Search Results
1553 results found with an empty search
- 2024 NFL Draft: USC QB Caleb Williams By The Numbers Analysis
2024 NFL Draft: USC QB Caleb Williams By The Numbers Analysis As we move into the 2024 NFL Draft player analysis before the 2023 college football season, we will provide in-depth scouting reports, film reviews, and more, covering the top players expected to declare for the 2024 NFL Draft. Each year the evaluation process starts with preliminary evaluations. Some are based on limited film reviews in the early stages; for others, we already have a full four games evaluated or more, and the final grade depends on the prospect's final season of film in college. Today, we look closer at the story the data can tell us for USC QB Caleb Williams, who is a projected 1st-round pick in the 2024 NFL Draft. Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Player Rankings and Analysis Don't forget to check out the Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Big Board. We have improved our analysis in recent years, adding player comparisons, NFL scheme fits, and more. Find Us On YouTube Our YouTube channel has become a central hub for our top NFL Draft player evaluations, fantasy football, and NFL analysis. Scouting Caleb Williams By The Numbers When Under Pressure In 2022, Caleb Williams was under pressure on 32% of his dropbacks (10th). Keeping A Play Alive Caleb Williams excelled at buying time to keep plays alive or pick up a first down with his legs in 2022. Among all QB's with 100+ pressured dropbacks, Williams extended plays out to 3.05 sec on average (5th). Williams ranked 8th nationally in total 1st downs when under pressure with 75. On Target Throws In A Clean Or Dirty Pocket Caleb Williams maintained a solid on-target throw rate even while under pressure in 2022. He was on target on 66% of his throws. He was also accurate in a clean pocket, completing 79% of his passes (27th nationally). Big Time Throws Caleb Williams ranked 4th nationally among FBS QB's with 32 big-time throws in 2022 when pressured or not pressured. These throws are considered tight window throws. He did have 13 big-time throws vs. pressure, which is 1 less than Drake Maye. Both are top 5 at making big-time throws under pressure. Bad Decisions Caleb Williams does need to clean up the decision-making. He was late or threw the football into traffic 11 times in 2022. Three Level Accuracy We discuss the three-level accuracy all the time and how it translates to the NFL, Short, intermediate, and deep throws. Short (0-9yds depth) Caleb Williams could improve his short accuracy. He completed 85% of his throws at this level of the field. 32% of his total throws were attempted at this level of the field, which is a lower number in an offense you might expect to attempt more throws at or near the line of scrimmage. He was top 20 in yards per attempt at this level, which is the number that matters most. If these throws are on time and on target at a 3% better rate, the yards per attempt could increase, which is why this data matters. Intermediate Throws (10-19yds depth) 23% of Caleb William's total throws were at this throw depth. Intermediate throws are a good measure that translates to the NFL level. Being accurate and consistent at this level is essential. By comparison, Williams and Drake Maye both display excellent accuracy at this level most of the time. Williams on target throw rate is 65%, while Maye is on target 66% of the time. Both ranked among the top 20 in college football in on-target throw rate. Both grade high in this category as well. Deep (20+ yds depth) In 2022, Caleb Williams on target throw rate of 48% ranked 14th in FBS among QB's with at least 50 attempts. By comparison, Drake Maye is 4th in on-target throw rate (53%). As a Runner Caleb Williams finished 2022 with 58 rush attempts and 624 sack-adjusted rush yards. Williams scored 10 rushing TD's. He was elusive in space, forcing 36 total missed tackles, and he was tough when needed picking up 359 of his total rush yards after contact. Williams picked up 42 total first downs using his legs. As a Passer In 2022, Caleb Williams took care of the football posting an elite 42/5 TD/INT ratio. He threw 4539 yards (ranking in the top 5) while completing 67% of his throws. *Some data is comprised using three different resources and combined within the analysis. We use PFF, SIS, and our internal data.
- Drake Maye’s Patriots Debut: 5 Key Observations
Drake Maye’s Patriots Debut: 5 Key Observations Drake Maye, chosen as the third overall pick by the Patriots in the 2024 NFL Draft and considered one of the top two or three quarterback prospects of the draft, made his NFL preseason debut on Thursday night against the Carolina Panthers. Here are five key observations from his first game as an NFL rookie. 1. Limited Snap Count Drake Maye’s debut was short-lived, with the rookie quarterback playing just one series in the Patriots' preseason opener against the Panthers. Completing 2-of-3 passes for 19 yards, Maye’s appearance was more of a teaser than a full showcase. Fans at Gillette Stadium were left wanting more, as Maye was quickly replaced by Bailey Zappe, prompting boos from the crowd. 2. Early Reps with the Starting O-Line Maye’s brief outing did have one notable aspect: it was his first time playing behind New England’s starting offensive line. This experience was crucial, despite the O-line’s struggles, including penalties and missed blocks. Working with the first-team unit will help Maye adjust to the speed and intensity of the NFL, even if the initial results were mixed. 3. Conservative Approach from the Patriots: The Patriots played it safe with their rookie, a decision likely influenced by the rainy conditions and the line’s shaky performance. Maye’s play-calling was conservative, featuring short passes and check-downs. This cautious approach kept him out of harm’s way but also limited his ability to demonstrate the full range of his skills. 4. A Taste of NFL Action Maye admitted to feeling some nerves before his debut, a natural response for a 21-year-old making his first NFL appearance. If you’re not nervous about something, it doesn’t mean anything to you. I think nerves are a good thing,” Maye said after the game ( Patriots.com ). Despite the limited action, he viewed the experience positively, saying it was “awesome” to finally play in front of fans at Gillette Stadium. This first taste of NFL action will serve as a foundation for future performances ( Patriots.com ). 5. Bigger Opportunities on the Horizon While Maye’s debut was brief, it’s clear that more significant opportunities are ahead. Head coach Jerod Mayo confirmed that the limited playing time was planned, with more substantial reps expected in the upcoming preseason games. As the Patriots prepare for joint practices with the Eagles, Maye will have the chance to further prove himself and possibly challenge Jacoby Brissett for the starting role.
