The 2026 NFL Draft tight end rankings deliver at least one true Day 1 prospect in Oregon’s Kenyon Sadiq. Beyond Sadiq, this is a deep class filled with complementary TE2 types and quality depth pieces — but it lacks multiple high-end, blue-chip talents at the top. This group is more projection-based, featuring a mix of strong in-line blockers and movement “F” tight ends who aren’t dominant at the point of attack. Our TE2 is Vanderbilt’s Eli Stowers. While he’s a willing blocker, he profiles more as a complementary number two or move “F” tight end with strong receiving chops. The good news? The NFL is leaning into heavier 12 personnel, and a player like Stowers could thrive paired with a true in-line option — think a team like Seattle alongside a blocker-receiver hybrid like AJ Barner. As you move down the board, there’s a cluster of Day Two and Day Three names who bring in-line blocking value with functional pass-catching ability. Georgia’s Oscar Delp fits that mold — a balanced tight end with TE1 upside. Michigan’s Marlin Klein also flashes a very high ceiling, but injuries and offensive limitations in 2025 leave some projection still on the table. Overall, this class brings strong depth and defined role diversity, even if it lacks multiple generational prospects at the top. League evaluators view this group as reliable — especially on Day Two — with meaningful starter and rotational value inside the top 100 picks. If you need depth or a high-quality TE2, this is the year to find one on Day Two or Day Three. Go to other positional grades: QB | RB | WR  | TE  | OL  | IDL  | Edge  | LB  | CB  | SAF 2026 NFL Draft Tight End Rankings 1). Kenyon Sadiq, 6’3”, 250 lbs, Oregon Grade Tier:  High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  Late 1st – Early 2nd Round Analysis: A rare two-phase tight end with legitimate three-down value. Sadiq blends burst, acceleration, and YAC ability with competitive in-line blocking temperament. He stresses defenses vertically up the seam and can align in-line, slot, or detached. Continued refinement in route detail will determine how quickly he reaches his Pro Bowl ceiling, but the traits profile as an instant-impact starter in a multiple offense. 2). Eli Stowers, 6’4”, 225 lbs, Vanderbilt Grade Tier:  Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Analysis: A movement-based “F” tight end with explosive seam speed and run-after-catch ability. Stowers wins with fluid hips, acceleration, and natural hands. His lean frame limits in-line blocking projection early, but his vertical stress ability and mismatch upside make him a valuable TE2 with starter potential in spread or 12-personnel offenses. 3). Oscar Delp, 6’5”, 245 lbs, Georgia Grade Tier:  Low-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  3rd–4th Round Analysis: A polished, balanced tight end who wins with route discipline, spatial awareness, and dependable hands. Delp provides reliable underneath separation and competitive in-line effort. While not a dynamic mismatch athlete, he offers a high floor as a TE2 with rotational value and eventual starter upside in a pro-style system. 4). Max Klare, 6’4”, 240 lbs, Ohio State Grade Tier:  Low-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  3rd–4th Round Analysis: A smooth, route-savvy receiving tight end who creates separation with nuance rather than power. Klare operates well in space and offers dependable hands over the middle. Limited in-line strength caps his Y projection, but he profiles as a high-floor flex tight end in pass-heavy offenses. 5). Michael Trigg, 6’4”, 240 lbs, Baylor Grade Tier:  Low-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  3rd–4th Round Analysis: A long, rangy flex tight end with red-zone upside and vertical seam value. Trigg wins with catch radius and body control but remains developmental as a route technician and blocker. Early career role projects as a move/F tight end with mismatch packages. 6). Justin Joly, 6’3”, 250 lbs, NC State Grade Tier:  Low-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  4th Round Analysis: A sturdy, chain-moving flex tight end with strong hands and leverage awareness. Joly wins through body control and contested-catch reliability rather than burst. Blocking consistency limits full-time Y projection, but he offers reliable TE2 value. 7). Marlin Klein, 6’6”, 250 lbs, Michigan Grade Tier:  Low-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  4th–5th Round Analysis: A traditional in-line Y tight end with early-down blocking utility. Klein brings size, leverage, and toughness at the point of attack. Limited vertical explosiveness caps mismatch upside, but he projects as a dependable TE2/3 in heavy personnel. 8). Jack Endries, 6’4”, 240 lbs, Texas Grade Tier:  Low-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  4th–5th Round Analysis: A high-floor receiving tight end who wins with awareness and reliable hands. Endries consistently finds soft spots in coverage but lacks high-end speed. Best suited as a flex TE2 in spacing-based passing systems. 9). Sam Roush, 6’5”, 260 lbs, Stanford Grade Tier:  Low-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  5th Round Analysis: One of the more traditional in-line Y tight ends in the class. Roush shows functional blocking ability and dependable hands underneath. Limited twitch and separation ability project him as a steady TE2 with three-down utility in balanced offenses. 10). Tanner Koziol, 6’7”, 240 lbs, Houston Grade Tier:  Backup Level NFL Projection:  6th–7th Round Analysis: A towering possession tight end with red-zone value and a strong catch radius. Koziol wins at the catch point but lacks separation, burst, and consistent in-line power. Projects as a situational TE3 with specialized scoring-area usage. How We Grade the Tight End Position Tight ends are evaluated primarily on role versatility, receiving impact, and in-line functional strength. Grades are driven by how consistently a player can create mismatches in the passing game while maintaining assignment integrity as a blocker. In today’s NFL, tight ends must threaten all three levels as receivers while holding up against defensive ends and linebackers in both zone and gap schemes. Key factors include route tree diversity, separation ability versus man and zone, catch radius, ball tracking, and yards-after-catch creation. We also weigh in-line blocking technique, anchor strength, hand placement, and willingness to sustain through contact. Alignment versatility — whether a player can function as a true Y, move F, H-back, or detached slot option — is critical. In a league built on matchup stress and personnel disguise, tight ends who can impact both the passing game and the run structure without tipping tendencies carry the highest value in our evaluation. Football Scout 365 Grade Scale Elite NFL Projection:  Top 5–10 Picks (1st Round) Franchise-altering talent with elite physical tools, advanced processing, and minimal weaknesses. Immediate high-impact starter with difference-making ability. Near Elite NFL Projection:  Mid-to-Late 1st Round High-level prospect with strong traits and football intelligence. Expected to become a major contributor early in their career with Pro Bowl upside. High-End Starter Potential NFL Projection:  2nd–3rd Round Projects as a quality NFL starter with strong tools and functional traits. May require refinement, but offers consistent impact with development. Mid-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  4th–5th Round Dependable starter or high-end rotational player. Solid athletic profile with some limitations that cap ceiling or require scheme fit. Low-Level Starter Potential NFL Projection:  6th–7th Round Developmental prospect with starter upside in defined roles. Inconsistencies in technique, processing, or durability limit long-term ceiling. Backup Level NFL Projection:  Undrafted Free Agent (UDFA) Depth player or rotational piece. Functional traits but limited upside for a long-term starting role. Not NFL Level NFL Projection:  Unlikely to Make NFL Roster Significant developmental needs across athleticism, technique, or processing. Long-shot to stick at the NFL level.

