Search Results

2026 NFL Draft Scouting Report: Miami EDGE Rueben Bain Jr. Rueben Bain Jr. is a disruptive and highly productive edge defender who enters 2025 with first-round aspirations despite an injury-impacted sophomore campaign. The former ACC Defensive Rookie of the Year combines powerful hands, a low center of gravity, and advanced pass-rush technique with elite motor and positional versatility. At 6’3”, 275 pounds, Bain carries an NFL-ready frame with little bad weight and an explosive first step that generates immediate leverage. Film Summary Bain’s tape reveals a compact, technically advanced pass-rusher who wins through leverage, violent hands, and relentless pursuit. He’s more of a technician than a twitch athlete, but his power and instincts make him a nightmare for opposing tackles. Ideal Scheme Fit: 4-3 Defensive End / Multiple Front Hybrid EDGE Key Strengths (Film-Based Traits) Explosive off the snap:  Fires out of his stance with excellent get-off and short-area quickness to threaten both the inside and outside shoulder. Advanced pass-rush arsenal:  Wins with a balanced mix of bull-rush power, inside counters, and hand-swipe moves. Converts speed to power efficiently and bends well through contact. Positional versatility:  Can play 4-3 DE, 5-tech, or slide inside as a sub-package rusher. Handles combo blocks and sets a firm edge against tight ends. Relentless motor:  Plays through the whistle and consistently retraces to finish backside plays. Developmental Areas (Growth Opportunities) Pass-rush timing:  Can be late with hand placement after initial contact; must refine strike timing to maximize first-step advantage. Durability:  Missed four games in 2024 with a calf injury; medical checks will be key through the pre-draft process. Tackling consistency:  Occasionally comes in high, leading to missed finishes in space. Grade and Projection Football Scout 365 Grade:  ( Near Elite) A high-caliber prospect projected to become a significant contributor by Year 2. Outstanding tools, high football IQ, and minimal weaknesses. NFL Draft Projection:  Mid-to-Late 1st Round Pro Comparison:   Brandon Graham

About the East-West Shrine Bowl (2026 Overview) The East-West Shrine Bowl is the longest-running college all-star football game in the nation and a cornerstone of the NFL Draft evaluation calendar. For more than a century, the event has provided elite college prospects a nationally televised platform to compete in front of NFL scouts, coaches, and executives from all 32 teams, with a structure built around pro-style practices and direct NFL evaluation. Under the direction of Eric Galko, Shrine Bowl Executive Director of Football Operations and Player Personnel, the event has evolved into one of the most NFL-aligned evaluation environments in the pre-draft process. Recent results underscore its credibility: the 2025 NFL Draft produced one first-round pick, nine selections in the first four rounds, 51 total draft picks, and 92 NFL Scouting Combine invitations from Shrine Bowl participants. Beyond football, the event supports Shriners Children’s , raising funds and awareness to help provide specialized pediatric care for children facing complex medical challenges. 2026 Event Details and Schedule Practices:  January 23–26, 2026 Game Date:  Tuesday, January 27, 2026 Kickoff:  7:00 PM ET Location:  Ford Center at The Star (Dallas Cowboys headquarters), Frisco, Texas Broadcast:  NFL Network Offense: Experience, Versatility, and Clear NFL Role Projection The quarterback group is headlined by experienced starters such as Cade Klubnik, Haynes King, and Joe Fagnano, each offering distinct stylistic profiles for evaluators to study in a pro-style environment. At the skill positions, receivers like De'Zhaun Stribling and Skyler Bell bring alignment flexibility and defined offensive roles, while the offensive line is anchored by versatile blockers such as Diego Pounds and Jagger Burton, giving NFL teams multiple evaluation pathways across the week. Quarterbacks (QB) Cade Klubnik — Clemson (EAST) Behren Morton — Texas Tech (EAST) Miller Moss — Louisville (WEST) Haynes King — Georgia Tech (WEST) Mark Gronowski — Iowa (WEST) Joe Fagnano — Connecticut (WEST) Kyron Drones — Virginia Tech (EAST) Jalon Daniels — Kansas (EAST) Running Backs (RB) Chip Trayanum — Toledo (EAST) Robert Henry Jr. — UTSA (EAST) Roman Hemby — Indiana (WEST) Eli Heidenreich — Navy (EAST) CJ Donaldson — Ohio State (WEST) Dean Connors — Houston (WEST) Demond Claiborne — Wake Forest (WEST) Kentrel Bullock — South Alabama (EAST) Wide Receivers (WR) Colbie Young — Georgia (EAST) Kaden Wetjen — Iowa (WEST) Jalen Walthall — Incarnate Word (EAST) Noah Thomas — Georgia (EAST) Zavion Thomas — LSU (EAST) J. Michael Sturdivant — Florida (WEST) De’Zhaun Stribling — Ole Miss (EAST) Chase Roberts — BYU (WEST) Eric Rivers — Georgia Tech (WEST) Kendrick Law — Kentucky (EAST) Chris Hilton — LSU (EAST) Emmanuel Henderson Jr. — Kansas (WEST) Jeff Caldwell — Cincinnati (WEST) Malik Benson — Oregon (WEST) Skyler Bell — Connecticut (WEST) Dillon Bell — Georgia (EAST) Tight Ends (TE) Seydou Traore — Mississippi State (WEST) Bauer Sharp — LSU (WEST) Eli Raridon — Notre Dame (EAST) Lake McRee — USC (EAST) Jaren Kanak — Oklahoma (WEST) Jack Endries — Texas (EAST) Dallen Bentley — Utah (EAST) Offensive Tackles (OT) Jayden Williams — Ole Miss (EAST) Aamil Wagner — Notre Dame (EAST) Keagen Trost — Missouri (EAST) Diego Pounds — Ole Miss (EAST) James Neal III — Iowa State (WEST) Riley Mahlman — Wisconsin (WEST) Fa’alili Fa’amoe — Wake Forest (WEST) Garrett DiGiorgio — UCLA (WEST) Travis Burke — Memphis (EAST) Chris Adams — Memphis (EAST) Interior Offensive Line (IOL) Dillon Wade — Auburn (EAST) Jaeden Roberts — Alabama (WEST) Ar’maj Reed-Adams — Texas A&M (WEST) Brian Parker II — Duke (WEST) Pete Nygra — Louisville (EAST) Febechi Nwaiwu — Oklahoma (WEST) Micah Morris — Georgia (EAST) Giovanni El-Hadi — Michigan (EAST) Anez Cooper — Miami (FL) (WEST) Pat Coogan — Indiana (WEST) DJ Campbell — Texas (EAST) Jager Burton — Kentucky (EAST) Josh Braun — Kentucky (EAST) Evan Beerntsen — Northwestern (WEST) Defense: Depth, Versatility, and Translatable NFL Traits The defensive roster at the 2026 East-West Shrine Bowl underscores why evaluators view this side of the ball as a strength of the event. The front seven is anchored by disruptive, role-diverse defenders such as Harold Perkins Jr., Albert Regis, and Malachi Lawrence, offering a mix of versatility, length, and power that translates cleanly to NFL schemes. In the secondary, defenders like Domani Jackson and Robert Spears-Jennings provide evaluators with press-man, zone, and sub-package options, while also projecting as early contributors on special teams. Interior Defensive Line (IDL) James Thompson Jr — Illinois (WEST) Gary Smith III — UCLA (EAST) Landon Robinson — Navy (EAST) Albert Regis — Texas A&M (WEST) Kaleb Proctor — Southeastern Louisiana (WEST) Tyler Onyedim — Texas A&M (WEST) Jackie Marshall — Baylor (EAST) Darrell Jackson Jr — Florida State (EAST) David Gusta — Kentucky (WEST) Dontay Corleone — Cincinnati (WEST) Brandon Cleveland — NC State (EAST) DeMonte Capehart — Clemson (EAST) David Blay — Miami (FL) (WEST) EDGE Defenders Wesley Williams — Duke (EAST) Bryan Thomas Jr — South Carolina (EAST) Tyreak Sapp — Florida (WEST) Mason Reiger — Wisconsin (EAST) Patrick Payton — LSU (EAST) Anthony Lucas — USC (EAST) Malachi Lawrence — UCF (WEST) Nyjalik Kelly — UCF (WEST) Marvin Jones Jr — Oklahoma (EAST) Keyshawn James-Newby — New Mexico (WEST) Aidan Hubbard — Northwestern (WEST) George Gumbs Jr — Florida (WEST) Ethan Burke — Texas (WEST) Linebackers (LB) Taurean York — Texas A&M (EAST) Declan Williams — Incarnate Word (EAST) West Weeks — LSU (EAST) Karson Sharar — Iowa (WEST) Jimmy Rolder — Michigan (WEST) Harold Perkins Jr — LSU (EAST) Red Murdock — Buffalo (EAST) Jackson Kuwatch — Miami (OH) (WEST) Jake Golday — Cincinnati (WEST) Eric Gentry — USC (WEST) Jaden Dugger — Louisiana (EAST) Wesley Bissainthe — Miami (FL) (WEST) Lander Barton — Utah (EAST) Cornerbacks (CB) Ceyair Wright — Nebraska (WEST) Jarod Washington — South Carolina State (EAST) DeVonta Smith — Notre Dame (EAST) Avery Smith — Toledo (EAST) Devon Marshall — NC State (EAST) Domani Jackson — Alabama (WEST) Ahmari Harvey — Georgia Tech (WEST) Jaylon Guilbeau — Texas (WEST) Andre Fuller — Toledo (EAST) Tyreek Chappell — Texas A&M (WEST) Brent Austin — California (EAST) Marcus Allen — North Carolina (EAST) Safeties (SAF) Cole Wisniewski — Texas Tech (EAST) Robert Spears-Jennings — Oklahoma (WEST) DQ Smith — South Carolina (EAST) Miles Scott — Illinois (WEST) Myles Rowser — Arizona State (EAST) Ahmaad Moses — SMU (WEST) Louis Moore — Indiana (WEST) Dalton Johnson — Arizona (EAST) Jalen Huskey — Maryland (WEST) Bishop Fitzgerald — USC (EAST) Austin Brown — Wisconsin (WEST)

