The stage is set as Georgia (12-1) faces off against Notre Dame (12-1) in the Allstate Sugar Bowl at Caesars Superdome in New Orleans on New Year's Day. Georgia vs. Notre Dame For Georgia, this game marks a significant challenge in their pursuit of a third national championship in four years. With quarterback Carson Beck sidelined, the Bulldogs will rely on the untested but promising Gunner Stockton. For Notre Dame, it’s a golden opportunity to break through their long-standing postseason barriers and earn a marquee win against college football’s reigning dynasty. Both teams bring elite talent, contrasting styles, and storied histories, ensuring a high-stakes battle under the lights in New Orleans. Key Storylines to Watch 1. Gunner Stockton’s Big Debut Georgia’s redshirt sophomore quarterback Gunner Stockton will make his first career start under the brightest spotlight. Stepping in for the injured Carson Beck, Stockton showed flashes of potential in relief during the SEC Championship Game against Texas, completing 12-of-16 passes for 71 yards and adding mobility to the offense. Notre Dame’s defense ranked third nationally in points allowed (13.6 per game) and leading the country in opponent passer rating (96.9), presents a formidable challenge. Stockton’s decision-making, mobility, and ability to spark Georgia’s offense will be critical to the Bulldogs’ success. 2. Notre Dame’s Ground-and-Pound Attack The Fighting Irish boast one of the most physical rushing offenses in college football, averaging 222.4 yards per game . Running back Jeremiyah Love and dual-threat quarterback Riley Leonard have combined for 31 rushing touchdowns. Georgia’s defense, traditionally dominant against the run, has shown cracks this season, ranking outside the SEC’s top five in limiting explosive run plays. Slowing down Notre Dame’s rushing attack will be essential for Georgia to control the tempo. 3. Georgia’s Receivers: Who Will Step Up? The Bulldogs have struggled to find consistency in the passing game this season, with no receiver surpassing 800 yards. Arian Smith and Dominic Lovett have shown flashes but must elevate their play against Notre Dame’s elite secondary, led by Xavier Watts and Leonard Moore. Tight end Oscar Delp, who caught key passes in the SEC Championship, may be a reliable target for Stockton in this critical game. 4. Notre Dame’s Defensive Resilience Without Rylie Mills Notre Dame will be without star defensive tackle Rylie Mills, who suffered a season-ending knee injury in the playoff win over Indiana. The loss of Mills, the team’s sacks leader and a key run-stopper, puts pressure on Gabriel Rubio and Howard Cross III to anchor the defensive front against Georgia’s physical offensive line. 5. Historic Stakes in New Orleans Georgia is 3-0 all-time against Notre Dame , including a Sugar Bowl win in 1981 that delivered the Bulldogs their first national championship. Notre Dame, meanwhile, hasn’t won a major bowl game since 1994. This clash of traditions adds an extra layer of intrigue to an already compelling matchup. NFL Draft Prospects to Watch Georgia: Malaki Starks, S : Elite playmaker with exceptional range and instincts, excelling in both run support and pass coverage. Jalon Walker, LB : Versatile linebacker with great sideline-to-sideline speed and the ability to rush the passer effectively. Mykel Williams, ED : Explosive edge rusher with a combination of power and finesse moves, consistently disruptive against both the pass and run. Tate Ratledge, G : Technically sound guard with excellent hand placement and strength, key in both pass protection and run blocking. Daylen Everette, CB : Athletic cornerback with fluid movement skills and the ability to match up with receivers of all sizes. Notre Dame: Xavier Watts, S : Versatile safety with elite instincts and tackling ability, excelling in both coverage and run defense. Riley Leonard, QB : Dual-threat quarterback with size, poise, and accuracy, capable of making plays through the air and on the ground. Jack Kiser, LB : Intelligent linebacker with excellent instincts and versatility, thriving in coverage and run-stopping situations. Mitchell Evans, TE : Athletic tight end with reliable hands and solid blocking skills, offering value as both a pass catcher and run blocker. Howard Cross III, DI : Powerful interior defender with quick hands and excellent gap control, a key disruptor in the trenches. Previous Meeting Highlights Score: Georgia 23, Notre Dame 17 (2019) The last meeting between these two programs was a tightly contested affair in Athens, with Georgia’s defense holding strong late to secure the win. The Sugar Bowl marks their first postseason matchup since 1981. Georgia vs. Notre Dame Odds and Projection Spread:  Georgia -1.5 Total Points Line:  44.5 The implied final score projects a razor-thin margin, with Georgia narrowly edging Notre Dame, 23-22. This reflects Georgia’s slight edge in talent and depth but also the challenges posed by Notre Dame’s physicality and balance. Prediction The Sugar Bowl quarterfinal pits Georgia’s championship pedigree against Notre Dame’s relentless physicality. The outcome will likely hinge on the Bulldogs’ ability to limit Notre Dame’s rushing attack and Gunner Stockton’s performance in his first career start. While Notre Dame’s defense and running game will keep the game close, Georgia’s depth, coaching, and ability to rise in big moments give the Bulldogs a slight edge. Expect a gritty, hard-fought battle with Georgia advancing to the semifinals. Projected Score:  Georgia 23, Notre Dame 20

The stage is set for a thrilling quarterfinal matchup in the College Football Playoff. No. 5 Texas (12-2) will take on No. 4 Arizona State (11-2) in the Chick-fil-A Peach Bowl at Mercedes-Benz Stadium in Atlanta on New Year’s Day. Texas vs. Arizona State For Texas, this game represents another step toward validating their status as a national powerhouse following their first College Football Playoff victory over Clemson. For Arizona State, it’s a chance to continue their Cinderella season, having shocked the nation by claiming the Big 12 title after being projected to finish last in the conference. Both teams bring unique strengths and compelling storylines, making this a must-watch matchup in Atlanta. Key Storylines to Watch 1. Can Cam Skattebo Carry Arizona State to Glory? Arizona State running back Cam Skattebo has been the backbone of the Sun Devils’ offense, finishing the season as a Heisman finalist. Skattebo amassed 1,568 rushing yards, 506 receiving yards, and 22 total touchdowns. His physical, downhill running style has made him one of the most feared backs in the nation. The Sun Devils lean heavily on their ground game, ranking 11th nationally in rush rate (60.7%). However, they face a daunting challenge against Texas' defense, which ranks 7th in EPA per rush and 13th in rushing defense. For Arizona State to pull off the upset, Skattebo must find ways to break through the Longhorns’ disciplined front seven, led by Alfred Collins and Anthony Hill Jr. 2. Texas’ Stifling Secondary vs. Arizona State’s Passing Game Texas boasts the nation’s No. 1 passing defense, allowing just 4.1 yards per dropback and ranking 3rd in interceptions. Led by Thorpe Award winner Jahdae Barron, along with standout safety Michael Taaffe, the Longhorns’ secondary has been a nightmare for opposing quarterbacks. Arizona State quarterback Sam Leavitt has been a revelation, earning All-Big 12 honors as a redshirt freshman. While his numbers (2,814 passing yards, 21 touchdowns) have been solid, he’ll need to elevate his game to navigate Texas’ suffocating coverage. With top receiver Jordyn Tyson doubtful, Leavitt will need contributions from Melquan Stovall and the rest of the Sun Devils’ receiving corps to keep Arizona State’s offense balanced. 