Search Results

The College Football Playoff committee unveils its first rankings Tuesday, giving teams a crucial look at the 12-team playoff race. Oregon, Ohio State, and Indiana lead in the Big Ten; Miami holds steady in the ACC; and Alabama and Georgia fight for SEC playoff spots, as BYU tops the Big 12 standings. After 10 weeks of college football action, the College Football Playoff selection committee is set to unveil its first rankings on Tuesday, offering an essential snapshot into the race for the historic 12-team playoff. Oregon, Ohio State, and Indiana have distanced themselves in the Big Ten, while Miami is holding steady for the ACC title. In the Big 12, BYU remains on top, with Colorado and Iowa State trailing after key upsets reshaped the standings. The SEC has Alabama and Georgia in fierce competition, both vying for limited playoff spots amid a crowded field of contenders. Key questions loom over this initial ranking: How far will Penn State drop after a home loss to Ohio State? Can undefeated Indiana sustain its playoff standing despite a weaker schedule? And which one-loss team will claim the committee’s highest respect? This ranking will give teams their first real look at playoff positioning, though seeding may evolve, with the top four conference champions earning byes and the top five conference champions securing playoff spots. College Football Playoff Odds, Rankings, and Win Projections According to ESPN Football Power Index (FPI). 1). Oregon Ducks (9-0) Oregon’s playoff case is bolstered by an October 12 win over Ohio State, one of the most impressive victories this season, especially with the Buckeyes’ recent success. Led by Heisman-contending quarterback Dillon Gabriel, Oregon has showcased a balanced approach, securing critical road wins, including at Boise State and Michigan, which strengthen their résumé among undefeated teams. Defensively, the Ducks are among the nation’s elite, allowing just over 15 points per game, placing them in the top ten for scoring defense. Oregon’s combination of strong offensive output and disciplined defense could provide them a secure path to the playoff, even if they face a setback in the Big Ten championship. Implied Playoff Odds: 96% Strength of Schedule (SOS): 45 Remaining SOS: 17 Win Total Prediction: 12 games Toughest Remaining Game:  Nov. 16 at Wisconsin 2). Georgia Bulldogs (7-1) Georgia’s playoff case is built on a season defined by resilience and strong performances against notable opponents. Led by quarterback Carson Beck, the Bulldogs have managed to secure wins over ranked teams like Texas and Clemson, demonstrating both offensive firepower and defensive solidity. Their recent game against Florida highlighted this resilience; despite Beck’s three interceptions, Georgia pulled off a comeback win in the fourth quarter, showcasing depth and adaptability. With the nation’s most challenging strength of schedule, the Bulldogs have critical opportunities in November, including games against Ole Miss and Tennessee, which will give them a chance to solidify their standing as one of the top teams if they close the season strong. Implied Playoff Odds: 93% Strength of Schedule (SOS): 1 Remaining SOS: 5 Win Total Prediction: 11 games Toughest Remaining Game:  Nov. 16 vs. Tennessee 3). Miami Hurricanes (9-0) Led by quarterback Cam Ward, a Heisman contender, Miami boasts one of the most explosive offenses in the nation, averaging over 50 points in five games this season. The Hurricanes’ ability to avoid trap games and secure decisive victories has kept them undefeated, although their lack of ranked wins may concern the committee. Miami ranks No. 1 in points per game and holds the No. 2 spot nationally in offensive efficiency, giving them an edge over other playoff hopefuls. With the ACC title and playoffs in sight, consistency will be crucial as they approach a favorable remaining schedule. Implied Playoff Odds: 93% Strength of Schedule (SOS): 46 Remaining SOS: 49 Win Total Prediction: 12 games Toughest Remaining Game:  Nov. 9 at Georgia Tech 4). Ohio State Buckeyes (7-1) Quarterback Will Howard led Ohio State to a crucial 20-13 victory over Penn State, boosting the Buckeyes' playoff standing and reinforcing their case to be ranked ahead of Georgia. Their lone setback, a one-point road loss to Oregon, is seen by the committee as one of the better losses compared to other contenders, given Oregon’s position as a top-ranked team. Ohio State’s potent offense, combined with a resilient defense, makes them a formidable candidate for a playoff spot, especially if they secure a spot in the Big Ten Championship. Upcoming matchups with Indiana and Michigan will be decisive tests in their playoff pursuit. Implied Playoff Odds: 92% Strength of Schedule (SOS): 19 Remaining SOS: 23 Win Total Prediction: 11 games Toughest Remaining Game:  Nov. 23 vs. Indiana 5). Indiana Hoosiers (9-0) Under the guidance of first-year head coach Curt Cignetti and transfer quarterback Kurtis Roarke, Indiana has reached an unprecedented 9-0 record. The Hoosiers boast a potent offense that ranks second nationally, averaging 46.6 points per game, while their disciplined defense holds opponents to just 13.67 points per game. Despite having one of the weakest schedules in the country, with opponents’ winning percentages ranking 104th, Indiana’s dominance is clear: they lead the nation with an average winning margin of nearly 33 points per game. However, their most challenging test looms on Nov. 23, when they face Ohio State—a game that could define their playoff aspirations. Implied Playoff Odds: 87% Strength of Schedule (SOS): 103 Remaining SOS: 14 Win Total Prediction: 12 games Toughest Remaining Game:  Nov. 23 at Ohio State 6). Texas Longhorns (7-1) Texas has delivered a strong season highlighted by key wins over Michigan and Oklahoma, both teams above .500, though not necessarily playoff-shaking for the committee. Quarterback Quinn Ewers has been instrumental, but it’s the Longhorns' standout offensive line and second-ranked defense—just behind Tennessee—that anchor their success. Despite a double-digit loss to Georgia, Texas escaped with a narrow 27-24 victory over Vanderbilt, where penalties and sacks exposed some areas for improvement. Texas A&M, a familiar rival from their Big 12 days, is their only ranked opponent left on the regular-season schedule. A win in that high-stakes matchup could solidify the Longhorns’ playoff case, while a loss may jeopardize their bid if other two-loss contenders present stronger résumés. Implied Playoff Odds: 78% Strength of Schedule (SOS): 54 Remaining SOS: 16 Win Total Prediction: 11 games Toughest Remaining Game:  Nov. 30 at Texas A&M 7). Penn State Nittany Lions (7-1) Quarterback Drew Allar and standout TE Tyler Warren have seen positive results from the addition of first-year OC Andy Kotelnicki. However, they faced a tough challenge when they were unable to score a touchdown against Ohio State at home, resulting in a loss where the defense played a crucial role in keeping the Nittany Lions competitive. The Nittany Lions' schedule has been lacking in notable victories, with their most significant win coming against Illinois, a team that has since weakened after losing to Minnesota. Victories over teams like Kent State (0-8), West Virginia, and Bowling Green (each with multiple losses) have not contributed much to their strength of schedule. Without any more games against ranked opponents, Penn State will need to secure convincing wins to enhance its playoff prospects and make a strong case for an at-large bid. Implied Playoff Odds: 75% Strength of Schedule (SOS): 28 Remaining SOS: 56 Win Total Prediction: 10 games Toughest Remaining Game:  Nov. 23 at Minnesota 8). Tennessee Volunteers (7-1) The Volunteers’ playoff case is bolstered by a strong defense that ranks third nationally in points allowed, giving up just 11.5 points per game—placing them ahead of Oregon, Georgia, and narrowly above Ohio State. Tennessee's recent narrow victory over Kentucky showed resilience, while their marquee win over Alabama remains a key highlight on their résumé. Although they suffered a close road loss to Arkansas, it doesn’t weigh as heavily as other teams' losses. However, Tennessee has shown vulnerabilities with turnovers and penalties, and they needed overtime to beat a four-loss Florida team. With a weak nonconference schedule in September, they’ll need a more assertive showing to impress the committee. Upcoming games provide an opportunity to solidify their case, especially with a high-stakes matchup against Georgia. Implied Playoff Odds: 74% Strength of Schedule (SOS): 33 Remaining SOS: 13 Win Total Prediction: 10 games Toughest Remaining Game:  Nov. 16 at Georgia 9). Boise State Broncos (7-1) Boise State’s playoff case is bolstered by a competitive 37-34 loss to Oregon, which remains one of the more respectable defeats in the country. Running back Ashton Jeanty, a Heisman hopeful, powers a high-octane offense ranked third nationally in scoring, averaging 45.7 points per game. The Broncos have recorded four impressive road victories, including a dominant 21-point win over Washington State and a solid performance against UNLV to lead the Mountain West. Complementing their offense, Boise State’s defense ranks first in the nation in sacks, with 38 on the season, which strengthens their playoff potential should they continue winning. Implied Playoff Odds: 69% Strength of Schedule (SOS): 59 Remaining SOS: 46 Win Total Prediction: 11 games Toughest Remaining Game:  Nov. 16 at San Jose State 10). BYU Cougars (8-0) BYU's undefeated record, featuring notable wins over SMU and Kansas State, has positioned them well in the playoff conversation. Their offense is among the most efficient in the nation, while their defense consistently keeps opponents in check. The Cougars’ Strength of Record metric ranks them third nationally, underscoring the difficulty of maintaining an undefeated season against this schedule. However, they’ve faced some weaker teams, like FCS Southern Illinois and a struggling Wyoming, which leaves little room for error if they are to remain a playoff contender. Each remaining game, especially against Arizona State, will be crucial to their playoff ambitions. Implied Playoff Odds: 58% Strength of Schedule (SOS): 70 Remaining SOS: 35 Win Total Prediction: 10 games Toughest Remaining Game:  Nov. 23 at Arizona State 11). Notre Dame Fighting Irish (7-2) Notre Dame capitalized on its recent bye week as several playoff contenders stumbled, bolstering its standing despite an early-season upset by Northern Illinois. Their recent dominant victory over Navy showcased the team's offensive improvement, a key factor as they eye a potential playoff spot. However, their independent status means they can't earn an automatic conference bid, adding pressure to secure a strong finish. The Irish must remain flawless, particularly in their final regular-season matchup against USC, to convince the committee of their playoff worthiness. Implied Playoff Odds: 57% Strength of Schedule (SOS): 75 Remaining SOS: 46 Win Total Prediction: 10 games Toughest Remaining Game:  Nov. 30 at USC 12). Alabama Crimson Tide (6-2) Alabama's playoff path is precarious, with a statement win over Georgia offset by an unexpected loss to Vanderbilt. Quarterback Jalen Milroe has led the offense, but the Tide faces a critical test in their upcoming clash with LSU. This game serves as a playoff elimination matchup, where a loss could derail Alabama’s hopes, putting a significant dent in their two-loss résumé. A win, however, would keep them in the race and strengthen their case for a rare two-loss team in playoff contention, especially with their top-tier strength of schedule. Implied Playoff Odds: 56% Strength of Schedule (SOS): 11 Remaining SOS: 22 Win Total Prediction: 10 games Toughest Remaining Game:  Saturday at LSU

