Search Results

The 2026 NFL Draft is here, and Football Scout 365 is tracking every pick live with instant analysis and letter grades. This live tracker will be updated throughout all three days of the draft, from Round 1 in Pittsburgh through the final selections on Day 3. For every pick, readers will get a quick breakdown of team fit, roster value, and overall draft grade based on need, player value, and scheme alignment. 2026 NFL Draft Hub Track the NFL Draft with predictive mock draft projections, big board rankings, and team needs analysis for all 32 NFL teams, powered by Football Scout 365. Click Here to Go To the NFL Draft Hub Day 1, Round 1 of the 2026 NFL Draft 1. Las Vegas Raiders: Fernando Mendoza, QB, Indiana Grade: A This is a clean alignment of need, value, and fit. The Raiders needed a quarterback, and Mendoza is the top passer in this class with the accuracy, poise, and processing to step into Klint Kubiak’s structure-based offense early. He gives Las Vegas a legitimate Year 1 starter option and the kind of franchise signal-caller worth building around. The remaining priority is clear: keep investing in the offensive line to protect the pick. 2). New York Jets: David Bailey, EDGE, Texas Tech Grade: A This is a clean need-value alignment for the Jets. Edge rusher was one of the most immediate priorities on the roster, and Bailey steps in as a Day 1 impact defender with proven production and elite athletic validation. His profile fits Aaron Glenn’s scheme perfectly, where winning 1-on-1 as a pass rusher is critical in a man-heavy structure. Bailey offers a high floor as a three-down edge with the ability to generate pressure, set the edge, and handle a full workload. The remaining question is long-term at quarterback, but this is a disciplined, high-value selection that strengthens the foundation of the defense. 3). Arizona Cardinals: Jeremiyah Love, RB, Notre Dame Grade: B This is a classic best player available selection with some roster-building tension. Love is one of the top overall talents in the class, offering elite speed, three-down versatility, and explosive playmaking that can elevate any offense immediately. However, Arizona’s roster construction makes this a luxury pick. Quarterback, offensive line, and edge remain higher-priority needs, and those positions carry significantly more value at No. 3 overall. Love gives the offense a dynamic centerpiece and a reliable outlet for whoever lines up at quarterback, but the long-term success of this pick will depend on how quickly Arizona addresses its more critical roster holes. 4). Tennessee Titans: Carnell Tate, WR, Ohio State Grade: B+ This is a strong offensive fit, but the value is more debatable at No. 4. Tate gives Tennessee a polished outside receiver for Cam Ward entering Year 2, and his route-running, timing, and separation skills fit Brian Daboll’s spread-based passing structure. He profiles as a true perimeter target, which matters because Wan’Dale Robinson gives the Titans slot flexibility but does not solve the WR1 need. The concern is board value. Tate is a clean first-round prospect and strong scheme fit, but taking him this early over higher-graded defensive talent or premium-position options keeps this from the A range. 5). New York Giants: Arvell Reese, EDGE/LB, Alabama Grade: A This is a best-player-available swing more than a clean need pick. Reese gives the Giants a rare front-seven chess piece with 4.46 speed at 241 pounds, plus the versatility to rush off the edge, play off-ball, and create pressure from multiple alignments. The fit works from a talent and schematic standpoint because Dennard Wilson can use him creatively in an aggressive pressure front. The only issue is roster overlap. With Brian Burns, Abdul Carter, and Kayvon Thibodeaux already in place, this does not address the Giants’ more pressing needs at interior defensive line, cornerback, or interior offensive line. A high-end talent pick, but not the cleanest roster fit. 6). Kansas City Chiefs (via CLE): Mansoor Delane, CB, LSU Grade: A This is a clean need, value, and scheme fit for Kansas City. Delane is the top corner in the class and gives Steve Spagnuolo a press-man defender who can step in immediately after the Chiefs’ secondary turnover at cornerback. His fluidity, mirror ability, ball skills, and run support profile match exactly what Kansas City asks from its outside corners. With Trent McDuffie, Jaylen Watson, and Joshua Williams no longer in the room, this is not just a value pick. It is a direct answer to one of the roster’s biggest needs with a top-10-caliber prospect. 7). Washington Commanders: Sonny Styles, LB, Ohio State Grade: A- This is more of a best-player-available selection than a pure needs-based pick, but the defensive fit is strong. Styles gives Washington a high-end second-level playmaker with rare athleticism, coverage range, blitz value, and the versatility to function as a foundational piece in Dan Quinn’s defense. Linebacker was not the loudest need compared to wide receiver, edge, or offensive line, but Washington’s defense needed impact talent after finishing near the bottom of the league in 2025. The Adam Peters 49ers connection also matters here, because Styles’ Fred Warner-type profile gives this front office a familiar blueprint to build around. Strong value, strong fit, slightly less clean from a need standpoint. 8). New Orleans Saints: Jordyn Tyson, WR, Arizona State Grade: A- This is a strong need and value match for New Orleans. Tyson gives the Saints a legitimate WR2 opposite Chris Olave with the route polish, alignment flexibility, and three-level separation ability to help stabilize the passing game around Tyler Shough. The roster need is clear after the Rashid Shaheed trade. The only factor keeping this just below a full A is the medical history. If New Orleans is comfortable with the durability outlook, this is a high-upside offensive addition with immediate starter traits. 9). Cleveland Browns (via KC): Spencer Fano, OT, Utah Grade: A This is a clean foundational pick for Cleveland. Fano addresses one of the Browns’ biggest roster problems after a 2025 season defined by offensive line instability and pressure issues. His athletic profile, movement skills, and positional flexibility fit Todd Monken’s offense, whether he stays at tackle or eventually kicks inside. The arm-length concern is the only real caveat, but the starter probability, scheme fit, and premium-position value make this a strong need-value alignment for a rebuilding roster. 10). New York Giants (via CIN): Francis Mauigoa, OT, Miami Grade: A- This is a strong need-based selection with long-term upside. Mauigoa gives the Giants immediate help along the interior offensive line, where the roster still needs reinforcement despite having stability at tackle. His power, anchor, and run-blocking profile fit the physical identity New York is building, and he offers positional flexibility with the ability to start inside early and potentially move back outside. While this may not carry the “gold jacket” ceiling referenced by the front office at No. 5, the value at No. 10 aligns much better, making this a high-floor, starting-caliber addition that directly supports the offense. 11). Dallas Cowboys (via MIA): Caleb Downs, S, Ohio State Grade: A+ This is a premium talent, clean need, and elite scheme fit all aligning for Dallas. Downs gives the Cowboys the interchangeable safety centerpiece Christian Parker needs in a Fangio-tree defense, with the range, processing, tackling, and coverage versatility to impact every level of the secondary. Dallas needed a foundational defensive piece after a 2025 season where the unit struggled badly, and Downs carries both a high floor and legitimate Pro Bowl upside. Trading up one spot to secure a top-10 caliber player at No. 11 is strong board management, making this one of the best picks of the round. 12). Miami Dolphins (via DAL): Kadyn Proctor, OT, Alabama Grade: B+ This is a philosophy-driven pick that leans toward long-term roster building over immediate need. Proctor brings elite size, movement skills, and upside at a premium position, aligning with Miami’s shift toward building from the inside out. He offers immediate starter potential with flexibility to play tackle or guard, which has value for a roster in transition. The concern is value relative to the board and positional urgency. Wide receiver and edge rusher were more pressing needs after significant offseason losses, and Proctor projects slightly below this range. Still, the upside and positional value make this a defensible investment. 13). Los Angeles Rams (via ATL): Ty Simpson, QB, Alabama Grade: B+ This is a forward-looking pick that prioritizes long-term stability at quarterback over immediate roster needs. Simpson fits cleanly into Sean McVay’s offense as a timing-based, play-action passer with strong processing and technical polish, making him a logical successor to Matthew Stafford. The value is where the grade settles. Simpson is more commonly viewed as a late first to early second-round talent, so taking him at No. 13 is a slight reach. The Rams also have more urgent win-now needs at wide receiver and offensive tackle. Still, the developmental runway behind Stafford and the schematic alignment make this a defensible investment. 14). Baltimore Ravens: Olaivavega Ioane, IOL, Penn State Grade: A- This is a clean need, value, and scheme-fit selection for Baltimore. Ioane gives the Ravens an immediate starter at right guard after losing Daniel Faalele, and his zone-blocking profile fits Declan Doyle’s run-heavy, play-action structure. His ability to move laterally, climb to the second level, and execute combination blocks makes him a strong match for a Lamar Jackson offense that needs movement skills up front. The value is also strong with Ioane carrying top-15 caliber grades. The only reason this is not a full A is the lingering center need after losing Tyler Linderbaum, but as a Day 1 interior starter, this is a strong Ravens-style pick. 15). Tampa Bay Buccaneers: Rueben Bain Jr., EDGE, Miami Grade: A- This is a strong need and value match for Tampa Bay. Bain gives Todd Bowles the power-based edge presence this defense lacked in 2025, especially after the pass rush struggled to generate pressure without heavy blitz volume. His leverage, hand usage, run strength, and elite production profile fit exactly what the Buccaneers need from an every-down edge defender. The value is excellent at No. 15 with Bain carrying top-10 talent on several boards. The only reasons this stops short of a clean A are the arm-length concerns and off-field background that teams had to evaluate, but the player fit and defensive need are clear. 16). New York Jets: Kenyon Sadiq, TE, Oregon Grade: B+ This is a premium talent selection, but the roster logic and positional value are difficult to fully justify. Sadiq is the top tight end in the class with rare movement ability, explosive seam-stretching traits, and legitimate mismatch value for the Jets’ passing game. He gives New York another high-end receiving option alongside Garrett Wilson and Mason Taylor, but tight end was not a top need compared to quarterback, edge, cornerback, or wide receiver. The player is worthy of Round 1, but the opportunity cost keeps the grade down, especially with more urgent needs still unresolved. 