Search Results

Summer Scouting Series: Football Scout 365 Analyst Brandon Lundberg shares his initial insights on key draft-eligible college football players in anticipation of the 2024 college football season. Luther Burden III Overview: Luther Burden III has quickly become one of the most dynamic wide receivers in college football. The Missouri standout, who is 5'11" tall and weighs 208 pounds, has excelled in his first two college seasons, establishing himself as a top NFL prospect. In 2023, Burden amassed 86 catches for 1,212 yards and nine touchdowns, demonstrating his exceptional ability to make plays. His outstanding performances led to him receiving First-Team All-SEC honors and multiple Second-Team All-America nods. His 1,212 receiving yards ranked third in Missouri's single-season history, underscoring his significant impact on the Tigers' 11-2 season. During his senior year at East St. Louis High School, Burden was a highly coveted five-star recruit, registering 71 receptions for 1,174 yards and 20 touchdowns, in addition to scoring eight times on punt returns. His choice to remain in-state and join Missouri has been mutually beneficial, as Burden has played a vital role in enhancing the program. Scouting Report: Measurables: Height:  5’11” Weight:  208 pounds 2023 Stats:  86 receptions for 1,212 yards (14.1 avg), 9 TDs Ceiling Potential: High-End Starter Potential Burden has the prototypical size, athleticism, and physical traits to be a high-level receiver in the NFL. His ability to perform after the catch and his nuanced route running make him a fit for both spread and West Coast offensive schemes. Given his current trajectory and skill set, he projects as a mid-to-late first-round pick with the potential to develop into a top-tier NFL receiver. Playstyle & Scheme Fit: Burden primarily operates as a versatile receiver who can line up in multiple positions, including outside, in the slot, and occasionally in the backfield. His impressive burst and foot speed allow him to stretch defenses vertically, while his physicality and play strength make him a reliable target in contested catch situations. His versatility makes him a valuable asset in multiple offensive schemes, particularly those that utilize consistent motion and designed touches for their receivers in the run game. Player Comparisons: Burden's combination of explosiveness, physicality, and versatility draws comparisons to Deebo Samuel and Jaxon Smith-Njigba. Like Samuel, Burden excels at making plays after the catch and can be used in various roles within the offense. His ability to win contested catches and his competitive nature make him a potential WR1 at the next level. Key Strengths: Contested Catch Ability Physical Runner Elusive In Space Where he excels: Burden combines short-area quickness, fluid route running, and physical dominance. He uses a variety of releases to get open, mixing tempo and using his size to overpower defenders. His ability to adjust to the ball and make catches in high-traffic areas or while double-teamed sets him apart. He’s a difficult tackle after the catch, with elusiveness and strength to run through arm tackles. Burden’s versatility allows him to be effective both as a deep threat and in the short-to-intermediate passing game. Key Weaknesses: Keep Building Route Tree Can Struggle vs. Physical DBs Improve Run Blocking Improvement Areas: In preparation for the 2024 season, Burden must focus on overcoming press coverage and enhancing his hand techniques to prevent disruptions at the line of scrimmage. It is essential for him to improve his route running by making sharper breaks and diversifying his route options. Moreover, refining his run-blocking skills is necessary. Developing greater consistency in creating separation will play a key role in his transition to the NFL. Advanced Data and Statistics: In 2023, Burden led Missouri with 86 receptions for 1,212 yards and 9 touchdowns. His PFF grades of 91.0 for receiving were among the highest at his position in the SEC. His ability to make contested catches was on full display, with 18 such receptions showcasing his physical dominance. Burden was one of five FBS receivers with at least 22 receptions of 20-plus yards in 2023. 2025 NFL Draft Projection: Entering the 2025 NFL Draft cycle, Burden is projected as a top-15 pick. His unique blend of size, speed, and athleticism, combined with his production at Missouri, makes him a strong contender for the WR1 spot. Summary Analysis: Luther Burden III possesses the explosive athleticism, physicality, and versatility to be a high-impact player in the NFL. His ability to make plays after the catch, combined with his route-running skills and competitive nature, make him a top prospect for the 2025 NFL Draft. While there are areas to improve, particularly in beating press coverage, Burden’s potential is undeniable. With continued development, he has the tools to be a top receiver in the NFL.

Summer Scouting Series : Football Scout 365 Analyst Brandon Lundberg shares his initial insights on key draft-eligible college football players in anticipation of the 2024 college football season. Tetairoa McMillan Overview : Arizona wide receiver Tetairoa McMillan has been a dominant force through his first two college seasons, putting himself firmly on the NFL Draft radar. As Arizona prepares for its inaugural season in the Big 12, McMillan is considered the best NFL prospect in the new conference. The 6-foot-5, 210-pound McMillan made some of the best plays of any receiver in college football last season. His 87.4 PFF overall grade and 89.1 receiving grade were both the highest marks at the position in the new-look Big 12. Though he lacks some separating ability as a big receiver, he hauled in 18 contested catches in 2023, many of which were jaw-dropping. He will bring WR1 potential to the pro level. Scouting Report: Measurables Height : 6’5” Weight : 210 pounds 2023 Stats : 90 receptions for 1,402 yards (15.6 avg), 10 TDs Ceiling Potential : High-End Starter Potential McMillan has the prototypical size, athleticism, and physical traits to be a high-level X receiver in the NFL. His ability to win contested catches and his route-running skills make him a dangerous weapon. Given his current trajectory and skill set, he projects as a mid-to-late first-round pick with the potential to develop into a top-tier NFL receiver. Playstyle & Scheme Fit : McMillan primarily operates as an outside X-receiver, utilizing his impressive size and athleticism to create mismatches. He excels in vertical routes, leveraging his long stride and explosive burst to stretch defenses. His versatility allows him to line up out wide or in the slot making him a valuable asset in multiple offensive schemes. McMillan’s ability to adjust to various roles within the offense showcases his adaptability and makes him a constant threat on the field. His alignment versatility, high-effort run blocking, and ability to manipulate coverage angles add significant value, especially in diverse offensive systems. Player Comparisons : McMillan's combination of size, catch radius, and contested catch ability draws comparisons to Mike Evans. Evans, known for his dominance at the catch point and ability to stretch the field, has been a consistent threat in the NFL. McMillan exhibits similar traits, including the ability to make acrobatic catches and dominate defenders with his physical presence. This makes him a potential WR1 at the next level, capable of being a go-to target in critical situations. Key Strengths Size and Catch Radius Route Running Dominant at the Catch Point/Ball Tracking Where he excels : At 6-foot-5 and 210 pounds, McMillan combines short-area quickness, fluid route running, and physical dominance. He uses a variety of releases to get open, mixing tempo and using his size to overpower defenders. His ability to adjust to the ball and make catches in high-traffic areas or while double-teamed sets him apart. He’s a difficult tackle after the catch, with elusiveness and strength to run through arm tackles. McMillan’s versatility allows him to be effective both as a deep threat and in the short-to-intermediate passing game. Key Weaknesses Top-End Speed Consistently Separating Reliance on Physical Attributes Improvement Areas : Looking ahead to the 2024 season, McMillan needs to work on beating press coverage and improving his hand usage to avoid being disrupted at the line of scrimmage. Enhancing his route running with sharper breaks and expanding his route tree will also be crucial. Additionally, he needs to refine his run-blocking technique to avoid being a pass-down tell. Developing more consistency in creating separation will be vital for his transition to the NFL. Advanced Data and Statistics : In 2023, McMillan led Arizona with 90 receptions for 1,402 yards and 10 touchdowns. His PFF grades of 87.4 overall and 89.1 for receiving were the highest at his position in the Big 12. His ability to make contested catches was on full display, with 18 such receptions showcasing his physical dominance. McMillan’s most notable performance came against Arizona State in the Territorial Cup, where he recorded 11 receptions for 266 yards, the highest receiving yardage in the history of the rivalry game. 2025 NFL Draft Projection : Entering the 2025 NFL Draft cycle, McMillan is projected as a top-10 pick. His unique blend of size, speed, and athleticism, combined with his production at Arizona, makes him a strong contender for the WR1 spot. With another year to refine his skills, McMillan has the potential to solidify his status as a blue-chip prospect. Summary Analysis : Tetairoa McMillan has the prototypical size, athleticism, body control, and physical dominance to be a high-level X receiver in the NFL. His ability to make plays at the catch point and his versatility in lining up out wide, or in the slot make him an invaluable asset. While there are areas to improve, particularly in beating press coverage and refining his route running, McMillan’s potential is undeniable. With continued development, he has the tools to be a top receiver in the NFL and a potential top-10 pick in the 2025 NFL Draft.

Summer Scouting Series : Football Scout 365 Analyst Brandon Lundberg shares his initial insights on key draft-eligible college football players in anticipation of the 2024 college football season. Travis Hunter Overview: While Colorado's 2023 season started with high hopes, it concluded with a sense of disappointment. However, Travis Hunter's individual displays consistently captured the spotlight throughout the year. As he gears up for the 2024 college football season, expectations are even greater for him as a versatile player and one of the leading candidates for the Heisman Trophy. Hunter originally considered the top high school prospect in the class of 2022, created a buzz when he changed his commitment from Florida State to Jackson State, showcasing the impact of then-Jackson State head coach Deion Sanders on the college football scene. Following an impressive season at Jackson State, where he excelled as both a cornerback and wide receiver, Hunter decided to join Sanders at Colorado. In the 2023 season opener against TCU, Hunter showcased his two-way versatility by playing 150 combined offensive and defensive snaps. On offense, he amassed 11 receptions for 119 yards and also managed to secure an interception while playing on the defensive side of the football. This outstanding performance quickly earned him national recognition at the beginning of the 2023 season. However, a severe injury (liver laceration) sustained from a hard hit in the Colorado State game sidelined Hunter for three weeks. Despite this setback, his versatile talents were evident every time he returned to the field. In 2024, Travis Hunter was selected as one of the top three cover athletes for the EA Sports College Football 25. As a prominent Heisman Trophy contender, there is debate among NFL Scouts regarding his suitability for the NFL. The question arises: Is he better suited as a wide receiver or a defensive back? Following a thorough review of Hunter's game footage from the previous year, here is my preliminary scouting assessment. Scouting Report: Measurables Height : 6-foot-1 Weight : 185 pounds 2023 Stats : 57 catches for 721 yards (12.6 average), 5 TDs; 30 tackles, 3 interceptions Ceiling Potential : (Elite Starter Potential) Hunter has the potential to be an elite NFL starter with the right development and fit. His exceptional athleticism and football IQ provide a solid foundation for success at the next level. Given his current trajectory and skill set, he projects as a first-round pick with the potential to develop into a franchise player. Playstyle & Scheme Fit : Hunter’s skill set translates best to a role that allows him to leverage his explosive athleticism and football instincts. As a wide receiver, he fits well in a West Coast offense or a spread system that emphasizes the quick passing game and allows him to use his agility to create separation and make plays after the catch. Defensively, Hunter excels in off-coverage and zone-based coverage schemes that take advantage of his ability to use his reactionary quickness and football IQ, where he can read and react to the football. Player Comparisons : Travis Hunter has been likened to a range of players, including Marcus Peters, Deion Sanders, Charles Woodson, and Champ Bailey. While he is often compared to successful college two-way players who excelled as defensive players in the NFL, a recent comparison to wide receiver Garrett Wilson by NFL Network Football Analyst Daniel Jeremiah is fitting due to their comparable playmaking ability and similar physical build. Key Strengths : Explosive Athletic Ability Versatility Ball Skills Where he excels : Hunter showcases explosive, fluid, and instinctual abilities on both sides of the ball. As a wide receiver, he offers versatility by lining up both outside and in the slot. His quick release allows him to accelerate off the line of scrimmage quickly. Hunter's smooth route running and efficient movement in and out of his breaks enable him to find gaps in coverage, making him an easy target for quarterbacks. He has natural hands and excels at gaining yards after the catch, using his agility and speed to evade defenders. Hunter's fluidity and playmaking ability stand out on defense, particularly in off-man and zone coverage. His quick feet and exceptional reaction time allow him to anticipate routes and make impactful plays on the ball. He also has notable recovery speed, which helps him correct positioning errors and disrupt plays even when caught out of position. Key Weaknesses : Tackling Thin, Wiry Frame Overaggressive in Press Alignment Improvement Areas : In preparation for the 2024 season, Hunter needs to concentrate on specific aspects to establish himself as a top prospect for the 2025 NFL Draft. On the offensive side of the football, he should work on increasing his play strength to prevent being disrupted on routes and to boost his ability to make contested catches. On the defensive side, Hunter needs to improve his tackling in space and maintain better eye discipline to avoid being caught out of position. Advanced Data and Statistics : During the 2023 season, Hunter led all FBS players in total snaps played in regular-season games. Throughout the year, he achieved 57 receptions for 721 yards and 5 touchdowns while playing offense, and also contributed with 30 tackles, 3 interceptions, and 5 pass breakups on defense. His exceptional endurance and versatility were showcased by his significant impact on both sides of the field, a rare feat in football. 2025 NFL Draft Projection : Heading into the 2025 NFL Draft cycle, Hunter grades out as an early-to-mid first-round prospect at both WR and CB. He’s in contention for the top spot at both positions and has the potential to be a blue-chip prospect worthy of top-10 capital by season’s end. Summary Analysis : Hunter is a unique talent with the potential to be an elite NFL starter at either wide receiver or cornerback. His exceptional athleticism, football IQ, and playmaking ability make him a top prospect for the 2025 NFL Draft. With continued development and improved play strength, Hunter has the tools to become a franchise player at the next level. The question is, will it be as a wide receiver or a defensive back? I am leaning on him being a better long-term NFL cornerback than a wide receiver, but there is no denying his talent as a wide receiver, and he could absolutely be a two-way player in the NFL as needed.