Proactive Week 10 waivers can make a difference in the playoff push. Here’s a data-backed breakdown of priority waiver wire additions and stashable players who could bring major value later in the season. The 2024 fantasy football season has been notably impacted by an uneven distribution of injuries, especially affecting wide receivers. Star receivers like Chris Olave, CeeDee Lamb, Drake London, and A.J. Brown suffered fresh injuries in Week 9, further depleting a position already ravaged by absences. Several top-tier wide receivers, including Rashee Rice, Brandon Aiyuk, and Stefon Diggs, are out for the season, while others, like Nico Collins and Cooper Kupp, have missed multiple games. In stark contrast, running backs have remained relatively healthy, with only a few notable absences, such as Christian McCaffrey and Isiah Pacheco early in the season. This trend has left many fantasy managers scrambling to fill receiver gaps while maintaining an excess of unspent FAAB dollars due to a lack of running back injuries. This unusual injury distribution is likely to influence the fantasy draft strategy for 2025, as the Zero-RB approach may lose appeal. Given the stability in the running back position and the challenges faced with wide receiver injuries, early rounds in future drafts may lean more toward running backs than in past years. Additionally, with fewer running back injuries, the waiver wire has seen minimal movement at that position, leaving managers with limited options and more unspent FAAB. As Week 10 approaches with four teams on a bye, managers are advised to manage FAAB cautiously and patch roster holes as frugally as possible, as waiver prospects across all positions remain thin. Waiver Wire Targets (Rostered in less than 50% of leagues) Tua Tagovailoa, QB, Miami Dolphins (43.0% Rostered) In his second game back from injury, Tua Tagovailoa showcased remarkable accuracy, completing 25 of 28 passes for 231 yards and two touchdowns. Although this impressive showing wasn’t enough to secure a win against Buffalo, Tua’s nearly flawless passing keeps the Miami offense moving. While he lacks the rushing upside that would push him into the top-tier QB finishes, the Dolphins have several favorable matchups on the horizon, including games against the Rams, Raiders, and Patriots, with playoff-friendly matchups against the Texans and Browns. Tua could be a valuable fantasy starter if the Dolphins’ offense maintains its current efficiency. Ray Davis, RB, Buffalo Bills (21% Rostered) Don’t overreact to Ray Davis’ 17-point performance in Week 9, where he had six total touches, one of which was a 63-yard catch-and-run touchdown. While he remains behind James Cook, Davis’ big-play ability makes him one of the highest-upside handcuffs in fantasy. If Cook were to miss time, Davis could slide into a lead role and produce high-end RB2 value. With a favorable schedule ahead, including a Week 10 matchup against the Colts, he’s a great stash option for teams eyeing league-winning upside. Quentin Johnston, WR, Los Angeles Chargers (20.7% Rostered) Returning from a two-game absence, Quentin Johnston made his presence felt in Week 9, hauling in four passes for 118 yards, including a touchdown on a deep play. However, this performance was somewhat inflated by a busted coverage, and Johnston has yet to see more than six targets in any game. Despite his sporadic involvement, the Chargers’ increased passing volume, combined with a WR-friendly schedule, could give Johnston FLEX value moving forward, especially with Justin Herbert showing improved form. Taysom Hill, TE, New Orleans Saints (25.6% Rostered) Taysom Hill continues to thrive in a multi-faceted role, scoring 16 PPR points in Week 9 with five carries for 19 yards and a touchdown, along with four catches for 41 yards. With the Saints’ offense missing several key players, including Chris Olave and Kendre Miller, Hill’s role is set to expand. He’s been a top performer among TEs in PPR formats and can be a weekly fantasy starter in a Saints offense that increasingly relies on his versatility. Mike Gesicki, TE, Cincinnati Bengals (13% Rostered) Mike Gesicki had a standout Week 9, catching five of his six targets for 100 yards and two touchdowns, following a strong Week 8 performance with seven catches for 73 yards. With Tee Higgins sidelined by a quad injury, Gesicki has stepped up as one of Joe Burrow’s primary targets, posting the highest TE score for the week with 24.5 fantasy points. However, Gesicki’s production has fluctuated with Higgins’ availability—he averages 8.9 half-point PPR points when Higgins is out, but just 2.22 points when Higgins plays. Keep an eye on Higgins’ injury status, as Gesicki’s usage and value rise when he’s the secondary receiving option in Cincinnati’s offense. Stash ‘Em for Later These under-the-radar players have the potential to become valuable fantasy contributors as the season progresses. Get ahead by stashing them now! Blake Corum, RB, Los Angeles Rams (17% Rostered) Behind Kyren Williams, Corum provides high-upside insurance. Averaging 5.4 yards per carry, Corum is ready for a larger role should Williams miss any time. He’s a valuable bench stash with high handcuff potential. Trey Benson, RB, Arizona Cardinals (15.6% Rostered) Trey Benson’s role in the Cardinals’ offense has been limited, but he saw notable early-down usage in Week 9. If his involvement continues to grow, he could be a strong handcuff option, especially with a top-three fantasy playoff schedule for running backs. His role in high-leverage situations makes him a worthwhile stash. Isaac Guerendo, RB, San Francisco 49ers (8% Rostered) With Jordan Mason’s recent injury setbacks, Guerendo emerged as the primary backup, posting 14 carries for 85 yards and a touchdown in Week 8. While the return of Christian McCaffrey lowers his immediate value, Guerendo’s high production makes him a valuable insurance policy if the injury bug strikes again. Kenneth Gainwell, RB, Philadelphia Eagles (2% Rostered) Gainwell is an essential insurance stash behind Saquon Barkley, particularly with a favorable late-season schedule. Gainwell could step into a starting role if Barkley misses time, with Weeks 14-17 matchups against weak run defenses in Carolina and Dallas. Gainwell could offer potential league-winning upside down the stretch. Keaton Mitchell, RB, Baltimore Ravens (4% Rostered) One of the most efficient running backs in 2023, Mitchell averaged 8.4 yards per carry before an ACL injury last season. After a recent return to practice, he could soon be back in the lineup. Mitchell is a high-upside stash, especially if the Ravens opt to rest Derrick Henry. He offers stand-alone and potential starter value if given the opportunity.

No. 3 Penn State faces No. 4 Ohio State in a Week 10 showdown. Both teams have NFL talent and elite defenses, making this a must-watch matchup. Penn State vs. Ohio State: Key Matchup Analysis Penn State’s defense is one of the stingiest in the nation, allowing only 30 second-half points over seven games and excelling in both total yards and points allowed. Under offensive coordinator Andy Kotelnicki, Penn State’s offense has seen significant improvement, combining innovative play-calling with high red-zone efficiency. Ohio State’s offense, led by quarterback Will Howard, tops the Big Ten with 40.3 points per game and 471.9 total yards per game , showcasing a balanced attack that will put Penn State’s defense to the test. This top-10 clash also features numerous NFL Draft prospects, making it a must-watch game for scouts evaluating future stars on both sides of the ball. Top NFL Draft Prospects: Penn State vs. Ohio State Matchup This top-10 clash also features numerous NFL Draft prospects, making it a must-watch game for scouts evaluating future stars on both sides of the ball. Ohio State Buckeyes Offensive Overview: Ohio State’s offense ranks among the nation’s best, boasting 472.0 yards per game (7th) and a 0.621 points-per-play efficiency (3rd). Led by QB Will Howard, who excels in deep passing with 1,795 yards, 17 TDs, and a 183.9 QBR, the Buckeyes’ passing game helps set up their formidable rushing attack. With standout WR Jeremiah Smith, who has tallied 623 receiving yards and 8 TDs. WR Emeka Egbuka’s precise route-running and run-after-catch ability further pressures Penn State’s secondary, creating opportunities for Ohio State’s rushing duo of Quinshon Judkins and TreVeyon Henderson. With Henderson averaging 7.2 yards per carry and Judkins delivering power between the tackles, the Buckeyes can maintain offensive balance and sustain drives. Their elite red-zone efficiency (100%, 1st) underscores Ohio State’s multifaceted scoring potential. Will Howard, QB Status:  Active Season Stats:  74.0% completion rate, 1,795 yards, 17 TDs, 4 INTs, 183.9 QBR Impact in This Game:  Howard’s accuracy and decision-making are pivotal, especially against Penn State’s defensive pressure. His connection with Egbuka will be essential for sustaining drives and moving the ball downfield. Quinshon Judkins, RB Status:  Active Season Stats:  520 rushing yards, 6.4 yards per carry, 6 TDs Impact in This Game:  Judkins’ powerful running complements Ohio State’s ground game, helping to control the clock and wear down Penn State’s defense with his yards-after-contact ability. TreVeyon Henderson, RB Status:  Active Season Stats:  449 rushing yards, 7.2 yards per carry, 4 TDs Impact in This Game:  Henderson’s speed adds explosiveness to the Buckeyes’ run game, enabling him to create big plays that will stretch Penn State’s defense. Emeka Egbuka, WR Status:  Active Season Stats:  43 receptions, 546 yards, 6 TDs, 12.7 yards per catch Impact in This Game:  Egbuka’s route-running precision and run-after-catch ability make him a reliable option in the passing game, helping sustain Ohio State’s drives and creating scoring opportunities. Defensive Overview: Ohio State’s defense is a major force, allowing only 11.9 points per game (2nd) and stifling opponents’ rushing attempts to 92.0 yards per game (4th). DE JT Tuimoloau and Jack Sawyer form a formidable edge-rushing duo, ranking among the best in sacks, with a team sack rate of 9.71% (11th). CB Denzel Burke leads the secondary with lockdown coverage, crucial in neutralizing Penn State’s deep threats. The Buckeyes’ ability to pressure Penn State’s quarterback and force turnovers will be a game-defining factor. JT Tuimoloau, DE Status:  Active Season Stats:  18 tackles, 4 sacks, 7 tackles for loss Impact in This Game:  Tuimoloau’s edge presence will be crucial in containing Penn State’s backfield and pressuring the quarterback, potentially forcing Penn State into quick, low-yardage plays. Jack Sawyer, DE Status:  Active Season Stats:  18 tackles, 2.5 sacks, 5 tackles for loss Impact in This Game:  Sawyer’s strength and pursuit on the opposite edge enhance Ohio State’s pass-rushing capabilities, limiting Penn State’s downfield options and tightening the Buckeyes’ defensive coverage. Denzel Burke, CB Status:  Active Season Stats:  20 tackles, 2 INTs, 31 return yards Impact in This Game:  Burke’s coverage skills will be vital in neutralizing Penn State’s receivers, as his physicality and ball skills can help force turnovers or incomplete passes. Penn State Nittany Lions Offensive Overview: Penn State’s balanced attack ranks 11th in total yards (463.7 per game) and 5th in third-down conversion rate (50%). The Nittany Lions combine a strong run game, led by RB Nick Singleton, who averages 6.4 yards per carry, with an explosive downfield passing game behind QB Drew Allar. With a 71.3% completion rate and 1,640 yards, Allar’s play will be crucial—should he play—especially in keeping Ohio State’s pass rush in check. TE Tyler Warren is a versatile contributor in both blocking and short-yardage situations, adding reliable red-zone capabilities. Penn State’s play-calling under Andy Kotelnicki emphasizes balance and creativity, vital in challenging Ohio State’s defense. Drew Allar, QB Status:  Game-time decision (knee) Season Stats:  71.3% completion rate, 1,640 yards, 12 TDs, 4 INTs, 174.6 QBR Impact in This Game:  Allar’s poise and downfield accuracy will be pivotal if he plays, helping keep Ohio State’s pass rush in check. If Allar is unavailable, backup Beau Pribula’s inexperience may prompt a more conservative game plan focused on rushing. Nick Singleton, RB Status:  Active Season Stats:  483 rushing yards, 6.4 yards per carry, 3 TDs Impact in This Game:  Singleton’s explosiveness and ability to gain yards after contact will be key in establishing the run, maintaining offensive balance, and controlling the clock. Tyler Warren, TE Status:  Active Season Stats:  47 receptions, 559 yards, 4 TDs, 11.9 yards per catch Impact in This Game:  Warren’s role as a blocker and red-zone target is critical against Ohio State’s edge