3. Texas’ Ground Game: Can It Dominate Again? Texas showcased its dominant rushing attack in their first-round win over Clemson, tallying 292 rushing yards at 6.1 yards per carry. Jaydon Blue, who broke off a game-sealing 77-yard touchdown run, leads a dynamic backfield that has steadily improved throughout the season. Arizona State’s run defense, led by C.J. Fite, ranks 52nd nationally, and they have struggled against elite rushing attacks. The battle in the trenches will likely dictate the pace of the game, as Texas looks to control the clock and wear down Arizona State’s defense. 4. The Quarterback Battle: Quinn Ewers vs. Sam Leavitt Quinn Ewers has been efficient this season, throwing for 26 touchdowns while minimizing mistakes. However, his decision-making has been inconsistent at times, which could give Arizona State’s opportunistic defense a chance to capitalize. On the other side, Sam Leavitt’s dual-threat ability adds an extra layer of complexity for Texas’ defense. While Leavitt has thrived in big moments, he hasn’t faced a defense as complete as Texas’. His poise under pressure will be critical as the Sun Devils look to pull off the upset. 5. Arizona State’s Cinderella Story From 3-9 last year to a Big 12 title this season, Arizona State’s meteoric rise under head coach Kenny Dillingham has been one of the year’s best stories. The Sun Devils enter the game on a six-game winning streak, fueled by a relentless ground attack and an opportunistic defense. Texas, meanwhile, is seeking redemption after falling short in last year’s playoff and has the chance to establish itself as a perennial title contender. The Peach Bowl serves as a proving ground for both programs to show they belong on the biggest stage. NFL Draft Prospects to Watch Texas: Jaydon Blue, RB:  Explosive runner with big-play ability and breakaway speed. Jahdae Barron, CB:  Elite cover corner with ball-hawking skills and instincts. Alfred Collins, DT:  Dominant interior lineman with excellent gap control and pass-rush ability. Quinn Ewers, QB: Efficient thrower with good arm talent and decision-making. Kelvin Banks, OT: Big athletic tackle with good movement skills and high-level blocking ability Arizona State: Cam Skattebo, RB:  Physical, downhill runner with strong hands and versatility. Previous Meeting Highlights Score:  Texas 52, Arizona State 34 (2007 Holiday Bowl) In their only previous meeting, the Longhorns dominated behind Jamaal Charles’ 161 rushing yards and two touchdowns. Michael Jones tallied 107 receiving yards and two touchdowns for the Sun Devils in a high-scoring affair. Texas vs. Arizona State Odds and Projection Texas enters the Peach Bowl as a 13-point favorite, with the total points line set at 51.5. The implied final score projects a Texas victory, 34-20, highlighting the Longhorns’ advantages in talent and depth. Prediction This Peach Bowl quarterfinal pits Arizona State’s improbable Cinderella story against a Texas team seeking to cement its place as a national powerhouse. The game will hinge on whether Arizona State’s ground game, led by Cam Skattebo, can find success against Texas’ elite defense. While the Sun Devils’ resilience and physicality will keep the game competitive, Texas’ depth, defensive dominance, and explosive playmakers give them the edge. Look for the Longhorns to pull away late and advance to the semifinals. Projected Score:  Texas 34, Arizona State 20

The stage is set for another thrilling College Football Playoff quarterfinal. No. 4 Penn State (12-2) will face No. 9 Boise State (12-1) in the Fiesta Bowl at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Arizona. For Penn State, this game represents an opportunity to lean on their balanced roster and elite defense as they seek a semifinal berth. For Boise State, it’s a chance to prove their high-powered offense can carry them to new heights on the national stage. Both teams bring contrasting strengths, setting the stage for a compelling battle in the desert. With championship dreams and NFL scouts watching closely, this matchup features elite talent, including Heisman finalists, dominant defensive linemen, and explosive offensive weapons. Key Storylines to Watch 1. Boise State’s Ashton Jeanty Chases History Boise State running back Ashton Jeanty has been the heart and soul of the Broncos’ offense. The Heisman Trophy runner-up leads the nation in rushing yards (2,497) and touchdowns (29) and is within striking distance of Barry Sanders’ single-season rushing record. Jeanty faces a stout Penn State run defense that ranks 10th nationally, allowing just 100.4 yards per game. If the Broncos hope to pull off the upset, Jeanty must find ways to break through Penn State’s front seven, led by Abdul Carter . 2. Penn State’s Ground-and-Pound Duo The Nittany Lions bring a thunderous one-two punch in the backfield with Nicholas Singleton and Kaytron Allen. Together, the duo has combined for 1,820 rushing yards and 16 touchdowns this season. Boise State’s defense, which ranks 23rd nationally in rushing yards allowed per game, will be tasked with slowing the physicality of Penn State’s run game. This battle in the trenches could dictate the tempo of the game. 3. Drew Allar’s Decision-Making Under Pressure Penn State quarterback Drew Allar has been steady this season, throwing for over 3,000 yards and 21 touchdowns while limiting turnovers. Boise State’s defense, however, excels at applying pressure, ranking second nationally with 51 sacks. Allar has only been sacked 14 times this season, but Boise State edge rusher Jayden Virgin-Morgan and his team-high 10 sacks could make life difficult. Allar’s ability to make quick decisions and avoid costly mistakes will be critical. 4. Can Boise State Contain TE Tyler Warren Penn State tight end Tyler Warren is a matchup nightmare. The Mackey Award winner has set a Big Ten single-season record for tight ends with 1,095 receiving yards and 10 total touchdowns. Boise State has struggled in pass defense, allowing 246.8 passing yards per game (109th nationally). Keeping Warren in check will be a top priority for the Broncos. 