Search Results

In the 2023 Fiesta Bowl, the undefeated Liberty Flames will be led by QB Kaidon Salter, who is expected to play. Salter has been instrumental in Liberty's success, while CB Kobe Singleton is also expected to play and will be much needed vs. the Ducks offense. The Oregon Ducks, with an 11-2 record, rely on senior QB Bo Nix, a Heisman finalist expected to play while also being draft-eligible in 2024. The Ducks face challenges with significant opt-outs, including WR Troy Franklin and others, which might impact their offensive efficiency and ability to get stops on defense. This matchup highlights Liberty's offensive versatility against Oregon's adaptability amidst key player opt-outs. Liberty Flames (13-0) Key Player: QB Kaidon Salter Draft Eligible Year: Likely 2024 or 2025, depending on his decision to declare early. Significance: Salter is the driving force behind Liberty's offense, leading them to an undefeated season with his impressive total yards and touchdowns. Opt-Out Status: Expected to play. X-Factor: CB Kobe Singleton Draft Eligible Year: Potentially 2024. Significance: Singleton's defensive prowess, with four interceptions, will be vital against Oregon's potent passing game. Opt-Out Status: Expected to play. Oregon Ducks (11-2) Key Player: QB Bo Nix Draft Eligible Year: 2024, as a senior. Significance: Nix, a Heisman finalist, is crucial to Oregon's offensive strength, boasting significant passing yards and touchdowns. Opt-Out Status: Expected to play. X-Factor: RB Jordan James Draft Eligible Year: Likely 2025 or later. Significance: With the potential absence of Bucky Irving, James’ role in the ground game becomes increasingly important. Opt-Out Status: Expected to play. Notable Opt-Outs: WR Troy Franklin (NFL Draft): Significant loss for Oregon's receiving corps. C Jackson Powers-Johnson (NFL Draft): Key offensive line player; absence affects line protection and run blocking. DL Popo Aumavae (NFL Draft): Impactful on defense, especially in run stopping and pass rush. CB Khyree Jackson (NFL Draft): Key component of Oregon's secondary, crucial in pass defense. Key Matchup Dynamics Liberty's Offensive Versatility vs. Oregon's Defense: Liberty’s offense, led by Salter, will test Oregon’s defense, which has to adapt to the absence of key players like Aumavae and Jackson. Oregon's Adaptability without Key Players: Oregon’s challenge will be maintaining offensive efficiency and defensive integrity despite significant opt-outs.

Florida State faces a massive challenge in the Orange Bowl against Georgia due to numerous key player opt-outs and transfers. This situation offers an early look at Florida State's potential 2024 roster and the depth and talent of the Georgia Bulldogs. Florida State Seminoles: Significant Player Opt-Outs and Draft Prospects Opt-Outs and Transfers: WR Keon Coleman: NFL draft opt-out, major loss for FSU's receiving corps. DE Jared Verse: NFL draft opt-out, significant impact on the defensive line. RB Trey Benson: Opt-out, the team's leading rusher. QB Tate Rodemaker: Transfer Portal departure, affecting the quarterback depth. Additional Opt-Outs/Transfers: WR Johnny Wilson, TE Jaheim Bell, and others. Key Draft Prospects Expected To Play: Braden Fiske (DT): Top 2024 prospect, known for his strong play and high energy. Kalen DeLoach (LB): 2024 prospect, versatile and dynamic defender. Patrick Payton (EDGE, 2025): Future prospect with impressive length and flexibility. FSU Season Recap: Challenged by injuries, notably to QB Jordan Travis. Strong season finish but missed the College Football Playoff due to ranking drop. FSU Orange Bowl Strategy: Relying on depth and resilience, testing lesser-known players against a tough opponent. Georgia Bulldogs: Player Status and Draft Prospects Player Status: TE Brock Bowers: Questionable (Ankle/Possible Opt-Out). OT Amarius Mims: Injury concern, unclear participation. CB Kamari Lassiter: Top-50 2024 prospect, playing in the Orange Bowl. DB Javon Bullard: Versatile 2024 prospect. QB Carson Beck (2025): Potential leading quarterback for the 2025 draft. UGA Team Strengths: Less impacted by opt-outs, maintaining a cohesive and strong roster. UGA Orange Bowl Strategy: Capitalize on Florida State's weakened roster by exploiting key player absences. Key Matchup Dynamics FSU's Adaptability: Can FSU overcome the loss of key players and show depth? Georgia's Roster Advantage: Will Georgia's intact roster lead to a decisive victory?

Overview The upcoming Peach Bowl featuring Penn State and Ole Miss is notable for minimal player opt-outs, a trend contrasting with other non-playoff bowl games. This can be attributed to various factors, including the cultural influence of coaches, draft prospect status, and transfer portal activity. Key Factors Influencing Player Participation James Franklin and Lane Kiffin's Cultural Influence: Both coaches have fostered a competitive spirit, influencing players to participate in bowl games. Limited Top Draft Prospects on Ole Miss: Lane Kiffin notes the absence of top draft prospects on his team, potentially reducing opt-outs. Transfer Portal Activity: Kiffin's active engagement contrasts with Penn State Head Coach James Franklin's roster stability. Full Roster Participation for Penn State: Despite having early-round draft prospects, Penn State expects full roster availability. Official Opt-Outs Penn State: DE Chop Robinson (Junior) - Expected first-round pick. Ole Miss: DE Cedric Johnson (Senior) - Notable 2023 performance. Players with Undecided Status OT Olu Fashanu (Senior, Penn State): Top-10 draft pick, status for Peach Bowl uncertain. CB Kalen King (Junior, Penn State): Challenging season, draft decision pending. CB Johnny Dixon (Senior, Penn State): Accepted Senior Bowl invitation, Peach Bowl status undecided. Future NFL Draft Stock Analysis with Eligible Years Ole Miss: Jaxson Dart (QB): Eligible 2024/2025. Strengths in mobility and arm strength; needs consistency in deep throws. Quinshon Judkins (RB): Eligible 2025. Excel in break tackle ability and agility; needs improvement in pass catching. Penn State: Nicholas Singleton (RB): Eligible 2025. Known for speed and vision; requires better pass protection skills. Drew Allar (QB): Eligible potentially 2025 or later. Strong in ball security; needs to improve in deep ball accuracy.

Here's a breakdown of the 2024 NFL Draft prospects from Ohio State and Missouri who will be active in the 2023 Cotton Bowl, along with their potential draft round projections: Ohio State NFL Draft Prospects: TreVeyon Henderson, RB: Possible first-round pick. A dynamic runner with excellent receiving skills. Emeka Egbuka, WR: Potential first-round pick. Known for his route-running and three-level playmaking ability. Denzel Burke, CB: First-round potential. Combines length, explosiveness, and ball skills. Tyleik Williams, DT: Could be a top-five DT in the draft. Notable for his size and versatility. Michael Hall Jr., DT: High impact player beyond his stats. Known for his block destruction and explosiveness. Cade Stover, TE: Well-rounded prospect. Strong blocker and reliable receiver. Other Prospects to Watch: Miyan Williams (RB), Josh Simmons (OT), Donovan Jackson (G), Ty Hamilton (DT), J.T. Tuimoloau (EDGE), Jack Sawyer (EDGE), Tommy Eichenberg (LB), Josh Proctor (S), Lathan Ransom (S). Missouri NFL Draft Prospects: Luther Burden, WR (2025 Draft): Likely early first-round pick in 2025. Known for his RAC ability and route running. Darius Robinson, EDGE: Potential riser with his switch to EDGE. Combines power and explosiveness. Brady Cook, QB: A wild card in the QB draft group. Notable for his athleticism and improving accuracy. Kris Abrams-Draine, CB: Skilled in off-man and zone coverage, with playmaking ability at the catch point. Cody Schrader, RB: Efficient, aggressive runner. Could be a late-round pick or an undrafted free agent. Other Prospects to Watch: Theo Wease (WR), Javon Foster (OT), Kristian Williams (DT), Nyles Gaddy (EDGE), Daylan Carnell (DB), Jaylon Carlies (S), Harrison Mevis (K). Notable Absences: Ohio State: Marvin Harrison Jr. (WR), is not playing to prepare for the NFL Draft. Missouri: Ty’Ron Hopper (LB) and Ennis Rakestraw Jr. (CB), are both out due to injury. This breakdown reflects their status and draft potential leading up to the Cotton Bowl. Draft stock can change based on performance in the bowl game and subsequent pre-draft workouts and interviews.

