- Class Summary & Final Grade: Las Vegas built the class around a franchise-defining pick, and the structure largely makes sense from there. Fernando Mendoza at No. 1 is a clean alignment of need, value, and fit, giving the Raiders a legitimate Year 1 starter for Klint Kubiak’s offense. Treydan Stukes adds secondary versatility, while Jermod McCoy at No. 101 is the best value in the class as a Round 1-caliber corner who slid because of knee concerns. Mike Washington Jr. gives the offense explosive RB2 upside, and Trey Zuhn adds interior offensive line flexibility. The main issue is that wide receiver, the most pressing remaining need, was not meaningfully addressed until Malik Benson in Round 6, and Brandon Cleveland only partially answers the nose tackle need. The premium quarterback pick and Day 2 value swings carry this to A-, but the unresolved WR need keeps it out of the A range. Pick-by-Pick Review: 1.1 Fernando Mendoza, QB, Indiana — A | Direct Need 2.38 Treydan Stukes, S, Arizona — B+ | Secondary Need 3.67 Keyron Crawford, EDGE, Auburn — C+ | Secondary Need 3.91 Trey Zuhn III, C, Texas A&M — B- | Secondary Need 4.101 Jermod McCoy, CB, Tennessee — A | Secondary Need 4.122 Mike Washington Jr., RB, Arkansas — A- | Depth / Development 5.150 Dalton Johnson, S, Arizona — B | Depth / Development 5.175 Hezekiah Masses, CB, California — D+ | Depth / Development 6.195 Malik Benson, WR, Oregon — C+ | Direct Need 7.229 Brandon Cleveland, DT, NC State — C+ | Direct Need Los Angeles Chargers 2026 NFL Draft Grade: B+ Class Summary & Final Grade: Los Angeles put together a need-driven, well-structured class with clear roster-building logic. Akheem Mesidor directly fills the edge need and fits the Mike Vrabel identity as a power-based front defender, while Jake Slaughter addresses the offensive line with center/guard flexibility. Brenen Thompson is the best value in the class, giving the Chargers elite vertical speed and a clean fit alongside Ladd McConkey and Quentin Johnston. Travis Burke and Logan Taylor add tackle depth, Nick Barrett reinforces the interior defensive line, and Genesis Smith gives the secondary a developmental post-safety swing. The only real drags are the developmental nature of the DB investment and the Alex Harkey pick, which adds risk without clear surplus value. The class addressed four of five major needs and earns a strong B+. Pick-by-Pick Review: 1.22 Akheem Mesidor, ED, Miami — B+ | Direct Need 2.63 Jake Slaughter, C/G, Florida — B | Direct Need 4.105 Brenen Thompson, WR, Mississippi State — A- | Direct Need 4.117 Travis Burke, OT, Memphis — B | Secondary Need 4.131 Genesis Smith, S, Arizona — C+ | Direct Need 5.145 Nick Barrett, DT, South Carolina — B | Direct Need 6.202 Logan Taylor, OT, Boston College — A | Secondary Need 6.206 Alex Harkey, IOL, Oregon — C | Secondary Need Los Angeles Rams 2026 NFL Draft Grade: C+ Class Summary & Final Grade: Los Angeles had one of the more structurally conflicted classes in this group. Ty Simpson at No. 13 is a logical long-term successor to Matthew Stafford and gives the Rams a polished timing-based passer, but quarterback was not an immediate need for a team coming off an NFC Championship appearance with multiple active roster holes. Max Klare at No. 61 compounds the issue as a luxury tight end pick at a non-critical position, while Keagen Trost reaches to address offensive tackle without providing a clear starter projection. CJ Daniels is the cleanest need/value fit in the class as a Day 3 receiver, and Tim Keenan III gives the Rams reasonable interior depth late. The problem is that OL, LB, DB, WR, and edge were all live needs, and none were meaningfully solved with starter-caliber capital. The long-term vision is understandable, but the short-term roster-building process keeps this in C+ territory. Pick-by-Pick Review: 1.13 Ty Simpson, QB, Alabama — B+ | BPA / Luxury 2.61 Max Klare, TE, Ohio State — C+ | BPA / Luxury 3.93 Keagen Trost, OT, Missouri — C | Secondary Need 6.197 CJ Daniels, WR, Miami — B | Direct Need 7.232 Tim Keenan III, DT, Alabama — B- | Depth / Development Miami Dolphins 2026 NFL Draft Grade: A- Class Summary & Final Grade: Miami entered the draft in full rebuild mode with wide receiver and edge rusher as the two most critical roster gaps, and the Dolphins used a 13-pick class to add volume, athletic upside, and multiple starting-caliber pieces. Kadyn Proctor gives Miami a high-upside tackle with premium size and movement skills, while Chris Johnson is the cleanest first-round pick in the class as a long, athletic corner who fits Jeff Hafley’s press-zone structure. The best value pocket comes in the middle rounds, where Chris Bell gives Miami potential WR1 upside at a discount and Kyle Louis adds sub-package versatility with starter traits. Caleb Douglas, Kevin Coleman Jr., and Lewis Bond help rebuild the receiver room through volume, while Trey Moore and Max Llewellyn add rotational edge depth. The main drag is that edge was never addressed with premium capital, and Jacob Rodriguez creates some linebacker overlap with Jordyn Brooks. Still, the Dolphins stacked useful players, rebuilt the WR room, and found enough value to land in the A- range. Pick-by-Pick Review: 1.12 Kadyn Proctor, OT, Alabama — B+ | Direct Need 1.27 Chris Johnson, CB, San Diego State — A- | Direct Need 2.43 Jacob Rodriguez, LB, Texas Tech — C+ | Secondary Need 3.75 Caleb Douglas, WR, Texas Tech — C+ | Direct Need 3.87 Will Kacmarek, TE, Ohio State — C+ | Depth / Development 3.94 Chris Bell, WR, Louisville — A- | Direct Need 4.130 Trey Moore, EDGE, Texas — B | Direct Need 4.138 Kyle Louis, LB/NB, Pittsburgh — A- | Secondary Need 5.158 Michael Taaffe, S, Texas — B | Secondary Need 5.177 Kevin Coleman Jr., WR, Missouri — C | Direct Need 5.180 Seydou Traore, TE, Mississippi State — B- | Depth / Development 6.200 DJ Campbell, IOL, Texas — B | Secondary Need 7.238 Max Llewellyn, EDGE, Iowa — B | Direct Need Minnesota Vikings 2026 NFL Draft Grade: B+ Class Summary & Final Grade: Minnesota built a defensively coherent class that fits Brian Flores' identity, but the unresolved WR3 need keeps the grade from climbing higher. Caleb Banks gives the Vikings a boom-or-bust interior disruptor with high-end pocket-collapsing upside, while Jake Golday adds rangy second-level versatility and immediate defensive competition. Domonique Orange, Jakobe Thomas, and Charles Demmings all fit the physical, disguise-heavy structure Minnesota wants on defense, and Caleb Tiernan gives the offense a flexible tackle/guard candidate with starter traits. The Day 3 value is strong, led by Demond Claiborne as an explosive change-of-pace back. The process gap is clear: Minnesota never drafted a wide receiver despite WR3 being the primary live need. The defensive identity is clean and the value density is solid, but that untouched offensive need caps the class at B+. Pick-by-Pick Review: 1.18 Caleb Banks, IDL, Florida — B | Direct Need 2.51 Jake Golday, LB, Cincinnati — B+ | Secondary Need 3.82 Domonique Orange, DT, Iowa State — B- | Direct Need 3.97 Caleb Tiernan, OT, Northwestern — B+ | Secondary Need 3.98 Jakobe Thomas, S, Miami (FL) — B | Direct Need 5.159 Max Bredeson, FB, Michigan — B- | Depth / Development 5.163 Charles Demmings, CB, Stephen F. Austin — B- | Secondary Need 6.198 Demond Claiborne, RB, Wake Forest — A | Depth / Development 7.235 Gavin Gerhardt, C, Cincinnati — C+ | Secondary Need New England Patriots 2026 NFL Draft Grade: B+ Class Summary & Final Grade: New England built a Maye-centric class with strong offensive line value and excellent late-round utility, but the failure to draft a wide receiver is the clear structural miss. Caleb Lomu is the anchor of the class, giving the Patriots a long-term blindside tackle candidate and direct protection investment for Drake Maye. Gabe Jacas adds a high-motor edge defender with legitimate Day 2 value, while Eli Raridon gives the offense a developmental tight end with size-speed upside. The Day 3 group is the strength of the class: Dametrious Crownover is outstanding sixth-round tackle value, Jam Miller brings three-down traits at a