rushers. His ability to convert short-yardage opportunities can help sustain Penn State’s drives. Defensive Overview: Penn State’s defense ranks among the most dominant, allowing only 14.3 points per game (7th) and 93.1 rushing yards (6th). EDGE Abdul Carter, with 4 sacks and 9.5 tackles for loss, leads a strong front seven that excels in both pass rush and coverage support. Dani Dennis-Sutton and S Jaylen Reed further bolster a defense that thrives on limiting big plays and enforcing a low opponent completion rate (57.28%, 28th). Penn State’s defensive pressure on Ohio State’s QB Will Howard and coverage against Egbuka will be key to containing the Buckeyes’ explosive plays. Abdul Carter, EDGE Status:  Active Season Stats:  22 tackles, 4 sacks, 9.5 tackles for loss Impact in This Game:  Carter’s speed and explosiveness off the edge will be essential in pressuring Ohio State’s quarterback and limiting their passing efficiency. Dani Dennis-Sutton, EDGE Status:  Active Season Stats:  12 tackles, 2 sacks, 5 tackles for loss Impact in This Game:  Dennis-Sutton’s complementary pass rush adds depth to Penn State’s defense, challenging Ohio State’s offensive line and disrupting their passing rhythm. Jaylen Reed, S Status:  Active Season Stats:  36 tackles, 2 sacks, 2 INTs, 41 return yards Impact in This Game:  Reed’s instincts and playmaking ability will be essential in containing Ohio State’s deep threats and supporting run defense. Game Outlook Ohio State’s explosive offense, which averages 472.0 yards per game (7th) and scores at an elite rate of 0.621 points per play (3rd), faces its toughest defensive challenge yet against Penn State. To control the pace, Ohio State will look to establish its run game, led by Quinshon Judkins (520 yards, 6.4 yards per carry) and TreVeyon Henderson (449 yards, 7.2 yards per carry). Success on the ground will allow QB Will Howard, who averages 9.6 yards per pass (6th) and holds a 74.0% completion rate, to find gaps in Penn State’s secondary. However, Penn State’s defense ranks 4th nationally in opponent yards per game (267.7) and is holding offenses to just 93.1 rushing yards (7th) – making it critical for Ohio State to stay balanced and capitalize on early down opportunities to avoid third-and-long situations. Meanwhile, Penn State’s balanced offense, ranking 11th nationally in total yards (463.7 per game) with a 50% third-down conversion rate (5th), will need a strong ground game to keep Ohio State’s aggressive defense at bay. Running back Nick Singleton, averaging 6.4 yards per carry, will be a key figure in Penn State’s effort to sustain drives and open up play-action opportunities for QB Drew Allar, who boasts a 71.3% completion rate and ranks 4th in yards per pass (9.9). For Ohio State defensive coordinator Jim Knowles, preparing for the complex schemes of Penn State’s OC Andy Kotelnicki will require a disciplined approach. Kotelnicki’s red-zone efficiency (93.3%, 18th) and creativity in balancing the pass and run will challenge Ohio State’s top-10 defensive metrics, including a 9.71% sack rate (11th). Knowles will need to anticipate Kotelnicki’s moves, particularly in Penn State’s red-zone schemes, where TE Tyler Warren’s versatility (559 yards, 4 TDs) could present matchup issues for Ohio State’s linebackers. Ultimately, this showdown could be decided by which team can establish the run and force their opponent into a one-dimensional game. With Big Ten standings and playoff stakes on the line, each coordinator’s adjustments and the ability to pressure the quarterback at key moments will likely shape the outcome.

No. 1 Texas faces No. 5 Georgia in a Week 8 showdown. Both teams have NFL talent and elite defenses, making this a must-watch matchup. The Texas Longhorns and Georgia Bulldogs will meet in a highly anticipated Week 8 showdown of the 2024 college football season. Both teams are loaded with NFL-caliber talent, and scouts will be watching closely as top prospects take the field. Texas enters as the No. 1 team in the country with the nation’s top defense, while No. 5 Georgia brings experience and a championship pedigree. This game promises to be a defining moment for both teams as they battle for national title aspirations. Texas vs. Georgia Matchup Analysis Texas leads the nation in scoring defense, allowing just 6.33 points per game, and in total defense, holding opponents to 229.7 yards per game. Their offense ranks fifth nationally, scoring 43.2 points per game and averaging 495.5 yards per game. Georgia, despite a loss to Alabama earlier in the season, features an offense averaging 30.6 points per game and a defense allowing 20.0 points per game. Both teams are capable of high-level play on both sides of the ball, and this game will showcase elite 2025 NFL Draft prospects. Top NFL Draft Prospects: Texas vs. Georgia Matchup Texas Longhorns Offensive Prospects and Matchup Analysis Texas's offense thrives on balance, with 52.74% of their plays coming from the run game, averaging an efficient 5.1 yards per carry. This success has been bolstered by their offensive line, which ranks 24th nationally in sack rate, allowing sacks on just 3.03% of pass attempts. Kelvin Banks Jr. anchors this unit, playing a pivotal role in opening up lanes for Texas’s rushing attack, which averages 189.0 yards per game. His protection of Quinn Ewers will be crucial, as Ewers has a 70.83% completion rate when given time to throw, but struggles under pressure, completing just 33% of passes when pressured against Oklahoma. The availability of Isaiah Bond, Texas's leading receiver with 369 yards, will also be key in stretching Georgia’s defense, which allows 7.4 yards per pass attempt, creating opportunities for both the ground game and short passing plays to keep Georgia off balance. Quinn Ewers, QB Leads Texas offense with 9.6 yards per pass attempt (8th nationally). Has a 70.83% completion rate with 1,710 yards and 12 touchdowns. Struggles under pressure: Completed 3-of-9 with an interception when pressured vs. Oklahoma but was 17-of-20 for 191 yards and a touchdown when given time. Georgia allows 7.4 yards per pass attempt; keeping Ewers upright will be crucial. Efficiency in passing and avoiding turnovers will be key to maintaining offensive balance. Isaiah Bond, WR Texas’s leading receiver with 369 yards on 21 catches despite missing part of the Oklahoma game. A vertical threat whose speed can stretch Georgia’s defense, which allows a 61.69% opponent completion rate. Deep-route capability will open up opportunities for the Texas passing game. If cleared to play, his presence could be a game-changer against Georgia’s secondary. Kelvin Banks Jr., OT Anchors a Texas offensive line that has allowed only a 3.03% sack rate (24th nationally). Will face Georgia’s pass rush, which boasts a 9.34% sack percentage. Reliable protector for Ewers, especially in crucial matchups against Georgia’s edge rushers. His ability to neutralize pressure will be critical to maintaining offensive rhythm. Gunnar Helm, TE Versatile tight end who contributes to both pass protection and run blocking. A reliable target in short-yardage situations, helping Texas convert 49.32% of third downs (10th nationally). Key in sustaining drives against Georgia, both in the passing game and run support. Helm’s blocking will also be crucial in protecting Ewers and opening up lanes for the running game. Defensive Prospects and Matchup Analysis The defense of Texas has been exceptional this season, leading in points allowed (6.33) and yards allowed (229.7) per game. They have performed well in restricting big plays and stopping rival offenses, especially in the passing game with an average of only 126.0 yards allowed per game. Texas's main focus will be on putting pressure on Georgia's quarterback Carson Beck, while also staying disciplined in their defensive coverage. It will be crucial for the Longhorns to push Georgia into obvious passing scenarios and hinder their ability to establish a running game. Andrew Mukuba, S Key transfer from Clemson, bringing leadership and experience to Texas’s secondary. Helps Texas lead the FBS in pass defense, allowing just 4.6 yards per pass attempt. Known for his ability to diagnose plays and cover ground quickly, essential against Georgia’s vertical passing game. His matchup against Georgia’s deep threat, Arian Smith, will be critical in preventing explosive plays. Jahdae Barron, S Leader in a Texas defense that allows just 0.097 points per play, the best in the FBS. Has been vital in red zone defense, where Texas holds opponents to a 33.33% scoring rate. Excellent in zone coverage, able to close quickly and neutralize opposing offenses. His instincts will play a major role in containing Carson Beck’s passing attack, especially on deep throws. David Gbenda, LB Standout linebacker in a front seven that has limited opponents to 103.7 rushing yards per game. Strong run defender with a quick ability to diagnose plays and fill gaps effectively. His tackling and control of the line of scrimmage will be key in stopping Georgia’s run game. Forcing Georgia into difficult passing situations by controlling the ground game is essential for Texas’s defensive success. Georgia Bulldogs Offensive Prospects and Matchup Analysis Georgia’s offense will need to establish the run game, which currently averages 4.3 yards per carry, in order to effectively execute their play-action pass game and keep Texas’s strong defense off balance. Carson Beck, who has thrown for nearly 2,000 yards and 15 touchdowns while completing 67.39% of his passes, will need to play one of his best games on the road. His ability to get the football out quickly and decisively on passing downs while averaging 8.6 yards per attempt will be critical—especially if this game turns into a shootout. Georgia’s offensive line, which has allowed only a 3.16% sack rate, will have to win the battle in the trenches to both establish the run and protect Beck from Texas’s relentless defensive pressure. If Georgia can maintain this offensive balance, they will have a better chance of breaking through Texas’s stout defense, which allows only 6.33 points per game. Carson Beck, QB Ranks among the top SEC quarterbacks with nearly 2,000 passing yards and 15 touchdowns. Completes 67.39% of his passes, averaging 8.6 yards per attempt, but faces his toughest challenge yet against a Texas defense allowing just 4.6 yards per pass and 6.33 points per game. Georgia has struggled with turnovers, only forcing five in six games, so Beck must be cautious with the football to avoid costly mistakes. His ability to maintain balance in the offense and protect the football will be crucial to Georgia's success. Trevor Etienne, RB Georgia’s lead back with 335 rushing yards, four touchdowns, and 5.3 yards per carry. Known for his ability to create yards after contact, Etienne will be vital against Texas’s defense, which allows only 103.7 rushing yards per game. Establishing the run early will be key to forcing Texas to commit more defenders to the box, opening play-action opportunities for Beck. Etienne's consistency will help keep Georgia's offense balanced and unpredictable. Arian Smith, WR Leads Georgia’s receivers with 412 yards and three touchdowns. His speed and ability to stretch defenses will test a Texas secondary that allows just 7.7 yards per completion. Connecting on deep routes will be critical for Smith to shift momentum in Georgia’s favor. Smith’s role as a deep threat will be essential in opening up Georgia’s passing game against Texas’s strong defense. Tate Ratledge, OG Anchors a Georgia offensive line that has allowed just a 3.16% sack rate this season. His performance in both run blocking and pass protection will be critical in keeping Beck clean and opening up rushing lanes. Ratledge’s ability to control the trenches will determine how effectively Georgia can execute their offense, especially in the run game. Oscar Delp, TE Reliable red-zone target for Beck, especially in short-yardage situations. Texas leads the nation in red-zone defense, allowing scores on just 33.33% of trips inside the 20, making Delp’s role in creating separation vital. Delp’s ability to secure contested catches will be key to converting critical scoring opportunities for Georgia. Defensive Prospects and Matchup Analysis Georgia’s defense will face a monumental challenge in containing