Search Results

2025 NFL Draft: 10 Sun Belt Draft Prospects to Watch This Season The Sun Belt Conference had six players selected during the 2024 NFL Draft, showcasing a slew of impressive prospects. Among those selected were Marshall running back Rasheen Ali, Georgia State offensive lineman Travis Glover, and Troy running back Kimani Vidal. As the 2024 college football season approaches, we’ve identified the top 10 Sun Belt prospects to watch for the 2025 NFL Draft. 10 Sun Belt Draft Prospects to Watch This Season 1. Jason Henderson, LB, Old Dominion Jason Henderson is arguably the best overall defender in the Sun Belt. He led the nation in tackles per game with 14.2 and finished second in total tackles with 170. Henderson’s ability to make plays all over the field makes him a top candidate for the 2025 NFL Draft. 2. Jordan McCloud, QB, Texas State The reigning Sun Belt Conference Player of the Year, Jordan McCloud has thrown for nearly 7,000 yards and 58 touchdowns in his college career. With his dual-threat ability and impressive production, McCloud is poised for another massive season, making him a top quarterback prospect in the Sun Belt. 3. Ben Bell, DE, Texas State Ben Bell was a standout pass rusher in 2023, accumulating 10 sacks and 16 tackles for loss. With his high motor and relentless pursuit, Bell is the conference’s best returning edge defender and a key player to watch in 2024. 4. Joey Aguilar, QB, App State Joey Aguilar took the Sun Belt by storm last season, setting new program records for passing yards (3,757) and touchdowns (33). His ability to command the offense and produce at a high level makes him a sleeper quarterback prospect in the 2025 NFL Draft. 5. Ismail Mahdi, RB, Texas State Despite his smaller stature at 5’9” and 180 pounds, Ismail Mahdi is an electric playmaker. After producing 1,606 total yards and 11 touchdowns in 2023, Mahdi’s versatility and big-play potential make him an intriguing prospect. 6. Jacob Dobbs, LB, James Madison Jacob Dobbs, a Holy Cross transfer, brings a wealth of experience to James Madison’s defense. With 432 tackles and 22.5 sacks during his collegiate career, Dobbs is expected to be the star of the Dukes' defense and a top linebacker prospect in the Sun Belt. 7. Jaden Voisin, SAF, South Alabama Jaden Voisin has been a force in South Alabama’s secondary, recording 151 tackles, 18 passes defensed, and six interceptions over the past two seasons. His ability to impact the game as both a coverage defender and a tackler makes him a top safety prospect. 8. Ethan Johnson, CB, App State Ethan Johnson emerged as a ball magnet for App State last season, with 11 pass breakups and one interception. His ability to disrupt the passing game, combined with his strong run support, makes him one of the top cornerbacks in the conference. 9. Chris Lewis, WR, Troy Chris Lewis is a big-bodied boundary receiver who averaged an astounding 22.97 yards per catch in 2023, leading the nation in that category. With 10 touchdowns on just 32 receptions, Lewis is a dynamic playmaker who should be Troy’s top receiving threat in 2024. 10. Ayo Adeyi, RB, James Madison Ayo Adeyi transferred to James Madison after three productive seasons at North Texas, where he averaged 6.8 yards per carry. Adeyi’s explosive running style and big-play ability make him a standout performer in the Sun Belt.

Mason Graham NFL Draft Scouting Report: Michigan’s Dominant Defender and Potential No. 1 Overall Prospect Summer Scouting Series: Football Scout 365 Analyst Brandon Lundberg shares his initial insights on key draft-eligible college football players in anticipation of the 2024 college football season. Mason Graham Overview Mason Graham has emerged as one of the premier defensive tackles in college football. Playing on a stacked Michigan Wolverines defensive unit, the 6’3”, 318-pound standout has become a cornerstone of the Wolverines' defense. Originally from Anaheim, California, Graham was a four-star recruit out of Servite High School, where he played alongside future NFL prospects like Noah Fifita and Tetairoa McMillan. Despite being lightly recruited, Michigan recognized his talent early and brought him to Ann Arbor, where he has since blossomed into a dominant force. In 2023, Graham recorded 3 sacks and 7.5 tackles for loss, earning First-Team All-Big Ten honors and helping Michigan secure a College Football Playoff berth. His ability to disrupt both the run and pass game has made him one of the most feared defensive tackles in the nation. As he enters his junior year, Graham is poised to be one of Michigan’s first selections in the 2025 NFL Draft, potentially contending for the number one overall pick in the draft. Measurables Height: 6’3” Weight: 318 pounds 2023 Stats: 3 sacks, 7.5 TFL, 42 total tackles Ceiling Potential: Elite Starter Potential Playstyle & Scheme Fit Graham primarily operates as an interior defensive lineman, excelling as a 3-technique in even fronts but also offering the versatility to play across multiple alignments. His quick first step and lateral agility make him a constant threat to penetrate gaps and disrupt plays. Graham’s ability to generate pressure and hold up against the run makes him an ideal fit for both one-gap and two-gap schemes. Player Comparisons Mason Graham’s blend of explosiveness, power, and evolving hand technique has led to comparisons with Aaron Donald. Like Donald, Graham can collapse the pocket with his strength while displaying the elite quickness that frequently demands double teams from opponents. His versatility across multiple positions along the defensive line, combined with his relentless motor, mirrors Donald's game-changing impact and adaptability. Where He Excels Graham combines an explosive first step with excellent lateral agility, allowing him to penetrate gaps and create havoc in the backfield. His hand usage is among the best in college football, as he consistently defeats blocks with quick and powerful swipes, rips, and push-pulls. Graham’s ability to stack and shed blockers makes him a formidable run defender, and his relentless motor ensures that he’s always in pursuit of the ball carrier. His versatility allows him to be effective in various defensive schemes and alignments, making him a valuable chess piece on the defensive line. Strengths High-ceiling pass-rush upside Strength and body control at the point of attack Efficient hand fighter to deconstruct blocks Improvement Areas Looking ahead to the 2024 season, Graham needs to work on improving his flexibility and hand usage. Enhancing his ability to bend around blocks and maintaining his balance after first contact will be crucial. Additionally, Graham must refine his ability to hold up against lateral duo blocks in the zone game, as his momentum can occasionally be used against him. Weaknesses Adequate arm length Rotational hip flexibility Ankle flexion Advanced-Data and Statistics In 2023, Graham earned an 85.1 overall PFF grade, including an 83.3 run-defense grade and a 79.0 pass-rush grade. His ability to create havoc in the backfield went beyond his ability to pressure the QB in 2023, as he recorded 45 defensive stops as a run defender. Graham was one of only two interior defensive linemen in the country to finish with top-10 grades as both a pass rusher and run defender, further solidifying his reputation as a disruptive presence on Michigan's defensive line. NFL Draft Projection Mason Graham projects as an early first-round pick in the 2025 NFL Draft. With his combination of strength, agility, and relentless motor, he has the potential to become a cornerstone player on an NFL defensive line. Continuing to refine his technique and improving consistency will be key to reaching his full potential as an elite defensive tackle in the league.

