Search Results

The 2024 NFL Scouting Combine is underway, with the workouts starting February 29th and lasting through March 3rd. Below is a list of curated NFL Combine content. Click Here: Check out the Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Big Board top 100 player rankings. We evaluate every player using a proprietary grading process that involves film evaluation combined with advanced data. On the back end, our scouting process mirrors the same process deployed by current NFL front-office personnel so that we can deliver the most in-depth player scouting reports available. All of this is currently free (subject to change). Each player scouting report includes: In-depth player scouting report Play Style and Scheme Fit Analysis Player Strengths & Weaknesses Player Comparisons 2024 NFL Combine Specific Content 20 Players Who Can Elevate Their 2024 NFL Draft Stock 20 Players Who Can Elevate Their 2024 NFL Draft Stock at The Combine NFL Combine Kicks Off With Coach and GM Interviews 2024 NFL Combine Day One Highlights: Insights from Coaches and GMs, McCarthy, Penix, and Odunze Confirm Participation Long Time NFL Scout Discusses Importance Of NFL Combine A Long Time NFL Scout Discussed Misconceptions vs. Reality at the NFL Scouting Combine Michigan Breaks NFL Combine Record With 18 Invites Michigan Football With Record 18 NFL Combine Invites | 2024 NFL Combine Invite Totals By School 321 Players Invited To Participate At The NFL Combine Complete List of 2024 NFL Combine Prospects Released Totaling 321 Invites Pre-Combine 2024 NFL Draft Player Rankings The QB Rankings 2024 NFL Draft Position Rankings: Top 5 Quarterbacks | Pre NFL Combine The RB Rankings 2024 NFL Draft Position Rankings: Top 5 Running Backs | Pre NFL Combine The WR Rankings 2024 NFL Draft Position Rankings: Top 10 Wide Receivers | Pre NFL Combine The TE Rankings 2024 NFL Draft Position Rankings: Top 5 Tight Ends | Pre NFL Combine The OT Rankings 2024 NFL Draft Position Rankings: Top 5 Offensive Tackles | Pre NFL Combine The IOL Rankings 2024 NFL Draft Position Rankings: Top 5 Interior Offensive Lineman | Pre NFL Combine The Defensive Rankings 2024 NFL Draft Position Rankings: The Top 3 Defenders By Position Group Ahead Of The 2024 NFL Combine Pre-NFL Combine Mock Drafts Mock Draft 1.0 Mock Draft 1.0: Chicago Bears Trade Back, Atlanta Falcons Draft Caleb Williams | 2024 NFL Draft Mock Draft 2.0 Mock Draft 2.0: Washington, New England, Atlanta, Denver, New York and Seattle Draft A QB Mock Draft 3.0 Mock Draft 3.0: Commanders Trade Up With Bears, Broncos Move Up For QB, 5 QB's Drafted In Round One of The 2024 NFL Draft Senior Bowl Content Players To Watch At The Senior Bowl 2024 Senior Bowl Preview: 10 Players That Can Elevate Their 2024 NFL Draft Stock Senior Bowl Day One Standouts 2024 Senior Bowl Day One Standout Players: Roman Wilson, Quinyon Mitchell, and Ladd McConkey Stole The Show The Top Performers From Senior Bowl Practices 2024 Senior Bowl: Top Performers Who Raised Their NFL Draft Stock? The Top Senior Bowl Game Performers 2024 Senior Bowl Game Recap: The MVP, The Standouts, Whose Stock Will Rise?

The NFL Combine is an event made for TV. The drills are generally less important than what you hear from all the social media analysts. Most of the hype is created to generate buzz—a fact I've mentioned for years. Another aspect is that the NFL Combine provides additional data points for evaluators to consider and compare to the film. It's all about matching your initial thoughts prior to the noise, or lack thereof, due to a 40-yard dash time or a remarkable vertical jump. If you actually watch the film of the players participating in the NFL Combine, you will not be surprised by their explosive, or not-so-explosive, 40 times and vertical jumps. What really matters are the player interviews with front-office personnel, coaches, and GMs and the medical evaluations. In a recent article written by Greg Gabriel, much of this was confirmed by Greg Gabriel, a reputable name in NFL scouting circles. Gabriel shared his thoughts on how actual NFL teams view the NFL Combine. Below, I provide a summarized version of Gabriel's thoughts. For more detailed insights, you can read the full article on SB Nation's Windy City Gridiron, linked in the text. Misconceptions vs. Reality at the NFL Scouting Combine In the article, Greg Gabriel reveals the common misunderstandings and truths about the NFL Scouting Combine. He clarifies that the widespread belief of players dramatically improving their draft stock based only on their combine performance is more of a media creation than reality. In fact, NFL teams do not usually alter a player's evaluation significantly based on their combine exercises, which mainly consist of non-football-specific athletic drills. Evaluating Performances May Prompt A Second Look Gabriel explains that while excellent performances are anticipated, subpar performances can lead to concerns, prompting scouts to reassess their initial opinions. However, an outstanding performance typically triggers a second look at the player's game footage rather than an instant elevation in draft prospects. He also observes that despite post-combine hype for some players, dramatic leaps in draft positioning are infrequent. Key Elements of the Combine According to Gabriel, the pivotal components of the combine are the medical assessments and the player interviews. The combine primarily exists to provide thorough medical examinations for the athletes, offering teams valuable health information. Although the interview portion is brief, it offers crucial insights into the players' personalities and can greatly influence a team's interest. Advice on Skipping Workouts Gabriel advises against avoiding combine workouts, arguing that participating offers a chance to rectify any poor performances at subsequent Pro Days. He uses Devin Hester as an example, who improved his draft prospects by bettering his time at his Pro Day following a less impressive combine showing. Significance of Specific Drills He points out that the importance of drills varies by position. For example, speed and agility are vital for skill positions, while vertical jumps and agility drills are critical for receivers to showcase their explosiveness and body control. Quarterback Workouts at the Combine Gabriel mentions that the quarterback drills at the combine are not as significant, given that the format does not allow quarterbacks to fully demonstrate their skills. He suggests that evaluations during Pro Days and private workouts are more reflective of a quarterback's true abilities. The NFL Combine Is Not A Definitive Factor In A Player's NFL Draft Outcome Gabriel's insights highlight NFL teams' internal processes and viewpoints regarding the combine. He emphasizes that while the combine is a crucial element of the scouting process, it is not the definitive factor in a player’s draft outcome. About Greg Gabriel Per The Website Windy City Gridiron Greg Gabriel has over three decades of experience working in the NFL, including stints in the front office with the Buffalo Bills, New York Giants, and Chicago Bears, where he was Director of College Scouting. Greg has done countless media appearances over the years and brought his unique scouting eye to Windy City Gridiron in 2022.

The 2024 NFL Combine unofficially started yesterday with GMs, coaches, and players doing the media rounds, and NFL teams began the individual player interview process. Medical evaluations will also take place this week, and as always, the medicals and the interviews will play a significant role in the NFL Draft evaluation process. Below is a list of news-related items from the first day of NFL Combine discussions, which included media sessions with coaches, players, and GMs. There are some interesting tidbits to take from these media sessions, so I wanted to compile some of the most relevant discussions centered around the NFL Combine and the 2024 NFL Draft. J.J. McCarthy Will Throw At The NFL Combine Michigan quarterback J.J. McCarthy is set to participate in the upcoming NFL Scouting Combine, where he will throw and work out alongside other quarterbacks. McCarthy, considered one of the top prospects in the draft, has been under scrutiny due to his limited usage in college. However, with a strong performance at the combine and his pro day, he could potentially secure a position as a top five pick. His decision to participate in the combine is crucial as it allows NFL teams to assess his abilities more closely, especially with other top quarterback prospects like Jayden Daniels and Caleb Williams opting out of the event. Opportunity for Bo Nix and Michael Penix Jr. To Showcase Their Talent The absence of USC's Caleb Williams and LSU's Jayden Daniels from the throwing events at the combine offers an opportunity for other quarterbacks, such as Oregon's Bo Nix and Washington's Michael Penix Jr., to capture the attention of NFL teams. Both Nix and Penix Jr. have confirmed their participation in the combine workouts, aiming to elevate their draft stock amidst a deep quarterback class. Patriots' Director of Scouting On QB Evaluation Strategy Eliot Wolf, the New England Patriots' Director of Scouting, shared insights into what the team looks for in a quarterback. Leadership, physical talent, and positive body language on the field are key attributes. The Patriots, holding the No. 3 overall pick in the 2024 NFL draft, are in the process of evaluating quarterbacks, emphasizing the importance of toughness at the position. This evaluation process is crucial as the Patriots consider making a change at quarterback. Rome Odunze Will Participate In Combine Drills In contrast to the trend of top prospects opting out of combine workouts, Washington wide receiver Rome Odunze has decided to participate fully in the drills at the combine. Expected to be a top-10 pick, Odunze's decision to perform all the drills sets him apart from other top wide receiver prospects like Marvin Harrison Jr. and Malik Nabers, who have chosen to skip the workouts. Odunze's exceptional physical attributes, including his speed, vertical leap, and broad jump measurements, are anticipated to impress NFL teams. Vikings' New QB Coach Is Former Drake Maye High School Coach The Minnesota Vikings have appointed Josh McCown as their new quarterbacks coach, a decision that carries significant implications given McCown's past coaching experience with top quarterback prospect Drake Maye in high school and his connections with the NFL, including the Vikings and head coach Kevin O'Connell. While the Vikings are exploring long-term options at quarterback, with Kirk Cousins' future uncertain, the hiring of McCown could hint at a potential interest in developing Maye, who shares the same agent with Cousins and is considered a high-ceiling talent in need of experience and seasoning​​. Panthers GM Dan Morgan Emphasizes Need for Wide Receiver Talent Carolina Panthers' new GM Dan Morgan and rookie head coach Dave Canales are clear about the team's need to enhance its wide receiver corps, especially after the team finished with the NFL's worst record in 2023. Despite not discussing quarterback Bryce Young's rocky rookie season, Morgan is focused on adding "playmakers" to provide better support for Young. He highlighted the necessity for more depth and competition among the wide receivers, pointing out the potential to bolster the squad through the draft or free agency. Morgan praised the current wide receiver class and expressed a desire for players who exhibit toughness and a passion for the game, eyeing the No. 33 overall pick as an opportunity to address this need with promising prospects available like Ladd McConkey, Troy Franklin, Adonai Mitchell, Keon Coleman, and Brian Thomas.