- 2024 Fantasy Football Redraft Rankings: 2QB Superflex Format
2024 Fantasy Football Redraft Rankings: 2QB Superflex Format Fantasy Football: Check out our latest 2024 2QB super flex fantasy football redraft rankings! These rankings are based on our updated projections using a .5 PPR format, helping you make the best decisions for your draft. 2024 2QB Superflex Redraft Rankings Josh Allen (BUF) - QB Josh Allen is coming off a dominant 2023 season, finishing as the overall QB1 in fantasy football. However, after Joe Brady took over play-calling duties, Allen’s passing metrics dipped slightly, with reductions in passing attempts, yards, and touchdowns per game. Despite these concerns, his rushing upside keeps him as a top-three quarterback option for 2024. Lamar Jackson (BAL) - QB Lamar Jackson returned to form in 2023, finishing as a top-three fantasy quarterback for the first time since his MVP season in 2019. Jackson’s elite rushing ability remains a cornerstone of his fantasy value, and his passing efficiency continues to be underrated. With his dual-threat capabilities, Jackson has top-three upside once again in 2024. Patrick Mahomes (KC) - QB Patrick Mahomes experienced a “down” year in 2023, finishing as QB10 in fantasy points per game, largely due to defensive schemes and a weaker supporting cast. Despite this, his accuracy remained elite. With the addition of new playmakers in the Chiefs’ offense, Mahomes is poised for a strong bounce-back season and should be considered a top-three fantasy quarterback in 2024. Jalen Hurts (PHI) - QB Jalen Hurts finished as the QB2 in fantasy points per game in 2023, thanks to his 15 rushing touchdowns and consistent goal-line usage. Despite a dip in production, Hurts’ rushing ability and improved passing metrics keep him among the elite quarterbacks. With the addition of Kellen Moore as offensive coordinator, Hurts could lead a high-flying Eagles offense in 2024. Christian McCaffrey (SF) - RB Christian McCaffrey continued to dominate in 2023, finishing as the top running back in fantasy football. He was an RB1 in 81% of his games and showed no signs of slowing down. With his combination of rushing and receiving production, McCaffrey remains a lock for the RB1 spot heading into 2024. CeeDee Lamb (DAL) - WR CeeDee Lamb emerged as one of the top wide receivers in fantasy football in 2023, leading all WRs in half-PPR formats with 335 fantasy points. Lamb’s red-zone usage was a key factor in his success, though some regression is possible in 2024 due to the Cowboys’ red-zone trends. His ongoing contract negotiations add an element of uncertainty. Tyreek Hill (MIA) - WR Tyreek Hill finished as the WR2 in 2023, amassing over 1,700 receiving yards and 12 touchdowns. His deep-threat ability remains unmatched, and despite turning 30, Hill is still among the elite wide receivers in the NFL. With a restructured contract, Hill is set for another explosive season in 2024. C.J. Stroud (HOU) - QB C.J. Stroud quickly silenced critics in his rookie season, finishing as a top-10 fantasy quarterback in 2023. His passing efficiency was impressive, ranking highly in key metrics despite the narrative surrounding his S2 score. With added weapons like Joe Mixon and Stefon Diggs, Stroud is set for a strong sophomore campaign and could break into the top-five quarterbacks in 2024. Joe Burrow (CIN) - QB Joe Burrow’s 2023 season was hampered by injuries, including a calf strain and a season-ending wrist injury. However, when healthy, Burrow was among the top quarterbacks, ranking as QB4 in fantasy points per game from Weeks 5-10. With a clean bill of health for 2024, Burrow is a mid-round pick with top-five upside. Ja'Marr Chase (CIN) - WR Ja'Marr Chase solidified his role as the Bengals’ offensive cornerstone, finishing 2023 with 100 receptions and over 1,200 yards. Although he was WR13 overall, he ranked as WR6 during Weeks 1-10 with Joe Burrow under center. Chase’s consistent red zone presence makes him a prime candidate for WR1 status in 2024, though his contract situation is worth monitoring. Anthony Richardson (IND) - QB Bijan Robinson (ATL) - RB Amon-Ra St. Brown (DET) - WR Dak Prescott (DAL) - QB Tua Tagovailoa (MIA) - QB Breece Hall (NYJ) - RB Justin Jefferson (MIN) - WR A.J. Brown (PHI) - WR Kyler Murray (ARI) - QB Jahmyr Gibbs (DET) - RB Jordan Love (GB) - QB Brock Purdy (SF) - QB Jonathan Taylor (IND) - RB Jayden Daniels (WAS) - QB Garrett Wilson (NYJ) - WR Puka Nacua (LAR) - WR Kyren Williams (LAR) - RB Saquon Barkley (PHI) - RB Caleb Williams (CHI) - QB Derrick Henry (BAL) - RB Isiah Pacheco (KC) - RB Chris Olave (NO) - WR Marvin Harrison Jr. (ARI) - WR De'Von Achane (MIA) - RB Jared Goff (DET) - QB Kirk Cousins (ATL) - QB Drake London (ATL) - WR Trevor Lawrence (JAX) - QB Sam LaPorta (DET) - TE Travis Etienne Jr. (JAX) - RB Davante Adams (LV) - WR Travis Kelce (KC) - TE Brandon Aiyuk (SF) - WR Jaylen Waddle (MIA) - WR James Cook (BUF) - RB Joe Mixon (HOU) - RB Josh Jacobs (GB) - RB Mike Evans (TB) - WR Nico Collins (HOU) - WR Justin Herbert (LAC) - QB Michael Pittman Jr. (IND) - WR Aaron Rodgers (NYJ) - QB Mark Andrews (BAL) - TE Matthew Stafford (LAR) - QB Deebo Samuel (SF) - WR DeVonta Smith (PHI) - WR Rachaad White (TB) - RB Kenneth Walker III (SEA) - RB Deshaun Watson (CLE) - QB D.K. Metcalf (SEA) - WR Malik Nabers (NYG) - WR Trey McBride (ARI) - TE DJ Moore (CHI) - WR Rashee Rice (KC) - WR Cooper Kupp (LAR) - WR Alvin Kamara (NO) - RB Aaron Jones (MIN) - RB Baker Mayfield (TB) - QB Amari Cooper (CLE) - WR Geno Smith (SEA) - QB Will Levis (TEN) - QB David Montgomery (DET) - RB Stefon Diggs (HOU) - WR Dalton Kincaid (BUF) - TE Tee Higgins (CIN) - WR James Conner (ARI) - RB D'Andre Swift (CHI) - RB Zay Flowers (BAL) - WR Rhamondre Stevenson (NE) - RB Bryce Young (CAR) - QB Tank Dell (HOU) - WR Derek Carr (NO) - QB Terry McLaurin (WAS) - WR Sam Darnold (MIN) - QB Daniel Jones (NYG) - QB George Kittle (SF) - TE Kyle Pitts (ATL) - TE Najee Harris (PIT) - RB George Pickens (PIT) - WR Jaylen Warren (PIT) - RB Drake Maye (NE) - QB Keenan Allen (CHI) - WR Raheem Mostert (MIA) - RB Evan Engram (JAX) - TE Zamir White (LV) - RB Chris Godwin (TB) - WR Zack Moss (CIN) - RB Tony Pollard (TEN) - RB Brian Robinson (WAS) - RB Diontae Johnson (CAR) - WR Calvin Ridley (TEN) - WR Russell Wilson (PIT) - QB Javonte Williams (DEN) - RB Christian Kirk (JAX) - WR Tyjae Spears (TEN) - RB Xavier Worthy (KC) - WR Justin Fields (PIT) - QB Devin Singletary (NYG) - RB Jake Ferguson (DAL) - TE Jonathon Brooks (CAR) - RB David Njoku (CLE) - TE Jayden Reed (GB) - WR Ladd McConkey (LAC) - WR Chase Brown (CIN) - RB Ezekiel Elliott (DAL) - RB Romeo Doubs (GB) - WR Brock Bowers (LV) - TE Nick Chubb (CLE) - RB Marquise Brown (KC) - WR Brian Thomas Jr. (JAX) - WR Courtland Sutton (DEN) - WR Gus Edwards (LAC) - RB Bo Nix (DEN) - QB Christian Watson (GB) - WR Jaxon Smith-Njigba (SEA) - WR DeAndre Hopkins (TEN) - WR Austin Ekeler (WAS) - RB Jerome Ford (CLE) - RB Keon Coleman (BUF) - WR Dallas Goedert (PHI) - TE Zach Charbonnet (SEA) - RB Curtis Samuel (BUF) - WR Chuba Hubbard (CAR) - RB Gardner Minshew (LV) - QB Jakobi Meyers (LV) - WR Tyler Lockett (SEA) - WR Blake Corum (LAR) - RB Romeo Doubs (GB) - WR Jameson Williams (DET) - WR Rico Dowdle (DAL) - RB Jordan Addison (MIN) - WR Joshua Palmer (LAC) - WR Khalil Shakir (BUF) - WR Brandin Cooks (DAL) - WR T.J. Hockenson (MIN) - TE Trey Benson (ARI) - RB Tyler Allgeier (ATL) - RB Ty Chandler (MIN) - RB Mike Williams (NYJ) - WR Rashid Shaheed (NO) - WR
- 2025 NFL Draft: Quarterback Rankings – Cam Ward, Shedeur Sanders & Tyler Shough Lead an Uncertain Class
2025 NFL Draft: Quarterback Rankings – Cam Ward, Shedeur Sanders & Tyler Shough Lead an Uncertain Class The 2025 quarterback class lacks a generational No. 1 overall lock like in recent years, but one name has finally separated from the pack. Cam Ward has surged to the top of the board with his elite arm talent, poise under pressure, and dynamic off-platform playmaking—cementing himself as QB1 and a likely No. 1 overall pick. Meanwhile, Shedeur Sanders remains a close second, offering high-level field vision, accuracy, and decision-making that fits today’s rhythm-based NFL offenses. Though stylistically different, both bring franchise potential in the right systems. Behind them, a wide range of developmental and pro-ready quarterbacks offer varying traits—mobility, toughness, arm strength, and poise. This class might lack a Trevor Lawrence-type generational talent, but it has depth and intrigue, particularly with scheme-specific fits and long-term upside. 2025 NFL Draft: Quarterback Rankings Near Elite Tier - 1st Round Projection Prospects in this tier possess elite physical tools and production but may need refinement or have slight limitations preventing them from reaching the “Elite” category. 1) Cam Ward | Miami | Ht: 6'2" | Wt: 220 lbs Player Comparison: Justin Fields meets Josh Allen (without the size) Analysis: Ward is a dynamic, fearless passer with elite off-platform ability, arm angles, and downfield aggression. He showed outstanding poise and growth at Miami, elevating his NFL readiness. The gap between him and the rest of the class has widened post-Pro Day. A perfect fit for vertical, play-extending offensive systems. High-Level Starter Potential – Late 1st to Early 2nd Round Projection A high-floor, pro-ready quarterback with advanced processing, accuracy, and poise. Lacks elite traits but has the tools to thrive early in the right structure. 2) Shedeur Sanders | Colorado | Ht: 6'2" | Wt: 215 lbs Player Comparison: Joe Burrow Ceiling, with Andy Dalton floor Analysis: Sanders is a polished pocket passer with elite ball placement, field vision, and anticipation. His ability to dissect defenses in a rhythm-based offense makes him a high-floor prospect. However, he must improve his pocket movement and ability to avoid sacks to maximize his potential as an NFL starter. Mid-Level Starter Potential - 2nd/3rd Round Projection A projected starter with strong physical tools and solid mechanics. While they have some limitations, development can elevate them into a consistent impact player. 3) Tyler Shough | Louisville | Ht: 6'5" | Wt: 225 lbs Player Comparison: Not Available Analysis: Shough has the ideal size, arm strength, and mobility for the NFL. His ability to operate within play-action and RPO-heavy systems makes him an intriguing prospect. However, durability concerns and inconsistency have hampered his development, making him a high-upside project rather than a plug-and-play starter. 4) Jaxson Dart | Ole Miss | Ht: 6'2" | Wt: 220 lbs Player Comparison: Gardner Minshew Analysis: Dart is a tough, athletic quarterback with a quick release and a strong arm. He excels in RPO-heavy offenses where his fast decision-making and quick processing shine. However, he needs to improve his deep-ball accuracy and full-field reads to become a long-term NFL starter. 5) Quinn Ewers | Texas | Ht: 6'2" | Wt: 206 lbs Player Comparison: Derek Carr (Maybe) Analysis: Ewers is a naturally gifted passer with a quick release and high-level touch on throws at all three levels. He thrives in structured offenses but struggles with pocket awareness, deep-ball consistency, and ball security. His ability to develop within a system will determine his long-term ceiling. 6) Will Howard | Ohio State | Ht: 6'4" | Wt: 235 lbs Player Comparison: Ryan Tannehill Analysis: Howard has intriguing size, arm strength, and athleticism, making him a solid developmental prospect. He thrives in vertical passing attacks but needs refinement in accuracy, mechanics, and decision-making under pressure. His potential as a dual-threat QB adds value to his projection. 