Summer Scouting Series Football Scout 365 Analyst Brandon Lundberg shares his initial insights on key draft-eligible college football players in anticipation of the 2024 college football season. Carson Beck Overview Carson Beck patiently waited for his turn, serving as the backup to Stetson Bennett at Georgia for three years before earning the starting role last season. Once given the opportunity, he made the most of it. Beck guided the Bulldogs through a successful 13-1 season, establishing himself as a prominent candidate for the top college football quarterback spot heading into the 2024 season. With a remarkable combination of arm strength, pocket accuracy, and decision-making skills, he finished third in the FBS with 3,941 passing yards. The team's only loss, halting a 29-game winning streak, came in a narrow three-point defeat to Alabama during the SEC Championship Game. It was only the second game all year where Beck failed to throw a touchdown pass. Shortly after, he confirmed his return for the 2024 season. Georgia is eager to secure their third national championship in four years, positioning them as a top contender for the title once again. Beck is among the frontrunners for the Heisman Trophy, making this a potentially remarkable period for the Jacksonville, Florida native. Will his impressive performance persist? Following a thorough analysis of Beck's gameplay from the previous year, here is my preliminary scouting evaluation. 2023 Stats: Completed 302-of-417 passes (72.4% Comp. Rate) for 3,941 yards (9.4 per attempt), 24 TDs and 6 INTs; added 60 carries for 116 yards (1.9 average), 4 TDs. Scouting Report: Measurables Height:  6-foot-4 Weight:  220 lbs Ceiling Potential: Mid-Level Starter PotentialBeck has the potential to be a solid NFL starter with the right development and fit. His polished mechanics and strong mental game provide a solid foundation for success at the next level. Given his current trajectory and skill set, he projects as a late first to early second-round pick with the potential to develop into a franchise quarterback. Playstyle & Scheme Fit: Carson Beck is a prototypical pocket passer with a solid frame and the ability to make all the necessary throws. He thrives in an offense that emphasizes timing and rhythm, excelling in play-action situations. Beck's ability to navigate pocket pressure makes him well-suited for pro-style offenses that require precise execution. His experience in Georgia's offense, which balances run and pass, prepares him for a variety of NFL systems, though he may thrive best in a scheme that leverages his pocket awareness and play-action skills. Player Comparisons: During the spring, scouts recorded Beck's measurements at 6-4 and 220 pounds. NFL Network's Daniel Jeremiah believes that Carson Beck shares similarities with Eli Manning when he was at Ole Miss, particularly in his skill to maneuver within the pocket. In one of my YouTube analysis videos, I highlighted that other scouts have drawn comparisons between Beck and Matt Ryan. Both Manning and Ryan thrived in the pocket, leveraging their physical stature to lead teams with strong rushing offenses, making crucial plays when needed. Beck's progress at Georgia indicates a promising future akin to theirs. Key Strengths Pocket Presence:  Beck has excellent awareness in the pocket, consistently keeping his composure under pressure and finding his check downs or making plays downfield. Accuracy:  He demonstrates impressive accuracy on short to intermediate throws, with a knack for placing the ball where only his receivers can make a play. Rhythm-Based Passer:  Beck excels in timing routes and has a quick release, which helps in a rhythm-based passing offense. His ability to hit receivers in stride is a significant asset. Where he excels: Beck possesses the ideal size and arm strength for his position. His quick and compact release, along with a solid base, allows him to deliver the ball with power and accuracy. I observed his ability to effectively use anticipation, velocity, and precise ball placement to thread the ball into tight windows. While he demonstrates athleticism to gain extra yards when opportunities arise, he primarily focuses on reading his progressions and operating from the pocket. Key Weaknesses Pressured Throws: Beck will need to improve his ability to make plays from the pocket when facing pressure. Layered Throws: Throws can come out flat at times allowing underneath defenders the opportunity to make a play on the football. Progressions:  Beck thrives when he is in rhythm but sometimes has issues post-snap when his initial read is off the table. Improvement Areas: Looking ahead to the 2024 season, there are key areas where Beck needs to show improvement to solidify his status as a top pick in the 2025 NFL Draft. The biggest issue for Beck is his accuracy when he’s moved off his spot. He has good pocket presence, but his accuracy suffers when he has to move, reset, and deliver the ball. Another area to watch is the tendency for his passes to get a little flat at times. Improving his ability to layer his throws will be a key area to watch for in 2024. A flat throw on those types of passes can allow underneath defenders to tip the ball, which could lead to turnovers and is a tendency that SEC defenses will look to exploit. Advanced-Data And Statistics In terms of advanced data, Beck faced the second-lowest pressure rate based on total passing snaps in 2023, according to Pro Football Focus. However, when pressured, his adjusted completion rate was 61%, ranking 53rd among all QBs in 2023 with at least 50 pressured pass attempts. When kept clean, his adjusted completion rate jumped to 81% with an average of 9.9 yards per attempt. Beck's overall time to throw in 2023 was 2.4 seconds, indicating his ability to process information quickly. He was most efficient when getting the ball out in under 2.5 seconds, with an adjusted completion rate of 87%. In 2023, Beck threw for nearly 4,000 yards with 24 touchdown passes to only six interceptions, ranking seventh nationally in QB rating. His efficiency and ability to take care of the football were notable. Beck was accurate at all three levels and rated elite at both deep and intermediate throws. The intermediate area, the most translatable to the NFL level, accounted for 37% of his total passing yards. He posted the sixth-best adjusted completion rate from the mid-range, according to Pro Football Focus, and received the 10th-highest grade from the intermediate level among all players with at least 100 pass attempts. Current Draft Projection and Summary Analysis 2025 NFL Draft Projection: Carson Beck is the current favorite to be the QB1 in the 2025 NFL Draft. He is currently being mocked as high as the top 5 of the 2025 NFL Draft. Summary Analysis: Beck could have transferred earlier in his career, but he chose to wait his turn for three seasons before winning the starting job last season. I believe his patience is about to be rewarded. He has all the tools to be a top draft pick, and the talent around him should lead to a deep postseason run for the Bulldogs. The SEC is stacked, but I came away very impressed with the overall depth and talent of the Georgia roster. Beck is easily the most talented UGA passer since Matthew Stafford departed after the 2008 season, and I can’t wait to study his play this fall.

Summer Scouting Series Football Scout 365 Analyst Brandon Lundberg shares his initial insights on key draft-eligible college football players in anticipation of the 2024 college football season. Shedeur Sanders Overview In the opening week of last season, Deion Sanders' debut with Colorado made a huge impact in college football, as they surprised many by defeating TCU 45-42. Shedeur Sanders, Deion's son, had an outstanding performance against the Horned Frogs, completing 81% of his passes for 510 yards and four touchdowns without any interceptions. Following this, the Buffaloes secured victories against Nebraska and Colorado State in the subsequent weeks, with the quarterback delivering impressive stats and entering the Heisman Trophy conversation. However, in the fourth week, Colorado faced a tough challenge, suffering a 42-6 loss to Oregon, with Sanders struggling and being sacked seven times. The following week, Colorado was defeated in a high-scoring game against USC. Despite the promising start, the 2023 Buffaloes only managed one more win, ending the season disappointingly at 4-8. As Colorado enters the second year under Coach Prime in Boulder and transitions to the Big 12 Conference, there is anticipation surrounding the performance of one of college football's most prominent figures. After reviewing Sanders' gameplay from the previous season, here is my initial scouting report on what to expect this year. Scouting Report: Measurables Height : 6-foot-2 Weight : 210 pounds 2023 Stats : Completed 298-of-430 passes (69.3% Comp. Rate) for 3,230 yards (7.5 per attempt), 27 TDs, and 3 INTs; he added 111 carries for -77 yards (-0.7 average), 4 TDs. Ceiling Potential : Sanders has the capacity to emerge as a dependable NFL starter through proper development and alignment. His competitive drive, coupled with his sharp mental acuity, lays a strong groundwork for success in the higher ranks. Considering his current progress and abilities, he is expected to be selected in the late first to early second round, with the possibility of evolving into a cornerstone quarterback for a team. Playstyle & Scheme Fit : Shedeur Sanders’ skill set translates best to a West Coast offense or a spread system that emphasizes quick, short to intermediate throws and allows him to use his athleticism to navigate the pocket and extend plays. These schemes will leverage his accuracy, decision-making, and ability to process defenses both pre- and post-snap, while also accommodating his need for further mechanical refinement. Player Comparisons : Daniel Jeremiah recently compared Sanders to Pro Bowl quarterback Geno Smith . They share a smooth throwing motion and deliver a firm, catchable ball. While both are capable of taking free yards in the run game, neither is dynamic as a ball-carrier. Sanders' ability to thrive in a structured offense and make key plays mirrors Smith's trajectory in the NFL. Key Strengths Arm Talent : Sanders has the arm strength to sustain velocity outside the numbers into the deep third. Short-Medium Accuracy : He demonstrates impressive accuracy on short to intermediate throws, with a knack for placing the ball where only his receivers can make a play. Decision Making : Sanders’ ability to handle complex defensive schemes and make quick, smart decisions enhances his draft stock. Where he excels : Sanders is a precise passer with a concise, fluid motion. His balance and weight transfer are exceptional when he releases the ball, showcasing ample arm strength to launch it deep downfield. He demonstrates good timing and anticipation in his throws, skillfully adjusting the pace as needed. Notably, his toughness stands out as he remains steadfast even under pressure, willing to endure hits to make successful completions. Key Weaknesses Lower Body Mechanics : His lower-body mechanics and drop-back footwork can be inconsistent. Be More Decisive : Sanders sometimes struggles with post-snap reads and can be a tick late to process and trigger on route breaks. Poise Under Pressure : Sanders needs to improve his ability to make plays from the pocket when facing pressure. His tendency to never give in and hold the ball results in far too many sacks. Improvement Areas : As we anticipate the 2024 season, Sanders must focus on enhancing specific aspects of his game to establish himself as a top prospect for the 2025 NFL Draft. One primary concern is Sanders' accuracy when he is forced to throw on the move. While he displays strong pocket awareness, his accuracy tends to decline when he is required to adjust his position before passing. Additionally, Sanders should work on speeding up his decision-making process to minimize the number of avoidable sacks he incurs. Advanced Data and Statistics In 2023, Sanders threw for 3,230 yards with 27 touchdown passes to only three interceptions, ranking high in QB efficiency. His completion rate of 69.3% highlights his accuracy and decision-making skills. Sanders faced a lot of pressure, taking seven sacks in the game against Oregon alone. Despite this, he demonstrated resilience and toughness, often standing tall in the pocket to deliver passes. According to Ryan McCrystal of Sharp Football Analysis, Sanders had a pressure rate of 38%, slightly higher than the NFL average of 36%. While the excuse for his uneven performances last year was that he was constantly under pressure, improving his ability to handle pressure will be crucial, as the NFL won't accept it as an excuse. If he can improve under these conditions, it will be excellent training for the next level. 2025 NFL Draft Projection Current projections indicate that Sanders is likely to be selected in the first round, although some discussions suggest he might fall to the early second round. While there is a chance for him to rise into the top of the first round, he must continue to make additional progress to reach that level. Summary Analysis : Sanders has the foundation in place to develop into a solid NFL starter. His mental toughness and competitive nature are significant assets. While there are areas for improvement, particularly in handling pressure and refining his mechanics, Sanders' potential is undeniable. With better protection and continued development, he has the tools to rise into the top ranks of the 2025 NFL Draft.