Moses is a true sideline to sideline player, that plays with good technique. He is a very physical and competitive player. Where he needs to improve is in pass coverage. He can get caught looking in the backfield, which does not bode well against play-action and RPO based offenses. Has played all LB positions. < Back Dylan Moses Alabama HT: 6030 WT: 235 YR: SR POS: LB OVR RK 72 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 7 High-End Starter Potential PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT Moses is a true sideline to sideline player, that plays with good technique. He is a very physical and competitive player. Where he needs to improve is in pass coverage. He can get caught looking in the backfield, which does not bode well against play-action and RPO based offenses. Has played all LB positions. CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS High-End Starter Potential (65-69) A player expected to become a top-tier starter within their first few years. They possess strong physical tools and good technical skills but may have some limitations in their game. With development, they can reach near-elite levels and provide consistent impact at their position. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS KEY WEAKNESSES PLAYER COMPARISONS

Stay informed on the rules and guidelines for using Football Scout 365 with our terms of service. Read through to learn about the terms and conditions that govern the use of our webpage. We aim to provide you with the best possible experience while keeping your safety in mind. TERMS OF SERVICE Acceptance of Terms By accessing, browsing, or using FootballScout365.com (the “Site”), you agree to be bound by these Terms and Conditions (“Terms”). Football Scout 365 reserves the right to modify or update these Terms at any time without prior notice. Your continued use of the Site following any changes constitutes acceptance of those changes. If you do not agree to these Terms, you are not authorized to access or use this Site. Purpose of the Site FootballScout365.com is a football scouting and NFL Draft analysis platform that publishes original editorial content, including scouting reports, rankings, grades, projections, opinions, and commentary. All public content on this Site is provided for general informational and editorial purposes only. Public Content vs. Professional Services FootballScout365.com provides public, informational content intended for broad audiences. This public website content does not constitute professional scouting services, consulting services, or individualized evaluation. Football Scout 365 may, on a case-by-case basis, provide private scouting reports, evaluations, or consulting services to individual athletes, agents, professional football teams, college football programs, athletic departments, or media organizations. Any such professional services are provided only pursuant to a separate written agreement and are governed exclusively by the terms of that agreement. Nothing contained on this public website shall be interpreted as offering, guaranteeing, or substituting for professional scouting services. Draft Decision and Reliance Disclaimer NFL Draft prospects, agents, advisors, or other parties may reference Football Scout 365 content as part of a broader evaluation process. However, all analysis, grades, rankings, projections, and opinions published by Football Scout 365 represent only one component of a larger body of information. Users are expressly advised not to rely solely on Football Scout 365 content when making decisions regarding draft declaration, eligibility, transfer decisions, representation, roster status, or career planning. Football Scout 365 does not guarantee draft position, selection status, contracts, roster outcomes, or professional advancement and assumes no responsibility for decisions made based in whole or in part on its content. All advice or analysis provided by Football Scout 365 is intended to supplement—not replace—other evaluations, data sources, and professional judgment. Third-Party Reports and Media Use Football Scout 365 may provide scouting reports, analysis, or evaluations to third parties, including media outlets, agents, professional organizations, or athletic departments, as part of its professional services or business solutions. Such materials are provided for informational and editorial purposes only and do not constitute endorsements, guarantees, or representations regarding player outcomes. Any redistribution, publication, or citation of such materials by third parties does not expand or modify the obligations or liabilities of Football Scout 365 beyond the scope of the applicable agreement governing that service. User Submissions Football Scout 365 welcomes constructive feedback and communications. If you submit or send any content to FootballScout365.com, including text, ideas, suggestions, or other materials (“Submissions”), you grant Football Scout 365 a worldwide, perpetual, irrevocable, royalty-free, and transferable license, including the right to sublicense, to use, reproduce, modify, publish, distribute, and display such Submissions in any media and for any purpose. All Submissions are considered non-confidential and non-proprietary. Football Scout 365 is under no obligation to maintain confidentiality, provide compensation, or acknowledge any Submission and shall not be liable for any use or disclosure of Submissions. Restrictions on Use All content on FootballScout365.com, including text, articles, reports, graphics, logos, videos, and site design (collectively, the “Content”), is owned by Football Scout 365 unless otherwise stated. You may not copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, scrape, data-mine, transmit, or commercially exploit any Content without prior written consent, except as expressly permitted below. Limited portions of text Content may be copied or shared solely for personal, non-commercial use, provided that all copies include the following notice: © 2026 FootballScout365.com. All rights reserved. Nothing on this Site shall be construed as granting any license or right to use Football Scout 365 intellectual property beyond what is expressly stated in these Terms. Third-Party Websites and Links The Site may contain links to third-party websites for reference or informational purposes. Football Scout 365 does not control, endorse, or assume responsibility for the content, accuracy, or practices of any third-party websites. Third-Party Platforms and Social Media Content Football Scout 365 publishes and distributes original football scouting and NFL Draft analysis across third-party platforms, including but not limited to YouTube and X (formerly Twitter). Content published on these platforms may include excerpts, summaries, short-form analysis, video clips, or commentary designed to direct users to FootballScout365.com for additional context. All content published on third-party platforms is subject to the terms, policies, moderation practices, and availability of those platforms. Football Scout 365 does