Search Results

The Capital One Orange Bowl will deliver a massive showdown between 6-seed Penn State and 7-seed Notre Dame. Both programs, rich in tradition and history, boast elite defenses, balanced offensive attacks, and NFL-caliber talent. With a trip to the national championship at stake, this semifinal promises a gritty battle where every inch matters. College Football Playoff Semifinal: Penn State vs. Notre Dame Penn State vs. Notre Dame Key Storylines to Watch 1. Defensive Dominance This matchup features two of the top defensive units in the nation: Penn State Defense : Ranked 5th in opponent points per game (15.8), excelling at limiting big plays and disrupting offenses with 102 tackles for loss this season. Notre Dame Defense : Allowing just 16.1 points per game, the Fighting Irish thrive on turnovers, ranking 13th nationally in interceptions and 4th in red-zone defense. Both teams have relied on their defenses to secure victories in the playoff, making this a game where field position and turnovers will likely decide the outcome. 2. Quarterback X-Factors Drew Allar (Penn State) : Allar has flashed NFL potential with his arm strength and decision-making. In the quarterfinal against Boise State, he showcased his ability to push the ball downfield, averaging 13.8 yards per attempt. Riley Leonard (Notre Dame) : The dual-threat quarterback is the heartbeat of Notre Dame’s offense. Leonard’s ability to extend plays with his legs and deliver timely throws makes him a constant threat, particularly on third downs. 3. Special Teams and Hidden Yards Notre Dame’s Jayden Harrison has been a game-changer, most notably with his 98-yard kickoff return for a touchdown against Georgia. Penn State will need to be disciplined in coverage to avoid giving up crucial field position. 4. The Battle in the Trenches Penn State’s Front Seven : Led by Abdul Carter and Kobe King, the Nittany Lions have one of the most disruptive defensive fronts in the nation, allowing just 3.1 yards per carry and recording 37 sacks this season. Notre Dame’s Offensive Line : Known for its physicality, the Irish line has excelled in pass protection, keeping Leonard clean in critical moments. However, they’ll face their toughest test yet against Penn State’s relentless pressure. Matchup Analysis: Penn State Offense vs. Notre Dame Defense Penn State Offense Key Strengths : The Nittany Lions are a balanced unit, averaging 202.2 rushing yards per game and 234.1 passing yards. Tight end Tyler Warren is a focal point of the passing attack, with 1,158 receiving yards and 12 touchdowns this season. Weaknesses : While the offense is efficient, it relies heavily on Allar’s ability to connect with Warren in key moments. Outside of Warren, the receiving corps has struggled to consistently create separation against top-tier secondaries. Notre Dame Defense Key Strengths : The Irish defense thrives on forcing mistakes, ranking 4th in red-zone defense and 13th in interceptions. Safety Xavier Watts is a ball-hawking playmaker, while linebacker Jack Kiser leads the unit with his sideline-to-sideline range. Weaknesses : Notre Dame has occasionally struggled to defend power rushing attacks, an area Penn State could exploit with running backs Kaytron Allen and Nicholas Singleton. Key to the matchup:  Can Penn State’s offensive line hold up against Notre Dame’s defensive front, giving Allar time to find Warren and stretch the field? Matchup Analysis: Notre Dame Offense vs. Penn State Defense Notre Dame Offense Key Strengths : Riley Leonard’s dual-threat ability makes Notre Dame’s offense unpredictable. The Irish average 6.5 yards per play, relying on a combination of Leonard’s mobility and a steady rushing attack led by Jeremiyah Love. Weaknesses : Notre Dame’s passing game has been inconsistent, with Beaux Collins as the only receiver to eclipse 450 yards this season. Against Penn State’s elite secondary, Leonard will need to be near-perfect. Penn State Defense Key Strengths : The Nittany Lions excel at creating havoc, ranking in the top 10 nationally in tackles for loss and sacks. Abdul Carter (90.8 PFF grade) and Kobe King anchor a defense that thrives on disrupting rhythm and forcing long-yardage situations. Weaknesses : The secondary, while strong, has shown vulnerability against mobile quarterbacks who can extend plays. Leonard’s ability to scramble and create off-script opportunities could challenge their discipline. Key to the matchup:  Can Penn State’s defense contain Leonard’s mobility while forcing Notre Dame into third-and-long situations? Top 2025 NFL Draft Prospects to Watch Penn State: Abdul Carter (EDGE):  Explosive pass rusher with elite quickness off the edge. Tyler Warren (TE):  Dominant receiving tight end with mismatch potential. Kobe King (LB):  Physical tackler with excellent instincts in run defense. Notre Dame: Xavier Watts (S):  Versatile safety with excellent range and ball skills. Riley Leonard (QB):  Dynamic dual-threat QB with NFL size and athleticism. Jack Kiser (LB):  Smart and physical leader of the defense. Penn State vs. Notre Dame Odds and Projection Spread:  Notre Dame -1.5 Over/Under:  45.5 points Prediction This semifinal is a battle of strengths, with both teams fielding elite defenses and capable offenses. Penn State’s ability to create havoc and control the tempo with its ground game gives it a slight edge. However, Notre Dame’s experience in close, high-stakes games and Leonard’s ability to deliver in clutch moments could prove decisive. Expect a physical, low-scoring affair where turnovers and special teams play a pivotal role. Ultimately, Notre Dame’s balanced approach and Leonard’s playmaking ability will be enough to secure a narrow victory. Implied Final Score:  Notre Dame 24, Penn State 21

The stage is set for a monumental showdown in the College Football Playoff semifinals as 8-seed Ohio State faces 5-seed Texas in the Cotton Bowl. Both teams bring elite talent and contrasting styles to this clash. Ohio State’s high-powered offense and dominant defense have steamrolled opponents in the postseason, while Texas relies on its elite defensive unit and explosive playmakers to outlast challengers. With a spot in the national championship on the line, this matchup promises fireworks. College Football Playoff Semifinal Preview Key Storylines to Watch Battle in the Trenches: Ohio State's offensive line ranks 106th in pass blocking per PFF , while Texas boasts the nation’s top-ranked pass-blocking unit. Conversely, Ohio State’s defensive front ranks 3rd in the nation in sacks , creating a critical matchup against Quinn Ewers and the Longhorns' offensive line. Strength vs. Strength: The Buckeyes bring the nation’s No. 1 PFF-graded defense, allowing just 12.1 points per game. Texas counters with the No. 2 defense, surrendering only 14.5 points per game . Both defenses are elite