← Back to NFL Draft Big Board Malik Muhammad Texas HT: 6000 WT: 190 YR: JR POS: CB OVR RK 60 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL KEY STRENGTHS Versatility in Coverage Instinctive and Aware Fluid Hips and COD KEY CONCERNS Turnover Production Technique vs. Vertical Routes Eye Discipline vs. Play Action PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT Muhammad is a twitch-driven, ultra-competitive man coverage defender with exceptional short-area agility and outstanding mirror ability. His smooth hips, elite footwork, and downhill speed allow him to frustrate receivers at all three levels. He displays very good awareness in zone and strong positional flexibility inside or outside. However, occasional over-aggression on double moves and play-strength development limit his current polish. He projects as an early-impact starter in press-man or match coverage schemes. PLAYER COMPARISON: CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS High-End Starter Potential (65-69) A player expected to become a top-tier starter within their first few years. They possess strong physical tools and good technical skills but may have some limitations in their game. With development, they can reach near-elite levels and provide consistent impact at their position. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Grade Scale Football Scout 365 grades reflect a prospect’s projected long-term NFL value and role. Draft ranges are general value projections, not predictions of an exact selection. Positional value, team needs, scheme fit, medical information and athletic testing can influence where a player is ultimately selected. How Football Scout 365 Grades NFL Draft Prospects Elite (75+): A rare, high-impact prospect with elite physical tools, advanced football intelligence and the ability to make an immediate NFL impact. Elite prospects carry franchise-altering potential and typically project as top 5–10 selections in the first round. Near Elite (70–74): A high-caliber prospect with outstanding physical tools, strong football intelligence and only minor developmental limitations. Near Elite prospects project as significant early-career contributors with Pro Bowl upside and first-round draft value. High-End Starter Potential (65–69): A starting-caliber prospect with strong physical tools, quality technical skills and a defined NFL role. These players may require development before reaching their ceiling but generally carry second- or third-round draft value. Mid-Level Starter Potential (60–64): A solid prospect with NFL-level tools and a pathway to becoming a dependable starter if key limitations are addressed. These players generally carry third- to fifth-round draft value. Low-Level Starter Potential (55–59): A developmental prospect who could become a low-end starter, high-end backup or valuable specialist in the right role. These players generally carry fifth- to seventh-round draft value. Backup Level (50–54): A depth or rotational prospect with enough functional ability to compete for an NFL roster spot but limited long-term starting potential. These players generally project as late Day 3 selections or priority undrafted free agents. Not NFL Level (Below 50): A developmental or camp prospect who does not currently demonstrate enough consistency, technical refinement or functional NFL traits to project as a regular contributor. These players generally project as undrafted free agents, practice-squad candidates or camp invitations. Draft position can vary based on positional value, team needs, scheme fit, medical evaluation and athletic testing.

2023 NFL Draft: NFL Mock Draft 2.1 | Post-Combine Edition | Seahawks Trade Up? Rodgers Traded? The Bears Trade The First Pick To Seattle? Mock Draft 2.1 is here; in our last edition, the Bears traded Justin Fields to the Falcons and drafted C.J. Stroud. In version 2.1, the bears trade the number one overall pick to the Seattle Seahawks, picking up both 2023 1st-round picks with additional future draft capital. The Seahawks Have A Bridge QB In Place Seattle is in the best position to draft a developmental QB after signing QB Geno Smith to a 3-year deal. Houston Takes C.J. Stroud #2 Overall Ohio State QB C.J. Stroud goes number two overall to the Houston Texans. After an excellent display of his mechanics and accuracy at the NFL Combine, the Texans select C.J. Stroud 2nd overall. The Carolina Panthers Trade Up To Draft Bryce Young In a draft day surprise, the Carolina Panthers trade up to grab Bryce Young ahead of the Indianapolis Colts. In a draft day surprise, the Panthers trade a future 1st round pick with their 2023 1st round pick and additional future draft capital to move ahead of the Colts. The Colts Still Draft A QB at 4th Overall In back-to-back mock drafts, we have 4 QB's going in the top 5 again, a trend we believe will continue in many mock drafts leading up to the 2023 NFL Draft. The Packers Trade Aaron Rodgers The New York Jets trade their 2023 1st round pick to the Green Bay Packers with additional future draft capital. The Jets are a young and talented team that is a QB away from being a threat to contend in the AFC. Click here to check out the Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Big Board. Click here to View all of our NFL Draft content in one place. First Round 2023 NFL Mock Draft (1). Seattle Seahawks (Via CHI) Select: QB Anthony Richardson | Florida Team Needs: G, C, DL Pending Free Agents: QB Geno Smith, RB Rashaad Penny, DL Poona Ford, OG Phil Haynes, QB Drew Lock Analysis: Anthony Richardson goes number one overall after a spectacular NFL Combine performance. He will sit behind Geno Smith, who just signed a three-year contract, and get a chance to develop. (2). Houston Texans Select: QB C.J. Stroud | Ohio State Team Needs: QB, C, DL Pending Free Agents: TE O.J. Howard, EDGE Ogbonnia Okoronkwo, DL Rasheem Green, TE Jordan Akins Analysis: Houston gets their QB of the future. Stroud had a phenomenal NFL Combine where he showed off his mechanics and accuracy. (3). Carolina Panthers (via AZ) Select: QB Bryce Young | Alabama Team Needs: QB, RB, TE, ED Pending Free Agents: QB Sam Darnold, DL Matthew Ioannidis, C Bradley Bozeman, LB Cory Littleton Analysis: In a trade with the Cardinals, The Panthers skip past the Indianapolis Colts to snag their QB of the now and the future. (4). Indianapolis Colts Select: QB Will Levis | Kentucky Team Needs: QB, OL Pending Free Agents: EDGE Yannick Ngakoue, WR Parris Campbell, OG Matt Pryor, LB Bobby Okereke, E.J. Speed Analysis: New Indianapolis Colts Head Coach Shane Steichen lands a high-ceiling QB. Will Levis would fit perfectly