not control, operate, or assume responsibility for third-party platforms, including the accuracy, visibility, moderation, removal, or continued availability of content hosted on such platforms. Analysis or commentary presented on third-party platforms may be abbreviated, condensed, or contextualized differently than full scouting reports or articles published on FootballScout365.com. Users are advised not to rely solely on third-party platform content when evaluating players, draft decisions, or professional outcomes and should consult full reports and additional sources as part of a broader evaluation process. References, excerpts, links, or embedded media directing users from third-party platforms to FootballScout365.com are provided for informational and promotional purposes only and do not create any additional obligations, warranties, guarantees, or professional duties beyond those expressly stated in these Terms. Disclaimers and No Warranties All content on FootballScout365.com is provided on an “as is” and “as available” basis without warranties of any kind, express or implied. Football Scout 365 makes no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or timeliness of any content. All scouting reports, evaluations, rankings, grades, projections, and opinions reflect subjective analysis and opinion only and are not statements of fact or guarantees of outcome. Football Scout 365 does not guarantee uninterrupted, secure, or error-free access to the Site and shall not be responsible for technical issues beyond its control. Limitation of Liability To the fullest extent permitted by law, Football Scout 365 shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, special, or punitive damages arising out of or related to your use of, or inability to use, the Site or its content, even if advised of the possibility of such damages. Your sole remedy for dissatisfaction with the Site is to discontinue use. Copyright and Trademarks FootballScout365.com, Football Scout 365, and all related names, logos, and branding are trademarks of Football Scout 365. Unauthorized use is strictly prohibited. All other trademarks, logos, or service marks appearing on the Site are the property of their respective owners and are used for identification purposes only. Copyright Infringement (DMCA Notice) Football Scout 365 respects the intellectual property rights of others. If you believe that any content on this Site infringes your copyright, please submit a written notice including: A description of the copyrighted work claimed to be infringed The specific URL or location of the allegedly infringing material Your name, address, telephone number, and email address A statement that you have a good-faith belief the use is not authorized A statement, under penalty of perjury, that the information provided is accurate and that you are authorized to act on behalf of the copyright owner Notices should be sent to: Football Scout 365 Marketing Football Scout 365 will respond to valid notices in accordance with applicable law. Modification or Discontinuation of the Site Football Scout 365 reserves the right to modify, suspend, or discontinue any portion of the Site at any time without notice. Governing Law and Venue These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Ohio, without regard to its conflict of law principles. Any legal action or proceeding arising out of or relating to these Terms or your use of the Site shall be brought exclusively in the state or federal courts located within the State of Ohio, and you consent to the personal jurisdiction and venue of such courts. Severability If any provision of these Terms is found to be unlawful, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect. Contact Information For questions regarding these Terms, please contact: Football Scout 365 Marketing

Top Waiver Wire and Trade Targets for Fantasy Football Week 3: Fields, Johnston, Henry, Steele Are Potential League Winners With Week 2 of the 2024 NFL season almost complete, it’s time to look toward Week 3 of the NFL season. Below, we highlight top waiver and trade targets at running back, wide receiver, tight end, and quarterback based on last week’s performances. Top Waiver Wire and Trade Targets for Fantasy Football I use Sleeper app ownership projections, but these numbers may vary. I don’t have a hard threshold for ownership percentages because some of these potential league-winning plays may need to be acquired via trade. Justin Fields, QB, Pittsburgh Steelers (31.2%) Fields continues to flash his dual-threat ability, and while the Steelers' offense is still evolving, his rushing production has returned to the forefront of his fantasy value. In Week 2, Fields rushed 12 times for 76 yards, adding solid rushing value that buoys his fantasy floor. 2-0 as Steelers' starter 22 rushing attempts through two games, 2nd among QBs behind Jayden Daniels Fields' improved passing efficiency (his completion percentage is up 10 points) and his ability to avoid turnovers make him an intriguing pickup. The Steelers offense is still taking shape, but if Fields remains the starter, he has the upside to be a weekly QB1, especially with his running ability. Quentin Johnston, WR, Los Angeles Chargers (6%) Johnston has finally begun to show the upside that made him a first-round pick in 2023. After struggling with drops and limited playing time as a rookie, Johnston led the Chargers in targets, yards, and touchdowns in Week 2. 5 receptions, 51 yards, 2 touchdowns on 6 targets in Week 2 Showed improved route running and contested catch ability As long as Justin Herbert is under center, there will be enough volume for a Chargers receiver to thrive. Johnston’s increased role in the offense, especially in the red zone, makes him a speculative add with massive upside as the season progresses. Hunter Henry, TE, New England Patriots (24%) Henry has long been a reliable but overlooked tight end option. In Week 2, he proved why he still deserves attention, leading the Patriots in receiving yards and targets. 8 receptions for 109 yards on 12 targets in Week 2 Patriots' pass game lacks a true WR1, allowing Henry to be the focal point With the Patriots' wide receivers struggling to dominate targets, Henry could continue to be Mac Jones' go-to option in the passing game. For teams looking for TE stability, Henry is a must-add as a consistent top-10 fantasy option at the position. Carson Steele, RB, Kansas City Chiefs (1.6%) With Chiefs starting RB Isiah Pacheco leaving Week 2 in a walking boot and now expected to land on IR, Carson Steele is poised to step into a larger role. While Samaje Perine handles third-down work, Steele is expected to see early-down and goal-line opportunities if Pacheco misses time. Increased short-yardage and goal-line role in Week 2 Chiefs' run-heavy approach will offer Steele valuable touches If Pacheco is sidelined, Steele could become the early-down workhorse in Kansas City’s high-powered offense. His value will skyrocket in the short term, making him one of the most important waiver wire targets of the week.

