Search Results

Day 1 of the 2025 NFL Scouting Combine is in the books, and with several top prospects opting out of testing, new names had a chance to seize the spotlight in Indianapolis. Mason Graham (Michigan) and Abdul Carter (Penn State)—the top two players on our Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Big Board —chose not to participate in workouts, along with other highly regarded defenders like Kenneth Grant (Michigan) and Jalon Walker (Georgia). With these big names sitting out, James Pearce Jr., Shemar Stewart, Landon Jackson, and CJ West capitalized on the opportunity to make their case as early-round picks. Below, we break down how these standouts performed, how their Combine results align with their scouting profiles, and how their draft stock has shifted based on today’s testing. Day One 2025 NFL Combine: Defensive Linemen & Linebackers James Pearce Jr. (EDGE, Tennessee) 40-Yard Dash:  4.47 seconds (Fastest among DL) 10-Yard Split:  1.56 seconds Vertical Jump:  31” Broad Jump:  10’3” Size:  6’5”, 245 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance: Pearce entered the Combine with questions about his bend and ability to consistently convert speed to power, but his elite 4.47-second 40-yard dash at 6’5”, 245 lbs reaffirmed his explosive get-off. His 1.56-second 10-yard split was among the best for edge rushers, emphasizing his ability to accelerate quickly off the line. His 31-inch vertical jump, however, was lower than expected, raising minor concerns about his lower-body explosiveness. 📈 Draft Stock Impact: Pearce’s stock had been slipping in recent weeks, with some teams viewing him as an early Round 2 prospect due to concerns about his flexibility and power at the point of attack. After today’s showing, he likely moved himself back into the top 20 conversation, where he had been projected earlier in the process. Shemar Stewart (EDGE, Texas A&M) 40-Yard Dash:  4.59 seconds 10-Yard Split:  1.58 seconds (2nd-best 265+ lb EDGE since 2010) Vertical Jump:  40” (Top 10 All-Time for EDGE) Broad Jump:  10’11” (Best among EDGE) Size:  6’5”, 267 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance: Stewart was already considered one of the most physically imposing prospects in this draft, but his testing numbers exceeded even the highest expectations. His 40-inch vertical and 10’11” broad jump place him among the best testers at his position in Combine history, comparable to Myles Garrett’s legendary workout. His 1.58-second 10-yard split ranks among the fastest ever recorded for an EDGE over 265 lbs, trailing only Nick Bosa (1.55s) in the last 15 years. 📈  Draft Stock Impact:  Already viewed as a top-20 lock on our draft board, and we have mocked him as a top-10 pick two separate times, Stewart solidified his standing today. His testing reinforced that he is one of the best athletic prospects in this class, and teams looking for a high-upside pass rusher will strongly consider him in the mid-first round range. Landon Jackson (EDGE, Arkansas) 40-Yard Dash:  4.68 seconds 10-Yard Split:  1.65 seconds Vertical Jump:  40.5” (Best among all DL) Broad Jump:  10’9” Size:  6’6”, 264 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance: Jackson's athletic ability had always been evident on film, but today’s performance put him firmly back on the radar as a first-round prospect. His 40.5-inch vertical jump is among the best ever for a defensive lineman, and his 10’9” broad jump confirms his elite lower-body power. While his 4.68-second 40-yard dash is solid for his size, his 1.65-second 10-yard split was slightly slower than other top edge rushers. 📈 Draft Stock Impact: Once viewed as a fringe first-rounder, Jackson may have worked his way back into late Round 1 discussions. His combination of length, motor, and elite explosion numbers could make him a fit for teams looking for a developmental but high-upside pass rusher at the back end of the first round. CJ West (DT, Indiana) 40-Yard Dash:  4.95 seconds 10-Yard Split:  1.73 seconds Vertical Jump:  33” Size:  6’1”, 316 lbs 📌 Scouting Report vs. Combine Performance: West turned heads with his rare speed for a 316-pound defensive tackle, becoming just the ninth DT since 2003 to run a sub-5.0-second 40-yard dash at 315+ lbs. His 33-inch vertical jump further demonstrated his athleticism, though his shorter arms (31.5”) and lack of length remain concerns for his ability to take on blockers at the next level. 📈 Draft Stock Impact: West was already viewed as a mid-Day 2 pick, and his testing today likely solidified that range. Teams needing a one-gap penetrating DT will see him as an early third-round option, with a chance to sneak into late Round 2 depending on team fit.

📢 Stay ahead of the game with our Football Scout 365 2025 NFL Mock Drafts! Below, you'll find all of our pre-NFL Combine mock drafts, featuring in-depth analysis, team fits, and player evaluations. From Mock Draft 1.0 to Mock Draft 3.0, we’ve broken down every major trend, riser, and surprise ahead of the 2025 NFL Draft. Click on the links below to watch the YouTube mock drafts or read the full written breakdowns on Football Scout 365! More 2025 NFL Draft Content 📊 Check out our complete NFL Draft Positional Rankings & Grades: 🔗  2025 NFL Draft Positional Grades & Rankings  🏆 Explore our updated 2025 NFL Draft Big Board: 🔗 Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Big Board 2025 NFL Mock Drafts: Pre-NFL Combine 2025 NFL Mock Draft 3.0: Three RBs in Round 1?! Sanders Lands in Cleveland, Jeanty Cracks the Top 10 📖 Read the Full Mock Draft:  🔗 Mock Draft 3.0 – Written Breakdown 🎥 Watch the Video:  🔗 Mock Draft 3.0 – YouTube 🔹 Key Takeaways: Could three running backs go in Round 1?  Jeanty, Henderson, and Hampton are on the rise. Shedeur Sanders to Cleveland?  Breaking down the latest buzz. Defensive dominance:  Where will Mason Graham and Abdul Carter land? 2025 NFL Mock Draft 2.0: Senior Bowl Risers Shake Up the Top 10 – Where Will Cam Ward & Shedeur Sanders Land? 📖 Read the Full Mock Draft:  🔗 Mock Draft 2.0 – Written Breakdown 🎥 Watch the Video:  🔗 Mock Draft 2.0 – YouTube 🔹 Key Takeaways: Senior Bowl impact:  Mike Green & Shemar Stewart emerge as top-10 picks. Quarterback movement:  How Shedeur Sanders & Cam Ward stack up. Defensive standouts:  Mason Graham, Abdul Carter, and Travis Hunter lead the class. 2025 NFL Mock Draft 1.0: First-Round Projections Featuring Mason Graham, Travis Hunter, and Will Johnson in a Defensive-Heavy Class 📖 Read the Full Mock Draft:   🔗 Mock Draft 1.0 – Written Breakdown 🎥 Watch the Video:  🔗 Mock Draft 1.0 – YouTube 🔹 Key Takeaways: Defense dominates:  6 of the top 10 picks are defensive players. QB uncertainty:  Will teams reach for a quarterback? Travis Hunter’s NFL projection:  CB or WR at the next level?

Who Will the Tennessee Titans Select at No. 1 Overall? The biggest question heading into the 2025 NFL Draft is what the Tennessee Titans will do with the number one overall pick. Will they select a quarterback, trade down, or opt for a defensive cornerstone like Abdul Carter or Mason Graham, as I projected in my first two mock drafts? The Titans hold all the leverage at the top, and their decision will have a ripple effect on the rest of the first round. 2025 NFL Mock Draft: 3 Running Backs Drafted in The 1st Round! Are the Cleveland Browns Targeting Shedeur Sanders? Another major shift from Mock Draft 2.0 is the growing buzz around the Cleveland Browns and their potential interest in Shedeur Sanders. Early reports indicated that Deion Sanders had a shortlist of teams he didn’t approve of for Shedeur , Cleveland was assumed to be on that list, though not confirmed. However, If Shedeur isn’t receiving the first-round attention he expected, his presumed stance on draft destination could change. It’s also worth considering that teams at the top of the draft may be posturing, leveraging their top-five picks to create trade opportunities. The Titans could be doing this, and perhaps the Browns are making a similar move. What’s clear is that both Shedeur Sanders and Cam Ward are likely top-10 picks, but I’m not entirely convinced that they will be selected first and second overall. With teams like the Raiders and Jets in need of a franchise quarterback, and no guarantee that Tennessee or Cleveland will land a solid free-agent QB, the situation remains unpredictable. Could Two (or Even Three) Running Backs Go in Round 1? One of the biggest trends I highlighted in Mock Draft 2.0 was the potential for two running backs to be drafted in the first round. It’s clear that Ashton Jeanty is RB1, but the debate for RB2 is more interesting. Right now, I have TreVeyon Henderson as my RB2, followed closely by Omarion Hampton and Kaleb Johnson, pending my final 2024 season grades. I strongly believe Henderson—who likely would have been RB1 in last year’s class had he declared—has played his way into first-round consideration. But here’s the real shock factor—there is a growing possibility that three running backs will be selected in the first round. That hasn’t happened since 2018, when Saquon Barkley (2nd overall, Giants), Rashaad Penny (27th overall, Seahawks), and Sony Michel (31st overall, Patriots) were all first-round selections. Why Three First-Round RBs Makes Sense Last night, I received a tweet notification from Daniel Jeremiah, who mentioned in his second mock draft that he had three RBs going in the first round. I responded, noting that the trend of Jeanty and Henderson as first-rounders was already expected, but a third RB entering the mix adds an intriguing wrinkle. Here’s why it makes sense: this wide receiver class lacks elite, top-end talent. Tetairoa McMillan is the top WR, and with Travis Hunter listed as a CB at the Combine, the value of WRs at the top of the draft has diminished. There are more WR2-type prospects in this class, while at least four legitimate RB1 three-down backs are expected to be drafted within the top 40 picks. Which Teams Could Draft a Running Back in Round 1? Now, which teams need an RB the most and could realistically take one in the first round? Off the top of my head, the Dallas Cowboys have been frequently linked to Ashton Jeanty in mock drafts. Other teams that could draft a running back in Round 1 include the Broncos, Chargers, Vikings, Steelers, and Chiefs, but there are two surprise teams in this mock draft that take an RB. Final Thoughts: The Biggest Draft Trends to Watch These are the major trends shaping up ahead of Mock Draft 3.0 and the 2025 NFL Draft. Expect QB drama at the top, increasing buzz around Shedeur Sanders, and the real possibility of multiple running backs going in the first round. 2025 NFL Mock Draft 3.0 1). Tennessee Titans – Abdul Carter | EDGE | Penn State Primary Team Needs:  (QB, OT, ED, CB) The Titans shake up the draft by selecting Abdul Carter first overall, prioritizing a defensive cornerstone over a quarterback. Carter brings elite burst, power, and versatility to Tennessee’s front seven, forming a dangerous pass-rushing trio with Harold Landry and Jeffrey Simmons. 