in a similar style of offense as Jalen Hurts. (5). Chicago Bears (via SEA) Select: EDGE Will Anderson Jr. | Alabama Team Needs: WR, TE, OL, DL, LB, DB Pending Free Agents: RB David Montgomery, C Sam Mustipher, WR N'Keal Harry, WR Dante Pettis Analysis: The Bears are in a perfect position to draft an elite edge rusher. (6). Detroit Lions Select: CB Christian Gonzalez | Oregon Team Needs: DI, LB, CB Pending Free Agents: WR DJ Chark, RB Jamaal Williams, LB Alex Anzalone, OG Evan Brown, CB Mike Hughes Analysis: The Lions could draft Jalen Carter as they did in my mock 2.0, but the 2.1 version considers his recent indiscretions, and the Lions get cold feet. Carter has been the number one overall pick on our board since November. The Lions decided to take the top CB on the board instead. (7). Las Vegas Raiders Select: CB Devon Witherspoon | Illinois Team Needs: QB, OL, DB Pending Free Agents: RB Josh Jacobs, CB Rock Ya-Sin, LB Denzel Perryman, WR Mack Hollins, EDGE Clelin Ferrell Analysis: The Raiders are in a bit of no man's land and need a QB. The way the board has fallen, the Raiders could be in the market for a free-agent QB, or they might have to roll with Jarrett Stidham. In this scenario, the Raiders could trade back if someone is interested, or they can fill their need at defensive back. (8). Atlanta Falcons Select: Edge Nolan Smith | Georgia Team Needs: WR, TE, OL, DL, LB, DB Pending Free Agents: RB David Montgomery, C Sam Mustipher, WR N'Keal Harry, WR Dante Pettis Analysis: Nolan Smith jumped back into the top ten of our rankings after his elite NFL Combine performance. The Falcons get the versatile edge rusher that they desperately need. (9). Arizona Cardinals (Via CAR) Select: Edge Tyree Wilson | Texas Tech Team Needs: G, C, ED, CB Pending Free Agents: EDGE J.J. Watt, WR A.J. Green, OT Kelvin Beachum, CB Byron Murphy, C Rodney Hudson Analysis: Edge rusher Tyree Wilson could be the top edge rusher in the class when it's all said and done. Getting him at nine overall is an incredible value. (10). Philadelphia Eagles Select: IDL Jalen Carter | Georgia Team Needs: WR, G, C, IDL Pending Free Agents: DL Javon Hargrave, CB James Bradberry, RB Miles Sanders, C Jason Kelce, DL Fletcher Cox Analysis: Stop the steal. The Eagles arguably get the top defender in the draft. Jalen Carter is considered the top interior defender and will fill a massive need. (11). Tennessee Titans Select: OT Paris Johnson Jr. | Ohio State Team Needs: WR, T, ED Pending Free Agents: TE Austin Hooper, OG Nate Davis, TE Geoff Swaim, LB David Long, DL Teair Tart Analysis: The Titans need an OT to replace Taylor Lewan. They could go with an edge rusher in this spot. (12). Houston Texans Select: WR Jaxon Smith-Njigba | Ohio State Team Needs: QB, C, DL Pending Free Agents: TE O.J. Howard, EDGE Ogbonnia Okoronkwo, DL Rasheem Green, TE Jordan Akins Analysis: The Texans drafted their QB of the future. Now they pair him with one of his favorite targets in college. (13). Green Bay Packers (Via NYJ) Select: EDGE Myles Murphy | Clemson Team Needs: WR, TE, ED, LB Pending Free Agents: WR Allen Lazard, TE Robert Tonyan Jr., OT Elgton Jenkins, S Adrian Amos, DL Dean Lowry Analysis: The Packers now have two first-round picks after trading Aaron Rodgers. (14). New England Patriots Select: WR Jordan Addison | USC Team Needs: QB, T, ED Pending Free Agents: OT Isaiah Wynn, RB Damien Harris, CB Myles Bryant, CB Jonathan Jones, WR Jakobi Meyers Analysis: The Patriots need to draft a WR, Bill will find a way to pass on a WR for the best available DB or OL, and then he will shock the world and draft Stetson Bennett in the 2nd or 3rd round. (15). Green Bay Packers Select: WR Quentin Johnston | TCU Team Needs: WR, TE, ED, LB Pending Free Agents: WR Allen Lazard, TE Robert Tonyan Jr., OT Elgton Jenkins, S Adrian Amos, DL Dean Lowry Analysis: Drafting a WR in this spot to support Jordan Love in the post-Aaron Rodgers era will be the likely route here. Many believe this will be a TE like Michael Mayer, and rightfully so, but Johnston has a true WR1 upside that could create a nice dup at WR with Christian Watson. (16). Washington Commanders Select: Peter Skoronski | Northwestern Team Needs: QB, G, C, LB Pending Free Agents: DL Daron Payne, QB Taylor Heinicke, OG Wes Schweitzer, LB Cole Holcomb, OG Trai Turner Analysis: Skoronski measured more like an interior guard than an OT, but he does bring positional versatility and can flip inside or outside as needed. (17). Pittsburgh Steelers Select: OT Dawand Jones | Ohio State Team Needs: T, LB, CB Pending Free Agents: DL Larry Ogunjobi, LB Devin Bush, DL Chris Wormley, CB Cam Sutton, QB Mason Rudolph Analysis: With essentially two first-round picks after the Dolphins forfeited pick, the Steelers have an excellent opportunity to capitalize. With apparent needs on the offensive line, they can also grab a top cornerback. (18). Detroit Lions Select: EDGE Bryan Bresee | Clemson Team Needs: DL, LB, CB Pending Free Agents: WR DJ Chark, RB Jamaal Williams, LB Alex Anzalone, OG Evan Brown, CB Mike Hughes Analysis: After getting a lockdown CB with their first pick, the Lions grab a freakish interior defender who can play all along the front. (19). Tampa Bay Bucs Select: OT Broderick Jones | Georgia Team Needs: QB, TE, G, C, DI Pending Free Agents: QB Tom Brady, LB Lavonte David, DL Akiem Hicks, WR Julio Jones, CB Sean Bunting, S Mike Edwards Analysis: Whoever is under center in 2023 will need to be better protected than Brady was in 2022. Drafting an OL here makes sense, but you must start rebuilding the defense. (20). Chicago Bears (via SEA) Select: RB Bijan Robinson | Texas Team Needs: WR, TE, OL, DL, LB, DB Pending Free Agents: RB David Montgomery, C Sam Mustipher, WR N'Keal Harry, WR Dante Pettis Analysis: The Bears snag an elite backfield mate to pair with Justin Fields. *Dolphins Forefeit Pick (21). Los Angeles Chargers Select: WR Zay Flowers | Boston College Team Needs: WR, T, LB, CB Pending Free Agents: DL Jerry Tillery, S Nasir Adderley, RB Sony Michel, LB Drue Tranquill, TE Donald Parham Analysis: The Chargers need help at CB and could use a WR. There is an argument that they could draft an edge rusher with Khalil Mack in his 30s and Joey Bosa's injury-plagued 2022; the Chargers need some youthful depth. (22). Baltimore Ravens Select: CB Joey Porter Jr. | Penn State Team Needs: WR, ED, CB Pending Free Agents: CB Marcus Peters, QB Lamar Jackson, OT Ja'Wuan James, CB Kyle Fuller Analysis: The Ravens grab a lengthy physical DB to solidify their secondary. (23). Minnesota Vikings Select: CB Kelee Ringo | Georgia Team Needs: DI, LB, CB Pending Free Agents: TE Irv Smith Jr., RB