The 2026 edition of the Reese’s Senior Bowl wraps up its final practice session on Thursday before culminating with the game on Saturday. As is the case every year, the practice week is where the true evaluation takes place, and it remains the portion of the event I value most from an NFL scouting perspective. Several prospects separated themselves during the week in Mobile, and as I do annually, this report focuses on the players who stood out the most during practice sessions and, more importantly, those who meaningfully enhanced their NFL Draft stock heading into the next phase of the pre-draft process. Garrett Nussmeier — QB, LSU Garrett Nussmeier has been consistent in Senior Bowl practices this week, and while Diego Pavia has arguably outplayed him so far, Nussmeier remains one of the most closely watched quarterbacks in Mobile after a sharp swing in his draft stock over the past year. Once viewed as a potential first-round pick following a breakout 2024 season, his momentum stalled after an injury-affected 2025 campaign in which he played just nine games and navigated a coaching change. Measuring 6’1”, 202 pounds at weigh-ins, size will be a limiting factor for some teams, but his practice work has been steady as he continues to work back from roughly three months away from meaningful game action. He currently carries a Day Two grade, with how early he comes off the board tied to his participation at the NFL Combine and LSU Pro Day, where his background growing up around the game with an NFL offensive coordinator father shows in how he approaches the process. Ted Hurst — WR, Georgia State Hurst delivered one of the defining plays of the week with a high-level one-handed grab that showcased his length, body control, and ball skills. At 6’3”, 207 pounds, he consistently showed the ability to stack corners vertically and adjust late to the football. His route pacing stood out, particularly on curls and comebacks, where he sank his hips well for a taller receiver and created functional separation. While he lacks true burner speed, his 61% contested-catch rate over the past two seasons and reliable hands profile him as a possession receiver with vertical value. Added strength against press coverage will determine how high he climbs, but his Senior Bowl week significantly boosted his draft stock. Tyren Montgomery — WR, John Carroll (D-III) Montgomery was the clear small-school riser of the week and one of the most intriguing prospects in Mobile. A former LSU basketball walk-on who transitioned through Nicholls State before landing at Division III John Carroll, Montgomery consistently won in one-on-one drills with short-area burst, agility, and competitiveness at the catch point. His ability to separate and finish against higher-profile defensive backs validated his production - 119 catches, 1,528 yards, and 15 touchdowns in 2025. Montgomery entered the week as an afterthought nationally, but his practice tape alone put him firmly on the NFL scouting radar as a developmental slot/Z receiver with upside. Malachi Fields — WR, Notre Dame Fields reminded evaluators in Mobile why his name has stayed relevant in NFL Draft circles. At 6’4”, 220 pounds, he looks the part of a prototypical X receiver. This week, he has consistently flashed strong hands, solid body control, and fluid route-running. While his college production never reached elite levels, the traits have always been NFL-caliber. His highlight reel diving catch on day two of the Senior Bowl drew mass attention on social media, but the more telling rep was a cleanly executed comeback route, where he sold vertical, stayed fluid at the breakpoint, and snapped it off with timing. There are some scouts who have an early-day-two grade on Fields, but he could elevate into the late-day-one range if he continues to stack good days through this All-Star and NFL Combine process. Derrick Moore — EDGE, Michigan Moore was one of the most disruptive defensive linemen during the week, consistently winning with power, leverage, and improved rush sequencing. He steamrolled Miami OT Markel Bell with a well-timed bull rush and flashed again as a run defender, using length and play strength to control the point of attack. Moore finished the 2025 season with 11 sacks, 41 pressures, and a top-15 PFF defensive grade, and his Senior Bowl performance reinforced that growth. At 6’3”, 260 pounds, he’s no longer just a speed-to-power rusher. His added inside counters and improved get-off have elevated his profile. He’s solidifying himself as a high-upside edge with early day two or even late day one potential. TJ Parker — EDGE, Clemson Parker entered the week with questions after a dip in 2025 production, but his power profile showed up immediately in practice. He unloaded his signature long-arm bull rush to walk Maryland OT Alan Herron straight back into the pocket and followed it with a clean inside counter on another rep. His strength and leverage remain calling cards, though teams will want to see more diversity in his rush plan. If Parker can continue layering counters off his power move, he has a chance to regain momentum after entering the year with top-10 buzz. Kyle Louis — LB, Pittsburgh Louis doesn’t fit the traditional linebacker mold at just under 6’0” and 224 pounds, but his coverage ability separated him from the pack. He operated as a nickel linebacker hybrid, showing quick processing, burst downhill, and excellent ball skills in coverage drills. One rep in particular stood out, where he mirrored a running back on an option route and undercut the throw for a pass breakup. His skill set profiles best in sub-packages, but his versatility and coverage instincts make him a rising name in this class. Colton Hood — CB, Tennessee Hood entered the week as one of the highest-rated prospects in Mobile and was tested accordingly. In a high-leverage one-on-one rep against SMU WR Jordan Hudson, Hood stayed in phase, located the ball, and knocked away a fade for a decisive win. While he had some ups and downs earlier in practice, his confidence, competitive nature, and ball skills stood out. Questions remain about his long speed and limited film due to multiple transfers, but Hood used Senior Bowl practices to reinforce his first-round traits. Zion Young — EDGE, Missouri Young backed up his confidence with production during practice week. After shaking off early rust, he consistently won in one-on-one drills with length, bend, and play strength, beating tackles like Max Iheanachor and Jude Bowry. At 6’5”, 263 pounds with 33½-inch arms, Young brings an NFL body type and disruptive presence. His energy, motor, and physical tools stood out, and his Senior Bowl showing helped solidify him as a Day Two edge prospect with upside.

We are in the midst of the all-star circuit as the Shrine Bowl wraps up, the Senior Bowl gets underway, and NFL Draft season is officially in full swing. With the NFL Combine right around the corner, things will begin to move quickly as we approach the 2026 NFL Draft, with Day 1 kicking off in Pittsburgh on April 23. With that in mind, it felt like the right time to release an updated NFL Mock Draft. A lot has changed since my last mock two months ago, most notably Dante Moore’s decision to stay at Oregon, which narrows the Day 1 quarterback pool to Indiana’s Fernando Mendoza and Alabama’s Ty Simpson. We also had to wait on several top underclassmen to finalize their draft decisions, which further shaped the board. This draft class is going to lean heavily toward the defensive side of the ball. I watched more defensive film this season than in any of the past few years, particularly at linebacker — a position that continues to evolve at the college level. The rise of hybrid defenders is evident, highlighted by Ohio State’s do-everything linebacker tandem of Arvell Reese and Sonny Styles. Another key name in this class is Ohio State safety Caleb Downs, whom I currently have graded as the top overall prospect. Downs is a true positionless chess piece and, in my view, warrants top-five consideration, especially in what is shaping up to be a lighter quarterback class at the top. Overall, this class is deeper than it’s often given credit for. I’d argue some of the skepticism comes from the fantasy football community, as this group isn’t as quarterback-driven as the 2024 class or the projected 2027 class. However, the wide receiver depth is real. I currently have at least four first-round wideouts, with a realistic path for five or even six to come off the board on Day 1. That group is led by Ohio State’s Carnell Tate, Arizona State’s Jordyn Tyson, and USC’s Makai Lemon. Other notes to consider: The Super Bowl will finalize picks 31 and 32. The all-star circuit is just getting started, and performances at the Senior Bowl and Shrine Bowl will impact draft stock. The NFL Combine will inevitably push some players up or down boards, so there’s still plenty of movement ahead. 2026 NFL Mock Draft (Senior Bowl Edition) 1. Las Vegas Raiders - Fernando Mendoza , QB, Indiana The Raiders reset at quarterback, selecting Heisman Trophy winner Fernando Mendoza after a historic season at Indiana. Mendoza clearly separated himself from the class, finishing with a 90.7 passing grade and elite red-zone efficiency (39 TDs, 0 INTs since 2024). His size, processing, and poise give the Raiders a true franchise-caliber QB to build around. 2. New York Jets - Rueben Bain Jr., EDGE, Miami With no quarterback worth forcing at No. 2, the Jets add the most dominant defensive edge player in the class. Bain posted a 92.8 PFF grade in 2025, ranking second among Power Four edge defenders and anchoring Miami’s playoff run. He gives New York a tone-setting pass rusher to headline a full defensive rebuild. 3. Arizona Cardinals - Spencer Fano , OT, Utah Arizona opts for stability up front, selecting one of the draft's cleanest offensive line prospects. Fano’s versatility across four OL spots and consistent run-blocking dominance make him a plug-and-play starter. With Kyler Murray’s future uncertain, protecting whoever plays quarterback becomes a priority. 4. Tennessee Titans - David Bailey, EDGE, Texas Tech Tennessee adds pure explosiveness off the edge to complement its interior defensive strength. Bailey’s first-step burst, bend, and finishing ability give the Titans a true difference-maker on passing downs. He fits cleanly as a hybrid EDGE who can tilt protections and close games late. 5. New York Giants - Arvell Reese , LB, Ohio State The Giants add a versatile front-seven chess piece in new head coach John Harbaugh's first season. Reese’s size, power, and versatility give New York a modern-day Swiss Army Knife linebacker who can align anywhere, rush the passer, set an edge, and disrupt pass protections. 