< Back Anthony Hill Jr. Texas HT: 6030 WT: 235 YR: JR POS: LB OVR RK 47 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL High-End Starter Potential PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT Hill is a prototype modern linebacker with elite size, range, and disruptive upside at 6’3”, 240+ pounds, flashing three-down NFL traits and high-level SEC production. He is at his best attacking downhill, blitzing interior gaps, scraping to the perimeter, and closing violently with length and burst. His tackling efficiency improved significantly in 2025 (sub-5% miss rate), showing growth in consistency. While he offers solid zone flashes, he is not yet a polished coverage linebacker and can lag in route anticipation and spatial discipline. Continued refinement in coverage will determine whether he becomes a true every-situation defensive centerpiece. CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS High-End Starter Potential (65-69) A player expected to become a top-tier starter within their first few years. They possess strong physical tools and good technical skills but may have some limitations in their game. With development, they can reach near-elite levels and provide consistent impact at their position. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg KEY STRENGTHS Sideline-to-sideline range Versatile usage Natural downhill blitzer KEY WEAKNESSES Can be late to disengage Occasionally overruns angles Refine patience/trust keys PLAYER COMPARISONS

College Football Playoff Preview: Ohio State vs. Oregon – Rose Bowl Rematch with Championship Stakes The stage is set for one of the most anticipated rematches in College Football Playoff history. No. 1 Oregon (13-0) will face No. 8 Ohio State (11-2) in the historic Rose Bowl on New Year’s Day. For Oregon, this game represents a chance to continue their undefeated season and move closer to a national championship. For Ohio State, it’s an opportunity to avenge their heartbreaking 32-31 loss in October, a game defined by controversial officiating and critical late-game errors. Both teams enter the rematch playing their best football of the season, setting the stage for a high-stakes battle between two of the nation’s most balanced and talented rosters. With championship aspirations and NFL scouts watching closely, this game highlights elite talent on both sides of the ball for each team, including rising NFL Draft prospects at quarterback, dominant defensive linemen, and explosive-skill players. Key Storylines to Watch Key Storylines: Oregon’s Defense vs. Ohio State’s Passing Game Oregon’s defense has been one of the most efficient against the pass this season, allowing just 176 passing yards per game—ranking 8th nationally. Their ability to pressure quarterbacks, led by edge rusher Jordan Burch, has been critical, with a sack rate of 8.5% (18th nationally) . However, in their first matchup, the Ducks struggled at times to contain Ohio State’s explosive passing attack. Will Howard delivered one of his best performances of the season back in October vs. Oregon, completing 28 of 35 passes for 326 yards, two touchdowns, and no interceptions. Ohio State’s offense was aggressive and efficient early, averaging 8.7 yards per play in the first quarter and building a 165-84 advantage in total yards. Emeka Egbuka and Jeremiah Smith combined for 19 receptions, 193 yards, and two touchdowns, frequently exploiting mismatches in Oregon’s secondary. While Oregon allowed explosive plays, their defense adjusted as the game progressed. They limited Ohio State to just 4 of 12 on third downs, stayed disciplined with only three penalties compared to Ohio State’s eight, and avoided turnovers that could have shifted momentum. The key to putting Ohio State into unfavorable passing situations is to keep their run game in check. In the first meeting, the Ducks held Ohio State to 4.3 yards per rush attempt—not dominant, but good enough to keep Ohio State in 3rd-and-obvious passing situations. To replicate their prior success, Oregon will need to contain Ohio State’s big-play threats and leverage their pass rush to disrupt Will Howard’s rhythm. This means forcing longer 3rd-down situations, allowing them to pin their ears back and get after the QB. A consistent pass rush, paired with disciplined coverage, will be critical to neutralizing the Buckeyes’ passing attack and securing another victory. Key Storylines: Oregon’s Offense vs. Ohio State’s Defense On the flip side, Oregon’s high-powered offense, averaging 36.9 points per game, will face an Ohio State defense that has allowed just 11.7 points per game over its last five matchups. Dillon Gabriel, the engine of Oregon’s offense, will be crucial. He has completed 72% of his passes this season, averaging 8.8 yards per attempt, and delivered a stellar performance in their first meeting, throwing for 341 yards and two touchdowns. Gabriel’s efficiency and his ability to extend plays with his legs (8.0 yards per rush in the first matchup) add another layer of complexity for Ohio State’s defense. Ohio State’s defense has undergone a transformation since that October loss, particularly in their pass defense, which hasn’t allowed a touchdown through the air in five games. Anchored by edge rushers J.T. Tuimoloau and Jack Sawyer, along with elite interior lineman Tyliek Williams, the Buckeyes boast one of the most formidable fronts in college football. This unit will be tasked with limiting an Oregon rushing attack that averages 5.0 yards per carry and tallied 155 rushing yards in the first meeting. Jordan James, who rushed for 115 yards and a touchdown in October, remains a key weapon for the Ducks. For Ohio State, the key will be keeping Oregon’s offense off schedule. The Ducks excel in manageable situations, converting 50% of third downs (5th nationally). However, in the first matchup, Oregon struggled in longer third downs, converting just 43% overall and only 2 of 5 in the third quarter. Forcing Oregon into third-and-5 or longer will allow the Buckeyes’ pass rush to focus on Gabriel, limiting