17). Detroit Lions: Blake Miller, OT, Clemson Grade: A- This is a clean, need-based pick for Detroit with immediate impact. The Lions entered the draft needing offensive line help after multiple departures, and Miller provides a plug-and-play solution at right tackle with extensive starting experience and strong technical fundamentals. His ability to anchor in pass protection and generate movement in the run game fits well within a multiple scheme that blends gap and zone concepts. While he may not carry elite long-term upside compared to some higher-ceiling options, the floor is high, and the fit is clear for a team looking to stabilize the line right away. 18). Minnesota Vikings: Caleb Banks, DT, Florida Grade: B This is a high-upside, need-driven selection with some medical risk attached. Banks gives Minnesota a true interior disruptor, which was the team’s top priority after offseason losses along the defensive line. His size, length, and ability to collapse the pocket fit cleanly in Brian Flores’ attacking front, where interior pressure is critical to the scheme. The concern is durability. Multiple foot injuries and a limited 2025 sample introduce risk at this range, and the value is slightly above his consensus board projection. If healthy, this is a potential difference-maker on the interior. 19). Carolina Panthers: Monroe Freeling, OT, Georgia Grade: B+ This is a strong roster-building pick centered on protecting Bryce Young. Offensive line was Carolina’s top need, and Freeling gives the Panthers a first-round tackle with size, movement skills, and developmental upside. He fits as either a long-term tackle option or immediate insurance while Ikem Ekwonu works back from injury, which gives Carolina needed flexibility up front. The only reason this stays out of the A range is that wide receiver and tight end were also legitimate needs, and the Panthers still need more difference-making talent around Young. 20). Philadelphia Eagles (via DAL): Makai Lemon, WR USC Grade: A- This is more of a best-player-available pick than a pure need selection, but the value is strong. Lemon gives Philadelphia a polished, productive receiver with inside-outside flexibility, toughness after the catch, and Day 1 readiness as a separator. Wide receiver is not the Eagles’ top need compared to edge, offensive line, or safety, but the A.J. Brown uncertainty and long-term depth behind DeVonta Smith make this a logical investment. If Lemon falls into this range, Philadelphia is getting a top-half-of-Round-1 caliber talent at a discount. 21). Pittsburgh Steelers: Max Iheanachor, OT, Arizona State Grade: B+ This is an upside-based offensive line investment with some short-term risk. Iheanachor gives Pittsburgh rare size, length, and athletic traits at tackle, which matters with Broderick Jones recovering from injury and Isaac Seumalo gone in free agency. The concern is readiness. His profile leans more developmental than plug-and-play, and the Steelers needed a more immediate stabilizer up front. The tools justify the pick in this range, but the lower production profile and longer runway keep it in the B range. 22). Los Angeles Chargers: Akheem Mesidor, EDGE, Miami Grade: B+ This is a strong need-value fit for the Chargers. Mesidor gives Los Angeles a productive, power-based edge rusher who can set the edge, win with effort and hand usage, and provide a long-term complement to Tuli Tuipulotu. The value lines up cleanly in this range, and the need is clear with Khalil Mack aging and Odafe Oweh gone. The only factors keeping this out of the A range are age and durability, especially with the prior foot injuries. Still, if the medicals check out, this is a high-floor pass-rush addition for a defense that needed another edge presence. 23). Dallas Cowboys (via PHI): Malachi Lawrence, EDGE, UCF Grade: A- This is a strong need and upside alignment for Dallas. Lawrence gives the Cowboys an explosive edge rusher with elite athletic traits, which is exactly what this defense needs after struggling to generate consistent pressure. His burst, length, and pass-rush tools fit well in an aggressive front, and pairing him with Rashan Gary adds much-needed depth and long-term stability on the edge. The value matches the range, but the grade stops short of a full A due to his developmental profile and inconsistency against the run. Still, this is a high-ceiling addition for a defense in need of impact talent. 24). Cleveland Browns (via JAX): KC Concepcion, WR, Texas A&M Grade: A- This is a strong need-based addition that completes Cleveland’s Round 1 approach. After addressing the offensive line earlier, the Browns now add a dynamic receiver to a unit that lacked a true go-to option. Concepcion brings separation ability, toughness over the middle, and versatility to line up inside or outside, making him an immediate contributor in a reworked offense. His profile fits well in a timing-based passing system and gives the Browns a reliable target for whoever lines up at quarterback. The value aligns in this range, and the only reason this is not a full A is the absence of elite size or top-tier athletic traits compared to other receivers in the class. 25). Chicago Bears: Dillon Thieneman, S, Oregon Grade: A This is one of the cleaner need-value fits in the back half of Round 1. Chicago had a major safety void after losing Kevin Byard and Jaquan Brisker, and Thieneman gives Dennis Allen a rangy, athletic defensive back with the speed to play single-high, rotate into two-high looks, and handle coverage responsibility in a man-heavy structure. His top-20 board value and elite athletic profile make the pick strong at No. 25. The Bears needed a long-term stabilizer in the secondary, and Thieneman fits both the roster need and defensive structure. 26). Houston Texans (via BUF): Keylan Rutledge, IOL, Georgia Tech Grade: B This is a strong need fit, but the value is a little rich in Round 1. Rutledge gives Houston a plug-and-play guard with size, toughness, movement skills, and the power profile to help stabilize the interior offensive line in front of C.J. Stroud. His athleticism and pull-game ability fit a Texans offense that needs cleaner pockets and more consistency in the run game. The concern is draft slot. Rutledge profiles more like a Day 2 value than a clear first-rounder, so this is a need-driven pick with immediate starter upside but some opportunity-cost risk. 27). Miami Dolphins (via SF): Chris Johnson, CB, San Diego State Grade: A- This is a strong scheme and need alignment for Miami. Johnson gives Jeff Hafley a long, athletic outside corner with the size, speed, and versatility to function in a press-zone, single-high structure. His ability to transition between man and zone concepts, combined with physical run support, fits exactly what this defense is being rebuilt around. Cornerback was a clear need after offseason losses, and Johnson projects as an immediate contributor with upside to develop into a long-term starter. The value is solid in this range, making this a clean defensive fit with minimal projection risk. 28). New England Patriots (via BUF/HOU): Caleb Lomu, OT, Utah Grade: A- This is a smart need-value fit for New England. Lomu gives the Patriots a long, athletic tackle with the pass-protection awareness and technical profile to support Drake Maye in Josh McDaniels’ pro-style passing game. His ability to eventually pair with Will Campbell gives New England flexibility at both tackle spots once Morgan Moses is no longer part of the long-term plan. He still needs added play strength and refinement in the run game, but the starter upside, premium-position value, and roster fit make this a strong forward-looking pick. 29). Kansas City Chiefs (via LAR): Peter Woods, IDL, Clemson Grade: B This is a solid need fit, but the value is a little aggressive in Round 1. Woods gives Kansas City a productive interior defender who can rotate early, push the pocket, and help preserve Chris Jones while developing into a larger role. The need is real with limited proven depth behind Jones, and Woods’ production profile fits what the Chiefs need inside. The issue is draft slot. He profiles closer to an early Day 2 value than a clear first-rounder, so this is a useful roster pick, but not the strongest board-value selection at No. 29. 30). New York Jets (via SF/DEN): Omar Cooper Jr., WR, Indiana Grade: A- This is a strong need and scheme fit for New York. Cooper gives the Jets a physical, YAC-driven receiver who can win through contact, separate in the short-to-intermediate game, and work both inside and outside in Frank Reich’s timing-based passing structure. With Garrett Wilson coming off injury and no proven WR2 on the roster, Cooper immediately fills one of the offense’s biggest holes while giving Geno Smith a reliable second target. The value is also strong in this range, especially with Cooper carrying top-20 board value. The only reason this is not a full A is that quarterback and edge remain bigger long-term roster questions. 31). Tennessee Titans (via BUF/NE): Keldric Faulk, EDGE, Auburn Grade: B+ This is a traits-based edge selection that aligns with Tennessee’s long-term defensive build. Faulk brings size, length, and versatility across the front, giving the Titans a physical edge presence who can set the edge and develop as a pass rusher. While he may not be the ideal explosive Wide-9 profile Robert Saleh typically prioritizes, the value at this stage of the round is strong for a player with first-round traits and upside. The pick is more developmental than immediate impact, but it adds a high-ceiling piece to a position of need. 32). Seattle Seahawks: Jadarian Price, RB, Notre Dame Grade: B+ This is a clean need and scheme fit for Seattle. Price gives the Seahawks a patient, balanced runner with the vision, contact balance, receiving upside, and pass-protection ability to fit Ryan Grubb’s spread/RPO-based offense. Running back was a real need with Kenneth Walker III gone and Zach Charbonnet recovering from injury, and Price offers immediate rotational value with feature-back upside. The value is reasonable at No. 32, especially with the fifth-year option attached. The only reasons this is not a full A are the fumble concerns and the possibility Seattle could have traded back and still landed him. Day 2, Round 2 of the 2026 NFL Draft 33). San Francisco 49ers (via NYJ): De’Zhaun Stribling, WR, Ole Miss Grade: B+ This is a traits-based value pick that aligns with San Francisco’s roster transition at wide receiver. Stribling brings size and vertical speed, giving Kyle Shanahan a different dimension in the passing game as a boundary target who can stretch defenses off play-action. The need is real after multiple departures at the position, and the 49ers added draft capital while still landing a high-upside prospect in this range. The concern is polish. His production profile and route consistency lag behind his athletic traits, making this more of a projection than a plug-and-play contributor. Still, in this system, the upside is worth the investment. 34). Arizona Cardinals: Chase Bisontis, IOL, Texas A&M Grade: B+ This is a strong need and scheme fit for Arizona early on Day 2. Bisontis gives the Cardinals a high-floor interior offensive lineman with the size, movement skills, and athletic profile to fit Mike LaFleur’s duo and power-based run game. He also aligns with Monti Ossenfort’s preference for building through the trenches, and Arizona had a real opening at right guard after losing Will Hernandez. The only reason this is not in the A range is positional priority, with edge and defensive line still sitting as bigger roster needs. Still, at No. 34, this is a clean value pick with Day 1 starter potential. 