Today's analysis will focus on 20 players who I believe can increase their 2024 NFL Draft stock with a great week at the 2024 NFL Combine. About The NFL NFL Draft Scouting Combine A total of 321 NFL Draft prospects have been invited to attend the 2024 NFL Combine. The event will take place in Indianapolis from February 26 through March 4. Each prospect will be able to display their abilities in the presence of NFL coaches, general managers, and scouts. Each year, before the NFL Draft, the NFL Combine serves as a platform for these athletes to improve their NFL Draft stock by demonstrating their skills to all 32 NFL teams. 2024 NFL Combine Schedule The NFL Scouting Combine Live Drills kick off on Thursday, February 29th, featuring exclusive LIVE broadcasting on the NFL Network starting at 3pm Eastern Time. Here's the complete schedule: Thursday, February 29th, 3pm ET: Defensive Linemen, Linebackers Friday, March 1st, 3pm ET: Defensive Backs, Tight Ends Saturday, March 2nd, 1pm ET: Quarterbacks, Wide Receivers, Running Backs Sunday, March 3rd, 1pm ET: Offensive Linemen The 2024 NFL Draft is loaded at several positions, with QB being the most scrutinized position group each year. This year's wide receiver class could be historic, with as many as six to eight wide receivers receiving 1st-round consideration. Other position groups like offensive tackle and defensive back are also very deep and talented. 20 Players That Can Elevate Their 2024 NFL Draft Stock Below, I have provided a list of 20 prospects who can increase or hold firm on their current 2024 NFL Draft position with a good week at the NFL Combine. QB J.J. McCarthy, Michigan (6'3", 205 lbs) Projected Draft Round: 1st Round, Top 15 Projected Team: Atlanta Falcons Analysis: McCarthy's tenure at Michigan, marked by a national championship and a 27-1 record as a starter, showcases his leadership and potential. Many in the draft world have narratives about his role at Michigan. The consistent narrative among some in the draft world is that J.J. McCarthy is "a game manager," but that could not be further from the truth. If you watch the tape, you see a QB with the same traits as both Caleb Williams and Drake Maye. He has a strong arm, is mobile, and can do all of the off-platform stuff. One advantage he has over every other prospect is that he is a winner. At the NFL Combine, McCarthy will get a chance to impress NFL GMs and scouts not just with his on-field acumen, but also when he interviews. QB Michael Penix Jr., Washington (6'3", 213 lbs) Projected Draft Round: Late 1st, Early Round two Projected Team: Atlanta Falcons Analysis: Michael Penix Jr. heads into the 2024 NFL Scouting Combine, aiming to rectify his draft trajectory after a series of uneven performances during the Senior Bowl practices led to skepticism regarding his draft stock. Choosing not to participate in the Senior Bowl game, Penix seeks to showcase his skills in Indianapolis, especially after a standout two-year stint at Washington, where he accumulated 4,903 passing yards with 36 touchdowns against just 11 interceptions. QB Spencer Rattler, South Carolina (6'1", 217 lbs) Projected Draft Round: 3rd Round Projected Team: Seattle Seahawks Analysis: Rattler's path, marked by notable highs and some unmet expectations, presents a mixed narrative. Following his MVP performance at the Senior Bowl, the Combine represents a critical opportunity for him to demonstrate continued progress and solidify his status as a potential top-tier draft pick. RB Jonathan Brooks, Texas (6'0", 210 lbs) Projected Draft Round: 3rd Round Projected Team: Green Bay Packers Analysis: Jonathan Brooks emerges from Texas as a running back to watch at the 2024 NFL Scouting Combine, particularly after overcoming an ACL tear. While it remains uncertain how many drills Brooks will participate in due to his recovery, the Combine will be crucial for teams to assess his rehabilitation progress and estimate his readiness for NFL play. Brooks boasts a commendable mix of speed and strength, attributes that could significantly enhance his draft prospects if he is able to demonstrate them at the Combine. RB Jaylen Wright, Tennessee (5'11", 210 lbs) Projected Draft Round: 4th Round Projected Team: Green Bay Packers Analysis: With an impressive junior year featuring over 1,000 rushing yards and an exceptional average of 7.39 yards per carry, Wright is positioned as an ascending draft prospect. The Combine will be a pivotal moment for him to showcase his athleticism and secure a higher ranking among a competitive running back cohort. RB Audric Estime, Notre Dame (5'11", 227 lbs) Projected Draft Round: 4th Round Projected Team: Chicago Bears Analysis: Estime enters the Combine without a clear consensus top running back in his class. His performance, particularly in the 40-yard dash and agility drills, could vault him into the top running back conversation, leveraging his collegiate momentum for draft stock improvement. WR Keon Coleman, Florida State (6'4", 215 lbs) Projected Draft Round: Mid to Late 1st Round Projected Team: Buffalo Bills Analysis: Keon Coleman has become a figure of intrigue in this draft cycle, initially considered the consensus WR2, only to see his stock fluctuate as the season progressed. Now seen as the consensus WR5, Coleman faces skepticism regarding his separation skills and concerns about how he might perform at the Combine. Despite this, the Florida State wideout, who transferred from Michigan State, brings a compelling blend of speed and strength to the table. WR Ricky Pearsall, Florida (6'1", 205 lbs) Projected Draft Round: 3rd Round Projected Team: Kansas City Chiefs Analysis: Pearsall's emergence as a significant offensive weapon for Florida is underscored by his 65 receptions for 965 yards and four touchdowns, marking his best collegiate season. His notable performance during Senior Bowl week sets a strong precedent for his potential Combine success, where he can further establish himself amid a competitive receiver class. WR Tez Walker, North Carolina (6'2", 200 lbs) Projected Draft Round: 2nd Round Projected Team: New England Patriots Analysis: Despite challenges during the Senior Bowl, Walker's previous seasons, boasting 1,620 yards and 18 touchdowns with an average of 16.8 yards per catch, illustrate his high potential. The Combine is crucial for him to demonstrate improved consistency and secure his position as a reliable prospect for the NFL. WR Xavier Legette, South Carolina (6'3", 227 lbs) Projected Draft Round: 2nd Round Projected Team: Dallas Cowboys Analysis: Legette's unique blend of size and late bloom at college presents a compelling case for NFL teams. The Combine offers him the chance to showcase his speed and ability to gain yards after the catch, potentially moving him from a second-round prospect to a first-round talent. TE Jaheim Bell, Florida State (6'1", 244 lbs) Projected Draft Round: 4th Round Projected Team: Cincinnati Bengals Analysis: Jaheim Bell significantly boosted his draft prospects during the Senior Bowl, displaying a blend of compact power and explosive playmaking ability. Bell, who combines the roles of a tight end, big slot, and H-back, showcases an athleticism that compensates for what he lacks in size. After a solid 2023 season where Bell recorded 39 receptions for 503 yards and two touchdowns, he is headed to the NFL Combine, where he could solidify his status as one of the most athletically gifted players at his position, potentially propelling his draft stock even higher. TE Theo Johnson, Penn State (6'6", 260 lbs) Projected Draft Round: 4th Round Projected Team: Philadelphia Eagles Analysis: Theo Johnson has emerged as a notable prospect in the NFL draft cycle. At Penn State, Johnson established himself as one of the most reliable pass-catchers, an All-Big Ten performer who caught 32 passes last season, showcasing his improvement as the season progressed. With the NFL Scouting Combine ahead, Johnson has the opportunity to further ascend up draft boards, particularly if he can showcase the speed and strength that made him a pivotal player for the Nittany Lions. OT Amarius Mims, Georgia (6'7", 340 lbs) Projected Draft Round: Mid to Late 1st Round Projected Team: Miami Dolphins Amarius Mims from Georgia, with his towering 6-foot-7, 340-pound frame, is already marked as a leading offensive tackle prospect due to his exceptional athleticism. Despite this, Mims faces scrutiny due to his limited playing time at Georgia, having only made eight career starts. In addition, his 2023 season was cut short by an ankle injury necessitating surgery. With the NFL Combine approaching, Mims is under pressure to dispel concerns regarding his durability and inexperience. OT Kingsley Suamataia, BYU (6'5", 315 lbs) Projected Draft Round: 2nd Round Projected Team: San Francisco 49ers Analysis: Suamataia enters the Combine with the opportunity to rise from the second tier of offensive tackles. Showcasing his strength, blocking skills, and intellect during interviews could elevate his draft stock significantly. DL T'Vondre Sweat, Texas (6'4", 362 lbs) Projected Draft Round: 2nd Round Projected Team: New Orleans Saints Analysis: Sweat's significant role at Texas, with a record of 128 total tackles and notable performances in pass breakups, showcases his dominance. His strength and technique, highlighted during the Senior Bowl, set expectations for a potentially standout Combine performance, which could significantly enhance his draft position. DL Braden Fiske, Florida State (6'5", 297 lbs) Projected Draft Round: 3rd Round Projected Team: New York Giants Analysis: Fiske's notable senior year stats, reflecting significant improvement after transferring from Western Michigan, have spotlighted his potential. His NFL Combine performance is a crucial opportunity to showcase his skills and elevate his draft stock from a Day 3 selection to a more prominent position. EDGE Austin Booker, Kansas (6'6", 245 lbs) Projected Draft Round: 3rd Round Projected Team: Detroit Lions Analysis: After transferring from Minnesota, Booker led the Jayhawks with 12 tackles for loss and eight sacks among 56 total stops, highlighting his substantial impact and potential. With his physical attributes, the Combine offers him a prime opportunity to showcase his skills and affirm his rising draft stock, particularly given his limited collegiate exposure but significant impact. EDGE Adisa Isaac, Penn State (6'4", 251 lbs) Projected Draft Round: 2nd Round Projected Team: Washington Commanders Analysis: Isaac's standout season featuring 33 pressures, 20 hurries, and 7.5 sacks positions him as a key prospect for the NFL. His performance at the Combine will be crucial in showcasing his strength, technique, and quickness off the edge, possibly propelling him into first-round discussions. LB Payton Wilson, NC State (6'4", 243 lbs) Projected Draft Round: 2nd Round Projected Team: Pittsburgh Steelers Analysis: Wilson's college tenure is marked by distinguished accomplishments, including unanimous All-American recognition and winning both the Butkus and Bednarik Awards, alongside a monumental tally of 402 total tackles. In a draft class void of a clear top linebacker, his NFL Combine performance can solidify his draft projection and elevate him to the top of the LB draft class. CB Kool-Aid McKinstry, Alabama (6'1", 195 lbs) Projected Draft Round: Mid to Late 1st Round Projected Team: Detroit Lions Analysis: McKinstry's defensive performance, allowing just 20 catches from 43 targets for 208 yards, establishes him as a formidable defensive back. Once considered the top DB in the 2024 NFL Draft class, The NFL Combine is a crucial juncture for him to outshine peers and validate his projection as a first-round pick, especially in a competitive cornerback class. CB Mike Sainristil, Michigan (5'10", 182 lbs) Projected Draft Round: 2nd Round Projected Team: San Francisco 49ers Analysis: Despite being considered undersized for his position, Mike Sainristil punches above his size. Sainristil combines a high football IQ with excellent ball skills and open-field tackling. Last season, he impressively recorded six interceptions, contributed to two forced fumbles, and broke up six passes, in addition to scoring two defensive touchdowns. His NFL Combine performance can silence some of the doubt.