the dual-threat quarterback’s ability to exploit mismatches. If Oregon can establish their run game as they did in October, averaging 5.0 yards per carry, it will be difficult for Ohio State to contain their balanced attack. However, if the Buckeyes can clog running lanes and pressure Gabriel consistently, they’ll have a much better chance of disrupting one of the nation’s most efficient offenses. Top NFL Draft Prospects to Watch Ohio State: TreVeyon Henderson, RB : Electrifying back with elite vision and breakaway speed. Quinshon Judkins, RB : Bruising runner who excels in short-yardage and goal-line situations. J.T. Tuimoloau, EDGE : Versatile defender capable of disrupting any offensive game plan. Jack Sawyer, EDGE : Relentless edge rusher who thrives against both the pass and run. Emeka Egbuka, WR : Reliable target with exceptional hands and route-running ability. Will Howard, QB: A poised, strong-armed passer with improving accuracy and decision-making. Oregon: Jordan Burch, EDGE : Dominant presence on the defensive line with elite athleticism. Derrick Harmon, IDL: Powerful interior disruptor with exceptional pocket-collapsing strength. Jordan James, RB : Versatile playmaker with balance and elusiveness. Dillon Gabriel, QB : Seasoned dual-threat quarterback with the ability to deliver in clutch moments. Previous Meeting Highlights Score: Oregon 32, Ohio State 31 (October 12, 2024) Gabriel’s 341 passing yards and three total touchdowns paced Oregon’s offense. Controversial officiating and clock mismanagement in the final moments derailed Ohio State’s comeback. Ohio State vs. Oregon Odds and Projection Ohio State enters the Rose Bowl as a narrow favorite with a -2.5 spread, and the total points line is set at 54.5. The implied final score projects Ohio State narrowly edging Oregon, 28.5-26 , reflecting the balance between Ohio State’s defensive resurgence and Oregon’s offensive firepower. Prediction The prediction for this Rose Bowl rematch leans slightly in Ohio State’s favor, thanks to their recent defensive dominance and offensive resurgence. The Buckeyes’ defense, which hasn’t allowed a passing touchdown in five games, is well-equipped to challenge Oregon’s explosive attack, bolstered by a revitalized pass rush featuring J.T. Tuimoloau and Jack Sawyer. Offensively, Ohio State’s rushing tandem of TreVeyon Henderson and Quinshon Judkins has excelled behind an improved offensive line, as demonstrated in their dominant performance against Tennessee. While Oregon brings a balanced offense and the dynamic playmaking of Dillon Gabriel, the Buckeyes’ ability to control the trenches on both sides of the ball gives them a slight edge in what promises to be a thrilling contest. Projected Implied Score: Ohio State 28.5, Oregon 26

2025 NFL Draft: Lacarea Pleasant-Johnson, Tony Dungy’s Nephew, Emerging as a Hidden Gem DB Prospect Each year, the NFL Draft showcases a handful of under-the-radar, hidden gem prospects—players with untapped potential who are often overlooked in the pre-draft spotlight. The 2025 NFL Draft is no exception, offering a deep pool of talent just waiting to be discovered. Today, we’re featuring one such prospect: Lacarea Pleasant-Johnson (LPJ) , a standout cornerback from Southern Utah University. With an elite combination of size, speed, and versatility, LPJ possesses the tools to develop into a high-level NFL contributor. Beyond his physical attributes, his resilience, leadership, and commitment to giving back make him an exceptional individual on and off the field. A true sleeper in this year’s class, LPJ is poised to turn heads as the draft approaches. Lacarea Pleasant-Johnson (LPJ) | Cornerback | Southern Utah University Height: 6’1” | Weight: 178 lbs | Wingspan: 79.0” | Arm Length: 34.28” | Hand Size: 10.0” | 40-Yard Dash: 4.42 (hand-timed) Background Lacarea Pleasant-Johnson, better known as LPJ, enters the 2025 NFL Draft as one of the most intriguing cornerback prospects from the FCS level. A former 3-star recruit and the No. 15-ranked player out of Arizona, LPJ started his collegiate career at Utah, transferred to UNLV, and found his stride at Southern Utah. Nephew to NFL Hall of Famer Tony Dungy, LPJ has the athletic pedigree, size, and skill set to develop into a starting-caliber NFL cornerback. He honors his late mother by wearing #31, which has become a symbol of his resilience and focus. LPJ’s 2024 season highlighted his potential, where he started every game, allowed no 100-yard receiving performances, and showcased the versatility to thrive in both press-man and zone coverage schemes . His verified Junior Day metrics, including a hand-timed 4.42 40-yard dash , a 79.0” wingspan , and 34.28” arms , give him one of the most physically impressive profiles in the draft. Strengths Size and Length: Ideal frame for an NFL cornerback with a 6’1” height and a massive 79.0” wingspan. His arm length (34.28”) allows him to consistently disrupt receivers in phase or at the LOS. Top-End Speed: A 4.42-second 40-yard dash (hand-timed) highlights his ability to cover ground quickly and stick with vertical threats. Ball Skills: Anticipates routes well, evidenced by 3 interceptions in 2024, including a highlight 59-yard pick-six against UC Davis . Versatility: Has experience at both boundary corner and nickel, thriving in both press and zone coverage systems. Run Support: Physical tackler who isn’t afraid to engage in run defense, with 2.5 tackles for loss in 2024. Mental Toughness and Leadership: Overcame significant personal adversity, channeling that into a focused, team-first approach on and off the field. Football IQ: NFL bloodlines combined with experience across three collegiate programs have prepared him to understand advanced defensive concepts. Weaknesses Tackling Consistency: While physical, his technique in wrapping up ball carriers can be refined. Mirroring Quick Receivers: Needs improvement in short-area footwork to match smaller, shifty NFL receivers. Developmental Coverage Technique: Could benefit from further refinement in man coverage, particularly in tracking through the receiver’s route tree. 2024 Season Highlights Games Played: 12 Tackles: 31 total (25 solo) TFL: 2.5 for 6 yards Sacks: 0.5 for 1 yard Interceptions: 3 (72 return yards, 1 touchdown) Pass Breakups: 9 Notable Performance: A 59-yard pick-six against UC Davis demonstrated his ability to capitalize on poor throws and create game-changing plays. NFL Comparisons 1. Richard Sherman (Seattle Seahawks) LPJ shares Sherman’s combination of size, length, and intelligence. Like Sherman, he excels in press coverage, using his physicality and length to disrupt passing windows. His ability to track the ball and handle contested throws makes him an intriguing option for teams running Cover-3 or press-heavy schemes. 