2026 NFL Draft Scouting Report: Indiana QB Fernando Mendoza Fernando Mendoza has emerged as one of the top quarterback prospects in the 2026 NFL Draft class after transferring to Indiana and immediately elevating the Hoosiers’ offense. At 6’5”, 225 pounds, Mendoza brings an ideal NFL frame paired with natural passing instincts, decisive processing, and consistent ball placement on short-to-intermediate throws. Originally a 3-star recruit in the 2022 class (per 247Sports), Mendoza flashed NFL-level arm talent at California before transferring in 2025 to play under Kurt Cignetti. His command of Indiana’s pro-style/RPO hybrid offense and ability to diagnose coverage post-snap have drawn comparisons to modern system passers like Jared Goff. Film Summary Mendoza’s film showcases a composed pocket passer who wins with anticipation, accuracy, and mental processing. He manipulates defenders with his eyes, layers throws over linebackers, and delivers on-time passes into tight windows. His base and mechanics are consistent from clean pockets, and his arm strength allows him to drive the football to all three levels. Though not a dynamic runner, Mendoza has enough mobility to escape pressure and deliver off-platform throws with poise. Ideal Scheme Fit Pro-Style / RPO Blend Offense — best suited for timing-based passing attacks emphasizing rhythm, layered route concepts, and pocket efficiency. Fits offenses similar to the Rams, Lions, or Vikings, where timing and anticipation define the quarterback play. Key Strengths (Film-Based Traits) Outstanding size and frame:  Ideal 6’5” build with high release and easy velocity generation. Advanced processing and anticipation:  Quick post-snap reader who identifies coverage rotations and triggers throws rapidly. Touch and layering ability:  Adjusts trajectory and pace to fit passes over defenders and drop into tight windows. Composure under pressure:  Keeps eyes downfield and delivers accurately despite pocket collapse. Functional mobility:  Not a runner, but capable of extending plays and maintaining throwing posture outside structure. Developmental Areas (Growth Opportunities) Deep-ball consistency:  Occasionally underthrows or over-strides, leading to placement variance on vertical concepts. Pocket mechanics under duress:  Feet can drift when pressured; must continue refining reset discipline. Decision-making confidence:  At times trusts arm too much, forcing throws into congested windows. Eye manipulation:  Can further develop ability to move safeties and linebackers post-snap to expand throwing lanes. Grade and Projection Ceiling Grade:   Near Elite. With continued refinement in pocket mechanics and vertical accuracy, Mendoza could ascend into the early first-round “Near Elite” range. NFL Draft Projection:  Mid to late 1st round Pro Comparison:   Jared Goff — similar size, rhythm-based accuracy, and anticipatory timing within structure. Final Analysis Fernando Mendoza profiles as a polished pocket passer whose game is predicated on timing, anticipation, and mental acuity. He combines a pro-ready frame with efficient mechanics and high-level touch, projecting as one of the safest quarterback prospects in the 2026 NFL Draft. While he lacks elite off-script athleticism, his field command and operational maturity stand out. In the right fit—particularly a system that values timing and progression-based reads—Mendoza has the tools to become a long-term NFL starter with fringe Pro Bowl upside.

Carson Beck’s college career has been a story of promise and volatility. At 6’4”, 225 pounds, the Miami quarterback brings prototypical size, arm talent, and extensive experience in multiple pro-style systems. Yet the defining trait of his evaluation remains inconsistency, stretches of high-level execution followed by head-scratching decisions that stall momentum. After four years at Georgia, Beck transferred to Miami for his final season, helping the Hurricanes reach the College Football Playoff behind a 73.3% completion rate, 3,581 yards, and 29 touchdowns. Under Shannon Dawson’s pro-spread offense, he has displayed leadership and command of the offense. When his processing is clean, Beck’s anticipation and ball placement resemble an NFL-caliber starter. But when forced off-script or asked to extend plays beyond structure, his decision-making varies. Carson Beck Scouting Report & Film Summary Beck is a rhythm passer who operates best on schedule. When he identifies coverage early and gets the ball out in under 2.5 seconds, he’s accurate, efficient, and confident. His quick-game timing and anticipatory throws mirror the traits of a veteran field general. However, when plays break down or post-snap rotations muddy his reads, Beck’s processing slows. His turnover-worthy plays nearly triple when he holds the ball beyond 2.5 seconds, and his play under pressure remains a major variable. Despite the inconsistency, Beck’s positives are undeniable. He can make any throw, he possesses pro-ready footwork, and a calm demeanor when protected. The question is whether he can translate those traits into sustained success against NFL pressure looks. Ideal Scheme Fit West Coast / Play-Action Hybrid. Beck fits systems emphasizing timing, layered route concepts, and defined reads. He projects best as a distributor in rhythm-based passing games that blend structure with movement throws, maximizing his anticipation and touch while minimizing prolonged pocket reads. Key Strengths (Film-Based Traits) Prototypical Size & Mechanics:  6’4” frame with clean base and over-the-top delivery; ideal stature for pocket operation. Anticipation & Timing:  NFL-caliber rhythm thrower; releases early with confidence in structure. Experience & Command:  40+ career starts in high-pressure SEC and ACC environments; comfortable executing complex pro-style concepts. Developmental Areas (Growth Opportunities) Processing Under Pressure:  Must improve post-snap reaction time and avoid forcing throws into rotation-heavy coverages. Decision-Making Consistency:  Turnover-prone when extending plays; needs to embrace checkdowns and avoid “hero ball.” Velocity & Arm Strength:  Functional but not elite; late throws lose zip and risk placement errors outside the numbers. Unique Playstyle Comparison Jared Goff’s rhythm and timing traits with flashes of Eli Manning’s volatility — precise and poised when in rhythm, but streaky when structure breaks down. NFL Draft Grade Range:  Mid-Level to High-End Starter. Toolsy, experienced passer with pro-ready mechanics and leadership qualities. His volatility limits his floor, but his processing growth at Miami shows starter-level upside. Draft Projection – Early Day Two to Day Three (Rounds 2-5)

2026 NFL Draft Scouting Report: Ohio State WR Carnell Tate Carnell Tate is the next wide receiver in the Ohio State pipeline of NFL-ready pass-catchers capable of emerging as a primary target at the next level. A former 5-star recruit in the 2023 class (per 247Sports), Tate combines polished route running, strong football intelligence, and a wide catch radius that makes him one of the most reliable targets in college football. At 6’3”, 195 pounds, Tate brings a long, fluid frame and natural body control that help him play bigger than his listed size. In 2024, he caught 52 passes for 733 yards and 4 touchdowns, flashing the kind of alignment versatility and detail that translate to a high-end NFL starter. He’s not a pure burner, but his combination of size, savvy, and spatial awareness allows him to consistently uncover in the intermediate levels of the field. Film Summary Tate’s tape shows a polished technician with a strong understanding of leverage, timing, and defensive manipulation. He’s a smooth, composed mover who wins with pacing and precision rather than elite twitch. His ability to throttle down, stack defenders, and adjust to zone coverage makes him a quarterback-friendly option across all alignments. Ideal Scheme Fit West Coast / Spread Hybrid Offense — systems emphasizing layered concepts, play-action, and timing routes. Tate thrives in rhythm-based passing games that value route precision over vertical explosion. Key Strengths (Film-Based Traits) Savvy route running:  Nuanced and detailed with stems and break points. Sells vertical routes effectively, manipulates leverage, and creates consistent separation underneath and on intermediate routes. Elite catch radius and body control:  Extends naturally away from his frame, plucks the football cleanly, and wins in contested-catch situations. Excellent timing and elevation at the catch point. Versatility and football IQ:  Understands spacing and leverage against both man and zone coverage. Can line up at X, Z, or slot — allowing creative personnel usage. Reliable hands:  Soft and steady at the catch point; rarely double-clutches or body-catches. Blocking toughness:  Shows effort and technique in the run game, sealing edges and engaging defenders to spring teammates. Developmental Areas (Growth Opportunities) Top-end speed:  Lacks elite vertical burst; must rely on craft and deception to win deep rather than pure separation speed. Yards after catch:  Limited twitch and second-gear acceleration restrict his ability to turn short passes into explosive plays. Play strength:  Can allow physical corners to linger in his hip pocket. Needs to develop more lower-body power to fight through contact and reroutes. Route transitions:  Long-legged stride occasionally leads to segmented breaks, tipping his intentions at the top of routes. Grade and Projection Football Scout 365 Grade:   Near Elite. A high-caliber prospect expected to become a significant contributor by Year 2. Displays strong football IQ, advanced route technique, and reliable hands with only minor athletic limitations. NFL Draft Projection:  Mid-to-Late 1st Round Pro Comparison:   Tee Higgins / Tyler Boyd hybrid — a savvy, long-framed possession target with WR1 upside in rhythm-based offenses. Final Analysis Carnell Tate embodies the next evolution of Ohio State’s receiver factory — a tall, fluid, and technically refined pass-catcher who wins with precision, intelligence, and poise. He projects as a high-end starter with Pro Bowl potential in an offense that values detail and timing. While he may never threaten defenses vertically with blazing speed, his ability to separate through technique and body control will translate seamlessly to the NFL. If he adds functional strength and modestly improves his burst, Tate has the ceiling to become a true No. 1 receiver at the next level — the kind of dependable target who keeps drives alive and consistently wins in high-leverage moments.