2). Cleveland Browns – Shedeur Sanders |QB| Colorado Primary Team Needs:  ( QB, RB, T, CB ) His dad reportedly said “no way” regarding the Browns, but when your son is getting second-round grades, you can’t take that risk. Sanders is a highly accurate QB with a proven track record as a productive starter. Pairing Shedeur Sanders with Malik Nabers could give the Giants the foundation for an explosive passing attack. 3). New York Giants – Cam Ward | QB | Miami Primary Team Needs:  ( QB, T, DB ) The Giants have already moved on from Daniel Jones and need a new quarterback to lead their offense. Cam Ward’s arm talent, mobility, and ability to create off-script plays make him a high-upside prospect for Brian Daboll’s system, giving New York a dynamic QB to develop. 4). New England Patriots – Travis Hunter | CB | Colorado Primary Team Needs:  ( RB, WR, G, T ) The Patriots land a rare two-way talent in Travis Hunter, giving them a lockdown corner with elite ball skills. Hunter’s versatility and playmaking ability make him a game-changer for New England’s defense, instantly upgrading their secondary. 5). Jacksonville Jaguars – Mason Graham | IDL | Michigan Primary Team Needs:  ( C, G, DI, CB ) I’ve mocked Mason Graham at 1st and 2nd overall—this is the lowest I’m willing to go. The Jaguars would be adding an interior defensive cornerstone with elite pass-rush and run-stopping ability. Graham remains the top-graded player on our board in this draft class. 6). Las Vegas Raiders – Ashton Jeanty | RB | Boise State Primary Team Needs:  ( QB, RB, WR, CB ) The Raiders shock the world—or is it really a shock? Jeanty holds a top-5 grade in our process, and if the Raiders want to elevate whoever is under center in 2025, he’d be an instant-impact player in this offense alongside Brock Bowers. 7). New York Jets – Will Johnson | CB | Michigan Primary Team Needs: ( QB, DI, DB ) Will Johnson is one of four players in this draft class with an elite-grade, and he plays a premium position. I’ve mocked him in the top five in both Mock Draft 1.0 and 2.0, but with the potential of Cam Ward and Shedeur Sanders going in the top five, he could fall. This would be a great landing spot, pairing him with a former DB as his head coach in Aaron Glenn. 8). Carolina Panthers – Mike Green | Edge | Marshall Primary Team Needs:  ( DL, DB ) Mike Green was a dominant force in the backfield at Marshall, creating havoc in games. However, there were concerns regarding the competition level and his playing weight. He addressed these issues at the Senior Bowl, proving his worth. The Panthers are in need of a versatile pass rusher, and Mike Green possesses one of the most extensive pass-rushing skill sets in the class, along with the speed and power to complement it. 9). New Orleans Saints – Shemar Stewart | Edge | Texas A&M Primary Team Needs:  ( WR, TE, DL ) With Cameron Jordan nearing the end of his career, the Saints invest in Shemar Stewart, a versatile run-stopping pass rusher. Stewart strengthens a defensive front in need of young playmakers. 10). Chicago Bears – Will Campbell | OT | LSU Primary Team Needs:  ( RB, C, G, ED ) Despite concerns about his length, Will Campbell is the top offensive lineman in the 2025 draft class. Even if he plays on the inside, the Bears must prioritize protecting Caleb Williams and supporting their run game. 11). San Francisco 49ers – Armand Membou | OT | Missouri Primary Team Needs:  ( G, T, DL ) Armand Membou combines exceptional strength and technique, with significant experience in the SEC. As Trent Williams approaches retirement and Colton McKivitz is set to become a free agent after 2025, Membou could act as a backup in 2025 if McKivitz steps in for Williams, and might then become a starting replacement in 2026. 12). Dallas Cowboys – Mykel Williams | Edge | Georgia Primary Team Needs:  ( G, T, DI, S ) The consensus for the Cowboys here is that Ashton Jeanty will fall to them, but not in this mock draft. Instead, with Jeanty off the table, the Cowboys land a high-ceiling edge rusher in Mykel Williams. Williams can flip inside or outside as needed, bolstering both the Cowboys' run defense and pass rush. 13). Miami Dolphins – Tyler Booker | IOL | Alabama Primary Team Needs:  ( G, T, DI, S ) With the 13th selection in the 2025 NFL Draft, the Miami Dolphins make a smart decision by choosing Tyler Booker from Alabama . He is a technically proficient IOL. Strengthening their line play is essential for the Dolphins. 14). Indianapolis Colts – Colston Loveland | TE | Michigan Primary Team Needs:  ( TE, ED, DB ) The Colts give Anthony Richardson a much-needed weapon at tight end with Colston Loveland. A big-bodied pass catcher with strong hands and blocking ability. 15). Atlanta Falcons – Kenneth Grant | IDL | Michigan Primary Team Needs:  ( WR, ED, LB, CB ) The Falcons' defense shows promise under Raheem Morris, but talent needs improvement across the board. Offensively, the team is secure with skilled players, a solid line, and young QB Michael Penix Jr. Kenneth Grant adds strength and pass-rush potential to a unit with aging veterans Grady Jarrett and David Onyemata, whose contracts expire after 2025. 16). Arizona Cardinals – Walter Nolen | IDL | Ole Miss Primary Team Needs:  ( G, T, DL ) Arizona reinforces its defensive front with Walter Nolen, a disruptive force on the interior. His blend of power, athleticism, and block-shedding ability makes him an immediate impact player. 17). Cincinnati Bengals – Tetairoa McMillan | WR| Arizona Primary Team Needs:  ( WR, G, DL ) The Bengals selected Arizona wide receiver Tetairoa McMillan with the 17th pick, highlighting his ideal fit for their scheme and roster. McMillan, whose playing style resembles Mike Evans and Tee Higgins. There is uncertainty about retaining Tee Higgins, especially with Ja’Marr Chase up for a contract extension. 18). Seattle Seahawks – Jalon Walker | LB | Georgia Primary Team Needs:  ( C, G, ED, LB ) Seattle adds versatility to its linebacker corps with Jalon Walker, an athletic and instinctive defender who can play inside or rush off the edge. His range and physicality fit Seattle’s defensive identity. 19). Tampa Bay Buccaneers – Benjamin Morrison | CB | Notre Dame Primary Team Needs:  ( ED, LB, DB ) Benjamin Morrison was absent for the majority of the 2024 college football season due to a hip injury, causing him to fade from many people's minds. However, he is a lockdown outside corner with excellent instincts and ball skills, the kind Todd Bowles can trust to handle one-on-one coverage. 20). Denver Broncos – Tyler Warren | TE | Penn State Primary Team Needs:  ( WR, TE, LB, S ) Bo Nix's unexpected rookie season was all the more remarkable given the limited offensive options beyond Courtland Sutton. Tyler Warren will immediately pose a receiving threat and enhance the tight-end group in a way that wasn't feasibly last season. 21). Pittsburgh Steelers – Jahdae Barron | CB | Texas Primary Team Needs:  ( QB, WR, DB ) One of the key attributes of the Texas star is his versatility. Unlike a tweener who might be too small for safety or too slow for cornerback, he is genuinely capable of handling any role. This is extremely beneficial for the Steelers' secondary, which could use assistance in the slot, on the outside, and opposite safety Minkah Fitzpatrick, depending on DeShon Elliott's playing position. 22). Los Angeles Chargers – James Pearce Jr | Edge | Tennessee Primary Team Needs:  ( RB, WR, TE, ED ) Considering Khalil Mack’s uncertain future at 34. With his career winding down, they’re looking to inject youth and dynamic playmaking into their defensive front to strengthen the unit for the future. 23). Green Bay Packers – Shavon Revel | CB | East Carolina Primary Team Needs:  ( WR, C, ED, CB ) The Packers need to strengthen their secondary, and with the lengthy Shavon Revel available, they are gaining significant value at the corner position and potentially securing a key player in their secondary in a division rich with wide receiver talent; Revel is the ideal selection. 24). Minnesota Vikings – Malaki Starks | S | Georgia Primary Team Needs:  ( RB, G, DI, CB ) Minnesota lands a versatile defensive chess piece in Malaki Starks, a rangy safety with elite athleticism and ball skills. His ability to play deep, in the box, or as a slot defender fills a major need in the Vikings' secondary. 25). Houston Texans – Kelvin Banks Jr. | OT | Texas Primary Team Needs:  ( WR, C, G, DI ) The Texans solidify their offensive line with Kelvin Banks Jr., one of the top tackles in this class. Protecting C.J. Stroud is the priority, and Banks provides a long-term answer at tackle. 26). Los Angeles Rams – Josh Simmons | OT | Ohio State Primary Team Needs:  ( TE, T, LB, CB ) The Rams strengthen their offensive line by acquiring Ohio State OT Josh Simmons. Although Simmons was injured in 2024, he is anticipated to fully recover. He was projected to be a top-15 pick in this class, but if he drops to the Rams' position, they might not hesitate to select him. 27). Baltimore Ravens – Luther Burden III | WR | Missouri Primary Team Needs:  ( WR, T, ED, CB ) If Luther Burden is available, it would be impossible to pass on the idea of him in the Ravens offense alongside Zay Flowers and Rashod Bateman, creating one of the most dynamic WR cores in the NFL. 28). Detroit Lions – Grey Zabel | OT | NDSU Primary Team Needs:  ( C, G, ED, LB ) In this mock draft, the Lions would have multiple top-tier options to choose from, but Zabel would fulfill several needs on their offense. Zabel is a versatile player capable of playing guard, center, or tackle. 29). Washington Commanders – TreVeyon Henderson | RB | Ohio State Primary Team Needs:  ( WR, T, ED, CB ) The Commanders add a versatile three-down back to open up the offense even more, pairing TreVeyon Henderson with Jayden Daniels. Henderson is a rising prospect who could make a lot of sense here. With playstyle comparisons to Jahmyr Gibbs, this is definitely something to keep an eye on. 30). Buffalo Bills – Matthew Golden | WR | Texas Primary Team Needs:  ( WR, DI, LB, CB ) The Bills have several needs, but none more critical than their defensive line. I debated between Nic Scourton and Derrick Harmon, but with quality interior DL options available on Day 2, addressing WR is a priority. They need a field stretcher and a separator—Matthew Golden is the perfect fit. 31). Kansas City Chiefs – Josh Conerly Jr. | OT | Oregon Primary Team Needs:  ( T, DL, LB ) The Chiefs address their offensive line needs by selecting Oregon OT Josh Conerly Jr. Conerly brings athleticism and versatility, providing crucial protection for Patrick Mahomes. Under Andy Reid’s coaching, he has the potential to develop into a premier NFL tackle. 32). Philadelphia Eagles – Omarion Hampton | RB | North Carolina Primary Team Needs:  ( WR, G, ED, CB ) The Philadelphia Eagles, under Howie Roseman, are no strangers to making a splash and selecting players either outside the consensus order or those who fall to them in the draft. In this scenario, with few clear landing spots for a second RB in Round 1 among teams with greater needs, the Eagles find an opportunity to elevate their run-first offense while also preserving Saquon Barkley. Enter North Carolina’s Omarion Hampton.