at forcing mistakes and limiting explosive plays. Quarterback Showdown: Ohio State’s Will Howard has been red-hot, with 630 passing yards, 5 TDs, and 1 INT in two playoff games, earning QBRs of 97.7 and 98.7 . Texas’ Quinn Ewers has also been solid, posting 524 passing yards, 4 TDs, and 2 INTs in his playoff run, but he will need to elevate his game against the Buckeyes' ferocious pass rush. Explosive Playmakers: Jeremiah Smith, Ohio State’s true freshman phenom, has been unstoppable with 290 receiving yards and 4 TDs in the playoffs. Texas counters with Matthew Golden, a dynamic receiver averaging 21.3 yards per catch in the postseason. Matchup Analysis: Ohio State Offense vs. Texas Defense Ohio State’s offense, ranked fourth in PFF grades, is led by quarterback Will Howard and wide receiver Jeremiah Smith. The Buckeyes average 6.9 yards per play and boast the No. 7 passing completion percentage nationally (70.8%). However, they face Texas’ No. 1 PFF-graded secondary, which has suffocated opposing quarterbacks, allowing just 5.5 yards per pass attempt. Key to the matchup: Can Ohio State protect Howard against Texas’ defensive front led by Alfred Collins? The Longhorns excel in creating pressure with the nation's 15th-ranked defense in terms of sack %, and with Ohio State’s struggling offensive line, it could be a decisive factor. Matchup Analysis: Texas Offense vs. Ohio State Defense Texas’ offense ranks 16th in PFF grades but faces the nation’s best defense in Ohio State. The Buckeyes have allowed just 3.9 yards per play and lead the nation in sacks. Ohio State’s secondary, ranked 11th, has shown it can shut down elite passing attacks, as evidenced by their performances against Oregon and Tennessee. Key to the matchup: Texas will rely on its elite offensive line to keep Ewers upright and give playmakers like Golden and tight end Gunnar Helm opportunities. However, Ohio State’s aggressive pass rush, led by Jack Sawyer and JT Tuimoloau, will test Texas' top-graded pass protection. Top 2025 NFL Draft Prospects to Watch Ohio State: Jeremiah Smith, WR:  Explosive receiver with game-changing ability. Jack Sawyer, EDGE:  Relentless pass rusher who disrupts opposing offenses. TreVeyon Henderson, RB:  Versatile back with elite vision and speed. JT Tuimoloau, EDGE:  Dominant presence in the pass and run game. Will Howard, QB:  Strong-armed leader who thrives in high-pressure moments. Texas: Kelvin Banks Jr., OT:  Anchor of the Longhorns' elite pass-blocking unit. Jahdae Barron, CB:  Top-ranked corner with elite coverage skills. Alfred Collins, DI:  Disruptive force in the trenches. Matthew Golden, WR:  Big-play receiver with speed to stretch the field. Andrew Mukuba, S:  Ball-hawking safety who thrives in coverage. Ohio State vs. Texas Odds and Projection Spread:  Ohio State -5.5 Over/Under:  53.5 points Prediction Ohio State enters as the more complete team, boasting a balanced offense and a defense that excels at limiting big plays. Texas has the talent to challenge the Buckeyes, particularly with their offensive line and secondary, but inconsistencies on offense could prove costly. Expect Ohio State’s defensive front to focus on disrupting Quinn Ewers, while Chip Kelly and Ryan Day implement a similarly aggressive game plan as the prior two games against Tennessee and Oregon, with Will Howard and Jeremiah Smith aiming to extend their dominant postseason run. Implied Final Score:  Ohio State 30, Texas 24

Notre Dame delivered a commanding defensive performance to defeat Georgia 23-10 in the College Football Playoff Sugar Bowl. A stunning 17-point surge spanning the final seconds of the first half and the opening kickoff of the second half sealed the Fighting Irish’s victory and a trip to the Orange Bowl semifinal against Penn State. College Football Playoff: Notre Dame’s Defense Shines in Sugar Bowl Victory Over Georgia Georgia's Offense Without Carson Beck Georgia entered the game relying on backup quarterback Gunner Stockton to replace the injured Carson Beck. Pre-game analysis expected Notre Dame's opportunistic defense, ranked third nationally in turnover margin, to capitalize on any mistakes. Game Outcome:  Notre Dame's defense rose to the occasion, forcing two turnovers, including a critical strip-sack that led to a touchdown. Stockton, in his first career start, had moments of brilliance, throwing for 234 yards and a touchdown, but he struggled under pressure, with Notre Dame recording four sacks and nine tackles for loss. Key Moments Defensive Battle Early The first quarter ended scoreless, marking the first CFP game without first-quarter points since 2018. Georgia’s first promising drive ended with Trevor Etienne fumbling deep in Notre Dame territory, his first career fumble in 425 touches. Notre Dame’s 17-Point Surge The game turned in 54 seconds spanning halftime: Late First-Half Touchdown:  With 43 seconds left in the second quarter, RJ Oben strip-sacked Stockton, and Notre Dame capitalized with a 13-yard touchdown pass from Riley Leonard to Beaux Collins. Second-Half Kickoff Return:  Jayden Harrison returned the opening kickoff of the third quarter 98 yards for a touchdown, extending the lead to 20-3. Georgia’s Missed Opportunities Georgia’s offense crossed into Notre Dame territory multiple times but failed to score touchdowns, going 0-for-2 in the red zone. A pass interference penalty on a 67-yard completion and two failed fourth-down attempts further hampered the Bulldogs. Player of the Game: Riley Leonard, QB, Notre Dame Leonard showcased his dual-threat ability, rushing for 80 yards and leading the Irish with timely plays. He also threw a crucial touchdown before halftime, finishing 15-of-24 for 90 yards. His leadership and poise were instrumental in Notre Dame’s victory. Postgame Insights Notre Dame’s Opportunistic Defense The Irish defense held Georgia to 62 rushing yards and stifled the Bulldogs’ attempts to establish offensive rhythm. Key plays included multiple sacks and a relentless effort to pressure Stockton, forcing quick decisions and errant throws. Georgia’s Missed Chances Despite outgaining Notre Dame 294-244 in total yards, Georgia’s self-inflicted mistakes—penalties, turnovers, and missed fourth-down conversions—proved costly. Key Stats Notre Dame:  244 total yards (154 rushing, 90 passing) Georgia:  296 total yards (234 passing, 62 rushing) Turnovers:  Notre Dame 0, Georgia 2 Sacks:  Notre Dame 4, Georgia 1 Red Zone Efficiency:  Notre Dame 1-for-2, Georgia 0-for-2 Looking Ahead Notre Dame:  The Fighting Irish advance to the Orange Bowl to face Penn State. Their defense will need to replicate this dominant performance against a potent Nittany Lions offense. Georgia:  The Bulldogs’ season ends with questions about their offensive consistency and depth. Carson Beck’s absence highlighted the challenges of adapting without a proven starter.