Texas’s balanced offensive attack, which averages 495.5 yards per game (6th nationally) and scores 43.2 points per game (5th nationally). The Bulldogs, who allow 20.0 points per game, must focus on forcing turnovers to disrupt Texas’s rhythm, as they rank second-to-last in the SEC with only five takeaways in six games. In the red zone, where Texas converts 84.62% of their opportunities, Georgia’s defense will need to tighten up, as they’ve allowed opponents to score on 84.62% of red zone trips this season. Key players like Malaki Starks, who leads the team with 32 tackles, and Tyrion Ingram-Dawkins, with three sacks, must be at their best to limit Texas’s explosiveness and prevent big plays from Quinn Ewers and Isaiah Bond. Malaki Starks, S Leads Georgia’s defense with 32 tackles and one interception, excelling in both coverage and run support. His ability to cover large areas of the field will be crucial against Texas’s high-powered passing attack, which averages 9.6 yards per attempt. Starks will need to limit explosive plays from Texas’s receiving corps, including deep threats like Isaiah Bond. Tyrion Ingram-Dawkins, DL A disruptive force in the trenches with three sacks and 12 tackles this season. His ability to generate interior pressure will be key to collapsing the pocket against Quinn Ewers, who excels when given time to throw. Ingram-Dawkins must continue disrupting Ewers’s rhythm by forcing quicker, less accurate throws under pressure. Mykel Williams, EDGE Williams will play a crucial role in Georgia’s pass rush, looking to capitalize on Ewers’s struggles under pressure. His ability to win off the edge will be essential in disrupting Texas’s offensive flow and limiting Ewers’s ability to make plays downfield. Williams’s performance could swing momentum if he can consistently create havoc in the backfield. Jalon Walker, LB Walker brings versatility to Georgia’s front seven with his athleticism and playmaking ability, recording 24 tackles this season. He will be pivotal in defending both the run and pass, ensuring Texas's balanced attack doesn’t get the best of Georgia’s defense. Walker’s speed and ability to close gaps will be vital in limiting Texas’s rushing production, as well as providing support in coverage against Texas’s tight ends and running backs. Overall Matchup Breakdown Texas’s Offense vs. Georgia’s Defense Key Factors: Protect Quinn Ewers:  Texas’s offensive line, led by Kelvin Banks Jr., must prevent Georgia’s pass rush, particularly Mykel Williams and Tyrion Ingram-Dawkins, from getting to Ewers. Exploit the Passing Game:  With Bond and Helm as key targets, Texas can take advantage of Georgia’s secondary, which has allowed 7.4 yards per pass. Maintain Balance:  Texas must keep Georgia’s defense honest by establishing the run game and leveraging play-action passes. Georgia’s Defensive Strategy: Pressure Ewers:  Georgia needs to generate consistent pressure to force quick throws and potential turnovers. Stop the Run:  Limiting Texas’s ground game will force the Longhorns into more predictable passing situations. Red Zone Defense:  Georgia must tighten up in the red zone, as Texas is efficient in converting trips inside the 20 into points. Georgia’s Offense vs. Texas’s Defense Key Factors: Balanced Attack:  Georgia must establish the run with Trevor Etienne and create time for Beck to find his playmakers downfield. Protect Carson Beck:  Georgia’s offensive line must hold up against Texas’s defensive front, particularly David Gbenda. Exploit Matchups:  Beck needs to find favorable matchups, especially with Arian Smith’s speed and Delp’s size against Texas’s secondary. Texas’s Defensive Strategy: Control the Line of Scrimmage:  Texas must win in the trenches to stop Georgia’s run game and force Beck into difficult passing situations. Force Turnovers:  Texas’s defense, which thrives on creating pressure and forcing mistakes, will look to disrupt Beck’s rhythm. Limit Explosive Plays:  Texas must prevent big plays from Smith and other Georgia receivers to keep the Bulldogs from gaining momentum. Final Thoughts The Texas vs. Georgia showdown features two powerhouse programs with championship aspirations, making it one of the most anticipated matchups of the season. Texas enters the game with the nation’s top-ranked defense, allowing just 6.33 points per game and holding opponents to a mere 229.7 yards per game, both first in the country. Offensively, the Longhorns rank fifth nationally in scoring, averaging 43.2 points per game, with Quinn Ewers leading an offense that produces 495.5 yards per game. Ewers’s ability to maintain balance between Texas’s potent running game, which averages 189.0 rushing yards per contest, and the explosive potential of Isaiah Bond (369 receiving yards), should he play, will be key to sustaining drives and keeping Georgia on their heels. Georgia, however, boasts an experienced roster, highlighted by Carson Beck, who has thrown for 1,941 yards and 15 touchdowns, with a 67.39% completion rate. Beck’s success will depend on the Bulldogs establishing the run behind Trevor Etienne, who averages 5.3 yards per carry and has scored four touchdowns. Georgia’s offensive line, which allows only a 3.16% sack rate, must hold firm against Texas’s formidable front seven that limits opponents to just 103.7 rushing yards per game. Defensively, Georgia needs to pressure Ewers consistently, as the Bulldogs’ defense ranks 13th in sack percentage (9.34%) but has struggled with turnovers, forcing just five all season. Their ability to tackle well and limit penalties (71.5 penalty yards per game) will also be crucial in stifling Texas’s efficient third-down offense (49.32% conversion rate). Ultimately, this game could come down to key moments in the red zone and third-down efficiency, with both teams needing to execute under pressure. Texas allows opponents to score on just 33.33% of red-zone opportunities, the best mark in the country, while Georgia’s defense has allowed an 84.62% red-zone conversion rate. Playing at home gives Texas a distinct advantage, but Georgia’s experience in high-stakes matchups and their ability to adapt make them a formidable opponent. The winner will significantly boost their College Football Playoff hopes, making this a pivotal game for both programs.

Fantasy Football Week 9 Waiver Targets : Add Jameis Winston, Braelon Allen, Keon Coleman, and Mike Gesicki to strengthen your lineup! Proactive Week 9 waivers can make a difference in the playoff push. Here’s a data-backed breakdown of priority waiver wire additions and stashable players who could bring major value later in the season. Waiver Wire Targets (Rostered in less than 50% of leagues) Jameis Winston, QB, Cleveland Browns (6% Rostered) With Deshaun Watson out for the season, Jameis Winston is the new starter in Cleveland, and he’s already off to a hot start. Winston threw for 334 yards and 3 touchdowns  against a strong Ravens defense in Week 8, showcasing his high-risk, high-reward style. With an average depth of target of 10.2 yards  and a 66% completion rate , Winston brings potential upside as Cleveland looks to unlock more deep plays in its offense. 24% target share  to Cedric Tillman, a favorite target with a big play potential Completed 3 touchdowns of over 20 yards, adding explosive fantasy appeal Braelon Allen, RB, New York Jets (38% Rostered) Allen has proven he can step up with a larger role if Breece Hall is ever sidelined, providing strong value as a stash. He’s already posted 29.4 PPR points  in Weeks 2 and 3, and he’s capable of a three-down workload in case of injury. Allen’s goal-line usage and versatility make him a handcuff to prioritize. Averaging 3.7 yards per carry , showing efficiency in limited touches Allen received a 43% rush attempt share in week 8! Keon Coleman, WR, Buffalo Bills (41% Rostered) Keon Coleman has emerged as a reliable WR2 in the Bills' offense, benefiting from defenses focusing on Amari Cooper. With 14 targets  in his last two games, Coleman has recorded 140 yards  and 2 touchdowns. His growing role suggests a steady WR3 upside as Buffalo leans on a balanced passing attack. Averaged 7 targets  and 70 yards per game  over the past two weeks Bills offense ranks top-10 in pass attempts, offering Coleman continued opportunities Mike Gesicki, TE, Cincinnati Bengals (10% Rostered) With Tee Higgins sidelined, Gesicki has stepped up for Cincinnati, becoming one of Joe Burrow’s most reliable options. In Week 8, he caught 7 of 8 targets for 73 yards  against Philadelphia’s tight end-stifling defense, showing Burrow’s trust in him as a short-to-mid-range option. Bengals' target share with Higgins out 15% , showing increased involvement Averaged 7 targets and 8.2 fantasy points per game  over three games without Higgins Stash 'em for Later These under-the-radar players have the potential to become valuable fantasy contributors as the season progresses. Get ahead by stashing them now! Blake Corum, RB, Los Angeles Rams ( 17 % Rostered) Corum’s role as a top-tier backup makes him an essential stash, especially with Kyren Williams as the Rams’ lead back. With Williams’ history of injuries, Corum’s 35% snap share in Week 6  and impressive burst make him a prime handcuff if Williams misses any time. 5.4 yards per carry  in limited snaps, showing efficient usage Has the potential to take on a heavy workload if needed, making him a high-upside backup Kimani Vidal, RB, Los Angeles Chargers (8% Rostered) Backing up J.K. Dobbins, Vidal’s potential for an expanded role makes him worth a stash, especially if Gus Edwards remains sidelined. Vidal has shown his explosiveness, scoring a 38-yard touchdown on his first Week 6 touch  and displaying big-play ability. Chargers rank in the top 10 in red-zone rush attempts, adding to Vidal’s upside Vidal’s 4.8 yards per carry  offers solid depth and home-run potential Isaac Guerendo, RB, San Francisco 49ers (3% Rostered) With Christian McCaffrey’s heavy workload, Guerendo is a valuable insurance policy. Last night against the Cowboys, Guerendo posted 14 carries for 85 yards & a TD and 3 catches for 17 yards on 4 targets. The uncertainty of Jordan Mason's health  further boosts Guerendo’s appeal as a stash, especially with the uncertainty surrounding CMC's return. 3.7 yards per carry  on limited snaps, with explosive potential in the 49ers’ high-powered offense If Mason remains out, Guerendo’s path to touches grows, making him an important handcuff Cedric Tillman, WR, Cleveland Browns (15% Rostered) Tillman has quickly become one of Jameis Winston’s top targets, seeing a 24% target share  in Week 8. With Cleveland’s passing game ramping up under Winston, Tillman could evolve into a WR2 or Flex play as he builds chemistry with his new quarterback. 21 targets in the past two games , proving he’s one of Winston’s favorite options Averages 15.4 yards per catch , making him a valuable deep threat if you have roster space