2025 NFL Mock Draft 2.0: Senior Bowl Risers Impact First-Round Projections – Updated rankings, top QB picks, and key draft stock movers. With the 2025 NFL Draft just a few months away, the Senior Bowl provided valuable insight into key risers, potential fallers, and the overall makeup of this year’s class. This draft cycle remains dominated by defensive talent, with blue-chip players like Michigan’s Mason Graham and Penn State's Abdul Carter. Unlike previous years, the quarterback class lacks a surefire generational talent. Shedeur Sanders (Colorado) and Cam Ward (Miami) headline the group, but neither carries the same elite upside as recent No. 1 overall picks like Caleb Williams or Trevor Lawrence. While positional value could push one of them into the top three, the real debate begins at QB3, with several names—Jaxson Dart, Jalen Milroe, and Quinn Ewers—vying for positioning. Beyond the quarterbacks, Senior Bowl standouts like Shemar Stewart, Mike Green, and Grey Zabel have seen their draft stock rise significantly, potentially shaking up the back half of the first round. Marshall’s Mike Green was one of the most disruptive pass rushers in Mobile, proving he belongs in Round 1 consideration. Meanwhile, North Dakota State’s Grey Zabel showed positional versatility on the interior offensive line, a trait highly coveted by NFL teams. With these takeaways in mind, Mock Draft 2.0 adjusts for the latest evaluations, team needs, and Senior Bowl performances. As always, team fit, draft capital, and positional value all play a role in these projections. 2025 NFL Mock Draft 2.0 - First-Round Projections 1). Tennessee Titans – Abdul Carter | EDGE | Penn State Primary Team Needs:  (Quarterback, Offensive Line, Defensive Playmakers) Titans Draft Capital:  1, 35, 102, 119, 142, 169, 180, 241 The Titans shake up the draft by selecting Abdul Carter first overall, prioritizing a defensive cornerstone over a quarterback. Carter brings elite burst, power, and versatility to Tennessee’s front seven, forming a dangerous pass-rushing trio with Harold Landry and Jeffrey Simmons. 2). Cleveland Browns – Mason Graham | IDL | Michigan Primary Team Needs:  (Quarterback, Defensive Line, Depth) Browns Draft Capital:  2, 33, 67, 94, 103, 165, 181, 194, 202, 216, 217, 257 Cleveland lands the best interior defensive lineman in the draft with Mason Graham, pairing him with Myles Garrett to form an elite front. Graham’s ability to collapse the pocket and anchor against double teams makes him a disruptive force inside. 3). New York Giants – Cam Ward | QB | Miami Primary Team Needs:  (Quarterback, Offensive Line, Future Assets) Giants Draft Capital:  3, 34, 65, 104, 134, 155, 221, 248 The Giants have already moved on from Daniel Jones and need a new quarterback to lead their offense. Cam Ward’s arm talent, mobility, and ability to create off-script plays make him a high-upside prospect for Brian Daboll’s system, giving New York a dynamic QB to develop. 4). New England Patriots – Travis Hunter | CB | Colorado Primary Team Needs:  (Offensive Line, Skill Positions, Defensive Depth) Patriots Draft Capital:  4, 38, 69, 77, 105, 145, 219, 222, 240 The Patriots land a rare two-way talent in Travis Hunter, giving them a lockdown corner with elite ball skills. Hunter’s versatility and playmaking ability make him a game-changer for New England’s defense, instantly upgrading their secondary. 5). Jacksonville Jaguars – Will Johnson | CB | Michigan Primary Team Needs:  (Defensive Secondary, Interior Defensive Line) Jaguars Draft Capital:  5, 36, 70, 88, 106, 125, 143, 184, 196, 223 Jacksonville bolsters its secondary with Will Johnson, a physical corner with shutdown ability. His size, speed, and instincts make him a perfect fit in the Jaguars’ defense, addressing a major need in their secondary. 6). Las Vegas Raiders – Shedeur Sanders | QB | Colorado Primary Team Needs:  (Quarterback, Defensive Line, Offensive Line) Raiders Draft Capital:  6, 37, 68, 73, 107, 144, 182, 214, 218, 224 The Raiders land their franchise quarterback in Shedeur Sanders, a poised passer with elite accuracy and pocket presence. With Tom Brady as a minority owner and vocal supporter, Sanders steps into an ideal situation to lead Vegas into the future. 7). New York Jets – Colston Loveland | TE | Michigan Primary Team Needs: (Quarterback, Trade Assets) Jets Draft Capital:  7, 42, 92, 109, 146, 157, 188, 210 The Jets give their offense a dynamic weapon, selecting Michigan tight end Colston Loveland. A mismatch nightmare with elite hands and route-running ability, Loveland gives New York a reliable safety valve in the passing game. 8). Carolina Panthers – Mike Green | EDGE | Marshall Primary Team Needs:  (Edge Rusher, Defensive Line, Secondary) Panthers Draft Capital:  8, 57, 74, 110, 113, 141, 147, 164, 229 Carolina strengthens its defensive front with Mike Green, an explosive pass rusher who dominated at the Senior Bowl. Green’s relentless motor and elite bend off the edge make him a much-needed disruptive force for the Panthers. 9). New Orleans Saints – Mykel Williams | EDGE | Georgia Primary Team Needs:  (Defensive Line, Offensive Line, Wide Receiver) Saints Draft Capital:  9, 40, 71, 93, 111, 130, 186, 254 With Cameron Jordan nearing the end of his career, the Saints invest in Mykel Williams, a versatile pass rusher with elite length and power. Williams strengthens a defensive front in need of young playmakers. 10). Chicago Bears – Shemar Stewart | EDGE | Texas A&M Primary Team Needs:  (Offensive Line, Defensive Line, Wide Receiver) Bears Draft Capital:  10, 39, 41, 72, 149, 197, 235, 242 The Bears add a dominant presence off the edge with Shemar Stewart, a physically gifted pass rusher with an elite frame. His blend of power and explosiveness gives Chicago a much-needed defensive cornerstone. 11). San Francisco 49ers – Tyler Booker | IOL | Alabama Primary Team Needs:  (Defensive Tackle, Pass Rushers, Offensive Line) 49ers Draft Capital:  11, 43, 75, 99, 112, 138, 139, 189, 228, 232, 255 San Francisco reinforces its interior offensive line by selecting Tyler Booker, a powerful and technically sound guard from Alabama. His ability to dominate in the run game and anchor against power rushers makes him a perfect fit. 12). Dallas Cowboys – Will Campbell | OT | LSU Primary Team Needs:  (Defensive Line, Offensive Line, Running Back) Cowboys Draft Capital:  12, 44, 76, 150, 170, 172, 174, 190, 211, 250 With Tyron Smith aging, the Cowboys secure their left tackle of the future in LSU’s Will Campbell. A dominant pass protector with the athleticism to thrive in Dallas’ blocking schemes, Campbell is an immediate upgrade. 13). Miami Dolphins – Armand Membou | IOL | Missouri Primary Team Needs:  (Offensive Line, Defensive Line, Linebacker) Dolphins Draft Capital:  13, 48, 98, 115, 135, 151, 156, 226, 233, 252 The Dolphins bolster their interior offensive line with Armand Membou, a technically sound lineman with elite versatility. Membou projects as a high-level guard but offers the ability to kick outside if needed. 14). Indianapolis Colts – Tyler Warren | TE | Penn State Primary Team Needs:  (Defensive Line, Linebacker, Offensive Line) Colts Draft Capital:  14, 45, 80, 116, 152, 191, 234 The Colts give Anthony Richardson a much-needed weapon at tight end with Tyler Warren. A big-bodied pass catcher with strong hands and blocking ability, Warren is an ideal fit for Indianapolis’ offense. 15). Atlanta Falcons – Jahdae Barron | DB | Texas Primary Team Needs:  (Pass Rushers, Defensive Line, Secondary) Falcons Draft Capital:  15, 46, 117, 244 Atlanta upgrades its secondary with the versatile Jahdae Barron, who can play outside, in the slot, or at safety. His instincts and physicality make him a valuable addition to a Falcons defense needing playmakers. 16). Arizona Cardinals – Walter Nolen | IDL | Ole Miss Primary Team Needs:  (Outside Linebacker, Cornerback, Interior Offensive Line) Cardinals Draft Capital:  16, 47, 78, 114, 153 Arizona reinforces its defensive front with Walter Nolen, a disruptive force on the interior. His blend of power, athleticism, and block-shedding ability makes him an immediate impact player. 17). Cincinnati Bengals – Kenneth Grant | IDL | Michigan Primary Team Needs:  (Wide Receiver, Offensive Line, Defensive Back) Bengals Draft Capital:  17, 49, 81, 118, 154, 195 Cincinnati lands a massive interior presence in Kenneth Grant, whose ability to clog lanes and collapse pockets will elevate their defensive front. His athleticism at his size is rare. 18). Seattle Seahawks – Jalon Walker | LB | Georgia Primary Team Needs:  (Offensive Line, Defensive Line, Secondary) Seahawks Draft Capital:  18, 50, 82, 137, 173, 187, 212, 236 Seattle adds versatility to its linebacker corps with Jalon Walker, an athletic and instinctive defender who can play inside or rush off the edge. His range and physicality fit Seattle’s defensive identity. 19). Tampa Bay Buccaneers – Tetairoa McMillan | WR | Arizona Primary Team Needs:  (Wide Receiver, Offensive Line, Defensive Line) Buccaneers Draft Capital:  19, 53, 84, 120, 158, 237 Tampa Bay lands a future No. 1 receiver in Tetairoa McMillan, a near clone of Mike Evans. His size, hands, and route-running ability make him the perfect long-term replacement in the Buccaneers’ offense. 20). Denver Broncos – Matthew Golden | WR | Texas Primary Team Needs:  (Tight End, Wide Receiver, Defensive Line, Secondary) Broncos Draft Capital:  20, 51, 85, 121, 193, 199, 209 Denver adds a dynamic playmaker in Matthew Golden, a smooth route-runner with inside-outside versatility. With a skill set reminiscent of Chris Olave, Golden’s speed, separation ability, and reliable hands make him a perfect fit in Sean Payton’s offense. 21). Pittsburgh Steelers – Emeka Egbuka | WR | Ohio State Primary Team Needs:  (Cornerback, Running Back, Wide Receiver, Offensive Line) Steelers Draft Capital:  21, 52, 83, 122, 163, 225, 231, 247 Pittsburgh adds a polished route-runner in Emeka Egbuka, pairing him with George Pickens to form a dangerous duo. His versatility and strong hands will immediately help their passing attack. 22). Los Angeles Chargers – Ashton Jeanty | RB | Boise State Primary Team Needs:  (Edge, Wide Receiver, Offensive Line, Safety) Chargers Draft Capital:  22, 55, 86, 124, 159, 177, 183, 201, 215, 220, 253 The Chargers land one of the best all-purpose backs in the draft with Ashton Jeanty. His vision, burst, and pass-catching ability make him a perfect fit for their offense. 23). Green Bay Packers – Jihaad Campbell | LB | Alabama Primary Team Needs:  (Defensive Line, Interior Offensive Line, Secondary, Wide Receiver) Packers Draft Capital:  23, 54, 87, 123, 160, 200, 239, 251 Green Bay strengthens its linebacker unit with Jihaad Campbell, a high-IQ defender with excellent range and leadership traits. His size and versatility make him an ideal fit for their defensive scheme. 24). Minnesota Vikings – Malaki Starks | S | Georgia Primary Team Needs:  (Secondary, Interior Defensive Line, Interior Offensive Line, Running Back) Vikings Draft Capital:  24, 97, 140, 161 Minnesota lands a versatile defensive chess piece in Malaki Starks, a rangy safety with elite athleticism and ball skills. His ability to play deep, in the box, or as a slot defender fills a major need in the Vikings' secondary. 25). Houston Texans – Kelvin Banks Jr. | OT | Texas Primary Team Needs:  (Wide Receiver, Offensive Line, Secondary) Texans Draft Capital:  25, 58, 89, 127, 167, 243 The Texans solidify their offensive line with Kelvin Banks Jr., one of the top tackles in this class. Protecting C.J. Stroud is the priority, and Banks provides a long-term answer at tackle. 26). Los Angeles Rams – Donovan Jackson | IOL | Ohio State Primary Team Needs:  (Offensive Line, Cornerback, Wide Receiver, Linebacker) Rams Draft Capital:  26, 90, 100, 126, 192, 203, 204 The Rams bolster their offensive line with Donovan Jackson, a versatile interior lineman who thrived after transitioning to tackle in 2024. His blend of power, mobility, and technical refinement makes him an ideal fit for Los Angeles' scheme, whether at guard or tackle. 27). Baltimore Ravens – Shavon Revel | CB | ECU Primary Team Needs:  (Cornerback, Edge, Offensive Line, Wide Receiver) Ravens Draft Capital:  27, 59, 91, 128, 136, 176, 178, 185, 205, 213, 245 The Ravens add a long, physical corner in Shavon Revel, addressing a key need in their secondary. His press-man ability and fluid coverage skills make him an ideal fit in Baltimore’s defensive scheme. 28). Detroit Lions – Benjamin Morrison | CB | Notre Dame Primary Team Needs:  (Cornerback, Edge, Wide Receiver, Interior Defensive Line, Offensive Line) Lions Draft Capital:  28, 60, 101, 132, 198, 227, 230, 246 The Lions shore up their secondary with Benjamin Morrison, a ball-hawking corner with elite instincts. His ability to play sticky coverage and disrupt passing lanes gives Detroit a long-term solution at CB. 29). Washington Commanders – Josh Simmons | OT | Ohio State Primary Team Needs:  (Offensive Line, Edge, Linebacker, Wide Receiver) Commanders Draft Capital:  29, 61, 79, 148, 207, 238, 249 Washington lands a high-upside offensive tackle in Josh Simmons, addressing a key need to protect Jayden Daniels. His athleticism and ability to mirror pass rushers make him a strong addition to the Commanders' front. 30). Buffalo Bills – Luther Burden III | WR | Missouri Primary Team Needs:  (Wide Receiver, Defensive Line, Secondary) Bills Draft Capital:  30, 56, 62, 108, 131, 171, 175, 179, 206, 208 The Bills secure their next playmaker at wide receiver with Luther Burden III, a dynamic weapon who thrives after the catch. His explosive route running and ability to separate add a new dimension to Buffalo’s passing attack. 31). Philadelphia Eagles – Azareye’h Thomas | CB | Florida State Primary Team Needs:  (Cornerback, Wide Receiver, Interior Defensive Line, Offensive Line) Eagles Draft Capital:  31, 63, 95, 129, 162, 166, 168 The Eagles add a long, athletic cornerback in Azareye’h Thomas, a high-upside defender with the tools to develop into a quality starter. His length, fluidity, and physicality make him an intriguing fit in Philadelphia’s secondary. 32). Kansas City Chiefs – James Pearce Jr. | EDGE | Tennessee Primary Team Needs:  (Edge, Offensive Line, Wide Receiver, Defensive Back) Chiefs Draft Capital:  32, 64, 66, 96, 133, 256 The Chiefs land a dynamic pass rusher in James Pearce Jr., who possesses elite first-step quickness and bend off the edge. His explosiveness and ability to generate pressure make him a perfect fit in Kansas City’s defensive front.