7) Kyle McCord | Syracuse | Ht: 6'3" | Wt: 224 lbs Player Comparison: Kirk Cousins Analysis: McCord is a mechanically sound pocket passer with high-level timing and accuracy. He fits well in structured offenses that emphasize quick decision-making. His lack of mobility and struggles under pressure cap his ceiling, but he has the tools to be a reliable game manager. Low-Level Starter Potential - 4th/7th Round Projection A developmental quarterback who has physical traits or experience but lacks the complete skill set to be a long-term franchise solution. 8) Jalen Milroe | Alabama | Ht: 6'2" | Wt: 220 lbs Player Comparison: Lamar Jackson (lite) Analysis: Milroe is an elite athlete with dynamic rushing ability and a powerful arm. His upside as a modern dual-threat QB is enticing, but he must refine his pocket presence, accuracy, and decision-making under pressure to become a consistent NFL starter. Best suited for a system incorporating designed QB runs and RPOs. 9) Dillon Gabriel | Oregon | Ht: 6'0" | Wt: 200 lbs Player Comparison: Gardner Minshew Analysis: Gabriel is a smart, timing-based passer who thrives in RPO-heavy offenses. His short-to-intermediate accuracy and ability to process quickly make him a great fit for a spread or West Coast scheme. However, his average arm strength and lack of top-tier athleticism limit his ceiling as a high-end starter. 10) Kurtis Rourke | Indiana | Ht: 6'5" | Wt: 223 lbs Player Comparison: Philip Rivers Analysis: Rourke possesses great size, touch, and field vision. He operates well in structured offenses that emphasize quick, on-time throws and vertical play-action shots. His mobility and pocket movement need improvement, but his arm talent and processing ability give him long-term upside. Backup Level – Day 3 Projection or Priority UDFA Developmental quarterbacks with physical tools, experience, or intangibles but lacking the consistency, traits, or upside to be long-term starters. 11) Riley Leonard | Notre Dame | Ht: 6'4" | Wt: 216 lbs Player Comparison: Not Available Analysis: Leonard is an intriguing blend of size, mobility, and arm strength. He fits well in pro-style offenses that emphasize play-action and vertical throws. His ability to extend plays adds value, but inconsistent ball placement and decision-making make him a long-term project rather than an immediate contributor.
- 404 | Football Scout 365
There’s Nothing Here... We can’t find the page you’re looking for. Check the URL, or head back home. Go Home
- 2024 NFL Draft Early Declaration Tracker: Running List of Declarations, Draft Declaration Deadline Info
2024 NFL Draft Early Declaration Tracker: Running List of Declarations, Draft Declaration Deadline Info NFL Draft Early Declaration Tracker Overview As the 2024 NFL Draft draws near, our comprehensive NFL Draft Underclassmen Tracker is your go-to source for the latest information on prospects deciding whether to enter the draft. This year marks a departure from the previous uncertainty regarding the deadline for underclassmen to declare their intentions, providing a much more transparent framework. Eligibility Landscape Post-COVID-19 The eligibility landscape has been complex following the NCAA's decision to grant an extra year of eligibility due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This resulted in a varied approach by educational institutions in listing their athletes' class years. Some schools advanced their players as per the usual progression, ignoring the extra year, while others retained athletes in their expected year of eligibility post-2021 season. As we move forward, the impact of these COVID-affected classes on eligibility is lessening. Tracking Underclassmen Decisions Our 2024 NFL Draft early declaration tracker aims to simplify this complexity. It includes decisions from players who have either accepted an All-Star game invitation post-season or have publicly declared their draft intentions or their decision to continue in school. To further clarify, we list these athletes based on their official class/year as per their school's roster page. This could result in scenarios like a "sophomore declaring for the draft" who is actually in their third year or a "redshirt senior" still having an additional year of eligibility. 2024 NFL Draft Declaration Deadline The deadline for declaring for the 2024 NFL Draft is firmly set for January 15, 2024. This contrasts with 2022's special deadline and establishes a clear cut-off for underclassmen to apply for Special Eligibility with the NFL. Adding to the excitement, for the first time, underclassmen are eligible to participate in prestigious events like the 2024 East-West Shrine Game and the 2024 Reese's Senior Bowl. The list of all underclassmen approved for the 2024 NFL Draft will be distributed to all 32 NFL teams by January 20, 2024. 2024 NFL Draft Early Declaration Tracker Quarterbacks Michael Pratt, Tulane Spencer Rattler, South Carolina Drake Maye, North Carolina Running Backs Braelon Allen, Wisconsin Tyrone Tracey Jr., Purdue Frank Gore Jr., Southern Miss MarShawn Lloyd, USC Miyan Williams, Ohio State Larry McCammon, FAU Ray Davis, Kentucky Jaden Shriden, Monmouth Bucky Irving, Oregon Jawhar Jordan, Louisville Jaylen Wright, Tennessee Emani Bailey, TCU Audric Estime, Notre Dame Trey Benson, Florida State Wide Receivers Xavier Worthy, Texas Anthony Gould, Oregon State Brenden Rice, USC Xavier Legette, South Carolina Jalen Coker, Holy Cross Lincoln Victor, Washington State Tulu Griffin, Mississippi State Ainias Smith, Texas A&M Bub Means, Pitt DeVaughn Vele, Utah Dayton Wade, Ole Miss Malik Washington, Virginia Johnny Wilson, Florida State Ricky Pearsall, Florida Devontez Walker, North Carolina Emeka Egbuka, Ohio State (Pending Confirmation) Keon Coleman, Florida State Tight Ends Jaheim Bell, Florida State Jared Wiley, TCU Theo Johnson, Penn State