35). Buffalo Bills (via TEN): T.J. Parker, EDGE, Clemson Grade: B+ This is a strong Day 2 value pick that fits Buffalo’s defensive transition. Parker gives the Bills a power-based edge defender with the versatility to rush from a stand-up alignment, kick inside on passing downs, and fit Jim Leonhard’s new 3-4 structure. The need is clear after losing edge depth, and landing a player with late first-round traits at No. 35 is good board value. The only concern is consistency after his sack production dipped in 2025, but the scheme fit and rotational upside make this a smart need-based selection. 36). Houston Texans: Kayden McDonald, DT, Ohio State Grade: B McDonald fills a real need on Houston’s interior defensive line after offseason turnover, bringing size, strength, and run-stopping reliability to the front. He projects best as a 1-technique who can anchor early downs and control gaps, which adds needed depth to the rotation. The concern is fit within DeMeco Ryans’ system, which prioritizes interior pass-rush disruption from the 3-technique spot. McDonald’s limited pass-rush upside and modest athletic profile cap his impact on third downs, making this more of a floor play than a difference-making addition. 37). New York Giants: Colton Hood, CB, Tennessee Grade: A- Hood gives the Giants a clean scheme and need fit in the secondary. His press-man ability, physicality at the line, and fluidity in transition align well with Dennard Wilson’s aggressive coverage system, where corners are asked to disrupt timing and hold up in isolation. With cornerback a clear roster need, Hood projects as an immediate contributor with starting upside. The value also holds in this range, as he carries late first-round grades across multiple boards. The only slight concern is experience, but the traits, production, and fit make this a strong addition to a defense already trending upward. 38). Las Vegas Raiders (via HOU/WSH): Treydan Stukes, S, Arizona Grade: B+ Stukes gives Las Vegas a versatile defensive back with the range, speed, and coverage flexibility to fit its new defensive structure. His ability to align at safety, slot, or even outside corner gives Rob Leonard and Joe Woods a movable secondary piece with immediate sub-package value. The 4.33 speed and strong ball production add legitimate playmaking upside, while the veteran additions around him should allow the Raiders to develop him in a defined safety role. The only concern is ceiling, with his production profile not quite matching the athletic traits, but this is a smart Day 2 fit that addresses the secondary with a starting-caliber player. 39). Cleveland Browns: Denzel Boston, WR, Washington Grade: A- Boston gives Cleveland a true boundary receiver with size, catch radius, and contested-catch ability — a direct complement to KC Concepcion’s skill set. After adding a separator in Round 1, the Browns now add a physical outside target who can win in tight coverage and provide a red-zone presence. The value is strong at this point in the draft, with Boston carrying late first-round grades on several boards. The only reason this is not a full A is timeline, as he projects closer to a Year 2 impact player rather than an immediate high-volume contributor. 40). Kansas City Chiefs: R Mason Thomas, EDGE, Oklahoma Grade: B Thomas gives Kansas City a high-motor edge defender with instincts, physicality, and enough pass-rush variety to contribute early in the rotation. The need is real after the Chiefs added cornerback in Round 1 and still needed more help opposite George Karlaftis. His effort, toughness, and ability to win with multiple rush moves fit Kansas City’s defensive mentality, even if he is not the classic Steve Spagnuolo size profile on the edge. The value is solid in Round 2, but the modest athletic profile and lack of ideal length keep this closer to a good pick than a home run. 41). Cincinnati Bengals: Cashius Howell, EDGE, Texas A&M Grade: B+ Howell gives Cincinnati another explosive pass-rush option for Al Golden’s man-heavy, pressure-driven defense. His twitch, effort, and ability to win with speed, power, or counters make him a useful rotational rusher early with starter upside if the frame concerns hold up. The Bengals already added Boye Mafe, but edge depth remained a real need, and Howell’s value at No. 41 is strong relative to his top-30 board range. The short arms and modest starter probability keep the grade out of the A range, but this is a smart Day 2 value pick at a premium position. 42). New Orleans Saints: Christen Miller, DT, Georgia Grade: B Miller gives New Orleans needed interior defensive line depth with the size, quickness, and positional versatility to fit Brandon Staley’s 3-4 front. He can align across the defensive line and offers enough first-step quickness to develop into a disruptive rotational piece next to Bryan Bresee. The value is fair in this range, but the impact may not be immediate. Cornerback and edge were more urgent needs, and Miller still needs technical development before becoming a reliable starter. 43). Miami Dolphins: Jacob Rodriguez, LB, Texas Tech Grade: C+ Rodriguez is a productive, instinctive linebacker with strong short-area athleticism and playmaking traits, but the fit in Miami is not clean. The Dolphins are building around Jordyn Brooks at linebacker, making this more of a depth or rotational addition than a true need-based pick. Hafley’s defensive structure prioritizes edge pressure and secondary play, areas that still carry more urgency. The value is reasonable in Round 2, but the positional overlap and roster priorities limit the overall impact of the selection. 44). Detroit Lions (via NYJ/DAL): Derrick Moore, EDGE, Michigan Grade: B+ Moore gives Detroit a productive Power 5 edge defender with the frame and toughness to work into the rotation opposite Aidan Hutchinson. His production profile is solid, and Brad Holmes has shown a willingness to trust tape, physicality, and football character over pure testing numbers. The concern is immediate impact. Detroit needed a more explosive edge presence after losing pass-rush production, and Moore’s modest athletic profile and lower starter probability make him more developmental than plug-and-play. The fit is reasonable, but the upside and urgency do not fully align with where the Lions are as a contender. 45). Baltimore Ravens: Zion Young, EDGE, Missouri Grade: B Young gives Baltimore a pro-ready rotational edge with size, power, and enough inside-outside versatility to fit Jesse Minter’s defensive front. His run defense, heavy hands, and sub-package value make him useful behind Trey Hendrickson while addressing a real pass-rush depth need. The concern is ceiling. Young’s athletic profile is modest, and he projects more as a steady rotational defender than a long-term impact starter. Solid Day 2 fit, but not a high-upside swing. 46). Tampa Bay Buccaneers: Josiah Trotter, LB, Missouri Grade: B- Trotter gives Tampa Bay an instinctive downhill linebacker with NFL bloodlines and the gap-shooting ability to fit Todd Bowles’ pressure-heavy defense. With Lavonte David retired and Alex Anzalone more of a short-term answer, linebacker depth was a real need. The concern is overall impact. Trotter’s athletic profile and starter projection are modest, and Tampa Bay still had bigger needs at edge and corner. He is a sensible developmental fit, but not a major needle-mover for the defense. 47). Pittsburgh Steelers (via IND): Germie Bernard, WR, Alabama Grade: B+ Bernard gives Pittsburgh a reliable slot-capable receiver who fits Mike McCarthy’s shift toward an 11-personnel, pass-first structure. He complements DK Metcalf and Michael Pittman Jr. as the underneath separator and chain-moving target, with the toughness and blocking value to stay on the field in multiple situations. The value is solid in this range, and wide receiver was a legitimate need for the new offensive identity. The only concern is positional priority, with interior offensive line, safety, and tackle also carrying major weight for the roster. 48). Atlanta Falcons: Avieon Terrell, CB, Clemson Grade: B+ Terrell fills a clear secondary need for Atlanta as a competitive nickel option with inside-outside flexibility and strong ball production. His instincts, toughness, and forced-fumble production give the Falcons a playmaking defensive back who can contribute early in sub-packages. The fit is also clean with A.J. Terrell already established on the outside, giving Atlanta a natural coverage pairing. The athletic profile and size are the main concerns, but the value and need both line up well at No. 49). Carolina Panthers (via MIN): Lee Hunter, DT, Texas Tech Grade: B+ Hunter gives Carolina a powerful interior run defender who can play next to Derrick Brown and help stabilize the front. His production profile, mass, leverage, and gap control make him a strong fit for a defense that needed more interior toughness after struggling to generate consistent pressure. The pass-rush ceiling is more limited, and the athletic profile is not high-end, but his floor as an early-down disruptor is strong. For a Panthers defense adding pieces around Brown, Jaelan Phillips, and Devin Lloyd, this is a sensible Day 2 trench investment. 50). New York Jets (via DET): D’Angelo Ponds, CB, Indiana Grade: B+ Ponds gives the Jets a highly productive, instinctive nickel defender with elite short-area explosiveness and ball skills. His fit in Aaron Glenn’s defense is clean, especially with the need for playmaking in the secondary after a turnover-deficient 2025 season. He projects as a slot corner who can trigger quickly, disrupt underneath routes, and generate takeaways. The value is strong in this range given his production profile. The only limitation is size, which caps his outside versatility and long-term ceiling, but as a sub-package weapon, this is a strong Day 2 addition. 51). Minnesota Vikings (via CAR): Jake Golday, LB, Cincinnati Grade: C+ Golday brings size, production, and testing numbers that make him a legitimate Day 2 linebacker prospect, but the fit in Brian Flores’ defense is not seamless. Minnesota asks its linebackers to process quickly, disguise coverage, and hold up in space, and Golday is still developing in those areas. His tackling production and athletic profile give him a path to becoming a contributor, but the scheme asks for more coverage versatility than he has consistently shown. The talent is solid, but the role projection keeps this grade in the C+ range. 52). Green Bay Packers: Brandon Cisse, CB, South Carolina Grade: B Cisse gives Green Bay a fast, fluid outside corner with the vision and closing speed to fit Jonathan Gannon’s zone-heavy coverage structure. His ability to play with eyes on the quarterback translates well in Cover 2 and match-zone concepts, and cornerback was a real need for a defense needing more depth. The value is solid in this range, with Cisse carrying Day 2 grades across major boards. The concern is physicality, both in press coverage and run support, which keeps this as a solid pick rather than a high-end one. 53). Indianapolis Colts (via PIT): CJ Allen, LB, Georgia Grade: A- Allen gives Indianapolis a Day 1 starter at one of its clearest roster holes. His instincts, tackling consistency, zone awareness, and communication skills fit Lou Anarumo’s multiple 4-3 defense, where linebackers have to process quickly and handle changing coverage looks. After losing Zaire Franklin and Germaine Pratt, the Colts needed a plug-and-play second-level defender, and Allen brings that profile. The only limitation is some tightness in man coverage, but the need, value, and leadership fit make this one of the cleaner Day 2 picks. 