Search Results

The 2026 NFL Scouting Combine represents the next inflection point in the draft cycle. Film evaluations are finalized, production profiles are complete, and verified testing, medicals, and interviews will now influence the final draft capital. This 2026 NFL Draft Big Board: Pre-Combine Top 100 reflects full-scope All-22 evaluation and long-term projection entering Indianapolis. Using the Football Scout 365 grading scale, the board currently includes 18 First-Round grades, 62 Day Two grades, and 20 Day Three grades, defining a class built more on starter-level depth than high-level blue-chip talent. At the very top sit two Elite prospects — Caleb Downs and Jeremiyah Love — rare, immediate-impact players capable of altering franchise direction early in their careers. Behind that Elite tier is a strong cluster of Near Elite prospects who define the strength of the class. Fernando Mendoza headlines a thin but intriguing quarterback group, while defenders like Rueben Bain Jr., David Bailey, Arvell Reese, and Sonny Styles anchor a versatile and athletic front seven. Offensively, Spencer Fano and Vega Ioane provide plug-and-play trench stability, and Carnell Tate leads a deep, 18-player wide receiver group that offers alignment flexibility and Day Two value throughout the board. Overall, the 2026 class profiles as a roster-building draft defined by plug-and-play offensive depth and high-end defensive flexibility from the front seven through the secondary. Football Scout 365 Big Board Grade Scale Each prospect on the Top 100 is evaluated through our proprietary film-based grading model and placed into one of the following tiers. Grades reflect long-term NFL projection, positional value, athletic profile, and developmental trajectory. Draft projections are aligned to historical valuation trends entering the 2026 NFL Draft. Top 100 Players Positional Count QB-2, RB-4, WR-18, TE-2, IOL-7, OT-10, IDL-9, Edge-15, LB-11, CB-12, SAF-9 Click and go to the tier Elite  – Top 5–10 Picks (1st Round) Near Elite  – Mid-to-Late (1st Rou nd ) High-End Starter Potential  – 2nd–3rd Round Mid-Level Starter Potential  – 4th–5th Round 2026 NFL Draft Big Board Elite Tier Rare, franchise-altering talent with top-of-draft value and immediate impact projection. 1) Caleb Downs, S, Ohio State (6’0”, 205) A high-IQ, position-flexible safety who can rotate post-snap, erase matchups in split-safety and big nickel structures, and serve as the defensive communicator with Elite, All-Pro ceiling. 2) Jeremiyah Love, RB, Notre Dame (6’0”, 214) An explosive, modern three-down back with elite acceleration and receiving upside who thrives in wide-zone systems and projects as an immediate impact RB1 with Pro Bowl ceiling. Near Elite Tier High-end impact prospects with early Round 1 value and Pro Bowl-caliber upside who project as foundational starters within their first two seasons. 3) Fernando Mendoza, QB, Indiana (6’5”, 225) A rhythm-based, precision pocket passer who wins with anticipation and processing, projecting as a high-floor timing-system starter with limited off-script ceiling. 4) Rueben Bain Jr., EDGE, Miami (6’3”, 275) A thick, twitchy, high-motor pass rusher with advanced hand usage and alignment versatility who projects as an early-impact, scheme-diverse EDGE with top-tier upside. 5) Arvell Reese, LB, Ohio State (6’4”, 243) A powerful hybrid front-seven weapon who can stack, blitz, and rush off the edge, projecting as a disruptive three-down linebacker in pressure-heavy defenses. 6) Sonny Styles, LB, Ohio State (6’4”, 230) A former safety turned modern hybrid linebacker with rare size-speed versatility, best suited for multiple fronts that value coverage flexibility and matchup tools. 7) David Bailey, EDGE, Texas Tech (6’3”, 250) An explosive, bendy edge rusher with a deep pass-rush arsenal and high-level production, projecting as an immediate third-down difference-maker with Round 1 ceiling. 8) Spencer Fano, OT, Utah (6’5”, 300) A technically polished, high-floor tackle with dominant run-game leverage and early starter projection at right tackle with long-term left-side upside. 9) Carnell Tate, WR, Ohio State (6’3”, 195) A refined perimeter receiver who separates with route detail and body control, projecting as a high-volume WR2 with reliable three-level production. 10) Olaivavega “Vega” Ioane, IOL, Penn State (6’4”, 330) A power-based interior mauler built to anchor gap schemes from Day 1, projecting as a stable starting guard with high-floor impact. 11) Kenyon Sadiq, TE, Oregon (6’3”, 250) An explosive, alignment-versatile tight end with true two-phase value, projecting as a matchup weapon in play-action and spacing-based offenses. 12) Francis Mauigoa, OT, Miami (6’6”, 315) A naturally gifted, movement-skilled tackle with scheme versatility and long-term All-Pro upside, projecting as a Day 1 starter on the right side. 13) Akheem Mesidor, EDGE, Miami (6’3”, 280) A polished, high-motor rusher with advanced hand usage and interior reduction versatility, projecting as an immediate third-down impact defender with high-end starter upside. 14) Mansoor Delane, CB, LSU (6’0”, 190) A scheme-versatile perimeter corner with fluid movement skills and advanced processing, projecting as a Day 1 starter with long-term CB1 upside in press-man and match coverage systems. 15) Makai Lemon, WR, USC (5’11”, 195) A polished, high-volume slot receiver who wins with precision, tempo, and ball skills, projecting as a plug-and-play impact target with Pro Bowl upside inside. 