discount, and Quintavious Hutchins adds pass-rush depth. Karon Prunty, Namdi Obiazor, and Behren Morton are depth plays with limited short-term impact. This is a well-structured class around protection and developmental value, but leaving WR and nose tackle untouched prevents an A-range grade. Pick-by-Pick Review: 1.28 Caleb Lomu, OT, Utah — A- | Direct Need 2.55 Gabe Jacas, ED, Illinois — B+ | Secondary Need 3.95 Eli Raridon, TE, Notre Dame — B | Secondary Need 5.171 Karon Prunty, DB, Wake Forest — C+ | Secondary Need 6.196 Dametrious Crownover, OT, Texas A&M — A | Direct Need 6.212 Namdi Obiazor, LB, TCU — C+ | Depth / Development 7.234 Behren Morton, QB, Texas Tech — C+ | Depth / Development 7.245 Jam Miller, RB, Alabama — B+ | Depth / Development 7.247 Quintavious Hutchins, EDGE, Boston College — B+ | Direct Need New Orleans Saints 2026 NFL Draft Grade: B+ Class Summary & Final Grade: New Orleans added real offensive talent, but the class is more complicated from a roster-building standpoint. Jordyn Tyson is a legitimate first-round receiver with WR2 impact opposite Chris Olave, and Bryce Lance was the best value in the class as a high-upside size-speed target in Round 4. Christen Miller gives the defensive front more interior versatility, while Jeremiah Wright adds functional guard depth and TJ Hall provides late cornerback depth. The issue is allocation: edge and cornerback were the two primary live needs, yet edge was never addressed and corner was not touched until pick 219. The triple-dip at wide receiver gives Tyler Shough more weapons, but it came at the expense of reinforcing the pass rush and secondary with meaningful capital. The talent level keeps this in the B+ range, but the premium-pick process is less clean than the grade suggests. Pick-by-Pick Review: 1.8 Jordyn Tyson, WR, Arizona State — A- | Secondary Need 2.42 Christen Miller, DT, Georgia — B | Secondary Need 3.73 Oscar Delp, TE, Georgia — B- | Depth / Development 4.132 Jeremiah Wright, OG, Auburn — B- | Secondary Need 4.136 Bryce Lance, WR, North Dakota State — A- | Secondary Need 5.172 Lorenzo Styles Jr., S, Ohio State — C+ | Depth / Development 6.190 Barion Brown, WR, LSU — C+ | Secondary Need 7.219 TJ Hall, CB, Iowa — B- | Direct Need New York Giants 2026 NFL Draft Grade: A- Class Summary & Final Grade: New York’s class is driven by elite premium execution and a clear plan to build around Jaxson Dart while reshaping the defense after the Dexter Lawrence trade. Arvell Reese gives the Giants a rare front-seven chess piece with immediate pressure-package value, while Francis Mauigoa directly addresses the offensive line with a physical, starter-caliber profile. Colton Hood is one of the cleanest scheme fits in the class as a press-man corner for an aggressive defensive structure, and Malachi Fields gives Dart a big-bodied red-zone target. The Day 3 group adds functional depth with Bobby Jamison-Travis, J.C. Davis, and Jack Kelly, but defensive line remains the key unresolved issue. Jamison-Travis addresses the Dexter Lawrence void in name only as a rotational gap-plugger, not a true replacement. The premium picks are strong enough to carry this into A- territory, with the lack of meaningful DL investment as the only major drag. Pick-by-Pick Review: 1.5 Arvell Reese, LB/ED, Ohio State — A | Secondary Need 1.10 Francis Mauigoa, OT, Miami — A- | Direct Need 2.37 Colton Hood, CB, Tennessee — A- | Direct Need 3.74 Malachi Fields, WR, Notre Dame — B | Secondary Need 6.186 Bobby Jamison-Travis, DL, Auburn — C+ | Direct Need 6.192 J.C. Davis, OT, Illinois — B | Secondary Need 6.193 Jack Kelly, LB, BYU — B | Secondary Need New York Jets 2026 NFL Draft Grade: A Class Summary & Final Grade: New York delivered one of the most talent-dense classes in the league, powered by three first-round picks and strong value through the middle rounds. David Bailey is the anchor as a Day 1 impact edge defender who transforms the pass rush, while Kenyon Sadiq gives the offense a rare-movement tight end with matchup value in 12 personnel. Omar Cooper Jr. adds a