2026 NFL Draft Scouting Report: Alabama QB Ty Simpson Ty Simpson’s rise from unproven depth piece to one of the most productive quarterbacks in the country has been one of the defining storylines of the 2025 college football season. In his first year as Alabama’s starter, Simpson has quickly elevated himself into first-round range. At 6’2”, 208 pounds, Simpson lacks prototype size but compensates with elite poise, quick processing, and advanced playmaking instincts. He’s a rhythm passer with an elastic arm, twitchy athleticism, and the ability to create second-reaction plays without sacrificing structure. A coach’s son with strong football DNA, Simpson blends discipline and improvisation as seamlessly as any passer in the 2026 NFL Draft class. Film Summary Simpson’s film reveals a confident, adaptable quarterback who thrives in chaos. He demonstrates high-level pocket awareness, keeps his eyes downfield while maneuvering away from pressure, and displays consistent accuracy on the move. His release is quick and compact, generating effortless velocity and pinpoint short-to-intermediate placement. What separates Simpson is his composure and situational precision. He’s been at his best on “got to have it” downs (3rd & 4+). When the moment demands it, Simpson maintains his base, resets his platform, and fires strikes into tight windows. While his arm strength is more “very good” than elite, his mechanical consistency and sequencing allow him to generate high-end velocity from a variety of angles. Ideal Scheme Fit West Coast / Spread Hybrid Offense — systems that emphasize timing. Simpson fits modern pro schemes, such as those used by the Lions, Rams, or Chargers, which rely on quick triggers, layered route concepts, and controlled movement within the pocket. Key Strengths (Film-Based Traits) Poise and composure:  Remains calm under duress, manipulates space in collapsing pockets, and delivers with balance and precision. Processing and anticipation:  Reads coverage rotations quickly and triggers throws on time, particularly in the short and intermediate levels. Accuracy and mechanics:  Smooth, compact release with excellent hip torque; places the ball where only his receivers can make a play. Extension ability:  Mobile enough to escape pressure and reset his base; creates off-script without panic or chaos. Clutch execution:  Statistically dominant in late-game and high-pressure scenarios; displays high football character and leadership. Developmental Areas (Growth Opportunities) Experience:  Just a one-year starter; still developing reps and defensive recognition consistency. Arm strength ceiling:  More functional than elite; must prove he can consistently drive the football into tight NFL windows outside the hashes. Pocket patience:  Occasionally holds the ball too long (3.0+ seconds average time-to-throw); must speed up internal clock against faster pro rushers. Ball security:  Three recorded fumbles in 2025; needs to improve grip awareness and pocket ball protection. Grade and Projection Football Scout 365 Grade:   Under Review Ceiling Grade:   Under Review NFL Draft Projection:  Under Review Pro Comparison:   Brock Purdy with more twitch — an efficient rhythm passer with elite pocket instincts, mobility, and late-down poise. Final Analysis Ty Simpson has turned limited experience into elite production through poise, processing, and precision. He’s a natural leader who thrives under pressure, balancing timing-based efficiency with improvisational creativity. His size and arm talent won’t blow evaluators away, but his mechanical polish, field vision, and competitive edge evoke starting-caliber stability from Day 1. Simpson projects as a scheme-versatile, long-term NFL starter in offenses that value quick processing, accuracy, and controlled mobility. If he continues to mature in full-field reads and maintains ball security, he could challenge for QB1 status in the 2026 class and cement himself as one of the most dependable quarterbacks in the draft.

2026 NFL Draft Scouting Report: Oregon QB Dante Moore Dante Moore is a natural thrower with top-tier rhythm, touch, and anticipation — built for modern NFL systems that marry pro-style structure with spread spacing. A former 5-star recruit and current leader of Oregon’s high-powered offense, Moore has taken a decisive leap forward in 2025, showing the mechanical polish and pocket maturity evaluators expected from one of the top quarterback prospects in the nation. At 6’3”, 206 pounds, Moore plays with a calm command rarely seen in underclassmen. His compact release and quick mental trigger make him an ideal fit for timing-based, rhythm passing offenses that emphasize full-field reads and controlled tempo. In 2025, he posted an FBS-best 3.2% pressure-to-sack rate, showcasing poise and spatial awareness in collapsing pockets. While not an overwhelming athlete or power thrower, Moore’s accuracy, touch, and field IQ make him one of the most efficient quarterbacks in college football — a polished passer with franchise-level potential. Film Summary Moore’s film reveals a poised, technically refined quarterback who plays with rhythm and balance. He processes coverages quickly and consistently layers throws with precision, especially on crossers and intermediate routes. His mechanics are crisp and repeatable, with a natural throwing motion that delivers an exceptionally catchable football. When extending plays, Moore maintains his base and vision, making sound decisions on the move. He’s a confident pocket operator who manipulates defenders with his eyes and shoulders, consistently finding open windows through timing and anticipation. Ideal Scheme Fit Pro-Style with Spread Elements — excels in quick-rhythm, timing-based systems that incorporate vertical play-action and intermediate drive concepts. Fits best in schemes similar to those run by the Houston Texans, Detroit Lions, or Los Angeles Rams, where precision, layered concepts, and timing define the passing game. Key Strengths (Film-Based Traits) Rhythm and accuracy:  Delivers with perfect tempo and consistent placement in short and intermediate areas. Pocket poise:  Calm and spatially aware, rarely flustered under pressure; maintains platform integrity. Processing and anticipation:  Reads coverages quickly, manipulates defenders, and times throws before breaks. Mechanical polish:  Compact, repeatable release; consistently balanced footwork in rhythm. Throw on the move:  Maintains touch and accuracy when forced off-platform or rolling to either side. Developmental Areas (Growth Opportunities) Deep-ball velocity:  Lacks elite drive on vertical throws; must maximize trajectory control at deeper depths. Footwork under duress:  Can rush setup when interior pressure collapses; must reset base more consistently. Explosiveness outside structure:  Athletic but not dynamic — more efficient than elusive when scrambling. Grade and Projection Football Scout 365 Grade:   High-End Starter Potential (73.8) A quarterback prospect with advanced mechanics, field command, and top-tier accuracy who projects as a quality NFL starter early in his career. With continued growth, he has the skill set to develop into a long-term franchise cornerstone. Ceiling Grade:   Elite Tier Starter (77.0) NFL Draft Projection:  Mid-to-Late 1st Round Pro Comparison:   C.J. Stroud / Jayden Daniels hybrid — anticipatory rhythm passer with layered touch and precision in timing-based offenses. Final Analysis Dante Moore projects as a modern, in-structure quarterback with high-level starter upside in the NFL. His combination of processing speed, accuracy, and pocket awareness allows him to thrive in systems that prioritize rhythm and decisiveness. While he lacks elite size or dual-threat explosiveness, his technical polish and situational poise give him the floor of a Day 1 starter, with the potential to develop into an elite-tier franchise quarterback as his vertical game continues to mature.

2026 NFL Draft Scouting Report: Clemson DL Peter Woods Peter Woods enters the 2026 NFL Draft as one of the premier defensive linemen in college football and a projected top-five overall pick. At 6’3”, 310 pounds, the Clemson standout combines rare explosiveness, heavy hands, and technical polish, making him one of the most dominant interior defenders. A former five-star recruit, Woods has lived up to expectations since arriving in Death Valley, earning Freshman All-American honors and developing into the top defensive tackle in the country by his junior season. Despite facing constant double teams, Woods consistently anchored Clemson’s front, displaying elite power, short-area burst, and a relentless motor that make him a disruptive force against both the run and the pass. Film Summary Woods’ tape showcases an interior defender who blends violent leverage play with twitchy athleticism. He’s explosive off the snap, uses his hands with technical precision, and resets the line of scrimmage with brute power. As a run defender, Woods’ ability to two-gap, shed, and stack blockers makes him one of the most complete interior players in the class. He plays low and compact, generating torque that overwhelms even the strongest offensive linemen. As a pass-rusher, Woods thrives on speed-to-power conversion and has refined his hand usage with rip and arm-over counters. While he’s not yet a high-volume sack producer, his disruption rate and ability to collapse the pocket consistently impact opposing quarterbacks. His football IQ and quick processing allow him to read blocking concepts instantly, making him equally valuable as a penetrator or a control-based gap defender. Ideal Scheme Fit Woods projects as a scheme-proof interior defender who can dominate from multiple alignments. He’s best suited as a 3-technique in an attacking 4-3 front or as a 2i/4i hybrid in odd fronts that prioritize gap versatility and penetration. Teams like Baltimore, Philadelphia, and Detroit that value explosive, multipurpose defensive linemen would maximize his impact. Key Strengths Elite first-step explosiveness:  Quick off the snap with rare burst for his size. Power and leverage dominance:  Creates immediate displacement with violent hand strikes. Technical refinement:  Advanced stack-and-shed technique with a developed counter arsenal. Football intelligence:  Reads and reacts to blocking schemes instantly. High motor:  Relentless competitor who plays through the whistle. Developmental Areas Pad-level consistency:  Can rise out of stance, diminishing leverage against doubles. Length limitations:  Shorter arms occasionally restrict reach disengagement. Pass-rush sequencing:  Still developing a deeper variety of secondary counters. Grade and Projection Summary Football Scout 365 Grade:   Near Elite - A high-caliber, scheme-diverse interior defender with rare power, explosiveness, and technical polish. Woods consistently wins with leverage, hand strength, and first-step quickness, projecting as an immediate impact starter and tone-setter on the defensive line. Ceiling Grade:   Elite: Franchise-caliber upside — possesses the explosive athleticism, power profile, and block-destruction traits to develop into one of the NFL’s premier interior disruptors. NFL Draft Projection:  Top 15 Picks (1st Round) Pro Comparison:   Mason Graham / Jalen Carter hybrid  — mirrors Graham’s compact frame, leverage mastery, and short-area torque, while flashing the high-end explosiveness and raw disruption potential reminiscent of Carter at his peak. Final Analysis Peter Woods is the prototype of a modern NFL interior disruptor — explosive, technically refined, and relentless. His combination of low center of gravity, violent hands, and rare athletic twitch allows him to consistently win leverage battles and dictate tempo in the trenches. Woods has already proven capable of commanding double teams and anchoring against both the run and pass, and his football IQ makes him plug-and-play ready for any scheme. He projects as a day-one starter with the potential to become a perennial All-Pro and defensive cornerstone at the next level. Simply put, Woods embodies the traits of a blue-chip prospect — one of the safest, most complete players in the 2026 NFL Draft class.