Alexander Mattison, CB Patrick Peterson, C Garrett Bradbury, WR Olabisi Johnson Analysis: The Vikings need help in their secondary. Ringo is a physical DB who can be an impact player in year one. (24). Jacksonville Jaguars Select: OT Anton Harrison | Oklahoma Team Needs: G, C, DB Pending Free Agents: TE Evan Engram, OT Jawaan Taylor, EDGE Arden Key, EDGE Dawuane Smoot, CB Tre Herndon Analysis: Jags grab the best available OT here. (25). New York Giants Select: WR Jalin Hyatt | Tennessee Team Needs: WR, TE, C, LB Pending Free Agents: QB Daniel Jones, RB Saquon Barkley, DL Dalvin Tomlinson, WR Sterling Shepard, WR Darius Slayton Analysis: The Giants possess decent draft capital. They have needs at WR and TE. The need a dynamic WR to help them stretch the field. (26). Dallas Cowboys Select: LB Trenton Simpson | Clemson Team Needs: WR, DL, LB Pending Free Agents: TE Dalton Schultz, RB Tony Pollard, OT Terence Steele, WR Noah Brown, LB Leighton Vander Esch Analysis: The Cowboys could use upgrades on the OL, but they could also add an elite TE in Michael Mayer to pair with CeeDee Lamb. They can also draft a versatile off-ball LB. (27). Buffalo Bills Select: S/Slot CB Brian Branch | Alabama Team Needs: G, C, DB Pending Free Agents: S Jordan Poyer, LB Tremaine Edmunds, QB Case Keenum, C Mitch Morse, OG Rodger Saffold Analysis: The Bills need to improve their offensive line, but they could also use a pass rusher. If Poyer is moving on, they can go safety in this spot if Brian Branch is still available. (28). Cincinnati Bengals Select: Jahmyr Gibbs | Alabama Team Needs: T, DI, CB Pending Free Agents: S Jessie Bates III, TE Hayden Hurst, CB Eli Apple, S Vonn Bell, RB Samaje Perine Analysis: With the Bengals front office not likely committing to Joe Mixon, why not grab the speed of Jahmyr Gibbs to pair with Burrow and Chase? (29). New Orleans Saints Select: Edge Lukas Van Ness | Iowa Team Needs: QB, DI, CB Pending Free Agents: DL David Onyemata, EDGE Marcus Davenport, WR Jarvis Landry, RB Mark Ingram, QB Andy Dalton Analysis: The Saints have options to replace the often-injured Marcus Davenport. (30). Philadelphia Eagles Select: IOL Steve Avila | TCU Team Needs: WR, G, C Pending Free Agents: DL Javon Hargrave, CB James Bradberry, RB Miles Sanders, C Jason Kelce, DL Fletcher Cox Analysis: The Super Bowl runner-up and a team with many potential pending free agents and Center Jason Kelce, who is mulling the idea of retiring. The Eagles need to find their Kelce replacement in the middle of their offensive line. With other needs at CB and the potential that James Bradberry could move on, the Eagles will have some solid options. (31). Kansas City Chiefs Select: Edge Keion White | Georgia Tech Team Needs: WR, DL, EDGE Pending Free Agents: OT Orlando Brown Jr., WR Mecole Hardman, WR Juju Smith-Schuster, S Juan Thornhill Analysis: The Super Bowl champs have a young defense with great potential and could use a WR. But after releasing Frank Clark, they need to add another pass rusher.

← Back to NFL Draft Big Board Ozzy Trapilo Boston College HT: 6080 WT: 321 YR: JR POS: OT OVR RK 58 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 7 KEY STRENGTHS Elite Size & Length Physical Run Blocker Technically Sound KEY CONCERNS Limited Athleticism Balance Issues in Space Can Be Stiff in Redirecting PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT Trapilo is a massive, technically sound offensive tackle with NFL bloodlines and extensive starting experience. His anchor, play strength, and hand technique make him an ideal fit for gap/power-heavy run schemes, particularly at right tackle. While his athleticism is only average and he struggles with lateral quickness in pass protection, he has a strong understanding of angles and positioning, making him a dependable pass blocker. His best NFL projection is as a starter at right tackle or a versatile backup who can provide depth across the offensive line. PLAYER COMPARISON: CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS High-End Starter Potential (65-69) A player expected to become a top-tier starter within their first few years. They possess strong physical tools and good technical skills but may have some limitations in their game. With development, they can reach near-elite levels and provide consistent impact at their position. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Grade Scale Football Scout 365 grades reflect a prospect’s projected long-term NFL value and role. Draft ranges are general value projections, not predictions of an exact selection. Positional value, team needs, scheme fit, medical information and athletic testing can influence where a player is ultimately selected. How Football Scout 365 Grades NFL Draft Prospects Elite (75+): A rare, high-impact prospect with elite physical tools, advanced football intelligence and the ability to make an immediate NFL impact. Elite prospects carry franchise-altering potential and typically project as top 5–10 selections in the first round. Near Elite (70–74): A high-caliber prospect with outstanding physical tools, strong football intelligence and only minor developmental limitations. Near Elite prospects project as significant early-career contributors with Pro Bowl upside and first-round draft value. High-End Starter Potential (65–69): A starting-caliber prospect with strong physical tools, quality technical skills and a defined NFL role. These players may require development before reaching their ceiling but generally carry second- or third-round draft value. Mid-Level Starter Potential (60–64): A solid prospect with NFL-level tools and a pathway to becoming a dependable starter if key limitations are addressed. These players generally carry third- to fifth-round draft value. Low-Level Starter Potential (55–59): A developmental prospect who could become a low-end starter, high-end backup or valuable specialist in the right role. These players generally carry fifth- to seventh-round draft value. Backup Level (50–54): A depth or rotational prospect with enough functional ability to compete for an NFL roster spot but limited long-term starting potential. These players generally project as late Day 3 selections or priority undrafted free agents. Not NFL Level (Below 50): A developmental or camp prospect who does not currently demonstrate enough consistency, technical refinement or functional NFL traits to project as a regular contributor. These players generally project as undrafted free agents, practice-squad candidates or camp invitations. Draft position can vary based on positional value, team needs, scheme fit, medical evaluation and athletic testing.