2. Channing Stribling (Michigan) LPJ’s combination of height and length is reminiscent of Channing Stribling, a former Michigan cornerback known for his frame and ball skills. Like Stribling, LPJ thrives in trail coverage and excels with his back to the quarterback, showing a natural ability to contest deep throws. However, Stribling’s lack of recovery speed and fluidity limited his NFL ceiling. LPJ offers a higher athletic upside with a verified 4.42 speed and superior arm length, but they share a similar need to refine short-area quickness and change-of-direction skills. Personal and Off-Field Impact LPJ’s character and leadership qualities shine just as brightly off the field as they do on it. NFL Bloodlines: As the nephew of Tony Dungy, NFL Hall of Famer, and cousin of Eddie Pleasant (former NFL safety) and MarJon Beauchamp (NBA player), LPJ has been exposed to elite athletic mentorship his entire life. Foundation: LPJ plans to launch the "Jaquel Pleasant Foundation" in honor of his late mother. This nonprofit will focus on supporting children who have lost parents to cancer, offering camps, resources, and financial assistance to those in need. Education: A dedicated student-athlete, LPJ has earned a Bachelor’s degree in Sociology from UNLV and is pursuing a Master’s in Sports Broadcasting and Communication at Southern Utah. Resilience: Having lost his mother at age 11, LPJ uses his mother’s memory as motivation. His journey through adversity is a testament to his mental toughness and relentless pursuit of excellence. NFL Draft Projection Projected Round: Late Day 3 Potential - Undrafted Free Agent Best Scheme Fit: Press-heavy or zone-based secondary. LPJ’s size, length, and speed fit the profile for NFL teams seeking a physical corner capable of matching up with larger receivers. Key Quotes On his game: “I model my game after Richard Sherman. I bring length, size, speed, and physicality to any secondary.” On his motivation: “I wear #31 because my mom passed away at that age. Every time I step on the field, I honor her memory.” Summary Lacarea Pleasant-Johnson is a sleeper prospect with all the physical tools and mental makeup to succeed at the NFL level. His combination of elite length, 4.42 speed, and versatility makes him an ideal fit for aggressive NFL defenses. Having allowed no 100-yard receiving games during his college career, LPJ has already shown the ability to be a lockdown defender. Off the field, LPJ’s leadership, academic achievements, and dedication to giving back through his foundation further highlight his potential to be a positive influence both in the locker room and in the community. With interest from several NFL teams and a strong Pro Day, he could solidify his spot as a Day 3 draft steal. LPJ is a player with the physical and mental attributes to outperform his draft position and contribute as a starter early in his career.

2026 NFL Draft QB Rankings: Who Is the QB1? 2026 NFL Draft QB Rankings Update: Indiana’s Fernando Mendoza has emerged as the new QB1, while Dante Moore, LaNorris Sellers, Carson Beck, and Garrett Nussmeier battle for position in a deep, evolving quarterback class. The 2026 NFL Draft quarterback race is heating up, and as we reach the midpoint of the 2025 college football season, the top of the board looks very different from what it did in the summer. What started as a battle between Arch Manning and Garrett Nussmeier during the early scouting cycle has shifted dramatically. Fast-forward to mid-October, and Indiana’s Fernando Mendoza has emerged as the new front-runner — while Dante Moore, LaNorris Sellers, Carson Beck, and Nussmeier are all fighting for positioning just behind him. The 2026 QB class looks deeper and more balanced than the 2025 crop, but without a consensus star like we saw in 2024. There’s a mix of polish, projection, and potential, and the next two months will decide who rises into solid first-round territory — and who fades into Day 2. This week’s Football Scout 365 Scouting Notebook builds off our updated Big Board Rankings , focusing on how each of these quarterbacks has evolved since the summer. The back half of the season will ultimately determine who cements their place at the top — but the early tape points to one of the most balanced and intriguing QB classes in recent years. QB1: Fernando Mendoza, Indiana — Stock Up (Round 1 Projection) Mendoza has gone from under-the-radar transfer to legitimate first-round prospect and the current QB1 on the Football Scout 365 Big Board . At 6-foot-5, 225 pounds, he checks every measurable box: size, arm strength, poise, and leadership. Indiana’s RPO-heavy system has unlocked his timing and leverage-based accuracy, especially in the red zone, where he leads the FBS in touchdown efficiency. His biggest growth area since his Cal days is poise — he’s learned to stay on rhythm under pressure and deliver from structure. While he’s not a dynamic runner, he’s athletic enough to extend plays and keep his eyes downfield. In our latest Mock Draft 2.0 , Mendoza went No. 1 overall to the New Orleans Saints, a perfect scheme fit for Kellen Moore’s offense. QB2–QB3 Battle: Nussmeier, Beck, Moore, Sellers — Stock Up & Down The race for QB2 is wide open, and several names are jockeying for position behind Mendoza. Garrett Nussmeier (LSU) entered the year