The 2023 college football conference championship weekend is pivotal for some of the top 2024 NFL draft prospects competing. With 11 title games across the Power 5, Group of 5 conferences, and an FCS matchup, the stakes are high for College Football Playoff implications and individual players aiming to elevate their draft stock. We selected a few prospects with the most to gain this week from each matchup. Power 5 Championship Players to Watch Pac-12: Oregon at Washington Date & Time: Friday, 8 p.m. ET (ABC) Bo Nix, QB, Oregon Strengths: Accuracy, decision-making, mobility. 2023 Performance: [Details of his performance, such as passing yards, touchdowns, etc.] Draft Projection: Day 2 prospect, potentially second or third round. Michael Penix Jr., QB, Washington Strengths: Superior arm strength, ability to make plays from the pocket. 2023 Performance: 3,899 passing yards, 32 TD passes. Draft Projection: Day 2 prospect, known for big-play potential. Rome Odunze, WR, Washington Strengths: Physicality, aggressive after-the-catch, big-play ability. 2023 Performance: 73 receptions, 1,326 yards, 13 touchdowns. Draft Projection: Potential top-15 pick. Big 12: Oklahoma State at Texas Date & Time: Saturday, 12 p.m. ET (ABC) Xavier Worthy, WR, Texas Strengths: Start-stop quickness, burst with the ball in hands, downfield threat. 2023 Performance: 67 receptions, 883 yards. Draft Projection: Top-32 player, highly sought after for explosive play ability. T'Vondre Sweat, DT, Texas Strengths: Size, strength, run stopping. 2023 Performance: 15 run stops, impactful in the middle. Draft Projection: Top-60 prospect, rising in ranks. Byron Murphy II, DT, Texas Strengths: Explosiveness, penetration ability. 2023 Performance: 11 pressures, five sacks. Draft Projection: Top-60 prospect, gaining attention for disruptive plays. SEC: Georgia at Alabama Date & Time: Saturday, 4 p.m. ET (CBS) Dallas Turner, EDGE, Alabama Strengths: Consistent pass-rushing, ability to create pressure. 2023 Performance: 8 sacks, 38 pressures. Draft Projection: Top-10 player, elite defensive prospect. Chris Braswell, EDGE, Alabama Strengths: Edge rushing, forcing turnovers. 2023 Performance: 8 sacks, 3 forced fumbles. Draft Projection: Early to middle Day 2 prospect. Amarius Mims, OT, Georgia Strengths: Size, pass protection, resilience post-surgery. 2023 Performance: Allowed only five pressures, no sacks. Draft Projection: Top-15 prospect, potential first-round pick. Big Ten: Michigan at Iowa Date & Time: Saturday, 8 p.m. ET (Fox) J.J. McCarthy, QB, Michigan Strengths: Creation ability, underneath passing. 2023 Performance: [Details of his performance, such as passing yards, touchdowns, etc.] Draft Projection: Top-20 player, fourth QB prospect. Kris Jenkins, DT, Michigan Strengths: Run defense and pass-rushing potential. 2023 Performance: Two tackles for loss. Draft Projection: Early- to mid-day two prospect, developing skills. ACC: Louisville at Florida State Date & Time: Saturday, 8 p.m. ET (ABC) Jared Verse, EDGE, Florida State Strengths: Speed-to-power pass rushing, run defense. 2023 Performance: 7 sacks, impactful in recent games. Draft Projection: Top-20 pick, potential to rise in ranks. Keon Coleman, WR, Florida State Strengths: Physicality at the catch point, explosiveness after the catch. 2023 Performance: 11 touchdowns on 46 catches. Draft Projection: Top-10 player, notable for big-play ability. Non-Power Five Championship Players To Watch Conference USA: New Mexico State at Liberty Date & Time: Friday, 7 p.m. ET (CBS Sports) X'Zauvea Gadlin, G, Liberty Strengths: Versatility on the offensive line, strong run-blocking. 2023 Performance: Consistent starting experience, no sacks allowed. Draft Projection: Day 3 pick, solid blocker with experience. MAC: Miami-Ohio at Toledo Date & Time: Saturday, noon ET (ESPN) Quinyon Mitchell, CB, Toledo Strengths: Breakup ability, coverage skills. 2023 Performance: Leads FBS in pass breakups. Draft Projection: Late-Day 2 or early-Day three pick, strong in coverage. Mountain West: Boise State at UNLV Date & Time: Saturday, 3 p.m. ET (Fox) Ricky White, WR, UNLV Strengths: Deep-ball tracking, open-field playmaking. 2023 Performance: 1,300 receiving yards, 7 touchdowns. Draft Projection: Midround pick, potential to return to school. AAC: SMU at Tulane Date & Time: Saturday, 4 p.m. ET (ABC) Michael Pratt, QB, Tulane Strengths: Toughness, playmaking under pressure. 2023 Performance: Tulane's career passing record holder. Draft Projection: Day 3 pick, intriguing skill set. SWAC: Prairie View A&M at Florida A&M Date & Time: Saturday, 4 p.m. ET (ESPN2) Isaiah Major, LB, Florida A&M Strengths: Run defense, gap shooting. 2023 Performance: Leading tackler, 177 tackles and 25 TFLs in two seasons. Draft Projection: Late-round pick or undrafted, special teams potential. Sun Belt: Appalachian State at Troy Date & Time: Saturday, 4 p.m. ET (ESPN) Javon Solomon, EDGE, Troy Strengths: Sack ability, versatile pass-rushing. 2023 Performance: Tied for second in FBS in sacks. Draft Projection: Late-round pick, fits as a 3-4 OLB in the NFL.