Notre Dame Overpowers Indiana to Secure Historic Playoff Victory In the first on-campus College Football Playoff game in history, No. 7 Notre Dame delivered a commanding 27-17 victory over No. 10 Indiana, propelled by a record-setting performance from running back Jeremiah Love and a suffocating defensive effort. The Fighting Irish (12-1) showcased the dominant physicality and defensive prowess that fueled their 11-game win streak, while Indiana’s (11-2) magical season ended under the weight of Notre Dame’s relentless attack. With the win, Marcus Freeman’s team advances to face SEC champion Georgia in the Sugar Bowl, taking one step closer to a national title. Setting the Tone Early On Notre Dame’s third play from scrimmage, Jeremiyah Love broke loose for a 98-yard touchdown run, tying the school record set in 2015 and marking the longest run in CFP history. Love’s sprint gave Notre Dame an immediate 7-0 lead and electrified the crowd at Notre Dame Stadium, where snowflakes danced in the brisk December air. “I was looking up at the video board — he wasn’t going to catch me,” Love said. Although Love reinjured his knee in the first half, his eight-carry, 108-yard performance set the tone for Notre Dame’s offense. The Irish controlled the trenches early, capitalizing on their offensive line’s strength against an Indiana defense that had been one of the nation’s best at limiting rushing yards before contact. A Defensive Clinic Notre Dame’s defense lived up to its reputation, neutralizing Indiana’s balanced offense from the opening whistle. Xavier Watts intercepted Indiana quarterback Kurtis Rourke on the Hoosiers’ first drive, setting the stage for a dominant defensive effort. Rourke, who entered the game with one of the nation’s top passing grades, struggled under constant pressure from Notre Dame’s front seven. He finished 20 of 33 for 215 yards with two late touchdowns, one interception, and minimal support from a ground game that managed just 63 rushing yards. “They took it to us,” Indiana coach Curt Cignetti said. “Their defense suffocated our offense until the last 1:50 or whatever.” Notre Dame’s defense, ranked among the best in the nation, held Indiana’s high-scoring offense to a single field goal until the final two minutes. Leonard’s Leadership Shines Notre Dame quarterback Riley Leonard rebounded from an early interception to deliver a composed performance. He accounted for two touchdowns—one passing, one rushing—and managed the game efficiently, finishing with 201 passing yards and 30 rushing yards. Leonard’s fourth-quarter touchdown run broke the school’s single-season record for rushing touchdowns by a quarterback, further cementing his status as a leader of this playoff-bound team. “We’re just trying to stay alive and play as many games as we can,” Leonard said. “This is why I came here—to play for a [national] championship.” Initial Thoughts vs. Reality Before the game, Notre Dame’s ability to dominate the trenches with their rushing attack and defense was seen as the key to victory. That prediction proved accurate, as Love’s early touchdown and the defense’s smothering performance dictated the game’s outcome. Indiana’s balanced offense, led by Kurtis Rourke and running back Jaylin Lucas, was expected to challenge Notre Dame’s defense. However, the Hoosiers’ struggles in the run game (63 yards) and inability to handle Notre Dame’s pass rush left them unable to mount a consistent attack. The implied score of 27-21 closely mirrored the final result of 27-17, but Notre Dame’s defense outperformed expectations by holding Indiana to 17 points—most of which came in garbage time. Key Stats Notre Dame: Jeremiah Love: 8 carries, 108 yards, 1 TD (98-yard run) Riley Leonard: 23 of 32, 201 passing yards, 1 TD, 1 INT; 30 rushing yards, 1 TD Xavier Watts: 1 INT, 3 tackles Indiana: Kurtis Rourke: 20 of 33, 215 yards, 2 TD, 1 INT Rushing Offense: 63 yards (3.0 YPC) Mikail Kamara: 1 sack, 4 pressures What’s Next? Notre Dame will face No. 2 Georgia in the Sugar Bowl on New Year’s Day, looking to advance to the CFP semifinals and keep their national championship hopes alive. With their defense firing on all cylinders and a potent rushing attack, the Irish are poised to challenge the Bulldogs. For Indiana, the loss caps an incredible turnaround season under first-year head coach Curt Cignetti. While falling short of the ultimate goal, the Hoosiers set a single-season school record for wins and re-established themselves as a program on the rise. “No one’s as disappointed as I am, but this team accomplished things no other Indiana team did,” Cignetti said. As the snowflakes settled over South Bend, Notre Dame celebrated not just a win, but a historic moment in their storied program—a victory that could propel them to even greater heights.

2027 NFL Draft WR Rankings: Who Is WR2 Behind Jeremiah Smith? Jeremiah Smith is the clear WR1 in the 2027 NFL Draft, but the race for WR2 remains open. Cam Coleman, Ryan Coleman-Williams, Charlie Becker, and the rest of the summer board are evaluated through film, production, translatable traits, and projected NFL role. Watch: 2027 NFL Draft WR Rankings — Who Is WR2 Behind Jeremiah Smith? The early 2027 NFL Draft WR rankings are led by Ohio State’s Jeremiah Smith, who enters summer scouting as the rare top-of-board talent in the group. Behind him, the class has the size and depth to become one of the strongest WR groups in recent cycles, with bigger-bodied perimeter targets like former Auburn, now Texas WR Cam Coleman and Indiana’s Charlie Becker giving the top tier real NFL starter upside. Alabama’s Ryan Coleman-Williams adds a different profile as an explosive vertical separator who could push closer to Smith’s range if he cleans up the hands, play strength, and consistency questions during the 2026 season. For Football Scout 365, this ranking is not just about raw grade. Wide receiver value depends on WR archetype, role clarity, ball skills, route development, play strength, alignment usage, and whether each player can win in a way that translates to NFL coverage. This summer checkpoint is built to separate true WR1 candidates, boundary X targets, vertical Z threats, slot/Z separators, and possession receivers before the 2026 tape gives us the next major grading update. Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Hub Preview The 2027 NFL Draft Hub is an all-in-one tool built around the Big Board, team needs analysis, and an early predictive mock draft. The Big Board adds a deeper scouting layer, including player grades, in-depth player comparisons, film-room-style video analysis, video profiles, and scheme-fit projections for top 2027 NFL Draft prospects. More Early 2027 NFL Draft Positional Rankings The 2027 NFL Draft position rankings organize the class by position, grade tier, scheme fit, and NFL projection. 2027 NFL Draft QB Rankings 2027 NFL Draft RB Rankings 2027 NFL Draft WR Rankings 2027 NFL Draft TE Rankings 2027 NFL Draft OL Rankings 2027 NFL Draft DL Rankings 2027 NFL Draft LB Rankings 2027 NFL Draft DB Rankings 2027 NFL Draft Early WR Rankings: Summer Scouting Tier Grade: Elite Rare, high-impact prospect with immediate star potential. Elite traits, advanced polish, and minimal weaknesses give this player franchise-altering upside. 1). Jeremiah Smith | Ohio State | 6'3", 223lbs Archetype: Primary Alpha WR Scouting Report: Jeremiah Smith is a rare WR1 prospect with the size, vertical speed, ball skills, and play strength to win as a true boundary X. He can stretch coverage, finish through contact, and separate well enough underneath to avoid being a catch-point-only receiver. His 2026 checkpoint is refinement: press releases, blocking consistency, and routine-play focus across a full alpha WR workload. Tier Grade: Near Elite High-caliber prospect with Pro Bowl-level upside. Strong physical tools, football IQ, and consistency project this player as a major contributor by Year 2. 2). Cam Coleman | Texas | 6’3”, 201 lbs Archetype: Vertical Boundary WR Scouting Report: Cam Coleman is a high-upside boundary X with vertical speed, ball tracking, catch radius, and contested-catch ability. He can stack coverage, win above the rim, and create red-zone stress as a primary outside target. His 2026 checkpoint is refinement: sharper press releases, better short-area route detail, and fewer routine focus drops. 3). Ryan Coleman-Williams | Alabama | 6’0”, 178 lbs Archetype: Lean-Frame Vertical Separator Scouting Report: Ryan Coleman-Williams is an explosive vertical Z with speed, release quickness, deep-ball tracking, and YAC value. He fits best in a spread or motion-heavy vertical system that creates free releases, slot access, stacks, and schemed touches. His 2026 checkpoint is play strength: cleaner hands, better press-contact answers, and steadier production against physical coverage. 