The rematch of Ohio State and Oregon in the College Football Playoff quarterfinals was expected to be a tightly contested battle. Instead, it turned into a showcase of Ohio State's dominance in all three phases of the game. The Buckeyes secured a commanding 41-21 victory over the top-seeded Ducks, advancing to the semifinals and delivering a statement performance on one of college football's grandest stages. College Football Playoff: Ohio State Overwhelms Oregon in Dominant Rose Bowl Victory Ohio State's Explosive Offense Will Howard and Jeremiah Smith Shine Heading into the game, Will Howard's poise and Jeremiah Smith’s explosiveness were touted as keys to Ohio State’s success. Game Outcome : Howard and Smith exceeded expectations. Howard completed 17-of-26 passes for 319 yards and three touchdowns, consistently finding Smith, who finished with seven receptions for 187 yards and two touchdowns. Smith’s performance, which included two catches over 40 yards, broke the Ohio State freshman single-game receiving record. TreVeyon Henderson’s Big Play Ability Ohio State’s ground game was also a focal point, with Henderson and Quinshon Judkins expected to share the workload. Game Outcome : Henderson delivered with 94 yards and two touchdowns on just eight carries, including a record-setting 66-yard touchdown run—the longest in Rose Bowl history. Judkins added 85 yards on 17 carries, helping the Buckeyes dominate with 181 total rushing yards. Defensive Masterclass Relentless Pressure on Dillon Gabriel Ohio State’s inability to pressure Dillon Gabriel in their regular-season meeting was a key storyline. Game Outcome : The Buckeyes flipped the script, sacking Gabriel eight times and forcing hurried throws throughout the game. Cody Simon led the way with 11 tackles, two sacks, and three tackles for loss, earning Rose Bowl Defensive MVP honors. Oregon’s offense managed just 276 total yards, including -23 rushing yards, their worst output of the season. Neutralizing Oregon’s Playmakers Oregon’s offense had thrived on balance and explosive plays all season. Game Outcome : With star wide receiver Evan Stewart sidelined and running back Jordan James limited by injury, the Ducks struggled to find rhythm. Gabriel connected with Traeshon Holden for two touchdowns, but the Ducks’ other playmakers were held in check. Key Moments Smith’s Electrifying Start : Jeremiah Smith opened the scoring with a 45-yard touchdown catch and added a 43-yard score in the second quarter, helping Ohio State jump out to a 34-0 lead by halftime. Henderson’s Explosive Run : Henderson’s 66-yard touchdown run in the second quarter showcased his elite speed and vision, putting the game out of reach early. Ohio State’s Defensive Stands : The Buckeyes allowed just three drives past midfield, with timely sacks and tackles for loss stifling Oregon’s offense at every turn. Game Stats Total Yards : Ohio State 500, Oregon 276 Rushing Yards : Ohio State 181, Oregon -23 Passing Yards : Ohio State 319, Oregon 299 Sacks : Ohio State 8, Oregon 0 Time of Possession : Oregon 30:55, Ohio State 29:05 Postgame Insights Ohio State’s Redemption After a regular-season loss to Oregon, the Buckeyes left no doubt in the rematch. Their offense was unstoppable in the first half, and the defense dominated the trenches, reversing the narrative from their October meeting. Oregon’s Struggles The Ducks’ bid for an undefeated season and national title fell short as their offense sputtered against Ohio State’s relentless pressure. Without balance, Oregon’s high-powered attack was reduced to sporadic moments of success. Player of the Game: Jeremiah Smith, WR, Ohio State Smith’s record-breaking performance (187 yards, 2 TDs) was the catalyst for Ohio State’s offensive explosion. His ability to stretch the field and create separation made him the game’s most impactful player. Looking Ahead Ohio State : The Buckeyes will face Texas in the Cotton Bowl semifinal on January 10. With their offense firing on all cylinders and their defense peaking, Ohio State looks the part as the best team left in the playoff field. Oregon : Despite the loss, Oregon’s season marked a successful Big Ten debut. The Ducks will aim to build on their 13-1 record and address weaknesses heading into 2025. The Rose Bowl showcased Ohio State’s championship potential and ended Oregon’s dream season, leaving the Buckeyes one step closer to a national title.

The College Football Playoff quarterfinal between Texas and Arizona State in the Peach Bowl had a little bit of everything, delivering the most competitive game of the inaugural 12-team playoff so far. In the end, Texas prevailed 39-31 in double overtime, advancing to the semifinals after surviving a late Arizona State rally that nearly changed the outcome. College Football Playoff: Texas Outlasts Arizona State in Double-Overtime Texas’ Air Attack and Ewers’ Poise Pre-game predictions emphasized Quinn Ewers’ arm talent and Texas’ receiving corps as key to victory. Ewers delivered, completing 20-of-30 passes for 322 yards, three touchdowns, and one interception, including critical throws in overtime. Matthew Golden emerged as his go-to target with seven receptions for 149 yards and a touchdown, including a game-saving 28-yard grab on fourth-and-13 in the first overtime. Cam Skattebo’s All-Around Impact Arizona State’s Cam Skattebo, touted for his versatility, exceeded expectations with a heroic performance. He rushed for 143 yards and two touchdowns, caught eight passes for 99 yards, and even threw a 42-yard touchdown pass. Despite his efforts, Texas’ defense made timely stops to limit his overall impact. Defensive Battle in the Trenches Arizona State’s defensive front was expected to challenge Texas’ rushing attack, and they succeeded. The Longhorns were held to just 53 rushing yards on 30 attempts (1.8 YPC). However, Texas’ defensive line matched the intensity, sacking Arizona State quarterback Sam Leavitt three times and contributing to a turnover that sealed the game. Key Moments Texas Takes Early Control : The Longhorns scored on their first two offensive plays, a 54-yard pass to Golden followed by a 23-yard touchdown strike to DeAndre Moore, taking a 14-3 lead. Silas Bolden’s 75-yard punt return touchdown extended the lead. Arizona State’s Fourth-Quarter Rally : Down 24-8, Arizona State scored two quick touchdowns and two 2-point conversions in a 91-second span, tying the game at 24. Skattebo’s 62-yard reception set up his 2-yard touchdown run, showcasing his dominance. Ewers’ Game-Saving Throw : On fourth-and-13 in the first overtime, Ewers found Golden for a 28-yard touchdown to keep Texas alive. He followed it with a 25-yard touchdown to Gunnar Helm in the second overtime, sealing the win. Andrew Mukuba’s Game-Ending Interception : Mukuba intercepted Leavitt’s pass in the second overtime, ending Arizona State’s valiant effort. Game Stats Total Yards : Texas 375, Arizona State 510 Passing Yards : Texas 322, Arizona State 296 Rushing Yards : Texas 53, Arizona State 214 Time of Possession : Arizona State 37:54, Texas 22:06 Turnovers : Texas 1, Arizona State 1 Postgame Insights Texas’ Resilience Despite being outgained and dominated in time of possession, Texas demonstrated grit in critical moments. Ewers’ clutch throws and timely defensive stops kept their championship hopes alive. Arizona State’s Missed Opportunities The Sun Devils had three drives inside Texas territory that ended with zero points, including a blocked field goal and two failed fourth-down attempts. A controversial no-call on targeting in the final minute also loomed large in Arizona State’s loss. Player of the Game: Quinn Ewers, QB, Texas Quinn Ewers’ poise under pressure was pivotal to Texas’ thrilling victory. Ewers completed 20-of-30 passes for 322 yards, three touchdowns, and one interception. His two clutch touchdown passes in overtime highlighted his ability to deliver when it mattered most. On fourth-and-13 in the first overtime, Ewers floated a 28-yard strike to Matthew Golden to extend the game. In the second overtime, he connected with Gunnar Helm on a 25-yard touchdown, followed by a successful 2-point conversion to Golden, sealing the win. Ewers also showcased his versatility with a 5-yard rushing touchdown earlier in the game, providing a steady hand amid Arizona State’s relentless comeback attempt. Looking Ahead Texas : The Longhorns move on to face the winner of the Rose Bowl (Oregon vs. Ohio State) in the Cotton Bowl semifinal on Jan. 10. They will need to clean up their ground game and refine their red-zone efficiency. Arizona State : Despite the loss, the Sun Devils’ remarkable season solidified their status as a rising program under head coach Kenny Dillingham. Skattebo’s performance and the team’s grit provide a strong foundation for 2025. The Peach Bowl delivered the drama the expanded College Football Playoff promised, leaving Texas one step closer to a national title and Arizona State with a bright future ahead.