Evolving NFL Team Building Strategies Building a successful team in the ever-evolving landscape of the NFL has seen significant shifts, particularly in the approach to the off-season and draft strategies. Traditionally, the backbone of roster construction lay in the gradual accumulation of talent through the NFL Draft, with free agency playing a supporting role. However, recent trends have showcased a change in philosophy, with some franchises adopting a more aggressive stance in both the draft and free agency. Los Angeles Rams: A Case Study in Aggressive Team Building The Los Angeles Rams’ 2021 Super Bowl victory, driven by their bold trade for quarterback Matthew Stafford, exemplifies this new approach, demonstrating that immediate success can be achieved by pushing all chips to the center. Yet, the subsequent season highlighted the risks of such a strategy, as the Rams faced challenges in sustaining their success due to heavy investment in a few key players and depleted draft capital. Blended Approaches: Philadelphia Eagles and Kansas City Chiefs On the other hand, teams like the Philadelphia Eagles and Kansas City Chiefs illustrate a more blended approach. The Eagles, leveraging aggressive moves - like acquiring AJ Brown - and astute draft choices, have managed to strike a balance, propelling them to Super Bowl contention. Similarly, the Chiefs, led by Patrick Mahomes, embody a philosophy of steady, long-term team building through the draft, supplemented by strategic free-agency decisions. This approach, akin to the Patriots' during their dynasty years, suggests a sustainable model for consistent success. The Dynamic NFL Landscape and Future Strategies These varied strategies underscore a more dynamic NFL landscape, where the draft remains a fundamental element but is now part of a broader, more nuanced approach to team building. The key for franchises lies in adapting to this changing environment - balancing the immediacy of free agency acquisitions with the long-term benefits of a well-executed draft strategy - to craft a championship-quality roster. Leveraging Analytical Models and Film Review in the NFL In the intricate and competitive realm of the NFL, the importance of leveraging analytical models and film review for self-scouting and evaluating draft talent is paramount. Every NFL team employs a comprehensive approach, integrating data analysis and detailed film review to understand their team's strengths, weaknesses, and needs. This meticulous process forms the backbone of preparing for the NFL Draft, allowing teams to pinpoint prospects that align with their specific requirements strategically. Team Needs Analysis for the 2024 NFL Draft The Team Needs analysis offered provides an early, insightful overview of potential strategies and considerations for each team ahead of the 2024 NFL Draft. By analyzing positional needs and assessing the current roster, teams can navigate the draft with a clear understanding of which positions require bolstering. This is not just about finding the best talent available; it's about finding the right fit for each team's unique system and future aspirations. Importance of Positional Need Understanding for NFL Teams Additionally, understanding the level of need by position is crucial for NFL General Managers and front-office personnel. This knowledge equips them to prepare for various scenarios, whether trading up for a high-value player or finding hidden gems in later rounds. The positional overview we provide in the below analysis is derived from comprehensive team needs data. This strategic insight is invaluable for making informed decisions that shape the future of NFL franchises. NFL Team Needs Overview The data below is an overview of positional needs for every NFL team. Offensive Linemen (OL): 23% Cornerbacks (CB): 23% Edge Rushers (Edge): 23% Wide Receivers (WR): 14% Defensive Tackles (DT): 14% Quarterbacks (QB): 9% Tight Ends (TE): 9% Other Needs: 8% The current data indicates a substantial demand among NFL teams for bolstering their offensive lines, with 23% of team needs focused on Offensive Linemen (OL). This trend is reflective of the league's emphasis on protecting quarterbacks. Similarly, with the NFL evolving into a predominantly passing league, the same percentage of needs (23%) is directed toward acquiring skilled Cornerbacks (CB) and Edge Rushers (Edge). These positions are critical for enhancing pass defense and applying pressure on opposing quarterbacks. Preliminary Individual NFL Draft Team Needs Analysis Chicago Bears (via CAR) Primary Need: OL Alternate Needs: OT, IOL, WR, TE, Edge Needs Analysis: Focus on interior offensive line and overall depth. Arizona Cardinals Primary Need: CB Alternate Needs: CB, WR, DT, IOL, TE Needs Analysis: Decisions to make regarding tight end and wide receiver positions. New England Patriots Primary Need: QB Alternate Needs: QB, CB, TE, OT, WR Needs Analysis: Require attention to offensive line depth. Chicago Bears Primary Need: OL Alternate Needs: OT, IOL, WR, TE, Edge Needs Analysis: Focus on interior offensive line and overall depth. Washington Commanders Primary Need: EDGE Alternate Needs: Edge, WR, OT, LB, CB Needs Analysis: Necessity for linebacker and depth in various positions. New York Giants Primary Need: OL Alternate Needs: RB, DT, QB, OL, TE Needs Analysis: Emphasis on building around young offensive linemen. Tampa Bay Buccaneers Primary Need: IOL Alternate Needs: QB, IOL, LB, S, CB Needs Analysis: Likely looking for a long-term solution at quarterback. New York Jets Primary Need: OT Alternate Needs: OT, IOL, QB, S, WR Needs Analysis: Consideration for wide receiver and offensive line. Los Angeles Chargers Primary Need: CB Alternate Needs: CB, RB, DT, TE, WR Needs Analysis: Need for depth at receiver and possible changes in the roster. Tennessee Titans Primary Need: OT Alternate Needs: OT, WR, Edge, RB, DT Needs Analysis: Focus on interior defensive line and overall roster depth. Baltimore Ravens Primary Need: IDL Alternate Needs: DT, WR, OG, RB, CB Needs Analysis: Running back as a potential need. Philadelphia Eagles Primary Need: CB Alternate Needs: RB, Edge, WR, LB, CB Needs Analysis: Focus on defensive line. No 1st Round Pick - Carolina Panthers Primary Need: OL Alternate Needs: Edge, WR, CB, LB, IOL Needs Analysis: Focus on offensive improvement and receiving corps. No 1st Round Pick - Cleveland Browns Primary Need: OT Alternate Needs: S, OT, Edge, DT, LB Needs Analysis: Emphasis on defensive backfield and line.

In the high-stakes college football arena, the Michigan vs. Ohio State rivalry boasts rosters teeming with NFL-caliber talent. As we focus on the potential NFL Draft prospects from these prestigious programs, it becomes clear that these two powerhouses could heavily influence the 2024 Draft. With the prospect of as many as 15-20 players from each team being drafted, our analysis centers on key 2024 eligible NFL Draft prospects. Our analysis includes the Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Ceiling Potential grade. The ceiling grade provides our vision of what we think a prospect can develop into at the NFL level. The analysis also incorporates each 2024 NFL Draft prospect's three-year PFF grades. Key 2024 NFL Draft Prospects to Watch Ahead of the Michigan vs. Ohio State Matchup Ohio State Offense Marvin Harrison Jr. - Wide Receiver: A player with an elite ceiling, Marvin Harrison Jr. stands out as a prototypical outside receiver, distinguished by his size, speed, and exceptional ball skills. TreVeyon Henderson - Running Back: Dynamic in both rushing and passing games, TreVeyon Henderson is a two-phase talent, contributing significantly to Ohio State's offensive prowess. Emeka Egbuka - Wide Receiver: Offering versatility and adaptability, Emeka Egbuka is a dynamic and versatile receiver, enhancing Ohio State's offensive strategy. Michigan Offense J.J. McCarthy - Quarterback: With exceptional speed and arm strength, J.J. McCarthy