We are entering the next stage of the NFL Draft player rankings process. As always, I start with the top 5 quarterbacks (QB), top 5 running backs (RB), top 10 wide receivers (WR), and the top 5 tight ends (TE) before diving into the updated offensive line and top defender grades. The defender rankings below are the top three ranked players at their position ahead of the 2024 NFL Draft. Click Here: Check out the Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Big Board top 100 player rankings. We evaluate every player using a proprietary grading process that involves film evaluation combined with advanced data. On the back end, our scouting process mirrors the same process deployed by current NFL front-office personnel so that we can deliver the most in-depth player scouting reports available. All of this is currently free (subject to change). Each player scouting report includes: In-depth player scouting report Play Style and Scheme Fit Analysis Player Strengths & Weaknesses Player Comparisons The Top 3 Cornerbacks (CB1) Nate Wiggins, Clemson (CB, 6'2", 185 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Wiggins excels with his disruptive range and efficiency against vertical threats. His agility and sharp route recognition make him adaptable to various defensive schemes, emphasizing his role in off-man coverage. His potential in the NFL aligns with 'High-End Starter Potential,' showcasing his capability to adjust and excel in numerous roles. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 1st NFL Teams Mocked: Colts, Vikings, Jaguars (CB2) Cooper DeJean, Iowa (CB, 6'1", 210 lbs) Projection: Elite Analysis: DeJean's spatial awareness and athleticism afford him versatility across the boundary, slot, and potentially safety roles. His explosive athleticism and quick response to plays highlight his proficiency in zone and off-man coverage, marking him as an 'Elite' prospect ready for early-round selection. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 1st NFL Teams Mocked: (CB3) Quinyon Mitchell, Toledo (CB, 6'0", 196 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Mitchell showcases exceptional zone and off-man coverage prowess, leveraging his excellent route recognition and ball skills to disrupt plays. His coverage instincts and reactive athleticism render him perfectly suited for schemes that value versatility, allowing him to excel both in open spaces and near the line of scrimmage. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 1st NFL Teams Mocked: Steelers, Eagles, Rams The Top 3 Edge Rushers (EDGE1) Dallas Turner, Alabama (ED, 6'4", 240 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Turner's flexibility across defensive alignments, comparable to notable NFL talents, underpins his value as a dynamic pass rusher. His need for refinement in run defense and block shedding does not overshadow his 'High-End Starter Potential,' promising a strong NFL impact. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 1st NFL Teams Mocked: Falcons, Vikings, Bears (EDGE2) Laiatu Latu, UCLA (ED, 6'5", 265 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Latu's pass rush ability and motor, suitable for odd front schemes, resonate with his compelling comeback story. His 'High-End Starter Potential' forecasts an impactful NFL career, emphasizing his skill set for aggressive defensive play. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 1st NFL Teams Mocked: (EDGE3) Jared Verse, Florida State (ED, 6'4", 250 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Verse's adaptability, mirroring the versatility of NFL edge rushers, positions him as a potential cornerstone in defensive strategies prioritizing quarterback pressures. His 'High-End Starter Potential' suggests year-one NFL readiness. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 1st NFL Teams Mocked: Seahawks, Rams, Bucs The Top 3 Interior Defensive Linemen (IDL1) Jer'Zhan Newton, Illinois (IDL, 6'2", 295 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Newton's athleticism and technical skills make him a fit for dynamic defensive fronts, aiming for Pro Bowl levels. His ability to lead Power 5 in pressures denotes his 'High-End Starter Potential,' promising a disruptive NFL presence. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 1st NFL Teams Mocked: Bengals, Raiders, Seahawks (IDL2) Byron Murphy II, Texas (IDL, 6'1", 308 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Murphy's prowess in run defense and potential in pass rush align him with traditional 4-3 schemes, where his foundational skills forecast 'High-End Starter Potential' as a solid interior force in the NFL. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 1st NFL Teams Mocked: Lions, Texans, Cardinals (IDL3) Kris Jenkins, Michigan (IDL, 6'3", 305 lbs) Projection: Mid-Level Starter Potential Analysis: Jenkins' effectiveness against the run and effort in pass rush cater to his suitability as a nose tackle or defensive tackle, suggesting 'Mid-Level Starter Potential.' Despite speed limitations, his strengths indicate a reliable defensive contribution. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 2nd-3rd NFL Teams Mocked: Packers, Bengals, Vikings The Top 3 Linebackers (LB1) Edgerrin Cooper, Texas A&M (LB, 6'3", 230 lbs) Projection: Mid-Level Starter Potential Analysis: Cooper's athletic profile and diagnostic ability fit a weakside linebacker role, highlighting his 'Mid-Level Starter Potential.' His versatility promises a dynamic impact within NFL defensive schemes. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 2nd-3rd Round NFL Teams Mocked: Packers, Eagles, Steelers (LB2) Junior Colson, Michigan (LB, 6'3", 247 lbs) Projection: Mid-Level Starter Potential Analysis: Colson's agility and coverage skills, effective in a 4-3 defense, mark him as a 'Mid-Level Starter Potential.' His comprehensive abilities suggest a path toward becoming a substantial defensive contributor. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 3rd-4th NFL Teams Mocked: Commanders, Chargers, Cardinals (LB3) Jeremiah Trotter Jr., Clemson (LB, 6'0", 230 lbs) Projection: Mid-Level Starter Potential Analysis: Trotter Jr.'s blend of run-stopping and pass rush potential positions him for versatile linebacker roles, with 'Mid-Level Starter Potential' indicating a promising NFL journey with substantial room for growth. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 3rd-4th NFL Teams Mocked: Packers, Eagles, Steelers The Top 3 Safeties (S1) Kamren Kinchens, Miami (S, 6'0", 205 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Kinchens' comprehensive coverage abilities and adaptability signal 'High-End Starter Potential,' predicting a significant defensive role. His need for improved tackling technique suggests areas for enhancement. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 2nd-3rd Round NFL Teams Mocked: Packers, Eagles, Bears (S2) Tyler Nubin, Minnesota (S, 6'2", 210 lbs) Projection: Mid-Level Starter Potential Analysis: Nubin's proficiency in run defense and straight-line speed cater to zone or nickel safety roles, with 'Mid-Level Starter Potential' underscoring his capacity for solid NFL contributions. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 2nd-3rd NFL Teams Mocked: Packers, Eagles, Bears (S3) Calen Bullock, USC (S, 6'3", 190 lbs) Projection: Low-Level Starter Potential Analysis: Bullock's prowess in deep coverage juxtaposes his need for tackling improvement, with 'Low-Level Starter Potential' highlighting developmental areas alongside promising pass-defense capabilities. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 3rd-4th NFL Teams Mocked: Packers, Bears, Bills

We are entering the next stage of the NFL Draft player rankings process. As always, I start with the top 5 quarterbacks (QB), top 5 running backs (RB), top 10 wide receivers (WR), and the top 5 tight ends (TE) before diving into the updated offensive line and top defender grades. Click Here: Check out the Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Big Board top 100 player rankings. We evaluate every player using a proprietary grading process that involves film evaluation combined with advanced data. On the back end, our scouting process mirrors the same process deployed by current NFL front-office personnel so that we can deliver the most in-depth player scouting reports available. All of this is currently free (subject to change). Each player scouting report includes: In-depth player scouting report Play Style and Scheme Fit Analysis Player Strengths & Weaknesses Player Comparisons The Top 5 IOL's The top 5 IOL's according to our updated 2024 NFL Draft Big Board player rankings, ranked ahead of the 2024 NFL Combine. (1) Jackson Powers-Johnson, Oregon (IOL, 6'3", 320 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Powers-Johnson is praised for his athleticism and versatility, shining in zone schemes with his footwork and movement. Despite his shorter reach, his effective anchoring and smart play compensate, making him ideal for dynamic offenses. Expected to be a Day 2 pick, his immediate impact as a starting center is anticipated, supported by his high football IQ and leadership. (2) Christian Mahogany, Boston College (IOL, 6'3", 322 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Mahogany's blend of power and technique positions him as a versatile force on the interior line, capable of excelling in any offensive setup. His ability to engage defenders at the second level and adeptness at handling complex defenses underscore his potential. Projected as a high-end starter, Mahogany's skill set promises significant NFL success. (3) Cooper Beebe, Kansas State (IOL, 6'4", 322 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Beebe's strength and base make him a formidable force in run-heavy schemes, with his versatility allowing play across the interior. While he shines in gap and power run schemes, further development in pass protection could round out his skill set. With high football IQ and adaptability, Beebe is seen as a valuable Day 2 selection. (4) Zak Zinter, Michigan (IOL, 6'6", 334 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Zinter's size and toughness make him a solid fit for vertical run schemes, leveraging his strength for effective engagement. While not the most mobile, his foundational skills suggest a reliable interior presence. Projected with Mid-Level Starter Potential, Zinter's consistency and football IQ forecast a successful NFL career. (5) Zach Frazier, West Virginia (IOL, 6'3", 310 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Frazier's technical proficiency and power excel in gap schemes, with his wrestling background enhancing his blocking leverage. While less suited for zone schemes, his reliable pass protection and football intelligence make him a dependable center option. Anticipated as a Day 2 selection, Frazier's potential as a solid NFL contributor is evident.