6. Cleveland Browns - Caleb Downs , S, Ohio State Cleveland stays true to best player available, landing the most complete defensive back in the class. Downs owns 85.0+ PFF grades in all three collegiate seasons and brings elite instincts, processing, and versatility to a Browns defense that needs stability on the back end. He immediately elevates coverage integrity while giving Cleveland a movable chess piece to disguise looks. 7. Washington Commanders - Carnell Tate , WR, Ohio State Washington gives Jayden Daniels a high-efficiency, quarterback-friendly target to stabilize the offense. Tate turned 61 targets into 51 receptions for 875 yards and nine touchdowns in 2025. He’s a polished route-running technician who consistently creates natural separation and can win in contested-catch situations. Tate profiles as a reliable chain-mover with legitimate WR1 upside as the offense matures. 8. New Orleans Saints - Mansoor Delane, CB, LSU The Saints reinforce the secondary with one of the most scheme-diverse corners in the draft. Delane’s ability to thrive in press-man, match quarters, and off coverage gives New Orleans flexibility. He projects as a high ceiling Day 1 starter. 9. Kansas City Chiefs - Francis Mauigoa, OT, Miami Kansas City invests up front to help extend the Patrick Mahomes window. Mauigoa allowed just two total hits/sacks across 500+ pass-blocking snaps during the 2025 season, pairing elite movement skills with power and balance. He gives the Chiefs a long-term cornerstone who fits both zone and gap concepts. 10. Cincinnati Bengals - Sonny Styles, LB, Ohio State Cincinnati adds a true front-seven multiplier to a defense that lacked speed and flexibility in 2025. Styles’ transition from safety shows up in his range, coverage instincts, and ability to carry routes, while his size allows him to play downhill, blitz through interior gaps, and set edges when needed. He profiles as a true “joker” defender who lets the Bengals stay in nickel and dime without sacrificing run integrity. 11. Miami Dolphins - Jermod McCoy , CB, Tennessee Miami targets a true CB1 to fit Jeff Hafley’s aggressive coverage philosophy. McCoy’s press-man discipline, recovery speed, and ball skills give the Dolphins a corner who can challenge receivers at the line and finish plays on the ball. If medicals check out, he brings immediate starter value to a secondary in need. 12. Dallas Cowboys - Makai Lemon , WR, USC Dallas adds a high-IQ slot separator to its embarrassment of offensive riches while insulating itself against future turnover at receiver. Lemon’s short-area quickness, route pacing, and big-play after-catch ability make him a natural fit alongside CeeDee Lamb and George Pickens. 13. Los Angeles Rams (via ATL) - Colton Hood, CB, Tennessee The Rams reload the secondary with a physical, scheme-versatile corner as multiple starters near free agency. Hood’s speed, length, and route recognition allow him to hold up in press-man while still fitting zone-match principles. He projects as an immediate rotational contributor with long-term starting upside. 14. Baltimore Ravens - Kayden McDonald, IDL, Ohio State Baltimore reinforces its defense with the best interior run defender in the class. McDonald led all interior defenders with a 91.2 run-defense grade and 30 run stops, giving the Ravens a true early-down anchor. He fits cleanly as a nose or shaded interior defender who occupies doubles and frees linebackers to flow cleanly and make plays. 15. Tampa Bay Buccaneers - Cashius Howell, EDGE, Texas A&M Tampa Bay addresses its pass-rush issues by adding one of the most productive edge defenders in the SEC. Howell posted a 90.0+ PFF pass-rush grade in three straight seasons and led the conference with 12 sacks in 2025, pairing production with a relentless motor. 16. New York Jets (via IND) - Avieon Terrell, CB, Clemson After landing Rueben Bain Jr., the Jets continue to rebuild the defense with a competitive, scheme-ready boundary corner. Terrell’s quick feet, fluid hips, and physical run defense give New York a reliable outside CB who can hold up in press-man and zone-match. He brings immediate starter traits to a secondary that still lacks long-term stability. 17. Detroit Lions - Caleb Lomu, OT, Utah Left tackle Taylor Decker could be on the way out this offseason. Even if Decker returns for another year, Detroit benefits from adding a clear succession plan. Utah’s Caleb Lomu brings balance, recovery athleticism, and pass-protection consistency, projecting as a high-floor tackle with the versatility to kick inside if needed. 18. Minnesota Vikings - Jeremiyah Love, RB, Notre Dame Minnesota adds an explosive offensive weapon to help out a young J.J. McCarthy. Love’s burst, vision, and receiving ability give the Vikings a true three-down back who thrives in wide-zone concepts. He immediately raises the ceiling of the offense while reducing pressure on the passing game. 19. Carolina Panthers - Jordyn Tyson, WR, Arizona State Carolina completes its receiver room by adding a true vertical separator with WR1 traits. Tyson’s ability to win off the line, stretch the field, and finish through contact gives Bryce Young another reliable target alongside Tetairoa McMillan. 20. Dallas Cowboys (via GB) - Akheem Mesidor, EDGE, Miami After addressing wide receiver earlier, Dallas capitalizes here by bolstering it's defensive pass rush. Mesidor’s burst, hand usage, and alignment flexibility give the Cowboys an immediate third-down disruptor with high level upside. He fits cleanly in multiple fronts and helps offset long-term uncertainty along the defensive line. 21. Steelers - Ty Simpson, QB, Alabama Pittsburgh finally invests in a long-term answer at quarterback, with Simpson fitting a developmental timeline if Aaron Rodgers returns for one more season under new head coach Mike McCarthy. Simpson’s 81.4 PFF passing grade and FBS-leading 30 big-time throws highlight his ability to operate efficiently within structure. 22. Chargers - Olaivavega Ioane, IOL, Penn State With Joe Alt and Rashawn Slater locked in on the edges, the Chargers stabilize the interior with a plug-and-play guard. Ioane posted an 80.0 PFF grade and did not allow a sack over the past two seasons, offering immediate pass-protection reliability. His power, anchor strength, and experience at both guard spots fit exactly what the Chargers need. 23. Eagles - Dillon Thieneman, S, Oregon Philadelphia adds a high-IQ safety capable of playing single-high or rotating post-snap. Thieneman brings elite tackling production, range, and ball skills, with over 300 career tackles and 8 interceptions in his three years at both Purdue and Oregon. His versatility allows Vic Fangio to disguise coverage while maintaining discipline against explosive plays. 24. Browns (via JAX) - Denzel Boston, WR, Washington Cleveland adds size and red-zone reliability to a receiver room that needs perimeter presence. Boston’s 6’4” frame gives the Browns a true boundary target who can win above the rim and expand the strike zone for their quarterback. He fits best in a play-action-based offense that leverages size mismatches and intermediate windows. 25. Bears - Emmanuel McNeil-Warren, S, Toledo Chicago targets an ascending safety with size, range, and explosive playmaking ability. McNeil-Warren brings downhill physicality and ball production, offering flexibility as a box defender or interchangeable safety in sub-packages. 26. Bills - C.J. Allen, LB, Georgia Buffalo addresses linebacker with Matt Milano and Shaq Thompson headed for free agency after a season in which the defense ranked 28th against the run. Allen brings the range, trigger speed, and physicality to immediately upgrade the second level. He can run and hit, but also offers the instincts and leadership profile to anchor the defense as a three-down MIKE/WILL in nickel-heavy looks. 27. 49ers - Kenyon Sadiq, TE, Oregon San Francisco reloads its offensive core with a true hybrid weapon built for Kyle Shanahan’s system. Sadiq’s elite burst, competitive blocking, and alignment versatility allow him to function as a Kittle–Juszczyk chess piece across formations. He gives the 49ers mismatch flexibility as they prepare for turnover at receiver. 28. Texans - Kadyn Proctor, OT, Alabama Houston continues to rebuild the offensive line with a mammoth blindside presence in Kadyn Proctor. The 6’7”, 360-pound tackle ranked fourth among qualified FBS tackles in PFF grading in 2025 and was one of just seven linemen to earn high-level grades as both a pass protector and run blocker. Proctor’s size, anchor strength, and improving footwork give the Texans a long-term left tackle option capable of stabilizing a unit that struggled throughout the season. 29. Rams - Monroe Freeling, OT, Georgia Georgia’s Monroe Freeling has climbed draft boards after a significant leap in pass protection grading in 2025, where he was charted as only giving up three sacks on the season. At 6’7”, 315 pounds, his length, movement skills, and improving anchor give him prototype left tackle tools, even if his technique remains inconsistent. He profiles as a high-ceiling developmental starter. 30. Broncos - Keldric Faulk, EDGE, Auburn Denver snags an interior disruptor in Clemson’s Peter Woods. At roughly 6’3”, 310–315 pounds, Woods brings elite first-step explosiveness, violent hands, and functional power, giving the Broncos high-level interior depth with long-term upside. While he experienced a down season in 2025, he earned PFF grades above 83.0 in each of the two prior years, reinforcing that his evaluation is trait- and impact-driven rather than box-score dependent. 31. New England Patriots - T.J. Parker, EDGE, Clemson New England lands a tone-setting edge defender who plays with the violence and effort profile they’ve historically valued. Parker hit a down year in 2025 (five sacks) along with much of Clemson’s defense, but his three-year body of work is the separator — 24 sacks over the past three seasons with PFF grades of 80.0+ in each of the last two. He wins with power, heavy hands, and finishing ability, projecting as an early-down edge who can grow into a primary closer as his pass-rush plan tightens up. 32. Seattle Seahawks - Brandon Cisse, CB, South Carolina Seattle closes the first round by betting on traits at cornerback with Brandon Cisse, a high-end athlete who fits the Seahawks’ man-coverage profile. At 6’0”, 190 pounds, Cisse brings elite speed, fluid hips, and press-man ability, and he’s expected to test extremely well during the pre-draft process. With potential turnover looming in the secondary, Cisse offers a long, athletic outside corner who can compete early while refining his zone awareness and tackling consistency.