with first-round expectations and has shown flashes of elite arm talent and vertical aggression. He’s a fearless thrower who thrives in rhythm but can veer into “hero-ball” mode when pressing. His five early interceptions and eight turnover-worthy plays are signs of the volatility that still defines his game — but the upside remains high. Carson Beck (Miami) has been the biggest riser since September. After transferring from Georgia, he’s looked more confident and efficient, completing 74% of his passes with 11 touchdowns through five games. His footwork, anticipation, and clean mechanics make him one of the most pro-ready passers in this class. Beck fits the mold of a Shanahan or McVay-style system quarterback who wins with precision and timing. Dante Moore (Oregon) continues to climb as well. After transferring from UCLA and sitting behind Dillon Gabriel last year, Moore looks far more mature and decisive under Will Stein’s play-calling. He’s completed 74% of his throws with 14 touchdowns and just one pick — and while he’s still developing, his pocket calmness and field vision flash NFL starter traits. Then there’s LaNorris Sellers (South Carolina) , perhaps the most polarizing prospect of the group. At 6-3, 240, he’s built like a linebacker but moves like a running back. Sellers’ improvement in accuracy (cutting his off-target rate nearly in half) is encouraging, but his post-snap processing and short-game pacing still need refinement. The ceiling is enormous — and so is the learning curve. If Sellers or Moore stay in school for another season, they could headline the 2027 QB class. But if they declare, both project as high-upside Day 1 or early Day 2 picks. Stock Watch: Risers and Fallers While Mendoza, Beck, and Moore are trending upward, others have seen their stock take a serious hit. Drew Allar (Penn State) has dropped significantly. After starting the season with QB1 hype, inconsistency, and a season-ending injury have further derailed his campaign. Cade Klubnik (Clemson) has suffered a similar fall. Once viewed as a potential top-10 pick, his timing and anticipation have evaporated under pressure, and the Clemson offense hasn’t helped. Klubnik still has the tools, but right now, he looks more like a mid-day two, early-day 3 project than a franchise cornerstone. On the flip side, Ty Simpson (Alabama) is climbing fast. After a rough opener, Simpson has rebounded with 16 touchdowns to just one interception, completing 84% of his catchable passes. He’s showing maturity, poise, and an ability to operate on time — exactly what NFL evaluators look for in a Year 1 starter. The Current QB Rankings (Mid-Season Update) 1️⃣ Fernando Mendoza, Indiana — QB1 (Round 1 Projection) 2️⃣ Garrett Nussmeier, LSU — QB2 (Early Day 1–Mid Day 2) 3️⃣ Carson Beck, Miami — QB3 (Late Day 1–Early Day 2) 4️⃣ Dante Moore, Oregon — QB4 (Round 1–Day 2 Borderline) 5️⃣ LaNorris Sellers, South Carolina — QB5 (Late Day 1–Early Day 2)

2025 NFL Draft: Safety Rankings – Malaki Starks & Nick Emmanwori Headline a Position Versatile Class The 2025 safety class offers a strong mix of versatility, physicality, and coverage ability, making it one of the more well-rounded groups in recent years. While it may not feature multiple first-round locks, it is led by Georgia’s Malaki Starks and South Carolina’s Nick Emmanwori, both of whom possess the rare blend of athleticism and instincts that make them immediate impact players at the next level. Starks is a true playmaker with elite range and man-to-man ability, while Emmanwori is a hybrid safety-linebacker with the size and physicality to thrive in multiple roles. Beyond the top names, this class is filled with quality depth, offering a variety of skill sets that cater to different defensive schemes. From ball-hawking safeties who excel in coverage to physical enforcers who can operate in the box, teams will have plenty of options on all three days of the draft. While the elite, can’t-miss prospects may be fewer than in some past years, the overall talent level provides NFL teams with the opportunity to find productive contributors at various points in the draft. 2025 NFL Draft: Safety Rankings Near Elite Tier - 1st Round Projection 1) Malaki Starks | Georgia | Ht: 6'1" | Wt: 205 lbs Player Comparison: Jessie Bates III Analysis: Starks is an elite, scheme-versatile safety with range, physicality, and ball skills to excel in any defensive system. His NFL-ready tackling and instincts allow him to play single-high, split-zone, or box safety. Needs to refine eye discipline and pursuit angles to maximize his impact. High-End Starter Potential - 2nd/3rd Round Projection 2) Nick Emmanwori | South Carolina | Ht: 6'3" | Wt: 227 lbs Player Comparison: Divine Deablo Analysis: Emmanwori is a supersized, physical defensive back with the versatility to play hybrid safety-linebacker roles. His length, speed, and tackling ability make him a tone-setting presence against the run, while his coverage skills allow him to match up against tight ends. Needs refinement in man coverage transitions. 3) Xavier Watts | Notre Dame | Ht: 5'11" | Wt: 198 lbs Player Comparison: Harrison Smith Analysis: Watts is a high-IQ safety with elite ball skills and anticipation. His route recognition, quick trigger, and physicality in run support make him a natural playmaker. Lacks top-end deep speed but thrives in split-zone and Cover 3 systems. 4) Kevin Winston Jr. | Penn State | Ht: 6'2" | Wt: 205 lbs Player Comparison: Not Available Analysis: Winston Jr. is a long, physical safety who excels in box safety, nickel, and Cover 3 strong safety roles. His tackling and pursuit speed make him a strong run defender, but he needs to improve deep coverage consistency. Mid-Level Starter Potential - 4th/5th Round Projection 5) Andrew Mukuba | Texas | Ht: 6'0" | Wt: 185 lbs Player Comparison: Julian Blackmon Analysis: Mukuba is a rangy free safety who thrives in zone-heavy schemes. His instincts, ball skills, and fluidity make him a natural deep-field defender, but his lean frame limits his effectiveness in the box.