We are entering the next stage of the NFL Draft player rankings process. As always, I start with the top 5 quarterbacks (QB), top 5 running backs (RB), top 10 wide receivers (WR), and the top 5 tight ends (TE) before diving into the updated offensive line and top defender grades. Click Here: Check out the Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Big Board top 100 player rankings. We evaluate every player using a proprietary grading process that involves film evaluation combined with advanced data. On the back end, our scouting process mirrors the same process deployed by current NFL front-office personnel so that we can deliver the most in-depth player scouting reports available. All of this is currently free (subject to change). Each player scouting report includes: In-depth player scouting report Play Style and Scheme Fit Analysis Player Strengths & Weaknesses Player Comparisons The Top 5 OT's The top 5 OT's according to our updated 2024 NFL Draft Big Board player rankings, ranked ahead of the 2024 NFL Combine. (1) Joe Alt, Notre Dame (OT, 6'7", 318 lbs) Grade: Elite Analysis: Joe Alt epitomizes the modern offensive tackle with his unique blend of size and athleticism. His lateral agility and nimbleness, honed from his basketball background, make him an exemplary fit for zone-blocking schemes. Alt's adeptness at handling complex defensive schemes and his potential as a day-one starter at left tackle are evident. While he seeks to refine his hand technique and balance, Alt's foundational skills suggest a trajectory toward becoming a Pro Bowl-caliber left tackle, embodying an elite prospect ready for the NFL's challenges. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 1st Consensus Overall Pick #: Top 10 Overall NFL Teams Mocked: Titans, Giants, Chargers (2) Olumuyiwa Fashanu, Penn State (OT, 6'6", 308 lbs) Grade: Near Elite Analysis: Olumuyiwa Fashanu stands out for his prototypical left tackle attributes, blending size, strength, and agility. His proficiency in pass protection and effectiveness in space position him as a linchpin for any offensive line. Fashanu's work ethic and finish on plays add significant value, indicating his readiness for a significant role in the NFL. Projected as a Day 1 selection, Fashanu is anticipated to quickly ascend to All-Pro status with advancements in pad level and consistency. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 1st Consensus Overall Pick #: Top 10 Overall NFL Teams Mocked: Jets, Titans, Bears (3) Taliese Fuaga, Oregon State (OT, 6'6", 333 lbs) Grade: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Taliese Fuaga's powerful and physical play style defines him as a key asset for run-first offenses. His ability to dominate in the run game and his adaptability to perform in pass protection underline his versatility. Fuaga's fit in zone concepts and his potential to play both guard and tackle at the professional level spotlight his comprehensive skill set. His path to becoming a significant contributor in the NFL is marked by his exceptional run blocking and evolving pass protection skills. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 1st Consensus Overall Pick #: Top 20 Overall NFL Teams Mocked: Raiders, Jets, Saints (4) J.C. Latham, Alabama (OT, 6'6", 326 lbs) Grade: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: J.C. Latham embodies the ideal offensive tackle with his impressive blend of strength, agility, and technical skill. His versatility shines in both pass protection and the run game, fitting seamlessly into diverse offensive schemes. Latham's immediate impact potential and pathway to Pro Bowl recognition are bolstered by his adaptability and technical prowess. With continued refinement, he is poised to emerge as a premier lineman in the NFL, showcasing the ability to succeed across various blocking schemes. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 1st Consensus Overall Pick #: Top 20 Overall NFL Teams Mocked: Bengals, Saints, Steelers (5) Amarius Mims, Georgia (OT, 6'7", 340 lbs) Grade: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Amarius Mims's combination of size, agility, and strength positions him as a versatile and impactful offensive tackle. His quick footwork and effective engagement with defenders highlight his capability in both run blocking and pass protection. Mims is particularly suited for zone-blocking schemes but also has the flexibility to excel in multiple positions along the offensive line. With focused improvement on technique and engagement consistency, Mims is on a trajectory toward becoming a foundational piece of an NFL offensive line, offering substantial value as a high-end starter. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 1st Consensus Overall Pick #: Top 20 Overall NFL Teams Mocked: Bengals, Dolphins, Packers

We are entering the next stage of the NFL Draft player rankings process. As always, I start with the top 5 quarterbacks (QB), top 5 running backs (RB), top 10 wide receivers (WR), and the top 5 tight ends (TE) before diving into the updated offensive line and top ten defender grades. Click Here: Check out the Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Big Board top 100 player rankings. We evaluate every player using a proprietary grading process that involves film evaluation combined with advanced data. On the back end, our scouting process mirrors the same process deployed by current NFL front-office personnel so that we can deliver the most in-depth player scouting reports available. All of this is currently free (subject to change). Each player scouting report includes: In-depth player scouting report Play Style and Scheme Fit Analysis Player Strengths & Weaknesses Player Comparisons The Top 5 TE's The top 5 TE's, according to our updated 2024 NFL Draft Big Board player rankings, ranked ahead of the 2024 NFL Combine. (1) Brock Bowers, Georgia Ranking Analysis: Brock Bowers is a versatile, athletic, tight end who can make plays in both the passing and the running game. He has been compared to some of the best tight ends in the NFL, including George Kittle, Travis Kelce, and Darren Waller. Bowers would fit well in a scheme that values athletic, pass-catching tight ends and takes advantage of his abilities in the middle of the field and down the seam. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 1st Consensus Overall Pick #: Top 10 Overall NFL Teams Mocked: Chargers, Broncos, Colts Ceiling: Elite, capable of becoming a cornerstone player for an NFL franchise. (2) Ja'Tavion Sanders, Texas Ranking Analysis:  Sanders is a dynamic tight end who excels in a versatile offensive scheme. His ability to line up in multiple positions, including in-line, slot, and even outside, makes him a valuable asset for any team looking for a modern, pass-catching tight end. He's particularly effective in schemes that utilize the tight end as a key weapon in the passing game, leveraging his route-running ability and athleticism to create mismatches. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 2nd-4th Round Consensus Overall Pick #: 40th Overall NFL Teams Mocked: Bengals, Dolphins, Commanders Ceiling: High-End Starter Potential, with the ability to significantly impact the game. (3) Jaheim Bell, Florida State Ranking Analysis: Jaheim Bell's role as a versatile H-back or move tight end is underscored by his athleticism and receiving skills. While he shows promise as a receiver, enhancements in contested catches and deep speed are necessary for NFL success. Bell's multifunctional play style, comparable to Hunter Henry and Gerald Everett, presents him as a valuable draft pick with the versatility to fit into numerous offensive formations. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 4th-5th Round Consensus Overall Pick #: NA NFL Teams Mocked: Bengals, Pats, Commanders Ceiling: Mid-Level Starter Potential, with the ability to exceed expectations within a few years. (4) AJ Barner, Michigan Ranking Analysis: AJ Barner embodies the traditional tight end archetype with a strong emphasis on blocking and reliable receiving. His fit in pro-style offenses that value a dual-threat tight end suggests a role as a dependable contributor. While Barner may not redefine the tight end position, his solid fundamentals and work ethic could make him a steady presence in the NFL. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 5th-6th Round Consensus Overall Pick #: NA NFL Teams Mocked: Bears, Bengals, Chargers Ceiling: Low-Level Starter Potential, indicating the potential for reliable, if not spectacular, NFL contributions. (5) Theo Johnson, Penn State Ranking Analysis: Theo Johnson's versatility as a tight end is highlighted by his receiving prowess and adequate blocking. Drawing comparisons to athletic tight ends like Mark Andrews, Johnson's ability in various offensive roles suggests a promising NFL future. While his blocking requires refinement, Johnson's athleticism and receiving skills make him a notable prospect in the draft. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 4th-6th Round Consensus Overall Pick #: NA NFL Teams Mocked: Bengals, Vikings, Texans Ceiling: Low-Level Starter Potential, with room for development into a more comprehensive role within an NFL offense.