After the conclusion of the 2026 College Football Playoff (congratulations to the Indiana Hoosiers), we are now full throttle into the all-star game circuit, with the Shrine Bowl already underway and the Senior Bowl on the horizon. That makes this the ideal checkpoint to update the 2026 NFL Draft Top 50 Big Board and accompanying positional rankings. As always, these rankings will evolve. It is still early in the pre-draft process, but after a full college football season, I’ve worked through countless hours of film study to establish this updated draft board. While no early ranking is ever perfect, this list will be continuously refined as more film is reviewed, all-star game evaluations are completed, and the NFL Combine process unfolds. My goal, as always, is to expand this board to 100 draftable prospects before April. With that said, the top five has undergone meaningful changes since the last update. Caleb Downs remains a near bell-to-bell No. 1 overall prospect, but Fernando Mendoza is now ranked second overall, not simply due to positional value, but because he is a legitimate top-10 talent in this class. He is followed closely by edge rushers Rueben Bain Jr. and David Bailey, two prospects whose rankings are largely interchangeable depending on team preference and scheme fit. Rounding out the top five is Arvell Reese, the do-everything linebacker from Ohio State who continues to separate himself as one of the most versatile defensive players in the draft. Top 50 Prospects Rankings - 2026 NFL Draft Class 1. Caleb Downs, S, Ohio State (6’0”, 205) Downs is the prototype modern-day safety with elite processing, communication skills, and positional versatility. He can align deep, in the slot, in the box, or as an overhang without compromising structure. Best suited for split-safety, match-zone, and big nickel systems where he can function as a coverage eraser and on-field communicator. 2. Fernando Mendoza, QB, Indiana (6’5”, 225) Fernando Mendoza is a prototypical pocket passer with advanced processing speed, poise, and consistent short-to-intermediate ball placement. He plays on schedule, throws with anticipation, and shows strong command in RPO and play-action structures, regularly winning with timing and leverage recognition. While not an elite athlete, he has functional mobility to extend plays and handle pressure with toughness and composure. 3. Rueben Bain Jr., EDGE, Miami (6’3”, 275) Bain is a refined, high-motor EDGE who wins with leverage, violent hands, and a polished pass-rush plan. He offers alignment flexibility as a 4-3 end, reduced 5-tech, or interior rusher on passing downs. The production and tape both point to immediate NFL impact with every-down value. 4. David Bailey, EDGE, Texas Tech (6’3”, 250) Bailey is an explosive, bendy pass rusher coming off a true breakout season. He wins with first-step quickness, closing speed, and a deep rush toolbox. Best deployed as a 3-4 OLB or hybrid EDGE, with run-game strength being the final piece separating him from full three-down dominance. 5. Arvell Reese, LB, Ohio State (6’4”, 243) Reese is a modern hybrid linebacker who thrives as a MIKE/SAM/EDGE chess piece in multiple fronts. His power, length, and inside-out versatility allow him to stress protections and finish plays downhill. While not a pure coverage linebacker, his pressure value and three-down utility are real. 6. Jeremiyah Love, RB, Notre Dame (6’0”, 210) Love is a dynamic, two-phase running back with elite acceleration and one-cut burst. He thrives in wide-zone concepts and offers real mismatch value as a receiver in space. Continued refinement in pass protection and workload sustainability will dictate how quickly he becomes a full-time NFL feature back. 7. Carnell Tate, WR, Ohio State (6’3”, 191) Tate is a polished route runner with advanced spatial awareness and strong contested-catch reliability. He consistently separates in the intermediate areas and expands throwing windows with body control and wingspan. Projects best as a high-volume target in timing-based and West Coast systems. 8. Jordyn Tyson, WR, Arizona State (6’1”, 195) Tyson brings WR1-caliber traits with vertical speed, alignment flexibility, and reliable separation. He can win on the boundary or from the slot and finishes well through contact. Press-man releases and durability will be key checkpoints moving forward. 9. Sonny Styles, LB, Ohio State (6’4”, 243) Styles is a hybrid defender with the size and movement skills to impact multiple phases. A former safety, he offers coverage fluidity, blitz value, and alignment versatility. Refinement in block shedding and technique will determine whether he reaches his high-end starter ceiling. 10. Spencer Fano, OT, Utah (6’5”, 304) Fano is a high-floor offensive tackle with polished technique and consistent run-blocking leverage. He has the athleticism to play either tackle spot and operate in zone or gap schemes. Added functional strength and refined hand timing versus power rushers will dictate his long-term ceiling. 11. Makai Lemon, WR, USC (5’11”, 195) Lemon is a high-IQ slot receiver with elite short-area quickness and advanced route pacing. He consistently separates against man and zone using leverage manipulation and spatial awareness. 12. Francis Mauigoa, OT, Miami (6’6”, 315) Mauigoa is a naturally gifted right tackle with rare movement skills and balance for his size. He shows Day 1 starter traits with scheme versatility in both zone and gap systems. 13. Peter Woods, IDL, Clemson (6’3”, 315) Woods is an explosive interior defender with elite first-step quickness and leverage control. He consistently disrupts the line of scrimmage as a penetrating 3-technique. 14. Jermod McCoy, CB, Tennessee (6’0”, 195) McCoy is a press-man eraser with elite mirror ability and disciplined hand usage. He consistently eliminates separation and converts coverage into ball production. 15. Mansoor Delane, CB, LSU (6’0”, 190) Delane is a complete, scheme-diverse corner with strong anticipation and fluid transitions. He thrives in both man-match and zone structures with starting-caliber consistency. 16. Kenyon Sadiq, TE, Oregon (6’3”, 250) Sadiq is a true two-phase tight end with elite explosiveness and functional inline strength. He stresses defenses vertically while maintaining blocking value on early downs. 17. Kayden McDonald, IDL, Ohio State (6’3”, 326) McDonald is a powerful interior anchor with elite play strength and leverage. He consistently resets the line of scrimmage and controls gaps as an early-down nose. 18. C.J. Allen, LB, Georgia (6’1”, 235) Allen is a rangy off-ball linebacker with strong diagnostics and tackling efficiency. He triggers downhill quickly and thrives in zone-heavy defensive structures. 19. Caleb Lomu, OT, Utah (6’5”, 295) Lomu is a smooth, technically refined pass protector with elite balance and recovery ability. He excels in movement-based blocking schemes that emphasize footwork and control. 20. Keldric Faulk, EDGE, Auburn (6’6”, 290) Faulk is a power-based edge defender with inside-out alignment versatility. He wins with length, leverage, and speed-to-power rather than pure bend. 21. Colton Hood, CB, Tennessee (6’0”, 195) Hood is an ascending perimeter corner with speed, length, and strong route recognition. He consistently stays in phase in press-man and zone-match coverage with reliable ball skills. 22. Avieon Terrell, CB, Clemson (5’11”, 180) Terrell is a twitchy, ultra-competitive corner who plays bigger than his frame. He thrives in press and match coverage with elite tackling effort and advanced instincts. 23. Cashius Howell, EDGE, Texas A&M (6’2”, 250) Howell is an explosive edge defender with strong speed-to-power conversion and an advanced rush plan. He creates disruption with first-step quickness, motor, and inside counters. 24. Caleb Banks, IDL, Florida (6’6”, 325) Banks is a rare interior athlete with elite length and pass-rush upside for his size. He flashes disruptive ability from multiple alignments as a penetrating interior defender. 25. Akheem Mesidor, EDGE, Miami (6’3”, 280) Mesidor is a polished, high-motor pass rusher with strong hand usage and rush sequencing. He offers immediate third-down value with inside-out alignment flexibility. 26. Olaivavega Ioane, IOL, Penn State (6’4”, 330) Ioane is a powerful interior lineman with elite anchor strength and grip power. He thrives in gap and inside-zone schemes as a tone-setting run blocker and firm pass protector. 27. T.J. Parker, EDGE, Clemson (6’3”, 265) Parker is a heavy-handed, power-based edge defender who consistently collapses pockets. He wins with strength, leverage, and finishing ability rather than pure speed. 28. Ty Simpson, QB, Alabama (6’2”, 208) Simpson is a rhythm-based quarterback with strong processing speed and timing accuracy. He operates efficiently within structure and thrives in progression-based passing systems. 29. Kadyn Proctor, OT, Alabama (6’7”, 369) Proctor is a massive, power-oriented left tackle with rare size and raw strength. He fits best in gap-heavy schemes but flashes enough athleticism to survive in zone concepts. 30. Christen Miller, IDL, Georgia (6’3”, 305) Miller is a disruptive interior defender with strong leverage, effort, and play strength. He consistently impacts the run game and flashes pass-rush upside in hybrid fronts. 31. Brandon Cisse, CB, South Carolina (6’0”, 190) Cisse is a competitive coverage corner with strong mirror ability and closing speed. He stays in phase and consistently attacks the catch point in man and zone looks. 32. Monroe Freeling, OT, Georgia (6’7”, 315) Freeling is a long, athletic tackle with smooth footwork and pass-set balance. He fits best in zone-based schemes that emphasize movement and recovery ability. 33. Denzel Boston, WR, Washington (6’4”, 210) Boston is a big-bodied boundary receiver with strong hands and red-zone production. He wins with size, body control, and contested-catch ability rather than separation. 34. Zion Young, EDGE, Missouri (6’5”, 262) Young is a long, power-based edge defender with disciplined run fits. He sets a firm edge and offers developing pass-rush value with inside-out versatility. 35. Anthony Hill Jr., LB, Texas (6’3”, 235) Hill is an explosive, rangy linebacker with elite burst, range, and closing speed. He brings three-phase value as a blitzer, run defender, and space-capable coverage linebacker. 