The 2025 NFL Draft process is heating up, and with the NFL Combine set to take place in Indianapolis from February 27th through March 3rd, prospects have one final chance to impress NFL teams before Pro Days. The event will provide 321 of the top draft-eligible players with a stage to showcase their physical tools in front of NFL coaches, general managers, and scouts. Each year, players see their draft stock rise or fall based on elite testing numbers, medical evaluations, and interviews. Below, I’ve highlighted 15 prospects who have the most to gain from a standout performance at the 2025 NFL Combine. 2025 NFL Combine: 15 Prospects Who Can Elevate Their Draft Stock Mike Green | EDGE | Marshall | Ht: 6'4" | Wt: 250 lbs Player Style Comparison: Haason Reddick Analysis: Green became my favorite player at the Senior Bowl, showcasing elite burst and pass-rush technique. His speed, bend, and first-step quickness could help him vault into the Top 20 discussion if he tests as expected. Shemar Stewart | EDGE | Texas A&M | Ht: 6'6" | Wt: 290 lbs Player Style Comparison: Travon Walker Analysis: Stewart is a high-upside defensive lineman with a rare blend of size and explosiveness. His sack production has been inconsistent, but a dominant Combine performance could push him into the top of round one. Kelvin Banks Jr. | OT | Texas | Ht: 6'4" | Wt: 324 lbs Player Style Comparison: Rashawn Slater Analysis: Banks has been up and down on draft boards, with some viewing him as a lock for Round 1 while others have concerns about his technical refinement. A dominant testing performance could reaffirm his status as a Top 15 pick and one of the best OTs in the class. TreVeyon Henderson | RB | Ohio State | Ht: 5'11" | Wt: 215 lbs Player Style Comparison: Jahmyr Gibbs Analysis: Henderson enters the Combine as my RB2 in this class and has a real shot at sneaking into Round 1 with a strong performance. His burst, acceleration, and receiving ability will be on display, and if he tests well, scouts may begin to see him in the same light as Jahmyr Gibbs. Omarion Hampton | RB | North Carolina | Ht: 6'0" | Wt: 220 lbs Player Style Comparison: James Conner Analysis: Hampton was once considered the potential RB1 in this class but fell behind Ashton Jeanty in the rankings. If he puts up elite speed and agility numbers, he could regain traction as the RB2. His combination of power, balance, and vision makes him an ideal fit in gap-heavy run schemes. Elic Ayomanor | WR | Stanford | Ht: 6'2" | Wt: 210 lbs Player Style Comparison: Allen Robinson Analysis: Ayomanor’s tape is impressive, but the big question remains: Is he an elite athlete? His 40-time, agility drills, and explosion tests will dictate his true ceiling at the next level. If he tests well, he could solidify himself as a late day one early Day 2 X-receiver. Elijah Arroyo | TE | Miami | Ht: 6'4" | Wt: 245 lbs Player Style Comparison: Darren Waller Analysis: Arroyo was one of the best pass catchers at the Senior Bowl, and if he runs a 4.5-range 40 and posts elite jumping numbers, he could solidify himself as TE2 in this draft class. His receiving upside is undeniable, but athleticism testing will be crucial for his final projection. Darius Alexander | IDL | Toledo | Ht: 6'4" | Wt: 310 lbs Player Style Comparison: Not Available Analysis: Alexander has been flying under the radar, but much like Quinyon Mitchell last year, he could rise quickly with strong NFL Combine numbers. His size, strength, and ability to penetrate gaps make him an ideal 3-tech at the next level. Harold Fannin Jr. | TE | Bowling Green | Ht: 6'4" | Wt: 230 lbs Player Style Comparison: Isaiah Likely Analysis: Fannin has flashed as a move tight end but appeared stiff at times during Senior Bowl practices. If he tests well in agility and explosion drills, he could secure himself as a Top 5 TE prospect in the draft. Kyle McCord | QB | Syracuse | Ht: 6'3" | Wt: 220 lbs Player Style Comparison: Jared Goff Analysis: McCord put together a record-breaking season at Syracuse and flashed NFL-caliber arm talent, yet he remains overlooked in the QB conversation. After a solid Shrine Bowl performance, a strong Combine showing—particularly in interviews could help him gain momentum as a potential Day 2 selection. Jeffrey Bassa | LB | Oregon | Ht: 6'2" | Wt: 235 lbs Player Style Comparison: Not Available Analysis: Bassa stood out in coverage drills at the Senior Bowl, showing great agility and speed. If he tests well at the Combine, he could rise into the Top 50 range, as coverage ability is a premium skill for modern linebackers. Tyler Shough | QB | Louisville | Ht: 6'5" | Wt: 225 lbs Player Style Comparison: Trevor Siemian Analysis: Shough was the most consistent quarterback at the Senior Bowl, showing good mechanics and touch on throws. Despite this, he hasn't received much pre-draft buzz. His athletic testing and throwing at the Combine could help solidify his standing as a late-day two, early-day three prospect. Jack Bech | WR | TCU | Ht: 6'2" | Wt: 215 lbs Player Style Comparison: Not Available Analysis: Bech dominated at the Senior Bowl, capping off the week with an MVP performance in the actual game. His route running and strong hands have already caught scouts’ attention, and if he tests better than expected, he could continue his meteoric rise up draft boards. Isaiah Bond | WR | Texas | Ht: 5'11" | Wt: 182 lbs Player Style Comparison: Not Available Analysis: Bond entered the season with Round 1 expectations but struggled with consistency. Now sitting in the Day 2/3 range, he desperately needs a strong Combine. His speed, quickness, and explosiveness will be his ticket back into early Day 2 conversations. Alijah Huzzie | CB | North Carolina | Ht: 5'11" | Wt: 195 lbs Player Style Comparison: Not Available Analysis:  Huzzie wasn’t (high) on my radar much before the Shrine Bowl (I know), but what I’ve seen is impressive. He has great instincts and physicality, and a strong NFL Combine performance could elevate his status as a potential early to mid-Day 2 pick.

2025 NFL Scouting Combine Participants Announced The NFL has officially released the full list of invitees for the 2025 NFL Scouting Combine, confirming 329 prospects will showcase their talents in Indianapolis. This week-long event, taking place from February 24 through March 3, serves as a crucial evaluation period for NFL scouts, coaches, and general managers ahead of the 2025 NFL Draft. Prospects will participate in various athletic testing, positional drills, and interviews with NFL teams as they look to improve their draft stock. Live coverage of the 2025 NFL Scouting Combine begins on February 27 and will be broadcast on NFL Network and NFL+. 2025 NFL Combine Workout Schedule 🔹 Thursday, Feb. 27 – 3 PM ET: Defensive Linemen & Linebackers 🔹 Friday, Feb. 28 – 3 PM ET: Defensive Backs & Tight Ends 🔹 Saturday, Mar. 1 – 1 PM ET: Quarterbacks, Wide Receivers & Running Backs 🔹 Sunday, Mar. 2 – 1 PM ET: Offensive Linemen & Specialists 2025 NFL Combine Invites Announced This year’s 329-player invite list features elite talent across every position, including top quarterback prospects like Shedeur Sanders, Quinn Ewers, and Cam Ward, along with running backs TreVeyon Henderson, Omarion Hampton, and Ollie Gordon II. Below is the full list of players invited to the 2025 NFL Scouting Combine, sorted by position. QUARTERBACKS Max Brosmer, Minnesota Brady Cook, Missouri Jaxson Dart, Mississippi Quinn Ewers, Texas Dillon Gabriel, Oregon Seth Henigan, Memphis Will Howard, Ohio State Riley Leonard, Notre Dame Kyle McCord, Syracuse Graham Mertz, Florida Jalen Milroe, Alabama Kurtis Rourke, Indiana Shedeur Sanders, Colorado Tyler Shough, Louisville Cam Ward, Miami RUNNING BACKS LeQuint Allen, Syracuse Ulysses Bentley IV, Mississippi Jaydon Blue, Texas Tahj Brooks, Texas Tech Donovan Edwards, Michigan Trevor Etienne, Georgia DJ Giddens, Kansas State Ollie Gordon II, Oklahoma State Omarion Hampton, North Carolina RJ Harvey, UCF TreVeyon Henderson, Ohio State Jarquez Hunter, Auburn Ja'Quinden Jackson, Arkansas Jordan James, Oregon Ashton Jeanty, Boise State Kaleb Johnson, Iowa Montrell Johnson Jr., Florida Quinshon Judkins, Ohio State Corey Kiner, Cincinnati Phil Mafah, Clemson Woody Marks, USC Damien Martinez, Miami Kyle Monangai, Rutgers Kalel Mullings, Michigan Devin Neal, Kansas Dylan Sampson, Tennessee Raheim Sanders, South Carolina Cam Skattebo, Arizona State Brashard Smith, SMU Bhayshul Tuten, Virginia Tech Marcus Yarns, Delaware WIDE RECEIVERS Andrew Armstrong, Arkansas Elic Ayomanor, Stanford Elijhah Badger, Florida Jack Bech, TCU Isaiah Bond, Texas Ja'Corey Brooks, Louisville Sam Brown Jr., Miami Pat Bryant, Illinois Luther Burden III, Missouri Beaux Collins, Notre Dame Chimere Dike, Florida Emeka Egbuka, Ohio State Da'Quan Felton, Virginia Tech Tai Felton, Maryland Jacolby George, Miami Matthew Golden, Texas Tre Harris, Mississippi Jayden Higgins, Iowa State Traeshon Holden, Oregon Jimmy Horn Jr., Colorado Tory Horton, Colorado State Kobe Hudson, UCF Daniel Jackson, Minnesota Tez Johnson, Oregon Josh Kelly, Texas Tech KeAndre Lambert-Smith, Auburn Jaylin Lane, Virginia Tech Dominic Lovett, Georgia Bru McCoy, Tennessee Tetairoa McMillan, Arizona Konata Mumpfield, Pittsburgh Nick Nash, San Jose State Isaiah Neyor, Nebraska Jaylin Noel, Iowa State Kaden Prather, Maryland Xavier Restrepo, Miami Jalen Royals, Utah State Arian Smith, Georgia Roc Taylor, Memphis Isaac TeSlaa, Arkansas Dont'e Thornton Jr., Tennessee Jordan Watkins, Mississippi Theo Wease Jr., Missouri Antwane Wells Jr., Mississippi LaJohntay Wester, Colorado Ricky White III, UNLV Kyle Williams, Washington State Savion Williams, TCU TIGHT ENDS Elijah Arroyo, Miami Gavin Bartholomew, Pittsburgh Jake Briningstool, Clemson Jalin Conyers, Texas Tech CJ Dippre, Alabama Mitchell Evans, Notre Dame Harold Fannin Jr., Bowling Green Terrance Ferguson, Oregon Thomas Fidone II, Nebraska Oronde Gadsden II, Syracuse Jackson Hawes, Georgia Tech Gunnar Helm, Texas Brant Kuithe, Utah Luke Lachey, Iowa Colston Loveland, Michigan Moliki Matavao, UCLA Bryson Nesbit, North Carolina Robbie Ouzts, Alabama Joshua Simon, South Carolina Mason Taylor, LSU Tyler Warren, Penn State OFFENSIVE LINEMEN Kelvin Banks Jr., Texas Anthony Belton, N.C. State Tyler Booker, Alabama Logan Brown, Kansas Will Campbell, LSU Connor Colby, Iowa Josh Conerly Jr., Oregon Hayden Conner, Texas Ajani Cornelius, Oregon Eli Cox, Kentucky Brandon Crenshaw-Dickson, Florida Garrett Dellinger, LSU Aireontae Ersery, Minnesota Dylan Fairchild, Georgia Miles Frazier, LSU Charles Grant, William & Mary Joshua Gray, Oregon State Myles Hinton, Michigan Joe Huber, Wisconsin Donovan Jackson, Ohio State Emery Jones Jr., LSU Luke Kandra, Cincinnati Drew Kendall, Boston College Chase Lundt, Connecticut Jake Majors, Texas Marcus Mbow, Purdue Seth McLaughlin, Ohio