As the college football postseason begins, the 2026 NFL Draft evaluation cycle officially shifts into its early-declaration phase. For NFL scouts, front offices, and draft analysts, this is the point in the calendar where the class begins to crystallize — as underclassmen make the definitive decision to forgo remaining eligibility and enter the draft. Rather than serving as a live declaration tracker, this article is designed to explain the early declaration process, outline key eligibility rules and deadlines, and provide context on how early entrants shape the overall draft landscape. For readers looking to track real-time declaration updates, the NFL maintains an official underclassmen tracker, which can be found here: 2026 NFL Draft Underclassmen Tracker 2026 NFL Draft: Eligibility and Early Declaration Rules When Is the 2026 NFL Draft? The 91st NFL Draft will be held April 23–25, 2026, in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Who Is Eligible to Enter the 2026 NFL Draft? A prospect becomes eligible for the NFL Draft once three years have passed since their high school graduating class. That includes: Players who have exhausted their collegiate eligibility Underclassmen (redshirt sophomores or juniors) who declare for special eligibility, forfeiting remaining NCAA eligibility From a scouting perspective, early entrants typically fall into one of three evaluation profiles: Clear Day 1–Day 2 projections Premium-position players (QB, EDGE, CB, OT, WR) with strong trait baselines Scheme-specific or role-defined prospects whose draft value has likely peaked Early Declaration Deadlines for Underclassmen The NFL now uses multiple declaration deadlines to accommodate postseason participation: January 5, 2026 - Early deadline allowing underclassmen to declare in time for college all-star game eligibility. January 14, 2026 - Traditional declaration deadline for most underclassmen. January 23, 2026 - Extended deadline for underclassmen competing in the College Football Playoff National Championship. *Once a player officially declares, that decision is irrevocable. How Early Declarations Shape the 2026 Draft Class Early declarations are one of the most influential structural forces in the draft cycle. They directly affect: Positional depth across the class All-star game invitations and practice exposure NFL Combine invite thresholds Day 2 vs. Day 3 clustering Return-to-school decisions for fringe prospects From a front-office lens, many early entrants already carry preliminary grades based on fall film. Declaring early often signals confidence that additional college reps are unlikely to materially improve draft positioning. What to Watch as the Process Continues Over the coming weeks, the 2026 NFL Draft landscape will continue to take shape with: Additional underclassmen declarations Senior Bowl and Shrine Bowl acceptances CFP-related deadline decisions Early medical and background evaluations Clearer separation at premium positions

As we head into December, the 2026 NFL Draft Big Board is starting to come into focus. A defensive back, a hybrid edge, and a pure pass rusher are all making legitimate cases to be the top player in the class. This is before factoring in a quarterback race that could completely reshape the top 10 of round one. The Quarterback Race Right now, we have three signal-callers — Fernando Mendoza (Indiana), Dante Moore (Oregon), and Ty Simpson (Alabama) — who each could go No. 1 overall depending on draft order. However, all three still hold college eligibility, which adds another layer of chaos to an already unpredictable class. Defensive Talent at the Top At the top, the defensive talent remains elite. Caleb Downs (Ohio State), Arvell Reese (Ohio State), and Rueben Bain Jr. (Miami) headline the board. Truthfully, any of the three could make a case for the top overall spot. Downs’ versatility and polish give him the edge for now, but Reese’s hybrid impact and Bain’s traditional edge dominance make the top tier as close as any in recent memory. This class is defined by its defensive depth at linebacker, edge rusher, and interior defensive lineman (IDL). The trenches are loaded with elite talent and solid depth pieces. The linebacker group is versatile, and the wide receiver class is showing early signs of star power. This is led by Jordyn Tyson (Arizona State), Carnell Tate (Ohio State), and Makai Lemon (USC). With the final weeks of the college football season ahead, including rivalry week, conference championships, and the College Football Playoff, the 2026 NFL Draft landscape is beginning to take shape. Click here to jump to the individual player rankings 2026 NFL Draft Big Board: Top 50 Overall Prospect Rankings 1. Caleb Downs, S, Ohio State (6’0”, 205) Downs is the prototype modern safety. He is a high-IQ, interchangeable defender who can align deep, in the slot, or in the box. His instincts, tackling consistency, and field command make him a defensive coordinator’s extension on the field. He is an ideal fit for split-safety or match-zone systems (49ers, Eagles, Ravens) that rely on communication and disguise. He can also thrive as a cover-2 or big nickel safety in 4-2-5 structures. 2. Arvell Reese, LB, Ohio State (6’4”, 243) Reese is a modern front-seven weapon. He is best deployed as a hybrid MIKE/SAM/EDGE in multiple fronts. His true three-down impact comes from his ability to stack blocks in base, rush with power on passing downs, and plug gaps in blitz-heavy looks. His style mirrors a “Micah Parsons-lite” profile — dominant power, inside-out utility, and rare scheme versatility. 3. Rueben Bain Jr., EDGE, Miami (6’3”, 275) Bain is a disruptive, technically refined pass rusher. He wins with leverage, hand power, and elite motor. He fits best in attacking 4-3 fronts as a hand-in-the-dirt edge or reduced 5-tech, but he can also slide inside on passing downs. With polish, he projects as an early NFL contributor with Pro Bowl-level potential. 4. Jeremiyah Love, RB, Notre Dame (6’0”, 210) Love is an explosive, two-phase offensive weapon. He thrives in space and is built for wide-zone and outside-zone systems. His one-cut burst and natural receiving skills create mismatch potential in motion and slot alignments. He projects as a modern feature back with RB1 upside in tempo-driven offenses. 5. Jordyn Tyson, WR, Arizona State (6’1”, 195) Tyson is a dynamic vertical threat. He possesses route precision and field-stretching speed. His alignment flexibility — boundary, slot, or motion — makes him ideal for timing-based or vertical-spread offenses. He profiles as a WR1-caliber prospect with pro-ready separation and playmaking traits. 6. Keldric Faulk, EDGE, Auburn (6’6”, 290) Faulk is a power-based, multi-alignment defender. He has inside-out utility and is best suited for 3-4 fronts as a 5-tech DE or base end in a 4-3. He wins with strength, leverage, and heavy hands. His versatility and edge-setting ability make him a valuable piece for hybrid defenses. 7. Carnell Tate, WR, Ohio State (6’3”, 191) Tate is a polished route runner with advanced spatial awareness. He thrives in West Coast and rhythm offenses. His smooth movement and reliable hands make him a high-volume target who consistently finds soft spots in coverage. 8. Jermod McCoy, CB, Tennessee (6’0”, 195) McCoy is a fluid, explosive cover corner built for man-match systems. His mirror technique, anticipation, and ball skills give him CB1 upside in press and match-quarters schemes. If healthy post-ACL recovery, he projects as an immediate impact starter. 9. Spencer Fano, OT, Utah (6’5”, 304) Fano offers plug-and-play reliability. He has elite run-blocking leverage and technical consistency. He’s scheme-diverse, capable of excelling in both zone and power concepts, and projects as a long-term starter with All-Pro ceiling. 10. Fernando Mendoza, QB, Indiana (6’5”, 225) Mendoza brings prototypical size and poise. He excels in RPO and play-action concepts. He’s efficient from the pocket, shows timing and touch at all levels, and has the tools to develop into a high-end starter in pro-style or spread hybrid systems. 11. Francis Mauigoa, OT, Miami (6’6”, 315) Mauigoa is one of the most naturally gifted linemen in the class. His blend of size, movement skills, and competitive toughness sets him apart. He’s a Day 1 right tackle with the athleticism and power to thrive in either wide-zone or gap/power systems. With refined hand usage and continued growth, he has legitimate All-Pro potential. 12. Makai Lemon, WR, USC (5’11”, 195) Lemon is a twitchy, high-IQ slot receiver. He thrives in quick-strike offenses built on timing and leverage. His short-area quickness and route pacing allow him to separate at will. His toughness over the middle makes him a natural fit in West Coast or RPO-heavy schemes. 13. Peter Woods, IDL, Clemson (6’3”, 315) Woods is a rare interior defender. He combines elite power, quickness, and leverage. Capable of thriving at 3-tech or 5-tech, he fits best in one-gap systems that emphasize disruption. His explosiveness and hand strength give him game-wrecking potential reminiscent of Quinnen Williams or Chris Jones. 14. Kadyn Proctor, OT, Alabama (6’7”, 369) Proctor brings prototype size and raw strength to the blindside. He is a mauler in the run game with improving pass protection. He fits best in power/gap schemes but flashes enough agility to hold his own in zone concepts. With better leverage and conditioning, he projects as a franchise-caliber left tackle. 15. David Bailey, EDGE, Texas Tech (6’3”, 250) A former Stanford standout, Bailey is an explosive edge defender. He has bend, burst, and a relentless motor. His athleticism and fluidity in space make him an ideal 3-4 OLB or hybrid rusher in multiple fronts. If his strength profile continues to improve, he’ll push for Round 1 consideration. 