An Offensive Explosion Expected In The Sugar Bowl The Sugar Bowl features two of the best offensive teams in college football. The matchup between Washington and Texas is expected to be a high-scoring affair in New Orleans on January 1st. Both teams feature a lot of future NFL Draft prospects. This analysis will focus on the top impact players eligible for the 2024 NFL Draft. The Washington Husky offense is loaded with the nation's top-graded WR group. Led by Rome Odunze, the Huskies have two additional NFL-caliber WRs in Jalen McMillan and Ja'Lynn Polk. The Texas Longhorns' defense will have to contend not only with the elite WRs, but the Huskies also have a potential first-round caliber QB in Michael Penix Jr. Penix is an accurate pocket passer. His rapport with Rome Odunze is special, and if the Huskies are going to win this game, they will need this combo to play at an elite level as they have throughout the 2023 college football season. WR Rome Odunze, Washington Height: 6'3" Weight: 212 lbs Overall Rk: 16 Play Style/Scheme: Dynamic receiver, known for deep-threat capabilities and reliable hands. Excels in vertical passing offense and could fit in a West Coast offense. Draft Grade: High-End Starter Potential On the other side of the equation, the Texas offense is led by an elite trio of pass catchers led by WRs Xavier Worthy and Addonai Mitchell and an elite TE in Ja'Tavion Sanders. They also have a very good QB in Quinn Ewers. Ewers could still opt to enter the NFL Draft, we are banking on his return to Texas in 2024, but if he has massive success in the College Football Playoffs, he could elevate himself into the backend of the 2024 NFL Draft conversation. TE Ja'Tavion Sanders, Texas Height: 6'4" Weight: 249 lbs Overall Rk: 22 Play Style/Scheme: Versatile, athletic tight end, similar to Travis Kelce and George Kittle. Fits well in schemes valuing athletic, pass-catching tight ends. Draft Grade: High-End Starter Potential The Texas Longhorn Defensive Line Could Be The Difference The offenses for both teams feature a lot of talent, but it could be the Texas defense led by two elite-level interior linemen who win the day for the Longhorns. IDL T'Vondre Sweat, Texas Height: 6'4" Weight: 362 lbs Overall Rk: 21 Play Style/Scheme: Strong run-stopper, ideal for schemes prioritizing run defense. Potential rotational role in the NFL with development in pass-rushing techniques. Draft Grade: High-End Starter Potential IDL Byron Murphy II, Texas Height: 6'1" Weight: 308 lbs Overall Rk: 68 Play Style/Scheme: Powerful and aggressive in run defense. Suited for traditional 4-3 defensive schemes focusing on run stopping and pocket pressure. Draft Grade: High-End Starter Potential I mentioned in the Sugar Bowl YouTube preview that both T'Vondre Sweat and Byron Murphy will have to have a massive game versus the interior of the Washington offensive line if Texas is going to have any shot at stopping the Washington offense. Both players can stop the run and pass rush, and it will be critical for these two to create enough havoc to move Penix off his spot consistently in the passing game. If they can, they could be the key to victory for the Longhorns. The Huskies Feature An Elite Pass Rusher Of Their Own ED Bralen Trice, Washington Height: 6'4" Weight: 274 lbs Overall Rk: 27 Play Style/Scheme: Physically imposing edge rusher, excels in explosiveness and run stopping. Best suited for a 4-3 defensive scheme. Draft Grade: Mid-Level Starter Potential Just like Texas, Washington will be dependent on the performance of their defensive line if they are going to get enough stops to pull away. Led by edge rusher Bralen Trice, a potential top 20 NFL Draft prospect, the Huskies will need to affect Quinn Ewers with their pass rush if they are going to have any shot at winning. ED Zion Tupuola-Fetui, Washington Height: 6'3" Weight: 260 lbs Overall Rk: 97 Play Style/Scheme: Dynamic edge rusher with speed and power. Best in a 4-3 defensive scheme as a traditional defensive end. Draft Grade: Mid-Level Starter Potential On the opposite side of Trice is another really good edge defender in Zion Tupuola-Fetui. You can only realistically double-team one edge player, so if Trice is unable to get loose, the game could hinge on his counterpart on the opposite end of the defensive line. Current List of 2024 NFL Draft Eligible Player Grades Below is a complete list of players for whom we currently have NFL Draft grades ahead of the Sugar Bowl between the Washington Huskies and the Texas Longhorns. Washington Top Draft Eligible Prospects WR Rome Odunze, Washington Height: 6'3" Weight: 212 lbs Overall Rk: 16 Play Style/Scheme: Dynamic receiver, known for deep-threat capabilities and reliable hands. Excels in vertical passing offense and could fit in a West Coast offense. Draft Grade: High-End Starter Potential ED Bralen Trice, Washington Height: 6'4" Weight: 274 lbs Overall Rk: 27 Play Style/Scheme: Physically imposing edge rusher, excels in explosiveness and run stopping. Best suited for a 4-3 defensive scheme. Draft Grade: Mid-Level Starter Potential QB Michael Penix Jr., Washington Height: 6'3" Weight: 214 lbs Overall Rk: 35 Play Style/Scheme: Mobile left-handed quarterback with improvisational flair. Suited for West Coast offense with RPOs and play-action. Draft Grade: Mid-Level Starter Potential WR Jalen McMillan, Washington Height: 6'1" Weight: 192 lbs Overall Rk: 41 Play Style/Scheme: Dynamic in vertical and intermediate routes, excels in downfield passing. Fits in offenses utilizing play-action and spread concepts. Draft Grade: Mid-Level Starter Potential OT Troy Fautanu, Washington Height: 6'4" Weight: 317 lbs Overall Rk: 45 Play Style/Scheme: Balanced offensive tackle with good technique and power. Versatile for various schemes, including zone-blocking and power-run. Draft Grade: Mid-Level Starter Potential ED Zion Tupuola-Fetui, Washington Height: 6'3" Weight: 260 lbs Overall Rk: 97 Play Style/Scheme: Dynamic edge rusher with speed and power. Best in a 4-3 defensive scheme as a traditional defensive end. Draft Grade: Mid-Level Starter Potential WR Ja'Lynn Polk, Washington Height: 6'2" Weight: 204 lbs Overall Rk: 102 Play Style/Scheme: Proficient route runner with ability to make contested catches. Suited for vertical passing schemes. Draft Grade: Mid-Level Starter Potential Texas Top Draft Eligible Prospects IDL T'Vondre Sweat, Texas Height: 6'4" Weight: 362 lbs Overall Rk: 21 Play Style/Scheme: Strong run-stopper, ideal for schemes prioritizing run defense. Potential rotational role in the NFL with development in pass-rushing techniques. Draft Grade: High-End Starter Potential TE Ja'Tavion Sanders, Texas Height: 6'4" Weight: 249 lbs Overall Rk: 22 Play Style/Scheme: Versatile, athletic tight end, similar to Travis Kelce and George Kittle. Fits well in schemes valuing athletic, pass-catching tight ends. Draft Grade: High-End Starter