4). Charlie Becker | Indiana | 6’4”, 204 lbs Archetype: Vertical Boundary X Scouting Report: Charlie Becker is a high-end boundary X with size, catch radius, contested-catch ability, and vertical tracking. He wins above the rim, stacks coverage downfield, and gives quarterbacks a large strike zone on isolation routes and red-zone throws. His 2026 checkpoint is expansion: sharper press releases, a fuller route tree, and more routine-play consistency across a WR1 workload. Tier Grade: High-End Starter Potential Starting-caliber prospect with top-tier starter upside. Strong traits and technical foundation create early impact potential, with development needed to reach the next level. 5). Mario Craver | Texas A&M | 5’9”, 165 lbs Archetype: Undersized Separator Scouting Report: Mario Craver is a high-end slot/Z weapon with rare speed, route suddenness, vertical separation, and explosive YAC value. He fits best in a spread, RPO, or motion-heavy system that creates space through crossers, screens, option routes, and manufactured touches. His 2026 checkpoint is play strength: handling NFL contact, improving blocking, and avoiding size-based limitations against physical coverage. 6). KJ Duff | Rutgers | 6’6”, 225 lbs Archetype: Big-Bodied Boundary WR Scouting Report: KJ Duff is a massive possession X WR with size, catch radius, ball tracking, contested-catch production, and red-zone value. He wins best along the boundary, where he can box out smaller corners and create quarterback-friendly targets without needing elite separation. His 2026 checkpoint is separation: cleaner releases, more route suddenness, better YAC value, and stronger blocking physicality. 7). Nick Marsh | Indiana | 6’3”, 203 lbs Archetype: Vertical X Receiver Scouting Report: Nick Marsh transferred from Michigan State to Indiana this offseason. He is a vertical X receiver with size, speed, catch radius, and physical YAC ability. He can stack corners, win at the catch point, and turn underneath or intermediate throws into chunk gains through contact. His 2026 checkpoint is consistency: fewer drops, stronger contested-catch efficiency, better blocking, and expanded route detail. 8). Jayce Brown | LSU | 6’0”, 179 lbs Archetype: Reliable Slot/Z Receiver Scouting Report: The K-State transfer is a polished slot/Z receiver who plays with high-level route tempo, reliable hands, and YAC value. He fits best in a spread or motion-heavy offense built around option routes, quick game, crossers, RPO access throws, and spacing concepts. His 2026 checkpoint is SEC translation: handling physicality, adding vertical threat value, and maintaining efficiency through contact. 9). Wyatt Young | Oklahoma State | 6’0”, 195 lbs Archetype: High-End Slot/Possession WR Scouting Report: Wyatt Young transferred from North Texas to Oklahoma State this offseason alongside quarterback Drew Mestemaker. He is a high-volume receiver with reliable hands, concentration, zone awareness, and physical YAC ability. He fits best in a spread, tempo, RPO, or timing-based passing game that lets him work option routes, quick game, and intermediate spacing. His 2026 checkpoint is Power 4 translation: sharper route detail, better fluidity out of breaks, and stronger answers versus press coverage. 10). Omarion Miller | Arizona State | 6’2”, 210 lbs Archetype: Long-Framed Perimeter Receiver Scouting Report: Omarion Miller transferred from Colorado to Arizona State this offseason. He is a big-bodied outside receiver with size, ball-tracking ability, contested-catch value, and YAC strength. He fits best in a pro-style or spread offense that uses boundary isolation routes, vertical shots, red-zone targets, and play-action concepts. His 2026 checkpoint is separation, including sharper route detail, cleaner releases, and more consistent top-end burst to push into a stronger starter pathway. 2027 NFL Draft WR Rankings: Key Questions Who is the top wide receiver in the 2027 NFL Draft rankings? Jeremiah Smith is the No. 1 wide receiver in the 2027 NFL Draft WR rankings entering summer scouting. He profiles as a rare WR1 prospect with the size, vertical speed, ball skills, and play strength to win as a true boundary X receiver. Who are the top wide receivers in the 2027 NFL Draft? The top wide receivers in the 2027 NFL Draft rankings include Jeremiah Smith, Cam Coleman, Ryan Coleman-Williams, Charlie Becker, Mario Craver, KJ Duff, Nick Marsh, Jayce Brown, Wyatt Young, and Omarion Miller. The group includes true WR1 candidates, vertical boundary targets, explosive Z receivers, slot separators, and possession profiles. Is Jeremiah Smith the top prospect in the 2027 NFL Draft? Jeremiah Smith enters summer scouting as one of the top overall prospects in the 2027 NFL Draft, not just the top wide receiver. His rare combination of size, vertical speed, body control, ball skills, and alpha WR projection gives him a legitimate top-of-board profile. Which 2027 NFL Draft wide receivers have WR1 upside? Jeremiah Smith, Cam Coleman, and Charlie Becker carry the clearest early WR1 pathways because of their size, catch radius, vertical ability, and outside alignment value. Ryan Coleman-Williams also has a high ceiling as an explosive vertical separator if the hands, play strength, and consistency improve in 2026. How are the 2027 NFL Draft WR rankings built? The 2027 NFL Draft WR rankings are built around Football Scout 365 grade tiers, 2025 tape, production profile, WR archetype, translatable traits, role clarity, and 2026 development checkpoints. Wide receiver value depends on how each player wins, whether the role translates to NFL coverage, and what must improve before the final draft cycle evaluation. When will the 2027 NFL Draft WR rankings be updated? The 2027 NFL Draft WR rankings will update throughout the 2026 college football season as new film, production, transfers, role changes, injuries, and player development reshape the board.

2023 College Football Week One Top Games To Watch, TV, Streaming, Kickoff Times Week one of the 2023 college football season is here. Below are the six matchups to watch in week one. Check back for more as we highlight the top 2024 NFL Draft prospects and their performances in these key matchups. The Top 6 College Football Week One Games Thursday, Aug. 31 No. 14 Utah vs. Florida | 8 p.m. | ESPN Saturday, Sept. 2 No. 17 TCU vs. Colorado | 12 p.m. | FOX South Carolina vs. No. 21 North Carolina (Charlotte, North Carolina) | 7:30 p.m. | ABC No. 7 Penn State vs. West Virginia | 7:30 p.m. | NBC Sunday, Sept. 3 No. 8 Florida State vs. No. 5 LSU (Orlando, Florida) | 7:30 p.m. | ABC Monday, Sept. 4 Duke vs. No. 9 Clemson | 8 p.m. | ESPN

How We Scout The Linebacker Position | NFL Draft | Football Scouting and Analytics Scouting linebackers in the NFL requires evaluating a player's size, speed, athleticism, instincts, and versatility. Below is a list of critical components we use to grade the LB position during the NFL Draft process. Every LB receives a grade on a scale of 1-10 for each of the below components during the scouting process. Once each player component is graded, we attach a final grade to indicate where the player stands before entering the NFL Draft, and then we attach a ceiling grade based on future potential. Here are some key factors to consider when scouting a linebacker: Size: A linebacker needs to have the size to take on blockers and tackle ball carriers. This includes their ability to generate power at the point of attack, maintain leverage, and finish tackles. Speed and Agility: A linebacker must be fast and agile enough to cover running backs and tight ends in pass coverage. This includes their ability to change direction quickly, accelerate off the snap, and pursue ball carriers. Coverage Ability: A linebacker needs to be able to cover running backs and tight ends in pass coverage. This includes their ability to read and react to the quarterback's movements, maintain tight coverage, and break up passes. Run Stopping Ability: A linebacker needs to stop the run and limit the yardage gained by ball carriers. This includes their ability to maintain gap control, pursue ball carriers, and shed blockers. Instincts: A linebacker must have strong instincts to read and react to offensive formations and anticipate plays. This includes their ability to recognize offensive schemes, diagnose plays, and communicate with their teammates. Versatility: A linebacker must be versatile enough to play different positions and execute different defensive schemes. This includes their ability to adjust to different offensive formations, work effectively with different defensive linemen and defensive backs, and contribute to special teams. Football IQ: A linebacker's football intelligence is vital in order to make quick decisions and adjustments on the field. This includes their ability to recognize offensive formations, diagnose plays, and communicate with their teammates. Durability: A linebacker's durability is essential, as they will be taking a lot of hits on the field. This includes their ability to stay healthy and recover quickly from injuries. When scouting a linebacker, it's essential to evaluate all of these factors and the player's overall performance on the field. It's also important to consider the team's specific needs and whether the linebacker's skills and attributes match the team's defensive system and style of play. Additionally, it's important to consider the linebacker's penalties and mental mistakes, as these can be a liability for the defense.