16. Mansoor Delane, CB, LSU (6’0”, 190) Delane is a physical, man-cover corner. He has NFL-ready technique and confidence. He’s sticky in press, aggressive at the catch point, and shows the football IQ to thrive in both man-match and Cover 3 systems. His transition to LSU has elevated his stock into early-round territory. 17. Ty Simpson, QB, Alabama (6’2”, 208) Simpson is a rhythm-based passer. He excels in timing systems that reward anticipation and accuracy. His compact release, processing speed, and poise under pressure give him early starter potential. Continued deep-ball refinement could elevate him into the top-15 mix. 18. Avieon Terrell, CB, Clemson (5’11”, 180) Terrell is a twitchy, physical corner. He has sharp instincts and top-tier tackling for his size. His man-match and press technique are clean. His aggressiveness at the catch point gives him CB1 upside. Best fit: zone-match or press-quarters schemes emphasizing physicality. 19. Dante Moore, QB, Oregon (6’3”, 206) Moore brings natural touch, anticipation, and field vision to a modern pro-style offense. His 2025 breakout year highlighted improved mechanics and composure under pressure. While he must add consistency on deep throws, his rhythm and processing are already first-round quality. 20. Kenyon Sadiq, TE, Oregon (6’3”, 250) Sadiq is a versatile tight end. He has elite explosiveness, functional strength, and YAC ability. He can line up in-line, in the slot, or as a boundary mismatch. His athletic profile fits perfectly in play-action-heavy or motion-based offenses built around hybrid tight ends. 21. Denzel Boston, WR, Washington (6’4”, 210) Boston is a prototypical boundary receiver. He has size, body control, and red-zone production. His strong hands and ability to adjust to off-target throws make him a reliable vertical and intermediate target. While not overly sudden, his high-point timing and physical play style give him WR2 upside in vertical or play-action offenses. 22. Colton Hood, CB, Tennessee (6’0”, 195) Hood is a confident, aggressive corner. He has fluid hips and top-tier awareness in both man and zone coverage. He plays bigger than his frame, using excellent route anticipation and physicality to disrupt receivers early. His recovery speed and timing at the catch point give him CB2 potential with CB1 traits if consistency improves. 23. Chris Bell, WR, Louisville (6’2”, 220) Bell is a power-built wideout. He blends vertical acceleration with physical toughness after the catch. His play style mirrors Deebo Samuel’s — a mix of strength, balance, and explosive YAC ability. He fits perfectly in play-action and West Coast systems built on crossers and schemed touches. 24. Cashius Howell, EDGE, Texas A&M (6’2”, 250) Howell is an explosive, undersized pass rusher. He has dynamic bend and burst off the edge. His speed-to-power conversion and relentless motor give him rotational value early. With added strength, he can develop into a disruptive 3-4 OLB or nickel pass-rush specialist. 25. Caleb Lomu, OT, Utah (6’5”, 295) Lomu is a technically refined tackle prospect. He has outstanding recovery balance and natural foot quickness. He thrives in zone-based run schemes where his mobility and leverage can be maximized. While his anchor strength needs improvement, his agility and feel in pass protection project long-term starting potential. 26. Christen Miller, IDL, Georgia (6’3”, 305) Miller is a powerful, ascending interior defender. He has the blend of length, motor, and quickness NFL teams covet. His ability to stack, shed, and reset the line of scrimmage makes him a scheme-versatile fit in 3- or 4-man fronts. He’s a breakout candidate with steady Day 2 value. 27. Matayo Uiagalelei, EDGE, Oregon (6’5”, 272) Uiagalelei is a fluid, long-limbed edge defender. He has excellent play recognition and closing speed. He wins with leverage, hand placement, and a controlled pass-rush plan. His hybrid build fits best as a 5-tech or 4i in multiple-front defenses that prioritize gap integrity and pressure flexibility. 28. Jacob Rodriguez, LB, Texas Tech (6’1”, 230) Rodriguez is a high-IQ, instinctive linebacker. He plays with urgency and physicality. He thrives in zone-match systems that let him read and trigger downhill. His tackling consistency and blitz timing make him an immediate depth and special teams contributor with starter potential in 4-2-5 defenses. 29. Olaivavega Ioane, IOL, Penn State (6’4”, 330) Ioane is a physically dominant interior lineman. He has powerful hands and a thick lower base. He excels in downhill run schemes, consistently generating movement at the point of attack. With improved pad level and foot consistency, he can develop into a long-term starting guard or center. 30. T.J. Parker, EDGE, Clemson (6’3”, 265) Parker enters 2025 as one of the most productive returning edge defenders in college football. His heavy hands, leverage control, and finishing power make him a reliable three-down defensive end. He projects best in even fronts as a 4-3 end but offers enough versatility to kick inside on passing downs. 31. Chris Brazzell II, WR, Tennessee (6’5”, 200) Brazzell is a long, smooth wideout. He has vertical burst and elite catch radius. His stride length and natural tracking ability make him a downfield weapon. His body control allows him to win in contested catch situations. Still developing as a route-runner, he projects as a high-upside X receiver with WR2 potential in vertical or RPO-based passing games. 32. C.J. Allen, LB, Georgia (6’1”, 235) Allen is an explosive, high-IQ linebacker. He has sideline-to-sideline range and strong diagnostic skills. A physical tackler with 4.5 speed, he thrives in zone-heavy systems that let him key, trigger, and attack downhill. His instincts and leadership give him three-down starter potential in modern 4-2-5 or 3-3-5 defenses. 33. Kayden McDonald, IDL, Ohio State (6’3”, 326) McDonald is a stout, two-gap nose tackle. He plays with heavy hands and excellent leverage. He excels at resetting the line of scrimmage and occupying space in the run game. He shows flashes of power-based pass rush from 0- to 3-tech alignments. He is an ideal fit in odd-front systems built around gap control and pocket disruption. 34. LT Overton, EDGE, Alabama (6’5”, 283) Overton is a rare size-speed edge defender. He can line up anywhere from 4i to 9-tech. His 2024 breakout at Alabama highlighted elite power and functional athleticism. He fits perfectly in multiple-front schemes that value hybrid alignment and inside-out versatility. 35. Jaishawn Barham, LB/EDGE, Michigan (6’4”, 248) Barham is a physically dominant hybrid defender. He can play off-ball or rush the edge. His explosiveness, striking power, and pursuit range give him three-down flexibility. If his full-time move to EDGE at Michigan sticks, he could emerge as one of the top pass rushers in the class. 36. Kevin Concepcion, WR, Texas A&M (5’11”, 187) Concepcion is a precise route-runner. He has sharp short-area quickness and elite feel for space. A technician who thrives in timing offenses, he projects best as a Z/slot hybrid in modern spread or West Coast schemes. His YAC ability and football intelligence make him a high-floor contributor with WR2 potential. 37. Trevor Goosby, OT, Texas (6’7”, 312) Goosby is a developmental tackle prospect. He has excellent length and strong lower-body control. His foot quickness and pass-set balance stand out, though his hand placement and anchor need refinement. He is a scheme-versatile lineman with starting upside once his technique stabilizes. 38. Sonny Styles, LB, Ohio State (6’4”, 243) Styles is a prototype hybrid defender. He has rare athletic traits and versatility. The former safety brings coverage fluidity to the linebacker position. This allows him to match tight ends and track running backs in space. He is a perfect fit for multiple-front defenses that rely on disguise and flexibility. 39. A’Mauri Washington, IDL, Oregon (6’3”, 330) Washington is a powerful, space-eating interior defender. He can anchor a defensive front. His combination of strength, length, and short-area explosiveness makes him ideal for early-down work in gap-control systems. With improved pad level and pass-rush variety, he could become a dependable NFL starter. 40. Austin Barber, OT, Florida (6’8”, 320) Barber is an experienced, long-armed tackle. He has excellent foot quickness and poise in pass protection. His movement skills make him a natural fit in zone schemes. His improved anchor strength has elevated his all-around game. He projects as a plug-and-play swing tackle with starter-level ceiling. 41. Zion Young, EDGE, Missouri (6’5”, 262) Young is a long, explosive edge defender. He has excellent hand timing and linear burst. He wins with length, leverage, and discipline in the run game. He flashes closing speed and power on stunts and twists. He projects as a high-upside rotational rusher who fits best in 4-3 fronts with attacking principles. 42. R. Mason Thomas, EDGE, Oklahoma (6’2”, 250) Thomas is a twitchy, compact edge rusher. He has elite first-step quickness and natural bend. His ability to dip, flatten, and finish through contact gives him early pass-rush value. While undersized, his explosiveness and motor make him a strong fit as a 3-4 OLB or situational speed rusher in hybrid defenses. 43. Gennings Dunker, OT, Iowa (6’5”, 316) Dunker is a powerful, tone-setting lineman. He has a nasty finish and strong run-blocking fundamentals. His lack of lateral quickness limits his NFL projection to guard. However, his leverage, anchor strength, and competitive edge make him a plug-and-play interior starter. 