When analyzing fantasy football, a tier-based analysis provides fantasy managers with a clearer understanding of the differences between each group of players and how to value them for the upcoming season. Let's dive into the tight end rankings and tiers for the 2024 fantasy football season. Tier System for TEs in a .5PPR Format: Tier 1 TE: 11 points or higher per game (Elite performers) Tier 2 TE: 10-10.9 points per game (High Level) Tier 3 TE: 9-9.9 points per game (Reliable starters) Tier 3 TE: 7-8.9 points per game (Reliable starters) Tier 3 TE: 6.9 points or lower per game (Reliable starters) 2024 Fantasy Football TE Projections Tier 1 TE: 11 Points or Higher Per Game (Elite Performers) These tight ends are elite performers, consistently scoring 11 or more points per game in a .5PPR format, making them top-tier options for fantasy football teams. Travis Kelce (KC) - 11.4 Sam LaPorta (DET) - 11.3 Tier 2 TE: 10-10.9 Points Per Game (High Level) These tight ends perform at a high level, averaging between 10 and 10.9 points per game in a .5PPR format, and are reliable contributors to fantasy teams. Trey McBride (ARZ) - 10.6 Evan Engram (JAX) - 10.2 Tier 3 TE: 9-9.9 Points Per Game (Reliable Starters) These tight ends are reliable starters, averaging between 9 and 9.9 points per game in a .5PPR format, providing consistent performance for fantasy teams. Dalton Kincaid (BUF) - 9.9 George Kittle (SF) - 9.7 Mark Andrews (BLT) - 9.5 Tier 4 TE: 7-8.9 Points Per Game (Serviceable Starters) These tight ends are serviceable starters, averaging between 7 and 8.9 points per game in a .5PPR format, making them solid but not spectacular options for fantasy teams. Kyle Pitts (ATL) - 8.9 Dallas Goedert (PHI) - 8.4 Jake Ferguson (DAL) - 8.1 Brock Bowers (LV) - 7.4 David Njoku (CLV) - 7.4 Tier 5 TE: 6.9 Points or Lower Per Game (Backup Options) These tight ends are backup options, averaging 6.9 points or fewer per game in a .5PPR format, and are generally used as fill-ins or bench players in fantasy football. Juwan Johnson (NO) - 6.8 Hunter Henry (NE) - 6.8 Cade Otton (TB) - 6.6 Cole Kmet (CHI) - 6.6 Dalton Schultz (HST) - 6.4 Chigoziem Okonkwo (TEN) - 6.3 Darren Waller (NYG) - 6.2 Noah Fant (SEA) - 6.0 Jonnu Smith (MIA) - 6.0

Below are my 2024 NFL fantasy football receiver projections using a tier-based system. Each tier is categorized by 0.5 point PPR ranges from tier one to tier four. Tier one consists of the top 7 WRs and tier two includes the next 5, leaving tiers three and four with a vast allotment of high-floor and potential high-ceiling guys that could jump into tier two level. There are 4 total TEs within this list of 32 receivers. Here are the tiers and the fantasy point ranges for each level. Enjoy! Tier 1 WR-TE: 230+ .5 PPR Tier 2 WR-TE: 200-229 .5 PPR Tier 3 WR-TE: 180-199 .5 PPR Tier 4 WR-TE: 160-179 .5 PPR Tier 1 Receiver: 230+.5 PPR Points 1). Tyreek Hill, MIA WR Projected 2024 Fantasy Points:  261 Targets:  160 Receiving Yards:  1500 Receiving TDs:  9 Tyreek Hill has been a consistent top performer in fantasy football, finishing the 2023 season with a career-high 1,799 receiving yards and 13 touchdowns. His elite speed and ability to create separation make him a prime target for deep throws, leading to substantial yardage and scoring opportunities. Hill's rapport with quarterback Tua Tagovailoa and his role as the primary offensive weapon for the Dolphins ensure he will continue to receive a high volume of targets, making him a low-risk, high-reward pick for 2024. 2). CeeDee Lamb, DAL WR Projected 2024 Fantasy Points:  257 Targets:  160 Receiving Yards:  1450 Receiving TDs:  9 CeeDee Lamb emerged as one of the top fantasy wide receivers in 2023, finishing with 135 receptions for 1,749 yards and 12 touchdowns. Lamb's ability to excel in contested catch situations and his significant role in Dallas's red-zone offense highlight his reliability. His catch rate improved by 6% from 2022, and his yards per catch after reception increased by 13%, demonstrating his growth as a receiver. Lamb's consistency and high target share, coupled with Dallas's offensive strategy, make him a valuable asset in 2024. 3). Ja'Marr Chase, CIN WR Projected 2024 Fantasy Points:  244 Targets:  165 Receiving Yards:  1350 Receiving TDs:  8 Ja'Marr Chase has quickly established himself as a key player for Cincinnati. In 2023, he was a focal point of the Bengals' offense, with a high target share and ability to generate explosive plays. Chase's chemistry with quarterback Joe Burrow and his proficiency in scoring touchdowns make him a top-tier receiver. His role in the offense is expected to remain substantial, ensuring continued high production in 2024. 4). Amon-Ra St. Brown, DET WR Projected 2024 Fantasy Points:  244 Targets:  160 Receiving Yards:  1350 Receiving TDs:  8 Amon-Ra St. Brown has shown great promise with a strong target share in Detroit. He excels in short to intermediate routes and has been a reliable target for quarterback Jared Goff. St. Brown's ability to consistently move the chains and his involvement in the red zone make him a valuable fantasy asset. With 160 targets projected for 2024, his consistent performance and ability to rack up yards and touchdowns make him a top-tier fantasy receiver. 5). Justin Jefferson, MIN WR Projected 2024 Fantasy Points:  242 Targets:  160 Receiving Yards:  1450 Receiving TDs:  7 Justin Jefferson remains a cornerstone for the Minnesota offense. Known for his exceptional route running and ability to make contested catches, Jefferson finished the 2023 season with significant yardage and touchdowns. With Kirk Cousins at quarterback, Jefferson continues to be the primary target in the Vikings' passing game, ensuring a high volume of targets and consistent production in 2024. 6). A.J. Brown, PHI WR Projected 2024 Fantasy Points:  236 Targets:  150 Receiving Yards:  1400 Receiving TDs:  8 A.J. Brown's physicality and big-play potential make him a high-value target for Philadelphia. In 2023, Brown showcased his ability to dominate in contested catch situations and generate yards after the catch. His chemistry with quarterback Jalen Hurts, and his role in the Eagles' offense make him a reliable fantasy option. With 150 targets projected for 2024, Brown's consistent production in yards and touchdowns makes him a strong fantasy asset. 7). Davante Adams, LV WR Projected 2024 Fantasy Points:  230 Targets:  160 Receiving Yards:  1300 Receiving TDs:  8 Davante Adams is a reliable and productive receiver for Las Vegas. Despite changes at the quarterback position, Adams continues to be the primary target, excelling in route running and contested catches. His high target share and ability to generate significant yardage and touchdowns ensure his place as a top-tier fantasy receiver. With 160 targets projected for 2024, Adams' production remains elite​. Tier 2 Receiver: 200-229 .5 PPR Points 8). Mike Evans, TB WR Projected 2024 Fantasy Points:  224 Targets:  140 Receiving Yards:  1300 Receiving TDs:  9 Mike Evans has been one of the most consistent fantasy wide receivers over the past decade. In 2023, he continued his streak of over 1,000 receiving yards, marking his 10th consecutive season achieving this milestone. Evans led the league with 13 receiving touchdowns, showcasing his dominant red-zone presence. Despite a lower overall volume of targets due to fewer pass attempts by the Buccaneers, his target share increased to 24.5%, highlighting his importance in the offense. His deep-ball prowess was evident, leading the league in deep-ball targets with 36 and maintaining a high average depth of target (aDOT) of 14.1 yards. With his strong track record and a stable quarterback situation with Baker Mayfield, Evans remains a reliable and valuable fantasy option for 2024 . 9). Puka Nacua, LA WR Projected 2024 Fantasy Points:  224 Targets:  140 Receiving Yards:  1325 Receiving TDs:  7 Puka Nacua emerged as a standout receiver for the Rams in his rookie season, showing exceptional route-running skills and reliability. His 2023 season saw him garner significant targets, contributing consistently to the offense. Nacua's ability to create separation and his involvement in both short and deep routes make him a versatile and dependable option in fantasy football. With Matthew Stafford returning as the quarterback, Nacua is expected to maintain a high target share and continue producing at a high level. His projected stats for 2024 reflect his growing role and potential as a top-tier receiver. 10). Drake London, ATL WR Projected 2024 Fantasy Points:  209 Targets:  140 Receiving Yards:  1200 Receiving TDs:  7 Drake London faced challenges in 2023, primarily due to inconsistent quarterback play and a run-heavy offensive scheme. Despite these issues, he managed a target share of 23.3%, demonstrating his importance in the Falcons' offense. With the addition of Kirk Cousins and a new offensive coordinator, London's outlook for 2024 is positive. His ability to make contested catches and his projected increase in target volume makes him a strong candidate for a breakout season. 11). Jaylen Waddle, MIA WR Projected 2024 Fantasy Points:  206 Targets:  140 Receiving Yards:  1200 Receiving TDs:  7 Jaylen Waddle faced some challenges in 2023, including a dip in yards per reception and injuries that caused him to miss games and snaps. Despite these issues, he maintained a high target rate of 27.5% on routes run and ranked eighth in the league with 2.68 yards per route run. Waddle's ability to create significant yards after the catch and his strong connection with Tua Tagovailoa make him a valuable asset for 2024. The expectation is that with better health and more consistent deep-ball targets, Waddle can bounce back to elite form. 12). Chris Olave, NO WR Projected 2024 Fantasy Points:  203 Targets:  140 Receiving Yards:  1200 Receiving TDs:  6 Chris Olave showed impressive growth in his second season, commanding a 25% target share and a 40% air yards share in the Saints' offense. Despite the challenges with Derek Carr's consistency, Olave managed to rack up over 1,100 receiving yards and five touchdowns. His catchable target rate improved significantly towards the end of the season, and with another year to build chemistry with Carr, Olave is expected to see continued improvement. His route-running ability and high usage metrics suggest a strong fantasy season ahead . Tier 3 Receiver: 180-199 .5 PPR Points 13). Garrett Wilson, NYJ WR Projected 2024 Fantasy Points:  199 Targets:  150 Receiving Yards:  1150 Receiving TDs:  6 Garrett Wilson solidified his role as a primary target in the Jets' offense in 2023. He maintained a high target volume and showcased his ability to generate yards after the catch. With the return of Arron Rodgers in 2024, Wilson's production is expected to increase dramatically, and we can see him ascend into tier-one. 14). Marvin Harrison Jr., ARZ WR Projected 2024 Fantasy Points:  198 Targets:  140 Receiving Yards:  1200 Receiving TDs:  6 Marvin Harrison Jr. is an exciting addition to the Cardinals' offense, bringing significant potential for yardage and touchdowns. His elite route-running skills and ability to make contested catches have drawn comparisons to some of the league's top receivers. With Kyler Murray at quarterback and an offensive scheme that will leverage Harrison's strengths, he is poised for a productive rookie season. 15). Brandon Aiyuk, SF WR Projected 2024 Fantasy Points:  197 Targets:  110 Receiving Yards:  1150 Receiving TDs:  7 Brandon Aiyuk's playmaking ability and efficiency make him a valuable receiver for the 49ers. He demonstrated his capability to secure significant yardage and touchdowns with fewer targets, highlighting his big-play potential. With a stable role in San Francisco's offense and strong chemistry with quarterback Brock Purdy, Aiyuk is expected to continue providing solid fantasy value in 2024 . 16). Deebo Samuel, SF WR Projected 2024 Fantasy Points:  195 Targets:  100 Receiving Yards:  875 Receiving TDs:  6 Rushing Yards:  180 Rushing TDs:  3 Deebo Samuel's dual-threat capability as a receiver and rusher makes him a unique fantasy asset. He contributed significantly in both receiving and rushing plays, ensuring a steady stream of fantasy points. With Kyle Shanahan's creative play-calling, Samuel is poised to maintain his high production levels in 2024. 17). Travis Kelce, KC TE Projected 2024 Fantasy Points:  194 Targets:  115 Receiving Yards:  1025 Receiving TDs:  8 Travis Kelce remains the premier tight end in fantasy football. His consistent ability to generate significant yardage and touchdowns makes him an essential pick for fantasy teams. With Patrick Mahomes at quarterback, Kelce's role in Kansas City's high-powered offense ensures continued elite production. 18). Nico Collins, HST WR Projected 2024 Fantasy Points:  193 Targets:  120 Receiving Yards:  1150 Receiving TDs:  6 Nico Collins emerged as a key player in Houston's offense. His potential for significant yardage and touchdowns, combined with an increasing target share, makes him a valuable fantasy asset. As he continues to develop and with potential improvements in the Texans' quarterback play, Collins is expected to enhance his production in 2024. 19). D.K. Metcalf, SEA WR Projected 2024 Fantasy Points:  193 Targets:  125 Receiving Yards:  1100 Receiving TDs:  7 D.K. Metcalf's physicality and red-zone presence make him a reliable option for Seattle. His ability to secure touchdowns and significant yardage with a relatively high target volume ensures continued fantasy relevance. With Geno Smith at quarterback and a stable role in the Seahawks' offense, Metcalf is poised to maintain his strong performance in 2024. 20). Sam LaPorta, DET TE Projected 2024 Fantasy Points:  192 Targets:  125 Receiving Yards:  975 Receiving TDs:  8 Sam LaPorta was a revelation as a rookie, finishing 2023 with 86 receptions for 889 yards and 10 touchdowns, making him the overall TE1. His ability to separate and excel in contested catches allowed him to thrive immediately. LaPorta's versatility and role as a primary target in the Lions' offense set the stage for continued success. With Jared Goff as the quarterback and the Lions' offense designed to utilize his skills, LaPorta is poised to be a top-tier tight end in fantasy football for 2024. 21). Rashee Rice, KC WR Projected 2024 Fantasy Points:  189 Targets:  130 Receiving Yards:  1000 Receiving TDs:  6 Rashee Rice had a promising rookie season with the Chiefs, recording 79 receptions for 938 yards and seven touchdowns over 16 games. Despite a slow start, he became more involved in the offense as the season progressed, particularly excelling in the latter part of the year with increased targets and yardage. However, his 2024 outlook is clouded by potential legal issues and a likely suspension stemming from a street-racing incident. Additionally, the Chiefs have added more competition at the wide receiver position, which could impact his target share. Despite these challenges, Rice is expected to be a significant contributor to the Chiefs' high-powered offense when on the field . 22). Michael Pittman Jr., IND WR Projected 2024 Fantasy Points:  182 Targets:  150 Receiving Yards:  1025 Receiving TDs:  4 Michael Pittman Jr. continued to be a reliable target for the Colts in 2023, with over 1,000 receiving yards. His high target share and ability to perform well despite inconsistent quarterback play make him a valuable fantasy asset. With the Colts likely improving their quarterback situation and offensive strategy in 2024, Pittman is poised for another productive season. His strong physical presence and ability to win contested catches will keep him as a primary option in the Colts' passing game. 23). Cooper Kupp, LA WR Projected 2024 Fantasy Points:  181 Targets:  120 Receiving Yards:  975 Receiving TDs:  6 Cooper Kupp's 2023 season was hampered by injuries, limiting his overall production. When healthy, Kupp remains one of the most consistent and productive receivers in the league. His chemistry with quarterback Matthew Stafford and his role as the primary target in the Rams' offense ensure that he will continue to be a valuable fantasy asset. Assuming better health in 2024, Kupp is expected to bounce back with strong yardage and touchdown numbers . Tier 4 Receiver: 160-179 .5 PPR Points 24). Trey McBride, ARZ TE Projected 2024 Fantasy Points:  179 Targets:  130 Receiving Yards:  975 Receiving TDs:  5 Trey McBride showed promise in his rookie season, becoming a reliable target in the Cardinals' offense. His ability to secure receptions and generate yards after the catch makes him a valuable tight-end option. With an expected increase in targets and improved chemistry with quarterback Kyler Murray, McBride is poised for a productive 2024 season, making him a strong fantasy pick in the tight end position. 25). DeVonta Smith, PHI WR Projected 2024 Fantasy Points:  179 Targets:  115 Receiving Yards:  1050 Receiving TDs:  6 DeVonta Smith continued to develop as a key receiver for the Eagles, showcasing his route-running precision and ability to make big plays. Despite sharing targets with A.J. Brown, Smith managed to produce solid yardage and touchdown numbers. His role in Philadelphia's dynamic offense and his connection with quarterback Jalen Hurts suggest that he will maintain his productivity and remain a valuable fantasy asset in 2024. 26). Amari Cooper, CLV WR Projected 2024 Fantasy Points:  178 Targets:  120 Receiving Yards:  1100 Receiving TDs:  5 Amari Cooper remained a consistent performer for the Browns, leveraging his excellent route-running and reliable hands to produce significant yardage. His chemistry with quarterback Deshaun Watson and role as the primary receiver in Cleveland's offense ensure that he will continue to be a key target. Cooper's consistent production makes him a dependable fantasy option for the 2024 season. 27). George Pickens, PIT WR Projected 2024 Fantasy Points:  178 Targets:  115 Receiving Yards:  1100 Receiving TDs:  6 George Pickens displayed his playmaking ability and potential in his rookie season with the Steelers. Known for his ability to make contested catches and generate yards after the catch, Pickens is expected to see an increased role in Pittsburgh's offense in 2024. His developing chemistry with quarterback Kenny Pickett and the potential for more targets make him an intriguing fantasy option with significant upside. 28). Chris Godwin, TB WR Projected 2024 Fantasy Points:  177 Targets:  130 Receiving Yards:  975 Receiving TDs:  5 Chris Godwin remained a reliable target for the Buccaneers, demonstrating his ability to generate yards after the catch and secure touchdowns. Despite Tampa Bay's quarterback uncertainty, Godwin's role as a primary receiver and his consistent production make him a valuable fantasy asset. With a stable target volume and his ability to perform well in various offensive schemes, Godwin is poised for another productive season in 2024. 29). Terry McLaurin, WAS WR Projected 2024 Fantasy Points:  175 Targets:  125 Receiving Yards:  1050 Receiving TDs:  5 Terry McLaurin continued to be a standout receiver for Washington, overcoming inconsistent quarterback play to produce solid yardage and touchdowns. His ability to make big plays and serve as a reliable target makes him a valuable fantasy option. With potential improvements in Washington's offensive strategy and quarterback play, McLaurin is expected to maintain his high level of production in 2024​. 30). Evan Engram, JAX TE Projected 2024 Fantasy Points:  174 Targets:  130 Receiving Yards:  900 Receiving TDs:  5 Evan Engram had a strong season with the Jaguars, becoming a reliable target for quarterback Trevor Lawrence. His ability to create mismatches and generate yards after the catch makes him a valuable fantasy tight end. With continued development in Jacksonville's offense and an increased target share, Engram is expected to build on his success and remain a top fantasy option in 2024 . 31). Tyler Lockett, SEA WR Projected 2024 Fantasy Points:  172 Targets:  110 Receiving Yards:  950 Receiving TDs:  6 Tyler Lockett's consistency and playmaking ability make him a reliable fantasy receiver. Despite sharing targets with D.K. Metcalf, Lockett managed to produce significant yardage and touchdowns. His role in Seattle's offense and chemistry with quarterback Geno Smith ensure that he will continue to be a valuable fantasy option in 2024. 32). Stefon Diggs, HST WR Projected 2024 Fantasy Points:  172 Targets:  110 Receiving Yards:  950 Receiving TDs:  6 Stefon Diggs continued to be a key target in Houston's offense, leveraging his route-running and reliable hands to produce solid yardage and touchdowns. His role as a primary receiver and connection with C.J. Stroud makes him a dependable fantasy asset. With a stable target volume and his ability to perform consistently, Diggs is expected to maintain his productivity in 2024​