Tip Reiman, Illinois Ben Sinnott, Kansas State Offensive Tackles Patrick Paul, Houston Kiran Amegadjie, Yale Tyler Guyton, Oklahoma Andrew Raym, Oklahoma Joe Alt, Notre Dame Jordan Morgan, Arizona Caedan Wallace, Penn State Offensive Guards Kenneth Horsey, Kentucky Mike Katic, Indiana Keaton Bills, Utah Centers Jackson Powers-Johnson, Oregon Defensive Tackles Jer'Zhan Newton, Illinois Keith Randolph Jr., Illinois McKinnley Jackson, Texas A&M Leonard Taylor III, Miami (FL) Evan Anderson, Florida Atlantic Linebackers Jeremiah Trotter Jr., Clemson Marist Liufau, Notre Dame Cedric Gray, North Carolina Edgerrin Cooper, Texas A&M Cornerbacks Nate Wiggins, Clemson Quinton Newsome, Nebraska Max Melton, Rutgers Safeties Kamren Kinchens, Miami (FL) James Williams, Miami (FL) Cole Bishop, Utah Omar Brown, Nebraska Sione Vaki, Utah Edge Rushers Chop Robinson, Penn State Kickers/Punters Cam Little, Arkansas
- 2025 NFL Draft: 15 Tight Ends You Should Know Ahead of the 2024 College Football Season
2025 NFL Draft: 15 Tight Ends You Should Know Ahead of the 2024 College Football Season The 2024 NFL Draft showcased exceptional talent among tight ends, headlined by the generational standout Brock Bowers, who was taken by the Las Vegas Raiders with the 13th overall pick. Following him, Ben Sinnott from Kansas State was the next tight end selected, going in the second round. Over the subsequent days of the draft, ten additional tight ends were chosen. Looking ahead to the 2025 NFL Draft, while it may lack a singular generational talent, it features a deep and talented pool ready to bolster the NFL ranks. Today's analysis will spotlight 15 tight ends to keep an eye on during the 2024 college football season. We've ranked them based on their Expected Points Added (EPA) from the 2023 season. Understanding Expected Points Added (EPA) for Tight Ends EPA is a critical statistical measure in football that assesses the impact of each play on a team's scoring potential. This metric is particularly valuable in evaluating tight ends, as it quantifies how their actions on the field contribute to the team's ability to score and ultimately succeed. The Significance of EPA in Football Analytics EPA directly correlates with a team's success by linking tight end performance to scoring outcomes. Tight ends with high EPA values are often key players in executing successful plays that enhance the team's chances of scoring and winning. This makes EPA an increasingly popular metric in both NFL and college football analytics, providing deeper insights than traditional statistics such as total yards or touchdowns. By leveraging EPA, analysts, coaches, and fans can gain a more nuanced understanding of how strategic play-calling and individual player performances influence the overall game beyond mere statistical outputs. 15 2025 NFL Draft Prospects To Watch Ranked By 2023 Total EPA HAROLD FANNIN JR., BOWLING GREEN EPA: 33.88 (2nd) Summary Analysis: Harold Fannin Jr. had an impressive 2023 season, leading all MAC tight ends with 44 receptions and 623 yards, generating an EPA of 33.88, which ranks him 2nd among tight ends. His efficiency is underscored by a 73.3% catch rate and 2.9 yards per route run. Notably, Fannin did not drop a single pass, highlighting his sure-handedness. As a first-team All-Conference and CFN third-team All-America selection, he is poised to be a key player for Bowling Green in 2024. TERRANCE FERGUSON, OREGON EPA: 28.51 (4th) Summary Analysis: Terrance Ferguson showcased his talent in 2023 with 42 receptions for 414 yards and six touchdowns, generating an EPA of 28.51, ranking 4th among tight ends. His reliability is reflected in an 82.4% catch rate and 1.6 yards per route run. Ferguson's ability to consistently get open and make plays makes him a crucial part of Oregon's offense. With high praise from offensive coordinator Will Stein, Ferguson is expected to have an even more impactful 2024 season. COLSTON LOVELAND, MICHIGAN EPA: 26.86 (7th) Summary Analysis: Colston Loveland emerged as one of the best tight ends in college football during his sophomore year, generating an EPA of 26.86, ranking him 7th among tight ends. He accumulated 649 receiving yards on 65 targets with a 69.2% catch rate. His athleticism makes him nearly unguardable, and his 2.6 yards per route run reflects his effectiveness in the passing game. Loveland’s contributions are essential for Michigan’s offensive success. TYLER WARREN, PENN STATE EPA: 25.15 (8th) Summary Analysis: Tyler Warren was a pivotal player for Penn State in 2023, generating an EPA of 25.15, ranking 8th among tight ends. He led the team with 34 receptions, 422 receiving yards, and seven touchdown catches. His 64.2% catch rate and 1.7 yards per route run highlight his role as a reliable target in the passing game. Warren’s ability to convert opportunities, with a 73.5% first-down rate, makes him an essential part of Penn State's offense. BRYSON NESBIT, NORTH CAROLINA EPA: 24.19 (10th) Summary Analysis: Bryson Nesbit has been a reliable target for North Carolina, generating an EPA of 24.19, ranking 10th among tight ends. He caught 66.1% of his targets and averaged 2.1 yards per route run. His 91.7% on-target catch rate and ability to stretch the field with 14.3 yards per reception make him a significant offensive weapon. Nesbit's contributions are essential for North Carolina's passing attack, making him a prospect to watch for the 2025 NFL Draft. JACK VELLING, OREGON STATE EPA: 23.5 (11th) Summary Analysis: Jack Velling tied for the national lead with eight receiving touchdowns in 2023, generating an EPA of 23.5, ranking 11th among tight ends. His 1.7 yards per route run and 79.3% first-down rate highlight his efficiency in Oregon State’s offense. Velling’s athleticism and ability to find the end zone make him a top tight end prospect for the 