54). Philadelphia Eagles: Eli Stowers, TE, Vanderbilt Grade: B+ Stowers gives Philadelphia a high-upside tight end with the athletic profile to threaten the seam and create mismatches off play-action. His movement skills fit Sean Mannion’s Shanahan/McVay-influenced structure, where tight ends need to block enough to stay attached while adding value in the intermediate passing game. With Dallas Goedert on a short-term deal, this is a smart future-facing pick. The only concern is whether Stowers has enough functional strength to become a complete inline player, but the value and long-term fit are strong. 55). New England Patriots (via LAC): Gabe Jacas, EDGE, Illinois Grade: B+ Jacas gives New England a high-upside edge rusher who fits Mike Vrabel’s multiple-front defensive structure. His size, heavy hands, and first-step burst give the Patriots a power-based complement to Harold Landry, while his motor and leadership fit the defensive identity Vrabel is building. Edge was a critical need, and the value is strong in this range for a Day 2 prospect with double-digit sack upside. The only concern is timeline, as Jacas profiles more as a rotational rusher early than a plug-and-play starter, but New England has the depth to develop him properly. 56). Jacksonville Jaguars: Nate Boerkircher, TE, Texas A&M Grade: B Boerkircher gives Jacksonville a developmental tight end with the blocking profile to fit Liam Coen’s West Coast, play-action structure. His ability to contribute as a Y-tight end gives the Jaguars useful depth behind Quintin Morris while adding a potential long-term piece at the position. The scheme fit is stronger than the pure value, as Boerkircher profiles more like a Day 3 prospect than a second-round target. Tight end was not a major need compared to defensive tackle, linebacker, or running back, but the role fit and developmental upside make this a reasonable depth investment. 57). Chicago Bears: Logan Jones, C, Iowa Grade: A- Jones gives Chicago a clean scheme fit for Ben Johnson’s zone-based, RPO-heavy offense. His athleticism, lateral movement, and ability to climb to the second level make him a strong long-term center option in front of Caleb Williams. The need is real after Drew Dalman’s retirement, with Garrett Bradbury more of a short-term answer. The only concerns are size and strength, as Jones will need to add functional mass to handle NFL nose tackles, but the value, fit, and developmental upside make this one of the stronger Day 2 picks. 58). Cleveland Browns (via SF): Emmanuel McNeil-Warren, S, Toledo Grade: B McNeil-Warren gives Cleveland a high-floor, production-driven safety with versatility to play in the box or rotate deep. His instincts, physicality, and 80%+ starter probability point to a reliable long-term contributor. While safety is not a primary need compared to OL, EDGE, or CB, the value at this spot is strong for a player with a late first to early second-round projection. The only concern is average top-end athleticism, which limits his true ceiling, but the floor and versatility make this a solid depth-plus-value addition. 59). Houston Texans: Marlin Klein, TE, Michigan Grade: C+ Klein gives Houston a developmental, in-line tight end with size and blocking upside, but the fit and value are modest. His profile leans more toward a traditional Y-tight end, while the Texans’ offense is built around spacing, tempo, and pass-catching versatility at the position. Tight end was not a priority need, and Klein’s production profile suggests a longer developmental runway. He can contribute in 12 personnel and as a red zone option, but this is more of a depth addition than an impact pick. 60). Tennessee Titans (via CHI/BUF): Anthony Hill Jr., LB, Texas Grade: B+ Hill gives Tennessee a fast, versatile linebacker with the coverage ability and blitz value to fit Robert Saleh’s defensive rebuild. His production, athletic profile, and green-dot experience give him a clear path to early snaps as a sideline-to-sideline defender. The value is strong at pick 60 for a prospect with top-40 board consideration and starter upside. The only limitation is physicality at the point of attack, but in Saleh’s system, Hill’s range and movement skills are exactly what the Titans need at the second level. 61). Los Angeles Rams: Max Klare, TE, Ohio State Grade: C+ Klare gives the Rams a natural receiving tight end with route-running polish, reliable hands, and enough after-catch ability to fit Sean McVay’s passing game. The issue is roster fit and role value. Los Angeles already has Tyler Higbee and Terrance Ferguson, and Klare’s blocking limitations make him a tougher fit in a 13-personnel structure that asks tight ends to hold up in the run game. He can add receiving depth and matchup value, but this does not address a major need, making it more of a developmental luxury pick. 62). Buffalo Bills (via DEN): Davison Igbinosun, CB, Ohio State Grade: C Igbinosun gives Buffalo size, length, and outside corner experience, but the fit is shaky for Jim Leonhard’s man-coverage structure. The Bills needed cornerback depth after moving Taron Johnson, and Igbinosun has the frame and durability teams want on the perimeter. The concern is movement skill. His stiff hips, limited short-area quickness, penalty history, and modest ball production make him a risky Day 2 investment in a scheme that asks corners to stay in phase. This feels more like a developmental CB3 or CB4 than a clean starter-level addition. 63). Los Angeles Chargers (via NE): Jake Slaughter, C, Florida Grade: B+ Slaughter gives the Chargers a high-floor interior lineman with elite production and strong positional intelligence. His experience, durability, and Rimington-level résumé translate well to a depth role with starting upside. He fits as a backup center with the flexibility to compete at guard, which addresses a real need for an offensive line coming off injuries. The limitation is ceiling, as he projects more as a reliable contributor than a high-end starter, but the value at this spot is strong. 64). Seattle Seahawks: Bud Clark, S, TCU Grade: B Clark gives Seattle a smart, instinctive safety with ball production, range, and the versatility to play deep or work from the slot. His 15 career interceptions fit Mike Macdonald’s defense, where safeties need to disguise, rotate, and make plays from two-high structures. The concern is need and frame. Safety was not one of Seattle’s most urgent roster holes, and Clark’s lean build may limit his box usage against bigger NFL personnel. Still, the instincts, leadership, and coverage versatility make him a solid Day 2 fit. Day 2, Round 3 of the 2026 NFL Draft 65). Arizona Cardinals: Carson Beck, QB, Miami Grade: C+ Arizona needed a quarterback after resetting the room, and Beck gives them an experienced pocket passer with strong college production. His size and rhythm-passing profile can function in Nathaniel Hackett’s structure, but the limited mobility and modest ceiling cap the fit. This is a reasonable value swing at pick 65, but Beck profiles more as a developmental bridge than a true franchise solution. 66). Denver Broncos (via TEN): Tyler Onyedim, DT, Texas A&M Grade: C+ Denver needed defensive line depth after losing John Franklin-Myers, and Onyedim fits the trench-first profile George Paton has consistently valued. The issue is immediate impact, as his modest NGS profile and low Year 1 starter probability make him more of a developmental rotational piece than a plug-and-play contributor. For a Super Bowl-contending roster, this feels a little rich at pick 66, especially with linebacker and tight end still carrying stronger need value. 67). Las Vegas Raiders: Keyron Crawford, EDGE, Auburn Grade: C+ Las Vegas adds pass rush depth after moving on from Maxx Crosby, and Crawford brings a production-driven profile with size and length to develop. The fit in a 3-4 scheme is less clean, as he projects more as a traditional edge than a versatile stand-up linebacker. At pick 67 the value is reasonable, but with bigger needs across the roster, this feels like a developmental depth move rather than a foundational piece. 68). Philadelphia Eagles (via NYJ): Markel Bell, OT, Miami Grade: C Bell gives Philadelphia rare size and long-term swing tackle upside, which matters with Lane Johnson nearing the end of his career. The concern is fit and urgency, as his modest athletic profile does not cleanly match a zone-heavy offensive structure, and edge rusher remained the Eagles’ bigger need. This is a developmental size bet more than a clear Day 2 value pick. 69). Chicago Bears (via HOU): Sam Roush, TE, Stanford Grade: B- Roush gives Chicago a big, athletic tight end with a pro-ready blocking profile that fits Ben Johnson’s offense. His size and inline value can help the run game while giving Caleb Williams a developmental safety valve. The concern is value and priority, as tight end was not a top need and Roush’s limited receiving production makes this more of a scheme bet than a clear impact pick. 70). San Francisco 49ers (via CLE): Romello Height, EDGE, Texas Tech Grade: B Height gives San Francisco needed pass-rush depth after a 2025 season where the defense struggled to generate sacks and pressure. His balanced athletic and production profile makes him a reasonable developmental rusher who can contribute early on passing downs. The concern is size and role projection, as he looks more like a rotational speed rusher than a true three-down edge, but the need and value line up well in this range. 71). Washington Commanders: Antonio Williams, WR, Clemson Grade: B+ Washington adds a much-needed slot weapon for Jayden Daniels, addressing a thin receiver room with a quick, YAC-oriented playmaker. Williams’ short-area burst and route quickness fit perfectly in a timing-based offense built on rhythm throws and spacing. The concern is limited college production and occasional drops, but the value and role projection make this a strong Day 2 fit. 72). Cincinnati Bengals: Tacario Davis, CB, Washington Grade: B+ Davis gives Cincinnati a long, athletic outside corner with the size and speed to match up in the AFC North. Cornerback was a real need with multiple contracts nearing expiration, and his press-coverage traits fit the Bengals’ defensive rebuild. The production profile is the concern, but at pick 72, this is a strong upside swing at a premium position. 73). New Orleans Saints: Oscar Delp, TE, Georgia Grade: B- Delp gives New Orleans a high-end athletic tight end with the size and speed to stretch the seam and help Tyler Shough in the red zone. The fit works as a developmental passing-game piece alongside Chris Olave and Jordyn Tyson, giving the Saints more formation flexibility. The concern is priority and production, as tight end was not a top need and Delp’s tools have not fully translated into consistent output. 74). New York Giants (via KC): Malachi Fields, WR, Notre Dame Grade: B Fields gives the Giants a big-bodied receiver with red zone value and contested-catch upside for Jaxson Dart. The need is real with Malik Nabers returning from injury and limited proven depth behind him. The concern is separation, as Fields’ 4.61 speed and modest starter projection make him more of a developmental boundary target than an immediate difference-maker. 