State Armand Membou, Missouri Wyatt Milum, West Virginia Jonah Monheim, USC Jack Nelson, Wisconsin Hollin Pierce, Rutgers Tate Ratledge, Georgia Jalen Rivers, Miami Caleb Rogers, Texas Tech Jonah Savaiinaea, Arizona Josh Simmons, Ohio State Torricelli Simpkins III, South Carolina Jackson Slater, Sacramento State Marcus Tate, Clemson Branson Taylor, Pittsburgh Ozzy Trapilo, Boston College Jalen Travis, Iowa State Xavier Truss, Georgia Carson Vinson, Alabama A&M Clay Webb, Jacksonville State Cameron Williams, Texas John Williams, Cincinnati Jared Wilson, Georgia Grey Zabel, North Dakota State DEFENSIVE LINEMEN Tommy Akingbesote, Maryland Darius Alexander, Toledo Tyler Baron, Miami Tyler Batty, BYU Zeek Biggers, Georgia Tech Yahya Black, Iowa Warren Brinson, Georgia Vernon Broughton, Texas Jordan Burch, Oregon Jamaree Caldwell, Oregon Abdul Carter, Penn State Alfred Collins, Texas Howard Cross III, Notre Dame Fadil Diggs, Syracuse Ethan Downs, Oklahoma Donovan Ezeiruaku, Boston College Joshua Farmer, Florida State Ashton Gillotte, Louisville Mason Graham, Michigan Kenneth Grant, Michigan Mike Green, Marshall Eric Gregory, Arkansas Ty Hamilton, Ohio State Derrick Harmon, Oregon Jared Harrison-Hunte, SMU Ahmed Hassanein, Boise State Tonka Hemingway, South Carolina Cam Horsley, Boston College Tyrion Ingram-Dawkins, Georgia Jared Ivey, Mississippi Cam Jackson, Florida Landon Jackson, Arkansas Sai'vion Jones, LSU Jah Joyner, Minnesota DeAndre Jules, South Carolina Kyle Kennard, South Carolina Steve Linton, Baylor Sean Martin, West Virginia Rylie Mills, Notre Dame Walter Nolen, Mississippi Omarr Norman-Lott, Tennessee Oluwafemi Oladejo, UCLA Payton Page, Clemson James Pearce Jr., Tennessee Aeneas Peebles, Virginia Tech JJ Pegues, Mississippi Jordan Phillips, Maryland Antwaun Powell-Ryland, Virginia Tech Jahvaree Ritzie, North Carolina Elijah Roberts, SMU Que Robinson, Alabama Ty Robinson, Nebraska Kaimon Rucker, North Carolina T.J. Sanders, South Carolina Jack Sawyer, Ohio State Nic Scourton, Texas A&M Elijah Simmons, Tennessee Tim Smith, Alabama Barryn Sorrell, Texas Nazir Stackhouse, Georgia Josaiah Stewart, Michigan Shemar Stewart, Texas A&M Bradyn Swinson, LSU Junior Tafuna, Utah Jay Toia, UCLA JT Tuimoloau, Ohio State Shemar Turner, Texas A&M Princely Umanmielen, Mississippi David Walker, Central Arkansas Deone Walker, Kentucky CJ West, Indiana Mykel Williams, Georgia Tyleik Williams, Ohio State LINEBACKERS Eugene Asante, Auburn Jeffrey Bassa, Oregon Carson Bruener, Washington Teddye Buchanan, Cal Jihaad Campbell, Alabama Barrett Carter, Clemson Jamon Dumas-Johnson, Kentucky Power Echols, North Carolina Jay Higgins, Iowa Shemar James, Florida Kobe King, Penn State Jack Kiser, Notre Dame Demetrius Knight Jr., South Carolina Cody Lindenberg, Minnesota Nick Martin, Oklahoma State Bam Martin-Scott, South Carolina Francisco Mauigoa, Miami Jalen McLeod, Auburn Kain Medrano, UCLA Smael Mondon Jr., Georgia Collin Oliver, Oklahoma State Chris Paul Jr., Mississippi Tyreem Powell, Rutgers Karene Reid, Utah Carson Schwesinger, UCLA Cody Simon, Ohio State Danny Stutsman, Oklahoma Jalon Walker, Georgia Jackson Woodard, UNLV DEFENSIVE BACKS BJ Adams, UCF Zy Alexander, LSU Trey Amos, Mississippi Jahdae Barron, Texas Billy Bowman Jr., Oklahoma Cobee Bryant, Kansas Denzel Burke, Ohio State Sebastian Castro, Iowa Alijah Clark, Syracuse Kitan Crawford, Nevada Mello Dotson, Kansas Nick Emmanwori, South Carolina O'Donnell Fortune, South Carolina Zah Frazier, UTSA Maxwell Hairston, Kentucky Jordan Hancock, Ohio State Jermari Harris, Iowa Marcus Harris, Cal Tommi Hill, Nebraska Maxen Hook, Toledo Travis Hunter, Colorado Alijah Huzzie, North Carolina Will Johnson, Michigan Bilhal Kone, Western Michigan Rayuan Lane III, Navy Robert Longerbeam, Rutgers Jason Marshall Jr., Florida Mac McWilliams, UCF R.J. Mickens, Clemson Malachi Moore, Alabama Benjamin Morrison, Notre Dame Jabbar Muhammad, Oregon Andrew Mukuba, Texas Jacob Parrish, Kansas State Darien Porter, Iowa State Caleb Ransaw, Tulane Lathan Ransom, Ohio State Jaylen Reed, Penn State Shavon Revel Jr., East Carolina Quincy Riley, Louisville Jonas Sanker, Virginia Marques Sigle, Kansas State Jaylin Smith, USC Malaki Starks, Georgia Upton Stout, Western Kentucky Dorian Strong, Virginia Tech Azareye'h Thomas, Florida State Dante Trader Jr., Maryland Malik Verdon, Iowa State Justin Walley, Minnesota Xavier Watts, Notre Dame Isas Waxter, Villanova Nohl Williams, Cal Kevin Winston Jr., Penn State Hunter Wohler, Wisconsin Craig Woodson, Cal SPECIALISTS Andres Borregales, K, Miami James Burnip, P, Alabama Jeremy Crawshaw, P, Florida Ryan Fitzgerald, K, Florida State Tyler Loop, K, Arizona Ben Sauls, K, Pittsburgh

About Our NFL Draft Grade Process At Football Scout 365 , we meticulously evaluate NFL Draft prospects using our internal evaluation grade scale, a system refined since the 2021 NFL Draft. Our grading process blends film study and advanced analytics, assessing players year-round—from the prior season’s tape to summer scouting, in-season evaluations, and key pre-draft events like the Senior Bowl and NFL Combine. This comprehensive approach ensures every data point is accounted for, allowing us to accurately assess each prospect’s NFL potential. 👉 Click here to learn more about our NFL Draft grade scale For the 2025 NFL Draft, we’re incorporating graded comparisons to top quarterbacks from previous draft classes. This process helps us identify anomalies and ensure our grades remain consistent and accurate by evaluating this year’s prospects alongside past evaluations. Our methodology follows BLESTO and NFL scouting department grading models, providing a data-driven approach to quarterback rankings. How We Grade Quarterbacks Scouting the quarterback position is one of the most complex evaluations in football. As the leader of the offense, a quarterback’s success often determines a team’s ceiling. Given the position’s importance, NFL teams invest anywhere from 6% to 25% of their salary cap in a franchise QB, a number that continues to rise. At Football Scout 365 , we use a detailed grading system that evaluates quarterbacks across multiple key traits. Each QB receives a 1-9 grade in the following categories, leading to an overall draft grade and a ceiling grade projecting long-term potential. Key Traits We Evaluate in Quarterbacks Arm Talent  – Accuracy, velocity, and ability to throw at all levels. Decision-Making  – Processing speed, defensive recognition, and turnover avoidance. Mobility  – Play-extending ability, pocket movement, and effectiveness throwing on the run. 👉 Click here to see our full QB evaluation process A successful evaluation requires analyzing a QB’s on-field performance, leadership, and football intelligence, while also considering how their skill set fits within an offensive system. Scheme adaptability and long-term development potential are key factors in projecting NFL success. Overview of the 2025 NFL Draft QB Class Several NFL franchises lack a long-term answer at quarterback and enter the offseason looking for upgrades. While scouts consider this a weaker class in terms of top-end talent, multiple quarterbacks are still expected to be first-round selections. Additionally, several intriguing mid-to-late-round prospects have caught the attention of NFL evaluators. QB Rankings: How This Year’s Class Stacks Up In evaluating the 2025 NFL Draft quarterback class, we compare each prospect to the top-tier QBs from previous draft classes, placing them within our NFL Draft grade scale. This system categorizes quarterbacks into four key tiers: Elite Tier Near Elite Tier High-End Starter Potential   Mid-Level Starter Potential Elite Tier (Generational/Franchise QB) 1). Caleb Williams (2024, USC) 2). Trevor Lawrence (2021, Clemson) *There are zero Elite QB grades in the 2025 NFL Draft class. Near Elite Tier (High-End Starter With Pro Bowl Upside) 3). Bryce Young (2023 NFL Draft, Alabama) 4). C.J. Stroud (2023 NFL Draft, Ohio State) *There are zero Near Elite QB grades in the 2025 NFL Draft class. High-End Starter Potential (Capable Long-Term Starter) 5). Jayden Daniels (2024, LSU) 6). J.J. McCarthy (2024, Michigan) 7). Drake Maye (2024, North Carolina) 8). Michael Penix Jr. (2024, Washington) 9). Shedeur Sanders (2025, Colorado)  A precision passer with excellent poise under pressure, Sanders excels in rhythm-based offenses. His accuracy and decision-making are NFL-ready. 10). Cam Ward (2025, Miami)  An aggressive passer with elite arm talent, Ward thrives in vertical passing schemes. His mechanics need refinement, but his ability to extend plays and push the ball downfield makes him one of the most exciting prospects in this class. 11). Justin Fields (2021, Ohio State) 12). Anthony Richardson (2023, Florida) Mid-Level Starter Potential (Developmental Starter With Upside) 13). Bo Nix (2024, Oregon) 14). Zach Wilson (2021, BYU) 15). Quinn Ewers (2025, Texas)  A high IQ passer with a quick release and excellent pocket presence, Ewers thrives in spread or West Coast schemes that emphasize RPOs and quick passing concepts. His deep-ball accuracy is a strength, but he must improve footwork and consistency under pressure to maximize his upside. 16). Jalen Milroe (2025, Alabama)  An elite dual-threat quarterback with a strong arm, Milroe fits best in a spread-based offense that utilizes RPOs and designed quarterback runs. His mobility and deep-ball ability are major assets, but he must refine his accuracy and decision-making in the intermediate passing game. 17). Will Levis (2023, Kentucky) 18). Kyle McCord (2025, Syracuse)  A pocket passer with strong arm talent and solid accuracy, McCord fits best in a play-action-heavy system that allows him to leverage timing throws and structured reads. His ability to make downfield throws when given a clean pocket is a plus, but he must improve handling pressure. 19). Mac Jones (2021, Alabama) 20). Jaxson Dart (2025, Ole Miss)  A strong-armed, athletic quarterback, Dart thrives in RPO-heavy and vertical passing schemes. His ability to make off-platform throws and extend plays is a plus, but he must refine his mechanics under pressure to transition smoothly into a pro-style system. 21). Will Howard (2025, Ohio State)  A big-bodied, strong-armed quarterback with solid mobility, Howard fits best in a vertical play-action offense. His deep-ball accuracy and poise in high-pressure situations stand out, but his lower-body mechanics and processing against complex defenses need refinement. 22). Dillon Gabriel (2025, Oregon)  A rhythm-based passer with strong football IQ and accuracy in the short-to-intermediate game, Gabriel thrives in quick-hitting offenses that emphasize timing and RPOs. His lack of elite size and arm strength limit his upside, but his decision-making makes him a solid developmental option.