Overview of Combine Invitations The 2024 NFL Scouting Combine invitations have painted a vivid picture of college football's top talent, with 321 athletes hailing from 93 colleges and universities. The SEC and Big Ten were prominently represented, showcasing their dominance in the college football landscape. The SEC led the pack with 75 athletes, outpacing the Big Ten's contribution of 60, despite both conferences boasting representation from 13 different institutions. Diverse Representation The diversity of college football was on full display, with every major conference contributing at least two teams' worth of talent. Moreover, the event saw representation from 11 FCS schools and even an Ivy League member, underscoring the wide net the NFL casts in its talent search. Michigan Football With Record 18 NFL Combine Invites At the forefront of this showcase were the Michigan Wolverines, the reigning National Champions, who set a new NFL combine record by securing 18 invites, a testament to their depth and talent across nearly all football positions. This remarkable achievement placed Michigan at the pinnacle of this year's NFL Combine representation, surpassing the previous record (15) held by Georgia's 2021 NFL Draft class. Elite School Representation The Wolverines led a distinguished group, as only seven schools saw 10 or more of their athletes invited. This elite list included all four of the recent College Football Playoff contenders, highlighting the correlation between on-field success and combine invitations. Leading Schools Following Michigan in the tally is Washington with 13, Florida State with 12, and Texas and Georgia with 11 invites each. Alabama and Penn State rounded out the group with 10 invites, showcasing the breadth of talent across the country's top football programs. Notably, despite its strong showing, Penn State was left out of the top six in the controversial final College Football Playoff rankings last December. Invite Totals By School Michigan: 18 Washington: 13 Florida State: 12 Texas: 11 Georgia: 11 Alabama: 10 Penn State: 10 LSU, Notre Dame, USC, Missouri, Ohio State: 8 each Oregon: 7 Kentucky, TCU, Clemson, Utah, Illinois: 6 each South Carolina, Texas A&M, Miami (FL), Arkansas, Auburn: 5 each North Carolina, Louisville, Arizona, Oregon State, Mississippi State, Iowa, Kansas State, Maryland: 4 each Tennessee, Tulane, BYU, Wisconsin, South Dakota State, Pittsburgh, Duke, Oklahoma, Houston, Texas Tech, Washington State, Ole Miss, UCLA: 3 each Western Kentucky, Marshall, Troy, UCF, Holy Cross, Florida, Colorado State, Minnesota, Wyoming, UConn, Boston College, NC State, Kansas, Wake Forest: 2 each Single invites include various schools from Southern Mississippi to Stanford, highlighting the diverse talent pool across the nation's college football landscape.

2024 NFL Scouting Combine Participants Announced The NFL Scouting Combine is a critical milestone in the transition of college football players to professional athletes in the NFL. This event brings together over 300 of the top college football talents, offering them a platform to demonstrate their abilities to coaches, general managers, and scouts. It serves as an essential prelude to the NFL Draft, allowing players to enhance their football profiles and display their skills to teams and fans nationwide. Their performances can significantly influence their positions in the upcoming Draft. The 2024 NFL Scouting Combine will feature live drills that kick off on Thursday, February 29th, with comprehensive live coverage available on the NFL Network starting at 3 pm ET. The schedule for the live drills is as follows: Thursday, February 29th, 3 pm ET: Focus will be on Defensive Linemen and Linebackers. Friday, March 1st, 3 pm ET: Defensive Backs and Tight Ends will take the stage. Saturday, March 2nd, 1 pm ET: Quarterbacks, Wide Receivers, and Running Backs will display their passing, catching, and running skills. Sunday, March 3rd, 1 pm ET: Offensive Linemen will conclude the Combine. Combine Invite List The NFL has unveiled the roster of players invited to the 2024 NFL Scouting Combine. Announced on Tuesday, the event has extended invitations to 321 prospects. Scheduled to be held in Indianapolis from February 26 to March 4, this year's combine will feature players categorized by their positions. Below is the list of invitees. Quarterbacks (QB): 14 Running Backs (RB): 29 Wide Receivers (WR): 39 Tight Ends (TE): 15 Offensive Linemen (OL): 59 Defensive Linemen (DL): 50 Linebackers (LB): 34 Defensive Backs (DB): 53 Specialists (K/P): 5 QUARTERBACKS Jayden Daniels, LSU Sam Hartman, Notre Dame Devin Leary, Kentucky Drake Maye, North Carolina J.J. McCarthy, Michigan Joe Milton III, Tennessee Bo Nix, Oregon Michael Penix Jr., Washington Michael Pratt, Tulane Spencer Rattler, South Carolina Austin Reed, Western Kentucky Kedon Slovis, BYU Jordan Travis, Florida State Caleb Williams, USC RUNNING BACKS Rasheen Ali, Marshall Braelon Allen, Wisconsin Emani Bailey, TCU Trey Benson, Florida State Jonathon Brooks, Texas Blake Corum, Michigan Isaiah Davis, South Dakota State Ray Davis, Kentucky Daijun Edwards, Georgia Audric Estimé, Notre Dame Frank Gore Jr., Southern Mississippi Isaac Guerendo, Louisville George Holani, Boise State Bucky Irving, Oregon Dillon Johnson, Washington Jawhar Jordan, Louisville Dylan Laube, New Hampshire MarShawn Lloyd, USC Jase McClellan, Alabama Kendall Milton, Georgia Keilan Robinson, Texas Cody Schrader, Missouri Will Shipley, Clemson Jaden Shirden, Monmouth Tyrone Tracy Jr., Purdue Kimani Vidal, Troy Michael Wiley, Arizona Miyan Williams, Ohio State Jaylen Wright, Tennessee WIDE RECEIVERS Javon Baker, UCF Jermaine Burton, Alabama Jalen Coker, Holy Cross Keon Coleman, Florida State Malachi Corley, Western Kentucky Jacob Cowing, Arizona Ryan Flournoy, Southeast Missouri State Troy Franklin, Oregon Anthony Gould, Oregon State Lideatrick Griffin, Mississippi State Marvin Harrison Jr., Ohio State Jha'Quan Jackson, Tulane Cornelius Johnson, Michigan Xavier Legette, South Carolina Luke McCaffrey, Rice Ladd McConkey, Georgia Jalen McMillan, Washington Bub Means, Pittsburgh Adonai Mitchell, Texas Malik Nabers, LSU Rome Odunze, Washington Ricky Pearsall, Florida Ja'Lynn Polk, Washington Brenden Rice, USC Tayvion Robinson, Kentucky Marcus Rosemy-Jacksaint, Georgia Ainias Smith, Texas A&M Brian Thomas Jr., LSU Jamari Thrash, Louisville Devaughn Vele, Utah Devontez Walker, North Carolina Malik Washington, Virginia Tahj Washington, USC Xavier Weaver, Colorado Jordan Whittington, Texas Isaiah Williams, Illinois Johnny Wilson, Florida State Roman Wilson, Michigan Xavier Worthy, Texas TIGHT ENDS Erick All, Iowa AJ Barner, Michigan Jaheim Bell, Florida State Brock Bowers, Georgia Devin Culp, Washington Dallin Holker, Colorado State Theo Johnson, Penn State Trey Knox, South Carolina Tanner McLachlan, Arizona Tip Reiman, Illinois Ja'Tavion Sanders, Texas Ben Sinnott, Kansas State Brevyn Spann-Ford, Minnesota Cade Stover, Ohio State Jack Westover, Washington Jared Wiley, TCU OFFENSIVE LINEMEN Isaiah Adams, Illinois Joe Alt, Notre Dame Kiran Amegadjie, Yale Gottlieb Ayedze, Maryland Karsen Barnhart, Michigan Graham Barton, Duke Cooper Beebe, Kansas State Keaton Bills, Utah Tanor Bortolini, Wisconsin Javion Cohen, Miami Andrew Coker, TCU Brandon Coleman, TCU Frank Crum, Wyoming Anim Dankwah, Howard Ethan Driskell, Marshall Kingsley Eguakun, Florida Josiah Ezirim, Eastern Kentucky Olumuyiwa Fashanu, Penn State Troy Fautanu, Washington Blake Fisher, Notre Dame Jeremy Flax, Kentucky Javon Foster, Missouri Zach Frazier, West Virginia Taliese Fuaga, Oregon State X'Zauvea Gadlin, Liberty Nick Gargiulo, South Carolina Delmar Glaze, Maryland Matt Goncalves, Pittsburgh Tylan Grable, UCF Garret Greenfield, South Dakota State Tyler Guyton, Oklahoma C.J. Hanson, Holy Cross Christian Haynes, Connecticut LaDarius Henderson, Michigan Christian Jones, Texas Matthew Jones, Ohio State Trente Jones, Michigan Trevor Keegan, Michigan Jarrett Kingston, USC Brady Latham, Arkansas JC Latham, Alabama Sataoa Laumea, Utah Matt Lee, Miami KT Leveston Jr., Kansas State Beaux Limmer, Arkansas Christian Mahogany, Boston College Mason McCormick, South Dakota State Dylan McMahon, N.C. State Amarius Mims, Georgia Jacob Monk, Duke Jordan Morgan, Arizona Hunter Nourzad, Penn State Drake Nugent, Michigan Patrick Paul, Houston Julian Pearl, Illinois Prince Pines, Tulane Jackson Powers-Johnson, Oregon Dominick Puni, Kansas Andrew Raym, Oklahoma Layden Robinson, Texas A&M Roger Rosengarten, Washington Walter Rouse, Oklahoma Nick Samac, Michigan State Kingsley Suamataia, BYU Jalen Sundell, North Dakota State Nathan Thomas, Louisiana Charles Turner III, LSU Sedrick Van Pran-Granger, Georgia Caedan Wallace, Penn State Zak Zinter, Michigan DEFENSIVE LINEMEN Austin Booker, Kansas Solomon Byrd, USC DeWayne Carter, Duke Nelson Ceaser, Houston Myles Cole, Texas Tech Jaden Crumedy, Mississippi State Tyler Davis, Clemson Brandon Dorlus, Oregon Justin Eboigbe, Alabama Jonah Elliss, Utah Braden Fiske, Florida State Gabe Hall, Baylor Michael Hall Jr., Ohio State Jaylen Harrell, Michigan Marcus Harris, Auburn Jalyx Hunt, Houston Christian Adisa Isaac, Penn State Brennan Jackson, Washington State McKinnley Jackson, Texas A&M Javontae Jean-Baptiste, Notre Dame Trajan Jeffcoat, Arkansas Jordan Jefferson, LSU Kris Jenkins, Michigan Cedric Johnson, Mississippi Mohamed Kamara, Colorado State Marshawn Kneeland, Western Michigan Laiatu Latu, UCLA Logan