The College Football Playoff quarterfinal game between Penn State and Boise State was filled with intriguing moments, but ultimately highlighted Penn State's capacity to assert its physical dominance, leading to a 31-14 victory. Here’s a breakdown of what stood out compared to the preview expectations , alongside postgame analysis and player performance insights. College Football Playoff: Penn State Overcomes Feisty Boise State to Claim VRBO Fiesta Bowl Victory Pre-Game Expectation vs. Reality Ashton Jeanty’s Historic Chase Pre-game, all eyes were on Boise State’s Heisman runner-up Ashton Jeanty and his pursuit of Barry Sanders’ single-season rushing record. Penn State’s stout run defense ranked 10th nationally, was expected to make this a challenging task. Game Outcome:  Jeanty was held to 104 yards on 30 carries (3.5 YPC), his lowest output of the season. Penn State’s defense, led by a disciplined front seven, stifled Jeanty and prevented explosive plays. The effort left Jeanty 28 yards shy of Sanders’ record, marking a bittersweet end to a historic season. Penn State’s Ground-and-Pound Attack The preview highlighted the Nittany Lions’ dynamic running back duo, Nicholas Singleton and Kaytron Allen, as pivotal to setting the game’s tone. Game Outcome:  This prediction hit the mark. Allen’s 134 rushing yards on 17 carries and Singleton’s 58-yard touchdown run capped a dominant rushing performance (216 yards total). Their contributions helped control the clock and wear down Boise State’s defense. Drew Allar’s Decision-Making Under Pressure Boise State’s aggressive pass rush, led by Jayden Virgin-Morgan, was expected to test Allar’s poise. Game Outcome:  While Allar wasn’t perfect (13-of-25, 171 yards), he delivered three touchdown passes without turnovers. His connection with tight end Tyler Warren (6 catches, 63 yards, 2 TDs) provided the offensive spark Penn State needed. Boise State’s Pass Defense Struggles The Broncos’ 109th-ranked pass defense was highlighted as a vulnerability, especially against Mackey Award winner Tyler Warren. Game Outcome:  As predicted, Warren was a matchup nightmare. He consistently found space in the red zone and capitalized on Boise State’s inability to defend the middle of the field. Discipline and Mistakes Both teams entered with strong postseason histories, but the game’s outcome would hinge on limiting mistakes. Game Outcome:  Boise State faltered here, committing 13 penalties, four turnovers, and two missed field goals. Penn State’s ability to capitalize on these mistakes proved decisive. Key Game Stats Total Yards:  Boise State 412, Penn State 387 Rushing Yards:  Penn State 216, Boise State 108 Turnovers:  Boise State 4, Penn State 1 Time of Possession:  Boise State 34:04, Penn State 25:56 Postgame Insights Penn State’s Resiliency and Balance While the Nittany Lions didn’t dominate statistically, they excelled in critical moments. Their ability to answer Boise State’s second-half rally with an 11-play, 75-yard touchdown drive was a turning point. Boise State’s Missed Opportunities The Broncos struggled to capitalize on Penn State’s mistakes. A hands-to-the-face penalty negated a touchdown, while two missed field goals cost valuable points. Maddux Madsen’s three interceptions further derailed Boise State’s comeback hopes. Defensive Adjustments Despite All-American edge rusher Abdul Carter being sidelined in the first half due to an undisclosed injury, Penn State's defense adjusted in the second half. Players such as Zakee Wheatley rose to the occasion, with Wheatley's fourth-quarter interception effectively sealing Boise State's fate. Player of the Game: Tyler Warren, TE, Penn State Tyler Warren proved once again he is the focal point of the Penn State offense by posting 6 receptions for 63 yards and 2 touchdowns, consistently finding space in Boise State’s defense. His critical catches not only accounted for two pivotal scores but also highlighted why he’s regarded as the potential TE1 in the 2025 NFL Draft. Warren’s ability to command attention and deliver in key moments provided the spark Penn State needed to maintain control and secure the victory. Looking Ahead Penn State’s semifinal matchup against the winner of Georgia vs. Notre Dame will test their ability to replicate this balanced performance. The health of Abdul Carter will be monitored as he will be critical for their defense’s chances in the next round of the College Football Playoff. For Boise State, the loss stings but doesn’t overshadow a remarkable season. Ashton Jeanty’s historic campaign and the Broncos’ resurgence under head coach Spencer Danielson reestablished them as a national power. Penn State moves on, one step closer to their first national title since 1986.