44. Caleb Banks, IDL, Florida (6’6”, 325) Banks is one of the most physically unique interior defenders in the class. He boasts elite length, agility, and disruptive upside. His ability to rush from multiple alignments and generate pressure with power and quickness makes him a natural 3-tech fit in 4-3 fronts. With refinement in pad level and counters, he carries top-20 upside. 45. Quincy Rhodes Jr., EDGE, Arkansas (6’6”, 276) Rhodes is a raw but toolsy defender. He has ideal NFL measurables and power traits. He flashes dominance when converting speed to power and setting hard edges versus the run. With improved hand placement and leverage consistency, he could develop into a starting-caliber 4-3 end or hybrid 5-tech. 46. A.J. Harris, CB, Penn State (6’1”, 191) Harris is a long, confident corner. He has scheme versatility and elite recovery traits. He thrives in man-match and Cover 3 systems. He shows physicality at the line and excellent awareness in zone. With improved ball production, he projects as a plug-and-play boundary starter at the next level. 47. Caleb Tiernan, OT, Northwestern (6’7”, 325) Tiernan is a towering, smooth-footed tackle. He has impressive reach and balance for his size. He is patient in pass protection and effective on the move in zone run schemes. His pad level and displacement strength remain developmental areas, but he has the frame and agility of a long-term starter. 48. Emmanuel McNeil-Warren, S, Toledo (6’2”, 202) McNeil-Warren is a rangy, instinctive safety. He has excellent closing speed and tackling discipline. He thrives as a single-high or deep-half defender. He reads the quarterback and triggers downhill with precision. His length and range make him a fit for zone-match or split-field schemes. 49. LaNorris Sellers, QB, South Carolina (6’3”, 240) Sellers offers rare dual-threat ability. He has a big arm and physical rushing style. His off-platform throws and improvisational creativity make him a dangerous playmaker in vertical or play-action offenses. Refinement in decision-making and timing will determine whether he reaches his top-tier ceiling. 50. Chris Johnson, CB, San Diego State (6’0”, 185) Johnson is a fluid, competitive corner. He has smooth hips and natural mirror ability. He excels in off-man and quarters coverage. He shows consistent ball tracking and click-and-close quickness. His athletic profile and football instincts make him an intriguing developmental starter at the next level. 2026 NFL Draft Positional Rankings Top 5 Quarterbacks — 2026 NFL Draft 1) Fernando Mendoza, Indiana (6’5”, 225) Prototypical pocket passer with size, anticipation, and poise in pro-spread systems. 2) Ty Simpson, Alabama (6’2”, 208) Accurate rhythm thrower who thrives in timing and progression-based offenses. 3) Dante Moore, Oregon (6’3”, 206) Quick processor with natural touch and franchise-level upside in hybrid pro schemes. 4) LaNorris Sellers, South Carolina (6’3”, 240) Big-armed dual-threat who can create off-script and attack vertically. 5) Jayden Maiava, USC (6’4”, 230) Toolsy, strong-arm passer built for vertical attacks with developmental starter traits. Top 5 Running Backs — 2026 NFL Draft 1) Jeremiyah Love, Notre Dame (6’0”, 210) Explosive two-phase weapon built for wide-zone and tempo offenses with home-run speed. 2) Justice Haynes, Michigan (5’11”, 210) Powerful one-cut runner with balance, burst, and three-down starter potential. 3) Jadarian Price, Notre Dame (5’11”, 210) Smooth, efficient runner with plus vision and underrated receiving value. 4) Jonah Coleman, Washington (5’9”, 229) Compact, physical tone-setter who thrives in gap and power run concepts. 5) Kaytron Allen, Penn State (5’11”, 220) Steady, downhill runner with strong contact balance and workhorse traits. Top 5 Wide Receivers — 2026 NFL Draft 1) Jordyn Tyson, Arizona State (6’1”, 195) Explosive field-stretcher with refined route running and top-tier WR1 traits in vertical and play-action systems. 2) Carnell Tate, Ohio State (6’3”, 191) Polished route technician with elite spatial awareness and reliable hands in timing-based offenses. 3) Makai Lemon, USC (5’11”, 195) Dynamic slot weapon with elite short-area quickness and route tempo; thrives in West Coast and RPO systems. 4) Denzel Boston, Washington (6’4”, 210) Prototypical X receiver with strong hands, body control, and red-zone dominance. 5) Chris Bell, Louisville (6’2”, 220) Physical, explosive YAC threat built for hybrid West Coast and play-action schemes. Top 5 Tight Ends — 2026 NFL Draft 1) Kenyon Sadiq, Oregon (6’3”, 250) Explosive, physical two-phase tight end with elite burst and true three-down versatility. 2) Michael Trigg, Baylor (6’4”, 240) Athletic flex target with soft hands and mismatch potential in spread or play-action systems. 3) Max Klare, Ohio State (6’4”, 240) Fluid mover with natural hands and seam-stretching ability; thrives in motion and spacing concepts. 4) Eli Stowers, Vanderbilt (6’4”, 225) Converted QB with top-tier athleticism and open-field explosiveness as a hybrid passing-game weapon. 5) Marlin Klein, Michigan (6’6”, 250) Tall, developmental inline prospect with strong blocking foundation and red-zone upside. Top 5 Offensive Tackles — 2026 NFL Draft 1) Spencer Fano, Utah (6’5”, 304) Technically refined tackle with elite run-blocking grades and day-one starter polish on either side. 2) Francis Mauigoa, Miami (6’6”, 315) Powerful, athletic right tackle with rare movement skills and All-Pro potential in any blocking scheme. 3) Kadyn Proctor, Alabama (6’7”, 369) Massive blindside protector with dominant strength and improving footwork in power/gap concepts. 4) Caleb Lomu, Utah (6’5”, 295) Smooth, flexible mover with quick feet and natural recovery ability in zone-based systems. 5) Trevor Goosby, Texas (6’7”, 312) Long, athletic pass protector who projects as a developmental left tackle with starter upside. Top 5 Interior Offensive Linemen — 2026 NFL Draft 1) Olaivavega Ioane, Penn State (6’4”, 330) Powerful, scheme-versatile guard with heavy hands and anchor strength for gap or inside zone systems. 2) Connor Lew, Auburn (6’3”, 300) Technically sound center-guard hybrid with high football IQ and consistent leverage control. 3) Logan Jones, Iowa (6’3”, 293) Athletic, experienced center who excels in wide-zone concepts and second-level blocking. 4) Cayden Green, Missouri (6’5”, 320) Strong, agile interior blocker with starter-level traits in gap-heavy and duo run schemes. 5) Emmanuel Pregnon, Oregon (6’5”, 315) Explosive, physical guard with strong hands and functional athleticism for multiple blocking systems. Top 5 Interior Defensive Linemen — 2026 NFL Draft 1) Peter Woods, Clemson (6’3”, 315) Dominant interior disruptor with elite first-step quickness and scheme versatility as a 3-tech or 5-tech. 2) Caleb Banks, Florida (6’6”, 325) Massive, explosive defensive tackle with rare length and athleticism — a prototype penetrating 3-tech. 3) Christen Miller, Georgia (6’3”, 305) Powerful, technically refined interior lineman who wins with leverage, effort, and consistent gap integrity. 4) Kayden McDonald, Ohio State (6’3”, 326) Dense, physical run stuffer with violent hands and disruptive power at the point of attack. 5) A’Mauri Washington, Oregon (6’3”, 330) Heavy-handed interior anchor who excels as a two-gapping nose or early-down run defender. Top 5 Edge Defenders — 2026 NFL Draft 1) Rueben Bain Jr., Miami (6’3”, 275) Polished, high-motor pass rusher with elite hand usage and scheme versatility — a true every-down disruptor. 2) Keldric Faulk, Auburn (6’6”, 290) Powerful, inside-out edge with multi-front versatility who wins with leverage, length, and violent temperament. 3) David Bailey, Texas Tech (6’3”, 250) Explosive, bendy speed rusher with three-down upside — thrives as a 3-4 OLB or hybrid edge in attacking schemes. 4) Cashius Howell, Texas A&M (6’2”, 250) Twitchy, high-energy rusher who excels with speed-to-power and bend off the corner in 4-3 alignments. 5) Matayo Uiagalelei, Oregon (6’5”, 272) Long, athletic edge defender with strong anchor traits and inside-out flexibility for multiple front structures. Top 5 Cornerbacks — 2026 NFL Draft 1) Jermod McCoy, Tennessee (6’0”, 195) Elite man-cover specialist with explosive hips, top-tier ball skills, and CB1 upside pending full recovery from ACL injury. 2) Mansoor Delane, LSU (6’0”, 190) Physical, instinctive corner who thrives in off-man and zone-match coverage, with the range and toughness to fit multiple schemes. 3) Avieon Terrell, Clemson (5’11”, 180) Highly competitive, twitchy corner with sticky coverage ability and strong tackling traits — projects as a Day 1 starter in press or quarters systems. 4) A.J. Harris, Penn State (6’1”, 191) Long, intelligent defender with balanced man-zone skills and strong run support — a plug-and-play boundary corner at the next level. 5) Colton Hood, Tennessee (6’0”, 195) Athletic, physical outside corner with fluid transitions and high football IQ — excels in man-match coverage with disruptive instincts. Top 5 Safeties — 2026 NFL Draft 1) Caleb Downs, Ohio State (6’0”, 205) Elite, interchangeable safety with rare instincts and positional versatility — the prototype for split-safety or match-zone defenses. 2) Dillon Thieneman, Oregon (6’0”, 207) Smart, rangy single-high safety with elite instincts and leadership traits — thrives in aggressive, disguise-heavy systems. 3) Kamari Ramsey, USC (6’0”, 204) Versatile, instinctive defender who can rotate between deep, slot, and box roles — excels in match-zone or hybrid coverage schemes. 4) Emmanuel McNeil-Warren, Toledo (6’2”, 202) Long, fluid safety with downhill burst and range to impact both the run and pass game in multi-front defenses. 5) A.J. Haulcy, LSU (6’0”, 222) Physical, tone-setting enforcer with strong tackling and communication skills — ideal for hybrid box and Cover-3 alignments.