The son of a former NFL player, Surtain has the pedigree. He is a long-player who plays with discipline. Surtain excels in man to man but can play zone when needed. He is not a speedy player, but he masks his lack of long speed by playing with great technique. He does an excellent job at challenging receivers at the line of scrimmage—Surtain projects as the top CB prospect in the 2021 NFL draft. ← Back to NFL Draft Big Board Patrick Surtain II Alabama HT: 6010 WT: 203 YR: JR POS: CB OVR RK 9 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 1 KEY STRENGTHS KEY CONCERNS PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT The son of a former NFL player, Surtain has the pedigree. He is a long-player who plays with discipline. Surtain excels in man to man but can play zone when needed. He is not a speedy player, but he masks his lack of long speed by playing with great technique. He does an excellent job at challenging receivers at the line of scrimmage—Surtain projects as the top CB prospect in the 2021 NFL draft. PLAYER COMPARISON: CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS Near Elite (70-74) A high-caliber prospect who is expected to become a significant contributor by Year 2. These players have outstanding physical tools and strong football IQ, with only minor flaws in their game. They demonstrate consistency at a high level and project as future Pro Bowl-caliber players if properly developed. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Grade Scale Football Scout 365 grades reflect a prospect’s projected long-term NFL value and role. Draft ranges are general value projections, not predictions of an exact selection. Positional value, team needs, scheme fit, medical information and athletic testing can influence where a player is ultimately selected. How Football Scout 365 Grades NFL Draft Prospects Elite (75+): A rare, high-impact prospect with elite physical tools, advanced football intelligence and the ability to make an immediate NFL impact. Elite prospects carry franchise-altering potential and typically project as top 5–10 selections in the first round. Near Elite (70–74): A high-caliber prospect with outstanding physical tools, strong football intelligence and only minor developmental limitations. Near Elite prospects project as significant early-career contributors with Pro Bowl upside and first-round draft value. High-End Starter Potential (65–69): A starting-caliber prospect with strong physical tools, quality technical skills and a defined NFL role. These players may require development before reaching their ceiling but generally carry second- or third-round draft value. Mid-Level Starter Potential (60–64): A solid prospect with NFL-level tools and a pathway to becoming a dependable starter if key limitations are addressed. These players generally carry third- to fifth-round draft value. Low-Level Starter Potential (55–59): A developmental prospect who could become a low-end starter, high-end backup or valuable specialist in the right role. These players generally carry fifth- to seventh-round draft value. Backup Level (50–54): A depth or rotational prospect with enough functional ability to compete for an NFL roster spot but limited long-term starting potential. These players generally project as late Day 3 selections or priority undrafted free agents. Not NFL Level (Below 50): A developmental or camp prospect who does not currently demonstrate enough consistency, technical refinement or functional NFL traits to project as a regular contributor. These players generally project as undrafted free agents, practice-squad candidates or camp invitations. Draft position can vary based on positional value, team needs, scheme fit, medical evaluation and athletic testing.

Overall, Max Melton has shown the potential to be a significant contributor at the NFL level. His combine performance solidified his standing as a top defensive back prospect. His speed, explosiveness, and ability in pass coverage make him a valuable asset. He would fit well in schemes that utilize his press coverage skills and can contribute immediately on special teams. With further development and coaching, Melton has the potential to become a high-level starter in the NFL. ← Back to NFL Draft Big Board Max Melton Rutgers HT: 5110 WT: 187 YR: JR POS: CB OVR RK 61 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 9 KEY STRENGTHS Elite Speed Explosive Athlete Good Man to Man KEY CONCERNS Run Angles More Zone Experience Reactionary Speed PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT Max Melton is a physical, agile cornerback who thrives in man-to-man coverage but also has the versatility to fit into zone schemes. His speed and explosiveness make him an excellent candidate for press coverage, and he has the ability to disrupt receivers at the line. Melton's run support is solid, making him a well-rounded prospect for teams looking for a cornerback who can contribute in various aspects of the game. PLAYER COMPARISON: CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS High-End Starter Potential (65-69) A player expected to become a top-tier starter within their first few years. They possess strong physical tools and good technical skills but may have some limitations in their game. With development, they can reach near-elite levels and provide consistent impact at their position. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Grade Scale Football Scout 365 grades reflect a prospect’s projected long-term NFL value and role. Draft ranges are general value projections, not predictions of an exact selection. Positional value, team needs, scheme fit, medical information and athletic testing can influence where a player is ultimately selected. How Football Scout 365 Grades NFL Draft Prospects Elite (75+): A rare, high-impact prospect with elite physical tools, advanced football intelligence and the ability to make an immediate NFL impact. Elite prospects carry franchise-altering potential and typically project as top 5–10 selections in the first round. Near Elite (70–74): A high-caliber prospect with outstanding physical tools, strong football intelligence and only minor developmental limitations. Near Elite prospects project as significant early-career contributors with Pro Bowl upside and first-round draft value. High-End Starter Potential (65–69): A starting-caliber prospect with strong physical tools, quality technical skills and a defined NFL role. These players may require development before reaching their ceiling but generally carry second- or third-round draft value. Mid-Level Starter Potential (60–64): A solid prospect with NFL-level tools and a pathway to becoming a dependable starter if key limitations are addressed. These players generally carry third- to fifth-round draft value. Low-Level Starter Potential (55–59): A developmental prospect who could become a low-end starter, high-end backup or valuable specialist in the right role. These players generally carry fifth- to seventh-round draft value. Backup Level (50–54): A depth or rotational prospect with enough functional ability to compete for an NFL roster spot but limited long-term starting potential. These players generally project as late Day 3 selections or priority undrafted free agents. Not NFL Level (Below 50): A developmental or camp prospect who does not currently demonstrate enough consistency, technical refinement or functional NFL traits to project as a regular contributor. These players generally project as undrafted free agents, practice-squad candidates or camp invitations. Draft position can vary based on positional value, team needs, scheme fit, medical evaluation and athletic testing.