The stage is set as Georgia (12-1) faces off against Notre Dame (12-1) in the Allstate Sugar Bowl at Caesars Superdome in New Orleans on New Year's Day. Georgia vs. Notre Dame For Georgia, this game marks a significant challenge in their pursuit of a third national championship in four years. With quarterback Carson Beck sidelined, the Bulldogs will rely on the untested but promising Gunner Stockton. For Notre Dame, it’s a golden opportunity to break through their long-standing postseason barriers and earn a marquee win against college football’s reigning dynasty. Both teams bring elite talent, contrasting styles, and storied histories, ensuring a high-stakes battle under the lights in New Orleans. Key Storylines to Watch 1. Gunner Stockton’s Big Debut Georgia’s redshirt sophomore quarterback Gunner Stockton will make his first career start under the brightest spotlight. Stepping in for the injured Carson Beck, Stockton showed flashes of potential in relief during the SEC Championship Game against Texas, completing 12-of-16 passes for 71 yards and adding mobility to the offense. Notre Dame’s defense ranked third nationally in points allowed (13.6 per game) and leading the country in opponent passer rating (96.9), presents a formidable challenge. Stockton’s decision-making, mobility, and ability to spark Georgia’s offense will be critical to the Bulldogs’ success. 2. Notre Dame’s Ground-and-Pound Attack The Fighting Irish boast one of the most physical rushing offenses in college football, averaging 222.4 yards per game . Running back Jeremiyah Love and dual-threat quarterback Riley Leonard have combined for 31 rushing touchdowns. Georgia’s defense, traditionally dominant against the run, has shown cracks this season, ranking outside the SEC’s top five in limiting explosive run plays. Slowing down Notre Dame’s rushing attack will be essential for Georgia to control the tempo. 3. Georgia’s Receivers: Who Will Step Up? The Bulldogs have struggled to find consistency in the passing game this season, with no receiver surpassing 800 yards. Arian Smith and Dominic Lovett have shown flashes but must elevate their play against Notre Dame’s elite secondary, led by Xavier Watts and Leonard Moore. Tight end Oscar Delp, who caught key passes in the SEC Championship, may be a reliable target for Stockton in this critical game. 4. Notre Dame’s Defensive Resilience Without Rylie Mills Notre Dame will be without star defensive tackle Rylie Mills, who suffered a season-ending knee injury in the playoff win over Indiana. The loss of Mills, the team’s sacks leader and a key run-stopper, puts pressure on Gabriel Rubio and Howard Cross III to anchor the defensive front against Georgia’s physical offensive line. 5. Historic Stakes in New Orleans Georgia is 3-0 all-time against Notre Dame , including a Sugar Bowl win in 1981 that delivered the Bulldogs their first national championship. Notre Dame, meanwhile, hasn’t won a major bowl game since 1994. This clash of traditions adds an extra layer of intrigue to an already compelling matchup. NFL Draft Prospects to Watch Georgia: Malaki Starks, S : Elite playmaker with exceptional range and instincts, excelling in both run support and pass coverage. Jalon Walker, LB : Versatile linebacker with great sideline-to-sideline speed and the ability to rush the passer effectively. Mykel Williams, ED : Explosive edge rusher with a combination of power and finesse moves, consistently disruptive against both the pass and run. Tate Ratledge, G : Technically sound guard with excellent hand placement and strength, key in both pass protection and run blocking. Daylen Everette, CB : Athletic cornerback with fluid movement skills and the ability to match up with receivers of all sizes. Notre Dame: Xavier Watts, S : Versatile safety with elite instincts and tackling ability, excelling in both coverage and run defense. Riley Leonard, QB : Dual-threat quarterback with size, poise, and accuracy, capable of making plays through the air and on the ground. Jack Kiser, LB : Intelligent linebacker with excellent instincts and versatility, thriving in coverage and run-stopping situations. Mitchell Evans, TE : Athletic tight end with reliable hands and solid blocking skills, offering value as both a pass catcher and run blocker. Howard Cross III, DI : Powerful interior defender with quick hands and excellent gap control, a key disruptor in the trenches. Previous Meeting Highlights Score: Georgia 23, Notre Dame 17 (2019) The last meeting between these two programs was a tightly contested affair in Athens, with Georgia’s defense holding strong late to secure the win. The Sugar Bowl marks their first postseason matchup since 1981. Georgia vs. Notre Dame Odds and Projection Spread:  Georgia -1.5 Total Points Line:  44.5 The implied final score projects a razor-thin margin, with Georgia narrowly edging Notre Dame, 23-22. This reflects Georgia’s slight edge in talent and depth but also the challenges posed by Notre Dame’s physicality and balance. Prediction The Sugar Bowl quarterfinal pits Georgia’s championship pedigree against Notre Dame’s relentless physicality. The outcome will likely hinge on the Bulldogs’ ability to limit Notre Dame’s rushing attack and Gunner Stockton’s performance in his first career start. While Notre Dame’s defense and running game will keep the game close, Georgia’s depth, coaching, and ability to rise in big moments give the Bulldogs a slight edge. Expect a gritty, hard-fought battle with Georgia advancing to the semifinals. Projected Score:  Georgia 23, Notre Dame 20

The stage is set for a thrilling quarterfinal matchup in the College Football Playoff. No. 5 Texas (12-2) will take on No. 4 Arizona State (11-2) in the Chick-fil-A Peach Bowl at Mercedes-Benz Stadium in Atlanta on New Year’s Day. Texas vs. Arizona State For Texas, this game represents another step toward validating their status as a national powerhouse following their first College Football Playoff victory over Clemson. For Arizona State, it’s a chance to continue their Cinderella season, having shocked the nation by claiming the Big 12 title after being projected to finish last in the conference. Both teams bring unique strengths and compelling storylines, making this a must-watch matchup in Atlanta. Key Storylines to Watch 1. Can Cam Skattebo Carry Arizona State to Glory? Arizona State running back Cam Skattebo has been the backbone of the Sun Devils’ offense, finishing the season as a Heisman finalist. Skattebo amassed 1,568 rushing yards, 506 receiving yards, and 22 total touchdowns. His physical, downhill running style has made him one of the most feared backs in the nation. The Sun Devils lean heavily on their ground game, ranking 11th nationally in rush rate (60.7%). However, they face a daunting challenge against Texas' defense, which ranks 7th in EPA per rush and 13th in rushing defense. For Arizona State to pull off the upset, Skattebo must find ways to break through the Longhorns’ disciplined front seven, led by Alfred Collins and Anthony Hill Jr. 2. Texas’ Stifling Secondary vs. Arizona State’s Passing Game Texas boasts the nation’s No. 1 passing defense, allowing just 4.1 yards per dropback and ranking 3rd in interceptions. Led by Thorpe Award winner Jahdae Barron, along with standout safety Michael Taaffe, the Longhorns’ secondary has been a nightmare for opposing quarterbacks. Arizona State quarterback Sam Leavitt has been a revelation, earning All-Big 12 honors as a redshirt freshman. While his numbers (2,814 passing yards, 21 touchdowns) have been solid, he’ll need to elevate his game to navigate Texas’ suffocating coverage. With top receiver Jordyn Tyson doubtful, Leavitt will need contributions from Melquan Stovall and the rest of the Sun Devils’ receiving corps to keep Arizona State’s offense balanced. 