is a highly athletic quarterback, a key player in Michigan's offensive lineup. Blake Corum - Running Back: A versatile running back, Blake Corum adds depth to Michigan's ground game, showcasing skills akin to notable players like Kenneth Walker, JK Dobbins, and Bryce Love. Roman Wilson - Wide Receiver: Known for his vertical threat capability, Roman Wilson is a pivotal part of Michigan's passing offense. Donovan Edwards - Running Back: Complementing Michigan's zone-blocking scheme, Donovan Edwards brings a versatile skill set to the team's rushing attack. Ohio State Defense J.T. Tuimoloau - Defensive End: J.T. Tuimoloau, known for his versatility, physical traits, and pursuit abilities, is a key figure in Ohio State's defensive line. Denzel Burke - Cornerback: As a tall, lanky cornerback with notable speed and physicality, Denzel Burke is a vital part of Ohio State's secondary. Tyleik Williams - Nose Tackle: Effective in a two-gap system, Tyleik Williams's thick build makes him a formidable presence on Ohio State's defensive front. Michigan Defense Mike Sainristil - Cornerback: Versatile in both nickel and press coverage, Mike Sainristil plays a crucial role in Michigan's secondary. Kris Jenkins - Defensive Lineman: A robust and commanding presence on the defensive line, Kris Jenkins excels in run-stopping, bolstering Michigan's defense. Michael Barrett - Linebacker: Known for his versatility and impact at the line of scrimmage, Michael Barrett is a key asset in Michigan's linebacking corps. Ohio State Buckeyes The Ohio State Buckeyes top graded 2024 NFL Draft prospects, according to Football Scout 365. Marvin Harrison Jr. Position: Wide Receiver School: Ohio State Draft Grade: 75.3 Ceiling: Elite Three-Year PFF Grades: 2023 - 89.2, 2022 - 90.2, 2021 - 60.5 Total Snaps in 2023: 591 Play Style/Scheme Fit: Prototypical outside receiver with size, speed, and ball skills. TreVeyon Henderson Position: Running Back School: Ohio State Draft Grade: 66.0 Ceiling: High-End Starter Potential Three-Year PFF Grades: 2023 - 89.3, 2022 - 73.9, 2021 - 81.4 Total Snaps in 2023: 306 Play Style/Scheme Fit: Dynamic two-phase talent, effective in both rushing and passing games. Emeka Egbuka Position: Wide Receiver School: Ohio State Draft Grade: 66.8 Ceiling: High-End Starter Potential Three-Year PFF Grades: 2023 - 73.6, 2022 - 83.1, 2021 - 72.8 Total Snaps in 2023: 345 Play Style/Scheme Fit: Dynamic and versatile receiver. J.T. Tuimoloau Position: Defensive End School: Ohio State Draft Grade: 65.9 Ceiling: High-End Starter Potential Three-Year PFF Grades: 2023 - 73.7, 2022 - 75.1, 2021 - 60.4 Total Snaps in 2023: 561 Play Style/Scheme Fit: Versatile with physical traits and pursuit abilities. Tyleik Williams Position: Nose Tackle School: Ohio State Draft Grade: 63.1 Ceiling: Mid-Level Starter Potential Three-Year PFF Grades: 2023 - 83.1, 2022 - 80.9, 2021 - 75.4 Total Snaps in 2023: 529 Play Style/Scheme Fit: Thickly-built, effective in a two-gap system. Michael Hall Jr. Position: Defensive Lineman School: Ohio State Draft Grade: 61.3 Ceiling: Mid-Level Starter Potential Three-Year PFF Grades: 2023 - 73.8, 2022 - 80.3, 2021 - 60.4 Total Snaps in 2023: 333 Play Style/Scheme Fit: Known for explosiveness and lateral burst. Denzel Burke Position: Cornerback School: Ohio State Draft Grade: 61.6 Ceiling: Mid-Level Starter Potential Three-Year PFF Grades: 2023 - 81.1, 2022 - 67.9, 2021 - 68.8 Total Snaps in 2023: 449 Play Style/Scheme Fit: Tall, lanky cornerback with speed and physicality. Donovan Jackson Position: Interior Lineman School: Ohio State Draft Grade: 62.2 Ceiling: Mid-Level Starter Potential Three-Year PFF Grades: 2023 - 70.0, 2022 - 76.7, 2021 - 68.5 Total Snaps in 2023: 710 Play Style/Scheme Fit: Versatile in both run and pass blocking. Matthew Jones Position: Offensive Guard School: Ohio State Draft Grade: 61.1 Ceiling: Mid-Level Starter Potential Play Style/Scheme Fit: Mauler in run game, patient in pass protection. Jack Sawyer Position: Defensive End School: Ohio State Draft Grade: 57.8 Ceiling: Low-Level Starter Potential Three-Year PFF Grades: 2023 - 88.9, 2022 - 74.0, 2021 - 66.0 Total Snaps in 2023: 492 Play Style/Scheme Fit: High-energy style, suitable for various defensive schemes. Tommy Eichenberg Position: Linebacker School: Ohio State Draft Grade: 56.9 Ceiling: Low-Level Starter Potential Three-Year PFF Grades: 2023 - 63.2, 2022 - 86.8, 2021 - 64.4 Total Snaps in 2023: 547 Play Style/Scheme Fit: Run-defending linebacker with good instincts. Cade Stover Position: Tight End School: Ohio State Draft Grade: 60.5 Ceiling: Mid-Level Starter Potential Three-Year PFF Grades: 2023 - 79.7, 2022 - 69.2, 2021 - 58.2 Total Snaps in 2023: 525 Play Style/Scheme Fit: Inline multi-role tight end, high-effort blocker. Michigan Wolverines The Michigan Wolverines top graded 2024 NFL Draft prospects, according to Football Scout 365. Roman Wilson Position: Wide Receiver School: Michigan Draft Grade: 67.9 Ceiling: High-End Starter Potential Three-Year PFF Grades: 2023 - 86.4, 2022 - 70.5, 2021 - 68.4 Total Snaps in 2023: 371 Play Style/Scheme Fit: Vertical threat capability. J.J. McCarthy Position: Quarterback School: Michigan Draft Grade: 65.6 Ceiling: High-End Starter Potential Three-Year PFF Grades: 2023 - 91.1, 2022 - 77.7, 2021 - 84.0 Total Snaps in 2023: 592 Play Style/Scheme Fit: Highly athletic quarterback with exceptional speed and arm strength. Kris Jenkins Position: Defensive Lineman School: Michigan Draft Grade: 62.9 Ceiling: Mid-Level Starter Potential Three-Year PFF Grades: 2023 - 80.5, 2022 - 80.7, 2021 - 72.4 Total Snaps in 2023: 284 Play Style/Scheme Fit: Robust and commanding presence, thriving in run-stopping. Zak Zinter Position: Offensive Lineman School: Michigan Draft Grade: 64.4 Ceiling: Mid-Level Starter Potential Three-Year PFF Grades: 2023 - 80.0, 2022 - 75.7, 2021 - 66.1 Total Snaps in 2023: 609 Play Style/Scheme Fit: Robust and aggressive style, especially in the run game. Blake Corum Position: Running Back School: Michigan Draft Grade: 64.7 Ceiling: Mid-Level Starter Potential Three-Year PFF Grades: 2023 - 81.5, 2022 - 96.2, 2021 - 89.0 Total Snaps in 2023: 328 Play Style/Scheme Fit: Versatile running back, similar to Kenneth Walker, JK Dobbins, and Bryce Love. Donovan Edwards Position: Running Back School: Michigan Draft Grade: 63.7 Ceiling: Mid-Level Starter Potential Three-Year PFF Grades: 2023 - 67.5, 2022 - 86.9, 2021 - 74.1 Total Snaps in 2023: 284 Play Style/Scheme Fit: Versatile skill set, complements a zone-blocking scheme. Mike Sainristil Position: Cornerback School: Michigan Draft Grade: 63.4 Ceiling: Mid-Level Starter Potential Three-Year PFF Grades: 2023 - 75.8, 2022 - 83.3, 2021 - 60.0 Total Snaps in 2023: 440 Play Style/Scheme Fit: Versatile, adept in nickel and press coverage. Rod Moore Position: Defensive Back School: Michigan Draft Grade: 63.4 Ceiling: Mid-Level Starter Potential Three-Year PFF Grades: 2023 - 67.6, 2022 - 83.8, 2021 - 69.0 Total Snaps in 2023: 280 Play Style/Scheme Fit: Best characterized by his propensity for diagnosing plays. Junior Colson Position: Linebacker School: Michigan Draft Grade: 63.1 Ceiling: Mid-Level Starter Potential Three-Year PFF Grades: 2023 - 78.9, 2022 - 75.5, 2021 - 48.5 Total Snaps in 2023: 452 Play Style/Scheme Fit: Versatile linebacker who thrives in both run defense and pass coverage. Michael Barrett Position: Linebacker School: Michigan Draft Grade: 63.3 Ceiling: Mid-Level Starter Potential Three-Year PFF Grades: Information not provided Total Snaps in 2023: Information not provided Play Style/Scheme Fit: Noted for his versatility, capable of impacting the line of scrimmage off the edge. Cornelius Johnson Position: Wide Receiver School: Michigan Draft Grade: 62.1 Ceiling: Mid-Level Starter Potential Three-Year PFF Grades: 2023 - 86.4, 2022 - 70.5, 2021 - 68.4 Total Snaps in 2023: 371 Play Style/Scheme Fit: His height and ability to track the ball make him a formidable threat in the deep passing game.

