Day Two of the 2024 NFL Combine has concluded and we are recapping the top performances by position group on the day. Check back at the end of each day as we continue to recap every position group from the drill work at the 2024 NFL Combine. Overview of Today's Analysis Below, we provide a breakdown of the top players ranked within their respective position groups. This analysis is based on the drill work and how it correlates with each prospect's initial scouting report from the Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Big Board, available on our website. Grading If the Film Matches the NFL Combine Data The aim of today's analysis is to assess each prospect's NFL Combine drill performance. We consider all aspects of the workouts, from the 40-yard dash to the on-field exercises, to determine if a prospect's previous film analysis and scouting report align with their performance during the NFL Combine's on-field drills. Learn more about the player grade scale here. The Top Tight End Grades At The 2024 NFL Combine Ja'Tavion Sanders, TE, Texas (6' 4'', 245 lbs) Combine Data & Ranking Within His Position Group: 40-Yard Dash: 4.69 seconds (9th among tight ends) 10-Yard Split: 1.59 seconds (7th among tight ends) Vertical Jump: Data not provided Broad Jump: Data not provided Scouting Report Connection: Ja'Tavion Sanders is recognized for his potential as a pass-catching tight end, with significant contributions already made at the college level, as reflected in his high production score. While he has the foundational size and skills for the position, there's room for improvement in run blocking and physical development. His combine speed indicates potential to compete at the NFL level, although it suggests he may not top the charts in terms of raw athleticism. Sanders' effectiveness in the passing game, particularly in making combat catches and running seams, aligns with the skill set expected from his combine results. Grade Assignment: Considering Sanders' solid college production and the skill set highlighted by his combine performance, his grade would be Above Average to Good (6-7). While he demonstrates the necessary abilities for a pass-catching tight end, there are areas for improvement, particularly in run blocking and enhancing his physicality at the point of attack. His ability to further develop these areas will be critical in realizing his potential as a plus starter in the NFL. Theo Johnson, TE, Penn State (6' 6'', 259 lbs) Combine Data & Ranking Within His Position Group: 40-Yard Dash: 4.57 seconds (2nd among tight ends) 10-Yard Split: 1.55 seconds (3rd among tight ends) Vertical Jump: 39.5'' (2nd among tight ends) Broad Jump: 10' 5'' (2nd among tight ends) Scouting Report Connection: Theo Johnson entered the scene with high expectations due to his physical attributes and recruitment background. His combine performance, particularly his remarkable results in speed and jumping events, underscores his physical traits and aligns with the anticipated potential. However, the scouting report highlights deficiencies in run blocking and lack of dynamism as a pass-catcher, areas not directly measured at the combine but crucial for a complete tight end. His ability to make contested catches and handle man coverage is noted, suggesting a solid foundation to build upon. Grade Assignment: Given Johnson's outstanding combine showing, which accentuates his natural athletic abilities, contrasted with the noted areas for improvement in actual gameplay, his grade is Above Average to Good (6-7). His physical attributes and combine performance suggest he has the raw materials necessary for success at the next level. However, to reach his full potential and become more than an average backup, he will need to address the highlighted shortcomings, particularly in run blocking and becoming a more dynamic receiving threat. Ben Sinnott, TE, Kansas State (6' 4'', 250 lbs) Combine Data & Ranking Within His Position Group: 40-Yard Dash: 4.68 seconds (8th among tight ends) 10-Yard Split: 1.59 seconds (8th among tight ends) Vertical Jump: 40'' (1st among tight ends) Broad Jump: 10' 6'' (1st among tight ends) Scouting Report Connection: Ben Sinnott is depicted as an athletic F tight end capable of contributing in the passing game while managing some blocking duties. His combine performance, especially in the vertical and broad jumps, underscores his athleticism and ability to operate in space, a critical asset for a pass-catching tight end. Despite concerns over his physicality and hand quickness in blocking and receiving, his combine results — particularly his leading vertical and broad jump scores — highlight his potential in the passing game. Grade Assignment: Considering Sinnott's strong combine performance, particularly in explosive metrics, juxtaposed with his developmental needs in blocking and physicality, his grade is Above Average to Good (6-7). His exceptional jump scores indicate significant athletic potential for a tight end, particularly in a pass-catching role. If he can enhance his blocking and refine his receiving skills, he has the foundational athletic traits to succeed and possibly exceed expectations in the NFL. Jaheim Bell, TE, Florida State (6' 2'', 241 lbs) Combine Data & Ranking Within His Position Group: 40-Yard Dash: 4.61 seconds (4th among tight ends) 10-Yard Split: 1.58 seconds (5th among tight ends) Vertical Jump: 35'' (5th among tight ends) Broad Jump: 10' 4'' (3rd among tight ends) Scouting Report Connection: Jaheim Bell, with his diverse play history at South Carolina and Florida State, presents as a hybrid athlete without a definitive position, challenging traditional tight end or lead blocker roles. His combine performance reflects his athleticism, particularly in speed and leaping ability, indicating potential seam running capability and effectiveness after the catch. However, his inconsistencies as a blocker and lack of positional clarity pose challenges for a straightforward NFL transition. Despite these concerns, his physical abilities suggest potential for a specialized role, possibly in more dynamic offensive schemes or special teams. Grade Assignment: Reflecting on Bell's solid combine performance and considering his athletic potential juxtaposed with the noted technical and positional challenges, his grade is Above Average to Good (6-7). His good showing in combine events suggests he possesses the necessary athletic tools for the NFL, but to fully capitalize on his potential, he will need to refine his blocking and find a niche that leverages his unique skill set effectively. Tip Reiman, TE, Illinois (6' 5'', 271 lbs) Combine Data & Ranking Within His Position Group: 40-Yard Dash: 4.64 seconds (6th among tight ends) 10-Yard Split: 1.55 seconds (2nd among tight ends) Vertical Jump: 33.5'' (7th among tight ends) Broad Jump: 10' 1'' (5th among tight ends) Scouting Report Connection: Tip Reiman is characterized as a large Y tight end with the potential to excel as a run blocker at the NFL level. His combine results, particularly his 40-yard dash and 10-yard split, suggest that he possesses the necessary speed and initial quickness for a player of his size, which could complement his blocking capabilities. While known more for his blocking than his pass-catching, his combine performance, especially in the broad jump, indicates a degree of athleticism that could help him develop into a more balanced tight end. His potential in run blocking is highlighted, though his effectiveness will depend on improving hand placement and consistency. Grade Assignment: Reflecting on Reiman's combine performance and his potential as highlighted in the scouting report, his grade would be Average (5). While he shows good athleticism for his size, particularly in speed and jumping events, his lower production score and the need for technical improvement in blocking indicate areas for development. His NFL success will largely depend on his ability to enhance his blocking skills, which, combined with his measured athletic traits, could make him a valuable asset as a run-blocking tight end.