3. Texas’ Ground Game: Can It Dominate Again? Texas showcased its dominant rushing attack in their first-round win over Clemson, tallying 292 rushing yards at 6.1 yards per carry. Jaydon Blue, who broke off a game-sealing 77-yard touchdown run, leads a dynamic backfield that has steadily improved throughout the season. Arizona State’s run defense, led by C.J. Fite, ranks 52nd nationally, and they have struggled against elite rushing attacks. The battle in the trenches will likely dictate the pace of the game, as Texas looks to control the clock and wear down Arizona State’s defense. 4. The Quarterback Battle: Quinn Ewers vs. Sam Leavitt Quinn Ewers has been efficient this season, throwing for 26 touchdowns while minimizing mistakes. However, his decision-making has been inconsistent at times, which could give Arizona State’s opportunistic defense a chance to capitalize. On the other side, Sam Leavitt’s dual-threat ability adds an extra layer of complexity for Texas’ defense. While Leavitt has thrived in big moments, he hasn’t faced a defense as complete as Texas’. His poise under pressure will be critical as the Sun Devils look to pull off the upset. 5. Arizona State’s Cinderella Story From 3-9 last year to a Big 12 title this season, Arizona State’s meteoric rise under head coach Kenny Dillingham has been one of the year’s best stories. The Sun Devils enter the game on a six-game winning streak, fueled by a relentless ground attack and an opportunistic defense. Texas, meanwhile, is seeking redemption after falling short in last year’s playoff and has the chance to establish itself as a perennial title contender. The Peach Bowl serves as a proving ground for both programs to show they belong on the biggest stage. NFL Draft Prospects to Watch Texas: Jaydon Blue, RB:  Explosive runner with big-play ability and breakaway speed. Jahdae Barron, CB:  Elite cover corner with ball-hawking skills and instincts. Alfred Collins, DT:  Dominant interior lineman with excellent gap control and pass-rush ability. Quinn Ewers, QB: Efficient thrower with good arm talent and decision-making. Kelvin Banks, OT: Big athletic tackle with good movement skills and high-level blocking ability Arizona State: Cam Skattebo, RB:  Physical, downhill runner with strong hands and versatility. Previous Meeting Highlights Score:  Texas 52, Arizona State 34 (2007 Holiday Bowl) In their only previous meeting, the Longhorns dominated behind Jamaal Charles’ 161 rushing yards and two touchdowns. Michael Jones tallied 107 receiving yards and two touchdowns for the Sun Devils in a high-scoring affair. Texas vs. Arizona State Odds and Projection Texas enters the Peach Bowl as a 13-point favorite, with the total points line set at 51.5. The implied final score projects a Texas victory, 34-20, highlighting the Longhorns’ advantages in talent and depth. Prediction This Peach Bowl quarterfinal pits Arizona State’s improbable Cinderella story against a Texas team seeking to cement its place as a national powerhouse. The game will hinge on whether Arizona State’s ground game, led by Cam Skattebo, can find success against Texas’ elite defense. While the Sun Devils’ resilience and physicality will keep the game competitive, Texas’ depth, defensive dominance, and explosive playmakers give them the edge. Look for the Longhorns to pull away late and advance to the semifinals. Projected Score:  Texas 34, Arizona State 20

The stage is set for another thrilling College Football Playoff quarterfinal. No. 4 Penn State (12-2) will face No. 9 Boise State (12-1) in the Fiesta Bowl at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Arizona. For Penn State, this game represents an opportunity to lean on their balanced roster and elite defense as they seek a semifinal berth. For Boise State, it’s a chance to prove their high-powered offense can carry them to new heights on the national stage. Both teams bring contrasting strengths, setting the stage for a compelling battle in the desert. With championship dreams and NFL scouts watching closely, this matchup features elite talent, including Heisman finalists, dominant defensive linemen, and explosive offensive weapons. Key Storylines to Watch 1. Boise State’s Ashton Jeanty Chases History Boise State running back Ashton Jeanty has been the heart and soul of the Broncos’ offense. The Heisman Trophy runner-up leads the nation in rushing yards (2,497) and touchdowns (29) and is within striking distance of Barry Sanders’ single-season rushing record. Jeanty faces a stout Penn State run defense that ranks 10th nationally, allowing just 100.4 yards per game. If the Broncos hope to pull off the upset, Jeanty must find ways to break through Penn State’s front seven, led by Abdul Carter . 2. Penn State’s Ground-and-Pound Duo The Nittany Lions bring a thunderous one-two punch in the backfield with Nicholas Singleton and Kaytron Allen. Together, the duo has combined for 1,820 rushing yards and 16 touchdowns this season. Boise State’s defense, which ranks 23rd nationally in rushing yards allowed per game, will be tasked with slowing the physicality of Penn State’s run game. This battle in the trenches could dictate the tempo of the game. 3. Drew Allar’s Decision-Making Under Pressure Penn State quarterback Drew Allar has been steady this season, throwing for over 3,000 yards and 21 touchdowns while limiting turnovers. Boise State’s defense, however, excels at applying pressure, ranking second nationally with 51 sacks. Allar has only been sacked 14 times this season, but Boise State edge rusher Jayden Virgin-Morgan and his team-high 10 sacks could make life difficult. Allar’s ability to make quick decisions and avoid costly mistakes will be critical. 4. Can Boise State Contain TE Tyler Warren Penn State tight end Tyler Warren is a matchup nightmare. The Mackey Award winner has set a Big Ten single-season record for tight ends with 1,095 receiving yards and 10 total touchdowns. Boise State has struggled in pass defense, allowing 246.8 passing yards per game (109th nationally). Keeping Warren in check will be a top priority for the Broncos. 5. The Fiesta Bowl Legacy Both teams are undefeated in Fiesta Bowl history, with Penn State boasting a 7-0 record and Boise State at 3-0. This quarterfinal marks their first-ever meeting, adding another layer of intrigue to a matchup already steeped in postseason history. Top NFL Draft Prospects to Watch Penn State: Tyler Warren, TE : Elite pass catcher with blocking ability; a game-changing tight end prospect. Abdul Carter, EDGE : Dominant pass rusher with elite athleticism and production. Nicholas Singleton, RB : Physical runner with excellent vision and burst. Drew Allar, QB : Strong-armed quarterback with size and improving accuracy. Boise State: Ashton Jeanty, RB : Explosive and elusive back chasing history. Jayden Virgin-Morgan, EDGE : Disruptive pass rusher with top-tier production. Cameron Camper, WR : Dynamic playmaker with a knack for explosive plays. Previous Meeting Highlights Score : First-ever meeting. While this is the first matchup between these programs, both bring storied Fiesta Bowl histories. Boise State is remembered for its iconic 2007 victory over Oklahoma, while Penn State’s 1987 win over Miami remains one of the most memorable in college football history. Penn State vs. Boise State Odds and Projection Penn State enters as the favorite with a -10.5 point spread, and the total points line is set at 52.5. The implied score projects a two-score game, with Penn State claiming the win vs. Boise State 32-21. Prediction This Fiesta Bowl battle will hinge on which team can dominate in the trenches. Penn State’s balanced offense and stifling defense give them a slight edge, especially if they can limit Ashton Jeanty’s impact. Boise State’s high-powered offense, led by Jeanty, and a defense anchored by Jayden Virgin-Morgan, have the potential to keep it close—but for how long? Penn State’s depth and physicality at the line of scrimmage on both sides of the ball may ultimately prove too much for the Broncos to handle. Projected Implied Score : Penn State 32, Boise State 21