75). Miami Dolphins: Caleb Douglas, WR, Texas Tech Grade: C+ Miami addresses a critical need at wide receiver with a big, vertical X target who brings rare size and speed to the offense. His profile fits a spread system that needs field-stretching ability, especially with a reset WR room. The issue is value, as Douglas projects later in the draft and this feels like an early swing on traits over production. 76). Pittsburgh Steelers (via DAL): Drew Allar, QB, Penn State Grade: C+ Pittsburgh needed a quarterback, and Allar brings the size, arm talent, and pocket-passing profile to fit Mike McCarthy’s pro-style offense. The concern is value, as Allar projects more like a fourth-round developmental quarterback than a top-80 pick. The need and team interest are clear, but the low starter probability and likely availability later make this feel like a reach. 77). Green Bay Packers (via TB): Chris McClellan, DT, Missouri Grade: B McClellan gives Green Bay needed interior defensive line depth with the size, length, and production profile to contribute as a rotational one-technique. His power-based game fits a slanting front, and the Packers needed long-term help with Devonte Wyatt returning from injury and Javon Hargrave serving as a short-term answer. The athletic ceiling is limited, but the need, role, and value make this a solid trench pick. 78). Indianapolis Colts: A.J. Haulcy, S, LSU Grade: A- Haulcy gives Indianapolis a high-floor safety with elite production, coverage versatility, and legitimate Day 1 starter traits. His ability to play deep, rotate down, or function as a big nickel fits well in the Colts’ Cover-2 structure next to Cam Bynum. Safety was a real need after losing Nick Cross, and Haulcy’s instincts, tackling profile, and green-dot experience make this one of the cleaner Day 2 values. 79). Atlanta Falcons: Zachariah Branch, WR, Georgia Grade: B- Branch gives Atlanta a needed speed element and slot/gadget option with the burst to create easy touches for Michael Penix Jr. His 4.35 speed and quickness fit as a motion, screen, and vertical-stretch piece alongside Drake London. The concern is role ceiling, as his size limits him as a true WR2, and the off-field misdemeanor charges add another evaluation flag. 80). Baltimore Ravens: Ja’Kobi Lane, WR, USC Grade: B- Lane gives Baltimore a big, athletic developmental receiver with the size, catch radius, and vertical ability to complement Lamar Jackson’s play-action passing game. The Ravens needed another target behind Zay Flowers and Rashod Bateman, especially one who can win in the red zone and downfield. The concern is value and polish, as Lane’s production lagged behind his traits and he may need time before becoming a reliable contributor. 81). Jacksonville Jaguars (via DET): 82). Minnesota Vikings: 83). Carolina Panthers: 84). Green Bay Packers: 85). Pittsburgh Steelers: 86). Los Angeles Chargers: 87). Miami Dolphins (via PHI): 88). Jacksonville Jaguars: 89). Chicago Bears: 90). San Francisco 49ers (via MIA): 91). Houston Texans (via BUF): 92). Dallas Cowboys (via SF): 93). Los Angeles Rams: 94). Miami Dolphins (via DEN): 95). New England Patriots: 96). Seattle Seahawks: 97). Minnesota Vikings: 98). Philadelphia Eagles: 99). Pittsburgh Steelers: 100). Jacksonville Jaguars (via DET):

Day 2 of the 2026 NFL Draft sets up as a defense-heavy board. After Round 1 leaned into offensive line, pass rush, and skill-position talent, several of the top remaining Football Scout 365 prospects are still available at cornerback, linebacker, safety, and interior defensive line. Cornerback is the headline. Jermod McCoy is the top player left on the FS365 board, while Colton Hood, Avieon Terrell, D’Angelo Ponds, and Brandon Cisse give teams multiple starting-caliber options. Cincinnati, New Orleans, Minnesota, Kansas City, Miami, and Seattle are all teams to watch if the corner run starts early. Linebacker could also move quickly after only one came off the board in Round 1, with C.J. Allen, Josiah Trotter, Jake Golday, Kyle Louis, Jacob Rodriguez, and Anthony Hill Jr. still available. The board also remains strong at safety and interior defensive line, led by Kayden McDonald, Lee Hunter, Jalon Kilgore, Emmanuel McNeil-Warren, A.J. Haulcy, and Treydan Stukes. Denzel Boston is the top wide receiver left, but the bottom line is clear: Day 2 should be defined by defensive value, with cornerback as the premium position to monitor early. 2026 NFL Draft Hub Track the NFL Draft with predictive mock draft projections, big board rankings, and team needs analysis for all 32 NFL teams, powered by Football Scout 365. Click Here to Go To the NFL Draft Hub Football Scout 365 Best Available Players In The 2026 NFL Draft 1. Jermod McCoy, CB, Tennessee Football Scout 365 Overall Rank: 17 McCoy is the top remaining player on the Football Scout 365 board and the biggest Round 1 slide from our perspective. The talent is still first-round caliber. He brings press-man physicality, patient footwork, recovery speed, and advanced route recognition. The medical variable tied to his ACL recovery is the reason he remains available, but the coverage profile still points to CB1 upside. Best Team Fits: The Dallas Cowboys make the most sense if McCoy reaches their Day 2 range. Cornerback remains a clear need, and McCoy’s press-man traits fit a defense that needs more high-end perimeter coverage. The Minnesota Vikings also stand out after passing on cornerback in Round 1. McCoy would give them the type of long-term outside corner they have been searching for. 2. Colton Hood, CB, Tennessee Football Scout 365 Overall Rank: 22 Hood is one of the cleanest cornerback values left on the board. He has the size, speed, length, and competitive profile to play outside, while also offering enough short-area quickness to handle certain slot matchups. His ball skills and route recognition translate well to press-man, off-man, and match-zone systems. Best Team Fits: The New Orleans Saints, Green Bay Packers, and Seattle Seahawks all fit the profile. New Orleans needs cornerback help early on Day 2. Green Bay could use another physical coverage player in the secondary. Seattle passed on cornerback in Round 1 and could circle back to the position if Hood slides into their range. 3. Jalon Kilgore, S, South Carolina Football Scout 365 Overall Rank: 24 Kilgore is one of the most versatile defensive backs still available. He can align at safety, in the slot, and in certain boundary looks, giving defensive coordinators a movable piece on the back end. His best traits are processing speed, zone awareness, short-area burst, and the ability to trigger downhill with urgency. Best Team Fits: The Cincinnati Bengals are a strong fit because of their need for defensive upgrades at multiple levels. Kilgore’s versatility would give them flexibility in sub-packages. The Atlanta Falcons also make sense for a defense that can use more speed and multiplicity in the secondary. Minnesota is another logical landing spot if it wants to add a defensive back with more alignment flexibility. 4. Denzel Boston, WR, Washington Football Scout 365 Overall Rank: 25 Boston is the top remaining wide receiver on the Football Scout 365 board. He is a big-bodied boundary receiver who wins with catch strength, body positioning, and red-zone production. He is not a pure vertical separator, but he understands leverage and creates throwing windows with size, timing, and physicality. Best Team Fits: The New York Jets are the cleanest fit at the top of Round 2. Boston would give them a physical boundary option to complement Garrett Wilson. The Tennessee Titans also make sense if they want to add size and reliability to the passing game. Cleveland could be in play as well if it prioritizes a possession-based perimeter target. 5. Avieon Terrell, CB, Clemson Football Scout 365 Overall Rank: 28 Terrell is a twitchy, competitive corner with quick feet, fluid hips, and strong route recognition. He plays bigger than his size and brings excellent run support value. His instincts, motor, and coverage discipline give him one of the higher floors among the remaining defensive backs. Best Team Fits: Kansas City is a strong fit after losing key pieces in the secondary and needing more cornerback depth. New Orleans could also target Terrell if it wants a competitive nickel/outside hybrid. Green Bay makes sense as a team that values coverage intelligence and physicality in the secondary. 6. Kayden McDonald, IDL, Ohio State Football Scout 365 Overall Rank: 29 McDonald is one of the top interior defensive linemen left on the board. At 6’3”, 326 pounds, he brings density, leverage, power, and true anchor strength. He is not a finished pass rusher, but his value as an early-down run defender is clear. He can occupy double teams, reset the line of scrimmage, and protect linebackers. Best Team Fits: The New York Giants make a lot of sense after trading Dexter Lawrence and needing to rebuild the interior defensive front. Houston also fits if it wants a physical early-down presence inside. Kansas City could be another landing spot if it prioritizes defensive line depth and run-game structure. 7. Emmanuel McNeil-Warren, S, Toledo Football Scout 365 Overall Rank: 31 McNeil-Warren is a long, downhill, tone-setting safety with a defined NFL role. He thrives near the line of scrimmage as a box defender, robber, or split-safety trigger player. His anticipation, physicality, and urgency against the run give him immediate sub-package value. Best Team Fits: The Chicago Bears stand out as a natural fit after losing safety depth and needing more physicality on the back end. Cincinnati also makes sense if it wants a downhill defender who can play robber looks and help stabilize the middle of the field. 8. T.J. Parker, EDGE, Clemson Football Scout 365 Overall Rank: 32 Parker is a power-based edge defender with NFL-ready strength, violent hands, and strong edge-setting ability. He wins with leverage and force more than elite bend, but his ability to compress the pocket and play through contact gives him a clear Day 2 profile. Best Team Fits: Cleveland is a logical fit if it wants more edge depth and power opposite its primary rushers. New Orleans also makes sense given its need for defensive front help. Baltimore could value Parker’s toughness, physicality, and ability to play heavy downs in a multiple-front structure. 9. Lee Hunter, IDL, Texas Tech Football Scout 365 Overall Rank: 36 Hunter is a massive, powerful interior defender built to control the A-gaps. He wins with leverage, heavy hands, and functional explosiveness off the snap. He is not a dynamic penetrator, but he can collapse the pocket with power and create structure for the rest of the front. Best Team Fits: Houston is one of the cleanest fits if it wants a high-floor interior anchor early on Day 2. The New York Giants also make sense as they continue reshaping the defensive line after the Dexter Lawrence trade. Hunter would give either team early-down mass and power inside. 