Daniel A. Crane's Analysis of NCAA Bylaw 11.6.1 and Its Antitrust Implications: In his Yale Journal on Regulation article "More on Sign Stealing and Antitrust," dated November 14, 2023, Daniel A. Crane examines the antitrust implications of NCAA Bylaw 11.6.1 in light of Michigan Football's sign-stealing allegations. Crane argues that while the rule is not inherently illegal under antitrust laws, its enforcement could face legal scrutiny. He asserts the rule, viewed more as financial than game-related, might restrain competition, leading to antitrust risks. Click To Read About: Michigan Football Sign Stealing - Potential Loophole In NCAA Bylaws? Key Points from Crane's Article: Rule of Reason: Bylaw 11.6.1 is subject to antitrust's rule of reason, adding complexity and unpredictability to its enforcement. Financial Focus: The rule, while not directly mentioning money, impacts financial aspects like scouting. Competition Restraint: Agreements to stop scouting could be illegal under antitrust laws, but Bylaw 11.6.1 avoids this due to its integration into NCAA regulations. Effects Argument: The rule's adherence or violation might affect on-field performance, but its financial motivation remains unchanged. Salary Cap Analogy: Similar to professional sports salary caps, a total ban on scouts is akin to a $0 salary cap and could be anticompetitive. Legal Risks: Enforcing the rule carries antitrust risk; a well-crafted legal complaint could lead to significant proceedings under the Sherman Act. Relevance to Michigan Football's Sign-Stealing Allegations: Crane's analysis indicates that enforcing Bylaw 11.6.1 in cases like Michigan's sign-stealing allegations might encounter antitrust law challenges, raising questions about the rule's legitimacy and NCAA's enforcement approach. In-Depth Breakdown of The Daniel Crane Article On Sign Stealing and Antitrust Daniel A. Crane's article in the Yale Journal on Regulation discusses the antitrust implications of enforcing NCAA Bylaw 11.6.1 in the context of sign-stealing allegations, like those associated with Michigan Football. Crane points out that while some business practices are outright illegal under antitrust laws, a rule prohibiting scouting would be judged under antitrust's rule of reason, which is more nuanced and unpredictable​​. He elaborates that the no-scouting rule is seen more as a financial rule than a game rule. The rule doesn’t directly mention money but aims to prohibit conduct (scouting) that inherently involves financial considerations. For instance, an agreement between schools to discontinue scouting would typically be illegal under antitrust laws as it restrains competition. However, Bylaw 11.6.1 escapes per se illegality because it's part of NCAA’s regulation of college athletics, though it still carries antitrust risks​​. Crane also touches on the effects argument, where adherence or violation of the rule by schools could impact on-field performance. He argues that this doesn’t change the underlying financial motivation of such rules, likening it to rules on player compensation or NIL (Name, Image, Likeness), which were struck down in previous cases​​. He further illustrates his point using the example of salary caps in professional sports, which are legal only due to a statutory labor exemption for collective bargaining. Absent this exemption, such salary caps would violate antitrust laws. This analogy is used to show how a total prohibition on scouts, as in Bylaw 11.6.1, could be seen as a $0 salary cap and thus anti-competitive​​. In conclusion, Crane emphasizes that while there are arguments that the no-scouting rule doesn't violate antitrust laws, enforcing Bylaw 11.6.1 still creates antitrust risk. He suggests that a well-crafted complaint against this rule under the Sherman Act could likely survive a motion to dismiss, leading to discovery and potential legal complications​​. In the context of Michigan Football's sign-stealing allegations, this analysis suggests that the enforcement of Bylaw 11.6.1 could potentially face legal challenges under antitrust law, raising questions about the rule's validity and the NCAA's enforcement actions.

Reviewing The Top 2023 NFL QB Draft Picks: NFL Draft Rookie Review Will Levis Below is a structured overview of former Kentucky QB and current Tennessee Titan QB Will Levis, including his pre-draft scouting report and player comparisons. 2023 Pre-NFL Draft Profile: Position: Quarterback College: Kentucky Height: 6'3 and 7/8" (6037 in scouting notation) Weight: 229 pounds Drafted: Specific draft position not provided in the initial information NFL Career Start: Made a notable debut with four touchdowns in his first game. Demonstrated significant resilience and play-making ability under pressure. Mike Vrabel, Titans coach, has given measured and constructive public assessments of his performance. Scouting Report: Will Levis is compared physically to Josh Allen with a strong arm, suggesting the ability to make powerful throws. As an athlete, he can extend plays and is capable of running with the ball to keep drives alive. Began the 2022 season with a developmental grade, but with the potential for an immediate impact. Primary Scout: Brandon Lundberg Playstyle & Scheme Fit: Levis is adaptable to various offensive schemes, but an offensive system that employs play-action, bootlegs, and read-option would likely best leverage his strengths. Key Strengths: Impressive arm strength. Good mobility. Solid mechanics. Key Weaknesses: Requires improvement in field awareness. Needs to develop better anticipation for plays. Ball placement has room for improvement. Player Comparisons: Josh Allen Ben Roethlisberger Carson Wentz Assessment of Will Levis Based on Early NFL Performance and Scouting Report: Will Levis’ early performances in the NFL have shown flashes of the potential identified in his scouting report. His strong arm is evident from his multi-touchdown debut, and his athleticism has been showcased as he maneuvered within the pocket and extended plays. Arm Strength: The four-touchdown debut underlines his strong arm, enabling him to make impactful plays downfield. Mobility: Despite facing defensive pressure, Levis has used his mobility to evade defenders and extend plays, aligning with his scouting report. Mechanics: His ability to connect on various throws suggests that Levis has brought solid mechanics from college to the NFL. Awareness and Anticipation: Coach Vrabel’s comments indicate that while there are positive signs, Levis has areas to grow regarding game awareness. Ball Placement: There may be inconsistencies as indicated by the Titans' struggles in the red zone, pointing towards Levis's need to refine his ball placement. Playstyle & Scheme Fit: The Titans' offensive strategies seem to accommodate Levis’ strengths, utilizing him in ways that align with the scouting report's recommendations. Developmental Grade and Ceiling Potential: Levis’ performances suggest that he is on track with the projected developmental grade, displaying an "Instant Impact ceiling" potential, as noted by scouts. In conclusion, Will Levis' initial NFL outings reflect the strengths and areas for development that scouts noted. His physical attributes, like arm strength and mobility, have been apparent, while his mechanics have been reliable. As he continues to gain experience and refine his awareness, anticipation, and ball placement, Levis is positioned to grow into the high-ceiling quarterback that his pre-draft assessment predicted. Let us know what you think about our Will Levis rookie review.