Potential WR Xavier Worthy, Texas Height: 6'1" Weight: 170 lbs Overall Rk: 26 Play Style/Scheme: Excels in a vertical-oriented offense with his speed and route-running ability. Draft Grade: High-End Starter Potential WR Adonai Mitchell, Texas Height: 6'4" Weight: 190 lbs Overall Rk: 28 Play Style/Scheme: Athletic wide receiver proficient in deep routes. Fits well in schemes utilizing vertical threats. Draft Grade: High-End Starter Potential RB Jonathon Brooks, Texas Height: 6'0" Weight: 207 lbs Overall Rk: 59 Play Style/Scheme: North-to-south runner, best suited for an inside zone scheme. Showcases agility and footwork in open spaces. Draft Grade: Mid-Level Starter Potential IDL Byron Murphy II, Texas Height: 6'1" Weight: 308 lbs Overall Rk: 68 Play Style/Scheme: Powerful and aggressive in run defense. Suited for traditional 4-3 defensive schemes focusing on run stopping and pocket pressure. Draft Grade: High-End Starter Potential S Jahdae Barron, Texas Height: 5'11" Weight: 192 lbs Overall Rk: 96 Play Style/Scheme: Excels in zone coverage, effective in run support. Versatile safety option. Draft Grade: Mid-Level Starter Potential

The 2024 Rose Bowl Game featuring the Michigan Wolverines and the Alabama Crimson Tide will showcase a lot of future NFL talent on both sides of the football. In fact, I can predict with near 100% confidence that every single starter playing in this matchup will be drafted in the next few draft cycles. For the sake of today's analysis, I want to focus on the top 2024 NFL Draft prospects and their potential impact on this college football semi-final matchup at the Rose Bowl Game on January 1st (Happy New Year) in Pasadena, California. The Impact of Michigan QB JJ McCarthy and Alabama QB Jalen Milroe QB J.J. McCarthy, Michigan: Height: 6'3" Weight: 196 lbs Overall Rk: 33 Play Style/Scheme: Highly athletic quarterback with exceptional speed and arm strength. Suited for schemes leveraging his mobility and play-making abilities. Draft Grade: Mid-Level Starter Potential Both Michigan and Alabama feature mobile QBs who can extend plays with their legs to keep a pass play alive, or they can take off and make a play on the run to move the chains in key moments. For Michigan, this game will ultimately be decided by JJ McCarthy and his ability to extend a play, allowing his receivers more time to get separation versus this elite Alabama secondary. QB Jalen Milroe, Alabama: Height: 6'2" Weight: 220 lbs Overall Rk: NR Play Style/Scheme: Dual-threat quarterback with rhythmical footwork and explosive speed. Effective in RPO plays and designed runs. Draft Grade: Low-Level Starter Potential As for Alabama, Jalen Milroe will be counted on to do much of the same, but the difference between the two players is that Milroe is built like a tank that can withstand more punishment throughout a 60-minute game as a designed runner than JJ McCarthy. Milroe's impact as a runner could be the difference in this game, but do not overlook his ability to drive the ball vertically. He is an excellent deep-ball thrower and a player who could elevate his 2024 NFL Draft stock massively against a very good Michigan defense loaded with NFL talent. The Battle in the Trenches Will Decide the Winner of the Rose Bowl Game OT J.C. Latham, Alabama: Height: 6'6" Weight: 326 lbs Overall Rk: 8 Play Style/Scheme: Power-based approach with unmatched athleticism and mobility. Versatile for any scheme, ideal in power-running offense. Comparable to Tyron Smith, David Bakhtiari, and Trent Williams. Draft Grade: Near Elite The Alabama offensive line, featuring one of the top players on our 2024 NFL Draft board at the right tackle position (JC Latham), has improved throughout the 2023 college football season. They excelled at run blocking but have had issues in pass protection, particularly in the SEC championship game against the Georgia defense. IDL Kris Jenkins, Michigan: Height: 6'3" Weight: 305 lbs Overall Rk: 55 Play Style/Scheme: Robust presence on the defensive line, thriving in run-stopping scenarios. Valuable in 3-4 and 4-3 schemes. Draft Grade: Mid-Level Starter Potential The Michigan defensive line has two future NFL players on the interior in Kenneth Grant and Mason Graham. We project both to be drafted in the first round of the 2025 NFL Draft. As for the 2024 NFL Draft, Kris Jenkins is the featured leader of the Michigan defensive line. Jenkins has first-round potential; I graded him to be a day-two pick. The Michigan defensive line rotates 9-10 players across the entire front, and that rotation will be pivotal in a game I believe Alabama will try to lean on the run game. The Alabama Defensive Line Could Dictate the Outcome of This Game ED Dallas Turner, Alabama: Height: 6'4" Weight: 240 lbs Overall Rk: 14 Play Style/Scheme: Versatile edge rusher thriving in 4-3 and 3-4 defenses. Draws parallels to Nolan Smith and Haason Reddick. Draft Grade: High-End Starter Potential As mentioned above regarding the Michigan defensive line vs. the Alabama offensive line, we have a similar scenario. The Alabama defensive line boasts one top 15 edge rusher in Dallas Turner and another player (Chris Braswell) that we believe will go in round two or three but could elevate his stock in the college football playoffs. The Michigan offensive line will be without its best interior blocker, Zak Zinter, who was lost to a season-ending injury against Ohio State. Michigan has a lot of experience on the offense, and they rotated 7 or 8 players this season, but none are at the level of Zak Zinter. They will need to punch well above their weight to defend the edge of their defense against Alabama. The Run Game Will Be Pivotal for Michigan to Have Success RB Blake Corum, Michigan: Height: 5'8" Weight: 212 lbs Overall Rk: 82 Play Style/Scheme: Workhorse back, proficient in zone and power run schemes. Combines quick feet, vision, and agility. Draft Grade: Mid-Level Starter Potential If Michigan cannot run the football, they will struggle mightily on offense, which will ultimately lead to them potentially losing this game more decisively. With that said, as mentioned above, it will come down to the legs of JJ McCarthy, opening up opportunities for Blake Corum and Donovan Edwards to make plays. Using zone-read to keep the Alabama defense honest can open up inside running lanes for Blake Corum and Donovan Edwards. RB Donovan Edwards, Michigan: Height: 6'1" Weight: 204 lbs Overall Rk: 83 Play Style/Scheme: Versatile, complements zone-blocking schemes. Crucial asset in running and passing game. Draft Grade: Mid-Level Starter Potential On the flip side, it will be vital for Michigan to use Donovan Edwards in the passing game. Finding ways to isolate him with a LB could open up big play opportunities not only for Edwards, but the potential he draws one of Alabama's elite safeties in coverage could open up opportunities for the Michigan TEs AJ Barner and Colston