10. Derrick Moore, EDGE, Michigan Football Scout 365 Overall Rank: 37 Moore is a power-based edge defender with starter traits built around leverage, leg drive, and speed-to-power conversion. His game is not built on elite first-step burst or corner flexibility, but he can collapse tackles into the pocket and win through physicality. Best Team Fits: Kansas City fits if it wants another edge/front player with power and inside-out flexibility. New Orleans is also a logical landing spot because of its need for defensive line help. Green Bay could be in play if it wants another strong-side edge who can set the edge and rush with force. 11. D’Angelo Ponds, CB, Indiana Football Scout 365 Overall Rank: 38 Ponds is one of the most productive defensive backs still available, with seven interceptions and 32 pass breakups across his college career. The size profile will be the debate, but the instincts, route recognition, competitiveness, and ball production are legitimate Day 2 traits. He projects best as a high-impact nickel or versatile CB2 in a match-zone or off-man-heavy system. Best Team Fits: Miami, Kansas City, New Orleans, Detroit, and Dallas all make sense. Miami and Kansas City need immediate cornerback help, New Orleans remains active in the Day 2 corner market, Detroit could use more nickel flexibility, and Dallas hosted Ponds on a Top 30 visit. 12. Christen Miller, IDL, Georgia Football Scout 365 Overall Rank: 39 Miller is one of the better developmental interior defensive linemen still available. He has the frame, first-step quickness, and active hands to play as a rotational 3-technique early, with the upside to become more impactful as his rush plan matures. The consistency is still developing, but the front versatility and physical profile are strong. Best Team Fits: Atlanta is the cleanest fit based on need and pre-draft engagement. The Falcons need more interior disruption and spent significant time on Miller during the process. The Giants, Packers, Broncos, and Bears also make sense as teams that could use defensive line depth and hybrid-front flexibility. 13. Brandon Cisse, CB, South Carolina Football Scout 365 Overall Rank: 41 Cisse is a traits-based corner with real movement upside. He brings speed, burst, fluidity, and vision in coverage. His ability to stay connected vertically and close on throws gives him one of the more intriguing ceilings among the remaining cornerbacks. He is not a finished press-man corner, but the athletic profile gives him starter upside with technical development. Best Team Fits: Seattle is the strongest team fit. The Seahawks have been heavily connected to Cisse and make sense if they want a long, explosive corner with developmental upside. Kansas City, Cleveland, Miami, and Green Bay also fit as teams that need more perimeter coverage depth. 14. A.J. Haulcy, S, LSU Football Scout 365 Overall Rank: 42 Haulcy has one of the strongest safety profiles left on the board. He brings experience, production, and alignment versatility with 44 career starts, 347 tackles, and 10 interceptions. At 215 pounds with 4.52 speed, he has the size and range to handle multiple safety roles. He can play deep, rotate down, cover the boundary, or function as a big nickel. Best Team Fits: Chicago is the best fit if the Bears want to replace lost safety production and add a reliable back-end defender. Jacksonville, Pittsburgh, Carolina, Philadelphia, and Buffalo also make sense. Carolina and Buffalo both had notable pre-draft interest. 15. Cashius Howell, EDGE, Texas A&M Football Scout 365 Overall Rank: 43 Howell is one of the top remaining pass rushers on the Football Scout 365 board. He is slightly undersized, but he wins with twitch, urgency, leverage, and a diverse rush plan. His explosiveness and technical development give him a clear Day 2 profile as a stand-up rusher or hybrid edge in a multiple-front defense. Best Team Fits: Detroit, Tampa Bay, Arizona, and Miami are logical fits. Tampa Bay stands out as a strong connection, while Detroit and Arizona both make sense for a twitchy edge who can add pass-rush juice. Miami could also view Howell as one of the better edge values left. 16. Jacob Rodriguez, LB, Texas Tech Football Scout 365 Overall Rank: 44 Rodriguez is one of the most instinctive linebackers left on the board. He is undersized by traditional standards, but his processing, toughness, run fits, and turnover production are outstanding. Thirteen career forced fumbles, including seven last season, match the tape. He fits best as a MIKE/WILL in a 4-3 zone-match defense or hybrid 4-2-5 structure. Best Team Fits: Tampa Bay, Cincinnati, Indianapolis, Pittsburgh, and Arizona all make sense. Cincinnati hosted Rodriguez on a Top 30 visit and has a clear need for more linebacker range and toughness. Tampa Bay is another strong fit because of his downhill instincts and defensive temperament. 17. Keionte Scott, CB, Miami Football Scout 365 Overall Rank: 45 Scott is a scheme-specific nickel defender with legitimate playmaking ability. His value comes from versatility, blitz timing, downhill trigger ability, and sub-package impact. He is one of the most effective blitzing defensive backs in this class and brings real disruption from the slot. He is not a full-time outside corner, but he can be a valuable STAR, nickel, or hybrid box defender. Best Team Fits: Houston, Miami, Chicago, Washington, and Seattle all fit. Houston hosted Scott on a Top 30 visit and makes sense if it wants more slot pressure and sub-package versatility. Chicago and Washington also showed pre-draft interest and could use his nickel/box flexibility. 18. Anthony Hill Jr., LB, Texas Football Scout 365 Overall Rank: 47 Hill is the best athletic linebacker left on the board. His testing backs up the tape: 4.51 speed, 37-inch vertical, and 10’5” broad jump at 238 pounds. The production is also strong, with 249 tackles, 31.5 tackles for loss, 17 sacks, and eight forced fumbles. He is at his best attacking downhill, blitzing interior gaps, scraping to the perimeter, and closing with force. Best Team Fits: Jacksonville, the Rams, Cincinnati, and Buffalo all make sense. Jacksonville could use a rangy second-level defender. The Rams fit if they want more athleticism and blitz value. Cincinnati and Buffalo both have logical linebacker needs and could value Hill’s explosive profile. 19. Keith Abney II, CB, Arizona State Football Scout 365 Overall Rank: 48 Abney is a strong processing corner with instincts, awareness, and ball production. He is not an elite athlete, but he sees routes develop quickly, communicates well, and plays with a “see ball, get ball” mentality in zone and off coverage. His best NFL fit is in Cover 3, match-zone, and off-man systems that protect him from excessive isolated press-man reps. Best Team Fits: Washington is one of the cleanest fits if Abney reaches Round 3. Carolina and Jacksonville also make sense as teams that could target value at corner later in the draft. His projection is more late Day 2 than early Round 2. 20. Zakee Wheatley, S, Penn State Football Scout 365 Overall Rank: 49 Wheatley is a long, rangy safety with developmental upside. His best projection comes in two-high structures where he can play with vision, overlap routes, and use his range from depth. He still needs to become more consistent as a processor and tackler, but the length and coverage traits give him a path to an NFL role. Best Team Fits: Pittsburgh and New England are the top fits. Pittsburgh could target him later as a developmental safety with special teams value. New England hosted him on a Top 30 visit and could see him as a two-high developmental piece. 21. Treydan Stukes, S, Arizona Football Scout 365 Overall Rank: 51 Stukes is a versatile nickel/safety hybrid with explosive testing and sub-package value. His 4.33 speed and 10’10” broad jump show up in his downhill trigger and ability to close space. He is at his best playing with vision, matching routes, and creating disruption from the slot or big nickel alignment. Best Team Fits: Minnesota is a strong fit because of its safety need and schematic flexibility. Pittsburgh, the Rams, Arizona, and Atlanta also make sense. Arizona had notable pre-draft engagement, while the Rams fit because of Stukes’ nickel/safety versatility. 22. Josiah Trotter, LB, Missouri Football Scout 365 Overall Rank: 52 Trotter is a physical, box-oriented linebacker with downhill temperament and tone-setting value against the run. He wins with toughness, contact balance, and the ability to trigger into interior gaps. The concern is the athletic profile in space, where hip stiffness and zone coverage limitations could create matchup issues at the next level. He projects best as an early-down MIKE or downhill run defender in a system that protects him from extended man coverage and allows him to play forward. Best Team Fits: Denver, the Rams, Cincinnati, and Dallas all make sense. Denver has been a frequent landing spot and needs more linebacker stability. The Rams could use second-level physicality. Cincinnati had notable pre-draft interest, and Dallas remains a logical fit given its linebacker need. 23. C.J. Allen, LB, Georgia Football Scout 365 Overall Rank: 53 Allen is one of the cleanest linebacker evaluations left on the board. He profiles as a three-down MIKE with strong processing, tackling efficiency, and communication skills. He is not the flashiest athlete in the class, but he wins with instincts, technique, and the ability to keep a defense organized. With only one linebacker selected in Round 1, Allen becomes one of the top second-level defenders available. He has the profile of an immediate floor-raiser for a defense that needs stability in the middle. Best Team Fits: Denver, Dallas, Buffalo, and Tampa Bay all fit. Denver has one of the clearest linebacker needs in this range. Dallas did not address the position in Round 1. Buffalo has long-term uncertainty at linebacker, and Tampa Bay could use another steady second-level presence. 24. Jake Golday, LB, Cincinnati Football Scout 365 Overall Rank: 54 Golday is a big, explosive linebacker with a pass-rush background and tone-setting traits near the line of scrimmage. He has the tools to impact the run game, pressure interior gaps, and add value as a downhill attacker. The developmental question is processing consistency, particularly when asked to sort through misdirection and coverage spacing. He fits best in an aggressive front that lets him play downhill, blitz, and use his size-speed profile as a pressure piece. Best Team Fits: Cincinnati is the strongest fit based on need and pre-draft engagement. Indianapolis, the Rams, and Denver also make sense. The Colts need more linebacker range, the Rams could use an explosive second-level defender, and Denver remains firmly in the linebacker market. 25. Kyle Louis, LB, Pittsburgh Football Scout 365 Overall Rank: 55 Louis is an athletic, coverage-capable linebacker with sub-package value. His best traits show up in space, where he can run, match, and operate as a WILL or rover type in a modern defensive structure. The frame and block deconstruction are the concerns, especially if teams ask him to consistently take on guards in the box. He projects best in a 4-2-5 or nickel-heavy defense that can use his range, coverage ability, and pursuit speed while limiting the number of direct interior collisions. Best Team Fits: Tampa Bay, Pittsburgh, and Atlanta stand out. Tampa Bay could use a coverage-capable linebacker in sub-packages. Pittsburgh makes sense as a team that values physical, instinctive second-level defenders and could use more range. Atlanta fits if it wants a hybrid linebacker who can function in space within a 4-2-5 structure.