16) Jordyn Tyson, WR, Arizona State (6’1”, 195) A refined route technician with three-level separation ability and WR1 ceiling, projecting as a high-floor starter if durability concerns are cleared. 17) Jermod McCoy, CB, Tennessee (6’0”, 195) A press-man technician with elite mirror ability and recovery speed, projecting as a true perimeter CB1 with Pro Bowl upside pending full medical clearance. 18) Peter Woods, IDL, Clemson (6’3”, 315) An explosive, penetration-based interior defender with rare first-step quickness, projecting as a disruptive 3-technique centerpiece in attacking one-gap schemes. High-End Starter Potential Tier Clear NFL starters with strong physical tools and long-term impact value, projecting as multi-year foundational pieces within their first few seasons. 19) Dillon Thieneman, S, Oregon (6’0”, 207) An instinctive, multi-alignment safety with strong range and coverage awareness, projecting as a three-down starter in disguise-heavy, zone-based defenses. 20) Kayden McDonald, IDL, Ohio State (6’3”, 326) A dense, power-based interior run defender with elite anchor ability, projecting as a tone-setting early-down nose in odd or hybrid fronts. 21) Denzel Boston, WR, Washington (6’4”, 210) A physical boundary receiver who wins at the catch point and in contested situations, projecting as a reliable possession-based perimeter starter. 22) C.J. Allen, LB, Georgia (6’1”, 235) A high-IQ, three-down MIKE linebacker built on processing speed and tackling efficiency, projecting as a Day 1 defensive stabilizer. 23) Omar Cooper Jr., WR, Indiana (6’0”, 200) An explosive, RAC-driven playmaker with vertical acceleration and versatility, projecting as a dynamic WR2 in motion-heavy spread offenses. 24) Kadyn Proctor, OT, Alabama (6’7”, 369) A massive, power-oriented tackle with rare physical tools and franchise-left-tackle upside if conditioning and leverage continue to improve. 25) Colton Hood, CB, Tennessee (6’0”, 195) A competitive, scheme-versatile corner with strong ball skills and perimeter athleticism, projecting as an early-impact outside starter. 26) Caleb Lomu, OT, Utah (6’5”, 295) A smooth, technically refined left tackle with high-end pass-protection balance, projecting as a long-term blindside anchor in zone-based systems. 27) Avieon Terrell, CB, Clemson (5’11”, 180) A twitchy, instinctive press-capable corner who competes above his size, projecting as an aggressive boundary starter in man- and match-heavy schemes. 28) Derrick Moore, EDGE, Michigan (6’3”, 258) A power-based edge defender with strong speed-to-power conversion, projecting as a rotational rusher early with starting upside in multiple fronts. 29) Jalon Kilgore, S, South Carolina (6’1”, 211) A versatile, explosive defensive back with strong zone awareness and click-and-close ability, projecting as an early sub-package contributor with starter upside in match-heavy systems. 30) Kyle Louis, LB, Pittsburgh (6’1”, 220) A space-athletic hybrid linebacker with true coverage value, projecting best as a WILL or big nickel defender in sub-package heavy defenses. 31) Caleb Banks, IDL, Florida (6’6”, 325) A rare size-movement interior disruptor with penetrating 3-tech upside, projecting as a scheme-diverse defensive chess piece with top-20 ceiling. 32. Ty Simpson, QB, Alabama (6’2”, 208) A rhythm-based, structure-dependent passer with developmental starter traits, projecting as a Day Two quarterback whose ceiling hinges on anticipation growth. 33) Lee Hunter, IDL, Texas Tech (6’4”, 325) A powerful, gap-controlling interior anchor built to occupy space and collapse pockets, projecting as a starting nose tackle in power-based fronts. 34) Keith Abney II, CB, Arizona State (6’0”, 190) An instinctive, zone-savvy corner with strong processing and ball disruption skills, projecting as a reliable CB2 in off-man and match-heavy schemes. 35) Kevin Concepcion, WR, Texas A&M (5’11”, 187) A sudden, quick-twitch slot playmaker with strong YAC ability, projecting as a high-volume underneath weapon in spacing-based offenses. 36) Keldric Faulk, EDGE, Auburn (6’6”, 290) A long, power-based edge defender with inside-out versatility, projecting as a high-floor strong-side starter in multiple-front defenses. 37) Emmanuel McNeil-Warren, S, Toledo (6’2”, 202) A downhill, tone-setting safety with robber and box value, projecting as a defined-role starter in split-safety and zone-heavy schemes. 38) T.J. Parker, EDGE, Clemson (6’3”, 265) A physical, leverage-driven power rusher with strong edge-setting ability, projecting as a dependable three-down starter in even or odd fronts. 39) Christen Miller, IDL, Georgia (6’3”, 305) A disruptive, leverage-based interior defender with scheme flexibility, projecting as a steady 3-tech/4i starter with rising Day Two value. 40) Jacob Rodriguez, LB, Texas Tech (6’1”, 230) A high-IQ, downhill linebacker with strong instincts and tackling reliability, projecting as a zone-match MIKE/WILL with early special teams and blitz value. 41) Keyshaun Elliott, LB, Arizona State (6’2”, 235) A physical, run-first linebacker with excellent play strength and diagnostic ability, projecting as an early-down MIKE/SAM in power-based defensive fronts. 42) Monroe Freeling, OT, Georgia (6’7”, 315) A long, athletic left tackle with high-upside pass-protection traits, projecting as a developmental blindside starter in pro-style systems. 