Baseline Evaluation: We review each prospect's scouting report to understand their expected strengths, weaknesses, and overall athletic profile. Note the key attributes that are crucial for their position and how they were evaluated based on their film-based scouting report analysis. Combine Performance Analysis: We then examine each player's NFL Combine results, focusing on the most relevant drills to their position and the attributes highlighted in their scouting reports. For an interior defensive lineman (IDL), relevant drills might include the 40-yard dash (indicative of speed), 10-yard split (initial quickness), vertical and broad jumps (explosiveness and lower-body strength), and bench press (upper-body strength). Comparison and Contextualization: Compare the player's Combine results to the expectations set by their scouting report. For example: If a player's scouting report highlights exceptional explosiveness and they rank highly in the vertical and broad jumps at the Combine, this would confirm the scouting analysis. Conversely, if a player is known for strength but performs poorly in the bench press, this might raise questions or indicate an area of discrepancy. Grade Assignment: Exceptional (9): The player's Combine performance is outstanding across all relevant drills, exceeding expectations based on their scouting report. Their athletic traits are among the top of their position group, confirming or surpassing their projected capabilities. Very Good to Outstanding (7-8): The player performs strongly in most relevant Combine drills, aligning well with their scouting report. They demonstrate the key physical attributes expected of them, with minor areas for improvement. Above Average to Good (6-7): The player performs well in several key areas but may have inconsistencies or areas that do not fully align with their scouting report. They show potential but also areas that need development. Average (5): The player meets the basic expectations in their Combine drills but does not stand out significantly. Their performance matches their scouting report's average attributes but lacks high-end highlights. Below Average to Poor (3-4): The player's Combine results are underwhelming in key areas that are important for their position and do not align with their scouting report's strengths. This indicates a gap between expected and actual physical abilities. Unacceptable to Very Bad (1-2): The player's performance in the Combine significantly underperforms against both the general expectations for their position and the specific attributes noted in their scouting report. This could significantly impact their draft stock and require reevaluation. Application of the Methodology: Braden Fiske: His NFL Combine performance in both the speed and power metrics was excellent, topping his position group in several key areas. This seems to align with a scouting report that would likely highlight his explosiveness and agility. Assuming his scouting report praises these qualities, his Combine performance could be graded as Exceptional (9) or Outstanding (8), depending on the exact contents of his scouting report. Byron Murphy II: He performed well in the speed and explosiveness categories, aligning with a scouting report likely emphasizing these traits. If his scouting report underscores explosive power and agility, his Combine grades should be Very Good (7) to Outstanding (8), reflecting his above-average performance and alignment with scouting expectations. Kris Jenkins: His Combine performance was good in terms of athleticism and explosiveness, as reflected in his 40-yard dash and broad jump rankings. If these attributes match his scouting report's emphasis on strength and motor skills, his grade would likely be Above Average (6) to Very Good (7), showing a good, but not top-tier, correlation between Combine performance and scouting expectations. This systematic approach provides a nuanced and detailed evaluation of how well each player's NFL Combine performance aligns with their scouting report, giving a more holistic view of their potential NFL success.

The NFL Combine offers numerous opportunities for prospects to showcase their elite athleticism to NFL scouts, GMs, and coaches. While I've stated before that the most critical aspects of the Combine are the interviews and medical evaluations, which remains true, each year, there are always a number of prospects who can significantly elevate their NFL Draft stock by demonstrating their elite athleticism. The following five players have already showcased their elite potential on film, and now it's time to confirm these traits through NFL Combine workouts. Chop Robinson, Edge, Penn State (6030, 250lbs) Football Scout 365 Grade: High-End Starter Potential Projected Draft Round: Early Round Two NFL Combine Expectations Robinson's physical stature and athleticism distinguish him as a unique talent in this draft class. With expectations of him running the 40-yard dash in the 4.4-second range and targeting a vertical leap in the 38-42-inch range, this presents a prime opportunity to showcase his explosiveness as an edge rusher. Xavier Worthy, WR, Texas (6010, 172lbs) Football Scout 365 Grade: High-End Starter Potential Projected Draft Round: Early to Mid-Round Two NFL Combine Expectations Worthy's speed and playmaking ability make him a standout prospect in this draft class. He is rumored to be capable of running the 40-yard dash in under 4.3 seconds, a testament to his elite speed. In addition to his raw speed, Worthy has proven himself to be a dynamic playmaker on the field. He averaged 7.6 yards after the catch in 2023, highlighting his ability to turn short gains into explosive plays. Moreover, Worthy showcased his deep-threat capability by logging a reception of at least 20 yards in all but two of the 14 games he played last season. Nate Wiggins, CB, Clemson (6020, 185lbs) Football Scout 365 Grade: High-End Starter Potential Projected Draft Round: Early to Mid 1st Round NFL Combine Expectations Wiggins is renowned for his athleticism and has cemented himself as a top prospect in this draft class. His elite athleticism is evident in plays such as the two pick-sixes he has recorded in the past two seasons, highlighting his ability to turn defense into offense quickly. There is some speculation that he could run a 40 in the 4.3 range. If he does, he could elevate to the top cornerback prospect in the 2024 NFL Draft. He is already considered our top corner on the Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Board. Jaylen Wright, RB, Tennessee (5110, 210lbs) Football Scout 365 Grade: Mid-Level Starter Potential Projected Draft Round: 3rd-4th Round NFL Combine Expectations Wright has a unique opportunity to turn heads at the NFL Combine. His background as a track athlete in high school was highlighted by a national-leading 55-meter dash time of 6.29 seconds. This track speed is further substantiated by impressive GPS measurements, where he has been clocked at a remarkable 23.6 mph. In addition to his speed, he reportedly recorded a 44-inch vertical and a 10-foot-8 broad jump. These numbers showcase his explosive power and hint at his potential for dynamic playmaking ability in the NFL. Devontez Walker, WR, North Carolina (6030, 200) Football Scout 365 Grade: High-End Starter Potential Projected Draft Round: 2nd-3rd Round NFL Combine Expectations "Tez" has established himself as a formidable vertical threat despite an abbreviated 2023 season due to initial NCAA eligibility issues related to his status as a two-time transfer. Once he hit the field, Walker demonstrated his ability to dismantle defenses, racking up seven touchdowns in only eight games. Walker's reputation for speed was further solidified during Senior Bowl practices, where he was notably fast. This speed is anticipated to translate impressively to the 40-yard dash at the NFL Combine in Indianapolis. Given his demonstrated on-field speed and ability to score, Walker is expected to be one of the top performers in speed and agility drills at the combine.

The 2024 NFL Scouting Combine is underway, with the workouts starting February 29th and lasting through March 3rd. Below is a list of curated NFL Combine content. Click Here: Check out the Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Big Board top 100 player rankings. We evaluate every player using a proprietary grading process that involves film evaluation combined with advanced data. On the back end, our scouting process mirrors the same process deployed by current NFL front-office personnel so that we can deliver the most in-depth player scouting reports available. All of this is currently free (subject to change). Each player scouting report includes: In-depth player scouting report Play Style and Scheme Fit Analysis Player Strengths & Weaknesses Player Comparisons 2024 NFL Combine Specific Content 20 Players Who Can Elevate Their 2024 NFL Draft Stock 20 Players Who Can Elevate Their 2024 NFL Draft Stock at The Combine NFL Combine Kicks Off With Coach and GM Interviews 2024 NFL Combine Day One Highlights: Insights from Coaches and GMs, McCarthy, Penix, and Odunze Confirm Participation Long Time NFL Scout Discusses Importance Of NFL Combine A Long Time NFL Scout Discussed Misconceptions vs. Reality at the NFL Scouting Combine Michigan Breaks NFL Combine Record With 18 Invites Michigan Football With Record 18 NFL Combine Invites | 2024 NFL Combine Invite Totals By School 321 Players Invited To Participate At The NFL Combine Complete List of 2024 NFL Combine Prospects Released Totaling 321 Invites Pre-Combine 2024 NFL Draft Player Rankings The QB Rankings 2024 NFL Draft Position Rankings: Top 5 Quarterbacks | Pre NFL Combine The RB Rankings 2024 NFL Draft Position Rankings: Top 5 Running Backs | Pre NFL Combine The WR Rankings 2024 NFL Draft Position Rankings: Top 10 Wide Receivers | Pre NFL Combine The TE Rankings 2024 NFL Draft Position Rankings: Top 5 Tight Ends | Pre NFL Combine The OT Rankings 2024 NFL Draft Position Rankings: Top 5 Offensive Tackles | Pre NFL Combine The IOL Rankings 2024 NFL Draft Position Rankings: Top 5 Interior Offensive Lineman | Pre NFL Combine The Defensive Rankings 2024 NFL Draft Position Rankings: The Top 3 Defenders By Position Group Ahead Of The 2024 NFL Combine Pre-NFL Combine Mock Drafts Mock Draft 1.0 Mock Draft 1.0: Chicago Bears Trade Back, Atlanta Falcons Draft Caleb Williams | 2024 NFL Draft Mock Draft 2.0 Mock Draft 2.0: Washington, New England, Atlanta, Denver, New York and Seattle Draft A QB Mock Draft 3.0 Mock Draft 3.0: Commanders Trade Up With Bears, Broncos Move Up For QB, 5 QB's Drafted In Round One of The 2024 NFL Draft Senior Bowl Content Players To Watch At The Senior Bowl 2024 Senior Bowl Preview: 10 Players That Can Elevate Their 2024 NFL Draft Stock Senior Bowl Day One Standouts 2024 Senior Bowl Day One Standout Players: Roman Wilson, Quinyon Mitchell, and Ladd McConkey Stole The Show The Top Performers From Senior Bowl Practices 2024 Senior Bowl: Top Performers Who Raised Their NFL Draft Stock? The Top Senior Bowl Game Performers 2024 Senior Bowl Game Recap: The MVP, The Standouts, Whose Stock Will Rise?