Via a Tweet (X) this morning from Dan Wetzel (Yahoo Sports), here is the University of Michigan’s 10-page letter to the Big Ten responding to the sportsmanship investigation. In addition, I summarized the 10-page document below. University of Michigan's Formal Response: The University of Michigan has submitted a tenacious and detailed formal response to a Big Ten investigation notice regarding sportsmanship policy violations. Michigan asserts that any disciplinary action at this stage would be procedurally incorrect and unjustified as the NCAA investigation is still active, and the university has not had the chance to review evidence or respond appropriately. The response emphasizes the limitations NCAA rules impose on Michigan conducting its own probe and asserts the right to further statements as the investigation proceeds. Contention Against Disciplinary Actions: Michigan contends that disciplinary actions based on unproven rule violations would violate the Big Ten Conference Handbook and that any punitive measures against Coach Jim Harbaugh would overstep the Commissioner's authority and lack factual basis. The university also challenges the evidence quality cited in the conference's communication, labeling it as predominantly second or third-hand summaries rather than the tangible evidence required by the Handbook. Advisement on Precedent-Setting: The response also suggests a cautious approach from the Conference in setting precedents, given the potentially widespread nature of in-person scouting and other dubious practices in the league. It points out that if the activities of Connor Stalions are deemed violations, similar actions by other teams may also be rule breaches, as evidenced by decoded signals from a Purdue coach. Commitment to Rules Compliance: Finally, Michigan reiterates its commitment to compliance, stating its readiness to assume responsibility for any confirmed misconduct following the NCAA investigation. However, it maintains that fairness and adherence to the Conference Handbook necessitate a thorough and equitable process for adjudicating violations, mitigating actions, and determining appropriate sanctions. Any disciplinary action without such due process is deemed improper and premature by the university.

Reviewing The Top 2023 NFL QB Draft Picks (C.J. Stroud) Below are all available Football Scout 365 pre-draft and post-draft videos related to former Ohio State QB and current Houston Texan QB C.J. Stroud. I also included his 2023 Football Scout 365 predraft scouting report and player comparisons. Profile: Position: Quarterback College: Ohio State Height: 6’3” Weight: 214 pounds Drafted 2nd overall by the Houston Texans in the 2023 NFL Draft NFL Career Start: He accumulated 1,212 passing yards, six touchdowns, and no interceptions in the first four NFL games. Named NFL Offensive Rookie of the Month for the first month of the 2023 season. He became the fifth offensive player in Texans' history to receive this honor. Emerged as a favorite for the NFL's Offensive Rookie of the Year award in 2023. Scouting Report: Known for accuracy and a strong arm, capable of making tight-window throws. Excels in throwing outside the numbers with precise ball placement. Exhibits excellent arm talent, with the ability to throw with touch at all levels. Responds well to pressure but could utilize his mobility more to extend plays. Player Comparisons: Justin Herbert Joe Burrow Matthew Stafford Pre-Draft Concerns: Scored 18 on the S2 cognition test, below the benchmark of 80, causing concern among NFL teams and analysts. Some teams potentially removed him from their draft boards due to the low cognition test score. His pre-draft journey highlighted resilience and sparked debate on the importance of cognitive test scores versus on-field performance. Assessment of C.J. Stroud Based on Early NFL Performance and Scouting Report: C.J. Stroud's early performance in the NFL indicates that his on-field play has effectively countered pre-draft concerns about his cognitive test scores. His ability to deliver a high volume of passing yards and touchdowns without interceptions demonstrates his aptitude for accuracy and strong decision-making—key attributes noted in his scouting report. The lack of interceptions also suggests that, in practice, his cognitive processing on the field is not impeding his performance. His recognition as the Offensive Rookie of the Month and positioning as a favorite for the Offensive Rookie of the Year award further attests to his capacity to translate his college success to the professional level, akin to the player comparisons with Herbert, Burrow, and Stafford. This performance may also contribute to the ongoing discourse about the relevance of cognitive tests in assessing future NFL success. Arm Strength: Stroud's compiled passing yards suggest that he's utilizing his strong arm effectively, possibly executing challenging throws that showcase his ability to make big plays downfield. Mobility: Without specific mention of rushing stats, the lack of interceptions may imply smart decision-making, which could include knowing when to use his mobility to evade pressure or extend plays. Mechanics: The significant yardage and number of touchdowns without interceptions hint at proficient mechanics, indicating that Stroud is able to execute the Texans' playbook with a high level of technical skill. Awareness and Anticipation: Stroud's clean interception record suggests strong on-field awareness and the ability to anticipate defensive actions, indicating that his cognitive processing during games is effective. Ball Placement: A successful early record, including touchdowns and high completion rates, points to accurate ball placement, which is crucial for connecting effectively with receivers and avoiding turnovers. Playstyle & Scheme Fit: Stroud's adaptability and performance suggest that he's well-suited to the Texans' offensive system, which likely takes advantage of his strengths as highlighted in his scouting report. Developmental Grade and Ceiling Potential: The immediate success Stroud has shown in the NFL, particularly being named Rookie of the Month, suggests that he has not only met but may be exceeding the high expectations set for him. In conclusion, C.J. Stroud's early NFL performances have validated the strengths observed in his scouting report. His arm strength, mechanics, and ball placement are contributing to his success with the Houston Texans. His awareness and anticipation appear to be assets despite pre-draft concerns about cognitive testing. Stroud's adaptation to the professional level and his recognition as an outstanding rookie indicate a potentially higher ceiling than initially projected.