36. R. Mason Thomas, EDGE, Oklahoma (6’2”, 250) Thomas is a twitchy speed rusher with excellent first-step quickness and bend. He wins early in reps and profiles as a situational pass-rush specialist. 37. A.J. Haulcy, S, LSU (6’0”, 222) Haulcy is a physical safety with strong downhill instincts and tackling presence. He fits best in box, robber, or split-field roles that allow him to trigger aggressively. 38. Kevin Concepcion, WR, Texas A&M (5’11”, 187) Concepcion is a polished route runner with strong feel for spacing and leverage. He consistently separates underneath and adds value after the catch. 39. Keith Abney II, CB, Arizona State (6’0”, 190) Abney is a fluid corner with balanced man-zone traits and competitive play strength. He plays with sound eye discipline and stays connected through route stems. 40. Eli Stowers, TE, Vanderbilt (6’4”, 225) Stowers is an explosive move tight end with receiver-like athleticism and YAC ability. He creates matchup stress from detached alignments rather than inline usage. 41. Omar Cooper Jr., WR, Indiana (6’0”, 200) Cooper is an explosive, compact receiver with strong contact balance and RAC ability. He stresses defenses on crossers, motion looks, and vertical shots with speed and physicality. 42. Gennings Dunker, OT, Iowa (6’5”, 316) Dunker is a powerful, tone-setting lineman with strong grip strength and finishing mentality. He projects best as a guard at the next level due to limited lateral range. 43. Emmanuel Pregnon, IOL, Oregon (6’5”, 318) Pregnon is a physical interior blocker with explosive pop and strong hand placement. He generates movement in the run game and holds firm against power rushers. 44. Chris Johnson, CB, San Diego State (6’0”, 185) Johnson is a fluid cover corner with smooth hips and natural mirror ability. He excels in off-man and quarters coverage with strong ball tracking. 45. Chris Bell, WR, Louisville (6’2”, 220) Bell is a power-built wideout with vertical acceleration and strong YAC traits. He wins through contact and adds value on schemed touches and in-breaking routes. 46. D’Angelo Ponds, CB, Indiana (5’9”, 170) Ponds is a highly instinctive, competitive defensive back with elite eyes and anticipation. He profiles best as a nickel defender with ball production and quick-trigger ability. 47. Lee Hunter, IDL, Texas Tech (6’4”, 325) Hunter is a heavy-handed interior defender with strong anchor ability and play strength. He excels as an early-down run stopper in gap-control fronts. 48. Germie Bernard, WR, Alabama (6’1”, 204) Bernard is a reliable, versatile receiver with strong hands and functional athleticism. He wins with route discipline, toughness, and consistency across alignments. 49. Emmanuel McNeil-Warren, S, Toledo (6’2”, 202) McNeil-Warren is a rangy safety with good closing speed and tackling discipline. He fits best in split-field or single-high zone roles. 50. Keionte Scott, CB, Miami (6’0”, 194) Scott is a physical, versatile defensive back with strong short-area quickness and competitive coverage traits. He fits best as a nickel or boundary corner in man-match and zone-heavy schemes. Pre Senior Bowl Positional Rankings Top 5 Quarterbacks Fernando Mendoza, Indiana Ty Simpson, Alabama Garrett Nussmeier, LSU Carson Beck, Miami Trinidad Chambliss, Ole Miss Top 5 Running Backs Jeremiyah Love, Notre Dame Jadarian Price, Notre Dame Jonah Coleman, Washington Emmett Johnson, Nebraska Nick Singleton, Penn State Top 10 Wide Receivers Carnell Tate, Ohio State Jordyn Tyson, Arizona State Makai Lemon, USC Denzel Boston, Washington Kevin Concepcion, Texas A&M Omar Cooper Jr., Indiana Chris Bell, Louisville Germie Bernard, Alabama Elijah Sarratt, Indiana Zachariah Branch, Georgia Top 5 Tight Ends Kenyon Sadiq, Oregon Eli Stowers, Vanderbilt Michael Trigg, Baylor Max Klare, Ohio State Tanner Koziol, Houston Top 5 Offensive Tackles Spencer Fano, Utah Francis Mauigoa, Miami Caleb Lomu, Utah Kadyn Proctor, Alabama Monroe Freeling, Georgia Top 5 Interior Offensive Linemen Olaivavega Ioane, Penn State Emmanuel Pregnon, Oregon Connor Lew, Auburn Jake Slaughter, Florida Pat Coogan, Indiana Top 10 Edge Rushers Rueben Bain, Miami David Bailey, Texas Tech Keldric Faulk, Auburn Cashius Howell, Texas A&M Akheem Mesidor, Miami T.J. Parker, Clemson Zion Young, Missouri R. Mason Thomas, Oklahoma Romello Height, Texas Tech Dani Dennis-Sutton, Penn State Top 5 Interior Defensive Linemen Peter Woods, Clemson Kayden McDonald, Ohio State Caleb Banks, Florida Christen Miller, Georgia Lee Hunter, Texas Tech Top 5 Linebackers Arvell Reese, Ohio State Sonny Styles, Ohio State C.J. Allen, Georgia Anthony Hill Jr., Texas Jacob Rodriguez, Texas Tech Top 10 Cornerbacks Jermod McCoy, Tennessee Mansoor Delane, LSU Colton Hood, Tennessee Avieon Terrell, Clemson Brandon Cisse, South Carolina Keith Abney II, Arizona State Chris Johnson, San Diego State D’Angelo Ponds, Indiana Keionte Scott, Miami Daylen Everette, Georgia Top 5 Safeties Caleb Downs, Ohio State Dillon Thieneman, Oregon Kamari Ramsey, USC Emmanuel McNeil-Warren, Toledo A.J. Haulcy, LSU

The Draft Starts in Mobile The Senior Bowl remains the premier college football all-star event and the official first step in the NFL Draft process. For more than 76 years, Mobile, Alabama, has served as the permanent home of the game, making it the longest continually running all-star showcase in football and a foundational evaluation stop for NFL decision-makers. The 2026 version will be played on Saturday, January 31, 2026, at Hancock Whitney Stadium, home of the University of South Alabama. Coverage will air nationally on NFL Network, with additional radio coverage via Fox Sports Pensacola and SiriusXM. Fan Fest activities will take place earlier in the day, leading into a 1:30 PM CT kickoff in Mobile. NFL-Driven Roster Construction and Evaluation Model The Senior Bowl reaffirmed its standing as the league’s most trusted all-star event with the release of its initial 130-plus accepted invitations for the 2026 game. While late additions and roster movement are expected as the process unfolds, the core roster is largely set heading into Senior Bowl week. Under the direction of Drew Fabianich, the Senior Bowl roster is built to mirror an NFL draft board rather than a traditional all-star selection model. Fabianich, a longtime NFL evaluator with nearly two decades of experience helping construct draft boards at the professional level, utilizes a positional vertical board approach—stacking prospects round by round in the same manner NFL teams evaluate their own classes. “We’ve got a positional vertical board, just like you would, round by round, for an NFL team,” Fabianich said. That philosophy continues to translate directly to draft outcomes. The 2025 Senior Bowl produced 106 NFL Draft selections, accounting for 41% of all drafted players, including seven first-round picks and 50 selections in the first three rounds. As a result, NFL front offices consistently treat Senior Bowl week as an extension of their draft rooms, with heavy general manager, head coach, and coordinator presence throughout practices and meetings. Senior Bowl by the Numbers The Senior Bowl’s impact on the NFL Draft remains unmatched among postseason all-star events: 47 more Top-3 Round selections  than any other All-Star Game 100% of NFL teams  selected at least one Senior Bowl participant 99% of 2025 participants  were drafted or signed as undrafted free agents As former NFL head coach Jon Gruden has stated, Mobile has become a proving ground for professional opportunity: “This is where players come — Mobile, Alabama. Guys get discovered here.” -Jon Gruden Best of the Best, From Every Level The 2026 Senior Bowl roster includes athletes from every level of college football, bringing together the nation’s top draft-eligible prospects to form the National and American teams. From Power Five programs to Group of Five and FCS standouts, the event offers a unified evaluation environment designed to identify players who can translate to the NFL level. What follows is a position-by-position breakdown of accepted player invites, providing a clear view of how the 2026 Senior Bowl roster is shaping up as the NFL Draft process begins in Mobile. Quarterback Luke Altmyer, Illinois Taylen Green, Arkansas Garrett Nussmeier, LSU Diego Pavia, Vanderbilt Cole Payton, North Dakota State Sawyer Robertson, Baylor Running back Kaytron Allen, Penn State Jonah Coleman, Washington Rahsul Faison, South Carolina Seth McGowan, Kentucky Jam Miller, Alabama Le'Veon Moss, Texas A&M Adam Randall, Clemson Nick Singleton, Penn State J'Mari Taylor, Virginia Mike Washington Jr., Arkansas Wide receiver Aaron Anderson, LSU Vinny Anthony II, Wisconsin Lewis Bond, Boston College Romello Brinson, SMU Barion Brown, LSU Deion Burks, Oklahoma Josh Cameron, Baylor Kevin Coleman Jr., Missouri KC Concepcion, Texas A&M Caleb Douglas, Texas Tech Malachi Fields, Notre Dame Jordan Hudson, SMU Ted Hurst, Georgia State Caullin Lacy, Louisville Ja'Kobi Lane, USC Elijah Sarratt, Indiana Brenen Thompson, Mississippi State Reggie Virgil, Texas Tech Harrison Wallace III, Mississippi Tight end Nate Boerkircher, Texas A&M Will Kacmarek, Ohio State John Michael Gyllenborg, Wyoming Joshua Cuevas, Alabama Justin Joly, N.C. State Tanner Koziol, Houston DJ Rogers, TCU Sam Roush, Stanford Dan Villari, Syracuse Offensive linemen Austin Barber, Florida Jude Bowry, Boston College Parker Brailsford, Alabama Fernando Carmona Jr., Arkansas Kage Casey, Boise State Dametrious Crownover, Texas A&M JC Davis, Illinois Gennings Dunker, Iowa Jalen Farmer, Kentucky Alex Harkey, Oregon Sam Hecht, Kansas State Max Iheanachor, Arizona State Delby Lemieux, Dartmouth Emmanuel Pregnon, Oregon Keylan Rutledge, Georgia Tech Drew Shelton, Penn State Jake Slaughter, Florida Beau Stephens, Iowa Logan Taylor, Boston College Carver Willis, Washington Jeremiah Wright, Auburn Trey Zuhn III, Texas A&M Defensive line Rueben Bain, Jr, Miami Cameron Ball, Arkansas Caleb Banks, Florida Nick Barrett, South Carolina Rayshaun Benny, Michigan Zane Durant, Penn State Bryson Eason, Tennessee Deven Eastern, Minnesota Gracen Halton, Oklahoma Lee Hunter, Texas Tech Tim Keenan III, Alabama Jeffrey M'Ba, SMU Chris McClellan, Missouri Domonique Orange, Iowa State Vincent Anthony Jr., Duke David Bailey, Texas Tech Keyron Crawford, Auburn Dani Dennis-Sutton, Penn State Logan Fano, Utah Romello Height, Texas Tech Quintayvious Hutchins, Boston College Gabe Jacas, Illinois Max Llewellyn, Iowa Akheem Mesidor, Miami Derrick Moore, Michigan LT Overton, Alabama T.J. Parker, Clemson Jack Pyburn, LSU Cian Slone, N.C. State Nadame Tucker, Western Michigan Zion Young, Missouri LINEBACKER Bryce Boettcher, Oregon Kendal Daniels, Oklahoma Kaleb Elarms-Orr, TCU Keyshaun Elliott, Arizona State Owen Heinecke, Oklahoma Jack Kelly, BYU Kyle Louis, Pitt Jacob Rodriguez, Texas Tech Xavian Sorey, Arkansas Scooby Williams, Texas A&M CORNERBACK Tacario Davis, Washington Charles Demmings, Stephen F. Austin Thaddeus Dixon, North Carolina Daylen Everette, Georgia TJ Hall, Iowa Davison Igbinosun, Ohio State Chris Johnson, San Diego State Will Lee III, Texas A&M Hezekiah Masses, Cal Jalen McMurray, Tennessee Julian Neal, Arkansas D'Angelo Ponds, Indiana Ephesians Prysock, Washington Chandler Rivers, Duke Treydan Stukes, Arizona Collin Wright, Stanford SAFETY Bud Clark, TCU Jalon Kilgore, South Carolina AJ Haulcy, LSU Emmanuel McNeil-Warren, Toledo VJ Payne, Kansas State Kamari Ramsey, USC DeShon Singleton, Nebraska Genesis Smith, Arizona Michael Taaffe, Texas Jakobe Thomas, Miami Zakee Wheatley, Penn State