Initial Draft Grades and Process Below are my initial 2025 NFL Draft film-based grades and the top 25 player rankings in advance of the 2024 college football season. Each year, I start off by re-evaluating the prior year's grades for players who did not enter the previous draft. Then, I begin to add the additional underclassmen projected as potential high-end NFL Draft prospects. I grade these underclassmen and add them to the 50-60 players I had grades on from the prior year, starting with an initial top 25. Grading Methodology My grading process allows me to remain objective, which is important early in the process because there are many players whose TV copy or all 22 tapes I have yet to watch. With that said, using our proprietary multi-pronged process, I always like to keep my Big Board rankings "way too early" in order of the player grade. These grades can and will change for many prospects as they add additional film in 2024, but for now, this is what I have. 2025 Draft Class Evaluation When evaluating the small sample size for the 2025 NFL Draft class, it is apparent that we are going to see a potential 180 flip from the 2024 offensively heavy NFL Draft, at least in the first round. The 2024 NFL Draft had zero defenders come off the board until Laiatu Latu at 15th overall, a first in NFL Draft history. If it were not for the need at the QB position in the NFL, the 2025 NFL Draft class could see as many as eight defenders off the board in the first ten picks with zero skill players off the board. That will not happen because of QB positional value and WR positional value, but there is a solid chance we see a 50-50 split in the top ten and a much heavier defensive draft on day one than we had in the 2024 NFL Draft. Here is a breakdown by position group for the below top 25 rankings: CB (Cornerback): 4 IDL (Interior Defensive Line): 4 ED (Edge Defender): 4 OT (Offensive Tackle): 3 WR (Wide Receiver): 3 QB (Quarterback): 3 S (Safety): 1 LB (Linebacker): 1 TE (Tight End): 1 RB (Running Back): 1 The Way Too Early 2025 NFL Draft Big Board Rankings 1). Travis Hunter, Colorado (CB, 6'1", 185 lbs) Projection:  Elite Analysis:  Travis Hunter stands out as a dynamic defensive talent, excelling as a shutdown cornerback with the versatility to also play safety. His combination of speed, athleticism, and physicality allows him to match up with any receiver, embodying a fearless approach. Drawing parallels to legends like Deion Sanders, Charles Woodson, and Devin Hester, Hunter mirrors their knack for playmaking. Overall, Hunter is a rare two-way talent with the potential to become a generational figure in the league. 2). Mason Graham, Michigan (IDL, 6'3", 318 lbs) Projection:  Elite Analysis:  Mason Graham primarily aligns as a 3-technique, showing versatility to position as a 1-technique, and occasionally plays outside the offensive tackle, with limited snaps in a more traditional defensive end or off-ball role. His strength at the point of attack and ability to disrupt both the pass and run game make him an ideal fit for defensive schemes that utilize defensive tackles in multiple roles, such as 4-3 systems where he can be a disruptive under-tackle, or in 3-4 systems as a versatile defensive end. 3). Will Johnson, Michigan (CB, 6'2", 205 lbs) Projection:  Elite Analysis:  A quintessential lockdown corner, Johnson can effectively erase half the field, granting defensive coordinators greater creativity with coverage schemes and blitzes. Will Johnson primarily aligns as an outside cornerback, with notable experience in the slot as well. His skill set and physical build make him an ideal fit for a team that employs a mix of man and zone coverages, where his length and agility can be best utilized. 4). James Pearce Jr., Tennessee (ED, 6'5", 245 lbs) Projection:  Near Elite Analysis:  James Pearce Jr. is an elite-level pass-rushing outside linebacker who excels not only in pressuring the quarterback but can also drop back into coverage. His physical traits and aggressive play style make him ideally suited for a 3-4 scheme as an outside linebacker, where he can leverage his speed and length to disrupt both passing and running plays. 5). Will Campbell, LSU (OT, 6'6", 325 lbs) Projection:  Near Elite Analysis:  Will Campbell has established himself as a premier left tackle, excelling in both pass protection and run blocking. His athleticism and technique allow him to effectively protect the quarterback's blind side and create lanes in the run game. He has shown versatility and consistency, making him an ideal fit for both zone and power running schemes due to his ability to engage and drive through defenders. His experience in a high-caliber collegiate program prepares him well for various offensive systems in the NFL. 6). Benjamin Morrison, Notre Dame (CB, 6'0", 185 lbs) Projection:  Near Elite Analysis:  Morrison thrives as an outside man/press cornerback, a role that capitalizes on his quick, short-area movements and ability to stay with receivers through routes. His physical style and agility make him ideal for teams looking for a cornerback who can handle top receivers one-on-one. Morrison's skills suggest he would fit best in defensive schemes that prioritize press and man coverage, where his ability to disrupt at the line of scrimmage and play physically downfield can be most effective. 7). Kenneth Grant, Michigan (IDL, 6'3", 340 lbs) Projection:  Near Elite Analysis:  Kenneth Grant has shown substantial growth in his ability to perform in various defensive alignments, indicating his adaptability and understanding of the game. Predominantly effective in the B gap, he demonstrates a profound impact against the run and in disrupting the pocket. His capabilities in the pass rush have increasingly been utilized, showcasing his versatility and potential adaptability to different NFL schemes. Grant would be particularly effective as a 3-technique in a 4-3 defense, leveraging his pass rush skills, or could serve well in a 3-4 scheme as a defensive end where his broad skill set can be utilized across the line. 8). Kelvin Banks, Texas (OT, 6'4", 324 lbs) Projection:  Near Elite Analysis:  Kelvin Banks Jr. exemplifies a modern offensive tackle with his light-footed agility and excellent balance. His play style suits a zone-blocking scheme particularly well, due to his ability to move laterally and engage moving targets in space. However, he has the raw attributes to adapt to a power scheme with further development in his strength and hand technique. 9). Deone Walker, Kentucky (IDL, 6'6", 348 lbs) Projection:  Near Elite Analysis:  Deone Walker is a versatile defensive lineman who can operate as a 1-tech nose tackle, a 3-tech IDL, or a 3-4 defensive end. His large frame, raw strength, and surprising agility are why he is rated so highly. Combining the attributes above with Walker's ability to occupy multiple blockers makes him a valuable asset in any defensive scheme at the NFL level. 10). Ashton Gillotte, Louisville (ED, 6'3", 270 lbs) Projection:  High-End Starter Potential Analysis:  Ashton Gillotte exhibits a dynamic blend of speed and power, making him a formidable force on the defensive line. His ability to generate quick pressure on quarterbacks through his explosive first step and bend around the edge is a critical asset. Gillotte's physical style and versatility make him an excellent fit in both 3-4 and 4-3 defensive alignments, as he has shown proficiency in playing across different positions on the line. 11). Luther Burden, Missouri (WR, 5'11", 208 lbs) Projection:  High-End Starter Potential Analysis:  Luther Burden III is a dynamic multi-role receiver who excels in a high-tempo, pass-oriented offense. His ability to perform after the catch and his nuanced route running make him a fit for both spread and West Coast offensive schemes. His physicality and competitive nature also make him valuable in situations where tough catches are required. 12). Malaki Starks, Georgia (S, 6'1", 205 lbs) Projection:  Near Elite Analysis:  Malaki Starks exhibits a balanced skill set that suits both man and zone coverage, making him versatile as a safety. His ability to read the quarterback and diagnose plays quickly is notable. Starks has shown effectiveness in slot/nickel situations, suggesting he could fit well in schemes that value multidimensional defensive backs who can cover, tackle, and play the ball. His experience and growing knowledge of defensive schemes, coupled with physical and mental development, indicate a strong adaptability to various defensive schemes at the NFL level. 13). Princely Umanmielen, Ole Miss (ED, 6'5", 255 lbs) Projection:  High-End Starter Potential Analysis:  Umanmielen's diverse skill set makes him suitable for both 3-4 and 4-3 defensive schemes. His ability to play with his hand in the dirt as a traditional defensive end in a 4-3 alignment, as well as his capability to stand up as an outside linebacker in a 3-4 front, highlights his versatility. Teams operating hybrid defenses would particularly benefit from his skill set, allowing them to utilize his strengths in multiple alignments depending on the game situation. 14). Tetairoa McMillan, Arizona (WR, 6'5", 210 lbs) Projection:  High-End Starter Potential Analysis:  Tetairoa McMillan primarily plays as an outside X-receiver, showcasing remarkable athleticism and a physical profile akin to NFL star Mike Evans. His playmaking ability and size make him an ideal fit for offenses that leverage deep threat receivers and require versatile play from the wide receiver position. His ability to create separation using his physicality and route precision complements vertical passing schemes well. 15). Harold Perkins, LSU (LB, 6'1", 250 lbs) Projection:  Near Elite Analysis:  Harold Perkins is a dynamic linebacker with a knack for being around the ball and making plays, particularly in the box. Despite his relatively smaller size for an edge rusher, his performance has not been hindered, as evidenced by his freshman season, where he tallied 7.5 sacks and continued to excel into his sophomore year with significant tackles for loss and sacks. He's shown adaptability in shifting from edge rushing to playing more centrally as an inside linebacker under LSU's scheme, which speaks to his versatility and potential fit in various defensive schemes at the professional level. 16). Shedeur Sanders, Colorado (QB, 6'2", 215 lbs) Projection:  High-End Starter Potential Analysis:  Shedeur Sanders is a mobile pocket passer with a remarkable ability to extend plays and improvise under pressure. He demonstrates consistent accuracy and timing on short to medium passes. Sanders has shown proficiency in navigating the pocket, using his athleticism effectively, and maintaining composure under pressure. However, his arm strength is considered average, and his footwork and overall throwing mechanics require refinement. 17). J.T. Tuimoloau, Ohio State (ED, 6'4", 270 lbs) Projection:  High-End Starter Potential Analysis:  In terms of scheme fit, Tuimoloau's combination of physical traits, pursuit abilities, and hand usage should allow him to fit well into multiple defensive schemes. While his primary role is likely to be as an edge rusher, his strengths against the run suggest that he could be used in a variety of ways depending on the defensive scheme and situation. 18). Emeka Egbuka, Ohio State (WR, 6'1", 205 lbs) Projection:  High-End Starter Potential Analysis:  Egbuka exhibits a play style that combines elite speed, agile route running, and the ability to make plays after the catch. His ability to perform both in the slot and on the outside makes him a versatile asset for any NFL team. Egbuka fits well in a spread offense that leverages his route-running skills and speed, making him a potent threat across all levels of the field. 19). Jonah Savaiinaea, Arizona (OT, 6'5", 330 lbs) Projection:  Mid-Level Starter Potential Analysis:  Jonah Savaiinaea is a massive offensive tackle who can also slot into an interior guard position if needed, showcasing versatility across the offensive line. His size and strength are his biggest assets, making him ideal for a power run scheme that leverages his ability to move defenders off the ball. His pass protection skills are advanced, particularly against bull rushes, but he must improve his agility and footwork to handle speed rushers at the NFL level. Savaiinaea's performance at Arizona has demonstrated significant potential for growth, especially in schemes that prioritize physical run blocking. 20). Carson Beck, Georgia (QB, 6'4", 220 lbs) Projection:  Mid-Level Starter Potential Analysis:  Carson Beck is a prototypical pocket passer with a poised and methodical approach to the game. He is most effective when given time to operate within the pocket, utilizing his strong arm and accuracy to execute the offense. Beck fits best in a pro-style offense that leverages his ability to make throws from the pocket and doesn't rely heavily on quarterback mobility. His play style is reminiscent of traditional drop-back passers, and he would excel in schemes that value precision passing and structured play designs. 21). Howard Cross III, Notre Dame (IDL, 6'0", 288 lbs) Projection:  High-End Starter Potential Analysis:  Howard Cross III is a powerful and stout interior defensive lineman, known for his ability to disrupt the run game. He has a solid build and uses his strength effectively to engage and shed blocks. While his pass rush skills are more limited, he shows potential in this area. Cross fits best in a 4-3 defensive scheme as a run-stopping DT, where his ability to plug gaps and control the line of scrimmage would be maximized. 22). Noah Fifita, Arizona (QB, 5'11", 196 lbs) Projection:  Mid-Level Starter Potential Analysis:  Noah Fifita is a quintessential pocket passer with a knack for precision and timing, making him a fit for pro-style or West Coast offenses that prioritize accuracy and decision-making over deep throws. His ability to read defenses and distribute the ball effectively makes him adaptable to various offensive schemes. Fifita is also an escape artist with good mobility. He can navigate the pocket to make a throw, keep a play alive to make throws outside of structure, or take off to pick up yards as a runner. 23). Tacario Davis, Arizona (CB, 6'4", 195 lbs) Projection:  Mid-Level Starter Potential Analysis:  Tacario Davis has flourished in a system that emphasizes heavy zone coverage, where his length and speed allow him to excel. Standing at 6-foot-4, he is a dominant physical presence on the field, capable of matching up against larger receivers. 24). Colston Loveland, Michigan (TE, 6'5", 245 lbs) Projection:  High-End Starter Potential Analysis:  Colston Loveland is a prototypical modern NFL tight end, effective as both a pass-catcher and a blocker. He thrives in an offense that utilizes the tight end as a key part of its passing game, similar to how Michigan has employed him. His ability to line up in multiple positions makes him a valuable asset for schemes that favor versatile tight ends who can create mismatches. 25). Donovan Edwards, Michigan (RB, 6'1", 210 lbs) Projection:  High-End Starter Potential Analysis:  Donovan Edwards is a talented running back, offering a great mix of speed, agility, and explosiveness. As a three-down back, Edwards brings valuable versatility to the field, where he can line up in the backfield, the slot, or split out wide as a receiver. Edwards's versatility could have allowed him to change positions from RB to WR a season ago, with Blake Corum gobbling up most of the backfield carries. He is exactly what NFL scouts and GM’s are looking for in today's NFL game at the RB position. Players like Donovan Edwards provide positionless versatility, and that's the direction in which the RB position appears to be trending.