physical YAC-driven target opposite Garrett Wilson, and D’Angelo Ponds directly addresses the cornerback need created by the Sauce Gardner trade. Cade Klubnik is the best value pick in the class, giving the Jets a legitimate developmental quarterback option in Round 4. The only structural issue is offensive line, which was the top remaining need and was not addressed until Anez Cooper in Round 6. Even with that gap, the premium execution, talent density, and value at quarterback push this into the A range. Pick-by-Pick Review: 1.2 David Bailey, ED, Texas Tech — A | Direct Need 1.16 Kenyon Sadiq, TE, Oregon — B+ | Secondary Need 1.30 Omar Cooper Jr., WR, Indiana — A- | Secondary Need 2.50 D’Angelo Ponds, CB, Indiana — B+ | Direct Need 4.103 Darrell Jackson Jr., DT, Florida State — B | Secondary Need 4.110 Cade Klubnik, QB, Clemson — A | Depth / Development 6.188 Anez Cooper, IOL, Miami — B- | Direct Need 7.228 VJ Payne, S, Kansas State — C+ | Depth / Development Philadelphia Eagles 2026 NFL Draft Grade: B+ Class Summary & Final Grade: Philadelphia entered the draft with safety as its clearest remaining need and used a nine-pick class to address it with volume while adding offensive skill talent and OL depth. Makai Lemon at No. 20 gives the Eagles a polished separator and long-term third weapon behind A.J. Brown and DeVonta Smith, while Eli Stowers adds a high-upside seam threat and future tight end succession plan. The safety need was addressed through Jakobe Thomas and Cole Wisniewski rather than a single premium investment, which is defensible for a roster that is largely built. Markel Bell is the class’s biggest question as a rare-size tackle prospect with scheme-fit concerns, but the Day 3 group is useful, with Cole Payton, Micah Morris, Uar Bernard, and Keyshawn James-Newby all fitting developmental roles. The top two picks were secondary-need investments, which keeps this out of the A range, but the class has a clear identity and sound roster-building logic. Pick-by-Pick Review: 1.20 Makai Lemon, WR, USC — A- | Secondary Need 2.54 Eli Stowers, TE, Vanderbilt — B+ | Secondary Need 3.68 Markel Bell, OT, Miami — C | Secondary Need 3.98 Jakobe Thomas, S, Miami — B | Direct Need 5.178 Cole Payton, QB, North Dakota State — B | Depth / Development 6.207 Micah Morris, IOL, Georgia — B- | Secondary Need 7.244 Cole Wisniewski, S, Texas Tech — B- | Direct Need 7.251 Uar Bernard, DL, Nigeria — B | Depth / Development 7.252 Keyshawn James-Newby, EDGE, New Mexico — B- | Secondary Need Pittsburgh Steelers 2026 NFL Draft Grade: B Class Summary & Final Grade: Pittsburgh entered the draft with quarterback and linebacker as its two clear premium needs, but only one was addressed with meaningful investment. Max Iheanachor gives the Steelers a high-upside tackle at a position of urgency, while Drew Allar directly addresses the long-term quarterback void despite valid reach concerns at pick 76. Germie Bernard adds a competitive receiver, but using pick 47 on a position already reinforced through Michael Pittman Jr. created a clear opportunity-cost issue while the linebacker room went untouched at the premium level. Gennings Dunker is a strong third-round interior offensive line value, and the back end of the class adds functional depth without major overreach. The offensive identity is clear: protect the quarterback, add weapons, and develop a long-term passer. The defensive roster-building logic is less complete, and the unresolved linebacker need keeps this class at B. Pick-by-Pick Review: 1.21 Max Iheanachor, OT, Arizona State — B+ | Direct Need 2.47 Germie Bernard, WR, Alabama — B | BPA / Luxury 3.76 Drew Allar, QB, Penn State — C+ | Direct Need 3.85 Daylen Everette, CB, Georgia — B | Secondary Need 3.96 Gennings Dunker, G, Iowa — B+ | Direct Need 4.121 Kaden Wetjen, WR, Iowa — B- | Depth / Development 5.169 Riley Nowakowski, TE, Indiana — C+ | Direct Need 6.210 Gabe Rubio, ED, Notre Dame — C+ | Depth / Development 7.224 Robert Spears-Jennings, S, Oklahoma — B- | Depth / Development 7.230 Eli Heidenreich, RB, Navy — B+ | Depth / Development San Francisco 49ers 2026 NFL Draft Grade: B Class Summary & Final Grade: San Francisco addressed several active needs, but the class is held back by uneven allocation and one major value miss. De’Zhaun Stribling is the best pick in the class, giving Kyle Shanahan’s offense a size-speed vertical piece with legitimate Day 1 utility, even if wide receiver was more luxury than need. Romello Height and Gracen Halton reinforce a defensive front that needed both edge depth and interior disruption, while Ephesians Prysock gives the 49ers Day 2-caliber corner traits at a discounted slot. Carver Willis is a reasonable developmental tackle, but Enrique Cruz is the class’s critical error as a traits-over-tape reach that undermines the value narrative. Kaelon Black also reads as a luxury running back investment at pick 90. San Francisco found useful pieces in the trenches and secondary, but the Cruz reach, Black allocation, and lack of verified safety investment keep this class in the B range. Pick-by-Pick Review: 2.33 De’Zhaun Stribling, WR, Ole Miss — B+ | BPA / Luxury 3.70 Romello Height, EDGE, Texas Tech — B | Direct Need 3.90 Kaelon Black, RB, Indiana — C+ | BPA / Luxury 4.107 Gracen Halton, DT, Oklahoma — B | Direct Need 4.127 Carver Willis, OT, Washington — B- | Direct Need 4.139 Ephesians Prysock, CB, Washington — B+ | Direct Need 5.154 Jaden Dugger, LB, Louisiana — B- | Depth / Development 5.179 Enrique Cruz, OT, Washington — D+ | Direct Need Seattle Seahawks 2026 NFL Draft Grade: B- Class Summary & Final Grade: Seattle’s class has functional pieces, but the failure to address edge rusher defines the grade. Jadarian Price is a clean need-and-value fit at the back end of Round 1, giving Ryan Grubb’s RPO-based offense a balanced runner with receiving upside after Kenneth Walker III’s departure. Bud Clark and Julian Neal reinforce the secondary with starter-caliber traits, while Beau Stephens is one of the cleaner Day 3 need/value picks as interior offensive line depth. Andre Fuller is the best value pick in the class, giving Seattle a legitimate late-round corner with starter-probability traits. The problem is structural: edge was the top unresolved need, and the Seahawks left the draft without a single investment at the position. The class adds depth and secondary help, but the pass-rush miss keeps it at B-. Pick-by-Pick Review: 1.32 Jadarian Price, RB, Notre Dame — B+ | Direct Need 2.64 Bud Clark, S, TCU — B | Direct Need 3.99 Julian Neal, CB, Arkansas — B | Direct Need 5.148 Beau Stephens, OG, Iowa — B+ | Direct Need 6.199 Emmanuel Henderson Jr., WR, Kansas — B- | Depth / Development 7.236 Andre Fuller, CB, Toledo — A- | Depth / Development 7.242 Deven Eastern, DT, Minnesota — D+ | Depth / Development 7.255 Michael Dansby, CB, Arizona — C | Depth / Development Tampa Bay Buccaneers 2026 NFL Draft Grade: A- Class Summary & Final Grade: Tampa Bay delivered one of the cleaner defensive-driven draft processes in the class. Rueben Bain is the anchor, giving Todd Bowles a power-based edge with immediate impact ability and an ideal fit in a pressure-heavy front. Josiah Trotter fills the linebacker need created by Lavonte David’s departure, while Keionte Scott directly addresses the cornerback need as an explosive nickel defender with sub-package impact. DeMonte Capehart is a major Day 3 value with rare length and interior power, and Billy Schrauth adds quality offensive line depth with long-term starter upside. Ted Hurst and Bauer Sharp are developmental offensive pieces, but the class is really about reinforcing Bowles’ defensive identity. Trotter’s coverage ceiling and the lack of a premium offensive weapon keep this just short of A territory, but the process, fit, and value are strong. Pick-by-Pick Review: 1.15 Rueben Bain, ED, Miami — A- | Direct Need 2.46 Josiah Trotter, LB, Missouri — B- | Direct Need 3.84 Ted Hurst, WR, Georgia State — B | Secondary Need 4.116 Keionte Scott, CB/NB, Miami — A- | Direct Need 5.155 DeMonte Capehart, DT, Clemson — A- | Secondary Need 5.160 Billy Schrauth, OG, Notre