43) Cashius Howell, EDGE, Texas A&M (6’2”, 250) An ascending, length-powered edge rusher with strong speed-to-power conversion, projecting as a multiple-front starter with double-digit sack upside. 44) Jake Golday, LB, Cincinnati (6’4”, 240) A big, explosive second-level defender with stack-and-shed power, projecting as a SAM or inside linebacker in aggressive fronts. 45) Chris Johnson, CB, San Diego State (6’0”, 185) A disciplined, zone-savvy corner with strong ball skills and tackling reliability, projecting as a starter in Cover 3 and match-heavy systems. 46) Max Iheanachor, OT, Arizona State (6’6”, 330) A traits-heavy, movement-skilled tackle with developmental polish needed, projecting as a high-upside starter in outside-zone schemes. 47) D’Angelo Ponds, CB, Indiana (5’9”, 170) An instinct-driven nickel corner with quick feet and strong zone awareness, projecting as a high-impact slot defender in match-zone systems. 48) Brandon Cisse, CB, South Carolina (6’0”, 190) An explosive press-man boundary corner with high developmental upside, projecting as a scheme-dependent starter with near-elite traits. 49) Josiah Trotter, LB, Missouri (6’2”, 237) An explosive downhill MIKE with strong run instincts and physical pop, projecting as an interior tone-setter in odd-front defenses. 50) Germie Bernard, WR, Alabama (6’1”, 204) A versatile, route-polished receiver with strong intermediate production and alignment flexibility, projecting as a reliable WR2/3 in timing-based offenses. 51) R. Mason Thomas, EDGE, Oklahoma (6’2”, 250) A twitch-driven, speed-based edge rusher with bend and vertical burst, projecting as an early third-down specialist with starter upside in odd fronts. 52) Anthony Hill Jr., LB, Texas (6’3”, 235) A rangy, downhill linebacker with disruptive blitz ability, projecting as a three-down impact defender if coverage refinement continues. 53) Blake Miller, OT, Clemson (6’6”, 315) An experienced, movement-skilled right tackle with zone-scheme value, projecting as a starting-caliber RT with developmental refinement needed. 54) Zakee Wheatley, S, Penn State (6’2”, 200) A rangy, instinctive post safety with strong ball skills, projecting as a single-high anchor in Cover 1 and Cover 3 structures. 55) Malik Muhammad, CB, Texas (6’0”, 190) A twitchy, competitive man-coverage defender with strong mirror ability, projecting as an early-impact starter in press-heavy systems. 56) Keionte Scott, CB, Miami (6’0”, 194) An explosive nickel defender with blitz and sub-package value, projecting as a high-energy STAR in pressure-heavy defenses. 57) Malachi Fields, WR, Notre Dame (6’4”, 220) A physical boundary receiver who wins at the catch point, projecting as a possession-based X with red-zone value. 58) Jadarian Price, RB, Notre Dame (5’11”, 210) A patient, vision-driven zone runner, projecting as an early-down starter in outside-zone systems if durability holds. 59) Chris Brazzell II, Tennessee, WR (6’5”, 200) A lengthy perimeter receiver who wins vertically with stride acceleration and catch-radius ball skills, projecting as an explosive outside target with red-zone value and developmental upside tied to strength and route refinement. 60) Zachariah Branch, Georgia, WR (5’11”, 175) An explosive slot weapon with rare acceleration and open-field creativity, projecting as a dynamic motion-based playmaker with immediate return value and WR3 upside in space-oriented offenses. 61) Logan Jones, Iowa, IOL (6’3”, 293) A highly athletic, zone-scheme center with strong processing and pass-protection consistency, projecting as a Day 1 starter in movement-based offensive systems. 62) C.J. Daniels, Miami, WR (6’2”, 205) A polished possession receiver who wins with route nuance and ball skills, projecting as a high-floor WR3 with WR2 upside in timing-based offenses. 63) Chase Bisontis, Texas A&M, IOL (6’5”, 315) A technically sound, movement-skilled interior blocker with balanced pass protection traits, projecting as an early starter in multiple or zone-heavy schemes. 64) Jonah Coleman, Washington, RB (5’9”, 229) A compact, power-driven runner with strong contact balance and zone vision, projecting as a dependable early-down starter with high-floor value. 65) Elijah Sarratt, Indiana, WR (6’2”, 210) A physical boundary chain-mover who wins at the catch point, projecting as a possession-based outside starter with red-zone reliability. 66) Treydan Stukes, Arizona, S (6’2”, 195) A versatile nickel/safety hybrid with strong zone instincts and downhill trigger ability, projecting as a sub-package starter in aggressive, multiple defenses. 67) Zion Young, Missouri, EDGE (6’5”, 262) A power-based edge defender with strong edge-setting ability and pocket-compression traits, projecting as a dependable strong-side starter in even fronts. 68) Dani Dennis-Sutton, Penn State, EDGE (6’5”, 272) A long, physical defensive end with pro-ready strength and early-down reliability, projecting as a rotational-to-starting power rusher in multiple fronts. 69) Connor Lew, Auburn, IOL (6’3”, 300) An athletic, high-IQ center with strong movement skills and zone-scheme value, projecting as a long-term starter pending full ACL recovery. 70) LT Overton, Alabama, EDGE (6’5”, 283) A power-based, multi-front defensive end with strong edge-setting traits, projecting as a base starter with inside reduction versatility. 