Drake Maye’s rise to the NFL began with a breakout season at the University of North Carolina (UNC) in 2022, where he established himself as one of the top quarterback prospects for the 2024 NFL Draft. Drake Maye's Transition to the NFL Standing at 6-foot-4 and weighing 230 pounds, Maye’s physical attributes were only part of what made him an intriguing NFL prospect. His stellar 2022 campaign saw him throw for 4,321 yards, 38 touchdowns, and just seven interceptions, completing 66.2% of his passes. In addition to his passing stats, Maye contributed 698 rushing yards and seven rushing touchdowns, adding a dual-threat element to his game that made him a true playmaker. His ability to thrive in off-script situations, combined with his arm strength, made him a dynamic quarterback prospect with significant NFL upside. Maye’s performance earned him numerous accolades, including sweeping all four major ACC awards (Player of the Year, Offensive Player of the Year, Rookie of the Year, and Offensive Rookie of the Year), joining elite company with Jameis Winston as the only other player to achieve that feat. His combination of size, mobility, and arm strength drew comparisons to top NFL quarterbacks like Justin Herbert and Josh Allen. However, Maye was not without his critics, as concerns about his mechanics and decision-making under pressure would later resurface in his junior season. Drake Maye Took A Step Back In 2023 At UNC Maye’s 2023 season saw a decline in both his numbers and his overall performance. Statistically, he threw for 3,812 yards, 29 touchdowns, and 12 interceptions—still impressive but a notable dip from his breakout sophomore year. His completion percentage dropped to 63%, and his decision-making came into question, particularly when facing more complex defensive schemes. His turnover rate increased, and while his arm strength and playmaking ability were still evident, Maye’s accuracy, especially in the intermediate range, became an issue. One of the primary areas of concern was Maye’s mechanics and footwork. While his arm strength was never in doubt, he often relied too heavily on it, leading to inconsistent accuracy, particularly when he was under pressure. His footwork showed little improvement between his sophomore and junior seasons, as he frequently failed to set his feet properly before making throws. This often resulted in balls being left behind receivers or off-target, leading to stalled drives and missed opportunities. These concerns were compounded by a less-than-ideal supporting cast, with Maye losing his top receiver, Josh Downs, to the NFL. Without Downs and facing tougher defenses, Maye struggled to carry the Tar Heels in the same way he had in 2022. UNC finished the 2023 season 8-5, with Maye still showing flashes of brilliance but unable to fully elevate his team. Despite this regression, Maye’s physical tools and prior performance in 2022 kept him firmly in the conversation as one of the top quarterbacks available in the 2024 NFL Draft. NFL Combine Performance and Draft Position Heading into the 2024 NFL Draft, Drake Maye was still considered one of the premier quarterback prospects, though his stock had fluctuated somewhat due to his 2023 performance. He entered the draft process with the reputation of a player with immense upside but one who also needed refinement, particularly in his mechanics and decision-making. At the NFL Combine, Maye’s measurable traits reinforced what scouts already knew about him. His size—6’4” and 230 pounds—made him one of the more physically imposing quarterbacks in the class. His arms measured 32.25 inches, and his wingspan exceeded 6’4”, all while showing strong agility in positional drills. While Maye chose not to run the 40-yard dash, his work in throwing drills confirmed his elite arm talent, particularly on deep passes. Maye was ultimately selected by the New England Patriots with the third overall pick in the 2024 NFL Draft, after Caleb Williams went to the Chicago Bears at No. 1 and Jayden Daniels to the Washington Commanders at No. 2. Maye’s selection marked the 10th time a North Carolina quarterback had been taken in the NFL Draft and the 25th first-round pick in UNC history. Pre-Draft Scouting: Drake Maye’s Strengths and Weaknesses Strengths Arm Talent : Maye was praised for his arm strength, capable of making all the NFL-level throws, particularly on deep balls. His ability to throw off-platform and push the ball downfield drew comparisons to Josh Allen and Justin Herbert. Mobility and Playmaking : Maye’s ability to extend plays and make off-script throws was one of his standout qualities, drawing comparisons to Patrick Mahomes. His escapability allowed him to create big plays when the structure of a play broke down. Deep Accuracy : Maye was consistently accurate on deep throws in college, often completing difficult passes into tight windows, which gave evaluators confidence that his deep ball would translate well to the NFL. Weaknesses Inconsistent Footwork and Mechanics : One of the most flagged concerns in Maye’s pre-draft scouting report was his inconsistent footwork, especially when he faced pressure. His tendency to throw off his back foot or rely solely on arm strength led to accuracy issues, particularly in the intermediate range. Decision-Making Under Pressure : Maye often struggled to handle complex defensive schemes in college, forcing throws into tight windows and making questionable decisions when blitzed. Intermediate Accuracy : While Maye excelled in pushing the ball downfield, his accuracy in the 10-19 yard range was inconsistent. His mechanics and reliance on arm talent over sound footwork led to a higher rate of missed throws in this area. Film and Data Analysis: Early Trends in the NFL Drake Maye’s first two NFL starts offer a small but meaningful sample to assess how his performance compares to pre-draft expectations, shedding light on his strengths and areas for improvement. Throws vs. Pressure Pre-Draft Evaluation:  Drake Maye’s footwork and mechanics were noted areas of concern, particularly under pressure. His pre-draft scouting report highlighted his reliance on arm strength over proper foot positioning, resulting in inconsistent accuracy—especially on intermediate throws. This habit often left passes slightly behind receivers or off-target in tight windows. First Two NFL Starts:  Drake Maye has shown notable improvement in footwork and mechanics, both in clean pockets and under pressure. Despite this, his completion percentage still drops significantly under pressure—from 69.5% in clean situations to 47.4%—indicating room for further development in handling defensive pressure. Early film evidence suggests he is indeed progressing in his mechanics, with a more consistent foundation whether pressured or in a clean pocket. Comparison: Maye’s early situation is reminiscent of Josh Allen’s initial NFL struggles, as Allen also had to refine his mechanics and footwork to make his arm talent more consistent. Like Allen, Maye has shown flashes of brilliance, but he will need to develop consistency under pressure to unlock his full potential. Accuracy Intermediate Throws (10-19 yards): Pre-Draft Evaluation : Maye’s accuracy in the intermediate range was inconsistent due to his footwork. His scouting report flagged these throws as an area needing refinement, as he often left balls behind his receivers. First Two NFL Starts : Drake Maye's mechanical consistency appears improved in his first two NFL starts. In 2024, he's completed 50% of his intermediate throws for 166 yards, one touchdown, and one interception. His passer rating in this range is 77.5, highlighting an area for continued refinement. Overall, though, his progress looks promising. Deep Throws (20+ yards): Pre-Draft Evaluation : Maye’s deep ball accuracy was one of his strongest traits at UNC, where he consistently connected on vertical passes. His arm strength gave scouts confidence that this skill would translate well to the NFL. First Two NFL Starts : Maye’s deep accuracy has indeed translated. Through two starts, he completed 4 of 6 deep throws (66.7%) for 127 yards and two touchdowns, yielding a passer rating of 149.3. His 40-yard touchdown pass in his debut is a strong early indicator that he can push the ball vertically, a trait that remains one of his strengths. Comparison : Maye’s deep-ball accuracy is reminiscent of Justin Herbert, who also entered the NFL with a reputation for excelling on vertical throws. Like Herbert, Maye’s arm talent enables him to connect on long throws, offering a reliable vertical threat for the Patriots. Performance Under Pressure Pre-Draft Evaluation : Maye’s decision-making under pressure was identified as a weakness, with scouts noting his tendency to force throws into tight coverage. He struggled against complex defensive schemes, often leading to turnovers. First Two NFL Starts : Maye’s struggles under pressure continue in the NFL. His PFF grade under pressure is just 28.1, with a completion rate of 47.4%, which drops significantly from his 69.5% completion rate in a clean pocket. Not all of this is on Drake Maye as the Patriots offensive line is one of the worst in pass pro in the NFL. Comparison : Maye’s early struggles mirror those of Mitchell Trubisky, who also entered the NFL with high potential but often struggled under pressure. For Maye to progress, he’ll need to improve his pocket awareness and speed up his decision-making against complex defenses. Time to Throw: Under 2.5 Seconds vs. Over 2.5 Seconds Pre-Draft Evaluation : Maye was praised for his quick release when necessary, though there were concerns about his tendency to hold onto the ball too long, especially when his first read wasn’t available. First Two NFL Starts : Drake Maye currently ranks in the bottom third of the NFL for time to throw, averaging 2.86 seconds per attempt. His completion rate shifts from 68% on throws under 2.5 seconds to 60% on throws over 2.5 seconds. A consistent theme on tape is his tendency to extend plays, which inflates his time-to-throw numbers—not due to processing issues but because of his ability to keep plays alive. He navigates the pocket well, sidestepping pressure to buy time, and the Patriots incorporate designed rollouts that also contribute to his higher time-to-throw average. Comparison: Maye’s struggles with processing speed resemble those of early-career Sam Darnold, who similarly had difficulty making quick decisions under NFL pressure. Maye will need to refine his processing and develop the ability to make decisive, accurate throws within a tighter time frame. Mobility and Playmaking Pre-Draft : Maye’s playmaking ability was a major asset at UNC, where he rushed for 1,209 yards and 16 touchdowns over two seasons. His scouting report highlighted his ability to extend plays and make throws on the run, which was a key component of his game. NFL Performance : In his first two NFL starts, Maye has shown flashes of this same mobility, including a 15-yard scramble for a first down and a 30-yard pass to Hunter Henry while under pressure. His ability to evade defenders and make off-schedule throws remains a strength, though his decision-making in these situations will be crucial for long-term success. Summary of Data Mobility and Playmaking: Maye’s ability to extend plays and make off-script throws has effectively translated to the NFL, aligning with his college performance. In his first two games, he has demonstrated an impressive 15-yard scramble and a 30-yard pass while under pressure, confirming his escapability and playmaking potential as a foundational strength. Intermediate Accuracy: Maye’s intermediate accuracy has been a point of emphasis since pre-draft evaluations, and early results suggest ongoing inconsistencies. With a current 50% completion rate in the 10-19 yard range, totaling 166 yards, one touchdown, and one interception, his passer rating sits at 77.5. This highlights areas for improvement in footwork and mechanics. However, his tape does show that he’s making strides in this category, signaling promising progress. Deep Ball Accuracy : With a 66.7% completion rate on deep throws (20+ yards), totaling 127 yards and two touchdowns, Maye’s ability to connect on deep vertical throws remains one of his most reliable assets. His passer rating of 149.3 on these throws underscores his strength in this area, as evidenced by his 40-yard touchdown pass in his NFL debut, aligning with pre-draft projections of his deep accuracy. Pressured Throws: Maye’s PFF rating of 28.1 under pressure confirms pre-draft concerns about his decision-making and mechanics when faced with defensive pressure. His completion percentage drops from 69.5% when kept clean to 47.4% when pressured, suggesting this remains a critical area for growth. Additionally, the Patriots' pass-blocking issues are also a contributing factor to Maye’s challenges in these situations. The Path Forward for Drake Maye Drake Maye’s early NFL starts have shown both his strong potential and the developmental areas that need focus. His arm strength, mobility, and deep-ball accuracy are clear assets that match his college profile, but refining his footwork, decision-making under pressure, and intermediate accuracy is essential for him to reach a higher level of consistency. With limited support from the Patriots' offense—lacking a true deep threat at wide receiver and one of the league’s lowest pass-blocking grades—Maye has faced additional challenges that highlight his need for quicker processing and adaptability. Overall, Maye has shown resilience and glimpses of the high-caliber play expected of him as a top draft pick. His raw talent is evident, and with steady improvement, he has the potential to solidify his position as this year’s QB2 or QB3 from the 2024 draft class.