The NFL Combine is an event made for TV. The drills are generally less important than what you hear from all the social media analysts. Most of the hype is created to generate buzz—a fact I've mentioned for years. Another aspect is that the NFL Combine provides additional data points for evaluators to consider and compare to the film. It's all about matching your initial thoughts prior to the noise, or lack thereof, due to a 40-yard dash time or a remarkable vertical jump. If you actually watch the film of the players participating in the NFL Combine, you will not be surprised by their explosive, or not-so-explosive, 40 times and vertical jumps. What really matters are the player interviews with front-office personnel, coaches, and GMs and the medical evaluations. In a recent article written by Greg Gabriel, much of this was confirmed by Greg Gabriel, a reputable name in NFL scouting circles. Gabriel shared his thoughts on how actual NFL teams view the NFL Combine. Below, I provide a summarized version of Gabriel's thoughts. For more detailed insights, you can read the full article on SB Nation's Windy City Gridiron, linked in the text. Misconceptions vs. Reality at the NFL Scouting Combine In the article, Greg Gabriel reveals the common misunderstandings and truths about the NFL Scouting Combine. He clarifies that the widespread belief of players dramatically improving their draft stock based only on their combine performance is more of a media creation than reality. In fact, NFL teams do not usually alter a player's evaluation significantly based on their combine exercises, which mainly consist of non-football-specific athletic drills. Evaluating Performances May Prompt A Second Look Gabriel explains that while excellent performances are anticipated, subpar performances can lead to concerns, prompting scouts to reassess their initial opinions. However, an outstanding performance typically triggers a second look at the player's game footage rather than an instant elevation in draft prospects. He also observes that despite post-combine hype for some players, dramatic leaps in draft positioning are infrequent. Key Elements of the Combine According to Gabriel, the pivotal components of the combine are the medical assessments and the player interviews. The combine primarily exists to provide thorough medical examinations for the athletes, offering teams valuable health information. Although the interview portion is brief, it offers crucial insights into the players' personalities and can greatly influence a team's interest. Advice on Skipping Workouts Gabriel advises against avoiding combine workouts, arguing that participating offers a chance to rectify any poor performances at subsequent Pro Days. He uses Devin Hester as an example, who improved his draft prospects by bettering his time at his Pro Day following a less impressive combine showing. Significance of Specific Drills He points out that the importance of drills varies by position. For example, speed and agility are vital for skill positions, while vertical jumps and agility drills are critical for receivers to showcase their explosiveness and body control. Quarterback Workouts at the Combine Gabriel mentions that the quarterback drills at the combine are not as significant, given that the format does not allow quarterbacks to fully demonstrate their skills. He suggests that evaluations during Pro Days and private workouts are more reflective of a quarterback's true abilities. The NFL Combine Is Not A Definitive Factor In A Player's NFL Draft Outcome Gabriel's insights highlight NFL teams' internal processes and viewpoints regarding the combine. He emphasizes that while the combine is a crucial element of the scouting process, it is not the definitive factor in a player’s draft outcome. About Greg Gabriel Per The Website Windy City Gridiron Greg Gabriel has over three decades of experience working in the NFL, including stints in the front office with the Buffalo Bills, New York Giants, and Chicago Bears, where he was Director of College Scouting. Greg has done countless media appearances over the years and brought his unique scouting eye to Windy City Gridiron in 2022.

The 2024 NFL Combine unofficially started yesterday with GMs, coaches, and players doing the media rounds, and NFL teams began the individual player interview process. Medical evaluations will also take place this week, and as always, the medicals and the interviews will play a significant role in the NFL Draft evaluation process. Below is a list of news-related items from the first day of NFL Combine discussions, which included media sessions with coaches, players, and GMs. There are some interesting tidbits to take from these media sessions, so I wanted to compile some of the most relevant discussions centered around the NFL Combine and the 2024 NFL Draft. J.J. McCarthy Will Throw At The NFL Combine Michigan quarterback J.J. McCarthy is set to participate in the upcoming NFL Scouting Combine, where he will throw and work out alongside other quarterbacks. McCarthy, considered one of the top prospects in the draft, has been under scrutiny due to his limited usage in college. However, with a strong performance at the combine and his pro day, he could potentially secure a position as a top five pick. His decision to participate in the combine is crucial as it allows NFL teams to assess his abilities more closely, especially with other top quarterback prospects like Jayden Daniels and Caleb Williams opting out of the event. Opportunity for Bo Nix and Michael Penix Jr. To Showcase Their Talent The absence of USC's Caleb Williams and LSU's Jayden Daniels from the throwing events at the combine offers an opportunity for other quarterbacks, such as Oregon's Bo Nix and Washington's Michael Penix Jr., to capture the attention of NFL teams. Both Nix and Penix Jr. have confirmed their participation in the combine workouts, aiming to elevate their draft stock amidst a deep quarterback class. Patriots' Director of Scouting On QB Evaluation Strategy Eliot Wolf, the New England Patriots' Director of Scouting, shared insights into what the team looks for in a quarterback. Leadership, physical talent, and positive body language on the field are key attributes. The Patriots, holding the No. 3 overall pick in the 2024 NFL draft, are in the process of evaluating quarterbacks, emphasizing the importance of toughness at the position. This evaluation process is crucial as the Patriots consider making a change at quarterback. Rome Odunze Will Participate In Combine Drills In contrast to the trend of top prospects opting out of combine workouts, Washington wide receiver Rome Odunze has decided to participate fully in the drills at the combine. Expected to be a top-10 pick, Odunze's decision to perform all the drills sets him apart from other top wide receiver prospects like Marvin Harrison Jr. and Malik Nabers, who have chosen to skip the workouts. Odunze's exceptional physical attributes, including his speed, vertical leap, and broad jump measurements, are anticipated to impress NFL teams. Vikings' New QB Coach Is Former Drake Maye High School Coach The Minnesota Vikings have appointed Josh McCown as their new quarterbacks coach, a decision that carries significant implications given McCown's past coaching experience with top quarterback prospect Drake Maye in high school and his connections with the NFL, including the Vikings and head coach Kevin O'Connell. While the Vikings are exploring long-term options at quarterback, with Kirk Cousins' future uncertain, the hiring of McCown could hint at a potential interest in developing Maye, who shares the same agent with Cousins and is considered a high-ceiling talent in need of experience and seasoning​​. Panthers GM Dan Morgan Emphasizes Need for Wide Receiver Talent Carolina Panthers' new GM Dan Morgan and rookie head coach Dave Canales are clear about the team's need to enhance its wide receiver corps, especially after the team finished with the NFL's worst record in 2023. Despite not discussing quarterback Bryce Young's rocky rookie season, Morgan is focused on adding "playmakers" to provide better support for Young. He highlighted the necessity for more depth and competition among the wide receivers, pointing out the potential to bolster the squad through the draft or free agency. Morgan praised the current wide receiver class and expressed a desire for players who exhibit toughness and a passion for the game, eyeing the No. 33 overall pick as an opportunity to address this need with promising prospects available like Ladd McConkey, Troy Franklin, Adonai Mitchell, Keon Coleman, and Brian Thomas.