71) Chris Bell, Louisville, WR (6’2”, 220) A physical, YAC-driven wideout with vertical acceleration and catch-point strength, projecting as a scheme-fit WR2 with upside in play-action offenses. 72) Bryce Boettcher, Oregon, LB (6’2”, 230) A coverage-capable, high-motor WILL linebacker with space athleticism, projecting as a sub-package defender with core special teams value. 73) Antonio Williams, Clemson, WR (5’11”, 190) A tempo-driven slot technician with strong spatial awareness and separation skills, projecting as a high-floor volume target in spacing-based systems. 74) Emmanuel Pregnon, Oregon, IOL (6’5”, 318) A powerful, tone-setting interior blocker with plug-and-play strength and anchor, projecting as a long-term starting guard in gap or multiple schemes. 75) A.J. Haulcy, LSU, S (6’0”, 222) A downhill, physical safety with strong zone instincts, projecting as a robber/box defender in run-support-driven schemes. 76) Genesis Smith, Arizona, S (6’2”, 202) A long, rangy centerfield safety with coverage range and tight-end matchup ability, projecting as a split-field or single-high starter in zone systems. 77) Daylen Everette, Georgia, CB (6’1”, 190) A press-man boundary corner with strong vertical speed and length, projecting as a scheme-dependent starter in man-heavy defenses. 78) Chandler Rivers, Duke, CB (5’11”, 180) An instinctive, zone-savvy defensive back with strong route anticipation, projecting as a nickel or boundary starter in match-heavy systems. 79) Gabe Jacas, Illinois, EDGE (6’3”, 275) A power-based edge rusher with speed-to-power traits and interior counter ability, projecting as a rotational early-down defender with starter upside. 80) Skyler Bell, Connecticut, WR (5’11”, 185) A polished inside/outside receiver with route detail and short-area burst, projecting as a reliable slot/Z target in timing-based offenses. Mid-Level Starter Potential Tier Defined-role starters with developmental traits and long-term rotational value who project as reliable contributors within structured systems. 81) Garrett Nussmeier, LSU, QB (6’2”, 200) An aggressive, rhythm-based pocket passer with functional arm strength, projecting as a high-floor backup with spot-start value in timing-based offenses. 82) Malik Benson, Oregon, WR (5’11”, 185) A track-speed vertical field-stretcher with explosive-play ability, projecting as a rotational X/Z weapon with upside tied to route refinement. 83) Romello Height, Texas Tech, EDGE (6’3”, 240) A bend-driven speed rusher with third-down juice, projecting as a rotational rush linebacker in wide-alignment fronts. 84) Jaishawn Barham, Michigan, EDGE (6’4”, 248) A twitchy hybrid front-seven defender with pass-rush upside, projecting as a SAM/pressure package contributor in odd fronts. 85) Ted Hurst, Georgia State, WR (6’3”, 185) A fluid, vertical perimeter target with developmental upside, projecting as a rotational boundary receiver with growth potential. 86) Jalen Farmer, Kentucky, IOL (6’5”, 320) A power-based right guard with strong anchor ability, projecting as a gap-scheme rotational starter with defined-role upside. 87) Taurean York, Texas A&M, LB (6’0”, 235) An instinct-driven, high-processing linebacker with tackling reliability, projecting as a zone-heavy MIKE/WILL in 4-2-5 structures. 88) Domonique Orange, Iowa State, IDL (6’4”, 325) A power-oriented nose tackle built for gap-control systems, projecting as a plug-and-play early-down interior anchor. 89) Kamari Ramsey, USC, S (6’0”, 204) A high-IQ split-field safety with strong zone instincts, projecting as a versatile sub-package defender in disguise-heavy schemes. 90) Jake Slaughter, Florida, IOL (6’5”, 308) A technically refined center with pass-protection reliability, projecting as a plug-and-play starter in zone-based offenses. 91) Eli Stowers, Vanderbilt, TE (6’4”, 225) A movement-based “F” tight end with seam-stretch and YAC ability, projecting as a receiving-focused TE2 with mismatch upside in spread offenses. 92) Austin Barber, Florida, OT (6’8”, 320) A physical, experienced lineman with strong anchor traits, projecting best as a gap-scheme guard with early rotational starter value. 93) Chris McClellan, Missouri, IDL (6’4”, 323) A powerful interior defender with penetration and bull-rush traits, projecting as a rotational Year 1 contributor with starter upside in multiple fronts. 94) Caleb Tiernan, Northwestern, OT (6’7”, 325) A technically polished lineman with strong leverage and hand timing, projecting as a swing tackle/guard with reliable starting potential. 95) Rayshaun Benny, Michigan, IDL (6’4”, 305) A leverage-driven interior defender with steady rotational value, projecting as a 3-tech or shade nose in even fronts. 96) Darrell Jackson Jr., Florida State, IDL (6’5”, 337) A massive, two-gap anchor with length and power, projecting as a run-plugging nose tackle in odd or heavy fronts. 97) Caden Curry, Ohio State, EDGE (6’3”, 260) A high-motor power rusher with strong edge-setting traits, projecting as a rotational defensive end with low-end starter upside. 98) Gennings Dunker, Iowa, OT (6’5”, 316) A rugged, power-based blocker who projects inside, offering guard starter traits in run-heavy, gap schemes. 99) Deion Burks, Oklahoma, WR (5’9”, 188) A quick-twitch slot playmaker with strong underneath separation and YAC value, projecting as a rotational weapon in spacing offenses. 100) Emmett Johnson, Nebraska, RB (5’11”, 200) A decisive, downhill runner built for gap schemes, projecting as a dependable rotational back with defined-role value.