2026 NFL Draft Scouting Report: Miami EDGE Rueben Bain Jr. Rueben Bain Jr. is a disruptive and highly productive edge defender who enters 2025 with first-round aspirations despite an injury-impacted sophomore campaign. The former ACC Defensive Rookie of the Year combines powerful hands, a low center of gravity, and advanced pass-rush technique with elite motor and positional versatility. At 6’3”, 275 pounds, Bain carries an NFL-ready frame with little bad weight and an explosive first step that generates immediate leverage. Film Summary Bain’s tape reveals a compact, technically advanced pass-rusher who wins through leverage, violent hands, and relentless pursuit. He’s more of a technician than a twitch athlete, but his power and instincts make him a nightmare for opposing tackles. Ideal Scheme Fit: 4-3 Defensive End / Multiple Front Hybrid EDGE Key Strengths (Film-Based Traits) Explosive off the snap:  Fires out of his stance with excellent get-off and short-area quickness to threaten both the inside and outside shoulder. Advanced pass-rush arsenal:  Wins with a balanced mix of bull-rush power, inside counters, and hand-swipe moves. Converts speed to power efficiently and bends well through contact. Positional versatility:  Can play 4-3 DE, 5-tech, or slide inside as a sub-package rusher. Handles combo blocks and sets a firm edge against tight ends. Relentless motor:  Plays through the whistle and consistently retraces to finish backside plays. Developmental Areas (Growth Opportunities) Pass-rush timing:  Can be late with hand placement after initial contact; must refine strike timing to maximize first-step advantage. Durability:  Missed four games in 2024 with a calf injury; medical checks will be key through the pre-draft process. Tackling consistency:  Occasionally comes in high, leading to missed finishes in space. Grade and Projection Football Scout 365 Grade:  ( Near Elite) A high-caliber prospect projected to become a significant contributor by Year 2. Outstanding tools, high football IQ, and minimal weaknesses. NFL Draft Projection:  Mid-to-Late 1st Round Pro Comparison:   Brandon Graham

About the East-West Shrine Bowl (2026 Overview) The East-West Shrine Bowl is the longest-running college all-star football game in the nation and a cornerstone of the NFL Draft evaluation calendar. For more than a century, the event has provided elite college prospects a nationally televised platform to compete in front of NFL scouts, coaches, and executives from all 32 teams, with a structure built around pro-style practices and direct NFL evaluation. Under the direction of Eric Galko, Shrine Bowl Executive Director of Football Operations and Player Personnel, the event has evolved into one of the most NFL-aligned evaluation environments in the pre-draft process. Recent results underscore its credibility: the 2025 NFL Draft produced one first-round pick, nine selections in the first four rounds, 51 total draft picks, and 92 NFL Scouting Combine invitations from Shrine Bowl participants. Beyond football, the event supports Shriners Children’s , raising funds and awareness to help provide specialized pediatric care for children facing complex medical challenges. 2026 Event Details and Schedule Practices:  January 23–26, 2026 Game Date:  Tuesday, January 27, 2026 Kickoff:  7:00 PM ET Location:  Ford Center at The Star (Dallas Cowboys headquarters), Frisco, Texas Broadcast:  NFL Network Offense: Experience, Versatility, and Clear NFL Role Projection The quarterback group is headlined by experienced starters such as Cade Klubnik, Haynes King, and Joe Fagnano, each offering distinct stylistic profiles for evaluators to study in a pro-style environment. At the skill positions, receivers like De'Zhaun Stribling and Skyler Bell bring alignment flexibility and defined offensive roles, while the offensive line is anchored by versatile blockers such as Diego Pounds and Jagger Burton, giving NFL teams multiple evaluation pathways across the week. Quarterbacks (QB) Cade Klubnik — Clemson (EAST) Behren Morton — Texas Tech (EAST) Miller Moss — Louisville (WEST) Haynes King — Georgia Tech (WEST) Mark Gronowski — Iowa (WEST) Joe Fagnano — Connecticut (WEST) Kyron Drones — Virginia Tech (EAST) Jalon Daniels — Kansas (EAST) Running Backs (RB) Chip Trayanum — Toledo (EAST) Robert Henry Jr. — UTSA (EAST) Roman Hemby — Indiana (WEST) Eli Heidenreich — Navy (EAST) CJ Donaldson — Ohio State (WEST) Dean Connors — Houston (WEST) Demond Claiborne — Wake Forest (WEST) Kentrel Bullock — South Alabama (EAST) Wide Receivers (WR) Colbie Young — Georgia (EAST) Kaden Wetjen — Iowa (WEST) Jalen Walthall — Incarnate Word (EAST) Noah Thomas — Georgia (EAST) Zavion Thomas — LSU (EAST) J. Michael Sturdivant — Florida (WEST) De’Zhaun Stribling — Ole Miss (EAST) Chase Roberts — BYU (WEST) Eric Rivers — Georgia Tech (WEST) Kendrick Law — Kentucky (EAST) Chris Hilton — LSU (EAST) Emmanuel Henderson Jr. — Kansas (WEST) Jeff Caldwell — Cincinnati (WEST) Malik Benson — Oregon (WEST) Skyler Bell — Connecticut (WEST) Dillon Bell — Georgia (EAST) Tight Ends (TE) Seydou Traore — Mississippi State (WEST) Bauer Sharp — LSU (WEST) Eli Raridon — Notre Dame (EAST) Lake McRee — USC (EAST) Jaren Kanak — Oklahoma (WEST) Jack Endries — Texas (EAST) Dallen Bentley — Utah (EAST) Offensive Tackles (OT) Jayden Williams — Ole Miss (EAST) Aamil Wagner — Notre Dame (EAST) Keagen Trost — Missouri (EAST) Diego Pounds — Ole Miss (EAST) James Neal III — Iowa State (WEST) Riley Mahlman — Wisconsin (WEST) Fa’alili Fa’amoe — Wake Forest (WEST) Garrett DiGiorgio — UCLA (WEST) Travis Burke — Memphis (EAST) Chris Adams — Memphis (EAST) Interior Offensive Line (IOL) Dillon Wade — Auburn (EAST) Jaeden Roberts — Alabama (WEST) Ar’maj Reed-Adams — Texas A&M (WEST) Brian Parker II — Duke (WEST) Pete Nygra — Louisville (EAST) Febechi Nwaiwu — Oklahoma (WEST) Micah Morris — Georgia (EAST) Giovanni El-Hadi — Michigan (EAST) Anez Cooper — Miami (FL) (WEST) Pat Coogan — Indiana (WEST) DJ Campbell — Texas (EAST) Jager Burton — Kentucky (EAST) Josh Braun — Kentucky (EAST) Evan Beerntsen — Northwestern (WEST) Defense: Depth, Versatility, and Translatable NFL Traits The defensive roster at the 2026 East-West Shrine Bowl underscores why evaluators view this side of the ball as a strength of the event. The front seven is anchored by disruptive, role-diverse defenders such as Harold Perkins Jr., Albert Regis, and Malachi Lawrence, offering a mix of versatility, length, and power that translates cleanly to NFL schemes. In the secondary, defenders like Domani Jackson and Robert Spears-Jennings provide evaluators with press-man, zone, and sub-package options, while also projecting as early contributors on special teams. Interior Defensive Line (IDL) James Thompson Jr — Illinois (WEST) Gary Smith III — UCLA (EAST) Landon Robinson — Navy (EAST) Albert Regis — Texas A&M (WEST) Kaleb Proctor — Southeastern Louisiana (WEST) Tyler Onyedim — Texas A&M (WEST) Jackie Marshall — Baylor (EAST) Darrell Jackson Jr — Florida State (EAST) David Gusta — Kentucky (WEST) Dontay Corleone — Cincinnati (WEST) Brandon Cleveland — NC State (EAST) DeMonte Capehart — Clemson (EAST) David Blay — Miami (FL) (WEST) EDGE Defenders Wesley Williams — Duke (EAST) Bryan Thomas Jr — South Carolina (EAST) Tyreak Sapp — Florida (WEST) Mason Reiger — Wisconsin (EAST) Patrick Payton — LSU (EAST) Anthony Lucas — USC (EAST) Malachi Lawrence — UCF (WEST) Nyjalik Kelly — UCF (WEST) Marvin Jones Jr — Oklahoma (EAST) Keyshawn James-Newby — New Mexico (WEST) Aidan Hubbard — Northwestern (WEST) George Gumbs Jr — Florida (WEST) Ethan Burke — Texas (WEST) Linebackers (LB) Taurean York — Texas A&M (EAST) Declan Williams — Incarnate Word (EAST) West Weeks — LSU (EAST) Karson Sharar — Iowa (WEST) Jimmy Rolder — Michigan (WEST) Harold Perkins Jr — LSU (EAST) Red Murdock — Buffalo (EAST) Jackson Kuwatch — Miami (OH) (WEST) Jake Golday — Cincinnati (WEST) Eric Gentry — USC (WEST) Jaden Dugger — Louisiana (EAST) Wesley Bissainthe — Miami (FL) (WEST) Lander Barton — Utah (EAST) Cornerbacks (CB) Ceyair Wright — Nebraska (WEST) Jarod Washington — South Carolina State (EAST) DeVonta Smith — Notre Dame (EAST) Avery Smith — Toledo (EAST) Devon Marshall — NC State (EAST) Domani Jackson — Alabama (WEST) Ahmari Harvey — Georgia Tech (WEST) Jaylon Guilbeau — Texas (WEST) Andre Fuller — Toledo (EAST) Tyreek Chappell — Texas A&M (WEST) Brent Austin — California (EAST) Marcus Allen — North Carolina (EAST) Safeties (SAF) Cole Wisniewski — Texas Tech (EAST) Robert Spears-Jennings — Oklahoma (WEST) DQ Smith — South Carolina (EAST) Miles Scott — Illinois (WEST) Myles Rowser — Arizona State (EAST) Ahmaad Moses — SMU (WEST) Louis Moore — Indiana (WEST) Dalton Johnson — Arizona (EAST) Jalen Huskey — Maryland (WEST) Bishop Fitzgerald — USC (EAST) Austin Brown — Wisconsin (WEST)