Which of the top 2024 NFL Draft prospects is the most clutch in key moments? Among the many data points we measure to evaluate the quarterback position is their ability to operate in high-leverage situations. The top quarterbacks at any level of football, but most importantly in college football and the NFL, are those who can minimize mistakes, manage the game as needed, and activate their game-changing ability in key moments. The definition of a key moment can vary, and we can get extremely granular in the analysis if needed. However, for this circumstance, I chose 3rd down and obvious passing situations as one of the better ways to measure a quarterback's clutch ability. The rankings below use a measure referred to as the expected points model or the points earned model. What is the Points Earned Model? The Points Earned model is an analytical framework used to quantify a player's contribution to their team's scoring output, taking into account the context and impact of each play. It's derived from the Expected Points Added (EPA) concept, which measures how each play affects the team's scoring chances. The Points Earned model goes beyond traditional statistics by considering the value of each play within its game context, offering a nuanced view of a player's performance and impact. It's particularly insightful for quarterbacks, as it captures their contribution to the team's scoring potential, factoring in the plays that lead directly to points and those that significantly improve the team's scoring chances. How Does This Apply To The Analysis Below? Today, we compare the top 2024 NFL Draft Quarterback prospects from this past 2023 college football season on third down and obvious passing situations of 5 yards or more. These throws by the QBs must be thrown past the sticks, eliminating some of the after-the-catch ability of their wide receivers from the equation. The Key metrics we are going to use in this analysis include the following *(Combined 3rd/4th down throws past the sticks of 5 yards or more to go) Points Added Per Play Ranking (PAA Per Play Rank) *SIS Definition:  Points Above Average per pass play. This metric measures a quarterback's effectiveness by comparing the points earned on each pass play to the league average. A higher value indicates a quarterback contributes more points than the average per play, highlighting their efficiency and effectiveness in critical situations. Positive Play% EPA Boom% Definition:  The percentage of pass attempts that resulted in an exceptionally successful play, defined by an EPA of at least +1. This indicates the quarterback's capability to create big, game-changing plays. A higher percentage represents a higher capability for making impactful plays. EPA Bust% Definition:  The percentage of pass attempts that resulted in a significant negative Expected Points Added (EPA), specifically less than -1. This metric identifies plays significantly decreasing a team's scoring opportunity or overall field position. A lower ranking (indicating fewer bust plays) is desirable, showing the quarterback's ability to avoid costly mistakes. The top QBs in the 2024 NFL Draft Ranked BY 2023 PAA Per Play *(Combined 3rd/4th down throws past the sticks of 5 yards or more to go) 1.) J.J. McCarthy (Michigan) PAA Per Play Rank:  1st nationally (1.06 PAA Per Play) Performance & Style Correlation:  McCarthy's efficiency is unparalleled with a 1.06 Points Above Average (PAA) per play, complemented by a leading Boom% rank (71.4%, 1st) and a remarkably low Bust% rank (20.0%, 4th), highlighting his precision and capacity for high-impact plays. This balance between high success in Boom% and minimizing failures in Bust% underscores his precision under pressure. Player Comparison Correlation:  The comparison to Joe Burrow spotlights McCarthy’s ability to elevate his game under pressure, suggesting potential growth areas in play processing and decision-making to reach Burrow's level of NFL success. 2). Bo Nix (Oregon) PAA Per Play Rank:  3rd nationally (0.96 PAA Per Play) Performance & Style Correlation:  Nix's play is characterized by a solid 0.96 Points Above Average (PAA) per play, a high Boom% rank (71.40%, 2nd), and a lower Bust% rank (19.0%, 3rd), demonstrating his capability to generate significant plays while efficiently avoiding negative outcomes. This proficiency in maximizing positive plays and mitigating risks highlights his suitability for dynamic offenses that leverage quarterback mobility and improvisational skills. Player Comparison Correlation:  The parallel with Jalen Hurts accentuates Nix's potential. His precision and decision-making could elevate his performance, fostering a trajectory of development akin to Hurts. 3). Caleb Williams (USC) PAA Per Play Rank:  5th nationally (0.87 PAA Per Play) Performance & Style Correlation: Williams showcases a notable 0.87 Points Above Average (PAA) per play, with a Boom% rank (59.0%, 13th) that contrasts with a higher Bust% rank (25.6%, 10th). This highlights his dynamic dual-threat abilities and indicates room for improvement in areas such as trusting his pocket and taking what the defense gives him rather than always chasing explosive plays. Player Comparison Correlation: Williams' comparison to Patrick Mahomes and Aaron Rodgers suggests his fit in schemes that prize mobility and playmaking, emphasizing that refining structured play could unlock his elite potential. 4). Jayden Daniels (LSU) PAA Per Play Rank:  23rd nationally (0.60 PAA Per Play) Performance & Style Correlation: Daniels' balance is evident with a 0.59 Points Above Average (PAA) per play. His moderate Boom% rank (52.9%, 27th) and Bust% rank (35.3%, 43rd) in key 3rd down and obvious passing situations are areas for improvement. This suggests that refining his decision-making could lead to more consistent high-impact plays. Player Comparison Correlation: Comparing Daniels to Lamar Jackson and Kyler Murray underscores his potential in an offense that allows for his creative playmaking ability to flourish. He will need to improve as a passer in key 3rd down and obvious passing moments; he is a dynamic runner who can beat you in two ways, but leveraging his running ability to create more opportunities as a passer will elevate his game at the NFL level. 5). Spencer Rattler (South Carolina) PAA Per Play Rank:  24th nationally (0.59 PAA Per Play) Performance & Style Correlation:  Rattler’s capability is marked by a 0.59 PAA per play, alongside a Boom% rank (46.3%, 66th) that is notably higher than his Bust% rank (41.5%, 85th), indicating a strong arm and creativity but also a need for better decision-making and consistency. This balance between creating impactful plays and the relatively higher occurrence of negative plays points to areas for growth in playmaking consistency. Player Comparison Correlation:  Rattler's parallels with Jameis Winston and Jay Cutler suggest a trajectory towards becoming a resilient quarterback, focusing on improving decision-making to mitigate bust plays and enhance overall performance. 6). Michael Penix Jr. (Washington) PAA Per Play Rank:  68th nationally (0.345 PAA Per Play) Performance & Style Correlation:  Penix demonstrates a classic pocket passer's profile with a blend of arm strength and accuracy, reflected in his Points Above Average (PAA) per play (0.345). Despite a moderate Boom% (48.0%, ranked 56th) and Bust% (34.0%, ranked 35th), Penix's tape shows a quarterback who can execute precise throws from the short to deep areas of the field. Ideal for a pro-style or West Coast offense, Penix's skill set aligns with a quarterback capable of managing the game effectively and making strong, accurate passes. Player Comparison Correlation:  Penix's comparisons to Tua Tagovailoa and Mac Jones resonate with the idea that he could thrive in the right system by leveraging his quick decision-making and accuracy. These comparisons suggest Penix possesses the foundational skills to develop into a reliable starting quarterback, emphasizing the importance of a supportive team structure and an offensive scheme that aligns with his strengths. 7). Drake Maye (North Carolina) PAA Per Play Rank:  69th nationally (0.34 PAA Per Play) Performance & Style Correlation:  Despite a lower Points Above Average (PAA) per play (0.34), Drake Maye's role in the Tar Heel offense was evident from his tape. However, in key 3rd down and obvious pass situations, his high Boom% (34.9%, ranked 124th) and high Bust% (41.9%, ranked 90th) indicate raw talent in improvisation but also highlight a necessity for improvement as a passer in high-leverage situations. His capability for making plays outside the structure is notable, but he needs to develop a greater trust in his pocket. His skill set is desirable in today's NFL, but he will need time to develop. Player Comparison Correlation:  Maye's potential comparisons to Justin Herbert and Josh Allen highlight his ability to thrive in a system that values quarterbacks who can extend plays and make decisive throws. His comparisons make sense, as Josh Allen and Justin Herbert needed to improve consistency and decision-making when they entered the NFL. Advanced-Data Glossary PAA Per Play Definition:  Points Above Average per pass play. This metric measures a quarterback's effectiveness by comparing the points earned on each pass play to the league average. A higher value indicates a quarterback contributes more points than the average per play, highlighting their efficiency and effectiveness in critical situations. Positive Play% Definition:  The percentage of pass attempts that resulted in a positive Expected Points Added (EPA). It reflects the quarterback's ability to consistently make plays that advance the team's position or score, with a higher percentage indicating more successful plays than total attempts. EPA Bust% Definition:  The percentage of pass attempts that resulted in a significant negative Expected Points Added (EPA), specifically less than -1. This metric identifies plays significantly decreasing a team's scoring opportunity or overall field position. A lower ranking (indicating fewer bust plays) is desirable, showing the quarterback's ability to avoid costly mistakes. Boom% Definition:  The percentage of pass attempts that resulted in an exceptionally successful play, defined by an EPA of at least +1. This indicates the quarterback's capability to create big, game-changing plays. A higher percentage represents a higher capability for making impactful plays. Total Points Earned in 2023 Definition:  The total points a quarterback is responsible for through passing in high-leverage situations during the season. It aggregates the value of all positive plays made by the quarterback. A higher total indicates a greater contribution to the team's scoring efforts in critical situations. Total Pass Attempts in this situation Definition:  The number of pass attempts made by the quarterback in high-leverage situations (3rd down and 5+ yards). This provides context for the sample size of the data, with more attempts offering a broader basis for evaluating the quarterback's performance.