5. The Fiesta Bowl Legacy Both teams are undefeated in Fiesta Bowl history, with Penn State boasting a 7-0 record and Boise State at 3-0. This quarterfinal marks their first-ever meeting, adding another layer of intrigue to a matchup already steeped in postseason history. Top NFL Draft Prospects to Watch Penn State: Tyler Warren, TE : Elite pass catcher with blocking ability; a game-changing tight end prospect. Abdul Carter, EDGE : Dominant pass rusher with elite athleticism and production. Nicholas Singleton, RB : Physical runner with excellent vision and burst. Drew Allar, QB : Strong-armed quarterback with size and improving accuracy. Boise State: Ashton Jeanty, RB : Explosive and elusive back chasing history. Jayden Virgin-Morgan, EDGE : Disruptive pass rusher with top-tier production. Cameron Camper, WR : Dynamic playmaker with a knack for explosive plays. Previous Meeting Highlights Score : First-ever meeting. While this is the first matchup between these programs, both bring storied Fiesta Bowl histories. Boise State is remembered for its iconic 2007 victory over Oklahoma, while Penn State’s 1987 win over Miami remains one of the most memorable in college football history. Penn State vs. Boise State Odds and Projection Penn State enters as the favorite with a -10.5 point spread, and the total points line is set at 52.5. The implied score projects a two-score game, with Penn State claiming the win vs. Boise State 32-21. Prediction This Fiesta Bowl battle will hinge on which team can dominate in the trenches. Penn State’s balanced offense and stifling defense give them a slight edge, especially if they can limit Ashton Jeanty’s impact. Boise State’s high-powered offense, led by Jeanty, and a defense anchored by Jayden Virgin-Morgan, have the potential to keep it close—but for how long? Penn State’s depth and physicality at the line of scrimmage on both sides of the ball may ultimately prove too much for the Broncos to handle. Projected Implied Score : Penn State 32, Boise State 21

The stage is set for one of the most anticipated rematches in College Football Playoff history. No. 1 Oregon (13-0) will face No. 8 Ohio State (11-2) in the historic Rose Bowl on New Year’s Day. For Oregon, this game represents a chance to continue their undefeated season and move closer to a national championship. For Ohio State, it’s an opportunity to avenge their heartbreaking 32-31 loss in October, a game defined by controversial officiating and critical late-game errors. Both teams enter the rematch playing their best football of the season, setting the stage for a high-stakes battle between two of the nation’s most balanced and talented rosters. With championship aspirations and NFL scouts watching closely, this game highlights elite talent on both sides of the ball for each team, including rising NFL Draft prospects at quarterback, dominant defensive linemen, and explosive-skill players. Key Storylines to Watch Key Storylines: Oregon’s Defense vs. Ohio State’s Passing Game Oregon’s defense has been one of the most efficient against the pass this season, allowing just 176 passing yards per game—ranking 8th nationally. Their ability to pressure quarterbacks, led by edge rusher Jordan Burch, has been critical, with a sack rate of 8.5% (18th nationally) . However, in their first matchup, the Ducks struggled at times to contain Ohio State’s explosive passing attack. Will Howard delivered one of his best performances of the season back in October vs. Oregon, completing 28 of 35 passes for 326 yards, two touchdowns, and no interceptions. Ohio State’s offense was aggressive and efficient early, averaging 8.7 yards per play in the first quarter and building a 165-84 advantage in total yards. Emeka Egbuka and Jeremiah Smith combined for 19 receptions, 193 yards, and two touchdowns, frequently exploiting mismatches in Oregon’s secondary. While Oregon allowed explosive plays, their defense adjusted as the game progressed. They limited Ohio State to just 4 of 12 on third downs, stayed disciplined with only three penalties compared to Ohio State’s eight, and avoided turnovers that could have shifted momentum. The key to putting Ohio State into unfavorable passing situations is to keep their run game in check. In the first meeting, the Ducks held Ohio State to 4.3 yards per rush attempt—not dominant, but good enough to keep Ohio State in 3rd-and-obvious passing situations. To replicate their prior success, Oregon will need to contain Ohio State’s big-play threats and leverage their pass rush to disrupt Will Howard’s rhythm. This means forcing longer 3rd-down situations, allowing them to pin their ears back and get after the QB. A consistent pass rush, paired with disciplined coverage, will be critical to neutralizing the Buckeyes’ passing attack and securing another victory. Key Storylines: Oregon’s Offense vs. Ohio State’s Defense On the flip side, Oregon’s high-powered offense, averaging 36.9 points per game, will face an Ohio State defense that has allowed just 11.7 points per game over its last five matchups. Dillon Gabriel, the engine of Oregon’s offense, will be crucial. He has completed 72% of his passes this season, averaging 8.8 yards per attempt, and delivered a stellar performance in their first meeting, throwing for 341 yards and two touchdowns. Gabriel’s efficiency and his ability to extend plays with his legs (8.0 yards per rush in the first matchup) add another layer of complexity for Ohio State’s defense. Ohio State’s defense has undergone a transformation since that October loss, particularly in their pass defense, which hasn’t allowed a touchdown through the air in five games. Anchored by edge rushers J.T. Tuimoloau and Jack Sawyer, along with elite interior lineman Tyliek Williams, the Buckeyes boast one of the most formidable fronts in college football. This unit will be tasked with limiting an Oregon rushing attack that averages 5.0 yards per carry and tallied 155 rushing yards in the first meeting. Jordan James, who rushed for 115 yards and a touchdown in October, remains a key weapon for the Ducks. For Ohio State, the key will be keeping Oregon’s offense off schedule. The Ducks excel in manageable situations, converting 50% of third downs (5th nationally). However, in the first matchup, Oregon struggled in longer third downs, converting just 43% overall and only 2 of 5 in the third quarter. Forcing Oregon into third-and-5 or longer will allow the Buckeyes’ pass rush to focus on Gabriel, limiting the dual-threat quarterback’s ability to exploit mismatches. If Oregon can establish their run game as they did in October, averaging 5.0 yards per carry, it will be difficult for Ohio State to contain their balanced attack. However, if the Buckeyes can clog running lanes and pressure Gabriel consistently, they’ll have a much better chance of disrupting one of the nation’s most efficient offenses. Top NFL Draft Prospects to Watch Ohio State: TreVeyon Henderson, RB : Electrifying back with elite vision and breakaway speed. Quinshon Judkins, RB : Bruising runner who excels in short-yardage and goal-line situations. J.T. Tuimoloau, EDGE : Versatile defender capable of disrupting any offensive game plan. Jack Sawyer, EDGE : Relentless edge rusher who thrives against both the pass and run. Emeka Egbuka, WR : Reliable target with exceptional hands and route-running ability. Will Howard, QB: A poised, strong-armed passer with improving accuracy and decision-making. Oregon: Jordan Burch, EDGE : Dominant presence on the defensive line with elite athleticism. Derrick Harmon, IDL: Powerful interior disruptor with exceptional pocket-collapsing strength. Jordan James, RB : Versatile playmaker with balance and elusiveness. Dillon Gabriel, QB : Seasoned dual-threat quarterback with the ability to deliver in clutch moments. Previous Meeting Highlights Score:  Oregon 32, Ohio State 31 (October 12, 2024) Gabriel’s 341 passing yards and three total touchdowns paced Oregon’s offense. Controversial officiating and clock mismanagement in the final moments derailed Ohio State’s comeback. Ohio State vs. Oregon Odds and Projection Ohio State enters the Rose Bowl as a narrow favorite with a -2.5 spread, and the total points line is set at 54.5. The implied final score projects Ohio State narrowly edging Oregon, 28.5-26 , reflecting the balance between Ohio State’s defensive resurgence and Oregon’s offensive firepower. Prediction The prediction for this Rose Bowl rematch leans slightly in Ohio State’s favor, thanks to their recent defensive dominance and offensive resurgence. The Buckeyes’ defense, which hasn’t allowed a passing touchdown in five games, is well-equipped to challenge Oregon’s explosive attack, bolstered by a revitalized pass rush featuring J.T. Tuimoloau and Jack Sawyer. Offensively, Ohio State’s rushing tandem of TreVeyon Henderson and Quinshon Judkins has excelled behind an improved offensive line, as demonstrated in their dominant performance against Tennessee. While Oregon brings a balanced offense and the dynamic playmaking of Dillon Gabriel, the Buckeyes’ ability to control the trenches on both sides of the ball gives them a slight edge in what promises to be a thrilling contest. Projected Implied Score:  Ohio State 28.5, Oregon 26

In the first-ever College Football Playoff game held in December at Ohio Stadium, the No. 8 Ohio State Buckeyes delivered a commanding 42-17 victory over No. 9 Tennessee. The win not only secured the Buckeyes’ spot in the CFP quarterfinals but also set up a highly anticipated rematch against No. 1 Oregon in the Rose Bowl on New Year’s Day. Setting the Tone Early Ohio State wasted no time establishing dominance. Will Howard opened the scoring with a 37-yard touchdown pass to freshman phenom Jeremiah Smith. The Buckeyes followed with a series of explosive plays, including a 29-yard touchdown run by TreVeyon Henderson and a one-yard plunge by Quinshon Judkins. The Buckeyes’ offense executed to near perfection, scoring on their first three drives to race out to a 21-0 lead in the first quarter. “We called this game more aggressively,” said Ohio State head coach Ryan Day. “Our guys were locked in from the start, and it showed.” Tennessee managed to respond with a second-quarter field goal and a two-yard touchdown run by quarterback Nico Iamaleava to make it 21-10 at halftime. However, the Volunteers were unable to carry that momentum into the second half. Will Howard Efficient, Defense Relentless Will Howard led the Buckeyes’ offense with precision, completing 24 of 29 passes for 311 yards and two touchdowns. Jeremiah Smith, the freshman receiver, caught six passes for 103 yards and both of Howard’s touchdown throws, showcasing why he’s one of the most exciting young players in college football. The defense, led by JT Tuimoloau and Jack Sawyer, stifled Tennessee’s offense. The Buckeyes recorded four sacks and held the Volunteers to just 256 total yards, including a meager 104 passing yards. Tuimoloau had two sacks, setting the tone for a defensive front that consistently disrupted Nico Iamaleava’s rhythm. “I got after them at halftime and challenged them,” said Ohio State defensive coordinator Jim Knowles. “Our defense responded and played lights out in the second half.” Ohio State’s secondary, statistically the best in the nation, limited Iamaleava to a season-low 104 passing yards on 14-of-31 completions. Tennessee’s rushing attack, led by Peyton Lewis, was similarly contained, with Lewis managing just 77 yards on 10 carries. Second-Half Dominance Ohio State pulled away in the second half, scoring three unanswered touchdowns. Howard connected with Smith for a 22-yard touchdown early in the third quarter, extending the lead to 28-10. Judkins added his second score of the night, a one-yard run before Henderson sealed the victory with a 24-yard touchdown run in the fourth quarter. The Buckeyes' defense shined in high-pressure moments, including a critical goal-line stand that ended Tennessee’s hopes of a comeback. Tennessee managed a late touchdown from Iamaleava but never seriously threatened Ohio State’s lead. Initial Thoughts vs. Reality Before the game, Tennessee’s balanced offense, led by Iamaleava, was expected to test Ohio State’s defense. However, the Volunteers struggled to sustain drives, averaging just 3.7 yards per play and converting only six of 16 third downs. Ohio State’s defense, which leads the nation in points allowed per game, lived up to its billing by forcing quick stops and limiting explosive plays. Conversely, Ohio State’s offense was pegged to rely on the run game, but it was the passing attack that shined early. Howard’s efficient performance (83% completion rate, 12.7 yards per completion) opened up opportunities for Henderson and Judkins, who combined for 156 rushing yards and four touchdowns. Key Stats Ohio State: Will Howard: 24/29, 311 yards, 2 TD, 1 INT Jeremiah Smith: 6 receptions, 103 yards, 2 TD TreVeyon Henderson: 10 carries, 80 yards, 2 TD Quinshon Judkins: 10 carries, 34 yards, 2 TD Defense: 4 sacks, 6 tackles for loss, 256 total yards allowed Tennessee: Nico Iamaleava: 14/31, 104 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT; 20 carries, 47 yards, 2 TD Peyton Lewis: 10 carries, 77 yards Total Offense: 256 yards What’s Next? Ohio State now turns its attention to No. 1 Oregon, the undefeated Big Ten champions. The rematch will take place in the Rose Bowl on New Year’s Day, with the Buckeyes seeking redemption after a heartbreaking 32-31 loss to the Ducks earlier this season. For Tennessee, the season ends with a 10-3 record and valuable lessons learned from their first CFP appearance. Head coach Josh Heupel will look to build on this experience as the Volunteers aim to remain contenders in the years to come. “This is a step forward for our program,” Heupel said. “We didn’t get the result we wanted tonight, but we’ll be back.”