The Michigan football program is under investigation due to allegations related to organized sign-stealing. The NCAA has received evidence from an outside law firm suggesting that the Michigan coaching staff might have been involved in systematic sign-stealing, which would potentially violate NCAA rules. This evidence includes detailed in-person scouting plans and budgetary information. While the evidence does not directly implicate head coach Jim Harbaugh, it indicates a structured approach to potentially circumventing NCAA rules. The core of the investigation revolves around whether Michigan, possibly by using third-party services for scouting (which isn't explicitly prohibited), breached the principles of fair play and competition upheld by the NCAA. Michigan Football Program Investigation: The NCAA's investigation into Michigan's football program brings these nuanced rules into the spotlight. Here's a simplified recap of recent developments: The investigation kick-started when an outside law firm acquired and presented to the NCAA alleged evidence of the Michigan coaching staff's involvement in organized sign-stealing. These revelations have plunged the program into a serious inquiry that could have broader implications than first assumed. The evidence, which outlines detailed in-person scouting plans and budgetary information, does not directly implicate the head coach, Jim Harbaugh. However, it shows a structured approach to possibly circumventing NCAA rules, raising questions about institutional ethics and compliance. The crux of the investigation hinges on understanding the scope of NCAA rules and whether Michigan, by possibly employing third-party services for scouting (an action not categorically banned), violated the spirit of fair play and competition upheld by the NCAA. Understanding NCAA's Stance on Sign Stealing: The NCAA rules do not explicitly prohibit all forms of sign-stealing, and there's a nuanced approach to what is and isn't allowed. Rule 1-11-h (NCAA Football 2023 Rules Book): This rule forbids recording the signals of an opposing team through any audio or video means. However, its scope is limited to individuals in the "team area" during a game, essentially covering players, coaches, and specific staff on the field sidelines. 2022-2023 NCAA Division 1 Manual Bylaw 11.6.1: This bylaw strictly prohibits off-campus, in-person scouting of future opponents within the same season, with specific exceptions. Importantly, this rule seems directly targeted at institutional staff members, not extending to independent spectators or fans. Rule Changes and Implications: Before August 2013, different rules applied to scouting across various sports. A significant change occurred in 2013, standardizing the scouting rules across all sports. This change also removed a ban on paying for scouting services, implying that institutions could now pay third parties for scouting information. The Gray Area In The NCAA Bylaws In essence, while you cannot record signals during the game on the field, institutions appear to be within their rights to hire third parties to scout and even record signals of opponents outside of the actual game area or off-campus. Expect This To Result In New Amendments to Current NCAA Rules This scenario underscores the importance of clarity in NCAA regulations and the ethical responsibilities of associated athletic programs. The investigation into Michigan's activities will likely serve as a precedent for assessing and possibly amending current rules and practices in college sports. Potential Penalties For Michigan Football Sign Stealing Operation? The exact penalties Michigan could face are yet to be determined. Still, they could range from warnings and education requirements to more severe consequences like scholarship reductions or postseason bans, depending on the violation level once the investigations are concluded. NCAA Violation Levels NCAA violations are categorized into three levels based on their severity: Level I (Severe Breach of Conduct): These are the most serious violations and significantly undermine the NCAA's foundational values of fairness, integrity, and student-athlete well-being. Penalties can include scholarship reductions, postseason bans, and financial penalties. Level II (Significant Breach of Conduct): These violations provide more than a minimal but less than a substantial recruiting, competitive, or other advantages. Penalties might include recruiting restrictions, scholarship reductions, and financial penalties. Level III (Breaches of Conduct): These are violations that are isolated or inadvertent and provide no more than a minimal recruiting, competitive or other advantages. Penalties are generally less severe, like warnings or minor recruiting restrictions. Future Developments As the situation unfolds, more information may become available through official channels or recent news updates from the NCAA, Big Ten Conference, or the University of Michigan regarding the investigation and potential penalties.

We are about to enter the month of November, and college football is about to heat up. That said, we are getting closer to the start of the NFL Draft season. Below is the updated 2024 NFL Draft top 50 player rankings. Click here to view the top 50 NFL Draft Big Board player rankings. Top 10 Players In Our Updated Top 50 2024 NFL Draft Big Board 1). Ohio State WR Marvin Harrison Jr., 6'4", 205lbs Summary: Marvin Harrison Jr. stands out as an exceptional wide receiver prospect in the NFL Draft with his unique blend of size, athleticism, and polished route-running skills. His 6-foot-4 solid frame and his speed and agility allow him to separate from defenders and make significant downfield plays. His superior ability to track the ball and secure contested catches makes him a dependable target. His precision in route-running and understanding of defensive coverage, paired with exceptional field awareness, allows him to exploit mismatches and create opportunities. Harrison Jr.'s strong work ethic, high football IQ, and potential for further growth suggest that he's poised to become an immediate impact player in the NFL. 2). Georgia TE Brock Bowers, 6'4", 230lbs Summary: Brock Bowers possesses exceptional athleticism and displays dynamic abilities as a tight end. His remarkable speed and impressive route running skills set him apart. Notably, he consistently delivers a high level of effort and performance. Bowers showcases his versatility by excelling in multiple facets of the tight end position. His exceptional speed and agility allow him to create separation from defenders effectively, while his superb ball-tracking skills make him a serious deep threat. Although there is room for improvement in his blocking abilities, Bowers remains an outstanding prospect overall. His rare skill set positions him to excel at the next level. 3). USC QB Caleb Williams, 6'1", 215lbs Summary: Caleb Williams is one of the most exciting quarterback prospects in recent years. He is currently the top QB on most 2024 NFL Draft boards. With his combination of arm talent, mobility, and football IQ, he has all the tools to be a successful quarterback at the NFL level. His ability to fit into various offensive schemes and make plays under pressure adds to his value. With the right development, he has the potential to be an elite NFL QB. 4). Penn State OT Olumuyiwa Fashanu, 6'6", 308lbs Summary: Fashanu is a formidable offensive tackle, showcasing a blend of strength and physicality that makes him a force to be reckoned with on the line. His hand placement and finishing ability are top-notch, allowing him to outmatch college-level defenders consistently. This prowess suggests that he has the potential to transition into a dominant blocker in the NFL. His run-blocking skills are evident, often paving the way for running backs to exploit gaps. However, a notable area of improvement is his tendency to overextend during pass protection, occasionally leading to sacks. 5). North Carolina QB Drake Maye, 6'4", 225lbs Summary: Drake Maye is a top 2024 NFL Draft prospect with a good blend of size, arm strength, and football IQ. His mechanics are sound, and he displays solid accuracy at all three levels of the field. While not a traditional dual threat, Maye's mobility is solid for his size. Maye has the potential to develop into a successful NFL quarterback and possesses instant-impact player traits that are comparable to top NFL QB's like Justin Herbert or Trevor Lawrence. 