Loveland. The Alabama Secondary Is an Elite Unit CB Kool-Aid McKinstry, Alabama: Height: 6'1" Weight: 195 lbs Overall Rk: 13 Play Style/Scheme: Excellent zone coverage awareness, skilled in bump and run, versatile in various NFL schemes. Draft Grade: High-End Starter Potential The Alabama secondary will be a problem for the Michigan receivers on the outside. Led by two projected first-rounders, Kool-Aid McKinstry and Terrion Arnold, the Michigan WRs will have to work harder to get separation. S Malachi Moore, Alabama: Height: 6'0" Weight: 182 lbs Overall Rk: 34 Play Style/Scheme: Versatile safety, agile and effective in pass coverage. Best fit in schemes valuing versatility in the secondary. Draft Grade: High-End Starter Potential In addition, the safeties for Alabama are both elite-level players led by Malachi Moore and a freshman in Caleb Downs. Current List of 2024 NFL Draft Eligible Player Grades Below is a complete list of players for whom we currently have NFL Draft grades ahead of the Rose Bowl Game between Michigan and Alabama. Both teams are deep and talented. Based on the overall talent evaluation, a handful of plays in key moments will decide this game, leading to a one-score game. Alabama Crimson Tide 2024 NFL Draft Eligible Players OT J.C. Latham, Alabama Height: 6'6" Weight: 326 lbs Overall Rk: 8 Play Style/Scheme: Power-based approach with unmatched athleticism and mobility. Versatile for any scheme, ideal in power-running offense. Comparable to Tyron Smith, David Bakhtiari, and Trent Williams. Draft Grade: Near Elite CB Kool-Aid McKinstry, Alabama Height: 6'1" Weight: 195 lbs Overall Rk: 13 Play Style/Scheme: Excellent zone coverage awareness, skilled in bump and run, versatile in various NFL schemes. Draft Grade: High-End Starter Potential ED Dallas Turner, Alabama Height: 6'4" Weight: 240 lbs Overall Rk: 14 Play Style/Scheme: Versatile edge rusher thriving in 4-3 and 3-4 defenses. Draws parallels to Nolan Smith and Haason Reddick. Draft Grade: High-End Starter Potential CB Terrion Arnold, Alabama Height: 6'0" Weight: 196 lbs Overall Rk: 19 Play Style/Scheme: Physical in press-man coverage, effective against running plays and screens. Aggressive style but requires refinement in coverage technique. Draft Grade: High-End Starter Potential S Malachi Moore, Alabama Height: 6'0" Weight: 182 lbs Overall Rk: 34 Play Style/Scheme: Versatile safety, agile and effective in pass coverage. Best fit in schemes valuing versatility in the secondary. Draft Grade: High-End Starter Potential ED Chris Braswell, Alabama Height: 6'3" Weight: 255 lbs Overall Rk: 65 Play Style/Scheme: Dynamic edge rusher, excels in explosiveness and agility. Versatile in 3-4 and 4-3 alignments. Draft Grade: Mid-Level Starter Potential LB Deontae Lawson, Alabama Height: 6'2" Weight: 230 lbs Overall Rk: 73 Play Style/Scheme: Dynamic, strong in run-stopping and explosiveness. Suited for 3-4 defensive schemes. Draft Grade: Mid-Level Starter Potential QB Jalen Milroe, Alabama Height: 6'2" Weight: 220 lbs Overall Rk: NR Play Style/Scheme: Dual-threat quarterback with rhythmical footwork and explosive speed. Effective in RPO plays and designed runs. Draft Grade: Low-Level Starter Potential WR Jermaine Burton, Alabama Height: 6'0" Weight: 200 lbs Overall Rk: NR Play Style/Scheme: Blend of speed and technical skill, versatile for various offensive schemes. Excels in spread and vertical passing attacks. Draft Grade: Mid-Level Starter Potential RB Jase McClellan, Alabama Height: 5'11" Weight: 212 lbs Overall Rk: NR Play Style/Scheme: Dynamic and powerful, effective in zone and power-run systems. Needs improvement in pass protection. Draft Grade: Low-Level Starter Potential Michigan Wolverines 2024 NFL Draft Eligible Players QB J.J. McCarthy, Michigan Height: 6'3" Weight: 196 lbs Overall Rk: 33 Play Style/Scheme: Highly athletic quarterback with exceptional speed and arm strength. Suited for schemes leveraging his mobility and play-making abilities. Draft Grade: Mid-Level Starter Potential CB Mike Sainristil, Michigan Height: 5'11" Weight: 180 lbs Overall Rk: 39 Play Style/Scheme: Versatile cornerback, adept in nickel and press coverage, effective against slot receivers. Draft Grade: High-End Starter Potential WR Roman Wilson, Michigan Height: 6'0" Weight: 192 lbs Overall Rk: 42 Play Style/Scheme: Vertical threat capability, potential fit in offensive schemes with a vertical passing focus. Draft Grade: Mid-Level Starter Potential IDL Kris Jenkins, Michigan Height: 6'3" Weight: 305 lbs Overall Rk: 55 Play Style/Scheme: Robust presence on defensive line, thriving in run-stopping scenarios. Valuable in 3-4 and 4-3 schemes. Draft Grade: Mid-Level Starter Potential IOL Zak Zinter, Michigan Height: 6'6" Weight: 334 lbs Overall Rk: 70 Play Style/Scheme: Robust and aggressive style, especially in run game. Suited for zone-heavy schemes. Draft Grade: Mid-Level Starter Potential LB Michael Barrett, Michigan Height: 6'0" Weight: 239 lbs Overall Rk: 76 Play Style/Scheme: Versatile linebacker, effective in man coverage and at the line of scrimmage. Best fit in 4-3 or 4-2-5 defenses. Draft Grade: Mid-Level Starter Potential S Rod Moore, Michigan Height: 6'0" Weight: 198 lbs Overall Rk: 79 Play Style/Scheme: Skilled in diagnosing plays, ideal for heavy zone coverage schemes. Comparable to Earl Thomas and Adrian Amos. Draft Grade: Mid-Level Starter Potential LB Junior Colson, Michigan Height: 6'3" Weight: 247 lbs Overall Rk: 80 Play Style/Scheme: Versatile linebacker, effective in run defense and zone coverage. Suited for 4-3 defensive schemes. Draft Grade: Mid-Level Starter Potential RB Blake Corum, Michigan Height: 5'8" Weight: 212 lbs Overall Rk: 82 Play Style/Scheme: Workhorse back, proficient in zone and power run schemes. Combines quick feet, vision, and agility. Draft Grade: Mid-Level Starter Potential RB Donovan Edwards, Michigan Height: 6'1" Weight: 204 lbs Overall Rk: 83 Play Style/Scheme: Versatile, complements zone-blocking schemes. Crucial asset in running and passing game. Draft Grade: Mid-Level Starter Potential TE AJ Barner, Michigan Height: 6'6" Weight: 251 lbs Overall Rk: NR Play Style/Scheme: Traditional tight end with strong blocking foundation and reliable receiving skills. Fits well in pro-style offenses. Draft Grade: Low-Level Starter Potential WR Cornelius Johnson, Michigan Height: 6'3" Weight: 211 lbs Overall Rk: NR Play Style/Scheme: Well-rounded receiver, excels in deep passing game. Fits in West Coast or Air Coryell systems. Draft Grade: Low-Level Starter Potential Alabama Draft Overview: Draft Grade: Near Elite: 1 player High-End Starter Potential: 4 players Mid-Level Starter Potential: 4 players Low-Level Starter Potential: 2 players Position: Offensive Tackle (OT): 1 player Cornerback (CB): 2 players Edge Defender (ED): 2 players Safety (S): 1 player Linebacker (LB): 1 player Quarterback (QB): 1 player Wide Receiver (WR): 1 player Running Back (RB): 1 player Michigan Draft Overview: Draft Grade: High-End Starter Potential: 2 players Mid-Level Starter Potential: 7 players Low-Level Starter Potential: 2 players Position: Quarterback (QB): 1 player Cornerback (CB): 1 player Wide Receiver (WR): 2 players Interior Defensive Line (IDL): 1 player Interior Offensive Line (IOL): 1 player Linebacker (LB): 2 players Safety (S): 1 player Running Back (RB): 2 players Tight End (TE): 1 player