Fantasy Football Week 8 Waiver Targets: Add Tua Tagovailoa, Ray Davis, Jauan Jennings, and Hunter Henry for a boost to your lineup! As we approach Week 8 of the fantasy football season, it's crucial to be proactive and strategic as the playoffs draw nearer. Whether you seek players for an instant boost or future potential, exploring the waiver wire could be the key to success. Here are four essential waiver targets for Week 8, along with a lineup of players worth stashing for later, who might become game-changers as the season unfolds. Waiver Wire Targets (Rostered in less than 50% of leagues) Tua Tagovailoa, QB, Miami Dolphins (30% Rostered) Tua Tagovailoa is set to return in Week 8 after missing time due to injury, and his fantasy value is undeniable. Tua is currently ranked 11th in EPA per game among quarterbacks and leads the NFL in deep passing yards per game (throws of 20+ air yards). His ability to stretch the field will be a major asset for QB-needy teams. Leads the NFL in deep yards per game with 82 passing yards on deep throws. 11th in EPA per game, showcasing his efficiency and effectiveness when healthy. A great matchup in Week 8 against the Cardinals, who give up the 10th most passing yards per game and the 3rd highest EPA per pass attempt, making him a priority add for QB streamers. Ray Davis, RB, Buffalo Bills (14% Rostered) Ray Davis is solidifying his role as the primary handcuff to James Cook in Buffalo. While Cook has carried the majority of the workload, the Bills may look to preserve his health by incorporating more of a 1-2 punch. Davis is primed to see additional opportunities as the season progresses, making him a valuable add for fantasy managers. 51 carries for 213 yards  and an average of 4.2 yards per carry. Yards After Contact (YAC) of 3.5 per attempt , showing his ability to create yardage. He’s one injury away from becoming the RB1 for a high-powered Buffalo offense. Jauan Jennings, WR, San Francisco 49ers (30% Rostered) Jauan Jennings has been a valuable contributor for the 49ers, leading the team in receiving yards with 404 and ranking 13th in the NFL with 16.2 yards per catch. However, Jennings was a surprise addition to the injury report after suffering a hip injury in Week 6. With Aiyuk sidelined, Jennings is positioned for a major role if healthy, but his Week 8 status needs to be monitored closely. Leads the 49ers in receiving yards (404) and ranks 10th in EPA per target. Playing 58.3% of offensive snaps, offering solid volume potential. Monitor his hip injury status, as he could be a key target in Week 8 against the Cardinals if cleared to play. Hunter Henry, TE, New England Patriots (27% Rostered) Hunter Henry reasserted himself as a key target in the Patriots' offense in Week 7, catching 8 passes for 92 yards on 9 targets. He’s one of the few tight ends with top-five weekly upside, though he has been inconsistent in recent seasons. Henry has TE1 potential moving forward, especially with Maye relying on him heavily in the Patriots' offense. 8 receptions, 92 yards (11.5 YPR) on 9 targets, leading all Patriots' pass-catchers. Averaging 5.5 receptions and 66.5 yards over the last 2 games. 20% target share with rookie QB Drake Maye at the helm. Stash 'em for later These players are flying under the radar but have the potential to become significant fantasy contributors down the stretch. Get ahead of your league and stash them now. Noah Gray, TE, Kansas City Chiefs (1% Rostered) Gray has seen increased usage due to the Chiefs shifting to 12 personnel with JuJu Smith-Schuster sidelined. He’s becoming more involved and led the team with 66 receiving yards in Week 7. Key Stat:  Four receptions for 66 yards in Week 7. Reason:  Could see more targets with continued 12 personnel usage, making him a sneaky tight-end option. Blake Corum, RB, Los Angeles Rams (5% Rostered) Corum’s role is expanding in the Rams' offense, and he has the potential to take over in the event of an injury to Kyren Williams. Key Stat:  Played 35% of offensive snaps in Week 6. Reason:  A valuable handcuff with upside if an injury occurs. Sean Tucker, RB, Tampa Bay Buccaneers (11% Rostered) Tucker shined in Week 6, and with Rachaad White potentially missing more time, Tucker could emerge as a key contributor in the Buccaneers' backfield. Key Stat:  192 total yards and 2 touchdowns on 17 touches in Week 6. Reason:  Potential league-winner if White continues to miss time. Kimani Vidal, RB, Los Angeles Chargers (8% Rostered) Vidal is backing up J.K. Dobbins but could see an expanded role with Gus Edwards sidelined, offering value as a handcuff with potential for more. Key Stat:  Scored a 38-yard touchdown on his first touch in Week 6. Reason:  A great stash option as the primary backup to Dobbins. Ricky Pearsall, WR, San Francisco 49ers (4% Rostered) With Brandon Aiyuk dealing with an ACL injury, Pearsall could step into a larger role in the 49ers' offense. Key Stat:  Pearsall is set to see an increased role due to injuries in the receiving corps. Reason:  Worth a stash as he could become more involved with Aiyuk out.

DeAndre Hopkins' contested-catch ability can boost Mahomes' red zone efficiency in 2024, turning more of his 92.3% on-target throws into TDs. While DeAndre Hopkins is expected to improve the Kansas City Chiefs' offense overall, one key area that deserves a closer look is red zone passing in 2024 . Given the Chiefs’ struggles in converting red zone opportunities into touchdowns, Hopkins could be a reason for optimism, particularly when it comes to improving Patrick Mahomes' efficiency when targeting outside wide receivers. Evaluating Deandre Hopkins' Endzone Target Efficiency in the Redzone (2021-23) From 2021-2023, in the red zone, Hopkins was targeted 22 times on throws to the endzone , catching 8 TDs  with an 88% catchable throw rate . These numbers aren’t necessarily elite—players like Mike Evans  had 34 end zone targets , 17 TDs , and a 49% catch rate  during the same period. Similarly, Davante Adams  had 31 end zone targets , 16 TDs , and a 53% catch rate . While Hopkins’ end zone catch rate (39%) might not stand out, his contested-catch ability in tight spaces makes him an invaluable asset in the red zone. DeAndre Hopkins : 39% catch rate, 8 TDs Mike Evans : 49% catch rate, 17 TDs Davante Adams : 53% catch rate, 16 TDs Patrick Mahomes' performance in the red zone passing game in 2024 has been subpar, but the blame cannot solely be placed on him. Looking at Patrick Mahomes' 2024 red zone passing numbers , there’s a clear gap between his accuracy and his scoring output. Mahomes has an elite 92.3% on-target throw rate  in the red zone, but his completion rate  is at 69.2% , and his TD rate  sits at just 15.4% . Compare that to other quarterbacks in 2024: Josh Allen : 15 attempts, 26.7% TD rate, 53.3% completion rate, 80% on-target throw rate Joe Burrow : 22 attempts, 27.3% TD rate, 50% completion rate, 85% on-target throw rate Justin Herbert : 12 attempts, 25% TD rate, 66.7% completion rate, 75% on-target throw rate Despite Mahomes' accuracy, his red zone efficiency when it comes to touchdowns is notably lower than other top QBs. This is where Hopkins can make a huge difference. Hopkins' contested-catch ability and success in tight spaces, especially in the end zone, can help Mahomes convert more of those on-target throws into touchdowns. Not only will Hopkins likely become the primary target , but his presence will demand additional defensive attention, freeing up more opportunities for Travis Kelce , Xavier Worthy , and even the run game in critical red zone situations.

Indiana coach Curt Cignetti, boasting a 119-35 record, declared "Google me" on Signing Day, highlighting his winning legacy to attract top recruits. Indiana Football’s Turnaround Under Curt Cignetti: A Masterclass in Culture Change, Talent Development, and Strategic Leadership When Curt Cignetti took over as head coach of the Indiana Hoosiers in 2024, he didn’t just inherit a football team—he inherited a program in desperate need of an identity and direction. With over 40 years of coaching experience and an impressive head coaching record of 119-35, Cignetti wasted no time making his impact. His bold statement to recruits on National Signing Day— “Google me” —wasn’t just bravado. It was a declaration of his proven success and a promise that Indiana football would be different under his leadership. “It’s pretty simple. I win. Google me.” - Indiana Head Football Coach Curt Cignetti Building a Winning Culture: The Foundation of Indiana’s Resurgence The key to Indiana’s resurgence has been Cignetti’s ability to instill a winning mindset throughout the program. Upon arriving in Bloomington, he immediately set about rebuilding the roster, bringing in 54 new players, including 30 via the transfer portal. However, more important than the roster overhaul was Cignetti’s focus on creating a culture of discipline, effort, and accountability—a philosophy he has carried with him throughout his successful coaching career. Curt Cignetti’s Coaching Progression Before arriving at Indiana, Cignetti’s resume featured success at nearly every stop: Pitt  – Graduate Assistant (1983) Davidson  – Offensive Coordinator/Wide Receivers Coach (1985-1986) Rice  – Wide Receivers Coach (1987-1992) Temple  – Quarterbacks and Wide Receivers Coach (1993-1999) NC State  – Offensive Coordinator/Quarterbacks Coach (2000-2006): Helped recruit and coach future NFL quarterbacks Philip Rivers and Russell Wilson. Alabama  – Wide Receivers Coach/Recruiting Coordinator (2007-2010): Part of the 2009 National Championship team, coached Julio Jones and recruited Heisman winner Mark Ingram. As a head coach, Cignetti turned around programs such as: IUP (2011-2016) : 53-17 record, three NCAA playoff appearances. Elon (2017-2018) : 14-9 record, back-to-back playoff appearances. James Madison (2019-2023) : 43-8 record, including an 11-1 season in their transition to FBS in 2023. At Indiana, Cignetti’s ability to identify and develop talent—whether through recruiting or the transfer portal—has driven the Hoosiers to their best start since 1967. The Role of Derek Owings: Building Mental and Physical Toughness Strength and conditioning coach Derek Owings  has been a transformative figure for Indiana football, playing a crucial role in the team's 2024 success. Following Curt Cignetti  from James Madison, Owings has turned Indiana’s weight room into the foundation for both physical and mental development. His philosophy of “continuous improvement” extends beyond physical conditioning, focusing on building discipline and accountability that mirrors Cignetti’s vision for the program. The Importance of Staff Continuity: Offensive and Defensive Coordinators Equally important to Indiana’s rapid turnaround is the continuity of Cignetti’s coaching staff , particularly Mike Shanahan  (offensive coordinator) and Bryant Haines  (defensive coordinator). Both followed Cignetti from James Madison, bringing a deep understanding of his system. This seamless integration has been essential in creating a cohesive, disciplined culture. Under Shanahan, Indiana’s offense has exploded, currently ranking 3rd in FBS with 48.7 points per game. His ability to implement Cignetti’s strategic vision has maximized the talents of key players like Kurtis Rourke and Justice Ellison. Meanwhile, Haines has transformed the defense, which now ranks 6th nationally in yards allowed per game (268.5 YPG). His disciplined, aggressive approach complements Shanahan’s high-powered offense, giving Indiana balance and consistency. Unified Vision: A Key to Indiana’s Resurgence The success of Indiana football in 2024 is a testament to the unified vision shared by Cignetti, Owings, Shanahan, and Haines. Their combined efforts have instilled discipline, accountability, and a relentless pursuit of excellence throughout the program. The result is a 7-0 record, with Indiana excelling on both sides of the ball—a level of success the program hasn’t experienced in decades. Together, they have built a winning program that combines offensive firepower with defensive resilience, laying the foundation for sustained success. Transfer Portal Success: A Game-Changer for Indiana A critical part of Cignetti’s success in 2024 has been his mastery of the transfer portal. Indiana executed one of the most comprehensive roster overhauls in college football during the offseason, using the portal to bring in experienced, impact players across all positions. This ability to blend new talent with the existing roster has been key to Indiana’s resurgence. Key Transfer Additions and Their Impact Kurtis Rourke (QB, Ohio) 2024 Stats : 1,941 passing yards, 15 TDs, 74.6% completion rate (3rd in FBS).Rourke’s leadership has been vital to Indiana’s 7-0 start. His ability to perform under pressure—evidenced by his perfect 9-of-9 on third downs against Nebraska—has transformed Indiana’s offense. Justice Ellison (RB, Wake Forest) 2024 Stats : 514 rushing yards, 7.0 YPC, 8 TDs.Ellison has provided the explosiveness Indiana’s ground game needed, helping the team average over 200 rushing yards per game. Elijah Sarratt (WR, James Madison) 2024 Stats : 578 receiving yards, 18.1 YPR, 3 TDs.Sarratt has emerged as a deep threat, stretching defenses and making Indiana’s passing attack one of the most dangerous in the Big Ten. Mikail Kamara (DL, James Madison) 2024 Stats : 6 sacks, 42 sack yards.Kamara has anchored a defensive line that leads the Big Ten in sacks, applying relentless pressure and disrupting opponents’ offensive game plans. Aiden Fisher (LB, James Madison): 2024 Stats : 66 tackles, 1.5 sacks.Fisher’s leadership on defense has made Indiana tougher and more resilient, allowing them to rank among the nation’s best in key defensive categories. Indiana’s Recruiting and Talent Rankings: A Year-Over-Year Comparison While Cignetti has excelled in the transfer portal, Indiana’s recruiting rankings, as measured by 247Sports’ Team Talent Composite , have seen some fluctuations over the past four years. 