Every draft class includes small-school prospects with the talent and work ethic to make an impact at the next level, and the 2025 NFL Draft will be no different. Western Carolina’s Curtis Fann Jr. is one such player. A former four-star recruit from Emanuel County Institute (GA), Fann’s path has taken him from Florida State to Akron before landing at Western Carolina, where he displayed his versatility, physicality, and ability to disrupt opposing offenses. At 6’3”, 250 pounds, Fann has the size and frame to fit multiple defensive schemes, with experience playing as an EDGE rusher, outside linebacker, and even kicking inside on some downs. He recorded 554 total defensive snaps in 2024, with a near-even split between run defense (264 snaps) and pass-rush situations (263 snaps), along with 27 coverage reps. His run-defense grade jumped from 43.9 at Akron to an impressive 69.3 in 2024 at Western Carolina, demonstrating steady year-over-year improvement. High School and Recruiting Background Fann was a dominant two-way player at Emanuel County Institute (GA), earning a four-star rating and ranking as the No. 26 strong-side defensive end in the nation. His impact on both sides of the ball helped lead his team to multiple playoff appearances. His recruitment saw him choose Florida State over Georgia and South Carolina, and he was rated No. 143 in ESPN’s Top 300 prospects. At Florida State, Fann redshirted in 2019 and spent 2020 on the scout team before transferring to Akron, where he saw his first collegiate action. College Career and Development Florida State (2019-2020) Redshirted in 2019 and spent 2020 on the scout team. Earned Seminole Scholar honors in 2020. Akron (2021) Played in 10 games, recording 12 total tackles, one QB hurry, and a half-tackle for loss. Primarily used as a rotational defensive lineman. Western Carolina (2023-2024) Developed into a key rotational defender, playing in all 11 games in 2023. Ranked 3rd on the team in run stops (23) and led the team with 2 forced fumbles in 2024. Tied for 3rd on the team in total pressures. Played 140 snaps at both Right and Left OLB in 2024, with nearly 100 snaps over the tackle or kicked inside. 2024 FCS Bowl The FCS Bowl is an annual post-season all-star game showcasing top college football seniors from FCS, D2, and D3 programs. Hosted by East Preps LLC, the event provides NFL and CFL scouts with an exclusive look at standout players from smaller schools. The game, held in Daytona Beach, FL, is coached by experienced pro-level coaches and has drawn scouts from all 32 NFL teams. With game film distributed directly to NFL teams by NFL Films, the FCS Bowl serves as a key scouting opportunity for under-the-radar prospects looking to prove themselves at the next level. Personal Background and Academic Achievements Curtis Fann Jr. is more than just a football player—he’s a determined, hard-working individual with a strong family-first mentality. Raised in Stillmore, Georgia, a small town with a population of just 447 people, Fann grew up in a tight-knit family with his mother, grandmother, great-grandmother, and great-aunt. His grandfather, Curtis Lee Fann, was one of his biggest role models. Despite the adversity he has faced, including the loss of multiple close family members while in college—his great-grandmother passed away during his first week at Florida State, and he also lost his cousin Keon Mack in 2024—Fann has remained resilient and focused on his journey. Academically, Fann is as dedicated in the classroom as he is on the field. He holds: Bachelor’s degree in Organizational Business Associate’s degree in Arts Master’s degree (Spring 2025) in Entrepreneurship His long-term aspirations go beyond football. While he is determined to make an NFL roster and contribute to a team, he also wants to use his education to build something impactful for his family and his community. “My goal is to make an NFL roster & contribute to a team in the best way possible, playing the game I love. I’ll do anything to help my team win on and off the field, no matter what it is. Another thing that is very important for me is learning from the veterans I will be around.” – Curtis Fann Jr. Advanced Metrics and Scouting Report Strengths ✅ Run Defense Growth – Improved his run-defense grade from 43.9 (Akron) to 69.3 (Western Carolina), showing development in block-shedding and gap control. ✅ Tackling Reliability – One of the most consistent tacklers on film; minimal missed assignments and graded highly as a tackler throughout his collegiate career. ✅ Versatility – Played EDGE, OLB, and even some interior reps, displaying positional flexibility that translates well to multiple schemes. ✅ Pass-Rushing Potential – Flashed disruptive moves, including an effective cross-chop technique, while tying for 3rd on his team in total pressures. ✅ Special Teams Usage – Logged special teams snaps on kickoff and punt teams, a crucial factor for undrafted players looking to make an NFL roster. ✅ High Motor and Physicality – Plays with relentless effort and a strong lower half, making him a tough matchup for offensive linemen. Weaknesses ❌ Overall Pass-Rush Production – While he flashes disruptive reps, his sack and pressure numbers do not stand out at the FCS level. ❌ Average Lateral Quickness – Can struggle with agility-based movements in space, limiting his effectiveness in open-field situations. ❌ Undersized for Some EDGE Roles – At 6’3”, 250 pounds, he may need to bulk up or transition to a hybrid role at the next level. 2024 Season Highlights 📌 Defensive Snaps Played : 554 📌 Tackles: 22 (15 solo) 📌 Sacks: 2 📌 Forced Fumbles: 2 (led team) 📌 Run Stops: 23 (3rd on team) 📌 PFF Run Defense Grade : 69.3 (Major improvement from Akron) NFL Projection and Fit Best Scheme Fit: Fann projects as a rotational EDGE or hybrid OLB in a 3-4 or 4-3 front, where he can use his versatility to defend the run and contribute as a situational pass rusher. NFL Player Comparison Jamir Jones (Pittsburgh Steelers) 🔸 6’3”, 255 lbs | Practice squad to rotational EDGE role 🔸 Good tackler and run defender, limited pass-rush upside early in his career 🔸 Gritty, high-motor player who made an impact through special teams before earning defensive snaps 🔸 Took a path through multiple teams before carving out a role—something Fann may have to do Draft Projection: Undrafted Free Agent / Priority UDFA 🔹 Practice Squad Candidate with Developmental Upside 🔹 Strong Fit for UFL, CFL, or Other Pro Leagues Summary Curtis Fann Jr. brings experience, physicality, and versatility to the table as a high-motor EDGE/OLB prospect. His steady improvement, tackling ability, and experience across multiple alignments make him an intriguing developmental player.  "I love football because it’s been my life since I was a kid. It’s my first love. God, Family, and Ball—those three things complete me. I love making plays, the chills that go through my body when I make a big play, and the process that comes with it. Even when it’s tough, it’s beautiful because the struggle produces greatness." – Curtis Fann Jr. While he may not be an immediate-impact NFL player, his ability to defend the run, create turnovers, and contribute on special teams makes him a viable practice squad or developmental piece for an NFL defense. If he doesn’t land on an NFL roster, his skill set translates well to leagues like the UFL, CFL, or indoor football, where he can continue refining his game and prove himself at the professional level.

The NFL’s Ultimate Pre-Draft Evaluation Event The NFL Scouting Combine is the premier evaluation event for draft-eligible college football players, offering NFL GMs, coaches, and scouts a centralized opportunity to assess prospects through a comprehensive series of medical, mental, and physical tests. Held annually in Indianapolis, Indiana, this invitation-only event determines how players stack up against the league’s elite draft prospects in a standardized setting. The Combine serves as a proving ground—a place where players can confirm their on-field dominance, answer lingering questions, and even reshape their draft stock with a standout performance. While game tape remains the most critical factor in an NFL team’s scouting process, the Combine allows evaluators to verify athletic ability, injury history, and football intelligence before making multimillion-dollar draft decisions. Each year, approximately 300 of the nation’s top prospects receive an exclusive invite to participate. But what happens in Indianapolis can either solidify a player’s first-round projection or expose weaknesses that push them down the draft board. Click to Expand 2025 NFL Scouting Combine Schedule Location: Lucas Oil Stadium, Indianapolis, INDates: February 27 – March 2, 2025 Date Position Groups Start Time (ET) TV Coverage Thursday, Feb 27 Defensive Linemen & Linebackers 3 PM ET NFL Network Friday, Feb 28 Defensive Backs & Tight Ends 3 PM ET NFL Network Saturday, Mar 1 Quarterbacks, Wide Receivers & Running Backs 1 PM ET NFL Network Sunday, Mar 2 Offensive Linemen 1 PM ET NFL Network The four-day event features measurable testing, on-field positional drills, and interviews that help teams assess how prospects handle pressure, adapt to coaching, and respond to high-stakes evaluations. Why the NFL Scouting Combine Matters The NFL Combine is more than a workout session—it’s an intense, highly scrutinized evaluation process that can reshape a player’s draft stock. Every drill, interview, and medical check holds weight. Medical Evaluations: Teams gather critical data on injuries, surgeries, and long-term health concerns. Athletic Testing: Prospects compete in key drills that quantify speed, explosiveness, agility, and strength. Team Interviews: Teams conduct 15-minute interviews to evaluate football IQ, personality, and character. On-Field Workouts: Players participate in position-specific drills to showcase technique, footwork, and movement skills. For some players, a dominant performance can propel them into the first round. For others, a poor showing may raise red flags that push them down draft boards. 2025 NFL Combine: Updated Performance Metrics & Records Each year, prospects aim to break records and make history at the Combine. Here’s a look at some of the most important drills and the top all-time performers in each category. 40-Yard Dash Importance: The premier speed test, crucial for skill positions like wide receivers, defensive backs, and running backs. Top All-Time Performers: Xavier Worthy, WR, Texas (2024) – 4.21 seconds John Ross, WR, Washington (2017) – 4.22 seconds Kalon Barnes, CB, Baylor (2022) – 4.23 seconds Chris Johnson, RB, East Carolina (2008) – 4.24 seconds 10-Yard Split Importance: Measures initial burst and acceleration, critical for pass rushers, running backs, and linebackers. Top All-Time Performers: Chris Johnson, RB, East Carolina (2008) – 1.40 seconds Henry Ruggs, WR, Alabama (2020) – 1.43 seconds Malcolm Mitchell, WR, Georgia (2016) – 1.43 seconds Vertical Jump Importance: A key indicator of lower-body explosiveness, useful for WRs, DBs, and pass rushers. Top All-Time Performers: Chris Conley, WR, Georgia (2015) – 45.00 inches Donald Washington, CB, Ohio State (2009) – 45.00 inches Byron Jones, CB, Connecticut (2015) – 44.50 inches Bench Press (225 lbs Reps) Importance: Tests upper-body strength and endurance, crucial for linemen and linebackers. Top All-Time Performers: Stephen Paea, DT, Oregon State (2011) – 49 reps Mitch Petrus, OL, Arkansas (2010) – 45 reps Mike Kudla, DL, Ohio State (2006) – 45 reps Bringing It All Together: The Road to the NFL Draft While the NFL Combine isn’t the final say, it provides one of the last major opportunities for prospects to boost their draft stock ahead of Pro Days and private workouts. A historic performance can skyrocket a player into the first round. A poor showing can force teams to reevaluate a prospect’s tape and long-term potential. Medical evaluations often carry more weight than the drills themselves. At the 2025 NFL Scouting Combine, all eyes will be on Indianapolis as teams search for the next franchise cornerstone. With the NFL Draft fast approaching, the Combine serves as a critical turning point in the journey to professional football. Exclusive coverage of the 2025 NFL Scouting Combine is available on NFL Network, NFL.com , NFL Now, and NFL Mobile.