The 2026 NFL Draft wide receiver rankings are far deeper than they’re getting credit for, and it aligns perfectly with where today’s NFL is headed at the position. While this class does feature a handful of traditional boundary “X” receivers, the true strength of the 2026 group lies in its depth of alignment-flexible slot and Z playmakers — a reflection of where the NFL game is trending. When you study recent NFL success stories, Puka Nacua, Amon-Ra St. Brown, Jaxon Smith-Njigba, the through line isn’t size or testing numbers. It’s separation nuance, spatial IQ, competitive toughness at the catch point, and the ability to generate efficient yards after the catch. That same profile shows up repeatedly throughout this 2026 wide receiver class. At the top of the 2026 wide receiver rankings is Ohio State’s Carnell Tate, a refined perimeter target who separates at all three levels. Arizona State’s Jordyn Tyson follows closely, bringing true WR1 route nuance and sudden separation ability. USC’s Makai Lemon rounds out the top tier as a high-volume slot who consistently plays bigger than his frame, winning with precision, toughness, and high-level run-after-catch ability. Overall, this class may not feature a single generational outlier, but it is loaded with versatile, new-age receivers who carry legitimate WR1 upside. More importantly, it offers a deep pool of WR2 and WR3 profiles ready to complement an established NFL alpha and contribute immediately in multiple alignments. If you need depth or a high-quality TE2, this is the year to find one on Day Two or Day Three. Go to other positional grades: QB  | RB | WR  | TE  | OL  | IDL  | Edge  | LB  | CB  | SAF 2026 NFL Draft Wide Receiver Rankings 1). Carnell Tate, 6’3”, 191 lbs, Ohio State Grade Tier:  Near Elite NFL Projection:  Mid-to-Late 1st Round Analysis: A refined perimeter receiver who wins with route detail, tempo manipulation, and catch-point consistency rather than overwhelming traits. Tate separates at all three levels with leverage and efficient footwork, and he consistently finishes through contact. While he lacks elite vertical speed and imposing play strength, his route polish and quarterback-friendly profile project him as a high-volume target with legitimate WR1 upside. 2). Jordyn Tyson, 6’1”, 195 lbs, Arizona State Grade Tier:  Near Elite NFL Projection:  Mid-to-Late 1st Round Analysis: Route manipulation and separation nuance define Tyson’s profile. He consistently creates clean throwing windows with sudden breaks, leverage control, and advanced pacing at the stem. His body control and timing at the catch point allow him to win through contact despite only average long speed. Durability remains the primary concern, but if healthy, Tyson projects as a high-floor WR2 with legitimate WR1 upside built on polish and competitive toughness. 3). Makai Lemon, 5’11”, 195 lbs, USC Grade Tier:  Near Elite NFL Projection:  Late 1st – Early 2nd Round Analysis: A high-volume slot receiver built for today’s NFL. Lemon separates with tempo, precision, and advanced spatial awareness against man and zone. He consistently wins through contact at the catch point despite modest size. Lacking elite vertical gear and outside dominance caps his overall ceiling slightly, but he projects as a plug-and-play slot with Pro Bowl upside. 4). Denzel Boston, 6’4”, 210 lbs, Washington Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd Round Analysis: A physical boundary receiver who wins with size, body positioning, and red-zone reliability. Boston plays through contact and consistently shields defenders at the catch point. Press coverage refinement and sustained separation remain areas for growth, but his catch strength and possession reliability project him as a high-floor perimeter starter. 5). Omar Cooper Jr., 6’0”, 200 lbs, Indiana Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Analysis: Explosiveness and contact balance drive Cooper’s impact. He threatens defenses vertically and horizontally with acceleration and run-after-catch creativity, fitting seamlessly into motion-heavy, spacing-based offenses. His physical temperament as a blocker adds to his multi-role value. Route consistency and detail will determine whether he reaches his ceiling, but the upside profiles as a dynamic WR2 with alignment versatility and big-play potential. 6). Malachi Fields, 6’4”, 220 lbs, Notre Dame Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Analysis: Fields brings classic boundary size and contested-catch reliability to the perimeter. He consistently plays through defenders at the catch point, shielding coverage on back-shoulder throws and intermediate concepts. While he lacks sudden release quickness and clean man-separation ability, his physicality and red-zone value project him as a possession-based WR2 with strong chain-moving utility. 7). Germie Bernard, 6’1”, 204 lbs, Alabama Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Analysis: Tempo and route polish define Bernard’s game. He uncovers at all three levels from both slot and outside alignments, winning with pacing and competitive toughness rather than pure speed. Without a true vertical second gear, his upside is tied to consistency and refinement against press, but his alignment flexibility gives him strong WR2/3 value. 8). C.J. Daniels, 6’2”, 205 lbs, Miami Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  3rd–4th Round Analysis: Route nuance and short-area efficiency anchor Daniels’ evaluation. He separates with sharp stems, fluid hip transitions, and a strong understanding of leverage, consistently presenting clean throwing windows at all three levels. Daniels tracks the football naturally and finishes outside his frame with body control and toughness in traffic. While he lacks elite vertical gear and does not consistently overpower defenders at the catch point, his football IQ, competitiveness, and willingness as a blocker make him a quarterback-friendly, scheme-versatile target. He projects as a high-floor WR3 with legitimate WR2 upside in timing-based or West Coast systems. 9). Kevin Concepcion, 5’11”, 187 lbs, Texas A&M Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Analysis: A quick-twitch slot weapon built on burst, short-area separation, and run-after-catch creativity. Concepcion thrives on option routes and quick-game concepts, creating immediate throwing windows. His game relies heavily on speed and acceleration rather than tempo manipulation, and contested-catch consistency remains developmental. Projects as a high-volume slot playmaker in spacing-based systems. 10). Chris Brazzell II, 6’5”, 200 lbs, Tennessee Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  3rd Round Analysis: A long, vertical perimeter target who wins with stride acceleration and catch radius. Brazzell stretches coverage downfield and finishes above the rim in contested situations. Limited suddenness underneath and strength versus tight man coverage cap his immediate ceiling, but refinement could unlock explosive outside playmaker value. 11). Zachariah Branch, 5’11”, 175 lbs, Georgia Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  3rd Round Analysis: Rare acceleration and open-field creativity make Branch one of the most explosive space players in the class. Much of his production has come on manufactured touches, and his route nuance must expand for full-time volume projection, but his immediate special teams value and motion-based offensive role create clear early impact potential. 12). Elijah Sarratt, 6’2”, 210 lbs, Indiana Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Analysis: Physicality and catch-point discipline define Sarratt’s profile. He consistently shields defenders, wins on back-shoulder concepts, and finishes through contact with strong timing and body control. While he lacks top-end vertical speed and elite suddenness, his understanding of leverage and route pacing allows him to create functional separation underneath. Press-coverage refinement will be key, but he projects as a dependable boundary chain-mover with red-zone value and WR2 upside. 