NFL Draft Early Declaration Tracker Overview As the 2024 NFL Draft draws near, our comprehensive NFL Draft Underclassmen Tracker is your go-to source for the latest information on prospects deciding whether to enter the draft. This year marks a departure from the previous uncertainty regarding the deadline for underclassmen to declare their intentions, providing a much more transparent framework. Eligibility Landscape Post-COVID-19 The eligibility landscape has been complex following the NCAA's decision to grant an extra year of eligibility due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This resulted in a varied approach by educational institutions in listing their athletes' class years. Some schools advanced their players as per the usual progression, ignoring the extra year, while others retained athletes in their expected year of eligibility post-2021 season. As we move forward, the impact of these COVID-affected classes on eligibility is lessening. Tracking Underclassmen Decisions Our 2024 NFL Draft early declaration tracker aims to simplify this complexity. It includes decisions from players who have either accepted an All-Star game invitation post-season or have publicly declared their draft intentions or their decision to continue in school. To further clarify, we list these athletes based on their official class/year as per their school's roster page. This could result in scenarios like a "sophomore declaring for the draft" who is actually in their third year or a "redshirt senior" still having an additional year of eligibility. 2024 NFL Draft Declaration Deadline The deadline for declaring for the 2024 NFL Draft is firmly set for January 15, 2024. This contrasts with 2022's special deadline and establishes a clear cut-off for underclassmen to apply for Special Eligibility with the NFL. Adding to the excitement, for the first time, underclassmen are eligible to participate in prestigious events like the 2024 East-West Shrine Game and the 2024 Reese's Senior Bowl. The list of all underclassmen approved for the 2024 NFL Draft will be distributed to all 32 NFL teams by January 20, 2024. 2024 NFL Draft Early Declaration Tracker Quarterbacks Michael Pratt, Tulane Spencer Rattler, South Carolina Drake Maye, North Carolina Running Backs Braelon Allen, Wisconsin Tyrone Tracey Jr., Purdue Frank Gore Jr., Southern Miss MarShawn Lloyd, USC Miyan Williams, Ohio State Larry McCammon, FAU Ray Davis, Kentucky Jaden Shriden, Monmouth Bucky Irving, Oregon Jawhar Jordan, Louisville Jaylen Wright, Tennessee Emani Bailey, TCU Audric Estime, Notre Dame Trey Benson, Florida State Wide Receivers Xavier Worthy, Texas Anthony Gould, Oregon State Brenden Rice, USC Xavier Legette, South Carolina Jalen Coker, Holy Cross Lincoln Victor, Washington State Tulu Griffin, Mississippi State Ainias Smith, Texas A&M Bub Means, Pitt DeVaughn Vele, Utah Dayton Wade, Ole Miss Malik Washington, Virginia Johnny Wilson, Florida State Ricky Pearsall, Florida Devontez Walker, North Carolina Emeka Egbuka, Ohio State (Pending Confirmation) Keon Coleman, Florida State Tight Ends Jaheim Bell, Florida State Jared Wiley, TCU Theo Johnson, Penn State Tip Reiman, Illinois Ben Sinnott, Kansas State Offensive Tackles Patrick Paul, Houston Kiran Amegadjie, Yale Tyler Guyton, Oklahoma Andrew Raym, Oklahoma Joe Alt, Notre Dame Jordan Morgan, Arizona Caedan Wallace, Penn State Offensive Guards Kenneth Horsey, Kentucky Mike Katic, Indiana Keaton Bills, Utah Centers Jackson Powers-Johnson, Oregon Defensive Tackles Jer'Zhan Newton, Illinois Keith Randolph Jr., Illinois McKinnley Jackson, Texas A&M Leonard Taylor III, Miami (FL) Evan Anderson, Florida Atlantic Linebackers Jeremiah Trotter Jr., Clemson Marist Liufau, Notre Dame Cedric Gray, North Carolina Edgerrin Cooper, Texas A&M Cornerbacks Nate Wiggins, Clemson Quinton Newsome, Nebraska Max Melton, Rutgers Safeties Kamren Kinchens, Miami (FL) James Williams, Miami (FL) Cole Bishop, Utah Omar Brown, Nebraska Sione Vaki, Utah Edge Rushers Chop Robinson, Penn State Kickers/Punters Cam Little, Arkansas

The Chicago Bears' performance analysis for the 2023 season and strategic outlook for 2024 reveals a team in transition with potential for significant growth. On offense, the Bears showed modest improvement, increasing their points per game from 19.2 in 2022 to 20.8 in 2023 and their yards per game from 307.8 to 324.2. This upward trend, though slight, indicates an offense finding its rhythm. Defensively, the Bears made notable strides, reducing opponent points per game from 27.2 to 23.8, and slashing yards allowed dramatically from 375.9 to 314.5, signaling a robust defensive turnaround. Heading into the 2024 season, the Bears are well-positioned financially, boasting a healthy cap space of $64.8 million. With effective cap space at $40.8 million and minimal dead money, they have ample opportunity to make strategic moves. With only 37 players currently under contract, the Bears must prioritize filling crucial positions through free agency and the draft, balancing the need for immediate impact players with long-term financial sustainability. Key potential free agents include impact players like Yannick Ngakoue and Justin Jones, alongside others who could bolster both offense and defense. Chicago Bears Free Agent and Salary Cap Analysis for 2024 Season Salary Cap Overview: Cap Space: The Bears have a robust $64,785,906 in cap space, providing significant leeway for roster adjustments and strategic acquisitions. Effective Cap Space: At $40,832,783, this figure shows the Bears' financial capacity after accounting for a minimum of 51 players, including the projected rookie class, highlighting ample room for additional signings. Active Cap Spending: Currently, $181,385,752 is allocated towards active roster salaries. Dead Money: A minimal amount of $859,071 in dead money showcases efficient cap management, freeing up more resources for active roster spending. Roster Size: With 37 players under contract for 2024, below the full roster size of 51, the Bears have multiple spots to fill, opening up opportunities in free agency and the draft. Strategic Salary Cap Considerations: Prioritize filling crucial positional needs, particularly where the draft may lack depth. Actively engage in free agency to complement the draft strategy, given several roster spots to fill. Utilize the low dead money for additional financial flexibility, possibly through contract