We are entering the next stage of the NFL Draft player rankings process. As always, I start with the top 5 quarterbacks (QB), top 5 running backs (RB), top 10 wide receivers (WR), and the top 5 tight ends (TE) before diving into the updated offensive line and top defender grades. The defender rankings below are the top three ranked players at their position ahead of the 2024 NFL Draft. Click Here: Check out the Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Big Board top 100 player rankings. We evaluate every player using a proprietary grading process that involves film evaluation combined with advanced data. On the back end, our scouting process mirrors the same process deployed by current NFL front-office personnel so that we can deliver the most in-depth player scouting reports available. All of this is currently free (subject to change). Each player scouting report includes: In-depth player scouting report Play Style and Scheme Fit Analysis Player Strengths & Weaknesses Player Comparisons The Top 3 Cornerbacks (CB1) Nate Wiggins, Clemson (CB, 6'2", 185 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Wiggins excels with his disruptive range and efficiency against vertical threats. His agility and sharp route recognition make him adaptable to various defensive schemes, emphasizing his role in off-man coverage. His potential in the NFL aligns with 'High-End Starter Potential,' showcasing his capability to adjust and excel in numerous roles. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 1st NFL Teams Mocked: Colts, Vikings, Jaguars (CB2) Cooper DeJean, Iowa (CB, 6'1", 210 lbs) Projection: Elite Analysis: DeJean's spatial awareness and athleticism afford him versatility across the boundary, slot, and potentially safety roles. His explosive athleticism and quick response to plays highlight his proficiency in zone and off-man coverage, marking him as an 'Elite' prospect ready for early-round selection. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 1st NFL Teams Mocked: (CB3) Quinyon Mitchell, Toledo (CB, 6'0", 196 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Mitchell showcases exceptional zone and off-man coverage prowess, leveraging his excellent route recognition and ball skills to disrupt plays. His coverage instincts and reactive athleticism render him perfectly suited for schemes that value versatility, allowing him to excel both in open spaces and near the line of scrimmage. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 1st NFL Teams Mocked: Steelers, Eagles, Rams The Top 3 Edge Rushers (EDGE1) Dallas Turner, Alabama (ED, 6'4", 240 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Turner's flexibility across defensive alignments, comparable to notable NFL talents, underpins his value as a dynamic pass rusher. His need for refinement in run defense and block shedding does not overshadow his 'High-End Starter Potential,' promising a strong NFL impact. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 1st NFL Teams Mocked: Falcons, Vikings, Bears (EDGE2) Laiatu Latu, UCLA (ED, 6'5", 265 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Latu's pass rush ability and motor, suitable for odd front schemes, resonate with his compelling comeback story. His 'High-End Starter Potential' forecasts an impactful NFL career, emphasizing his skill set for aggressive defensive play. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 1st NFL Teams Mocked: (EDGE3) Jared Verse, Florida State (ED, 6'4", 250 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Verse's adaptability, mirroring the versatility of NFL edge rushers, positions him as a potential cornerstone in defensive strategies prioritizing quarterback pressures. His 'High-End Starter Potential' suggests year-one NFL readiness. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 1st NFL Teams Mocked: Seahawks, Rams, Bucs The Top 3 Interior Defensive Linemen (IDL1) Jer'Zhan Newton, Illinois (IDL, 6'2", 295 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Newton's athleticism and technical skills make him a fit for dynamic defensive fronts, aiming for Pro Bowl levels. His ability to lead Power 5 in pressures denotes his 'High-End Starter Potential,' promising a disruptive NFL presence. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 1st NFL Teams Mocked: Bengals, Raiders, Seahawks (IDL2) Byron Murphy II, Texas (IDL, 6'1", 308 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Murphy's prowess in run defense and potential in pass rush align him with traditional 4-3 schemes, where his foundational skills forecast 'High-End Starter Potential' as a solid interior force in the NFL. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 1st NFL Teams Mocked: Lions, Texans, Cardinals (IDL3) Kris Jenkins, Michigan (IDL, 6'3", 305 lbs) Projection: Mid-Level Starter Potential Analysis: Jenkins' effectiveness against the run and effort in pass rush cater to his suitability as a nose tackle or defensive tackle, suggesting 'Mid-Level Starter Potential.' Despite speed limitations, his strengths indicate a reliable defensive contribution. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 2nd-3rd NFL Teams Mocked: Packers, Bengals, Vikings The Top 3 Linebackers (LB1) Edgerrin Cooper, Texas A&M (LB, 6'3", 230 lbs) Projection: Mid-Level Starter Potential Analysis: Cooper's athletic profile and diagnostic ability fit a weakside linebacker role, highlighting his 'Mid-Level Starter Potential.' His versatility promises a dynamic impact within NFL defensive schemes. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 2nd-3rd Round NFL Teams Mocked: Packers, Eagles, Steelers (LB2) Junior Colson, Michigan (LB, 6'3", 247 lbs) Projection: Mid-Level Starter Potential Analysis: Colson's agility and coverage skills, effective in a 4-3 defense, mark him as a 'Mid-Level Starter Potential.' His comprehensive abilities suggest a path toward becoming a substantial defensive contributor. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 3rd-4th NFL Teams Mocked: Commanders, Chargers, Cardinals (LB3) Jeremiah Trotter Jr., Clemson (LB, 6'0", 230 lbs) Projection: Mid-Level Starter Potential Analysis: Trotter Jr.'s blend of run-stopping and pass rush potential positions him for versatile linebacker roles, with 'Mid-Level Starter Potential' indicating a promising NFL journey with substantial room for growth. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 3rd-4th NFL Teams Mocked: Packers, Eagles, Steelers The Top 3 Safeties (S1) Kamren Kinchens, Miami (S, 6'0", 205 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Kinchens' comprehensive coverage abilities and adaptability signal 'High-End Starter Potential,' predicting a significant defensive role. His need for improved tackling technique suggests areas for enhancement. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 2nd-3rd Round NFL Teams Mocked: Packers, Eagles, Bears (S2) Tyler Nubin, Minnesota (S, 6'2", 210 lbs) Projection: Mid-Level Starter Potential Analysis: Nubin's proficiency in run defense and straight-line speed cater to zone or nickel safety roles, with 'Mid-Level Starter Potential' underscoring his capacity for solid NFL contributions. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 2nd-3rd NFL Teams Mocked: Packers, Eagles, Bears (S3) Calen Bullock, USC (S, 6'3", 190 lbs) Projection: Low-Level Starter Potential Analysis: Bullock's prowess in deep coverage juxtaposes his need for tackling improvement, with 'Low-Level Starter Potential' highlighting developmental areas alongside promising pass-defense capabilities. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 3rd-4th NFL Teams Mocked: Packers, Bears, Bills