13). Chris Bell, 6’2”, 220 lbs, Louisville Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Analysis: Power and run-after-catch ability drive Bell’s evaluation. He blends vertical acceleration with contact balance, creating explosive YAC opportunities on crossers and in-breakers. His physicality at the catch point adds red-zone and contested-catch value. Technical refinement versus press and improved hand consistency will determine how quickly he reaches his ceiling, but the upside projects as a physical WR2 with offensive centerpiece potential in a play-action-heavy system. 14). Antonio Williams, 5’11”, 190 lbs, Clemson Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  3rd Round Analysis: Tempo and spatial intelligence are the foundation of Williams’ game. He separates with leverage control, route pacing, and sharp footwork, consistently uncovering against man and zone. While he lacks true vertical gear and elite size, his run-after-catch vision and competitive toughness create reliable slot production. Projects as a high-floor volume slot starter in spacing-based offenses. 15). Skyler Bell, 5’11”, 185 lbs, Connecticut Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  3rd–4th Round Analysis: Route detail and short-area burst allow Bell to win at multiple levels. He accelerates quickly, manipulates stems, and consistently separates with sharp breaks. Though not a true burner, his technical consistency and improved hands profile him as a reliable slot/Z contributor early. Minor drop history and limited catch radius slightly cap his ceiling, but he projects as a high-floor timing-based receiver. 16). Malik Benson, 5’11”, 185 lbs, Oregon Grade Tier:  Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  3rd–4th Round Analysis: Track-caliber speed and vertical acceleration define Benson’s projection. He forces early hip turns from corners and creates natural separation on go routes, posts, and deep overs, consistently threatening explosive plays. His ball tracking and body control downfield are legitimate strengths, and his speed opens access throws underneath. However, a limited route tree, slender frame, and inconsistent release package create volatility against press-heavy coverage. Benson profiles as an immediate vertical X/Z field-stretcher with upside tied to refinement in tempo, leverage manipulation, and short-area route detail. 17). Ted Hurst, 6’3”, 185 lbs, Georgia State Grade Tier:  Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  4th–5th Round Analysis: Length and vertical speed highlight Hurst’s upside. He stresses coverage early in routes and tracks the ball naturally downfield. However, he must play with more physicality at the catch point and improve consistency against stronger competition. Development in route refinement and play strength will determine his long-term projection as a boundary starter. 18). Brenen Thompson, 5’9”, 170 lbs, Mississippi State Grade Tier:  Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  4th–5th Round Analysis: Rare acceleration and long-speed immediately define Thompson’s impact. A true vertical field-stretcher, he forces safeties to widen their landmarks and can flip coverage structure with pure speed. He complements that burst with sudden stop-start ability that makes double moves and underneath counters effective once defenders respect the deep threat. His undersized frame limits contested-catch wins and durability raises concerns, but he projects as a rotational deep-threat weapon capable of manufacturing explosive plays. 19). Bryce Lance, 6’3”, 209 lbs, North Dakota State Grade Tier:  Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  4th–5th Round Analysis: Stride length and ball tracking anchor Lance’s projection. He presses vertically and consistently finishes deep throws with concentration and frame control. However, limited short-area quickness and high-cut movement mechanics restrict sudden separation ability. The transition to NFL competition will test his consistency, but he fits best in a vertical offense that maximizes catch-point wins downfield. 20). Deion Burks, 5’9”, 188 lbs, Oklahoma Grade Tier:  Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  4th–5th Round Analysis: Acceleration and open-field creativity define Burks’ game. He separates underneath with sharp breaks and spatial awareness, then becomes dangerous after the catch with vision and lateral agility. Vertical consistency and contested-catch limitations cap his full-time upside, but he projects as a rotational slot weapon with return and manufactured-touch value in motion-heavy offenses. 21). Ja’Kobi Lane, 6’4”, 200 lbs, USC Grade Tier:  Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  4th–5th Round Analysis:n Catch-point dominance and red-zone utility highlight Lane’s profile. He consistently boxes out defenders with timing and body control, converting contested throws outside the numbers. While he flashes leverage awareness, his route tree lacks urgency and refinement, and he does not possess true vertical separation speed. Added strength and route detail will determine his ceiling, but he projects as a developmental boundary X with immediate scoring-area value. How We Grade the Wide Receiver Position Wide receivers are evaluated primarily on separation ability, alignment versatility, and functional playmaking impact. Grades are driven by how consistently a player can win against man and zone coverage, create throwing windows for the quarterback, and generate production independent of scheme manufacturing. In today’s NFL, receivers must function as movable chess pieces capable of aligning outside, in the slot, or in motion without sacrificing timing, spacing, or route integrity. Key factors include route tempo and detail, leverage manipulation, release package efficiency, catch-point consistency, and run-after-catch creation. We heavily weigh spatial awareness versus zone, toughness through contact, and the ability to finish in traffic. While size and timed speed matter, separation craft, football IQ, competitive temperament, and down-to-down reliability carry the most weight in a league increasingly built on spacing, rhythm, and yards after the catch. Football Scout 365 Grade Scale Elite NFL Projection:  Top 5–10 Picks (1st Round) Franchise-altering talent with elite physical tools, advanced processing, and minimal weaknesses. Immediate high-impact starter with difference-making ability. Near Elite NFL Projection:  Mid-to-Late 1st Round High-level prospect with strong traits and football intelligence. Expected to become a major contributor early in their career with Pro Bowl upside. High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Projects as a quality NFL starter with strong tools and functional traits. May require refinement, but offers consistent impact with development. Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  4th–5th Round Dependable starter or high-end rotational player. Solid athletic profile with some limitations that cap ceiling or require scheme fit. Low-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  6th–7th Round Developmental prospect with starter upside in defined roles. Inconsistencies in technique, processing, or durability limit long-term ceiling. Backup Level NFL Projection:  Undrafted Free Agent (UDFA) Depth player or rotational piece. Functional traits but limited upside for a long-term starting role. Not NFL Level NFL Projection:  Unlikely to Make NFL Roster Significant developmental needs across athleticism, technique, or processing. Long-shot to stick at the NFL level.