The stage is set for one of the most anticipated rematches in College Football Playoff history. No. 1 Oregon (13-0) will face No. 8 Ohio State (11-2) in the historic Rose Bowl on New Year’s Day. For Oregon, this game represents a chance to continue their undefeated season and move closer to a national championship. For Ohio State, it’s an opportunity to avenge their heartbreaking 32-31 loss in October, a game defined by controversial officiating and critical late-game errors. Both teams enter the rematch playing their best football of the season, setting the stage for a high-stakes battle between two of the nation’s most balanced and talented rosters. With championship aspirations and NFL scouts watching closely, this game highlights elite talent on both sides of the ball for each team, including rising NFL Draft prospects at quarterback, dominant defensive linemen, and explosive-skill players. Key Storylines to Watch Key Storylines: Oregon’s Defense vs. Ohio State’s Passing Game Oregon’s defense has been one of the most efficient against the pass this season, allowing just 176 passing yards per game—ranking 8th nationally. Their ability to pressure quarterbacks, led by edge rusher Jordan Burch, has been critical, with a sack rate of 8.5% (18th nationally) . However, in their first matchup, the Ducks struggled at times to contain Ohio State’s explosive passing attack. Will Howard delivered one of his best performances of the season back in October vs. Oregon, completing 28 of 35 passes for 326 yards, two touchdowns, and no interceptions. Ohio State’s offense was aggressive and efficient early, averaging 8.7 yards per play in the first quarter and building a 165-84 advantage in total yards. Emeka Egbuka and Jeremiah Smith combined for 19 receptions, 193 yards, and two touchdowns, frequently exploiting mismatches in Oregon’s secondary. While Oregon allowed explosive plays, their defense adjusted as the game progressed. They limited Ohio State to just 4 of 12 on third downs, stayed disciplined with only three penalties compared to Ohio State’s eight, and avoided turnovers that could have shifted momentum. The key to putting Ohio State into unfavorable passing situations is to keep their run game in check. In the first meeting, the Ducks held Ohio State to 4.3 yards per rush attempt—not dominant, but good enough to keep Ohio State in 3rd-and-obvious passing situations. To replicate their prior success, Oregon will need to contain Ohio State’s big-play threats and leverage their pass rush to disrupt Will Howard’s rhythm. This means forcing longer 3rd-down situations, allowing them to pin their ears back and get after the QB. A consistent pass rush, paired with disciplined coverage, will be critical to neutralizing the Buckeyes’ passing attack and securing another victory. Key Storylines: Oregon’s Offense vs. Ohio State’s Defense On the flip side, Oregon’s high-powered offense, averaging 36.9 points per game, will face an Ohio State defense that has allowed just 11.7 points per game over its last five matchups. Dillon Gabriel, the engine of Oregon’s offense, will be crucial. He has completed 72% of his passes this season, averaging 8.8 yards per attempt, and delivered a stellar performance in their first meeting, throwing for 341 yards and two touchdowns. Gabriel’s efficiency and his ability to extend plays with his legs (8.0 yards per rush in the first matchup) add another layer of complexity for Ohio State’s defense. Ohio State’s defense has undergone a transformation since that October loss, particularly in their pass defense, which hasn’t allowed a touchdown through the air in five games. Anchored by edge rushers J.T. Tuimoloau and Jack Sawyer, along with elite interior lineman Tyliek Williams, the Buckeyes boast one of the most formidable fronts in college football. This unit will be tasked with limiting an Oregon rushing attack that averages 5.0 yards per carry and tallied 155 rushing yards in the first meeting. Jordan James, who rushed for 115 yards and a touchdown in October, remains a key weapon for the Ducks. For Ohio State, the key will be keeping Oregon’s offense off schedule. The Ducks excel in manageable situations, converting 50% of third downs (5th nationally). However, in the first matchup, Oregon struggled in longer third downs, converting just 43% overall and only 2 of 5 in the third quarter. Forcing Oregon into third-and-5 or longer will allow the Buckeyes’ pass rush to focus on Gabriel, limiting the dual-threat quarterback’s ability to exploit mismatches. If Oregon can establish their run game as they did in October, averaging 5.0 yards per carry, it will be difficult for Ohio State to contain their balanced attack. However, if the Buckeyes can clog running lanes and pressure Gabriel consistently, they’ll have a much better chance of disrupting one of the nation’s most efficient offenses. Top NFL Draft Prospects to Watch Ohio State: TreVeyon Henderson, RB : Electrifying back with elite vision and breakaway speed. Quinshon Judkins, RB : Bruising runner who excels in short-yardage and goal-line situations. J.T. Tuimoloau, EDGE : Versatile defender capable of disrupting any offensive game plan. Jack Sawyer, EDGE : Relentless edge rusher who thrives against both the pass and run. Emeka Egbuka, WR : Reliable target with exceptional hands and route-running ability. Will Howard, QB: A poised, strong-armed passer with improving accuracy and decision-making. Oregon: Jordan Burch, EDGE : Dominant presence on the defensive line with elite athleticism. Derrick Harmon, IDL: Powerful interior disruptor with exceptional pocket-collapsing strength. Jordan James, RB : Versatile playmaker with balance and elusiveness. Dillon Gabriel, QB : Seasoned dual-threat quarterback with the ability to deliver in clutch moments. Previous Meeting Highlights Score:  Oregon 32, Ohio State 31 (October 12, 2024) Gabriel’s 341 passing yards and three total touchdowns paced Oregon’s offense. Controversial officiating and clock mismanagement in the final moments derailed Ohio State’s comeback. Ohio State vs. Oregon Odds and Projection Ohio State enters the Rose Bowl as a narrow favorite with a -2.5 spread, and the total points line is set at 54.5. The implied final score projects Ohio State narrowly edging Oregon, 28.5-26 , reflecting the balance between Ohio State’s defensive resurgence and Oregon’s offensive firepower. Prediction The prediction for this Rose Bowl rematch leans slightly in Ohio State’s favor, thanks to their recent defensive dominance and offensive resurgence. The Buckeyes’ defense, which hasn’t allowed a passing touchdown in five games, is well-equipped to challenge Oregon’s explosive attack, bolstered by a revitalized pass rush featuring J.T. Tuimoloau and Jack Sawyer. Offensively, Ohio State’s rushing tandem of TreVeyon Henderson and Quinshon Judkins has excelled behind an improved offensive line, as demonstrated in their dominant performance against Tennessee. While Oregon brings a balanced offense and the dynamic playmaking of Dillon Gabriel, the Buckeyes’ ability to control the trenches on both sides of the ball gives them a slight edge in what promises to be a thrilling contest. Projected Implied Score:  Ohio State 28.5, Oregon 26