We are entering the next stage of the NFL Draft player rankings process. As always, I start with the top 5 quarterbacks (QB), top 5 running backs (RB), top 10 wide receivers (WR), and the top 5 tight ends (TE) before diving into the updated offensive line and top defender grades. Click Here: Check out the Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Big Board top 100 player rankings. We evaluate every player using a proprietary grading process that involves film evaluation combined with advanced data. On the back end, our scouting process mirrors the same process deployed by current NFL front-office personnel so that we can deliver the most in-depth player scouting reports available. All of this is currently free (subject to change). Each player scouting report includes: In-depth player scouting report Play Style and Scheme Fit Analysis Player Strengths & Weaknesses Player Comparisons The Top 5 IOL's The top 5 IOL's according to our updated 2024 NFL Draft Big Board player rankings, ranked ahead of the 2024 NFL Combine. (1) Jackson Powers-Johnson, Oregon (IOL, 6'3", 320 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Powers-Johnson is praised for his athleticism and versatility, shining in zone schemes with his footwork and movement. Despite his shorter reach, his effective anchoring and smart play compensate, making him ideal for dynamic offenses. Expected to be a Day 2 pick, his immediate impact as a starting center is anticipated, supported by his high football IQ and leadership. (2) Christian Mahogany, Boston College (IOL, 6'3", 322 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Mahogany's blend of power and technique positions him as a versatile force on the interior line, capable of excelling in any offensive setup. His ability to engage defenders at the second level and adeptness at handling complex defenses underscore his potential. Projected as a high-end starter, Mahogany's skill set promises significant NFL success. (3) Cooper Beebe, Kansas State (IOL, 6'4", 322 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Beebe's strength and base make him a formidable force in run-heavy schemes, with his versatility allowing play across the interior. While he shines in gap and power run schemes, further development in pass protection could round out his skill set. With high football IQ and adaptability, Beebe is seen as a valuable Day 2 selection. (4) Zak Zinter, Michigan (IOL, 6'6", 334 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Zinter's size and toughness make him a solid fit for vertical run schemes, leveraging his strength for effective engagement. While not the most mobile, his foundational skills suggest a reliable interior presence. Projected with Mid-Level Starter Potential, Zinter's consistency and football IQ forecast a successful NFL career. (5) Zach Frazier, West Virginia (IOL, 6'3", 310 lbs) Projection: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Frazier's technical proficiency and power excel in gap schemes, with his wrestling background enhancing his blocking leverage. While less suited for zone schemes, his reliable pass protection and football intelligence make him a dependable center option. Anticipated as a Day 2 selection, Frazier's potential as a solid NFL contributor is evident.

We are entering the next stage of the NFL Draft player rankings process. As always, I start with the top 5 quarterbacks (QB), top 5 running backs (RB), top 10 wide receivers (WR), and the top 5 tight ends (TE) before diving into the updated offensive line and top defender grades. Click Here: Check out the Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Big Board top 100 player rankings. We evaluate every player using a proprietary grading process that involves film evaluation combined with advanced data. On the back end, our scouting process mirrors the same process deployed by current NFL front-office personnel so that we can deliver the most in-depth player scouting reports available. All of this is currently free (subject to change). Each player scouting report includes: In-depth player scouting report Play Style and Scheme Fit Analysis Player Strengths & Weaknesses Player Comparisons The Top 5 OT's The top 5 OT's according to our updated 2024 NFL Draft Big Board player rankings, ranked ahead of the 2024 NFL Combine. (1) Joe Alt, Notre Dame (OT, 6'7", 318 lbs) Grade: Elite Analysis: Joe Alt epitomizes the modern offensive tackle with his unique blend of size and athleticism. His lateral agility and nimbleness, honed from his basketball background, make him an exemplary fit for zone-blocking schemes. Alt's adeptness at handling complex defensive schemes and his potential as a day-one starter at left tackle are evident. While he seeks to refine his hand technique and balance, Alt's foundational skills suggest a trajectory toward becoming a Pro Bowl-caliber left tackle, embodying an elite prospect ready for the NFL's challenges. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 1st Consensus Overall Pick #: Top 10 Overall NFL Teams Mocked: Titans, Giants, Chargers (2) Olumuyiwa Fashanu, Penn State (OT, 6'6", 308 lbs) Grade: Near Elite Analysis: Olumuyiwa Fashanu stands out for his prototypical left tackle attributes, blending size, strength, and agility. His proficiency in pass protection and effectiveness in space position him as a linchpin for any offensive line. Fashanu's work ethic and finish on plays add significant value, indicating his readiness for a significant role in the NFL. Projected as a Day 1 selection, Fashanu is anticipated to quickly ascend to All-Pro status with advancements in pad level and consistency. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 1st Consensus Overall Pick #: Top 10 Overall NFL Teams Mocked: Jets, Titans, Bears (3) Taliese Fuaga, Oregon State (OT, 6'6", 333 lbs) Grade: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Taliese Fuaga's powerful and physical play style defines him as a key asset for run-first offenses. His ability to dominate in the run game and his adaptability to perform in pass protection underline his versatility. Fuaga's fit in zone concepts and his potential to play both guard and tackle at the professional level spotlight his comprehensive skill set. His path to becoming a significant contributor in the NFL is marked by his exceptional run blocking and evolving pass protection skills. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 1st Consensus Overall Pick #: Top 20 Overall NFL Teams Mocked: Raiders, Jets, Saints (4) J.C. Latham, Alabama (OT, 6'6", 326 lbs) Grade: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: J.C. Latham embodies the ideal offensive tackle with his impressive blend of strength, agility, and technical skill. His versatility shines in both pass protection and the run game, fitting seamlessly into diverse offensive schemes. Latham's immediate impact potential and pathway to Pro Bowl recognition are bolstered by his adaptability and technical prowess. With continued refinement, he is poised to emerge as a premier lineman in the NFL, showcasing the ability to succeed across various blocking schemes. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 1st Consensus Overall Pick #: Top 20 Overall NFL Teams Mocked: Bengals, Saints, Steelers (5) Amarius Mims, Georgia (OT, 6'7", 340 lbs) Grade: High-End Starter Potential Analysis: Amarius Mims's combination of size, agility, and strength positions him as a versatile and impactful offensive tackle. His quick footwork and effective engagement with defenders highlight his capability in both run blocking and pass protection. Mims is particularly suited for zone-blocking schemes but also has the flexibility to excel in multiple positions along the offensive line. With focused improvement on technique and engagement consistency, Mims is on a trajectory toward becoming a foundational piece of an NFL offensive line, offering substantial value as a high-end starter. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 1st Consensus Overall Pick #: Top 20 Overall NFL Teams Mocked: Bengals, Dolphins, Packers