The 2026 NFL Draft is a needs-driven class with a lot of starter value throughout. Quarterback is not strong beyond the top two names, Fernando Mendoza and Ty Simpson, and running back could dry up quickly after the Notre Dame duo of Jeremiyah Love and Jadarian Price come off the board. But for teams looking for inside-outside offensive line versatility, edge rushers, versatile linebackers, and quality No. 2 and No. 3 wide receivers, this is the kind of draft where key needs can be addressed, and rosters can be strengthened. The trade market in this draft feels active, and we could see multiple deals before or during it, starting on Day 1. We already saw one major move the weekend before the draft, with the Giants sending defensive lineman Dexter Lawrence to the Bengals for the 10th overall pick. There are also strong indications that the Cardinals could look to move back from their top-five spot, and the Cowboys at No. 12 stand out as one potential trade partner. Arizona has also been widely linked to Alabama quarterback Ty Simpson, which only adds more intrigue to what they could do near the top of the board. In this final 2026 NFL Mock Draft, Football Scout 365 projects all 32 first-round picks using team needs, player evaluations, predictive mock draft trends, and league intel. Each selection also connects back to the new NFL Draft Hub , which features a full predictive mock draft, a Top 50 Big Board, written scouting reports, and individual player evaluation videos. The Final 2026 NFL Mock Draft 1. Las Vegas Raiders Projected Pick: Fernando Mendoza, QB, Indiana Why This Pick Fits:  The Raiders are positioned to reset the franchise at quarterback, and Mendoza gives them a high-floor distributor with elite accuracy, anticipation, and poise from the pocket. Once quarterback is addressed, Las Vegas can use its strong early capital to build around him at wide receiver and defensive tackle. 2. New York Jets Projected Pick: Arvell Reese, LB, Ohio State Why This Pick Fits:  Reese gives the Jets a true front-seven chess piece with the size, power, and versatility to impact the game as an off-ball linebacker and pressure defender. New York still has enough capital after this selection to circle back to wide receiver and quarterback depth. Note:  The Jets could be a trade-back candidate for a team that loves David Bailey or Arvell Reese here. 3. Arizona Cardinals Projected Pick: David Bailey, ED, Texas Tech Why This Pick Fits:  Arizona needs premium impact talent, and David Bailey gives the defense an explosive edge rusher with first-step burst, bend, and true finishing ability. Offensive line, quarterback, and safety remain major needs, but this adds a high-end disruptor to anchor the defensive reset. Note:  Watch out for the Cardinals to be a team to trade back in this spot, especially if there is a team that loves David Bailey or Arvell Reese. 4. Tennessee Titans Projected Pick: Jeremiyah Love, RB, Notre Dame Why This Pick Fits:  Tennessee needs more difference-making talent around its young offensive core, and Jeremiyah Love gives the offense an explosive centerpiece with home-run speed, receiving upside, and every-down value. Edge, wide receiver, and center still remain priorities, but adding a dynamic weapon here helps raise the ceiling of the unit. Note:  The theme in this year's top 10 could be to trade back and gain draft capital in this draft or the 2027 draft. The Titans are a candidate to do just that. Again, if a certain player is available here and a team is in love, the Titans could seek to capitalize. 5. New York Giants Projected Pick: Sonny Styles, LB, Ohio State Why This Pick Fits:  The Giants need more size, range, and toughness in the middle of the defense, and Sonny Styles gives them a versatile front-seven defender who can impact the run game and create alignment flexibility. Defensive tackle, guard, and cornerback remain important, but this addition would help reshape the identity of the defense. Note:  I can see the Giants going offensive line, but would they be willing to pass up on a talented premium player in this draft class to gain more draft capital? The Giants are on the radar as a possible trade-back candidate. 6. Cleveland Browns Projected Pick: Carnell Tate, WR, Ohio State Why This Pick Fits:  Cleveland needs more reliability and polish on the perimeter, and Carnell Tate gives the offense a receiver with advanced route detail, strong body control, and consistent catch-point production. Wide receiver is one of the clearest roster needs, and this move gives the Browns a steady target while they continue addressing tackle and quarterback long term. Note: I believe this is a possible trade-back spot for the Browns. They could go offensive line, but will they do it in this spot? I like Spencer Fano or Monroe Freeling. If they stay here, they go premium pick. 7. Washington Commanders Projected Pick: Rueben Bain Jr., ED, Miami Why This Pick Fits:  Washington needs more high-end disruption off the edge, and Rueben Bain Jr. gives the defense a powerful, polished pass rusher with every-down value. Cornerback and wide receiver remain important needs, but this adds a premium defensive piece to raise the ceiling of the front. Note:  The Commanders could use more picks in the class to fill more holes, and they are a prime trade-back target for teams looking to move into position to grab a WR, or one of the top offensive linemen. In addition, if Bain, Bailey, or Styles were to fall, they could be in the perfect position. 8. New Orleans Saints Projected Pick: Jermod McCoy, CB, Tennessee Why This Pick Fits:  New Orleans has several realistic paths here, but Jermod McCoy gives the defense a high-upside corner with press-man ability, recovery speed, and long-term CB1 traits. Wide receiver and edge remain strong options, but this adds a premium coverage piece to a secondary that needs more long-term stability. Note:  I think the Saints are in a good spot, and they could pivot a lot of different ways to fill needs. They could snag a top WR here. I have seen some Jordyn Tyson mocks to the Saints. They could go with Delane or McCoy here at corner. 9. Kansas City Chiefs Projected Pick: Spencer Fano, OT, Utah Why This Pick Fits:  Kansas City can take the best available premium player here, and Spencer Fano gives the offense a high-floor tackle with starting versatility and long-term value. Edge, cornerback, and wide receiver remain clear needs, but this keeps the offensive line pipeline strong before the Chiefs pick again later in Round 1. Note: I went back and forth here with cornerback, WR or offensive line. I like Delane or McCoy in this spot, but the Chiefs are in a good spot to take the best available premium player here and then grab a need at the back end of round one. 10. New York Giants (via Cincinnati) Projected Pick: Caleb Downs, S, Ohio State Why This Pick Fits:  The Giants now own two top-10 picks in this mock, giving them a chance to keep reshaping the roster with premium talent. After landing Sonny Styles earlier in the round, New York doubles down on defensive speed and versatility with Caleb Downs, one of the most instinctive and complete defenders in the class. 11. Miami Dolphins Projected Pick: Jordyn Tyson, WR, Arizona State Why This Pick Fits:  Miami needs another high-end target in the passing game, and Jordyn Tyson gives the offense a polished, quarterback-friendly receiver with strong separation ability and catch-point consistency. Edge and cornerback still remain major needs, but this adds a needed playmaker to help structure the offense. Note: A lot of insiders believe Tyson could jump into the top 10 picks. Some speculate that the Giants are in contention, which is why they traded Dexter Lawrence to the Bengals for the 10th overall pick. 12. Dallas Cowboys Projected Pick: Mansoor Delane, CB, LSU Why This Pick Fits:  Dallas still needs more long-term stability at cornerback, and Mansoor Delane gives the secondary a polished, scheme-versatile cover man with the movement skills, instincts, and competitive toughness to contribute early. Linebacker and edge remain important needs, but this adds a premium defensive piece to a cornerback room that still carries risk. Note : The Cowboys are in a spot where a trade-up could be possible. Speculation is that they really like David Bailey and Arvell Reese. They may have to part ways with picks 12 and 20 to get into the top 5. 13. Los Angeles Rams Projected Pick: Monroe Freeling, OT, Georgia Why This Pick Fits:  The Rams need a long-term answer at right tackle, and Monroe Freeling gives them a traits-rich blocker with elite size, athleticism, and developmental starter upside. With Rob Havenstein retired and Warren McClendon in a contract year, this selection helps solidify an important long-term spot up front, while wide receiver and cornerback remain in play later. Note: Some believe Freeling has top-10 upside, and you can see it on tape. Many mocks have the Rams taking a WR here with the Puka Nacua off-field situation, but in this instance, I go tackle. 14. Baltimore Ravens Projected Pick: Olaivavega Ioane, IOL, Penn State Why This Pick Fits:  Baltimore needs to re-establish stability on the interior offensive line, and Olaivavega Ioane gives the unit a powerful, high-floor presence built for physical downhill football. Defensive tackle and wide receiver still matter, but this fills the clearest immediate need with a plug-and-play option. 15. Tampa Bay Buccaneers Projected Pick: Kenyon Sadiq, TE, Oregon Why This Pick Fits:  Tampa Bay can add more offensive versatility here, and Kenyon Sadiq gives the unit a dynamic tight end with three-down value, explosive receiving ability, and alignment flexibility. Edge and linebacker remain major needs, but this adds a matchup piece who fits the offense’s use of multiple-tight-end looks. 16. New York Jets Projected Pick: Makai Lemon, WR, USC Why This Pick Fits:  With a second first-round pick, the Jets are in position to come back and address wide receiver, and Makai Lemon gives the offense a polished, high-volume target with strong separation skills and reliable hands. Quarterback and edge still remain part of the long-term plan, but this adds another needed weapon opposite Garrett Wilson. Note:  Makai Lemon is projected anywhere from pick 8 to pick 25 in mock drafts. I have mocked him in the top 10, and this would be my lowest for Lemon. This would be a massive get for the Jets, who I have mocked a WR in this spot a few times. 17. Detroit Lions Projected Pick: Francis Mauigoa, OT, Miami Why This Pick Fits:  Detroit still needs to reinforce the offensive line, and Francis Mauigoa gives the roster a powerful, athletic tackle with Day 1 starter traits and long-term upside. Edge and cornerback remain important needs, but keeping the front strong is central to the Lions’ roster identity. Note: This is quite the fall for Mauigoa, but the fit would be perfect considering Dan Campbell mentioned a potential Penei Sewell transition to left tackle. I had Proctor here at one point. There are some rumors circulating about Mauigoa's health, so I am looking into that. If the rumors are false, he is unlikely to fall this far. 18. Minnesota Vikings Projected Pick: Dillon Thieneman, S, Oregon Why This Pick Fits:  Minnesota has to address key transition points on the roster, and Dillon Thieneman gives the defense an instinctive, versatile safety with strong three-down value. Center and wide receiver still remain in play, but this adds a long-term answer in the secondary with immediate role flexibility. Note: I know, just like everyone else, I go with the Harrison Smith style safety. I have seen mocks with WR in this spot, and I have seen Kenyon Sadiq. 19. Carolina Panthers Projected Pick: Omar Cooper Jr., WR, Indiana Why This Pick Fits:  Carolina still needs another explosive playmaker in the passing game, and Omar Cooper Jr. gives the offense a compact, dynamic receiver with vertical juice and run-after-catch value. Safety and defensive line remain important needs, but this adds another needed weapon around the offense. 