Makai Lemon NFL Draft Scouting Report 2026 NFL Draft Scouting Report: USC WR Makai Lemon Makai Lemon is a twitchy, highly technical wide receiver who wins with elite short-area quickness, advanced route running, and positional intelligence. Operating primarily from the slot, Lemon weaponizes his foot speed, hip fluidity, and tempo manipulation to uncover against both man and zone coverage. He excels in option-route concepts, consistently reading leverage and attacking blind spots in zone alignments. Lemon’s separation is built on nuance—subtle head fakes, sharp stop-start motion, and the ability to decelerate with precision at the top of routes. At the catch point, Lemon is fearless and focused. Despite being under six feet tall, he competes above his frame through timing, body control, and courage in traffic. After the catch, he becomes a decisive RAC threat—winning with angular efficiency and toughness rather than pure burst. His vision and anticipation allow him to turn short throws into chunk gains, particularly from condensed or bunch sets. Film Summary Lemon’s film reveals a polished slot technician whose game is built on intelligence, pacing, and leverage manipulation. He thrives on spatial awareness and route craft, maintaining tempo control throughout his breaks. His ability to diagnose coverage and react in-route makes him a quarterback’s best friend in timing-based systems. Ideal Scheme Fit West Coast / Spread Hybrid Offense — best utilized in RPO or motion-heavy systems emphasizing timing, spacing, and leverage creation for slot receivers. Lemon excels from 11-personnel sets that use high-volume slot targets (e.g., Rams, 49ers, Lions). Key Strengths (Film-Based Traits) Elite route running & short-area quickness: Creates consistent separation with rapid footwork, tempo variation, and balance through transitions. Football IQ & coverage recognition: Diagnoses leverage instantly; excels in option routes and zone soft spots. Contested-catch focus: Extends naturally and attacks the ball with late hands to minimize DB reaction time. Toughness & reliability: Fearless across the middle; willing blocker who competes in congested areas. Alignment versatility: Capable of functioning in the slot or flexed outside; understands spacing in multi-receiver sets. Developmental Areas (Growth Opportunities) Top-end speed: Lacks elite vertical burst; more deceptive than explosive. Play strength: Needs to add mass to fight through press and maintain body control after contact. Boundary effectiveness: Can play outside in spurts but maximizes value inside, where he has two-way release flexibility. Grade and Projection Football Scout 365 Grade: Near Elite. A high-caliber, system-specific prospect who projects as an immediate contributor and long-term high-end starter. Shows elite technical skill and football IQ with minor athletic limitations. NFL Draft Projection: Early-to-Mid 1st Round Pro Comparison: Amon-Ra St. Brown / Cooper Kupp hybrid — cerebral slot receiver with elite route timing, separation craft, and zone IQ. Final Analysis Makai Lemon embodies the modern slot archetype: intelligent, twitchy, and technically precise. His game mirrors that of Amon-Ra St. Brown and Cooper Kupp—receivers who rely on leverage manipulation and football intellect rather than raw athleticism. Lemon projects as a high-end starter with near-elite upside in NFL systems that prioritize spacing, tempo, and rhythm passing. While he lacks true burner speed, his ability to consistently win separation, read coverages in real time, and convert tough catches in traffic will make him a Day 1 contributor. In the right scheme, Lemon has All-Pro production potential from the slot and can evolve into one of the NFL’s most reliable chain-movers.

While at Tennessee, Tillman topped 1000 yards in 2021. In 2022, he battled through an ankle injury, but when available, he was productive. His size and athleticism profile are alluring. How he performs at the Senior Bowl and the NFL Combine could elevate his draft stock. ← Back to NFL Draft Big Board Cedric Tillman Tennessee HT: 6030 WT: 213 YR: SR POS: WR OVR RK 86 POS RK CEILING POTENTIAL 10 KEY STRENGTHS Big Frame Ball Skills Body Control KEY CONCERNS Route Tree More After Catch Versatility PLAYSTYLE & SCHEME FIT Tillman's play style and physical attributes make him a good fit for NFL offenses that utilize big, physical receivers who can win in contested catch situations. He has a knack for finding openings in zone coverage and can use his size and length to shield defenders from the ball. He also has good hands and a large catch radius, which makes him a reliable target for quarterbacks. PLAYER COMPARISON: CEILING GRADE ANALYSIS High-End Starter Potential (65-69) A player expected to become a top-tier starter within their first few years. They possess strong physical tools and good technical skills but may have some limitations in their game. With development, they can reach near-elite levels and provide consistent impact at their position. Primary scout: Brandon Lundberg Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Grade Scale Football Scout 365 grades reflect a prospect’s projected long-term NFL value and role. Draft ranges are general value projections, not predictions of an exact selection. Positional value, team needs, scheme fit, medical information and athletic testing can influence where a player is ultimately selected. How Football Scout 365 Grades NFL Draft Prospects Elite (75+): A rare, high-impact prospect with elite physical tools, advanced football intelligence and the ability to make an immediate NFL impact. Elite prospects carry franchise-altering potential and typically project as top 5–10 selections in the first round. Near Elite (70–74): A high-caliber prospect with outstanding physical tools, strong football intelligence and only minor developmental limitations. Near Elite prospects project as significant early-career contributors with Pro Bowl upside and first-round draft value. High-End Starter Potential (65–69): A starting-caliber prospect with strong physical tools, quality technical skills and a defined NFL role. These players may require development before reaching their ceiling but generally carry second- or third-round draft value. Mid-Level Starter Potential (60–64): A solid prospect with NFL-level tools and a pathway to becoming a dependable starter if key limitations are addressed. These players generally carry third- to fifth-round draft value. Low-Level Starter Potential (55–59): A developmental prospect who could become a low-end starter, high-end backup or valuable specialist in the right role. These players generally carry fifth- to seventh-round draft value. Backup Level (50–54): A depth or rotational prospect with enough functional ability to compete for an NFL roster spot but limited long-term starting potential. These players generally project as late Day 3 selections or priority undrafted free agents. Not NFL Level (Below 50): A developmental or camp prospect who does not currently demonstrate enough consistency, technical refinement or functional NFL traits to project as a regular contributor. These players generally project as undrafted free agents, practice-squad candidates or camp invitations. Draft position can vary based on positional value, team needs, scheme fit, medical evaluation and athletic testing.