restructuring. Balance high-value signings with maintaining cap space for future seasons. Key Potential Free Agents: Yannick Ngakoue (EDGE): UFA with a significant snap count of 73.7%, aged 29. Current APY: $10,500,000. A pivotal defensive player essential for maintaining a strong pass rush. Justin Jones (IDL): UFA with 63.0% snaps, aged 28. Current APY: $6,000,000. Key to the interior defense, making him a valuable asset for the Bears' defensive line. Lucas Patrick (LG): UFA with an 83.5% snap count, aged 31. Current APY: $4,000,000. Critical for the offensive line, especially in protecting the QB and supporting the running game. Cairo Santos (K): Void contract, contributing 34.8% snaps, aged 33. Current APY: $3,000,000. A crucial player in special teams whose performance can influence crucial game outcomes. Robert Tonyan (TE): UFA with 24.1% snaps, aged 30. Current APY: $2,650,000. Role as TE could be pivotal depending on his performance in the passing game. Jaylon Johnson (CB): UFA with 78.6% snaps, aged 25. Current APY: $1,617,194. A young cornerback vital for maintaining secondary stability. Darnell Mooney (WR): UFA with 72.6% snaps, aged 27. Current APY: $894,262. Significant to the Bears' receiving corps, potentially a key re-signing for the offense. Potential Offseason Team Positional Needs and Analysis: The Bears' substantial cap space positions them favorably to address key needs identified for the 2024 season. These needs include vital positions such as QB, WR, OT, EDGE, and DL. The financial flexibility combined with strategic signings and draft picks will be crucial in shaping a competitive roster for the upcoming season. PFF Player Grade Overview Jaylon Johnson (CB) - PFF Grade: 90.6 (2024 Free Agent) DJ Moore (WR) - PFF Grade: 87.8 Noah Sewell (LB) - PFF Grade: 86.5 T.J. Edwards (LB) - PFF Grade: 79.5 D'Onta Foreman (HB) - PFF Grade: 76.9 (2024 Free Agent) Montez Sweat (ED) - PFF Grade: 75.5 Justin Fields (QB) - PFF Grade: 75.1 Teven Jenkins (G) - PFF Grade: 74.4 Marcedes Lewis (TE) - PFF Grade: 73.5 (2024 Free Agent) Khalil Herbert (HB) - PFF Grade: 77.2 Summary Analysis And Recommendations To Help Improve The Team As indicated by the PFF data and statistics, the Chicago Bears' performance in the 2023 season highlights several areas needing improvement for greater competitiveness in the NFC North and the NFL. Defensive Challenges (Ranked 30th): The defense is a significant concern, ranked 30th in the league. This low ranking and the high number of points allowed (309, tied for 24th) suggest critical weaknesses in stopping opposing offenses. Addressing this will require a focus on acquiring impact players in the defensive line and secondary, either through the draft or free agency. Evaluating and potentially adjusting defensive schemes could also be beneficial. Offensive Improvements (Ranked 20th): While performing better than the defense, the offense still has room for improvement. Enhancing the offensive line to protect the quarterback better and create effective running lanes should be a priority. Enhancing the receiver group could also help increase the team's points scored. Special Teams (Ranked 17th): This mid-tier ranking suggests a balanced performance with room for improvement. Upgrading specialist positions and improving coverage units can contribute to better field position and impact the outcome of games. Overall Team Strategy: The Bears should focus on drafting defensive players, particularly in positions like EDGE, LB, or CB. Using available cap space judiciously in free agency to fill roster gaps, especially on defense, is crucial. Investing in developing young players, particularly in underperforming positions, is also essential. Coaching and Schemes: The coaching staff needs to reassess their strategies on both offense and defense, maximizing the talents of the current roster and making necessary adjustments to improve overall team performance.

Reviewing The Top 2023 NFL QB Draft Picks (Rookie Review: Anthony Richardson) Here is an organized evaluation of former Florida QB and current Indianapolis Colts QB Anthony Richardson, considering his scouting report, early NFL performance, and player comparisons. Rookie Review: Anthony Richardson. Profile: Position: Quarterback College: Florida Height: 6'4" (6036 in scouting notation) Weight: 244 pounds Drafted: 4th overall by the Indianapolis Colts in the 2023 NFL Draft NFL Career Start: Richardson's rookie season ended prematurely due to a season-ending shoulder surgery. Played in four games, completing 50 of 84 pass attempts for 577 yards, three touchdowns, and one interception. Demonstrated his dual-threat capabilities with 136 rushing yards and four rushing touchdowns. Scouting Report: Embodies the prototype quarterback with a big arm and excellent athleticism. Best suited for a pro-spread offense blending play-action, RPOs, and zone reads. Noted as a developmental talent with accuracy issues needing improvement. Ideal fit would be with a creative head coach or offensive coordinator, potentially benefiting from a year of learning. Primary Scout: Brandon Lundberg Key Strengths: Big Arm Excellent Athleticism Escape Artist Capabilities Key Weaknesses: Accuracy Issues Developmental Aspects Combine and Athleticism Scores: 40-Yard Dash: 4.43 seconds Vertical Jump: 40.5 inches Broad Jump: 10' 9'' Assessment of Anthony Richardson Based on Early NFL Performance and Scouting Report: Although cut short, Richardson's early NFL performance provided glimpses into his potential and the areas needing development highlighted in his scouting report. Arm Strength and Athleticism: The 577 passing yards and four rushing touchdowns in just four games indicate his strong arm and athleticism. These attributes align with his scouting report, showcasing his ability as a dual-threat quarterback. Developmental Aspects: His accuracy issues, a noted weakness, are hard to fully evaluate given the short span of play. However, the limited interceptions suggest some level of efficiency. Scheme Fit and Playstyle: Richardson's fit in the Colts' offense, focusing on spread-based and RPO concepts, appears promising. His injury, unfortunately, limits the assessment of his full integration into this system. Learning and Adaptation: The season-ending injury and consequent surgery provide an unintended opportunity for Richardson to learn and adapt from the sidelines, potentially addressing some developmental needs. In conclusion, Anthony Richardson's brief rookie season displayed the strengths outlined in his scouting report, particularly his arm strength and athleticism. His development as a passer remains an area to watch, especially in terms of accuracy. The injury and early end to his season emphasize the importance of durability and adaptability for Richardson moving forward. His future potential in the NFL remains high, contingent on his recovery and continued development.