2026 NFL Draft Scouting Report: Indiana QB Fernando Mendoza Fernando Mendoza has emerged as one of the top quarterback prospects in the 2026 NFL Draft class after transferring to Indiana and immediately elevating the Hoosiers’ offense. At 6’5”, 225 pounds, Mendoza brings an ideal NFL frame paired with natural passing instincts, decisive processing, and consistent ball placement on short-to-intermediate throws. Originally a 3-star recruit in the 2022 class (per 247Sports), Mendoza flashed NFL-level arm talent at California before transferring in 2025 to play under Kurt Cignetti. His command of Indiana’s pro-style/RPO hybrid offense and ability to diagnose coverage post-snap have drawn comparisons to modern system passers like Jared Goff. Film Summary Mendoza’s film showcases a composed pocket passer who wins with anticipation, accuracy, and mental processing. He manipulates defenders with his eyes, layers throws over linebackers, and delivers on-time passes into tight windows. His base and mechanics are consistent from clean pockets, and his arm strength allows him to drive the football to all three levels. Though not a dynamic runner, Mendoza has enough mobility to escape pressure and deliver off-platform throws with poise. Ideal Scheme Fit Pro-Style / RPO Blend Offense — best suited for timing-based passing attacks emphasizing rhythm, layered route concepts, and pocket efficiency. Fits offenses similar to the Rams, Lions, or Vikings, where timing and anticipation define the quarterback play. Key Strengths (Film-Based Traits) Outstanding size and frame:  Ideal 6’5” build with high release and easy velocity generation. Advanced processing and anticipation:  Quick post-snap reader who identifies coverage rotations and triggers throws rapidly. Touch and layering ability:  Adjusts trajectory and pace to fit passes over defenders and drop into tight windows. Composure under pressure:  Keeps eyes downfield and delivers accurately despite pocket collapse. Functional mobility:  Not a runner, but capable of extending plays and maintaining throwing posture outside structure. Developmental Areas (Growth Opportunities) Deep-ball consistency:  Occasionally underthrows or over-strides, leading to placement variance on vertical concepts. Pocket mechanics under duress:  Feet can drift when pressured; must continue refining reset discipline. Decision-making confidence:  At times trusts arm too much, forcing throws into congested windows. Eye manipulation:  Can further develop ability to move safeties and linebackers post-snap to expand throwing lanes. Grade and Projection Ceiling Grade:   Near Elite. With continued refinement in pocket mechanics and vertical accuracy, Mendoza could ascend into the early first-round “Near Elite” range. NFL Draft Projection:  Mid to late 1st round Pro Comparison:   Jared Goff — similar size, rhythm-based accuracy, and anticipatory timing within structure. Final Analysis Fernando Mendoza profiles as a polished pocket passer whose game is predicated on timing, anticipation, and mental acuity. He combines a pro-ready frame with efficient mechanics and high-level touch, projecting as one of the safest quarterback prospects in the 2026 NFL Draft. While he lacks elite off-script athleticism, his field command and operational maturity stand out. In the right fit—particularly a system that values timing and progression-based reads—Mendoza has the tools to become a long-term NFL starter with fringe Pro Bowl upside.

Carson Beck’s college career has been a story of promise and volatility. At 6’4”, 225 pounds, the Miami quarterback brings prototypical size, arm talent, and extensive experience in multiple pro-style systems. Yet the defining trait of his evaluation remains inconsistency, stretches of high-level execution followed by head-scratching decisions that stall momentum. After four years at Georgia, Beck transferred to Miami for his final season, helping the Hurricanes reach the College Football Playoff behind a 73.3% completion rate, 3,581 yards, and 29 touchdowns. Under Shannon Dawson’s pro-spread offense, he has displayed leadership and command of the offense. When his processing is clean, Beck’s anticipation and ball placement resemble an NFL-caliber starter. But when forced off-script or asked to extend plays beyond structure, his decision-making varies. Carson Beck Scouting Report & Film Summary Beck is a rhythm passer who operates best on schedule. When he identifies coverage early and gets the ball out in under 2.5 seconds, he’s accurate, efficient, and confident. His quick-game timing and anticipatory throws mirror the traits of a veteran field general. However, when plays break down or post-snap rotations muddy his reads, Beck’s processing slows. His turnover-worthy plays nearly triple when he holds the ball beyond 2.5 seconds, and his play under pressure remains a major variable. Despite the inconsistency, Beck’s positives are undeniable. He can make any throw, he possesses pro-ready footwork, and a calm demeanor when protected. The question is whether he can translate those traits into sustained success against NFL pressure looks. Ideal Scheme Fit West Coast / Play-Action Hybrid. Beck fits systems emphasizing timing, layered route concepts, and defined reads. He projects best as a distributor in rhythm-based passing games that blend structure with movement throws, maximizing his anticipation and touch while minimizing prolonged pocket reads. Key Strengths (Film-Based Traits) Prototypical Size & Mechanics:  6’4” frame with clean base and over-the-top delivery; ideal stature for pocket operation. Anticipation & Timing:  NFL-caliber rhythm thrower; releases early with confidence in structure. Experience & Command:  40+ career starts in high-pressure SEC and ACC environments; comfortable executing complex pro-style concepts. Developmental Areas (Growth Opportunities) Processing Under Pressure:  Must improve post-snap reaction time and avoid forcing throws into rotation-heavy coverages. Decision-Making Consistency:  Turnover-prone when extending plays; needs to embrace checkdowns and avoid “hero ball.” Velocity & Arm Strength:  Functional but not elite; late throws lose zip and risk placement errors outside the numbers. Unique Playstyle Comparison Jared Goff’s rhythm and timing traits with flashes of Eli Manning’s volatility — precise and poised when in rhythm, but streaky when structure breaks down. NFL Draft Grade Range:  Mid-Level to High-End Starter. Toolsy, experienced passer with pro-ready mechanics and leadership qualities. His volatility limits his floor, but his processing growth at Miami shows starter-level upside. Draft Projection – Early Day Two to Day Three (Rounds 2-5)

2026 NFL Draft Scouting Report: Ohio State WR Carnell Tate Carnell Tate is the next wide receiver in the Ohio State pipeline of NFL-ready pass-catchers capable of emerging as a primary target at the next level. A former 5-star recruit in the 2023 class (per 247Sports), Tate combines polished route running, strong football intelligence, and a wide catch radius that makes him one of the most reliable targets in college football. At 6’3”, 195 pounds, Tate brings a long, fluid frame and natural body control that help him play bigger than his listed size. In 2024, he caught 52 passes for 733 yards and 4 touchdowns, flashing the kind of alignment versatility and detail that translate to a high-end NFL starter. He’s not a pure burner, but his combination of size, savvy, and spatial awareness allows him to consistently uncover in the intermediate levels of the field. Film Summary Tate’s tape shows a polished technician with a strong understanding of leverage, timing, and defensive manipulation. He’s a smooth, composed mover who wins with pacing and precision rather than elite twitch. His ability to throttle down, stack defenders, and adjust to zone coverage makes him a quarterback-friendly option across all alignments. Ideal Scheme Fit West Coast / Spread Hybrid Offense — systems emphasizing layered concepts, play-action, and timing routes. Tate thrives in rhythm-based passing games that value route precision over vertical explosion. Key Strengths (Film-Based Traits) Savvy route running:  Nuanced and detailed with stems and break points. Sells vertical routes effectively, manipulates leverage, and creates consistent separation underneath and on intermediate routes. Elite catch radius and body control:  Extends naturally away from his frame, plucks the football cleanly, and wins in contested-catch situations. Excellent timing and elevation at the catch point. Versatility and football IQ:  Understands spacing and leverage against both man and zone coverage. Can line up at X, Z, or slot — allowing creative personnel usage. Reliable hands:  Soft and steady at the catch point; rarely double-clutches or body-catches. Blocking toughness:  Shows effort and technique in the run game, sealing edges and engaging defenders to spring teammates. Developmental Areas (Growth Opportunities) Top-end speed:  Lacks elite vertical burst; must rely on craft and deception to win deep rather than pure separation speed. Yards after catch:  Limited twitch and second-gear acceleration restrict his ability to turn short passes into explosive plays. Play strength:  Can allow physical corners to linger in his hip pocket. Needs to develop more lower-body power to fight through contact and reroutes. Route transitions:  Long-legged stride occasionally leads to segmented breaks, tipping his intentions at the top of routes. Grade and Projection Football Scout 365 Grade:   Near Elite. A high-caliber prospect expected to become a significant contributor by Year 2. Displays strong football IQ, advanced route technique, and reliable hands with only minor athletic limitations. NFL Draft Projection:  Mid-to-Late 1st Round Pro Comparison:   Tee Higgins / Tyler Boyd hybrid — a savvy, long-framed possession target with WR1 upside in rhythm-based offenses. Final Analysis Carnell Tate embodies the next evolution of Ohio State’s receiver factory — a tall, fluid, and technically refined pass-catcher who wins with precision, intelligence, and poise. He projects as a high-end starter with Pro Bowl potential in an offense that values detail and timing. While he may never threaten defenses vertically with blazing speed, his ability to separate through technique and body control will translate seamlessly to the NFL. If he adds functional strength and modestly improves his burst, Tate has the ceiling to become a true No. 1 receiver at the next level — the kind of dependable target who keeps drives alive and consistently wins in high-leverage moments.