The 2024 NFL Draft's first round was highlighted by a quarterback showcase, with six quarterbacks selected, setting a record for the highest number taken in the first round since the common draft era began in 1967. While Caleb Williams going No. 1 to the Chicago Bears was no surprise, there was some suspense about who would go second to the Washington Commanders. Washington chose LSU's Jayden Daniels, while North Carolina's Drake Maye went third to the New England Patriots. When the Atlanta Falcons selected Michael Penix Jr. at No. 8, it marked the first time in the common draft era that four quarterbacks were chosen within the first eight picks. Minnesota traded up to 10th overall with the New York Jets to draft J.J. McCarthy, and the Broncos took Bo Nix 12th overall. In this analysis, I am going to rank and grade each of the 2024 NFL Draft quarterbacks based on their scheme fit and surrounding personnel. I will also provide some 2024 yards and touchdown projections for each QB. Each player drafted is in a unique situation. The Bears went out of their way to surround Caleb Williams with outstanding talent, while the Minnesota Vikings were already in a good place when they drafted J.J. McCarthy. However, a team like the Patriots has question marks about their skill players, and Drake Maye still needs time to develop. The reality is that this is not a one-size-fits-all situation for every player. A few of these players will struggle in one way or another, but it is always a good exercise to identify the players who land in the best spots while also recognizing the players who landed in the not-so-great spots. Coaching Scheme Fit Grade This grade evaluates how well a player's skills and attributes align with the offensive or defensive system they are entering in the NFL. It considers how their play style, experience, and strengths match the strategies and preferences of the coaching staff. A:  Excellent fit. The player's abilities align perfectly with the team's schemes and coaching strategies. B:  Good fit. The player has most of the skills needed to succeed, with minor adjustments or development needed. C:  Average fit. The player fits the system in general but may face significant challenges or require substantial development. D:  Poor fit. There are notable mismatches between the player's style and the team's schemes that might hinder their success. F: Very poor fit. The player's skills and the team's strategies are fundamentally misaligned, posing serious challenges for effective integration. Surrounding Cast Grade This grade assesses the quality and compatibility of the teammates surrounding the player, including the offensive line for a quarterback or the defensive line for a linebacker, as well as key skill position players. A:  Excellent support. The player has a strong, talented group of teammates that enhance their ability to perform and adapt. B:  Good support. The supporting cast is competent, providing the player with a solid foundation to succeed. C:  Average support. The team provides basic support, but improvements could significantly enhance the player’s performance. D:  Poor support. The supporting cast may hinder the player's ability to perform well due to lack of talent or poor fit. F: Very poor support. The player is surrounded by teammates who are significantly below average, likely affecting their development and success. These grades help in understanding the potential for a player to succeed in their new NFL environment by analyzing how well they fit into their team's system and the quality of the support they receive. Bonus Fantasy Football Points Projections The last part is a bonus for fantasy football readers. I added a projected high-low fantasy points projection using 4 points per TD pass and -2 per interception format for each of the quarterbacks in the analysis. Rookie QB Scheme Fit and Situational Rankings 1). Caleb Williams - Chicago Bears Height:  6'1" |  Weight:  214 lbs Projections:  3500-4000 passing yards, 25-30 passing TDs, 15-20 interceptions, 300-400 rushing yards, 3-5 rushing TDs Fantasy Projection High Projection : 320 Fantasy Points Low Projection : 248 Fantasy Points Overview: Caleb Williams was the expected No. 1 overall pick, celebrated for his elite arm talent and mobility. His ability to make off-schedule throws and extend plays has made his transition to the NFL highly anticipated. Play Style and Scheme Fit: Grade: A Williams demonstrates exceptional improvisational skills and an ability to dissect defenses from the pocket. His adeptness at evading pass rushers and making accurate throws on the run aligns perfectly with Bears offensive coordinator Shane Waldron's system, which favors quick passes, play-action, and deep balls. Supporting Cast: Grade: A With targets like DJ Moore, Rome Odunze, and Keenan Allen, along with tight end Cole Kmet, Williams is well-equipped to thrive. His rushing ability, highlighted by 27 touchdowns over three seasons in college, adds a dynamic component to the Bears' offense. Year One Starter?:  Yes. Williams has been designated the starting quarterback following the trade of Justin Fields to Pittsburgh. 2). J.J. McCarthy - Minnesota Vikings Height:  6'3" |  Weight:  214 lbs Projections:  3,000-3500 passing yards, 20-25 passing TDs, 14-19 interceptions, 250-300 rushing yards, 2-4 rushing TDs. Fantasy Projection High Projection : 285.0 Fantasy Points Low Projection : 214.0 Fantasy Points Overview: J.J. McCarthy, chosen tenth by the Minnesota Vikings, brings a record of 27-1 as a college starter. His ability to execute tight-window throws and make plays under pressure makes him a valuable addition to the Vikings. Play Style and Scheme Fit: Grade: A McCarthy's efficiency, his clutch ability in key situations, and his proficiency in executing a similar style of offense at Michigan are well-matched with head coach Kevin O'Connell’s offensive strategies, which emphasize a balanced attack with dynamic playmaking. His ability to extend plays and execute on designed runs fits seamlessly into the Vikings' scheme. Supporting Cast: Grade: A Surrounded by playmakers like Justin Jefferson, Jordan Addison, and tight end T.J. Hockenson, McCarthy is poised to succeed. The offensive line, highly ranked in both pass protection and run blocking in 2023, according to PFF, will support his transition to the NFL. Year One Starter:  McCarthy is not expected to start immediately with Sam Darnold on the roster, providing him time to develop under the guidance of new QB coach Josh McCown. 3). Michael Penix Jr. - Atlanta Falcons Height:  6'3" |  Weight:  218 lbs Projections:  500-1000 passing yards, 5-10 passing TDs, 2-5 interceptions, 50 rushing yards, 0 rushing TDs Fantasy Projection High Projection : 74.0 Fantasy Points Low Projection : 29.0 Fantasy Points Overview: After revitalizing his career at Washington, Michael Penix Jr. was selected eighth overall by the Atlanta Falcons. Known for his deep accuracy and quick decision-making, Penix is a playmaker and a leader poised to be the Falcons QB of the future. Play Style and Scheme Fit: Grade: A Penix is renowned for his arm strength and ability to navigate the pocket. His deep-ball accuracy and quick reads are ideally suited for a hybrid West Coast spread style of offense. The good news for Penix is that new Falcons OC Zac Robinson is a Sean McVay disciple who will likely deploy a similar style of offense to that of McVay, which focuses on the run and play-action pass games from various formations. The use of presnap motion and scheming guys open could be a staple in Atlanta for years to come. Supporting Cast: Grade: A Penix will benefit from a strong supporting cast, including dynamic receivers like Darnell Mooney and Drake London, and a tight end in Kyle Pitts with elite potential. Add in a three-down RB with elite pass-catching ability in Bijan Robinson with an offensive line that ranked 4th in pass protection last season; Penix is in a solid spot to develop. Year One Starter?:  Unlikely right away. Kirk Cousins is expected to remain the starter for the next few years, but Penix provides a solid backup option and potential future starter as he adapts to the NFL. 4). Bo Nix - Denver Broncos Height:  6'2" |  Weight:  214 lbs Projections:  3,000-3500 passing yards, 15-20 passing TDs, 15-20 interceptions, 200-400 rushing yards, 1-4 rushing TD Fantasy Projection High Projection : 287.0 Fantasy Points Low Projection : 209.0 Fantasy Points Overview: Bo Nix, drafted twelfth by the Denver Broncos, has evolved into a sound decision-maker with extensive experience from his time at Auburn and Oregon. His quick release and the ability to make plays on the run are what set him apart. He is also a good decision-maker and game manager. Play Style and Scheme Fit: Grade: A Nix's style aligns well with head coach Sean Payton’s system, which focuses on timing, rhythm, and tempo. His wealth of collegiate experience and ability to execute a detailed-oriented playbook make him a good fit for the Broncos’ offensive strategy. Supporting Cast: Grade: B While the Broncos' supporting cast, including receivers like Courtland Sutton, Marvin Mims, and tight end Greg Dulcich, offers reliability and playmaking ability, the offensive line's effectiveness will be critical to Nix’s success. The line is expected to be solid, though the center position may require attention. Year One Starter?:  It depends on Payton's strategy and evaluation during training camp. Given Nix's extensive college experience and Payton's coaching style, he may see significant playing time early in his rookie year. 5). Jayden Daniels - Washington Commanders Height:  6'4" |  Weight:  210 lbs Projections:  3,500-4000 passing yards, 15-20 passing TDs, 15-20 interceptions, 500-700 rushing yards, 5-8 rushing TDs Fantasy Projection High Projection : 348.0 Fantasy Points Low Projection : 261.0 Fantasy Points Overview: Jayden Daniels selected second overall by the Washington Commanders, brings a dynamic dual-threat capability to the team. His collegiate success suggests a smooth transition to the professional level. Play Style and Scheme Fit: Grade: B Daniels excels at getting the ball out quickly and with precision when he likes the pre-snap look. His play style, combining quick decision-making with mobility, fits well into Offensive Coordinator Kliff Kingsbury's scheme, which leverages a QB's ability to escape pressure and extend plays. The core of his offense is the Air Raid. However, at times, it can be very vanilla, and that is why I am not completely sold on the fit. I know that people like to compare Jayden Daniels to Kyler Murray, and they instantly think this is a great match, but how did that work out in Arizona? I have always viewed Kingsbury's offenses in Arizona as stagnant, without a lot of motion and varying formational use. He did start to diversify these aspects as time went on, and his time at USC with Lincoln Riley could also improve his creativity. I am in a wait-and-see mindset, but I gave it a solid B overall. Supporting Cast: Grade: B While Daniels has elite targets like Terry McLaurin and Jahan Dotson, the Commanders' offensive line, which allowed 65 sacks last season, remains a concern and could limit his effectiveness unless improvements are made. Year One Starter?:  Yes. With a new owner, general manager, and coach, the Commanders are poised to start Daniels immediately, looking to rebuild and capitalize on his talents. 6). Drake Maye - New England Patriots Height:  6'4" |  Weight:  220 lbs Projections:  2500-3000 passing yards, 16-20 passing TDs, 13-18 interceptions, 300-500 rushing yards, 2-5 rushing TDs Fantasy Projection High Projection : 281.0 Fantasy Points Low Projection : 207.0 Fantasy Points Overview: Drake Maye, chosen third by the New England Patriots, is recognized for his strong arm and mobility. His proficiency in making off-platform throws and extending plays under pressure positions him as a formidable quarterback prospect. Play Style and Scheme Fit: Grade: C Maye has a good pocket presence and the ability to keep plays alive or pick up yards with his legs. Offensive Coordinator Alex Van Pelt will be tasked with building an offense that focuses on Maye's core strengths early on while he develops and improves his mechanics. The Patriots will likely lean on the run game a lot if Drake Maye is in the lineup as a rookie, and that will allow them to set up play-action opportunities. Van Pelt was not the primary playcaller in Cleveland; he was tasked with game planning and play design, so there are a lot of unknowns about Van Pelt and his ability to call plays. What we do know is that he is a true quarterback coach who has worked with Aaron Rodgers, Baker Mayfield, and, most recently, Deshaun Watson. Supporting Cast: Grade: C The supporting cast, including receivers like Kendrick Bourne, Juju Smith-Schuster, and K.J. Osborn, are not considered elite. Still, the offensive line, ranked 29th in pass protection last year, may hinder his ability to perform consistently, but the run blocking ranked at the top of the NFL and could be how they set things up offensively in 2024. The bottom line is that this is the toughest spot for any of the rookie quarterbacks to have landed, and the Patriots have a lot of work to do to get this offense in a place that can support a young quarterback. Year One Starter?:  Not initially. The Patriots have brought in Jacoby Brissett to mentor Maye, allowing him time to develop without the immediate pressure of starting.