In the first round of the expanded College Football Playoff, No. 5 Texas capitalized on a dominant rushing performance and key defensive stops to defeat No. 12 Clemson 38-24 in front of a packed crowd at Darrell K. Royal-Texas Memorial Stadium in Austin. The Longhorns (12-2) now advance to the Peach Bowl, where they will face No. 4 Arizona State. Setting the Tone with the Ground Game Texas leaned heavily on its running game, amassing 292 yards on the ground at an impressive 6.1 yards per carry. Jaydon Blue led the charge with 146 yards and two touchdowns, including a game-sealing 77-yard sprint in the fourth quarter that put the Longhorns up 38-24. “Once I got past the line, I just kept running. I knew they weren’t going to catch me,” Blue said of his electrifying run. Quintrevion Wisner complemented Blue’s effort with 110 yards and two first-half touchdowns, helping Texas establish control early. Ewers Efficient, Defense Stands Tall Quarterback Quinn Ewers delivered a poised performance, completing 17 of 24 passes for 202 yards and a touchdown. His first-half precision, highlighted by a 43-yard connection with Matthew Golden and a 19-yard touchdown pass to tight end Gunnar Helm, helped Texas build a commanding 28-10 halftime lead. Ewers’ ability to spread the ball efficiently kept Clemson’s defense on its heels and played a crucial role in the Longhorns' offensive success. On the defensive side, Texas faced a strong challenge from Clemson quarterback Cade Klubnik, who threw for 336 yards and three touchdowns while completing 60% of his passes. Despite Klubnik’s late-game surge that cut Texas’ lead to 31-24, the Longhorns' defense delivered when it mattered most. A critical goal-line stand in the fourth quarter, featuring back-to-back stops at the 1-yard line, extinguished Clemson’s comeback hopes. Texas also tallied three sacks and seven tackles for loss, disrupting Clemson’s offensive rhythm and limiting their run game to just 76 yards on 24 attempts (3.2 yards per carry). “Our defense has been our backbone all year, and they showed up again tonight when we needed them most,” Texas head coach Steve Sarkisian said. Initial Thoughts vs. Reality Before the game, Clemson’s passing attack, led by Klubnik, was expected to challenge Texas' defense. While Klubnik showcased his talent with 336 passing yards and three touchdowns, the Longhorns’ ability to stifle Clemson’s run game and deliver timely defensive stops ultimately swung the game in Texas’ favor. Clemson’s reliance on the pass made their offense predictable, allowing Texas to key in on crucial late-game situations. On the other hand, Texas’ rushing attack, identified pregame as a potential advantage, surpassed expectations. The Longhorns ran for 292 yards on 48 carries, averaging 6.1 yards per attempt. Jaydon Blue was electric with 146 yards and two touchdowns, including a game-sealing 77-yard burst in the fourth quarter. Quintrevion Wisner contributed 110 yards and two scores, while the offensive line consistently overpowered Clemson’s defensive front. Texas' dominant ground game not only controlled the tempo but also exposed Clemson's defensive weaknesses, cementing the Longhorns' victory. Key Stats Texas: Jaydon Blue: 146 rushing yards, 2 TDs Quintrevion Wisner: 110 rushing yards, 2 TDs Quinn Ewers: 17/24, 202 yards, 1 TD Gunnar Helm: 6 receptions, 77 yards, 1 TD Clemson: Cade Klubnik: 26/43, 336 yards, 3 TDs, 1 INT Rushing Offense: 76 yards (3.2 YPC) T.J. Moore: 7 receptions, 91 yards, 1 TD What’s Next? Texas moves on to face No. 4 Arizona State in the Peach Bowl on New Year’s Day. The Longhorns will look to build on their dominant rushing performance as they aim for a spot in the semifinals. For Clemson, the season ends with questions about its defensive front and how head coach Dabo Swinney can address the team’s struggles against physical rushing attacks. Despite the loss, the Tigers made strides in returning to the College Football Playoff and will look to build on this momentum next season. In the first-ever on-campus CFP matchup for Texas, the Longhorns showcased their offensive firepower and defensive resilience, propelling them one step closer to a national championship.

In the first round of the College Football Playoff, No. 6 Penn State showcased its dominance on both sides of the ball, crushing No. 11 SMU 38-3 at Beaver Stadium. The Nittany Lions relied on a stifling defense, including two first-half pick-sixes and a powerful ground game, to secure the victory and advance to face No. 3 Boise State in the Fiesta Bowl. Setting the Tone Early Penn State’s defense made a statement from the outset, with linebacker Dominic DeLuca intercepting SMU quarterback Kevin Jennings on the Mustangs’ opening drive. DeLuca returned the interception 23 yards for a touchdown, giving the Nittany Lions an early 7-0 lead. Jennings’ struggles continued later in the first quarter, throwing another interception to Tony Rojas, who returned it 59 yards for Penn State’s second defensive touchdown. These turnovers gave Penn State a commanding 14-0 lead and set the tone for the rest of the game. Defensive Dominance Penn State’s defense was relentless, forcing three interceptions and holding SMU to just 218 total yards. The Mustangs, known for their high-powered offense led by Jennings and running back Brashard Smith, were unable to find a rhythm. Smith was limited to 43 yards on 17 carries, and SMU’s offense failed to reach the end zone. The Nittany Lions tallied 10 tackles for loss and sacked Jennings three times, with linebacker Abdul Carter leading the charge. SMU’s best opportunity came in the third quarter when they drove into the red zone but were forced to settle for a field goal after multiple penalties stalled their momentum. Ground Game Fuels Nittany Lions On offense, Penn State leaned heavily on its running backs. Kaytron Allen rushed for 85 yards and two touchdowns, including a 25-yard score in the second quarter that extended the lead to 21-0. Nicholas Singleton added 66 yards and a touchdown as the Nittany Lions averaged 5.6 yards per carry. Quarterback Drew Allar managed the game efficiently, completing 13 of 23 passes for 127 yards. While the passing attack didn’t produce any touchdowns, it complemented the ground game and controlled the clock, keeping SMU’s offense off the field. Initial Thoughts vs. Reality The pre-game analysis highlighted the matchup between SMU’s explosive offense and Penn State’s elite defense. The Nittany Lions’ defense delivered far beyond expectations, holding SMU to a single field goal and scoring two defensive touchdowns. Kevin Jennings, who entered the game with just eight interceptions on the season, threw three in the first half alone. Penn State’s offensive strategy also matched predictions, as they exploited SMU’s undersized linebackers and controlled the game through their running attack. SMU’s inability to handle Penn State’s physicality in the trenches was a decisive factor. *Please note I compiled the final stats for this article with 10 minutes to go in the 4th QTR of a 38-3 game. Key Stats Penn State: Kaytron Allen: 13 carries, 85 yards, 2 TDs Nicholas Singleton: 10 carries, 66 yards, 1 TD Dominic DeLuca: 2 INTs, 1 returned for a touchdown Tony Rojas: 1 INT, 1 returned for a touchdown SMU: Kevin Jennings: 17 of 33, 158 yards, 3 INTs Brashard Smith: 17 carries, 43 yards Total Yards: 218 What’s Next? Penn State advances to the Fiesta Bowl, where they will face No. 3 Boise State on New Year’s Eve. The Nittany Lions will look to maintain their momentum, particularly on defense, as they prepare to face a balanced Boise State offense. For SMU, the loss caps a successful 11-3 season, but their inability to match Penn State’s physicality in the trenches exposed areas for improvement. With a young core led by Jennings and Smith, the Mustangs will aim to build on their playoff experience moving forward. Penn State’s commanding victory underscores their playoff credentials and sets the stage for what promises to be an intriguing quarterfinal matchup.