NFL Combine Records: Top performers by Event, Including the 40-yard dash, vertical jump, and More Each year, the NFL Combine offers an opportunity for invitees to showcase their overall athleticism. Football scouts, NFL GMs, and coaches can use the combine to solidify their initial scouting evaluations for each prospect, and it can also raise questions about a prospect's initial evaluation. Regardless, players who perform at a high level each year have great odds of increasing their NFL Draft stock as they demonstrate physical traits that translate well to professional football. However, it's important to note that while NFL combine performances can boost a prospect's NFL Draft stock, it is just one part of a player's overall evaluation, which includes thorough game tape analysis, individual interviews, and medical assessments. 40-Yard Dash Importance: The 40-yard dash is crucial for evaluating a player's speed and acceleration, especially for skill positions like wide receivers, running backs, and defensive backs. John Ross holds the record with a time of 4.22 seconds. Exceptional performance in this drill can significantly boost a player's draft stock. Top Performers: Washington WR John Ross: 4.22 seconds (2017) Baylor CB Kalon Barnes: 4.23 seconds (2022) East Carolina RB Chris Johnson: 4.24 seconds (2008) Michigan CB DJ Turner: 4.26 seconds (2023) Texas San Antonio CB Riq Woolen: 4.26 seconds (2022) Kent State RB Dri Archer: 4.26 seconds (2016) Alabama WR Henry Ruggs II: 4.27 seconds (2020) Texas WR Marquise Goodwin: 4.27 seconds (2013) Baylor WR Tyquan Thornton: 4.28 seconds (2022) Minnesota CB Jalen Myrick: 4.28 seconds (2017) UAB WR J.J. Nelson: 4.28 seconds (2015) Clemson WR Jacoby Ford: 4.28 seconds (2010) 10-Yard Split Importance: The 10-yard split measures initial acceleration and is particularly important for evaluating linemen and linebackers who need quick bursts of speed. Chris Johnson leads with a 1.40-second record. Good performance here indicates potential for explosive power off the line. Top Performers: East Carolina RB Chris Johnson: 1.40 seconds (2008) Alabama WR Henry Ruggs: 1.43 seconds (2020) Georgia WR Malcom Mitchell: 1.43 seconds (2016) Mississippi S Zedrick Woods: 1.44 seconds (2019) LSU CB Donte Jackson: 1.44 seconds (2018) Houston CB William Jackson: 1.44 seconds (2016) Ohio State WR Parris Campbell: 1.45 seconds (2019) UMass Amherst WR Andy Isabella: 1.45 seconds (2019) Ohio State WR Terry McLaurin: 1.45 seconds (2019) Mississippi WR DK Metcalf: 1.45 seconds (2019) Maryland S Darnell Savage: 1.45 seconds (2019) Auburn WR Darius Slayton: 1.45 seconds (2019) LSU CB Greedy Williams: 1.45 seconds (2019) USC CB Terrell Thomas: 1.45 seconds (2008) Vertical Jump Importance: This measures lower-body strength and explosiveness, relevant for wide receivers, tight ends, and defensive backs. Chris Conley and Donald Washington share the record at 45 inches. High vertical jumps can indicate good potential for catching or defending high passes. Top Performers: Georgia WR Chris Conley: 45.00 inches (2015) Ohio State CB Donald Washington: 45.00 inches (2009) Michigan WR Donovan Peoples-Jones: 44.50 inches (2020) Connecticut CB Byron Jones: 44.50 inches (2015) Illinois SAF Quan Martin: 44.00 inches (2023) Virginia S Juan Thornhill: 44.00 inches (2019) Connecticut S Obi Melifonwu: 44.00 inches (2017) Fresno State CB A.J. Jefferson: 44.00 inches (2010) Notre Dame WR Miles Boykin: 43.50 inches (2019) Missouri WR Emanuel Hall: 43.50 inches (2019) Texas A&M WR Speedy Noil: 43.50 inches (2017) Utah S Marcus Williams: 43.50 inches (2017) Connecticut WR Kashif Moore: 43.50 inches (2012) Pittsburgh TE Dorin Dickerson: 43.50 inches (2010) Broad Jump Importance: Similar to the vertical jump, the broad jump assesses lower-body strength and explosiveness, crucial for all positions, particularly skill players. Byron Jones set the NFL combine record at 12 feet, 3 inches. A long broad jump can signify good overall athletic ability and explosiveness. Top Performers: Connecticut CB Byron Jones: 12 feet, 3 inches (2015) Missouri WR Emanuel Hall: 11 feet, 9 inches (2019) Virginia S Juan Thornhill: 11 feet, 9 inches (2019) Connecticut S Obi Melifonwu: 11 feet, 9 inches (2017) Notre Dame WR Miles Boykin: 11 feet, 8 inches (2019) Michigan WR Donovan Peoples-Jones: 11 feet, 7 inches (2020) Georgia WR Chris Conley: 11 feet, 7 inches (2015) Southern Mississippi OLB Jamie Collins: 11 feet, 7 inches (2013) Kansas State CB Julius Brents: 11 feet, 6 inches (2023) Southern Illinois S Jeremy Chinn: 11 feet, 6 inches (2020) TCU WR Jalen Reagor: 11 feet, 6 inches (2020) Kentucky OLB Bud Dupree: 11 feet, 6 inches (2015) 3-Cone Drill Importance: This drill tests agility, flexibility, and change-of-direction speed. Jeff Maehl and Buster Skrine share the top spot with a time of 6.42 seconds. Excellent performance here is particularly valued for running backs, linebackers, and defensive backs. Top Performers: Oregon WR Jeff Maehl: 6.42 seconds (2011) Tennessee-Chattanooga DB Buster Skrine: 6.42 seconds (2011) West Virginia LB David Long: 6.45 seconds (2019) Louisville WR Scott Long: 6.45 seconds (2010) Ohio State WR Dane Sanzenbacher: 6.46 seconds (2011) BYU FS Daniel Sorensen: 6.47 seconds (2011) Sam Houston State CB Zyon McCollum: 6.48 seconds (2022) LSU WR Terrence Toliver: 6.48 seconds (2011) Stanford WR Devon Cajuste: 6.49 seconds (2016) Florida RB Chris Rainey: 6.50 seconds (2012) Texas DB Chykie Brown: 6.50 seconds (2011) Mount Union College WR Cecil Shorts: 6.50 seconds (2011) Michigan CB Leon Hall: 6.50 seconds (2007) 20-Yard Shuttle Importance: The 20-yard shuttle assesses short-area quickness, agility, and change-of-direction capability. Brandin Cooks and Jason Allen hold the record at 3.81 seconds. This is crucial for defensive backs and receivers to demonstrate their lateral speed and quickness. Top Performers: Oregon State WR Brandin Cooks: 3.81 seconds (2014) Tennessee CB Jason Allen: 3.81 seconds (2006) Memphis CB Bobby McCain: 3.82 seconds (2015) William & Mary CB B.W. Webb: 3.84 seconds (2013) Boston College FS Justin Simmons: 3.85 seconds (2016) Washington CB Desmond Trufant: 3.85 seconds (2013) Boise State WR Austin Pettis: 3.88 seconds (2011) Washington WR Kevin King: 3.88 seconds (2017) Wake Forest CB Kevin Johnson: 3.89 seconds (2015) Louisville WR Damian Copeland: 3.90 seconds (2014) Vanderbilt DB Casey Hayward: 3.90 seconds (2012) Idaho DB Shiloh Keo: 3.90 seconds (2011) Tennessee-Chattanooga DB Buster Skrine: 3.90 seconds (2011) Oregon State S Sabby Piscitelli: 3.90 seconds (2007) Bench Press Importance: This is a test of upper-body strength and endurance, most relevant for linemen and linebackers. Stephen Paea holds the record with 49 reps. A high number of reps can enhance a prospect's profile, especially for those in the trenches. Top Performers: Oregon State DT Stephen Paea: 49 reps (2011) Arkansas OL Mitch Petrus: 45 reps (2010) Ohio State DL Mike Kudla: 45 reps (2006) Fresno State G Netane Muti: 44 reps (2020) Memphis DT Dontari Poe: 44 reps (2012) Georgia DT Jeff Owens: 44 reps (2010) Stanford DT Harrison Phillips: 42 reps (2018) North Carolina C Russell Bodine: 42 reps (2014) N.C State DL Tank Tyler: 42 reps (2007) Washington DT Vita Vea: 41 reps (2018) Michigan C David Molk: 41 reps (2012)