In the first-ever College Football Playoff game held in December at Ohio Stadium, the No. 8 Ohio State Buckeyes delivered a commanding 42-17 victory over No. 9 Tennessee. The win not only secured the Buckeyes’ spot in the CFP quarterfinals but also set up a highly anticipated rematch against No. 1 Oregon in the Rose Bowl on New Year’s Day. Setting the Tone Early Ohio State wasted no time establishing dominance. Will Howard opened the scoring with a 37-yard touchdown pass to freshman phenom Jeremiah Smith. The Buckeyes followed with a series of explosive plays, including a 29-yard touchdown run by TreVeyon Henderson and a one-yard plunge by Quinshon Judkins. The Buckeyes’ offense executed to near perfection, scoring on their first three drives to race out to a 21-0 lead in the first quarter. “We called this game more aggressively,” said Ohio State head coach Ryan Day. “Our guys were locked in from the start, and it showed.” Tennessee managed to respond with a second-quarter field goal and a two-yard touchdown run by quarterback Nico Iamaleava to make it 21-10 at halftime. However, the Volunteers were unable to carry that momentum into the second half. Will Howard Efficient, Defense Relentless Will Howard led the Buckeyes’ offense with precision, completing 24 of 29 passes for 311 yards and two touchdowns. Jeremiah Smith, the freshman receiver, caught six passes for 103 yards and both of Howard’s touchdown throws, showcasing why he’s one of the most exciting young players in college football. The defense, led by JT Tuimoloau and Jack Sawyer, stifled Tennessee’s offense. The Buckeyes recorded four sacks and held the Volunteers to just 256 total yards, including a meager 104 passing yards. Tuimoloau had two sacks, setting the tone for a defensive front that consistently disrupted Nico Iamaleava’s rhythm. “I got after them at halftime and challenged them,” said Ohio State defensive coordinator Jim Knowles. “Our defense responded and played lights out in the second half.” Ohio State’s secondary, statistically the best in the nation, limited Iamaleava to a season-low 104 passing yards on 14-of-31 completions. Tennessee’s rushing attack, led by Peyton Lewis, was similarly contained, with Lewis managing just 77 yards on 10 carries. Second-Half Dominance Ohio State pulled away in the second half, scoring three unanswered touchdowns. Howard connected with Smith for a 22-yard touchdown early in the third quarter, extending the lead to 28-10. Judkins added his second score of the night, a one-yard run before Henderson sealed the victory with a 24-yard touchdown run in the fourth quarter. The Buckeyes' defense shined in high-pressure moments, including a critical goal-line stand that ended Tennessee’s hopes of a comeback. Tennessee managed a late touchdown from Iamaleava but never seriously threatened Ohio State’s lead. Initial Thoughts vs. Reality Before the game, Tennessee’s balanced offense, led by Iamaleava, was expected to test Ohio State’s defense. However, the Volunteers struggled to sustain drives, averaging just 3.7 yards per play and converting only six of 16 third downs. Ohio State’s defense, which leads the nation in points allowed per game, lived up to its billing by forcing quick stops and limiting explosive plays. Conversely, Ohio State’s offense was pegged to rely on the run game, but it was the passing attack that shined early. Howard’s efficient performance (83% completion rate, 12.7 yards per completion) opened up opportunities for Henderson and Judkins, who combined for 156 rushing yards and four touchdowns. Key Stats Ohio State: Will Howard: 24/29, 311 yards, 2 TD, 1 INT Jeremiah Smith: 6 receptions, 103 yards, 2 TD TreVeyon Henderson: 10 carries, 80 yards, 2 TD Quinshon Judkins: 10 carries, 34 yards, 2 TD Defense: 4 sacks, 6 tackles for loss, 256 total yards allowed Tennessee: Nico Iamaleava: 14/31, 104 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT; 20 carries, 47 yards, 2 TD Peyton Lewis: 10 carries, 77 yards Total Offense: 256 yards What’s Next? Ohio State now turns its attention to No. 1 Oregon, the undefeated Big Ten champions. The rematch will take place in the Rose Bowl on New Year’s Day, with the Buckeyes seeking redemption after a heartbreaking 32-31 loss to the Ducks earlier this season. For Tennessee, the season ends with a 10-3 record and valuable lessons learned from their first CFP appearance. Head coach Josh Heupel will look to build on this experience as the Volunteers aim to remain contenders in the years to come. “This is a step forward for our program,” Heupel said. “We didn’t get the result we wanted tonight, but we’ll be back.”

In the first round of the expanded College Football Playoff, No. 5 Texas capitalized on a dominant rushing performance and key defensive stops to defeat No. 12 Clemson 38-24 in front of a packed crowd at Darrell K. Royal-Texas Memorial Stadium in Austin. The Longhorns (12-2) now advance to the Peach Bowl, where they will face No. 4 Arizona State. Setting the Tone with the Ground Game Texas leaned heavily on its running game, amassing 292 yards on the ground at an impressive 6.1 yards per carry. Jaydon Blue led the charge with 146 yards and two touchdowns, including a game-sealing 77-yard sprint in the fourth quarter that put the Longhorns up 38-24. “Once I got past the line, I just kept running. I knew they weren’t going to catch me,” Blue said of his electrifying run. Quintrevion Wisner complemented Blue’s effort with 110 yards and two first-half touchdowns, helping Texas establish control early. Ewers Efficient, Defense Stands Tall Quarterback Quinn Ewers delivered a poised performance, completing 17 of 24 passes for 202 yards and a touchdown. His first-half precision, highlighted by a 43-yard connection with Matthew Golden and a 19-yard touchdown pass to tight end Gunnar Helm, helped Texas build a commanding 28-10 halftime lead. Ewers’ ability to spread the ball efficiently kept Clemson’s defense on its heels and played a crucial role in the Longhorns' offensive success. On the defensive side, Texas faced a strong challenge from Clemson quarterback Cade Klubnik, who threw for 336 yards and three touchdowns while completing 60% of his passes. Despite Klubnik’s late-game surge that cut Texas’ lead to 31-24, the Longhorns' defense delivered when it mattered most. A critical goal-line stand in the fourth quarter, featuring back-to-back stops at the 1-yard line, extinguished Clemson’s comeback hopes. Texas also tallied three sacks and seven tackles for loss, disrupting Clemson’s offensive rhythm and limiting their run game to just 76 yards on 24 attempts (3.2 yards per carry). “Our defense has been our backbone all year, and they showed up again tonight when we needed them most,” Texas head coach Steve Sarkisian said. Initial Thoughts vs. Reality Before the game, Clemson’s passing attack, led by Klubnik, was expected to challenge Texas' defense. While Klubnik showcased his talent with 336 passing yards and three touchdowns, the Longhorns’ ability to stifle Clemson’s run game and deliver timely defensive stops ultimately swung the game in Texas’ favor. Clemson’s reliance on the pass made their offense predictable, allowing Texas to key in on crucial late-game situations. On the other hand, Texas’ rushing attack, identified pregame as a potential advantage, surpassed expectations. The Longhorns ran for 292 yards on 48 carries, averaging 6.1 yards per attempt. Jaydon Blue was electric with 146 yards and two touchdowns, including a game-sealing 77-yard burst in the fourth quarter. Quintrevion Wisner contributed 110 yards and two scores, while the offensive line consistently overpowered Clemson’s defensive front. Texas' dominant ground game not only controlled the tempo but also exposed Clemson's defensive weaknesses, cementing the Longhorns' victory. Key Stats Texas: Jaydon Blue:  146 rushing yards, 2 TDs Quintrevion Wisner:  110 rushing yards, 2 TDs Quinn Ewers:  17/24, 202 yards, 1 TD Gunnar Helm:  6 receptions, 77 yards, 1 TD Clemson: Cade Klubnik:  26/43, 336 yards, 3 TDs, 1 INT Rushing Offense:  76 yards (3.2 YPC) T.J. Moore:  7 receptions, 91 yards, 1 TD What’s Next? Texas moves on to face No. 4 Arizona State in the Peach Bowl on New Year’s Day. The Longhorns will look to build on their dominant rushing performance as they aim for a spot in the semifinals. For Clemson, the season ends with questions about its defensive front and how head coach Dabo Swinney can address the team’s struggles against physical rushing attacks. Despite the loss, the Tigers made strides in returning to the College Football Playoff and will look to build on this momentum next season. In the first-ever on-campus CFP matchup for Texas, the Longhorns showcased their offensive firepower and defensive resilience, propelling them one step closer to a national championship.