2025 NFL Draft. AMARI NIBLACK, TEXAS EPA: 16.28 (24th) Summary Analysis: Amari Niblack showcased his athletic prowess during the 2023 season at Alabama, averaging 16.4 yards per reception and achieving an EPA of 16.28, which placed him 24th among tight ends. While Niblack should work on maintaining consistency, his knack for explosive plays makes him a promising prospect. Following his transfer to the Texas Longhorns, he is anticipated to play a significant role in their offense during the 2024 college football season. MITCHELL EVANS, NOTRE DAME EPA: 15.91 (26th) Summary Analysis: Mitchell Evans was playing like one of the best tight ends in the country before his season-ending injury in 2023, generating an EPA of 15.91, ranking 26th among tight ends. His 69% catch rate and 2.7 yards per route run demonstrate his impact on the field. Evans' ability to force missed tackles and find soft spots in coverage make him a valuable asset for Notre Dame. OSCAR DELP, GEORGIA EPA: 8.88 (68th) Summary Analysis: Oscar Delp's athleticism was on display in 2023, generating an EPA of 8.88, ranking 68th among tight ends. He caught 80% of his targets with a 2.3 yards per route run average. His ability to get open and make plays in the passing game is a significant asset for Georgia, and he is expected to take on a larger role in the upcoming season. GAVIN BARTHOLOMEW, PITTSBURGH EPA: 9.88 (89th) Summary Analysis: Gavin Bartholomew had a solid 2023 season with 18 receptions for 326 yards, generating an EPA of 9.88, ranking 61st among tight ends. His 62.1% catch rate and 1.7 yards per route run highlight his ability to make plays despite inconsistent quarterback play. Bartholomew's potential makes him a key player for Pittsburgh’s offense in 2024. BRANT KUITHE, UTAH EPA: 6.65 (87th) (2022 EPA) Summary Analysis: Despite missing the 2023 season, Brant Kuithe remains a top prospect due to his previous performance, generating an EPA of 6.65 in 2022, ranking 87th among the 2023 tight ends. His past achievements, including leading all FBS tight ends with 31 forced missed tackles from 2019-2021, showcase his playmaking ability. Kuithe is expected to make a strong return in 2024. LUKE LACHEY, IOWA EPA: 5.59 (101st) Summary Analysis: Luke Lachey’s 2023 season was cut short due to an ankle injury, generating an EPA of 5.59, ranking 101st among tight ends. Despite limited play, his previous performances, including a 77.7 receiving grade in 2022, highlight his potential. Lachey is expected to bounce back in 2024 and continue the tradition of elite Iowa tight ends. BENJAMIN YUROSEK, GEORGIA EPA: 1.75 (125th) Summary Analysis: Benjamin Yurosek had a challenging 2023 season at Stanford, generating an EPA of 1.75, ranking 125th among tight ends. Despite this, his previous achievements, including leading all returning tight ends with 1,300+ receiving yards since 2021, underscore his potential for a bounce-back year. Yurosek’s ability to create yards after the catch makes him a valuable asset for Georgia’s offense. JAKE BRININGSTOOL, CLEMSON EPA: -1.65 (150th) Summary Analysis: Jake Briningstool struggled in 2023, generating an EPA of -1.65, ranking 150th among tight ends. Despite these challenges, he has shown promise over the last two seasons, racking up 783 yards and nine touchdowns. Briningstool is poised to rebound in 2024 and solidify his role in Clemson’s offense.
- After Further Review: The Final Preseason Over Analysis Of The Top 2021 NFL Rookie QB's
After Further Review: The Final Preseason Over Analysis Of The Top 2021 NFL Rookie QB's The 2021 preseason brought a lot of hype, especially regarding the top rookie QB's from the 2021 NFL Draft class. The intrigue of how each of the top rookie QB's would perform in each of the last three weeks has been at the top of NFL headlines. So today, I will deliver my final review of the top 2021 NFL Draft QB's after three weeks of preseason football. A 2021 Pre-Draft Summary Review and How Each Of the QB's Performed In their Week One Preseason Debut's I highlighted the debuts of each of the top NFL rookie QB's all of which are vying for a starting position. Many may or may not know that I had Trevor Lawrence listed as the top QB in the 2021 NFL Draft, followed by Justin Fields, Zach Wilson, Mac Jones, and Trey Lance. My 2021 NFL Draft argument in summary for each player is as follows. Trevor Lawrence (has all the tools) Go To NFL Draft Big Board Player Profile Justin Fields (tough, intelligent, athletic, conflict player, with great accuracy) Go To NFL Draft Big Board Player Profile Zach Wilson (Arm talent, precision passer, extends plays with legs, did not play against the best competition at BYU, needs time to develop) Go To NFL Draft Big Board Player Profile Mac Jones (Anticipatory thrower, intelligent, a statue with good pocket movement) Go To NFL Draft Big Board Player Profile Trey Lance (Athlete, strong arm, needs work on short, intermediate game, great deep accuracy, needs to develop, competition level in college a factor) Go To NFL Draft Big Board Player Profile How the Rookie QB's Rank Post Preseason No change in the rankings. Jacksonville Jaguars Trevor Lawrence in a Bad Spot As A Rookie 3 GP, 3 GS, 31-44, 70.5% comp rte , 323 pass yds, 3 pass TD's, 0 INT's , 9 rush yds, 0 rush TD's, 3 Sacks, 106.5 QBR One thing is prominent; Trevor Lawrence is in a bad spot in Jacksonville, and he has the potential to struggle mightily. Lawrence made some great throws throughout and finished week three strong vs. the Cowboys completing 11-12 passes for 139 yards and two TD's. Even though it was against the Cowboy's backups, Lawrence showed us his potential completing two-deep balls, one for a TD. Chicago Bears Justin Fields In a Bad Spot As A Rookie, But Athleticism Covers Up Bears Deficiencies 3 GP, 1 GS, 30-49, 61.2% Comp Rte, 276 Pass Yds, 2 pass TD's, 0 INT's , 92 rush yds , 1 rush TD, 3 sacks, 90.2 QBR Andy Dalton might start week one, but Justin Fields will take the reigns before you know it. Fields can do a lot with his legs; he can extend plays when pass pro breaks down and move the chains in crucial third-down situations. When Fields has time, he does a good job making decisions from the pocket. He is in no way a perfect player, but the Bears got a good one who has the potential to be the best QB in the class down the road. New York Jets QB Zach Wilson Proved He Might Be More NFL Ready Than Expected 2 GP, 2 GS, 15-20, 75% comp rte , 191 pass yds, 2 TD's, 0 INT's , 0 rush yds, 0 rush TD's, 0 sacks , 137.7 QBR The Jets will be the worst team in their division, but Wilson provides great optimism in the same way that Justin Fields does for the Bears. His accuracy, ability to extend plays and decisiveness as a thrower in the preseason have stood out. He has a great rapport with free agent WR Corey Davis which is a big deal. And he has already made some big-time tight-window throws in the preseason. Wilson, like, Lawrence is in a bad spot on a somewhat unpredictably bad team. New England Patriots QB Mac Jones Is as Efficient As Advertised Coming Into The NFL 3 GP, 0 GS, 36-52, 69.2% comp rte , 389 pass yds, 1 pass TD, 0 INT's , 3 rush yds, 0 rush TD's, 5 sacks , 97.4 QBR I believed that Mac Jones would be the most NFL-ready rookie entering the NFL. For starters, he is a distributor by nature. He does not possess any of the jaw-dropping physical tools that the other top QB's in the 2021 NFL Draft have. Still, his anticipatory throwing and pocket awareness is precisely why the Patriots drafted him. He also takes care of the football, and that is important to a defensive-minded team. The reality is, can he consistently move the football in a real NFL game? And when needed, can he drive the football vertically when presented with the opportunity? He proved he could do all these things in the preseason. Assuming he has done enough to surpass veteran QB Cam Newton, will it translate to the regular season? San Francisco 49er QB Trey Lance Is As Advertised, Will Be a Co-Starter (Lance Gets Three Paragraphs) 3 GP, 0 GS, 19-41, 46.3% comp rte , 276 pass yds, 3 pass TD's , 1 INT, 16 rush yds, 1 rush TD, 6 sacks , 83.0 QBR After watching the 49ers vs. the Raiders yesterday, I see the vision and how alternating QB's in Shanahan's system can work. I also witnessed a few things that might not be so beneficial in the regular season. You can do some creative stuff regarding breaking tendencies and keeping defenses on their heels with an alternating QB system. But as I witnessed vs. the Raiders, a false start penalty on a drive that could have been the result of two QB's alternating and the difference in their cadence could be an issue down the road in a critical moment. In addition, I watched the 49ers alternate to Trey Lance when Jimmy G had a nice rhythm going, and that can be an issue as well. Outside of that, I think there is something to what Shanahan is doing, and because Lance needs time to develop, alternating the two can be beneficial to his growth. I believe that Shanahan has something great brewing with his idea of rotating the two QB's. Lance is by far the one guy I have been keeping an eye on. I thought Shanahan should have taken Fields if he wanted to go the athlete at QB route, I believe Fields is far more NFL ready, but he chose Lance, who possesses a big arm and a tough running style ahead of the more NFL ready guys. In Summary Justin Fields and Zach Wilson proved they have what it takes to be starting NFL QB's. They show NFL-ready traits and other developmental qualities. Mac Jones proved he is what he is, an efficient player who distributes the football and protects the football. Trevor Lawrence had ups and downs, but his talent is undeniable. Lawrence is in a bad spot; he will get a reprieve more than the other guys due to his situation unless he completely flops in the regular season. Trey Lance needs more development on short, intermediate throws but did improve every week. Trey Lance has a big arm and great deep accuracy, something we knew entering the 2021 NFL preseason. QB Whose Stock Improved The Most In Preseason Zach Wilson improved his stock the most in the preseason, he and Lawrence will both be rookie starters out of the gate, and it was important for both to show they could handle that responsibility as rookies, and both proved they have the ability. Wilson completed 75% of his throws, and posted a 137.7 QBR on 20 pass attempts in two preseason starts. Every One Of the Top Rookie QB's Might Start At Some Point In 2021 Every one of these guys might be the starter for their respective teams in 2021 at some point. With Justin Fields pushing to be the starter and pressure mounting on Matt Nagy from the media and Bears faithful, it might come to fruition in week one and the rumors of Mac Jones taking the reigns as early as week one for the Patriots. We already know Zach Wilson and Trevor Lawrence are the starters for the Jets and Jaguars, it is Trey Lance who is on the bubble even though he will get a lot of snaps in 2021 if the alternating QB approach is indeed the route Kyle Shanahan plans to go. 2021 NFL Draft QB Rankings Remain The Same Following Preseason My rookie QB rankings haven't changed based on the data in the preseason. I am confident, based on the situation, that Lawrence will struggle. Zach Wilson has some pieces to be successful, but the Jets overall roster will provide some inconsistent moments, and Justin Fields is in a similar situation to Zach Wilson in that I believe he has some nice parts around him, but the OL is a question mark and the coaching staff decision making does not provide a lot of confidence. Mac Jones and Trey Lance are in the best positions to be successful as rookies.