The 2024 NFL Draft is brimming with talent, featuring well-known prospects and some who might be undervalued. Every draft analyst has players they advocate for passionately. Below, I've listed players I would strongly recommend if I were in a team's front office or as the GM. In the days leading up to the draft, I would make a strong case for these players, especially if a team has a need at their position. This approach is about championing their potential to significantly impact the NFL based on thorough analysis and conviction. 1). J.J. McCarthy - Quarterback, University of Michigan Class : Junior Height/Weight : 6'3", 219 lbs Projected Draft Round : Top 10 Pick, 1st Round Where I Would Draft: Top 5, QB2 2024 Draft Prospect Ranking : #6 Overall Player Profile : J.J. McCarthy exhibits a strong pocket presence combined with notable mobility, making him a fit for offensive schemes that value mobile pocket passers like those in a Shanahan/Payton style offense. His ability to make plays off-script and his proficiency in the intermediate/short passing game are key assets. Strengths : Accuracy on the move, high-velocity throws, clutch ability Areas for Improvement : Deep accuracy, adherence to structure, tendency to force throws Ceiling Grade : Near Elite 2). Quinyon Mitchell - Cornerback, University of Toledo Class : Junior Height/Weight : 6'0", 196 lbs Projected Draft Round : Top 20, Round One Where I Would Draft: Top 10 or 15, CB1 2024 Draft Prospect Ranking : #9 Overall Player Profile : Quinyon Mitchell is recognized for his playmaking ability and versatility as a cornerback. He combines excellent ball skills with a physical approach, ideal for press-man and zone schemes. His speed and strong frame allow him to effectively cover and limit receivers, particularly along the boundary. Mitchell excels in schemes that employ off-man and zone-heavy approaches, where his quick reactions and defensive awareness come to the forefront. Strengths : High football IQ, ability to mirror and match receivers, strong ball skills Areas for Improvement : Tackling technique, reactionary quickness, can be tight-hipped at times Ceiling Grade : Near Elite 3). Cooper DeJean - Cornerback, University of Iowa Class : Junior Height/Weight : 6'1", 210 lbs Projected Draft Round : First Round Where I Would Draft: Top 15, CB2, or CB3 2024 Draft Prospect Ranking : #10 Overall Player Profile : Cooper DeJean is adept in zone and off-man coverage, using his size and athleticism to excel in various alignments. His explosive athleticism and rapid closing speed make him effective in managing space and reacting quickly to plays. Strengths : Zone coverage, versatility, run support Areas for Improvement : Man-to-man coverage, fluidity, physicality Ceiling Grade : Near Elite 4). Chop Robinson - Edge Defender, Penn State Class : Junior Height/Weight : 6'3", 250 lbs Projected Draft Round : Mid-Round One, late 1st Round Where I Would Draft: Top 10-15, I would potentially take him as the top edge rusher in the class based on ceiling potential. 2024 Draft Prospect Ranking : #16 Overall Player Profile : Chop Robinson is known for his energy and aggressiveness, and he is suited for a stand-up EDGE role or as a designated pass rusher. His dense build and explosiveness enable him to generate significant pressure, making him a disruptive presence on the field. Strengths : Explosiveness, agility, motor Areas for Improvement : Consistency, arm length, stiffness Ceiling Grade : Near Elite 5). Michael Penix Jr. - Quarterback, University of Washington Class : Senior Height/Weight : 6'3", 214 lbs Projected Draft Round : Mid-1st, early 2nd Round Where I Would Draft: Top 20 for a team that needs an NFL-ready player 2024 Draft Prospect Ranking : #30 Overall Player Profile : A classic pocket passer, Michael Penix Jr. is known for his precision and strong arm. Best suited for a pro-style or West Coast offense, he is poised in the pocket and excels at making decisive, accurate throws. Strengths : Arm strength, mobility, pocket awareness Areas for Improvement : Consistent accuracy, mechanics, anticipatory throws Ceiling Grade : High-End Starter Potential 6). Mike Sainristil - Cornerback, University of Michigan Class : Senior Height/Weight : 5'11", 180 lbs Projected Draft Round : 2nd Round Where I Would Draft: Late 1st, early 2nd round, culture builder, playmaker, leader, he is worth a late round one pick. 2024 Draft Prospect Ranking : #31 Overall Player Profile : Sainristil is a versatile cornerback with excellent quickness and instincts, particularly effective in nickel and press coverage. His athleticism allows him to cover slot receivers effectively and contribute in various secondary roles. Strengths : Quickness, fluidity, instincts Areas for Improvement : Transitional issues, size, press man coverage Final Grade : High-End Starter Potential 7). Keon Coleman - Wide Receiver, Florida State University Class : Junior Height/Weight : 6'4", 215 lbs Projected Draft Round : 2nd Round Where I Would Draft: Early to mid round two based on his current value, he could be a steal. 2024 Draft Prospect Ranking : #47 Overall Player Profile : Coleman is a physically imposing receiver known for his strong hands and ability to make contested catches. His physicality and effective use of body positioning make him a formidable target, particularly suited as an X receiver. Strengths : Physical attributes, contested catches, versatility Areas for Improvement : Deep speed, route consistency, concentration Ceiling Grade : High-End Starter Potential 8). Tez Walker - Wide Receiver, University of North Carolina Class : Junior Height/Weight : 6'3", 200 lbs Projected Draft Round : 2nd Round Where I Would Draft: Mid Round Two 2024 Draft Prospect Ranking : #57 Overall Player Profile : A strong vertical threat, Tez Walker uses his speed and size to excel on deep routes. He is adept at making adjustments and securing catches in tight coverage, making him a valuable asset in a vertical passing offense. Strengths : Deep speed, ball tracking, playmaking ability Areas for Improvement : Route running, run blocking, agility Ceiling Grade : High-End Starter Potential 9). Cooper Beebe - Interior Offensive Lineman, Kansas State University Class : Senior Height/Weight : 6'4", 322 lbs Projected Draft Round : 3rd-4th Round Where I Would Draft: 3rd Round 2024 Draft Prospect Ranking : #67 Overall Player Profile : A power-oriented lineman, Cooper Beebe excels in run-heavy schemes that utilize his strength and mobility. His ability to pull and climb to the second level makes him an effective blocker in gap and power run schemes. Strengths : Stout build, leverage, strength Areas for Improvement : Length, lateral agility, reactionary speed Ceiling Grade : High-End Starter Potential 10). Luke McCaffrey - Wide Receiver, Rice University Class : Junior Height/Weight : 6'2", 195 lbs Projected Draft Round : 4th Round Where I Would Draft: 3rd Round 2024 Draft Prospect Ranking : #87 Overall Player Profile : Former quarterback turned wide receiver, McCaffrey excels in reading defenses and finding open spaces, making him ideal for the slot. His quick feet and sharp cuts make him elusive, though his lean frame and marginal play strength are concerns. Strengths : High IQ, agile movements, strong hands Areas for Improvement : Route tree refinement, gaining wider receiver experience, improving physicality Ceiling Grade : Mid-Level Starter Potential

The 2024 NFL Draft has concluded, culminating months of behind-the-scenes scouting and analysis during a three-day event in Detroit, Michigan, which drew a record attendance of over 700,000 fans, more than any previous NFL Draft. Why Are We Grading The Draft Before The Three-Year Window? Grading the NFL Draft immediately after its conclusion is often criticized because it typically takes two to three years to truly assess which players will succeed. However, the real value in immediate draft grades lies in the extensive time spent analyzing prospects, understanding where they were selected, and determining why they were chosen at their specific draft spots. Additionally, draft grades evaluate each team's ability to fill primary and secondary needs. Did they address their primary needs with prospects who have high-ceiling potential? How effectively did they meet their secondary needs, and what is the initial perception of these efforts? While we can revisit and regrade these drafts in a few years, for now, evaluating the here and now allows us to reflect on our initial perceptions later. 2024 NFL Draft Overview A record six quarterbacks were drafted in the first 12 picks, with no defensive players selected until the 15th overall—the longest gap between an offensive or defensive player in NFL Draft history. There was much speculation that there could be zero defenders taken in the first ten picks, but having none in the first 15 was unprecedented. This trend was less about the talent available and more due to QB-needy teams selecting quarterbacks earlier than expected, coupled with an exceptionally deep wide receiver class featuring talents like Marvin Harrison Jr., Rome Odunze, and Malik Nabers—who each could have been the top wide receiver in any of the past several drafts. The depth of offensive tackles and the need at that position played a significant role this year, leading to more first-round offensive players than any other draft in history, with 23 total offensive players, including eight offensive linemen. How Did Our Big Board Rankings Stack Up? Regarding our big board rankings for this draft class, it was our best recorded year since we started publishing a top 100 Big Board back in 2021. Seventy-eight of our top 100 players were drafted within the first 100 picks, with 95% of our top 150 fully graded players drafted. Additional Draft Notes: Overall, the 2024 NFL Draft proved to be as deep as advertised. We had grades on 26 wide receivers, and all 26 were drafted. Our top three wide receivers, Marvin Harrison Jr., Rome Odunze, and Malik Nabers, were all ranked in the top ten and drafted in the top ten. We graded 11 quarterbacks in the draft, and 10 were drafted, with one signing a guaranteed free agent contract. Our top-graded quarterback, Caleb Williams, went first overall. Our second-highest graded quarterback, J.J. McCarthy, was the fourth quarterback drafted, landing at pick 10 with the Minnesota Vikings, while Jayden Daniels and Drake Maye, 3rd and 4th ranked quarterbacks, went second and third overall, respectively. Michael Penix's going eighth overall to the Falcons was a big surprise in the mainstream media, but not to us, as he was ranked as high as the third quarterback on our board at one time. All 13 running backs we graded were drafted. Our top-ranked running back, Blake Corum, was the second running back off the board after Texas' Jonathan Brooks. We had grades for 21 cornerbacks in this draft class, and 20 were drafted while one signed a UDFA deal, ensuring all 21 are in the NFL. Our top-graded cornerback, Quinyon Mitchell, went to the Eagles and was the first cornerback selected in the 2024 NFL Draft. All 32 Teams 2024 NFL Draft Grades Arizona Cardinals Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A) The Arizona Cardinals adeptly utilized the NFL Draft to reinforce their team, focusing particularly on enhancing their receiving corps, defensive line, and secondary. Marvin Harrison Jr. from Ohio State is recognized as a generational talent, which aligns perfectly with the Cardinals’ ability to maximize their playmakers’ effectiveness. This high-caliber addition significantly raises the expectations for quarterback Kyler Murray. The team’s performance in the middle rounds was notably strong, as they secured several players who could challenge for starting roles much earlier than anticipated, bolstering their roster depth before the projected talent cutoff after Round 3. This strategic approach has positioned them well for the upcoming season. Day One: Average Grade (A-) 4) Marvin Harrison Jr., WR, Ohio State (A+) 27) Darius Robinson, ED, Missouri (A-) Day Two: Average Grade (C+) 43) Max Melton, CB, Rutgers (B) 66) Trey Benson, HB, Florida State (B+) 71) Isaiah Adams, T, Illinois (C) 82) Tip Reiman, TE, Illinois (C) 90) Elijah Jones, CB, Boston College (C) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 104) Dadrion Taylor-Demerson, S, Texas Tech (A-) 138) Xavier Thomas, ED, Clemson (A) 162) Christian Jones, T, Texas (B+) 191) Tejhaun Palmer, WR, UAB (C) 226) Jaden Davis, CB, Miami (FL) (C-) Atlanta Falcons Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B) The Atlanta Falcons focused on a mix of high-reward and developmental picks to address their current roster and future needs. The selection of Michael Penix Jr. from Washington at the 8th overall was a major surprise, considering their current quarterback situation with Kirk Cousins. Penix is viewed as a high-risk, high-reward quarterback with the potential to be the franchise's future leader. The Falcons also aimed to bolster their defensive line and add depth to their backfield and special teams with their mid and late-round picks. Day One: Average Grade (B+) 8) Michael Penix Jr., QB, Washington (B+) Day Two: Average Grade (B) 35) Ruke Orhorhoro, DI, Clemson (C) 74) Bralen Trice, ED, Washington (B) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 109) Brandon Dorlus, DI, Oregon (A+) 143) JD Bertrand, LB, Notre Dame (B) 186) Jase McClellan, HB, Alabama (B) 187) Casey Washington, WR, Illinois (B) 197) Zion Logue, DI, Georgia (C) Baltimore Ravens Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A) The Baltimore Ravens executed a strategic draft, effectively bolstering their secondary and defensive line while also enhancing offensive line depth. Nate Wiggins from Clemson, selected as one of the top corners in the draft, exemplifies Baltimore’s focus on adding elite speed and versatility to their defensive backfield. The team's performance in the later rounds was equally impressive, securing potential impact players like Adisa Isaac from Penn State and Tez Walker from North Carolina, which significantly boosts their defensive and offensive capabilities respectively. This comprehensive approach demonstrates Baltimore's commitment to maintaining a balanced and competitive roster. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 30) Nate Wiggins, CB, Clemson (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 62) Roger Rosengarten, T, Washington (B) 93) Adisa Isaac, ED, Penn State (A+) Day Three: Average Grade (A) 113) Tez Walker, WR, North Carolina (A) 130) T.J. Tampa, CB, Iowa State (A+) 165) Rasheen Ali, HB, Marshall (B) 218) Devin Leary, QB, Kentucky (B) 228) Nick Samac, C, Michigan State (B) 250) Sanoussi Kane, S, Purdue (C) Buffalo Bills Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B+) The Buffalo Bills focused on strengthening their roster across multiple positions, particularly in their secondary, offensive line, and receiving corps. The selection of Keon Coleman from Florida State highlights their attempt to add a prototypical "X" receiver, providing a significant boost to their passing game. Ray Davis from Kentucky and Sedrick Van Pran from Georgia were standout picks, adding versatility and effectiveness to both the rushing and pass protection aspects of their game. This draft illustrates Buffalo’s intent to address gaps while also preparing for future development needs. Day One: No Picks Day Two: Average Grade (B) 33) Keon Coleman, WR, Florida State (B+) 60) Cole Bishop, S, Utah (B+) 95) DeWayne Carter, DI, Duke (B) Day Three: Average Grade (A-) 128) Ray Davis, HB, Kentucky (A) 141) Sedrick Van Pran, C, Georgia (A) 160) Edefuan Ulofoshio, LB, Washington (B) 168) Javon Solomon, ED, Troy (B+) 204) Tylan Grable, T, UCF (B) 219) Daequan Hardy, CB, Penn State (B) 221) Travis Clayton, G, Buffalo (C) Carolina Panthers Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B+) The Carolina Panthers made strategic moves to enhance their receiving options and bolster their defensive and offensive lines. Xavier Legette from South Carolina, compared stylistically to AJ Brown, represents a significant addition to their receiving corps, promising to impact their offensive scheme immediately. Ja'Tavion Sanders from Texas and Michael Barrett from Michigan were also notable selections, aimed at providing immediate contributions to the offense and defense, respectively. This draft approach shows Carolina's commitment to building a robust team framework. Day One: Average Grade (B+) 32) Xavier Legette, WR, South Carolina (B+) Day Two: Average Grade (C) 46) Jonathon Brooks, HB, Texas (A-) 72) Trevin Wallace, LB, Kentucky (C) Day Three: Average Grade (A) 101) Ja'Tavion Sanders, TE, Texas (A+) 157) Chau Smith-Wade, CB, Washington State (B+) 200) Jaden Crumedy, DI, Mississippi State (B) 240) Michael Barrett, LB, Michigan (A-) Chicago Bears Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A+) The Chicago Bears strategically drafted to maximize their offensive potential, significantly enhancing their quarterback and wide receiver positions. Caleb Williams from USC, seen as a generational talent, is compared favorably with elite NFL quarterbacks and sets a high bar for Chicago's future offensive capabilities. Rome Odunze from Washington, picked to complement Williams, is expected to dramatically impact the Bears' passing game. The Bears also focused on strengthening their special teams and defensive line, indicating a comprehensive approach to building a competitive team. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 1) Caleb Williams, QB, USC (A+) 9) Rome Odunze, WR, Washington (A+) Day Two: No Picks Day Three: Average Grade (A) 75) Kiran Amegadjie, T, Yale (A) 122) Tory Taylor, P, Iowa (A) 144) Austin Booker, ED, Kansas (A) Cincinnati Bengals Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B+) The Cincinnati Bengals effectively addressed their offensive line and added depth across the defensive line and receiving corps in this draft. Amarius Mims from Georgia, a highly anticipated tackle, was a significant addition, expected to protect Joe Burrow for the foreseeable future. The Bengals' strategy also included bolstering their defense with multiple picks that could contribute immediately, showcasing their balanced approach to building both sides of the ball. Day One: Average Grade (B+) 18) Amarius Mims, OT, Georgia (B+) Day Two: Average Grade (B+) 49) Kris Jenkins, DI, Michigan (B+) 80) Jermaine Burton, WR, Alabama (B+) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 97) McKinnley Jackson, DI, Texas A&M (C) 115) Erick All, TE, Iowa (B+) 149) Josh Newton, CB, TCU (B) 194) Tanner McLachlan, TE, Arizona (B) 214) Cedric Johnson, ED, Mississippi (B) 224) Daijahn Anthony, S, Mississippi (B) 237) Matt Lee, C, Miami (FL) (B) Cleveland Browns Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B) The Cleveland Browns focused on enhancing their defensive capabilities and adding versatile offensive weapons. Michael Hall Jr. from Ohio State and Zak Zinter from Michigan were key early picks aimed at improving the defensive and offensive lines, respectively. Cleveland's later rounds were marked by selections that emphasized increasing the team's playmaking ability and depth, such as Jamari Thrash from Louisville and Nathaniel Watson from Mississippi State, who are expected to contribute both in regular plays and special teams. Day One: No Picks Day Two: Average Grade (B) 54) Michael Hall Jr., DI, Ohio State (B) 85) Zak Zinter, G, Michigan (B) Day Three: Average Grade (B+) 156) Jamari Thrash, WR, Louisville (B+) 206) Nathaniel Watson, LB, Mississippi State (B+) 227) Myles Harden, CB, South Dakota (B) 243) Jowon Briggs, DI, Cincinnati (A-) Dallas Cowboys Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B) The Dallas Cowboys concentrated on strengthening their offensive and defensive lines through strategic draft selections. Tyler Guyton from Oklahoma, a versatile offensive tackle, and Marshawn Kneeland from Western Michigan, a solid run defender, are expected to contribute significantly to their respective units. The Cowboys also added depth with picks aimed at improving special teams and rotational contributions, indicating a focus on solidifying their overall team structure and readiness for the upcoming challenges. Day One: Average Grade (B) 29) Tyler Guyton, OT, Oklahoma (B) Day Two: Average Grade (B+) 56) Marshawn Kneeland, ED, Western Michigan (B+) 73) Cooper Beebe, G, Kansas State (B+) 87) Marist Liufau, LB, Notre Dame (C) Day Three: Average Grade (A) 174) Caelen Carson, CB, Wake Forest (A+) 216) Ryan Flournoy, WR, Southeast Missouri State (C) 233) Nathan Thomas, T, Louisiana (B) 244) Justin Rogers, DI, Auburn (B) Denver Broncos Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B) The Denver Broncos strategically selected Bo Nix from Oregon as their potential franchise quarterback, indicating a significant commitment to reshaping their offense. The draft choices, including Troy Franklin from Oregon and Kris Abrams-Draine from Missouri, align with Denver’s strategy to enhance their passing game and secondary. The late-round picks continue to support this strategy, aiming to develop depth and versatility across the roster. Day One: Average Grade (C+) 12) Bo Nix, QB, Oregon (C+) Day Two: No Picks Day Three: Average Grade (A) 76) Jonah Elliss, ED, Utah (A) 102) Troy Franklin, WR, Oregon (A+) 145) Kris Abrams-Draine, CB, Missouri (B+) 147) Audric Estime, HB, Notre Dame (B) 235) Devaughn Vele, WR, Utah (B) 256) Nick Gargiulo, C, South Carolina (B) Detroit Lions Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B+) The Detroit Lions focused on bolstering their secondary and offensive line, addressing key areas of need with high-potential picks. Terrion Arnold from Alabama and Ennis Rakestraw Jr. from Missouri were notable for their immediate potential to improve Detroit's coverage capabilities. The Lions' strategy reflects a commitment to building a robust defensive lineup, complemented by strategic additions to the offensive line and special teams. Day One: Average Grade (B+) 24) Terrion Arnold, CB, Alabama (B+) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 61) Ennis Rakestraw Jr., CB, Missouri (A) 126) Giovanni Manu, T, Detroit (B) 132) Sione Vaki, S, Utah (B+) Day Three: Average Grade (A-) 189) Mekhi Wingo, DI, LSU (A-) 210) Christian Mahogany, G, Boston College (A) Green Bay Packers Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B) The Green Bay Packers focused on reinforcing their offensive line and adding dynamic playmakers in the 2024 NFL Draft. Jordan Morgan from Arizona, a versatile offensive lineman, was a key acquisition, expected to compete for a critical role protecting the quarterback. The Packers also secured high-quality additions to their backfield and defense, aiming to increase their overall team speed and versatility. Day One: Average Grade (B+) 25) Jordan Morgan, OT, Arizona (B+) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 45) Edgerrin Cooper, LB, Texas A&M (B+) 58) Javon Bullard, S, Georgia (B+) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 88) MarShawn Lloyd, HB, USC (B+) 91) Ty'Ron Hopper, LB, Missouri (C) 111) Evan Williams, S, Oregon (C) 163) Jacob Monk, G, Duke (C) 169) Kitan Oladapo, S, Oregon State (B) 202) Travis Glover, T, Georgia State (C) 245) Michael Pratt, QB, Tulane (A-) 255) Kalen King, CB, Penn State (A-) Houston Texans Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B) The Houston Texans strategically bolstered their secondary, offensive line, and special teams with this year's draft picks. Key selections like Kamari Lassiter from Georgia and Calen Bullock from USC reflect Houston's commitment to enhancing their defensive backfield, while Blake Fisher from Notre Dame provides much-needed stability on the offensive line. The selection of Cade Stover from Ohio State is a highlight, potentially offering a new offensive weapon at tight end. Day One: No Picks Day Two: Average Grade (B) 42) Kamari Lassiter, CB, Georgia (B) 59) Blake Fisher, T, Notre Dame (B) 78) Calen Bullock, S, USC (B) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 123) Cade Stover, TE, Ohio State (A-) 188) Jamal Hill, LB, Oregon (C) 205) Jawhar Jordan, HB, Louisville (B) 238) Solomon Byrd, ED, USC (B) 249) LaDarius Henderson, T, Michigan (B) Indianapolis Colts Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A) The Indianapolis Colts focused on adding high-impact players across the board, with a notable emphasis on bolstering their defensive and offensive lines. Laiatu Latu from UCLA and Adonai Mitchell from Texas are key examples of their strategy to inject talent into critical areas, potentially providing immediate contributions. The Colts also enhanced their offensive flexibility with selections like Tanor Bortolini from Wisconsin and Cade Stover from Ohio State, addressing both short-term needs and long-term depth. Day One: Average Grade (A) 15) Laiatu Latu, ED, UCLA (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A+) 52) Adonai Mitchell, WR, Texas (A+) 79) Matt Goncalves, T, Pittsburgh (B) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 117) Tanor Bortolini, C, Wisconsin (A) 142) Anthony Gould, WR, Oregon State (B) 151) Jaylon Carlies, S, Missouri (C) 164) Jaylin Simpson, S, Auburn (B) 201) Micah Abraham, CB, Marshall (C) 234) Jonah Laulu, DI, Oklahoma (B) Jacksonville Jaguars Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B-) Jacksonville Jaguars' draft approach was aimed at upgrading their receiver corps and defensive line, with a significant investment in physical and versatile players like Brian Thomas Jr. from LSU and Maason Smith from LSU. The Jaguars also focused on adding depth to their secondary with picks like Jarrian Jones from Florida State and improving their special teams with the addition of Cam Little from Arkansas, reflecting a holistic approach to team building. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 23) Brian Thomas Jr., WR, LSU (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (C) 48) Maason Smith, DI, LSU (C) 96) Jarrian Jones, CB, Florida State (B+) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 114) Javon Foster, T, Missouri (B) 116) Jordan Jefferson, DI, LSU (C) 153) Deantre Prince, CB, Mississippi (C) 167) Keilan Robinson, HB, Texas (B) 212) Cam Little, K, Arkansas (B) 236) Myles Cole, ED, Texas Tech (B) Kansas City Chiefs Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A-) The Kansas City Chiefs executed a focused strategy to enhance their offensive firepower and defensive flexibility. Xavier Worthy from Texas, a dynamic receiver, stands out as a significant addition. The Chiefs also invested in protecting Patrick Mahomes with the selection of Kingsley Suamataia from BYU and added depth to their tight end room and secondary. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 28) Xavier Worthy, WR, Texas (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (B+) 63) Kingsley Suamataia, T, BYU (B+) Day Three: Average Grade (A) 131) Jared Wiley, TE, TCU (B+) 133) Jaden Hicks, S, Washington State (A+) 159) Hunter Nourzad, C, Penn State (B+) 211) Kamal Hadden, CB, Tennessee (B+) 248) C.J. Hanson, G, Holy Cross (B) Las Vegas Raiders Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A-) The Las Vegas Raiders focused on adding potential star power and depth across their roster. Brock Bowers from Georgia and Jackson Powers-Johnson from Oregon were notable picks, expected to immediately boost the Raiders' offensive capabilities. The selection of Delmar Glaze from Maryland and the emphasis on enhancing the defensive and offensive lines reflect Las Vegas's strategy to build a robust and competitive team for the future. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 13) Brock Bowers, TE, Georgia (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A+) 44) Jackson Powers-Johnson, C, Oregon (A+) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 77) Delmar Glaze, T, Maryland (C) 112) Decamerion Richardson, CB, Mississippi State (B) 148) Tommy Eichenberg, LB, Ohio State (B) 208) Dylan Laube, HB, New Hampshire (B) 223) Trey Taylor, S, Air Force (B) 229) M.J. Devonshire, CB, Pittsburgh (B) Los Angeles Chargers Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A) The Los Angeles Chargers focused on strengthening their offensive and defensive lines and added significant depth to their secondary. Joe Alt from Notre Dame, a standout offensive tackle, and Ladd McConkey from Georgia, a versatile receiver, were key additions aimed at boosting the Chargers' offensive capabilities. The Chargers also focused on adding depth to their linebacker and defensive line positions, ensuring that they remain competitive in all phases of the game. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 5) Joe Alt, OT, Notre Dame (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 34) Ladd McConkey, WR, Georgia (A) 69) Junior Colson, LB, Michigan (B+) Day Three: Average Grade (B+) 105) Justin Eboigbe, ED, Alabama (C) 137) Tarheeb Still, CB, Maryland (B) 140) Cam Hart, CB, Notre Dame (A) 181) Kimani Vidal, HB, Troy (A-) 225) Brenden Rice, WR, USC (A) 253) Cornelius Johnson, WR, Michigan (B) Los Angeles Rams Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A-) The Los Angeles Rams focused on enhancing their defensive prowess and adding dynamic playmakers to their offense. Jared Verse from Florida State, a versatile defensive end, and Blake Corum from Michigan, a highly agile running back, highlight the Rams' strategy to build a robust and flexible team. The Rams' draft picks reflect a clear intent to enhance their defensive line and secondary while adding explosive potential to their offensive lineup. Day One: Average Grade (A) 19) Jared Verse, ED, Florida State (A) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 39) Braden Fiske, DI, Florida State (B) 83) Blake Corum, HB, Michigan (A) Day Three: Average Grade (B+) 99) Kamren Kinchens, S, Miami (FL) (A-) 154) Brennan Jackson, ED, Washington State (B) 196) Tyler Davis, DI, Clemson (B+) 209) Joshua Karty, K, Stanford (B) 213) Jordan Whittington, WR, Texas (A-) 217) Beaux Limmer, C, Arkansas (A-) 254) KT Leveston, T, Kansas State (A-) Miami Dolphins Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B+) The Miami Dolphins targeted a mix of high-impact and developmental players to strengthen their roster. Chop Robinson from Penn State is a standout pick, a potential star at the edge rusher position with the right development. The Dolphins also bolstered their offensive line with Patrick Paul from Houston, adding much-needed protection for Tua Tagovailoa. The addition of dynamic playmakers like Jaylen Wright from Tennessee and Mohamed Kamara from Colorado State in the later rounds indicates a clear strategy to enhance their offensive explosiveness and defensive depth. Day One: Average Grade (A) 21) Chop Robinson, ED, Penn State (A) Day Two: Average Grade (B) 55) Patrick Paul, T, Houston (B) Day Three: Average Grade (B+) 120) Jaylen Wright, HB, Tennessee (B+) 158) Mohamed Kamara, ED, Colorado State (B+) 184) Malik Washington, WR, Virginia (B+) 198) Patrick McMorris, S, California (C) 241) Tahj Washington, WR, USC (A-) Minnesota Vikings Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A+) The Minnesota Vikings made strategic moves to improve both their offense and defense, selecting highly capable players. J.J. McCarthy from Michigan stands out as a potentially transformative quarterback, fitting perfectly into Minnesota’s system. Dallas Turner from Alabama offers significant value as a versatile linebacker, enhancing their defensive strength. The Vikings' focus on adding depth and talent, such as Khyree Jackson from Oregon in the secondary and Walter Rouse from Oklahoma on the offensive line, showcases a commitment to building a solid and versatile roster. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 10) J.J. McCarthy, QB, Michigan (A+) 17) Dallas Turner, ED, Alabama (A+) Day Two: No Picks Day Three: Average Grade (B) 108) Khyree Jackson, CB, Oregon (A-) 177) Walter Rouse, T, Oklahoma (B) 203) Will Reichard, K, Alabama (B) 230) Michael Jurgens, G, Wake Forest (B) 232) Levi Drake Rodriguez, DI, Texas A&M-Commerce (B) New England Patriots Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B-) The New England Patriots focused on revitalizing their offense with the addition of Drake Maye from North Carolina, a quarterback with the tools to potentially lead the franchise. The Patriots also targeted enhancing their receiving corps and offensive line depth with picks like Ja'Lynn Polk from Washington and Layden Robinson from Texas A&M. The selection of dynamic receivers and solid offensive linemen demonstrates New England's strategy to build around their new quarterback and solidify the offense. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 3) Drake Maye, QB, North Carolina (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (B+) 37) Ja'Lynn Polk, WR, Washington (B+) 68) Caedan Wallace, T, Penn State (C) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 103) Layden Robinson, G, Texas A&M (B) 110) Javon Baker, WR, UCF (B+) 180) Marcellas Dial, CB, South Carolina (C) 193) Joe Milton, QB, Tennessee (B) 231) Jaheim Bell, TE, Florida State (A-) New Orleans Saints Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A-) The New Orleans Saints capitalized on key opportunities in the draft to significantly upgrade their roster, particularly on the offensive line and in the secondary. Taliese Fuaga from Oregon State, an elite offensive tackle with the versatility to play multiple positions, highlights their approach to strengthening the line. Kool-Aid McKinstry from Alabama adds immediate talent and depth to their secondary, addressing a critical need. The Saints also sought depth and potential impact players in the later rounds, enhancing both their defensive and offensive units. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 14) Taliese Fuaga, OT, Oregon State (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 41) Kool-Aid McKinstry, CB, Alabama (A) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 150) Spencer Rattler, QB, South Carolina (A-) 170) Bub Means, WR, Pittsburgh (B) 175) Jaylan Ford, LB, Texas (B) 199) Khristian Boyd, DI, Northern Iowa (B+) 239) Josiah Ezirim, T, Eastern Kentucky (B) New York Giants Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A) The New York Giants focused heavily on bringing in high-impact talent, particularly at wide receiver and in the secondary. Malik Nabers from LSU, as a highly-touted receiver, is expected to elevate the Giants' offensive playmaking ability immediately. The Giants also added depth and versatility to their defensive backfield, with Ty Nubin from Minnesota and Andru Phillips from Kentucky enhancing their coverage capabilities. The selection of impactful players across the board underscores the Giants' intent to effectively bolster both sides of the ball. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 6) Malik Nabers, WR, LSU (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 47) Ty Nubin, S, Minnesota (A+) 70) Andru Phillips, CB, Kentucky (B+) Day Three: Average Grade (A) 107) Theo Johnson, TE, Penn State (A) 166) Tyrone Tracy, HB, Purdue (A) 183) Darius Muasau, LB, UCLA (B) New York Jets Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A-) The New York Jets executed a focused draft strategy to fortify their offensive line and add dynamic weapons to their offense. Olumuyiwa Fashanu from Penn State, a top tackle prospect, is expected to become a cornerstone on the offensive line. The Jets also selected playmakers like Malachi Corley from Western Kentucky and Braelon Allen from Wisconsin, aiming to inject versatility and explosiveness into their offensive schemes. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 11) Olumuyiwa Fashanu, OT, Penn State (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (B+) 65) Malachi Corley, WR, Western Kentucky (B+) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 134) Braelon Allen, HB, Wisconsin (B+) 171) Jordan Travis, QB, Florida State (B) 173) Isaiah Davis, HB, South Dakota State (A-) 176) Qwan'tez Stiggers, CB, New York (B) 257) Jaylen Key, S, Alabama (B) Philadelphia Eagles Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A) The Philadelphia Eagles targeted versatility and athleticism in their draft picks, focusing on strengthening their secondary and adding depth to their offensive and defensive lines. Quinyon Mitchell from Toledo, an elite cornerback prospect, and Cooper DeJean from Iowa, another versatile secondary player, highlight their commitment to improving their defensive backfield. The Eagles also added dynamic offensive playmakers like Ainias Smith from Texas A&M and strategic depth pieces like Trevor Keegan from Michigan, showing a balanced approach to building their roster. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 22) Quinyon Mitchell, CB, Toledo (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 40) Cooper DeJean, CB, Iowa (A+) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 94) Jalyx Hunt, ED, Houston Christian (B+) 127) Will Shipley, HB, Clemson (A-) 152) Ainias Smith, WR, Texas A&M (A-) 155) Jeremiah Trotter Jr., LB, Clemson (B+) 172) Trevor Keegan, G, Michigan (B+) 185) Johnny Wilson, WR, Florida State (B+) 190) Dylan McMahon, C, North Carolina State (C) Pittsburgh Steelers Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A+) The Pittsburgh Steelers focused on adding strength and versatility to their offensive line and injecting new talent into their receiving and defensive units. Troy Fautanu from Washington and Zach Frazier from West Virginia are expected to significantly enhance the Steelers' offensive line capabilities, while Roman Wilson from Michigan provides an exciting new weapon for their passing game. The Steelers' strategic selection of high-impact players across the board demonstrates their commitment to building a balanced and competitive team. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 20) Troy Fautanu, OT, Washington (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 51) Zach Frazier, C, West Virginia (A+) 84) Roman Wilson, WR, Michigan (A+) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 98) Payton Wilson, LB, North Carolina State (A) 119) Mason McCormick, G, South Dakota State (B+) 178) Logan Lee, DI, Iowa (B) 195) Ryan Watts, CB, Texas (B) San Francisco 49ers Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B) The San Francisco 49ers focused on adding dynamic and versatile players to their roster this draft season. Ricky Pearsall from Florida, a standout wide receiver known for his excellent route running and ability to track the ball, was a significant acquisition. The 49ers also fortified their offensive line and secondary with Dominick Puni from Kansas and Renardo Green from Florida State, aiming to bolster both pass protection and coverage depth. Additional picks in the secondary and offensive skill positions underline their strategy to increase depth and enhance playmaking abilities across the board. Day One: Average Grade (B+) 31) Ricky Pearsall, WR, Florida (B+) Day Two: Average Grade (B) 64) Renardo Green, CB, Florida State (B) 86) Dominick Puni, T, Kansas (B) Day Three: Average Grade (B+) 124) Malik Mustapha, S, Wake Forest (B) 129) Isaac Guerendo, HB, Louisville (B+) 135) Jacob Cowing, WR, Arizona (A) 215) Jarrett Kingston, G, USC (C) 251) Tatum Bethune, LB, Florida State (B) Seattle Seahawks Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B+) The Seattle Seahawks strategically targeted areas of need, focusing particularly on their defensive line and secondary while also strengthening the offensive line. Byron Murphy II from Texas, the top interior defender in the draft, is expected to make an immediate impact. The Seahawks also added key offensive linemen like Christian Haynes from Connecticut and Sataoa Laumea from Utah, aiming to solidify their protection schemes and run game. The secondary received new talent with picks like Nehemiah Pritchett from Auburn and D.J. James from Auburn, enhancing their coverage abilities. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 16) Byron Murphy II, IDL, Texas (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A) 81) Christian Haynes, G, Connecticut (A+) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 118) Tyrice Knight, LB, UTEP (C) 121) AJ Barner, TE, Michigan (B) 136) Nehemiah Pritchett, CB, Auburn (B) 179) Sataoa Laumea, T, Utah (B) 192) D.J. James, CB, Auburn (B+) 207) Mike Jerrell, T, Findlay (C) Tampa Bay Buccaneers Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B+) Tampa Bay Buccaneers targeted both offensive and defensive enhancements through their draft picks. Graham Barton from Duke, a versatile offensive lineman, was a key addition to solidifying the interior and possibly playing multiple positions on the line. Chris Braswell from Alabama and Tykee Smith from Georgia were significant defensive additions, with Braswell expected to provide immediate edge rushing capabilities and Smith enhancing the run defense. Jalen McMillan from Washington and Bucky Irving from Oregon are expected to bring dynamism to the offense, particularly in the passing and running games. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 26) Graham Barton, IOL, Duke (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (B+) 57) Chris Braswell, ED, Alabama (B+) 89) Tykee Smith, S, Georgia (B) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 92) Jalen McMillan, WR, Washington (A) 125) Bucky Irving, HB, Oregon (B+) 220) Elijah Klein, G, UTEP (C) 246) Devin Culp, TE, Washington (C) Tennessee Titans Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: B) The Tennessee Titans focused on solidifying their offensive and defensive lines with high-ceiling picks like J.C. Latham from Alabama and T'Vondre Sweat from Texas. Both are expected to bring physicality and durability to the line units. The Titans also added depth to their linebacker group and secondary with picks like Cedric Gray from North Carolina and Jarvis Brownlee Jr. from Louisville, enhancing their defensive versatility. The selection of Jha'Quan Jackson from Tulane as a return specialist underscores their focus on improving special teams. Day One: Average Grade (A) 7) J.C. Latham, OT, Alabama (A) Day Two: Average Grade (B) 38) T'Vondre Sweat, DI, Texas (B) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 106) Cedric Gray, LB, North Carolina (B) 146) Jarvis Brownlee Jr., CB, Louisville (B+) 182) Jha'Quan Jackson, WR, Tulane (B) 242) James Williams, S, Miami (FL) (B) 247) Marcus Harris, DI, Auburn (B) 252) Jaylen Harrell, ED, Michigan (A-) Washington Commanders Draft Summary (Overall Average Grade: A) The Washington Commanders prioritized acquiring game-changing talent at key positions, particularly at quarterback, with Jayden Daniels from LSU as their highest quarterback draft pick since Robert Griffin III. Jayden Daniels offers dynamic playmaking ability that could revitalize the Commanders' offense. The draft strategy also focused on shoring up the defensive line and secondary with high-impact picks like Jer'Zhan Newton from Illinois and Mike Sainristil from Michigan. Day One: Average Grade (A+) 2) Jayden Daniels, QB, LSU (A+) Day Two: Average Grade (A+) 36) Jer'Zhan Newton, DI, Illinois (A+) 50) Mike Sainristil, CB, Michigan (A+) 53) Ben Sinnott, TE, Kansas State (C) Day Three: Average Grade (B) 50) Mike Sainristil, CB, Michigan (A+) 53) Ben Sinnott, TE, Kansas State (C) 67) Brandon Coleman, T, TCU (B+) 100) Luke McCaffrey, WR, Rice (B) 139) Jordan Magee, LB, Temple (B+) 161) Dominique Hampton, S, Washington (B) 222) Javontae Jean-Baptiste, ED, Notre Dame (C)