2026 NFL Draft Scouting Report: Alabama QB Ty Simpson Ty Simpson’s rise from unproven depth piece to one of the most productive quarterbacks in the country has been one of the defining storylines of the 2025 college football season. In his first year as Alabama’s starter, Simpson has quickly elevated himself into first-round range. At 6’2”, 208 pounds, Simpson lacks prototype size but compensates with elite poise, quick processing, and advanced playmaking instincts. He’s a rhythm passer with an elastic arm, twitchy athleticism, and the ability to create second-reaction plays without sacrificing structure. A coach’s son with strong football DNA, Simpson blends discipline and improvisation as seamlessly as any passer in the 2026 NFL Draft class. Film Summary Simpson’s film reveals a confident, adaptable quarterback who thrives in chaos. He demonstrates high-level pocket awareness, keeps his eyes downfield while maneuvering away from pressure, and displays consistent accuracy on the move. His release is quick and compact, generating effortless velocity and pinpoint short-to-intermediate placement. What separates Simpson is his composure and situational precision. He’s been at his best on “got to have it” downs (3rd & 4+). When the moment demands it, Simpson maintains his base, resets his platform, and fires strikes into tight windows. While his arm strength is more “very good” than elite, his mechanical consistency and sequencing allow him to generate high-end velocity from a variety of angles. Ideal Scheme Fit West Coast / Spread Hybrid Offense — systems that emphasize timing. Simpson fits modern pro schemes, such as those used by the Lions, Rams, or Chargers, which rely on quick triggers, layered route concepts, and controlled movement within the pocket. Key Strengths (Film-Based Traits) Poise and composure:  Remains calm under duress, manipulates space in collapsing pockets, and delivers with balance and precision. Processing and anticipation:  Reads coverage rotations quickly and triggers throws on time, particularly in the short and intermediate levels. Accuracy and mechanics:  Smooth, compact release with excellent hip torque; places the ball where only his receivers can make a play. Extension ability:  Mobile enough to escape pressure and reset his base; creates off-script without panic or chaos. Clutch execution:  Statistically dominant in late-game and high-pressure scenarios; displays high football character and leadership. Developmental Areas (Growth Opportunities) Experience:  Just a one-year starter; still developing reps and defensive recognition consistency. Arm strength ceiling:  More functional than elite; must prove he can consistently drive the football into tight NFL windows outside the hashes. Pocket patience:  Occasionally holds the ball too long (3.0+ seconds average time-to-throw); must speed up internal clock against faster pro rushers. Ball security:  Three recorded fumbles in 2025; needs to improve grip awareness and pocket ball protection. Grade and Projection Football Scout 365 Grade:   Under Review Ceiling Grade:   Under Review NFL Draft Projection:  Under Review Pro Comparison:   Brock Purdy with more twitch — an efficient rhythm passer with elite pocket instincts, mobility, and late-down poise. Final Analysis Ty Simpson has turned limited experience into elite production through poise, processing, and precision. He’s a natural leader who thrives under pressure, balancing timing-based efficiency with improvisational creativity. His size and arm talent won’t blow evaluators away, but his mechanical polish, field vision, and competitive edge evoke starting-caliber stability from Day 1. Simpson projects as a scheme-versatile, long-term NFL starter in offenses that value quick processing, accuracy, and controlled mobility. If he continues to mature in full-field reads and maintains ball security, he could challenge for QB1 status in the 2026 class and cement himself as one of the most dependable quarterbacks in the draft.

2026 NFL Draft Scouting Report: Oregon QB Dante Moore Dante Moore is a natural thrower with top-tier rhythm, touch, and anticipation — built for modern NFL systems that marry pro-style structure with spread spacing. A former 5-star recruit and current leader of Oregon’s high-powered offense, Moore has taken a decisive leap forward in 2025, showing the mechanical polish and pocket maturity evaluators expected from one of the top quarterback prospects in the nation. At 6’3”, 206 pounds, Moore plays with a calm command rarely seen in underclassmen. His compact release and quick mental trigger make him an ideal fit for timing-based, rhythm passing offenses that emphasize full-field reads and controlled tempo. In 2025, he posted an FBS-best 3.2% pressure-to-sack rate, showcasing poise and spatial awareness in collapsing pockets. While not an overwhelming athlete or power thrower, Moore’s accuracy, touch, and field IQ make him one of the most efficient quarterbacks in college football — a polished passer with franchise-level potential. Film Summary Moore’s film reveals a poised, technically refined quarterback who plays with rhythm and balance. He processes coverages quickly and consistently layers throws with precision, especially on crossers and intermediate routes. His mechanics are crisp and repeatable, with a natural throwing motion that delivers an exceptionally catchable football. When extending plays, Moore maintains his base and vision, making sound decisions on the move. He’s a confident pocket operator who manipulates defenders with his eyes and shoulders, consistently finding open windows through timing and anticipation. Ideal Scheme Fit Pro-Style with Spread Elements — excels in quick-rhythm, timing-based systems that incorporate vertical play-action and intermediate drive concepts. Fits best in schemes similar to those run by the Houston Texans, Detroit Lions, or Los Angeles Rams, where precision, layered concepts, and timing define the passing game. Key Strengths (Film-Based Traits) Rhythm and accuracy:  Delivers with perfect tempo and consistent placement in short and intermediate areas. Pocket poise:  Calm and spatially aware, rarely flustered under pressure; maintains platform integrity. Processing and anticipation:  Reads coverages quickly, manipulates defenders, and times throws before breaks. Mechanical polish:  Compact, repeatable release; consistently balanced footwork in rhythm. Throw on the move:  Maintains touch and accuracy when forced off-platform or rolling to either side. Developmental Areas (Growth Opportunities) Deep-ball velocity:  Lacks elite drive on vertical throws; must maximize trajectory control at deeper depths. Footwork under duress:  Can rush setup when interior pressure collapses; must reset base more consistently. Explosiveness outside structure:  Athletic but not dynamic — more efficient than elusive when scrambling. Grade and Projection Football Scout 365 Grade:   High-End Starter Potential (73.8) A quarterback prospect with advanced mechanics, field command, and top-tier accuracy who projects as a quality NFL starter early in his career. With continued growth, he has the skill set to develop into a long-term franchise cornerstone. Ceiling Grade:   Elite Tier Starter (77.0) NFL Draft Projection:  Mid-to-Late 1st Round Pro Comparison:   C.J. Stroud / Jayden Daniels hybrid — anticipatory rhythm passer with layered touch and precision in timing-based offenses. Final Analysis Dante Moore projects as a modern, in-structure quarterback with high-level starter upside in the NFL. His combination of processing speed, accuracy, and pocket awareness allows him to thrive in systems that prioritize rhythm and decisiveness. While he lacks elite size or dual-threat explosiveness, his technical polish and situational poise give him the floor of a Day 1 starter, with the potential to develop into an elite-tier franchise quarterback as his vertical game continues to mature.