6). Notre Dame OT Joe Alt, 6'7", 318lbs Summary: Joe Alt, a versatile offensive tackle prospect from Notre Dame, brings a unique combination of athleticism, size, and a notable sports lineage to the NFL Draft. Standing at 6 feet 7 inches with a solid build, Alt follows in the footsteps of his father, John Alt, a former NFL offensive lineman who enjoyed a successful career with the Kansas City Chiefs. Joe Alt initially played tight end before transitioning to full-time tackle. This background as a tight end contributes to his exceptional athleticism and footwork, allowing him to move fluidly and mirror pass rushers effectively. Alt's length, quickness off the snap, and ability to engage defenders make him a valuable asset in both the passing and running game. He utilizes his long arms and sound technique to excel in pass protection, maintaining separation, and neutralizing rushers effectively. Alt's versatility is showcased by his ability to play both left and right tackle positions, seamlessly adapting to different roles and assignments. 7). UCLA ED Laiatu Latu, 6'5", 265lbs Summary: UCLA edge rusher Laiatu Latu's excellent quickness, body control, and hand usage make him a menacing presence to quarterbacks. At 6'4", 265 lbs, with a 40-time of 4.70 seconds, his athletic profile is solid, and his comeback from a severe neck injury to earn First Team All-Pac-12 and College Football Comeback Player of the Year in 2022 showcases his tenacity. Latu's broad range of pass rush moves and ability to win the edge underline his potential, although concerns exist regarding his power at the point of attack and change of direction. His projection as a Day 1 pick and a winning starter from day one, especially in teams with an odd front scheme, hints at his immediate impact potential in the NFL. Latu's resilience and continuous development hint at a promising professional trajectory as a three-down player with further strength and technique refinement. 8). Illinois Jer'Zhan Newton, 6'2", 295lbs Summary: Jer'Zhan Newton has been recognized for his excellent natural leverage, alignment versatility, and explosiveness, making him a formidable player on the defensive line. His performance in 2022 earned him first-team All-American honors, and he led Power 5 interior defensive linemen in pressures, reflecting his effective pass-rushing skills. His agility, showcased by his torso flexibility, ankle flexion, and active and violent hand usage, contribute to his ability to disrupt plays against the run and the pass. Despite his frame being considered lean for an interior defender, his strengths in leverage, explosiveness, and hand usage enable him to overcome blockers and make significant impacts during games. 9). Alabama CB Kool-Aid McKinstry, 6'1", 195lbs Summary: Kool-Aid McKinstry is a dynamic press-man corner, boasting exceptional foot quickness and fluid hips that enable him to mirror receivers effortlessly. His competitive nature shines at the catch point, consistently battling for pass breakups or interceptions. McKinstry's physicality extends beyond coverage; he's a robust tackler in run support and showcases a fearless blitzing approach. However, he occasionally allows too much separation in trail technique, potentially leaving him vulnerable to vertical threats in the NFL. Overall, McKinstry's athletic prowess positions him as a top-tier outside corner, but his physicality also suggests potential success in the slot. 10). Michigan QB J.J. McCarthy, 6'3", 196lbs Summary: J.J. McCarthy is a promising quarterback prospect out of Michigan, displaying impressive arm strength, good mobility, and a high football IQ. He can throw the ball with power and precision from the pocket or on the move, where he has made some big-time off-platform throws. However, there are areas for improvement, particularly concerning his inconsistency in accuracy, pocket presence, and decision-making about when to pass or run. Despite these areas of development, McCarthy's raw potential suggests he could become a high-level starting quarterback in the NFL. His blend of physical skills, mental acumen, and leadership abilities could position him to make a significant impact at the professional level. Click here to view the top 50 NFL Draft Big Board player rankings.

As we enter the back nine of the 2023 college football season, we are only a few months away from the 2024 NFL Draft season. We have compiled our mid-year college football all-prospect NFL Draft 1st team. Each player listed is eligible for the 2024 NFL Draft. Who is the top player in this year's 2024 NFL Draft class? It is Caleb Williams from USC at the top, followed by North Carolina QB Drake Maye, and we can debate forever who should go 3rd, but it is going to be a log jam in this spot with names like Brock Bowers and Marvin Harrison Jr. along with Notre Dame OT Joe Alt. QB: Caleb Williams, USC (6-1, 215lbs) The Numbers: Caleb Williams has posted 1800+ yards passing and an elite 22/1 TD/INT ratio. If he declares, he remains the projected number-one overall pick in the 2024 NFL Draft. RB: Audric Estime, Notre Dame (5-11, 227lbs) The Numbers: Among all backs with at least 75 rush attempts this season, Estime ranks 3rd in the nation in yards after contact per attempt (4.37). At 5-11, 227lbs, Estime is also excellent in space, forcing missed tackles. Among backs with at least 75 rush attempts, Estime ranks 3rd in forced missed tackles. WR1: Marvin Harrison Jr., Ohio State (6-4, 205lbs) The Numbers: Marvin Harrison Jr. is playing in an offense with a new starter at QB this year in Kyle McCord. McCord has had his ups and downs and is nowhere near the level of player C.J. was a season ago, and that has shown in the data for Marvin Harrison. Regardless, Harrison has put up 500 yards and 4 TD's on the season and remains the WR1 on our NFL Draft board. WR2: Keon Coleman, Florida State (6-4, 215lbs) The Numbers: Coleman is a big-bodied power forward who can run fluid routes. His ability to go up and get the football is a massive reason why we have him ranked as the WR2 through the first half of the college football season. He has 6 TD's on the season, and though he doesn't blow up the stat sheet, his impact has been felt since he arrived in Tallahassee. SlotWR1: Roman Wilson, Michigan (6-0, 192lbs) The Numbers: Wilson is a dynamic athlete who has elevated his route running acumen in a big way. So far in 2023, he is Michigan's top WR and J.J. McCarthy's go-to receiver. He has 8 TD's on the season and has elite QBR when targeted on deep 20+ yard pass plays (158.3). TE1: Brock Bowers, Georgia (6-4, 240lbs) The Numbers: Bowers will be an elite NFL TE on the same level as Travis Kelce and George Kittle. According to high-ranking sources, If Kelce and Kittle were to have a baby, it would be Brock Bowers. Bowers is a do-it-all all TE. He can line up anywhere, block, and run the football if you need him to. He is elite. He leads all TE's in yards on the season with 548, and he has 4 TD's so far. OT1: Joe Alt, Notre Dame (6-7, 318lbs) The Numbers: Joe Alt is a known commodity in a draft that will produce a lot of outstanding tackles. Regardless of the depth, we expect Alt to be the top tackle drafted in the 2024 NFL Draft. Alt is one of the top-graded tackles in the nation and has only allowed 3 pressures on the season, according to PFF. OT2: Taliese Fuaga, Oregon State (6-6, 333lbs) The Numbers: Fuaga is an elite-level mauler in the run game and has improved into a near-elite player as a pass blocker. He is ranked 2nd nationally in PFF offensive grade, right behind Joe Alt. OG1: Zak Zinter, Michigan (6-6, 334lbs) The Numbers: Zinter plays in a diverse pro-style scheme that features a lot of different blocking schemes. Zinter is a balanced blocker in run and pass sets who has allowed only 1 pressure so far on the season. OG2: Cooper Beebe, Kansas State (6-4, 310lbs) The Numbers: Beebe has been a mainstay in our rankings since a season ago. So far on the season, he is grading out as the 4th best OG in pass pro and the 2nd best OG in run blocking among players with at least 100 snaps. OC1: Sedrick Van Pran, Georgia (6-4, 310lbs) The Numbers: Van Pran plays in a run-based power offense. He is a balanced run-and-pass blocker who can make an immediate impact in the NFL as a rookie. According to PFF, he has the 3rd highest offensive grade among OG's.