Each year, the NFL Combine offers an opportunity for invitees to showcase their overall athleticism. Football scouts, NFL GMs, and coaches can use the combine to solidify their initial scouting evaluations for each prospect, and it can also raise questions about a prospect's initial evaluation. Regardless, players who perform at a high level each year have great odds of increasing their NFL Draft stock as they demonstrate physical traits that translate well to professional football. However, it's important to note that while NFL combine performances can boost a prospect's NFL Draft stock, it is just one part of a player's overall evaluation, which includes thorough game tape analysis, individual interviews, and medical assessments. 40-Yard Dash Importance : The 40-yard dash is crucial for evaluating a player's speed and acceleration, especially for skill positions like wide receivers, running backs, and defensive backs. John Ross holds the record with a time of 4.22 seconds. Exceptional performance in this drill can significantly boost a player's draft stock. Top Performers : Washington WR John Ross: 4.22 seconds (2017) Baylor CB Kalon Barnes: 4.23 seconds (2022) East Carolina RB Chris Johnson: 4.24 seconds (2008) Michigan CB DJ Turner: 4.26 seconds (2023) Texas San Antonio CB Riq Woolen: 4.26 seconds (2022) Kent State RB Dri Archer: 4.26 seconds (2016) Alabama WR Henry Ruggs II: 4.27 seconds (2020) Texas WR Marquise Goodwin: 4.27 seconds (2013) Baylor WR Tyquan Thornton: 4.28 seconds (2022) Minnesota CB Jalen Myrick: 4.28 seconds (2017) UAB WR J.J. Nelson: 4.28 seconds (2015) Clemson WR Jacoby Ford: 4.28 seconds (2010) 10-Yard Split Importance : The 10-yard split measures initial acceleration and is particularly important for evaluating linemen and linebackers who need quick bursts of speed. Chris Johnson leads with a 1.40-second record. Good performance here indicates potential for explosive power off the line. Top Performers : East Carolina RB Chris Johnson: 1.40 seconds (2008) Alabama WR Henry Ruggs: 1.43 seconds (2020) Georgia WR Malcom Mitchell: 1.43 seconds (2016) Mississippi S Zedrick Woods: 1.44 seconds (2019) LSU CB Donte Jackson: 1.44 seconds (2018) Houston CB William Jackson: 1.44 seconds (2016) Ohio State WR Parris Campbell: 1.45 seconds (2019) UMass Amherst WR Andy Isabella: 1.45 seconds (2019) Ohio State WR Terry McLaurin: 1.45 seconds (2019) Mississippi WR DK Metcalf: 1.45 seconds (2019) Maryland S Darnell Savage: 1.45 seconds (2019) Auburn WR Darius Slayton: 1.45 seconds (2019) LSU CB Greedy Williams: 1.45 seconds (2019) USC CB Terrell Thomas: 1.45 seconds (2008) Vertical Jump Importance : This measures lower-body strength and explosiveness, relevant for wide receivers, tight ends, and defensive backs. Chris Conley and Donald Washington share the record at 45 inches. High vertical jumps can indicate good potential for catching or defending high passes. Top Performers : Georgia WR Chris Conley: 45.00 inches (2015) Ohio State CB Donald Washington: 45.00 inches (2009) Michigan WR Donovan Peoples-Jones: 44.50 inches (2020) Connecticut CB Byron Jones: 44.50 inches (2015) Illinois SAF Quan Martin: 44.00 inches (2023) Virginia S Juan Thornhill: 44.00 inches (2019) Connecticut S Obi Melifonwu: 44.00 inches (2017) Fresno State CB A.J. Jefferson: 44.00 inches (2010) Notre Dame WR Miles Boykin: 43.50 inches (2019) Missouri WR Emanuel Hall: 43.50 inches (2019) Texas A&M WR Speedy Noil: 43.50 inches (2017) Utah S Marcus Williams: 43.50 inches (2017) Connecticut WR Kashif Moore: 43.50 inches (2012) Pittsburgh TE Dorin Dickerson: 43.50 inches (2010) Broad Jump Importance : Similar to the vertical jump, the broad jump assesses lower-body strength and explosiveness, crucial for all positions, particularly skill players. Byron Jones set the NFL combine record at 12 feet, 3 inches. A long broad jump can signify good overall athletic ability and explosiveness. Top Performers : Connecticut CB Byron Jones: 12 feet, 3 inches (2015) Missouri WR Emanuel Hall: 11 feet, 9 inches (2019) Virginia S Juan Thornhill: 11 feet, 9 inches (2019) Connecticut S Obi Melifonwu: 11 feet, 9 inches (2017) Notre Dame WR Miles Boykin: 11 feet, 8 inches (2019) Michigan WR Donovan Peoples-Jones: 11 feet, 7 inches (2020) Georgia WR Chris Conley: 11 feet, 7 inches (2015) Southern Mississippi OLB Jamie Collins: 11 feet, 7 inches (2013) Kansas State CB Julius Brents: 11 feet, 6 inches (2023) Southern Illinois S Jeremy Chinn: 11 feet, 6 inches (2020) TCU WR Jalen Reagor: 11 feet, 6 inches (2020) Kentucky OLB Bud Dupree: 11 feet, 6 inches (2015) 3-Cone Drill Importance : This drill tests agility, flexibility, and change-of-direction speed. Jeff Maehl and Buster Skrine share the top spot with a time of 6.42 seconds. Excellent performance here is particularly valued for running backs, linebackers, and defensive backs. Top Performers : Oregon WR Jeff Maehl: 6.42 seconds (2011) Tennessee-Chattanooga DB Buster Skrine: 6.42 seconds (2011) West Virginia LB David Long: 6.45 seconds (2019) Louisville WR Scott Long: 6.45 seconds (2010) Ohio State WR Dane Sanzenbacher: 6.46 seconds (2011) BYU FS Daniel Sorensen: 6.47 seconds (2011) Sam Houston State CB Zyon McCollum: 6.48 seconds (2022) LSU WR Terrence Toliver: 6.48 seconds (2011) Stanford WR Devon Cajuste: 6.49 seconds (2016) Florida RB Chris Rainey: 6.50 seconds (2012) Texas DB Chykie Brown: 6.50 seconds (2011) Mount Union College WR Cecil Shorts: 6.50 seconds (2011) Michigan CB Leon Hall: 6.50 seconds (2007) 20-Yard Shuttle Importance : The 20-yard shuttle assesses short-area quickness, agility, and change-of-direction capability. Brandin Cooks and Jason Allen hold the record at 3.81 seconds. This is crucial for defensive backs and receivers to demonstrate their lateral speed and quickness. Top Performers : Oregon State WR Brandin Cooks: 3.81 seconds (2014) Tennessee CB Jason Allen: 3.81 seconds (2006) Memphis CB Bobby McCain: 3.82 seconds (2015) William & Mary CB B.W. Webb: 3.84 seconds (2013) Boston College FS Justin Simmons: 3.85 seconds (2016) Washington CB Desmond Trufant: 3.85 seconds (2013) Boise State WR Austin Pettis: 3.88 seconds (2011) Washington WR Kevin King: 3.88 seconds (2017) Wake Forest CB Kevin Johnson: 3.89 seconds (2015) Louisville WR Damian Copeland: 3.90 seconds (2014) Vanderbilt DB Casey Hayward: 3.90 seconds (2012) Idaho DB Shiloh Keo: 3.90 seconds (2011) Tennessee-Chattanooga DB Buster Skrine: 3.90 seconds (2011) Oregon State S Sabby Piscitelli: 3.90 seconds (2007) Bench Press Importance : This is a test of upper-body strength and endurance, most relevant for linemen and linebackers. Stephen Paea holds the record with 49 reps. A high number of reps can enhance a prospect's profile, especially for those in the trenches. Top Performers : Oregon State DT Stephen Paea: 49 reps (2011) Arkansas OL Mitch Petrus: 45 reps (2010) Ohio State DL Mike Kudla: 45 reps (2006) Fresno State G Netane Muti: 44 reps (2020) Memphis DT Dontari Poe: 44 reps (2012) Georgia DT Jeff Owens: 44 reps (2010) Stanford DT Harrison Phillips: 42 reps (2018) North Carolina C Russell Bodine: 42 reps (2014) N.C State DL Tank Tyler: 42 reps (2007) Washington DT Vita Vea: 41 reps (2018) Michigan C David Molk: 41 reps (2012)

About the NFL Scouting Combine and Why It Is Important The NFL Scouting Combine is an event where college football players eligible for the NFL Draft showcase their physical and mental abilities in a standardized setting. Here are some key things to know about the NFL Combine: Location: The NFL Combine is typically held in late February or early March at Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis, Indiana. However, the event was not held in 2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and the location for future events may be subject to change. Attendees: The Combine is invite-only, and invitations are typically extended to around 300 top college football prospects eligible for the upcoming NFL Draft. Tests and drills: Prospects at the Combine undergo a battery of physical tests and drills to assess their athleticism, strength, and football skills. These include the 40-yard dash, vertical jump, broad jump, three-cone drill, shuttle run, and bench press. Medical evaluations: Besides the physical tests, prospects undergo a thorough medical evaluation to assess any pre-existing injuries or medical conditions. Interviews: Teams also have the opportunity to interview prospects, both individually and in group settings, to assess their character, work ethic, and football IQ. Importance: The Combine can significantly affect a prospect's draft stock. Their performance in the physical tests and interviews can substantially influence how teams view them as potential NFL players. Overall, the NFL Combine is an essential event for both teams and players, as it provides a standardized setting for prospects to showcase their skills and for teams to evaluate them as potential draft picks. The NFL Scouting Combine Data Using Our Free NFL Combine Research Tool Here are some averages of the top player assessments at the NFL Combine since 2012. Average 40 Time Since 2012: 4.7 Average Vertical Jump Since 2012: 33" Average 3-Cone Drill Since 2012: 7.3Sec Average Bench Reps Since 2012: 20 Average Shuttle Run Since 2012: 4.5Sec Defining each NFL Combine measurable and the top performers . 40 Yard Dash The 40 Yard Dash is a test that college football players undergo at the NFL Combine, and it measures a player's speed, acceleration, and explosiveness. Here's how it works: The player starts from a three-point stance at the starting line. At the whistle, the player sprints 40 yards as quickly as possible, with their time being recorded from start to finish. The 40-yard dash is considered one of the most important tests at the NFL Combine. Speed is an essential attribute for many positions in football, including wide receivers, running backs, and defensive backs. A fast 40 40-yard dash time can greatly improve a player's draft stock and overall NFL prospects. Top 5 All-Time 40-Yard Dash Times Xavier Worthy, 2024 NFL Combine – 4.21 seconds  (WR, Texas) John Ross, 2017 NFL Combine – 4.22 seconds  (WR, Washington) Kalon Barnes, 2022 NFL Combine – 4.23 seconds  (CB, Baylor) Chris Johnson, 2008 NFL Combine – 4.24 seconds  (RB, East Carolina) DJ Turner II, 2023 NFL Combine – 4.26 seconds  (CB, Michigan) 20 Yard Shuttle Run The shuttle run, also known as the 5-10-5 drill, is one of the tests that college football players undergo at the NFL Combine. The shuttle run measures a player's agility and ability to change direction quickly. Here's how it works: The player starts in a three-point stance at the starting line. At the whistle, the player sprints five yards to the right, touches the line, and then sprints 10 yards to the left and touches the line. The player sprints five yards back to the starting line, completing the drill. The player's time is recorded from start to finish, indicating their ability to accelerate, change direction, and decelerate quickly. The shuttle run is considered an important test at the NFL Combine because agility and quickness are crucial for many positions in football, including running backs, wide receivers, and defensive backs. A good time in the shuttle run can help players stand out to NFL teams and improve their draft stock. The Top NFL Combine Shuttle Run Performances Brandin Cooks – wide receiver – 3.81 seconds – 2014 NFL Combine Jason Allen – cornerback – 3.81 seconds – 2006 NFL Combine Bobby McCain – cornerback – 3.82 seconds – 2015 NFL Combine B.W. Webb – cornerback – 3.84 seconds – 2013 NFL Combine Justin Simmons – safety – 3.85 seconds – 2016 NFL Combine Three Cone Drill (Lateral Agility) The Three Cone Drill, or the L-Drill, is a test that college football players undergo at the NFL Combine. The drill measures a player's ability to change direction, agility, and acceleration. Here's how it works: Three cones are placed in an L-shape, with each cone five yards apart from each other. The player starts at the first cone and sprints to the second cone, then quickly changes direction and sprints around the second cone to the third cone. The player then changes direction again and sprints around the third cone, finishing the drill at the starting point. The player's time is recorded from the start to the finish, indicating their ability to change direction quickly while maintaining their speed and balance. The Three Cone Drill is considered to be an important test at the NFL Combine because the ability to change direction quickly and maintain balance is crucial for many positions in football, including running backs, wide receivers, and defensive backs. A good time in the Three Cone Drill can help a player stand out to NFL teams and potentially improve their draft stock. The Top NFL Combine Three-Cone Performances Jordan Thomas – cornerback – 6.28 seconds – 2018 NFL Combine Jeffrey Maehl – wide receiver – 6.42 seconds – 2011 NFL Combine Buster Skrine – cornerback – 6.44 seconds – 2011 NFL Combine Scott Long – wide receiver – 6.45 seconds – 2010 NFL Combine David Long – cornerback – 6.45 seconds – 2019 NFL Combine Vertical Jump (Measures Explosiveness) The Vertical Jump is a test that college football players undergo at the NFL Combine, and it measures a player's explosive lower body power and jumping ability. Here's how it works: The player stands with both