We are entering the next stage of the NFL Draft player rankings process. As always, I start with the top 5 quarterbacks (QB), top 5 running backs (RB), top 10 wide receivers (WR), and the top 5 tight ends (TE) before diving into the updated offensive line and top ten defender grades. Click Here: Check out the Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Big Board top 100 player rankings. We evaluate every player using a proprietary grading process that involves film evaluation combined with advanced data. On the back end, our scouting process mirrors the same process deployed by current NFL front-office personnel so that we can deliver the most in-depth player scouting reports available. All of this is currently free (subject to change). Each player scouting report includes: In-depth player scouting report Play Style and Scheme Fit Analysis Player Strengths & Weaknesses Player Comparisons The Top 5 TE's The top 5 TE's, according to our updated 2024 NFL Draft Big Board player rankings, ranked ahead of the 2024 NFL Combine. (1) Brock Bowers, Georgia Ranking Analysis: Brock Bowers is a versatile, athletic, tight end who can make plays in both the passing and the running game. He has been compared to some of the best tight ends in the NFL, including George Kittle, Travis Kelce, and Darren Waller. Bowers would fit well in a scheme that values athletic, pass-catching tight ends and takes advantage of his abilities in the middle of the field and down the seam. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 1st Consensus Overall Pick #: Top 10 Overall NFL Teams Mocked: Chargers, Broncos, Colts Ceiling: Elite, capable of becoming a cornerstone player for an NFL franchise. (2) Ja'Tavion Sanders, Texas Ranking Analysis:  Sanders is a dynamic tight end who excels in a versatile offensive scheme. His ability to line up in multiple positions, including in-line, slot, and even outside, makes him a valuable asset for any team looking for a modern, pass-catching tight end. He's particularly effective in schemes that utilize the tight end as a key weapon in the passing game, leveraging his route-running ability and athleticism to create mismatches. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 2nd-4th Round Consensus Overall Pick #: 40th Overall NFL Teams Mocked: Bengals, Dolphins, Commanders Ceiling: High-End Starter Potential, with the ability to significantly impact the game. (3) Jaheim Bell, Florida State Ranking Analysis: Jaheim Bell's role as a versatile H-back or move tight end is underscored by his athleticism and receiving skills. While he shows promise as a receiver, enhancements in contested catches and deep speed are necessary for NFL success. Bell's multifunctional play style, comparable to Hunter Henry and Gerald Everett, presents him as a valuable draft pick with the versatility to fit into numerous offensive formations. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 4th-5th Round Consensus Overall Pick #: NA NFL Teams Mocked: Bengals, Pats, Commanders Ceiling: Mid-Level Starter Potential, with the ability to exceed expectations within a few years. (4) AJ Barner, Michigan Ranking Analysis: AJ Barner embodies the traditional tight end archetype with a strong emphasis on blocking and reliable receiving. His fit in pro-style offenses that value a dual-threat tight end suggests a role as a dependable contributor. While Barner may not redefine the tight end position, his solid fundamentals and work ethic could make him a steady presence in the NFL. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 5th-6th Round Consensus Overall Pick #: NA NFL Teams Mocked: Bears, Bengals, Chargers Ceiling: Low-Level Starter Potential, indicating the potential for reliable, if not spectacular, NFL contributions. (5) Theo Johnson, Penn State Ranking Analysis: Theo Johnson's versatility as a tight end is highlighted by his receiving prowess and adequate blocking. Drawing comparisons to athletic tight ends like Mark Andrews, Johnson's ability in various offensive roles suggests a promising NFL future. While his blocking requires refinement, Johnson's athleticism and receiving skills make him a notable prospect in the draft. Draft Projections Projected NFL Draft Round: 4th-6th Round Consensus Overall Pick #: NA NFL Teams Mocked: Bengals, Vikings, Texans Ceiling: Low-Level Starter Potential, with room for development into a more comprehensive role within an NFL offense.

In my latest Mock Draft 3.0, we have a complete post-Super Bowl NFL Draft order following the Kansas City Chiefs' victory over the San Francisco 49ers. With just a few weeks remaining before the start of the 2024 NFL Draft Combine in Indianapolis, I wanted to present one more mock draft before the combine and will follow up with Mock Draft 4.0 post-NFL Combine. In this mock, a few trades will affect the top 10 of the 2024 NFL Draft as teams are positioning themselves to move up for a QB. Check Out My Other Mock Drafts Mock Draft 1.0 (Mock Draft 1.0: Chicago Bears Trade Back, Atlanta Falcons Draft Caleb Williams | 2024 NFL Draft) Mock Draft 2.0 (Mock Draft 2.0: Washington, New England, Atlanta, Denver, New York and Seattle Draft A QB) In this round one mock draft, we observe the following positional highlights: 5 quarterbacks (QBs) were selected in Round One. I anticipate that anywhere between 3-6 QBs could go, with several teams potentially trading up to secure a QB; this is due to the anticipated lack of high talent in the 2025 NFL Draft class, prompting teams to be more aggressive in the 2024 NFL Draft. 5 wide receivers (WRs) are off the board in what is one of my deepest WR classes yet. We could see between 4 and 7 WRs drafted in the first round. 6 offensive tackles (OTs) were chosen, showcasing the depth of this group of tackles. There might be between 4 to 7 OTs selected in round one. 7 cornerbacks (CBs) were taken in a deep and talented group. I expect anywhere from 4 to 8 CBs to be taken in the first round alone. 5 EDGE rushers snagged in round one in a class that lacks a clear elite set of players at the top but possesses solid talent with high-end potential. Check out the Football Scout 365 NFL Draft Big Board top 100 player rankings. We evaluate every player using a proprietary grading process that involves film evaluation combined with advanced data. On the back end, our scouting process mirrors the same process deployed by current NFL front-office personnel so that we can deliver the most in-depth player scouting reports available. All of this is currently free (subject to change). Each player scouting report includes: In-depth player scouting report Play Style and Scheme Fit Analysis Player Strengths & Weaknesses Player Comparisons Round One NFL Mock Draft 3.0 (1). Washington Commanders (via CHI, CAR) The Pick: QB Caleb Williams, USC Needs: QB, Edge, WR, IOL, LB Key Free Agents: Kamren Curl, Jacoby Brissett, Curtis Samuel Pick Rationale: The Commanders are in a prime position to draft a quarterback by staying at pick two while also possessing the option to trade back. The race for QB2 is quite competitive, featuring J.J. McCarthy, Jayden Daniels, and Drake Maye as key contenders ahead of the NFL Combine. Given these circumstances, they seem prepared to make a bold move. The decision to bring in Kliff Kingsbury was made with a clear purpose, suggesting that going all out to draft Caleb Williams is their best course of action following Kingsbury's hiring. (2). Chicago Bears (via WAS) The Pick: WR Marvin Harrison Jr., Ohio State Needs: IOL, WR, TE, Edge, CB Key Free Agents: Darnell Mooney, Yannick Ngakoue, D'Onta Foreman, Justin Jones, Montez Sweat Pick Rationale: The Chicago Bears selected Ohio State WR Marvin Harrison Jr. through a trade with the Washington Commanders. The Commanders went all in to acquire Caleb Williams, offering the Bears multiple first-round picks and the opportunity to move back just one spot—a proposal the Bears couldn't turn down. This trade signals the Bears' commitment to Justin Fields as they accumulate draft capital to construct a roster around him. (3). New England Patriots The Pick: QB Drake