20. Dallas Cowboys Projected Pick: Akheem Mesidor, DL, Miami Why This Pick Fits:  With a second first-round pick, Dallas can continue reinforcing the defense, and Akheem Mesidor gives the front a versatile pass rusher who can win outside or reduce inside. After adding Mansoor Delane at No. 12, this pick shifts the focus back to the defensive front while giving Dallas another disruptive piece with alignment flexibility. Note:  I believe this is a spot a team like the Cardinals might look to move up to grab Ty Simpson. 21. Pittsburgh Steelers Projected Pick: Kadyn Proctor, OT, Alabama Why This Pick Fits:  Pittsburgh has a real need for more long-term stability at tackle, and Kadyn Proctor gives the offense a high-upside blocker with rare size, power, and starting-caliber traits. Wide receiver, interior offensive line, and safety still remain in play, but this adds a premium talent to one of the roster’s most important long-term spots. Note: I believe this is a spot a team like the Cardinals might look to move up to grab Ty Simpson. Who knows, maybe the Steelers are quietly interested in Simpson. 22. Los Angeles Chargers Projected Pick: Keldric Faulk, ED, Auburn Why This Pick Fits:  The Chargers need more long-term depth on the edge, and Keldric Faulk gives the front a powerful, versatile defender with immediate rotational value and starter upside. Interior offensive line still remains the bigger roster need, but this is strong value at a premium position with expiring contracts creating urgency. Note: Faulk is projected to go anywhere between 12th and early day two, depending on the source. I think this is the sweet spot. 23. Philadelphia Eagles Projected Pick: Denzel Boston, WR, Washington Why This Pick Fits:  Philadelphia can add another big-bodied target to the passing game, and Denzel Boston gives the offense a physical boundary receiver with ball skills, catch-point toughness, and red-zone value. Edge, offensive line, and tight end remain important needs, but this adds a reliable perimeter option with starting upside. Note: The AJ Brown trade rumors are fueling this pick. 24. Cleveland Browns Projected Pick: Blake Miller, OT, Clemson Why This Pick Fits:  Cleveland still needs a long-term answer at tackle, and Blake Miller gives the offensive line an experienced, starting-caliber blocker with the movement skills to develop into a steady presence up front. Wide receiver and quarterback remain major priorities, but this addresses one of the roster’s clearest needs with a premium position investment. 25. Chicago Bears Projected Pick: Kayden McDonald, IDL, Ohio State Why This Pick Fits:  Chicago still needs more size and strength up front, and Kayden McDonald gives the defensive line a powerful interior presence with run-stopping value and long-term upside. Edge, safety, and center remain important needs, but this adds another needed piece to the front. 26. Buffalo Bills Projected Pick: T.J. Parker, ED, Clemson Why This Pick Fits:  Buffalo needs a long-term edge presence opposite Greg Rousseau, and T.J. Parker gives the front a power-based rusher with strong hands, edge-setting ability, and starter upside. Linebacker and wide receiver remain important needs, but this addresses a premium position with a high-floor defender. 27. San Francisco 49ers Projected Pick: Max Iheanachor, OT, Arizona State Why This Pick Fits:  San Francisco still has long-term questions in the trenches, and Max Iheanachor gives the offense a traits-heavy tackle with movement skills that fit the scheme. Safety and edge remain in play, but this adds a high-upside offensive line piece with developmental starter potential. 28. Houston Texans Projected Pick: Peter Woods, IDL, Clemson Why This Pick Fits:  Houston still needs more disruption on the interior, and Peter Woods gives the front an explosive defensive tackle with rare first-step quickness and one-gap penetration ability. Offensive line and cornerback depth remain important, but this adds a premium interior defender to pair with an already talented edge group. 29. Kansas City Chiefs Projected Pick: Chris Johnson, CB, San Diego State Why This Pick Fits:  With a second first-round pick, Kansas City can add more long-term stability in the secondary, and Chris Johnson gives the defense an instinctive, productive corner with strong ball skills and zone-match ability. Edge, wide receiver, and defensive tackle remain priorities, but this adds another coverage piece to a roster still built to contend. 30. Miami Dolphins Projected Pick: Malachi Lawrence, ED, UCF Why This Pick Fits:  After addressing wide receiver earlier with Jordyn Tyson, Miami can turn back to the defensive front with Malachi Lawrence, an ascending edge rusher with prototypical size, length, and explosive get-off. Cornerback remains in play, but this gives the Dolphins another pressure piece with the rush polish and pro traits to develop into a consistent impact defender. Note: Miami's aggressive, blitz-heavy scheme under Hafley allows Lawrence to maximize his elite athleticism while developing his weaknesses in a rotational role. Lawrence is projected to go on day two, but he is quickly rising up draft boards. I also believe the Dolphins could trade back here and potentially get Lawrence early on day two. 31. New England Patriots Projected Pick: KC Concepcion, WR, Texas A&M Why This Pick Fits:  New England needs more quick-separating talent in the passing game, and KC Concepcion gives the offense immediate burst, slot flexibility, and run-after-catch value. Offensive line and edge remain important needs, but this adds a quarterback-friendly target who can uncover quickly for an offense that needs more easy-access throws. Note : The Patriots have a clear trade-back opportunity in this mock. With the Cardinals and Jets sitting at picks 33 and 34, New England could move down a few spots and still land KC Concepcion or one of the top linebackers, such as Jacob Rodriguez. This feels like a realistic spot where a trade could happen. 32. Seattle Seahawks Projected Pick: Colton Hood, CB, Tennessee Why This Pick Fits:  Seattle could be tempted by running back here, but this spot also profiles as a realistic trade-back window. If the Seahawks stay put, Colton Hood gives them a competitive inside-outside corner with playmaking ability, physicality, and scheme versatility. He adds depth and long-term stability to a secondary built to contend. Note:  The Super Bowl champs are being mocked to take an RB, EDGE, or CB here in some cases. All are valid needs. I can also see the Seahawks trading out of this spot, especially with teams like the Jets at No. 33 and Cardinals at No. 34 positioned to move up for Ty Simpson. Teams without a day one pick in the 2026 NFL Draft 41. Cincinnati Bengals Projected Pick: Jacob Rodriguez, LB, Texas Tech Why This Pick Fits:  Cincinnati can use Day 2 to keep addressing the front seven, and Jacob Rodriguez gives the defense an instinctive, productive linebacker with strong range and playmaking ability. Defensive tackle, offensive tackle, and wide receiver still remain important needs, but this adds another active defender to the middle of the unit. 47. Indianapolis Colts Projected Pick: Derrick Moore, ED, Michigan Why This Pick Fits:  Indianapolis still needs more juice off the edge, and Derrick Moore gives the front a power-based rusher with starting upside and strong developmental value. Linebacker and wide receiver remain important needs, but this adds another needed piece to a defense that is clearly prioritizing speed and disruption up front. 48. Atlanta Falcons Projected Pick: Christen Miller, IDL, Georgia Why This Pick Fits:  Atlanta needs more size and power in the middle of the defense, and Christen Miller gives the front a disruptive interior presence with scheme versatility and strong run-defense value. Linebacker and wide receiver still remain important, but this helps reinforce the identity they are trying to build. 52. Green Bay Packers Projected Pick: Keith Abney II, CB, Arizona State Why This Pick Fits:  Green Bay still needs more long-term stability in the secondary, and Keith Abney II gives the defense an instinctive, competitive corner with scheme versatility and strong ball-production traits. Edge and offensive line depth still remain in play, but this adds needed competition to the back end. 56. Jacksonville Jaguars Projected Pick: Keionte Scott, CB, Miami Why This Pick Fits:  Jacksonville still needs more speed and disruption on defense, and Keionte Scott gives the unit a versatile sub-package defender who can blitz, trigger downhill, and create energy in the secondary. Defensive tackle, edge, and linebacker remain the clearer needs, but this adds a movable defensive piece with immediate role value. 62. Denver Broncos Projected Pick: Josiah Trotter, LB, Missouri Why This Pick Fits:  Denver still needs more stability at linebacker, and Josiah Trotter gives the defense an instinctive downhill presence with strong run-game urgency and physicality. Tight end remains the bigger offensive need, but this adds a tone-setting front-seven piece to a defense that still needs second-level help.

Explore Football Scout 365’s 2022 NFL Draft analysis, scouting reports, mock drafts, and prospect coverage featuring film-based evaluation, player rankings, and class updates throughout the scouting cycle. 2022 NFL DRAFT ANALYSIS Super Bowl LIX: Highlighting Howie Roseman’s Draft Strategy — The Eagles’ Top-Graded Players From Our Board Since 2021 Brandon Lundberg Feb 8, 2025 Michigan vs. Ohio State: A Data-Driven Look at NFL Talent and On-Field Success Brandon Lundberg Nov 29, 2024 Elite QB Blueprint: How 2021-2024 NFL Draft Quarterbacks Stacked Up Against Today’s Elite QBs Using Pre-Draft Scouting Data Brandon Lundberg Oct 31, 2024 How We Grade NFL Combine Performance: Matching the Film Based Scouting Reports To Combine Data Brandon Lundberg Mar 1, 2024 NFL Combine Records: Top performers by Event, Including the 40-yard dash, vertical jump, and More Brandon Lundberg Feb 29, 2024 The Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Big Board, Front Office Level Analysis At Your Fingertips Brandon Lundberg Jun 23, 2023 NFL Scouting Combine: The Importance Of The NFL Combine | The Data | How Important Are The Workouts? Brandon Lundberg Feb 26, 2023 The 2022 NFL Offseason All in One Place Brandon Lundberg Jun 7, 2022 2022 NFL Draft Composite Grades For All 32 NFL Teams Brandon Lundberg May 2, 2022 2022 NFL Draft: After a Chaotic 1st Round, We list Our Top Ten Available And Mock The 2nd Round Brandon Lundberg Apr 29, 2022 1 2 3 4

Track the NFL Draft with predictive mock draft projections, big board rankings, and team needs analysis for all 32 NFL teams, powered by Football Scout 365. 2026 NFL DRAFT HUB Track the NFL Draft with predictive mock draft projections, big board rankings, and team needs analysis for all 32 NFL teams, powered by Football Scout 365.

NFL Draft scouting reports, prospect rankings, Big Board analysis, and mock drafts built on front office-style player evaluation, All-22 film study, advanced analytics, and NFL scheme fit projection. NFL DRAFT HUB Track predictive mock drafts, big board rankings, and team needs analysis in one interactive NFL Draft Hub built on film, data, and scheme fit. Launch Draft Hub 1 S Caleb Downs Ohio State VIEW PROFILE 3 QB Fernando Mendoza Indiana VIEW PROFILE 5 LB Arvell Reese Ohio State VIEW PROFILE 7 ED David Bailey Texas Tech VIEW PROFILE 9 TE Kenyon Sadiq Oregon VIEW PROFILE 2 RB Jeremiyah Love Notre Dame VIEW PROFILE 4 ED Rueben Bain Miami VIEW PROFILE 6 LB Sonny Styles Ohio State VIEW PROFILE 8 WR Carnell Tate Ohio State VIEW PROFILE 10 IOL Olaivavega Ioane Penn State VIEW PROFILE TOP 10 NFL DRAFT PROSPECTS VIEW ALL RANKINGS FEATURED CONTENT 2026 NFL Mock Draft: Dexter Lawrence Trade Shakes Up Top 10; Ty Simpson to Arizona? Brandon Lundberg 3 days ago 2026 NFL Draft Big Board: Top 100 Prospects Update Featuring Caleb Downs, Jeremiyah Love, Fernando Mendoza Brandon Lundberg Apr 1 Denzel Boston NFL Draft Scouting Report Brandon Lundberg Mar 16 David Bailey NFL Draft Scouting Report Brandon Lundberg Mar 11 Sonny Styles NFL Draft Scouting Report Brandon Lundberg Mar 10 2026 NFL Combine Mock Draft: Projecting All 32 First-Round Picks Brandon Lundberg Feb 26 2026 NFL Draft Quarterback Rankings: Fernando Mendoza, Ty Simpson Headline A Weak QB Class Brandon Lundberg Feb 21 2026 NFL Draft Running Back Rankings: Jeremiyah Love, Jadarian Price Headline a Top-Heavy RB Class Brandon Lundberg Feb 20 VIEW ALL ANALYSIS