The quarterback conversation entering the 2026 NFL Scouting Combine is straightforward at the top and complicated immediately after. Fernando Mendoza remains the clear QB1 in this class, and his draft positioning is unlikely to change in Indianapolis. The real question begins with Ty Simpson. If Simpson is the projected QB2 entering the week, can he do enough to firmly plant himself in the Day One conversation? And after Mendoza and Simpson, who separates as QB3? Indianapolis provides a neutral environment — identical throws, identical interview structure, identical scrutiny. In a class defined by thin margins, the Combine could shape the order behind the top two. Ty Simpson, Alabama (Projected QB2) Analysis: Assuming Simpson enters Indianapolis as QB2, this is his opportunity to solidify first-round momentum rather than simply protect his current standing. His tape flashes timing, anticipation, and middle-of-the-field confidence, particularly when operating from structure. The concern lies in his limited starting experience, late-season inconsistency, and durability questions tied to his frame. The Combine is critical for Simpson. Clean mechanics during scripted throws, verified size, and strong interviews could push him toward the top of Round Two — with an outside shot at sneaking into late Round One conversations. A flat showing, however, tightens the margin between him and the rest of this tier. Garrett Nussmeier, LSU (Projected QB3) Analysis: Nussmeier’s draft arc has been volatile. A year ago, he was discussed as a potential QB1 candidate. Now, he enters Indianapolis fighting to stabilize his evaluation. Over a two-year sample, the tape shows NFL-caliber arm strength and flashes of high-level processing, but it also reveals turnover volatility and risk-heavy decision-making. The Combine represents a perception reset. If he throws with rhythm, demonstrates improved command, and handles interviews with composure, he could climb back into the Day Two conversation. Without that clarity, teams may view him as a developmental mid-round investment. Carson Beck, Miami NFL Draft Projection:  4th–5th Round Analysis: Beck remains one of the more complex evaluations in this group. When protected and operating within rhythm, he flashes strong accuracy and the ability to diagnose coverage structures. Under pressure, however, his performance can become streaky and negative plays snowball. The Combine should highlight his strengths — clean platform mechanics and natural arm talent in controlled throwing sessions. While his current projection sits in the late-round range, a sharp and confident performance in Indianapolis could help him reenter the broader Day Two discussion internally for some quarterback-needy teams. Cole Payton, North Dakota State NFL Draft Projection:  4th–6th Round Analysis: Payton is the traits-based wild card. The former FCS standout brings dual-threat ability, high-end arm elasticity, and impressive off-platform ball placement. His throwing motion is unconventional, but the ball jumps off his hand with velocity and life. The primary concern remains experience — only one season as a starter and limited exposure against Power Five competition. Indianapolis provides a critical apples-to-apples comparison against top-tier quarterbacks. If he looks natural, decisive, and consistent in drills, his stock could rise quickly. If inconsistencies show, teams may view him as a developmental late-round swing. Drew Allar, Penn State NFL Draft Projection:  4th–6th Round Analysis: Allar’s trajectory mirrors elements of both Nussmeier and Beck. Once viewed as a potential first-round quarterback, a disappointing 2025 campaign cooled that momentum. He possesses NFL-level arm strength and prototypical size, but his tendency to predetermine throws and lock onto primary reads has raised concerns about processing and adaptability. The Combine setting should showcase his pure arm talent. Whether it does enough to shift the broader evaluation remains the question. Cade Klubnik, Clemson NFL Draft Projection:  5th–7th Round Analysis: Klubnik enters Indianapolis as a classic tools-based projection. His arm strength and rushing ability are intriguing, and those traits should translate well during throwing sessions at Lucas Oil Stadium. However, inconsistent footwork and pocket presence remain areas that require development. The Combine will not erase structural concerns, but it can reinforce why his physical profile remains appealing to teams seeking a developmental quarterback with upside. Luke Altmyer, Illinois NFL Draft Projection:  5th–7th Round Analysis: Altmyer profiles as a developmental option with functional arm strength and a quick release. While it is difficult to project him into the top-75 mix, Indianapolis offers an opportunity to showcase velocity and mechanical efficiency in a structured setting. A clean and controlled week could solidify his status as an early Day Three selection for teams seeking quarterback depth with developmental upside.

The Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Big Board elevates player rankings with an innovative approach. We offer individual film-based player grades, tailored assessments of scheme fit, comprehensive player comparisons, and more to provide you with a thorough understanding of each prospect's potential. Top of Page NFL DRAFT BIG BOARD YEAR OFF/DEF POS 2026 1 S Caleb Downs Ohio State PROFILE 2 RB Jeremiyah Love Notre Dame PROFILE 3 QB Fernando Mendoza Indiana PROFILE 4 ED Rueben Bain Miami PROFILE 5 LB Arvell Reese Ohio State PROFILE 6 LB Sonny Styles Ohio State PROFILE 7 ED David Bailey Texas Tech PROFILE 8 OT Spencer Fano Utah PROFILE 9 WR Carnell Tate Ohio State PROFILE 10 IOL Olaivavega Ioane Penn State PROFILE 11 TE Kenyon Sadiq Oregon PROFILE 12 OT Francis Mauigoa Miami PROFILE 13 ED Akheem Mesidor Miami PROFILE 14 CB Mansoor Delane LSU PROFILE 15 WR Makai Lemon USC PROFILE 16 WR Jordyn Tyson Arizona State PROFILE 17 CB Jermod McCoy Tennessee PROFILE 18 IDL Peter Woods Clemson PROFILE 19 S Dillon Thieneman Oregon PROFILE 20 IDL Kayden McDonald Ohio State PROFILE 21 WR Denzel Boston Washington PROFILE 22 LB C.J. Allen Georgia PROFILE 23 WR Omar Cooper Jr. Indiana PROFILE 24 OT Kadyn Proctor Alabama PROFILE 25 CB Colton Hood Tennessee PROFILE First Prev Page 1 Next Last

Football Scout 365 provides NFL Draft analysis, player rankings, player grades, advanced stats, fantasy football analysis, and more. 2026 NFL Draft Positional Rankings Hub | Complete Player Grades and Scouting Reports The 2026 NFL Draft Positional Rankings Hub is your central resource for complete player grades, in-depth scouting analysis, and projected draft ranges across every position group. From premium defensive talent to modern offensive playmakers, this hub organizes the full 2026 NFL Draft board in one place, giving you structured rankings and evaluation tiers as the class continues to take shape. 2026 NFL Draft Big Board: Pre-Combine Top 100 Rankings 2026 NFL Draft Big Board reveals a class defined by starter-level depth and selective top-end talent. With 18 First-Round grades and 62 Day Two grades, this cycle emphasizes plug-and-play offensive contributors and elite defensive versatility. Headlined by Caleb Downs and Jeremiyah Love, the 2026 NFL Draft class offers perimeter strength, front-seven impact, and strong roster-building value. 1 S Caleb Downs Ohio State VIEW PROFILE 3 QB Fernando Mendoza Indiana VIEW PROFILE 5 LB Arvell Reese Ohio State VIEW PROFILE 7 ED David Bailey Texas Tech VIEW PROFILE 9 WR Carnell Tate Ohio State VIEW PROFILE 2 RB Jeremiyah Love Notre Dame VIEW PROFILE 4 ED Rueben Bain Miami VIEW PROFILE 6 LB Sonny Styles Ohio State VIEW PROFILE 8 OT Spencer Fano Utah VIEW PROFILE 10 IOL Olaivavega Ioane Penn State VIEW PROFILE TOP 10 NFL DRAFT PROSPECTS VIEW ALL RANKINGS Malik Benson’s Draft Stock Is Rising Ahead of the 2026 NFL Combine #shorts #foryou Play Video Cole Payton’s Draft Stock Could Skyrocket at the NFL Combine 👀 #shorts #foryou Play Video Fernando Mendoza, Ty Simpson Lead 2026 NFL Draft QB Rankings #shorts #foryou Play Video Jeremiyah Love, Jonah Coleman Lead The 2026 NFL Draft RB Rankings #shorts #foryou Play Video Play Video Play Video Facebook Twitter Pinterest Tumblr Copy Link Link Copied Close FEATURED CONTENT 2026 NFL Draft Big Board: Pre-Combine Top 100 Rankings Brandon Lundberg 22 minutes ago 2026 NFL Scouting Combine: Quarterbacks With the Most to Gain Brandon Lundberg 2 days ago 2026 NFL Draft Quarterback Rankings: Fernando Mendoza, Ty Simpson Headline A Weak QB Class Brandon Lundberg 2 days ago 2026 NFL Draft Running Back Rankings: Jeremiyah Love, Jadarian Price Headline a Top-Heavy RB Class Brandon Lundberg 3 days ago 2026 NFL Draft Positional Rankings Hub | Complete Player Grades and Scouting Reports Brandon Lundberg 4 days ago 2026 NFL Draft Wide Receiver Rankings: Carnell Tate, Jordyn Tyson, Makai Lemon Lead a Deep WR Class Brandon Lundberg 4 days ago 2026 NFL Draft Tight End Rankings: Kenyon Sadiq, Eli Stowers Lead a Versatile, Projection-Heavy Class Brandon Lundberg 6 days ago 2026 NFL Draft Offensive Line Rankings: Spencer Fano, Francis Mauigoa Headline Deep Class Brandon Lundberg 7 days ago VIEW ALL ANALYSIS

< Back Lee Hunter Texas Tech HT: 6040 WT: 325 YR: SR POS: IDL OVR RK 33 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL High-End Starter Potential OVR RK PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT Hunter is a massive, powerful interior presence built to control the A-gaps in both odd and even fronts. With a broad frame and elite wingspan, he wins at the point of attack with leverage, violent hands, and functional explosiveness off the snap. He consistently resets the line of scrimmage versus single blocks and has the strength to survive and recover against double teams. While not a dynamic gap penetrator or high-end pass rusher, he collapses the pocket with power and forces quarterbacks off their spot. Hunter projects as an early-down tone-setter and rotational interior anchor who can develop into a full-time starting nose tackle in a power-based defensive scheme. CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS High-End Starter Potential (65-69) A player expected to become a top-tier starter within their first few years. They possess strong physical tools and good technical skills but may have some limitations in their game. With development, they can reach near-elite levels and provide consistent impact at their position. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS Elite size Strong leverage/Hand Use Effective two-gap anchor KEY WEAKNESSES Limited pass-rush arsenal Pad level vs. double teams Rotational stamina questions PLAYER COMPARISONS DJ Reader Malik Benson’s Draft Stock Is Rising Ahead of the 2026 NFL Combine #shorts #foryou Play Video Cole Payton’s Draft Stock Could Skyrocket at the NFL Combine 👀 #shorts #foryou Play Video Fernando Mendoza, Ty Simpson Lead 2026 NFL Draft QB Rankings #shorts #foryou Play Video Jeremiyah Love, Jonah Coleman Lead The 2026 NFL Draft RB Rankings #shorts #foryou Play Video Play Video Play Video Facebook Twitter Pinterest Tumblr Copy Link Link Copied Close