As we enter the back nine of the 2023 college football season, we are only a few months away from the 2024 NFL Draft season. We have compiled our mid-year college football all-prospect NFL Draft 1st team. Each player listed is eligible for the 2024 NFL Draft. Who is the top defender in this year's 2024 NFL Draft class? Unlike the 2023 NFL Draft, the 2024 NFL Draft does not have that clear dominant defender. Last season, it was Will Anderson and Jalen Carter; this year, there is a ton of talent, but it is still up in the air who is the top overall defender. Mid-Year All NFL Draft Defensive Team IDL1: T'Vondre Sweat, Texas (6-4, 362lbs) The Numbers: Sweat is a big-bodied interior defensive lineman. We list him as our top 3-tech in the 2024 NFL Draft class, and for good reason. We have him graded as an elite run stuffer and a near-elite pass rusher. He is versatile enough to play in the A and B gaps. He has 10 total pressures and one sack on the season so far. IDL2: Jer'Zhan Newton, Illinois (6-2, 295lbs) The Numbers: Newton is another versatile interior player that we can line up in the B gap on one down and flip to the A gap on the next before aligning him over a tackle. According to our internal grading, he is an elite interior pass rusher and run stopper, and according to PFF, he is nearing the elite range on a play-by-play basis. He leads the nation in total pressures (25) among all interior defenders and has recorded 3 sacks. Edge1: Dallas Turner, Alabama (6-4, 242) The Numbers: Turner is the next in a long line of elite-level edge rushers sent to the NFL by Alabama. Turner is an energetic edge player who will align standing up on the edge. He has the athleticism to play in coverage if needed and is an elite pass rusher. So far on the year, he is 3rd nationally in sacks with 7 while he leads the nation in total pressures. Edge2: Laiatu Latu, UCLA (6-5, 265lbs) The Numbers: Latu is putting up elite numbers, and his tape also proves he is a very legit round-one talent. He is an elite pass rusher, and on the season, he ranks 5th in total pressures with 29. ILB1: Deontae Lawson, Alabama (6-2, 230lbs) The Numbers: We might be a bit early on Lawson, but his tape and grades through the midway point of the season provide us with enough to believe he could be a top inside LB prospect in the 2024 NFL Draft if he chose to declare. Lawson is excellent in all three phases at the position; he can run, stop, pass rush, and cover in space. So far on the season, Lawson has posted 10 pressures with 2 sacks and has stuffed the run 25 times with only one missed tackle. ILB1: Power Echols, North Carolina (6-0, 225lbs) The Numbers: Echols is another player we are higher on than other outlets, and for good reason. He is solid vs the run, he can pass rush, but where he is elite from the LB position is in coverage. He has one INT on the season and has given up a low 38.8 NFL passer rating when targeted on 15 targets in 2023. CB1: Kris Abrams-Draine, Mizzou (5-11, 178lbs) The Numbers: Abrams Drain is a solid physical press-man corner. Teams have targeted him 10 times in man-to-man coverage, and he has surrendered one catch. CB2: Cooper DeJean, Iowa (6-1, 207) The Numbers: DeJean projects as a safety on some draft boards, but he has the athleticism to play corner, and coming from the zone-heavy Iowa defense, he is an absolute ball-hawking playmaker. He has 2 picks and an elite 32.8 NFL passer rate when targeted. In 2022, DeJean posted 3 pick sixes. While he has not run a pick back yet for a TD in 2023, he does have a punt return for a TD. Nickel1: Mike Sainristil, Michigan (5-10, 182lbs) The Numbers: Michigan has produced some solid slot corners in recent years; most notable was Dax Hill. The question post-Dax Hill, who would replace him? In came the converted WR Mike Sainristil in 2022. In 2023, his second year at the position, Sainristil has 2 INT's and two defensive TD's. He has a sack and three total pressures through the season's mid-way point. His value in coverage and his ability to support in-run defense are a big reason this Michigan defense plays at such an elite level in 2023. Safety1: Calen Bullock, USC (6-3, 190lbs) The Numbers: Bullock provides the versatility you want from a safety in today's football. He can play deep safety, in the box like an additional LB, or in the slot. He is an elite-level defender in coverage in 2023, giving up a low 78.1 NFL passer rating when targeted. He has 1 pick and, 5 PBU's and two defensive TD's. Safety2: Jaylin Simpson, Auburn (6-1, 178) The Numbers: Just like Bullock at USC, Simpson provides versatility at deep safety, in the box, and in the slot as needed. Simpson is a solid man-to-man defender but elite as a zone defender. He surrenders an elite 21.3 NFL passer rating when targeted in zone. He has 4 total INT's to this point in the 2023 season.

Week four of the 2023 college football season is over; we have more names to add to our 2024 NFL Draft watch list after another week of college football. Throughout the 2023 college football season, we will examine the weekly 2024 NFL draft-eligible prospects whose stock is rising or who need to be on the radar after a big performance. Some of these players may already be in the top 50 NFL Draft rankings; many will be in the unpublished top 100 to be released at a later date. As the season progresses, many of the prospects we add will be guys performing at a high level weekly and less about the single-game performances. The 2024 NFL Draft Big Board is Live 2024 NFL Draft Big Board Spotlight Player of The Week Florida State WR Keon Coleman This Week's 2024 NFL Draft Watch Prospects Of The Week Florida State WR Keon Coleman vs. Clemson Wk Grade: Near Elite Summary: Keon Coleman did not finish the week with a perfect elite grade but continues to be elite on the big stage. Against the Seminoles this past Saturday, Coleman had 5 catches on 9 targets, 86 yards, and two TD's including the eventual game-winner. Coleman is a big-bodied yet athletic receiver you can line up in the slot or out wide. He can body defenders, and he is a solid route runner. Oregon QB Bo Nix vs. Colorado Wk Grade: Near Elite Summary: Oregon smashed Colorado at home, and Bo Nix led the way, racking up 286 passing yards, and completing 86% of his passes with three TD's. He did have the one INT, which is why he did not earn an Elite grade. Michigan Nickel Safety Mike Sainristil vs. Rutgers Wk Grade: Near Elite Summary: Sainristil started the game by giving up a long TD to Rutgers, one that he should have had some help over the top from his safety. He eventually atoned for his mistake with an awesome pick-six that changed the game's momentum. Penn State ED Chop Robinson vs. Iowa Wk Grade: Elite Summary: A player to watch, Robinson can get after the QB. Against the Hawkeyes, he pass-rushed 14 times with three total pressures. He had two hits on the QB and a sack. Alabama ED Dallas Turner vs. Ole Miss Wk Grade: Elite Summary: Turner played 56 total snaps vs. Ole Miss. He was sent on a pass rush 34 times, racking up five pressures and 2 sacks.