Lee, Iowa Zion Logue, Georgia Fabien Lovett Sr., Florida State Braiden McGregor, Michigan Byron Murphy II, Texas Myles Murphy, North Carolina Jer'Zhan Newton, Illinois Eyabi Okie-Anoma, Charlotte Ruke Orhorhoro, Clemson Keith Randolph Jr., Illinois Chop Robinson, Penn State Darius Robinson, Missouri Justin Rogers, Auburn Maason Smith, LSU Javon Solomon, Troy T'Vondre Sweat, Texas Leonard Taylor III, Miami Xavier Thomas, Clemson Bralen Trice, Washington David Ugwoegbu, Houston Jared Verse, Florida State Eric Watts, Connecticut Mekhi Wingo, LSU LINEBACKERS Michael Barrett, Michigan JD Bertrand, Notre Dame Tatum Bethune, Florida State Chris Braswell, Alabama Aaron Casey, Indiana Steele Chambers, Ohio State Junior Colson, Michigan Edgerrin Cooper, Texas A&M Kalen DeLoach, Florida State Khalid Duke, Kansas State Tommy Eichenberg, Ohio State Jaylan Ford, Texas Easton Gibbs, Wyoming Cedric Gray, North Carolina Ty'Ron Hopper, Missouri Jontrey Hunter, Georgia State Curtis Jacobs, Penn State Tyrice Knight, UTEP Marist Liufau, Notre Dame Jordan Magee, Temple Darius Muasau, UCLA Gabriel Murphy, UCLA Maema Njongmeta, Wisconsin Jeremiah Trotter Jr., Clemson Zion Tupuola-Fetui, Washington Dallas Turner, Alabama Edefuan Ulofoshio, Washington Trevin Wallace, Kentucky Nathaniel Watson, Mississippi State Payton Wilson, N.C. State DEFENSIVE BACKS Kris Abrams-Draine, Missouri Daijahn Anthony, Mississippi Terrion Arnold, Alabama Cole Bishop, Utah Beau Brade, Maryland Millard Bradford, TCU Jarvis Brownlee Jr., Louisville Javon Bullard, Georgia Calen Bullock, USC Jaylon Carlies, Missouri Caelen Carson, Wake Forest Ryan Cooper Jr., Oregon State Cooper DeJean, Iowa M.J. Devonshire, Pittsburgh Marcellas Dial, South Carolina Johnny Dixon, Penn State Willie Drew, Virginia State Renardo Green, Florida State Kamal Hadden, Tennessee Dominique Hampton, Washington Myles Harden, South Dakota Daequan Hardy, Penn State Cam Hart, Notre Dame Jaden Hicks, Washington State Khyree Jackson, Oregon DJ James, Auburn Carlton Johnson, Fresno State Isaiah Johnson, Syracuse Elijah Jones, Boston College Jarrian Jones, Florida State Jaylen Key, Alabama Kamren Kinchens, Miami Kalen King, Penn State Kamari Lassiter, Georgia Dwight McGlothern, Arkansas Kool-Aid McKinstry, Alabama Patrick McMorris, Cal Max Melton, Rutgers Quinyon Mitchell, Toledo Malik Mustapha, Wake Forest Josh Newton, TCU Tyler Nubin, Minnesota Kitan Oladapo, Oregon State Tyler Owens, Texas Tech Andru Phillips, Kentucky Deantre Prince, Mississippi Nehemiah Pritchett, Auburn Josh Proctor, Ohio State Ennis Rakestraw Jr., Missouri Decamerion Richardson, Mississippi State Demani Richardson, Texas A&M Christian Roland-Wallace, USC Mike Sainristil, Michigan Andre' Sam, LSU Jaylin Simpson, Auburn Tykee Smith, Georgia Chau Smith-Wade, Washington State Tarheeb Still, Maryland T.J. Tampa, Iowa State Dadrion Taylor-Demerson, Texas Tech Ro Torrence, Arizona State Sione Vaki, Utah Josh Wallace, Michigan Ryan Watts, Texas Nate Wiggins, Clemson Evan Williams, Oregon James Williams, Miami SPECIALISTS Joshua Karty, K, Stanford Cam Little, K, Arkansas Harrison Mevis, K, Missouri Ryan Rehkow, P, BYU Will Reichard, K, Alabama Tory Taylor, P, Iowa

In my latest Mock Draft 3.0, we have a complete post-Super Bowl NFL Draft order following the Kansas City Chiefs' victory over the San Francisco 49ers. With just a few weeks remaining before the start of the 2024 NFL Draft Combine in Indianapolis, I wanted to present one more mock draft before the combine and will follow up with Mock Draft 4.0 post-NFL Combine. In this mock, a few trades will affect the top 10 of the 2024 NFL Draft as teams are positioning themselves to move up for a QB. Check Out My Other Mock Drafts Mock Draft 1.0 (Mock Draft 1.0: Chicago Bears Trade Back, Atlanta Falcons Draft Caleb Williams | 2024 NFL Draft) Mock Draft 2.0 (Mock Draft 2.0: Washington, New England, Atlanta, Denver, New York and Seattle Draft A QB) In this round one mock draft, we observe the following positional highlights: 5 quarterbacks (QBs) were selected in Round One. I anticipate that anywhere between 3-6 QBs could go, with several teams potentially trading up to secure a QB; this is due to the anticipated lack of high talent in the 2025 NFL Draft class, prompting teams to be more aggressive in the 2024 NFL Draft. 5 wide receivers (WRs) are off the board in what is one of my deepest WR classes yet. We could see between 4 and 7 WRs drafted in the first round. 6 offensive tackles (OTs) were chosen, showcasing the depth of this group of tackles. There might be between 4 to 7 OTs selected in round one. 7 cornerbacks (CBs) were taken in a deep and talented group. I expect anywhere from 4 to 8 CBs to be taken in the first round alone. 5 EDGE rushers snagged in round one in a class that lacks a clear elite set of players at the top but possesses solid talent with high-end potential. Check out the Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Big Board top 100 player rankings. We evaluate every player using a proprietary grading process that involves film evaluation combined with advanced data. On the back end, our scouting process mirrors the same process deployed by current NFL front-office personnel so that we can deliver the most in-depth player scouting reports available. All of this is currently free (subject to change). Each player scouting report includes: In-depth player scouting report Play Style and Scheme Fit Analysis Player Strengths & Weaknesses Player Comparisons Round One NFL Mock Draft 3.0 (1). Washington Commanders (via CHI, CAR) The Pick: QB Caleb Williams, USC Needs: QB, Edge, WR, IOL, LB Key Free Agents: Kamren Curl, Jacoby Brissett, Curtis Samuel Pick Rationale: The Commanders are in a prime position to draft a quarterback by staying at pick two while also possessing the option to trade back. The race for QB2 is quite competitive, featuring J.J. McCarthy, Jayden Daniels, and Drake Maye as key contenders ahead of the NFL Combine. Given these circumstances, they seem prepared to make a bold move. The decision to bring in Kliff Kingsbury was made with a clear purpose, suggesting that going all out to draft Caleb Williams is their best course of action following Kingsbury's hiring. (2). Chicago Bears (via WAS) The Pick: WR Marvin Harrison Jr., Ohio State Needs: IOL, WR, TE, Edge, CB Key Free Agents: Darnell Mooney, Yannick Ngakoue, D'Onta Foreman, Justin Jones, Montez Sweat Pick Rationale: The Chicago Bears selected Ohio State WR Marvin Harrison Jr. through a trade with the Washington Commanders. The Commanders went all in to acquire Caleb Williams, offering the Bears multiple first-round picks and the opportunity to move back just one spot—a proposal the Bears couldn't turn down. This trade signals the Bears' commitment to Justin Fields as they accumulate draft capital to construct a roster around him. (3). New England Patriots The Pick: QB Drake Maye, UNC Needs: QB, TE, OT, WR, RB Key Free Agents: Trent Brown, Hunter Henry, Kyle Dugger, Josh Uche, Mike Onwenu Pick Rationale: The New England Patriots address their critical need at quarterback by selecting UNC's Drake Maye as their pick. Faced with the potential departures of key free agents like Trent Brown and Hunter Henry and considering their need for improvement at wide receiver, tackle, and edge defender, the Patriots' choice of Maye underscores a strategic pivot toward rejuvenating their offense. Amid speculation around trading for Justin Fields or trading back due to interest from quarterback-needy teams, they chose to secure a potential franchise quarterback in Drake Maye. (4). Arizona Cardinals The Pick: WR Malik Nabers, LSU Needs: WR, DT, IOL, Edge, CB Key Free Agents: Marquise Brown, L.J. Collier, Antonio Hamilton, Greg Dortch Pick Rationale: The Arizona Cardinals, selecting fourth in the draft, chose LSU WR Malik Nabers, targeting him as the next-best wide receiver option after missing out on Marvin Harrison Jr. With pressing needs in wide receiver, offensive line, defensive line, linebacker, and cornerback positions, and facing the potential free agency departures of key players like Marquise Brown and L.J. Collier, the Cardinals should be focused on strengthening their pass rush and coverage capabilities. (5). Los Angeles Chargers The Pick: TE Brock Bowers, Georgia Needs: CB, RB, DT, TE, C Key Free Agents: Austin Ekeler, Gerald Everett, Kenneth Murray, Austin Johnson, Michael Davis Pick Rationale: Jim Harbaugh's arrival signals a fresh chapter for the Chargers, bringing a focus on strengthening the team's core, especially in the face of key free agents' potential exits. His decision to bring along defensive coordinator Jesse Minter underscores a commitment to defense. With critical needs across the board and the looming free agency of Austin Ekeler and Gerald Everett, prioritizing the tight end position with a player like Brock Bowers could provide both immediate impact and long-term benefits. (6). New York Giants The Pick: OT Joe Alt, Notre Dame Needs: DT, RB, IOL, Edge, CB Key Free Agents: Adoree' Jackson, Saquon Barkley, Parris Campbell, A'Shawn Robinson Pick Rationale: The New York Giants, holding the sixth pick, have selected Notre Dame OT Joe Alt to address their significant need on the offensive line. With critical needs across defensive tackle, running back, interior offensive line, edge rusher, and cornerback positions, and facing the potential loss of key free agents such as Adoree' Jackson, Saquon Barkley, and A'Shawn Robinson, the Giants could