In the first on-campus College Football Playoff game in history, No. 7 Notre Dame delivered a commanding 27-17 victory over No. 10 Indiana, propelled by a record-setting performance from running back Jeremiah Love and a suffocating defensive effort. The Fighting Irish (12-1) showcased the dominant physicality and defensive prowess that fueled their 11-game win streak, while Indiana’s (11-2) magical season ended under the weight of Notre Dame’s relentless attack. With the win, Marcus Freeman’s team advances to face SEC champion Georgia in the Sugar Bowl, taking one step closer to a national title. Setting the Tone Early On Notre Dame’s third play from scrimmage, Jeremiyah Love broke loose for a 98-yard touchdown run, tying the school record set in 2015 and marking the longest run in CFP history. Love’s sprint gave Notre Dame an immediate 7-0 lead and electrified the crowd at Notre Dame Stadium, where snowflakes danced in the brisk December air. “I was looking up at the video board — he wasn’t going to catch me,” Love said. Although Love reinjured his knee in the first half, his eight-carry, 108-yard performance set the tone for Notre Dame’s offense. The Irish controlled the trenches early, capitalizing on their offensive line’s strength against an Indiana defense that had been one of the nation’s best at limiting rushing yards before contact. A Defensive Clinic Notre Dame’s defense lived up to its reputation, neutralizing Indiana’s balanced offense from the opening whistle. Xavier Watts intercepted Indiana quarterback Kurtis Rourke on the Hoosiers’ first drive, setting the stage for a dominant defensive effort. Rourke, who entered the game with one of the nation’s top passing grades, struggled under constant pressure from Notre Dame’s front seven. He finished 20 of 33 for 215 yards with two late touchdowns, one interception, and minimal support from a ground game that managed just 63 rushing yards. “They took it to us,” Indiana coach Curt Cignetti said. “Their defense suffocated our offense until the last 1:50 or whatever.” Notre Dame’s defense, ranked among the best in the nation, held Indiana’s high-scoring offense to a single field goal until the final two minutes. Leonard’s Leadership Shines Notre Dame quarterback Riley Leonard rebounded from an early interception to deliver a composed performance. He accounted for two touchdowns—one passing, one rushing—and managed the game efficiently, finishing with 201 passing yards and 30 rushing yards. Leonard’s fourth-quarter touchdown run broke the school’s single-season record for rushing touchdowns by a quarterback, further cementing his status as a leader of this playoff-bound team. “We’re just trying to stay alive and play as many games as we can,” Leonard said. “This is why I came here—to play for a [national] championship.” Initial Thoughts vs. Reality Before the game, Notre Dame’s ability to dominate the trenches with their rushing attack and defense was seen as the key to victory. That prediction proved accurate, as Love’s early touchdown and the defense’s smothering performance dictated the game’s outcome. Indiana’s balanced offense, led by Kurtis Rourke and running back Jaylin Lucas, was expected to challenge Notre Dame’s defense. However, the Hoosiers’ struggles in the run game (63 yards) and inability to handle Notre Dame’s pass rush left them unable to mount a consistent attack. The implied score of 27-21 closely mirrored the final result of 27-17, but Notre Dame’s defense outperformed expectations by holding Indiana to 17 points—most of which came in garbage time. Key Stats Notre Dame: Jeremiah Love: 8 carries, 108 yards, 1 TD (98-yard run) Riley Leonard: 23 of 32, 201 passing yards, 1 TD, 1 INT; 30 rushing yards, 1 TD Xavier Watts: 1 INT, 3 tackles Indiana: Kurtis Rourke: 20 of 33, 215 yards, 2 TD, 1 INT Rushing Offense: 63 yards (3.0 YPC) Mikail Kamara: 1 sack, 4 pressures What’s Next? Notre Dame will face No. 2 Georgia in the Sugar Bowl on New Year’s Day, looking to advance to the CFP semifinals and keep their national championship hopes alive. With their defense firing on all cylinders and a potent rushing attack, the Irish are poised to challenge the Bulldogs. For Indiana, the loss caps an incredible turnaround season under first-year head coach Curt Cignetti. While falling short of the ultimate goal, the Hoosiers set a single-season school record for wins and re-established themselves as a program on the rise. “No one’s as disappointed as I am, but this team accomplished things no other Indiana team did,” Cignetti said. As the snowflakes settled over South Bend, Notre Dame celebrated not just a win, but a historic moment in their storied program—a victory that could propel them to even greater heights.