Dame — B+ | Direct Need 6.185 Bauer Sharp, TE, LSU — B- | Depth / Development Tennessee Titans 2026 NFL Draft Grade: B Class Summary & Final Grade: Tennessee’s class has strong premium talent, but the interior offensive line issue keeps the final grade capped. Carnell Tate gives Brian Daboll’s offense a polished outside receiver with Day 1 starter traits, while Keldric Faulk reinforces the edge room with size, length, and physicality. Anthony Hill Jr. meaningfully upgrades the linebacker room as a rangy, athletic tone-setter for Robert Saleh’s defense. Nick Singleton is one of the best value swings in the class, giving the Titans explosive backfield depth in Round 5. The issue is protection for Cam Ward: Fernando Carmona and Pat Coogan address the offensive line only as developmental depth, not as plug-and-play starters. The top three picks are strong, but the most important structural need on the roster remains underserved, keeping this at B. Pick-by-Pick Review: 1.4 Carnell Tate, WR, Ohio State — B+ | Direct Need 1.31 Keldric Faulk, ED, Auburn — B+ | Direct Need 2.60 Anthony Hill Jr., LB, Texas — B+ | Direct Need 5.142 Fernando Carmona, OG, Arkansas — B- | Direct Need 5.165 Nick Singleton, RB, Penn State — B+ | Direct Need 6.184 Jackie Marshall, DT, Baylor — B- | Secondary Need 6.194 Pat Coogan, C, Indiana — B- | Direct Need 7.225 Jaren Kanak, TE, Oklahoma — C+ | Depth / Development Washington Commanders 2026 NFL Draft Grade: A- Class Summary & Final Grade: Washington built a high-value class around impact talent, offensive support for Jayden Daniels, and smart Day 3 value. Sonny Styles is the headliner as a high-end second-level defender who fits the Adam Peters and Dan Quinn blueprint, even if linebacker was not the top need. Antonio Williams gives Daniels a quick, YAC-oriented slot weapon for the rhythm passing game, while Joshua Josephs is the best value in the class as a Day 3 edge with developmental starter traits. Kaytron Allen adds a physical committee back, and Matt Gulbin partially addresses the center need. The one unresolved issue is cornerback, which remained a primary roster void and was not addressed with premium capital. The value at the top and the Josephs steal push this to A-, but the cornerback miss keeps it from the A range. Pick-by-Pick Review: 1.7 Sonny Styles, LB, Ohio State — A- | BPA / Luxury 3.71 Antonio Williams, WR, Clemson — B+ | Secondary Need 5.147 Joshua Josephs, EDGE, Tennessee — A- | Direct Need 6.187 Kaytron Allen, RB, Penn State — B+ | Direct Need 6.209 Matt Gulbin, C, Michigan State — B- | Direct Need 7.223 Athan Kaliakmanis, QB, Rutgers — C+ | Depth / Development

NFL DRAFT HUB Track predictive mock drafts, big board rankings, and team needs analysis in one interactive NFL Draft Hub built on film, data, and scheme fit. Launch Draft Hub < Back Kamari Ramsey USC HT: 6000 WT: 204 YR: RSO POS: S OVR RK 91 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL Mid-Level Starter Potential PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT Ramsey is a high-IQ, read-and-react safety with high-end starter potential in modern, disguise-heavy defenses. He excels as a split-field safety, robber, or nickel defender, where his elite zone eyes, processing speed, and route recognition allow him to stay in phase and attack the football. While his vertical recovery speed and tackle consistency limit his ceiling as a full-time post safety or pure man defender, his versatility, competitiveness, and anticipation make him a valuable defensive chess piece. CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS Mid-Level Starter Potential (60-64) A solid, dependable starter with the potential to exceed expectations. They have good athleticism and tools but may lack elite traits. While they show flashes of high-level play, they also have some notable weaknesses that must be developed. These players often need 2-3 years to establish themselves. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS Instinctive and Disciplined Physical Tackler Versatility KEY WEAKNESSES Ball Production Range Limitation Recovery Quickness PLAYER COMPARISON Bryan Cook Xavier McKinney