have considered trading back but chose to secure the top offensive tackle on their draft board. (7). Denver Broncos (via TEN) The Pick: QB J.J. McCarthy, Michigan Needs: QB, DT, TE, CB, Edge Key Free Agents: Pick Rationale: In a strategic move via a trade with Tennessee, the Denver Broncos select Michigan QB J.J. McCarthy, positioning him as their future franchise QB. This decision comes amid considerations for upgrades at quarterback, wide receiver, center, edge defender, and cornerback. (8). Atlanta Falcons The Pick: QB Jayden Daniels, LSU Needs: QB, WR, Edge, CB, DT Key Free Agents: Matt Hennessy, Jeff Okudah, Calais Campbell, Cordarrelle Patterson, Bud Dupree Pick Rationale: The Falcons looked poised to snag J.J. McCarthy in this spot possibly, but the Broncos jumped ahead of them at pick 7 to grab the former Michigan QB. So, they go with the next available QB in the class, a player in the current mix to be the QB2. Jayden Daniels would bring a dynamic element to the QB position in Atlanta in an offense already loaded with dynamic talent. (9). Chicago Bears The Pick: Edge Dallas Turner, Alabama Needs: IOL, WR, TE, Edge, CB Key Free Agents: Darnell Mooney, Yannick Ngakoue, D'Onta Foreman, Justin Jones, Montez Sweat Pick Rationale: At the ninth pick, the Chicago Bears select Edge Dallas Turner from Alabama, aiming to bolster their defensive front seven. (10). New York Jets The Pick: OT Olu Fashanu, Penn State Needs: OT, WR, S, DT, QB Key Free Agents: Carl Lawson, Duane Brown, Dalvin Cook, Jordan Whitehead Pick Rationale: The New York Jets, with the tenth pick, choose OT Olu Fashanu from Penn State, addressing a critical need on their offensive line. With many other needs and key free agents that could be on the move, they go with the best available tackle option. (11). Minnesota Vikings The Pick: CB Cooper DeJean, Iowa Needs: QB, RB, G, C, DL, LB, DB Key Free Agents: Kirk Cousins, Danielle Hunter, Marcus Davenport, Jordan Hicks, Joshua Dobbs Pick Rationale: At pick eleven, the Minnesota Vikings secure a pivotal addition to their secondary with Iowa's Cooper DeJean, strategically addressing their need for defensive playmakers. (12). Tennessee Titans (via DEN) The Pick: OT Taliese Fuaga, Oregon State Needs: OT, CB, WR, Edge, RB Key Free Agents: Ryan Tannehill, Derrick Henry, Teair Tart, Denico Autry, Sean Murphy-Bunting Pick Rationale: The Tennessee Titans should focus on protecting Will Levis by revamping the OL in this draft. In addition, they need to address needs in the secondary and their need to add a more consistent pass rush. (13). Las Vegas Raiders The Pick: QB Michael Penix Jr., Washington Needs: QB, RB, OL, DL, LB, DB Key Free Agents: Josh Jacobs, Austin Hooper, Marcus Peters, Andre James, Jermaine Eluemunor Pick Rationale: The Raiders are contemplating their quarterback situation and need significant improvements on the offensive line. The potential departure of Josh Jacobs also puts the running back position in focus. They also have OL needs and could draft a top DB or edge player in this spot. (14). New Orleans Saints The Pick: WR Rome Odunze, Washington Needs: QB, OT, DL Key Free Agents: Andrus Peat, Cesar Ruiz, Jameis Winston, James Hurst Pick Rationale: New Orleans must rejuvenate its edge rush and receiving corps, particularly if Michael Thomas departs. Offensive line and cornerback depth are also areas of concern. (15). Indianapolis Colts The Pick: IDL Jer'Zhan Newton, Illinois Needs: WR, OL, DL, DB Key Free Agents: Jonathan Taylor, Michael Pittman Jr., Grover Stewart, Kenny Moore, Gardner Minshew Pick Rationale: With key defensive and offensive playmakers potentially leaving, the Colts face crucial decisions at DT and WR. Enhancing the pass rush and secondary will be vital for their AFC South aspirations. (16). Seattle Seahawks The Pick: Edge Jared Verse, Florida State Needs: IOL, Edge, QB Key Free Agents: Damien Lewis, Bobby Wagner, Mario Edwards, Darrell Taylor, Devin Bush, Leonard Williams Pick Rationale: Seattle may explore QB options and must solidify the interior offensive line. The potential departure of Bobby Wagner highlights the need for linebacker reinforcements. (17). Jacksonville Jaguars The Pick: Edge Laiatu Latu, UCLA Needs: IOL, DB, ED Key Free Agents: Josh Allen, Calvin Ridley, Ben Bartch, Brandon McManus, K'Lavon Chaisson, Ezra Cleveland Pick Rationale: Jacksonville is focused on shoring up its pass rush and offensive line, with key decisions looming on free agents like Josh Allen and Calvin Ridley. Cornerback depth is also a priority. (18). Cincinnati Bengals The Pick: CB Quinyon Mitchell, Toledo Needs: CB, DT, WR, OT Key Free Agents: D.J. Reader, Tee Higgins, Tyler Boyd, Jonah Williams, Chidobe Awuzie Pick Rationale: Cincinnati seeks to address its defensive vulnerabilities, particularly in the secondary, and to replenish its receiving corps and offensive line in anticipation of possible departures of key free agents. (19). Los Angeles Rams The Pick: CB Kool-Aid McKinstry, Alabama Needs: CB, Edge, S, K, QB Key Free Agents: Demarcus Robinson, Jordan Fuller, Cam Akers, John Johnson Pick Rationale: The Rams are focused on reinforcing their secondary and edge rush capabilities, alongside considering future prospects at quarterback, to maintain a competitive edge in the NFC West. (20). Pittsburgh Steelers The Pick: CB, Terrion Arnold, Alabama Needs: QB, OT, IOL, CB, LB Key Free Agents: Levi Wallace, Markus Golden, Mason Rudolph, Desmond King, Miles Boykin Pick Rationale: Pittsburgh is poised to address its most pressing needs, notably at quarterback. Reinforcing the offensive line, particularly at tackle, remains a priority to protect their QB and enhance the run game. They have needs in the secondary and at LB. (21). Miami Dolphins The Pick: OT JC Latham, Alabama Needs: IOL, S, WR, DT, TE Key Free Agents: Christian Wilkins, Raekwon Davis, Connor Williams, Robert Hunt, Jerome Baker, Chase Claypool Pick Rationale: Miami should look to solidify its interior offensive line and add a dynamic playmaker at the safety position. (22). Philadelphia Eagles The Pick: C Jackson Powers-Johnson, Oregon Needs: RB, WR, CB, LB, Edge Key Free Agents: Jason Kelce, Brandon Graham, Fletcher Cox, Derek Barnett, D'Andre Swift Pick Rationale: Philadelphia has needs on the offensive line, specifically at the center position after the retirement of Jason Kelce. They need to add an edge rusher and could use some upgrades in the secondary. (23). Houston Texans (via Cleveland Browns) The Pick: IDL Byron Murphy, Texas Needs: OT, DT, CB, Edge, WR Key Free Agents: Josh Jones, Sheldon Rankins, Dalton Schultz, Devin Singletary, Shaquill Griffin Pick Rationale: Houston's draft strategy focuses on fortifying the offensive tackle position and bolstering the defensive line to improve their pass rush and coverage. (24). Dallas Cowboys The Pick: OT Amarius Mims, Georgia Needs: OT, RB, IOL, CB, WR Key Free Agents: Tyron Smith, Tony Pollard, Stephon Gilmore, Dorance Armstrong, Jayron Kearse Pick Rationale: The Cowboys will look to strengthen its offensive line and secure dynamic playmakers at running back and wide receiver, addressing crucial areas to aid in Dak Prescott's success. (25). Green Bay Packers The Pick: CB Nate Wiggins, Clemson Needs: S, OT, CB, IOL, Edge Key Free Agents: Rashan Gary, A.J. Dillon, Yosh Nijman, Jon Runyan, Darnell Savage Pick Rationale: The Packers want to reinforce their secondary and offensive tackle positions. The priority will likely be protecting Aaron Rodgers, but they might be better served using free agency. (26). Tampa Bay Buccaneers The Pick: Edge Chris Braswell, Alabama Needs: QB, WR, IOL, S, Edge Key Free Agents: Mike Evans, Devin White, Lavonte David, Antoine Winfield Jr., Baker Mayfield Pick Rationale: Tampa Bay's selection centers on addressing immediate needs at quarterback and wide receiver, alongside building up the interior offensive line and safety positions. If Baker Mayfield and Mike Evans can be retained, the Bucs will be in a good place to draft defensive help. (27). Arizona Cardinals (via HOU) The Pick: Edge Bralen Trice, Washington Needs: WR, DT, IOL, Edge, CB Key Free Agents: Marquise Brown, L.J. Collier, Antonio Hamilton, Greg Dortch Pick Rationale: With the potential departure of key free agents like Marquise Brown, bolstering the wide receiver corps becomes a priority. Additionally, reinforcing the defensive line and secondary is crucial for improving the team's overall defensive stature. Upgrading the interior offensive line and adding edge rushers would solidify the foundation for a competitive roster in the upcoming season. (28). Buffalo Bills The Pick: WR Brian Thoma Jr., LSU Needs: S, DT, Edge, WR, CB Key Free Agents: Micah Hyde, Leonard Floyd, A.J. Epenesa, Gabriel Davis, Poona Ford Pick Rationale: The Bills should focus on enhancing the defense, particularly at safety and on the defensive line, while also seeking to complement Stefon Diggs with additional receiving talent. (29). Detroit Lions The Pick: CB Ennis Rakeshaw Jr., Missouri Needs: CB, OG, Edge, WR, DT Key Free Agents: Jonah Jackson, Chauncey Gardner-Johnson, Emmanuel Moseley, Teddy Bridgewater, Romeo Okwara, Donovan Peoples-Jones Pick Rationale: The Lions need to address the cornerback position. (30). Baltimore Ravens The Pick: WR Keon Coleman, Florida State Needs: DT, OG, WR, CB, RB Key Free Agents: Justin Madubuike, J.K. Dobbins, Odell Beckham Jr., Kevin Zeitler, Michael Pierce Pick Rationale: The Ravens can go many ways with this pick; with needs at WR, and RB, they also have needs in the secondary and the interior of their OL. The best available at any of these positions might be the right move. (31). San Francisco 49ers The Pick: CB Kamari Lassiter, Georgia Needs: CB, Edge, OT, IOL, DT Key Free Agents: QB Sam Darnold, DT Javon Kinlaw, S Tashaun Gipson, LB Oren Burks, EDGE Clelin Ferrell, EDGE Chase Young Pick Rationale: The 49ers lost the Super Bowl and will follow that with the potential loss of many key free agents. They have needs in key areas of their defense, starting in the secondary, and if they do not retain Chase Young, they will need to address the edge rusher position. (32). Kansas City Chiefs The Pick: OT Jordan Morgan, Arizona Needs: DT, WR, OT, CB, RB Key Free Agents: Chris Jones, Donovan Smith, Mike Edwards, Willie Gay Jr., L'Jarius Sneed, Mecole Hardman Pick Rationale: They need an elite WR, they can use some youth on the OL, and they will have plenty of options to do either in this spot of the draft.