feet flat on the ground under a measuring apparatus called a Vertec. The player then jumps as high as they can, hitting the Vertec with their hand at the highest point of their jump. The difference between the player's standing reach and their highest point of contact with the Vertec is recorded as their vertical jump height. The Vertical Jump is considered an important test at the NFL Combine because a player's ability to jump high can indicate their lower body strength, power, and explosiveness. This is particularly important for positions such as wide receivers, defensive backs, and defensive linemen, where jumping high can help a player make plays on the ball, disrupt passes, or jump over blockers. The Top NFL Combine Vertical Jump Performances Chris Conley – wide receiver – 45 inches – 2015 NFL Combine Donald Washington – cornerback 45 inches – 2009 NFL Combine Byron Jones – cornerback – 44.5 inches – 2015 NFL Combine A.J. Jefferson – cornerback – 44 inches – 2010 NFL Combine Obi Melifonwu – safety – 44 inches – 2017 NFL Combine Broad Jump (Measures Explosiveness) The Broad Jump is a test that college football players undergo at the NFL Combine, and it measures a player's lower body explosive power, lower body strength, and overall athleticism. Here's how it works: The player stands with both feet shoulder-width apart behind a starting line. The player then jumps forward as far as they can, landing on both feet and keeping their balance. The distance between the starting line and the point where the player's heels make contact with the ground is recorded as their broad jump distance. The Broad Jump is considered an important test at the NFL Combine because a player's ability to jump far can indicate their lower body strength, power, and explosiveness. This is particularly important for positions such as wide receivers, defensive backs, and defensive linemen, where the ability to jump far can help a player make plays on the ball, disrupt passes, or jump over blockers. The Top NFL Combine Broad Jump Performances Byron Jones – cornerback – 12’3″ – 2015 NFL Combine Obi Melifonwu – safety – 11’9″ – 2017 NFL Combine Emanuel Hal – wide receiver – 11’9″ – 2019 NFL Combine Juan Thornhill – safety – 11’9″ – 2019 NFL Combine Miles Boykin – wide receiver – 11’8″ – 2019 NFL Combine Bench Press (Measures Strength) The Bench Press is a test that college football players undergo at the NFL Combine, and it measures a player's upper body strength and endurance. Here's how it works: The player lies flat on a bench with their feet on the ground and their hands on the bar, using a grip that is shoulder-width apart. The player then lifts the bar off the rack, lowers it to their chest, and then lifts it back up until their arms are fully extended. The player repeats this motion as many times as they can in a set period of time (usually 225 pounds for as many reps as possible). The number of reps that the player can complete is recorded as their bench press score. The Bench Press is considered an important test at the NFL Combine because upper body strength is important for many positions in football, including offensive linemen, defensive linemen, and tight ends. The Top NFL Combine Bench Press Performances Stephen Paea, 2011 NFL Combine – 49 reps (DT, Oregon State) Mitch Petrus, 2010 NFL Combine – 45 reps (OL, Arkansas) Mike Kudla, 2006 NFL Combine – 45 reps (DL, Ohio State) Netane Muti, 2020 NFL Combine – 44 reps (G, Fresno State) Dontari Poe, 2012 NFL Combine – 44 reps (DT, Memphis)

2024 NFL Scouting Combine Participants Announced The NFL Scouting Combine is a critical milestone in the transition of college football players to professional athletes in the NFL. This event brings together over 300 of the top college football talents, offering them a platform to demonstrate their abilities to coaches, general managers, and scouts. It serves as an essential prelude to the NFL Draft, allowing players to enhance their football profiles and display their skills to teams and fans nationwide. Their performances can significantly influence their positions in the upcoming Draft. The 2024 NFL Scouting Combine will feature live drills that kick off on Thursday, February 29th, with comprehensive live coverage available on the NFL Network starting at 3 pm ET. The schedule for the live drills is as follows: Thursday, February 29th, 3 pm ET : Focus will be on Defensive Linemen and Linebackers. Friday, March 1st, 3 pm ET : Defensive Backs and Tight Ends will take the stage. Saturday, March 2nd, 1 pm ET : Quarterbacks, Wide Receivers, and Running Backs will display their passing, catching, and running skills. Sunday, March 3rd, 1 pm ET : Offensive Linemen will conclude the Combine. Combine Invite List The NFL has unveiled the roster of players invited to the 2024 NFL Scouting Combine. Announced on Tuesday, the event has extended invitations to 321 prospects. Scheduled to be held in Indianapolis from February 26 to March 4, this year's combine will feature players categorized by their positions. Below is the list of invitees. Quarterbacks (QB) : 14 Running Backs (RB) : 29 Wide Receivers (WR) : 39 Tight Ends (TE) : 15 Offensive Linemen (OL) : 59 Defensive Linemen (DL) : 50 Linebackers (LB) : 34 Defensive Backs (DB) : 53 Specialists (K/P) : 5 QUARTERBACKS Jayden Daniels, LSU Sam Hartman, Notre Dame Devin Leary, Kentucky Drake Maye, North Carolina J.J. McCarthy, Michigan Joe Milton III, Tennessee Bo Nix, Oregon Michael Penix Jr., Washington Michael Pratt, Tulane Spencer Rattler, South Carolina Austin Reed, Western Kentucky Kedon Slovis, BYU Jordan Travis, Florida State Caleb Williams, USC RUNNING BACKS Rasheen Ali, Marshall Braelon Allen, Wisconsin Emani Bailey, TCU Trey Benson, Florida State Jonathon Brooks, Texas Blake Corum, Michigan Isaiah Davis, South Dakota State Ray Davis, Kentucky Daijun Edwards, Georgia Audric Estimé, Notre Dame Frank Gore Jr., Southern Mississippi Isaac Guerendo, Louisville George Holani, Boise State Bucky Irving, Oregon Dillon Johnson, Washington Jawhar Jordan, Louisville Dylan Laube, New Hampshire MarShawn Lloyd, USC Jase McClellan, Alabama Kendall Milton, Georgia Keilan Robinson, Texas Cody Schrader, Missouri Will Shipley, Clemson Jaden Shirden, Monmouth Tyrone Tracy Jr., Purdue Kimani Vidal, Troy Michael Wiley, Arizona Miyan Williams, Ohio State Jaylen Wright, Tennessee WIDE RECEIVERS Javon Baker, UCF Jermaine Burton, Alabama Jalen Coker, Holy Cross Keon Coleman, Florida State Malachi Corley, Western Kentucky Jacob Cowing, Arizona Ryan Flournoy, Southeast Missouri State Troy Franklin, Oregon Anthony Gould, Oregon State Lideatrick Griffin, Mississippi State Marvin Harrison Jr., Ohio State Jha'Quan Jackson, Tulane Cornelius Johnson, Michigan Xavier Legette, South Carolina Luke McCaffrey, Rice Ladd McConkey, Georgia Jalen McMillan, Washington Bub Means, Pittsburgh Adonai Mitchell, Texas Malik Nabers, LSU Rome Odunze, Washington Ricky Pearsall, Florida Ja'Lynn Polk, Washington Brenden Rice, USC Tayvion Robinson, Kentucky Marcus Rosemy-Jacksaint, Georgia Ainias Smith, Texas A&M Brian Thomas Jr., LSU Jamari Thrash, Louisville Devaughn Vele, Utah Devontez Walker, North Carolina Malik Washington, Virginia Tahj Washington, USC Xavier Weaver, Colorado Jordan Whittington, Texas Isaiah Williams, Illinois Johnny Wilson, Florida State Roman Wilson, Michigan Xavier Worthy, Texas TIGHT ENDS Erick All, Iowa AJ Barner, Michigan Jaheim Bell, Florida State Brock Bowers, Georgia Devin Culp, Washington Dallin Holker, Colorado State Theo Johnson, Penn State Trey Knox, South Carolina Tanner McLachlan, Arizona Tip Reiman, Illinois Ja'Tavion Sanders, Texas Ben Sinnott, Kansas State Brevyn Spann-Ford, Minnesota Cade Stover, Ohio State Jack Westover, Washington Jared Wiley, TCU OFFENSIVE LINEMEN Isaiah Adams, Illinois Joe Alt, Notre Dame Kiran Amegadjie, Yale Gottlieb Ayedze, Maryland Karsen Barnhart, Michigan Graham Barton, Duke Cooper Beebe, Kansas State Keaton Bills, Utah Tanor Bortolini, Wisconsin Javion Cohen, Miami Andrew Coker, TCU Brandon Coleman, TCU Frank Crum, Wyoming Anim Dankwah, Howard Ethan Driskell, Marshall Kingsley Eguakun, Florida Josiah Ezirim, Eastern Kentucky Olumuyiwa Fashanu, Penn State Troy Fautanu, Washington Blake Fisher, Notre Dame Jeremy Flax, Kentucky Javon Foster, Missouri Zach Frazier, West Virginia Taliese Fuaga, Oregon State X'Zauvea Gadlin, Liberty Nick Gargiulo, South Carolina Delmar Glaze, Maryland Matt Goncalves, Pittsburgh Tylan Grable, UCF Garret Greenfield, South Dakota State Tyler Guyton, Oklahoma C.J. Hanson, Holy Cross Christian Haynes, Connecticut LaDarius Henderson, Michigan Christian Jones, Texas Matthew Jones, Ohio State Trente Jones, Michigan Trevor Keegan, Michigan Jarrett Kingston, USC Brady Latham, Arkansas JC Latham, Alabama Sataoa Laumea, Utah Matt Lee, Miami KT Leveston Jr., Kansas State Beaux Limmer, Arkansas Christian Mahogany, Boston College Mason McCormick, South Dakota State Dylan McMahon, N.C. State Amarius Mims, Georgia Jacob Monk, Duke Jordan Morgan, Arizona Hunter Nourzad, Penn State Drake Nugent, Michigan Patrick Paul, Houston Julian Pearl, Illinois Prince Pines, Tulane Jackson Powers-Johnson, Oregon Dominick Puni, Kansas Andrew Raym, Oklahoma Layden Robinson, Texas A&M Roger Rosengarten, Washington Walter Rouse, Oklahoma Nick Samac, Michigan State Kingsley Suamataia, BYU Jalen Sundell, North Dakota State Nathan Thomas, Louisiana Charles Turner III, LSU Sedrick Van Pran-Granger, Georgia Caedan Wallace, Penn State Zak Zinter, Michigan DEFENSIVE LINEMEN Austin Booker, Kansas Solomon Byrd, USC DeWayne Carter, Duke Nelson Ceaser, Houston Myles Cole, Texas Tech Jaden Crumedy, Mississippi State Tyler Davis, Clemson Brandon Dorlus, Oregon Justin Eboigbe, Alabama Jonah Elliss, Utah Braden Fiske, Florida State Gabe Hall, Baylor Michael Hall Jr., Ohio State Jaylen Harrell, Michigan Marcus Harris, Auburn Jalyx Hunt, Houston Christian Adisa Isaac, Penn State Brennan Jackson, Washington State McKinnley Jackson, Texas A&M Javontae Jean-Baptiste, Notre Dame Trajan Jeffcoat, Arkansas Jordan Jefferson, LSU Kris Jenkins, Michigan Cedric Johnson, Mississippi Mohamed Kamara, Colorado State Marshawn Kneeland, Western Michigan Laiatu Latu, UCLA Logan Lee, Iowa Zion Logue, Georgia Fabien Lovett Sr., Florida State Braiden McGregor, Michigan Byron Murphy II, Texas Myles Murphy, North Carolina Jer'Zhan Newton, Illinois Eyabi Okie-Anoma, Charlotte Ruke Orhorhoro, Clemson Keith Randolph Jr., Illinois Chop Robinson, Penn State Darius Robinson, Missouri Justin Rogers, Auburn Maason Smith, LSU Javon Solomon, Troy T'Vondre Sweat, Texas Leonard Taylor III, Miami Xavier Thomas, Clemson Bralen Trice, Washington David Ugwoegbu, Houston Jared Verse, Florida State Eric Watts, Connecticut Mekhi Wingo, LSU LINEBACKERS Michael Barrett, Michigan JD Bertrand, Notre Dame Tatum Bethune, Florida State Chris Braswell, Alabama Aaron Casey, Indiana Steele Chambers, Ohio State Junior Colson, Michigan Edgerrin Cooper, Texas A&M Kalen DeLoach, Florida State Khalid Duke, Kansas State Tommy Eichenberg, Ohio State Jaylan Ford, Texas Easton Gibbs, Wyoming Cedric Gray, North Carolina Ty'Ron Hopper, Missouri Jontrey Hunter, Georgia State Curtis Jacobs, Penn State Tyrice Knight, UTEP Marist Liufau, Notre Dame Jordan Magee, Temple Darius Muasau, UCLA Gabriel Murphy, UCLA Maema Njongmeta, Wisconsin Jeremiah Trotter Jr., Clemson Zion Tupuola-Fetui, Washington Dallas Turner, Alabama Edefuan Ulofoshio, Washington Trevin Wallace, Kentucky Nathaniel Watson, Mississippi State Payton Wilson, N.C. State DEFENSIVE BACKS Kris Abrams-Draine, Missouri Daijahn Anthony, Mississippi Terrion Arnold, Alabama Cole Bishop, Utah Beau Brade, Maryland Millard Bradford, TCU Jarvis Brownlee Jr., Louisville Javon Bullard, Georgia Calen Bullock, USC Jaylon Carlies, Missouri Caelen Carson, Wake Forest Ryan Cooper Jr., Oregon State Cooper DeJean, Iowa M.J. Devonshire, Pittsburgh Marcellas Dial, South Carolina Johnny Dixon, Penn State Willie Drew, Virginia State Renardo Green, Florida State Kamal Hadden, Tennessee Dominique Hampton, Washington Myles Harden, South Dakota Daequan Hardy, Penn State Cam Hart, Notre Dame Jaden Hicks, Washington State Khyree Jackson, Oregon DJ James, Auburn Carlton Johnson, Fresno State Isaiah Johnson, Syracuse Elijah Jones, Boston College Jarrian Jones, Florida State Jaylen Key, Alabama Kamren Kinchens, Miami Kalen King, Penn State Kamari Lassiter, Georgia Dwight McGlothern, Arkansas Kool-Aid McKinstry, Alabama Patrick McMorris, Cal Max Melton, Rutgers Quinyon Mitchell, Toledo Malik Mustapha, Wake Forest Josh Newton, TCU Tyler Nubin, Minnesota Kitan Oladapo, Oregon State Tyler Owens, Texas Tech Andru Phillips, Kentucky Deantre Prince, Mississippi Nehemiah Pritchett, Auburn Josh Proctor, Ohio State Ennis Rakestraw Jr., Missouri Decamerion Richardson, Mississippi State Demani Richardson, Texas A&M Christian Roland-Wallace, USC Mike Sainristil, Michigan Andre' Sam, LSU Jaylin Simpson, Auburn Tykee Smith, Georgia Chau Smith-Wade, Washington State Tarheeb Still, Maryland T.J. Tampa, Iowa State Dadrion Taylor-Demerson, Texas Tech Ro Torrence, Arizona State Sione Vaki, Utah Josh Wallace, Michigan Ryan Watts, Texas Nate Wiggins, Clemson Evan Williams, Oregon James Williams, Miami SPECIALISTS Joshua Karty, K, Stanford Cam Little, K, Arkansas Harrison Mevis, K, Missouri Ryan Rehkow, P, BYU Will Reichard, K, Alabama Tory Taylor, P, Iowa