- 404 | Football Scout 365
There’s Nothing Here... We can’t find the page you’re looking for. Check the URL, or head back home. Go Home
- Colston Loveland Dynasty Rookie Profile – Fantasy Football 2025
Colston Loveland Dynasty Rookie Profile – Fantasy Football 2025 Colston Loveland Dynasty Rookie Profile TE – Chicago Bears | Drafted: Round 1 | College: Michigan Colston Loveland enters the NFL as one of the most dynamic tight end prospects in recent memory. A top-10 pick by the Chicago Bears, Loveland lands in a creative Ben Johnson offense alongside Caleb Williams, Rome Odunze, and D.J. Moore. With vertical stretch ability and a versatile skill set, Loveland projects as a high-ceiling rookie with immediate top-12 TE fantasy upside in PPR formats. College Career Recap Loveland stepped into the spotlight at Michigan as a true freshman in 2022, emerging behind Luke Schoonmaker. By 2023, he became the Wolverines’ primary receiving threat at tight end, racking up 45 receptions for 649 yards and 4 TDs during a national title run. His 2024 season was slightly shortened by a shoulder injury, but he still broke Michigan’s single-season TE record with 56 receptions. While Michigan’s offense leaned heavily on the run game, Loveland made the most of his opportunities, finishing his college career with a 2.22 yards per route run average and a separation rate in the 96th percentile. He exits Ann Arbor as one of the most efficient tight ends of the past five seasons and a legitimate downfield threat who can work all three levels of the field. NFL Scouting Report Measured at 6'6", 248 pounds with 10" hands and a 32.75" arm length, Loveland profiles as a modern hybrid tight end with elite receiving upside. He’s fluid in and out of breaks, with the ball skills and route-running nuance to create separation against linebackers and safeties. He shows great control on deep routes and adjusts well to off-target throws. His main concerns come from inline blocking, where he lacks ideal power and leverage against defensive ends. Still, his overall effort and technique offer hope for growth with NFL coaching. Loveland’s contested catch rate needs refinement, but his ability to stretch the seam and win after the catch makes him a mismatch weapon in today’s pass-heavy NFL. Scheme Fit & Projected Role with Bears Loveland steps into a retooled Chicago offense led by new head coach Ben Johnson, who turned Sam LaPorta into a fantasy superstar in Detroit. Johnson isn’t afraid to feature athletic tight ends in the vertical passing game, and Loveland fits that mold perfectly. Despite the presence of Cole Kmet and Durham Smythe, Loveland is expected to command a significant snap share as a rookie, especially in 11 personnel. The Bears' wide receiver room is stacked with D.J. Moore, Rome Odunze, and Luther Burden III, but Loveland was drafted ahead of Burden and is likely to be a top-three option in the target pecking order. Expect him to be featured on seam routes, crossers, and schemed YAC opportunities — all staples of Ben Johnson’s tight end usage. Rookie Outlook (2025) Floor: Low-end TE1 in PPR formats; red zone weapon with weekly volatility Ceiling: Top-6 fantasy tight end with explosive YAC upside and vertical usage Early Projection: 55–70 receptions, 700+ yards, 5–7 TDs Expected PPG (0.5 PPR): 8–12 Long-Term Dynasty Value Colston Loveland is a foundational dynasty TE prospect and a top-2 tight end in the 2025 rookie class. His high-end draft capital, elite athleticism, and perfect scheme fit under Ben Johnson make him a long-term TE1 candidate. While he may share snaps early on with Cole Kmet, Loveland’s upside is undeniable — he has the traits and situation to emerge as the next great fantasy tight end.
- 2024 Senior Bowl Day One Standout Players: Roman Wilson, Quinyon Mitchell, and Ladd McConkey Stole The Show
2024 Senior Bowl Day One Standout Players: Roman Wilson, Quinyon Mitchell, and Ladd McConkey Stole The Show Day one of the 2024 Senior Bowl is in the books, and there were some noticeable standouts on the first day. Below, I provide some of my day one Senior Bowl observations for the top performers. Click Here: Check out the Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Big Board top 100 player rankings. We evaluate every player using a proprietary grading process that involves film evaluation combined with advanced data. On the back end, our scouting process mirrors the same process deployed by current NFL front-office personnel so that we can deliver the most in-depth player scouting reports available. All of this is currently free (subject to change). Each player scouting report includes: In-depth player scouting report Play Style and Scheme Fit Analysis Player Strengths & Weaknesses Player Comparisons Taliese Fuaga, Offensive Tackle FS365 BB Rk: 13, Mid-Level Starter Potential Taliese Fuaga is as advertised. He had a great day one at the Senior Bowl, including some nice one-on-one wins vs Laiatu Latu. Known for his powerful run blocking and solid pass protection, his performance as a right tackle was dominant throughout the day. Laiatu Latu, Edge, UCLA FS365 BB Rk: 21, High-End Starter Potential Laiatu Latu impressed with a variety of pass-rush moves and his exceptional burst off the line during the first day. His agility, power in the pass rush, and efforts in run defense showcased his well-rounded capabilities and high-end starter potential. Michael Penix Jr., Quarterback, Washington FS365 BB Rk: 27, Mid-Level Starter Potential Michael Penix Jr. exhibited remarkable arm talent on Day 1, particularly noticeable on deep throws. His quick decision-making and poise under pressure suggested traits that could be advantageous in a pro-style offense. Quinyon Mitchell, Cornerback, Toledo FS365 BB Rk: 46, Mid-Level Starter Potential (We are moving his ranking up) Quinyon Mitchell showcased his skills in both man and press coverage during the first day of the Senior Bowl. His competitive nature, excellent reaction times, and ability to quickly close on the ball were evident, reinforcing his potential effectiveness in various coverage schemes. Tyler Guyton, Offensive Tackle, Oklahoma FS365 BB Rk: 54, Under Review Tyler Guyton stood out on Day 1 with his size and strength, effectively dominating in one-on-one drills. He displayed good footwork and balance in pass protection, suggesting his capability to handle speed rushers and maintain solid blocks. Ladd McConkey, Wide Receiver, Georgia FS365 BB Rk: 51, Mid-Level Starter Potential Ladd McConkey's route-running abilities were on full display during the first day, where he consistently created separation from defenders. His excellent hands and understanding of leverage against defenders emphasized his adaptability and potential in various offensive setups. Roman Wilson, Wide Receiver, Michigan FS365 BB Rk: 80, Mid-Level Starter Potential Roman Wilson made a strong impression on Day 1 of the Senior Bowl, showcasing his ability to create mismatches and make contested catches. He demonstrated quick acceleration and sharp route running, underscoring his potential in a vertical passing game.
- 404 | Football Scout 365
There’s Nothing Here... We can’t find the page you’re looking for. Check the URL, or head back home. Go Home