2021 : Ranked 38th, 2-10 record. 2022 : Ranked 39th, 4-8 record. 2023 : Ranked 47th, 3-9 record. 2024 : Ranked 57th, 7-0 record (despite a perceived drop in talent). Despite a perceived decline in recruiting class rankings, Cignetti has shown that success isn’t always tied to star ratings. His ability to develop players and maximize their potential—regardless of recruiting rankings—has been instrumental in Indiana’s success. The Results Speak for Themselves: Year-Over-Year Improvement The most dramatic evidence of Indiana’s turnaround is in the numbers. Compared to the 2023 season, the Hoosiers have improved in almost every key metric: Offensive Improvements: Scoring Offense : 27.0 PPG (2023) → 48.7 PPG (2024) | +21.7 PPG 3rd Down Conversion : 36.69% (2023) → 54.17% (2024) | +17.48% Rushing Yards Per Game : 120.9 (2023) → 202.4 (2024) | +81.5 YPG Defensive Improvements: Total Yards Allowed Per Game : 333.7 (2023) → 268.5 (2024) | -65.2 YPG 3rd Down Conversion Allowed : 36.69% (2023) → 35.06% (2024) | -1.63% Rushing Yards Allowed Per Game : 120.9 (2023) → 93.5 (2024) | -27.4 YPG These improvements highlight the impact of Cignetti’s coaching philosophy and staff continuity. Indiana's Uncharted Path: Can Cignetti's Hoosiers Defy the Odds in 2024? Indiana’s 7-0 start in 2024 has launched the Hoosiers into uncharted territory, currently ranked No. 13 in the nation and emerging as serious contenders for the Big Ten title. However, their toughest challenges lie ahead. With upcoming games against Washington, Michigan, and Ohio State, Indiana faces one of the most difficult remaining schedules in the country. ESPN’s FPI ranks Indiana's overall strength of schedule (SOS) at 109th, but their remaining SOS is ranked 17th, highlighting the steep road ahead as they look to extend their historic run. Indiana Has Been A Perennial Doormat Throughout Its History This success is even more remarkable when compared to Indiana football’s history of mediocrity. The Hoosiers have only won two Big Ten titles, with the last coming in 1967 when they went 9-2 and made their lone Rose Bowl appearance. Historically overshadowed by the university’s basketball program, Indiana football has averaged just 3.9 wins per season since 1884. Even over the past two decades, prior to 2024, they averaged 4.5 wins and 7.3 losses, with only 12 total bowl appearances—a testament to their long-standing struggles to sustain success. The 1967 season has been the high-water mark for Indiana football, but the 2020 season under Tom Allen offered a glimpse of potential. That year, the Hoosiers went 6-2 in a pandemic-shortened season, beating Michigan and Penn State while losing by one score to Ohio State. However, it was viewed as the program’s ceiling—flashes of competitiveness but never quite reaching elite status. The 2024 season under Curt Cignetti has the potential to surpass that. If Indiana can win out, or even lose only to Ohio State while keeping it close, they would be in contention for a Big Ten Championship Game appearance and a possible College Football Playoff berth—unprecedented for the program. This would be a monumental achievement, not only elevating Indiana football to new heights but cementing Cignetti’s legacy as one of the sport’s top coaches.

Ashton Jeanty is on pace for the greatest single season ever by a college football RB since Barry Sanders in 1988. Ashton Jeanty Is Pacing the Greatest Season Ever by a College Football RB Ashton Jeanty is on pace for a historic season at Boise State, potentially challenging Barry Sanders' NCAA single-season rushing record of 2,628 yards set in 1988. Through six games, Jeanty has 1,248 rushing yards, averaging 208 per game. Over a 12-game season, Jeanty would reach 2,496 yards, just shy of Sanders’ mark. However, with a likely Mountain West Championship and bowl game, Jeanty could play 14 games, putting him on pace to reach 2,912 yards, surpassing Sanders. Jeanty’s efficiency makes his chase even more remarkable, as he averages 9.9 yards per carry, gaining nearly a first down on every touch. While Sanders averaged 238.9 yards per game, Jeanty’s consistency and extra games give him a chance to break the record. If he stays healthy, Jeanty could solidify his place in college football history. The Advanced Data Proves Just How Elite Ashton Jeanty Is Jeanty's exceptional performance this season is evident in his 914 yards gained after contact. This figure alone would position him in second place for total rushing yards among all FBS backs in 2024. Additionally, his average of 152 yards after contact per game accounts for 73% of his total rushing yards per game. If he participates in 14 games, he is on track to exceed 2,000 yards after contact. Load The Box, It won't Matter So far this season, Jeanty has faced one of the highest loaded box rates (27.8% of rushes against 8+ defenders) compared to other high-volume running backs. Despite this, he maintains an impressive average of 9.9 yards per carry. His blend of strength and agility renders him difficult to contain, even when up against a loaded box. How Does Ashton Jeanty Compare to Recent High-End NFL RB Prospects? Ashton Jeanty's physical and athletic traits place him among the most elite running back prospects in recent years, drawing comparisons to NFL stars like Christian McCaffrey, Saquon Barkley and Bijan Robinson. At 5-foot-9 and 215 pounds, Jeanty’s raw lower body power (605-lb squat) combined with his low center of gravity and compact frame gives him elite contact balance, making it difficult for defenders to bring him down. When comparing Jeanty’s numbers to other top NFL RB prospects like Barkley, McCaffrey, and Bijan Robinson, he excels in crucial metrics such as yards after contact per rush and missed tackles forced percentage (44%). Through six games, Jeanty has accumulated 7.25 yards after contact per rush, surpassing McCaffrey, Barkley, and even Robinson during their college careers. His ability to create yards after contact, combined with the ability to break long runs, places him at the top of the list of most desirable NFL Draft prospects at the running back position in the last 10 years. While he may not possess the blazing speed of Saquon Barkley or Breece Hall, his power and contact balance make him a unique threat. Ashton Jeanty Is Chasing History, The Heisman, And A Top 10 Spot In The 2025 NFL Draft Jeanty is undoubtedly the top running back in college football, with the majority of NFL scouts considering him the top prospect at his position for the 2025 NFL Draft. If Jeanty can maintain this performance, he could potentially make history in college football, surpassing NFL legend Barry Sanders as the leading rusher in a single season and possibly becoming the greatest college football running back of all time.

We're nearing the halfway point of fantasy football! It's time for bold moves. Check out Week 7 waiver wire, trade targets, and stash players! We’re approaching the halfway point of the fantasy football regular season, and whether you’re riding high or desperately needing a win, now is the time to make bold moves. Below are four key waiver wire and trade targets for Week 7, followed by a list of "Stash Them for Later" players who could become league winners down the stretch. Fantasy Football Waiver Wire Targets Drake Maye, QB, New England Patriots (3.8% Rostered) Drake Maye showed flashes of his potential in his NFL debut in Week 6. Despite facing constant pressure from the Texans’ front, Maye displayed poise, delivering three touchdowns and even contributing with his legs. His rushing ability adds an exciting element for fantasy managers. Threw for 243 yards and 3 touchdowns , adding 38 rushing yards. Faces a favorable matchup against the Jaguars in Week 7. Strong dual-threat option for QB-needy teams in 1QB leagues. Isaac Guerendo, RB, San Francisco 49ers (0.9% Rostered) Isaac Guerendo took full advantage of his opportunity in Week 6 after Jordan Mason went down with a shoulder injury. Guerendo's elite speed and big-play ability were on full display, making him a high-priority waiver wire addition as the 49ers look for stability in their backfield. Rushed for 99 yards on 10 carries , including a 76-yard run. With Mason’s status uncertain, Guerendo could see an increased workload. Shanahan’s system has historically produced fantasy-relevant RBs, making Guerendo a must-add. Demario Douglas, WR, New England Patriots (21.1% Rostered) Demario Douglas has quickly become one of Drake Maye’s favorite targets, emerging as the Patriots' top pass-catching option. His speed and ability to create separation have made him a reliable fantasy option, especially in deeper leagues. 6 catches for 92 yards and 1 touchdown  on 9 targets in Week 6. Continues to grow chemistry with Maye, making him a WR3/flex option. Facing a Jaguars secondary that has struggled to contain receivers, he’s set for another strong week. Zach Ertz, TE, Washington Commanders (53.6% Rostered) Zach Ertz continues to be a steady fantasy performer, seeing consistent targets every week. While he hasn’t found the end zone recently, his role in Washington's offense makes him one of the more reliable tight ends, especially in PPR leagues. Caught 4 passes for 68 yards  on 5 targets in Week 6. His consistent usage makes him a safe TE option in an unpredictable position. With the Commanders’ offense clicking, Ertz remains a valuable pickup. Stash 'em for later These players might not be immediate starters but have the potential to become significant fantasy contributors as the season progresses. Grab them now and hold for later. Joe Flacco, QB, Indianapolis Colts (2.5% Rostered) Flacco has provided stability in the Colts' offense and could be a viable option if you need a bye-week fill-in or backup quarterback. Key Stat:  Over 225 passing yards in each of his starts. Reason:  With a favorable upcoming schedule, he’s a smart stash for QB depth. Blake Corum, RB, Los Angeles Rams (5.1% Rostered) Corum is starting to see increased involvement in the Rams’ offense and has the skillset to take over if the starter gets injured. Key Stat:  Played 35% of offensive snaps in Week 6. Reason:  A valuable handcuff with upside if an injury occurs. Sean Tucker, RB, Tampa Bay Buccaneers (1.0% Rostered) Tucker stepped up in Week 6 with Rachaad White sidelined, showcasing his ability to handle a significant workload. Key Stat:  192 total yards and 2 touchdowns on 17 touches. Reason:  If White continues to miss time, Tucker could emerge as a league winner. Kimani Vidal, RB, Los Angeles Chargers (2.3% Rostered) Vidal is behind J.K. Dobbins on the depth chart but is poised to take on a larger role with Gus Edwards sidelined. Key Stat:  Scored a touchdown on his first touch, a 38-yard reception in Week 6. Reason:  A great handcuff with potential value as a Dobbins backup. Michael Wilson, WR, Arizona Cardinals (18.4% Rostered) Wilson has quietly produced consistent fantasy numbers and could see an even bigger role if the Cardinals' top receiver remains sidelined. Key Stat:  26 targets over the last four weeks. Reason:  A solid depth option with WR3 potential if the starter remains out. Xavier Legette, WR, Carolina Panthers (28.9% Rostered) Legette has become a go-to target in Carolina’s offense, especially with injuries to their receiving corps. Key Stat:  2 double-digit fantasy games in his last three outings. Reason:  He’s trending upward and could become a consistent WR3/flex option. Rashod Bateman, WR, Baltimore Ravens (5.9% Rostered) Bateman has started to solidify his role in the Ravens’ offense, making him a viable stash for the remainder of the season. Key Stat:  12 targets in the last two weeks. Reason:  As the Ravens’ WR2, he has upside in a high-powered offense.