Maye, UNC Needs: QB, TE, OT, WR, RB Key Free Agents: Trent Brown, Hunter Henry, Kyle Dugger, Josh Uche, Mike Onwenu Pick Rationale: The New England Patriots address their critical need at quarterback by selecting UNC's Drake Maye as their pick. Faced with the potential departures of key free agents like Trent Brown and Hunter Henry and considering their need for improvement at wide receiver, tackle, and edge defender, the Patriots' choice of Maye underscores a strategic pivot toward rejuvenating their offense. Amid speculation around trading for Justin Fields or trading back due to interest from quarterback-needy teams, they chose to secure a potential franchise quarterback in Drake Maye. (4). Arizona Cardinals The Pick: WR Malik Nabers, LSU Needs: WR, DT, IOL, Edge, CB Key Free Agents: Marquise Brown, L.J. Collier, Antonio Hamilton, Greg Dortch Pick Rationale: The Arizona Cardinals, selecting fourth in the draft, chose LSU WR Malik Nabers, targeting him as the next-best wide receiver option after missing out on Marvin Harrison Jr. With pressing needs in wide receiver, offensive line, defensive line, linebacker, and cornerback positions, and facing the potential free agency departures of key players like Marquise Brown and L.J. Collier, the Cardinals should be focused on strengthening their pass rush and coverage capabilities. (5). Los Angeles Chargers The Pick: TE Brock Bowers, Georgia Needs: CB, RB, DT, TE, C Key Free Agents: Austin Ekeler, Gerald Everett, Kenneth Murray, Austin Johnson, Michael Davis Pick Rationale: Jim Harbaugh's arrival signals a fresh chapter for the Chargers, bringing a focus on strengthening the team's core, especially in the face of key free agents' potential exits. His decision to bring along defensive coordinator Jesse Minter underscores a commitment to defense. With critical needs across the board and the looming free agency of Austin Ekeler and Gerald Everett, prioritizing the tight end position with a player like Brock Bowers could provide both immediate impact and long-term benefits. (6). New York Giants The Pick: OT Joe Alt, Notre Dame Needs: DT, RB, IOL, Edge, CB Key Free Agents: Adoree' Jackson, Saquon Barkley, Parris Campbell, A'Shawn Robinson Pick Rationale: The New York Giants, holding the sixth pick, have selected Notre Dame OT Joe Alt to address their significant need on the offensive line. With critical needs across defensive tackle, running back, interior offensive line, edge rusher, and cornerback positions, and facing the potential loss of key free agents such as Adoree' Jackson, Saquon Barkley, and A'Shawn Robinson, the Giants could have considered trading back but chose to secure the top offensive tackle on their draft board. (7). Denver Broncos (via TEN) The Pick: QB J.J. McCarthy, Michigan Needs: QB, DT, TE, CB, Edge Key Free Agents: Pick Rationale: In a strategic move via a trade with Tennessee, the Denver Broncos select Michigan QB J.J. McCarthy, positioning him as their future franchise QB. This decision comes amid considerations for upgrades at quarterback, wide receiver, center, edge defender, and cornerback. (8). Atlanta Falcons The Pick: QB Jayden Daniels, LSU Needs: QB, WR, Edge, CB, DT Key Free Agents: Matt Hennessy, Jeff Okudah, Calais Campbell, Cordarrelle Patterson, Bud Dupree Pick Rationale: The Falcons looked poised to snag J.J. McCarthy in this spot possibly, but the Broncos jumped ahead of them at pick 7 to grab the former Michigan QB. So, they go with the next available QB in the class, a player in the current mix to be the QB2. Jayden Daniels would bring a dynamic element to the QB position in Atlanta in an offense already loaded with dynamic talent. (9). Chicago Bears The Pick: Edge Dallas Turner, Alabama Needs: IOL, WR, TE, Edge, CB Key Free Agents: Darnell Mooney, Yannick Ngakoue, D'Onta Foreman, Justin Jones, Montez Sweat Pick Rationale: At the ninth pick, the Chicago Bears select Edge Dallas Turner from Alabama, aiming to bolster their defensive front seven. (10). New York Jets The Pick: OT Olu Fashanu, Penn State Needs: OT, WR, S, DT, QB Key Free Agents: Carl Lawson, Duane Brown, Dalvin Cook, Jordan Whitehead Pick Rationale: The New York Jets, with the tenth pick, choose OT Olu Fashanu from Penn State, addressing a critical need on their offensive line. With many other needs and key free agents that could be on the move, they go with the best available tackle option. (11). Minnesota Vikings The Pick: CB Cooper DeJean, Iowa Needs: QB, RB, G, C, DL, LB, DB Key Free Agents: Kirk Cousins, Danielle Hunter, Marcus Davenport, Jordan Hicks, Joshua Dobbs Pick Rationale: At pick eleven, the Minnesota Vikings secure a pivotal addition to their secondary with Iowa's Cooper DeJean, strategically addressing their need for defensive playmakers. (12). Tennessee Titans (via DEN) The Pick: OT Taliese Fuaga, Oregon State Needs: OT, CB, WR, Edge, RB Key Free Agents: Ryan Tannehill, Derrick Henry, Teair Tart, Denico Autry, Sean Murphy-Bunting Pick Rationale: The Tennessee Titans should focus on protecting Will Levis by revamping the OL in this draft. In addition, they need to address needs in the secondary and their need to add a more consistent pass rush. (13). Las Vegas Raiders The Pick: QB Michael Penix Jr., Washington Needs: QB, RB, OL, DL, LB, DB Key Free Agents: Josh Jacobs, Austin Hooper, Marcus Peters, Andre James, Jermaine Eluemunor Pick Rationale: The Raiders are contemplating their quarterback situation and need significant improvements on the offensive line. The potential departure of Josh Jacobs also puts the running back position in focus. They also have OL needs and could draft a top DB or edge player in this spot. (14). New Orleans Saints The Pick: WR Rome Odunze, Washington Needs: QB, OT, DL Key Free Agents: Andrus Peat, Cesar Ruiz, Jameis Winston, James Hurst Pick Rationale: New Orleans must rejuvenate its edge rush and receiving corps, particularly if Michael Thomas departs. Offensive line and cornerback depth are also areas of concern. (15). Indianapolis Colts The Pick: IDL Jer'Zhan Newton, Illinois Needs: WR, OL, DL, DB Key Free Agents: Jonathan Taylor, Michael Pittman Jr., Grover Stewart, Kenny Moore, Gardner Minshew Pick Rationale: With key defensive and offensive playmakers potentially leaving, the Colts face crucial decisions at DT and WR. Enhancing the pass rush and secondary will be vital for their AFC South aspirations. (16). Seattle Seahawks The Pick: Edge Jared Verse, Florida State Needs: IOL, Edge, QB Key Free Agents: Damien Lewis, Bobby Wagner, Mario Edwards, Darrell Taylor, Devin Bush, Leonard Williams Pick Rationale: Seattle may explore QB options and must solidify the interior offensive line. The potential departure of Bobby Wagner highlights the need for linebacker reinforcements. (17). Jacksonville Jaguars The Pick: Edge Laiatu Latu, UCLA Needs: IOL, DB, ED Key Free Agents: Josh Allen, Calvin Ridley, Ben Bartch, Brandon McManus, K'Lavon Chaisson, Ezra Cleveland Pick Rationale: Jacksonville is focused on shoring up its pass rush and offensive line, with key decisions looming on free agents like Josh Allen and Calvin Ridley. Cornerback depth is also a priority. (18). Cincinnati Bengals The Pick: CB Quinyon Mitchell, Toledo Needs: CB, DT, WR, OT Key Free Agents: D.J. Reader, Tee Higgins, Tyler Boyd, Jonah Williams, Chidobe Awuzie Pick Rationale: Cincinnati seeks to address its defensive vulnerabilities, particularly in the secondary, and to replenish its receiving corps and offensive line in anticipation of possible departures of key free agents. (19). Los Angeles Rams The Pick: CB Kool-Aid McKinstry, Alabama Needs: CB, Edge, S, K, QB Key Free Agents: Demarcus Robinson, Jordan Fuller, Cam Akers, John Johnson Pick Rationale: The Rams are focused on reinforcing their secondary and edge rush capabilities, alongside considering future prospects at quarterback, to maintain a competitive edge in the NFC West. (20). Pittsburgh Steelers The Pick: CB, Terrion Arnold, Alabama