Entering Day 3 of the 2024 NFL Draft, here are the best available players, according to our NFL Draft Big Board player rankings. A lot of talent is still available ahead of day three of the 2024 NFL Draft. In fact, several names still available possess day-one and day-two talent. That is how deep this draft class is. 29). Troy Franklin, WR, Oregon Troy Franklin is a highly effective player who can excel in a West Coast offense, utilizing his speed and route-running in a timing and precision-based offense. 55). Christian Mahogany, IOL, Boston College Christian Mahogany is a versatile lineman, effective in both run and pass blocking. 57). Tez Walker, WR, North Carolina Tez Walker dominates as a vertical threat due to his speed and size, making him ideal for offenses that prioritize deep passing. He needs to develop his route running and blocking. 58). Khyree Jackson, CB, Oregon Khyree Jackson excels in press coverage, using his length to disrupt receivers effectively. He's best suited for man-to-man defense but needs to improve his agility to handle quicker receivers. 64). Jaden Hicks, S, Washington State Jaden Hicks is well-suited for a Zone Box/Strong Safety role. 68). Spencer Rattler, QB, South Carolina Spencer Rattler, known for his arm strength and mobility, fits best in offensive schemes that leverage his ability to make off-platform throws and extend plays. 72). Cam Hart, CB, Notre Dame Cam Hart is versatile, excelling in both zone and press coverage, making him well-suited for complex defensive schemes that utilize varied coverage strategies. 74). Leonard Taylor III, IDL, Miami Leonard Taylor III is effective as a 3-technique in even fronts, bringing strong pass-rushing capabilities but needing to improve his consistency against double teams. 75). Johnny Wilson, WR, Florida State Johnny Wilson uses his size and athleticism to excel at contested catches. He's effective in stretching the defense vertically and using his body to box out. 76). Ja'Tavion Sanders, TE, Texas Ja'Tavion Sanders excels as a modern receiving tight end, capable of significant contributions in the passing game, particularly in schemes that utilize his after-catch abilities in space. 79). T.J. Tampa, CB, Iowa State T.J. Tampa is effective as an Outside Zone CB, using his length and agility to disrupt passing lanes. His style fits well with zone-heavy defensive schemes. 80). Brandon Dorlus, IDL, Oregon Brandon Dorlus displays versatility on the defensive line, effective both on the edge and inside, with strong technique against the run. 83). Javon Baker, WR, UCF Javon Baker is a precise route runner with strong hands, effective at the catch point and suitable for schemes that value precise route running and contested catch ability. 84). Jeremiah Trotter Jr., LB, Clemson Jeremiah Trotter Jr. is dynamic in run defense and can contribute in pass rush scenarios, fitting well in both 4-3 and 3-4 defensive schemes as a versatile linebacker. 86). Jacob Cowing, WR, Arizona Jacob Cowing is a potent vertical threat, utilizing his speed and route-running to stretch defenses, making him a significant threat on deep routes. 88). Brenden Rice, WR, USC Brenden Rice is effective in deep-route scenarios, using his speed and physicality to make plays downfield and in the red zone, suited for vertical and West Coast offenses. 89). Austin Booker, ED, Kansas Austin Booker is a dynamic edge rusher with a strong first step and variety of moves, best in schemes that utilize his pass-rushing abilities on the edge. 91). Kris Abrams-Draine, CB, Missouri Kris Abrams-Draine is adaptable to various defensive schemes, with strong coverage skills both in the slot and on the boundary. 92). Jamari Thrash, WR, Louisville Jamari Thrash fits well in a versatile receiving role, utilizing his skills to gain yards after the catch, suitable for slot roles or secondary outside options in spread offenses. 95). Kalen King, CB, Penn State Kalen King excels as an Outside Man/Press Cornerback, using his quickness and coverage skills to effectively challenge receivers, fitting aggressive defensive schemes. 99). Josh Newton, CB, TCU Josh Newton's skill set makes him ideal for zone defenses, leveraging his recognition skills and physicality to excel in press coverage. 100). Jaylen Wright, RB, Tennessee Jaylen Wright is notable for his speed and playmaking ability, best utilized in schemes that allow him to use his receiving skills and operate in space. 103). Malik Washington, WR, Virginia Malik Washington is an explosive slot receiver, utilizing his agility and route-running to create separation and make plays after the catch. 104). Bucky Irving, RB, Oregon Bucky Irving is versatile and dynamic, excelling in outside zone and gap schemes due to his speed and agility, also contributing in the passing game. 105). Audric Estime, RB, Notre Dame Audric Estime is a powerful back, ideal for ground-and-pound offenses and effective in zone-blocking schemes due to his ability to identify and exploit lanes. 106). Ray Davis, RB, Kentucky Ray Davis is a power back, ideal for short-yardage situations and zone-blocking schemes, demonstrating good hands and versatility in the passing game. 107). Will Shipley, RB, Clemson Will Shipley is dynamic and versatile, effective in both zone and power-run schemes due to his vision, agility, and tackle-breaking ability. 108). Sedrick Van Pran, IOL, Georgia Sedrick Van Pran is highly athletic and intelligent, effective in both power and zone blocking schemes, valued for his mobility and versatility on the line. 109). Isaac Guerendo, RB, Louisville Isaac Guerendo shows excellent patience and vision, fitting well in zone and gap running schemes due to his speed and power blend. 110). Cedric Gray, LB, North Carolina Cedric Gray is explosive and versatile, capable of impacting both the run and pass game, fitting well in zone-heavy systems as an inside linebacker. 112). Mason McCormick, IOL, South Dakota State Mason McCormick is a strong run blocker, best suited for power run strategies, though he needs to improve pass protection and mobility to enhance his versatility. 114). Michael Barrett, LB, Michigan Michael Barrett is versatile, effective as a hybrid linebacker in both the box and coverage, fitting well in 4-3 or 4-2-5 defensive schemes due to his coverage skills and edge impact.

Entering Day 2 of the draft, here are the best available players, according to our NFL Draft Big Board player rankings. There is a lot of talent available ahead of day two of the 2024 NFL Draft. After a QB- and OL-heavy day one, several high-level prospects are still available, including some that could have been drafted on day one. 10). Cooper DeJean, CB, Iowa Ideal for zone and off-man schemes. Versatile enough for various alignments including boundary, slot, and possibly field safety. Known for explosive athleticism and rapid closing speed. 19). Kool-Aid McKinstry, CB, Alabama Excellent in zone coverage; utilizes length to disrupt passes. Skilled in bump and run. Known for physicality and solid tackling. Fits well in complex zone systems. 20). Adonai Mitchell, WR, Texas Excels in deep routes with strong hands and route-running. Ideal for vertical threat schemes needing receivers to create separation and make big plays downfield. 28). Ladd McConkey, WR, Georgia Known for route-running precision and creating separation. Excels in the slot with quickness and understanding of defenses. Fits well in a spread offense, leveraging open-field abilities. 29). Troy Franklin, WR, Oregon Speed, athleticism, and ball skills make him ideal for a West Coast offense or schemes using short passes and screens. Compared to receivers like Devonta Smith and Chris Olave. 31). Mike Sainristil, CB, Michigan Adept in nickel and press coverage. Quickness and athleticism enable effective coverage of slot receivers and contribute in various secondary roles. 33). Payton Wilson, LB, NC State Versatile, high-energy linebacker suited for aggressive, swarming defensive schemes. Excels in run stopping and pass coverage with sideline-to-sideline speed. 34). Jer'Zhan Newton, IDL, Illinois Best fit as a 3-tech in hybrid fronts. Known for explosive athleticism and refined hand technique. Suited for modern, versatile defensive schemes. 35). Jackson Powers-Johnson, IOL, Oregon Excels in a zone-based running scheme with advanced footwork and lateral movement. High football IQ makes him ideal for schemes that value versatility and the center's role as an on-field coordinator. 36). Chris Braswell, ED, Alabama Dynamic edge rusher with explosiveness and agility. Strength in pass rush scenarios. Fits well in schemes that utilize edge rushers in aggressive pass-rush scenarios. 39). Roman Wilson, WR, Michigan Characterized by vertical threat capability, ideal for offensive schemes that leverage speed and deep passing plays. Room for expansion in the short and intermediate game. 40). Braden Fiske, IDL, Florida State Excels as a three-technique in a 4-3 defense, primarily as an interior pass rusher. Needs improvement in run defense but is agile and active with hands in pass rush scenarios. 41). Cole Bishop, S, Utah Fluid in movement with quick directional changes, well-suited for a free safety role in versatile defensive schemes. Needs to improve tackling and positioning. 42). Ruke Orhorhoro, IDL, Clemson Versatile defender, fits well as a defensive end in a 3-4 defense or various other defensive schemes. Known for run stopping and pressure on the quarterback through power and explosiveness. 43). Zach Frazier, IOL, West Virginia Powerful and technically proficient, thrives in a gap scheme focusing on run blocking. Ideal for offenses emphasizing power running, though less suited for extensive movement required in zone schemes. 46). Ennis Rakestraw Jr., CB, Missouri Instinctive in man coverage with effective press-man technique. Excels in changing direction and flipping hips seamlessly, fitting well in schemes that leverage man coverage and instinctive play. 47). Keon Coleman, WR, Florida State Physical and aggressive at the catch point with strong hands. Effective in contested catch scenarios and as an X receiver in schemes that value physicality. 49). Kris Jenkins, IDL, Michigan Robust and effective in run-stopping scenarios, suited for a 3-4 scheme as a nose tackle or 4-3 defensive tackle. Needs refinement in pass-rushing skills and versatility. 50). Tyler Nubin, S, Minnesota Physical with strong run defense instincts. Ideal for roles that leverage run-stopping abilities, potentially as a zone slot/nickel safety or in two-high safety alignments. 51). Michael Hall Jr., IDL, Ohio State Ideal as a three-technique on an even line with one-gap principles. Known for explosiveness and leveraging length into power. Needs improvement in pass-rushing technique and hand placement. 53). Blake Corum, RB, Michigan Dynamic, compact running back suited for a zone-blocking scheme. Excels with vision and agility, effective in between-the-tackles runs. Solid pass protection skills make him a viable three-down back. 54). Ben Sinnott, TE, Kansas State Versatile F-tight-end able to play in-line, in the backfield, or split out as a receiver. Effective pass catcher and blocker, suitable for various roles in the NFL. 55). Christian Mahogany, IOL, Boston College Capable of thriving in any offensive scheme with power, technique, and athleticism. Effective at moving to the second level and handling stunts and twists. Ideal for teams that prioritize physicality in the trenches. 56). T'Vondre Sweat, IDL, Texas Strong run-stopper, best suited for schemes prioritizing run defense. Potential as a rotational, two-down player with room for development in pass-rushing techniques. 57). Tez Walker, WR, North Carolina Thrives as a vertical threat with speed and size to dominate on deep routes. Ideal for a vertical passing offense looking for dynamic playmakers to stretch the field. 58). Khyree Jackson, CB, Oregon Long, athletic cornerback ideal for man-to-man defensive schemes. Excels in press coverage, leveraging exceptional length to disrupt routes. Notable for aggressive physicality against the run. 59). Christian Haynes, IOL, Connecticut Excels in wide zone blocking schemes with exceptional technique and athleticism. Best suited for offenses prioritizing mobility and space creation in offensive linemen. 60). Kingsley Suamataia, OT, BYU A formidable blocker with significant reach and a strong base, excels in both run blocking and pass protection. Versatile, fitting well in both zone and power run schemes. 61). Max Melton, CB, Rutgers Physical, agile cornerback excellent in man-to-man coverage and versatile enough for zone schemes. Solid in run support, making him a well-rounded prospect for various defensive roles. 62). Adisa Isaac, ED, Penn State Best utilized in schemes that emphasize agility and pass rush technique, particularly as a designated pass rusher. Fits well in hybrid defenses with potential in creative defensive fronts. 63). Junior Colson, LB, Michigan Versatile linebacker effective in run defense and pass coverage. Ideal for a 4-3 defensive scheme, using speed and agility to cover a wide range of the field and make plays.