Oregon vs. Ohio State: NFL scouts will be watching closely as Ohio State faces Oregon in a 2024 season showdown featuring top draft prospects from both powerhouse teams. The Ohio State Buckeyes and Oregon Ducks are set for one of the most anticipated matchups of the 2024 college football season. Both teams are loaded with talent, and this game will showcase numerous 2025 NFL Draft prospects. Scouts will be watching closely as the Buckeyes and Ducks put their top players on display. Below are the top prospects from each team, divided by offense and defense. Top NFL Draft Prospects: Oregon vs. Ohio State Matchup Ohio State Buckeyes Offensive Prospects And Matchup Analysis Ohio State’s offense has been firing on all cylinders, boasting an impressive average of 6.2 yards per carry and a staggering 221.6 rushing yards per game, placing them second in yards per attempt nationally among Power Four teams. The tandem of TreVeyon Henderson, who averages an explosive 8.0 yards per carry, and Quinshon Judkins, with 7.8 yards per carry, provides a one-two punch that combines speed, vision, and physicality, making them an unpredictable and versatile threat. Anchored by a strong offensive line, including key contributors like Josh Simmons (PFF grade: 89.0) and Donovan Jackson, the Buckeyes have consistently created wide-open lanes, which have allowed their backs to maximize yardage after contact and sustain long drives. However, while quarterback Will Howard maintains a solid 71.5% completion rate, his deep passing has shown inconsistency, completing just 5 of 11 passes over 20 yards for 196 yards—an area Oregon’s defense will look to exploit. For Henderson, Judkins, and Emeka Egbuka, who is also emerging as a top target in the passing game, this matchup is pivotal as they are all vying for early-round consideration in the 2025 NFL Draft; their performances against Oregon’s aggressive defense will be closely scrutinized by scouts. Emeka Egbuka, WR Egbuka stands out as Ohio State’s top receiver, demonstrating excellent route-running skills, ball tracking, and the ability to make plays at all levels of the field. This season, he already has more receiving touchdowns than he did last year, showcasing his growth as a go-to target for the Buckeyes. TreVeyon Henderson, RB Henderson is a versatile back with three-down capabilities. His explosiveness and vision make him a consistent big-play threat. He’s also dependable in pass protection and effective as a pass-catcher, traits that will appeal to NFL scouts. Quinshon Judkins, RB A transfer from the SEC, Judkins has adapted quickly, averaging 7.8 yards per carry this season. His quick decision-making and athleticism have made him an impactful player in Ohio State's offense. Scouts want to see more from him as a blocker to further elevate his draft stock. Donovan Jackson, LG Jackson is a versatile interior lineman known for his strong hands and ability to engage effectively with defensive linemen. His agility allows him to excel in a zone-blocking scheme, and his strength makes him effective in a power scheme as well. Josh Simmons, LT Simmons is a nimble and athletic tackle who has shown great improvements in his pass protection and run blocking this season. With no penalties or sacks allowed so far, he has become a key asset on the Buckeyes’ offensive line. Defensive Prospects And Matchup Analysis Ohio State’s defense has established itself as a force to be reckoned with, ranking 3rd among Power Four teams by limiting opponents to a mere 3.2 yards per carry and just 90.2 rushing yards per game. The front seven, led by dominant players like Tyleik Williams (PFF grade: 91.8) and Jack Sawyer (PFF grade: 85.1), has proven adept at controlling the trenches, frequently disrupting opponents’ run schemes and collapsing pockets with a 27.5% stuff rate that highlights their aggressive approach. Edge rushers Jack Sawyer and J.T. Tuimoloau bring relentless pressure, making it difficult for opposing quarterbacks to find rhythm. The Buckeye secondary is spearheaded by standout defenders Denzel Burke and safety Lathan Ransom (PFF grade: 93.8), providing a reliable backstop. Ransom’s instinctive play, combined with fellow safety Caleb Downs’ support (PFF grade: 76.6) and Jordan Hancock’s coverage ability, ensures that Ohio State’s defense remains adaptable against the run and the pass. With Williams, Burke, and Sawyer projected as top prospects for the 2025 NFL Draft, their ability to dominate this high-stakes matchup and prove themselves against a dynamic Oregon offense will significantly impact their draft evaluations and stock. Denzel Burke, CB Burke is an instinctive cover corner who competes aggressively. This season, he has not allowed a reception over 20 yards, showcasing his ability to keep plays in front of him. His competitive nature and athleticism will be tested against Oregon’s receiving corps. J.T. Tuimoloau, EDGE Tuimoloau is a versatile edge defender who excels at setting the edge and rushing the passer. He leads the Buckeyes in tackles for loss and sacks this season. NFL teams will be watching to see if he can dominate against Oregon's talented offensive line. Jack Sawyer, EDGE Sawyer combines an explosive first step with physical hands, making him an effective pass rusher. His ability to pressure the quarterback consistently has been key for Ohio State, and he’ll look to have a major impact against the Ducks. Lathan Ransom, S Ransom’s read-react skills and closing speed make him a standout safety. Though he’s still developing in zone coverage, his ability to diagnose and react quickly against the run and in short coverage will be crucial against Oregon’s offense. Tyleik Williams, DT Williams is a force on the interior, known for his power and leverage. After returning from injury, he looked dominant in Ohio State’s win over Iowa, especially against the run. He projects as a three-down player at the next level if he continues his strong play. Oregon Ducks Offensive Prospects And Matchup Analysis Oregon’s offense, led by quarterback Dillon Gabriel, has been dynamic, averaging 4.6 yards per carry and 164.4 rushing yards per game. Gabriel has excelled as a rhythm passer, maintaining a high 78% completion rate and amassing 1,449 yards with 11 touchdowns, but the pressure will be on him to perform against Ohio State’s relentless pass rush. Oregon’s offensive line, which includes standout players like Josh Conerly Jr. (PFF grade: 77.7) and Iapani Laloulu (PFF grade: 81.1), has been effective in protecting Gabriel and opening lanes for lead back Jordan James, who averages 6.3 yards per carry. James’ ability to gain yards after contact is central to Oregon’s ground game success, but the challenge will be maintaining this efficiency against an Ohio State front known for its physicality and run-stopping prowess. With Gabriel, James, and key playmakers like Tez Johnson and Terrance Ferguson eyeing the 2025 NFL Draft, this matchup will serve as a crucial test; their ability to navigate Ohio State’s defense, create explosive plays, and maintain consistency will be pivotal for both the game’s outcome and their NFL aspirations. Dillon Gabriel, QB Gabriel is a rhythm passer who excels in an up-tempo offense. Despite his high completion percentage this season, his red zone accuracy needs improvement. A strong performance against Ohio State’s defense could elevate his draft stock. Jordan James, RB James has emerged as Oregon’s lead back, averaging 6.3 yards per carry. Known for his contact balance and ability to create yardage after contact, he’s a name scouts are watching as he continues to develop in the Ducks’ offense. Ajani Cornelius, RT Cornelius, a transfer from Rhode Island, has been inconsistent this season but possesses the tools NFL teams value in an offensive tackle. His performance against Ohio State’s pass rushers will be critical in evaluating his draft potential. Josh Conerly Jr., LT A former five-star recruit, Conerly has shown flashes of potential but needs to build consistency. Scouts will be watching closely to see if he can hold his own against Ohio State’s top edge rushers. Terrance Ferguson, TE Ferguson is a versatile tight end who can create mismatches in the passing game. His size and reliable hands make him an intriguing prospect, particularly in red-zone situations. Improvement as a blocker will be key to his draft evaluation. Defensive Prospects And Matchup Analysis Oregon’s defense, while effective in spots, shows vulnerabilities, particularly against the run. They currently allow 4.8 yards per carry and 117.8 rushing yards per game, ranking them 41st among Power Four teams in terms of rushing yards allowed per game. Key defenders like edge rusher Jordan Burch (PFF grade: 63.9) and interior lineman Derrick Harmon (PFF grade: 64.7) will be critical in generating pressure and plugging gaps to limit Ohio State’s dynamic ground attack. Oregon’s secondary is led by Jabbar Muhammad (PFF grade: 72.9), who has shown some resilience—particularly when the defensive line creates pressure—the defense struggles in non-pressured scenarios, allowing an average of 11.1 yards per attempt on deep throws and area the Buckeyes will likely target. Brandon Johnson has also stepped up this season, showing improved coverage skills, but without consistent disruption from the front, the secondary risks exposure against Ohio State’s talented receiving corps. With several of these defenders, including Burch and Harmon, being evaluated as potential early-round 2025 NFL Draft candidates, their performance in containing Ohio State’s offense will be instrumental in to increasing their NFL Draft stock and the overall outcome of this pivotal matchup. Jordan Burch, EDGE Burch, a powerful edge rusher, combines size and explosiveness to create pressure off the edge. He’s shown the ability to collapse the pocket and is expected to be a disruptive force against Ohio State’s offensive line. Jeffrey Bassa, LB Bassa was an All-Pac-12 defender last year but needs to show more consistency in his play. A strong performance against Ohio State’s offense could help him recapture the attention of NFL scouts. Jabbar Muhammad, CB Despite being undersized, Muhammad has a knack for finding the football. His instinctive ball skills could be his ticket to the NFL, though his speed and size will be closely evaluated against Ohio State’s talented receivers. Derrick Harmon, DT Harmon has been a revelation for Oregon, leading all FBS interior defensive linemen in pressures this season. His disruptive quickness makes him a tough matchup, and he could play a pivotal role in slowing down Ohio State’s run game. Bryce Boettcher, LB A dual-sport athlete with the Ducks, Boettcher has shown a high football IQ and physicality on the field. Scouts will be paying attention to his ability to cover Ohio State’s versatile offense and contribute in the run game.