No. 11 SMU Mustangs at No. 6 Penn State Nittany Lions (Saturday, 12 PM EST on TNT/Max) SMU’s high-powered offense, led by QB Kevin Jennings and RB Brashard Smith, presents a significant challenge for Penn State’s defense. Can Penn State Contain SMU’s Dynamic Offense? SMU’s high-powered offense, led by QB Kevin Jennings and RB Brashard Smith, presents a significant challenge for Penn State’s defense. Jennings has been outstanding against single-high coverages, posting a 90.5 passing grade, while Smith is among the most versatile backs in the nation. Penn State’s defense, known for its elite pass rush and strong linebacker play, must rise to the occasion. Penn State, meanwhile, will look to lean on its physicality, especially in the trenches, to wear down SMU. If the Nittany Lions can dominate on both sides of the line of scrimmage, they should have the upper hand. Three Keys for Penn State to Win 1. Control the Line of Scrimmage Penn State’s offensive line must open up lanes for their running backs and give Drew Allar time to find his receivers. The Nittany Lions’ rushing attack will need to exploit SMU’s undersized linebackers, who struggle against downhill runs. 2. Lean on Tyler Warren Tight end Tyler Warren has been the Nittany Lions’ most reliable offensive weapon, leading all Power Four tight ends in receptions and yards. Warren must have a big game against SMU’s safeties, who rank among the best in the nation. 3. Pressure Kevin Jennings Penn State’s pass rush, led by Abdul Carter and Dani Dennis-Sutton, must disrupt Jennings’ timing. The Nittany Lions cannot allow SMU’s quarterback to get comfortable in the pocket, especially against single-high coverage schemes. Key NFL Draft Prospect to Watch for Penn State: Abdul Carter, EDGE Carter is a projected top-10 pick in the 2025 NFL Draft, known for his relentless motor and game-wrecking ability. His impact as both a pass rusher and run defender will be crucial to Penn State’s success. Three Keys for SMU to Win 1. Win the Perimeter Matchups SMU’s wide receivers must take advantage of Penn State’s occasional lapses in single-high coverage. Kevin Jennings has thrived against such schemes, and the Mustangs will need big plays through the air to stay competitive. 2. Get Brashard Smith in Space Smith, one of the nation’s most dynamic backs, must be utilized effectively in both the run and passing game. Penn State has been vulnerable on outside runs, which SMU can exploit with Smith’s speed and versatility. 3. Hold Up in the Trenches SMU’s offensive line must protect Jennings and create running lanes against Penn State’s ferocious defensive front. A clean pocket and a balanced offensive attack are critical for the Mustangs to keep pace. Key NFL Draft Prospect to Watch for SMU: Brashard Smith, RB Smith, with a 91.2 PFF grade, is one of the most versatile offensive weapons in the nation. His ability to create explosive plays both as a runner and receiver will be vital to SMU’s chances. Current Odds and Prediction Penn State:  -10.5 Implied Game Total:  50 Points The predicted final score is approximately 31-21  in favor of Penn State. The Nittany Lions’ defense, led by Abdul Carter, is expected to disrupt SMU’s offensive rhythm. Offensively, Tyler Warren and the Penn State ground game should find success against the Mustangs' undersized front seven. While SMU’s explosive offense poses a significant threat, Penn State’s physicality and home-field advantage give the Nittany Lions the edge in this intriguing first-round matchup.

No. 12 Clemson Tigers at No. 5 Texas Longhorns (Saturday, 4 PM EST on TNT/Max) Texas’ elite rushing attack and defensive front should overwhelm Clemson, whose edge defense and interior offensive line are a weakness. Can Clemson Contain Texas’ Explosive Outside Zone Rushing Attack? The No. 5 Texas Longhorns (11-2) narrowly missed a first-round bye after an overtime loss to Georgia in the SEC Championship, while No. 12 Clemson (10-3) earned the final playoff seed with a dramatic win over SMU in the ACC Championship. Texas brings a potent rushing attack and elite defense into the matchup, while Clemson relies heavily on the playmaking ability of QB Cade Klubnik. With the winner advancing to face No. 4 Arizona State in the quarterfinals, the stakes couldn’t be higher for these two storied programs. Three Keys for Texas to Win 1. Exploit Clemson’s Weakness on Outside Runs Texas has a dominant offensive line anchored by Kelvin Banks Jr. and Cameron Williams, who thrive in outside zone concepts. Clemson has struggled to contain outside runs, allowing 6.0 yards per carry on those plays, the sixth-worst in the Power Four. Texas needs to lean on this advantage and create explosive plays on the ground with Quintrevion Wisner and Jaydon Blue. 2. Dominate on Defense Texas boasts the best defense in college football, ranking first in coverage grade (92.9) and third in pass-rushing grade (90.2). The Longhorns must pressure Cade Klubnik and force him into mistakes while shutting down Clemson’s interior rushing attack. 3. Avoid Turnovers Quinn Ewers and the Texas offense have been susceptible to turnovers in key games. Keeping the ball secure and avoiding momentum-shifting plays will be critical against a Clemson defense that thrives on creating takeaways. Key NFL Draft Prospect to Watch for Texas: Kelvin Banks Jr., OT A potential top-10 pick, Banks excels in both pass protection and run blocking. His ability to neutralize Clemson’s edge rushers and pave the way for outside runs will be crucial for Texas’ success. Three Keys for Clemson to Win 1. Cade Klubnik Must Be Elite Klubnik has proven he can make big plays, ranking eighth among FBS quarterbacks with an 87.5 passing grade. Against Texas’ top-ranked defense, he must rise to the occasion and deliver a near-perfect performance. 2. Shore Up the Edge Defense Clemson’s edge rushers have struggled to contain outside zone runs, but this must change against Texas. Players like T.J. Parker and Jaheim Lawson need to step up to prevent Texas from dominating on the perimeter. 3. Win the Turnover Battle Clemson has a knack for creating turnovers in high-stakes games, and that could be the equalizer against a more talented Texas team. Short fields and game-changing plays are essential for the Tigers to pull off the upset. Key NFL Draft Prospect to Watch for Clemson: Cade Klubnik, QB The engine of Clemson’s offense, Klubnik’s dual-threat ability, and decision-making under pressure will be pivotal. If he can exploit Texas’ defense and avoid mistakes, Clemson has a chance to keep the game competitive. Current Odds and Prediction Texas:  -11.5 Implied Game Total:  51.5 Points Predicted Score: Texas 31, Clemson 20 Texas’ elite rushing attack and defensive front should overwhelm Clemson, whose edge defense and interior offensive line are glaring weaknesses. While Cade Klubnik has the talent to keep Clemson competitive, the Tigers will struggle to score consistently against Texas’ top-tier defense. The Longhorns take care of business at home and advance to the Peach Bowl to face Arizona State.