College Football Playoff: Ohio State Overwhelms Oregon in Dominant Rose Bowl Victory The rematch of Ohio State and Oregon in the College Football Playoff quarterfinals was expected to be a tightly contested battle. Instead, it turned into a showcase of Ohio State's dominance in all three phases of the game. The Buckeyes secured a commanding 41-21 victory over the top-seeded Ducks, advancing to the semifinals and delivering a statement performance on one of college football's grandest stages. College Football Playoff: Ohio State Overwhelms Oregon in Dominant Rose Bowl Victory Ohio State's Explosive Offense Will Howard and Jeremiah Smith Shine Heading into the game, Will Howard's poise and Jeremiah Smith’s explosiveness were touted as keys to Ohio State’s success. Game Outcome : Howard and Smith exceeded expectations. Howard completed 17-of-26 passes for 319 yards and three touchdowns, consistently finding Smith, who finished with seven receptions for 187 yards and two touchdowns. Smith’s performance, which included two catches over 40 yards, broke the Ohio State freshman single-game receiving record. TreVeyon Henderson’s Big Play Ability Ohio State’s ground game was also a focal point, with Henderson and Quinshon Judkins expected to share the workload. Game Outcome : Henderson delivered with 94 yards and two touchdowns on just eight carries, including a record-setting 66-yard touchdown run—the longest in Rose Bowl history. Judkins added 85 yards on 17 carries, helping the Buckeyes dominate with 181 total rushing yards. Defensive Masterclass Relentless Pressure on Dillon Gabriel Ohio State’s inability to pressure Dillon Gabriel in their regular-season meeting was a key storyline. Game Outcome : The Buckeyes flipped the script, sacking Gabriel eight times and forcing hurried throws throughout the game. Cody Simon led the way with 11 tackles, two sacks, and three tackles for loss, earning Rose Bowl Defensive MVP honors. Oregon’s offense managed just 276 total yards, including -23 rushing yards, their worst output of the season. Neutralizing Oregon’s Playmakers Oregon’s offense had thrived on balance and explosive plays all season. Game Outcome : With star wide receiver Evan Stewart sidelined and running back Jordan James limited by injury, the Ducks struggled to find rhythm. Gabriel connected with Traeshon Holden for two touchdowns, but the Ducks’ other playmakers were held in check. Key Moments Smith’s Electrifying Start : Jeremiah Smith opened the scoring with a 45-yard touchdown catch and added a 43-yard score in the second quarter, helping Ohio State jump out to a 34-0 lead by halftime. Henderson’s Explosive Run : Henderson’s 66-yard touchdown run in the second quarter showcased his elite speed and vision, putting the game out of reach early. Ohio State’s Defensive Stands : The Buckeyes allowed just three drives past midfield, with timely sacks and tackles for loss stifling Oregon’s offense at every turn. Game Stats Total Yards : Ohio State 500, Oregon 276 Rushing Yards : Ohio State 181, Oregon -23 Passing Yards : Ohio State 319, Oregon 299 Sacks : Ohio State 8, Oregon 0 Time of Possession : Oregon 30:55, Ohio State 29:05 Postgame Insights Ohio State’s Redemption After a regular-season loss to Oregon, the Buckeyes left no doubt in the rematch. Their offense was unstoppable in the first half, and the defense dominated the trenches, reversing the narrative from their October meeting. Oregon’s Struggles The Ducks’ bid for an undefeated season and national title fell short as their offense sputtered against Ohio State’s relentless pressure. Without balance, Oregon’s high-powered attack was reduced to sporadic moments of success. Player of the Game: Jeremiah Smith, WR, Ohio State Smith’s record-breaking performance (187 yards, 2 TDs) was the catalyst for Ohio State’s offensive explosion. His ability to stretch the field and create separation made him the game’s most impactful player. Looking Ahead Ohio State : The Buckeyes will face Texas in the Cotton Bowl semifinal on January 10. With their offense firing on all cylinders and their defense peaking, Ohio State looks the part as the best team left in the playoff field. Oregon : Despite the loss, Oregon’s season marked a successful Big Ten debut. The Ducks will aim to build on their 13-1 record and address weaknesses heading into 2025. The Rose Bowl showcased Ohio State’s championship potential and ended Oregon’s dream season, leaving the Buckeyes one step closer to a national title.

2025 NFL Draft: Pro Day Schedule With the 2025 NFL Scouting Combine complete and free agency starting to wind down, the focus now shifts to the pro day circuit, an essential step in the NFL Draft evaluation process. Pro days provide a controlled environment for prospects to showcase their athleticism, position-specific drills, and on-field workouts in front of scouts, coaches, and executives. Unlike the Combine, pro days allow players to perform in familiar surroundings with their own trainers and teammates, often leading to improved performances in drills such as the 40-yard dash, three-cone drill, and position-specific workouts. Additionally, pro days serve as a critical opportunity for non-Combine invitees to make a lasting impression on NFL teams. For some players, this will be their only chance to work out in front of scouts before draft day. Teams also use these visits to gather medical updates, conduct interviews, and refine their scouting reports. Below is a list of confirmed college pro days ahead of the 2025 NFL Draft, which takes place from April 24-26 in Green Bay, Wisconsin. 2025 NFL Draft: Pro Day Schedule Big 12 Pro Day The Big 12 is hosting a joint pro day at The Star in Frisco, Texas, from March 18-21, featuring prospects from multiple schools: Arizona Arizona State Baylor BYU UCF Cincinnati Colorado Houston Iowa State Kansas Kansas State Oklahoma State TCU Texas Tech Utah West Virginia March 3 Ball State Miami (Ohio) March 4 Indiana March 5 Purdue March 7 Washington State Wisconsin March 10 Washington Western Michigan March 11 Kentucky Oklahoma Tennessee March 12 Georgia Rutgers USC March 13 Clemson Colorado State Illinois March 14 Delaware Georgia Tech March 17 Arkansas Northern Illinois Oregon State Syracuse UCLA March 18 Central Arkansas Memphis Oregon South Carolina Virginia March 19 Alabama Alabama A&M Minnesota San Jose State Stanford March 20 California William & Mary March 21 Florida State Michigan Missouri Utah State March 24 Auburn Boston College Bowling Green East Carolina Iowa Marshall Miami North Carolina Northern Iowa SMU Toledo UNLV UTSA March 25 Louisville Nebraska N.C. State Texas Tulane UConn March 26 Boise State LSU Navy Ohio State Pittsburgh Virginia Tech Western Kentucky March 27 Florida North Dakota State Notre Dame Texas A&M Villanova March 28 Jacksonville State Maryland Mississippi Penn State March 31 Sacramento State April 1 Nevada