Joe Alt showcases exceptional balance, flexibility, and strength, which allow him to stymie rushers effectively. His instinctive blocking and quick reaction speed contribute to his high performance in both run and pass blocking. Despite needing some improvement in maintaining strength after contact and sealing defenders, his overall skill set makes him a highly regarded prospect for the NFL Draft. His draft projection is very high, considered a top-five prospect and the top offensive tackle in the 2024 NFL Draft class by many scouts. He is expected to make an immediate impact in the NFL and has the potential to develop into a franchise left tackle​​​​. NFL DRAFT HUB Track predictive mock drafts, big board rankings, and team needs analysis in one interactive NFL Draft Hub built on film, data, and scheme fit. Launch Draft Hub < Back Joe Alt Notre Dame HT: 6070 WT: 318 YR: JR POS: OT OVR RK 7 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 1 Near Elite PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT Joe Alt showcases a rare blend of size, length, and athleticism that makes him a formidable force in both pass protection and run blocking. His ability to maintain excellent recovery balance and keep his equilibrium throughout plays demonstrates his high level of adaptability and technical refinement. This combination of skills makes him an ideal candidate for any team seeking a franchise left tackle, especially those that utilize zone-based schemes where his mobility and skill in engaging defenders at the second level can be fully utilized. CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS Near Elite (70-74) A high-caliber prospect who is expected to become a significant contributor by Year 2. These players have outstanding physical tools and strong football IQ, with only minor flaws in their game. They demonstrate consistency at a high level and project as future Pro Bowl-caliber players if properly developed. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS Athleticism Size Lateral Agility KEY WEAKNESSES Balance Issues Late Hands Leverage PLAYER COMPARISON Taylor Decker Riley Reiff Kolton Miller

Suamataia has the potential to develop into a high-level starter in the NFL, particularly if he can refine his technique and physical conditioning. He has the foundational skills and physical attributes to make an immediate impact and grow into a key piece on an NFL offensive line. NFL DRAFT HUB Track predictive mock drafts, big board rankings, and team needs analysis in one interactive NFL Draft Hub built on film, data, and scheme fit. Launch Draft Hub < Back Kingsley Suamataia BYU HT: 6060 WT: 325 YR: RSO POS: OT OVR RK 60 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 9 Mid-Level Starter Potential PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT Kingsley Suamataia is a towering presence on the line with significant reach and a strong base, making him a formidable blocker. He demonstrates above-average agility and footwork, essential for handling fast edge rushers. Suamataia excels in both run blocking and pass protection, showing a good balance in his game. His hand placement and finishing skills stand out, allowing him to maintain control against various defensive schemes. Suamataia is versatile and can fit well in both zone and power run schemes, thanks to his ability to move to the second level and his strong anchoring in pass protection. CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS Mid-Level Starter Potential (60-64) A solid, dependable starter with the potential to exceed expectations. They have good athleticism and tools but may lack elite traits. While they show flashes of high-level play, they also have some notable weaknesses that must be developed. These players often need 2-3 years to establish themselves. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS Size & Reach Hand Placement Versatile KEY WEAKNESSES Bend Lower Strength Consistency vs. Elite PLAYER COMPARISON