This detailed analysis of the New England Patriots' current situation considers the once-unthinkable prospect of moving on from legendary coach Bill Belichick. With a dismal 2-10 record under Belichick, the worst at this point in his tenure, the Patriots are facing a significant crossroads. This decline, highlighted by an NFL-worst five-game losing streak and historical low points, has brought the team to a critical juncture. Rebuilding The New England Patriots: Do The Patriots Move On From Bill Belichick, Draft A QB? Kraft's Crucial Decision: Belichick's Future and Legacy As owner Robert Kraft contemplates the future of his signature franchise, he faces the daunting task of possibly replacing Belichick, who is just 17 victories shy of surpassing Don Shula’s record as the winningest coach in NFL history. This decision echoes past moments in NFL history where iconic coaches like Chuck Noll, Tom Landry, and Shula himself faced the end of their illustrious careers. 2024 Draft Strategy: Eyeing a Franchise Quarterback The Patriots' struggle extends beyond coaching, with a significant focus on their performance in the upcoming 2024 NFL Draft, where they potentially hold the 2nd overall pick. This position opens the possibility of drafting a franchise quarterback, with top prospects like Caleb Williams or Drake Maye on the radar, addressing one of the team's most pressing needs. Belichick's Legacy vs. Team Rebuild: A Historic Decision In this context, Belichick's future, coupled with the team's draft strategy and significant cap space, forms the crux of the Patriots' potential rebuilding strategy. Whether Belichick stays to chase the record or Kraft opts for a fresh start, the decision will be a historic and possibly transformative one for the franchise. Comprehensive Analysis of the Patriots' Current Situation Below is an analysis of the Patriot's current situation. The analysis covers all aspects to be considered when rebuilding an NFL franchise, including stats overview, pending free agency ahead of the 2024 offseason, NFL Draft & free agency team needs, top player grades, and more. New England Patriots Season Stats Overview Patriots Year Over Year Offensive Points Per Game 2022: The Patriots averaged 21.4 points per game. 2023: The Patriots averaged 13.0 points per game. New England Patriots Yards Per Game: 2022 vs. 2023 2022 Performance: Yards per Game: 314.6 2023 Performance: Yards per Game: 291.4 New England Patriots Opponents' Points Per Game: 2022 vs. 2023 2022 Performance: Opponents' Points per Game: 20.4 2023 Performance: Opponents' Points per Game: 20.9 New England Patriots Opponent Yards Per Game: 2022 vs. 2023 2022 Performance: Opponent Yards per Game: 322.0 2023 Performance: Opponent Yards per Game: 306.9 New England Patriots Projected Team Needs Analysis QB, OT, WR, TE, CB, EDGE, DL New England Patriots 2024 Salary Cap Space Analysis Base Salary Cap (2024): $242,000,000 Team's Active Cap Spending (2024): $160,507,571 Dead Money (2024): $7,983,623 2024 Calculated Salary Cap The calculated salary cap space for the New England Patriots in 2024 is approximately $73,508,806. This figure aligns closely with the provided cap space of $75,321,858. The slight difference might be due to additional factors like carryover and adjustments not accounted for in the basic calculation. 2024 Effective Salary Cap Space The effective cap space for the Patriots in 2024, which accounts for signing at least 51 players and the projected rookie class, is $61,769,140. This figure is lower than the basic cap space calculation, reflecting the costs of maintaining a full roster and incoming rookies. Key Potential Free Agents for the Patriots in 2024 Hunter Henry (TE) Type: UFA (Unrestricted Free Agent) Age: 30 Snaps: 74.5% Current APY: $12,500,000 Guarantees: $25,000,000 Trent Brown (RT) Type: Void Age: 31 Snaps: 68.0% Current APY: $6,500,000 Kendrick Bourne (WR) Type: UFA Age: 29 Snaps: 48.0% Current APY: $5,000,000 Mike Gesicki (TE) Type: UFA Age: 29 Snaps: 48.5% Current APY: $4,500,000 Ezekiel Elliott (RB) Type: UFA Age: 29 Snaps: 38.4% Current APY: $3,000,000 Kyle Dugger (S) Type: UFA Age: 28 Snaps: 97.1% Current APY: $2,082,976 Michael Onwenu (LG) Type: UFA Age: 27 Snaps: 74.1% Current APY: $874,367 Top Graded Patriots Players (PFF Grades) Jahlani Tavai (LB) PFF Grade: 87.8 Free Agent in 2024: No Positional Strength: Strong in run defense and good coverage skills. Pharaoh Brown (TE) PFF Grade: 85.1 Free Agent in 2024: Yes Positional Strength: Exceptional receiving and blocking capabilities. Jabrill Peppers (S) PFF Grade: 84.9 Free Agent in 2024: No Positional Strength: Versatile safety, strong in run support and coverage. Mack Wilson Sr. (LB) PFF Grade: 82.0 Free Agent in 2024: No Positional Strength: Versatile linebacker with ability to cover and support in run defense. Alex Austin (CB) PFF Grade: 82.4 Free Agent in 2024: No Positional Strength: Excellent in coverage, good ball skills. Christian Gonzalez (CB) PFF Grade: 80.8 Free Agent in 2024: No Positional Strength: Good speed, agility in coverage, and potential in man-to-man defense. Trent Brown (T) PFF Grade: 81.0 Free Agent in 2024: Yes (Void) Positional Strength: Dominant in pass protection and run blocking. Jonathan Jones (CB) PFF Grade: 75.0 Free Agent in 2024: No Positional Strength: Strong in coverage, especially in slot defense. David Andrews (C) PFF Grade: 74.6 Free Agent in 2024: No Positional Strength: Reliable in pass protection, strong leadership and communication skills. Christian Barmore (DI) PFF Grade: 74.5 Free Agent in 2024: No Positional Strength: Effective interior pass rusher, strong against the run. Rhamondre Stevenson (HB) PFF Grade: 71.3 Free Agent in 2024: No Positional Strength: Powerful runner, good in pass protection, and capable receiver. Matthew Judon (ED) PFF Grade: 70.2 Free Agent in 2024: No Positional Strength: Excellent edge rusher, strong in setting the edge against the run. Ezekiel Elliott (HB) PFF Grade: 69.3 Free Agent in 2024: Yes (UFA) Positional Strength: Strong, consistent runner with good vision and receiving ability. Conor McDermott (T) PFF Grade: 69.7 Free Agent in 2024: No Positional Strength: Solid in both run blocking and pass protection. Cole Strange (G) PFF Grade: 65.3 Free Agent in 2024: No Positional Strength: Shows potential in pass protection and run blocking. Hunter Henry (TE) PFF Grade: 65.1 Free Agent in 2024: Yes (UFA) Positional Strength: Reliable target in passing game, solid blocker. 2023 Season Overview Record: 3-10 Division: AFC East Scoring Points Scored: 169 (Ranked 31st) Points Allowed: 272 (Tied for 16th) PFF Team Grades Overall: 29th Offense: 28th Defense: Tied for 19th Special Teams: Tied for 24th Final Analysis Overall Performance: Ranked 29th overall, the team is performing poorly compared to the rest of the league. This low ranking indicates significant issues across the board. Offensive Struggles: With an offense ranked 28th, the team has been ineffective in scoring. The low points scored (169, 31st in the league) further highlight this issue. This could be due to various problems, including quarterback performance, offensive line issues, or ineffective play-calling. Defensive Performance: The defense is ranked tied for 19th, below average but not as poor as the offense. The points allowed (272, tied for 16th) suggest that the defense is performing at a mediocre level, being relatively better at preventing scores than the league average. Special Teams: The special teams unit, tied for 24th, is also underperforming. This could impact the team's field position and overall game management, contributing to the poor record. Record and Divisional Context: With a 3-10 record in the competitive AFC East, the team is likely struggling against strong divisional opponents. This record indicates that they are not competitive this season. Conclusion Rebuilding The New England Patriots The team's overall poor performance in the 2023 season can be attributed to significant offensive shortcomings, a below-average defense, and underperforming special teams. To improve, the team needs to address these areas, potentially looking at coaching strategies, player personnel changes, or adjustments in their game plan. The end of the season might also bring about considerations for draft strategies, trades, or free agency moves to bolster weak areas.