The 2024 NFL Draft wide receiver class is deep, with several players at the top of the rankings showing elite or near-elite ceiling potential. Currently, there are 21 receivers in the top 100 of the Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Big Board. Click Here: Check out the Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Big Board top 100 player rankings. We evaluate every player using a proprietary grading process that involves film evaluation combined with advanced data. On the back end, our scouting process mirrors the same process deployed by current NFL front-office personnel so that we can deliver the most in-depth player scouting reports available. All of this is currently free (subject to change). Each player scouting report includes: In-depth player scouting report Play Style and Scheme Fit Analysis Player Strengths & Weaknesses Player Comparisons Today, we're focusing on the top 10 wide receivers in the 2024 NFL Draft class ahead of the 2024 NFL Combine. A lot can change post-NFL Combine, so we plan to revisit this analysis post-combine to discuss potential risers and fallers at the wide receiver position. The Top 10 WR's (1) Marvin Harrison Jr., Ohio State Analysis: Marvin Harrison Jr. is an outside X-receiver known for his polished route running, exceptional hands, and ability to create separation from defenders consistently. He excels in various offensive schemes due to his ability to run precise routes across all field levels and his effectiveness in contested catch situations. Harrison's size and body control make him an ideal target in the red zone and on the boundary. His skill set suggests he would thrive in a pro-style offense that values precise route running and the ability to win one-on-one matchups. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 1st Consensus Overall Pick #: 2nd NFL Teams Mocked: Cardinals, Patriots Grade Analysis: Elite prospect with the potential to be an NFL difference-maker, showcasing rare physical tools and consistent high-level performance. (2) Malik Nabers, LSU Analysis: Nabers excels with his dynamic playmaking ability, combining speed, explosiveness, and agility to create separation and make plays in open space. His physicality and strong hands make him a reliable target in contested situations. While he continues refining his route-running, his skill set matches offensive schemes prioritizing vertical threats and versatile receivers capable of making an impact across the field. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 1st Consensus Overall Pick #: 5th NFL Teams Mocked: Giants, Bears, Chargers Grade Analysis: High-end starter Potential, projected to be a top starter within his early NFL years, possessing significant playmaking ability. (3) Rome Odunze, Washington Analysis: Odunze is versatile, capable of playing across the formation, in the slot, and out wide. His key strengths are his exceptional hands and ability to dominate in contested catch situations. Despite lacking elite speed, his agility and ability to maintain concentration in traffic stand out. The refinement in route running, especially for routes requiring sharp separation, is an area for development. His play style suits a scheme that leverages his ability to win 50-50 balls and his effective use in the red zone​. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 1st Consensus Overall Pick #: 7th NFL Teams Mocked: Bears, Cardinals, Giants Grade Analysis: High-end starter Potential, indicating readiness to become a significant contributor with versatile deep-threat capabilities. (4) Keon Coleman, Florida State Analysis: Coleman is a physical and aggressive receiver at the catch point, with strong hands that maintain catches through contact. He is effective in crowded spaces, tracks the ball well on downfield routes, and is comfortable using his body to shield defenders, making him a formidable target for contested catches. Coleman's ability to decelerate quickly and use efficient footwork makes him a threat on comeback routes. His physicality also extends to blocking, where he is effective in the run game. Coleman fits best as an X receiver in a scheme that values physicality and the ability to win contested catches. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 1st Consensus Overall Pick #: 23rd NFL Teams Mocked: Buccaneers, Broncos, Jaguars Grade Analysis: High-end starter Potential, poised for significant contribution and development as a top starter within the NFL framework. (5) Brian Thomas Jr., LSU Analysis: Brian Thomas Jr. is a tall, physically imposing wide receiver. His size and ball-tracking ability make him an ideal fit for offenses emphasizing a deep passing game. He needs to improve in route running precision and physicality in run blocking. His style is well-suited for a vertical or spread offense where he can utilize his deep route and jump-ball abilities. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 1st Consensus Overall Pick #: 21st NFL Teams Mocked: Bengals, Bills, Cowboys Grade Analysis: Mid-Level Starter Potential, suggesting capability for significant growth and the potential to exceed early expectations. (6) Troy Franklin, Oregon Ranking Analysis: Troy Franklin is a talented wide receiver with the speed, athleticism, and ball skills to be a star in the NFL. He would fit well in any offensive scheme, but he would be especially effective in a West Coast offense that relies on timing and precision. He would also be a good fit for an offense that uses a lot of screens and other short passes. Franklin has been compared to several receivers, but some of his most similar comparisons include Devonta Smith, Chris Olave, and Jordan Addison. These receivers are known for their speed, athleticism, and route-running ability. Franklin can potentially be a first-round pick in the NFL Draft, but he must improve his blocking and durability. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: Potential 1st, requiring further development NFL Teams Mocked: Bills, Texans, Chiefs Grade Analysis: Mid-Level Starter Potential, indicating the likelihood of becoming a solid contributor with the capacity for significant growth. (7) Ladd McConkey, Georgia Ranking Analysis: Ladd McConkey is a versatile wide receiver known for his route-running precision and ability to create separation. While he excels in the slot due to his quickness and understanding of defensive schemes, McConkey's ability to track the ball and his hands make him a reliable target on the outside. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: Late 1st to 3rd round variance NFL Teams Mocked: Chiefs, Bills Grade Analysis: Mid-Level Starter Potential, with room for exceeding expectations through versatility and open-field prowess. (8) Adonai Mitchell, Texas Ranking Analysis: Adonai Mitchell is a versatile and athletic wide receiver, proficient in deep routes and tracking the ball effectively. His long arms and frame enable him to play bigger than his size, making him a threat in various passing situations. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 2nd to 3rd NFL Teams Mocked: Giants, Titans Grade Analysis: High-end starter Potential, with athleticism and skill suggesting a significant role in an NFL offense. (9) Tez Walker, North Carolina Ranking Analysis: Tez Walker is recognized for his deep-route proficiency and ball-tracking abilities, making him a valuable asset for teams seeking a vertical threat. His speed and agility enable him to excel in various offensive schemes, particularly those prioritizing downfield passing. Walker's solid route-running across different levels adds to his versatility and NFL appeal. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 2nd to 3rd NFL Teams Mocked: Patriots, Ravens Grade Analysis: High-end starter Potential, indicating readiness to contribute and evolve into a key player in the NFL. (10) Roman Wilson, Michigan Ranking Analysis: Roman Wilson's vertical threat capability stands out, with the potential to excel in offensive schemes that leverage his speed and deep route proficiency. While his primary strength lies in stretching the defense, further development in his route tree could enhance his overall game and make him a more comprehensive threat. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 2nd-4th round variance NFL Teams Mocked: Bears, Lions Grade Analysis: Mid-Level Starter Potential, with the athleticism and performance level suggesting a capacity for growth and significant contribution.