No. 10 Indiana Hoosiers at No. 7 Notre Dame Fighting Irish (Friday, 8 PM EST on ABC/ESPN) Notre Dame’s elite rushing attack has carried the team all season, but Indiana’s defense presents its toughest challenge yet. Can Notre Dame’s Ground Game Dominate Indiana’s Stout Defense? Notre Dame’s elite rushing attack has carried the team all season, but Indiana’s defense presents its toughest challenge yet. The Fighting Irish rank third in the FBS in rushing EPA and lead Power Four teams with 6.7 yards per carry. However, Indiana’s defense allows only 3.7 yards per attempt and leads the nation in yards before contact allowed (0.8). The battle between Notre Dame’s offensive line and Indiana’s physical front seven will likely determine the game. If Notre Dame can establish the run, it will control the tempo. But if Indiana can force Riley Leonard into third-and-long situations, the Hoosiers could have a chance to pull off the upset. Three Keys for Notre Dame to Win 1. Dominate on the Ground Notre Dame’s rushing attack, led by Jeremiyah Love and quarterback Riley Leonard, has been the backbone of their offense. The Fighting Irish must control the clock and wear down Indiana’s defense to dictate the pace of the game. 2. Force Kurtis Rourke into Mistakes Notre Dame’s pass rush and secondary must pressure Indiana QB Kurtis Rourke, who thrives under pressure with a nation-leading 87.0 PFF passing grade. Generating turnovers will be critical for Notre Dame to prevent Indiana’s explosive offense from finding rhythm. 3. Win the Trenches on Defense Notre Dame’s defensive line needs to stifle Indiana’s rushing attack and force the Hoosiers into obvious passing situations. A dominant performance in the trenches could limit Indiana’s balanced offense. Key NFL Draft Prospect to Watch for Notre Dame: Xavier Watts, Safety Watts is a ball-hawking safety with a 30.4 passer rating allowed and an 85.6 PFF grade . His ability to shut down passing lanes and force turnovers could be pivotal in neutralizing Indiana’s offense. Three Keys for Indiana to Win 1. Disrupt Notre Dame’s Offense Indiana’s standout edge rusher Mikail Kamara must lead the charge. With 60 pressures (2nd in the nation) and an 89.2 PFF grade, Kamara can disrupt Notre Dame’s ground game and force Riley Leonard into difficult throws under duress. 2. Protect Kurtis Rourke Indiana’s offensive line must hold up against Notre Dame’s pass rush to give Rourke time to operate. Rourke is second among FBS QBs with a 91.8 passing grade, but he needs a clean pocket to connect with his receivers. 3. Limit Big Plays on Defense Indiana’s zone-heavy defense has excelled at preventing explosive plays. They must bottle up Notre Dame’s three-headed rushing attack and force Leonard to beat them through the air, where he has struggled against zone coverage. Key NFL Draft Prospect to Watch for Indiana: Mikail Kamara, EDGE Kamara is the centerpiece of Indiana’s defense, combining explosiveness and versatility to wreak havoc on opposing offenses. A game-changing performance from him could swing the outcome in Indiana’s favor. Current Odds and Prediction Notre Dame:  -8 Implied Game Total:  48 Points The predicted final score is approximately 27-21  in favor of Notre Dame. The Fighting Irish’s dominant ground game, combined with their home-field advantage, makes them the favorite. However, Indiana’s elite pass defense and big-play ability on offense give them a legitimate chance to pull off the upset if they can control the line of scrimmage and limit mistakes. This game is a true clash of styles, with Notre Dame’s methodical rushing attack battling Indiana’s balanced offensive firepower and stout defensive front.

No. 9 Tennessee Volunteers at No. 8 Ohio State Buckeyes (Saturday, 8 PM EST on ABC/ESPN) Ohio State’s weakened O-line must contain Tennessee’s top pass rush, or Tennessee will wreak havoc on Will Howard. Can Ohio State’s offensive line hold up Against The Vols' Tough Defensive Line? Ohio State’s offensive line has struggled significantly since the loss of star left tackle Josh Simmons and center Seth McLaughlin to season-ending injuries. Their pass-blocking grade ranks 128th in the FBS since Week 7, leaving QB Will Howard vulnerable in the pocket. Tennessee’s defense, led by James Pearce Jr., ranks 12th in pass-rushing grade and 11th in pressure rate, creating a massive challenge for the Buckeyes' depleted offensive line. If Ohio State can find a way to protect Howard and allow him time to distribute the ball to their elite receiving corps, the Buckeyes could find success. But if Tennessee’s defensive front dominates, it could be a long night for the Buckeyes' offense. Three Keys for Tennessee to Win 1. Dominate the Line of Scrimmage on Defense Tennessee’s defensive front is one of the nation’s best, spearheaded by James Pearce Jr. The Volunteers need to exploit Ohio State’s weakened offensive line to generate consistent pressure on Will Howard. Forcing hurried throws or sacks will keep Ohio State’s passing attack out of rhythm. 2. Establish the Ground Game Tennessee’s rushing attack, led by Dylan Sampson, needs to control the clock and keep Ohio State’s defense on the field. Sampson, who boasts a 90.7 PFF rushing grade, must find success against a Buckeyes defense that ranks fourth in run defense grade. 3. Limit Explosive Plays Ohio State thrives on big plays, particularly through the air with receivers like Emeka Egbuka and freshman Jeremiah Smith. Tennessee’s secondary, led by Jermod McCoy, must stay disciplined and avoid giving up deep shots that can change the game’s momentum. Key NFL Draft Prospect to Watch for Tennessee: James Pearce Jr., EDGE Pearce is a potential first-round pick with an elite 89.6 pass-rush grade and the top pressure rate among all FBS edge defenders. He has the ability to single-handedly disrupt Ohio State’s passing game. Three Keys for Ohio State to Win 1. Protect Will Howard The offensive line must find a way to slow down Tennessee’s pass rush. Utilizing quick passes, play action, and creative protection schemes will be essential to giving Howard the time he needs to find his elite wideouts. 2. Control the Defensive Line Ohio State’s defense must stop Dylan Sampson and the Volunteers’ ground game. If the Buckeyes can dominate the trenches and force Tennessee into third-and-long situations, they can dictate the flow of the game. 3. Exploit Tennessee’s Secondary With Tennessee focusing on pressuring the quarterback, Ohio State needs to lean on Emeka Egbuka and Jeremiah Smith to win their matchups. Howard must be precise and quick in his reads to capitalize on any openings in the Volunteers' secondary. Key NFL Draft Prospect to Watch for Ohio State: Emeka Egbuka, WR Egbuka is a polished route runner and a top target for Will Howard. With elite hands and the ability to create separation, Egbuka could exploit Tennessee’s secondary and be the difference-maker for Ohio State. Current Odds and Prediction Ohio State:  -7.5 to -8 Implied Game Total:  46-47 Points The predicted final score is approximately 27-20 in favor of Ohio State, reflecting the 7.5-point spread and 46.5-point over/under. Ohio State’s top-ranked defense, allowing only 10.9 points per game, and their home-field advantage at Ohio Stadium underpin their favored status. Tennessee’s offense, while averaging 37.3 points per game, has struggled against elite defenses like Georgia and Alabama, managing just 20.5 points per game in those contests. The implied total suggests a game driven by strong defensive performances, with Tennessee’s pass rush expected to challenge Ohio State’s offensive line while Ohio State’s playmakers exploit key opportunities to secure a hard-fought victory.