The 2024 NFL Draft is swiftly approaching, and we are meticulously analyzing each NFL team to pinpoint their specific needs. This process involves a thorough evaluation of the talent available in the draft, helping to determine which positions teams are likely to prioritize early on. Our analysis provides a detailed breakdown of players rated on the Football Scout 365 NFL Draft board. The objective is to map out the distribution of players by position, assess the average grade for each position group, and then align this information with the projected 2024 team needs across the NFL. Click here to check out the Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Board. Overview of the Analysis: 2024 NFL Draft: Measuring Positional Value Considering the abundant talent in positions such as Wide Receiver (WR), Cornerback (CB), and Offensive Tackle (OT), teams needing to strengthen these areas have the flexibility to use their highest draft picks on them. However, the situation is more challenging for teams desperately in need of a Quarterback (QB). These teams may need a more strategic approach, possibly considering trades or exploring free agency options. Team Needs Analysis Frequent needs across NFL teams include: Edge Defenders (EDGE) Cornerbacks (CB) Wide Receivers (WR) Offensive Tackles (OT) Interior Defensive Linemen (IDL) Teams looking to bolster their defensive line should prioritize these positions early in the draft due to high quality and limited depth. Conversely, for positions with less demand, such as Safety (S), Linebacker (LB), and Running Back (RB), the strategy may involve a mix of selecting the best available talent and addressing specific team needs, particularly in the mid to late rounds of the draft. Percentage Of Player Graded By Position Group Most Represented Positions: Wide Receivers (15.32%), Quarterbacks (11.29%), and Cornerbacks (10.48%) have the highest representation. Highest Average Grades: Offensive Tackles (65.27), Wide Receivers (65.58), and Cornerbacks (65.92) show high average grades, indicating quality talent. Wide Receivers (WR): 15.32% Quarterbacks (QB): 11.29% Cornerbacks (CB): 10.48% Safeties (S): 9.68% Running Backs (RB): 8.87% Offensive Tackles (OT): 8.06% Tight Ends (TE): 8.06% Linebackers (LB): 8.06% Edge Defenders (ED): 7.26% Interior Defensive Linemen (IDL): 6.45% Average Grade By Position Group High-Value Positions: Given the high demand and strong talent pool, positions like WR, CB, and OT may hold significant value in this draft. Moderate-Value Positions: QB, despite being essential, may not be as highly valued given the lower overall grade and fewer teams needing them. Lower-Value Positions: Positions with either less demand or weaker talent pools, like TE or LB, might be lower in draft value. ED (Edge Defender): 66.07 Laiatu Latu, UCLA Grade: 66.88 Ceiling: High-End Starter Potential IDL (Interior Defensive Lineman): 66.02 T'Vondre Sweat, Texas Grade: 68.57 Ceiling: High-End Starter Potential CB (Cornerback): 65.92 Cooper DeJean, Iowa Grade: 75.31 Ceiling: Elite WR (Wide Receiver): 65.58 Marvin Harrison Jr., Ohio State Grade: 75.32 Ceiling: Elite S (Safety): 62.67 Kamren Kinchens, Miami Grade: 68.44 Ceiling: High-End Starter Potential OT (Offensive Tackle): 65.27 Joe Alt, Notre Dame Grade: 77.82 Ceiling: Elite TE (Tight End): 63.09 Brock Bowers, Georgia Grade: 75.38 Ceiling: Elite RB (Running Back): 62.92 TreVeyon Henderson, Ohio State Grade: 66.00 Ceiling: High-End Starter Potential QB (Quarterback): 62.24 Caleb Williams, USC Grade: 73.82 Ceiling: Near Elite LB (Linebacker): 61.57 Edgerrin Cooper, Texas A&M Grade: 61.56 Ceiling: Mid-Level Starter Potential IOL (Interior Offensive Lineman): 61.36 Jackson Powers-Johnson, Oregon State Grade: 62.18 Ceiling: Mid-Level Starter Potential Averages by Conference Big Ten: High representation and quality (Marvin Harrison Jr., WR, 75.3 grade). SEC: Notably strong players (Brock Bowers, TE, 75.3 grade). Other conferences: Notable talent like Joe Alt, OT, with a 77.8 grade. BIG TEN Conference: Percentage of Players: 30.65% Average Grade for BIG TEN Players: Approximately 63.25 Top-Graded Player: Marvin Harrison Jr., Ohio State (WR) Grade: 75.3 Ceiling: Elite SEC Conference: Percentage of Players: 20.97% Average Grade for SEC Players: Approximately 64.10 Top-Graded Player: Brock Bowers, Georgia (TE) Grade: 75.3 Ceiling: Elite ACC Conference: Percentage of Players: 18.55% Average Grade for ACC Players: Approximately 63.69 Top-Graded Player: Keon Coleman, Florida State (WR) Grade: 75.1 Ceiling: Elite PAC 12 Conference: Percentage of Players: 18.55% Average Grade for PAC 12 Players: Approximately 62.31 Top-Graded Player: Caleb Williams, USC (QB) Grade: 73.8 Ceiling: Near Elite BIG 12 Conference: Percentage of Players: 10.48% Average Grade for BIG 12 Players: Approximately 62.69 Top-Graded Player: T'Vondre Sweat, Texas (IDL) Grade: 68.5 Ceiling: High-End Starter Potential Other Conferences: Percentage of Players: 5.65% Average Grade for Players from Other Conferences: Approximately 64.47 Top-Graded Player: Joe Alt, Notre Dame (OT) Grade: 77.8 Ceiling: High-End Starter Potential

Tis the season, we have a list, we are checking it once, we are checking it twice. We have updated the 2024 NFL Draft Big Board from 50 prospects to now include 100 prospects. That means we are getting closer to the start of the NFL Draft season. Some Notes About The NFL Draft Big Board Update A few things to consider with this recent update. We still have to monitor and remove draft-eligible players that have yet to declare. I left a few in the rankings that are on the fence because we all know 20-year-old kids can change their minds at any moment. Top 100 Big Board Rankings Click here to view the actual top 100 Big Board. Or you can scroll through the updated top 10 of the player rankings, but I advise you to check out the more in-depth draft board that includes each player's play style and scheme fit, player comparisons, and more. Below Are the Updated Top 10 Players Based On Their 2023 Grades. No grade is final, but we have completed 80% of the process as we await the NFL Combine and Pro Day season. Enjoy! 1). Marvin Harrison Jr. Position: WR School: Ohio State Play Style/Scheme: Harrison Jr. is a prototypical outside receiver known for his precise route-running and reliable hands. He excels in schemes that leverage his ability to create separation and his understanding of defensive coverages, making him a consistent threat in various passing situations. 2). Joe Alt Position: OT School: Notre Dame Play Style/Scheme: Alt's athleticism and technique shine in pass protection and run blocking. He's adaptable to various offensive line schemes, particularly those that value agile and technically sound tackles. His ability to handle speed rushers and his strength in the run game make him a versatile offensive line prospect. 3). Brock Bowers Position: TE School: Georgia Play Style/Scheme: Bowers is a versatile, athletic tight end who excels in both the passing game and blocking. His scheme fit includes offenses that utilize the tight end as a primary receiver, given his route-running skills, speed, and ability to create mismatches against linebackers and safeties. 4). Keon Coleman Position: WR School: Florida State Play Style/Scheme: Coleman is characterized as a "throwback" physical receiver with excellent body control and catching ability. His play style fits well in vertical passing offenses that leverage his size and ability to win contested catches. 5). Cooper DeJean Position: CB School: Iowa Play Style/Scheme: DeJean's traits and style make him an ideal fit in defensive schemes that require versatile cornerbacks. He excels in zone coverage with his instinctive play and ball skills but also shows promise in man-to-man situations due to his agility and speed. 6). Caleb Williams Position: QB School: USC Play Style/Scheme: Williams is an electrifying dual-threat quarterback with a strong arm and mobility. He fits best in offensive systems that can capitalize on his ability to make plays both in and outside of the pocket, utilizing his dynamic playmaking skills. 7). Olumuyiwa Fashanu Position: OT School: Penn State Play Style/Scheme: Fashanu exhibits a play style characterized as technically sound and physically imposing. He is suited for offensive schemes that require reliable pass protection and effective run blocking, as he demonstrates proficiency in both areas. 8). J.C. Latham Position: OT School: Alabama Play Style/Scheme: Latham, while still evolving as a player, possesses a blend of size, strength, and agility. He's a fit for offensive line schemes that value versatile tackles capable of excelling in both pass protection and run blocking. 9). Drake Maye Position: QB School: North Carolina Play Style/Scheme: Maye is a mobile pocket passer with a strong arm and good decision-making skills. His best fit is in an offensive scheme that blends traditional pocket passing with the ability to extend plays and make throws on the move. 10). Laiatu Latu Position: ED School: UCLA Play Style/Scheme: Latu's play style is characterized by his physicality and ability to disrupt the backfield. He is well-suited for defensive schemes that emphasize aggressive edge rushing and require players to be effective in both pass rush and run defense.