Needs: QB, OT, IOL, CB, LB Key Free Agents: Levi Wallace, Markus Golden, Mason Rudolph, Desmond King, Miles Boykin Pick Rationale: Pittsburgh is poised to address its most pressing needs, notably at quarterback. Reinforcing the offensive line, particularly at tackle, remains a priority to protect their QB and enhance the run game. They have needs in the secondary and at LB. (21). Miami Dolphins The Pick: OT JC Latham, Alabama Needs: IOL, S, WR, DT, TE Key Free Agents: Christian Wilkins, Raekwon Davis, Connor Williams, Robert Hunt, Jerome Baker, Chase Claypool Pick Rationale: Miami should look to solidify its interior offensive line and add a dynamic playmaker at the safety position. (22). Philadelphia Eagles The Pick: C Jackson Powers-Johnson, Oregon Needs: RB, WR, CB, LB, Edge Key Free Agents: Jason Kelce, Brandon Graham, Fletcher Cox, Derek Barnett, D'Andre Swift Pick Rationale: Philadelphia has needs on the offensive line, specifically at the center position after the retirement of Jason Kelce. They need to add an edge rusher and could use some upgrades in the secondary. (23). Houston Texans (via Cleveland Browns) The Pick: IDL Byron Murphy, Texas Needs: OT, DT, CB, Edge, WR Key Free Agents: Josh Jones, Sheldon Rankins, Dalton Schultz, Devin Singletary, Shaquill Griffin Pick Rationale: Houston's draft strategy focuses on fortifying the offensive tackle position and bolstering the defensive line to improve their pass rush and coverage. (24). Dallas Cowboys The Pick: OT Amarius Mims, Georgia Needs: OT, RB, IOL, CB, WR Key Free Agents: Tyron Smith, Tony Pollard, Stephon Gilmore, Dorance Armstrong, Jayron Kearse Pick Rationale: The Cowboys will look to strengthen its offensive line and secure dynamic playmakers at running back and wide receiver, addressing crucial areas to aid in Dak Prescott's success. (25). Green Bay Packers The Pick: CB Nate Wiggins, Clemson Needs: S, OT, CB, IOL, Edge Key Free Agents: Rashan Gary, A.J. Dillon, Yosh Nijman, Jon Runyan, Darnell Savage Pick Rationale: The Packers want to reinforce their secondary and offensive tackle positions. The priority will likely be protecting Aaron Rodgers, but they might be better served using free agency. (26). Tampa Bay Buccaneers The Pick: Edge Chris Braswell, Alabama Needs: QB, WR, IOL, S, Edge Key Free Agents: Mike Evans, Devin White, Lavonte David, Antoine Winfield Jr., Baker Mayfield Pick Rationale: Tampa Bay's selection centers on addressing immediate needs at quarterback and wide receiver, alongside building up the interior offensive line and safety positions. If Baker Mayfield and Mike Evans can be retained, the Bucs will be in a good place to draft defensive help. (27). Arizona Cardinals (via HOU) The Pick: Edge Bralen Trice, Washington Needs: WR, DT, IOL, Edge, CB Key Free Agents: Marquise Brown, L.J. Collier, Antonio Hamilton, Greg Dortch Pick Rationale: With the potential departure of key free agents like Marquise Brown, bolstering the wide receiver corps becomes a priority. Additionally, reinforcing the defensive line and secondary is crucial for improving the team's overall defensive stature. Upgrading the interior offensive line and adding edge rushers would solidify the foundation for a competitive roster in the upcoming season. (28). Buffalo Bills The Pick: WR Brian Thoma Jr., LSU Needs: S, DT, Edge, WR, CB Key Free Agents: Micah Hyde, Leonard Floyd, A.J. Epenesa, Gabriel Davis, Poona Ford Pick Rationale: The Bills should focus on enhancing the defense, particularly at safety and on the defensive line, while also seeking to complement Stefon Diggs with additional receiving talent. (29). Detroit Lions The Pick: CB Ennis Rakeshaw Jr., Missouri Needs: CB, OG, Edge, WR, DT Key Free Agents: Jonah Jackson, Chauncey Gardner-Johnson, Emmanuel Moseley, Teddy Bridgewater, Romeo Okwara, Donovan Peoples-Jones Pick Rationale: The Lions need to address the cornerback position. (30). Baltimore Ravens The Pick: WR Keon Coleman, Florida State Needs: DT, OG, WR, CB, RB Key Free Agents: Justin Madubuike, J.K. Dobbins, Odell Beckham Jr., Kevin Zeitler, Michael Pierce Pick Rationale: The Ravens can go many ways with this pick; with needs at WR, and RB, they also have needs in the secondary and the interior of their OL. The best available at any of these positions might be the right move. (31). San Francisco 49ers The Pick: CB Kamari Lassiter, Georgia Needs: CB, Edge, OT, IOL, DT Key Free Agents: QB Sam Darnold, DT Javon Kinlaw, S Tashaun Gipson, LB Oren Burks, EDGE Clelin Ferrell, EDGE Chase Young Pick Rationale: The 49ers lost the Super Bowl and will follow that with the potential loss of many key free agents. They have needs in key areas of their defense, starting in the secondary, and if they do not retain Chase Young, they will need to address the edge rusher position. (32). Kansas City Chiefs The Pick: OT Jordan Morgan, Arizona Needs: DT, WR, OT, CB, RB Key Free Agents: Chris Jones, Donovan Smith, Mike Edwards, Willie Gay Jr., L'Jarius Sneed, Mecole Hardman Pick Rationale: They need an elite WR, they can use some youth on the OL, and they will have plenty of options to do either in this spot of the draft.

Overview of Combine Invitations The 2024 NFL Scouting Combine invitations have painted a vivid picture of college football's top talent, with 321 athletes hailing from 93 colleges and universities. The SEC and Big Ten were prominently represented, showcasing their dominance in the college football landscape. The SEC led the pack with 75 athletes, outpacing the Big Ten's contribution of 60, despite both conferences boasting representation from 13 different institutions. Diverse Representation The diversity of college football was on full display, with every major conference contributing at least two teams' worth of talent. Moreover, the event saw representation from 11 FCS schools and even an Ivy League member, underscoring the wide net the NFL casts in its talent search. Michigan Football With Record 18 NFL Combine Invites At the forefront of this showcase were the Michigan Wolverines, the reigning National Champions, who set a new NFL combine record by securing 18 invites, a testament to their depth and talent across nearly all football positions. This remarkable achievement placed Michigan at the pinnacle of this year's NFL Combine representation, surpassing the previous record (15) held by Georgia's 2021 NFL Draft class. Elite School Representation The Wolverines led a distinguished group, as only seven schools saw 10 or more of their athletes invited. This elite list included all four of the recent College Football Playoff contenders, highlighting the correlation between on-field success and combine invitations. Leading Schools Following Michigan in the tally is Washington with 13, Florida State with 12, and Texas and Georgia with 11 invites each. Alabama and Penn State rounded out the group with 10 invites, showcasing the breadth of talent across the country's top football programs. Notably, despite its strong showing, Penn State was left out of the top six in the controversial final College Football Playoff rankings last December. Invite Totals By School Michigan: 18 Washington: 13 Florida State: 12 Texas: 11 Georgia: 11 Alabama: 10 Penn State: 10 LSU, Notre Dame, USC, Missouri, Ohio State: 8 each Oregon: 7 Kentucky, TCU, Clemson, Utah, Illinois: 6 each South Carolina, Texas A&M, Miami (FL), Arkansas, Auburn: 5 each North Carolina, Louisville, Arizona, Oregon State, Mississippi State, Iowa, Kansas State, Maryland: 4 each Tennessee, Tulane, BYU, Wisconsin, South Dakota State, Pittsburgh, Duke, Oklahoma, Houston, Texas Tech, Washington State, Ole Miss, UCLA: 3 each Western Kentucky, Marshall, Troy, UCF, Holy Cross, Florida, Colorado State, Minnesota, Wyoming, UConn, Boston College, NC State, Kansas, Wake Forest: 2 each Single invites include various schools from Southern Mississippi to Stanford, highlighting the diverse talent pool across the nation's college football landscape.